WEBVTT - The Coldplay Affair. And What The Internet Did Next.

0:00:10.622 --> 0:00:13.341
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.822 --> 0:00:17.182
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:17.222 --> 0:00:18.982
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on.

0:00:20.942 --> 0:00:24.142
<v Speaker 3>Hello and welcome to Momma Mia. Out loud What women

0:00:24.182 --> 0:00:27.502
<v Speaker 3>are actually talking about? On Monday, the twenty first of July,

0:00:27.862 --> 0:00:32.141
<v Speaker 3>excuse me, I went on holiday and our tagline appears

0:00:32.182 --> 0:00:33.142
<v Speaker 3>to have changed again.

0:00:33.342 --> 0:00:33.942
<v Speaker 2>What's going on?

0:00:34.982 --> 0:00:35.222
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:00:36.182 --> 0:00:38.821
<v Speaker 1>I was bored of the old one. And also sometimes

0:00:38.862 --> 0:00:41.181
<v Speaker 1>people got upset because if we talked about something that

0:00:41.182 --> 0:00:44.461
<v Speaker 1>they weren't talking about, they tried to say that they

0:00:44.462 --> 0:00:46.982
<v Speaker 1>weren't talking about it. So I tried to make for

0:00:47.062 --> 0:00:47.662
<v Speaker 1>gender happen.

0:00:47.782 --> 0:00:48.902
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was like fetch.

0:00:49.022 --> 0:00:50.662
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't make it happen. You know, one like to

0:00:50.742 --> 0:00:51.222
<v Speaker 1>axing me.

0:00:51.462 --> 0:00:53.982
<v Speaker 4>What women are talking about is the truest to out loud.

0:00:54.062 --> 0:00:56.982
<v Speaker 4>I was saying before. I feel like we came into

0:00:56.982 --> 0:00:59.982
<v Speaker 4>work with a loud hat on. We tried to see

0:01:00.022 --> 0:01:02.182
<v Speaker 4>if it suited us and if people gave us compliments.

0:01:02.422 --> 0:01:04.382
<v Speaker 4>Neither of those things happened, and now we're coming back

0:01:04.382 --> 0:01:06.021
<v Speaker 4>to work the next day without the hat and we're

0:01:06.021 --> 0:01:07.782
<v Speaker 4>not saying anything We tried to say.

0:01:07.661 --> 0:01:10.342
<v Speaker 1>Women come to debrief that that just sounded a bit defeated.

0:01:10.581 --> 0:01:14.862
<v Speaker 1>It sounded passive, and we're nothing if not inconsistent.

0:01:15.022 --> 0:01:19.662
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, look, I'm Holly Wainwright. I'm maist High Holidays,

0:01:19.742 --> 0:01:22.182
<v Speaker 3>and I think we're thinking about ourselves a little too much.

0:01:22.342 --> 0:01:22.902
<v Speaker 2>That's what I do.

0:01:23.062 --> 0:01:25.382
<v Speaker 4>That'll be a thing true. I'm me A Friedman and

0:01:25.462 --> 0:01:26.542
<v Speaker 4>I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:01:27.182 --> 0:01:30.782
<v Speaker 2>And here is what is on our agenda for today.

0:01:31.182 --> 0:01:34.182
<v Speaker 4>The moment that brought the Internet together we need to

0:01:34.262 --> 0:01:37.902
<v Speaker 4>unpack in a revolting amount of detail, the Coldplay kiss

0:01:37.942 --> 0:01:38.702
<v Speaker 4>Can discourse.

0:01:38.902 --> 0:01:39.622
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait.

0:01:39.782 --> 0:01:43.142
<v Speaker 3>Also, my imaginary friend Gwyneth Paltrow is the subject of

0:01:43.142 --> 0:01:46.142
<v Speaker 3>a tea soaked new unauthorized biography or.

0:01:46.502 --> 0:01:50.582
<v Speaker 1>Is she plus main character? Energy is ruining our public spaces.

0:01:51.182 --> 0:01:55.182
<v Speaker 1>People are pooing in public pools and adams, yes, adults

0:01:55.462 --> 0:01:59.062
<v Speaker 1>and newly returned europe correspondent has some stories to share.

0:01:59.062 --> 0:02:01.742
<v Speaker 4>But first, I just wanted to thank me out louders

0:02:01.902 --> 0:02:05.502
<v Speaker 4>for all their lovely messages. At the end of last week,

0:02:05.662 --> 0:02:08.902
<v Speaker 4>after I shared a story about pregnancy loss, I was

0:02:09.621 --> 0:02:13.582
<v Speaker 4>in undated with messages, all of them so kind like

0:02:13.702 --> 0:02:18.462
<v Speaker 4>our out louder community is just remarkable. And I was

0:02:18.502 --> 0:02:21.782
<v Speaker 4>listening to an episode of Ezracline recently and he was

0:02:21.782 --> 0:02:24.262
<v Speaker 4>speaking to this person who's a Buddhist, and the Buddhist

0:02:24.342 --> 0:02:26.862
<v Speaker 4>was saying that there's a story that they tell about

0:02:26.902 --> 0:02:30.862
<v Speaker 4>a woman who's grieving, and the Buddha says, if you

0:02:30.942 --> 0:02:33.542
<v Speaker 4>want to recover, you just have to go and find

0:02:33.622 --> 0:02:36.662
<v Speaker 4>this mustard seed. But you have to find it, you

0:02:36.702 --> 0:02:39.181
<v Speaker 4>have to go around and ask this whole village, find

0:02:39.222 --> 0:02:42.142
<v Speaker 4>it from someone who has never experienced grief. And so

0:02:42.181 --> 0:02:43.942
<v Speaker 4>she goes and tries to find this mustard seed, and

0:02:43.982 --> 0:02:46.102
<v Speaker 4>of course every house that she enters, they too have

0:02:46.181 --> 0:02:50.022
<v Speaker 4>their own story of grief. And why that story is

0:02:50.062 --> 0:02:55.061
<v Speaker 4>so powerful is because it's in that connection and realizing

0:02:55.142 --> 0:02:59.422
<v Speaker 4>that whatever pain you're in right now is being experienced

0:02:59.702 --> 0:03:02.382
<v Speaker 4>by people all of the time. I think when we

0:03:02.422 --> 0:03:04.422
<v Speaker 4>get stuck in pain, it's because we think no one

0:03:04.462 --> 0:03:06.942
<v Speaker 4>else is feeling how we feel. Yeah, and I actually

0:03:07.022 --> 0:03:07.422
<v Speaker 4>found it.

0:03:07.422 --> 0:03:08.422
<v Speaker 1>It's the loneliness of it.

0:03:08.582 --> 0:03:10.982
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I don't feel lonely. And there were people

0:03:11.022 --> 0:03:14.102
<v Speaker 4>that I know who said to me, I had a

0:03:14.142 --> 0:03:18.022
<v Speaker 4>miscarriage on the same day, like that's how common it is.

0:03:18.462 --> 0:03:22.342
<v Speaker 4>But having people put words around it was just so

0:03:22.342 --> 0:03:24.742
<v Speaker 4>so so comforting. So thank you to the out louders.

0:03:24.782 --> 0:03:26.662
<v Speaker 4>And I also have a confession to add to that,

0:03:27.462 --> 0:03:31.582
<v Speaker 4>which is, if you saw me with shopping bags over

0:03:31.622 --> 0:03:33.342
<v Speaker 4>the weekend, it couldn't.

0:03:32.982 --> 0:03:34.182
<v Speaker 1>Have been you because you're not buying.

0:03:34.222 --> 0:03:37.182
<v Speaker 2>You're not. Twenty twenty five is don't buy anything year

0:03:37.222 --> 0:03:38.142
<v Speaker 2>for Jesse friends.

0:03:38.182 --> 0:03:39.062
<v Speaker 4>I was feeling pain.

0:03:39.742 --> 0:03:40.782
<v Speaker 1>The year is thrift.

0:03:40.902 --> 0:03:42.182
<v Speaker 4>I thought, what would Maya Friedman do?

0:03:42.742 --> 0:03:44.702
<v Speaker 2>Should do? I should go and buy something.

0:03:44.702 --> 0:03:47.902
<v Speaker 4>And the Maya it helped. I'm sorry, I'm sorry I've

0:03:47.902 --> 0:03:51.222
<v Speaker 4>been thrifting, but trying to get secondhand jeans is too hard,

0:03:51.262 --> 0:03:54.182
<v Speaker 4>and so I went, you know what, Jesse, be kind

0:03:54.182 --> 0:03:56.862
<v Speaker 4>to yourself and go and buy some new things, and

0:03:56.902 --> 0:03:58.582
<v Speaker 4>it did help. I'm not going to do it again,

0:03:58.902 --> 0:04:00.502
<v Speaker 4>but I just have to confess because I'm sure out

0:04:00.542 --> 0:04:01.982
<v Speaker 4>louders saw me, and I'm sure that they were going

0:04:02.062 --> 0:04:04.702
<v Speaker 4>to write an unauthorized biography about the time Jesse broke

0:04:04.702 --> 0:04:05.102
<v Speaker 4>her promise.

0:04:05.222 --> 0:04:08.062
<v Speaker 1>I recommend it. Some people eat their feelings. I shop

0:04:08.182 --> 0:04:09.862
<v Speaker 1>for my feelings. Help.

0:04:09.902 --> 0:04:13.262
<v Speaker 3>It does help us, Ah, Jesse, I listened obviously to

0:04:13.302 --> 0:04:15.622
<v Speaker 3>what you said, and like all those out louders who

0:04:15.662 --> 0:04:19.022
<v Speaker 3>contacted you, I just thought it was brilliantly put and

0:04:19.062 --> 0:04:21.861
<v Speaker 3>thank you for sharing it now they're making you feel

0:04:21.902 --> 0:04:22.981
<v Speaker 3>the way you made them.

0:04:23.022 --> 0:04:26.541
<v Speaker 5>Hmmm, we'd like to say hello to some of you

0:04:26.621 --> 0:04:36.101
<v Speaker 5>in the crowd. How are we going to do that is,

0:04:36.101 --> 0:04:39.222
<v Speaker 5>we're going to use our cameras and put some of

0:04:39.301 --> 0:04:43.581
<v Speaker 5>the other big screen. So please, if you haven't done

0:04:43.582 --> 0:04:45.662
<v Speaker 5>your makeup, do your makeup now.

0:04:46.342 --> 0:04:49.581
<v Speaker 4>This time a week ago, very few people knew the

0:04:49.662 --> 0:04:53.741
<v Speaker 4>name or were familiar with the face of CEO Andy Byron,

0:04:54.301 --> 0:04:57.421
<v Speaker 4>a married man and father of two. Byron decided on

0:04:57.501 --> 0:05:01.541
<v Speaker 4>Wednesday night to attend a Coldplay concert in Boston, which would,

0:05:01.741 --> 0:05:06.061
<v Speaker 4>as it happens, blow up his entire life. So here's

0:05:06.061 --> 0:05:09.901
<v Speaker 4>what actually happened. Coldplay was playing the Jumbo t So

0:05:10.541 --> 0:05:12.782
<v Speaker 4>when a kiss cam landed on a man and a

0:05:12.821 --> 0:05:16.582
<v Speaker 4>woman cuddling and they were watching the.

0:05:16.582 --> 0:05:19.101
<v Speaker 3>Stage, is a kiss cam supposed to be? I know

0:05:19.181 --> 0:05:21.182
<v Speaker 3>this is a really dumb question, but you know there

0:05:21.181 --> 0:05:23.981
<v Speaker 3>are no dumb questions. When the camera lands on you.

0:05:23.981 --> 0:05:25.981
<v Speaker 3>You're meant to like do a little performance for it,

0:05:25.981 --> 0:05:28.621
<v Speaker 3>aren't you? Like do a kiss play to it?

0:05:28.741 --> 0:05:31.541
<v Speaker 4>And this is a thing that happens at Coldplay concerts, right,

0:05:31.621 --> 0:05:34.702
<v Speaker 4>and some football games. And yes, and they go and

0:05:34.981 --> 0:05:38.381
<v Speaker 4>scout like the videographer who's there goes and scouts people

0:05:38.421 --> 0:05:40.941
<v Speaker 4>and sort of says, okay, let's go to these these people.

0:05:40.981 --> 0:05:43.861
<v Speaker 4>They look quite cuddly, and so went to this couple.

0:05:44.022 --> 0:05:47.222
<v Speaker 4>But something really unusual happened, which was that they jumped

0:05:47.222 --> 0:05:51.222
<v Speaker 4>apart and immediately attempted to hide their faces, and Chris Martin,

0:05:51.301 --> 0:05:53.541
<v Speaker 4>who's the lead singer of Coldplay, said.

0:05:53.981 --> 0:05:58.222
<v Speaker 5>Oh, what either having an affair or.

0:06:00.621 --> 0:06:04.941
<v Speaker 4>I hope we didn't do something bad. Now we can

0:06:05.061 --> 0:06:08.101
<v Speaker 4>argue about who might have done something bad, but something

0:06:08.222 --> 0:06:11.422
<v Speaker 4>very bad did indeed happen. A twenty eight year old

0:06:11.501 --> 0:06:15.101
<v Speaker 4>named Grace Springer filmed that moment and then she uploaded

0:06:15.142 --> 0:06:17.981
<v Speaker 4>it to social media, and by the following day, the

0:06:18.061 --> 0:06:19.582
<v Speaker 4>pair had been identified.

0:06:19.741 --> 0:06:22.421
<v Speaker 1>Why did she do that? Out of interest? Like she

0:06:22.821 --> 0:06:26.301
<v Speaker 1>actually interviews everybody involved made content.

0:06:26.702 --> 0:06:30.782
<v Speaker 4>She says that she saw it and when all something

0:06:30.861 --> 0:06:32.941
<v Speaker 4>tense has happened here, I'm not quite sure what it is.

0:06:33.061 --> 0:06:35.222
<v Speaker 4>I'll upload it and let the internet figure it out.

0:06:35.262 --> 0:06:39.181
<v Speaker 4>Because she thought if either of those partners are watching,

0:06:39.262 --> 0:06:40.181
<v Speaker 4>like they have the right to know.

0:06:40.301 --> 0:06:42.061
<v Speaker 1>So she thought she was doing God's work.

0:06:42.501 --> 0:06:44.901
<v Speaker 3>She thought she was I think she showed it to

0:06:44.941 --> 0:06:47.621
<v Speaker 3>her friends, and her friends all went, oh my god,

0:06:47.702 --> 0:06:49.861
<v Speaker 3>you've got to upload about it, and it's.

0:06:49.741 --> 0:06:52.821
<v Speaker 4>Going to go viral, viewed more than one hundred million times.

0:06:53.262 --> 0:06:55.782
<v Speaker 4>I want to ask before we go any further, tell

0:06:55.821 --> 0:06:58.541
<v Speaker 4>me what your initial reaction was when you saw this

0:06:58.621 --> 0:06:59.822
<v Speaker 4>video at the end of last week.

0:07:00.022 --> 0:07:00.421
<v Speaker 5>Ma'am.

0:07:01.981 --> 0:07:06.741
<v Speaker 1>I thought this is incredible, Oh my god, and I

0:07:06.821 --> 0:07:10.261
<v Speaker 1>sort of laughed a little bit. Yeah, but there, I

0:07:10.302 --> 0:07:13.862
<v Speaker 1>guess because we work in the media and we're very

0:07:14.142 --> 0:07:19.221
<v Speaker 1>familiar with, you know, public shaming and virality. I felt

0:07:19.222 --> 0:07:23.342
<v Speaker 1>a bit sick from the beginning because I get very

0:07:23.381 --> 0:07:25.942
<v Speaker 1>caught up in how people's lives can change in an instant.

0:07:25.982 --> 0:07:29.142
<v Speaker 1>You know Lee's sales book Any Ordinary Day, where she

0:07:29.182 --> 0:07:32.982
<v Speaker 1>talks to people who've suffered tragedies, usually accidents or the

0:07:33.142 --> 0:07:36.742
<v Speaker 1>loss of a loved one very suddenly. And I know

0:07:36.862 --> 0:07:39.422
<v Speaker 1>this isn't that, but that sense of even when you

0:07:39.462 --> 0:07:41.622
<v Speaker 1>were just saying that they woke up and they went

0:07:41.821 --> 0:07:44.142
<v Speaker 1>let's and you know, it turns out they were having

0:07:44.182 --> 0:07:47.662
<v Speaker 1>an affair, but they went, let's go to this Coldplay concert,

0:07:47.702 --> 0:07:50.581
<v Speaker 1>and you think about them, every step they took and

0:07:50.622 --> 0:07:54.542
<v Speaker 1>every single decision that got to that point, and then oblivion.

0:07:54.782 --> 0:07:56.702
<v Speaker 4>Holly, how about you? How did you respond when you

0:07:56.742 --> 0:07:57.942
<v Speaker 4>first saw it, Well, I.

0:07:57.982 --> 0:08:00.542
<v Speaker 3>Just thought it was really juicy. I was immediately like,

0:08:00.582 --> 0:08:03.102
<v Speaker 3>what an idiot? Those were my first thoughts. It's like,

0:08:03.902 --> 0:08:05.422
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know why, but of course I thought

0:08:05.422 --> 0:08:07.582
<v Speaker 3>he was an idiot rather than her. That's my own

0:08:07.662 --> 0:08:10.822
<v Speaker 3>personal prejudice. I thought, what absolute idiot, and then I

0:08:10.862 --> 0:08:13.381
<v Speaker 3>went ha ha ha. And then of course I didn't

0:08:13.381 --> 0:08:14.622
<v Speaker 3>necessarily keep thinking that.

0:08:14.902 --> 0:08:18.422
<v Speaker 4>I do agree that I thought it was very funny

0:08:18.462 --> 0:08:21.062
<v Speaker 4>and immediately wanted to send it to people because I

0:08:21.222 --> 0:08:23.261
<v Speaker 4>was like, I think as well, there was this moment

0:08:23.342 --> 0:08:27.742
<v Speaker 4>of like, doesn't everyone know a CEO or a CEO

0:08:27.782 --> 0:08:31.182
<v Speaker 4>coded person who has or is currently cheating on their

0:08:31.222 --> 0:08:34.382
<v Speaker 4>wife and appears to experience no repercussions as a result.

0:08:34.502 --> 0:08:37.422
<v Speaker 3>And also that in that I mean and we didn't

0:08:37.462 --> 0:08:39.102
<v Speaker 3>know this when we very first saw it, but when

0:08:39.102 --> 0:08:41.302
<v Speaker 3>it became apparent the story of who they were, a

0:08:41.342 --> 0:08:43.422
<v Speaker 3>lot of people cheat with people at work like that

0:08:43.582 --> 0:08:45.942
<v Speaker 3>is a place that happens a lot, and if those

0:08:45.942 --> 0:08:49.022
<v Speaker 3>people are particularly senior, often a lot of people within

0:08:49.062 --> 0:08:51.062
<v Speaker 3>the business will know that that's happening, but it's just

0:08:51.102 --> 0:08:53.462
<v Speaker 3>all accepted that we just don't talk about it, and

0:08:53.502 --> 0:08:57.022
<v Speaker 3>all those kind of things. Originally, I thought, oh, imagine

0:08:57.022 --> 0:08:59.182
<v Speaker 3>if they were all, like the whole team was there.

0:08:59.302 --> 0:09:00.862
<v Speaker 2>You know, that isn't what turned out to have happened.

0:09:00.902 --> 0:09:03.902
<v Speaker 3>But I told myself many stories, and then I started

0:09:03.902 --> 0:09:06.302
<v Speaker 3>to see all those like letters to this man's wife

0:09:06.342 --> 0:09:08.182
<v Speaker 3>and everything on the internet, and I was like, oh, dear,

0:09:08.382 --> 0:09:08.942
<v Speaker 3>I sound.

0:09:08.782 --> 0:09:10.662
<v Speaker 1>A bit sactimonious when I say that, like what I

0:09:10.702 --> 0:09:13.662
<v Speaker 1>said before, because it's not like I also didn't go, yeah,

0:09:13.702 --> 0:09:15.982
<v Speaker 1>that was jucy. And I wanted to know cause I

0:09:16.022 --> 0:09:19.102
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know more. Who's she, Who's he? How that? What?

0:09:19.582 --> 0:09:22.422
<v Speaker 1>You know? I wanted. I was hungry to know the story.

0:09:22.582 --> 0:09:26.182
<v Speaker 4>So the more came, as happens with the internet. Byron

0:09:26.382 --> 0:09:29.182
<v Speaker 4>is fifty. He was the CEO of Astronomers, which is

0:09:29.182 --> 0:09:31.982
<v Speaker 4>a tech firm, and the woman he was with was

0:09:32.102 --> 0:09:35.342
<v Speaker 4>revealed to be Kristen Cabot. She is the chief people

0:09:35.382 --> 0:09:39.142
<v Speaker 4>officer the same company, and there's ambiguity about whether she

0:09:39.462 --> 0:09:43.222
<v Speaker 4>is still married or recently separated. Right, we know that

0:09:43.462 --> 0:09:47.702
<v Speaker 4>Byron married two kids. By Friday, both Byron and Cabot

0:09:47.702 --> 0:09:50.422
<v Speaker 4>had been put on leave by their company, and by Saturday,

0:09:50.542 --> 0:09:53.902
<v Speaker 4>Byron had resigned as CEO. She also has two kids, right,

0:09:54.102 --> 0:09:55.222
<v Speaker 4>I believe, So what's that?

0:09:55.542 --> 0:09:58.062
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that the put them on leave and

0:09:58.102 --> 0:10:00.862
<v Speaker 3>resignation was inevitable? Like, is that how it would play

0:10:00.902 --> 0:10:03.622
<v Speaker 3>in a corporate sense? You think me are always well?

0:10:03.822 --> 0:10:07.702
<v Speaker 1>Before that, there was the statement that he allegedly made,

0:10:07.742 --> 0:10:10.782
<v Speaker 1>which everybody shared and of people reacted to.

0:10:11.182 --> 0:10:13.822
<v Speaker 4>So what's interesting is that this was one of the

0:10:13.862 --> 0:10:18.102
<v Speaker 4>first viral moments in the age of AI, and so

0:10:18.182 --> 0:10:21.262
<v Speaker 4>what happened was an influx of things where everyone sat

0:10:21.262 --> 0:10:24.142
<v Speaker 4>there going is this real? Even I think the kiscam footage,

0:10:24.142 --> 0:10:26.982
<v Speaker 4>it was sort of like is this real? So there

0:10:27.262 --> 0:10:30.862
<v Speaker 4>was fake stak it a bit, yeah, fake tweets and

0:10:30.902 --> 0:10:33.342
<v Speaker 4>this isn't AI related. But I was on TikTok watching

0:10:33.342 --> 0:10:37.262
<v Speaker 4>his daughter post these tiktoks that said reconnecting with life

0:10:37.262 --> 0:10:39.462
<v Speaker 4>after your dad's affair makes national news. I went deep

0:10:39.502 --> 0:10:41.422
<v Speaker 4>on her. It turns out that was not his daughter.

0:10:41.942 --> 0:10:42.742
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have a daughter.

0:10:42.782 --> 0:10:44.862
<v Speaker 4>He didn't have a daughter. So there was a coldplay

0:10:44.862 --> 0:10:47.502
<v Speaker 4>tweet that read, starting with our next show, We're introducing

0:10:47.542 --> 0:10:50.262
<v Speaker 4>camera free audience sections for people in their side pieces.

0:10:50.462 --> 0:10:51.302
<v Speaker 2>Fake funny.

0:10:51.462 --> 0:10:53.902
<v Speaker 4>Then the statement from Andy Byron. I believe that there

0:10:53.902 --> 0:10:56.502
<v Speaker 4>were multiple ones, but there was one you might have

0:10:56.542 --> 0:10:58.822
<v Speaker 4>seen where he expressed how troubling it was that a

0:10:58.822 --> 0:11:00.942
<v Speaker 4>private moment became public without his consent.

0:11:01.142 --> 0:11:03.302
<v Speaker 1>And the reason that I thought that was interesting is

0:11:03.382 --> 0:11:07.142
<v Speaker 1>because that spoke to you know, we often talk about

0:11:07.262 --> 0:11:09.942
<v Speaker 1>the second idea or the third idea, which is everybody

0:11:10.022 --> 0:11:12.662
<v Speaker 1>reacts in one way, but then what's the bigger issue?

0:11:12.702 --> 0:11:15.102
<v Speaker 1>Right if you zoom out? And I think that the

0:11:15.182 --> 0:11:17.622
<v Speaker 1>reason that so many people were fooled by that statement.

0:11:17.702 --> 0:11:19.342
<v Speaker 1>The only time I got a bit sus is when

0:11:19.342 --> 0:11:20.462
<v Speaker 1>he quoted a culture.

0:11:20.782 --> 0:11:21.342
<v Speaker 4>How it ended.

0:11:21.502 --> 0:11:23.662
<v Speaker 1>But before that I was on board because it followed

0:11:23.702 --> 0:11:27.902
<v Speaker 1>the template of public statements, public apologies, because we know

0:11:28.022 --> 0:11:30.822
<v Speaker 1>that in a vacuum people will make stuff up, right,

0:11:30.902 --> 0:11:32.662
<v Speaker 1>so you've got to you know that the first rule

0:11:32.702 --> 0:11:34.422
<v Speaker 1>of crisis pr is that you've got to try and

0:11:34.422 --> 0:11:38.262
<v Speaker 1>take control of the situation, to try and corterize the wound.

0:11:39.222 --> 0:11:43.462
<v Speaker 1>And what he said about a private situation became public

0:11:43.742 --> 0:11:47.742
<v Speaker 1>that way and taking time to think and learn and reflect.

0:11:48.262 --> 0:11:50.982
<v Speaker 1>All of that was like tick tick tick tick, but

0:11:51.022 --> 0:11:51.622
<v Speaker 1>then it was fake.

0:11:51.902 --> 0:11:54.502
<v Speaker 4>It also reminded us. I think of how if any

0:11:54.542 --> 0:11:58.222
<v Speaker 4>of us were to go viral in an hour, what

0:11:58.342 --> 0:12:02.462
<v Speaker 4>can be found from LinkedIn profiles from the dig online

0:12:02.622 --> 0:12:05.302
<v Speaker 4>what they were able to find all of his family.

0:12:05.462 --> 0:12:09.182
<v Speaker 4>His wife had to, you know, go super private in

0:12:09.262 --> 0:12:10.902
<v Speaker 4>order to not have their detail shared.

0:12:11.022 --> 0:12:14.862
<v Speaker 1>She took down her surname from her profile. Then she

0:12:14.902 --> 0:12:18.142
<v Speaker 1>deleted family photos. Because we've got our journalistic hats on.

0:12:18.222 --> 0:12:20.422
<v Speaker 1>The first place, this is the biggest story in the world.

0:12:20.702 --> 0:12:23.782
<v Speaker 1>The first place you go is what's on Instagram. Yeah,

0:12:23.822 --> 0:12:25.982
<v Speaker 1>because that's publicly usable, right.

0:12:25.982 --> 0:12:29.742
<v Speaker 2>But how ridiculous this is the biggest story in the world. Yeah,

0:12:29.862 --> 0:12:34.462
<v Speaker 2>and we'll get to why that executives. Yeah, cheating at

0:12:34.462 --> 0:12:35.582
<v Speaker 2>a Coldplay concert?

0:12:35.782 --> 0:12:38.742
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think? Because as an example of that, Jesse,

0:12:39.102 --> 0:12:41.862
<v Speaker 1>I was on Reddit yesterday and I was doing a

0:12:41.902 --> 0:12:44.142
<v Speaker 1>search because you're right. By last night it became really

0:12:44.182 --> 0:12:46.742
<v Speaker 1>confusing about what was real and what was real. And

0:12:46.982 --> 0:12:50.542
<v Speaker 1>I follow lots of different threads on Reddit. And what

0:12:50.662 --> 0:12:52.662
<v Speaker 1>was interesting about why this was such a huge story

0:12:52.822 --> 0:12:55.302
<v Speaker 1>is that the tech threads were about it, the work

0:12:55.342 --> 0:12:57.782
<v Speaker 1>threads were about it, the gossip threads were about it,

0:12:58.062 --> 0:13:01.702
<v Speaker 1>the news threads were about it. Like the ven diagram

0:13:01.902 --> 0:13:03.302
<v Speaker 1>of all the different places at time.

0:13:03.342 --> 0:13:07.782
<v Speaker 4>The reason that happened, I reckon, is because the Internet

0:13:07.902 --> 0:13:10.622
<v Speaker 4>is so divided and so contented, amptuous, and we are

0:13:11.182 --> 0:13:13.662
<v Speaker 4>constantly at each other, probably in the last few years

0:13:13.662 --> 0:13:17.342
<v Speaker 4>more than ever before. And for the last four days,

0:13:17.462 --> 0:13:20.142
<v Speaker 4>the internet has had a common enemy. We have all

0:13:20.182 --> 0:13:23.062
<v Speaker 4>been united and even the means I don't know find

0:13:23.062 --> 0:13:23.662
<v Speaker 4>that's true.

0:13:23.702 --> 0:13:26.142
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we have a common enemy? I don't see.

0:13:26.142 --> 0:13:28.622
<v Speaker 4>Well, everyone almost looked at it. It was like everyone's

0:13:28.702 --> 0:13:31.462
<v Speaker 4>laugh immediately was like sucked in, You're having an affair.

0:13:31.822 --> 0:13:33.862
<v Speaker 4>And isn't that calma like.

0:13:33.822 --> 0:13:34.542
<v Speaker 1>Real shaden for it?

0:13:35.142 --> 0:13:38.142
<v Speaker 3>Yes, exactly for women whose husbands have cheated on them

0:13:38.182 --> 0:13:40.662
<v Speaker 3>and they have found out but humiliated. There's no question

0:13:40.782 --> 0:13:45.901
<v Speaker 3>that he in particular was an instant villain. But unfortunately

0:13:45.942 --> 0:13:48.342
<v Speaker 3>what has happened, which is always what happens, is that then,

0:13:48.462 --> 0:13:51.222
<v Speaker 3>as you've said, you know, his wife gets her privacy

0:13:51.222 --> 0:13:54.502
<v Speaker 3>horrifically invaded. Her picture is all over the internet. Here

0:13:54.542 --> 0:13:57.142
<v Speaker 3>are five things you didn't know about the CEO's wife,

0:13:57.222 --> 0:13:59.862
<v Speaker 3>you know, and then the woman in question also obviously

0:14:00.022 --> 0:14:02.102
<v Speaker 3>the twenty five things you didn't know about her, and

0:14:02.462 --> 0:14:05.902
<v Speaker 3>before you know it, the shit really is smeared everywhere

0:14:06.102 --> 0:14:09.502
<v Speaker 3>all over everybody involved. So if it started with an

0:14:09.662 --> 0:14:13.502
<v Speaker 3>almost like oh, this is quite satisfying watching this powerful

0:14:13.862 --> 0:14:16.102
<v Speaker 3>man being sort of humiliated.

0:14:16.182 --> 0:14:18.582
<v Speaker 2>That isn't really what happened.

0:14:18.222 --> 0:14:22.662
<v Speaker 4>And the dig then happened. We're recording this on you know,

0:14:22.822 --> 0:14:26.222
<v Speaker 4>Monday morning. He has made no statement yet, but his

0:14:26.342 --> 0:14:29.062
<v Speaker 4>salary has since been revealed as being in the ballpark

0:14:29.102 --> 0:14:31.662
<v Speaker 4>of about a million Australian dollars a year, and a

0:14:31.742 --> 0:14:35.302
<v Speaker 4>LinkedIn post that relevant. Well, I think that it adds

0:14:35.342 --> 0:14:38.262
<v Speaker 4>to the idea that this is an entitled.

0:14:38.022 --> 0:14:38.702
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent.

0:14:38.902 --> 0:14:41.182
<v Speaker 3>I think if he was a teacher and she was

0:14:41.222 --> 0:14:43.222
<v Speaker 3>a nurse, this story is not as good.

0:14:43.422 --> 0:14:46.342
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no question, because then there's also this thing of like,

0:14:47.142 --> 0:14:49.902
<v Speaker 4>if he's having an affair with someone at work, what

0:14:50.022 --> 0:14:53.662
<v Speaker 4>are the power dynamics there? That's interesting. Then a post

0:14:53.702 --> 0:14:56.982
<v Speaker 4>on LinkedIn by the editor in chief of Forbes Australia

0:14:57.382 --> 0:15:00.382
<v Speaker 4>was about how there's barely any gender diversity. It looks

0:15:00.422 --> 0:15:02.262
<v Speaker 4>like she might be the only one kind of in

0:15:02.302 --> 0:15:06.022
<v Speaker 4>the higher in the leadership teams that's a female.

0:15:06.102 --> 0:15:08.622
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think it's become I mean in the age

0:15:08.662 --> 0:15:11.262
<v Speaker 1>of the hot take, where everybody needs to have a

0:15:11.302 --> 0:15:14.342
<v Speaker 1>hot take to get engagement, to get traffic. I mean, look,

0:15:14.342 --> 0:15:18.502
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about it today, right but everybody then projecting

0:15:18.942 --> 0:15:22.822
<v Speaker 1>their lens onto it. So is it about diversity in

0:15:22.822 --> 0:15:25.822
<v Speaker 1>the leadership team? Is it about the cheated wife? Is

0:15:25.822 --> 0:15:28.822
<v Speaker 1>it about public spaces and what's private? Is it about AI?

0:15:28.982 --> 0:15:31.422
<v Speaker 1>Now all the pieces are running out about AI and

0:15:31.462 --> 0:15:33.622
<v Speaker 1>what's so hard? You know that thing about lives make

0:15:33.662 --> 0:15:35.582
<v Speaker 1>their way around the world three times before the truth

0:15:35.622 --> 0:15:38.062
<v Speaker 1>can do up at shoes. We were talking in our

0:15:38.102 --> 0:15:40.542
<v Speaker 1>slack journal last night, and a lot of us were

0:15:40.582 --> 0:15:42.862
<v Speaker 1>at very different parts of the story. Like some of

0:15:42.942 --> 0:15:45.262
<v Speaker 1>us really believed that the other woman in the video

0:15:45.622 --> 0:15:48.582
<v Speaker 1>was their head of HR and that she'd recently been promoted,

0:15:48.702 --> 0:15:51.222
<v Speaker 1>and other people knew that wasn't true. And then some

0:15:51.262 --> 0:15:54.382
<v Speaker 1>of us thought his daughter's on TikTok, and others knew

0:15:54.382 --> 0:15:57.782
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't true. So most people got little bits

0:15:57.822 --> 0:15:58.422
<v Speaker 1>of the story.

0:15:58.542 --> 0:16:01.902
<v Speaker 4>And I think most people are just at the memes, right,

0:16:02.022 --> 0:16:04.422
<v Speaker 4>Like most people are just consuming this as a series

0:16:04.502 --> 0:16:09.022
<v Speaker 4>of funny memes and they see as it is, here

0:16:09.102 --> 0:16:12.422
<v Speaker 4>is this kind of ideologue that represents the Master of

0:16:12.462 --> 0:16:15.782
<v Speaker 4>the universe, a particular type of man, as we said,

0:16:15.862 --> 0:16:18.222
<v Speaker 4>which maybe he is that.

0:16:18.702 --> 0:16:20.542
<v Speaker 1>But it also maybe he isn't.

0:16:20.462 --> 0:16:26.262
<v Speaker 4>Yeah exactly, And facing the wrath of the potentially tens

0:16:26.262 --> 0:16:28.462
<v Speaker 4>of millions of women who have either experienced this or

0:16:28.502 --> 0:16:31.902
<v Speaker 4>seen it happen, who then have somewhere to project their

0:16:31.942 --> 0:16:35.582
<v Speaker 4>fury and their anger at the dishonesty of some men.

0:16:36.022 --> 0:16:38.062
<v Speaker 4>That irks me, like, I'm starting to feel a bit

0:16:38.102 --> 0:16:40.782
<v Speaker 4>sick about this whole thing. And then I saw Grace Springer,

0:16:40.822 --> 0:16:43.062
<v Speaker 4>the woman who shared the video, right, and she's been

0:16:43.062 --> 0:16:46.382
<v Speaker 4>interviewed and everything. Her most recent or one of her

0:16:46.422 --> 0:16:50.542
<v Speaker 4>most recent Instagram stories was, you're so welcome for today's entertainment.

0:16:50.622 --> 0:16:53.262
<v Speaker 4>Want to show your gratitude? Help me who is just

0:16:53.302 --> 0:16:55.982
<v Speaker 4>a girl payoff eighty thousand dollars in student lines? And

0:16:56.022 --> 0:16:57.422
<v Speaker 4>now she's got a link and you can go and

0:16:57.422 --> 0:17:00.062
<v Speaker 4>help her pay off their student lins. So everyone who

0:17:00.182 --> 0:17:03.222
<v Speaker 4>can is capitalizing off this viral moment.

0:17:03.662 --> 0:17:05.662
<v Speaker 2>It's just a desperate need for distraction.

0:17:05.982 --> 0:17:06.182
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:17:07.182 --> 0:17:08.542
<v Speaker 2>The world is a scary place.

0:17:08.581 --> 0:17:11.621
<v Speaker 3>We could spend forty eight hours obsessing over this story

0:17:11.662 --> 0:17:13.861
<v Speaker 3>and making celebrities out of all of the people in

0:17:13.942 --> 0:17:16.821
<v Speaker 3>it for five minutes, and no one will remember this

0:17:17.302 --> 0:17:20.262
<v Speaker 3>in twenty four hours, and those people's lives are ruined.

0:17:20.341 --> 0:17:22.061
<v Speaker 3>Is it their fault or not? Is a bit of

0:17:22.101 --> 0:17:25.741
<v Speaker 3>a matter of opinion. But there's interesting.

0:17:25.542 --> 0:17:28.342
<v Speaker 1>On that for one second, because I'm interested in the

0:17:28.381 --> 0:17:31.821
<v Speaker 1>idea of the punishment in the crime, right, So I

0:17:31.861 --> 0:17:34.821
<v Speaker 1>think we can all agree that what they did was

0:17:34.861 --> 0:17:35.302
<v Speaker 1>not good.

0:17:36.302 --> 0:17:37.341
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't appear to be good.

0:17:38.262 --> 0:17:40.862
<v Speaker 3>He and his wife were separated and have been operated

0:17:40.901 --> 0:17:43.662
<v Speaker 3>for a long time. She has not spoken on the record, dography,

0:17:43.742 --> 0:17:45.821
<v Speaker 3>We have no idea, so a lot of assumptions are

0:17:45.861 --> 0:17:46.262
<v Speaker 3>being made.

0:17:46.381 --> 0:17:49.462
<v Speaker 1>Right, So if we all agree cheating is not good,

0:17:49.621 --> 0:17:53.381
<v Speaker 1>if that's in fact what happened, but what should the

0:17:53.422 --> 0:17:56.222
<v Speaker 1>punishment for that be? Should it be that you your

0:17:56.262 --> 0:17:59.302
<v Speaker 1>reputation is forever destroyed, that the entire world is united

0:17:59.302 --> 0:18:01.782
<v Speaker 1>in laughing at you, that you lose your career, that

0:18:01.821 --> 0:18:06.221
<v Speaker 1>you lose your means to feed your family, that you're utterly, utterly,

0:18:06.302 --> 0:18:07.621
<v Speaker 1>abjectly humiliated.

0:18:08.581 --> 0:18:12.661
<v Speaker 4>Is that totally like that's disproportionate. Yeah, because the affair,

0:18:13.101 --> 0:18:16.262
<v Speaker 4>whether the affair goes against company policy is even a question,

0:18:16.581 --> 0:18:18.861
<v Speaker 4>right because it's like, if that had just been discovered,

0:18:19.581 --> 0:18:21.661
<v Speaker 4>would that have been an issue or a conflict of interest?

0:18:21.982 --> 0:18:24.862
<v Speaker 4>But the kiss cam element, what I like to think

0:18:24.901 --> 0:18:28.261
<v Speaker 4>about is what if they just kissed, and they just kissed,

0:18:28.702 --> 0:18:29.542
<v Speaker 4>and this would never.

0:18:29.422 --> 0:18:31.141
<v Speaker 2>Have gone viral. That's true, it wouldn't have got anything.

0:18:31.182 --> 0:18:33.942
<v Speaker 4>It was the reaction, which I completely understand why they

0:18:33.942 --> 0:18:36.421
<v Speaker 4>reacted like that, but it was that that kind of

0:18:36.422 --> 0:18:39.022
<v Speaker 4>suggested some guilt. I understand why Chris Martin kind of went.

0:18:38.942 --> 0:18:41.462
<v Speaker 3>Oh, if he hadn't have said what he said, it

0:18:41.502 --> 0:18:43.421
<v Speaker 3>probably which is I'm not saying we should be blaming

0:18:43.502 --> 0:18:45.382
<v Speaker 3>Chris Martin. Yeah, but like if he hadn't have said

0:18:45.381 --> 0:18:47.461
<v Speaker 3>what he said about either you're cheating or you're just

0:18:47.542 --> 0:18:51.341
<v Speaker 3>very shy, then Grace the young woman posted this probably

0:18:51.341 --> 0:18:52.542
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't have thought twice about it.

0:18:52.621 --> 0:18:53.941
<v Speaker 2>No one would have thought twice about it.

0:18:53.982 --> 0:18:58.061
<v Speaker 3>You're right, their guilty reaction to it started the story

0:18:58.661 --> 0:19:01.022
<v Speaker 3>in point about what they deserve for that. Me, you're

0:19:01.061 --> 0:19:04.462
<v Speaker 3>so right to be honest. I mean, again, this is assumption,

0:19:04.581 --> 0:19:06.501
<v Speaker 3>just as much as it's an assumption to pretend we

0:19:06.502 --> 0:19:08.381
<v Speaker 3>know the inner workings of either of their marriages.

0:19:09.621 --> 0:19:11.141
<v Speaker 2>Life probably isn't going to be ruined.

0:19:11.182 --> 0:19:14.022
<v Speaker 3>Like high profile CEOs have gone away with all kinds

0:19:14.061 --> 0:19:15.622
<v Speaker 3>of affairs for a very long time, and they get

0:19:15.661 --> 0:19:17.421
<v Speaker 3>another job and another job, and it might just be

0:19:17.462 --> 0:19:19.422
<v Speaker 3>acquired a job, but you know, no one knew who

0:19:19.422 --> 0:19:21.421
<v Speaker 3>he was a week ago, and no one will know

0:19:21.462 --> 0:19:24.422
<v Speaker 3>who he is in a couple of months. The collateral

0:19:24.502 --> 0:19:26.502
<v Speaker 3>damage around him, I don't agree.

0:19:26.542 --> 0:19:28.821
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't agree with that, because I mean, he's

0:19:28.821 --> 0:19:31.181
<v Speaker 1>not Jeff Bezos, right, So yes, you're right, someone like

0:19:31.222 --> 0:19:34.782
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg or Donald Trump, nothing's going

0:19:34.861 --> 0:19:35.342
<v Speaker 1>to touch them.

0:19:35.381 --> 0:19:37.581
<v Speaker 4>But he doesn't feeding even the feeding his family point,

0:19:37.621 --> 0:19:40.182
<v Speaker 4>it's like when you see the salary, there's a world

0:19:40.182 --> 0:19:41.621
<v Speaker 4>in which we all kind of got to kilby.

0:19:41.782 --> 0:19:43.902
<v Speaker 3>I think that the he'll be fine thing is why

0:19:43.942 --> 0:19:46.061
<v Speaker 3>people feel comfortable laughing about it. You know how I

0:19:46.061 --> 0:19:49.101
<v Speaker 3>said before, this is a different story if he's not him.

0:19:49.381 --> 0:19:51.782
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying that's right, but that's why, because we

0:19:51.861 --> 0:19:53.542
<v Speaker 3>don't really feel like he's going to be a victim.

0:19:53.581 --> 0:19:56.182
<v Speaker 3>We've all read a million stories about men who've harassed

0:19:56.182 --> 0:19:58.101
<v Speaker 3>women at work, never mind had affairs, but still go

0:19:58.141 --> 0:19:59.902
<v Speaker 3>on to get another good job, and another good job,

0:19:59.901 --> 0:20:02.821
<v Speaker 3>another good job. What's also interesting about this, though, and

0:20:02.821 --> 0:20:04.262
<v Speaker 3>we're going to talk in a minute about how we

0:20:04.302 --> 0:20:06.462
<v Speaker 3>all want to be main characters now, is this is

0:20:06.502 --> 0:20:08.461
<v Speaker 3>the sort of stuff that only used to happen to

0:20:08.462 --> 0:20:12.862
<v Speaker 3>famous people like who could forget those paparazzi pictures of

0:20:12.982 --> 0:20:17.141
<v Speaker 3>Kristin Stewart pashing her director Rupert Sanders when she was

0:20:17.182 --> 0:20:20.542
<v Speaker 3>still with Robert Pattinson, and there were these paparazzi pictures.

0:20:20.542 --> 0:20:22.542
<v Speaker 3>They're some of the most famous ones of all time

0:20:23.022 --> 0:20:25.902
<v Speaker 3>of them canoodling somewhere in a canyon in.

0:20:25.942 --> 0:20:27.222
<v Speaker 2>La or whatever, and it.

0:20:27.222 --> 0:20:31.662
<v Speaker 3>Went around the world in an instant, his wife, her relationship.

0:20:31.901 --> 0:20:34.501
<v Speaker 3>But this used to be that's what happens when you're

0:20:34.542 --> 0:20:38.222
<v Speaker 3>famous and you've corded the attention and you've asked for it,

0:20:38.341 --> 0:20:42.262
<v Speaker 3>and then you have no privacy. Now, because the Internet

0:20:42.262 --> 0:20:45.542
<v Speaker 3>can turn any of us into a celebrity, amenable celebrity

0:20:45.901 --> 0:20:49.901
<v Speaker 3>within three minutes. All of us have that level of

0:20:49.942 --> 0:20:52.061
<v Speaker 3>scrutiny around the corner.

0:20:51.782 --> 0:20:57.542
<v Speaker 4>And we're treating each other like interactive reality shows. And

0:20:58.141 --> 0:21:00.422
<v Speaker 4>we're at a show on Saturday night. Nicki Glazer, who

0:21:00.661 --> 0:21:04.661
<v Speaker 4>is a comedian, she hosted the Oscars this year, and

0:21:04.742 --> 0:21:06.861
<v Speaker 4>she made a joke about this, which I thought was

0:21:06.861 --> 0:21:09.821
<v Speaker 4>actually quite funny, where she went around and showed people

0:21:09.861 --> 0:21:11.421
<v Speaker 4>on the screen and even if she was doing that,

0:21:11.462 --> 0:21:14.661
<v Speaker 4>I went, that's my worst nightmare to be broadcast in

0:21:14.702 --> 0:21:17.701
<v Speaker 4>front of all these people. Five thousand and six thousand people.

0:21:18.101 --> 0:21:20.221
<v Speaker 4>But then the idea that you could then be broadcast

0:21:20.262 --> 0:21:23.341
<v Speaker 4>to whoever chooses to film it is a whole other ballgame.

0:21:23.621 --> 0:21:25.821
<v Speaker 4>But then they eventually the last one that they got

0:21:25.861 --> 0:21:29.142
<v Speaker 4>to was Lisa Wilkinson being embraced by Hamish Blake, which

0:21:29.262 --> 0:21:32.542
<v Speaker 4>was the joke, which was actually very funny. But then

0:21:32.581 --> 0:21:34.821
<v Speaker 4>of course someone to film that and then that's gone

0:21:35.341 --> 0:21:39.022
<v Speaker 4>viral as well. So the platform of it, I think

0:21:39.101 --> 0:21:40.782
<v Speaker 4>is just terrified, the.

0:21:40.782 --> 0:21:45.542
<v Speaker 1>Saturation, like there's no one of any generation presumably. I've

0:21:45.581 --> 0:21:47.221
<v Speaker 1>got a friend whose overseas at the moment, and she

0:21:47.262 --> 0:21:50.141
<v Speaker 1>was in an aerobi in an uber and the uber

0:21:50.222 --> 0:21:52.941
<v Speaker 1>driver who didn't speak English, was laughing with her about

0:21:52.942 --> 0:21:56.141
<v Speaker 1>it and about coldplay. It's the scale that's hard to

0:21:56.141 --> 0:21:57.021
<v Speaker 1>get your head around.

0:21:57.101 --> 0:21:59.661
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it ends up being connective tissue between people. It's

0:21:59.702 --> 0:22:02.662
<v Speaker 4>small talk, it's fodder, it's stuff for a comedy show.

0:22:02.581 --> 0:22:05.542
<v Speaker 1>And everyone wants the next instrument. So yeah, my question

0:22:05.702 --> 0:22:08.661
<v Speaker 1>is when will we walk away from this story? What

0:22:08.821 --> 0:22:13.462
<v Speaker 1>will satis by our appetite for resolution of this narrative.

0:22:13.542 --> 0:22:15.941
<v Speaker 3>It probably depends what happens next, right, because there's a

0:22:15.982 --> 0:22:19.422
<v Speaker 3>world where the woman in the video decides to come

0:22:19.422 --> 0:22:21.661
<v Speaker 3>out and tell a story and do an interview, or

0:22:21.742 --> 0:22:23.661
<v Speaker 3>the wife comes out and does that, or you know,

0:22:23.782 --> 0:22:27.102
<v Speaker 3>they perpetuate the story in whatever way that will keep

0:22:27.141 --> 0:22:30.661
<v Speaker 3>it going. But there's also a very strong likelihood that

0:22:30.702 --> 0:22:33.382
<v Speaker 3>this will die away very quickly, like all our memorable

0:22:33.502 --> 0:22:35.941
<v Speaker 3>Internet obsessions do, and in a couple of months we'll

0:22:35.942 --> 0:22:37.621
<v Speaker 3>all be going, can you remember that time when we

0:22:37.661 --> 0:22:40.022
<v Speaker 3>were all obsessed with that CEO? Whatever happened to him?

0:22:40.101 --> 0:22:43.662
<v Speaker 3>Like it kind of depends what happens next.

0:22:44.061 --> 0:22:47.381
<v Speaker 1>In a moment. From Polarate's classes to cafes, concerts to

0:22:47.502 --> 0:22:52.422
<v Speaker 1>tourist destinations, public spaces have been overtaken by main character Syndrome.

0:22:52.621 --> 0:22:54.302
<v Speaker 1>Holly is going to tell us what it's like in

0:22:54.381 --> 0:22:57.581
<v Speaker 1>Rome and Paris and London right now.

0:22:59.821 --> 0:23:03.622
<v Speaker 3>Sixteen year olds will be voting in the next UK election.

0:23:04.302 --> 0:23:07.141
<v Speaker 3>When the Labor Party won government in Britain last year,

0:23:07.262 --> 0:23:10.581
<v Speaker 3>one of their key manifesto promises is that they would

0:23:10.621 --> 0:23:13.381
<v Speaker 3>lower the voting age from eighteen to sixteen, and they're

0:23:13.381 --> 0:23:13.861
<v Speaker 3>doing it.

0:23:14.422 --> 0:23:18.702
<v Speaker 1>I have a question, yes, why because the people who

0:23:18.782 --> 0:23:21.782
<v Speaker 1>would maybe be excited about that have not been allowed

0:23:21.782 --> 0:23:22.661
<v Speaker 1>to vote in that election.

0:23:22.742 --> 0:23:24.902
<v Speaker 4>Now, why is it so popular so yes, Why.

0:23:24.742 --> 0:23:26.661
<v Speaker 1>Is it so popular? Why would you go, yeah, you

0:23:26.661 --> 0:23:28.861
<v Speaker 1>know what, my children need to be able to vote.

0:23:28.901 --> 0:23:31.302
<v Speaker 3>Well, when you think about it, it sounds kind of wild.

0:23:31.422 --> 0:23:34.742
<v Speaker 3>But even here in Australia, it was only in nineteen

0:23:34.821 --> 0:23:37.821
<v Speaker 3>seventy three that they lowered the voting age from twenty

0:23:37.821 --> 0:23:39.741
<v Speaker 3>one to eighteen, So it used to be seen as

0:23:39.821 --> 0:23:43.061
<v Speaker 3>ridiculous that you would let anyone between eighteen and twenty

0:23:43.061 --> 0:23:45.422
<v Speaker 3>one vote. That adults were twenty one and that was it.

0:23:45.542 --> 0:23:48.582
<v Speaker 4>And whether it's true or not, there is a sense

0:23:48.942 --> 0:23:51.542
<v Speaker 4>that young people will vote more progressively.

0:23:51.341 --> 0:23:53.661
<v Speaker 3>So often it is popular with left wing parties, but

0:23:53.702 --> 0:23:56.061
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't actually turn out to be true. But the

0:23:56.262 --> 0:23:59.621
<v Speaker 3>argument is that at sixteen years old, you can work,

0:23:59.742 --> 0:24:01.941
<v Speaker 3>you can pay tax, and you can fight for your country,

0:24:01.982 --> 0:24:05.262
<v Speaker 3>so why can't you vote, And that seems to be

0:24:05.462 --> 0:24:06.462
<v Speaker 3>you have a lot of resonance.

0:24:06.581 --> 0:24:07.421
<v Speaker 1>You can make a baby.

0:24:07.502 --> 0:24:11.861
<v Speaker 3>Here in Australia, Independent MP Manique Ryan is going to

0:24:11.861 --> 0:24:13.982
<v Speaker 3>table the bill here too. It was last tabled here

0:24:13.982 --> 0:24:16.302
<v Speaker 3>in twenty eighteen by the Greens and it was chucked

0:24:16.302 --> 0:24:18.141
<v Speaker 3>out because one of the arguments here is but we

0:24:18.222 --> 0:24:20.222
<v Speaker 3>have compulsory voting and can you make a.

0:24:20.182 --> 0:24:21.421
<v Speaker 2>Sixteen year old vote.

0:24:21.702 --> 0:24:24.141
<v Speaker 3>But Manique Ryan's bringing it back in light of the

0:24:24.222 --> 0:24:26.901
<v Speaker 3>UK thing and saying, well, why don't we make it

0:24:26.942 --> 0:24:29.462
<v Speaker 3>so that you it is compulsory, but you won't find

0:24:29.502 --> 0:24:31.341
<v Speaker 3>them if they don't do it, So it's kind of

0:24:31.422 --> 0:24:34.302
<v Speaker 3>like soft compulsory. So it looks like it might happen

0:24:34.302 --> 0:24:35.581
<v Speaker 3>here too. What do we think about it?

0:24:35.982 --> 0:24:42.221
<v Speaker 4>I feel surprisingly not that passionate about allowing sixteen year

0:24:42.262 --> 0:24:45.262
<v Speaker 4>olds to vote. I feel as though, as someone who

0:24:45.302 --> 0:24:47.861
<v Speaker 4>considers myself progressive, it is something that I should be

0:24:47.861 --> 0:24:51.262
<v Speaker 4>fighting for. But I keep hearing the argument young people,

0:24:51.302 --> 0:24:53.262
<v Speaker 4>they're the ones who these policies are going to impact

0:24:53.302 --> 0:24:55.341
<v Speaker 4>the most. And I find that kind of a weak

0:24:55.422 --> 0:24:57.061
<v Speaker 4>argument because it's like, yeah, you could say that about

0:24:57.061 --> 0:24:59.101
<v Speaker 4>five year olds. I don't think five year olds should vote.

0:24:59.302 --> 0:25:03.941
<v Speaker 4>Like there is something about civic understanding and comprehension and

0:25:03.982 --> 0:25:07.141
<v Speaker 4>political knowledge and all that kind of stuff that I

0:25:07.182 --> 0:25:10.581
<v Speaker 4>think comes with voting. And they say sixteen year olds

0:25:10.621 --> 0:25:11.742
<v Speaker 4>can be taxed, right.

0:25:11.782 --> 0:25:13.662
<v Speaker 3>That seems to me to be a sensible argument. If

0:25:13.661 --> 0:25:15.742
<v Speaker 3>I have to pay tax, I should have a say yes.

0:25:15.782 --> 0:25:18.502
<v Speaker 4>But isn't it that if you earn less than about

0:25:18.542 --> 0:25:21.341
<v Speaker 4>eighteen five hundred dollars then you don't pay tax. So

0:25:21.422 --> 0:25:24.101
<v Speaker 4>most sixteen year olds aren't paying tax, they're not paying rent,

0:25:24.182 --> 0:25:26.621
<v Speaker 4>they're not like not that they're not impacted by policies,

0:25:26.861 --> 0:25:29.821
<v Speaker 4>but I think of myself at sixteen and my level

0:25:29.821 --> 0:25:32.661
<v Speaker 4>of engagement, even myself at eighteen and my level of engagement,

0:25:32.982 --> 0:25:35.982
<v Speaker 4>and I think I didn't know what I was doing. Mayo,

0:25:36.061 --> 0:25:37.141
<v Speaker 4>what do you think I'm.

0:25:37.061 --> 0:25:38.861
<v Speaker 1>Stuck on the idea of five year olds voting. I

0:25:39.022 --> 0:25:45.182
<v Speaker 1>just put up your hand. Plus, I really like wrestling

0:25:45.182 --> 0:25:49.581
<v Speaker 1>with this issue because I think the idea, if it's

0:25:49.742 --> 0:25:52.421
<v Speaker 1>not compulsory, the people who will vote will be the

0:25:52.422 --> 0:25:56.182
<v Speaker 1>ones who are really engaged. The reason I love compulsory

0:25:56.262 --> 0:25:57.862
<v Speaker 1>voting is that you know.

0:25:57.821 --> 0:25:58.742
<v Speaker 4>It's good for moderation.

0:25:59.061 --> 0:26:01.461
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's good to sort of get a bit of

0:26:01.502 --> 0:26:05.622
<v Speaker 1>a common denominator, not necessarily the lowest, but a common denominator.

0:26:05.982 --> 0:26:08.341
<v Speaker 1>I'm also really interested in this idea of all the things.

0:26:08.341 --> 0:26:11.181
<v Speaker 1>As you say, Ohole, that you can do sixteen, but

0:26:11.222 --> 0:26:14.942
<v Speaker 1>you can't drink alcohol until you're eighteen, and I'm interested

0:26:14.982 --> 0:26:15.302
<v Speaker 1>in that.

0:26:15.462 --> 0:26:17.222
<v Speaker 4>I was really interested that you could join the army

0:26:17.262 --> 0:26:19.222
<v Speaker 4>at sixteen. I fact checked that because I wouldn't get

0:26:19.262 --> 0:26:20.821
<v Speaker 4>you and you came sixteen and six months.

0:26:20.861 --> 0:26:22.782
<v Speaker 3>And also, you know you said not that many sixteen

0:26:22.821 --> 0:26:25.262
<v Speaker 3>year olds are working, but plenty do. You can have

0:26:25.302 --> 0:26:27.022
<v Speaker 3>an apprenticeship, you can train.

0:26:27.262 --> 0:26:28.542
<v Speaker 4>That's a really good point.

0:26:28.782 --> 0:26:29.941
<v Speaker 2>Sixteen year olds are at school.

0:26:30.061 --> 0:26:30.901
<v Speaker 4>Oh, that's a good point.

0:26:30.942 --> 0:26:32.061
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm all.

0:26:31.942 --> 0:26:34.741
<v Speaker 3>For it if the policies of the country impact you

0:26:35.022 --> 0:26:37.581
<v Speaker 3>and you're of that age. What's interesting to me about

0:26:37.581 --> 0:26:39.942
<v Speaker 3>it is that in so many other areas of our

0:26:40.022 --> 0:26:45.581
<v Speaker 3>culture now we're extending childhood. We're very much about infantilizing

0:26:45.621 --> 0:26:48.182
<v Speaker 3>people until they're about twenty five. These days, it seems

0:26:48.502 --> 0:26:51.182
<v Speaker 3>so this sort of almost seems countercultural to say, yeah,

0:26:51.222 --> 0:26:53.622
<v Speaker 3>but sixteen year olds are savvy enough to be able

0:26:53.621 --> 0:26:54.941
<v Speaker 3>to vote, But personally I think they are.

0:26:55.022 --> 0:26:56.821
<v Speaker 2>I know that when I was young, I felt.

0:26:56.661 --> 0:26:58.782
<v Speaker 3>Very passionately that I should be able to vote before

0:26:58.782 --> 0:27:01.181
<v Speaker 3>I was eighteen, and I think I probably knew what

0:27:01.182 --> 0:27:01.941
<v Speaker 3>I was talking about.

0:27:02.061 --> 0:27:05.621
<v Speaker 4>Austria, Germany, Brazil, they've all changed their voting age sixteen.

0:27:05.661 --> 0:27:07.061
<v Speaker 4>It does look like we're going that way.

0:27:07.462 --> 0:27:09.701
<v Speaker 3>And in Britain and also in terms of numbers, and

0:27:09.742 --> 0:27:11.581
<v Speaker 3>they think this is going to add another one and

0:27:11.581 --> 0:27:14.302
<v Speaker 3>a half million people to the electoral role. But it's

0:27:14.302 --> 0:27:16.941
<v Speaker 3>not compulsory there here, it wouldn't be anything like that

0:27:17.022 --> 0:27:18.782
<v Speaker 3>number because our population is a lot smaller, so it

0:27:18.782 --> 0:27:22.742
<v Speaker 3>probably wouldn't be the decider, but it would definitely make

0:27:22.782 --> 0:27:24.022
<v Speaker 3>campaigns more interesting.

0:27:24.942 --> 0:27:28.981
<v Speaker 1>Main character syndrome is ruining public spaces. That's the title

0:27:28.982 --> 0:27:30.621
<v Speaker 1>of a piece I read this week by the writer

0:27:30.901 --> 0:27:34.262
<v Speaker 1>Molly Bath on Substack, and before we unpack it, I

0:27:34.302 --> 0:27:36.941
<v Speaker 1>want to do a quick glossary of what main character

0:27:36.982 --> 0:27:40.821
<v Speaker 1>syndrome actually is. It's the delusion that you are the

0:27:40.861 --> 0:27:43.022
<v Speaker 1>center of the universe like a toddler.

0:27:43.141 --> 0:27:43.942
<v Speaker 4>Is it a delusion?

0:27:44.462 --> 0:27:47.501
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're right, actually, because we all are literally all

0:27:47.621 --> 0:27:48.422
<v Speaker 1>the center of.

0:27:48.381 --> 0:27:49.181
<v Speaker 2>Our own universe.

0:27:49.341 --> 0:27:51.821
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it's one thing to feel it or know

0:27:51.901 --> 0:27:55.582
<v Speaker 1>it and another to pay yeah, act as if everybody

0:27:55.621 --> 0:27:58.701
<v Speaker 1>else in the world is a NPC non playing character

0:27:58.861 --> 0:28:02.101
<v Speaker 1>in the story of your life. You can kind of

0:28:02.182 --> 0:28:04.741
<v Speaker 1>trace it back to the introduction of the front facing

0:28:04.782 --> 0:28:08.302
<v Speaker 1>camera on the iPhone four back in twenty ten. That

0:28:08.462 --> 0:28:11.141
<v Speaker 1>was kind of ground zero, the cultural tipping point, because

0:28:11.182 --> 0:28:13.661
<v Speaker 1>that's when the world stopped being something that you looked

0:28:13.742 --> 0:28:17.861
<v Speaker 1>at and started being something that looked back at you

0:28:18.262 --> 0:28:20.302
<v Speaker 1>as the main character, with you in the middle of it.

0:28:20.742 --> 0:28:23.262
<v Speaker 1>And in this piece, Molly Bath says that it's kind

0:28:23.302 --> 0:28:26.262
<v Speaker 1>of made us all seemingly oblivious to just how annoying

0:28:26.302 --> 0:28:30.381
<v Speaker 1>we are in public. So she starts from a good place.

0:28:30.462 --> 0:28:32.941
<v Speaker 1>You know, this idea of main character syndrome. It's a

0:28:33.022 --> 0:28:35.421
<v Speaker 1>sort of self empowerment. It's like, here are my boundaries,

0:28:35.462 --> 0:28:37.461
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to put myself first. I'm not going

0:28:37.502 --> 0:28:40.742
<v Speaker 1>to be a martyr. But it can really mutate quite

0:28:40.822 --> 0:28:43.902
<v Speaker 1>quickly into a type of oblivious narcissism. And she gives

0:28:43.902 --> 0:28:47.262
<v Speaker 1>some examples of things like, you know, talking loudly on

0:28:47.302 --> 0:28:49.542
<v Speaker 1>the phone in public at the movies or on public

0:28:49.582 --> 0:28:51.222
<v Speaker 1>transporter and cafes.

0:28:50.862 --> 0:28:52.782
<v Speaker 4>Or playing your YouTube video on a train.

0:28:52.782 --> 0:28:55.741
<v Speaker 1>Yes, or someone's phone pinging in a yoga class. This

0:28:55.862 --> 0:28:58.382
<v Speaker 1>also fairly extreme example. It's been a while since I've

0:28:58.422 --> 0:29:01.702
<v Speaker 1>been to a public pool, but in the UK and

0:29:01.782 --> 0:29:03.942
<v Speaker 1>in parts of the US, they've been reports that they've

0:29:03.982 --> 0:29:07.102
<v Speaker 1>had to empty and close public pools because people have

0:29:07.142 --> 0:29:09.862
<v Speaker 1>been pooing in them. Not children, adults who justdn't be

0:29:09.862 --> 0:29:12.461
<v Speaker 1>bothered to get out and go to the bathroom.

0:29:12.902 --> 0:29:16.062
<v Speaker 4>Do we know couldn't be bothered? I immediately, and maybe

0:29:16.062 --> 0:29:17.542
<v Speaker 4>this is my own context, but I look at that,

0:29:17.661 --> 0:29:21.102
<v Speaker 4>and I think of whether it's people with disabilities, people

0:29:21.102 --> 0:29:24.582
<v Speaker 4>who are older, like, are there instances where adults? I

0:29:24.582 --> 0:29:25.742
<v Speaker 4>would want more details on that.

0:29:26.142 --> 0:29:28.102
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be something that's rising.

0:29:28.502 --> 0:29:31.221
<v Speaker 4>What is rising is things like public urination. Like public

0:29:31.342 --> 0:29:33.382
<v Speaker 4>urination to me is the idea that you're in their

0:29:33.422 --> 0:29:35.902
<v Speaker 4>home and you're winging on the streets as a terroist.

0:29:36.142 --> 0:29:36.862
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not cool.

0:29:37.102 --> 0:29:39.422
<v Speaker 1>Don't pop a squat, yeah in the middle of Rome

0:29:39.822 --> 0:29:42.982
<v Speaker 1>like Holly did. Yes, she didn't really. But it also

0:29:43.062 --> 0:29:45.582
<v Speaker 1>has had an impact on tourism. And I want to

0:29:45.622 --> 0:29:47.542
<v Speaker 1>just link to a story that I've been reading about

0:29:47.582 --> 0:29:50.062
<v Speaker 1>and haven't really understood until now. There's been a lot

0:29:50.062 --> 0:29:52.542
<v Speaker 1>of protests in some of the big European cities over

0:29:52.582 --> 0:29:55.221
<v Speaker 1>summer about over tourism. You know, we saw some in

0:29:55.302 --> 0:29:58.222
<v Speaker 1>Venice being some in Rome the Louver closed for a

0:29:58.302 --> 0:30:00.582
<v Speaker 1>day because the staff just said, it's just too many people,

0:30:00.582 --> 0:30:04.181
<v Speaker 1>we can't take it whole. You have returned from the

0:30:04.182 --> 0:30:07.702
<v Speaker 1>frontline of main characters Syndrome, which is Europe in summer, right,

0:30:08.661 --> 0:30:09.662
<v Speaker 1>what did you see?

0:30:09.782 --> 0:30:11.782
<v Speaker 4>Were you an MPC and other people's holiday.

0:30:11.782 --> 0:30:15.182
<v Speaker 3>It's so funny because I've just come back from holiday

0:30:15.182 --> 0:30:18.582
<v Speaker 3>where I went to all those tourist hotspots with my family,

0:30:18.702 --> 0:30:20.862
<v Speaker 3>and that is not something that we do every year,

0:30:20.942 --> 0:30:24.461
<v Speaker 3>certainly not. But we went to London, Paris, Rome, and

0:30:24.462 --> 0:30:26.062
<v Speaker 3>then we spent a week in Italy with my family

0:30:26.062 --> 0:30:28.701
<v Speaker 3>and Manchester. But funnily enough that I don't have to

0:30:28.702 --> 0:30:30.862
<v Speaker 3>fight off that many influences in Manchester. I don't know

0:30:30.862 --> 0:30:33.542
<v Speaker 3>where they were, no viral restaurants. I haven't been to

0:30:33.582 --> 0:30:36.702
<v Speaker 3>Paris since I was twenty one, right, So like this

0:30:36.782 --> 0:30:40.102
<v Speaker 3>is a long time. Things have changed, friends, things have

0:30:40.302 --> 0:30:43.382
<v Speaker 3>changed a great deal. So here's one of the things.

0:30:43.542 --> 0:30:45.782
<v Speaker 3>My daughter's fifteen, and I don't want to embarrass it,

0:30:45.822 --> 0:30:48.062
<v Speaker 3>but I'm going to you ever so slightly. She knew

0:30:48.142 --> 0:30:51.062
<v Speaker 3>she was going to these cities, and she had a

0:30:51.102 --> 0:30:54.582
<v Speaker 3>shot list prepared for pictures that she wanted. And I

0:30:54.862 --> 0:30:57.062
<v Speaker 3>in my head, I thought, isn't that cute that my

0:30:57.742 --> 0:31:00.062
<v Speaker 3>daughter has done a bit of research and she's excited

0:31:00.342 --> 0:31:02.302
<v Speaker 3>that when we go to London, she knows that there's

0:31:02.302 --> 0:31:03.982
<v Speaker 3>this thing called Big Ben, she knows she wants a

0:31:03.982 --> 0:31:05.582
<v Speaker 3>picture with it. When we go to Paris, she knows

0:31:05.622 --> 0:31:06.742
<v Speaker 3>there's this thing called the Affatage.

0:31:06.782 --> 0:31:08.622
<v Speaker 2>She knows pa with it. That's real cute.

0:31:08.622 --> 0:31:09.142
<v Speaker 1>Which change.

0:31:10.182 --> 0:31:11.902
<v Speaker 4>When I went overseas for the first time, I was

0:31:11.942 --> 0:31:13.942
<v Speaker 4>doing the same thing, like I went, I don't wait

0:31:13.982 --> 0:31:15.222
<v Speaker 4>to get a photo with the Eiffel Tower.

0:31:16.262 --> 0:31:20.421
<v Speaker 3>But no, she has saved to Pinterest, and as I

0:31:20.542 --> 0:31:23.622
<v Speaker 3>found out, she is not alone this particular shot that

0:31:23.661 --> 0:31:25.302
<v Speaker 3>you've got to get when you go to London and

0:31:25.302 --> 0:31:27.102
<v Speaker 3>you go to Big Ben and there's a phone box

0:31:27.102 --> 0:31:29.181
<v Speaker 3>in a certain place and whatever. And I'm obviously an

0:31:29.222 --> 0:31:32.142
<v Speaker 3>indulgent mum who's excited that my daughter's excited. So I'm like,

0:31:32.222 --> 0:31:34.102
<v Speaker 3>let's go there, Let's go and get you this picture.

0:31:34.222 --> 0:31:35.462
<v Speaker 1>What's so special about it?

0:31:35.542 --> 0:31:36.822
<v Speaker 2>Like, it's just a really good view.

0:31:36.902 --> 0:31:38.902
<v Speaker 3>So you get a London phone box and Big Ben

0:31:38.942 --> 0:31:40.502
<v Speaker 3>in the background and probably a London bus.

0:31:40.542 --> 0:31:41.862
<v Speaker 2>It's like iconic composition.

0:31:42.622 --> 0:31:45.542
<v Speaker 3>So you turn up to this phone box and there

0:31:45.622 --> 0:31:47.941
<v Speaker 3>is a que Like I'm not joking, this is not

0:31:48.102 --> 0:31:52.982
<v Speaker 3>a official sight seeing anything. There is a Q twenty

0:31:53.022 --> 0:31:57.342
<v Speaker 3>minutes long of other people, mostly young people, mostly female

0:31:57.422 --> 0:32:00.542
<v Speaker 3>older than fifteen, but like, who are all also taking

0:32:00.622 --> 0:32:03.302
<v Speaker 3>this particular picture in this particular place. You go to

0:32:03.742 --> 0:32:07.222
<v Speaker 3>Paris and the amount of time you have to wait

0:32:07.422 --> 0:32:10.302
<v Speaker 3>for again mostly young women, to get the shot that

0:32:10.342 --> 0:32:12.822
<v Speaker 3>they want in front of the tower at this particular time,

0:32:12.822 --> 0:32:15.542
<v Speaker 3>in this particular place, looking this particular way, head down,

0:32:15.582 --> 0:32:18.182
<v Speaker 3>maybe looking away, maybe looking off to the side. Then

0:32:18.661 --> 0:32:22.062
<v Speaker 3>the queue and the one in London, the poor Internet boyfriends,

0:32:22.102 --> 0:32:25.102
<v Speaker 3>and is going to generalize, but it's true of like

0:32:25.182 --> 0:32:27.862
<v Speaker 3>the girls posing for the picture and then taking the

0:32:27.862 --> 0:32:28.862
<v Speaker 3>phone back going through them.

0:32:28.902 --> 0:32:29.741
<v Speaker 2>No no, no, not that one.

0:32:29.822 --> 0:32:34.102
<v Speaker 3>Let's do it again, like reshooting everybody doing these content

0:32:34.182 --> 0:32:38.782
<v Speaker 3>creator shots. It is very different. That is new, new energy.

0:32:38.822 --> 0:32:41.022
<v Speaker 3>Everywhere we went. We went to when we were in Rome,

0:32:41.262 --> 0:32:43.542
<v Speaker 3>we went to the Trevy Fountain very very early. I'm

0:32:43.582 --> 0:32:46.221
<v Speaker 3>not that bothered about the Trevy Fountain. Obviously, all of

0:32:46.222 --> 0:32:49.342
<v Speaker 3>that stuff's gorgeous. There were women at six am who

0:32:49.422 --> 0:32:53.222
<v Speaker 3>looked like they had been in full glam for an hour,

0:32:53.302 --> 0:32:57.221
<v Speaker 3>and they were there in evening dresses with heels and

0:32:57.382 --> 0:32:58.862
<v Speaker 3>head to get this iconic to.

0:32:58.862 --> 0:32:59.702
<v Speaker 2>Get these shots.

0:32:59.742 --> 0:33:02.862
<v Speaker 3>And it made me really not I mean, I wasn't.

0:33:02.942 --> 0:33:04.582
<v Speaker 3>I know, I sound like I'm being a grumpy old

0:33:04.582 --> 0:33:05.181
<v Speaker 3>woman about it.

0:33:05.222 --> 0:33:06.342
<v Speaker 1>I just found it so.

0:33:06.661 --> 0:33:09.742
<v Speaker 3>Interesting because it is so different. It's true that we've

0:33:09.782 --> 0:33:13.502
<v Speaker 3>always taken pictures of things, and we've always taken pictures

0:33:13.982 --> 0:33:17.062
<v Speaker 3>of ourselves in places that we've always wanted to go,

0:33:17.222 --> 0:33:20.382
<v Speaker 3>and it's like a prove I was there, look back

0:33:20.422 --> 0:33:22.622
<v Speaker 3>at it and remember that I was really there because

0:33:22.622 --> 0:33:25.182
<v Speaker 3>the fleeting nature of travelers. You know, then you're back

0:33:25.182 --> 0:33:26.742
<v Speaker 3>home and you're in your office job and you're like,

0:33:26.862 --> 0:33:28.662
<v Speaker 3>was I ever even at the Eiffel Tower?

0:33:28.661 --> 0:33:29.701
<v Speaker 2>And you can look at these pictures.

0:33:29.702 --> 0:33:33.062
<v Speaker 3>But it's a very specific I'm going to use the

0:33:33.062 --> 0:33:37.062
<v Speaker 3>word I would say wrong esthetic. It's a very specific

0:33:37.182 --> 0:33:39.782
<v Speaker 3>type of person and there are so many of them,

0:33:39.822 --> 0:33:42.262
<v Speaker 3>and it's really something new, and I could only think

0:33:42.262 --> 0:33:43.422
<v Speaker 3>of it as main character.

0:33:43.782 --> 0:33:45.902
<v Speaker 4>I think there are a few different things that are

0:33:45.942 --> 0:33:48.741
<v Speaker 4>like coalescing at the same time. The first is that

0:33:49.262 --> 0:33:51.182
<v Speaker 4>when my mum went to Europe for the first time,

0:33:51.222 --> 0:33:52.982
<v Speaker 4>when you took a photo and you got it developed,

0:33:53.582 --> 0:33:56.022
<v Speaker 4>you could only really have one. There wasn't unlimited right,

0:33:56.062 --> 0:33:58.461
<v Speaker 4>and now you've got unlimited data. It's not even like

0:33:58.462 --> 0:34:00.542
<v Speaker 4>a memory stick. It's like you can take three hundred

0:34:00.582 --> 0:34:02.382
<v Speaker 4>photos if you want to get the right one. The

0:34:02.382 --> 0:34:05.862
<v Speaker 4>second is video is that often from what as a

0:34:05.902 --> 0:34:08.622
<v Speaker 4>consumer who is seeing a lot of people in Europe,

0:34:08.622 --> 0:34:13.342
<v Speaker 4>I'm seeing people in all gowns doing almost runway walks.

0:34:13.022 --> 0:34:15.142
<v Speaker 2>In front of the trap fashion show. Right, it's like

0:34:15.182 --> 0:34:17.181
<v Speaker 2>a fashion show, a fashion shoot, and I.

0:34:17.142 --> 0:34:19.741
<v Speaker 4>Always think, imagine how that felt a film. I'd be

0:34:19.822 --> 0:34:22.221
<v Speaker 4>so because everyone would be would be watching you.

0:34:22.382 --> 0:34:25.102
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what do you do in your You're holding everybody in.

0:34:25.862 --> 0:34:28.702
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no offense to them, but they are holding everybody

0:34:28.781 --> 0:34:31.542
<v Speaker 3>up because they're hogging that spot and that view while

0:34:31.582 --> 0:34:34.502
<v Speaker 3>they do their fourteen takes so back to the idea

0:34:34.502 --> 0:34:37.102
<v Speaker 3>of everybody's main character and whether it's irritating that the

0:34:37.142 --> 0:34:40.142
<v Speaker 3>phone's pinging in the yoga studio or the whatever is

0:34:40.181 --> 0:34:44.661
<v Speaker 3>that your bespoke photo shoot at one of whatever place

0:34:44.741 --> 0:34:48.701
<v Speaker 3>you're at, everybody else is waiting. And it's changing cities

0:34:48.741 --> 0:34:50.741
<v Speaker 3>in a way that I can understand is you go

0:34:50.781 --> 0:34:53.302
<v Speaker 3>to places that are very Instagram famous. There's a particular

0:34:53.342 --> 0:34:56.741
<v Speaker 3>market in London that has this strawberry stand. It's just

0:34:56.822 --> 0:35:00.142
<v Speaker 3>chocolate covered strawberries, right, but it is so viral that

0:35:00.181 --> 0:35:03.342
<v Speaker 3>place that it has changed the entire nature of this market.

0:35:03.661 --> 0:35:06.902
<v Speaker 3>On a Tuesday lunchtime wasn't even school holidays. It is

0:35:06.982 --> 0:35:09.142
<v Speaker 3>so mobbed you can't get near it. All the stalls

0:35:09.142 --> 0:35:13.301
<v Speaker 3>around are getting no custom. The conques are like zig

0:35:13.382 --> 0:35:15.462
<v Speaker 3>zag backwards on each other. And they've got a system

0:35:15.462 --> 0:35:17.622
<v Speaker 3>in place, and it's all for the gram.

0:35:17.741 --> 0:35:19.821
<v Speaker 4>There used to be a lonely planet or whatever, and

0:35:19.822 --> 0:35:22.062
<v Speaker 4>it's saying, oh, this cafe is good or whatever. But

0:35:22.102 --> 0:35:24.542
<v Speaker 4>the idea that, as we were saying before, overnight, you

0:35:24.542 --> 0:35:27.542
<v Speaker 4>can go from being a little known cafe to being

0:35:27.781 --> 0:35:31.142
<v Speaker 4>entirely viral. And that's not just happening to the little bakery.

0:35:31.181 --> 0:35:33.901
<v Speaker 4>It can happen to certain spots. There's always a new

0:35:33.942 --> 0:35:38.142
<v Speaker 4>spot that's blowing up in terms of interest. And the

0:35:38.221 --> 0:35:40.102
<v Speaker 4>other thing that they talk about with over tourism, because

0:35:40.102 --> 0:35:42.542
<v Speaker 4>this was a discussion before COVID. The Internet's made it

0:35:42.542 --> 0:35:45.181
<v Speaker 4>really easy to book things, and the cost of air

0:35:45.221 --> 0:35:48.341
<v Speaker 4>travel being lower than it was a few generations ago,

0:35:48.542 --> 0:35:50.701
<v Speaker 4>means it's more accessible and you've got more and more

0:35:50.741 --> 0:35:55.501
<v Speaker 4>people going and then having this sense of entitlement which

0:35:55.622 --> 0:35:59.582
<v Speaker 4>begins on the plane. It's like I get on the plane,

0:35:59.622 --> 0:36:02.662
<v Speaker 4>I go, this is my holiday, and this country exists

0:36:02.701 --> 0:36:05.661
<v Speaker 4>for me, and this air hostess exists for me, and

0:36:06.221 --> 0:36:09.542
<v Speaker 4>nothing will ruin my holiday. And so even the behavior,

0:36:10.102 --> 0:36:10.622
<v Speaker 4>we're all.

0:36:10.462 --> 0:36:12.462
<v Speaker 1>The main character of our own holidays.

0:36:12.542 --> 0:36:14.661
<v Speaker 4>Yes, but it's almost.

0:36:14.382 --> 0:36:17.902
<v Speaker 1>Like locations have become famous. I mean, I know that

0:36:17.942 --> 0:36:19.982
<v Speaker 1>sounds funny because we've always had famous places like the

0:36:20.022 --> 0:36:24.142
<v Speaker 1>Harmbridge or Big Bear or the Empire State Building. But

0:36:24.181 --> 0:36:27.542
<v Speaker 1>it's more than that now because like the strawberry stand,

0:36:28.701 --> 0:36:31.221
<v Speaker 1>like it's no longer enough to go and take a

0:36:31.221 --> 0:36:33.821
<v Speaker 1>picture of that. It's so funny the different generations and

0:36:33.862 --> 0:36:37.342
<v Speaker 1>what they film, because I've got a number of friends

0:36:37.701 --> 0:36:40.421
<v Speaker 1>gen X's who are in Europe at the moment, and

0:36:40.822 --> 0:36:44.502
<v Speaker 1>the photos they take are still old school. Here's some strawberries,

0:36:44.582 --> 0:36:46.781
<v Speaker 1>or here's my dinner, or here's a view, or here's

0:36:46.822 --> 0:36:49.421
<v Speaker 1>a sunset or here's an interesting thing I can see.

0:36:49.422 --> 0:36:52.181
<v Speaker 1>So they're still looking out at the world. And I

0:36:52.181 --> 0:36:53.781
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to say that we're better than the people

0:36:53.781 --> 0:36:56.421
<v Speaker 1>who are looking back at themselves, but the people looking

0:36:56.462 --> 0:37:00.502
<v Speaker 1>back at themselves the currencies that they were there needing

0:37:00.582 --> 0:37:03.942
<v Speaker 1>to insert themselves in there, because what you say about

0:37:04.022 --> 0:37:09.902
<v Speaker 1>your daughter, hole, she's not an influencer, she's just a me.

0:37:10.542 --> 0:37:13.661
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just the people who were monetizing this content.

0:37:14.062 --> 0:37:16.542
<v Speaker 1>It's the idea that almost like when you go to Disneyland,

0:37:16.582 --> 0:37:18.782
<v Speaker 1>you want the photo in front of the Disney Castle

0:37:18.822 --> 0:37:21.421
<v Speaker 1>because you've seen that and it's iconic and it's like, look,

0:37:21.462 --> 0:37:23.741
<v Speaker 1>I'm inside this iconic theme.

0:37:23.781 --> 0:37:26.301
<v Speaker 3>It's also that you know, our social media platforms have

0:37:26.342 --> 0:37:28.582
<v Speaker 3>done the art direction for us, right, so they're like,

0:37:28.622 --> 0:37:30.462
<v Speaker 3>if you stand in this place and you look a

0:37:30.462 --> 0:37:33.221
<v Speaker 3>certain way at this certain time, you'll get this amazing

0:37:33.302 --> 0:37:36.382
<v Speaker 3>shot that used to be just the sort of privilege

0:37:36.422 --> 0:37:38.421
<v Speaker 3>of a certain kind of person who had an eye

0:37:38.462 --> 0:37:40.982
<v Speaker 3>for that. So in some ways it's democratizing. But the

0:37:41.062 --> 0:37:43.982
<v Speaker 3>other thing is that our fomo, I think, has just

0:37:44.062 --> 0:37:46.181
<v Speaker 3>reached new levels with it. When you walk around a

0:37:46.221 --> 0:37:48.462
<v Speaker 3>city like London or or Paris, and this did actually

0:37:48.462 --> 0:37:50.861
<v Speaker 3>happen in Manchester too, you'll suddenly see a big queue

0:37:50.942 --> 0:37:54.142
<v Speaker 3>for something and immediately human nature, what are they quing for?

0:37:54.502 --> 0:37:56.542
<v Speaker 3>What do they know that I don't know that I

0:37:56.542 --> 0:37:59.221
<v Speaker 3>should join that queue? And in Paris you'd walk past

0:37:59.302 --> 0:38:01.622
<v Speaker 3>and it would be a particular petiserie. There'd be four

0:38:01.701 --> 0:38:03.982
<v Speaker 3>other bakeries on the street, but this particular one has

0:38:04.022 --> 0:38:07.221
<v Speaker 3>this cake that is particularly instagrammable. So the queue is

0:38:07.261 --> 0:38:09.821
<v Speaker 3>out the door, you can join a virtual way list

0:38:09.862 --> 0:38:11.341
<v Speaker 3>for it. You could do all these things, and so

0:38:11.422 --> 0:38:13.622
<v Speaker 3>everywhere we'd go there'd be a queue and we'd all

0:38:13.661 --> 0:38:15.221
<v Speaker 3>be like, what are they queuing for? What are they

0:38:15.302 --> 0:38:19.261
<v Speaker 3>cuing for? And then, horrifyingly, on the last day we

0:38:19.261 --> 0:38:21.422
<v Speaker 3>were there, we were walking around in the evening and

0:38:21.462 --> 0:38:23.622
<v Speaker 3>we'd been, as I say, seeing these cues for days

0:38:23.622 --> 0:38:24.181
<v Speaker 3>and kind of.

0:38:24.542 --> 0:38:25.142
<v Speaker 2>What's that about?

0:38:25.142 --> 0:38:27.262
<v Speaker 3>That must be something viral, that must be something exciting,

0:38:27.542 --> 0:38:29.942
<v Speaker 3>And then we saw this queue outside this place on

0:38:29.982 --> 0:38:32.821
<v Speaker 3>a side street in Paris, and we were like, what's that?

0:38:32.822 --> 0:38:33.102
<v Speaker 2>What's that?

0:38:33.181 --> 0:38:35.142
<v Speaker 3>And we realized this was a literal queue for a

0:38:35.181 --> 0:38:38.342
<v Speaker 3>souper kitchen, like a queue for people who are hungry

0:38:38.542 --> 0:38:42.102
<v Speaker 3>trying to get themselves fed, next to the tourists in

0:38:42.142 --> 0:38:44.301
<v Speaker 3>their long line trying to get a picture of their cake.

0:38:44.342 --> 0:38:47.542
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying that with any moral judgment. They're like, oh,

0:38:47.022 --> 0:38:50.662
<v Speaker 3>I would never like, you know, I totally was buying

0:38:50.701 --> 0:38:53.781
<v Speaker 3>the macarons that looked really pretty. But it's kind of

0:38:54.142 --> 0:38:56.982
<v Speaker 3>really interesting how it's messed with our heads.

0:38:57.022 --> 0:39:00.342
<v Speaker 4>I think the irony is that the beauty of travel

0:39:01.022 --> 0:39:03.301
<v Speaker 4>is the opposite of the main character syndrome is it

0:39:03.342 --> 0:39:06.542
<v Speaker 4>you often feel anonymous, You feel like no one knows you.

0:39:06.542 --> 0:39:09.502
<v Speaker 4>You feel like on the main stage is the culture

0:39:09.622 --> 0:39:12.701
<v Speaker 4>and the people, and you're like this viewer rather than

0:39:12.741 --> 0:39:16.142
<v Speaker 4>this person who the world it makes you feel small.

0:39:16.302 --> 0:39:19.022
<v Speaker 4>That's the beauty of it. We're not just saying this.

0:39:19.022 --> 0:39:21.582
<v Speaker 4>There's all this research and all of these countries that

0:39:21.622 --> 0:39:25.062
<v Speaker 4>have come out and said people are etching their names

0:39:25.062 --> 0:39:28.142
<v Speaker 4>on the Colosseum, like all these countries have come out

0:39:28.181 --> 0:39:32.382
<v Speaker 4>from Amsterdam to Kyoto. They literally have new codes of conduct.

0:39:32.781 --> 0:39:35.062
<v Speaker 4>Some countries are getting people to sign it when they

0:39:35.102 --> 0:39:37.861
<v Speaker 4>get there to go this is how you have to

0:39:37.862 --> 0:39:40.062
<v Speaker 4>behave in our country. Because we're having all of these

0:39:40.102 --> 0:39:43.782
<v Speaker 4>issues with tourists that there is this entitlement. I also

0:39:43.862 --> 0:39:46.542
<v Speaker 4>wonder I think it is a Western thing. I think

0:39:46.542 --> 0:39:50.182
<v Speaker 4>that it's a Western entitlement to like you just come

0:39:50.181 --> 0:39:52.941
<v Speaker 4>to this country. You see it in Bali, where it's

0:39:53.062 --> 0:39:58.542
<v Speaker 4>like this total disregard for cultural sensitivity is about things

0:39:58.822 --> 0:40:03.861
<v Speaker 4>and posing or you know, being really insensitive to cultural

0:40:03.942 --> 0:40:06.102
<v Speaker 4>or religious sites. Like that kind of stuff is all

0:40:06.142 --> 0:40:06.662
<v Speaker 4>over Europe.

0:40:06.701 --> 0:40:09.542
<v Speaker 3>It makes you realize you're We were in some beautiful

0:40:09.622 --> 0:40:14.062
<v Speaker 3>for churches in Italy and some people are literally lying

0:40:14.102 --> 0:40:15.821
<v Speaker 3>on the floor in the middle of a cathedral trying

0:40:15.822 --> 0:40:18.182
<v Speaker 3>to get a photo of the well. Their friend leans

0:40:18.221 --> 0:40:20.741
<v Speaker 3>over them to get the shot of them doing the

0:40:20.781 --> 0:40:23.982
<v Speaker 3>peace sign underneath the amazing fresco or whatever. And I'm

0:40:24.022 --> 0:40:29.302
<v Speaker 3>not a religious person, but I found that insensitive, insensitive

0:40:29.462 --> 0:40:32.341
<v Speaker 3>and a bit ick. And the problem is is you

0:40:32.422 --> 0:40:34.542
<v Speaker 3>see it though, and the other little thought in the

0:40:34.542 --> 0:40:37.181
<v Speaker 3>back of your head, And certainly if you're I mean,

0:40:37.261 --> 0:40:38.102
<v Speaker 3>I didn't, but you're like.

0:40:38.102 --> 0:40:39.382
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that would be a good shot.

0:40:39.781 --> 0:40:40.741
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:40:41.302 --> 0:40:43.942
<v Speaker 3>Before you know it, you're probably joining the queue to

0:40:44.062 --> 0:40:47.022
<v Speaker 3>lie on the floor in this century's old cathedral and

0:40:47.181 --> 0:40:49.302
<v Speaker 3>do a peace sign in front of the Virgin Mary

0:40:50.462 --> 0:40:54.142
<v Speaker 3>after the break? What happens when someone writes an unauthorized

0:40:54.142 --> 0:40:57.261
<v Speaker 3>biography of you and you kind of like it? All

0:40:57.261 --> 0:40:59.661
<v Speaker 3>the signs are that maybe the new Gwyneth Paltrow book

0:40:59.822 --> 0:41:00.861
<v Speaker 3>might be an inside job.

0:41:01.502 --> 0:41:04.261
<v Speaker 1>Do you want daily outloud access? Why wouldn't you? We

0:41:04.382 --> 0:41:08.661
<v Speaker 1>dropped besides every Tuesday and Thursday exclusively for Muma MEA.

0:41:08.741 --> 0:41:09.381
<v Speaker 2>Subscribers.

0:41:09.701 --> 0:41:11.381
<v Speaker 1>Follow the link in the show notes to get us

0:41:11.422 --> 0:41:13.942
<v Speaker 1>in your ears five days a week, and a huge

0:41:13.982 --> 0:41:22.181
<v Speaker 1>thank you if you're already a subscriber. Look, I might have.

0:41:22.221 --> 0:41:25.542
<v Speaker 3>Been on holiday, but don't believe for one second that

0:41:25.622 --> 0:41:28.701
<v Speaker 3>when my imaginary friend Gwyneth Paltrow was on the gram

0:41:28.701 --> 0:41:32.261
<v Speaker 3>making paleo lobster benedict for her husband the other day.

0:41:32.622 --> 0:41:35.502
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't right there with her. What a relatable queen

0:41:35.822 --> 0:41:36.221
<v Speaker 2>she is.

0:41:36.382 --> 0:41:39.022
<v Speaker 1>I saw making a tuna salad for him. Gosh, she's been.

0:41:38.862 --> 0:41:44.062
<v Speaker 2>Cooking for tuna saldy guy is easy, look, tasty, paleo lobster.

0:41:44.582 --> 0:41:45.142
<v Speaker 2>Bless her.

0:41:45.781 --> 0:41:48.462
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, while she was doing that, I like to imagine

0:41:48.462 --> 0:41:50.462
<v Speaker 3>that her lawyers were likely on the phone to People

0:41:50.542 --> 0:41:54.421
<v Speaker 3>magazine because they were about to publish a cover proclaiming

0:41:54.741 --> 0:42:00.181
<v Speaker 3>all the juicy gossip about Gwyneth from a new unauthorized biography.

0:42:00.822 --> 0:42:03.342
<v Speaker 3>This book is written by this woman called Amy Odell,

0:42:03.701 --> 0:42:07.701
<v Speaker 3>and it's being tagged as a bombshell book, bombshell, big letters, Mia,

0:42:07.741 --> 0:42:09.741
<v Speaker 3>what's an unauthorized biography?

0:42:09.822 --> 0:42:12.661
<v Speaker 2>And is Amy O'Dell like sheer? Big name jehoe have

0:42:12.781 --> 0:42:13.542
<v Speaker 2>been worried about this?

0:42:13.741 --> 0:42:17.142
<v Speaker 1>She's people in the industry know who she is, and

0:42:17.181 --> 0:42:19.901
<v Speaker 1>by that I sort of mean media fashion, that sort

0:42:19.942 --> 0:42:23.661
<v Speaker 1>of adjacent world. She is an author and a journalist.

0:42:24.022 --> 0:42:28.662
<v Speaker 1>She wrote the very very well received and successful also

0:42:28.781 --> 0:42:32.062
<v Speaker 1>unauthorised biography of Anna Wintour in twenty twenty two.

0:42:32.181 --> 0:42:34.942
<v Speaker 4>What does unauthorized rey unauthorized means?

0:42:35.102 --> 0:42:37.861
<v Speaker 1>It's not with the overt cooperation of the subject, and

0:42:37.902 --> 0:42:41.181
<v Speaker 1>they don't have any power over what you do publish,

0:42:41.661 --> 0:42:45.102
<v Speaker 1>who you do talk to. And there are different versions

0:42:45.221 --> 0:42:47.781
<v Speaker 1>of authorized and unauthorized, right, and the opposite of that

0:42:47.862 --> 0:42:51.821
<v Speaker 1>is an autobiography, which is you have complete control because.

0:42:51.582 --> 0:42:52.502
<v Speaker 2>You're writing it all.

0:42:52.542 --> 0:42:57.422
<v Speaker 1>A ghostwriter writes it with you. People often prefer unauthorized

0:42:57.502 --> 0:43:00.542
<v Speaker 1>because it means that you get the full story. But

0:43:00.741 --> 0:43:03.782
<v Speaker 1>then there are some that are really salacious and trying

0:43:03.822 --> 0:43:07.142
<v Speaker 1>to tell a particular juicy story, and then there are

0:43:07.142 --> 0:43:09.461
<v Speaker 1>others that have the you know. For example, with the Ana

0:43:09.622 --> 0:43:12.542
<v Speaker 1>Winter book, she didn't try to shut it down. Now,

0:43:12.582 --> 0:43:14.781
<v Speaker 1>if Anna winto hadn't wanted that book to happen, she

0:43:14.822 --> 0:43:17.302
<v Speaker 1>would have told everybody, do not speak to amy Odell.

0:43:17.661 --> 0:43:19.781
<v Speaker 1>She didn't do that. Now. Gwyneth Paltry didn't do that

0:43:19.942 --> 0:43:20.941
<v Speaker 1>to Amyodell either.

0:43:20.942 --> 0:43:21.421
<v Speaker 2>With her book.

0:43:21.502 --> 0:43:22.742
<v Speaker 4>Was Anna Wintre's flattering.

0:43:22.942 --> 0:43:25.861
<v Speaker 1>I read it and it's the definitive biography of her.

0:43:26.062 --> 0:43:28.342
<v Speaker 1>And Anna probably won't ever write a book about herself,

0:43:28.822 --> 0:43:31.702
<v Speaker 1>but it was well done. She interviewed over two hundred

0:43:31.701 --> 0:43:33.462
<v Speaker 1>and twenty people for that book. I think about the

0:43:33.502 --> 0:43:37.102
<v Speaker 1>same for the Gwyneth book, and it was very comprehensive,

0:43:37.261 --> 0:43:39.502
<v Speaker 1>so it wasn't you know some unauthorised biographies or just

0:43:39.542 --> 0:43:42.062
<v Speaker 1>have an unnamed source and read like the Daily Mail.

0:43:42.422 --> 0:43:45.462
<v Speaker 1>But these books are extraordinary pieces of journalism.

0:43:45.781 --> 0:43:48.782
<v Speaker 4>Can you tell me what we know? What did the people?

0:43:49.181 --> 0:43:52.742
<v Speaker 3>So there's say what I'm interested about this is about

0:43:52.822 --> 0:43:54.982
<v Speaker 3>whether or not this book, whether or not Gwyneth is

0:43:55.022 --> 0:43:58.382
<v Speaker 3>in on it, right because it's described as a bombshell book.

0:43:58.502 --> 0:44:01.461
<v Speaker 3>It's not actually out yet and there's an NDA on it.

0:44:01.661 --> 0:44:05.982
<v Speaker 3>But People had an exclusive. Now, People magazine is still

0:44:06.102 --> 0:44:10.661
<v Speaker 3>widely regarded as the celebrity's mouthpiece if any gossip magazine,

0:44:10.741 --> 0:44:14.861
<v Speaker 3>as it were, has any credibility anymore and forever, really

0:44:14.902 --> 0:44:18.181
<v Speaker 3>it's People magazine. It's where celebrities go to confirm or

0:44:18.221 --> 0:44:21.142
<v Speaker 3>deny certain stories, to do exclusives back in the day

0:44:21.181 --> 0:44:23.382
<v Speaker 3>when that was a big thing. And so the fact

0:44:23.422 --> 0:44:26.422
<v Speaker 3>that they have the first extracts of this book is meaningful.

0:44:26.822 --> 0:44:29.221
<v Speaker 3>The other thing that might mean that gwynethsineon is, as

0:44:29.261 --> 0:44:32.142
<v Speaker 3>far as we can tell, despite it being called bombshell,

0:44:32.701 --> 0:44:35.381
<v Speaker 3>there doesn't seem to be a smoking gun here right.

0:44:35.661 --> 0:44:39.062
<v Speaker 3>Things that we know so far, she considered Brad Pitt

0:44:39.062 --> 0:44:40.781
<v Speaker 3>to be a bit of a dullard and she says

0:44:40.822 --> 0:44:43.622
<v Speaker 3>things like we came from very different backgrounds. I had

0:44:43.661 --> 0:44:46.622
<v Speaker 3>to teach him about the different types of caviat in restaurants.

0:44:46.701 --> 0:44:48.861
<v Speaker 4>And didn't she say he's dumber shit or something.

0:44:48.942 --> 0:44:50.741
<v Speaker 3>She is alleged to have told her friends that she

0:44:50.741 --> 0:44:53.221
<v Speaker 3>thought he was dumb as shit. There's a suggestion that

0:44:53.261 --> 0:44:56.102
<v Speaker 3>maybe she cheated on him, and there's a suggestion that

0:44:56.181 --> 0:44:59.542
<v Speaker 3>maybe ben Affleck cheated on her. There's some stuff in

0:44:59.582 --> 0:45:02.142
<v Speaker 3>there about why her and Madonna's friendship ended. I liked

0:45:02.221 --> 0:45:05.022
<v Speaker 3>that ye which was that Madonna and Lord es Gate

0:45:05.062 --> 0:45:08.941
<v Speaker 3>crashed a family holiday of Gwyneth and Chris Martin's back

0:45:08.982 --> 0:45:11.982
<v Speaker 3>to our friend who likes to out married cheating couples,

0:45:12.462 --> 0:45:14.701
<v Speaker 3>and that Madonna was so awful and so awful to

0:45:14.741 --> 0:45:16.542
<v Speaker 3>her daughter that Chris was like, we can't hang around

0:45:16.542 --> 0:45:17.302
<v Speaker 3>with that woman anymore.

0:45:17.342 --> 0:45:18.941
<v Speaker 2>She's awful. So there's stuff like that.

0:45:19.022 --> 0:45:21.142
<v Speaker 1>I don't think my daughter would be a very good hang.

0:45:21.781 --> 0:45:24.261
<v Speaker 2>I reckon she'd be quite a good I also read.

0:45:24.261 --> 0:45:28.821
<v Speaker 1>In that excerpt that Gwyneth said that ben Affleck is

0:45:28.902 --> 0:45:31.341
<v Speaker 1>very good at kindly. Yes, she really liked having sex

0:45:31.342 --> 0:45:33.142
<v Speaker 1>with him because he gives such good hand yeap.

0:45:33.462 --> 0:45:35.782
<v Speaker 3>So there's that kind of juice, but there doesn't seem

0:45:35.781 --> 0:45:38.261
<v Speaker 3>to be like a really really awful thing. But here's

0:45:38.302 --> 0:45:41.261
<v Speaker 3>my question is if you were turning a blind eye

0:45:41.342 --> 0:45:44.342
<v Speaker 3>to a biography about yourself, because as me as already said,

0:45:44.701 --> 0:45:48.142
<v Speaker 3>it looks like Anna Wintour. Amy Odell has said this herself.

0:45:48.181 --> 0:45:49.701
<v Speaker 3>She was working on that book for two years and

0:45:49.701 --> 0:45:52.222
<v Speaker 3>she was kind of getting nowhere. And then Anna Wintour

0:45:52.502 --> 0:45:55.382
<v Speaker 3>heard obviously that she was doing it, and agreed to

0:45:55.502 --> 0:45:58.221
<v Speaker 3>hand over a list of contacts, not to talk to her,

0:45:58.261 --> 0:46:00.901
<v Speaker 3>but to say these people will talk to you. Because say,

0:46:00.902 --> 0:46:03.102
<v Speaker 3>if someone called you, Jesse and said I'm writing a

0:46:03.142 --> 0:46:07.502
<v Speaker 3>selicious book about Holly, You'd say, I will tell you nothing,

0:46:07.781 --> 0:46:10.502
<v Speaker 3>because I am a loyal and honest friend. But if

0:46:10.542 --> 0:46:12.741
<v Speaker 3>I said to you it's all right, babe, talk to them.

0:46:12.862 --> 0:46:16.262
<v Speaker 3>It'll be okay, then you would right. More likely obviously

0:46:16.302 --> 0:46:19.022
<v Speaker 3>they'd be writing books because let's play along. So but

0:46:19.062 --> 0:46:20.781
<v Speaker 3>would I do that if I knew you were going

0:46:20.822 --> 0:46:22.382
<v Speaker 3>to make me sound like a snobby idiot?

0:46:22.701 --> 0:46:26.461
<v Speaker 4>Well, what's interesting, right is that I think the context

0:46:26.582 --> 0:46:31.502
<v Speaker 4>of this being us is libel laws. Right, So this

0:46:31.701 --> 0:46:35.221
<v Speaker 4>is going to be written regardless. There is nothing that

0:46:35.382 --> 0:46:38.902
<v Speaker 4>is going to stop that book being published. There was

0:46:38.902 --> 0:46:43.502
<v Speaker 4>an unauthorized biography written about Tom Cruise, and it's different

0:46:43.542 --> 0:46:46.661
<v Speaker 4>in Australia. Even that Tom Cruise biography wasn't published here

0:46:46.661 --> 0:46:48.661
<v Speaker 4>for a long while because of we have very very

0:46:48.661 --> 0:46:52.822
<v Speaker 4>strict defamation laws. So for Gwyneth, it's like Amy O'Dell

0:46:52.902 --> 0:46:54.861
<v Speaker 4>can kind of say what she wants. So you would

0:46:54.902 --> 0:46:57.381
<v Speaker 4>want some kind of involvement.

0:46:57.582 --> 0:46:59.742
<v Speaker 3>Mia, Do you think there's a world in which Anana

0:46:59.781 --> 0:47:03.022
<v Speaker 3>Wintour or Gwyneth Peltrow goes, Okay, I'm going to give

0:47:03.022 --> 0:47:04.701
<v Speaker 3>you access to some of my people. So some of

0:47:04.741 --> 0:47:07.661
<v Speaker 3>the what the only really named source I've seen much

0:47:07.661 --> 0:47:08.982
<v Speaker 3>in this because a lot of it's dug up from

0:47:08.982 --> 0:47:13.261
<v Speaker 3>old interviews is Kevin o'quon, who's the famous celebrity makeupartist

0:47:13.302 --> 0:47:15.422
<v Speaker 3>who has that mascara that everybody was Yeah.

0:47:15.302 --> 0:47:15.821
<v Speaker 1>But he's dead.

0:47:16.062 --> 0:47:16.942
<v Speaker 2>Oh of course he is.

0:47:17.181 --> 0:47:20.301
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, so that's easy he could give permission. I

0:47:20.342 --> 0:47:24.661
<v Speaker 1>think what's interesting these books are important in the important

0:47:24.701 --> 0:47:28.222
<v Speaker 1>cultural figures, and she is certainly from Goop to Conscious

0:47:28.302 --> 0:47:32.661
<v Speaker 1>Uncoupling to Shakespeare in Love, she's certainly got a footprint

0:47:32.822 --> 0:47:37.502
<v Speaker 1>on our culture. It's important, or it's a worthwhile exercise

0:47:37.582 --> 0:47:41.861
<v Speaker 1>to have one sort of place where all of that

0:47:42.062 --> 0:47:44.782
<v Speaker 1>is examined, the influence that person has on the culture.

0:47:45.181 --> 0:47:48.221
<v Speaker 1>There are examples where like an unauthorised biography Andrew Morton

0:47:48.261 --> 0:47:50.381
<v Speaker 1>and Princess Diana, right, we found out after she died

0:47:50.422 --> 0:47:52.261
<v Speaker 1>that she actually was the source of that and she

0:47:52.342 --> 0:47:56.382
<v Speaker 1>was literally sending him notes. And then there are others.

0:47:56.741 --> 0:47:59.261
<v Speaker 1>It very much depends who the writer is. Kitty Kelly

0:47:59.342 --> 0:48:02.822
<v Speaker 1>was a very famous biographer in the eighties and nineties,

0:48:02.862 --> 0:48:06.582
<v Speaker 1>and she would write like trashy, pretty trashy, like sensationalist ones.

0:48:07.142 --> 0:48:11.661
<v Speaker 1>I think when a respected journalist wants to write a

0:48:11.942 --> 0:48:14.942
<v Speaker 1>biography of you, first of all, it's a way to

0:48:15.022 --> 0:48:17.941
<v Speaker 1>slightly control it because they are a decent journalist who

0:48:17.942 --> 0:48:19.821
<v Speaker 1>have got a lot of connections in the industry, who

0:48:19.902 --> 0:48:22.542
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to want to make enemies of you or

0:48:22.582 --> 0:48:26.102
<v Speaker 1>of everybody else. And so it kind of plants the

0:48:26.142 --> 0:48:29.102
<v Speaker 1>flag in the ground and stops more salacious books from

0:48:29.181 --> 0:48:32.461
<v Speaker 1>having any credibility. And also from everything I've read about

0:48:32.502 --> 0:48:36.062
<v Speaker 1>Gwyneth's approach to this book is that people have talked

0:48:36.382 --> 0:48:39.181
<v Speaker 1>about her and gossiped about her since she first came

0:48:39.221 --> 0:48:41.741
<v Speaker 1>on the scene. There's no point in shutting it down.

0:48:41.781 --> 0:48:44.741
<v Speaker 1>I think she's changed her view of that because back

0:48:44.741 --> 0:48:47.421
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties, Grenon Carter was working on a cover

0:48:47.502 --> 0:48:51.221
<v Speaker 1>story for Vanity Fair about Gwyneth Paltrow and she moved

0:48:51.221 --> 0:48:52.781
<v Speaker 1>Heaven and Nurse to try and get that shut down,

0:48:52.822 --> 0:48:55.582
<v Speaker 1>and she was successful for many, many years. It ended

0:48:55.622 --> 0:48:58.502
<v Speaker 1>up coming out years later in a much watered down form.

0:48:59.102 --> 0:49:02.261
<v Speaker 1>But it's also flattering, so not necessarily the book, but

0:49:02.382 --> 0:49:03.542
<v Speaker 1>the idea that someone would write.

0:49:03.661 --> 0:49:05.422
<v Speaker 3>She's doing a lot of interviews and stuff lately, so

0:49:05.462 --> 0:49:07.661
<v Speaker 3>she's obviously prepared to be more public than she was,

0:49:07.701 --> 0:49:09.381
<v Speaker 3>as you say. But I heard her say on one

0:49:09.382 --> 0:49:11.542
<v Speaker 3>of the podcasts recently, when someone said, what's the worst

0:49:11.542 --> 0:49:14.221
<v Speaker 3>misconception out there about you? She said that I'm a

0:49:14.221 --> 0:49:17.542
<v Speaker 3>snob who's out of touch. Now, everything I've read in

0:49:17.582 --> 0:49:20.941
<v Speaker 3>this of this book, from the caveat to the you know,

0:49:21.102 --> 0:49:22.902
<v Speaker 3>Ben Affleck was too much of a guy's guy and

0:49:22.942 --> 0:49:25.701
<v Speaker 3>all that kind of stuff certainly doesn't help that view

0:49:25.701 --> 0:49:27.701
<v Speaker 3>of her. But do you think there's a world where

0:49:27.701 --> 0:49:31.142
<v Speaker 3>you go if you don't write the worst things, I'll

0:49:31.221 --> 0:49:33.022
<v Speaker 3>let you have access to not.

0:49:33.142 --> 0:49:35.861
<v Speaker 2>So bad flattering And I.

0:49:35.982 --> 0:49:37.942
<v Speaker 1>Saw that it keeps her culturally relevant.

0:49:38.022 --> 0:49:41.861
<v Speaker 4>The headline going around which was that maybe at the

0:49:41.942 --> 0:49:44.102
<v Speaker 4>end of school or something, she said her biggest fear

0:49:44.181 --> 0:49:46.782
<v Speaker 4>was obesity. Like things like that can do a lot.

0:49:46.661 --> 0:49:49.301
<v Speaker 3>Of yeah's a lot of stuff in there that makes it. Well,

0:49:49.342 --> 0:49:51.502
<v Speaker 3>that's what was written about her in the yearbook. Yes,

0:49:51.582 --> 0:49:54.142
<v Speaker 3>that it would be her worst nightmare. So it certainly

0:49:54.181 --> 0:49:59.622
<v Speaker 3>reinforces everything about privileged, waspy, skinny, white lady who breezes

0:49:59.661 --> 0:50:01.982
<v Speaker 3>through life, NEPO baby, all that stuff.

0:50:01.982 --> 0:50:03.741
<v Speaker 2>It's all seems.

0:50:03.462 --> 0:50:05.741
<v Speaker 3>To be in here, But there isn't anything in there

0:50:06.302 --> 0:50:08.741
<v Speaker 3>so far that we didn't all already know.

0:50:08.781 --> 0:50:10.821
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't. I couldn't of anything worse. I could not

0:50:10.982 --> 0:50:15.901
<v Speaker 4>think of anything worse than having two hundred people go

0:50:15.982 --> 0:50:18.981
<v Speaker 4>on the record to bitch about you to a strangers,

0:50:19.542 --> 0:50:21.781
<v Speaker 4>to then be read by millions and millions of people,

0:50:21.862 --> 0:50:23.342
<v Speaker 4>and there is not a single thing you can do

0:50:23.382 --> 0:50:24.302
<v Speaker 4>about it like that.

0:50:24.422 --> 0:50:26.181
<v Speaker 1>But you just said they were bitching about her. They

0:50:26.181 --> 0:50:28.022
<v Speaker 1>won't know a bitch about her, like a lot of people

0:50:28.342 --> 0:50:30.301
<v Speaker 1>sully things about her.

0:50:30.382 --> 0:50:33.382
<v Speaker 4>The thing about a source, right is that like, yes, Holly,

0:50:33.462 --> 0:50:36.462
<v Speaker 4>I'm loyal, and so I probably wouldn't say anything. A

0:50:36.542 --> 0:50:40.262
<v Speaker 4>source often has to feel something quite strongly about the subject.

0:50:40.661 --> 0:50:41.622
<v Speaker 2>You kissed off at work.

0:50:41.701 --> 0:50:44.102
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, if someone asked me about someone I felt kind

0:50:44.102 --> 0:50:45.661
<v Speaker 4>of neutral about, I'd be like, I don't really have

0:50:45.701 --> 0:50:48.661
<v Speaker 4>anything to say. They work out and whatever, Right, But

0:50:48.741 --> 0:50:52.022
<v Speaker 4>it's people with an axe to grind or like. And

0:50:52.342 --> 0:50:55.062
<v Speaker 4>there is not a single person on the planet who

0:50:55.062 --> 0:50:57.261
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't have someone they've come across who doesn't have a

0:50:57.342 --> 0:50:58.542
<v Speaker 4>terrible story to tell about you.

0:50:58.822 --> 0:51:01.381
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but the choice of journalists or that knowing who

0:51:01.422 --> 0:51:04.821
<v Speaker 1>the journalist is. Amy Odell's not interested in writing either

0:51:04.822 --> 0:51:08.582
<v Speaker 1>a hagiography which is just a puff piece, or a

0:51:08.622 --> 0:51:11.261
<v Speaker 1>trash book. She's not. And I think I've been asked

0:51:11.302 --> 0:51:15.782
<v Speaker 1>to contribute to profiles about particular high profile people before,

0:51:16.502 --> 0:51:18.741
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually after you check with them that they

0:51:18.862 --> 0:51:21.421
<v Speaker 1>are okay with you talking to the journalist. And often

0:51:21.462 --> 0:51:24.022
<v Speaker 1>I've had them done of me before and they say, oh,

0:51:24.062 --> 0:51:26.181
<v Speaker 1>who could we talk to? And you give them a

0:51:26.181 --> 0:51:28.181
<v Speaker 1>few people who you know will say something really nice

0:51:28.181 --> 0:51:29.661
<v Speaker 1>about you, and then they go and find people who

0:51:29.701 --> 0:51:31.942
<v Speaker 1>will say full things about you. I had to do

0:51:31.982 --> 0:51:34.462
<v Speaker 1>one of Zoe Foster Blake for a profile that the

0:51:34.661 --> 0:51:37.781
<v Speaker 1>Stradling Financial Review we're doing, and I really enjoyed the

0:51:37.781 --> 0:51:41.022
<v Speaker 1>process of thinking what I wanted to say about her,

0:51:41.221 --> 0:51:44.501
<v Speaker 1>like what I could offer to a profile that would

0:51:44.582 --> 0:51:48.662
<v Speaker 1>give the reader some insight into her. Obviously, you don't

0:51:48.701 --> 0:51:51.301
<v Speaker 1>just say, oh, she's really great and she's cool, like

0:51:51.382 --> 0:51:54.261
<v Speaker 1>I had to actually and be spa yeah. And for her,

0:51:54.382 --> 0:51:58.462
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Zoe really knows what she wants to

0:51:58.542 --> 0:52:00.461
<v Speaker 1>do and what she doesn't want to do. And even

0:52:00.462 --> 0:52:03.542
<v Speaker 1>though there's a lot of pressure to be an influencer

0:52:03.582 --> 0:52:06.142
<v Speaker 1>and be this, and she pioneered a voice that a

0:52:06.221 --> 0:52:10.022
<v Speaker 1>generation of young writers in Australia have tried to copy.

0:52:10.622 --> 0:52:12.542
<v Speaker 1>And she was also the first one in Australia that

0:52:12.661 --> 0:52:14.982
<v Speaker 1>gave a brand of voice. And all of these things

0:52:14.982 --> 0:52:18.661
<v Speaker 1>are very specific things. But that profile was not just

0:52:18.781 --> 0:52:21.861
<v Speaker 1>a suck up puff piece. But it was interesting to

0:52:21.942 --> 0:52:25.142
<v Speaker 1>read and it was interesting to contribute to. So I've

0:52:25.221 --> 0:52:26.142
<v Speaker 1>ordered the book of your pre.

0:52:26.102 --> 0:52:28.542
<v Speaker 2>Ordered of course, I have you heard it here first.

0:52:28.622 --> 0:52:31.181
<v Speaker 3>Ben Affleck gives good head and everything in this book

0:52:31.261 --> 0:52:32.422
<v Speaker 3>is true.

0:52:33.422 --> 0:52:35.741
<v Speaker 2>That is all we have time for out louders. It's

0:52:35.982 --> 0:52:37.422
<v Speaker 2>very good to be back with you.

0:52:37.862 --> 0:52:41.542
<v Speaker 3>Thank you to wonderful em and Amelia for filling my

0:52:41.622 --> 0:52:44.142
<v Speaker 3>seat while I was gone, and thank you to our

0:52:44.181 --> 0:52:46.622
<v Speaker 3>wonderful team for putting this show together as they always do.

0:52:46.741 --> 0:52:48.582
<v Speaker 3>We're going to be back in your ears tomorrow.

0:52:48.701 --> 0:52:49.942
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye bye.

0:52:50.862 --> 0:52:53.781
<v Speaker 4>Shout out to any Mum and MEA subscribers listening. If

0:52:53.822 --> 0:52:55.781
<v Speaker 4>you love the show and you want to support us,

0:52:56.022 --> 0:52:58.822
<v Speaker 4>subscribing to Mom and Mia is the very best way

0:52:58.862 --> 0:53:01.422
<v Speaker 4>to do so. There's a link in the episode description.