WEBVTT - The Most Surprising Relationship Red Flag

0:00:08.234 --> 0:00:10.953
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:16.194 --> 0:00:18.834
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to Mom and Mia out Loud. It's

0:00:18.834 --> 0:00:21.714
<v Speaker 2>what women are actually talking about on Monday, the eighth

0:00:21.754 --> 0:00:22.434
<v Speaker 2>of December.

0:00:22.514 --> 0:00:25.034
<v Speaker 3>I'm Holly wayIn Wright, I'm Amelia Laster and.

0:00:25.034 --> 0:00:26.074
<v Speaker 4>I'm Jesse Stephens.

0:00:26.234 --> 0:00:30.514
<v Speaker 2>And here's what's on our agenda for today. Why Australian

0:00:30.554 --> 0:00:34.194
<v Speaker 2>women are still obsessed with Oprah Winfrey at least if

0:00:34.234 --> 0:00:37.114
<v Speaker 2>my social media feed from the weekend is anything to

0:00:37.114 --> 0:00:37.714
<v Speaker 2>be believed.

0:00:38.114 --> 0:00:40.553
<v Speaker 5>Plus, this is the week, this is the week that

0:00:40.593 --> 0:00:44.354
<v Speaker 5>the social media band takes effect. Why do I suddenly

0:00:44.434 --> 0:00:45.953
<v Speaker 5>have complicated feelings about it?

0:00:46.513 --> 0:00:50.913
<v Speaker 4>And apparently Travis Kelcey confessed to a giant red flag

0:00:51.034 --> 0:00:54.754
<v Speaker 4>in his relationship with Taylor Swift And I'm not so convinced.

0:00:55.434 --> 0:00:58.794
<v Speaker 4>But first, Jesse Stevens, in case you missed it, it's

0:00:58.794 --> 0:01:02.273
<v Speaker 4>the time of the year. Wherefore about eleven seconds, a

0:01:02.354 --> 0:01:05.834
<v Speaker 4>dictionary and a design service become surprisingly relevant. They have

0:01:05.874 --> 0:01:07.914
<v Speaker 4>their moment in the sun, we all make a fuss

0:01:07.914 --> 0:01:11.393
<v Speaker 4>and forget about them for twelve months. The Oxford Dictionary

0:01:11.394 --> 0:01:13.673
<v Speaker 4>has declared that their word of the year for twenty

0:01:13.794 --> 0:01:16.154
<v Speaker 4>twenty five is rage bait.

0:01:16.074 --> 0:01:17.994
<v Speaker 3>Which is interesting because I thought that was two words.

0:01:18.154 --> 0:01:19.914
<v Speaker 4>Yes, well last year was brain rot.

0:01:19.994 --> 0:01:21.754
<v Speaker 3>It's true also two words.

0:01:22.034 --> 0:01:24.634
<v Speaker 4>There are allegations that this is a classic example of

0:01:24.714 --> 0:01:27.634
<v Speaker 4>rage bait, given they've broken their own rules.

0:01:28.034 --> 0:01:28.994
<v Speaker 1>That's so true.

0:01:29.314 --> 0:01:31.874
<v Speaker 4>You can't upset the dictionary people like know your audience.

0:01:32.034 --> 0:01:35.393
<v Speaker 4>The dictionary people are really annoyed. But use of the term,

0:01:35.554 --> 0:01:37.874
<v Speaker 4>let's call it a term has tripled in the last

0:01:37.914 --> 0:01:42.594
<v Speaker 4>twelve months, and the president of Oxford Languages says that

0:01:42.634 --> 0:01:45.034
<v Speaker 4>the term brain rot from last year and rage bait

0:01:45.074 --> 0:01:47.834
<v Speaker 4>from this year, they sort of reveal how the digital

0:01:47.834 --> 0:01:52.394
<v Speaker 4>world are reshaping how we think and more generally, our behavior.

0:01:52.754 --> 0:01:55.674
<v Speaker 4>The Internet used to work on curiosity gaps, used to

0:01:55.754 --> 0:01:59.034
<v Speaker 4>work on what we call clickbait, right, and now it's

0:01:59.074 --> 0:02:02.034
<v Speaker 4>all about baiting people with the strongest emotion that they

0:02:02.034 --> 0:02:05.994
<v Speaker 4>can possibly generate, which is rage. Do you think this

0:02:06.154 --> 0:02:07.874
<v Speaker 4>was the year of rage bait?

0:02:08.514 --> 0:02:11.514
<v Speaker 5>I don't think the human race is okay. Brain rot

0:02:11.594 --> 0:02:14.514
<v Speaker 5>last year, rage bait this year. I do think it

0:02:14.594 --> 0:02:17.914
<v Speaker 5>shows that we're getting more sophisticated in our understanding of

0:02:17.954 --> 0:02:19.754
<v Speaker 5>what the internet is doing to us.

0:02:19.994 --> 0:02:23.874
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yeah, And I like that it's not meme terms.

0:02:23.954 --> 0:02:26.914
<v Speaker 4>Like for a while it was kind of these ridiculous,

0:02:26.954 --> 0:02:29.314
<v Speaker 4>not like skibbety toilet like that kind of stuff that

0:02:29.354 --> 0:02:29.634
<v Speaker 4>you go.

0:02:29.594 --> 0:02:30.954
<v Speaker 1>Through boat face.

0:02:31.234 --> 0:02:33.474
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so for five seconds, maybe that's a meme. But

0:02:33.514 --> 0:02:36.034
<v Speaker 4>I think that these terms, as you say, describe a

0:02:36.074 --> 0:02:38.073
<v Speaker 4>real phenomenon, so I have more respect for them.

0:02:38.154 --> 0:02:41.514
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think they speak to our increasing literacy. Right

0:02:41.594 --> 0:02:44.594
<v Speaker 2>to your point about us becoming more sophisticated, is that

0:02:44.674 --> 0:02:48.194
<v Speaker 2>hopefully by elevating and amplifying the term rage bait, we're

0:02:48.194 --> 0:02:50.594
<v Speaker 2>better at spotting it and that would be a good thing.

0:02:50.874 --> 0:02:53.954
<v Speaker 4>Yes, And we saw it like used in advertising this year.

0:02:54.034 --> 0:02:58.194
<v Speaker 4>Remember we talked about the Elf ad that awful matt Rice,

0:02:58.674 --> 0:03:01.554
<v Speaker 4>who they knew their audience didn't like because he'd made

0:03:01.594 --> 0:03:03.954
<v Speaker 4>a really off color domestic violence joke and they threw

0:03:04.034 --> 0:03:06.234
<v Speaker 4>him in the ad blew up. The other one was

0:03:06.274 --> 0:03:07.794
<v Speaker 4>the American Eagle, and there.

0:03:07.714 --> 0:03:11.434
<v Speaker 2>Was just maybe you could argue the pubic hair, mercant.

0:03:11.514 --> 0:03:12.394
<v Speaker 4>Skin rage bait.

0:03:12.434 --> 0:03:15.914
<v Speaker 2>There are some very good rage bait marketing techniques now.

0:03:15.954 --> 0:03:19.314
<v Speaker 5>But I've noticed in my group chats that the rage

0:03:19.314 --> 0:03:23.314
<v Speaker 5>bait cycle has abated a little bit. So for instance,

0:03:23.354 --> 0:03:26.634
<v Speaker 5>I used to have one group chat where we would

0:03:26.674 --> 0:03:28.634
<v Speaker 5>just send each other links that we knew would get

0:03:28.634 --> 0:03:31.474
<v Speaker 5>each other worked up about politics. It was called rage

0:03:31.474 --> 0:03:35.474
<v Speaker 5>bit and now that's thread. We've decided that we're not

0:03:35.514 --> 0:03:37.354
<v Speaker 5>going to do that anymore. And I think there is

0:03:37.394 --> 0:03:40.194
<v Speaker 5>a power in naming it and then recognizing, oh, all

0:03:40.194 --> 0:03:41.314
<v Speaker 5>I'm doing is rage baiting.

0:03:41.474 --> 0:03:44.914
<v Speaker 4>I'm being played. And that actually brings us to the

0:03:44.914 --> 0:03:49.194
<v Speaker 4>color of the year, right, which is kill me. Pantone,

0:03:49.194 --> 0:03:52.394
<v Speaker 4>which is a printing business, they declare every year their color.

0:03:52.434 --> 0:03:54.514
<v Speaker 4>Who can remember the color of twenty twenty five?

0:03:54.594 --> 0:03:55.794
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm obsessed with the colors.

0:03:55.834 --> 0:04:00.874
<v Speaker 4>It was brown, it's round, and I reckon, spot on,

0:04:01.154 --> 0:04:03.314
<v Speaker 4>I reckon, they nailed it. I saw a lot of

0:04:03.394 --> 0:04:07.274
<v Speaker 4>macka moose this year. The color of twenty twenty six

0:04:07.514 --> 0:04:14.074
<v Speaker 4>is white, specifically Cloud Dancer, which is described as a

0:04:14.114 --> 0:04:17.354
<v Speaker 4>lofty white that serves as a symbol of calming influence

0:04:17.674 --> 0:04:21.594
<v Speaker 4>in a society rediscovering the value of quiet reflection. So

0:04:21.873 --> 0:04:23.753
<v Speaker 4>what does the color of the year mean. It means

0:04:23.753 --> 0:04:25.434
<v Speaker 4>that we're going to be wearing it. It means it's

0:04:25.433 --> 0:04:27.313
<v Speaker 4>going to be the brand palette of a lot of

0:04:27.393 --> 0:04:30.433
<v Speaker 4>different places. It means celebrities and red carpets. It means

0:04:30.633 --> 0:04:33.033
<v Speaker 4>the color of your interiors. We're going to be seeing

0:04:33.073 --> 0:04:36.553
<v Speaker 4>it everywhere. I want to know if you are rage

0:04:36.594 --> 0:04:40.553
<v Speaker 4>baited that white is technically a shade, not a color.

0:04:41.834 --> 0:04:45.674
<v Speaker 2>I'm raged baited just by the whole idea because A

0:04:45.953 --> 0:04:48.674
<v Speaker 2>I can't wear white, so I feel like excluded. I

0:04:48.674 --> 0:04:51.753
<v Speaker 2>feel excluded in every way, like I can't wear white

0:04:51.753 --> 0:04:54.513
<v Speaker 2>because of my coloring, but I also just can't wear white.

0:04:54.674 --> 0:04:55.073
<v Speaker 5>I can't.

0:04:56.354 --> 0:04:57.193
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Yes, if.

0:04:57.113 --> 0:04:59.753
<v Speaker 2>I was wearing what Amelia was wearing now, I would

0:04:59.753 --> 0:05:01.753
<v Speaker 2>have spilt something down it, even if there was nothing

0:05:02.234 --> 0:05:04.553
<v Speaker 2>near me. Yesterday, you know, I was influenced by you, Jesse,

0:05:04.633 --> 0:05:06.873
<v Speaker 2>And over the weekend I bought one of those stripe

0:05:06.873 --> 0:05:10.393
<v Speaker 2>tea yeah, you know, the viral strapergy shirts, and mine

0:05:10.474 --> 0:05:14.714
<v Speaker 2>is navy with like a yellow stripe. Was literally wearing

0:05:14.794 --> 0:05:16.954
<v Speaker 2>it for five minutes coffee down at all the yellow

0:05:16.993 --> 0:05:17.993
<v Speaker 2>stripes covered in coffee.

0:05:18.034 --> 0:05:18.994
<v Speaker 3>That shirt is dead to me.

0:05:18.993 --> 0:05:21.233
<v Speaker 2>Now and I'm a properly grown woman and I still

0:05:21.274 --> 0:05:22.313
<v Speaker 2>can't wear white now.

0:05:22.354 --> 0:05:24.394
<v Speaker 5>All this means is that bibbs are back, bibs are

0:05:24.393 --> 0:05:25.953
<v Speaker 5>gonna be bibs.

0:05:26.034 --> 0:05:30.714
<v Speaker 4>I love that. Or like a really enriching cultural conversation

0:05:30.993 --> 0:05:34.234
<v Speaker 4>about stain removal, like how to get things out of

0:05:34.794 --> 0:05:37.034
<v Speaker 4>your clothes. Apparently. I did read an article that said,

0:05:37.553 --> 0:05:39.753
<v Speaker 4>on Christmas Day, we're all wearing white.

0:05:40.193 --> 0:05:41.113
<v Speaker 3>I'm not Amelia.

0:05:41.274 --> 0:05:42.954
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of controversy over this.

0:05:43.034 --> 0:05:45.553
<v Speaker 5>I love pantone color of the year, obsessed with it,

0:05:45.674 --> 0:05:48.433
<v Speaker 5>generally by a pair of slippers in whatever color it

0:05:48.474 --> 0:05:50.794
<v Speaker 5>is to set a tone for the year ahead. There

0:05:50.834 --> 0:05:53.034
<v Speaker 5>hasn't been this much controversy with the color of the

0:05:53.113 --> 0:05:55.794
<v Speaker 5>year since twenty twenty one, when they named two colors.

0:05:55.794 --> 0:05:57.993
<v Speaker 5>Do you remember that they named gray and yellow and

0:05:58.034 --> 0:05:59.553
<v Speaker 5>everyone said, hang on, it's meant to.

0:05:59.474 --> 0:06:00.513
<v Speaker 1>Be color of the year.

0:06:01.234 --> 0:06:03.634
<v Speaker 5>But people are saying that they're quite tone deaf, or

0:06:03.674 --> 0:06:06.954
<v Speaker 5>they're calling them pantone deaf. I'm sorry, I didn't make

0:06:07.313 --> 0:06:09.273
<v Speaker 5>up and it did take me in an alarmingly long

0:06:09.313 --> 0:06:11.393
<v Speaker 5>time to get that joke, so I'll repeat it again,

0:06:11.714 --> 0:06:14.354
<v Speaker 5>pan tone death. Some people are saying that the color

0:06:14.393 --> 0:06:17.553
<v Speaker 5>evokes white supremacy at a time when right wing parties

0:06:17.553 --> 0:06:19.914
<v Speaker 5>are on the rise around the world. Others are saying

0:06:19.914 --> 0:06:22.873
<v Speaker 5>it's a recession indicator because we can't afford color anymore.

0:06:23.313 --> 0:06:26.914
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness, No, because wearing white is a rich

0:06:26.953 --> 0:06:29.794
<v Speaker 2>person's game. Everybody knows that it means that you can

0:06:29.834 --> 0:06:33.514
<v Speaker 2>afford to have your clothes professionally cleaned and your sheets

0:06:33.834 --> 0:06:36.993
<v Speaker 2>professionally cleaned. Rich people wear white a lot. Jerry halliwell

0:06:37.073 --> 0:06:40.513
<v Speaker 2>only wears white and she's married to one of those richefwondu. Yeah,

0:06:40.553 --> 0:06:42.354
<v Speaker 2>can you remind me what the name of it is again?

0:06:42.393 --> 0:06:42.713
<v Speaker 3>Please?

0:06:42.914 --> 0:06:44.273
<v Speaker 1>It is cooler.

0:06:45.714 --> 0:06:47.313
<v Speaker 3>Did not have to refer to notes.

0:06:47.594 --> 0:06:49.474
<v Speaker 4>I believe it is a cool white rather than a

0:06:49.474 --> 0:06:49.954
<v Speaker 4>warm white.

0:06:49.993 --> 0:06:51.594
<v Speaker 2>It is one of my favorite things to do is

0:06:51.633 --> 0:06:53.233
<v Speaker 2>in Bunnings, is to go and look at the paint

0:06:53.234 --> 0:06:55.113
<v Speaker 2>wall and look at all the shades of white and

0:06:55.154 --> 0:06:57.993
<v Speaker 2>try and boggle my brain about their minuscule differences.

0:06:58.073 --> 0:06:59.794
<v Speaker 5>And if you've ever shot for a wedding dress, you

0:06:59.834 --> 0:07:02.234
<v Speaker 5>do know that there are actually which you haven't hold

0:07:02.234 --> 0:07:05.234
<v Speaker 5>is sorry, but there are multiple.

0:07:07.193 --> 0:07:08.314
<v Speaker 1>Get married because you knew that.

0:07:08.313 --> 0:07:11.713
<v Speaker 4>Why it wasn't Mum says, why it's not a color?

0:07:11.754 --> 0:07:12.354
<v Speaker 4>She wore gold?

0:07:12.594 --> 0:07:14.914
<v Speaker 3>No very nice? Of course she did go on steep.

0:07:16.754 --> 0:07:19.954
<v Speaker 5>The world is watching Australia this week because on Wednesday,

0:07:20.194 --> 0:07:23.554
<v Speaker 5>the social media ban finally comes into effect. Now, if

0:07:23.554 --> 0:07:25.393
<v Speaker 5>you're anything like me, I feel like this has been

0:07:25.393 --> 0:07:28.754
<v Speaker 5>coming for such a long time, and this Wednesday here, this.

0:07:29.074 --> 0:07:31.874
<v Speaker 3>Wednesday, like Christmas for some of us friends.

0:07:32.434 --> 0:07:34.194
<v Speaker 5>Now the Quikie has your covered on the nuts and

0:07:34.194 --> 0:07:36.354
<v Speaker 5>bolts of what is happening, and there are a lot

0:07:36.393 --> 0:07:37.994
<v Speaker 5>of nuts and bolts in terms of how this is

0:07:38.034 --> 0:07:41.114
<v Speaker 5>going to be implemented. They also have an interview with

0:07:41.194 --> 0:07:44.354
<v Speaker 5>the teenagers who are challenging this ban in the High Court.

0:07:44.674 --> 0:07:46.833
<v Speaker 1>You can hear that on the QUICKI tomorrow. But I

0:07:46.914 --> 0:07:49.674
<v Speaker 1>wanted to check in on how we're all feeling.

0:07:49.354 --> 0:07:51.234
<v Speaker 5>About it, because I've been on a bit of a

0:07:51.474 --> 0:07:54.754
<v Speaker 5>roller coaster of emotions about this ban. At first, I

0:07:54.834 --> 0:07:57.794
<v Speaker 5>felt real unbridled joy and pride in the fact that

0:07:57.874 --> 0:08:00.234
<v Speaker 5>Australia is really leading the world in this, and other

0:08:00.274 --> 0:08:04.434
<v Speaker 5>countries Malaysia, Indonesia, France, Denmark, they're all considering doing exactly

0:08:04.434 --> 0:08:07.434
<v Speaker 5>the same thing. Chris Pratt, he has a movie he's

0:08:07.474 --> 0:08:09.634
<v Speaker 5>been talking about how great he thinks the social media

0:08:09.674 --> 0:08:12.274
<v Speaker 5>ban is. You know, the world is looking at us

0:08:12.314 --> 0:08:14.754
<v Speaker 5>and is cheering us on in large parts of it.

0:08:15.234 --> 0:08:18.274
<v Speaker 5>But in the last i'd say the last couple of weeks,

0:08:18.554 --> 0:08:21.833
<v Speaker 5>I've started to hear some arguments that have given me

0:08:21.914 --> 0:08:26.034
<v Speaker 5>pause about this ban. One of them came from the

0:08:26.074 --> 0:08:27.913
<v Speaker 5>Sidney Monty Herald newspaper which.

0:08:27.754 --> 0:08:32.873
<v Speaker 1>Reported today that a full two thirds.

0:08:33.154 --> 0:08:36.914
<v Speaker 5>Of parents are going to find ways to get around

0:08:36.914 --> 0:08:40.634
<v Speaker 5>this ban. And I hadn't even considered that there were

0:08:40.714 --> 0:08:43.034
<v Speaker 5>ways to get around the band, But of course Holly's

0:08:43.074 --> 0:08:46.194
<v Speaker 5>been implying to me that there are many loopholes and

0:08:46.274 --> 0:08:48.234
<v Speaker 5>many ways in which parents are just going to say,

0:08:48.314 --> 0:08:51.154
<v Speaker 5>I can't fight this fight with my teenager, I can't

0:08:51.194 --> 0:08:53.834
<v Speaker 5>pull an addict away from something, and.

0:08:53.754 --> 0:08:54.754
<v Speaker 1>Look, I should say that.

0:08:54.834 --> 0:08:57.674
<v Speaker 5>Albow, in response to this kind of criticism, says, it

0:08:57.714 --> 0:08:59.874
<v Speaker 5>was never meant to be perfectly enforced. It was meant

0:08:59.914 --> 0:09:02.314
<v Speaker 5>to start conversations, and it was meant to change a

0:09:02.394 --> 0:09:05.114
<v Speaker 5>social norm over time. But it does kind of make

0:09:05.154 --> 0:09:08.594
<v Speaker 5>me think that it's being undermined little bit by parents. Holly,

0:09:08.914 --> 0:09:10.554
<v Speaker 5>what do you think? You know?

0:09:10.634 --> 0:09:13.474
<v Speaker 2>I've been dying to talk about this every episode. I'm like,

0:09:13.554 --> 0:09:14.834
<v Speaker 2>can we talk about it yet?

0:09:15.634 --> 0:09:16.194
<v Speaker 3>Like stop it?

0:09:16.754 --> 0:09:19.194
<v Speaker 2>Just full disclosure, because if you are a regular out louder,

0:09:19.234 --> 0:09:21.754
<v Speaker 2>you would have heard my voice last week reading some

0:09:21.914 --> 0:09:25.594
<v Speaker 2>ads from the federal government about the social media delay

0:09:25.594 --> 0:09:28.274
<v Speaker 2>as they calling it, and I agreed to do those

0:09:28.314 --> 0:09:30.914
<v Speaker 2>because I am a supporter. Like full disclosure, I think

0:09:30.914 --> 0:09:34.394
<v Speaker 2>it's great, but I think it's complicated, and I think

0:09:34.434 --> 0:09:39.034
<v Speaker 2>we have to be really mindful in the next few weeks, months,

0:09:39.034 --> 0:09:42.714
<v Speaker 2>whatever of where the criticisms about this are coming from, right,

0:09:42.754 --> 0:09:45.594
<v Speaker 2>Because one thing you've got to remember, and we're not

0:09:45.594 --> 0:09:47.834
<v Speaker 2>getting into the nuts and bots, as you say, But

0:09:48.034 --> 0:09:51.554
<v Speaker 2>the pressure in this case is on the tech companies

0:09:51.634 --> 0:09:55.514
<v Speaker 2>to stop kids getting on their apps, rather than it's

0:09:55.554 --> 0:09:58.434
<v Speaker 2>not supposed to be to stop parents from letting their

0:09:58.514 --> 0:09:59.434
<v Speaker 2>kids get on the apps.

0:09:59.434 --> 0:10:01.234
<v Speaker 3>Do you understand that distinction, right?

0:10:01.314 --> 0:10:04.594
<v Speaker 2>So it's not like if you have a fifteen year

0:10:04.634 --> 0:10:07.074
<v Speaker 2>old and your fifteen year old is still on snap

0:10:07.194 --> 0:10:09.434
<v Speaker 2>Chat next week, you're going to go to prison. That's

0:10:09.514 --> 0:10:11.874
<v Speaker 2>not what's going to happen. And Nora are they and

0:10:11.914 --> 0:10:13.554
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to get fined, and nor are they.

0:10:13.634 --> 0:10:16.434
<v Speaker 2>The idea is to pressure the tech companies to make

0:10:16.474 --> 0:10:19.594
<v Speaker 2>it much harder, if not impossible, for kids under sixteen

0:10:19.634 --> 0:10:22.874
<v Speaker 2>to get online. Now that's not something the tech companies

0:10:22.874 --> 0:10:23.434
<v Speaker 2>are fans of.

0:10:23.594 --> 0:10:25.354
<v Speaker 3>Right. Ninety nine percent of.

0:10:25.314 --> 0:10:29.034
<v Speaker 2>Australian teenagers use some form of social media ninety nine percent,

0:10:29.474 --> 0:10:32.594
<v Speaker 2>So that is a lot of customers who are being

0:10:32.634 --> 0:10:35.953
<v Speaker 2>served ads all the time. So there are lots of

0:10:35.994 --> 0:10:38.794
<v Speaker 2>sort of vested interests without wanting to sound too conspiratorial

0:10:38.834 --> 0:10:41.354
<v Speaker 2>about this, who are not mad keen on this working,

0:10:41.834 --> 0:10:43.514
<v Speaker 2>And so I think we have to be mindful of that.

0:10:43.874 --> 0:10:46.354
<v Speaker 2>But back to the point, Amelia, of whether parents are

0:10:46.354 --> 0:10:50.474
<v Speaker 2>going to help their kids get around this man, they

0:10:50.634 --> 0:10:55.114
<v Speaker 2>definitely are going to because so my kids are exactly

0:10:55.114 --> 0:10:57.274
<v Speaker 2>in the bull's eye for this right thirteen and fifteen,

0:10:57.514 --> 0:11:00.314
<v Speaker 2>and me and my friends and most of my friends

0:11:00.314 --> 0:11:02.714
<v Speaker 2>I guess who you know I see regularly, their kids

0:11:02.714 --> 0:11:05.154
<v Speaker 2>are somewhere in that ballpark two, probably aged between like

0:11:05.234 --> 0:11:08.234
<v Speaker 2>nine and sixteen, And say, all the time, what did

0:11:08.274 --> 0:11:11.114
<v Speaker 2>we fight about before there were phones? What did parents

0:11:11.154 --> 0:11:12.114
<v Speaker 2>and kids.

0:11:11.954 --> 0:11:13.394
<v Speaker 3>Argue about before there were phones?

0:11:13.434 --> 0:11:16.714
<v Speaker 2>Because it is the biggest source of contention in every

0:11:16.754 --> 0:11:21.554
<v Speaker 2>house I know, including my own screen time, phone usage, addiction,

0:11:21.994 --> 0:11:24.474
<v Speaker 2>social media, all of those things are the things that

0:11:24.554 --> 0:11:27.194
<v Speaker 2>we have most conflict about. And so in a way,

0:11:27.274 --> 0:11:29.594
<v Speaker 2>you'd think, oh, well, how great, because now you don't

0:11:29.634 --> 0:11:31.714
<v Speaker 2>have to row about it because it's just illegal for

0:11:31.754 --> 0:11:32.714
<v Speaker 2>them to be on YouTube.

0:11:32.754 --> 0:11:34.274
<v Speaker 1>But that's exactly what I thought.

0:11:34.274 --> 0:11:37.953
<v Speaker 2>But that's not the case, because what it means is

0:11:38.754 --> 0:11:42.034
<v Speaker 2>you are now going to be fighting about them getting

0:11:42.074 --> 0:11:44.994
<v Speaker 2>off those things. The thing is Although I'm a big

0:11:44.994 --> 0:11:47.754
<v Speaker 2>supporter of the ban, I've never been a really big

0:11:47.794 --> 0:11:50.754
<v Speaker 2>supporter of the Jonathan Height kind of argument that really

0:11:50.834 --> 0:11:53.554
<v Speaker 2>parents just all need to get together and agree. Me

0:11:53.634 --> 0:11:55.354
<v Speaker 2>and all my friends are not going to buy our kids'

0:11:55.354 --> 0:11:59.754
<v Speaker 2>phones because I think it's a really simplistic idea, given

0:11:59.794 --> 0:12:02.034
<v Speaker 2>all the forces that are coming at us, that if

0:12:02.114 --> 0:12:05.394
<v Speaker 2>parents were just just grew a pair and told their

0:12:05.474 --> 0:12:07.394
<v Speaker 2>kids to get off phones, we wouldn't have a problem.

0:12:07.514 --> 0:12:10.714
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a really complicated relationship that teens

0:12:10.714 --> 0:12:14.114
<v Speaker 2>have with these platforms. We've just been handed a really

0:12:14.114 --> 0:12:16.674
<v Speaker 2>good tool to be able to help us get the

0:12:16.714 --> 0:12:20.154
<v Speaker 2>kids off them. But I think that the great benefit

0:12:20.194 --> 0:12:22.794
<v Speaker 2>of this ban is actually not going to be fifteen

0:12:22.834 --> 0:12:24.674
<v Speaker 2>year olds. It's going to be for the twelve year

0:12:24.674 --> 0:12:26.674
<v Speaker 2>olds who are never going to get on these platforms

0:12:26.674 --> 0:12:28.714
<v Speaker 2>in the first place, or the nine year old who

0:12:28.794 --> 0:12:31.034
<v Speaker 2>are not going to be handed a phone at eleven

0:12:31.034 --> 0:12:33.754
<v Speaker 2>and given Snapchat anymore. I think that actually the biggest

0:12:33.794 --> 0:12:37.034
<v Speaker 2>benefit is going to come from those kids rather than

0:12:37.074 --> 0:12:38.514
<v Speaker 2>for the kids who are already in the eye of

0:12:38.554 --> 0:12:38.994
<v Speaker 2>the storm.

0:12:39.274 --> 0:12:42.914
<v Speaker 4>That's an interesting idea because even smoking right, like, if

0:12:42.914 --> 0:12:44.714
<v Speaker 4>you look at they were all different there were public

0:12:44.794 --> 0:12:49.713
<v Speaker 4>health campaigns, and there was the cost and almost the

0:12:49.874 --> 0:12:55.754
<v Speaker 4>social backlash towards people who smoked. And that didn't happen overnight.

0:12:55.834 --> 0:12:58.474
<v Speaker 4>It didn't happen with one piece of legislation or one policy.

0:12:58.914 --> 0:13:02.394
<v Speaker 4>It happened gradually, and so a lot of the arguments

0:13:02.394 --> 0:13:05.114
<v Speaker 4>that I hear against it. I think about alcohol, you

0:13:05.154 --> 0:13:08.954
<v Speaker 4>can say, oh, well, can technically go out and buy

0:13:08.954 --> 0:13:10.674
<v Speaker 4>alcohol for a seventeen year old. What if the parent

0:13:10.714 --> 0:13:12.194
<v Speaker 4>wants to have a glass of wine in their house

0:13:12.194 --> 0:13:14.994
<v Speaker 4>with their seventeen year old, What if they're seventeen and eleven,

0:13:15.194 --> 0:13:19.234
<v Speaker 4>Like that's been going on forever, and you negotiate it

0:13:19.274 --> 0:13:22.754
<v Speaker 4>as a family. But the fact that it is sort

0:13:22.794 --> 0:13:26.554
<v Speaker 4>of enshrined in law that that's not something that a

0:13:26.594 --> 0:13:30.914
<v Speaker 4>seventeen year old is allowed to do is in the parents' arsenal,

0:13:31.234 --> 0:13:33.914
<v Speaker 4>and it's in the teacher's arsenal as well. Like I'm

0:13:33.954 --> 0:13:36.434
<v Speaker 4>thinking about all of the teachers who are dealing with

0:13:36.874 --> 0:13:41.434
<v Speaker 4>social media conflicts every single day as part of their job,

0:13:42.114 --> 0:13:44.674
<v Speaker 4>who can now probably go you shouldn't even be on there.

0:13:44.794 --> 0:13:47.354
<v Speaker 4>Even that gives them something, And I think that it

0:13:47.514 --> 0:13:50.154
<v Speaker 4>chose the Australian government has a backbone I think it's brave.

0:13:50.234 --> 0:13:52.434
<v Speaker 4>I think it's bold. The rest of the world is

0:13:52.714 --> 0:13:57.634
<v Speaker 4>following suit, not identically interestingly, so even Denmark. I think

0:13:58.234 --> 0:14:00.794
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of talk about that they're not allowed

0:14:00.834 --> 0:14:03.914
<v Speaker 4>on without parental consent. I wonder if that is a

0:14:03.994 --> 0:14:07.234
<v Speaker 4>change that will happen or curfew is the other they

0:14:07.634 --> 0:14:08.114
<v Speaker 4>talking about.

0:14:08.154 --> 0:14:12.314
<v Speaker 2>The problem with the parental consent model is in theory,

0:14:12.354 --> 0:14:15.354
<v Speaker 2>this only really works if it's everybody. So that's always

0:14:15.434 --> 0:14:17.634
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Hight's argument that I referenced before, and if you're

0:14:17.634 --> 0:14:20.994
<v Speaker 2>not awhere, he is the guy who wrote The Anxious Generation.

0:14:21.514 --> 0:14:25.554
<v Speaker 2>He's an American, what is his psychologist? And he's very

0:14:25.554 --> 0:14:28.994
<v Speaker 2>widely credited for It was actually the South Australian premier's

0:14:28.994 --> 0:14:31.514
<v Speaker 2>wife who read that book here and started pushing her

0:14:31.554 --> 0:14:34.514
<v Speaker 2>husband to do something about this. But that's kind of

0:14:34.514 --> 0:14:36.874
<v Speaker 2>the theory that his stuff about the village, like parents

0:14:36.914 --> 0:14:39.194
<v Speaker 2>should get together in a village almost and say we're

0:14:39.274 --> 0:14:42.994
<v Speaker 2>all not going to do phones is really as I say,

0:14:43.034 --> 0:14:44.354
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that works. I think it's a bit

0:14:44.354 --> 0:14:46.474
<v Speaker 2>of a middle class fantasy that everybody's just going to

0:14:46.554 --> 0:14:49.194
<v Speaker 2>do that. But I think that the thing that's really

0:14:49.234 --> 0:14:51.794
<v Speaker 2>good about the social media benefit works is that your

0:14:51.914 --> 0:14:54.914
<v Speaker 2>kid is going to say, I'm so isolated from my

0:14:54.994 --> 0:14:57.114
<v Speaker 2>friends if you'd kick me off social media. It's like,

0:14:57.154 --> 0:14:58.474
<v Speaker 2>but none of your friends are going to be on

0:14:58.514 --> 0:15:00.634
<v Speaker 2>social media, so you're not going to be isolated from

0:15:00.634 --> 0:15:04.194
<v Speaker 2>your friends, and you'll find somewhere else together on the Internet.

0:15:04.274 --> 0:15:06.794
<v Speaker 4>And here there are some really good arguments, as there

0:15:06.834 --> 0:15:09.754
<v Speaker 4>is with any change in legislation. So there was an

0:15:09.834 --> 0:15:13.114
<v Speaker 4>article in The Guardian by Ezra Shohl, who is the

0:15:13.114 --> 0:15:15.074
<v Speaker 4>son of Natasha Shol, who has spoken about on this

0:15:15.114 --> 0:15:18.794
<v Speaker 4>podcast before. She's a brilliant writer. And he is fifteen

0:15:19.074 --> 0:15:23.274
<v Speaker 4>and is quadriplegic. He is in a wheelchair. He has

0:15:23.674 --> 0:15:28.954
<v Speaker 4>suffered the most horrific health crises over the last few years,

0:15:29.434 --> 0:15:33.234
<v Speaker 4>and the thing that has connected him to the outside

0:15:33.274 --> 0:15:36.954
<v Speaker 4>world when he has been stuck in a hospital bed

0:15:37.074 --> 0:15:40.634
<v Speaker 4>during adolescence has been social media. And I don't doubt

0:15:40.634 --> 0:15:42.994
<v Speaker 4>that that's his story. And in fact he made some

0:15:43.114 --> 0:15:46.034
<v Speaker 4>really good points. He wrote, if tech companies have the

0:15:46.194 --> 0:15:49.594
<v Speaker 4>capability to delete accounts for people under the age of sixteen,

0:15:49.874 --> 0:15:52.674
<v Speaker 4>they also have the capability to delete accounts that bully,

0:15:52.714 --> 0:15:56.994
<v Speaker 4>harass or cause harm. And he said that he's been bullied.

0:15:56.994 --> 0:15:59.314
<v Speaker 4>He gets stuff all the time, and he reports these

0:15:59.314 --> 0:16:03.514
<v Speaker 4>accounts and nothing happens. And as anyone with a profile knows,

0:16:03.674 --> 0:16:07.954
<v Speaker 4>you can get horrifically abused and nothing. So I think

0:16:07.994 --> 0:16:12.194
<v Speaker 4>this also proves the capabilities that tech companies have to

0:16:12.274 --> 0:16:17.034
<v Speaker 4>do more than their doing. But I think that ultimately

0:16:17.354 --> 0:16:20.914
<v Speaker 4>this is about utilitarianism. I think it's about the greater good.

0:16:21.474 --> 0:16:23.794
<v Speaker 4>I think it's got to look at you know, what

0:16:23.874 --> 0:16:25.874
<v Speaker 4>this has done to teen brains, and when I look

0:16:25.914 --> 0:16:30.194
<v Speaker 4>at like I saw this interview with Miranda Kerr a

0:16:30.234 --> 0:16:31.754
<v Speaker 4>few months ago. I think you talked about it on

0:16:31.834 --> 0:16:35.194
<v Speaker 4>Parenting out Loud and the Miranda Curs of the world,

0:16:35.194 --> 0:16:38.634
<v Speaker 4>who of course are married to the founder of Snapchat.

0:16:38.834 --> 0:16:41.354
<v Speaker 4>Do you think their kids have access to social media? No,

0:16:41.434 --> 0:16:44.994
<v Speaker 4>they don't because they know that screens are corrosive and

0:16:45.074 --> 0:16:47.394
<v Speaker 4>damaging and blah blah blah. So what I've always hated

0:16:47.554 --> 0:16:51.434
<v Speaker 4>is the divide between the tech billionaires who are very

0:16:51.474 --> 0:16:55.194
<v Speaker 4>strict with their screen time and just allowing everyone else

0:16:55.274 --> 0:16:56.954
<v Speaker 4>to kind of fall victim to it.

0:16:56.994 --> 0:16:59.754
<v Speaker 5>And let's be clear, those tech companies right now are

0:16:59.834 --> 0:17:04.154
<v Speaker 5>quaking in their very expensive boots and Holly, I couldn't

0:17:04.234 --> 0:17:07.714
<v Speaker 5>underscore more what you said before about be conscious of

0:17:07.754 --> 0:17:10.754
<v Speaker 5>where you're hearing criticism over the next few weeks and

0:17:10.834 --> 0:17:15.513
<v Speaker 5>who is criticizing this legislation. Because these companies they're not

0:17:15.634 --> 0:17:18.154
<v Speaker 5>worried about the fines from the Australian government. They've made

0:17:18.154 --> 0:17:20.594
<v Speaker 5>the point that look, these companies could be fined fifty

0:17:20.674 --> 0:17:23.513
<v Speaker 5>million dollars dollars if they're shown to not be making

0:17:23.514 --> 0:17:26.273
<v Speaker 5>sure that the safeguards are in place to stop children

0:17:26.274 --> 0:17:29.634
<v Speaker 5>from signing up. Yeah, fifty million dollars is nothing for Mata.

0:17:29.874 --> 0:17:32.033
<v Speaker 5>Someone pointed out who used to work at Matter in

0:17:32.074 --> 0:17:34.234
<v Speaker 5>a BBC article that that's the equivalent of a parking

0:17:34.234 --> 0:17:37.074
<v Speaker 5>ticket for Matter. They make fifty million dollars in about

0:17:37.074 --> 0:17:39.474
<v Speaker 5>two hours, so it's not really a problem for them.

0:17:39.954 --> 0:17:41.714
<v Speaker 5>That's not why they're worried. They're not worried about the

0:17:41.714 --> 0:17:44.954
<v Speaker 5>fifty million dollars. They're worried that the Australian government is

0:17:45.074 --> 0:17:48.834
<v Speaker 5>leading the charge in changing a social norm that will

0:17:48.834 --> 0:17:52.794
<v Speaker 5>make a child looking at TikTok or YouTube the same

0:17:52.874 --> 0:17:55.514
<v Speaker 5>as seeing a child smoking a cigarette. You can see

0:17:55.554 --> 0:17:57.954
<v Speaker 5>a child smoking a cigarette's pretty rare these days, but

0:17:58.234 --> 0:18:01.794
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure that there are some kids who sneak a cigarette,

0:18:01.954 --> 0:18:05.154
<v Speaker 5>but we look at it aghast because we have decided

0:18:05.194 --> 0:18:07.674
<v Speaker 5>as a society that that is not okay. And that

0:18:07.834 --> 0:18:09.434
<v Speaker 5>is what the social media said exactly.

0:18:09.474 --> 0:18:14.154
<v Speaker 4>And the tech companies aren't worried that the poor teenagers

0:18:14.194 --> 0:18:17.874
<v Speaker 4>won't be able to, you know, really galvanize and have

0:18:17.994 --> 0:18:20.154
<v Speaker 4>their online communities. They're not worried about that. They're worried

0:18:20.194 --> 0:18:21.234
<v Speaker 4>that they're not going to be able to serve them

0:18:21.234 --> 0:18:24.754
<v Speaker 4>ads anymore. And that I think is surely we can

0:18:24.794 --> 0:18:26.553
<v Speaker 4>hold hands and agree that that's a good thing.

0:18:26.474 --> 0:18:29.874
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and I do. The only thing I want to say, though,

0:18:30.034 --> 0:18:31.954
<v Speaker 2>is that the articles that are coming out now about

0:18:31.954 --> 0:18:34.914
<v Speaker 2>parents aren't going to enforce it, and there will inevitably

0:18:34.994 --> 0:18:39.033
<v Speaker 2>be a conversation about like, oh, helicopter parents can't be

0:18:39.194 --> 0:18:40.234
<v Speaker 2>strict with their kids.

0:18:40.274 --> 0:18:40.914
<v Speaker 3>That will be.

0:18:41.074 --> 0:18:43.754
<v Speaker 4>That's what will comment. Sec Yeah, I want to.

0:18:43.754 --> 0:18:45.914
<v Speaker 2>Be really clear, because, as I say, I am in

0:18:45.954 --> 0:18:48.274
<v Speaker 2>that sort of bull's eye. If your kid is say

0:18:48.314 --> 0:18:50.594
<v Speaker 2>sixteen or out of this now, it's hard to hear

0:18:50.754 --> 0:18:52.594
<v Speaker 2>everybody around you saying.

0:18:52.794 --> 0:18:55.314
<v Speaker 3>Your kid's brain is damaged, your kid is addicted.

0:18:55.594 --> 0:18:57.874
<v Speaker 2>You've been terrible parents who've just let your kids have

0:18:57.954 --> 0:19:00.394
<v Speaker 2>unfettered access to this Our kids are all going to

0:19:00.434 --> 0:19:02.234
<v Speaker 2>be pure and great and we're never going to give

0:19:02.274 --> 0:19:04.834
<v Speaker 2>them screens, and they won't. You know, it's hard to

0:19:04.874 --> 0:19:08.114
<v Speaker 2>hear that and not get your hackles up, because this

0:19:08.154 --> 0:19:09.474
<v Speaker 2>is a truth. And I'll put my hand up and

0:19:09.474 --> 0:19:12.434
<v Speaker 2>say it's the truth for me too. Technology and phones

0:19:12.834 --> 0:19:15.954
<v Speaker 2>and all that come along with them, which we are

0:19:16.034 --> 0:19:18.354
<v Speaker 2>broadly as a culture now sort of holding hands and

0:19:18.394 --> 0:19:21.474
<v Speaker 2>going not great for kids, have kind of made parenting

0:19:21.514 --> 0:19:23.954
<v Speaker 2>a lot easier in a million ways, right Like they

0:19:23.994 --> 0:19:26.674
<v Speaker 2>really have for busy working families, for the kind of

0:19:26.754 --> 0:19:29.353
<v Speaker 2>parents who which most parents are, who don't have all

0:19:29.394 --> 0:19:30.954
<v Speaker 2>the time in the world to be policing what their

0:19:30.994 --> 0:19:33.194
<v Speaker 2>kids are doing every minute, you know, who don't have

0:19:33.234 --> 0:19:35.914
<v Speaker 2>the time to be ferrying them around to improving activities

0:19:35.914 --> 0:19:36.754
<v Speaker 2>and all that stuff.

0:19:37.274 --> 0:19:38.674
<v Speaker 3>There does feel to me to be.

0:19:38.674 --> 0:19:42.354
<v Speaker 2>A little bit of a snobby divide opening about whether

0:19:42.474 --> 0:19:45.154
<v Speaker 2>or not, you know, the kids who aren't addicted to

0:19:45.234 --> 0:19:48.434
<v Speaker 2>social media are in one class and one who are aren't.

0:19:48.514 --> 0:19:51.434
<v Speaker 2>And I think that that's part of all the arguments

0:19:51.434 --> 0:19:53.513
<v Speaker 2>we're going to see opening up over the next few weeks.

0:19:54.194 --> 0:19:56.634
<v Speaker 2>I think we need to be careful not to demonize

0:19:57.074 --> 0:20:01.194
<v Speaker 2>this generation that have grown up with their phones. If

0:20:01.194 --> 0:20:03.553
<v Speaker 2>this van is successful and followed around the world, and

0:20:03.594 --> 0:20:06.553
<v Speaker 2>you know, as you say, Amelia, the social norm is

0:20:06.594 --> 0:20:08.594
<v Speaker 2>successful shifted, and let's all hope it is.

0:20:08.634 --> 0:20:12.034
<v Speaker 3>I genuinely hope that it is. That's great, But.

0:20:12.034 --> 0:20:14.594
<v Speaker 2>We are going to then have in this generational line

0:20:14.594 --> 0:20:16.954
<v Speaker 2>of like kind of like in the old days we

0:20:17.034 --> 0:20:19.114
<v Speaker 2>grew up before they knew that it was bad for

0:20:19.154 --> 0:20:22.234
<v Speaker 2>you to drink when you were pregnant, or not clip

0:20:22.234 --> 0:20:24.154
<v Speaker 2>your kids in in the car. I heard you talking

0:20:24.154 --> 0:20:26.874
<v Speaker 2>on parenting out loud about seat belts and drawing that comparison,

0:20:27.794 --> 0:20:30.313
<v Speaker 2>like we shouldn't demonize that, just like I think we

0:20:30.314 --> 0:20:32.754
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't demonize the parents who've got a fifteen year old

0:20:32.834 --> 0:20:34.954
<v Speaker 2>right now and they're going if they're on Snapchat for

0:20:34.954 --> 0:20:36.914
<v Speaker 2>another month, is that going to be the end.

0:20:36.874 --> 0:20:37.274
<v Speaker 1>Of the world.

0:20:37.314 --> 0:20:37.394
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:20:37.514 --> 0:20:40.154
<v Speaker 5>And part of that is recognizing that the most powerful

0:20:40.194 --> 0:20:42.954
<v Speaker 5>people and the richest people the world has ever seen

0:20:43.354 --> 0:20:47.394
<v Speaker 5>have thrown everything at the wall to make children dependent

0:20:47.514 --> 0:20:50.114
<v Speaker 5>on what their offerings are. And the more that we

0:20:50.154 --> 0:20:53.754
<v Speaker 5>can shift that understanding from it's not about what parents

0:20:53.794 --> 0:20:56.794
<v Speaker 5>have decided or not decided. It was the most sophisticated

0:20:56.834 --> 0:21:00.634
<v Speaker 5>propaganda machine that had ever been thrown at anyone, and

0:21:00.674 --> 0:21:03.154
<v Speaker 5>it was thrown at kids. And now the Albanzi government

0:21:03.274 --> 0:21:04.514
<v Speaker 5>is trying to stop that tide.

0:21:04.634 --> 0:21:07.313
<v Speaker 4>And Wednesday I think is the first day in what

0:21:07.714 --> 0:21:13.674
<v Speaker 4>I think they want to be a cultural, social, worldwide shift.

0:21:13.874 --> 0:21:15.994
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think if on Friday all of the

0:21:16.074 --> 0:21:18.074
<v Speaker 4>kids aren't off social media, it's a failure.

0:21:18.354 --> 0:21:20.954
<v Speaker 2>Agreed, But thoughts and prayers if you're arguing with your

0:21:20.994 --> 0:21:27.353
<v Speaker 2>fourteen right now after the break, why Oprah Wisdom is

0:21:27.434 --> 0:21:39.354
<v Speaker 2>still all over your feed in twenty twenty five. My

0:21:39.674 --> 0:21:42.154
<v Speaker 2>social media feed, because I'm an adult and I'm allowed

0:21:42.154 --> 0:21:42.674
<v Speaker 2>to have one.

0:21:43.754 --> 0:21:47.154
<v Speaker 3>This weekend has been swamped by a.

0:21:47.074 --> 0:21:49.874
<v Speaker 2>Lot of women who've been to see Oprah Winfrey on

0:21:49.914 --> 0:21:52.513
<v Speaker 2>her tour around Australia. So if you're not on the

0:21:52.554 --> 0:21:54.793
<v Speaker 2>same kind of algorithmic or bent as I am, the

0:21:54.914 --> 0:21:58.274
<v Speaker 2>seventy one year old is in Australia right now. She's

0:21:58.274 --> 0:22:01.553
<v Speaker 2>doing these big speaking events. She's also doing lots of

0:22:01.554 --> 0:22:04.234
<v Speaker 2>social media. So every city she goes to, she's doing

0:22:04.234 --> 0:22:06.314
<v Speaker 2>a hike there because she says she hikes every day

0:22:06.354 --> 0:22:09.754
<v Speaker 2>now and she is eating local delicacies. And then she's

0:22:09.794 --> 0:22:13.434
<v Speaker 2>having these huge, sort of arena sized shows women are going.

0:22:13.794 --> 0:22:16.234
<v Speaker 2>The vibe seems to be very much with their mates,

0:22:16.514 --> 0:22:18.994
<v Speaker 2>you know, getting dressed up, put your other Camilla or

0:22:19.034 --> 0:22:21.714
<v Speaker 2>your imitation Camilla, caf done on. Go and see Oprah

0:22:21.714 --> 0:22:24.154
<v Speaker 2>talk and then post her wisdom. The kind of things

0:22:24.194 --> 0:22:26.674
<v Speaker 2>I'm seeing being posted are five things I learned at

0:22:26.714 --> 0:22:27.314
<v Speaker 2>Oprah last.

0:22:27.354 --> 0:22:29.033
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I'm seeing all of them, and I'm reading all

0:22:29.074 --> 0:22:30.194
<v Speaker 4>of them because I would.

0:22:30.034 --> 0:22:30.474
<v Speaker 3>Have loved to go.

0:22:30.554 --> 0:22:31.394
<v Speaker 1>Are people loving it?

0:22:31.554 --> 0:22:33.794
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I'm seeing this kind of thing. This is interesting.

0:22:34.194 --> 0:22:36.793
<v Speaker 2>You cannot be friends with anyone who is even a

0:22:36.834 --> 0:22:38.793
<v Speaker 2>little bit jealous of you. This is one of the

0:22:38.834 --> 0:22:42.114
<v Speaker 2>things I saw. This is unfortunate. I've declared in the past, Jesse,

0:22:42.594 --> 0:22:47.034
<v Speaker 2>I have had times when I've been jealous of you, exactly.

0:22:47.594 --> 0:22:49.874
<v Speaker 2>Jealousy is a crack in the foundation, says Oprah. The

0:22:49.914 --> 0:22:50.794
<v Speaker 2>whole house will fall.

0:22:50.794 --> 0:22:53.394
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, I'm prone to jealousy.

0:22:53.554 --> 0:22:54.154
<v Speaker 3>You're in trouble.

0:22:54.714 --> 0:22:57.234
<v Speaker 2>Life is whispering to you all of the time. You

0:22:57.354 --> 0:22:59.434
<v Speaker 2>only go off track when you're not listening.

0:22:59.794 --> 0:23:00.954
<v Speaker 1>This is interesting.

0:23:01.754 --> 0:23:02.273
<v Speaker 3>I like that.

0:23:02.354 --> 0:23:04.394
<v Speaker 4>I don't fully understand it, but I like the vibe.

0:23:04.474 --> 0:23:06.994
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is the kind of stuff that I'm seeing post.

0:23:07.114 --> 0:23:09.034
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's saying this is what Oprah taught me last night.

0:23:09.514 --> 0:23:11.594
<v Speaker 2>The stereotype of the women who are going but I'm

0:23:11.594 --> 0:23:13.954
<v Speaker 2>sure this isn't entirely true, of course, is that there

0:23:13.954 --> 0:23:16.034
<v Speaker 2>are a certain age that they're white, that they're into

0:23:16.074 --> 0:23:20.034
<v Speaker 2>self optimization. But this is largely an audience that's come

0:23:20.034 --> 0:23:23.234
<v Speaker 2>of age with her, right, So Oprah is a guru

0:23:23.474 --> 0:23:24.314
<v Speaker 2>to this generation.

0:23:24.434 --> 0:23:26.034
<v Speaker 4>Say I will fight you on that.

0:23:26.194 --> 0:23:26.754
<v Speaker 3>Good I don't.

0:23:26.954 --> 0:23:29.674
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that it is a certain generation. The

0:23:29.674 --> 0:23:34.434
<v Speaker 4>people I'm seeing are in their twenties. They are diverse,

0:23:34.634 --> 0:23:38.154
<v Speaker 4>and when I looked into it, one of the hallmarks

0:23:38.154 --> 0:23:40.634
<v Speaker 4>of her longevity has been the diversity of her audience.

0:23:40.754 --> 0:23:43.594
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean, I think that's certainly true, because she's

0:23:43.914 --> 0:23:46.394
<v Speaker 2>you know, she has so many stories to tell. But

0:23:46.554 --> 0:23:49.514
<v Speaker 2>I think she is seen by her critics as being

0:23:50.354 --> 0:23:52.714
<v Speaker 2>like a sort of Tamu guru in a way, when

0:23:52.714 --> 0:23:54.114
<v Speaker 2>really I would argue she's the og.

0:23:54.554 --> 0:23:55.194
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, me too.

0:23:55.234 --> 0:23:58.914
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, Amelia always says that you're a bit baffled by

0:23:58.914 --> 0:23:59.754
<v Speaker 2>the Oprah phenomena.

0:23:59.914 --> 0:24:01.194
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like full disclosure.

0:24:01.274 --> 0:24:03.314
<v Speaker 5>I wanted to do this today because I did say

0:24:03.394 --> 0:24:06.154
<v Speaker 5>she was in Australia, and I have to admit that

0:24:06.154 --> 0:24:09.033
<v Speaker 5>that phenomenon past nearby, and I want to learn. I

0:24:09.074 --> 0:24:13.474
<v Speaker 5>want to learn why Australian women in particular evidently still

0:24:13.514 --> 0:24:16.434
<v Speaker 5>love Oprah After decades in the public eye, she is

0:24:16.514 --> 0:24:19.914
<v Speaker 5>still attracting thousands of people to these shows. They're gathering

0:24:19.954 --> 0:24:21.994
<v Speaker 5>a lot from it. I want you to explain her

0:24:22.034 --> 0:24:22.674
<v Speaker 5>appeal to me.

0:24:22.794 --> 0:24:24.594
<v Speaker 3>Do you want a little cheat sheet I do on

0:24:24.754 --> 0:24:25.554
<v Speaker 3>Oprah Winfrey.

0:24:25.994 --> 0:24:28.314
<v Speaker 2>Now, this could be the longest cheat sheet of all time,

0:24:28.514 --> 0:24:29.794
<v Speaker 2>but it's not going to be.

0:24:29.554 --> 0:24:31.154
<v Speaker 3>Because we will be here all day.

0:24:31.754 --> 0:24:34.354
<v Speaker 2>Did you know the place that Oprah was born, which

0:24:34.394 --> 0:24:37.394
<v Speaker 2>is in Mississippi in the States, is called Kosiosco.

0:24:37.434 --> 0:24:40.314
<v Speaker 5>Nolasco Bridge in New York City.

0:24:40.474 --> 0:24:43.474
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so famously.

0:24:43.554 --> 0:24:45.794
<v Speaker 2>I guess the Oprah myth and it isn't a myth,

0:24:45.834 --> 0:24:48.114
<v Speaker 2>it is her origin story is a large part of

0:24:48.114 --> 0:24:51.394
<v Speaker 2>her appeal right very top line. She was born to

0:24:51.434 --> 0:24:56.554
<v Speaker 2>teenage parents in Kosiosco, Mississippi, and she had a very

0:24:56.554 --> 0:25:00.194
<v Speaker 2>tough upbringing. She was sexually abused as a teenager. She

0:25:00.234 --> 0:25:01.834
<v Speaker 2>gave birth to a little boy at fourteen.

0:25:01.954 --> 0:25:02.513
<v Speaker 3>He died.

0:25:03.314 --> 0:25:08.954
<v Speaker 2>Despite this absolutely traumatic upbringing, I guess you'd say she

0:25:08.994 --> 0:25:11.554
<v Speaker 2>started working in media when she was seventeen.

0:25:11.714 --> 0:25:12.154
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:25:12.274 --> 0:25:16.834
<v Speaker 2>And then she started working for a TV station locally

0:25:16.914 --> 0:25:19.954
<v Speaker 2>to her, and then she was working in Baltimore, and

0:25:19.994 --> 0:25:22.554
<v Speaker 2>then she most notably made a move to Chicago, which

0:25:22.554 --> 0:25:25.594
<v Speaker 2>is where she built her empire. Right, So, from a

0:25:25.674 --> 0:25:28.313
<v Speaker 2>very young age, she was incredibly driven. There are so

0:25:28.474 --> 0:25:31.114
<v Speaker 2>many firsts when it comes to Oprah Winfrey.

0:25:31.194 --> 0:25:31.354
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:25:31.794 --> 0:25:33.234
<v Speaker 3>She was the first.

0:25:33.034 --> 0:25:36.554
<v Speaker 2>Woman in history to own and produce her own talk show.

0:25:36.994 --> 0:25:40.954
<v Speaker 2>She's the first Black American woman to be syndicated, the

0:25:40.994 --> 0:25:44.513
<v Speaker 2>first Black American woman to be a billionaire, the first

0:25:44.714 --> 0:25:48.834
<v Speaker 2>Black American woman to own a TV network. She decided

0:25:48.834 --> 0:25:52.154
<v Speaker 2>that news reporting wasn't really her thing because.

0:25:51.794 --> 0:25:55.354
<v Speaker 3>She struggled with the objectivity of it, which is a very.

0:25:55.714 --> 0:25:56.954
<v Speaker 4>Self aware thing to say.

0:25:57.034 --> 0:25:59.154
<v Speaker 2>I love her, Yeah, it's very self aware, but it

0:25:59.234 --> 0:26:01.434
<v Speaker 2>also is like one of the foundations for what she

0:26:01.554 --> 0:26:04.594
<v Speaker 2>then almost invented in a way, which was this like

0:26:04.834 --> 0:26:07.674
<v Speaker 2>own your truth, Yes, own your truth. So rather than

0:26:07.754 --> 0:26:10.874
<v Speaker 2>just reporting the news, she wanted to create the culture.

0:26:10.954 --> 0:26:13.354
<v Speaker 2>I guess, right, So she wanted to be a journal

0:26:13.434 --> 0:26:17.273
<v Speaker 2>and in nineteen eighty four, she relocated to Chicago to

0:26:17.434 --> 0:26:20.874
<v Speaker 2>host a low rated morning talk show called Am Chicago.

0:26:21.314 --> 0:26:23.313
<v Speaker 2>It was immediately a hit with her hosting it.

0:26:23.394 --> 0:26:23.594
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:26:24.074 --> 0:26:26.874
<v Speaker 2>They say that because she was authentic and empathetic and engaging.

0:26:27.434 --> 0:26:29.513
<v Speaker 2>She quickly took the show from last place to the

0:26:29.514 --> 0:26:31.954
<v Speaker 2>top of the ratings within a year, and they soon

0:26:32.114 --> 0:26:34.394
<v Speaker 2>renamed the show after her within a year of her

0:26:34.434 --> 0:26:37.954
<v Speaker 2>doing it by nineteen eighty eight, so only four years.

0:26:38.514 --> 0:26:41.033
<v Speaker 2>That show was such a hit, and she acquired ownership

0:26:41.074 --> 0:26:44.194
<v Speaker 2>and production responsibilities for it, making her the first woman

0:26:44.234 --> 0:26:46.874
<v Speaker 2>in history to own and produce her own talk show.

0:26:47.034 --> 0:26:48.634
<v Speaker 4>Wo wow, I invented it.

0:26:48.794 --> 0:26:49.834
<v Speaker 3>She invented that shit.

0:26:50.314 --> 0:26:53.994
<v Speaker 2>She founded Hyper Productions, groundbreaking move that secured her creative

0:26:54.034 --> 0:26:56.194
<v Speaker 2>control and made her loads of money. It's another big

0:26:56.234 --> 0:26:58.594
<v Speaker 2>thing about Oprah. She is very, very rich, as we know.

0:26:59.034 --> 0:27:01.314
<v Speaker 2>And then as we know, right, the Oprah Winfrey Show

0:27:01.314 --> 0:27:03.513
<v Speaker 2>started off in a kind of it was like, I

0:27:03.554 --> 0:27:05.474
<v Speaker 2>don't know what we call it, like shock TV in

0:27:05.514 --> 0:27:08.714
<v Speaker 2>those days, Like she'd have oring family members. I remember

0:27:08.834 --> 0:27:11.034
<v Speaker 2>very clearly an episode she had the Clueklux Klan.

0:27:10.914 --> 0:27:13.354
<v Speaker 5>On god Is how as a child of the nineties,

0:27:13.594 --> 0:27:16.674
<v Speaker 5>I knew Oprah. She had this talk show that had

0:27:16.714 --> 0:27:19.954
<v Speaker 5>the scandalous sort of soap operaary elements to it.

0:27:20.274 --> 0:27:20.554
<v Speaker 3>See.

0:27:20.634 --> 0:27:24.594
<v Speaker 4>I think that you can only understand Oprah in relationship

0:27:24.634 --> 0:27:33.114
<v Speaker 4>to Jerry Springer like Jerry Springer was the scandalous, ethically dubious,

0:27:33.394 --> 0:27:36.994
<v Speaker 4>there was no soul to it. It was maybe the

0:27:37.034 --> 0:27:42.234
<v Speaker 4>original rage bait that was happening, and Oprah was almost

0:27:42.474 --> 0:27:46.114
<v Speaker 4>the more like morally upright version of that.

0:27:46.354 --> 0:27:50.073
<v Speaker 2>But it's the order of things, So Oprah was first,

0:27:50.234 --> 0:27:52.754
<v Speaker 2>uh huh, And Oprah's TV show did have a fair

0:27:52.794 --> 0:27:54.793
<v Speaker 2>bit of that, but she didn't like it. By the

0:27:54.914 --> 0:27:57.273
<v Speaker 2>end of the eighties, she was over that kind of

0:27:57.274 --> 0:28:00.274
<v Speaker 2>stuff and she wanted to move in the nineties, which

0:28:00.314 --> 0:28:03.394
<v Speaker 2>she did into more like it's amazing to think that

0:28:03.434 --> 0:28:05.994
<v Speaker 2>the infamous Wagon of Fat episode, which is one of

0:28:05.994 --> 0:28:09.754
<v Speaker 2>the things that is most often used to criticize her for,

0:28:09.834 --> 0:28:12.514
<v Speaker 2>which is the episode where very famously she lost lots

0:28:12.514 --> 0:28:14.674
<v Speaker 2>of weight on a diet that she later admitted was

0:28:14.954 --> 0:28:18.394
<v Speaker 2>incredibly dangerous and basically starvation, and then she walked onto

0:28:18.394 --> 0:28:19.793
<v Speaker 2>her set with her Wagon and Fat.

0:28:20.754 --> 0:28:23.634
<v Speaker 3>Was in nineteen eighty eight, and like, that is a

0:28:23.714 --> 0:28:24.314
<v Speaker 3>very long time ago.

0:28:24.394 --> 0:28:26.234
<v Speaker 2>So she was doing that kind of stuff and then

0:28:26.314 --> 0:28:29.234
<v Speaker 2>Jerry Springer started doing it, Doctor Phil started doing it,

0:28:29.394 --> 0:28:31.714
<v Speaker 2>these other people started doing it, and she was like, oh,

0:28:31.794 --> 0:28:34.154
<v Speaker 2>I think I've given birth to a monster. And she

0:28:34.514 --> 0:28:37.033
<v Speaker 2>shifted into self help stuff.

0:28:37.154 --> 0:28:37.474
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:28:37.634 --> 0:28:39.434
<v Speaker 5>Do you think that part of the reason why that

0:28:39.514 --> 0:28:42.834
<v Speaker 5>wagon of felt was such a milestone in TV history

0:28:42.954 --> 0:28:46.194
<v Speaker 5>and for Oprah was because she basically kind of invented

0:28:46.274 --> 0:28:49.914
<v Speaker 5>vulnerability on TV because before that, is it true that

0:28:50.034 --> 0:28:52.434
<v Speaker 5>it was much more polished and people didn't sort of

0:28:52.474 --> 0:28:54.594
<v Speaker 5>open up in that way about their struggles?

0:28:54.834 --> 0:28:57.834
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? I think so. They weren't as candid about it.

0:28:57.874 --> 0:28:59.314
<v Speaker 4>And when you go back and you look at all

0:28:59.354 --> 0:29:04.274
<v Speaker 4>the times Oprah was asked or mocked or criticized openly

0:29:04.354 --> 0:29:06.554
<v Speaker 4>to her face on other talk shows about her weight,

0:29:06.634 --> 0:29:09.474
<v Speaker 4>you can complete understand how she got to that point.

0:29:09.554 --> 0:29:11.474
<v Speaker 4>And I think that she was trying to use it

0:29:12.034 --> 0:29:17.674
<v Speaker 4>as a way to help inspire other women, which ironically

0:29:18.394 --> 0:29:21.034
<v Speaker 4>now her being in Australia. If you have a really

0:29:21.034 --> 0:29:23.754
<v Speaker 4>good look at that poster of Oprah's touring poster, it's

0:29:23.794 --> 0:29:25.354
<v Speaker 4>got a big face of her, and it's got all the

0:29:25.434 --> 0:29:28.754
<v Speaker 4>dates you can see presented by and it has a

0:29:28.754 --> 0:29:31.194
<v Speaker 4>brand name that I actually didn't recognize, and that brand

0:29:31.234 --> 0:29:35.394
<v Speaker 4>is a pharmaceutical company that makes weight loss products, which

0:29:35.434 --> 0:29:38.194
<v Speaker 4>is why she's here. They've paid for her to come

0:29:38.234 --> 0:29:40.914
<v Speaker 4>out here, which is sort of a lens by which

0:29:40.954 --> 0:29:43.354
<v Speaker 4>a lot of Maybe her social media content makes more

0:29:43.394 --> 0:29:47.514
<v Speaker 4>sense that she's doing these hikes and that, you know,

0:29:47.634 --> 0:29:50.754
<v Speaker 4>lots of commentary as they always has been about her body.

0:29:50.954 --> 0:29:53.554
<v Speaker 5>The one I saw of her in Sydney after she'd

0:29:53.594 --> 0:29:55.594
<v Speaker 5>been on a hike and then she went to eat

0:29:55.634 --> 0:29:59.794
<v Speaker 5>hotcakes said something to the effect of, I've now earned

0:29:59.914 --> 0:30:03.474
<v Speaker 5>myself the ability to have an indulgent meal. Yeah, it

0:30:03.594 --> 0:30:06.594
<v Speaker 5>is diet adjacent culture that she is still pushing.

0:30:07.234 --> 0:30:12.914
<v Speaker 4>No one has marinated in diet culture more than Oprah

0:30:12.954 --> 0:30:17.314
<v Speaker 4>Whgfrey like she has been the subject of it. She

0:30:17.554 --> 0:30:19.914
<v Speaker 4>has been in many ways victim of it. But then

0:30:19.954 --> 0:30:22.554
<v Speaker 4>I suppose at the same time she's espoused it because

0:30:22.594 --> 0:30:24.394
<v Speaker 4>that's the world in which she grew up.

0:30:24.474 --> 0:30:27.474
<v Speaker 2>I think you've got to remember that, like her peak.

0:30:27.554 --> 0:30:30.514
<v Speaker 2>So the peak of Oprah's powers in terms of influence

0:30:31.114 --> 0:30:34.594
<v Speaker 2>were the eighties and nineties, right, and diet culture in

0:30:34.594 --> 0:30:37.674
<v Speaker 2>inverted commas didn't exist, as in it did absolutely exist,

0:30:37.794 --> 0:30:39.074
<v Speaker 2>but we didn't have a name for it.

0:30:39.154 --> 0:30:40.274
<v Speaker 3>We couldn't point at it.

0:30:40.714 --> 0:30:41.394
<v Speaker 1>Air that you breathe.

0:30:41.474 --> 0:30:44.154
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it's just every single woman wanted to lose. Yeah.

0:30:44.634 --> 0:30:47.234
<v Speaker 2>And so if you think that the power that Oprah

0:30:47.314 --> 0:30:49.874
<v Speaker 2>harnessed and then, as you say, Jesse, that power kind

0:30:49.874 --> 0:30:52.074
<v Speaker 2>of got hijacked by lots of other sort of other

0:30:52.154 --> 0:30:57.754
<v Speaker 2>shows and things. Was Middle America ordinary in inverted commas,

0:30:57.794 --> 0:31:02.274
<v Speaker 2>people watching television during the day, wrestling with the kind

0:31:02.314 --> 0:31:05.234
<v Speaker 2>of things that ordinary people wrestle with, which is family

0:31:05.314 --> 0:31:10.514
<v Speaker 2>dynamics and problems, money, weight relationships. She spoke to people

0:31:10.554 --> 0:31:12.994
<v Speaker 2>about the shit they really cared about, rather than what

0:31:13.114 --> 0:31:16.394
<v Speaker 2>she thought they should care about. That's the secret of

0:31:16.434 --> 0:31:19.514
<v Speaker 2>her success in those days. And we can pretend, as

0:31:19.594 --> 0:31:23.114
<v Speaker 2>much as we want, retrospectively or otherwise that women didn't

0:31:23.154 --> 0:31:26.394
<v Speaker 2>care about losing weight. But women cared, and you could

0:31:26.594 --> 0:31:28.914
<v Speaker 2>still argue now care enormously about weight.

0:31:28.994 --> 0:31:29.474
<v Speaker 1>They just do.

0:31:30.234 --> 0:31:32.394
<v Speaker 2>And I think that Oprah, if we think about the

0:31:32.434 --> 0:31:34.794
<v Speaker 2>Wagon of Fat being nineteen eighty eight, which is a

0:31:34.874 --> 0:31:37.954
<v Speaker 2>very long time ago, over that time, I think that

0:31:38.074 --> 0:31:41.194
<v Speaker 2>Oprah's lens on it has shifted as well. She during

0:31:41.194 --> 0:31:44.274
<v Speaker 2>that time has lost weight, put on weight, written a

0:31:44.314 --> 0:31:46.914
<v Speaker 2>million different words about it, spoken words about it, decided

0:31:46.994 --> 0:31:49.194
<v Speaker 2>not to speak about it at all, make a deal

0:31:49.234 --> 0:31:51.714
<v Speaker 2>with weight watches, make a deal with medical weight loss company,

0:31:51.754 --> 0:31:55.114
<v Speaker 2>don't do that. Over that time, she has ridden all

0:31:55.194 --> 0:31:58.234
<v Speaker 2>kinds of waves with that and she's been blamed in

0:31:58.274 --> 0:32:02.114
<v Speaker 2>a way for being a paragon of diet culture, when

0:32:02.114 --> 0:32:04.674
<v Speaker 2>I think that actually she just kind of reflected.

0:32:04.274 --> 0:32:07.074
<v Speaker 3>She gave to us shar and she reflects it to us.

0:32:07.154 --> 0:32:10.634
<v Speaker 2>And so where she is now here having been brought

0:32:10.674 --> 0:32:14.594
<v Speaker 2>here by a medical weight loss company, which whatever feelings

0:32:14.634 --> 0:32:16.154
<v Speaker 2>you have about that, and there are many to have,

0:32:16.234 --> 0:32:19.034
<v Speaker 2>I think she reflects where weight loss culture is in

0:32:19.074 --> 0:32:23.034
<v Speaker 2>this moment, which is the GLP one revolution. You can

0:32:23.074 --> 0:32:26.314
<v Speaker 2>go hiking and eat hotcakes and take like obesity is

0:32:26.354 --> 0:32:28.074
<v Speaker 2>a disease. That's what she's talking about a lot. So

0:32:28.114 --> 0:32:31.914
<v Speaker 2>I think it's hard to uncouple Oprah from that, But

0:32:32.034 --> 0:32:33.554
<v Speaker 2>she's actually a lot more than.

0:32:33.514 --> 0:32:36.194
<v Speaker 5>That, right, And what I'm hearing from the way that

0:32:36.234 --> 0:32:41.754
<v Speaker 5>you describe her extraordinary rise is that she made people

0:32:41.794 --> 0:32:46.034
<v Speaker 5>who didn't feel very seen feel seen and understood as well,

0:32:46.194 --> 0:32:48.914
<v Speaker 5>not just seen, but understood at a time when their

0:32:48.954 --> 0:32:52.634
<v Speaker 5>concerns were seen as quotidian or not important, or superficial

0:32:52.714 --> 0:32:55.834
<v Speaker 5>or silly. And so, what do you think accounts for

0:32:55.914 --> 0:33:00.634
<v Speaker 5>both the longevity of that career, because now everyone discloses everything.

0:33:00.834 --> 0:33:02.794
<v Speaker 5>So back in the eighties and the early nineties, when

0:33:02.834 --> 0:33:05.914
<v Speaker 5>she's doing the wagon of fat that's unusual and revolutionary.

0:33:06.194 --> 0:33:08.434
<v Speaker 5>Now we all know much about each other, as the

0:33:08.554 --> 0:33:11.194
<v Speaker 5>internet meme goes, So what do you think it counts

0:33:11.194 --> 0:33:15.634
<v Speaker 5>for that continued fascination with Oprah when everyone's disclosing everything.

0:33:15.674 --> 0:33:19.474
<v Speaker 5>And also for Australian women, she strikes me so quintessentially

0:33:19.514 --> 0:33:22.714
<v Speaker 5>American in her rise and in the adversity that she's

0:33:22.714 --> 0:33:25.354
<v Speaker 5>had to overcome. What is it about Oprah these days

0:33:25.354 --> 0:33:27.474
<v Speaker 5>for Australian women that still clearly resonates.

0:33:28.034 --> 0:33:34.474
<v Speaker 4>I think she doesn't talk about structural inequality. She doesn't

0:33:34.474 --> 0:33:37.394
<v Speaker 4>talk about the structures. She doesn't talk about things like

0:33:37.514 --> 0:33:43.074
<v Speaker 4>corporate power, or the gender divide, or environmental degradation or

0:33:43.114 --> 0:33:46.434
<v Speaker 4>all the scary big things. She talks about you and

0:33:46.474 --> 0:33:47.034
<v Speaker 4>your purpose, the.

0:33:47.034 --> 0:33:47.994
<v Speaker 1>Scary small things.

0:33:48.154 --> 0:33:53.234
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, exactly right. That actually she talks so eloquently

0:33:53.474 --> 0:33:58.394
<v Speaker 4>about grief and about friendship and about your goals and

0:33:58.434 --> 0:34:02.394
<v Speaker 4>your purpose. Which does it applies to the poor person

0:34:02.434 --> 0:34:05.914
<v Speaker 4>in Middle America? It applies to the rich celebrity in

0:34:05.954 --> 0:34:09.673
<v Speaker 4>Hollywood equally, And so I think whether or not that's

0:34:09.714 --> 0:34:11.873
<v Speaker 4>a good thing, and whether or not it's at all

0:34:12.034 --> 0:34:16.074
<v Speaker 4>true or you can uncouple capitalist structures from how people's

0:34:16.154 --> 0:34:18.554
<v Speaker 4>lives turn out whatever. But the reason that she can

0:34:18.634 --> 0:34:24.394
<v Speaker 4>fill a room is because there's something like fundamentally empowering

0:34:24.634 --> 0:34:27.034
<v Speaker 4>about that. And I've always had a relationship to Oprah.

0:34:27.114 --> 0:34:30.834
<v Speaker 4>That's like your great auntie who always buys you a

0:34:30.874 --> 0:34:34.074
<v Speaker 4>really good present and has great advice and gives you

0:34:34.114 --> 0:34:36.434
<v Speaker 4>the right book at the right moment. Like that's as simple,

0:34:36.634 --> 0:34:38.873
<v Speaker 4>and who doesn't want that? And everyone wants that. And

0:34:38.914 --> 0:34:43.634
<v Speaker 4>she's even seen as having been responsible for the reinvigoration

0:34:43.674 --> 0:34:46.114
<v Speaker 4>of reading in the US, like what she did with

0:34:46.714 --> 0:34:48.274
<v Speaker 4>her book club and her magazine.

0:34:48.554 --> 0:34:51.394
<v Speaker 5>Now is she now? Reese and all these other people

0:34:51.594 --> 0:34:54.354
<v Speaker 5>have come in her footsteps, Quen, all these people wouldn't

0:34:54.394 --> 0:34:54.913
<v Speaker 5>exist with.

0:34:54.874 --> 0:34:56.994
<v Speaker 1>The business empires they do were it not for Oprah.

0:34:57.154 --> 0:34:59.393
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's so true, Jesse.

0:34:59.554 --> 0:35:02.953
<v Speaker 2>I think that her appeal is because her story, her

0:35:02.954 --> 0:35:05.194
<v Speaker 2>origin story, and then all the things she's been through

0:35:05.234 --> 0:35:08.594
<v Speaker 2>in the past four decades. People are very seduced by

0:35:08.754 --> 0:35:13.234
<v Speaker 2>stories of transformation. That's true, whether they are, you know,

0:35:13.394 --> 0:35:16.913
<v Speaker 2>privileged and wealthy but always wanting to be better, you know,

0:35:17.034 --> 0:35:19.634
<v Speaker 2>like this self optimization culture which you could are You

0:35:19.634 --> 0:35:22.314
<v Speaker 2>could string together quite a goog argument that Oprah has

0:35:22.354 --> 0:35:26.834
<v Speaker 2>mainstreamed because therapy speaks self optimization, a certain amount of

0:35:26.834 --> 0:35:29.114
<v Speaker 2>wu woo. She's the points of criticism that you can

0:35:29.234 --> 0:35:29.714
<v Speaker 2>put on her.

0:35:29.754 --> 0:35:29.913
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:35:29.914 --> 0:35:32.074
<v Speaker 2>For example, she was a massive support of The Secret.

0:35:32.674 --> 0:35:34.913
<v Speaker 2>The first time I ever saw The Secret, it was

0:35:34.994 --> 0:35:38.114
<v Speaker 2>on Oprah. You know, those kind of things. But she

0:35:38.394 --> 0:35:41.954
<v Speaker 2>mainstreamed all that stuff, and she is in herself. She

0:35:42.034 --> 0:35:45.274
<v Speaker 2>embodies a story of transformation and she continues to and

0:35:45.314 --> 0:35:48.514
<v Speaker 2>I think that's really seductive to everybody. The big points

0:35:48.514 --> 0:35:51.074
<v Speaker 2>of criticism for Oprah are the weight stuff which we

0:35:51.154 --> 0:35:54.274
<v Speaker 2>just talked about, toxic diet culture, the fact that she

0:35:54.514 --> 0:35:58.834
<v Speaker 2>is a multi billionaire who apparently her property portfolio is

0:35:58.874 --> 0:36:00.194
<v Speaker 2>worth like five billion dollars.

0:36:00.194 --> 0:36:00.354
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:36:00.394 --> 0:36:03.274
<v Speaker 2>She is also a massive flat flut. I always fail

0:36:03.354 --> 0:36:04.674
<v Speaker 2>with this wordlaist.

0:36:05.034 --> 0:36:07.554
<v Speaker 4>She did land in Australia on her private jet, she did.

0:36:07.874 --> 0:36:09.834
<v Speaker 3>I mean she goes too.

0:36:09.874 --> 0:36:10.634
<v Speaker 1>That's a long fly.

0:36:10.874 --> 0:36:11.034
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:36:11.594 --> 0:36:13.994
<v Speaker 2>She gives hundreds of millions to charities that she supports,

0:36:14.034 --> 0:36:15.634
<v Speaker 2>and she has an academy in South Africa and all

0:36:15.674 --> 0:36:18.354
<v Speaker 2>those things. But still you cannot be beyond approach when

0:36:18.394 --> 0:36:20.274
<v Speaker 2>you've got that level of personal wealth.

0:36:20.314 --> 0:36:22.073
<v Speaker 3>She owns large swedes.

0:36:22.674 --> 0:36:26.154
<v Speaker 5>That it's the women billionaires who often get this criticism

0:36:26.194 --> 0:36:28.234
<v Speaker 5>that in itself being a billionaire is not okay.

0:36:28.274 --> 0:36:30.274
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's true, although I do have a few problems

0:36:30.274 --> 0:36:32.754
<v Speaker 2>with some of the male billionaires too. She has had

0:36:32.834 --> 0:36:35.154
<v Speaker 2>lots of criticism for the people she's chosen to platform

0:36:35.194 --> 0:36:38.514
<v Speaker 2>over time. You know, we're talking about before racist like

0:36:38.514 --> 0:36:40.913
<v Speaker 2>the KKK. She got a lot of trouble on her

0:36:40.954 --> 0:36:43.194
<v Speaker 2>book club for James Fray, remember the guy with a

0:36:43.234 --> 0:36:46.914
<v Speaker 2>Million Little Pieces. We talked the other week about Jenny McCarthy,

0:36:46.994 --> 0:36:50.554
<v Speaker 2>the anti vaxxa, various kind of questionable health growers.

0:36:50.554 --> 0:36:53.314
<v Speaker 3>But then if you're on Telly for forty.

0:36:53.074 --> 0:36:56.994
<v Speaker 2>Years, making content in all kinds of different climates, you

0:36:57.074 --> 0:36:59.074
<v Speaker 2>are going to get it wrong sometimes. So she gets

0:36:59.114 --> 0:37:00.433
<v Speaker 2>a lot of criticism for all those things.

0:37:00.434 --> 0:37:02.994
<v Speaker 5>And like you said, because she's done so many firsts,

0:37:03.034 --> 0:37:06.274
<v Speaker 5>there's something by definition pushing the boundaries about what she does.

0:37:06.434 --> 0:37:07.114
<v Speaker 1>It's inevitable.

0:37:07.354 --> 0:37:09.594
<v Speaker 2>And also what's interesting about opes, as I like to

0:37:09.594 --> 0:37:12.274
<v Speaker 2>call it because we're such good friends, is one of

0:37:12.314 --> 0:37:14.914
<v Speaker 2>her pieces of magic, which I think some very famous

0:37:14.914 --> 0:37:17.433
<v Speaker 2>successful people have, is that even though they are so

0:37:17.594 --> 0:37:21.274
<v Speaker 2>unrelatable in every way, she sort of feels relatable too.

0:37:22.034 --> 0:37:24.393
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that's interesting about Oprah in

0:37:24.514 --> 0:37:26.714
<v Speaker 2>terms of being one of the most iconic women of

0:37:26.754 --> 0:37:30.074
<v Speaker 2>a generation, is that her private life is quite unconventional

0:37:30.114 --> 0:37:31.394
<v Speaker 2>really so she's never married.

0:37:31.714 --> 0:37:32.473
<v Speaker 3>She's been with the.

0:37:32.434 --> 0:37:34.834
<v Speaker 2>Same and as Stedman. We could all recite this. They

0:37:34.834 --> 0:37:38.234
<v Speaker 2>have been together for forty years. They once got engaged

0:37:38.234 --> 0:37:39.994
<v Speaker 2>but quickly called it off, but never broke up.

0:37:39.994 --> 0:37:42.513
<v Speaker 1>Okaya, why they're just.

0:37:42.554 --> 0:37:45.114
<v Speaker 2>Not into it at that time in her life she

0:37:45.194 --> 0:37:48.993
<v Speaker 2>was always I prioritize work. You know, her life has

0:37:49.034 --> 0:37:52.354
<v Speaker 2>been work. She never had children after that tragic death

0:37:52.394 --> 0:37:54.554
<v Speaker 2>of that little boy when she was a teenager. Her

0:37:54.714 --> 0:37:57.913
<v Speaker 2>famous best friend Gail King, who is famous now too,

0:37:57.954 --> 0:38:00.474
<v Speaker 2>goes everywhere with it. In fact, my favorite Oprah detail

0:38:00.514 --> 0:38:02.473
<v Speaker 2>is that in all of her homes, which is the.

0:38:02.434 --> 0:38:05.234
<v Speaker 3>Kind of thing you can only say about billionaires, Gail.

0:38:04.994 --> 0:38:07.114
<v Speaker 2>Has her own room, like with her own deck or

0:38:07.274 --> 0:38:08.834
<v Speaker 2>I'm always like, if I was a moult.

0:38:08.794 --> 0:38:09.594
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'd do.

0:38:10.514 --> 0:38:12.514
<v Speaker 2>Gayla is the lover of her Gayle is the lover

0:38:12.554 --> 0:38:14.993
<v Speaker 2>of her life. You know, none of that is particularly

0:38:15.034 --> 0:38:19.034
<v Speaker 2>relatable business, but everybody's like, yeah, Oprah my position on her,

0:38:19.074 --> 0:38:20.393
<v Speaker 2>I would have liked to go and see her, even

0:38:20.434 --> 0:38:24.073
<v Speaker 2>though I do have some issues with the blatant product.

0:38:23.714 --> 0:38:26.554
<v Speaker 3>Placement of the aforementioned.

0:38:26.314 --> 0:38:29.114
<v Speaker 2>Medical weight loss company in that I don't necessarily like

0:38:29.154 --> 0:38:30.834
<v Speaker 2>her or not like her, but she's just there's no

0:38:30.994 --> 0:38:32.954
<v Speaker 2>question she's one of the most iconic figures.

0:38:33.114 --> 0:38:33.794
<v Speaker 3>I think it would have.

0:38:33.754 --> 0:38:35.913
<v Speaker 4>Been a lovely night. I would have really enjoyed it.

0:38:36.674 --> 0:38:40.154
<v Speaker 4>After the break, Travis Kelcey just shared an insight into

0:38:40.194 --> 0:38:43.314
<v Speaker 4>his relationship with Taylor Swift and apparently it's a big

0:38:43.354 --> 0:38:48.594
<v Speaker 4>red flag one unlimited out loud access. We drop episodes

0:38:48.674 --> 0:38:52.634
<v Speaker 4>every Tuesday and Thursday exclusively for Mum and MEA subscribers.

0:38:53.114 --> 0:38:55.194
<v Speaker 4>Follow the link in the show notes to get us

0:38:55.194 --> 0:38:57.954
<v Speaker 4>in your ears five days a week, and a huge

0:38:57.994 --> 0:39:11.834
<v Speaker 4>thank you to all our current subscribers. If you're not

0:39:11.994 --> 0:39:15.554
<v Speaker 4>up to date with New Heights Travis Kelsey's podcast aka

0:39:15.834 --> 0:39:19.433
<v Speaker 4>Taylor Swift's fiance and a famous NFL player, I want

0:39:19.434 --> 0:39:21.914
<v Speaker 4>to tell you about an episode recently.

0:39:21.954 --> 0:39:24.314
<v Speaker 1>Do we all regularly podcast?

0:39:24.394 --> 0:39:26.873
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Yeah, it's a weekly listen. I've never listened to

0:39:26.954 --> 0:39:28.394
<v Speaker 4>one minute of this podcast.

0:39:28.434 --> 0:39:31.194
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I listened to the inter Taylor Holy Smokey's that

0:39:31.274 --> 0:39:32.834
<v Speaker 2>was great. That was two hours of my life.

0:39:32.954 --> 0:39:34.234
<v Speaker 4>Did you ever listen to another one?

0:39:34.394 --> 0:39:34.514
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:39:34.674 --> 0:39:35.314
<v Speaker 3>But I know.

0:39:36.034 --> 0:39:37.993
<v Speaker 2>But the reason I know what you're going to say

0:39:38.034 --> 0:39:40.234
<v Speaker 2>in a minute is because I did see these social

0:39:40.274 --> 0:39:43.473
<v Speaker 2>media clips where he was interviewing one George Clooney, who

0:39:43.834 --> 0:39:45.354
<v Speaker 2>you know up there with Oprah for me.

0:39:45.794 --> 0:39:48.953
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, okay, So he had George Clooney on and they

0:39:48.994 --> 0:39:54.554
<v Speaker 4>got onto the topic of relationships. Travis asked his friend

0:39:54.554 --> 0:39:57.953
<v Speaker 4>George about something he'd said about a year or so ago,

0:39:58.034 --> 0:40:00.674
<v Speaker 4>which actually came up on our podcast as well, which

0:40:00.754 --> 0:40:04.634
<v Speaker 4>is that George Clooney said that him and Amle have not,

0:40:04.914 --> 0:40:08.234
<v Speaker 4>in their ten years together, had a fight.

0:40:09.154 --> 0:40:09.873
<v Speaker 3>Fun fact for you.

0:40:09.914 --> 0:40:13.314
<v Speaker 4>They've got twins, they do, and they seem to be thriving.

0:40:14.114 --> 0:40:16.794
<v Speaker 3>Well, you just have to be like George in a mile.

0:40:16.914 --> 0:40:19.154
<v Speaker 4>Oh my gosh. Okay, that's really inspired.

0:40:19.154 --> 0:40:20.794
<v Speaker 3>I asked them to send you some positivity.

0:40:20.794 --> 0:40:23.954
<v Speaker 4>Made exactly right. They seem to like their twins. Okay,

0:40:23.994 --> 0:40:28.234
<v Speaker 4>this is great. Then George replied, I'm not lying, Travis.

0:40:28.274 --> 0:40:31.714
<v Speaker 4>Shall we ask you the same question? And Travis confessed

0:40:32.034 --> 0:40:34.234
<v Speaker 4>that while him and Taylor only been together for two

0:40:34.274 --> 0:40:37.994
<v Speaker 4>and a half years, they have never gotten into an argument.

0:40:37.834 --> 0:40:38.674
<v Speaker 3>Not once.

0:40:39.834 --> 0:40:42.914
<v Speaker 4>And then came the commentary. So there was a viral

0:40:43.074 --> 0:40:45.993
<v Speaker 4>tweet that was sharing that headline and it said this

0:40:46.074 --> 0:40:49.553
<v Speaker 4>is a bad sign. And Nowther said when couples say

0:40:49.634 --> 0:40:51.913
<v Speaker 4>this shit, all I can think is you're either a

0:40:51.914 --> 0:40:54.714
<v Speaker 4>psychopath or you view your partner the same way you

0:40:54.794 --> 0:40:57.593
<v Speaker 4>do a pet a pet. And an article on Mama

0:40:57.634 --> 0:41:02.594
<v Speaker 4>Mia called their lack of fighting a red flag, Amelia,

0:41:02.794 --> 0:41:03.874
<v Speaker 4>is it a red flag?

0:41:04.434 --> 0:41:07.834
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting that we kind of go back and fourth

0:41:08.314 --> 0:41:11.594
<v Speaker 5>as a society about what we think the gold standard is,

0:41:11.914 --> 0:41:14.513
<v Speaker 5>because in my life already, I feel like I've looked

0:41:14.514 --> 0:41:16.554
<v Speaker 5>through a couple of incoundations of this. There was a

0:41:16.634 --> 0:41:19.993
<v Speaker 5>time where the gold standard was no fighting, and then

0:41:19.994 --> 0:41:22.914
<v Speaker 5>it very much moved. I think we all got parrel pilled.

0:41:23.074 --> 0:41:26.873
<v Speaker 5>That's my phrase for the therapization of our culture by

0:41:26.994 --> 0:41:30.554
<v Speaker 5>Esther Perel and Esther Pearrel's basic idea is that you

0:41:30.594 --> 0:41:33.554
<v Speaker 5>can talk through anything, including an affair. She's basically like,

0:41:33.594 --> 0:41:36.754
<v Speaker 5>you know, setting aside abuse, obviously, you can work through

0:41:36.994 --> 0:41:39.314
<v Speaker 5>just about any relationship issue if you just.

0:41:39.314 --> 0:41:41.754
<v Speaker 4>Hash it out, have a little chat, go for it.

0:41:41.754 --> 0:41:44.714
<v Speaker 5>There's a Psychology Today headline that kind of summarizes where

0:41:44.714 --> 0:41:46.994
<v Speaker 5>we were as a culture around this issue for a

0:41:46.994 --> 0:41:49.914
<v Speaker 5>long time, which was if you never fight, someone is hiding.

0:41:50.154 --> 0:41:52.674
<v Speaker 5>So the idea is that if you're not fighting, it's

0:41:52.714 --> 0:41:55.874
<v Speaker 5>because you're repressing something, and that's a very unhealthy, even

0:41:55.994 --> 0:41:57.114
<v Speaker 5>toxic dynamic.

0:41:57.474 --> 0:41:58.314
<v Speaker 3>Is it that? Well?

0:41:58.314 --> 0:42:01.034
<v Speaker 5>But now it feels like we've now swung back, and

0:42:01.074 --> 0:42:04.033
<v Speaker 5>now we've got these two probably the two most kind

0:42:04.074 --> 0:42:08.194
<v Speaker 5>of iconic couples in the world right now, George and Lamar,

0:42:08.634 --> 0:42:12.473
<v Speaker 5>Taylor and Travis proudly declaring that they don't fight. I

0:42:12.514 --> 0:42:14.794
<v Speaker 5>think we've seen the pendulum swing back again.

0:42:15.034 --> 0:42:18.914
<v Speaker 4>Okay, unpopular opinion, all the money in the world, clean house,

0:42:19.714 --> 0:42:20.874
<v Speaker 4>not fighting over directions.

0:42:21.034 --> 0:42:23.354
<v Speaker 1>But they do have twins, as Holy says.

0:42:23.314 --> 0:42:26.554
<v Speaker 4>I know, but I think they would have some support

0:42:26.994 --> 0:42:27.953
<v Speaker 4>around them.

0:42:28.634 --> 0:42:31.234
<v Speaker 5>I think Taylor Travis actually have kind of a complicated

0:42:31.274 --> 0:42:32.074
<v Speaker 5>schedule to deal with.

0:42:32.154 --> 0:42:35.194
<v Speaker 1>He is a professional football player. She just did the

0:42:35.234 --> 0:42:37.033
<v Speaker 1>most successful tour of all time.

0:42:37.234 --> 0:42:39.674
<v Speaker 4>Can you imagine the g Cow for the the g

0:42:39.874 --> 0:42:45.634
<v Speaker 4>Cow would be intense. But I will also say, Google calendar, Oh.

0:42:44.794 --> 0:42:47.314
<v Speaker 3>God, we've still got a calendar in the kitchen on

0:42:47.354 --> 0:42:47.874
<v Speaker 3>the wall.

0:42:51.314 --> 0:42:55.154
<v Speaker 4>Taylor Taylor.

0:42:56.794 --> 0:42:58.234
<v Speaker 1>The blue is Travis's.

0:43:00.674 --> 0:43:02.234
<v Speaker 4>But you look at all those things and you also

0:43:02.274 --> 0:43:05.393
<v Speaker 4>go two and a half years, you don't have kids.

0:43:05.634 --> 0:43:07.514
<v Speaker 4>Do they have a shared mortgage. Yet I don't think

0:43:07.554 --> 0:43:11.714
<v Speaker 4>they'll have a mortgage, will they, Amelia? Maybe mortgage?

0:43:11.754 --> 0:43:13.194
<v Speaker 3>Imagine Taylor Travis.

0:43:12.914 --> 0:43:16.433
<v Speaker 4>At the back in there fight for alone. I don't

0:43:16.434 --> 0:43:18.913
<v Speaker 4>think that they're going to be there. So are there

0:43:18.994 --> 0:43:21.554
<v Speaker 4>less things to fight about when you're Travis.

0:43:21.314 --> 0:43:24.634
<v Speaker 2>And oh yeah, I think that Clooney said, what would

0:43:24.674 --> 0:43:25.474
<v Speaker 2>we fight about?

0:43:25.634 --> 0:43:28.393
<v Speaker 3>Question back? That must be one of the most privileged

0:43:28.474 --> 0:43:32.074
<v Speaker 3>statement questions we fight about.

0:43:33.074 --> 0:43:36.034
<v Speaker 4>Can you w the bench? I'll just get out cleaner.

0:43:36.074 --> 0:43:37.074
<v Speaker 4>Who's right here to do it?

0:43:37.234 --> 0:43:37.514
<v Speaker 3>Great?

0:43:37.914 --> 0:43:40.953
<v Speaker 5>George could be like, I hate human rights exactly.

0:43:42.514 --> 0:43:44.873
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, Ama, you're too beautiful. Stop it.

0:43:45.834 --> 0:43:51.634
<v Speaker 2>I hate fighting, hate fighting, which is why my preferred

0:43:51.714 --> 0:43:56.114
<v Speaker 2>method is the much more insidious, toxic, passive aggressive fighting.

0:43:56.234 --> 0:43:58.794
<v Speaker 3>So instead of saying that you haven't cleaned the.

0:43:58.794 --> 0:44:04.074
<v Speaker 2>Bench, you say something like, interesting, how you chose to

0:44:04.234 --> 0:44:06.714
<v Speaker 2>just leave that little thing that like, you know, or whatever.

0:44:06.474 --> 0:44:07.674
<v Speaker 4>It is, which is a discussion.

0:44:07.794 --> 0:44:09.794
<v Speaker 3>It's a discussion, exactly.

0:44:10.314 --> 0:44:13.634
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, How you still don't know where this goes in

0:44:13.634 --> 0:44:13.993
<v Speaker 2>the cobo.

0:44:14.154 --> 0:44:16.953
<v Speaker 4>That's an observation, exactly, that's not a fire.

0:44:17.514 --> 0:44:18.074
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:44:18.154 --> 0:44:21.634
<v Speaker 2>How you didn't put the lid back on the toothpaste. Yes,

0:44:21.914 --> 0:44:25.434
<v Speaker 2>that's just an invitation to explore your different techniques exactly

0:44:25.874 --> 0:44:29.314
<v Speaker 2>paste management. I think pass agnes is good.

0:44:29.834 --> 0:44:30.314
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:44:30.674 --> 0:44:31.834
<v Speaker 3>I think it's interesting.

0:44:31.914 --> 0:44:34.634
<v Speaker 2>Tara from Amamea wrote, as you said that this was

0:44:34.674 --> 0:44:37.474
<v Speaker 2>a red flag and that she was worried about it

0:44:37.514 --> 0:44:40.393
<v Speaker 2>because she said, a huge part of any relationship is

0:44:40.474 --> 0:44:44.194
<v Speaker 2>conflict resolution and learning each other's fight styles. But what

0:44:44.314 --> 0:44:46.594
<v Speaker 2>if your two people who hate fighting? Are you supposed

0:44:46.594 --> 0:44:49.674
<v Speaker 2>to force yourself to fight? Because it's important to know,

0:44:49.794 --> 0:44:53.474
<v Speaker 2>maybe your fight style is to your point before Amelia hiding,

0:44:53.914 --> 0:44:57.714
<v Speaker 2>my fight style might be retreat, not attack.

0:44:57.994 --> 0:45:00.393
<v Speaker 1>You know what I don't think Esther Perel is a

0:45:00.514 --> 0:45:05.034
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of retreat. What's passive aggression with retreat? Well,

0:45:05.074 --> 0:45:06.194
<v Speaker 1>she has this interesting question.

0:45:06.234 --> 0:45:08.114
<v Speaker 5>She says, what most people don't realize is that you're

0:45:08.114 --> 0:45:10.674
<v Speaker 5>not actually fighting about money or commitment or who does

0:45:10.714 --> 0:45:13.594
<v Speaker 5>the housework. What you're actually fighting about is a lack.

0:45:13.394 --> 0:45:15.714
<v Speaker 1>Of affection, respect, power.

0:45:15.514 --> 0:45:18.234
<v Speaker 5>Or some combination of the three, just the two lit

0:45:19.194 --> 0:45:21.194
<v Speaker 5>Another way of thinking about this is that there's this

0:45:21.234 --> 0:45:24.274
<v Speaker 5>sort of like adage that every couple has the same

0:45:24.354 --> 0:45:27.433
<v Speaker 5>three fights and it just manifests in different ways. I

0:45:27.674 --> 0:45:29.513
<v Speaker 5>very much agree with that, and I guess those same

0:45:29.554 --> 0:45:32.513
<v Speaker 5>three fights are affection, respect, and power, And now even

0:45:32.594 --> 0:45:34.873
<v Speaker 5>Taylor and Travis and George and a mile are having

0:45:34.914 --> 0:45:37.913
<v Speaker 5>to navigate relationship dynamics where those things are flowing back

0:45:37.954 --> 0:45:38.394
<v Speaker 5>and forth.

0:45:38.474 --> 0:45:40.873
<v Speaker 4>This is about our definition of fight, yeah, and it's

0:45:40.914 --> 0:45:44.234
<v Speaker 4>about our definition of argument. I reckon that if you

0:45:44.834 --> 0:45:50.234
<v Speaker 4>are the child of parents who fought really openly, you

0:45:50.274 --> 0:45:53.194
<v Speaker 4>felt like you had to walk on eggshells. Sometimes I

0:45:53.194 --> 0:45:56.794
<v Speaker 4>think it's just temperament. You don't like to escalate, then

0:45:57.274 --> 0:45:59.674
<v Speaker 4>you might resist going to that. And I don't think

0:45:59.714 --> 0:46:01.874
<v Speaker 4>any way is necessarily better or worse.

0:46:02.554 --> 0:46:05.394
<v Speaker 1>Because don't you have a degree in psychology.

0:46:06.594 --> 0:46:11.114
<v Speaker 2>Us has a degree in psychology, And because you're identical twins.

0:46:11.114 --> 0:46:14.274
<v Speaker 2>If she's got a degree in psychology, do you psychology?

0:46:14.314 --> 0:46:15.513
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a psychologist.

0:46:15.554 --> 0:46:17.234
<v Speaker 4>I have a master's in history.

0:46:17.594 --> 0:46:19.834
<v Speaker 1>Gender study, gender studies. There you go.

0:46:19.914 --> 0:46:22.714
<v Speaker 4>Both of them didn't give me a lot of clarity

0:46:22.754 --> 0:46:25.913
<v Speaker 4>on fighting, but I will say it did make me

0:46:25.994 --> 0:46:29.674
<v Speaker 4>good at arguing. And therefore, if you're I remember thinking

0:46:29.674 --> 0:46:31.473
<v Speaker 4>this at the time, George Cloone is just a clever

0:46:31.554 --> 0:46:33.754
<v Speaker 4>man not to fight with a human rights law. Yes,

0:46:34.234 --> 0:46:35.274
<v Speaker 4>that's what you just need to know.

0:46:35.274 --> 0:46:38.634
<v Speaker 5>You so true and son, who's the better fighter between

0:46:38.674 --> 0:46:40.393
<v Speaker 5>Taylor and Travis.

0:46:40.474 --> 0:46:42.314
<v Speaker 3>Taylor by about a thousand.

0:46:42.354 --> 0:46:43.074
<v Speaker 4>He's a poet.

0:46:44.074 --> 0:46:45.954
<v Speaker 3>Do remember that interview where.

0:46:45.754 --> 0:46:48.794
<v Speaker 1>He probably had some kind of brain She.

0:46:48.954 --> 0:46:51.154
<v Speaker 3>Used a couple of long words and he went wow.

0:46:53.434 --> 0:46:54.354
<v Speaker 1>But I reckon that you.

0:46:54.314 --> 0:46:57.154
<v Speaker 4>Can sort of disagree with things and there can be

0:46:57.194 --> 0:46:59.834
<v Speaker 4>points of tension in the relationship, but you wouldn't define

0:46:59.834 --> 0:47:03.714
<v Speaker 4>that as a fight, like there can be discussions. I

0:47:03.754 --> 0:47:06.394
<v Speaker 4>would think that in my own relationship, like we don't

0:47:06.674 --> 0:47:12.034
<v Speaker 4>like fighting, don't feel so, and even my I don't

0:47:12.074 --> 0:47:14.594
<v Speaker 4>fight with my mum, that doesn't mean that we don't

0:47:14.634 --> 0:47:18.994
<v Speaker 4>have moments of probably what would be considered conflict. And

0:47:18.994 --> 0:47:22.114
<v Speaker 4>I think that conflict management evolves in in that way.

0:47:22.154 --> 0:47:24.714
<v Speaker 4>But the idea that if you're I just think we

0:47:24.834 --> 0:47:26.913
<v Speaker 4>use the term red flag too liberally. Now we just

0:47:26.994 --> 0:47:29.114
<v Speaker 4>stick it on everything, and it's like, if your biggest

0:47:29.114 --> 0:47:32.114
<v Speaker 4>problem is that you get along too well, I think.

0:47:31.954 --> 0:47:34.874
<v Speaker 5>You're so you're not worried for them, You're not losing

0:47:34.954 --> 0:47:36.994
<v Speaker 5>any not losing a second.

0:47:37.394 --> 0:47:38.234
<v Speaker 1>I'm selfish of you.

0:47:38.674 --> 0:47:41.594
<v Speaker 2>I know people who love fighting and it's their dynamic

0:47:41.674 --> 0:47:45.354
<v Speaker 2>and their relationship. They shout that good and they're shouting

0:47:45.354 --> 0:47:47.433
<v Speaker 2>at each other and it gets all the sexual juicies going,

0:47:47.394 --> 0:47:49.714
<v Speaker 2>and they love it, and if you're around them, as

0:47:49.754 --> 0:47:52.714
<v Speaker 2>someone who hates fighting, you're very uncomfortable. I get very

0:47:52.794 --> 0:47:55.754
<v Speaker 2>uncomfortable if people are fighting. I get very uncomfortable with retreats.

0:47:55.754 --> 0:47:58.194
<v Speaker 3>See that doesn't mean they're right and I'm wrong. It's

0:47:58.274 --> 0:47:59.234
<v Speaker 3>just different strokes.

0:47:59.234 --> 0:48:01.874
<v Speaker 5>But do you feel like that kind of relationship where

0:48:01.914 --> 0:48:04.114
<v Speaker 5>you are even observing the fighting. It's that sort of

0:48:04.154 --> 0:48:06.834
<v Speaker 5>prevalent that people in their lives are watching them fight.

0:48:07.634 --> 0:48:10.553
<v Speaker 5>That cannot actually be good for the relationship.

0:48:10.754 --> 0:48:12.913
<v Speaker 1>So then to be fighting that much.

0:48:12.794 --> 0:48:15.794
<v Speaker 2>No, But I think people would say we're getting things

0:48:15.834 --> 0:48:18.114
<v Speaker 2>out in the open. We'd say, what we mean, we

0:48:18.194 --> 0:48:20.754
<v Speaker 2>clear the air. You know how, there are some people

0:48:20.754 --> 0:48:22.873
<v Speaker 2>who cry easily, and if you're not a cryer, you

0:48:22.914 --> 0:48:25.234
<v Speaker 2>see them crying, you're like, oh my god. Yeah, you

0:48:25.274 --> 0:48:27.074
<v Speaker 2>take it really seriously. And then you get to know

0:48:27.114 --> 0:48:28.913
<v Speaker 2>them and you realize that it's not a big deal

0:48:28.914 --> 0:48:31.474
<v Speaker 2>that they're crying. I think for some people, shouting and

0:48:31.674 --> 0:48:34.074
<v Speaker 2>arguing is like that too, So you're thinking, oh, these

0:48:34.114 --> 0:48:35.834
<v Speaker 2>guys are going to get divorced. They're fighting, and for

0:48:35.874 --> 0:48:38.034
<v Speaker 2>them it's just Tuesday. You know, It's like I think

0:48:38.434 --> 0:48:41.393
<v Speaker 2>different dynamics. But I think if you, as to your point, Jesse,

0:48:41.514 --> 0:48:44.194
<v Speaker 2>if various things in your life made you feel like

0:48:44.274 --> 0:48:46.993
<v Speaker 2>fighting is unsafe, that someone might leave at any time,

0:48:47.074 --> 0:48:48.314
<v Speaker 2>like you're not going to be fighting.

0:48:48.634 --> 0:48:51.594
<v Speaker 4>I read this theory. It's called the Little Fox's theory

0:48:51.634 --> 0:48:54.114
<v Speaker 4>of couple fights, and it's a bit some quote from

0:48:54.114 --> 0:48:56.554
<v Speaker 4>the Bible, the Fox's reference, But basically what it means

0:48:56.994 --> 0:48:58.834
<v Speaker 4>is that most couples, when you get down to it,

0:48:58.874 --> 0:49:01.553
<v Speaker 4>if you said, Amelia, explained to me your last fight

0:49:01.714 --> 0:49:05.714
<v Speaker 4>with your partner, it would be over nothing like I

0:49:05.714 --> 0:49:06.474
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't understand.

0:49:06.554 --> 0:49:09.674
<v Speaker 5>Oh, the opposite of that idea that you're actually fighting

0:49:09.714 --> 0:49:11.034
<v Speaker 5>about affection respect.

0:49:11.234 --> 0:49:13.993
<v Speaker 4>Which you know what you probably are. That's the underlying thing.

0:49:14.114 --> 0:49:16.634
<v Speaker 4>But in terms of what you're of speaking to a

0:49:16.634 --> 0:49:19.674
<v Speaker 4>friend recently who had a fight with his partner, it's

0:49:19.714 --> 0:49:23.354
<v Speaker 4>like a misinterpretation of a thing. And then someone snapped.

0:49:23.674 --> 0:49:26.714
<v Speaker 4>The biggest fight Luker and I've ever had was when

0:49:27.034 --> 0:49:29.594
<v Speaker 4>Luna was really little. It was late at night and

0:49:29.634 --> 0:49:32.434
<v Speaker 4>I said you're up. I meant you're up, as in

0:49:32.514 --> 0:49:35.393
<v Speaker 4>you're awake, could you take the baby? And he heard

0:49:35.434 --> 0:49:39.634
<v Speaker 4>it as you're up, like look at you. Finally around

0:49:39.634 --> 0:49:42.274
<v Speaker 4>to look after the baby, and it was this complete

0:49:42.314 --> 0:49:48.074
<v Speaker 4>miscommunication of time that was about absolutely nothing. But underlying

0:49:48.114 --> 0:49:50.354
<v Speaker 4>it was just two people that were really tired or

0:49:50.394 --> 0:49:53.634
<v Speaker 4>whatever it is. And I think that often those little

0:49:53.634 --> 0:49:55.513
<v Speaker 4>fights are about nothing at all.

0:49:55.634 --> 0:49:58.394
<v Speaker 2>There is another option we haven't considered that maybe George

0:49:58.434 --> 0:50:02.873
<v Speaker 2>Clooney Travis Kelcey are perfect people who always put the

0:50:02.994 --> 0:50:06.514
<v Speaker 2>lid back on the toothpaste, who never give their partners

0:50:06.554 --> 0:50:08.913
<v Speaker 2>any reason and to be angry with them in any way.

0:50:09.114 --> 0:50:10.154
<v Speaker 3>Is this a possibility?

0:50:10.234 --> 0:50:14.473
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and seem pretty agreeable and they married perfect people.

0:50:15.274 --> 0:50:15.794
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:50:16.274 --> 0:50:18.634
<v Speaker 4>Maybe that's the life hack that we all forgot.

0:50:18.714 --> 0:50:21.114
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if Brent says this about me, because Clooney

0:50:21.154 --> 0:50:22.993
<v Speaker 2>said neither of us are going to win. I've met

0:50:22.994 --> 0:50:25.954
<v Speaker 2>this incredible woman. She's beautiful and smart, and she stands

0:50:25.954 --> 0:50:28.394
<v Speaker 2>for all the most important things I believe in the world.

0:50:28.634 --> 0:50:30.834
<v Speaker 3>And I can't believe how lucky I am. So what

0:50:30.914 --> 0:50:32.114
<v Speaker 3>am I going to fight about?

0:50:32.314 --> 0:50:36.514
<v Speaker 4>I reckon Breds, you stand for Hollywayen Right, is George cleaning?

0:50:36.554 --> 0:50:39.714
<v Speaker 3>I'm here for George. Well, this has been fun.

0:50:39.834 --> 0:50:42.513
<v Speaker 2>Friends out louders, thank you for having us in your

0:50:42.554 --> 0:50:45.074
<v Speaker 2>ears on this Monday don't forget, of course, that you

0:50:45.114 --> 0:50:46.194
<v Speaker 2>can watch us on YouTube.

0:50:46.354 --> 0:50:47.714
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk to you tomorrow.

0:50:48.034 --> 0:50:56.274
<v Speaker 4>Bye. Mum and mayor acknowledges the traditional owners of the

0:50:56.354 --> 0:50:58.594
<v Speaker 4>land on which we have recorded this podcast.