Speaker 1: Late Welcome to the Late Debase. Good evening and welcome
Speaker 1: to the program.
Speaker 2: I'm Caleb Bond with Liz Stora and Joe Hildebrand. Well,
Speaker 2: get the fighter jets ready, that's what Joe Biden reckons
Speaker 2: you'll need if you want to take him on. Personally,
Speaker 2: I think a feather would probably do the job. But
Speaker 2: we'll tell you why that is later in the show,
Speaker 2: when we get to the papers, we'll tell you about
Speaker 2: the school that spent one hundred thousand dollars on a
Speaker 2: robot dog. I know it costs a lot to buy
Speaker 2: a pure bred dog, but one hundred k seems a
Speaker 2: bit steep to me. And green activists have actually managed
Speaker 2: to make the new portrait of King Charles look better.
Speaker 1: We'll show you what it looks like now.
Speaker 2: But first, if you were a chicken hearing all the
Speaker 2: news about bird flu over the last few days, you
Speaker 2: may well be reacting.
Speaker 1: Something like this.
Speaker 3: Let's go.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: Apparently the big problem here is that if you have
Speaker 2: chickens in your backyard, you are the real threat. Now
Speaker 2: we know that there are only five outbreaks currently in
Speaker 2: Victoria of bird flu. They have been contained, thousands of
Speaker 2: chickens have been killed a million chickens, well, a millionaires thousands,
Speaker 2: is it not?
Speaker 1: There are thousands In a minute a million.
Speaker 3: Chickens. At least ten chickens have been killed.
Speaker 2: Genocide is being perpetrated upon the chickens in order to
Speaker 2: stop the proliferation of bird flu. If you have chickens
Speaker 2: in your backyard in Victoria, or at least across vast
Speaker 2: swaths of the place, you've been told to keep them
Speaker 2: either in a shed or a cage, and there are
Speaker 2: heavy penalties if you.
Speaker 1: Don't do so.
Speaker 2: But one researcher from Queensland seas, just as if you
Speaker 2: thought you know bird flu didn't sound scary enough, this.
Speaker 1: Is COVID with wings. This is a particular searcher, Dr Mason.
Speaker 1: He says.
Speaker 2: If we consider this like COVID, where we enforced nationwide
Speaker 2: lockdowns to try and contain the spread, this is much
Speaker 2: the same, except all it takes is one infected bird
Speaker 2: to fly the virus from.
Speaker 1: A backyard to a chicken farm.
Speaker 2: Well, doctor Matt Mason, I have no doubt that it
Speaker 2: could well move between someone's backyard and a chicken farm.
Speaker 2: But seriously, it only exists in Victoria. We're not talking
Speaker 2: about the entirety of the country. This is a researcher
Speaker 2: in Queensland talking to the Career Mail, where there.
Speaker 1: Is no bird flu. Look, I know it's bad. Million
Speaker 1: chickens are being killed.
Speaker 2: Liz Great, got dozens of chickens.
Speaker 1: You've got, You've got Coals.
Speaker 2: Has of course restricted the sale of eggs everywhere except
Speaker 2: w Way.
Speaker 1: Why w Way. I don't know. Maybe they'd buy so.
Speaker 2: Many eggs over there, But the egg industry has said
Speaker 2: there is no shortage of eggs. There is nothing to
Speaker 2: worry about. So you pile all this stuff on top
Speaker 2: of each other. It's covid with wings. You know we're
Speaker 2: going to have egg shortages. It's the toilet paper of
Speaker 2: the chicken world. It leads people to think that this
Speaker 2: is some great thing that's going to kill everyone. That's
Speaker 2: going to be the end of chickens in Australia.
Speaker 1: It's not really that bad.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we're going for another hell scare. We're playing the
Speaker 4: fearpool and now now it's bird flu.
Speaker 5: It's the latest thing. Everyone get on it.
Speaker 4: Meanwhile, only four percent of our twenty one million egg
Speaker 4: laying hens has been affected. Everyone calmed down. It was
Speaker 4: only picked up on five farms. That's where the million
Speaker 4: chickens got excommunicated by the way went to chicken Heaven.
Speaker 4: The one strain was found on four farms. Another different
Speaker 4: strain was found on the fifth farm.
Speaker 1: But the acts that.
Speaker 4: This guy's now suggesting that backyard farms could be some
Speaker 4: kind of carriers. If anything, if you've got a few
Speaker 4: choks in your backyard, you're the least likely to have
Speaker 4: a chook with avian flu that's going to fly to
Speaker 4: a farm and infect those guys.
Speaker 2: To your chickens in the first place, because you can
Speaker 2: make the farm they've got chickens coming in left, right,
Speaker 2: et cetera.
Speaker 4: Indeed, hence they've had doubt chicken flo So the fact
Speaker 4: that this is even being suggested, I hate anything that
Speaker 4: points to any kind of limitations on people who want
Speaker 4: to grow their own food or in this case, just
Speaker 4: have a few eggs hatched in the backyard. Have written
Speaker 4: not well, not hatched, but harvested from the backyard, from
Speaker 4: a few chooks in the backyard. And if that's where
Speaker 4: this ends up going, I will blow my stack. We
Speaker 4: already know that Agriculture Victoria has shut down these smaller
Speaker 4: suppliers and that does get me furious. Surf Coast eggs
Speaker 4: have been taken off the shelves, and how's this letter
Speaker 4: from West Eggs, who are a small family owned business.
Speaker 4: Eggs are their life. They're sent out this letter to
Speaker 4: all their customers saying, look, please bear with us agriculturists.
Speaker 4: Victoria have shut us down. We can't have any eggs
Speaker 4: leave our property. This is extremely distressing to us because
Speaker 4: eggs are our income. We still have a business to run,
Speaker 4: a family to feed, staff to pay. This is what
Speaker 4: gets me fired up about these things, because fine, the
Speaker 4: massive farms, yes, test everyone kill a million birds if
Speaker 4: you have to do what you need to do to
Speaker 4: contain the thing. But these smaller suppliers, these family, little
Speaker 4: farms now being shut down, it just looks like we're
Speaker 4: we're doing the same that we did back in nineteen
Speaker 4: ninety where it's like we I guess the question is
Speaker 4: is this really about health or is it about obliterating
Speaker 4: the little guys, because again, the little guys haven't been
Speaker 4: implicated in this in order to help the big guys.
Speaker 6: I don't think they're talking about chicken run where the
Speaker 6: chickens actually fly out and go there saying like any
Speaker 6: other bird, because this I don't think this just infects chickens.
Speaker 3: Does it affect all bird?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 6: Sure, so any other bird could pick it up in
Speaker 6: a chicken farm and a chicken coop in a backyard
Speaker 6: and then fly to chi.
Speaker 2: Far more likely picks it up at the chicken farm
Speaker 2: brings it to your chickens.
Speaker 1: In your backyard. Like, how if you've got four.
Speaker 2: Chickens in your backyard that you've had for the last
Speaker 2: two years, how are your chickens going to get bird
Speaker 2: flu unless someone brings it from another place, most likely
Speaker 2: a farm.
Speaker 3: You're going to say, China, where.
Speaker 1: Could well be?
Speaker 2: Don't forget the guys.
Speaker 6: Humans at least you can control you can, well, you
Speaker 6: can control their behavior if you're a fashionst dictorial state.
Speaker 6: But humans can't control their baby. So you can talk
Speaker 6: with humans, You can reason with humans and say, all right,
Speaker 6: don't do this. Might be a good idea not to
Speaker 6: do that. I, as you know, we're right on the
Speaker 6: front line saying that COVID restrictions were excessive and wrong
Speaker 6: and not based in science. All that has since been
Speaker 6: proven true. But we can't really tell birds what to do.
Speaker 6: So surely there does have to be some kind of like,
Speaker 6: if you don't want it spreading everywhere, you do have
Speaker 6: to have some kind of restriction.
Speaker 2: But they've already got the restriction. In Victoria, if you
Speaker 2: have chickens in your backyard, you are required now to
Speaker 2: keep them either in a cage so they cannot wander,
Speaker 2: or in a shed.
Speaker 1: They've already put the restriction in.
Speaker 3: That cage has to be rated a four star.
Speaker 2: Energy right, it must have cooling, an insulation, and it
Speaker 2: has to be draft proofed. Our the story we're talking
Speaker 2: about last night in Victoria where they're imposing this on landlords.
Speaker 2: But still, what is it any business or any problem
Speaker 2: of a person who's got chickens in the backyard.
Speaker 1: Oh you know, you might be the one that causes
Speaker 1: the outbreak. It's got nothing to do with you. If
Speaker 1: the chickens come in from somewhere else, you problem.
Speaker 3: Oh well, I suppose, yes, that is true.
Speaker 6: But I'm just saying that I'm not particularly across Avian
Speaker 6: veterinary science, whereas I am across human behavior, because I've
Speaker 6: done it pretty much every bad thing that any human
Speaker 6: being can do, plus all good ones.
Speaker 2: Hang on, what is should we can we go through
Speaker 2: the list here alphabetically.
Speaker 6: You know, but I suppose, like, okay, I remember covering
Speaker 6: the equine flu, right, and that was when I first
Speaker 6: got to know Peter of Landers, and he did amazing
Speaker 6: things to help the keep the horse racing industry going
Speaker 6: while quarantining these other horses. And again this is I reckon,
Speaker 6: this is where he learned his straps to keep the
Speaker 6: NRL going when COVID came. Just saying, maybe you don't
Speaker 6: want the entire like even with the eggs r us guys,
Speaker 6: I don't know if you want, you know, if this
Speaker 6: could shut down the entire egg farming industry, is it
Speaker 6: not worth having some quarantine?
Speaker 3: I mean I don't actually can into a copyhouse kids.
Speaker 4: They've done in the bigger farms where it is required.
Speaker 4: I'm just saying, why crack down on the little guys,
Speaker 4: and why is this flogging Queensland now? Talking about backyard
Speaker 4: chickens being.
Speaker 7: The chickens and your backyard, you're going to unleash it
Speaker 7: on the rest of the world, and indeed in Victoria,
Speaker 7: I mean, I mean all the way from Victoria.
Speaker 4: I don't think chickens can fly that mate.
Speaker 1: Anyway to the UK.
Speaker 4: Now where last week, Faraj had a banana milkshake shoved
Speaker 4: in his face. This week some dude has chucked chunks
Speaker 4: of cemented him while he's in the middle of campaigning.
Speaker 5: Check it out.
Speaker 4: But in signature forage fashion, he soon took to Twitter
Speaker 4: to let everyone know he was not cowed.
Speaker 8: I'm not a softy. You know you can say what
Speaker 8: you've bullomen like to me. Do you start chucking smant
Speaker 8: at me or stuck chucking stones at me? It's very,
Speaker 8: very different, and this is a willful attempt, second time
Speaker 8: in a week. In a way, it's a wilful attempt
Speaker 8: to stop me taking part in this general election and
Speaker 8: that is just plain wrong at every level.
Speaker 4: The man's got a country to save and he's not
Speaker 4: backing down. Here's one of the many reasons that he
Speaker 4: does indeed have a country to save. As we know,
Speaker 4: immigration is out of control in the UK, as it
Speaker 4: seems to be across the West, and this is one
Speaker 4: of many scenes unfolding on London streets all too regularly.
Speaker 5: It was terrified the boys had to be rescued by
Speaker 5: the police of bobbles and eggs rained down on them.
Speaker 4: This enraged Muslim mob continued to hold a rally, saying
Speaker 4: all manner of unsavory things, including the fact that since
Speaker 4: they're not afraid of death, no one's ever going to
Speaker 4: stand in their way, because to them death is the
Speaker 4: beginning of life, and therefore they are indestructible and they
Speaker 4: are here to assert their dominance. I'll tell you who's
Speaker 4: having absolutely none of that. Should she get in Now
Speaker 4: that mccron has called a snap election in France, here's
Speaker 4: Le Penn talking to one of the many parties she's
Speaker 4: had since having such an incredible win at the European
Speaker 4: Parliament elections last weekend. Here's what she's promising if when
Speaker 4: France goes to the polls next month, she's elected as president,
Speaker 4: So that pen.
Speaker 9: S elbos de fronsell come dont unrison in soul for
Speaker 9: garritur de cose kao avacuiology total give la mar de
Speaker 9: conseil lepinas you know, only avecdiology.
Speaker 8: Lets you have the.
Speaker 9: Tradition the nationality experts le corseki adoptorology. Let me you
Speaker 9: have that cod cad you the only tribunal opinion le
Speaker 9: lois exists in Cifi. The exappl que ab moi president
Speaker 9: say luis applica sof abian not dle mus get fer
Speaker 9: me the pleasure do an expersave.
Speaker 1: There's association.
Speaker 4: Wouldn't you give your front teeth? Wouldn't you sever a
Speaker 4: limb just to have one or two? God, maybe a
Speaker 4: handful of leaders who are happy to talk like that,
Speaker 4: brave enough to talk like that on our national stage
Speaker 4: here in Australia and simply say there are certain ideologies
Speaker 4: that are uncompatible with ours and from now on we
Speaker 4: are not having a bar of it.
Speaker 2: And of course there's been no appetite whatsoever to go after,
Speaker 2: certainly with the full force of the law that we
Speaker 2: actually have in this country. Reach isn't whatever in light
Speaker 2: of October seven. And you know what a great language
Speaker 2: is the French.
Speaker 3: Like, oh my god, you serious like throwing up.
Speaker 1: Awful stand I know you hate I know you hate
Speaker 1: the French, and I know you hate La.
Speaker 2: The French make Grete wine and Grete cheese and great food.
Speaker 2: Otherwise they're very free.
Speaker 1: Over there, and they've got a great But it's the reason,
Speaker 1: the reason you have people like people like lapin coming
Speaker 1: to the fore.
Speaker 2: And of course Farage is doing so well, and I
Speaker 2: Suspectable will do well with his Reform Party in the UK.
Speaker 2: You know, people going around throwing some meents at him,
Speaker 2: and all it does is embolden him and make him
Speaker 2: look better.
Speaker 1: It makes him look more.
Speaker 2: Popular, because if you've got to go after this, and
Speaker 2: this is what you've been talking about, you the left
Speaker 2: keeps doing themselves over by demonizing these people so hard
Speaker 2: for things that are legitimate concerns amongst the population. The
Speaker 2: people go, well, God, if these dickheads hate him so much,
Speaker 2: then I'm going to vote for him. And that's what
Speaker 2: you saw broadly across the EU with the European elections,
Speaker 2: and over in Germany with the a FD party, which
Speaker 2: is one of the right wing parties that did well
Speaker 2: out of the EU election.
Speaker 1: They've actually had an uptick in the youth vote. The
Speaker 1: a f D party in Germany. Leeds not make from
Speaker 1: ros I.
Speaker 3: Think we should.
Speaker 6: You can't say that if you say I FD is
Speaker 6: not seriously very hard Nazis. They're extremely far right party
Speaker 6: and not not like compliment a right fine, yep, no,
Speaker 6: go for it, like acting more youth fantastic?
Speaker 4: What you know about the f a f D that
Speaker 4: make them raging Nazis, the.
Speaker 6: A f D are an extremely, extremely, extremely unpleasant bunch
Speaker 6: of people.
Speaker 2: But.
Speaker 6: Around some of those other much much darker historically.
Speaker 2: Okay, let's for a minute then, except your premise, they're
Speaker 2: a very nasty bunch of people. Why do you think
Speaker 2: there has been a ten percent increase in the youth
Speaker 2: vote for such a nasty bunch of people.
Speaker 1: Sorry, Lizzie, you okay, over, slowly, slowly die now.
Speaker 2: The reaction you have had across Europe is because no
Speaker 2: one has taken any notice of legitimate concerns about immigration,
Speaker 2: the cost of living, the standard of living, et cetera.
Speaker 2: That's why you have a rise in the vote for
Speaker 2: these parties. It's why you get a ten percent rise
Speaker 2: in the youth vote. Where across the world it's generally
Speaker 2: acknowledged that young people quite greeny and left wing, and
Speaker 2: you've had somewhat of a change in that because people
Speaker 2: are seeing what's happening around them.
Speaker 1: No one's taken it seriously.
Speaker 6: I think there's a big difference between the sort of
Speaker 6: values that these parties have and their their history, what
Speaker 6: they are based in, how they were formed.
Speaker 5: Well, let's talk about them now. As the referring to history.
Speaker 3: Joe like, what want to talk about them now?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 3: The party? The party? Now, I'll tell you about what
Speaker 3: A former member says that now.
Speaker 4: God's waiting room. He's been a member of the party
Speaker 4: for most of his life.
Speaker 1: And he's like, what does it become?
Speaker 3: You're not even going to take the work member.
Speaker 4: For you have said that the a f D Party
Speaker 4: as a whole historically has been raging Nazi radical right.
Speaker 3: They have very very about the anti immigration to.
Speaker 4: Day that is obviously pushing against the radical leftists currently
Speaker 4: in power because they've had enough of it, not because
Speaker 4: they're Nazis, not because they radical.
Speaker 7: White right wing.
Speaker 10: They need an air.
Speaker 5: Problem that has taken the.
Speaker 6: IFD are not like Donald Trump, They're not like Nigel Farage.
Speaker 6: They are not like the other populist parties that have
Speaker 6: sprung up more recently in other country. The A f
Speaker 6: D are a nasty bunch of really bad people.
Speaker 4: Illustration of what you are talking about modern day illustrating, not.
Speaker 3: Modern day illustration.
Speaker 6: People can go and look into it if they want,
Speaker 6: but I'm just saying, for the sake of this show
Speaker 6: and for the sake of your fine reputations, I wouldn't
Speaker 6: be praising a f D as a bunch of freedom
Speaker 6: fighters and a bunch of wonderful I don't think neither
Speaker 6: of them did that.
Speaker 2: But even if you accept the premise as I said before,
Speaker 2: that there are a nasty bunch of people, there's a
Speaker 2: reason that you would have a rise in that vote,
Speaker 2: and it's because no one takes.
Speaker 1: And it is because of the left that.
Speaker 2: People get pushed to that level, because no one else
Speaker 2: takes them seriously.
Speaker 3: Yeah, no, absolutely, there are a reason why people go
Speaker 3: to Well, I'm not young, so the left.
Speaker 6: My people, My people are moderate centrists who are to
Speaker 6: the right of the left spectrum, not the same people
Speaker 6: by the sort of people who are driving the youth
Speaker 6: into the arm of AfD, and certainly not the people
Speaker 6: who are in AfD themselves. But look, we all know
Speaker 6: that young people do stupid things. We all know that
Speaker 6: people generally, if they feel.
Speaker 5: So they're only voting for the.
Speaker 6: People feel different, disenfranchised by the government they've got, they
Speaker 6: are going to seek out other alternatives, and particularly if
Speaker 6: you're young, you'll go to the alternative that speaks most
Speaker 6: directly to you, that seems to have the simplest Ideas
Speaker 6: I was a student socialist when I was. When I
Speaker 6: was a teenager and a UNI student, that was idiotic.
Speaker 6: That was young, That was dumbest because I didn't know
Speaker 6: any better. I got older and I learned young people
Speaker 6: do stupid things. They have often very naive and simplistic
Speaker 6: political ideologies and naive and simplistic politics. And then hopefully
Speaker 6: you grow older and you grow out of it and
Speaker 6: you become more sensible. As Winston Churchill said, if you're
Speaker 6: not a socialist at eighteen, you have no heart. If
Speaker 6: you're still a socialist at fifty, you have no head.
Speaker 2: Well, I'm heartless, hardcaring, heartless individual. I've got one theory
Speaker 2: actually as to why the AfD vote may have surged
Speaker 2: among you. Take a look at one of the MPs
Speaker 2: that was elected in the EU elections. Have we got
Speaker 2: the photograph here? We may or may not have the
Speaker 2: photo doesn't look like.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there we go. If you're a young man in Germany,
Speaker 1: as if.
Speaker 2: You would not vote for her, I reckon, that's why
Speaker 2: the a FD vote has gone up.
Speaker 1: She's single handedly done the good.
Speaker 3: What their position is on the.
Speaker 1: S S, I'll come on.
Speaker 2: Joe the lot, Joe, Joe, Joe, guys, Joe, I know
Speaker 2: where you're going with this. They expelled the who made
Speaker 2: the comments, who made whether there were certain members of
Speaker 2: the s S who were not criminals.
Speaker 1: They expelled him. What do you want them to do? Say, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: we love you spell question.
Speaker 3: The question is why I was there in the first place.
Speaker 1: The question is there are idiots in the Labor Party
Speaker 1: as well?
Speaker 7: That party Glass Houses should.
Speaker 3: Not one in the Labor Party who's an apologist for
Speaker 3: the SS.
Speaker 2: Well, there are people in the Labor Party who are
Speaker 2: apologists for the slaughter of Jews? Does that mean the
Speaker 2: entire Labor Party he believes in the slaughter.
Speaker 3: Of Slightly different being, I don't think just for the
Speaker 3: slaughter of I.
Speaker 4: Think there are They have accused Israel of war crimes
Speaker 4: and genocide. Their names are head Edge, used it and
Speaker 4: an r Le just to name two.
Speaker 3: I think that's slightly I think that is slightly different.
Speaker 4: I think you will defend them regardless.
Speaker 3: I think that's lamenting.
Speaker 6: But lamenting the deaths of Palestinians is not the same
Speaker 6: as saying, hey, not everyone in the SS was a
Speaker 6: bad We're not talking.
Speaker 4: About lamenting the deaths everyone ought to be lamenting the
Speaker 4: deaths we're talking about accusing Israel for simply trying to
Speaker 4: get their hostages back doing what they must, while her
Speaker 4: Muss uses their own people as human shields. Israel could
Speaker 4: have done this without killing anybody, but no, they've been
Speaker 4: forced to because again the Palestine, you know.
Speaker 3: It actually did commit genocide.
Speaker 6: But there.
Speaker 4: Is a reason why the a f D are now
Speaker 4: polling higher than each of Germany's three ruling coalition parties.
Speaker 4: So you can say voted for them is just Nazis now,
Speaker 4: But no, I've seen that there is a.
Speaker 6: Difference the parties and the people who are in them
Speaker 6: and what they stand for, and people who will flock
Speaker 6: to party because they feel like they're not being.
Speaker 2: The conflation with the party anyway, just just to be clear,
Speaker 2: inflation with the party. Just to be clear, We're not
Speaker 2: We're not clear, can I finish? We are not suggesting
Speaker 2: the particular Labor MPs are apologists for the slaughter of Jews.
Speaker 2: We are talking specifically about anti Israel's sentiment. That is
Speaker 2: not to say that there could be members and I'm
Speaker 2: sure there are members of the Labor Party given the
Speaker 2: tendencies of some people within the party who would be
Speaker 2: apologists for the slaughter was just for.
Speaker 6: A Nazi RANGI and you cannot say the same thing
Speaker 6: about AfD. And you do not want to go to
Speaker 6: the ground defending these guys. I swear, I promise you.
Speaker 6: I'm trying to look out for you. I'm trying to
Speaker 6: help you.
Speaker 1: You cannot take my size.
Speaker 2: You cannot visit the sins of certain members of a
Speaker 2: party upon the whole party.
Speaker 1: And that's kind of what you were suggested, prety.
Speaker 4: Okay, let's talk about former Deputy Chief Health Officer. His
Speaker 4: name is Nick Cooksworth.
Speaker 5: You would know him.
Speaker 4: He's basically a household name and he was one of
Speaker 4: many throughout the pandemic who were talking up the jabs
Speaker 4: as everyone did.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 4: This morning on two GB he told Ben Fordham not
Speaker 4: only is he done with the COVID jabs, but he's
Speaker 4: been done with them for years. I've had my influenza
Speaker 4: vaccine and I'm still being.
Speaker 1: Vaccinated for COVID.
Speaker 2: No, when did you stop doing that?
Speaker 1: About two years ago?
Speaker 8: I had three vaccines and that's been enough for me.
Speaker 1: Any reason? Why?
Speaker 8: Because I don't think I need any more, Ben, And
Speaker 8: the science tells me that I don't.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 5: The science says that now does it.
Speaker 4: Well, here's a little helpful mashup of the same man,
Speaker 4: Nick Kotsworth, encouraging other people to still get it over
Speaker 4: that same period of time that he decided he'd had
Speaker 4: enough for himself.
Speaker 1: Those who choose not to get vaccinated need to There
Speaker 1: needs to be some sort of incentive, stick, perhaps.
Speaker 10: And what is a reasonable level of community vaccination to
Speaker 10: achieve before we abandon mandates?
Speaker 1: Do you get a fifth dose?
Speaker 4: Your protection against severe disease is enhanced for around about
Speaker 4: eight to twelve weeks, and then it.
Speaker 1: Returns to what it was after the fourth dose.
Speaker 11: Well, I think certainly we didn't get it wrong promoting
Speaker 11: the vaccines, Caul, but the mandates.
Speaker 1: Yes, how do you like that?
Speaker 4: Trust the experts, they said, here's the expert, And there
Speaker 4: he was encouraging everybody else to get it, even insinuating
Speaker 4: that they're there ought to be some sort of stick
Speaker 4: and incentive. Well, he actually called time on it a
Speaker 4: couple of years later himself and says, oh, I'm not
Speaker 4: taking it anymore, and the science says that I don't
Speaker 4: have to take it anymore. I think it's very important
Speaker 4: that we revisit these things when these guys get caught out,
Speaker 4: because people who trusted these guys need to be reminded
Speaker 4: just how badly they were betrayed by them. I was
Speaker 4: watching an interview recently of Tucker Carlson and the guy
Speaker 4: asked him, so, why didn't you get the job? And
Speaker 4: I really resonated with his answer. He said, look, I'm
Speaker 4: not a medical person, I'm not a scientist. I simply
Speaker 4: didn't trust these people, all the people trying to sell
Speaker 4: it to us. I simply said to myself, I genuinely
Speaker 4: don't believe you. In fact, I don't even think you
Speaker 4: believe yourself. And as someone who also didn't take it,
Speaker 4: I totally resonated with that.
Speaker 2: I appreciate Coachworth saying look, I haven't taken it for
Speaker 2: two years because I don't believe it's of any value
Speaker 2: to me anymore. It would be nice if that then
Speaker 2: came with a small apology to say, look, I was
Speaker 2: wrong too for so long, suggest that you should also
Speaker 2: be taking it because it would bring such great value
Speaker 2: to you. Because you know, if someone can put their
Speaker 2: hand up and say I got it wrong, you actually
Speaker 2: go okay, yep, you're a human, you got it wrong.
Speaker 2: You're admitting it, admitting that you got it wrong, and
Speaker 2: we appreciate that you have said that.
Speaker 1: He hasn't actually gone that far, has.
Speaker 6: He, Joe No, But I mean I don't know how
Speaker 6: much he did actually get it wrong. He said that
Speaker 6: in the early days it was very implied.
Speaker 3: I haven't had one for it, no matter who's in power.
Speaker 1: So this is all absolutely quite trapped from our bow
Speaker 1: or what.
Speaker 3: The issues are.
Speaker 2: Labour Scare campaign is already looking desperate.
Speaker 4: Chris Kenny has the courage to question everyone and everything.
Speaker 2: Don't take our prosperity, our democracy, our freedom for granted.
Speaker 1: They're always under thread.
Speaker 10: Let's stand up for our values, demand better from our
Speaker 10: leaders and question everything.
Speaker 1: For Kenny Report Monday to Thursday on Sky News.
Speaker 10: Get sixty months interest free at Harvey Norman no the
Speaker 10: buzzard no interest with sixty monthly repayments from Latitude Financial Services,
Speaker 10: and receive a bonus gift card. I've the one thousand dollars.
Speaker 10: That's one hundred dollar gift card for every thousand year spend.
Speaker 10: Turns for these changes and exclusions are play Harvey Nomen
Speaker 10: clearance on now Roach.
Speaker 6: I think that's probably fair enough. My preference at the
Speaker 6: time was if you vaccinated, you're immediately out of lockdown.
Speaker 6: You can do whatever you want, and that would encourage
Speaker 6: people to take it. I think early on, I think
Speaker 6: it was part of the vaccine hesitancy among Astrazenica, and
Speaker 6: people go, I'm not sure if the vaccines really right
Speaker 6: for melan blah blah, when everyone's just going cold, can
Speaker 6: we please get out of here? I think, you know,
Speaker 6: I don't think obviously we know that you know, COVID
Speaker 6: in terms of things like the Spanish flu or the
Speaker 6: pibotic plague or other great pestilences throughout history, there's nowhere
Speaker 6: near as deadly as them. I don't think the vaccine
Speaker 6: is anywhere near as deadly as COVID for older people,
Speaker 6: clearly played a really good role for people who were
Speaker 6: going to be fine with COVID anyway, like me, like you, No,
Speaker 6: you probably didn't need to take it. But at a
Speaker 6: time when that wasn't clear, and we all wanted to
Speaker 6: just get out of lockdown and get on with our lives,
Speaker 6: I thought taking the vaccine right.
Speaker 2: Thing were one of coming in quite clear very early on,
Speaker 2: was that the vaccine did not stop transmission, and it
Speaker 2: didn't stop you catching it right now. The argument was
Speaker 2: that almost like some sort of pill you might take
Speaker 2: that it would you reduce your chance of transit, it
Speaker 2: would reduce your chance of contracting it, at which point,
Speaker 2: surely it is just a personal choice. I have a
Speaker 2: personal choice as to whether I want to take this
Speaker 2: vaccine that may help lower my chance of contracting COVID.
Speaker 2: It's not some great social help to the world. It's
Speaker 2: literally just about you. And on that basis, the idea
Speaker 2: of mandates were rubbish, and so to.
Speaker 6: Be found, the mandates and is certainly the mandates after
Speaker 6: a time should have been lifted.
Speaker 2: By the time we got onto the vaccine. Here Israel
Speaker 2: was already onto their third dose. I mean they were
Speaker 2: aware of how quickly they needed.
Speaker 1: To go through the booster system in order to keep
Speaker 1: this the man.
Speaker 6: The mandates were kind of like a flip of what
Speaker 6: like What was really initially happening was it was an
Speaker 6: incentive scheme. So it was saying, all right, if you
Speaker 6: want to get out, if you want to get your
Speaker 6: freedoms back, if you want to go out to work.
Speaker 6: And again I don't particularly like the fact that there
Speaker 6: were these restrictions imposed in the first place, and I
Speaker 6: railed against it and made plenty of enemies on the left,
Speaker 6: I can assure you, but they were saying, if you
Speaker 6: want to go and work, go back to work, if
Speaker 6: you want to get our lockdown, you need to be vaccinated,
Speaker 6: right And that then, because governments didn't revisit it as
Speaker 6: Cosworth said they should have, that it then ended up
Speaker 6: being a sort of default mandate where instead of it
Speaker 6: being a carrot to get people out and say, look,
Speaker 6: if you vaccinated, you can go and do all these
Speaker 6: wonderful things that you used to and you get your
Speaker 6: life back, it then inadvertently became a stick because when
Speaker 6: life sort of got back to normal, people who hadn't
Speaker 6: been vaccinated were still being excluded, even though there was
Speaker 6: no longer any real public health reason for that. And
Speaker 6: I think that is the problem, and that is where
Speaker 6: it should have been fixed up. But you know, again,
Speaker 6: at the time, I think anything you can use to
Speaker 6: limit the number of restrictions that are imposed to get
Speaker 6: kids back at school, get people back at work, and
Speaker 6: protect the other I mean, vaccines were still still invaluable
Speaker 6: in protecting people we're really vulnerable to COVID, namely the
Speaker 6: older and infirm, and.
Speaker 4: Which is all we should have ever done.
Speaker 1: And again that was, you know, a personal choice for
Speaker 1: you to take that.
Speaker 6: Yeah, they wanted to die, they could choose not to
Speaker 6: take the vaccine or whatever, but it helps you alone, right.
Speaker 1: It wasn't a particular issue of you, jab, we're going
Speaker 1: to stop COVID.
Speaker 4: We know that didn't happen, and we knew that from
Speaker 4: the very first roll out. All but it'll stop transmission.
Speaker 4: We knew it didn't.
Speaker 3: It significantly reduced. It is what they said.
Speaker 6: And this is the thing that black and white absolutism
Speaker 6: is exactly the thinking that was behind Dan Andrews and
Speaker 6: the lockdowns and the pursuit of the false idol of
Speaker 6: COVID zero, which Nick Coatesworth has also been really strong on.
Speaker 6: So you can't say, oh, no, we shouldn't have had
Speaker 6: this absolutist all or nothing approach to COVID, but we
Speaker 6: should have this absolutist all.
Speaker 3: Or nothing approached the vaccines.
Speaker 6: At the very least, you would have to say, well,
Speaker 6: some people should get vaccinated because they're at risk.
Speaker 3: Then you would have to go down there.
Speaker 4: I know one should have been forced to get vaccinated.
Speaker 4: It should have been made available. Thank you, government, You've
Speaker 4: done your job.
Speaker 5: Now leave it at that.
Speaker 4: Any step beyond that, I've got a muster's degree in
Speaker 4: human rights. Any step beyond that you have crossed a
Speaker 4: sacred line. You do not get to tell anyone. One
Speaker 4: of the only things that we have true possession over
Speaker 4: on this earth is this our bodies. Nobody gets to
Speaker 4: tell you what to put into it. Nobody even gets
Speaker 4: to manhandled it. We recognize that as assault or battery.
Speaker 5: Nobody.
Speaker 1: This is yours.
Speaker 4: And that sacred line was absolutely obliterated by the state.
Speaker 4: There is absolutely no excuse for it under any circle.
Speaker 3: But no one's holding you down and sticking your needle in.
Speaker 4: Everyone says that job.
Speaker 1: But are you really going to just put.
Speaker 5: Your family out on the streets.
Speaker 1: Because they haven't had a million days.
Speaker 4: Come on, they had a choice, They had a choice.
Speaker 4: That is nonsense and we all know it, and as
Speaker 4: a father of three kids, you should know it too,
Speaker 4: because if you're living from paycheck to paycheck and they
Speaker 4: say you can get the jab and continue to earn
Speaker 4: that ajax or you can refuse it.
Speaker 6: And you're i'turse. But clearly the vaccine needed to be there.
Speaker 6: And it needed to be taken up. And in the
Speaker 6: early days, I think I don't think it's unreasonable to say,
Speaker 6: if you want to go back to work, if you
Speaker 6: want to go back to school, if you want all
Speaker 6: this stuff back, then you need to be vaccine.
Speaker 3: But it's a.
Speaker 1: Form of coercion.
Speaker 2: If you wanted the kids back in school, you could
Speaker 2: have just opened the schools back up. And I said
Speaker 2: that go back to school. You didn't have to link
Speaker 2: it to the vaccine. Indeed, of course the federal government
Speaker 2: still recommends that the vaccine is your best protection against COVID.
Speaker 2: But it is interesting to see people who were heavily
Speaker 2: involved in the regime being put forward when it started
Speaker 2: now saying.
Speaker 1: That they haven't taken a job for two years.
Speaker 2: Let's move on to the US where Hunter Barden, of
Speaker 2: course has now been convicted of gun crimes.
Speaker 1: We all know what he got up to on that
Speaker 1: little laptop that some people said was not legit.
Speaker 2: The detailed well, let's call it the debauchery of Joe
Speaker 2: Biden's son, shall we. And of course he's now been
Speaker 2: convicted of signing a piece of paper to buy a
Speaker 2: gun at the time that he was a drug addict.
Speaker 1: In order to earn a gun in the US, you
Speaker 1: have to declare that.
Speaker 2: You are not a drug user. He falsified those documents.
Speaker 2: He is David Weiss from the Department of Justice, the
Speaker 2: Special Council, saying that no one, even the President of
Speaker 2: the United States son, is above the law.
Speaker 11: This case was about the illegal choices defendant made while
Speaker 11: in the throes of addiction, his choice to lie on
Speaker 11: a government forum when he bought a gun, and the
Speaker 11: choice to then possess that gun. It was these choices
Speaker 11: and the combination of guns and drugs that made his
Speaker 11: conduct dangerous. Second, no one in this country is above
Speaker 11: the law. Everyone must be accountable for their actions, even
Speaker 11: this defendant.
Speaker 2: The President has responded to this today he said, as
Speaker 2: I said last week, I am the President, but I
Speaker 2: am also a dad.
Speaker 1: Jill and I love our son. It's Jill's steps on
Speaker 1: it should be noted, and we are so proud of
Speaker 1: the man he is today, So proud of our convicted son.
Speaker 2: So many families who had loved one's battle addiction understand
Speaker 2: the feeling of pride seeing someone you love come out
Speaker 2: the other side and be so strong.
Speaker 1: He is not out the other side.
Speaker 2: Still a lot he't He hasn't been sentenced yet, right,
Speaker 2: so you know, he could potentially face tail time.
Speaker 1: He's not really on the other side yet. But of
Speaker 1: course there's a litany of.
Speaker 2: Other crimes that they could have gone after Hunter Biden for,
Speaker 2: but the statute of limitations was allowed to run out
Speaker 2: on all of them. So you've got a situation now
Speaker 2: where it's kind of like, Okay, Trump got done for
Speaker 2: the hush money stuff because it might have influenced the
Speaker 2: presidential election, and now sort.
Speaker 1: Of tit for tat.
Speaker 2: We've got over here proof as well that the justice
Speaker 2: system is totally unbiased because we got Hunter Biden on something,
Speaker 2: you know, but there's a lot of other stuf that
Speaker 2: they could will have gone him for and chose not
Speaker 2: to do. He is former a Republican presidential runner. Vivik
Speaker 2: Ramaswami explaining exactly what has happened here.
Speaker 12: This trial was a sham, just like the Trump trial.
Speaker 12: It was a sham, but a sham for a different reason.
Speaker 12: It's a sham designed to legitimize the Trump conviction. That's
Speaker 12: why it came right after even for charges that date
Speaker 12: way far back. But it also avoids accountability for the
Speaker 12: Biden crime family on the actual things that Hunter Biden
Speaker 12: should have been charged for, like, for example, peddling for
Speaker 12: an influence while his actual father, Joe Biden, was the
Speaker 12: Vice President of the United States, Hunter had no business
Speaker 12: serving on the board of a Ukrainian energy company, a
Speaker 12: state affiliated energy company that's affiliated with the same country
Speaker 12: Ukraine that his father now is the US president, is
Speaker 12: sending hundreds of billions of dollars of your taxpayer money
Speaker 12: to That's where the real crimes lie.
Speaker 1: Indeed, I think that's quite right.
Speaker 2: I mean, you know, they got Hunter Biden for falsifying
Speaker 2: document about him being a drag addict and he bought
Speaker 2: a gun. I think most people look at that in
Speaker 2: the same way as they look at the Trump stuff
Speaker 2: and go, really, it was not the greatest cob he's
Speaker 2: ever committed.
Speaker 1: These other stuff they could have got.
Speaker 4: Yeah, they went after the smallest charge they possibly could,
Speaker 4: the one in which also there was so much evidence
Speaker 4: they couldn't get away with not going after him. But
Speaker 4: remember this is the same DOJ that did allow the
Speaker 4: statute of limitations to run out to expire on basically
Speaker 4: his serious tax what's the best way to say charges,
Speaker 4: there were charges there. They buried evidence of the Biden's
Speaker 4: foreign bribery allegations, and then they attended to give him
Speaker 4: a sweetheart deal with really broad boundaries. Anyway, like the
Speaker 4: whole thing is such a joke. But of course the
Speaker 4: prosecutor that you just saw there, David Weize, couldn't go
Speaker 4: after any of that because it would take everyone straight
Speaker 4: back to the corruption of the Biden family.
Speaker 2: Just before we get to the break, speaking of the
Speaker 2: Biden family, he is the big man, as his son
Speaker 2: Hunter calls him, Joe Biden himself saying, get the photo
Speaker 2: JITs ready if you want to take me on.
Speaker 13: By the way, if they want to think is to
Speaker 13: take on government if we get out of line, which
Speaker 13: they're talking on again about, well guess what they need
Speaker 13: f fifties they don't need, rightful.
Speaker 1: Good luck that one anyway.
Speaker 2: Coming after the break, we'll get into the papers. We'll
Speaker 2: tell you about the school in Canberra that's been one
Speaker 2: hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: I'm on a robotic dog all that more.
Speaker 2: After this, let's get straight into the papers, starting with
Speaker 2: the Courier mail tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Liz Well, I.
Speaker 5: Thank you, Caleb, since you are so nicely.
Speaker 4: Christopherole's housing pitch polls race Judy Freehorns.
Speaker 1: Yes, Stuart Christophole.
Speaker 4: First home buyers who build a house would not pay
Speaker 4: any stamp duty on it, and struggling savers would be
Speaker 4: handed government equity to buy a home under a major
Speaker 4: housing policy to be unveiled today by Opposition leader David
Speaker 4: chris A Fooley. Isn't this just common sense policy at
Speaker 4: a time like.
Speaker 1: This, Yes, it is, I believe, no brainer.
Speaker 6: I think the Men's government's doing it. So another great
Speaker 6: labor right policy being adopted by the Power belief. Peter
Speaker 6: malanowskis is doing it in South Australia, so it's great
Speaker 6: to have everyone on the same page. Good work, my
Speaker 6: favorite boys.
Speaker 3: That's happened.
Speaker 2: I think it is worth doing it seriously because I
Speaker 2: think we're talking about this before. The biggest impediment to
Speaker 2: buying a new home is the stamp duty because.
Speaker 1: You know, you've charges and go, and then they're like.
Speaker 2: We want all this mister government says, I want all
Speaker 2: this money from you from the pleasure of buying this
Speaker 2: overpriced home in our country. You're in our state, because
Speaker 2: of course it's the state that livies the stamp duty.
Speaker 2: Why even have stamp duty in the first place. I
Speaker 2: know why we have stamp duniy because it makes lots
Speaker 2: of money for the state government, but it is such
Speaker 2: an unfair at tax, particularly.
Speaker 6: For first time That's the reason why is basically because
Speaker 6: state governments used to.
Speaker 3: Levy income correct and they took it away from the
Speaker 3: Second World War.
Speaker 6: They gave that power to the commonwealth, and so all
Speaker 6: these other taxes like payroll tax, dam due, which are
Speaker 6: terrible taxes. They're penalized people for doing good things like
Speaker 6: providing jobs or getting into the housing market. The state
Speaker 6: government held onto them because they were the only way
Speaker 6: that they could sort of preserve an independent stream of revenue.
Speaker 6: But now it's like tens and tens of thousands of dollars.
Speaker 6: And I'm going to be brutally honest with you, I
Speaker 6: don't think it costs that much money to stamp something.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 2: And by the way, while while we're on housing news,
Speaker 2: some breaking news here Merry Big Council in Melbourne has
Speaker 2: just voted in favor of emotion to investigate doubling council
Speaker 2: rate for property investors and therefore having the council rates
Speaker 2: for people who own their own homes and businesses. So
Speaker 2: that would mean if if you own a rental property
Speaker 2: in Merry Big Council, the council is now going to
Speaker 2: look into the idea of charging you double rates. Sure
Speaker 2: we'll get into that properly tomorrow night.
Speaker 4: But that just.
Speaker 1: Laws come down from Mary Big Camp very much.
Speaker 6: Another bit of breaking news, the New South Bell's Greens
Speaker 6: are considering decriminalizing co Caine.
Speaker 5: Well. Look.
Speaker 6: In another breaking news, Hunter Biden is now moving to
Speaker 6: Sydney to the Odds now the National Muster. And this
Speaker 6: one just does my head in. It's the pick lead
Speaker 6: on page one, Compassion for crims but no to hope.
Speaker 6: So while we've got all these rapists and pedophiles and
Speaker 6: murderers walking the streets because of this legal loophole that
Speaker 6: the government failed to adequately close, not the government, Immigration
Speaker 6: Minister Andrew Giles, the Uberanezi government is otherwise doing a
Speaker 6: fantastic job.
Speaker 1: He gets five dollars.
Speaker 6: Now we now we now have and this guy I
Speaker 6: just don't don't get, but we now have. And it's
Speaker 6: worth reading the article because the lead doesn't give it away.
Speaker 6: It basically says miracle baby saying from certain death by
Speaker 6: an Australian woman working in the remote corner of China
Speaker 6: has been denied Australian citis and ship in the latest
Speaker 6: immigrat and fast under battled Minister Andrew Drafts. Now, that
Speaker 6: is all correct, but the real devil is in the details.
Speaker 6: So what happened is the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, which had
Speaker 6: of course been overturning all these canceled visas and allowing
Speaker 6: the criminals to stay, also got it right.
Speaker 3: They're actually allowed.
Speaker 6: To find upstanding Australian to stay and found that this
Speaker 6: person adopted hope, her name is so pretty ominously titled
Speaker 6: person she was adopted, who was left for dead in China,
Speaker 6: adopted pretty much at birth, adopted. You know, this baby
Speaker 6: was in birth to an abandoned They thought it was
Speaker 6: brain damage as she wasn't.
Speaker 3: She's grow out of it.
Speaker 6: She was adopted right then and there and turned out
Speaker 6: to be a fine, upstanding, wonderful human being living in Australia.
Speaker 6: And she's been and the administrat is in trouble and said, yeah,
Speaker 6: this is your daughter. You're an Australian, she's your adopted daughter. Therefore,
Speaker 6: by dissent. This person is also an Australian because she's
Speaker 6: your daughter and you're in Australian right, Pretty easy, pretty simple. Hunt, No,
Speaker 6: the minister checked my nome. It's Andrew Giles appealed.
Speaker 3: The administrative decision.
Speaker 6: An Administrative Appeals Tribunal's decision made the matter go to
Speaker 6: the Federal Court to say, no, you're not entitled to
Speaker 6: Australian citizenship because she wasn't actually the daughter of the
Speaker 6: Australian at the exact moment she was born and then
Speaker 6: abandoned mine.
Speaker 3: Can you imagine that? Imagine?
Speaker 4: Actually, she looks fifteen.
Speaker 6: She's fantastic. It's not like she's a she's going to
Speaker 6: be a burden the country. She's here, she's happy, she's great.
Speaker 6: But he won't let her be a citizen because she
Speaker 6: was abandoned by her mother. Basically, and the Australian woman
Speaker 6: could while she was still in the world.
Speaker 2: Heck, you know, so you know we let all these
Speaker 2: people out of immigration detention, didn't have any legislation ready
Speaker 2: to go to redetain them. You send down Erection ninety nine.
Speaker 2: That means all of these people who ought to be
Speaker 2: deported foreign criminals don't get deported and you blame.
Speaker 1: That on the AAT and the AAT. That's something good.
Speaker 2: This woman observes to be an Australian citizen and all
Speaker 2: these other things that you've just totally ignored. First order
Speaker 2: of business in my office today because I'm mister Giles
Speaker 2: and pretending to me anyway, We've got to stop this
Speaker 2: girl becoming an Australian citizen. Seriously, mate, you are a
Speaker 2: dead set w anchor. Anyway, let's move on to the Cans.
Speaker 2: Come on, Liz, you know put.
Speaker 3: W Have you ever been on a W boat? I
Speaker 3: have to make port they throw over the w anchor.
Speaker 1: To the Cans.
Speaker 4: They actually had a campaign in South Australia January road
Speaker 4: Safety I've never.
Speaker 2: Safety and it said, you know, put your seat belt on,
Speaker 2: don't be at W and then there was a picture
Speaker 2: of an A isn't that stre.
Speaker 6: It's also a camp forward by the NT News where
Speaker 6: they were trying to cracked out on the fishows and
Speaker 6: they ran it every single day and the banner was
Speaker 6: I float and I vote, I like it.
Speaker 2: I like it. Let's go to the Cans post where
Speaker 2: extraordinary story Tomorrow Council strips comics from library.
Speaker 1: Kids books banned. I'm not sure that you'd actually.
Speaker 2: Call them kids books when we get into it, A
Speaker 2: series of comic books depicting children as young as ten
Speaker 2: in graphic and non consensual sex will be pulled from
Speaker 2: the shelves of Can's libraries. Can's Regional Council's library catalog
Speaker 2: showed half a dozen books by Ken Akamatsu, a Japanese
Speaker 2: manga artist and politician, listed as young adult fiction that
Speaker 2: contained highly confronting images of nudity and violent sex involving
Speaker 2: childlike characters. One character is described as ten years old.
Speaker 2: What was the book doing in the library in the
Speaker 2: first place?
Speaker 3: How is a politician? What's his platform?
Speaker 1: Extraordinary?
Speaker 5: Is he a politician?
Speaker 1: In Japan?
Speaker 4: Books make get into our jolly libraries. Hats off to
Speaker 4: Paul Ford Ice again another great story of why when
Speaker 4: you see this stuff right into your council. One man
Speaker 4: got these books out of all those libraries, and thank
Speaker 4: God for that. I'm sick of these sickos trying to
Speaker 4: make our kids sick.
Speaker 5: Basically to the Canberra.
Speaker 4: Times, Now School's one hundred thousand dollars robot dog spend
Speaker 4: criticize Brenda Bella Christian College has been criticized for appearing
Speaker 4: to spend more than one hundred thousand dollars on a robotic.
Speaker 5: Dog as it faces both.
Speaker 4: A refinancing deal falling through and potentially being cut off
Speaker 4: from federal government funding. I want to know who found
Speaker 4: the dog and was like, hang on a minute, you
Speaker 4: guys are crying poor, and yeah, one hundred K for.
Speaker 1: A robot dog on the first place.
Speaker 3: Then they had to hire a robotic dog catcher to
Speaker 3: go and get it.
Speaker 2: Okay, that it's not true, and then you'll need a
Speaker 2: robotic dog walker to go along with it.
Speaker 1: You know, you can go go and get some muck
Speaker 1: from the pound. You don't need a robotic dog. I've
Speaker 1: never heard of it.
Speaker 4: You do if you're collaborating with the world's leading autonomous
Speaker 4: robotics organization.
Speaker 1: Apparently, thank you very much. Break you remember that portrait
Speaker 1: of King Charles with all the red on it. It's
Speaker 1: had an upgrade. Now I don't know about you, apparently.
Speaker 2: I learned today there's a new Wallace and Grommet film coming.
Speaker 2: I'm so excited it's coming at Christmas time.
Speaker 1: But I don't know about you. I love Wallace and fancy, jeez,
Speaker 1: we'll go somewhere where there's cheese.
Speaker 2: I don't know that you'll find any cheese at the
Speaker 2: Philip Mold Gallery in London though, But that didn't stop
Speaker 2: a bunch of protesters, greeny, animal rights, the usual types
Speaker 2: going along to deface the King's new portrait.
Speaker 1: Take a look now.
Speaker 2: It's something about their protesting against iris p c A
Speaker 2: certified farms because they don't have proper protocols on them.
Speaker 1: Or some nonsense.
Speaker 2: I got to say, though, if you look at the
Speaker 2: original version of the King Charles portrait, I reckon that
Speaker 2: was actually an improvement to be I reckon it looks
Speaker 2: better now with Wallace.
Speaker 3: So why they cross the Charles about the I think
Speaker 3: the Royal I think.
Speaker 6: Because the Royal Society for the Protection against Crillity Animals.
Speaker 6: It's literally the Royals were running it.
Speaker 1: Probably Charles as.
Speaker 3: They go marsh societies.
Speaker 5: But what do that.
Speaker 6: I don't understand what they're thinking or are they cross
Speaker 6: because like he only talks to plants and not animals.
Speaker 4: They're like, they're like the climate protests is they just
Speaker 4: go after famous stuff. So Mono he never had a
Speaker 4: thing to do with then. But They're like, hey, this
Speaker 4: is famous and it's a big thing at the moment,
Speaker 4: and there's lots of people in this gallery.
Speaker 5: So I'm going to deface that.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: You know what I think about this climate change racket.
Speaker 3: It's all about the money. Okay, Okay, here's.
Speaker 6: The show stopper, literally a barbecue stopper. Champ banned from
Speaker 6: hot dog comp Joey comp I said. Joey Chestnut has
Speaker 6: been banned from twenty twenty four Nathan's hot dog eating
Speaker 6: contest over partnership with a vegan wiener company. How he's
Speaker 6: been so, he's been banned from the Proper hot Dog competition,
Speaker 6: which which has which has been sponsored by Nathan's famous
Speaker 6: international hot dog eating continent.
Speaker 5: He won it for sixteen years.
Speaker 6: He's won it for sixteen years in a row, and
Speaker 6: now he's been banned from it because he's now sponsoring
Speaker 6: a rival companies that is not Nathan's.
Speaker 1: And you know what, I'm the indiction.
Speaker 3: I Oh, no, I've been banned from the.
Speaker 6: Coca Cola competition because suddenly I'm an ambassador for PEPSI. Well,
Speaker 6: you know what, if I wanted to see a vegan wiener,
Speaker 6: I go to an extinction, rebellion context, right, Joe.
Speaker 1: Anyway, that's it for us tonight. That makes the rein
Speaker 1: of Petty Show