WEBVTT - The Worst-First Theory and Do Babies Belong In Business Class?

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Parenting Out Loud, the podcast to parents who

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>don't always listen to parenting podcasts. We take a look

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>at sort of the trends and the culture and what

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>parents are thinking about.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Monique Poley, I'm Amelia Lester, and I am Stacy Kicks.

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 2>So happy to be back with both of you. I

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 2>loved listening last week with beautiful Gracie on here, but

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>happy to be back yapping with you two min's.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 3>You've got a bit of housekeeping, don't you.

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh God, I have a public apology to make.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Actually, I think they might call it in the biz

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a product recall. Last week I recommended on this show

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Ted Lasso season four. Yeah, and look, I did say

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it yet. That's my first mistake.

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh you did a prereco Oh.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to publicly apologize for that recommendation. The show

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is abominable. Do not spend your time on it. And

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I apologize unreservedly. And I think what hurts me the

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>most is that parents have such limited time to sit

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>down and watch TV, and the fact that I told

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>people to go and spend their precious screen time on

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>this disaster. It cuts me deep and I'm going to

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>make up for it today, okay, but coming up on

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>today's show onto serious business.

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the influencer who sent her five year old to

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the park alone, even just saying it stresses me out.

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 3>What do you want your kids to be when they

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 3>grow up? And if the answer is doctor or lawyer,

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 3>find out why you're increasingly alone?

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>And do your kids know what FESTI means because I

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>have a petition to bring back old school slang. But first,

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.279
<v Speaker 1>we do like to bring you sort of what's around

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on the internet each week, and each of us has

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>something to submit today from their algorithm that it feels

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like everyone is kind of talking about. So Amelia your

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>submission please.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>In case you missed it. An Australian mum's Instagram video

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 3>has sparked a debate about where the babies belong in

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 3>business class. The Australian jewelry designer Charlotte Freeman was flying

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 3>into Singapore recently trying to comfort her one year old

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 3>son Freddie, when a fellow passenger decided to get involved.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Here's Charlotte, So we just.

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 5>Flew into Singapore this morning and I wanted to let

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 5>you know about an incident we had on the plane

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 5>where Freddy was a little bit unsettled and crying a bit,

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 5>and this lady took it upon herself to scream across

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 5>the cabin at the top of her lungs.

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 6>Shut up. Now, that same lady stood up and stared

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 6>me down, and I said, is everything okay? And she said, no,

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 6>your baby has been crying and I'm in business class.

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 6>And I said to this lady, well, you obviously haven't

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 6>had kids, otherwise you would understand what it's like to

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 6>have a child. And unfortunately this comes with having a baby.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 6>And she said, I have five. And then she proceeded

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 6>to say that because she had paid for her business

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 6>class ticket that a mother and a child, which should

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 6>never be in business class. There should always be an.

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Economy So look, Charlotte told MoMA Mia this week that

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 3>she wound up taking Freddie down to economy class because

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 3>she just felt more comfortable there. And to that, I say, welcome, Charlotte.

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 3>We're a friendly bunch down the back of the way.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 3>We're a little smelly at times, but we are friendly.

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>You welcome the crying babies.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Look from one disgruntled mother to another this week, my

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 2>submission is Anne Hathaway, who is just everywhere. That woman

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 2>is the booked and busiest woman in the world right now.

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>She's got five movies coming out this year.

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And then she's just pregnant casually with her third child.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 2>On top of that, she's been doing the rounds for

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 2>her movie The End of Oak Street, and she was

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>wearing this really cool Prabo gerrang like high low top.

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>It has like a big train on the back of it,

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>and she's got low slung jeans on with the belly

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 2>out the middle. Her body's gone, third kid, know what

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 2>we're doing here? Bam? And people malfunctioned overseeing like a

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 2>normal prego body, unrestrained in the wild like. People were

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 2>accusing her of having a fake bump on because they

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 2>didn't think it looked the shape that a normal pregnant

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>belly should look. This was widespread, not a few wackos,

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people saying, why does it look like that,

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 2>That's not how bellies are meant to look. Absolutely insane.

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 2>And then I just love her because she just clapped

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 2>back to the next day by posting and getting ready

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>video for that day and she wrote fake hare real

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 2>bump full stop.

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>That's so boring, just the whole station around. Oh God,

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm so bored by it. But do you know the

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing I do think, quite honestly, when I look

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>at her, is I do get jealous that she seems

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to be just glowing her way through this third pregnancy.

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 3>I read a quote from her that said that she

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 3>realized when she turned forty that life was not a

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 3>dress rehearsal, that this is it, this is her chance,

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 3>and that's informing how she's going about her third and

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 3>what she thinks will be her final pregnancy.

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>She's just like letting it all out there.

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 3>And then she went on a talk show after the

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 3>premiere with a similar bump showcase and piece. You can

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 3>tell that she's just informed by this. This is the

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 3>last time I'm doing this. I'm just not leaving anything

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 3>out there on the tape.

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love it, Love Anne.

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So you know what the Internet loves more than hating

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Anne Hathaway.

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Love.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It loves wholesome dud content. And so my submission this

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>week from my algorithm is a wholesome Internet daut of

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the week. This is Melbourne dad Zachary Perez. He's on

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Instagram as at non practicing genius. He decided to start

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a dad's walking group, and in week one this is

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>what happened.

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 4>To my dad's walking group this morning. But that doesn't matter.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 4>I didn't really promote it all that well, and it's

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 4>still a gorgeous morning to be out walking with my lad.

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>So the footage of him is like him walking along

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this trail, the babies in the baby Bjorn with its

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>little head bouncing around, and he's like, you know, no

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>one came. That's okay, I'll try again next week, And

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the internet did what the internet does, and boom, Like

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>the next week, over fifty dads and babies all rocked

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>up to this Sunday Dad's walk.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 4>Just back at the car now after an incredible turnout.

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 4>There had to be at least fifty dads. There could

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 4>have been a lot more, and kids that came along

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 4>had a great wonder the weather held off, met some

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 4>good fowlers, had some great chats, and just feeling really

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 4>really pumped.

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I love this and I don't want a dad bash.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Where not dad bashes. Here were four the wholesome dads.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>We're pro dad, but there was like a tiny bit

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of cynicism in me that was like this dad started

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a walking group and he ended up on the Today

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Show talking about his walking group, Like every mum that's

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in a mum's walking group, that's just like another Tuesday

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for the mums. But it's Yeah, it was super wholesome

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and a beautiful little story in my algorithm.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love it, and I think dads don't have

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 2>that community as much, so I do think it needs to.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 2>And like as you were saying that, it went viral

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 2>and then fifty dad showed up. I was imagining fifty

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 2>wives at home going, you have to go to this

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 2>this guy, he doesn't have anyone there with him, and

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 2>you're going and taking our kids. So I think the

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.239
<v Speaker 2>mums are probably to thank for it. Actually, I saw.

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 3>It in my neighborhood a bunch of elderly men in

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 3>a walking group the other day.

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>They must have mostly.

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Been in their eighties and they were walking around the

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 3>local oval together having a chat. Why are we so

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 3>heartwarmed by men just being together, not at the pub.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's just because we want them to have

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 3>social connections.

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes we do, and it's those scripts of masculinity being

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>hard and not connecting and bearing feelings deep and yeah

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're trying to disrupt, I guess, so any chance

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we see it, we're like, yay, yay, dud's.

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>So, the big story this week that's been doing the

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>rounds is about an influencer who sent her five year

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 2>old to the park alone, and it sparked this massive

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.119
<v Speaker 2>debate about whether this is free range parenting or whether

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 2>this is just straight up irresponsible. So I want to

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>play you a little bit off the clip. I've just

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 2>let my five year old go to the park on

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 2>his own. I feel quite nervous, but I'm going to

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>let him grow up. He will be six next month.

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I live opposite the park.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 2>The windows all open, the door obviously can't be open

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 2>because I've got a dog. I'm checking every thirty seconds.

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 5>I've just checked.

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go check again.

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 2>So that was content creator Charlotte Lanford tag. She's a

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 2>mom of two from the UK. She posts quite regularly

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 2>just about family life, and I want to give you

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of further context before we dive into it.

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 2>So Charlotte's described her son as very responsible and wise,

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and she says that she wouldn't let her younger son

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 2>do the same. She just thinks he's got the personality

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 2>where he can do that. Their park is directly across

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 2>the road, and they live in a culder sac where

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 2>they've lived for years, so very familiar with the area,

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 2>and that she can hear him from the kitchen window,

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>and he can hear her when she yells out across

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the road. He responds to her in the video. Regardless

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 2>of all of that, people called her actions straight up neglect.

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>They were comparing this to the Maddie McCann case. Other

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 2>people were saying that they don't even let their children

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 2>in their backyard unattended, and so why was she letting

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>her child leave the house across the road be at

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the park on his own. And that's why I wanted

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 2>to talk about it, because there's an argument being made

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>that this is everything that's wrong with parenting now, that

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 2>we have such a tight leash on them, that we

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 2>never let them do anything, and that this is the problem.

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 2>And yet at the same time, the minute the words

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 2>came out of her mouth that she was sending the

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 2>five year old to the park alone, my stomach was

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>in or not and I just thought, oh my god,

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I just couldn't do it. I wouldn't do it because

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 2>it would be the least enjoyable experience for me, because

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I would be a nightmare, a ball of nerves the

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 2>whole time. So I want to know what your initial

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 2>reactions are.

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to provoke you on that. So I hear

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that and I feel the same way. The anxiety is enormous.

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But what if you know, and we do know from

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the research and the data that this is actually really

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>good for kids?

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeap?

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Does that change how you feel about it? Like so

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>much of parenting is actually about having to park what

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to do your people pleasing tendencies and your

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>need to protect them in order for them to spread

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>their wings. So you're a smart woman, You're the editor

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of Muma Mia, you read all the parenting books, you

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>have done all the parenting research, and yet you still

0:10:58.640 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do this.

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, And I think that is one of the

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 2>things that's tricky about parenting is that you're constantly fighting

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 2>against this need to keep them safe one hundred percent

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 2>of the time with this need to let them exist.

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>And that was the argument Charlotte made that she was like,

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 2>they need to be prepared for the world. I'm preparing

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 2>them for the world. They need to feel confident to

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 2>be away from me and to be their own character

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 2>and their own person. And so that is what she

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 2>argued that she is doing. But that was very different

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 2>to the response that she got.

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to think that I would do this. The

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 3>thing that would worry me most is actually not stranger

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 3>dangers so much as traffic danger. Did she mention, is

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 3>this across the street?

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, across the street, but quite on a quiet street, right, Yeah?

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Because I think that is a very real threat. But

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 3>I think so much depends on the child. And I

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>love that she wanted to explain she knows this child,

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 3>she wouldn't do it with this other child. And the

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 3>example I give is that, knowing all of all the

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 3>consensus of the researchers that we have to let kids

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 3>roam by themselves, I put my two kids on I

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 3>sent them on the school bus last year sort of

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 3>as an experiment. And obviously that's very safe. It's daugh

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 3>to door service. But I could tell that it was

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 3>stretching them both a bit beyond where they were comfortable.

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 3>They didn't come home beaming with pride as I might

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 3>have imagined. They came home looking a little nervous really,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 3>so I decided it was too early for them. But

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 3>this year, and I've mentioned this on the show, I

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 3>started sending them to the cafe on our block to

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 3>get to get coffees in the morning, and that really

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 3>made them feel exhilarated and they came back so filled

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>with confidence and excitement about what they'd done. I think

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 3>they did get some judgment from the cafe, but they

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 3>loved doing it. So I just want to come back

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 3>to the idea that it depends on the child, and you,

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 3>as the parent of the child, know what you feel

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 3>that they're capable of in any given moment.

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely so, yes, it does depend on the child, but

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it wholly also depends on the parenting style too, right,

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And there has been all this research and the data

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>into this, and may I go down into my what

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the researchers say, mate, please thank you so step one. Okay,

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So the first thing to say is that, as you

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>alluded to Amelia, like stranger danger is a myth, it's

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not actually a thing like if we look at them,

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Because what played out here in the comments of this

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>TikTok was a term called worst first thinking, where we

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>default to imagining the very worst case scenario and then

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>we behave like that is what is going to happen.

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>But we know from the data. It tells us that

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>most harmful encounters that children have statistically happen with people

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that they already know and trust. And there's another crazy

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>statistic that kids are more likely to be seriously injured

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in a car accident than to be taken by a stranger. Now,

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>even the Morecambe Foundation says this. This was the more

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>com Foundation was set up by Bruce and Denise Morecambe

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in memory of Daniel Walcombe, who you may remember was

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>abducted and murdered in two thousand and three. Their CEO,

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Holly Brennan says, stranger danger is based on a myth.

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not evidence based. Less than one percent of children

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>are adopted by someone who could genuinely be classified as

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a stranger. But here is what the experts want you

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to know. Peter Gray is this research psychologist at Boston University.

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>He's an emeritus professor in pediatrics and his whole job

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is to research this. And what he says is that

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>when adults are always hovering and keeping kids safe from

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>every risk, kids never get the chance to build the

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>sense that they can handle stuff or solve problems, or

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>be independent, or build resilience, and this is a recipe

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for anxiety. And what we see is that all these

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>kids nowadays have less unsupervised, self directed play than they

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>used to, and that sort of decline correlates lines up

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>perfectly with rising anxiety and depression rates over the same decades.

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And he also did a huge research piece into actually

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it was Macquari Unversity did this huge re search piece

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>into parents with anxiety raise children who are more likely

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to have anxiety, And some of the research around it

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>was because of the way that they parent. They always

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>prevent risk, they prevent dangerous situations. They have that feeling

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that they want to keep their children couched in safety,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking it's for their own good, but it's actually doing

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the opposite.

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that was a big part of what

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>bothered people so much about Charlotte's video was the lack

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 2>of anxiety. Like she does sound nervous. Of course, you

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 2>hear are in that clip saying like I'm checking him

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 2>every thirty seconds, But it wasn't this real, like deep seated,

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 2>He's going to get taken like she wasn't thinking about that.

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 2>That wasn't where her thought pro was. It was just

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 2>about you know, was he okay? Had he fallen off

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 2>a swing or something like that. And she spoke a

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit in subsequent videos because needless to say, the

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>comments were vile towards her. People were even threatening to

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 2>call child services on her and saying, we can figure

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 2>out where you live now we know you're across from

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 2>a park, Like it really went to this dark place.

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>And she was saying, given she co parents with her

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 2>partner and that her children are away from her for

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 2>half of the week, she's really had to learn to

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 2>relinquish a bit of that control over knowing what her

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 2>children are doing every second of every day, and so

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 2>when they are in her care, she tries to not

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>take that away from them either and still give them

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 2>that space to be doing that. And like you said,

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 2>mon's about stranger danger. I looked into it because I

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 2>wanted to know, like what numbers are we talking, Like

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>how rare are we talking with stranger danger? And it's

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 2>so little that they just say fewer than one percent.

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Exceedingly rare is what comes up again and again across

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 2>the board. I'm talking US, UK and in Australia. Like

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 2>even in the US, it's around one hundred children in

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 2>the US are taken by a stranger, but a lot

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 2>of those are returned, So we're talking minuscule numbers. But

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 2>I do think people will argue those numbers are so

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 2>minuscule because we don't let them roam around as much anymore.

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 2>So you know, the fear isn't completely unfounded.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask Amelia a question about the coffee run.

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>The first time that you did it, how did you

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>feel versus the tenth time, Like was it the first time?

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Were you full of anguish? Were you at the window

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>picking out? And has it become easier?

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Good question. That coffee ru is a very particular thing.

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 3>There is no road to cross. I don't think I

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 3>would ever let them do this if it involves crossing

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 3>a road. It is on our block. So that's the

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 3>first thing I want to say. The second thing about

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 3>it is that I felt proud, actually because I felt

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 3>proud of them for meeting the challenge, but also proud

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 3>of myself because I am aware of that research. I

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 3>am aware of the idea that experts sinc we're wrapping

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 3>children in cottonwall and that's contributing to higher anxiety and

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 3>depression rates later on. But it's easier said than done

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 3>to surrender the reins. I come back to something you

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 3>said at the start, Moons. I think that's so true.

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 3>The ongoing tension in parenting is you want to give

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 3>them freedom, you want them to grow up, but you

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 3>also want to look after them, and that tension it's

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 3>not easy to resolve. And I take my hat off

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 3>to Charlotte Blandford tag because I think what she did

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 3>there was hard. It was hard.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, palette cleanser Now because of the night, I

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>quite like to get into bed with my electory blanket

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>on and have a good old dirty scroll on Reddit.

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I mean, I'm not watching ted Lasso anymore.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Plenty of time up my sleeve for it. So someone

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>on Reddit posted this week and I wanted to bring

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>it to you for your consideration. It was in the

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>subreddit Australian Nosagia and they wrote, I really miss the

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Aussie slang that was part of almost every conversation when

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I was in school, rack off bloodger festie rats as.

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Can we start using them more? Agaan please? So girls,

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>give me your very best school yard slang that you

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>want to bring back.

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I want to bring back mole. We used to call

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 2>each other moles all the time, and it was it

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 2>could be derogatory or it could be endearing. It was

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of like the C word. It was really just

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 2>in the context of how you used it. That's so random.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>We used to just call everything random. It wasn't that random,

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 2>but you would call it that. And talking to the hand.

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we need to make people do that much. Yes,

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 2>talk to the hand, because if they say listen and

0:19:55.800 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 2>everything was like chat or rank, I remember r. That's

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 2>so rank. Well that's mad chat there my face.

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 3>Why do we have so many words for things that

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 3>were discussed?

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Interesting? Yeah, mine, This really took me on a trip

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 3>down memory lane. First of all, rakoff is the greatest.

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Another reddit classic is someone put together a supercut of

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 3>the original Heartbreak High characters saying rack off to each other.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if either of you watched the original

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Heartbreak High on ABC. It was very risky. It was

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 3>like a grassy bit for Australia and they all said

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 3>rack off to each other. It was just it was

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 3>just the greatest get stuffed. Oh yeah, gets Captain Kim

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Lyon gets stuffed. The pair of views sucked in. We

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 3>don't say sucked in enough. It's a great everyday expression. Yes,

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 3>and dobber like you don't. I feel like that's gone,

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Like kids today are not even familiar with the concept

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 3>of dobbing.

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 2>No, they're.

0:20:57.840 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 3>Yours.

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Just do you remember don't pike on me, don't pike,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>don't be a piker?

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, And it was like the worst thing you

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 2>could be if you if you did that, if you bailed.

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you bailed. It was don't pike on me. Yeah,

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm cut. I'm so cut.

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 2>I feel like this.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Is like South Australian. I don't know.

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah we had cut. Yeah, we had cut in the

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Western suburbs, so we didn't have a hole in South Australia.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, that's Stacy.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.719
<v Speaker 3>You got something here that I need you to bring up.

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, okay, so this is not slang, so I'm

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 2>breaking the rules. But it was the first thing I

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>thought of. As soon as I heard the words Festi

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 2>and rack Off, I was like, it brought me back

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to the time that we would draw stusses on everything.

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember, Yes, they were like a three D

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 2>s like why did we do that?

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 3>And why was it everywhere? No?

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Like I had them all over my Pensylca.

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 3>You remember feeling like my mastery the of the.

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.959
<v Speaker 2>Yes and you were like so cool and batter if

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 2>you mailed you know what.

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Project for next week? Parenting out loud listeners. Teach your kids.

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, teach them a life skill that they'll actually.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 2>Yes, this is our generational skill that we need to

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>past out.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And if they don't get it, you can be like, ah, sucking, yes,

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>sucked in.

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Your dirty mole.

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 3>What do you want your kid to be when they

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 3>grow up? A recent New York Times article shows there

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 3>is this growing disconnect between what parents want for their

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 3>kids and what kids want for themselves. The article was

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 3>called mom, Dad, I want.

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>To be a worlder, great headline.

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 3>So choosing a trade is for some young people a

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 3>way to be proactive about this changing employment landscape that

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 3>we're always hearing so much about. They keep hearing AIS

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 3>coming for you, aas coming for white collar jobs, and

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 3>they think to themselves, but can AI fix or sink?

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 3>And the answer is at this time of recording, no.

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 3>But for many parents there's still this linking stigma around

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 3>the trades, this sense that having a vocational occupation is

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 3>inferior to an office job. And one vocational school expert

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 3>who was interviewed kind of summed it up. He said,

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to get them proud to say my kid's

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 3>a worlder at a cocktail party. So the picture in

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 3>Australia is very similar. I was interested to learn that

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 3>apprenticeships are up eighteen percent year on year and there's

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 3>national shortages in eighteen construction and trades occupations, so that

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 3>includes electricians, plumbers, carpenter's, bricklayers, Ruth Tyler's. Australia needs more

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 3>of them. So why can't parents just get over themselves

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.719
<v Speaker 3>and instead of saying become a doctor, become a lawyer,

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 3>say I really want you to be a bricklayer, Stacy.

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 2>I think there's two reasons that this goes on. I

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 2>think one of them is that classic thing of it

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 2>was drilled into us by you know gen X or

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 2>boomer parents, like you hustle, hustle, you work hard, you

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 2>climb the ladder. It was all about a ladder, like

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 2>you've had to keep going up a ladder.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Which is actually used in a lot of trades. Yes, true, true.

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 2>Famously ladder is very popular in the trades. So I

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 2>think part of it is that is that we see

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 2>certain careers as having and most of them are boring

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 2>white collar desk jobs that you are climbing up and

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 2>there's the next stage in the next stage above you,

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 2>whereas trades are seen as like career jobs where you

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 2>were you are doing them for a lifelong, but they're

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 2>not seen in that traditional progression way, which is just

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>is actually unfounded. It's not true there is. But I

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 2>think the other thing that's going on is exactly what

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 2>that guy said, that we want something like we see

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 2>our children as an extension of ourselves, and we kind

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 2>of want to say, well, look what they did.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Look for cocktail party.

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.360
<v Speaker 2>It's the cocktail party theory. It's one hundred percent right.

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 2>You want something to gloat about, like, let's be real's

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 2>that's probably what it comes down to. For the people

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>where that matters. It's that you're thinking, oh, well, I

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 2>want to be able to impress them with how brilliant

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 2>my child is. And their job is usually the first

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 2>question when you ask what do they do?

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Successive governments over decades have disincentivized young people from choosing university.

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 3>They've said, we'd rather that you just start making money upfront,

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 3>go through a tafe or a trade school, hit the

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 3>ground running as a bricklayer or as an electrician. We

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 3>don't want to invest anymore in that longer term university education.

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 3>And young people have listened to that and gone, Okay,

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking that at face value, particularly as cost of

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 3>living rises and student loans get higher and higher, I

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 3>can see why for young people they don't want to

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 3>make that investment in themselves.

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think the whole ai of it has ruined

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 2>the guaranteed return on investment. Like you know, before it

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 2>would have been that I'll put in the hard yards

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 2>now and I'll have this big debt, but then I

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 2>know that I'm going to get a higher paying job

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 2>at the end of it. That was kind of the.

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Deal literally has In fact, salaries between white collar jobs

0:25:56.119 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and the trades have actually the gap has really now.

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So why would you go and put yourself through

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 2>four years at that high cost when the job you

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 2>want might not even be there at the end of it.

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Like you can go and start doing a trade now,

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>like you can see why for this younger generation it's

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 2>so much more attractive to them to just go and

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 2>start earning money.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 3>But then I wonder, because this article in the New

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 3>York Times is very much about gen Z and gen Z,

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 3>it must be said in the US, where the university

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 3>system is quite differently structured financially, my question to you

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 3>is do you think Australian Gen Alpha kids are going

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 3>to even experience that sense of stigma around the trades

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 3>and vocations versus professions or do you think by then,

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 3>because of AI, because of the salary windows narrowing, they're

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 3>not even going to see this as a thing.

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know. It feels like there's kind of

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 2>a big flattening.

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Now, Yeah, it's that great flattening. I love that phrase, Stacey.

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 3>You made the point that we're all sitting here doing

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 3>a job that we could not have imagined, that was

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 3>not in our year twelve job's guide at all.

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Like, I don't think our parents would have been sitting

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 2>around going I really hope my daughter like spends her

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 2>days yapping in front of a microphone and other people

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 2>listen to that, Like, I still don't know if they

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 2>fully understand what my job is now and you know so,

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I think this is probably just something that happens with

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 2>every cycle, with every generation of kids. There will be

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 2>jobs that we have no clue about and that we

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 2>might go, why are they doing that when they could

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 2>do this? But you know the world is expanding and

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 2>changing and they'll move on to those roles.

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's all we have time for today on Parenting

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Out Loud. Thank you so much for spending your precious,

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>precious time with us. We do have a lowis little

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>favor to ask. We're looking for more smart parents to

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>come and listen to the show and to be part

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of these conversations. So if there's someone in your life,

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>school parent or like childcare parent that you're like, oh yeah,

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I reckon, I reckon, they would like some smart chat

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're searching for a new podcast, we'd love you

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>to share this with them, just like flick them the

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>link mentioned in conversation, grab their phone and follow the

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 1>show from their phone. Thanks so bossy, so bossy. All right,

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>we will see you again next week. Bye. Mummy. Acknowledges

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the traditional owners of the land on which we have

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>recorded this podcast