WEBVTT - Albo’s Kylie Problem & Harry’s Eat Pray Love Moment

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Out loud as Hello, hello, and welcome to Mom and

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>me are out loud. It's what women are actually talking

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>about on Monday, the sixth of July. I'm Holly Wayne, right,

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Amelia Lester, and I'm m Vernham. Yes, it's the

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Monday after Taylor Swift's wedding. Did you to notice?

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Did you?

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 3>In case you missed it? I heard something was on,

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 3>but I was. I played pickleball actually in the weekend,

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 3>so I didn't.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, that was probably one of the events at one

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of the stations inside of Madison Square Garden entertaining.

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't there, which is hurtful.

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>That's true because our Amelia is mysterious New York.

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 4>You do and you do it.

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean you look fresh.

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, first class will do that to you.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to know all about the gossip

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>about Taylor swis wedding, why were there so many people there?

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Why was Jalo there? And yet some very was there

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and yet some very famous people were not there? Why

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>all the intense private see and the intense.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Publicity like an interesting combo.

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a very interesting business. I talk about all that

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>with Mia on the emergency episode that is already in

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>your feed. But this show that we're making right now

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is a tailor free zone, and I'm sure, well almost

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>almost free zone. We can't promise entirely, and I'm sure

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to sum out loud as that will come as a

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>little relief. But anyway, on today's show, What's made our Agenda, Amelia.

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 5>Look, Olbo's in trouble for his answer to a variant

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 5>on the old shag Mary Kill game, and I'm wondering

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 5>if it's just time to retire that game once and

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 5>for all.

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm asking if eighteen is too young to carry

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in nation's hopes on your shoulders. Yes, we're talking a

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the soccer roos, but actually it's broader

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>than that.

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 3>It's like when are you properly a grown up? Plus,

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 3>there are a new pair of glasses that are going

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 3>viral at the moment for all the wrong reasons. But

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 3>first m after months of back and forth, which for

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 3>some people like myself, felt like he is because we've

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 3>been covering it a lot on our Schirreless Gossip episode

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 3>too much. Some would say the Scirreless Gossip episodes we

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.519
<v Speaker 3>do for subscribers on Tuesdays have been very Harry heavy lately,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 3>very Harry heavy, especially his movements around the world. It

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 3>is official though he will be landing in the UK tomorrow. However,

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 3>it has been reported that this is going to be

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a pray love episode for him because

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 3>he's going alone. He's going Solow. Meghan and the two

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 3>kids will not be joining him, which.

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Is a backflip because last week he released a statement

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>from his camp saying that they were going to.

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Be and then he's not going and that has had

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 3>that statement came out after it was confirmed that they

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 3>will not be getting police security.

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 4>Are we done with the story now? Do we think?

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you joking? It doesn't even started. There's a little

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>loophole in what they've said. So they've said that Meghan

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and the children will not be traveling to London, but

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>some people think that means that other parts the trip

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 1>they may still be included. Like we talked on this show,

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't we Amelia about how they're going to Althorpe.

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Diana's resident's.

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Going to take the children, maybe to see Princess Dinna's grave.

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>That's still on the table. But basically this has been

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a big chamouz between the fact that Harry had said

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be the family's first visit back

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to the UK in four years, the first time that

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>King Charles well being King got to meet his grandchildren again,

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and there was going to be this big reunion. And

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>now it seems that definitely not okay.

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 5>But here's what I don't get, Holly, and I need

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 5>you to explain it to me. They were never guaranteed security.

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 5>He said he couldn't take the family to the UK

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 5>unless they were granted state security. They were never guaranteed

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 5>state security, and in fact, the decision not to give

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 5>them state security was I think ten days ago now,

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 5>So why did he then say I'm bringing them and

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 5>then only to backflip again.

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's interesting because a lot of this is obviously

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out of leaks from Harry's camp, and there was

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>some mutterings at the end of last week that the

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>threat level had been escalated, that there had maybe been

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>some kind of credible threat against that about Harry and

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the family in London, And so it seems they.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 4>Don're not well liked there, are they.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, Look, it depends who you listen to. There are

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the a lot of the media hate Harry

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and Meghan for well documented reasons, partly because they keep

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>suing them, that's part of it. But they are often saying, oh,

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>they're making up all this stuff, you know, like why

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>can't they just carry on like normal people. But Harry's

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>position has always been, well, I'm not a normal person.

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a very high threat level. So other people say,

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>why don't you pay for it yourself? And anyway, this

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>argument has been going on forever, and it seems that

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Amelia, of course that he was never guaranteed security.

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there has been no change to that agreement.

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think that he had hoped that with King

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Charles's olive brown so he would intervene.

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 5>Maybe I'm obsessed with one detail about the security. Apparently

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 5>one particular sticking point is you know how Charles has

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 5>offered them bucking him palace. It's been reported to stay out,

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 5>which seems nice, but the famous one. That's the famous one.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 5>But apparently there's an issue about how to get in

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 5>and out of the palace if you joint has state security,

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 5>which conjured up to me the image of like can

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 5>you just get in an uber from heath Throw and

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 5>be like bucking In Palace and then like the uber

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 5>like drives up to the gates and you're like, no,

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 5>it's cool, I'm has Like what happens?

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I would have to go up to the gate and

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>talk to the guard on the front and be like

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>remember me, and they'd be like, no, I'm royal, but

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>are you. There's a lot of debate about that. Anyway,

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I just have to drop one more royal thing. Did

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you all catch Prince William on Travis Kelce's podcast New

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>High Obsess?

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 4>You know I didn't. He didn't catch him there.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>I It was really interesting because obviously Travis Kelsey has

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a podcast called New Heights. He has it with his brother.

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I only ever listened to it when really really famous

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>people are on it. But it's basically a sports show.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so when they talk about sport, you're not into it.

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm quite into.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>This one because they were talking about the World Cup football.

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 5>We've also had a lot of like now it's become

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 5>a really big deal podcast, like Brad Pitt's been on it,

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 5>a lot of non sports people have been on.

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>It's competing with the other you know, the celebrities are

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>up there, just other podcast as Bill exactly. It really is.

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So Prince William was on there in the context of

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>him being president of the FA, which is the British

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Football Association, and how tight he is with football, and

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a very interesting interview because Prince William says

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing like as is trained to do. Travis Kelcey makes

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of lovely overtures to him because they met at

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the Era's tour.

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 5>But they've also met apparently just a few weeks ago.

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 5>He William and Kate met with Travis and Taylor when

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 5>Travis and Taylor were in London, and I thought that

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 5>was very telling because what it means is Taylor and

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 5>Travis have picked Wills and Kate over Harry and Meghan.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>It's true, and Harry and Meghan were not at the

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Wedding of the Century on the weekend, and I'm sure

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Megan would have loved that way. Prince William's on there.

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was very interesting because this is a

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast hosted by two brothers, two very tight brothers, and

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>William and I mean, so there must have been so

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>many no go areas because obviously Harry's business exactly. And

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>then Travis makes quite a lot of comments about meeting

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>William and the kids at the Eras tour and how

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>lovely it was to meet Princess Charlotte. And William just

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>has that perfect super famous person way of like appearing

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>warm and lovely but saying not one thing, just kind

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of like, yeah, it was great.

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Didn't you say that? The only fan photo Taylor poster

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 2>for the whole Eras tour was.

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Of Prince It was of Prince William with Trav and

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I think her caption was like hello there, mate, and

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.239
<v Speaker 3>like she had so many like famous, famous celebrities attend

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 3>the Eras tour in the VIP tent and he was

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 3>the only photo she posted.

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 2>So she's picked us.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but she's always been friends with him, Like there

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 3>was a time where they did karaoke together when they

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 3>were younger.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 4>She's always been a William gal oh.

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe once upon a time she thought that

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>might have been her love story.

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 6>End.

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>But the only thing is, as you say, they've definitely

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>picked aside. At the end of the podcast, Travis is like,

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we love you guys, we love the royal family. It

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>was like very pro rome. We'll be back in a minute.

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 5>Anthony Alberizi is the latest man to get in trouble

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 5>for playing the game of Kiss Mary Kill, or at

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 5>least a variation of it. Let's watch the moment, during

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.599
<v Speaker 5>his appearance on the podcast Bush Deep. I did not

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 5>know about this podcast until now. It is hosted by

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 5>a comedian and actress named Nikki Osborne, who, if you

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 5>imagine this, if you're listening, is kind of dressed up

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 5>in a sort of like Steve Erwhennie cos play, but

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 5>sexy outfit, interviewing Albo at the lodge, and the concept

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 5>is that they're drinking together Jag Mary Date, Kylie Minow,

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 5>Nicole Kibben or Ronda Birch Moore.

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I've just got married on six months in.

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, if it ghost kicks up, let's just pretend.

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 5>Oh Kylie clearly in Mary, Kylie and Shagger and Data all.

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 6>Of the above.

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, it's a triple She's terrific. All right, that's fair. Okay.

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 5>The Prime Minister has apologized unequivocally that's his word, not mine,

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 5>for his remarks after mp Zli, Steggel and others suggested

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 5>he should have just said, look, I'm not playing this game.

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 2>They've said it's sexist. He should have refused to play, but.

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 5>It reminded me of another man who played this game,

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 5>and then it went viral, and that man is Travis Kelcey.

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 5>This weekend, this clip was everywhere. This is him in

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 5>a twenty sixteen interview with the TV station after Buzz

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 5>It's called Kill Mary Kiss Okay, okay, so ready, Taylor Swift,

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 5>Ariana Grande, Katy Perry, Damn.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 6>That's messed up. I don't want to.

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Kill any of them.

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, it's just the game.

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 6>Arianna, Unfortunately, I love you, but you're gone, and then

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 6>Taylor Swift would be the kiss.

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, awkward, incorrect, incorrect choosing.

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 5>But what's striking to me in both these clips, and

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure it's evident to you too, is that both

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 5>Albo and Kelsey, who I think we can generally agree,

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 5>whatever our politics or music preferences, are probably pretty good blokes.

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 5>Both of them seem visibly and audibly uncomfortable with being

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 5>asked to play this game, which leads me to ask Colly,

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 5>is this game irragi will be sexist?

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Is it time to ban it?

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I quite like it, I mean I don't like it.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it in its original version, like Kiss

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Kill Mary or whatever we used to call it back

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>in the day, or ruder words, and that anyone being

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>killed clearly not don't like it, yes, but it is

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 1>very revealing. And I have heard so call her Daddy

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>likes to play this quite a bit. Alex Cooper like that,

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and they'll throw it to female celebrities too. Female celebrities

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>play this game too. There's a classic one with Ryan's

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the Three Ryans, Quantum Gosling Reynolds. I mean, that's that's

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>a good game.

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't play that game.

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think the problem what this tells is particularly

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>an Albo's case, is there is a very fine line

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of being I'm a modern dude who understands that going

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on podcasts is really important part of my communications strategy.

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>My team keep telling me that's a good idea. But

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>podcasts are very risky for politicians and for big name

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>celebrities because they're often long form.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 4>So in up until.

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>About five years ago, really politicians we generally see them

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in one of two contexts, either quick SoundBite on a

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>breakfast TV show or a proper in depth interview on

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>like a seven point thirty, So they're either being interrogated

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>about politics, or they're being asked to give quick, pithy

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>opinions and soundbites about their policies our long rambling interviews,

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>or maybe on a sixty minutes where they've been granted

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>access to their home and their family. But it's very editedet, yes,

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>which is great for the same reason I think actually

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>very revealing podcasts are very intimate. It's very very hard

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to fake who you are on a podcast, particularly over time.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And this, remember was a big point of conversation around

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris, is that why didn't she do Rogan? Why

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't she do call her or she did do call

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>her daddy? Why didn't she do some of those less

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>friendly pods And they're saying it's very hard to hold

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it for all that.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 5>But you just said in the previous segment that William

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 5>did an exceptional job of behaving himself and sort of

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 5>just talking within the lines on New Height.

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>He did a long form podcast, so it's possible.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, although it was like thirty minutes max, But yes,

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it was possible, but very boring. There's a reason why

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the only bit of that interview that's going viral is

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the introduction ye that Jason Kelsey gave him because there

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>is nothing else that he said. And the problem is

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is every podcaster wants the viral clip.

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so.

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Albo knows he's going on a comedy show, he knows

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>probably he's going to be asked this.

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the podcast is called bush Deep exactly, and Nick

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 3>even says, we ask all of our guests this.

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 4>So the fact that he.

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>What would end if he'd have said, because I agree

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>like he should have said no, Zali Stegele's right about that.

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't think his answer was particularly offensive or wrong.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He was trying to get out of there and just say,

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like kylie all the things. How do you think he

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>would have it would have gone down if he'd have

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>just said I absolutely refused to answer that.

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I think he could have literally just said I respect

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 3>all three and.

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 4>I wish them all the best.

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 3>But that's what I would expect from a prime minister.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a game that can only be

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 3>played by normies, and it can only be played by

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 3>normies in relation to celebrities. So you could only do

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 3>the Ryans on the road.

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 5>We can't do people can't have a celebrit pretty playing it.

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 3>No, you can't have a celebrity playing it because they're

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 3>too even. That's why when Travis played it the first time,

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 3>when this interview first went viral, it was fine because

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't there yet.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 4>Now it's not fine. I can't play that game now.

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>At that time, he had no idea of what his

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>life would.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Be exackly where it's like I once was asked in

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 3>a truth or their game with friends to do a

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 3>shag Mary kill with people in the room.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 4>You can't do that.

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 5>So when we were on tour last year and I

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 5>did a Q and A with the host.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 4>I haven't forgotten about.

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I think we occasionally.

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 5>So the idea was the audience would ask questions that

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 5>I would put to you the OG hosts about loud

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 5>and occasionally I think we would get an audience question

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 5>suggesting that we play this game. And I tried it

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 5>a couple of times on you, but it's it did

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 5>feel a bit gross. It just it just felt a

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 5>little bit like kind of old fashioned or anachronistic to

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 5>be making. Even given that you were women and we

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 5>were playing it heteronormal of Lisa we were discussing then.

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 2>It still felt a little old fashioned.

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>There's no question that it's objectifying and all those things,

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but it is revealing. Kim Kardashian played in twenty nineteen

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and she was asked which she would She was given

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama, Vladimir Putin, and Donald Trump.

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 5>Oh that's just see, this game is not actually a

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 5>game if you're like putting like not people who were

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 5>evenly matched together.

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to know how she watched? How she chose?

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Quite surprising? Please, she said she'd marry Barack Obama. That

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is not surprising. She said she would kiss Vladimir Putin.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I would too, and she would kill.

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 5>The only thing I'd worry about is if Vladimir Putin

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 5>had laced his lips with some kind of poison, because

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 5>that seems like the sort of thing he would do.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 5>But kiss Donald Trump, I'd much from the kids, Vladimir Putin,

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 5>Are you kidding?

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Would you not see?

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I respect all three.

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 5>I wish I'm all the what's interesting it Slate had

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 5>this big funny debate on their site about the sort

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 5>of nuances of this game, and they had two real

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 5>like kind of sticking points that they could not agree on.

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 5>One is whether the marriage and the game is celibate, Like,

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 5>is the point that you're trying to decide who you

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 5>want to be friends with. And the other one was

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 5>whether once you kiss the person you select, you never

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 5>see them again or could you just be in a

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 5>casual kissing relationship forever.

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, because the kiss has been changed, this is an

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 3>issue with modifications, yeah, and the original because.

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Kiss and shag are very different.

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And it has and I think the swapping the shag

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>for kiss and all those things and getting rid of

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the kill, which obviously is a good thing, but like

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's fangs de fanged the whole process.

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 3>I feel like keeping the kill in like makes us

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 3>remember that it is a fun, silly game and if

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 3>you try to make exerience, Like with the elbow question,

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 3>it was shaggy, very date. Yeah, and then we thought

0:16:57.840 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Albot thought I was getting away. I don't have to

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 3>kill anyone, but you're still shaggy.

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, she actually made it a little bit more fraud.

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>It's true. Back to my point about how it's hard

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to hide on a long form show. Albo or anyone

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>in Albo's position should not get you know how, like

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>reality TV contestants, after ten minutes, they forget the cameras

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>are on and they just start acting like idiots and

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>their true selves come out. That's also what I do

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast, thank you. That's what That's what long

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>form interviews are meant to do. Lull you into a

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>place where you're we're just having a chat. We're just

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>having a chat.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Any prime minister, I mean, should of course never be

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>lulled into that. So he should have had no question.

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>He should have had an answer prepared for this if

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>his team knew this game was coming, and the answer

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>should not have been Kylie.

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting that he even chose to go on this

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 5>this type of show because just broadening it out to

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 5>like what politicians do in the age of radical authenticity,

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 5>that is the era of podcasts.

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 2>This show is very rye bald like.

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 5>The humor is quite coarse, as you as you detected

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 5>from the ties. They do drink as they discuss things,

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 5>and she's certainly there were not a lot of questions

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 5>on negative gearing or capital gains tax changes. What do

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 5>you think is the strategy given that politicians do kind

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 5>of get these offers? Now, Holly, do you think he

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 5>kind of ered inn even going on a podcast like.

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>This, Yes, because the problem is is once you're in

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that position, you have a lot to lose. Interestingly, in

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the last election cycle, both Anthony Albanesi and Peter Dutton,

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>who was the opposition candidate last election, I'm sure we've

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>all forgotten that because everything's happened so quickly. We'll, like

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Peter what both came in and sat down with Kate

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Langbrook for a long form No Filter interview. Now, the

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>premise of No Filter is that they're not going to

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>be grilled about capital gains tax. That's not what it's about.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It's more of a conversation about your life and your

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>influences and you're, you know, trying to get a little

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 1>bit under the skin. And interestingly, everyone said that Dutton

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 1>was more relaxed than Albo and the albow was a

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>little more that sort of wooden and pulled together in

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>his conversation. And people were a bit surprised by that

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>because Dutton in particular had a reputation at that time

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>as being hard man. You know, you might imagine that

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't be that relaxed in a one on one

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>interview like that. But the thing is is Albo was

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the one who had everything to lose in that situation

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>because he was defending his position whereas Dutton was swinging

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>for that position. This is the second time that Albow

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>has tripped up recently in into a long form interview

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>that's supposed to be kind of informal. This one was

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously a quick fire around, and then he was on

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>stage at a conference in Victoria and again quick fire around.

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>He was asked one word to describe and then throw

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in various names. One of them was grace tame. The

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>first word out of his mouth was difficult.

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 4>It's like hm.

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was supposed to be a kind of throwaway loles,

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>but once you're prime minister, there's nothing you can't do

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>throwaway in lolls, and I think that it's very easily weaponized.

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It also is quite revealing, and I think that ideally

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>as much as all politicians are being given this message.

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's something very interesting playing out in Britain about

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>this at the moment with the new prime ministerial candidate.

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Everyone says he's so naturally, such a guy, he knows

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>how to talk to people, Andy Burnham, and it's like sure,

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but once he's Prime minister change those rules change, And

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>really I don't know if there's much upside to being

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on there being asked silly questions about who you're shagging,

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>or one would to describe this famous, high profile woman

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>like it feels like a trap in a moment. Is

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen years old? Just too young to have the weight

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of the nation on your shoulders?

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 3>So, Mark Zuckerberg, Amelia, you're knowing? Can I say intimately?

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think. Come on, I can't.

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 4>I can't college with it.

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Any out louders who are like suddenly going what Amelia

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>and zuck were at college at the same time, and

0:20:58.520 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>he was.

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 5>Launched, and we have an interaction when I was a

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 5>student journalist when I asked to interview him. I'm just

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 5>very excited for the forthcoming Social Network two movie where

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 5>he's played by Jeremy Strong.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Jeremy Strong looks so good.

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 5>I was shack married day Jeremy Strong. He would be

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 5>a lot of work, but I think you'd be worth it.

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>No, he's the guy from Succession. In case anyone's struggling

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to place in Kendall met doctor, Yes Kendall No, no, no, anyway,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you'll be in it. Oh sorry, anyway, Sorry,

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>this isn't about Amelia's love story with Jeremy Stohn slash Mark.

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>It is about Mark Zuckerberg's meta glasses. If you think

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>this is an old story, it kind of mean is

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>because he launched meta glasses, which are glasses that you

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>wear on your face like normal reading glasses, except they're

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>smart glasses. So they have a little camera on the

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>side so you can film and take photos with your glasses.

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 4>There's little speakers.

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 5>Can I just say, let's file with smart glasses under

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 5>the things that don't need to be smart and also

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 5>in that category's washing machines. I never asked for a

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 5>smart washing machine, and I never asked for smart glasses.

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>About fridges, some people know I don't.

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Want anything smart except me.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't need to be knocking on my fridge to

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 3>see what's in there. I can just open the door.

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 3>So these smart glasses have now come gone viral again

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 3>because they've roped in one Kylie Jenner. So Kylie Jenna

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 3>has launched her own design with metaglasses.

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>They do it look really good?

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 4>I have to say it.

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you like them?

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I love I think they've like the first round of

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>release of this everyone went so daggy, But now they've

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>got proper designers on board.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they look very pretty.

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 5>The first ones were ray bands and Oakleys, but these

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 5>ones are stepped up fashion worse.

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, stepped up fashion wise. They look very fancy minus

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 3>the surveillance aspect of them. So Kylie partnered with them

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 3>to promote her own line of the glasses. She also

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 3>designed them herself, and with that came a huge, huge campaign.

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 3>They did a relaunch of metaglasses and they also did

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 3>an array of gifting to some top tier influences.

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 5>I heard that the Kylie glasses. I heard this because,

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 5>like I kept reading about them. They have a single

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 5>rhinestone on the lens to denote what it's like to

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 5>get the paparazzi always taking photos of Oh.

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 3>I need that for what and the smart glasses do

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 3>m So the smart glasses thank you so much for asking.

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 3>So what they do is they have a little camera

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 3>on the side so you can take photos and videos

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 3>of like everyone without their consent, which is really nice

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 3>because sometimes it's awkward to ask for consent, so you.

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Can do that.

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 5>But to be phanom meta, they say that they have

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.239
<v Speaker 5>designed them so that people will know if you are

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 5>taking a photo or a video.

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Correct, there's a red light, So apparently there's a light

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>that goes on if you're filming, But apparently it's relatively

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>easy to disable if you have if your intentions are

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>not pure, like most ordinary people probably wouldn't bother disabling that.

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you're specifically wearing the glasses too, I don't know,

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 1>film Taylor Swift's wedding. When you're you can apparently quite

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>easily disable the light.

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 3>You can also get like sometimes your glasses can become

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 3>a screen, so if you're lost, you can get Google

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Maps up on your glasses.

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Can you put the maps? Can you put them on

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>in a meeting? Pretend you're paying attention but really be

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>watching the England game?

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 4>I hope so.

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 5>But then I think the only person who can get

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 5>away with wearing glasses, sunglasses and a meeting is Anna

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 5>Winterur that's fair, fair.

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Point anyway, I digress.

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Since these glasses have gone viral and term has re emerged.

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 3>And this term first came out about in twenty fourteen

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 3>when Google introduced Google Glogle glass and the term used

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 3>to describe people who wear these smart glasses and they're

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 3>called glassholes.

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised there was a big ding dong in

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 1>England because there's a sort of disgraced comedian he used

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a very big deal in England called Michael

0:24:55.600 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Barrymore and now he's like, he's huge on TikTok for

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>doing really simple things with So he puts his glasses on,

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>he goes into a shop and he films all his

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>interactions with say the shop assistance, the checkout person, you know,

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's had puts them in sort of slightly comedic

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>situations without their consent, uploads it to TikTok.

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 4>They love millions of followers.

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, the Shop Workers Union in Britain has and actually

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>in Australia too, are launching a sort of a claim

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to make them illegal, well not illegal, but to make

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>them what's the word, well, basically banned from shops, that

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>you can't wear them in shops and various other smart

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>wearable technologies too, because it's an invasion of privacy all

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of those things, but which you could totally see why.

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's also been reported that it has been used

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 3>by like immigration officers and agents to track people. So

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 3>it has become like a huge deal, especially in the

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 3>US of people pushing back at this it's been so

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 3>like pushed back. There have been influencers who have been

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 3>deleting their posts of them wearing.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Glass and that's a big deal, for.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 3>A huge deal, everyone's saying, it's like we have to

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 3>do to the meta glasses what we did for fur

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 3>back in the day.

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 4>And make them cool.

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>That's so interesting because you don't want to bully people,

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, if you make something so daggy,

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>so unimpressive that it shames you, sometimes shame can be

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a useful tool because this is also used obviously by

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>people doing those awful pickup videos on the internet. The

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Manisphere guy's going up to women wearing filming them without

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>their consent.

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 5>I think what you're saying is it's going to come

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 5>down to whether or not they're perceived as cool. And

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 5>it's interesting that Mark Zuckerberg tried to preempt this. Remember

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 5>that earlier this year he was seen, he went to

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 5>the mcgala, he was seen front row at the prior

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 5>to show in Milan. He was trying to get ahead

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 5>of this and say I'm a fashion person and himself.

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 5>Now he's not wearing it at the moment. People track

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 5>the chain as an indication of where Mark Zuckerberg is

0:26:58.359 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 5>at and right now he's chainless.

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Someone who wasn't at Taylor's wedding because he was on

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>my TV. He was eighteen year old Lucas Herrington. Now

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>he is the youngest soccer U to ever be in

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the team for a World Cup. And on Saturday morning,

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're watching it, it was an

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>ungodly hour. The soccer US were playing knockout game against

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Egypt in Egypt in Dallas. They got to extra time

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>at one to one and they went to penalties. Yes,

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I am the sports correspondent now that both sisters have gone.

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Is it hard for you to say soccer instead of football?

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it, but I'll do it. I know

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>my place.

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 4>So it went to penalties.

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Everybody who knows anything about soccer slash football. This was

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>also a point of contention on the Travis Kelcey podcast

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>with Prince William. They kept saying soccer football to him

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and he kept saying, I don't think so right now?

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>We call it football anyway. Penalties. Theres anyone who knows

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a brutal it's the best of five one on one.

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>You and the goalie and nobody wants to do it.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 1>But World Cups are decided on them all the time

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>because you play in ninety minutes, then you play another

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty and then if you haven't got a result, it's penalties.

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Top teams train obviously heavily on penalties. They'll agree who's

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 1>going to take them beforehand. It's a very professional setup.

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much like the old days where people

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>just sort of put their hands up anyway, turn my

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>turn anyway. Australia, to be fair, did not start the

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>penalties well. They swapped out their goalie when it was

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>clear that was about to happen, and then Harry Soutar,

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>who is known as Captain Cragus, missed the first one.

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Egypt scored theirs, and then our fourth take up was

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Herrington. He's from Queensland, he was playing in Brisbane,

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>now plays in America and he's really good.

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 4>But he got up.

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>And he missed and we were out.

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Immediately. People were mad.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So Socceru's great Robbie Slader said, well, he wrote for

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Code Sports the minute Lucas Herrington stepped up for the

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>penalty kick, I felt angry. The whole country should be

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>this should never have been put at his feet with

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Australia and a penalty shootout for World Cup survivor. Surely

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>someone in the soccer's brain trust should have said, do

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we really want to hang this on an eighteen year

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>old I have seen and then lots of people obviously

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>came out and defending Lucas and Slater wasn't criticizing Lucas,

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.719
<v Speaker 1>who's criticizing the team decision to do it. I also

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>anecdotally saw a lot of women on the weekend, particularly moms,

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly moms with a bit of a protective vibe, saying

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this was unreasonable. They should never have let him do that,

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly not so late in the penalty lineup, like maybe

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>he could have taken the second one or something where

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be your kick that sends you home.

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It's really unfair for a young man. But my vibe

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is this is what professional sport is, and if you're

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>old enough to play on the team, aren't you old

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>enough to take that pressure? But is eighteen too young?

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 4>M I don't think eighteen is too young.

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 3>I feel like if you're good enough to be on

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 3>that team, like you said, whole they would have had

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 3>that decision made before they even started playing, before they

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 3>even before the World Cup even was on, and I

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 3>feel so bad for Lucas, Like, yes, he probably has

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Year twelve formal coming up, He's got other stresses going on,

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 3>and I think he would have just felt so proud

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 3>to represent his country. And to be fair, there have

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 3>been a lot of commentators saying that they were really

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 3>proud and it was a very brave and courageous thing

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 3>for him to do.

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:24.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, it was.

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a very brave and courageous thing for him

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to do and the potential consequences are heavy.

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 3>The consequences are heavy, but at the end of the day,

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 3>he was the best player to do that kick in

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.719
<v Speaker 3>that moment, and I think age is like it's regardless

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 3>of his age, he was just the best person to

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 3>do it. And the conversation would be so different if

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 3>he got that goal.

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 4>We all would have been like, our eighteen.

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Year old superstar, look at him, go young people can

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 3>do anything.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 5>We actually know it would be different because earlier on

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 5>in this World Cup he became the youngest ever Australian

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 5>to score in a World when he scored against Paraguay,

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 5>which was part of why Australia got to where it

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 5>got to and advanced in the game.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 2>So you can't have it both ways.

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 6>I know.

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately in football everyone always wants it both ways, right.

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>They're like, if you get on and you do grade,

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it was like that was a great decision and if

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't it was the end of the world. Now

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel in a way we're getting better at not

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>piling quite so much pressure and vitriol on players who

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>messed these things up. Messed these things up is a

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>terrible thing to say. Harrington messed nothing up. But who

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>don't get their penalties back. In twenty twenty in the Euros,

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>England were playing in the final and it went to

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>penalty shootout because of course it always does. And the

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>three players who whose penalties were either saved or they

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>missed were all black players, Black English players, and they

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>suffered such relentless racist abuse as a result of bit

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of their penalties not going in that you know, FIFA

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>had to step in. The captain Harry Kane made the

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>point to all the fans, we don't want you as fans.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to behave like you can go and

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>go somewhere else, and those young men had to have protection.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>There was all this drama around it, and it was

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>just I always just want to say to people, what

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's like to stand up there for

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the goalie?

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 4>And they'd be like, oh, I could school that.

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 2>I could school that.

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I don't think you could, guys, I don't

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>think you could.

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 3>I've also noticed that the fan culture towards men's sport

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 3>is so different towards women's sport.

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 4>It like this whole thing.

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 3>And all the people with all the opinion pieces about

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>who should have done the kick, who should have been

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 3>the goalie, It's like it comes from like a place

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 3>of anger and disappointment. And I remember when the Matilda's

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 3>were playing and when we hosted the World Cup in Australia,

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 3>when the Matilda's got left out of the game.

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>There was a penalty shootout, a penalty shootout which not

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>for the final but for the semi that was like

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>back of the hiding behind the couch.

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 3>And we won that. But even when we and I

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 3>remember watching the game against England, I went with my family.

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 4>And it was so so sad.

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 3>But the amount, the amount of proudness we had towards

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 3>those young women. Was just amazing and I've never seen

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 3>anything like it, and I don't get that same feeling

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 3>with men's sport when their team gets kicked out.

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, I want to say that I'm really proud of him.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, eighteen is really young. And I read an

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 5>interesting thing which is that he was actually able to

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 5>represent four countries in this Cup, Australia, Finland, Germany and Zimbabwe.

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 5>And he has chosen to represent Australia because it's the

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 5>country of his birth and so we would never have

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 5>even gotten to where we got to in this World

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Cup had he not kicked that goal against Paraguay.

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>So I want to ask about eighteen year olds. Do

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you think, because you're an adult, he plays professional sport

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for a professional club in America, this sort of outpouring

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of almost maternal protection towards him. Do you think that

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't think that eighteen is old enough to be

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>able to handle pressure?

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Question?

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Nah, I think they can handle pressure. He didn't have

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 3>like the best people doing sports, sport would be so boring.

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 4>Currently in the F one grid.

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 3>The rainy chair, we go right now, Kimmi Antonelli is

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 3>scoring the most points out of everyone and he is

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 3>the young one of the youngest on the grid.

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 4>He started when he was seventeen.

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 5>I think part of why we want to watch sport

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 5>is because it's really high pressure.

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 2>There are really high stakes.

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 5>Look, when he kicked that goal against Paraguay, people were

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 5>predicting that he was going to move from the American

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 5>side to a Spanish side where he was going to

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 5>get between twenty three million and thirty million dollars.

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 2>So look, I think he'll be fine.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 5>Professional sports is high pressure, but that's part of what

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 5>the money's for.

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 2>As John Drapel would say.

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 4>It's true.

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And also there was a time in British football where

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>nobody really wanted to play for England because they saw

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>what happened. If you stuffed up. If you've watched the

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Beckham documentary, you would all know. There was a moment

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in the World Cup back in the nineties where David

0:34:56.040 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Beckham got sent off and allegedly lost us that that

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>World Cup, and there were effigies of him hanging outside pubs.

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:07.399
<v Speaker 1>He was berated and harassed for a full year. Every

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>time he ran on a pitch. People were booing, people

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>were throwing things, and so over the years people were saying, well,

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want my kid to go into football, or

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.760
<v Speaker 1>people were saying I don't want to play at that level.

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>It's too intense.

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 3>But the harassment is like crazy, like you're just a

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 3>bad person, because how does US.

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 4>Losing the World Cup affect you into?

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 5>What?

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I often wonder though, if sport can give you that

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>excuse to be a bad person, you know, like to

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>let that all hang out.

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, we've got neither Stephen's sister here to be sports correspondents,

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 5>So Holly's done an admirable job. But I also have

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:44.439
<v Speaker 5>a piece of sporting news to bring from the World Cup.

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 5>So a Team USA player, his name is Follerin' Balligan.

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 5>He got a red card during the US team's game

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 5>against Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is a game that the

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 5>US went on to win. But Trump called FIFA three

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 5>times over this red card and basically not basically, FIFA caved,

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 5>rescinded the red card, allow Balligan is free to play

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 5>in teen USA's next game against Belgium this week.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, how do we call FIFA rag outrageous?

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't eve enjoyed the sports report. Mama Mia Outloud

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Sports Report. I promise we won't keep doing that. I

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>just you know, I know you all wanted to send

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Harrington your love. We know you just want to check

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the score. I totally do. Can we just wind up

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 1>so I can check these on score?

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Please?

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you out louders for being in our ears. This

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is your reminder again there is another episode of out

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Loud today.

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 4>You've got two.

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>It's me and me are talking all about the Taylor

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Swift wedding as much as we know so far, which

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is a lot.

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 4>I'd say it's a lot. A lot happened.

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:50.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in your ears tomorrow. Bye bye bye, Mama.

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on which

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>we've recorded this podcast.