WEBVTT - Why did Erin Patterson captivate the country?

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Usually when I'm interested in a crime, I want there

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to be layers. I'm interested in stories which tell us

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>something about Australia and what it is like to be

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>living in this country in twenty twenty five.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Like so many of us, Chloe Hooper spent twenty twenty

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 2>five obsessing over the triple murder trial of Aaron Patterson.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 3>It was different to the crimes that she's.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Written about before in her books The Arsonist and the

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Tall Man, which was about a death in custody.

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 3>For Chloe, it.

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 2>Was the domestic nature of the Mushroom killings, the family

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>dynamic that drew her in.

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Love skirts very close to hate sometimes, and hate can

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>skirt close to love, And I think in our domestic settings,

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>people have these really complex relationships, and so I think

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>there was a sort of you know, even it's pretty warped,

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but people attached to this story like a folks story

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>because we could all relate to it in some way. Actually,

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it told us something about Australia's fascination with

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>true crime, and people were tuning into this story for

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of complex reasons.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 2>So why did this story captivate the country and what

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 2>does it say? About us, particularly about women that were

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 2>drawn to true crime. That was one of the questions

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 2>that drove Chloe and her friends and colleagues, the writers

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Helen Ganner and Sarah Krasnastein, as they began traveling to

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the town of Morewell to watch Aaron Patterson's trial. What

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 2>followed is the Mushroom Tapes. Conversations on a triple Murder,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 2>a book that wrestles with ideas about power.

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Money, marriage and murder.

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Ruby Jones and you're listening to seven AM today

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Chloe Hooper on what our collective fascination with Aaron Patterson

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>tells us about who we are as a country in

0:01:54.520 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. It's Wednesday, December thirty one. Chloe, this

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 2>case became a national obsession this year, But if you

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 2>look back to when the story first broke in twenty

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, we got these brief details of what had happened,

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 2>and these initial glimpses of Aaron Patterson herself. I just

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 2>can't fathom what has happened.

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That Ian and he have lost her lives, and Gail

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>has lost her life, and Donna is still in hospital,

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and I pray, I pray that he pulls through.

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 2>What do you think it was that, I think right

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>from the very beginning before it sort of turned into

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess what it is now? What do you think

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 2>was interesting about it at that point?

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think everybody I know has some family complexity,

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>has a relative or in law, or knows somebody who

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>has had a bitter separation. And I think that something

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>about this story spoke to all of our sense of

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>family dynamics and how complicated they can be. And I

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>think in a way, Aaron Patterson is a sort of

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>operatic figure. The sort of scale of what she did

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>was just so extreme, and I think people kind of

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>tapped into that.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 2>As the book describes, there was this whole cottage industry

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 2>of journalists, of podcasters, of authors, documentary filmmakers, TV producers,

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, TV fiction in the work as well. So

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>everyone's there in this tiny town in more Well for

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the duration of this trial. So I mean, first of all, well,

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 2>just I mean, what was that lacking part of that?

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it started off slowly. We got to the trial.

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>It was day five, so it was you know, we

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really decided to go until the trial had already started.

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>And at first you could find a seat in the

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>courtroom relatively easily, and then slowly, as you probably saw

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:09.119
<v Speaker 1>photographs in the newspapers are online, there were crowds descending

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>on the court house.

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 4>This is more Well, a small, unassuming town two hours

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 4>outside of Melbourne. Until recently, its main tourist attractions were

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 4>a rose garden and an art gallery. But that was

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 4>before it became the host of an Australian murder trials

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 4>gripped the nation and captured international attention.

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>People were getting up at four am and driving to

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>get a seat and lining up outside.

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Well. Almost every major news outlet in the country has

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>set up basically this is Channel seven, Here is the ABC,

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 2>it's Channel ten and Channel nine, this.

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Is the Lunelab. And then there was sort of seemed

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>to be more and more news outlets and media events

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and people doing crosses about this story all over the world.

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 3>It's a case straight out of a true crime TV.

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Psychostaticquit yours a whole Australian mushroom poisoning fatalities made headlines

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 4>far beyond the sleepy Aussie tone in which they happened.

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, every conversation you had with friends or family

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>seemed to revolve around this. It did become a national obsession.

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 2>And so this book, this is a very kind of

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>different book to what you've put out in the past.

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 3>It's a collaborative work.

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 2>How did it change your process and the way that

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>you thought about the case? To be spending all of

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 2>this time I'm picking it in these conversations with two

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 2>other brilliant writers, Sarah Cratenstein and Helen Ghana, I.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Think that we got further working together than we would

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>have worked by ourselves. And it was an amazing experience

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>because usually we would all go into court proceedings on

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>our own, and you know, we'd have your notebook, and

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it's very sort of solitary in a way, exercise. But

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that there was something actually accelerated by not

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>putting your shoulder to your work and hiding it and

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>doing it on your own, actually engaging in these conversations,

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think there were sort of moments where we

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>would spark off each other and lift each other up

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>further in our thinking. And I suppose I see this

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>book as actually just as much about women talking about

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>power and about good and evil and ethics of crime

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>writing and writing in general. And I suppose to have

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>those conversations with Helen and with Sarah was a special

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>moment in all of our lives. And we're all at

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>different stages in our careers. But you know, when you'd

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>go to a trial, you're also sitting alongside really great misery,

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and so there is always the reality behind the headlines

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>of the damage that is wrought in true crime, in

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>communities and a family.

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Coming up.

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>What the trial revealed about Aaron Patterson and about us

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 2>if we go back to the trial itself, so as

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 2>it progressed, more and more of Aaron's life was revealed.

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 2>So you know, you looked inside her kitchen, you heard

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 2>her children talking. Her estranged husband also gave evidence. So

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 2>before anyone heard from Aaron herself, there was already this

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>picture of her forming, I suppose. So how did you

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 2>start to think about her who she was?

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 3>At that point?

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I had a sense that she was a fairly dark

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>character from her actions. It just struck me as incredibly

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>calculated to go and search for deathcat mushrooms and then

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>spend months working out how to make this meal and

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>inviting your husband's family over. She invited them over two

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks before the lunch. It was also after she had

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>served the lunch. It's a horrible way to kill somebody

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's very slow and painful, And there were opportunities

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>where she might have told medicos earlier that she'd foraged

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>for mushrooms, and they may have been able to administer

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>a prophylactic which could potentially have changed the outcomes for

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>her victims.

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 2>And So, how did the way that you saw Erin

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 2>compare to the others?

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I thought that they had sort of access to

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>deeper wells of humanity. They've had more sympathy for Erin

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>than I did. But I guess that one of the

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting things about collaborating with other people is that even

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>when you disagree, it's almost as if you're all taking

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>different sides, which actually, in the writing of a book

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>an author might do anyway. So maybe they could afford

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to be softer because I was being more hardline. And

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that there actually was a way in which

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>our different perspectives balanced out, and the disagreements we were

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>having kind of replicated what could happen in a writer's head.

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that in a way, this book kind

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of shows the seams of what can happen in the

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>making of a book, and.

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't clear for a lot of the trial whether

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>or not Aaron Patterson would give evidence, but she did end.

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Up doing that.

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 2>So when that happened, what were you kind of looking for?

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I suppose I think that when you're watching somebody on

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the stand, you're thinking, well, you know, wondering what the

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>jury will make of their presentation. I was particularly interested

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in the stories in which that erin was telling the jury,

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>but also the stories in which she felt that she

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>was telling herself. Some of these tales were blatantly untrue.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So Aaron Patterson is a person who lies very easily,

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and when she got onto the stand there were a

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>number of discrepancies which she had to try to explain

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>her way out of. Sometimes she did that very artfully,

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 1>other times it was a less convincing performance. She was

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>also on the stand for over a week, which is

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot for somebody under pressure to maintain their

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>different fictions, I suppose, in a really stressful environment. At

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of it, there was the feeling, though that

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>she had done very well, and it was unclear whether

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>or not she would be found guilty, or at least

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>there seemed a strong possibility that there would be a

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>hung jury.

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Did you find your opinion of her changing at all

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 2>during that week?

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I suppose the personality that thinks that they can get

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>away with a crime like this is also one that

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>thinks that they can kind of talk their way out

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of it. So I didn't believe going into the trial

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that Erin was innocent. We knew before driving to Morewell

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that there had been charges just recently dropped against her

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>for attempting to murder her husband, and that he had

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>been in a coma as well, with part of his

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>small intestine removed after eating some of Aaron's food. So

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it seemed clear to me that she probably was guilty,

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't know that she was going to I

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't know whether or not she would actually be found guilty,

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So my opinion of her did not change a great deal.

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 2>And how do you feel now, both about your own

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>interest in this case and all of our fascinations with it.

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think that in some ways Erin seemed to

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>me a kind of fixed force in this saga, And

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that our reactions and I'm you know, my reaction,

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Sarah's reaction, Helen's reaction, and Australia and the world's reaction

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is sort of more interesting. In a way, we know

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that true crime is a genre, that the production of

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>it is largely being driven by a female audience, and

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that's across all of the media. So why broadly are

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we fascinated by true crime and why in particular this crime.

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's an escape. I think that these

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>are stories about power. I think women are often tend

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to empathize not just with the victim of the crime,

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately most often the victims are women, but also

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>with the murderer. I think that in this case, most

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>people are waking up in a state of deep anxiety

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:27.359
<v Speaker 1>in Australia in twenty twenty five, but it regarding wars

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>around climate change, AI cost of living, and it's a

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>horrible thing. But in a way, I think we were

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>all looking at this trial so as not to think

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>about these issues that confront our day to day life

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in ways we don't know how to fix or understand.

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>With true crime, there's often the sense of an ending,

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the sense that Erin is now in jail, that order

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is restored, and we don't need to look so deeply

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>at our own disorder.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Well Chloie, thank you so much for speaking with me,

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 2>and congratulations again.

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 3>I loved the book. I really enjoyed reading it. Ruby,

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 3>thanks so much.

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Tomorrow, on the show, I'm bringing you an interview with

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 2>China expert Linda Javin. After years of spectacular growth, China

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 2>has been struggling. People in the country are now stuck

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 2>in a loop of burnout and austerity, with high youth

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 2>unemployment and low birth rates. The country has been trying

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 2>to turn us around, focusing on things like tech AI

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 2>and electric vehicles. We look at how China's new economic

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 2>experiment went in twenty twenty five and what this year

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>holds for one of the world's great superpowers.

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm Ruby Jones. Thanks for listening.