Speaker 1: This is Outsiders. Good morning, and welcome to Outsiders, the
Speaker 1: show that is to combating woke identity politics and left
Speaker 1: wing idiocy. What the British Police Force are to Benny Hill?
Speaker 2: Ah, Yes, that's the modern, woke, diverse and inclusive police force.
Speaker 2: Not quite sure about how to handle someone who's an
Speaker 2: armed criminal.
Speaker 3: Oh I gotta love a little Boots Randolph there on
Speaker 3: a Sunday morning. Okay, so that footage was sped up
Speaker 3: in reverse. But sadly the British Police, well they do
Speaker 3: set themselves up for a bit of comedy, but even
Speaker 3: they aren't as comical as the ludicrous, as ludicrous as
Speaker 3: these Queensland Police officers were arresting Billboard Chris this week
Speaker 3: in Brisbane.
Speaker 4: I have a lawsuit against your government next week.
Speaker 5: I need you to move a outside of the Queen
Speaker 5: Street mall area, which is bounded by so Adelaigh Street.
Speaker 2: Is the next main street down there.
Speaker 5: Edward Street is the next street down that way, Elizabeth
Speaker 5: Street is the street here and George Street is the
Speaker 5: street at the top of the mall. Okay, and that's
Speaker 5: for a period of six hours.
Speaker 1: Heaven help us. Yes, Billboard Chris, who has devoted his
Speaker 1: life to attacking the vile cult of childhood transgenderism. Was
Speaker 1: arrested this week in Brisbane and Chris will be joining
Speaker 1: us later on in the show to tell us all
Speaker 1: about it. But first let's grab the latest Outsiders news. Well,
Speaker 1: we were showing the Benny Hill British Police Force, but
Speaker 1: the truth is of course stranger than the comedy. This
Speaker 1: weekend we've had the UK police arresting James and Rita,
Speaker 1: a dad for comments that he made about his nine
Speaker 1: year old girls school teachers on a WhatsApp.
Speaker 2: Yes, this couple were held in a cell for eleven hours,
Speaker 2: arrested in front of their crying children. So you can
Speaker 2: just imagine how traumatize those poor kids are and James,
Speaker 2: after a five week investigation, there's no case to answer.
Speaker 2: We don't know what they posted in that WhatsApp group
Speaker 2: that alerted the police and had so many of them
Speaker 2: shop up to their home to arrest them. If you
Speaker 2: think there's free speech in the UK, you're kidding yourself
Speaker 2: at this point.
Speaker 3: Well you know this is the thing. I mean, look
Speaker 3: at the footage you see there on the screen. The
Speaker 3: police said six one, two, three, four five six officers
Speaker 3: to go and arrest a middle aged couple for comments
Speaker 3: that they made in a WhatsApp group. Now we don't
Speaker 3: know what the comments were, so, you know, but there's
Speaker 3: no indication that they were anything sort of threatening or
Speaker 3: anything like that. The best indication that we've gotten from
Speaker 3: news reports is that they were complaining about the recruitment
Speaker 3: teacher for a new teacher at their school. We also
Speaker 3: know that the couple that their eldest daughter at the
Speaker 3: school does have some epilepsy neurodivergence issues and they were
Speaker 3: not allowed to meet with the school to talk about
Speaker 3: these medical issues. So it sounds like these parents had
Speaker 3: a real grievance. But the fascinating thing here, well fascinating
Speaker 3: but also chilling thing is the way the UK has
Speaker 3: now become this sort of place where it's a real dystopia.
Speaker 3: You know, the cops knock on your door for saying
Speaker 3: the wrong thing online. And you know, for the country
Speaker 3: that supposedly gave us free speech, that gave us the
Speaker 3: aero pagentica, which gave us all of these great defenses
Speaker 3: of liberty, to now be in this place where they
Speaker 3: charge you with a non crime, hate crime or whatever,
Speaker 3: and the processess his punishment.
Speaker 6: I think it's a disgrace.
Speaker 7: Well.
Speaker 1: Also, James, you say that we don't know what the
Speaker 1: crime is what they said on that WhatsApp group, but
Speaker 1: nor is the guy's being a charge. The police wouldn't
Speaker 1: even tell him what he'd actually said. That was wrong.
Speaker 1: But I mean something, But.
Speaker 2: Don't say it's racial, because I can I guarantee you
Speaker 2: if it was racial, given what the UK's current hate
Speaker 2: speech laws are, there would be charges. The fact is
Speaker 2: there are no charges, so whatever it is, it doesn't
Speaker 2: even have to be the wrong thing. We have seen
Speaker 2: people in the UK being harassed by the cops having
Speaker 2: to go through this process for just stating biological facts
Speaker 2: about gender about immigration. If you're stating a very much
Speaker 2: a mainstream view about the levels of immigration, and perhaps
Speaker 2: you've got a problem with illegal immigration, that could see
Speaker 2: the cops knocking on your door if someone takes offense
Speaker 2: and makes a formal complace.
Speaker 1: And that's what I mean by racial because in their eyes,
Speaker 1: any comment about immigration, any comment to do with people
Speaker 1: coming over the wood, is deemed as racial. But James,
Speaker 1: there is a racial component to what is happening with
Speaker 1: the British law. We now have a two tier legal system, James,
Speaker 1: whereby white men will be treated harsh shut now under
Speaker 1: British law.
Speaker 3: Joe, Well, yeah, it's really really shocking. This Basically now
Speaker 3: they have put in the system whereby pre sentencing reports
Speaker 3: which basically automatically take into account your race, your gender,
Speaker 3: your circumstance, all of that to mitigate the sentences that
Speaker 3: you might get for whatever crime your alleged to have
Speaker 3: committed and been brought before the course of convicted of
Speaker 3: that now means essentially that white Britons are going to
Speaker 3: get the worst treatment when it comes to sentencing. This
Speaker 3: is the two tier justice system. This is why they
Speaker 3: call Keir Starmer two tier care. And I'll tell you something,
Speaker 3: guys do.
Speaker 2: Then Kirstarma recognized how.
Speaker 8: Bad disappointed in this response, and the Lord Chancellor is
Speaker 8: obviously continuing to engage on this, and we're considering our
Speaker 8: response and you know, all options are on the table.
Speaker 8: But I am disappointed at this outcome and now we'll
Speaker 8: have to consider what we do as a result.
Speaker 2: I don't know, if only there was a Prime minister
Speaker 2: who cared about these you could be you're the Prime
Speaker 2: minister here. I mean, he's acting like is just some
Speaker 2: dude off the street. He's a little bit of great.
Speaker 1: Yes, it's ridiculous, but also but James, the reality is
Speaker 1: what they have literally done is brought in laws whereby
Speaker 1: if you are any of those identity politics groups, women, gays,
Speaker 1: of ethnic whatever origin, anything other than a white man
Speaker 1: must be treated more leniently. So by definition, white men
Speaker 1: will be treated harsher under the British legal system.
Speaker 3: And we'll just be really frank about what we're talking about.
Speaker 3: Who we're talking about. You know, basically people have people
Speaker 3: of different religions of getting a lighter sentence and a
Speaker 3: lighter treatment. And so this means, you know a lot
Speaker 3: of migrants who might commit crime, they're going to get
Speaker 3: a lighter treatment, then somebody who was a Britain committing
Speaker 3: the same crime.
Speaker 1: That's shocking.
Speaker 3: Keir Starmer, I don't trust anything he has said there
Speaker 3: about claiming that he's distressed about that, because you know,
Speaker 3: this is the same guy who saw his opinion numbers
Speaker 3: absolutely plummet and then started talking about, oh maybe we
Speaker 3: have to do something about immigration really here, really okay, fine,
Speaker 3: now you tell us. But the thing too, the other
Speaker 3: week there was that phenomenal speech that JD. Vance gave
Speaker 3: at the European Union where he called out Britain, and
Speaker 3: he called out Europe, but he called out Britain in
Speaker 3: particular and said that Britain, which was a bastion of liberty,
Speaker 3: has no longer been become that, and they are straying
Speaker 3: very far away from that. And the real point is
Speaker 3: that if America is going to go and defend liberal democracies,
Speaker 3: and you want to be defended, you've got to act
Speaker 3: like a liberal democracy. And Britain has strayed so far
Speaker 3: from the century. It took centuries for Britain to develop
Speaker 3: the traditions of law and liberty that we enjoy as well,
Speaker 3: and now they're torturing them at a rate of noves.
Speaker 2: And this undermines the most basic principle of our justice system,
Speaker 2: that justice is blind, that everyone's equal under the law,
Speaker 2: that you're not going to get preferential treatment based on
Speaker 2: who you are, and we already see it happening, even
Speaker 2: before this formal recognition that it's happening. We have seen
Speaker 2: it over and over again with people getting ridiculously leaning
Speaker 2: sentences and then having people in the UK locked up
Speaker 2: for being in an anti immigration protest, even if they
Speaker 2: weren't guilty of anything that was approaching violence, but they
Speaker 2: were at a violent protest, so they were guilty by association.
Speaker 2: Same thing doesn't happen with these pro Palestinian protests. That's
Speaker 2: a very different approach. So we have seen it over
Speaker 2: and over again. Not immune format. It's happening right now.
Speaker 1: Well, I was going to say, we are not immune
Speaker 1: from it. And where Britain goes, we tend to go, James.
Speaker 1: A few years later, we already have in place hate
Speaker 1: speech laws and these sorts of touchy feely no crime
Speaker 1: actually being committed laws are coming into Australia exactly as
Speaker 1: they did in Britain. We are heading down the same path,
Speaker 1: which is what we'll be talking to Billboard Chris about
Speaker 1: the e Safety Commissioner, because we're heading straight down the
Speaker 1: same path. But anyway, let's talk about Australian news. Is
Speaker 1: there an Australian news? Has there anything happened?
Speaker 9: Oh?
Speaker 1: Yes, of course it's the election, folks. We have an election.
Speaker 1: May third is the big election. Everyone's out there rushing
Speaker 1: around all very exciting. Yesterday A couple of things Rita
Speaker 1: that caught all our eyes. One was the heckling of Albaniasi.
Speaker 1: Watch this Rita tell us what happened.
Speaker 2: Well, this is very interesting. A young man, it seemed
Speaker 2: aggrieved about the housing situation, about the amounts of immigration
Speaker 2: that's coming into the country. This isn't obviously illegal immigration.
Speaker 2: This is a planned policy by the Labor government to
Speaker 2: bring in record numbers. So let's have a listen to
Speaker 2: what he said to the Prime minister.
Speaker 10: One million immigrants in five years is going to increase
Speaker 10: demand on the medical system.
Speaker 1: But what about the fact that people.
Speaker 10: My age can't get any housing. We can't get rentals anymore.
Speaker 10: We have no future in this country anymore. And we
Speaker 10: think that's kind of ridiculous. No, you can't touch me.
Speaker 1: Mate, you.
Speaker 7: Cole.
Speaker 1: There you go.
Speaker 2: He was shown out, But I think what he said
Speaker 2: there was very much on point. This is something young
Speaker 2: people are rightly concerned about, Rowan because they have been
Speaker 2: priced out of the housing market. A bunch of policies
Speaker 2: have seen rent skyrocket because there's also been a war
Speaker 2: on investors. At the same time that we are seeing
Speaker 2: property prices impact by the lack of supply. We're not
Speaker 2: having as many houses built because we have so much
Speaker 2: regulation costs are so high and it is just a
Speaker 2: terrible spiral for young people.
Speaker 1: Well let's look now at that same interview. So that's
Speaker 1: a young guy on day two of the election campaign
Speaker 1: confronting the Prime minister. Now have a look at the
Speaker 1: same interview from the other angle. Watch Charmers and Alban
Speaker 1: Easy and Mark Butler's faces on day two of the
Speaker 1: election campaign faced by a real Australian. Or play that
Speaker 1: clip now, Okay, so we actually hear the same thing,
Speaker 1: the same questions being asked, and the three of them
Speaker 1: are clueless, like the three monkeys sitting there. James here,
Speaker 1: no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. And look
Speaker 1: at the Prime Minister's face, completely clueless on the second
Speaker 1: day of the election campaign, confronted by a real Australian
Speaker 1: with real concerns.
Speaker 3: You know this this young this young person, his concerns
Speaker 3: are I think legitimate and you know note also, let's
Speaker 3: not a couple of things. Number one, this person asked
Speaker 3: a question in a way that was not like some
Speaker 3: screaming climate processor like the ones who's been heckling Peter
Speaker 3: Dutt along the way. This was a respectful question and
Speaker 3: a passion question. But the fact is that kid is right.
Speaker 1: He's right.
Speaker 3: Young people in this country have particularly been sold out
Speaker 3: when it comes to housing policy, when it comes to
Speaker 3: mass migration and what it comes down to. We saw
Speaker 3: it a few weeks ago. Let us not forget the
Speaker 3: mass minting of Australian citizens right before the vote in
Speaker 3: Western Sydney and Melbourne electorates, because you know what, it
Speaker 3: just showed the nakedness of what this migration policy is
Speaker 3: all about. There are three basic pillars to it. Number
Speaker 3: one is universities or the tertiary sectorists call it. Number
Speaker 3: two is big business and number three is the Labor Party.
Speaker 3: They want votes, they want these votes that come from
Speaker 3: mass migration and young people, young Australians are getting left
Speaker 3: out in the cold.
Speaker 2: I think it's a discreet Well, yeah, they are recruiting
Speaker 2: voters because certain migrant groups, a lot of migrant groups
Speaker 2: have traditionally backed Labor. I think that can change. It's
Speaker 2: maybe something they regret. And we've seen this in the
Speaker 2: US where Democrats have a very permissive policy to illegal
Speaker 2: immigration because that at some point they hope that these
Speaker 2: people become fast tracked to citizenship and it's a new
Speaker 2: voter base and when you're talking about millions of people
Speaker 2: in the US, it can have an impact. But guess what,
Speaker 2: Hispanic voters are increasingly leaning well under Trump anyway, leaning right,
Speaker 2: they're socially conservative, and the Liberal Party the Coalition need
Speaker 2: to seize on the opportunity because the reality is we
Speaker 2: have had millions come in in recent years. They're here,
Speaker 2: a lot of them are on the path to citizenship,
Speaker 2: So appeal to them. Don't write them off as they're
Speaker 2: going to be lifelong labor supporters, because they don't need
Speaker 2: to be. These are people who are often aspirational, working
Speaker 2: middle class that care about their kids not being indoctrinated
Speaker 2: at schools. There's a lot of areas where the Liberal Party,
Speaker 2: with economic policy, with energy policy, with social policies, the
Speaker 2: so called culture wars, can reach these voters, and yet
Speaker 2: they seem to shy away.
Speaker 1: From that and they shouldn't. And that's things like the
Speaker 1: transgender debate, James, where obviously a lot of ethnic communities,
Speaker 1: migrant communities are appalled when they find out what their
Speaker 1: kids have been We saw in the voice.
Speaker 3: We saw with the voice, we saw it, you know,
Speaker 3: we actually also saw with the game marriage debated as well,
Speaker 3: so we're a lot of these seats voted, you know, Yes,
Speaker 3: we're a lot of the voted no, you know, but
Speaker 3: reader's right. You know, a lot of these communities are
Speaker 3: socially conservative for one thing. And it's really interesting to
Speaker 3: note that many of these migrants, even though they might
Speaker 3: not be Catholic themselves, send their kids to local, low
Speaker 3: fee Catholic schools, independence Catholic schools, because they get values
Speaker 3: there and get protected from other values that are being
Speaker 3: pushed in the public schools. Of their enterprising, they tend
Speaker 3: to be business owners. They want to make money here,
Speaker 3: which is all great, and that's all really well to
Speaker 3: the good. But I think there's another element to that too,
Speaker 3: and this is where I think the Coalition needs to
Speaker 3: lean further into, you know, really the Team Australia thing
Speaker 3: and saying us, actually, Australia is a place to be
Speaker 3: proud of and when you come here, it's not just
Speaker 3: to make some bucks. It is actually because you want
Speaker 3: to be Australian. And I think there's a big opportunity
Speaker 3: there for the Coalition.
Speaker 1: Well, let's ask one of the coalitions leading lights in
Speaker 1: my opinion, Senator Matt Canavan. Matt Great to see you.
Speaker 1: Thanks for coming on outsiders as always? Is the coalition
Speaker 1: doing enough, you know, to show that you guys will
Speaker 1: stand in front of one flag not three flags? The
Speaker 1: Prime Minister announced the election in front of the Torres
Speaker 1: Strait Island flag. There wasn't an Australian flag to be seen.
Speaker 1: Is this a key issue and is the coalition hammering
Speaker 1: this point hard enough?
Speaker 11: Well, look, I think we live in one country Rowan,
Speaker 11: and if we should unite behind one country, Peter Dutton's
Speaker 11: been very clear about that. Obviously, the Prime Minister sought
Speaker 11: to divide Australian so with a three hundred million dollar
Speaker 11: voice referendum that was a complete failure and flop and
Speaker 11: distracted his government from the real issues. Look, I suppose
Speaker 11: most of this election will be about those issues that
Speaker 11: affect people, because yes, I do believe we've.
Speaker 7: Got your night behind one country.
Speaker 11: But the first thing any incoming government has got to
Speaker 11: do is fixed the cost of living crisis that is
Speaker 11: hurting so many Australians, that is causing division and lack
Speaker 11: of social cohesion in our society. Because I noticed that
Speaker 11: directly when you go out now and promote how great
Speaker 11: our country is, how lucky we is where our country is.
Speaker 11: You do get understandable feedback sometimes that people don't feel
Speaker 11: all that lucky living in Australia where the grocery prices
Speaker 11: have gone up by average three thousand dollars a year
Speaker 11: for Australian's power bills up over a thousand dollars a
Speaker 11: year for many Australian families. People are getting crushed by that.
Speaker 11: And so our first job to rekindle the Australian spirit,
Speaker 11: the patriotism that we've all been non for about Australia
Speaker 11: is to make Australia lucky again. We've got to make
Speaker 11: our country luck again. We've got to make our own luck.
Speaker 11: We are a very lucky country in terms of the
Speaker 11: resources we have. We have more natural resources per person
Speaker 11: than anywhere in the world, perhaps except Antarctica.
Speaker 7: But we should be using them.
Speaker 11: If we use those resources, like Peter Dutton said this week,
Speaker 11: like our gas resources will bring down the cost of energy.
Speaker 11: That'll bring down the cost of everything food, transport of course,
Speaker 11: for electricity bills. And I think that that is the
Speaker 11: first step towards getting back to everybody being proud of
Speaker 11: the Australian flag and having a nice and harmonious and
Speaker 11: forward looking country once again.
Speaker 2: Well, you mentioned resources and cost of living, but the
Speaker 2: coalition's energy policies still appear very much confused. We're talking
Speaker 2: about nuclear fantastic, but that's years away, that's not going
Speaker 2: to have an impact during the next term and people
Speaker 2: need cost of living relief. Now, what are we doing
Speaker 2: about actually increasing supply, not just redirecting gas to the
Speaker 2: domestic market, but making sure we actually use those resources.
Speaker 2: We're doing more gas exploration, We're doing more with coal, uranium,
Speaker 2: just making sure we're actually benefiting from the luck we
Speaker 2: have on being on having all these natural resources.
Speaker 11: Well, reader, I think you've put the timeline out right
Speaker 11: there and your question that we've got to take action
Speaker 11: that both delivers results in the short term, the medium
Speaker 11: term and the long term. You know that things aren't
Speaker 11: going to completely go back to how good they were
Speaker 11: twenty years ago in our energy system overnight, but we
Speaker 11: can take steps straight away. So what Peter's announced this
Speaker 11: week was redirecting gas back to Australia. That will of
Speaker 11: course increase supply of gas straight away for Australians, and
Speaker 11: the basic economic principle will be the more supply we have,
Speaker 11: the lower the price will be. That will bring immediate
Speaker 11: downward pressure on gas prices and therefore energy prices.
Speaker 7: For all austrains in the median term.
Speaker 11: Yeah, of course, we do need to get more supply
Speaker 11: of those resources like gas, and we've announced that we
Speaker 11: will invest in critical gas infrastructure to bring more gas
Speaker 11: all around Australia, will facilit take the approval process to
Speaker 11: make sure gas investments can get approval and therefore get
Speaker 11: finance and get going. Will end the ridiculous subsidy taxpayer
Speaker 11: subsidy that is provided to the Environmental Defender's Office, which
Speaker 11: spend their time effectively lying to courts to knock off
Speaker 11: these developments. So they have been proven to have done that.
Speaker 11: So that's what we'll do in those terms. And then
Speaker 11: of course in the long term we've got the nuclear
Speaker 11: policy as well. Now, look, i'd love to see us
Speaker 11: do more on the cold stuff. I've been very open
Speaker 11: and transparent about that. But the choice now in the
Speaker 11: next few weeks is between no hope and some hope.
Speaker 11: The Labor government, of course, has been absolutely hopeless and
Speaker 11: their budget this week just doubled down on more of
Speaker 11: the same, more of the same, green subsidies to technologies
Speaker 11: like hydrogen that are not working, more of the sign
Speaker 11: government spending it's going to push us over trillion dollars
Speaker 11: in debt, and more of the sign migration policies which
Speaker 11: is crowding out young people from housing, whereas on all
Speaker 11: of those measures the Liberal and National parties are offering
Speaker 11: offering hype that will cut back that migration levels. We'll
Speaker 11: restraining government spending by restricting and bringing down employment of
Speaker 11: public service and the seven billion dollar cost there. And
Speaker 11: as I said, hope that we will develop our gas
Speaker 11: resources to bring in more energy in the short and
Speaker 11: medium term to our energy to start energy supply systems.
Speaker 3: Hey madam want to we'll ask you too about another
Speaker 3: issue here too. And you know we saw the other
Speaker 3: day when the Prime Minister announced he was calling the election,
Speaker 3: there was aig question about which flags were behind him.
Speaker 3: But it kind of points to a bigger issue here
Speaker 3: that we are seeing Australian's lockdown of Australian spaces. We
Speaker 3: had a report this week that a tour owner in
Speaker 3: Cacadu says it's basically impossible to do tours up there,
Speaker 3: visiting numbers in just that one Park have fallen from
Speaker 3: two hundred and fifty thousand one hundred and sixty thousand
Speaker 3: a year. But the list of places now where on
Speaker 3: various different indigenous related grounds that people are not able
Speaker 3: to go to. Kaku Kepe York Lake Air has been
Speaker 3: lately cut off, the Bundercliffs that get grampy, the Flinders
Speaker 3: regions and so on, all these places that all Australians
Speaker 3: have enjoyed. What would the Coalition do about making sure
Speaker 3: that Australian spaces are available for all Australians.
Speaker 11: Well, it's very sad, James, really really sad. It's a
Speaker 11: wonderful part of Australia. Obviously I was proud enough as
Speaker 11: Northern Australian Minister to make some investments in the resort
Speaker 11: out there.
Speaker 7: It is owned by an indigenous.
Speaker 11: Corporation at Ularu, the Voyages Resort, But of course that
Speaker 11: investment is not bearing fruit when you just restrict access
Speaker 11: to the major reason people travel there. It's a long
Speaker 11: way Togo, it's quite costly. The reason people went there
Speaker 11: is because they loved walking up the biggest rock in
Speaker 11: the world. And so when the decision was made to
Speaker 11: do that, of course that had massive economic implications for
Speaker 11: all people around the are but particularly the Indigenous people
Speaker 11: who own many of the major assets there. So it's
Speaker 11: been devastating in terms of what the collation will do.
Speaker 11: I know that Kimberly home there in Richmond in the
Speaker 11: northern New Sothales coast, she's been pushing really hard and
Speaker 11: successfully convinced our party to reopen access to Mount Warning.
Speaker 11: Mount Warning is a wonderful, beautiful now and I've climbed
Speaker 11: a few times in northern New South Wales. It's named
Speaker 11: after when Captain Cook or He's sailors explorers saw this
Speaker 11: mountain that it prevented them from getting shipwrecked on the coast,
Speaker 11: and they call it Mount Warming. It's got a great
Speaker 11: history and it's lovely for people to be able to
Speaker 11: walk up and enjoy it so much of the beautiful
Speaker 11: Australian environment. It's been the last couple he has been
Speaker 11: locked out and it's devastating for tourists and small business
Speaker 11: organizations across Northern New South Wales.
Speaker 7: So we'll reopen that. We'll reopen that.
Speaker 11: There are Aboriginal people who want it reopened for the
Speaker 11: same reason as you've outlined in terms of Boolaro I
Speaker 11: leave that to people like you said the price. I'm
Speaker 11: not as familiar with exactly the status there, but the
Speaker 11: basic rule should be that those parts of Australia should
Speaker 11: be open to all Australians. And we should also help
Speaker 11: help to the indigenous communities and Aboriginal people that see
Speaker 11: those sites as sacred to protect them, to have an
Speaker 11: income stream from them will.
Speaker 7: Help do that.
Speaker 11: We can do all these things, we can balance the
Speaker 11: veneration of those facilities, and also to jurism.
Speaker 7: I mean, look at the Vatican.
Speaker 11: Look at the Vatican like it's the most important sacred
Speaker 11: site of Catholics in the world, but of course.
Speaker 7: It's open to all people around the world. And that
Speaker 7: also helps reserve the.
Speaker 11: Vatican long term because it provides an enormous income stream.
Speaker 11: So many sacred sites around the world have that business model.
Speaker 11: Why don't we hear in Australia.
Speaker 1: Well, I want to ask you about this character called
Speaker 1: Justin Muhammad, who is the ambassador for First Nations people.
Speaker 1: He's on a very healthy salary. I'm sure he wanders
Speaker 1: around the world on behalf of not all Australians, but
Speaker 1: on behalf of First Nations. Australians they've just given him
Speaker 1: another one hundred and ninety grand for strategic planning consultation
Speaker 1: services over the rest of the half year. Will the
Speaker 1: Coalition commit to us saying goodbye to this character's contract
Speaker 1: and getting rid of the first nation's ambassador which diviides
Speaker 1: Australia completely, And why should Australian taxpayers be paying for
Speaker 1: this nonsense.
Speaker 7: It's totally absurd, isn't It's ridiculous.
Speaker 11: I mean, as I just said that last answer, we
Speaker 11: should respect Aboriginal sites, Aboriginal culture. We respect our English
Speaker 11: heritage and Mirgrant heritage. All of those things we respect.
Speaker 11: And there's some differences between us that can be dealt
Speaker 11: with and you know, venerated among ourselves. But when we
Speaker 11: go and face other people around the world, we should
Speaker 11: produce a united front. It's like your own family, or
Speaker 11: you've all got differences among yourself and your family, but
Speaker 11: whenever you're dealing with other families, you stay united and
Speaker 11: you protect each other. You protect your brothers, your sisters,
Speaker 11: your father and your kids, and same principle should apply.
Speaker 11: We should all protect Australians overseas and our interest over
Speaker 11: streets as one at united front. Just putting Australians first.
Speaker 11: That's the basic principle here, so most things we are
Speaker 11: ending that position. I'm not exactly sure about that guy's
Speaker 11: contract and what we can do there, but we won't
Speaker 11: be proceeding, as my understanding with a first nation's ambassador.
Speaker 11: That's totally unnecess We should present the United front of
Speaker 11: the world good.
Speaker 1: So he can pack his bags for one last time
Speaker 1: and leave Canberra.
Speaker 7: Well, I'm not really sure about his contract.
Speaker 1: I know, I.
Speaker 7: Got it.
Speaker 2: What about we know? Just Enterprice has also got the
Speaker 2: our version of the Department of Government Efficiency and she
Speaker 2: said she is going to focus on the enormous amounts
Speaker 2: that are spent in the indigenous area with very little
Speaker 2: results billions every year. What other areas of cost savings
Speaker 2: are we going to see because the budget ain't looking
Speaker 2: too good right now.
Speaker 11: Yeah, look rere to GREGT Christ's Look, it's not for
Speaker 11: me to announce the Just Center's policies there, so I
Speaker 11: can't speak for her and I won't. But from my
Speaker 11: own perspective, I think definitely in the area of agency
Speaker 11: growth we've had over time.
Speaker 7: In this country.
Speaker 11: We've got agencies like the Workplace Gender Equality Agency was
Speaker 11: just PA, which can require businesses to produce paperwork. And
Speaker 11: so it's not just the government waste that we should
Speaker 11: be focused on, which definitely we should be, but it's
Speaker 11: also the government red tape that creates waste within the
Speaker 11: private sector that makes our productivity performance perform as it is,
Speaker 11: which is in the toilet right now. That's what we've
Speaker 11: also got to focus on. Another one is this ridiculous
Speaker 11: climate reporting the government's brought in there. We will bring
Speaker 11: in from July this year, large businesses will all have
Speaker 11: to report their carbon emissions to the government. Not only that,
Speaker 11: it's not just affecting large businesses, they have to report
Speaker 11: the carbon emissions of their clients and who they deal
Speaker 11: with in business and their supply chain to the government
Speaker 11: as well. So that will mean if a farmer and
Speaker 11: we've confirmed this and centered estimates with government officials, a
Speaker 11: farmer who may have a loan, we say A and Z,
Speaker 11: and A and Z have to report their carbon emissions.
Speaker 11: A and Z has to go to that farm and say, hey,
Speaker 11: how many cows do you have that are farting and
Speaker 11: doing other things around your property? We need to know
Speaker 11: so we can report that to the government and even
Speaker 11: the government figures show that will put a three point
Speaker 11: two billion dollar cost on the histral economy in terms
Speaker 11: of more red tape and paperwork. This sort of stuff
Speaker 11: is mad and there needs to be a fine tooth
Speaker 11: comb gone through it because this affects all the strains.
Speaker 11: Our productivity has fallen at five percent under this government.
Speaker 11: It's never seen a fall like that ever before, and
Speaker 11: that is a direct impact on our standard living. A
Speaker 11: lower productivity means we're producing less for the same amount
Speaker 11: of work.
Speaker 7: Doesn't mean you have to work harder.
Speaker 11: It means you're producing less for the same amount of
Speaker 11: work and that produces less well for all of us,
Speaker 11: to fund medicare, to fund our schools, and of course
Speaker 11: to allow us to have a good stand of living,
Speaker 11: especially to provide for our children.
Speaker 1: Well, Matt, there's a copycat show on the ABC called Insiders,
Speaker 1: which very few people watch, but we've done it so
Speaker 1: that nobody else has to. The Prime Minister was on
Speaker 1: there just a few minutes ago disagreeing with you, so
Speaker 1: I want to play you. He's the clip of Anthony
Speaker 1: Alberanisi on Insiders and get your reaction to it.
Speaker 12: What we have with all of our cost of living measures,
Speaker 12: whether it's free tape, cheap childcare, the tax cuts that
Speaker 12: we are now topping up so that Australians will benefit
Speaker 12: by two and a half thousand dollars extra dollars in
Speaker 12: their pocket is what's making a difference. Our wage increases
Speaker 12: where real wages are increasing, so we want people to
Speaker 12: earn more and keep more of what they earn. I've
Speaker 12: heard it wants people to work longer for less.
Speaker 11: Matta, is there a single word of truth in any
Speaker 11: of that? Tell us, well, it's exactly wrong for the
Speaker 11: reasons I just outlined. Because our productivity has fallen so
Speaker 11: much under Anthony Albanezi. That means people have to work
Speaker 11: harder and longer to earn the same.
Speaker 7: Amount of money.
Speaker 11: And with everything going up in cost, with interest rates
Speaker 11: going up, interest rates go up, and your productivity is
Speaker 11: low to that means you know, you might even have
Speaker 11: to earn more, right because you're chasing a moving target
Speaker 11: just to keep your standard living. And as I say,
Speaker 11: if you're producing less per hour because of this red tape,
Speaker 11: because it's bureaucracy just trying to do something in the business,
Speaker 11: trying to create wealth and value for our country, but
Speaker 11: instead you've got to spend a quarter of the day
Speaker 11: filling out forms. If that's what the government requires you
Speaker 11: to do, all of us have to work harder just
Speaker 11: to get the same sound of living, or of course
Speaker 11: we work the same and we get the lost tat
Speaker 11: of living, we go backwards, which is probably most people's experience.
Speaker 11: But there are record numbers of austrainers now working two jobs.
Speaker 11: You're working two jobs, and the Labor Party's partners in
Speaker 11: the Greens, they've got this ridiculous palsy of allowing of
Speaker 11: getting people to wear four.
Speaker 1: Days a week.
Speaker 11: It's like, why don't you just create an economy so
Speaker 11: we can just go back to working just a standard
Speaker 11: five days a week. We don't have to work a
Speaker 11: second job just to keep our head above the water.
Speaker 11: That would, I think be appreciated by most austraints instead
Speaker 11: of telling these fairy tales to people that somehow you
Speaker 11: can wave a magic wand and Canberra and cut people's
Speaker 11: working hours overnight without any impact on the economy.
Speaker 7: These guys are insane. They don't know how to major
Speaker 7: an economy.
Speaker 11: They haven't run a business in their lives, and they're
Speaker 11: doing enormous, enormous damage to not only businesses in this country,
Speaker 11: but through the flow on effects to just average mom
Speaker 11: and dads who are struggling to get by. There has
Speaker 11: to be As I said at the start, there has
Speaker 11: to be a change. Things are not going well. I
Speaker 11: think everybody can admit that, even sometimes you get the
Speaker 11: Labor Party to admit that.
Speaker 7: The k it's a bit tough. They blame other people,
Speaker 7: but it's tough right right now. So don't we need
Speaker 7: a change.
Speaker 11: Don't we need to actually do something different because what
Speaker 11: we're doing right now is not working.
Speaker 7: And as I said, the budget this week was just
Speaker 7: more of the.
Speaker 11: Same, exactly, more of the same, more to hydrogen, more
Speaker 11: another four thousand public servants employed, more debt, more spending,
Speaker 11: and of course more migration.
Speaker 7: With nowhere for them to live. That's not going to
Speaker 7: cut it now.
Speaker 11: We need a better approach, and as I say, there
Speaker 11: is at least hope in a change of a government
Speaker 11: to a Dutton led Liberal National Party government.
Speaker 7: I think that's what people should get behind now.
Speaker 11: It could vent your frustrations with minor parties, but that's
Speaker 11: not going to deliver any change that our country desperately needs.
Speaker 1: Senator Matt Canavan terrific stuff. Thank you so much for
Speaker 1: chatting to us here on Outsiders after the break Rita's
Speaker 1: reality Check. Lots more coming up here on Outsiders.
Speaker 2: Welcome back. You're watching Outsiders with your host Rowan. Did
Speaker 2: you know I grew up in public housing? Dean James,
Speaker 2: I'm not woke Morrow, and I'm Rida Panahian. This week
Speaker 2: we finally got an election date and with it the
Speaker 2: fluff pieces and why Albo isn't really a hard left
Speaker 2: economically illiterate new Marxist ideal locke who has spent decades
Speaker 2: in labour socialist left faction. No, Alban Easy is apparently
Speaker 2: a reformist, not a revolutionary.
Speaker 1: Just ask him.
Speaker 2: Yes, he's reformed our living standards all right. Costs have
Speaker 2: gone up, living standards have gone down dramatically during his reign.
Speaker 2: Thanks Anthony. Expect to see more fluff pieces and claims
Speaker 2: of Albow being a moderate, reminiscent of the nonsense we
Speaker 2: saw before the last election. Remember this I'm not Woke
Speaker 2: and the sub headline there Albow wur vows to swerve
Speaker 2: away from the left. How did that go? On election night,
Speaker 2: Anthony Albaneze announced the hard left policy of trying to
Speaker 2: enshrine racial division and privilege into the Constitution with a voice,
Speaker 2: and he has not stopped since in pushing a hard
Speaker 2: left agenda, whether it's energy policy, economic policy, social policy.
Speaker 2: This is who he is. This is what modern labor is,
Speaker 2: and no matter how they try to mask it with
Speaker 2: fruity ads like this.
Speaker 1: Well missed speaker, they are delulu with no salulu.
Speaker 7: So I just watched have a call the election, and
Speaker 7: everybody there is so much mistake.
Speaker 3: If re elected, Alba will literally wipe twenty percent of
Speaker 3: his student dat.
Speaker 2: Yeah, like literary literary. My god, I hate people say
Speaker 2: literally when they shouldn't say literally. It's a pet hate,
Speaker 2: but it's just a shameless attempt to buy votes from
Speaker 2: low information voters. Labor headquarters are putting outs like that
Speaker 2: on social media, and apparently objectifying women is cool again
Speaker 2: among the leftist feminist brigade, Jazz and big Position. Have
Speaker 2: you ever tried business? I don't know what's happening. And
Speaker 2: while they're doing that, Labor is attacking Peter Dutton and
Speaker 2: the Liberal Party for supposedly being anti women. That's because
Speaker 2: the Liberals don't have quotas.
Speaker 1: I've got a confession to make.
Speaker 9: I was wrong about something, and that is the fact
Speaker 9: that I did not think that the Liberals could get
Speaker 9: any worse with women. They have secretly walked back their
Speaker 9: quotas for women. We set quoters years ago, and that
Speaker 9: has meant that now we're the first government to have
Speaker 9: a majority female caucus in Australia's history.
Speaker 1: When you've got a party room.
Speaker 9: And a government that looks like the country that you
Speaker 9: were there to represent, you make better decisions.
Speaker 2: Evidently not love. This has been the most economically destructive,
Speaker 2: anti business, anti personal freedom government we have seen in
Speaker 2: my lifetime. Anyway, if that's what quotas get you, then
Speaker 2: you can have them. And let's end on this rather
Speaker 2: bizarro labor ad about again Medicare. They're obsessed with this
Speaker 2: medi Scare two point oh campaign and I can only
Speaker 2: assume the advertising team is on a particularly potent combination
Speaker 2: of drugs. What is going on, Rohan, you're the advertising
Speaker 2: You're come out with some campaigns that have still remembered
Speaker 2: decades later. They won awards. What are they doing? Are
Speaker 2: they We're looking on going what is happening? When is
Speaker 2: it actually effective? Are they getting through to.
Speaker 1: How to reach voters only to people who aren't the
Speaker 1: remotest bit interested in what the issues actually.
Speaker 2: Are to Australia.
Speaker 1: That is a lot of Australian So it's all touchy
Speaker 1: feely stuff, but it has no depth to it. So
Speaker 1: those sort of advertising campaigns might touch a few people,
Speaker 1: but they have no depth, They had no residents. We
Speaker 1: saw the great ad during the Trump campaign which many
Speaker 1: people credited as being the pivotal ad that won the election,
Speaker 1: which was.
Speaker 3: Which was they are for the them, Donald Trump is
Speaker 3: for you.
Speaker 7: And I'll tell you what.
Speaker 3: That ad was so effective, and when I was in
Speaker 3: the States before the election, you heard it everywhere. It
Speaker 3: was on constant penetration. I don't know personally what these
Speaker 3: guys are trying to do, because you know, now my
Speaker 3: Instagram and my social media algorithms are such that I
Speaker 3: get fed this stuff constantly. The cat thing is just
Speaker 3: completely trippy, and you know, like I was looking at
Speaker 3: the comments on it and one of the comments was, oh, great,
Speaker 3: well you've won the notional vote of my seven year
Speaker 3: old daughter. Well done, labor. But this is really really
Speaker 3: totally self indulgent stuff here, and it speaks to me
Speaker 3: a real lack of policies.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's exactly what you do when you don't have
Speaker 1: any reach a when confronted with a real gen z
Speaker 1: or whatever, a young guy asking real questions. As we saw,
Speaker 1: they were speechless. They had nothing to say because their
Speaker 1: ad gurus haven't taught well how to respond to someone
Speaker 1: asking a genuine question. But let's have a look, let's
Speaker 1: be fair, let's have a look at the coalition ad now,
Speaker 1: or one of them, and see if we think it's
Speaker 1: any better.
Speaker 7: We live in the best country in the world right now,
Speaker 7: it's at a turning point.
Speaker 1: Too.
Speaker 13: Many are having to make sacrifices just to afford the
Speaker 13: weekly shop and pay their bills. This election is a
Speaker 13: choice about who can help Australians get ahead by managing
Speaker 13: our economy better. Australia can't afford to continue on its
Speaker 13: current path. Let's get our country back on track.
Speaker 1: So, reader and James, a good ad has a strong
Speaker 1: idea behind it. There's no really strong idea behind that.
Speaker 1: It could be a clip from anything, but it's not
Speaker 1: offensive and it's telling a message.
Speaker 3: Well, look, it's telling a message. And you know, I
Speaker 3: think it's good insofar as it goes. But I tell
Speaker 3: you what they're really going to have to rev up.
Speaker 3: I think talking about exactly what has gone wrong over
Speaker 3: the last three years. People feel like things are going wrong,
Speaker 3: but the ads, I think, Ed Roan, you're the ad man,
Speaker 3: so you tell me. But I feel like these ads
Speaker 3: should really do more to crystallize really what has gone
Speaker 3: wrong here over the last three years. And it all
Speaker 3: comes down to the fact that Ethne Albin Easy he is, like,
Speaker 3: you know, practically a socialist. He's our first left faction
Speaker 3: prime minister, and everything that has happened since then has
Speaker 3: flowed from that.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 3: Remind people about the voice and that they fitted away
Speaker 3: the first twelve eighteen months of their government, you know,
Speaker 3: messing around with that. Remind everybody about the actual stark
Speaker 3: terms in which food has gone up something like thirty percent.
Speaker 1: You know, since this government, this should.
Speaker 2: Be so simple to put together that ad. No, I'm sorry. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it's been offensive, but that's the best thing you can
Speaker 2: say about it. It's also completely forgettable. It has no
Speaker 2: clear message, it has no slogan, and yeah we should
Speaker 2: be above slogans, but we're not. You need to a
Speaker 2: clear message, something that people can remember, because people don't
Speaker 2: live and brief politics. They've got bills to pay, families
Speaker 2: that take care of. You've got to actually get through.
Speaker 2: And it's not too hard to have a very clear
Speaker 2: ad with arrows going up, how much has energy gone up?
Speaker 2: How much has your grocery bill come up? How much
Speaker 2: of our mortgage has gone up during that term with
Speaker 2: interest rates skyrocketing up? And just bring it home that
Speaker 2: the pain you're feeling is not just in your household.
Speaker 2: This is across the economy. They've got so much to
Speaker 2: work with. There is so much ammunition they have to
Speaker 2: articulate why things have gone wrong, rather than just giving
Speaker 2: this sort of broad message about.
Speaker 1: The key thing for me. There's three key figures for me.
Speaker 1: One is trillion? Where are trillion dollars in debt? I
Speaker 1: never thought I would see that in my lifetime, James.
Speaker 1: Where's a million? Which is over a million migrant support
Speaker 1: into the country under labor and many more yet to come.
Speaker 7: And what do you get?
Speaker 1: So that's what you've lost?
Speaker 7: What have you got?
Speaker 1: A five dollars tax cut? Oh wow? I mean it's
Speaker 1: clear that the Labor government has failed on every single issue.
Speaker 1: It's not a hard story to tell. Well, no, it's not.
Speaker 3: And you know, I think, really Peter Dunton needs to
Speaker 3: urgently take a page out of Tony Abbot's playbook, because
Speaker 3: Tony Abbott, as an Amation leader was incredibly effective. He
Speaker 3: was incredibly effective at crystallizing exactly what was wrong and
Speaker 3: what they would do to stop the things that had
Speaker 3: gone wrong. Labor's got a great big green tax that
Speaker 3: is not just on your power bill, but it's on
Speaker 3: everything that you consume. It's your food, it's your powers,
Speaker 3: everything that you consume. The trillion dollar debt again, I
Speaker 3: don't even know frankly how clued into the deficit people
Speaker 3: are these days. I feel like that issue has come off.
Speaker 3: I think it's much more local. I think it's much
Speaker 3: more hip pocket sort of thing. So, you know, it's
Speaker 3: the great big green tax on everything. It is the
Speaker 3: lack of anything about housing and the big indict if
Speaker 3: the biggest indatement of the Albanezi government is that people
Speaker 3: no longer are convinced that their kids are going to
Speaker 3: have with their grandkids are going to have the same
Speaker 3: or a better life than they enjoyed.
Speaker 1: And that is the that is the.
Speaker 3: Needs to crystallize bring we are going to bring this back,
Speaker 3: which is kind of what that was talking about.
Speaker 2: Yeah, with Tony at but we still remember all these
Speaker 2: years later stop the bus exactly and the carbon tax
Speaker 2: that were they were the slogans, they were the clear messages,
Speaker 2: that were election promises and they happened. So they shouldn't
Speaker 2: just be cheap slogans. There should actually be policies of
Speaker 2: the implemented. But it's easy to paint a picture, have
Speaker 2: an ad where every time someone goes to pay for something,
Speaker 2: Albo and Adam Bant are taking a bit of that
Speaker 2: money out of their pocket. For all the taxes, all
Speaker 2: the regulation, the way we are over regulating and businesses
Speaker 2: are stifled. You can paint a picture very clearly in
Speaker 2: fifteen to twenty seconds without having someone doing a monologue
Speaker 2: to camera like that.
Speaker 1: You also have James. You also have issues like the
Speaker 1: reason you mentioned we discussed the Kamala Harris ad with
Speaker 1: Trump is it because it crystallized. It was one idea
Speaker 1: which crystallized everything that was wrong, which is a cultural
Speaker 1: issue in Australia. The cultural issue which the Coalition already
Speaker 1: won was the voice. Every day we should see Peter
Speaker 1: Dutton and just Center Price out there attacking all this
Speaker 1: waste of money and Indigenous affairs, all this nonsense First
Speaker 1: Nations ambassadors and all that sort of stuff. That's where
Speaker 1: they can be attacking and standing up for the Australia
Speaker 1: of one equals.
Speaker 3: Now I'd make one other suggestion to here. You know
Speaker 3: when and you know we talked about that protester before
Speaker 3: and what he was talking about about the housing. You know,
Speaker 3: this is how This is how they should actually be talking.
Speaker 1: They should be.
Speaker 3: Saying, you know, labor is not for you, Labor is
Speaker 3: not for your kids. They are for brief and people
Speaker 3: who will vote for them as staying in power forever.
Speaker 1: Do you want that?
Speaker 3: But the other point i'd make too, just on the
Speaker 3: Tony Abbott stuff. You know, you remember how absolutely furious
Speaker 3: the ABC and the Herald and the Age were at
Speaker 3: him every day, and I think, you know, Peter Dunton
Speaker 3: should wake up every morning and he should look at
Speaker 3: the headlines on the ABC and the Herald and if
Speaker 3: they are not furious with him, then he needs to
Speaker 3: have a big spread advisor to say, let's get them
Speaker 3: angry because they're the ones we want to recause they're.
Speaker 1: Not voting for us anyway. Absolutely speaking of which, after
Speaker 1: the break, net Zany left Delnacy Whacademia in.
Speaker 7: A tick.
Speaker 1: You're watching outside, isn't thank you so much for watching
Speaker 1: us every Sunday morning, and you do not want to
Speaker 1: miss us during the election. Every every Sunday morning will
Speaker 1: be giving you all the best of what has happened
Speaker 1: during the week over the election campaign, including all the
Speaker 1: electoral dysfunction that occurs throughout the campaign. Hustings on the hustings.
Speaker 1: Let's start off with Sarah Hansome.
Speaker 14: Yeah, on the aid of the election, have you sold
Speaker 14: out your environment credentials?
Speaker 2: Throwing up ten stinking and attention.
Speaker 1: Salmon, salmon. I'm not sure about that one. How did
Speaker 1: that one go down?
Speaker 7: That did not go down? Well?
Speaker 3: I mean I was watching that and when I saw
Speaker 3: it happened, I thought, is this like you know the
Speaker 3: scenes from The Godfather where they open up the bullproof
Speaker 3: vest and they say, you know, Luca Brozi sleeps of
Speaker 3: the fishes. Here this whole thing. Of course, you know,
Speaker 3: this is a fascinating issue where the Barjian skate, which
Speaker 3: is this you know, wonderful, cute, cuddly fish that lives
Speaker 3: down to the waters off Tasman is apparently threatened by
Speaker 3: the salmon farms. The Greens are all up and arm
Speaker 3: but everybody is missing sort of the big angle on
Speaker 3: this here is that this issue of the salmon farm
Speaker 3: is a huge issue in Tasmania.
Speaker 1: There's jobs, there's.
Speaker 3: Money in this and it also highlights the big divide
Speaker 3: between Tanya Pliversek, who has the ability to with a
Speaker 3: stroke for repent, kill off the industry and Anthony Alberinezi,
Speaker 3: who wants to put legislation through to save the industry
Speaker 3: because he needs to save those seats. It's fascinating to
Speaker 3: be because of course tiny Plimer sac has that grieves
Speaker 3: of seat or under threat of the Green seat in Sydney,
Speaker 3: but there's also no love lost between her and the
Speaker 3: Prime Minister.
Speaker 2: No no love lost. And also interesting is that this
Speaker 2: is an issue that brings the Greens back to what
Speaker 2: they were traditionally created for, which wasn't to be a
Speaker 2: Marxist economy destroying cancer on Australian politics. That was supposed
Speaker 2: to actually care about the environment, about being green, and
Speaker 2: we see very little of that from them these days,
Speaker 2: other than trying to completely destroy our economy with their
Speaker 2: emission targets. So on the one hand, I can kind
Speaker 2: of see the point of this stunt as much as
Speaker 2: Australians would look on and go what just clownish antiques
Speaker 2: from the Greens. At least it's a core issue that
Speaker 2: they used to care.
Speaker 1: About, and Tasmania does play a role historically. I mean
Speaker 1: there was the logging thing under the Howard Is it
Speaker 1: was the Franklin River dam, going right back to Hawk.
Speaker 1: But another one I wanted to talk about Reader and
Speaker 1: James is Snowy two pointer, who is back in there?
Speaker 1: Is what a joke Malcolm Turnbull's fantasy for renewables, All renewables,
Speaker 1: By the way, fantas work again. Roll you're pushing water uphill.
Speaker 1: You push the water up up hill. There you go,
Speaker 1: You push the water uphill and then it comes down
Speaker 1: and that gets you electricity at night. It's all nonsense.
Speaker 1: But of course, because they are such hypocrites, they push
Speaker 1: the water uphill, they do all that. But now they're
Speaker 1: going to fell all the trees across the top ranges
Speaker 1: of Cosiosco as well, snow gums, ribbon gums, red native shrubs,
Speaker 1: habitat for creatures, all being flattened thanks to Matt Kaine
Speaker 1: thanks to all these lovees.
Speaker 3: It's you know, this is exactly a replay too though
Speaker 3: of what we have seen, uh you know, and this
Speaker 3: is absolutely beautiful country here, these trees, this environment, you know.
Speaker 3: I mean, I'm the last the world's last great endorsement,
Speaker 3: so I'm not really a big, you know, outdoors kind
Speaker 3: of guy, but this is beautiful country out there. We've
Speaker 3: seen this over and over again that with all of
Speaker 3: these sort of green things, that's you know, we've got
Speaker 3: to destroy the environment in order to save it. How
Speaker 3: many times have we seen the environmental impact statements about
Speaker 3: you know, wind farms and solar farms in places like
Speaker 3: Queensland where koalas are just yeah, we're gonna kill baby koalas,
Speaker 3: you know. But it's all part of the price of
Speaker 3: saving the planet. I mean, this is how absurd it is.
Speaker 3: And one more thing too, how it's twelve million dollars
Speaker 3: now for this thing. How many of these nuclear reactors
Speaker 3: could we get for this one? Hydronons?
Speaker 1: Have they have? They got the thing out of the
Speaker 1: tunnel yet, Florence the Shane.
Speaker 2: Sarah Hanson Young and a dead salmon. This is the
Speaker 2: sort of policies where they could actually have an impact,
Speaker 2: where of course they back this madness, but if they
Speaker 2: looked at the absolute environmental destruction that's happening with these
Speaker 2: solar farms and wind turbines, that is where they could
Speaker 2: get some support, and perhaps they could get the support
Speaker 2: of all those disaffected TILL voters. Because again this week
Speaker 2: we saw down in Melbourne, Minique Ryan's husband tearing down
Speaker 2: see Liberal sign and behaving fairly appallingly on camera before
Speaker 2: the footage when public and suddenly he was very apologetic.
Speaker 2: Suddenly he wasn't for that sort of behavior at all.
Speaker 2: But I do wonder how often it happens, because I
Speaker 2: hear in Kyong and elsewhere where there are TILL candidates
Speaker 2: the coalition signs, the Liberal signs do not last long.
Speaker 2: They get damaged, they get torn down.
Speaker 1: Steel into teel, they put the steel into teel. We'll
Speaker 1: all also want to talk about uts and shameful sins.
Speaker 1: Have a listened to this, This is utterly disgusting. Brother.
Speaker 3: She says should feel uncomfortable, and to make them uncomfortable,
Speaker 3: and that.
Speaker 1: Includes some grub at uts, saying that Jews in Australia
Speaker 1: should feel uncomfortable, and then singling out a person in
Speaker 1: the crowd and saying that person over. This is despicable,
Speaker 1: This is repulsive. This is what Penny Wong and Anthony
Speaker 1: Albanezi have unleashed onto this nation. They should hang their
Speaker 1: heads in shame, not be standing for reelection in my opinion.
Speaker 3: Well, Rowan, you know what we have here too with
Speaker 3: this is absolute proof about the whole sort of line
Speaker 3: that oh, we can criticize Israel, but it doesn't mean
Speaker 3: we're criticizing Jews are being anti Jewish people. Well you know,
Speaker 3: I mean when you make the link like that Jewish
Speaker 3: people need to feel uncomfortable because of what what Israel
Speaker 3: is doing, that leak suddenly becomes a lot clearer.
Speaker 2: And the University of Sydney has also learned this week
Speaker 2: wanting to decolonize the curriculum and indigenize the curriculum, whatever
Speaker 2: the hell that means, but basically it means more indoctrination
Speaker 2: in higher education. And we're seeing McCrory University, we saw
Speaker 2: that with UTS. It is just across the board at
Speaker 2: our universities. And again this is at a big area
Speaker 2: where the Dutton opposition can take us.
Speaker 1: Standing on an This is one of those other issues
Speaker 1: that they should be getting out getting in there. We're
Speaker 1: talking about the curriculum, the school curriculum. That's where it's
Speaker 1: coming up. After the break, We've got billboard Chriss and
Speaker 1: I'll chat to you about other things as well. In
Speaker 1: a tick, Hello, you're watching Outsiders with Rita will decide
Speaker 1: who comes into this country and the circumstances in which
Speaker 1: they come Panahe James, how much gst on a birthday cake?
Speaker 1: Morrow and myself Rowan. If you don't like our show,
Speaker 1: don't watch It's deed. Yes, it's selection time this morning.
Speaker 1: I'd like to focus on the real choice at this selection, namely,
Speaker 1: who is going to be shaping all our lives for
Speaker 1: the next three years. Who will be sitting at the
Speaker 1: table as our lives are regulated and our earnings taxed.
Speaker 1: I've narrowed down the choice to five people from each
Speaker 1: of the major parties. Do you want our country to
Speaker 1: be run by Anthony Albanizi? A man who sat on
Speaker 1: his hands while Chinese warship circled the nation, sat at
Speaker 1: the tennis while indigenous crime spiraled out of control in
Speaker 1: Alice Springs, and who was so arrogant he forced the
Speaker 1: nation to endure the nightmare of the four hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty million dollar Voice referendum, along with Chris Bowen, the
Speaker 1: man destroying our energy grid, gussy who's gutted our manufacturing base,
Speaker 1: who's torched our future prosperity and vandalizes our countryside notions
Speaker 1: with his insane renewables projects, along with Penny Wong, responsible
Speaker 1: for the most disgraceful approach to Israel, which has, in
Speaker 1: my opinion, fomented the worst antisemitism this nation has ever seen,
Speaker 1: along with Jim Chalmers, the trillion dollar debt man, who
Speaker 1: is hell bent on thieving even more money from red
Speaker 1: tirees by taxing unrealized gains on superannuation funds pure theft,
Speaker 1: along with Tony Burke, who has flooded our nation with
Speaker 1: over a million migrants, including over three thousand people from
Speaker 1: the terrorist hellhole of Gaza. Or would you prefer a
Speaker 1: government that includes Peter Dutton, a decent man who's actually
Speaker 1: has a pragmatic and practical plan to bring down the
Speaker 1: cost of living and your household bills, who has stood
Speaker 1: up against anti Semitism and believes in one flag only
Speaker 1: for Australians, along with just sent a Nampa jimper Price,
Speaker 1: the brave Aboriginal woman who stood up to the Larney
Speaker 1: Left and won the fire against the insanity of the Voice,
Speaker 1: along with James Patterson, who has fought repeatedly to warn
Speaker 1: Australians about the threats posed by China and fought equally
Speaker 1: hard to protect Australian Jews from the viole antisemitism unleashed
Speaker 1: by the Labor Party, along with Matt Canavan, who we
Speaker 1: had earlier on the show, the intellectual leader of the
Speaker 1: Nationals who will eventually prevail I have absolutely no doubt
Speaker 1: about it in getting us out of the Paris Agreement
Speaker 1: and ditching net zero, along with Alexantik, a true blue
Speaker 1: Conservative who fights tooth and nail every day against the
Speaker 1: tyranny of woke ideology infecting our schools, our universities, the
Speaker 1: ABC and so many other institutions.
Speaker 7: So there you have it.
Speaker 1: I've given you a pick of five of the top
Speaker 1: players from each party. Who do you want shaping your
Speaker 1: children's future? Now? The good news is that, as usual,
Speaker 1: Chris Bowen, who I mentioned earlier, Chris Bowen can always
Speaker 1: be relied on to give Australians a very clear and
Speaker 1: succinct reason not to vote for Labor. He did so
Speaker 1: in twenty nineteen when he said if you don't like
Speaker 1: Labour's policies, don't vote for us. So nobody did, which
Speaker 1: cost Bill shortened that election. And I'm delighted to say
Speaker 1: that Chris Bowen has already done it again this election.
Speaker 1: Here he is giving perfect advice as to why not
Speaker 1: to vote for Labor. And it's only day three of
Speaker 1: the election campaign. Asking about the election, fair enough, there'll
Speaker 1: be a real contest on outside. We believe climate change
Speaker 1: is real. There are enough climate deniers in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: five in.
Speaker 7: The federal Liberal National Party to stop climate action.
Speaker 1: Hallelujah. There you have it. According to Chris Bowen himself,
Speaker 1: there are enough MPs in the Coalition to stop the
Speaker 1: climate energy renewables insanity. That's brilliant news. Thank goodness for that.
Speaker 1: Thank you Chris for pointing that out. We might yet
Speaker 1: get out of Paris and abandon that zero after all.
Speaker 1: So there you have it, folks, what better reason to
Speaker 1: vote coalition? Thank you Chris Bowen. And finally, just in
Speaker 1: case you are still undecided, who can forget this gem
Speaker 1: from back in twenty twenty two. Albow and the six
Speaker 1: point plan comedy goal. Yesterday you talked about Labour's six
Speaker 1: point plan. What are the six points?
Speaker 12: The six points are what we will do in terms
Speaker 12: was outlined by Bill Shorten. What that's about is make
Speaker 12: no what what what that's about?
Speaker 7: What are the six points?
Speaker 12: Well, if you let me answer the question, what that's
Speaker 12: about is making sure that we take pressure off people
Speaker 12: who are at the moment having their programs cut.
Speaker 1: That's one mister, mister Albanese. One are the other five points?
Speaker 7: Mister Rabanesi.
Speaker 2: Six points are to be handed to you by your advisor.
Speaker 1: Then that's shot.
Speaker 2: Right, So we just saw it, but it's on camera.
Speaker 1: Are comedy goald Ritza Heckler's people interrupting? You know they
Speaker 1: are critical to an election campaign. So Peter Dunnan's have
Speaker 1: his own couple of characters yesterday. Let's have a look. Oh.
Speaker 2: I think it was someone who was perturbed about nuclear energy,
Speaker 2: greeny till labor types and lefty. I think it is
Speaker 2: going to be interesting how he handles this. I think
Speaker 2: the coalition should be leaning into this. They should be
Speaker 2: going to university campuses anywhere where they can guarantee just feral,
Speaker 2: ugly support. I agree types who the mainstream Australia has
Speaker 2: no time for. I think it actually is a clever
Speaker 2: way to say we're not for these people, not for
Speaker 2: the loud activists class.
Speaker 3: I think there's a really issuing. I don't know if
Speaker 3: we have the clip here, but he was basically set
Speaker 3: upon a Chinese restaurant in Brisbane, I think it was.
Speaker 3: And it was you know, the usual sort of tape
Speaker 3: and you can pretty much picture it in your head
Speaker 3: coming in and screaming Karen, you know in the middle
Speaker 3: aged white woman bloomer, you know, the sort of person
Speaker 3: to be, you know, knitting outside a gas company headquarters
Speaker 3: of that sort of thing, you know. But the really
Speaker 3: interesting thing here, because it's a really interesting dynamic to
Speaker 3: the two. But let's have a look here first and
Speaker 3: then come back and talk about this. How a look
Speaker 3: at this?
Speaker 10: Why are you lying to these during people about condom
Speaker 10: nuclear and guess he's going to cook the country.
Speaker 2: He's going to cook out country. Yes, straight from Central
Speaker 2: Casting America. They call these awfuls affluent white female, these liberals.
Speaker 2: I don't know if she's affluent, but they typically are
Speaker 2: that activists call well.
Speaker 3: Yeah, look they are, and I mean and you know,
Speaker 3: that's that's that's part of it. But there's another really
Speaker 3: interesting thing here too, which is that we've heard so
Speaker 3: much talk about uh, you know, young people and young
Speaker 3: males particularly becoming you know, quite left out by the
Speaker 3: current political settlement, which is the sort of lefty establishment
Speaker 3: sort of little bit. And we've seen this crystallized. We've
Speaker 3: seen this here in the last twenty four hours. You know,
Speaker 3: if you look at the protester who readA just described
Speaker 3: so wonderfully as being part of the awful types of
Speaker 3: and then you look at the young man who was
Speaker 3: protesting at and asking a question very respectfully insensibly of
Speaker 3: Peter of f the Albanezi and his team and Jim Chalmers,
Speaker 3: you know, you see that the dynamic and the energy
Speaker 3: has shifted so suddenly. Now the left is being protested
Speaker 3: by a younger generation, whereas the conservative politician Peter Dutton
Speaker 3: they are getting their attacks from the older generation. That
Speaker 3: tells me a lot, I think if you're paying attention
Speaker 3: about where the future of politics is heading.
Speaker 2: And despite the unhinged campaign against Donald Trump, particularly from
Speaker 2: the media and celebrity class, who you would think younger
Speaker 2: voters would listen to a bit more. He got more
Speaker 2: young voters than any Republican for I think something close
Speaker 2: to twenty years, and that's shocked a lot of people.
Speaker 2: He wasn't just young men. He got more young women
Speaker 2: as well than Republicans traditionally get. So that is something
Speaker 2: again the coalition could look at, particularly when it comes
Speaker 2: to female voters, because we know female voters are leaning left.
Speaker 2: So if Trump is able to get more than other Republicans,
Speaker 2: look at what's happening. Look at how that message is
Speaker 2: being communicated. And instead of just being scared wickless constantly
Speaker 2: by any mention of Trump or any comparisons to Trump,
Speaker 2: see how this man managed to win an election in
Speaker 2: a landslide despite having the media dead set against him
Speaker 2: well eight solid years.
Speaker 3: There's a really interesting thing too, with the you know,
Speaker 3: the shifting bed versus women. And I was talking to
Speaker 3: a poster about this and they explained to me that basically,
Speaker 3: in both the United States and Australia, you know, men
Speaker 3: have actually always stayed slightly to the right, et cetera.
Speaker 3: You know, and they move maybe a little bit to
Speaker 3: the right with trumpet a huge amount it's actually young
Speaker 3: women in the last ten years who have taken this
Speaker 3: huge swing to the left, which is fascinating, but also
Speaker 3: it's interesting too. He also said that a young man
Speaker 3: who's twenty five years old in the United States right
Speaker 3: now is going to be more conservative than his seventy
Speaker 3: five year old grandfather. Yes, which is very interesting as well.
Speaker 3: There's so much energy here that Peter Dutton Conservatives here
Speaker 3: in general, I think can tap because young people have
Speaker 3: been sold out and frankly, they've been sold out by
Speaker 3: both sides of politics when it comes to things like housing.
Speaker 3: You know, the Coalition was in power for a long
Speaker 3: long time. They didn't do anything to solve the migration problem,
Speaker 3: and they didn't do anything to solve housing either. So
Speaker 3: we have to be honest about that, and we.
Speaker 2: Have to also start talking to women and young women
Speaker 2: very differently from the conservative side, because it's always about
Speaker 2: trying to adopt the left's messaging and just do a
Speaker 2: little bit of a softer version, a less leftist version
Speaker 2: of that, and it does not You actually need to
Speaker 2: stand for something and have some principles that are unshakable.
Speaker 2: Then you can communicate to both sexes. But if you're
Speaker 2: going to be constantly sort of me toing the left
Speaker 2: talking points when you don't really believe in it, and
Speaker 2: they know you don't believe in it. You're not actually
Speaker 2: generating a debate, you're not actually presenting an argument saying,
Speaker 2: forget about that victimhood mindset. They've sold you this is
Speaker 2: better for women, and we're not seeing that. And we're
Speaker 2: also got to talk about if the trend comes here
Speaker 2: as it has in the US. And in the US,
Speaker 2: if you look at married women, they vote Republican more.
Speaker 2: They certainly did in the last election. Married men, unmarried
Speaker 2: men Republican more, but unmarried women the margin is enormous.
Speaker 2: It's almost two to one voting Left as opposed to Republican.
Speaker 2: And I think the same trend is evident here. We
Speaker 2: don't have the stats like they have in America, but
Speaker 2: it is something to keep in mind.
Speaker 3: Well, the thing is there is that, you know, what's
Speaker 3: happening is that the left's policies which encourage dependents, have
Speaker 3: basically encouraged a lot of women to essentially marry the state.
Speaker 3: You know, I mean, that's basically what's happening here. But
Speaker 3: Redia raise a great point about that sort of me
Speaker 3: tooing of the left policies here, and whether it's women
Speaker 3: or men or the entire population here. You know, the
Speaker 3: Left is always about dependence, so always picking your pocket,
Speaker 3: handing stuff back to you, picking your pocket handing stuff
Speaker 3: back to you. That's what they do, and it's not
Speaker 3: about empowering people. And that is where I think, you know,
Speaker 3: there's so much opportunity for the Coalition, you know, because
Speaker 3: you're saying to women, essentially you must be dependent on
Speaker 3: us for child care, it must be dependent on this
Speaker 3: for that or the other thing, and all of that's
Speaker 3: really condescending. It doesn't empower women. It doesn't empower women
Speaker 3: to you know, do things like star businesses. It almost
Speaker 3: sort of assumes that they can't, which is I think
Speaker 3: a horrendous thing to be saying. But that goes beyond
Speaker 3: that here too. You know, there should be also more
Speaker 3: family friendly tax policies around income splitting, around raising the
Speaker 3: threshold for when you've got kids when your tax kick said,
Speaker 3: there's so many things that can be done here can
Speaker 3: create that prominent.
Speaker 1: Social change, absolutely, but there's also the issue of patriotism
Speaker 1: and the Coalition needs to go and stronger that is
Speaker 1: why they won the Voice, because the coalition stood up
Speaker 1: and said, we are Australia, black and white together, Jacenter
Speaker 1: and Peter together, we are Australia. We are the future
Speaker 1: one people. We are a proud people, we are proud
Speaker 1: of our history. And that won them the Voice and
Speaker 1: that's what we need to hear more of in this
Speaker 1: election campaign. Now we're going to join now by Chris Elston.
Speaker 1: You men know him as Billboard Chris. He was here
Speaker 1: on Outsiders when he was last in Australia. Chris has
Speaker 1: just been up there. Chris is a fantastic campaigner against
Speaker 1: the insanity of transgenderism. He's done so much around the
Speaker 1: world to help shift that entire discussion, huge success in America, Canada,
Speaker 1: here as well. Chris is here for reasons he'll tell
Speaker 1: us in a second, to do with basically his fight
Speaker 1: with the Australian government and e Safety Commissioner and the
Speaker 1: censorship in Australia. But he was arrested in Brisbane, not charged,
Speaker 1: but arrested. Chris, Welcome to Outsideers. It's great to see you.
Speaker 1: Tell us why you're here briefly, and will play some
Speaker 1: of the footage as well, but tell us why you're here,
Speaker 1: and then tell us what happened in Brisbane.
Speaker 4: Sure, so I came back to your beautiful country to
Speaker 4: sue your government in what is hopefully a landmark freedom
Speaker 4: of speech case because about a year ago, I criticized
Speaker 4: the appointment of a woman named Teddy Cook. This is
Speaker 4: a transactivist, woman who identifies as a man, who is
Speaker 4: appointed to the World Health Organization tasked with drafting healthcare
Speaker 4: policy for trans identified children and adults. This is a
Speaker 4: woman who posts pictures of beastiality, bondage, all sorts of
Speaker 4: very inappropriate things. She's not a medical doctor or health
Speaker 4: professional at all. She's just an activist and I don't
Speaker 4: think she's the one who should be writing health care policy,
Speaker 4: especially for kids who are struggling with this transgender craze.
Speaker 7: So I criticized her.
Speaker 4: Your E Safety Commissioner, or E Nanny as I call her,
Speaker 4: ordered my post taken down. I filed an appeal. Incredible
Speaker 4: the Elon Musk then filed an appeal. So our appeals
Speaker 4: have been joined. They are two separate appeals, but it's
Speaker 4: all being heart as one case. So I'm going to
Speaker 4: be in court from Monday to Friday, this week fighting
Speaker 4: your E Safety Commissioner to ensure that Australians have the
Speaker 4: rate to see and see what they want on the internet.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm glad you're fighting the case and the E
Speaker 1: Safety Commissioner. Both parties, major parties. You know, we're in
Speaker 1: an election campaign here, Chris. The Coalition as well as
Speaker 1: Labor support this Julian Mangrant and her E safety regime.
Speaker 1: It's quite insane, rita.
Speaker 8: It is.
Speaker 2: And I think the Australian taxpayer wants to be funding
Speaker 2: this defense on behalf of the Safety Commission now because
Speaker 2: we didn't ask for this sort of nanny policing of
Speaker 2: the internet. So and she's already been embarrassed once in
Speaker 2: the courts with this fight with Elon Musk. Now, just
Speaker 2: with you. You go out there, you have a billboard
Speaker 2: with a clear message and you engage in conversations with people,
Speaker 2: whether they agree with your disagree. If you tell us
Speaker 2: what happening in Queensland where the police were harassing you
Speaker 2: were saying, you were disturbing the piece, you weren't entitled
Speaker 2: to be there, and all the footage I saw, and
Speaker 2: I looked at a fair bit of footage you were
Speaker 2: just standing there. Some passes by who were obviously activist
Speaker 2: types were abusing you, but you weren't responding, and yet
Speaker 2: you're the one the police were worried about.
Speaker 7: As usual.
Speaker 4: So, yes, I was in Chrismon every day, I've been
Speaker 4: meeting with several politicians. I've been meeting several politicians all
Speaker 4: across the country, which is amazing because Canadians don't want
Speaker 4: to meet with me, so I'm thankful for that. But
Speaker 4: I just do what I always do. I went, I
Speaker 4: found a busy spot. It was the public square on
Speaker 4: Queen Street, and I set up my tripod near a pole,
Speaker 4: out of the way so no one will run into it.
Speaker 4: And I was just standing in the corner of this
Speaker 4: large square and I wait quietly if people want to
Speaker 4: approach and have a conversation that I have one.
Speaker 7: And that's all I was doing.
Speaker 4: And then a council worker came along and he said
Speaker 4: I was obstructing people's movement and I had to leave.
Speaker 4: I disagree wholeheartedly with this statement. It's an no right lie.
Speaker 4: I wasn't obstructing anyone, so I refused to leave. He
Speaker 4: gave me an eight hundred and six dollars ticket still
Speaker 4: told me I had to leave again.
Speaker 7: I said no.
Speaker 4: Nine police officers showed up and over the next hour
Speaker 4: they were debating what to do with me, and eventually
Speaker 4: they took my signs off of me. Each one of
Speaker 4: them grabbed on in my arms and they marched me
Speaker 4: out of there. I thought I was going to jail.
Speaker 2: Here's me, Chris. Are you nine police officers showed up
Speaker 2: for an hour. There's people who have been breaking You've
Speaker 2: got their car smashed up. They can't get any cops
Speaker 2: to show up. I have to go to the police
Speaker 2: station to make a report. You've got nine police officers
Speaker 2: worried about you standing there wearing a billboard in a
Speaker 2: big public square.
Speaker 7: Would but reading on?
Speaker 2: We've got a coalition government in Queensland, do we not?
Speaker 1: Chris?
Speaker 4: But I'm having very dangerous conversations. I think that we
Speaker 4: shouldn't meme and sterilize children. So I can't be out
Speaker 4: there having that conversation. All of your parties go along
Speaker 4: with this. They need to stop me. But they've tried
Speaker 4: to stop me in the digital town square. Now they've
Speaker 4: tried to stop me in the physical town square in Brisbane.
Speaker 4: And just yesterday again I was ordered out of the
Speaker 4: town square in Melbourne, and again I said no, So
Speaker 4: we cannot live in a society like this. Children are
Speaker 4: coming to harm. We need to be able to talk
Speaker 4: about it. But they're doing all they can to stop
Speaker 4: this conversation.
Speaker 3: Well, so this is what I don't understand. I mean,
Speaker 3: you know, Queensland is in. Queenslanders are pretty sensible people.
Speaker 3: They've got a coalition government up there. I can understand
Speaker 3: this happening in Victoria, but Queensland. Come on, what is it? Well,
Speaker 3: you know what I'm talking about, Rita, come on, what
Speaker 3: is it that is the driving thing about what you're saying?
Speaker 3: Why is your message so threatening that the police instantly
Speaker 3: understand and have to react in such a way that
Speaker 3: you know you're obstructing, but our non cops aren't obstructing
Speaker 3: the footpath?
Speaker 13: What is it about?
Speaker 3: I mean, seriously, think about how absurd this is. But
Speaker 3: why is this so triggering to establishment politicians? Why are
Speaker 3: they so scared of anybody say hey, this ain't a
Speaker 3: great situation and don't want to raise awareness of it.
Speaker 7: You're absolutely right.
Speaker 1: So here's the thing.
Speaker 4: The people support me wherever I go in the world,
Speaker 4: and I've been all over the world. Now, I just spoke.
Speaker 4: I was on the streets of Davos. They featured my
Speaker 4: sign on the big screen at the General Session at
Speaker 4: the World Economic Forum. I was at the UN speaking
Speaker 4: of the Human Rights Council. But my bread and butter
Speaker 4: is talking to regular people on the street, and I
Speaker 4: get support from more than ninety percent of the population.
Speaker 4: But the far left screen bloody murder, and then that
Speaker 4: paralyzes the rest of the left who don't want to
Speaker 4: say anything or else they're called a bigot. And the
Speaker 4: weakest ones of all are the politicians.
Speaker 7: But they need to.
Speaker 4: Stand up because if you look at the statistics in
Speaker 4: the presidential election, for example, the number one issue that
Speaker 4: caused swing voters to go for the Republicans was this
Speaker 4: transgender insanity. Moms and dads know that their girls or
Speaker 4: girls and their boys are boys. They don't want boys
Speaker 4: and girls' sports. And this is a winning issue for
Speaker 4: any politician who finds just the wee bit of courage
Speaker 4: that it takes to stand up and speak against it.
Speaker 1: I agree wholeheartedly, and our coalition should. In fact, they're
Speaker 1: completely on the wrong side of the E Safety Commissioners
Speaker 1: supporting her. You are the embodiment, literally, Chris of the
Speaker 1: free speech argument. I want to play a clip of you.
Speaker 1: You engage with the public with humor, You crack jokes,
Speaker 1: you're never offensive, you get your message across. Here's a
Speaker 1: bloker who came up to you in Brisbane and you
Speaker 1: had some very quick, entertaining little comments under your brain.
Speaker 1: Had a listen.
Speaker 8: To see I've had a sex to be done.
Speaker 1: Oh that's great, and I chose my an informed choice
Speaker 1: about that. I'm really glad to do so.
Speaker 8: I've sterilize myself.
Speaker 7: That's good for society, of course, in your case.
Speaker 8: And a lot of cases of sort of I don't know,
Speaker 8: false minorities.
Speaker 1: That's good for society. In your page, very quick, Chris
Speaker 1: very it's very funny. But the point is you do
Speaker 1: it so good naturedly, you do it with humor. And
Speaker 1: isn't this the essence of free speech. Isn't this what
Speaker 1: the e Safety Commissioner and all these laws against free
Speaker 1: speech don't understand that you can have free speech, that
Speaker 1: you can get your point across, you can do it
Speaker 1: with humor. But you have and you always listen to
Speaker 1: the other side. And I think that's the embodiment of
Speaker 1: free speech, which is lost in all this. You don't
Speaker 1: need censorship laws.
Speaker 4: Chris, No, we don't. There are laws against incitement of violence,
Speaker 4: and that's fine. We shouldn't be inciting violence, but we
Speaker 4: should be able to talk about anything. And we're talking
Speaker 4: about a situation where across the Western world, hundreds of
Speaker 4: thousands of children are coming to permanent harm. Why because
Speaker 4: they've fallen for this lie teaching them that they're supposed
Speaker 4: to be something they're not. The only affirming thing about
Speaker 4: gender affirming care, it's affirming self hatred instead of telling
Speaker 4: children that they are beautiful just as they are, that
Speaker 4: there's no right or wrong way to be a girl
Speaker 4: or a boy. These kids who are gender non conforming,
Speaker 4: who've had abuse, who've suffered sexual abuse, and who were
Speaker 4: on the artism spectrum, these are the vulnerable kids who
Speaker 4: are falling for this lie, and we need to be
Speaker 4: able to have discussions about it. So I'm going to
Speaker 4: keep doing it no matter what all these moll coops
Speaker 4: try to do. I'll be back out there again this
Speaker 4: week after trial, each day having conversations, because one conversation
Speaker 4: at the time, We're going to put a stop to
Speaker 4: this child abuse.
Speaker 1: More power to you on your billboard. Billboard, Chris, thanks
Speaker 1: so much for coming on outside as retail. We just
Speaker 1: wanted to quickly.
Speaker 2: I'm going to mention what he said about independent voters
Speaker 2: in the US. I've written about this. He was one
Speaker 2: hundred percent right. The research they did and the polling
Speaker 2: they did post election shows the number one issue for
Speaker 2: swing voters, for independent voters wasn't inflation in the economy.
Speaker 2: It wasn't the border crisis, which is obviously huge. It
Speaker 2: was the trans cultural issues, the air and look.
Speaker 1: How the coalition treated Catherine Deeves at the last election,
Speaker 1: and why this isn't first forefront in the election issup
Speaker 1: Wi but Dutton.
Speaker 2: It is such a massive opportunity.
Speaker 1: Yes, this is this is the thing.
Speaker 3: There are all of these issues, not just this.
Speaker 1: This is one of them.
Speaker 3: There are plenty of issues out there that are what
Speaker 3: are called eighty twenty issues, right, exactly eighty percent of
Speaker 3: people think this is totally common sense. Twenty percent you know, say,
Speaker 3: you know, are the hard left. Those twenty percent drive
Speaker 3: the left policy, whether it's the Democrats or labor And
Speaker 3: you can absolutely get eighty percent of people say no,
Speaker 3: it's perfectly sensible that we you know, to port Venezuelan
Speaker 3: gang members or you know, we don't allow children to
Speaker 3: have these life saving, life changing of life altering procedures.
Speaker 3: It's just so straightforward.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, we'll take a short break.
Speaker 7: We'll be back.
Speaker 1: Well, lots more to chat about here on outside is
Speaker 1: back in a table.
Speaker 3: Well, hello, you were watching Outsiders with your hosts Rowan
Speaker 3: Dean and Rita Pannahey, and of course i'm James Morrow. Well,
Speaker 3: you know, one of the things that always defines the
Speaker 3: left is how when it comes to school and universities
Speaker 3: and all of that, they tend to gravitate towards, let's
Speaker 3: be frank about it, the softer, more sharing and carrying
Speaker 3: subjects like you know, gender studies and decolonizing Shakespeare, while
Speaker 3: the right tends to refer the real world of the
Speaker 3: hard sciences. This is the sort of thing why engineering
Speaker 3: schools are so often the last bastion of soundness at
Speaker 3: many schools, and it also explains this presumably lefty elon
Speaker 3: musk hating road ranger type defying all the laws of
Speaker 3: physics by trying to take on a tesla, and well
Speaker 3: they just didn't get it. Have a look here we
Speaker 3: see the anti Tesla truck come flying up here. They're
Speaker 3: going to try and break short on this, make life
Speaker 3: difficult for the Tesla driver. And then they are off
Speaker 3: and oh, wait for it, they are going to try
Speaker 3: and make a turn here. They have been harassing the
Speaker 3: Tesla and boom, that's gonna hurt. Well, I've bet they
Speaker 3: can't wait to file the insurance papers for that one
Speaker 3: and blame Elon Musk.
Speaker 1: But hey, look that was just puff out anyway.
Speaker 3: Of course, there is more going on than just deranged
Speaker 3: Elon anti Elon Musk activists. The American media is, of course,
Speaker 3: also having its own car crashes. Take a look at
Speaker 3: this exchange what happened on CNN a couple of days ago,
Speaker 3: which I think represents both a masterclass in explaining how
Speaker 3: the American mainstream media works flooding the zone with whatever
Speaker 3: they deem to be the big negative story of the
Speaker 3: day about Trump, while also ignoring their own failings, like
Speaker 3: say CNN's loss of a five million dollar defamation payout
Speaker 3: that they were forced to make to a Navy veteran
Speaker 3: turned private contractor that they had unfairly and inaccurately accused
Speaker 3: of doing unsavory black market things in Afghanistan. Now, keep
Speaker 3: that story in mind here as you watch CNN's Caitlin
Speaker 3: Collins try to drill Veterans Administration Secretary Doug Collins no
Speaker 3: relation by the way, over this mini scandal that keeps
Speaker 3: playing on about the White House and the use of
Speaker 3: a signal encrypted messaging app to discuss war plans, because
Speaker 3: this exchange also gives you a masterclass for conservative politicians
Speaker 3: in how to deal with this sort of treatment.
Speaker 15: Do you believe that a mistake was made here though,
Speaker 15: to have this conversation, to add a reporter, and to
Speaker 15: have it on an unsupported, unclassified group.
Speaker 16: Setting, Kayle, I've just told you, I've just answered the question.
Speaker 16: I wasn't a part of it, and you know I'm
Speaker 16: not going to speculate more than what the President's already
Speaker 16: talked about and those have been involved and talked about,
Speaker 16: but would love to talk about the veterans.
Speaker 3: Well, fair enough. But do you think Caitlin was just
Speaker 3: gonna leave it there? Oh no, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 3: not on your life.
Speaker 15: Yeah, and I do have questions on the veterans, but
Speaker 15: giving what we saw with the the group chat and
Speaker 15: how this was used, you are a member of the cabinet.
Speaker 15: You obviously know these other members, several of them who
Speaker 15: were in there. Is this typical for the cabinet to
Speaker 15: have conversations over signal?
Speaker 1: Is this something that you use?
Speaker 16: All right? Well, Kaylen, send you and Dally. Do I
Speaker 16: want to talk about the VA I have a question
Speaker 16: as via secretary is cabinet. I want to ask you
Speaker 16: because I've been co curious about this because my job
Speaker 16: is to take care of veterans, and I would like
Speaker 16: to know why CNN is hostile to veterans, especially one
Speaker 16: in Florida where you just had a five million dollar
Speaker 16: defamation suit taking a fence at a veteran who is
Speaker 16: trying to help people. In fact, one of your employees
Speaker 16: actually said we're going to nail him. I have a
Speaker 16: question for you, Caitlin.
Speaker 1: Is that employee still employed and he wasn't done yet.
Speaker 16: I like to hear from CNN, as the veteran cabinet secretary,
Speaker 16: why CNN seems to have a problem with veterans.
Speaker 15: Well, mister secretary, respectfully, my question was about whether or
Speaker 15: not he was a member of the cabinet. Use this,
Speaker 15: and respectfully, I'm conde.
Speaker 1: The investigation, and that, folks, is how it's done.
Speaker 3: Turn it around, make the media answer the questions that
Speaker 3: they don't want to, and just on that while official
Speaker 3: Washington loses its mind over the Cabinet members using the
Speaker 3: signal app to discuss airstrike on WoT he's in Yemen,
Speaker 3: calling for resignations and the like.
Speaker 1: To turn that around again.
Speaker 3: It is also worth pointing out that there was far
Speaker 3: less press scrutinary and I think don't work any calls
Speaker 3: for resignations during the failed Biden administrations pull out from
Speaker 3: Afghanistan that left thirteen service members dead and billions and
Speaker 3: billions of dollars of equipment and weaponry in the hands
Speaker 3: of the Taliban. I'm not the only one saying that.
Speaker 3: Here's Vice President jd Vance addressing this very problem.
Speaker 17: I find the American media's obsession with this issue very,
Speaker 17: very interesting because I happen to remember about four years
Speaker 17: ago when American milllitary leadership made a catastrophic error that
Speaker 17: got thirteen amer innocent Americans killed in Afghanistan and had
Speaker 17: about eighty billion dollars in military equipment turned over to
Speaker 17: one of the worst terrorist organizations in the world, and
Speaker 17: for years the American media ran cover, ran cover for
Speaker 17: a Biden administration that refused to fire any generals or
Speaker 17: even launch an internal investigation that was meaningful and.
Speaker 1: Substantive about what happened.
Speaker 17: And now the same American media that covered for the
Speaker 17: Biden administration after the untimely death and the unnecessary death
Speaker 17: of thirteen brave Americans is really really interested in forcing
Speaker 17: the President of the United States to fire someone because
Speaker 17: of a signal.
Speaker 1: Chat Vance is right.
Speaker 3: This double standard is ridiculous, and it is why it
Speaker 3: is important to remember that so much of what we
Speaker 3: are seeing now, so much of the outrage in so
Speaker 3: many areas, be it in the media or academia or
Speaker 3: anywhere else, comes comes from the fact that everyone in
Speaker 3: all these institutions had assumed that the Democrat big swamp
Speaker 3: grift was going to go on forever. And so what
Speaker 3: did they do while they set up a whole bunch
Speaker 3: of rules about how things would work and run without
Speaker 3: ever imagining Donald Trump could ever win and turn the
Speaker 3: whole power structure around on them. So sorry, guys, but
Speaker 3: for now, at least, it's game over.
Speaker 1: Great stuff James, and we've got an update on James's
Speaker 1: story from last week with the instant coom, a lady
Speaker 1: who went flying to tried to grab a magahattan. Yes,
Speaker 1: let's have a look here.
Speaker 3: For those who didn't see it, here, here's what happened
Speaker 3: on a New York City subway about a week or
Speaker 3: so ago.
Speaker 1: Have watched this to stop.
Speaker 3: And she goes, look, we got an update on this
Speaker 3: story here because that woman has been identified and you're
Speaker 3: not going to believe this here as a creative director,
Speaker 3: a creative director for a number of big luxury brands
Speaker 3: that you would have heard of, so you know, very
Speaker 3: nice heared deign to take the subway and then try it.
Speaker 3: But also she's also an Italian American citizen, and I
Speaker 3: don't duel national. I don't think she voted for Maloney.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, she's what we were talking about previously, that
Speaker 2: awful phenomenon affluent y female liberal as that lifty uh
Speaker 2: and uh she was literally felt entitled to chase that
Speaker 2: poor boy on the platform, try to physically take that
Speaker 2: hat off him. And yeah, that piece of instant karma
Speaker 2: was delicious. But yeah, she works for brands like Tiffany,
Speaker 2: so very high air, very affluent. But a point you
Speaker 2: made there about Afghanistan, which shocks me that the media
Speaker 2: still after this did not try to hold the Biden
Speaker 2: administration accountable because remember, they had an air strike in
Speaker 2: the aftermath of that to supposedly kill those who were responsible,
Speaker 2: and they killed a AID worker and his young family.
Speaker 2: There was I think six or seven young children who
Speaker 2: were murdered wrongly, and they acknowledged they got it wrong.
Speaker 2: And yet again nobody lost their job. Nobody is this
Speaker 2: picture of some of the children who were killed in
Speaker 2: that air strike, and to this day, no one has
Speaker 2: lost their job other than possibly a president by.
Speaker 3: About the signal chat chat, you know, look, the signal
Speaker 3: chat was you know, incautious, and whoever added that Jeffrey
Speaker 3: Goldberg guy from the Atlantic, really should you know, be
Speaker 3: cashiered because that is absolutely inexcusable. Because here's the thing,
Speaker 3: you know, the Trump administration is about bringing America back
Speaker 3: to responsibility and people taking responsibility for their mistakes. So
Speaker 3: there needs to be some accountability on that. But it's
Speaker 3: not a hanging offense for the whole administration. Let's put
Speaker 3: that aside. You know, remember, though, like the history of this,
Speaker 3: when America you know, was the great nation that Donald
Speaker 3: Trump wants to get it back to after Pearl Harbor,
Speaker 3: President Franklin Roosevelt fired the general who was in charge
Speaker 3: of the Pacifics and this happened on your watch. You're
Speaker 3: out what happens after Afghanistan. Well, everybody rallies around, you know,
Speaker 3: Mark Billy and everybody else, and the Pentagon and said,
Speaker 3: oh look all of these you know people who are
Speaker 3: all doing all the diversity stuff in Washington. That hasn't
Speaker 3: distracted them from their main mission. But of course it
Speaker 3: clearly has, and there's been no accountability. This is what
Speaker 3: the Trump administration needs to do. It is it doesn't
Speaker 3: need to do its possibility for these things.
Speaker 1: And they can start by firing that Steve Whitcoff bloke.
Speaker 1: He seems to be a complete joke. But anyway, that's
Speaker 1: a different story. I want to talk about the Middle
Speaker 1: East briefly.
Speaker 7: Reta.
Speaker 1: We've seen these demonstrations in Gaza from some very brave
Speaker 1: individuals who are protesting Ghazans, protesting against Hamas. The media
Speaker 1: doesn't fit. The media narrative so bare the media is
Speaker 1: barely touching it. We're not seeing the demonstrations on the
Speaker 1: streets of Sydney or the opera house supporting these characters
Speaker 1: against Hamas, which is what we should be doing, and
Speaker 1: our politicians should be encouraging this, because what's going to
Speaker 1: happen only one of two things. Either Hamas is going
Speaker 1: to wipe these characters out, or as I passionately hope,
Speaker 1: Hamas is on the point of being wiped out and
Speaker 1: is now so weakened that people in the Gaza strip
Speaker 1: feel emboldened to turn against them. But what we don't
Speaker 1: want to see is a situation where Hamas remains in
Speaker 1: power and we end up with so called elections and
Speaker 1: Hamas ribbins. So that's got to be avoided all costs.
Speaker 1: The West needs to be getting behind these people if
Speaker 1: it's legitimate, and encouraging any kind of descent against.
Speaker 2: The mass, seeing that after what eighteen months of protests,
Speaker 2: pro Palestinian protests, we haven't seen a single one that
Speaker 2: I'm aware of in the West that is anti Jimas,
Speaker 2: that is pro Palestinian, but anti Hamask because as we know,
Speaker 2: har Maas are absolutely brutal islam As terrorists, and they
Speaker 2: the way they treat their rown, the way they treat
Speaker 2: those who they think have defied their orders, is absolutely sadistic,
Speaker 2: so that we don't see that at all, says Plenty.
Speaker 1: But this to me, James, is this is Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: vision for Gaza coming to life. Donald Trump said people
Speaker 1: would voluntarily leave. Now if Hamas is defeated, we're going
Speaker 1: to see people like that voluntarily leaving, but some will
Speaker 1: voluntarily come back after gars are restored.
Speaker 3: I think we also need to be careful though, because
Speaker 3: you know how many times in the Middle East, and
Speaker 3: the last in exact years, like the Iranian Revolution. Really
Speaker 3: you know about this, you know, started out looking like
Speaker 3: it was a liberalizing movement. Of course, you know, the
Speaker 3: liberals gave way to Khomenih.
Speaker 2: And the islam get together.
Speaker 18: You've gottudent, But you've got I have been researching this
Speaker 18: u and there is a terrible report that one of
Speaker 18: the leaders of these protests in Gaza has been tortured
Speaker 18: and killed by Hamas.
Speaker 3: So of course we knew that's going to happen. There
Speaker 3: is some question, but he was actually backing these protests.
Speaker 3: The PLO might be behind them as well. You've got
Speaker 3: to be suspicion there's going to be any peace there
Speaker 3: until there's an actual occupation by some sort of multinational
Speaker 3: force by Israel.
Speaker 1: You need Israel to occupy it, and you need hown
Speaker 1: wiped out.
Speaker 7: That's what we need to wipe out.
Speaker 1: And that's that can only happen within Israeli occupation. But
Speaker 1: the real story was what happened to Iran in the
Speaker 1: cy called Green Revolution, where the West stood back and
Speaker 1: and the poor people there were terrorized. And yeah, yes, anyway,
Speaker 1: I want to talk briefly. Let's have a bit of humor.
Speaker 1: I've got to have some more humor. Kamala Harris always
Speaker 1: provides humor. But guess what she's coming to Australia to
Speaker 1: provide some humor for us.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 1: I don't know if this is a joke or someone's
Speaker 1: done this as a spoof or whatever, but the claim
Speaker 1: is on Instagram that Kamala Harris is going to talk
Speaker 1: at some Queensland real estate function later in the year. Fools.
Speaker 1: But can you I can just imagine the speech, you know,
Speaker 1: towers on the Gold Coast, unburdened by what could have
Speaker 1: been and burdened by what we see.
Speaker 3: Maybe this is what maybe this is what Carbal Harris
Speaker 3: should be doing. She should become, you know, a real
Speaker 3: estate agent. She should be out there every Saturday, flogging
Speaker 3: houses and diagrams, saying you know, here's a ven diagram
Speaker 3: of what you could do to this living room. The
Speaker 3: living room and the dining room are ven dive reby together.
Speaker 3: This property is unburdened by what has been in terms
Speaker 3: of heritage restrictions. There's so many ways that Kamala Harris
Speaker 3: could go with this.
Speaker 1: I do hope she comes out reta.
Speaker 2: That would be so much fun, hilarious. I really do
Speaker 2: hope this story is true.
Speaker 1: But I you have your suspicion, imagine a.
Speaker 2: Real estate institute of any sort of description. Because real
Speaker 2: estate ages are typically self employed types, they normally care
Speaker 2: about economic management, so to have her come and words
Speaker 2: salads doesn't really make.
Speaker 1: It's a building. A building is a building. It's where
Speaker 1: they build a building and you buy the anyway, we
Speaker 1: can have lots of fun with Kamala Harris for hours.
Speaker 7: Back in a tick.
Speaker 1: Roll up, roll up, step right this way. It's the wackiest,
Speaker 1: craziest show in town. It's the Canberra Clown Show. Grab
Speaker 1: Bag Giveaway Bonanza Extravaganza, coming to you from the Burley Griffin.
Speaker 1: All the money you can print, Big top starring our
Speaker 1: very own prime clown Albosa and money bags Jimbo. Here
Speaker 1: they are presenting the federal budget to the elated Australian taxpayer.
Speaker 7: You gave me too much money.
Speaker 1: That's not going to cost all this.
Speaker 3: Have you got two tens for a five?
Speaker 7: Just so happy to have it?
Speaker 1: That's enough. I like her. She's a regular scuff. That's why.
Speaker 19: There's our warman at knowlser serves around the son. Just
Speaker 19: a minute, right, what's wrong?
Speaker 1: Just a minute?
Speaker 3: Fifteen dollars went south?
Speaker 1: Sorry, my mistake. That was the famous comedy duet duo
Speaker 1: Appatt and Costello, of course, And they're two tens for
Speaker 1: a five. Sleight of hand, sketch. Easy mistake to make,
Speaker 1: of course. In fact, it's barely indistinguished, indistinguishable from Alboso's
Speaker 1: and Charmer's budget sleight of hand.
Speaker 12: Another one hundred and fifty dollars is coming off your
Speaker 12: power bill. That's every household, no strings attached, just real money,
Speaker 12: straight off your bill. And that's on top of the
Speaker 12: three hundred dollars we've already taken off.
Speaker 18: Ah.
Speaker 1: Yes, jacking up our power bills by an absolute fortune
Speaker 1: in order to satisfy their climate lunacy ideology and then
Speaker 1: giving us peanuts back instead. But you can't fool all
Speaker 1: the people all the time. Can you wait aavin?
Speaker 3: Are you accusing me of cheating?
Speaker 7: Here's your fire to me back my two ten?
Speaker 1: Sorry my mistake, Abd and Costello again, just like the
Speaker 1: Australian taxpayer. But are Albow and Charmers really any less deceitful?
Speaker 7: Okay?
Speaker 12: Id at one point one five million jobs more than
Speaker 12: any government in Australian history inspired the divil global economic times.
Speaker 19: Over a million jobs by this gument, the vast majority
Speaker 19: of which were gumment created jobs paid for by you
Speaker 19: and me the taxpayer.
Speaker 1: Yep, it looks like we taxpayers really are the mugs.
Speaker 16: Can you think tax cuts will make a difference on
Speaker 16: the doors for your MPs now out there in those
Speaker 16: big marginal seat spots.
Speaker 7: Even if it is only five bucks a week?
Speaker 5: Well, what we're trying to do here with this fifty
Speaker 5: bucks a week in three tax cuts is too well,
Speaker 5: cumulatively fifty bucks a week.
Speaker 7: We can go back and forth on if you like, Andrew,
Speaker 7: it wouldn't make for very good TV.
Speaker 1: Fifty bucks five bucks, Yes, it's Abbott and Costello all
Speaker 1: over again. As one hunter pointed out on Twitter, here
Speaker 1: are Albozo's real achievements one and a half million Third
Speaker 1: World migrants, Rents up thirty six percent, electricity up thirty
Speaker 1: two percent, groceries up twenty six percent, real wages down
Speaker 1: over three percent, and the biggest drop in living standards
Speaker 1: ever recorded in Australia. Not to mention our debt blowout,
Speaker 1: We're heading for a trillion dollars of gross debt next
Speaker 1: year thanks to these clowns, the worst in the developed world.
Speaker 1: And if you're a regular Joe you know just how.
Speaker 7: It feels.
Speaker 4: Again.
Speaker 1: Indeed. Meanwhile, ladies and gentlemen, plenty more comedy acts to
Speaker 1: keep you entertained in the Canbratown Show this week, including
Speaker 1: that class act known as saving Monique Ryan.
Speaker 7: Hang on mate, what are you doing?
Speaker 1: I'm taking the side down?
Speaker 7: Yeah, beg you pardon I'm taking the side down.
Speaker 8: What are you doing that for?
Speaker 1: Because it's on public land? Ah? Yes, Monique Ryan's husband
Speaker 1: straight from the Teal's integrity units, busy putting the steal
Speaker 1: into teals and caught red handed stealing Liberal party signs.
Speaker 1: And how did the good doctor herself respond?
Speaker 9: Can I ask you, what do you think of your
Speaker 9: husband's decision to remove the Liberal candidates sign and cuyong If.
Speaker 8: I don't have a comment for your comment on that
Speaker 8: matter already, thank you.
Speaker 1: Do you think that was an appropriate thing to do?
Speaker 2: Could you please get your cameras away from me?
Speaker 1: Do you think it was an appropriate thing to do
Speaker 1: for him to remove that sign? Oh? Good grief? And
Speaker 1: how did Alboso himself respond to Monique Ryan's husband being
Speaker 1: caught stealing placards a disgraceful bit of election tampering from
Speaker 1: one of the people whose votes or the party whose
Speaker 1: votes will be crucial in keeping Albozo in power. Did
Speaker 1: Alboso condemn that behavior?
Speaker 12: Of course, not so on a day where we've got
Speaker 12: a sixteen point five billion dollar national education announcement. I'm
Speaker 12: asked about someone's husband removing a Liberal party sign on
Speaker 12: a road somewhere.
Speaker 3: That has that.
Speaker 7: You're going to election.
Speaker 12: Is there any connection whatsoever with anyone in the Labor
Speaker 12: Party with this alleged event, of which I did not know.
Speaker 1: No, okay, I think you've answered your question. Yes, the
Speaker 1: connection is to your gunmans. Mind you, that answer made
Speaker 1: about as much sense as this one. I ah de
Speaker 1: Lulu with no solulu. Mister Smooker, that nonsense was part
Speaker 1: of a dare that Albozo made to use gen Z's
Speaker 1: slang language on the floor of Parliament. That's really classy.
Speaker 1: And then there was this peculiar performance of Albozos that
Speaker 1: popped up online where he appears to be smirking while
Speaker 1: talking about two car crashes. Most peculiar, Mama, Yeah, there were.
Speaker 12: Two excellents, one not long after Leagan Brisbine and then
Speaker 12: one at the top of the goldca So we had
Speaker 12: to beg gems.
Speaker 1: But ladies and gentlemen, never fear if Alboso wasn't quite
Speaker 1: your taste. With plenty of other clowns. And this week's
Speaker 1: prize performance, of course, came from Sea Patrol Sarah the
Speaker 1: clownfish of swamp Burley Griffin.
Speaker 14: On the eve of the election, Had you sold out
Speaker 14: your environmentals?
Speaker 2: Throw it often stinking in that attention, Summon heads.
Speaker 7: Inaction, Salmon Senner Sarah.
Speaker 1: Heads Young removed the prop.
Speaker 2: From the chamber.
Speaker 1: What was Sarah carping on about brimming with one liners?
Speaker 1: Sounds fishy to me? What would Ringo Star say? Hyperball
Speaker 1: the world of hyperbole as Julia Gillard would say, James,
Speaker 1: you had to comment on the patrol, Sarah, I was
Speaker 1: just watching that.
Speaker 3: Its probably about the eighth time I've seen that since
Speaker 3: it happened here. But how is it that she was
Speaker 3: able to, you know, get to her seat with a
Speaker 3: with a set with a giant fish?
Speaker 11: How did she get in?
Speaker 2: We played the footage earlier. She boasted about this, she
Speaker 2: posted on social media.
Speaker 3: She wrapped the.
Speaker 2: Fish in newspapers, looking like she was just holding a
Speaker 2: big bundle of newspapers to her chest and walked in.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, but then how does she smuggled it in
Speaker 1: that way?
Speaker 3: And she gets it into the set of chamber, but
Speaker 3: then it's like she's going to walk down she had
Speaker 3: the thing unwrapped. So nos, hang on a seconds.
Speaker 1: You know, pick up what happened to the poor fish?
Speaker 1: Did someone get fish fed in that that with some lemon?
Speaker 1: Exactly baked it for her? Now speaking, we always like
Speaker 1: a good segue here. So speaking of dieting, did you
Speaker 1: know or diets reta, did you know, James, did you
Speaker 1: know that dieting is racist?
Speaker 6: Course of course, saying diets as white women, we lose
Speaker 6: less weight and we lose it slower even when we're
Speaker 6: following the diet than our white women counterparts. It's literally
Speaker 6: that the racism that you're experiencing and the struggle to
Speaker 6: make ends meet actually means the diet don't work.
Speaker 4: For you.
Speaker 1: To say everything's racist everything you name, you can't think
Speaker 1: of anything that you can't blame on racism.
Speaker 2: Reason, no, no personal responsibility, no personal agency. It's all
Speaker 2: just racism.
Speaker 3: Nah, just yeah, Well, give that lady a fresh SALMONI
Speaker 3: I will say though, that this gives me an excuse
Speaker 3: not to get rid of those Christmas pounds because I'm
Speaker 3: being an ally.
Speaker 1: Now. This clip amused me of a couple of characters
Speaker 1: from the CSIRO complaining it would appear about having to
Speaker 1: fill in Donald Trump's DEI form. Let's have a look.
Speaker 1: There's lots to be anxious about.
Speaker 12: In today's Sitting Morning Herald goes after Australia's CSIRO.
Speaker 1: That's Australia's Scientific and Industrial Research Organization. Trump just needs to.
Speaker 2: Have a look at that and just put on red
Speaker 2: line through that funding. I mean, why our American taxpayers
Speaker 2: funding this to begin with the American taxpayers of a
Speaker 2: right to us and if so called scientists can't say, yes,
Speaker 2: we believe that there are two genders, that your chromosomes
Speaker 2: determine your gender, that we don't believe in one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty different varieties. If that can't commit to those
Speaker 2: very basic facts, well then America is very much entitled
Speaker 2: to say, well, values don't align, Our scientific understanding doesn't align.
Speaker 2: You do your own funding.
Speaker 3: And look, I think Donald Trump here has hit on
Speaker 3: a real nerve. Clearly you saw it from our friend there.
Speaker 3: But you know the fact is that there have been
Speaker 3: claims and accusations at the CSIRO, which was once more
Speaker 3: a very nonpartisan, entirely scientific wasearch. Body has been in
Speaker 3: fact learning politics around particularly things like renewable energy influence,
Speaker 3: how the outcome of the reports.
Speaker 2: It's totally hijacked by political consideration. Let's not mince our words.
Speaker 2: That have been absolutely, just like academia, hijacked by ideologues.
Speaker 2: And they think they're entitled to our taxes now they
Speaker 2: think they're entitled to American tax payers money as well.
Speaker 1: Well done Donald Trump for pulling a plug, and the
Speaker 1: coalition should be forefront of saying the same sort of thing.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was asked, what is a woman have a listen.
Speaker 1: Since Democrats seem to struggle answering this question, I wanted
Speaker 1: to ask you what is a woman and why is
Speaker 1: it important that we understand the difference between men and women.
Speaker 3: Well, it's sort of easy to answer for me, because
Speaker 3: a woman is somebody that can have a baby under
Speaker 3: certain circumstances.
Speaker 1: Seems pretty simple, James.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Look, I think I think Donald Trump was or
Speaker 3: somebody who would be able to definitely.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 2: Well, Apple, Apple of is quite a stir because they've
Speaker 2: had a major change to their maps. Everyone who's got
Speaker 2: an Apple phone probably uses those Apple maps and they're
Speaker 2: now adding a so called traditional names. So you don't
Speaker 2: go from you're going to go to Melbourne anymore, You're
Speaker 2: going to what is it? James numb what? Yes, yes,
Speaker 2: something again trying to appease the actor.
Speaker 1: But again, where are the coalitions. They should be out
Speaker 1: there front and center. These are the cultural war issues.
Speaker 1: The coalition could win this election on this sort of nonsense.
Speaker 3: Tell Australia Post to take the traditional police nameline off
Speaker 3: the Express Post veloves mean, what are you supposed to say, Hey, Siri,
Speaker 3: take me from Kagary to norm come exactly.
Speaker 1: That's it for this week's Outsiders. Thank you so much
Speaker 1: for watching like sighting times with the election coming up
Speaker 1: all during the week, you've got the Reta Panel, any show,
Speaker 1: and you've got James the Show tonight at six pm
Speaker 1: on the campaign, and of course you've got Rwandan, James
Speaker 1: Morrow and Rita Pannehy Friday nights. See you then,