WEBVTT - Credlin | 24 September

0:00:02.450 --> 0:00:07.060
<v Speaker 1>Peter Credlin, live from News 24.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Good evening. Welcome to the program. Here's what's coming up

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:13.780
<v Speaker 2>on Credlin. A data breach that happened months ago. A

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 2>prime minister that was told about it on the weekend.

0:00:16.980 --> 0:00:19.700
<v Speaker 2>The poor old Australians only found out about it today.

0:00:20.180 --> 0:00:24.370
<v Speaker 2>So time to reinstate the AI expert panel the prime

0:00:24.410 --> 0:00:27.430
<v Speaker 2>minister dumped. We'll talk to one of the men on

0:00:27.470 --> 0:00:30.730
<v Speaker 2>that panel in a moment. Yet more warnings about rent

0:00:30.750 --> 0:00:34.979
<v Speaker 2>increases driven by Labor's tax hikes amid fears more Australians

0:00:35.020 --> 0:00:38.250
<v Speaker 2>will end up in social housing as properties up for

0:00:38.290 --> 0:00:41.530
<v Speaker 2>sale languish in a stagnant market. Fears the cost of

0:00:41.550 --> 0:00:45.050
<v Speaker 2>diesel could top $ 4 a litre, as farmers warn they

0:00:45.070 --> 0:00:49.540
<v Speaker 2>can't absorb another financial hit, nor too can the trucking sector.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 2>And never mind today's crime stats revealing a shoplifting epidemic

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>in Victoria, the Premier now wants to throw open the

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.290
<v Speaker 2>doors to the pub until 3am.

0:01:00.270 --> 0:01:02.810
<v Speaker 3>We're going to make sure, as an automatic right, the

0:01:02.850 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 3>pubs can open to 3am. Today it's about supporting small businesses.

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.780
<v Speaker 3>They're in the heart of every community, pubs, publicans, more

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 3>patrons means more jobs and a great local thriving economy.

0:01:19.270 --> 0:01:22.750
<v Speaker 2>They call it bread and circuses in campaign times. That

0:01:22.870 --> 0:01:27.430
<v Speaker 2>is what that is. First, revelations today that multiple Australian

0:01:27.470 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 2>government systems were infiltrated by a leading US artificial intelligence

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:36.590
<v Speaker 2>company called OpenAI and should surprise no one.

0:01:37.390 --> 0:01:41.300
<v Speaker 4>This incident occurred in June this year and involved an

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 4>open AI agent gaining unauthorised access into the public-facing Medicare

0:01:47.620 --> 0:01:50.110
<v Speaker 4>Statistics Reporting Service portal.

0:01:52.230 --> 0:01:55.390
<v Speaker 2>And no surprises. After all, the Albanese government's far more

0:01:55.430 --> 0:01:58.610
<v Speaker 2>concerned with censoring what you can access on the internet

0:01:59.050 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 2>than it is with protecting the sensitive information it holds online.

0:02:02.500 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and keeps safe from compromise.

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.620
<v Speaker 5>I note that the Prime Minister gave a keynote speech

0:02:08.940 --> 0:02:12.330
<v Speaker 5>back in July on AI. He made a big song

0:02:12.370 --> 0:02:15.890
<v Speaker 5>and dance about it. He did not even mention cyber

0:02:15.910 --> 0:02:22.170
<v Speaker 5>defence and the importance of defence against AI attacks on

0:02:22.250 --> 0:02:25.330
<v Speaker 5>our critical systems. He didn't mention it. It wasn't even

0:02:25.410 --> 0:02:27.930
<v Speaker 5>part of his speech. Now we need better than that

0:02:27.970 --> 0:02:29.870
<v Speaker 5>from this Prime Minister and we need better than that

0:02:30.030 --> 0:02:30.810
<v Speaker 5>from his ministers.

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.110
<v Speaker 2>Later in the program, we'll speak with Professor Toby Walsh,

0:02:36.669 --> 0:02:40.730
<v Speaker 2>one of Australia's foremost AI experts, to understand exactly what

0:02:40.810 --> 0:02:44.090
<v Speaker 2>went wrong here and what should happen now to get

0:02:44.130 --> 0:02:48.450
<v Speaker 2>ahead of the AI risks. But know this, Professor Walsh

0:02:48.490 --> 0:02:50.830
<v Speaker 2>was appointed by the Prime Minister to join an expert

0:02:51.030 --> 0:02:54.730
<v Speaker 2>AI panel to advise government about all of these very

0:02:54.770 --> 0:02:58.750
<v Speaker 2>important cyber issues. It was an unpaid role that he

0:02:58.810 --> 0:03:01.770
<v Speaker 2>thought was ongoing, a role he agreed to do because

0:03:01.810 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 2>he cares about his country. Instead, the Prime Minister disbanded

0:03:06.180 --> 0:03:10.550
<v Speaker 2>his own AI expert panel after only a couple of months.

0:03:11.169 --> 0:03:15.900
<v Speaker 2>Without experts advising the Albanese government, Australia's flying blind as

0:03:15.940 --> 0:03:18.700
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the world moves fast in the arms

0:03:18.820 --> 0:03:22.690
<v Speaker 2>race of AI. And we are falling behind because of

0:03:22.770 --> 0:03:27.669
<v Speaker 2>sheer incompetence, ignorance and likely lack of funding to put

0:03:27.710 --> 0:03:34.090
<v Speaker 2>in place the cybersecurity architecture that Australia must have. That's because, yes,

0:03:34.220 --> 0:03:36.940
<v Speaker 2>AI is a powerful tool for good, but there are

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:41.100
<v Speaker 2>also very real and significant risks. We know it will

0:03:41.180 --> 0:03:45.380
<v Speaker 2>transform business. It'll reform productivity. But that will come at

0:03:45.420 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the cost of jobs as well as deliver economic gains.

0:03:49.100 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>So we need to have our eyes wide open on

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.770
<v Speaker 2>all of this. As with the Industrial Revolution, we can

0:03:54.890 --> 0:03:58.770
<v Speaker 2>probably now make a good fist at modelling the commercial

0:03:58.810 --> 0:04:02.590
<v Speaker 2>gains from AI. But that's not where I'm focused. What's

0:04:02.670 --> 0:04:06.790
<v Speaker 2>always concerned me here is the military and national security

0:04:06.830 --> 0:04:10.740
<v Speaker 2>applications of AI. What happens when a rogue state or

0:04:10.780 --> 0:04:14.140
<v Speaker 2>a terror group uses AI to create a deadly new

0:04:14.380 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 2>biological weapon? Or perhaps a new explosive that can bring

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 2>down aircraft that's not detectable when carried through airport security screening?

0:04:24.490 --> 0:04:27.469
<v Speaker 2>Right now, the only real AI debate that Albanese is

0:04:27.529 --> 0:04:31.030
<v Speaker 2>having is data centres and whether or not they use

0:04:31.110 --> 0:04:35.289
<v Speaker 2>renewable power. I mean, overseas, they're laughing at us, trying

0:04:35.310 --> 0:04:38.380
<v Speaker 2>to power AI with wind and solar and while they

0:04:38.540 --> 0:04:43.190
<v Speaker 2>use our uranium to power high-end new reactors or our

0:04:43.270 --> 0:04:46.950
<v Speaker 2>coal and gas, ensuring they have reliable baseload to run

0:04:47.010 --> 0:04:50.710
<v Speaker 2>their AI, why we just muddle along, caught between a

0:04:50.750 --> 0:04:52.810
<v Speaker 2>rock and a hard place, saying we're all for AI

0:04:53.150 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 2>and net zero, when clearly you can't have both. It's

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 2>critical that voters are not fooled here, because there's no

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.020
<v Speaker 2>doubt that Albanese wants to try and conflate the issue

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:09.190
<v Speaker 2>of AI safety And this example today of the Medicare

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:13.420
<v Speaker 2>hack is real with his digital duty of care legislation,

0:05:14.060 --> 0:05:19.060
<v Speaker 2>but they are two very different things. AI safety and

0:05:19.100 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 2>a properly resourced cybersecurity apparatus in Australia involving our spy

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.700
<v Speaker 2>and military intelligence agencies is a good thing. And in

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>broad terms, I'd also support some sort of global guardrails

0:05:32.100 --> 0:05:37.170
<v Speaker 2>provided they are sensible and limited. But they can't constrain

0:05:37.330 --> 0:05:41.950
<v Speaker 2>good countries like Australia from developing as we must, given

0:05:41.970 --> 0:05:46.730
<v Speaker 2>that bad actors will ignore all rules anyway. But Labor's

0:05:46.790 --> 0:05:50.170
<v Speaker 2>digital duty of care legislation is not about any of this.

0:05:51.089 --> 0:05:56.050
<v Speaker 2>Digital duty of care is about censorship. It's about restricting

0:05:56.150 --> 0:06:00.490
<v Speaker 2>or stopping the information that adults can access, the information

0:06:00.730 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>they get on their devices. And this was precisely what

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:09.100
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister admitted himself in comments yesterday at the

0:06:09.140 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 2>United Nations.

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.180
<v Speaker 4>The truth is this is having an impact on our

0:06:14.220 --> 0:06:20.050
<v Speaker 4>entire society and how it functions with misinformation, disinformation, with

0:06:20.060 --> 0:06:24.330
<v Speaker 4>the increased polarisation that we're seeing as well in the

0:06:24.390 --> 0:06:29.010
<v Speaker 4>political system where people are moving away from the centre

0:06:29.110 --> 0:06:31.450
<v Speaker 4>and more and more to the extremes, be they of

0:06:31.490 --> 0:06:32.470
<v Speaker 4>the left or the right.

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.510
<v Speaker 2>That line there about misinformation, disinformation, about the left and

0:06:38.529 --> 0:06:42.230
<v Speaker 2>the right of politics is a killer. It shows Albanese's

0:06:42.410 --> 0:06:46.010
<v Speaker 2>true motivation here. And the fact that the Prime Minister's

0:06:46.050 --> 0:06:50.380
<v Speaker 2>office took those references out of his media transcript to

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 2>try and stop us from noticing what he said, says

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 2>it all. Something that Sarah Henderson was quick to pick

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 2>up when speaking with me here last night.

0:07:00.330 --> 0:07:03.030
<v Speaker 6>That speech that he gave today, they've now removed that

0:07:03.190 --> 0:07:08.430
<v Speaker 6>damning extraordinary section from the transcript on the Prime Minister's

0:07:08.510 --> 0:07:13.210
<v Speaker 6>media website. So talk about disinformation on the Prime Minister's

0:07:13.290 --> 0:07:13.970
<v Speaker 6>own website.

0:07:15.790 --> 0:07:20.190
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sensible regulation about the architecture of AI should be

0:07:20.210 --> 0:07:23.990
<v Speaker 2>looked at with the caveat that, as always with Labor,

0:07:24.350 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the devil's in the detail. But banning content under yet

0:07:29.020 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 2>to be defined definitions of harm at the whim of

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Labor's communications minister, Annika Wells, well, that must be opposed.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.850
<v Speaker 6>The real story here is that the minister has unfettered

0:07:42.900 --> 0:07:47.150
<v Speaker 6>powers to decide any category of harm that should be

0:07:47.590 --> 0:07:50.090
<v Speaker 6>shut down. It is all about shutting down what people

0:07:50.110 --> 0:07:53.690
<v Speaker 6>can say and see online. It's all about shutting down

0:07:53.750 --> 0:07:55.450
<v Speaker 6>the political opponents of Labor.

0:07:56.990 --> 0:08:00.730
<v Speaker 2>Don't buy the Albanese government's BS here. This is not

0:08:00.770 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>about keeping children safe online. There are already a myriad

0:08:05.060 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 2>of laws to do this now. Laws to ban kids

0:08:07.860 --> 0:08:11.420
<v Speaker 2>under 16 from social media. Laws to deal with online

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:16.420
<v Speaker 2>child exploitation, child pornography. Laws against things like enabling acts

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.630
<v Speaker 2>of terrorism, like bomb making. Or as we saw yesterday

0:08:20.910 --> 0:08:24.850
<v Speaker 2>with the arrest of Mohamed Bakhit, laws against the alleged

0:08:24.910 --> 0:08:29.410
<v Speaker 2>membership of Islamic terror organisations and the spreading of online propaganda.

0:08:29.890 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 2>We already have all of these laws. Now, if they're

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.060
<v Speaker 2>not tough enough, put them back into the parliament before

0:08:36.100 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Christmas and make them tougher. But we cannot allow the

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.700
<v Speaker 2>Albanese government to use these issues as cover to shut

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.969
<v Speaker 2>down legitimate debates that they don't want to have to

0:08:47.590 --> 0:08:51.070
<v Speaker 2>stop you finding out the truth or to stop the media,

0:08:51.090 --> 0:08:54.670
<v Speaker 2>at least some of the media, from holding the Prime

0:08:54.690 --> 0:08:59.700
<v Speaker 2>Minister and his government to account. Labor's petrified at the

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 2>way the online world has democratised information access. And the

0:09:04.620 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 2>left blames online media for the rise of One Nation,

0:09:08.100 --> 0:09:12.510
<v Speaker 2>for Trump and for reform in the United Kingdom as well. Now,

0:09:12.550 --> 0:09:15.590
<v Speaker 2>for a long time, the left had a pretty cosy

0:09:15.690 --> 0:09:20.050
<v Speaker 2>cartel with media players like the ABC that basically ran

0:09:20.110 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 2>paid advertising for Labor and the left. Well, not so anymore,

0:09:24.100 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>as people have turned away from news sources like that

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 2>and pick up their devices and go digging on their own. Now,

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.540
<v Speaker 2>what that's done is it's exposed Labor's slick spin machine

0:09:35.860 --> 0:09:39.220
<v Speaker 2>for what it is, and record low approval polls for

0:09:39.260 --> 0:09:44.170
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister are the result. This is why Labor

0:09:44.410 --> 0:09:49.050
<v Speaker 2>are panicking. That's why Albanese wants the whole show shut down.

0:09:49.510 --> 0:09:52.939
<v Speaker 2>It's got nothing to do with children, It's about censorship

0:09:53.100 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 2>and power. The other point I want to make in

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.350
<v Speaker 2>relation to the hack being put into the media domain

0:09:59.410 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 2>today is the fact that the Prime Minister was told

0:10:02.540 --> 0:10:07.540
<v Speaker 2>about this open AI break into Medicare on the weekend.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:12.579
<v Speaker 2>Only you were told today. So why keep it a

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.380
<v Speaker 2>secret for much of the week? I'd say it's got

0:10:16.420 --> 0:10:19.819
<v Speaker 2>a lot to do with this ridiculous award he picked

0:10:19.900 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 2>up in New York overnight as some sort of international

0:10:23.580 --> 0:10:28.970
<v Speaker 2>statesman when at home, clearly, he's a laughingstock. Labor hardheads

0:10:28.990 --> 0:10:32.210
<v Speaker 2>would have thought, gee, this award comes at a shocking

0:10:32.250 --> 0:10:35.890
<v Speaker 2>time for the government. Those appalling polls on Monday, the

0:10:35.950 --> 0:10:39.250
<v Speaker 2>threat of a rate rise next week. Reports today too

0:10:39.290 --> 0:10:43.109
<v Speaker 2>that diesel fuel will be rationed, some predicting it could

0:10:43.170 --> 0:10:46.420
<v Speaker 2>hit as high as $ 4 a litre. So what better

0:10:46.460 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 2>way to get the award off the front pages and

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 2>for all the mocking to stop, but to throw out

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:57.500
<v Speaker 2>this story of a government systems hack. What's also telling

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.059
<v Speaker 2>is the fact the hack occurred back in June. It

0:11:00.100 --> 0:11:04.860
<v Speaker 2>was only uncovered because the company fessed up. Our security

0:11:04.900 --> 0:11:07.739
<v Speaker 2>systems in Canberra, they didn't pick it up. We only

0:11:07.820 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 2>know about it because the company emailed the bureaucrats to

0:11:11.090 --> 0:11:13.710
<v Speaker 2>tell them what had happened and And the Prime Minister

0:11:13.730 --> 0:11:17.130
<v Speaker 2>then held off making this information public until he needed

0:11:17.490 --> 0:11:22.530
<v Speaker 2>a distraction. What a joke. Now, I'll say this again.

0:11:22.550 --> 0:11:25.469
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I've ever met, ever seen a more

0:11:25.710 --> 0:11:30.020
<v Speaker 2>underwhelming individual occupy the highest office in this country. He's

0:11:30.100 --> 0:11:33.900
<v Speaker 2>out of touch. He's intellectually out of his depth. And

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:38.939
<v Speaker 2>he lacks character. And there isn't a worse political trifecta

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:46.130
<v Speaker 2>than that. All right, let's get the headlines. That and

0:11:46.170 --> 0:11:48.540
<v Speaker 2>more with our political reporter, Ruben Spargo.

0:11:49.700 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Good evening. The Australian government is launching a task force

0:11:52.580 --> 0:11:56.460
<v Speaker 1>to counter AI cyber threats after a rogue open AI

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.140
<v Speaker 1>agent hacked into Medicare data. The rapid review will help

0:12:00.179 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>determine whether current arrangements are fit for purpose to prepare

0:12:03.780 --> 0:12:09.179
<v Speaker 1>for and respond to incidents. This is an unintended access,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that's clear, but it definitely does raise questions about whether

0:12:13.580 --> 0:12:16.180
<v Speaker 1>The law has been broken in respect of this. The

0:12:16.220 --> 0:12:19.340
<v Speaker 1>opposition is calling for the Australian Signals Directorate's funding to

0:12:19.380 --> 0:12:21.579
<v Speaker 1>be increased to better detect threats.

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.780
<v Speaker 7>We need to be significantly scaling up and upgrading our

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 7>cyber defences and actually.

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.820
<v Speaker 1>The best tools to do that are artificial intelligence tools.

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.739
<v Speaker 1>One of the government's major concerns is the technology is

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:36.900
<v Speaker 1>moving so quickly it is outpacing Australia's ability to respond.

0:12:37.540 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>The coalition is vowing to dismantle Labor's renewables policy if

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.590
<v Speaker 1>it wins the next election. A bill would be introduced

0:12:44.610 --> 0:12:47.550
<v Speaker 1>to Parliament to remove the legislated target of net zero

0:12:47.590 --> 0:12:52.090
<v Speaker 1>by 2050 and the safeguard mechanism designed to limit industry emissions.

0:12:52.670 --> 0:12:56.290
<v Speaker 8>You can subsidise our industrial base to keep jobs onshore

0:12:56.370 --> 0:12:59.890
<v Speaker 8>and pursue a renewables-only approach, as Labor is doing, or

0:12:59.910 --> 0:13:02.710
<v Speaker 8>you can actually use the resources that are under our

0:13:02.750 --> 0:13:05.630
<v Speaker 8>very feet that have made us a rich and wealthy nation.

0:13:06.030 --> 0:13:09.220
<v Speaker 1>The plan would also scrap vehicle emission standards and shift

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.500
<v Speaker 1>the Australian energy regulator's focus to affordability.

0:13:14.350 --> 0:13:17.130
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get into that more. News24 contributor Carolee

0:13:17.150 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Katzenbarnes back with us after a pretty rugged few months

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 2>and Deputy Executive Director at the IPA, Dan Wild. Carolee,

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.420
<v Speaker 2>as I said, you've been here on the program, I

0:13:27.460 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 2>should say, but you've had a lot going on at home.

0:13:29.980 --> 0:13:32.059
<v Speaker 2>You lost your beautiful husband, Peter. We gave him a

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>terrific send-off on Friday, so we're delighted to have you

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>back in the chair, mate. It's so good to have

0:13:38.070 --> 0:13:40.969
<v Speaker 2>you here. Let's start with the AI data breach. A

0:13:41.010 --> 0:13:44.050
<v Speaker 2>few points I want to note here. This happened in June,

0:13:44.390 --> 0:13:47.690
<v Speaker 2>PM told on the weekend, but we only learn about

0:13:47.730 --> 0:13:51.150
<v Speaker 2>it today. The notification about the breach didn't come from

0:13:51.170 --> 0:13:53.270
<v Speaker 2>the government, it came from the company, and they had

0:13:53.309 --> 0:13:58.100
<v Speaker 2>to email a public access point or an email box

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.910
<v Speaker 2>to tell us what was happening. I'll speak to an

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 2>expert in a moment about what you can do now

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:09.130
<v Speaker 2>to turn this around. Surely, Dan... Labor needs that panel

0:14:09.170 --> 0:14:11.870
<v Speaker 2>of experts to be rapidly reinstated.

0:14:14.010 --> 0:14:14.870
<v Speaker 9>Well, that's right, Peter.

0:14:14.890 --> 0:14:18.210
<v Speaker 10>There's a couple of things here for me. Firstly, the

0:14:18.270 --> 0:14:20.730
<v Speaker 10>timing of it, as you alluded to in your monologue,

0:14:21.190 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 10>has coincided with providing some space for Anthony Albanese's award.

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 10>And now because things are going sour, as you know

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 10>from your experience in politics, they keep these things in

0:14:32.100 --> 0:14:34.410
<v Speaker 10>their back pocket. and roll it out when they want

0:14:34.430 --> 0:14:37.150
<v Speaker 10>to change the topic of discussion in the news. Now,

0:14:37.190 --> 0:14:40.470
<v Speaker 10>I know that sounds cynical, but unfortunately, that's often why.

0:14:41.010 --> 0:14:43.230
<v Speaker 10>People at home wonder, why is this just coming out now?

0:14:43.690 --> 0:14:45.490
<v Speaker 10>This is often the reason why. There's a very strong

0:14:45.530 --> 0:14:48.310
<v Speaker 10>political reason for it. The other thing also, as you

0:14:48.330 --> 0:14:51.030
<v Speaker 10>alluded to, was the government has taken its eye off

0:14:51.710 --> 0:14:54.470
<v Speaker 10>the ball. When it comes to the internet, when it

0:14:54.530 --> 0:14:57.270
<v Speaker 10>comes to the online world, they are not focused on

0:14:57.330 --> 0:15:02.370
<v Speaker 10>things like AI security. They are focused on government censorship

0:15:02.730 --> 0:15:07.130
<v Speaker 10>of Australians through their digital duty of care legislation. So

0:15:07.410 --> 0:15:09.489
<v Speaker 10>this is a government that is not focused on the

0:15:09.530 --> 0:15:12.890
<v Speaker 10>things that matter to our national interest. The other thing

0:15:12.940 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 10>I would be very interested in, Peter, is why was

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.580
<v Speaker 10>that task force that you mentioned, why was it disbanded,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.100
<v Speaker 10>I wonder? Was it disbanded because they were providing advice

0:15:22.140 --> 0:15:24.620
<v Speaker 10>to the Prime Minister or to his ministers or senior

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.020
<v Speaker 10>advisers that was inconvenient and they did not want to hear?

0:15:28.350 --> 0:15:29.670
<v Speaker 10>I wonder if that was one of the reasons.

0:15:31.580 --> 0:15:33.660
<v Speaker 2>Well, we'll ask one of those experts in a moment.

0:15:34.850 --> 0:15:36.380
<v Speaker 2>My point at the top of the show there about

0:15:36.420 --> 0:15:41.870
<v Speaker 2>this conflation by the government between appropriate, and I'm saying appropriate,

0:15:41.890 --> 0:15:45.510
<v Speaker 2>I don't want big regulation, but appropriate regulation of the

0:15:45.710 --> 0:15:50.110
<v Speaker 2>AI environment, and then Labor's try-on with this digital duty

0:15:50.150 --> 0:15:51.990
<v Speaker 2>of care, trying to put the two things together when

0:15:52.030 --> 0:15:56.890
<v Speaker 2>I argue they're very, very different, Kerri-Lee. The debate about censorship,

0:15:57.050 --> 0:16:00.130
<v Speaker 2>if we don't have sufficient laws to We've already got

0:16:00.170 --> 0:16:03.140
<v Speaker 2>a range of mechanisms that we can improve. But this

0:16:03.180 --> 0:16:06.700
<v Speaker 2>is about stopping Australians getting information that will send the

0:16:06.740 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister's personal rating even lower. This is an election strategy.

0:16:12.140 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not about keeping people safe or children safe online

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 2>at all. It's not.

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 11>And Australians are being gaslit once again by Anthony Albanese

0:16:20.740 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 11>in the Albanese government. I mean, the digital duty of care,

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 11>it's nothing more than just a political censorship bill. And

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:31.900
<v Speaker 11>he's preying on the fears of parents and other caregivers.

0:16:32.300 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 11>And as you say, conflating the two together. This is

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:39.590
<v Speaker 11>an extraordinary attack on free speech for Australians, but it's

0:16:39.750 --> 0:16:44.590
<v Speaker 11>also extraordinary that this would give the communications minister completely

0:16:44.810 --> 0:16:49.210
<v Speaker 11>unfettered power without a parliamentary oversight as to what they

0:16:49.250 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 11>deem to be harmful and what they don't. And I

0:16:51.910 --> 0:16:53.740
<v Speaker 11>think it's a bit rich of him to do this.

0:16:53.780 --> 0:16:57.430
<v Speaker 11>And as Sarah Henderson pointed out last night, It's just extraordinary.

0:16:57.470 --> 0:17:01.130
<v Speaker 11>But the problem is he is relying on merging the

0:17:01.170 --> 0:17:03.750
<v Speaker 11>two together so that people don't know what will happen.

0:17:03.850 --> 0:17:06.300
<v Speaker 11>But it's really good that you're pointing it out, because

0:17:06.340 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 11>the more that we can point out to the Australian

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.780
<v Speaker 11>people that the digital duty of care is completely different

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.899
<v Speaker 11>to AI regulation, the better that it will be. And

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 11>it's like communist China. This is not what should be

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.850
<v Speaker 11>happening in a Western democracy like Australia.

0:17:22.570 --> 0:17:24.929
<v Speaker 2>They tried, didn't they, Dan, during the voice debate to

0:17:25.010 --> 0:17:27.790
<v Speaker 2>shut us down. I know they tried the IPA to

0:17:27.830 --> 0:17:30.470
<v Speaker 2>get you offline. They certainly tried a number of times

0:17:30.530 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 2>with Bea about the Uluru Statement of the Heart. But

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:39.419
<v Speaker 2>this would succeed, that sort of move would succeed second

0:17:39.460 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>time around if they had this legislation in place.

0:17:44.180 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right.

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.780
<v Speaker 10>This is a really good point because, as I mentioned

0:17:47.859 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 10>the other week or the week before, this is really

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.570
<v Speaker 10>the third crack that the government has had. at trying

0:17:52.590 --> 0:17:55.590
<v Speaker 10>to do this. They had the misinformation laws back in 2024.

0:17:55.590 --> 0:17:58.650
<v Speaker 10>They had a crack at some hate speech laws earlier

0:17:58.690 --> 0:18:00.540
<v Speaker 10>this year. Now they're having another crack at it now.

0:18:01.020 --> 0:18:03.740
<v Speaker 10>Ever since they lost the voice to Parliament debate, this

0:18:03.780 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 10>government has convinced itself that what they need to do,

0:18:06.940 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 10>rather than explaining to people, right, this is the thing

0:18:09.220 --> 0:18:11.870
<v Speaker 10>about this government, it has never won an argument with

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.609
<v Speaker 10>the Australian people. It doesn't take its policies to the

0:18:14.670 --> 0:18:18.590
<v Speaker 10>people and try to convince them of the legitimacy of

0:18:18.630 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 10>those policies. What it does is it either just shoves

0:18:21.060 --> 0:18:23.660
<v Speaker 10>it through Parliament and guillotines debate, or it just tries

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.620
<v Speaker 10>to censor debate and not have a debate whatsoever. So this,

0:18:26.820 --> 0:18:29.609
<v Speaker 10>and you'll remember after the voice vote, what did Albanese

0:18:29.619 --> 0:18:33.310
<v Speaker 10>and the chief campaigners blame? They blamed misinformation. Either you

0:18:33.350 --> 0:18:36.169
<v Speaker 10>voted no because you're too dumb or you voted no

0:18:36.190 --> 0:18:39.170
<v Speaker 10>because you're a racist, right? That is how this government thinks.

0:18:39.330 --> 0:18:41.270
<v Speaker 10>They don't understand. People voted no because they thought it

0:18:41.290 --> 0:18:43.470
<v Speaker 10>was a bad idea and they didn't want it. So, yeah,

0:18:43.490 --> 0:18:45.430
<v Speaker 10>the government's going to try and push ahead with censorship

0:18:45.530 --> 0:18:48.540
<v Speaker 10>and it would have a massively negative effect on our

0:18:48.580 --> 0:18:50.619
<v Speaker 10>ability to to debate things in this country.

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.300
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to this report today that the Australian Energy

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.980
<v Speaker 2>Market Operator, AEMO, the regulator, is basically, they've got a

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.780
<v Speaker 2>plan to put the $ 50 million cost of EV charger

0:19:04.900 --> 0:19:09.610
<v Speaker 2>rollout onto everyone's power bill across the country, whether you

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.830
<v Speaker 2>want an EV charger, whether you have an EV charger

0:19:13.010 --> 0:19:15.850
<v Speaker 2>or not. Kerri-Lee, how can this be justified? We can't

0:19:15.890 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 2>pay our bills as it is. Well, it's incredibly unfair.

0:19:19.820 --> 0:19:22.780
<v Speaker 11>And I noticed that Anna Collier, who's the chair of

0:19:22.820 --> 0:19:26.149
<v Speaker 11>the Australian Energy Market Commission, she's actually said that it

0:19:26.170 --> 0:19:30.490
<v Speaker 11>would add $ 1 a year to people's power bills, average

0:19:30.550 --> 0:19:34.109
<v Speaker 11>power bills. This is another example of gaslighting. We had

0:19:34.130 --> 0:19:36.429
<v Speaker 11>this when they introduced the negative gearing things in the

0:19:36.470 --> 0:19:39.530
<v Speaker 11>budget where they said rents would only rise by $ 2

0:19:39.070 --> 0:19:39.490
<v Speaker 11>a week.

0:19:39.590 --> 0:19:40.470
<v Speaker 2>That hasn't worked.

0:19:40.850 --> 0:19:44.030
<v Speaker 11>This is appalling. I mean, this should be an industry thing.

0:19:44.210 --> 0:19:47.550
<v Speaker 11>It is being run by private enterprise. They're putting their money,

0:19:47.570 --> 0:19:49.310
<v Speaker 11>they're putting their things on.

0:19:49.270 --> 0:19:49.949
<v Speaker 2>The line to do.

0:19:50.060 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 11>This. To actually slug the Australian taxpayer, because about $ 20

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:58.190
<v Speaker 11>billion worth is needed for proper infrastructure, is just not fair.

0:19:58.330 --> 0:20:01.850
<v Speaker 11>Australian consumers will be at a disadvantage. And the problem

0:20:01.910 --> 0:20:05.470
<v Speaker 11>is this all ties into Chris Bowen's energy plans, etc.

0:20:05.510 --> 0:20:08.409
<v Speaker 11>They just cannot accept They cannot accept that they have

0:20:08.450 --> 0:20:11.730
<v Speaker 11>not invested properly into infrastructure and now they want to

0:20:11.750 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 11>slug the Australian taxpayer with more. I'm really sorry for

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.100
<v Speaker 11>Anna Collier to say it would add an extra $ 1

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.899
<v Speaker 11>a year to the average Australian's power bill is an

0:20:20.980 --> 0:20:25.540
<v Speaker 11>absolute insult. Poles and wires companies are monopoly and monopolies

0:20:25.660 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 11>and we will all be paying the price for that.

0:20:28.140 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 8>It's absolutely appalling.

0:20:31.340 --> 0:20:33.740
<v Speaker 2>Dan, a quick one for you. Master Builders today issued

0:20:33.780 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>a warning that rent increases are driving inflation. These are

0:20:36.500 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the ones out of the budget on the back of

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 2>those tax hikes that are moving the rents, obviously. But

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 2>those rent increases will send more people out of renting

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:48.310
<v Speaker 2>properties into social housing. We know, of course, the clearance

0:20:48.369 --> 0:20:52.290
<v Speaker 2>rates on the weekend are very, very sluggish. In August,

0:20:52.330 --> 0:20:56.450
<v Speaker 2>Sydney was at a six-year low in terms of, you know,

0:20:56.550 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 2>how long properties were sitting there on the market and selling.

0:21:00.250 --> 0:21:02.350
<v Speaker 2>It begs the question, I can't get a straight answer

0:21:02.390 --> 0:21:06.390
<v Speaker 2>out of anyone in Canberra. What actually is the definition

0:21:06.410 --> 0:21:11.129
<v Speaker 2>of social housing? Is this housing that we're subsidising as taxpayers?

0:21:11.190 --> 0:21:13.610
<v Speaker 2>Talk me through what the truth is here.

0:21:15.310 --> 0:21:17.410
<v Speaker 10>Well, in essence, yes, that's what it is. We now

0:21:17.450 --> 0:21:19.949
<v Speaker 10>have almost a million Australians who are in social housing

0:21:19.990 --> 0:21:23.260
<v Speaker 10>of some kind. Now, two-thirds roughly of that is in

0:21:23.300 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 10>housing that is directly run and operated by the government itself.

0:21:27.330 --> 0:21:29.969
<v Speaker 10>A few percent is in relation to Indigenous and then

0:21:30.010 --> 0:21:34.070
<v Speaker 10>about 25 to 30 percent is through community organisations, many

0:21:34.090 --> 0:21:36.380
<v Speaker 10>of whom receive government funding as well. So, yes, most

0:21:36.420 --> 0:21:38.859
<v Speaker 10>of this is taxpayer funded housing that's then rented off

0:21:39.380 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 10>to people who can't afford or can't find a rental property. Now,

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 10>this is one of the great untold stories of the

0:21:45.740 --> 0:21:49.020
<v Speaker 10>failure of this government's migration and housing programs, which is

0:21:49.060 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 10>that there's many people who need social housing. If it

0:21:51.740 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 10>weren't for social housing, they'd be on the street. But

0:21:54.020 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 10>there's many people who have been forced into social housing

0:21:56.790 --> 0:21:59.590
<v Speaker 10>because they literally cannot get a rental property. They just

0:21:59.650 --> 0:22:01.350
<v Speaker 10>can't get one. So they have to stay with their

0:22:01.369 --> 0:22:04.290
<v Speaker 10>parents or their grandparents or do whatever they have to do.

0:22:04.690 --> 0:22:06.550
<v Speaker 10>Or if they don't have that support available, they've got

0:22:06.570 --> 0:22:08.770
<v Speaker 10>to go into a social house. So this is what

0:22:08.830 --> 0:22:11.580
<v Speaker 10>happens when you have a massive surge in demand that

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.379
<v Speaker 10>we've had from mass migration coupled with a complete failure

0:22:14.420 --> 0:22:14.940
<v Speaker 10>of supply.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:16.260
<v Speaker 7>And on top of that, as.

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.900
<v Speaker 10>You rightly say, these tax changes mean that fewer people

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.179
<v Speaker 10>are investing, rents go up even more. So Look, unfortunately,

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.460
<v Speaker 10>more people are going to find themselves in this situation.

0:22:26.140 --> 0:22:28.300
<v Speaker 2>And it just grows the state. It makes us ever

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.900
<v Speaker 2>more reliant on government, which is not what we want

0:22:31.940 --> 0:22:33.710
<v Speaker 2>in a country like Australia. Thank you to you both.

0:22:33.869 --> 0:22:36.230
<v Speaker 2>As I said, Kerri-Lee, great to have you back. All right,

0:22:36.250 --> 0:22:38.530
<v Speaker 2>let's go now to the breach today. Let's bring in

0:22:38.550 --> 0:22:42.550
<v Speaker 2>a professional to unpick it for us now, Chief Scientist

0:22:42.590 --> 0:22:46.450
<v Speaker 2>at the University of New South Wales AI Institute, Professor

0:22:46.510 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Toby Walsh. Professor, I've been waiting for you all day

0:22:50.660 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 2>because there's so much chatter around and half of it

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.310
<v Speaker 2>doesn't add up to the next person who speaks. What happened?

0:22:58.330 --> 0:23:01.750
<v Speaker 2>What have we learnt today about this breach?

0:23:03.570 --> 0:23:06.810
<v Speaker 12>Well, the government got another lucky break here. Fortunately, it

0:23:06.850 --> 0:23:10.030
<v Speaker 12>turned out it wasn't particularly serious. We didn't lose too

0:23:10.050 --> 0:23:13.490
<v Speaker 12>much sensitive information here. But it shows that these companies

0:23:13.530 --> 0:23:16.689
<v Speaker 12>need much better oversight, independent oversight from the government that

0:23:16.710 --> 0:23:17.190
<v Speaker 12>they're not getting.

0:23:19.390 --> 0:23:22.690
<v Speaker 2>So the PM, when he spoke about it, basically said

0:23:22.830 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 2>that this was a front-facing information portal, so there was

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.660
<v Speaker 2>nothing there other than basically statistics. But it was behind,

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.540
<v Speaker 2>if I could call it, a firewall or some sort

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 2>of security mechanism. Obviously, it was breached. It wasn't just

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:42.139
<v Speaker 2>this website, though, this information system. There were multiple. The

0:23:42.180 --> 0:23:44.780
<v Speaker 2>one I was most concerned about was Medicare. But the

0:23:44.820 --> 0:23:50.010
<v Speaker 2>persistence of this open AI technology agent, if I can

0:23:50.070 --> 0:23:52.230
<v Speaker 2>call it that, that just kept going at it and

0:23:52.270 --> 0:23:55.570
<v Speaker 2>breaking down all the protections the government had. The fact

0:23:55.609 --> 0:23:59.890
<v Speaker 2>that the government's own back end didn't trigger some sort

0:23:59.910 --> 0:24:03.660
<v Speaker 2>of alarm, that they were only told about this by

0:24:03.700 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the company, that's concerning. Yeah, it is.

0:24:08.140 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 12>It's very concerning that we had to be told that

0:24:10.180 --> 0:24:15.700
<v Speaker 12>this had happened. The information they got was public-facing information.

0:24:15.740 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 12>All they said was about to be put in the

0:24:17.460 --> 0:24:20.820
<v Speaker 12>public domain. it wasn't too harmful. And the sorts of

0:24:20.859 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 12>things that the bots were doing, that sophisticated sort of

0:24:24.500 --> 0:24:26.020
<v Speaker 12>things that I've actually done when I've been trying to

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 12>get information out of the government's website, trying to guess

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 12>what the pile names might be called for data for

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.580
<v Speaker 12>another year. But you're right, the persistence and the volume

0:24:34.619 --> 0:24:37.379
<v Speaker 12>that comes out. We may be talking about hundreds or

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.140
<v Speaker 12>even sometimes thousands of these agents that come at you

0:24:40.369 --> 0:24:43.590
<v Speaker 12>over weeks and it will eventually get through. So this

0:24:43.630 --> 0:24:47.490
<v Speaker 12>time the government got lucky, nothing serious happened. But what's

0:24:47.510 --> 0:24:48.330
<v Speaker 12>going to happen next time?

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 2>And what about the response from OpenAI? Because I listened

0:24:53.060 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 2>to one interview where they're not even sure how this happened.

0:24:57.540 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they know it was one of their agents.

0:24:59.180 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 2>They're not dodging that. But the agent is thinking, I guess,

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 2>faster and deeper and more autonomously than how they perhaps

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:07.740
<v Speaker 2>programmed it.

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so it was entirely autonomous. There wasn't significant oversight

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:12.940
<v Speaker 12>of this.

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 9>It is worrying.

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 12>At best, it's incompetence for this company, this trillion-dollar company.

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 12>has just failed the basic cybersecurity.

0:25:21.820 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 9>Or at worst, it's carelessness.

0:25:23.900 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 12>And I think really what we're going to have to

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 12>do is hold the offices of these companies responsible. If

0:25:28.460 --> 0:25:30.580
<v Speaker 12>a human was doing this to the vacuum, they would

0:25:30.619 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 12>be facing prosecution.

0:25:31.830 --> 0:25:33.420
<v Speaker 9>I don't think we could just get them away.

0:25:33.460 --> 0:25:36.669
<v Speaker 12>They all gleefully tell us, oh, we've had another AI

0:25:36.710 --> 0:25:38.129
<v Speaker 12>break into someone's system.

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.580
<v Speaker 9>And to talk up the capabilities of their system.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:43.850
<v Speaker 12>All of the companies, not just Open AI, have been

0:25:43.890 --> 0:25:47.890
<v Speaker 12>gleefully telling us this rather than being ashamed that they've

0:25:47.910 --> 0:25:49.570
<v Speaker 12>actually lost control of their systems.

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:53.980
<v Speaker 2>Well, I listened to ministers today. I listened to the

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister. I don't get a sense they've got a

0:25:55.859 --> 0:26:00.020
<v Speaker 2>real handle on on any of these issues, the complexity

0:26:00.060 --> 0:26:02.340
<v Speaker 2>of these issues. I read a report the other day,

0:26:02.380 --> 0:26:06.300
<v Speaker 2>there's only about 10 employees in the government cyber AI unit.

0:26:07.020 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 2>You were there on an expert panel for about a year.

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 2>It was disbanded. Surely now's the time to bring it back.

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.660
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think the government needs more expertise all around.

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.620
<v Speaker 12>I mean, I'm very happy to continue to lend my

0:26:21.660 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 12>expertise back to the government to help them understand where

0:26:25.619 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 12>this very rapidly evolving field is going and where the

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.460
<v Speaker 12>risk is starting to emerge. But equally, at the AI

0:26:31.510 --> 0:26:35.290
<v Speaker 12>Safety Institute, it needs to be much larger. The government's

0:26:35.330 --> 0:26:37.790
<v Speaker 12>putting up 30 million or something for it. And that's

0:26:37.850 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 12>a tenth of what the UK government's putting at it.

0:26:40.070 --> 0:26:42.050
<v Speaker 12>And we can see the threats are only getting more

0:26:42.090 --> 0:26:44.430
<v Speaker 12>significant and more challenging by the day.

0:26:46.190 --> 0:26:48.580
<v Speaker 2>What worries me, Toby, is we're having a debate about

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 2>data centres and their power source and where they're located

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:55.459
<v Speaker 2>and whether communities want them near them or not. But

0:26:55.500 --> 0:27:00.180
<v Speaker 2>that's just the engine, basically, for the architecture that we're

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:04.140
<v Speaker 2>not even sure of the scale and scope. We're all

0:27:04.180 --> 0:27:06.860
<v Speaker 2>saying it'll be transformative, it'll be great for the economy.

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.300
<v Speaker 2>But I used a couple of examples tonight. You know,

0:27:09.340 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 2>wait till AI develops some sort of weapon to bring

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.030
<v Speaker 2>down an aircraft that can pass through security. Wait till

0:27:17.290 --> 0:27:22.310
<v Speaker 2>AI has a very contagious, deadly biological agent and it's

0:27:22.430 --> 0:27:25.090
<v Speaker 2>in the hands of a terror group or a rogue

0:27:25.369 --> 0:27:29.470
<v Speaker 2>nation state. That's where I'm concerned. But I feel we're

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of two parts removed from the debate and we're

0:27:32.740 --> 0:27:33.740
<v Speaker 2>behind the eight ball.

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:37.939
<v Speaker 9>We are a bit behind. I think the idea that

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 9>AI is going to kill us all is a bit fantastical.

0:27:40.060 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 9>But the idea that it could kill a few people.

0:27:41.780 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 12>As you gave a few examples there, we saw already

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.660
<v Speaker 12>earlier this week about how Chinese EV cars can easily

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.699
<v Speaker 12>be hacked and taken over and you can turn the

0:27:51.740 --> 0:27:54.340
<v Speaker 12>lights off and you can turn the brakes on and

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.660
<v Speaker 12>you can even control the steering. Those things, we've seen

0:27:59.020 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 12>how dependent we are on these systems. Air traffic control

0:28:01.180 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 12>systems in the United Kingdom keep on crashing. Well, what

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 12>if the AI starts attacking the air traffic control systems?

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 9>What sort of work is it going to do? We're

0:28:08.300 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 9>really not addressing these issues at all.

0:28:11.660 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 2>And also, I've read concern about home batteries or the

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 2>lithium batteries that people are putting on the side of

0:28:16.380 --> 0:28:19.380
<v Speaker 2>their homes to store the energy from their solar systems. Again,

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 2>they've got a connectivity and a brain, if I can

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:24.820
<v Speaker 2>call it that. So if you were sitting there now,

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.140
<v Speaker 2>if you were the Prime Minister's ear, what would you

0:28:27.220 --> 0:28:30.580
<v Speaker 2>say needs to happen in the short to medium term

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.619
<v Speaker 2>urgently on the back of what we've learned today?

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.659
<v Speaker 12>Well, in the short term, it's very clear that we

0:28:36.700 --> 0:28:40.550
<v Speaker 12>have to increase our cyber defences, the cyber security has

0:28:40.590 --> 0:28:42.110
<v Speaker 12>become a very significant issue.

0:28:42.390 --> 0:28:43.330
<v Speaker 9>These new AI.

0:28:43.130 --> 0:28:46.500
<v Speaker 12>Tools have significant side of the capability and we can't

0:28:46.540 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 12>sit around. We need more expertise in government, more oversight.

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:51.860
<v Speaker 12>We need to invest much more time and effort in that.

0:28:52.220 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 12>In the longer term, I think we've really got to

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.820
<v Speaker 12>think about how we properly regulate this industry.

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.340
<v Speaker 9>No other trillion dollar industry doesn't.

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.700
<v Speaker 12>Get any independent oversight.

0:29:01.180 --> 0:29:02.670
<v Speaker 9>They're still marking their own homework.

0:29:02.710 --> 0:29:06.070
<v Speaker 12>And as they've just demonstrated yet again, they're not marking

0:29:06.090 --> 0:29:07.230
<v Speaker 12>their homework very well at all.

0:29:07.270 --> 0:29:08.650
<v Speaker 9>They had it in late.

0:29:09.250 --> 0:29:11.550
<v Speaker 12>They didn't really own up to all the mistakes they'd

0:29:11.570 --> 0:29:13.610
<v Speaker 12>made and to the seriousness. They sent it to an

0:29:14.070 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 12>obscure government email address. They just can't be trusted to

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 12>look after their own homework.

0:29:20.900 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 2>And just quickly, Toby, my point at the top of

0:29:22.620 --> 0:29:26.780
<v Speaker 2>the show, that's not to mean, though, you conflate... regulation

0:29:26.820 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 2>of the AI space, the architecture of artificial intelligence and

0:29:32.140 --> 0:29:34.810
<v Speaker 2>the digital duty of care legislation that the government's got

0:29:34.850 --> 0:29:38.690
<v Speaker 2>on the table that goes to the content that's available

0:29:38.750 --> 0:29:40.620
<v Speaker 2>to people online. They're not the same thing.

0:29:42.380 --> 0:29:43.060
<v Speaker 9>They're not the same thing.

0:29:43.140 --> 0:29:45.380
<v Speaker 12>I mean, they're sort of mixed in the sense that

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.340
<v Speaker 12>the AI is also deciding how you see the content,

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:54.090
<v Speaker 12>and the algorithm is deciding which particular content you see.

0:29:54.110 --> 0:29:57.050
<v Speaker 12>So it's a confused mixture of things that they're trying

0:29:57.470 --> 0:29:59.010
<v Speaker 12>to do there with the digital duty of care.

0:29:59.030 --> 0:29:59.950
<v Speaker 9>It does involve AI.

0:30:00.270 --> 0:30:02.130
<v Speaker 12>Of course, it involves just the pure design of it,

0:30:02.410 --> 0:30:03.950
<v Speaker 12>and it does involve, as you say, the content that

0:30:03.970 --> 0:30:04.470
<v Speaker 12>you get to see.

0:30:06.550 --> 0:30:07.610
<v Speaker 2>I'll leave it there. I hope you get a call

0:30:07.630 --> 0:30:10.190
<v Speaker 2>from the Prime Minister. I hope he's desperate enough to

0:30:10.230 --> 0:30:11.990
<v Speaker 2>admit he got it wrong and put you on the paddle.

0:30:12.050 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Toby Walsh, thank you. Professor Walsh there from the University

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.220
<v Speaker 2>of New South Wales. After the break, Jacinta Allen, hot

0:30:17.300 --> 0:30:21.460
<v Speaker 2>seat at the Corruption Royal Commission. Will she give evidence

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 2>before the state election? And crime data out today in Victoria,

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 2>record levels of retail shoplifting. We'll get into that in

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:37.310
<v Speaker 2>a moment. Welcome back. Well, how are we going to

0:30:37.330 --> 0:30:39.729
<v Speaker 2>keep the economy running with farmers set to fork out

0:30:39.830 --> 0:30:43.470
<v Speaker 2>up to $ 4 a litre for diesel? We'll get into

0:30:43.510 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 2>that in a moment, but now to reports that former

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.660
<v Speaker 2>Premier Jacinta Allen will be grilled by the Royal Commission

0:30:48.340 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 2>over how she was never made aware of a key

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 2>document that raised the alarm on big build corruption allegations,

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:58.270
<v Speaker 2>despite being directed to read the briefing. Here to discuss

0:30:58.310 --> 0:31:01.270
<v Speaker 2>this and plenty more, including those crime stats out today,

0:31:01.730 --> 0:31:05.580
<v Speaker 2>Shadow Police Minister Brad Batten. Brad, thank you. Just before

0:31:05.620 --> 0:31:07.690
<v Speaker 2>we get into the, first of all, the Royal Commission

0:31:07.710 --> 0:31:10.650
<v Speaker 2>started yesterday, but it was all the sort of preparatories.

0:31:11.770 --> 0:31:14.870
<v Speaker 2>Before we get into the fact of these two premiers

0:31:14.930 --> 0:31:17.950
<v Speaker 2>and whether we will see them before the election, the

0:31:18.070 --> 0:31:23.100
<v Speaker 2>public interest immunity waiver, Labor love this. It stops them

0:31:23.130 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 2>having to give a full and frank account to the

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:31.060
<v Speaker 2>Royal Commission. They can decline to hand over paperwork. You

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.620
<v Speaker 2>guys want that waived. You want it gone. You want

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.300
<v Speaker 2>this to be a fed income Royal Commission and you're

0:31:36.340 --> 0:31:37.870
<v Speaker 2>voting on this in the Parliament right now.

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.370
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, we know for a fact already we've seen Daniel

0:31:40.430 --> 0:31:42.750
<v Speaker 13>Andrews go in hearings before and he loves the I

0:31:42.790 --> 0:31:43.450
<v Speaker 13>don't recall.

0:31:43.470 --> 0:31:44.890
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't know. I can't remember.

0:31:44.910 --> 0:31:46.730
<v Speaker 13>You can't remember all those. Now it'll actually be I

0:31:46.770 --> 0:31:49.390
<v Speaker 13>don't have to and that's the biggest problem. This is

0:31:49.410 --> 0:31:53.130
<v Speaker 13>giving him the authority effectively and just into Alan to

0:31:53.230 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 13>hide documents, to say to them, We don't think this

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.570
<v Speaker 13>actually needs to be released. We're not going to release it.

0:31:58.610 --> 0:32:00.990
<v Speaker 13>And the Royal Commission can't compel them to. And I

0:32:01.010 --> 0:32:01.710
<v Speaker 13>just think it's too important.

0:32:01.730 --> 0:32:04.410
<v Speaker 2>That's because they've got a provision in an active parliament

0:32:04.430 --> 0:32:07.370
<v Speaker 2>in Victoria that we don't have for a federal Royal Commission.

0:32:07.390 --> 0:32:08.730
<v Speaker 2>That's the best as I can understand it.

0:32:08.750 --> 0:32:09.170
<v Speaker 9>That's correct.

0:32:09.230 --> 0:32:11.130
<v Speaker 13>And we've got it here in Victoria. And it's literally,

0:32:11.170 --> 0:32:13.090
<v Speaker 13>as we're sitting here right now, they're debating this in

0:32:13.110 --> 0:32:15.850
<v Speaker 13>the parliament and the government have worked with the Greens

0:32:15.930 --> 0:32:19.130
<v Speaker 13>to stop our amendment, to remove it so that the

0:32:19.190 --> 0:32:21.510
<v Speaker 13>documents would have to be released and should be put

0:32:21.570 --> 0:32:23.810
<v Speaker 13>up to the Royal Commission because we believe they should.

0:32:24.290 --> 0:32:27.130
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, I think Australians would say it's got, Victorians

0:32:27.150 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 2>would say it has to. If you are elected at

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the end of the year in November, you've already said

0:32:32.700 --> 0:32:36.540
<v Speaker 2>you're going to enlarge this Royal Commission, more terms, more

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:40.180
<v Speaker 2>expert commissioners, and clearly you'd put this through the parliament again.

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, and James Newbury's come out today and he's spoken

0:32:42.500 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 13>very clearly on exactly how we're going to go through

0:32:44.500 --> 0:32:47.790
<v Speaker 13>that process. Obviously, once the Royal Commission has started, some

0:32:47.830 --> 0:32:50.870
<v Speaker 13>things can be complicated. We understand that. So James is

0:32:50.930 --> 0:32:54.220
<v Speaker 13>working through that right now. to ensure that whatever we do, hopefully,

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 13>post-November 28th, we'll sit till the end of the year

0:32:57.580 --> 0:32:59.380
<v Speaker 13>to get as much through as we can, including that

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:03.070
<v Speaker 13>to ensure that the public get a guarantee that documents

0:33:03.090 --> 0:33:05.969
<v Speaker 13>can be released in the Royal Commission that could be

0:33:06.010 --> 0:33:08.610
<v Speaker 13>held to account to make sure people get the full story.

0:33:08.670 --> 0:33:10.270
<v Speaker 13>Because the last thing we want is in five years'

0:33:10.310 --> 0:33:12.470
<v Speaker 13>time them going, someone got away with it because we

0:33:12.490 --> 0:33:13.190
<v Speaker 13>hid some documents.

0:33:13.330 --> 0:33:16.380
<v Speaker 2>So call me cynical, right? I originally thought we're not

0:33:16.390 --> 0:33:18.340
<v Speaker 2>going to see Jacinta Allen or Dan Andrews this side

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 2>of the election. If the Greens vote with Labor... and

0:33:22.620 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 2>keep this protection racket going, I bet she will front

0:33:26.850 --> 0:33:30.550
<v Speaker 2>because she'll know it's safer to front with this protection

0:33:30.590 --> 0:33:34.750
<v Speaker 2>racket in place rather than risk having to front should

0:33:34.770 --> 0:33:37.230
<v Speaker 2>you win in November. Yeah, they'd be petrified.

0:33:37.870 --> 0:33:40.350
<v Speaker 13>Like the Premier, as you said before, the then Premier,

0:33:40.930 --> 0:33:43.490
<v Speaker 13>should have seen documents when she was the Minister. And

0:33:43.530 --> 0:33:45.950
<v Speaker 13>if she hasn't, these are documents that have been noted

0:33:46.010 --> 0:33:48.469
<v Speaker 13>and signed and They've gone through. You can't say that

0:33:48.530 --> 0:33:50.910
<v Speaker 13>that much has gone through a minister's office and they

0:33:50.930 --> 0:33:53.310
<v Speaker 13>weren't aware because there's only two things then. Either one,

0:33:53.910 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 13>you know about it and you're involved, or two, you're incompetent.

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.540
<v Speaker 13>And either way, it's cost Victorians billions of dollars and

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:02.540
<v Speaker 13>someone needs to be held to account. If it's a

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 13>director of a company, it should be treated the same

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 13>as a minister of the Crown if they are knowledgeable

0:34:07.620 --> 0:34:08.750
<v Speaker 13>of this and they know about it.

0:34:09.540 --> 0:34:12.730
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Let's go to then the IBAC changes that the

0:34:12.770 --> 0:34:13.910
<v Speaker 2>government's put on the table.

0:34:13.969 --> 0:34:14.209
<v Speaker 9>Some.

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:18.219
<v Speaker 2>look sensible. I don't think they go far enough. Again,

0:34:18.260 --> 0:34:19.290
<v Speaker 2>where are you sitting on those?

0:34:19.410 --> 0:34:21.089
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so we're going to say to them we won't

0:34:21.110 --> 0:34:24.830
<v Speaker 13>oppose the legislation going through. There was four amendments put

0:34:24.870 --> 0:34:27.830
<v Speaker 13>forward by James. We wanted to make sure that we

0:34:27.850 --> 0:34:30.110
<v Speaker 13>could get the IBAC changes through as fast as possible.

0:34:30.130 --> 0:34:32.670
<v Speaker 13>So that's why they're sitting tonight. And I think if

0:34:32.690 --> 0:34:34.180
<v Speaker 13>I'm correct, and I haven't checked my phone in the

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:35.580
<v Speaker 13>last two minutes, but I think they would have gone

0:34:35.620 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 13>through in the last few minutes. But again, the Greens

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.219
<v Speaker 13>and Labor have worked to ensure that any of our

0:34:40.260 --> 0:34:43.190
<v Speaker 13>changes were stopped. They then took out a few of

0:34:43.210 --> 0:34:44.990
<v Speaker 13>the changes themselves to get the eye back to make

0:34:45.030 --> 0:34:45.380
<v Speaker 13>it stronger.

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:47.819
<v Speaker 2>OK, now I'll say this to people at home. The

0:34:47.860 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 2>reason we're talking today and there's so much legislative focus,

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.950
<v Speaker 2>it's the last sitting day before the election on November 28.

0:34:54.950 --> 0:34:57.850
<v Speaker 2>Talk to me about these crime stats today. Just record

0:34:57.910 --> 0:35:02.210
<v Speaker 2>high numbers of retail theft. Victorians know it. You can't

0:35:02.250 --> 0:35:04.770
<v Speaker 2>go to a supermarket anymore without having to pass through

0:35:04.810 --> 0:35:07.690
<v Speaker 2>these doors and show receipts. And I was at Coles

0:35:07.750 --> 0:35:10.529
<v Speaker 2>and I know 3OW has reported on this. There are

0:35:10.630 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 2>literally theft stickers on a scotch fillet piece of steak.

0:35:14.260 --> 0:35:15.050
<v Speaker 2>It's got that bad.

0:35:15.489 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 13>The theft in retail stores is huge. And we've seen

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:20.860
<v Speaker 13>the statistics. We don't even see all the statistics. Coles

0:35:20.940 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 13>and Woolworths will tell you that there's so much that

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.419
<v Speaker 13>still goes unreported here in Victoria, whereas in other states

0:35:26.460 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 13>it's online. So we're not seeing all of it at

0:35:29.020 --> 0:35:31.500
<v Speaker 13>the moment. That's probably the scariest part. But it's also

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 13>now it's staff at risk. Like if I speak to Coles, Woolworths, Bunnings,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.180
<v Speaker 13>the big retailers, they're all talking about body-worn cameras for 16-year-olds.

0:35:40.210 --> 0:35:42.189
<v Speaker 13>Because people aren't just grabbing it and stealing it. They're

0:35:42.230 --> 0:35:44.430
<v Speaker 13>happy to actually assault a staff member or abuse a

0:35:44.450 --> 0:35:46.310
<v Speaker 13>staff member on the way out while they're stealing it

0:35:46.330 --> 0:35:48.390
<v Speaker 13>because they know there's no consequences for it.

0:35:49.219 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 2>What about this rumbling today, and of course it's grand

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:58.939
<v Speaker 2>final on Saturday, that the AFL has long talked about

0:35:58.980 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 2>for media rights purposes and to make more money, to

0:36:01.489 --> 0:36:05.810
<v Speaker 2>do a night grand final, and that Jess is reported

0:36:05.910 --> 0:36:08.660
<v Speaker 2>to have been Quick to say, well, I'm not so

0:36:08.739 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 2>sure about that. I think Victorians like the tradition of

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 2>an afternoon match. I listened to an interview from the

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 2>boss of the AFL, Andrew Dillon, this morning on 3OW,

0:36:17.620 --> 0:36:20.340
<v Speaker 2>and he basically intimated he's going to sit close to

0:36:20.380 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 2>her at the footy and teach her different. Let's have

0:36:23.660 --> 0:36:24.020
<v Speaker 2>a listen.

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 14>Look, that's something that's only just come to my attention,

0:36:27.410 --> 0:36:30.069
<v Speaker 14>but I'm looking forward to seeing Jess at the footy

0:36:30.130 --> 0:36:31.450
<v Speaker 14>on Saturday and we'll have a good chat then.

0:36:33.370 --> 0:36:35.649
<v Speaker 2>Okay, where do you stand, night game or day game?

0:36:35.730 --> 0:36:37.190
<v Speaker 13>Look, I have to be honest, I love the day game.

0:36:37.270 --> 0:36:39.630
<v Speaker 13>I do like the tradition. We're going through a discussion

0:36:39.670 --> 0:36:41.370
<v Speaker 13>right at the moment. It's not a policy at the moment.

0:36:41.430 --> 0:36:43.750
<v Speaker 13>It's obviously got out there, but it is something we

0:36:43.790 --> 0:36:46.250
<v Speaker 13>have spoken about. And I hope Andrew has, you can

0:36:46.270 --> 0:36:48.270
<v Speaker 13>put his point forward, but also we have to think

0:36:48.350 --> 0:36:51.710
<v Speaker 13>about the people who make football. And that's not the AFL.

0:36:51.810 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 13>That's actually the people out there, the supporters, the punters

0:36:54.300 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 13>that go. And let's be honest, I'm a Geelong supporter,

0:36:57.340 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 13>so I've been lucky over the last few years to

0:36:58.860 --> 0:36:59.459
<v Speaker 13>have a few wins.

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 2>Don't rub it in. I'm rich.

0:37:00.780 --> 0:37:03.410
<v Speaker 13>And there's nothing, well, you beat us in 2020. And

0:37:03.430 --> 0:37:05.370
<v Speaker 13>there's nothing better after a win to go out with

0:37:05.390 --> 0:37:08.090
<v Speaker 13>your mates and have a celebration or come into Melbourne

0:37:08.110 --> 0:37:10.700
<v Speaker 13>and see the players get presented. If you finish your

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.540
<v Speaker 13>game at 11 o'clock at night, that's all gone. That's

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 13>a Sunday issue. And then, let's be honest, players want

0:37:15.940 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 13>to go and celebrate. Sunday's a whole different game.

0:37:17.860 --> 0:37:20.060
<v Speaker 2>It's also really important for all the businesses that hang

0:37:20.100 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 2>off sport. And I think there's been a lot of

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 2>criticism with this Friday public holiday in Victoria. That used

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 2>to be a big day for restaurants and other businesses

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.130
<v Speaker 2>in town, and that's been lost to them. Yeah, it's

0:37:31.190 --> 0:37:31.610
<v Speaker 2>a challenge.

0:37:31.630 --> 0:37:33.910
<v Speaker 13>The grand final public holiday, as we've already said, we're

0:37:33.930 --> 0:37:36.210
<v Speaker 13>not changing, but the reality is at the moment it

0:37:36.230 --> 0:37:39.010
<v Speaker 13>has put some challenges out there for particular businesses in Victoria.

0:37:39.130 --> 0:37:39.410
<v Speaker 11>All right.

0:37:39.469 --> 0:37:41.710
<v Speaker 2>Last day of Parliament. This means you're hitting the campaign hustings,

0:37:41.750 --> 0:37:42.149
<v Speaker 2>Brad Batten.

0:37:42.390 --> 0:37:42.730
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:37:42.790 --> 0:37:44.839
<v Speaker 13>I'm out there ready to roll and loving it out

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:46.779
<v Speaker 13>in Berwick and out in the southeast. And I can

0:37:46.820 --> 0:37:48.580
<v Speaker 13>tell you I'll be looking forward to coming back here

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.460
<v Speaker 13>November 29th because I reckon the southeast is ready for

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 13>a change.

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:52.760
<v Speaker 2>And the mullet's going to stay for the campaign?

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 13>Not to my wife's pleasure, but yes.

0:37:55.690 --> 0:37:57.469
<v Speaker 2>I'm with the wife on this one. That mullet's got

0:37:57.489 --> 0:37:59.230
<v Speaker 2>to go. All right, leave it there. Quick break. After

0:37:59.250 --> 0:38:03.290
<v Speaker 2>the break, we'll get into diesel, $ 4 a litre. Goodness me.

0:38:09.690 --> 0:38:12.310
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back. International panel coming up. But now to deepening

0:38:12.350 --> 0:38:16.009
<v Speaker 2>concerns over the cost of fuel with diesel expected to

0:38:16.090 --> 0:38:19.290
<v Speaker 2>go through the roof as our ag sector battles to

0:38:19.330 --> 0:38:23.819
<v Speaker 2>survive financial hits. Of course, too, it'll impact transport, but

0:38:23.860 --> 0:38:25.989
<v Speaker 2>they are more likely to be able to pass it

0:38:26.070 --> 0:38:28.710
<v Speaker 2>on than our farmers. Joining me now, Head of Energy

0:38:28.750 --> 0:38:34.170
<v Speaker 2>Research at MST Financial, Saul Kovonick. Saul, talk of $ 4

0:38:33.910 --> 0:38:38.810
<v Speaker 2>a litre I filled up today. It was just on $ 2. 98,

0:38:37.330 --> 0:38:40.569
<v Speaker 2>I think very close to $ 3. $ 4, though, how real

0:38:40.610 --> 0:38:40.930
<v Speaker 2>is that?

0:38:42.590 --> 0:38:45.980
<v Speaker 7>Well, just as six months ago the idea of $ 3

0:38:45.580 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 7>a litre would have been unheard of, I'm afraid $ 4

0:38:48.580 --> 0:38:51.320
<v Speaker 7>is very much a number that could be on the cards.

0:38:51.969 --> 0:38:54.340
<v Speaker 7>given the developments that are going on both in the

0:38:54.380 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 7>Middle East and now potentially in the US and the

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 7>ramifications from that. Australia is actually the most vulnerable nation

0:39:01.500 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 7>in the world when it comes to diesel imports. We're

0:39:03.660 --> 0:39:07.029
<v Speaker 7>the largest diesel importer by a long way because of

0:39:07.090 --> 0:39:10.989
<v Speaker 7>our large agricultural and mining sectors. Australia only accounts for

0:39:11.030 --> 0:39:15.930
<v Speaker 7>about 1% of global fuel demands, but we account for 10%

0:39:15.930 --> 0:39:20.609
<v Speaker 7>of the global seaboard diesel trade. And so that means

0:39:20.650 --> 0:39:23.170
<v Speaker 7>when you start to see shortages in diesel around the world,

0:39:23.550 --> 0:39:25.549
<v Speaker 7>we are one of the most susceptible at the end

0:39:25.570 --> 0:39:26.410
<v Speaker 7>of that supply chain.

0:39:28.020 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so how do we compare to the other big

0:39:30.780 --> 0:39:35.950
<v Speaker 2>ag nations like United States, Canada, parts of Europe? Do

0:39:35.989 --> 0:39:39.430
<v Speaker 2>they make their own diesel onshore? Do they refine their

0:39:39.469 --> 0:39:42.150
<v Speaker 2>own product? Or are they heavy importers like us?

0:39:44.260 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 7>So those other nations you mentioned are largely self-sufficient in

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 7>both actually their oil production and in refining or can

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:55.819
<v Speaker 7>get their refined product from their neighbours. Now, the risk

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:59.430
<v Speaker 7>we face here is twofold. First of all, the war

0:39:59.450 --> 0:40:02.350
<v Speaker 7>in the Middle East is still in an escalatory trajectory

0:40:02.390 --> 0:40:04.890
<v Speaker 7>and it's broadening to provide two choke points, not just

0:40:04.910 --> 0:40:06.989
<v Speaker 7>in the Strait of Hormuz, but also through the Red Sea,

0:40:07.010 --> 0:40:08.910
<v Speaker 7>which is the one way Saudi Arabia has been getting

0:40:08.950 --> 0:40:11.140
<v Speaker 7>its fuel out of the Middle East by passing the strait.

0:40:11.690 --> 0:40:13.989
<v Speaker 7>But the second thing now is the potential for the

0:40:14.010 --> 0:40:18.350
<v Speaker 7>United States to restrict its diesel exports, precisely because it's

0:40:18.450 --> 0:40:23.150
<v Speaker 7>facing political pressure from the farming Republicans within the US

0:40:23.510 --> 0:40:26.770
<v Speaker 7>and their farmers who are pacing higher diesel prices right

0:40:26.810 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 7>into the midterm elections. And if the US cuts off

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.940
<v Speaker 7>its diesel exports, which account for a third of the

0:40:31.980 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 7>world's seaborne trade, you could then see Europe also look

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 7>to protect their own first and cut off their diesel exports.

0:40:37.820 --> 0:40:40.299
<v Speaker 7>Russia already has. China's done it before earlier this year

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:42.340
<v Speaker 7>and could do it again. And so if you don't

0:40:42.380 --> 0:40:44.819
<v Speaker 7>have your sovereign supply chain you're left at the end.

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.140
<v Speaker 7>And that puts you in a precarious situation.

0:40:48.700 --> 0:40:51.299
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the talk was about a 90-day ban and that

0:40:51.340 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 2>would take them across and through the midterms. And I

0:40:54.300 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 2>hear your point about the Republicans and the farming states there.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:01.300
<v Speaker 2>So how real do you think that is? And two,

0:41:01.340 --> 0:41:05.149
<v Speaker 2>if there was to be a spike in fuel costs here,

0:41:05.170 --> 0:41:08.350
<v Speaker 2>diesel particularly, diesel more than petrol, when are we likely

0:41:08.370 --> 0:41:12.190
<v Speaker 2>to see it? This side of Christmas, after Christmas? And

0:41:12.270 --> 0:41:15.010
<v Speaker 2>what about demands do you think from the government to

0:41:15.110 --> 0:41:16.410
<v Speaker 2>cut the excise again?

0:41:18.530 --> 0:41:21.320
<v Speaker 7>So at this point, it's looking more likely than not

0:41:21.380 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 7>that the US will look to restrict diesel to at

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 7>least a degree ahead of the early November midterms. That

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 7>would start to flow through. If they announce that, that

0:41:29.500 --> 0:41:31.899
<v Speaker 7>would flow through immediately on diesel prices, but would really

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:36.950
<v Speaker 7>start to crunch potentially from as early as late October.

0:41:37.989 --> 0:41:41.230
<v Speaker 7>That has both a pricing implication, but it has much

0:41:41.270 --> 0:41:43.930
<v Speaker 7>more an implication on what that would mean for our

0:41:44.030 --> 0:41:48.350
<v Speaker 7>agricultural sector. And if you recall, the government has... It

0:41:48.469 --> 0:41:51.109
<v Speaker 7>previously disbanded its fuel security taskforce, but that could have

0:41:51.130 --> 0:41:53.950
<v Speaker 7>to be reinstated because the whole point of Australia potentially

0:41:53.989 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 7>going to stage three and stage four of rationing is

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 7>to protect our agricultural sector in addition to our other

0:41:59.180 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 7>critical sectors. So that means diverting diesel away from many

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.240
<v Speaker 7>of us who need it in the cities to making

0:42:06.260 --> 0:42:09.379
<v Speaker 7>sure at least our farmers can get it. Hopefully these

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:11.940
<v Speaker 7>things don't play out in that worst case scenario, but

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 7>I'm actually more worried now than I've been at any

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 7>point since the war began about the potential for us

0:42:16.380 --> 0:42:17.460
<v Speaker 7>to go to rationing for diesel.

0:42:19.130 --> 0:42:22.730
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with you. I heard warnings within the Canberra

0:42:22.790 --> 0:42:27.469
<v Speaker 2>bureaucracy that they were preparing for rationing. So if that

0:42:27.510 --> 0:42:31.350
<v Speaker 2>sort of discussion's happening, that's pretty real to me. Saul,

0:42:31.370 --> 0:42:32.870
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry I've got to leave it there. I do

0:42:32.910 --> 0:42:35.610
<v Speaker 2>want to catch up with you, though, about fuel and

0:42:35.890 --> 0:42:39.110
<v Speaker 2>energy policy broadly. There's coalitions put their policy out yesterday,

0:42:39.489 --> 0:42:41.450
<v Speaker 2>but we'll do that next week. Certainly. Thanks for joining

0:42:41.489 --> 0:42:45.380
<v Speaker 2>me tonight. All right, let's go. Quick break. International panel

0:42:45.980 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 2>after the break. international panel. It's Thursday and they're here

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 2>with me in the studio, News24 contributor Kosha Garda, Labor

0:42:56.620 --> 0:42:59.660
<v Speaker 2>MP Michael Damby. Welcome to you both. Hey, I want

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:02.580
<v Speaker 2>to go to this award that Albo got, Global Citizen

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 2>of the Year or whatever it is, from the Atlantic Council, Michael.

0:43:05.940 --> 0:43:09.379
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting. I went digging around. Lo and behold, who

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:14.140
<v Speaker 2>is on the International Advisory Board for this mob but

0:43:14.219 --> 0:43:14.860
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Rudd?

0:43:15.780 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 14>I'm surprised most members of the Atlantic Council wouldn't know

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:20.730
<v Speaker 14>who Albo was but At least there was someone there

0:43:20.750 --> 0:43:22.259
<v Speaker 14>who knew where he was and that's probably why he

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:22.509
<v Speaker 14>got it.

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:27.500
<v Speaker 2>He got it for, amongst many things, AUKUS. But Scott

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:29.900
<v Speaker 2>Morrison should have got the award for AUKUS and didn't.

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I said today that, you know, this digital hack that

0:43:36.739 --> 0:43:38.859
<v Speaker 2>he found out about on the weekend was held over

0:43:38.900 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 2>kosher just because they needed a distraction. This is terrible optics.

0:43:43.380 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 2>For a prime minister struggling as he is at home,

0:43:45.580 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 2>talk of interest rates next week rising, fuel prices out

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:51.189
<v Speaker 2>of control. This is a bad look.

0:43:51.530 --> 0:43:54.170
<v Speaker 15>Very bad look. And he, in general, doesn't come across

0:43:54.250 --> 0:43:57.629
<v Speaker 15>as somebody that can speak tech or explain what's going

0:43:57.790 --> 0:44:00.690
<v Speaker 15>on and how is a government that increasingly is demanding

0:44:00.750 --> 0:44:03.070
<v Speaker 15>more and more of our digital footprint to be loaded

0:44:03.110 --> 0:44:05.630
<v Speaker 15>into the system. How is it equipped for cybersecurity or

0:44:05.670 --> 0:44:07.830
<v Speaker 15>any of that stuff? So it's not helpful, but he

0:44:08.030 --> 0:44:09.910
<v Speaker 15>came out and gave a statement and off we go.

0:44:10.930 --> 0:44:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Xi Jinping arrived into the US and on the tarmac

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:18.980
<v Speaker 2>waiting was the president and the first lady. That's very unusual, right?

0:44:19.060 --> 0:44:21.500
<v Speaker 2>For any world leader, any head of state to greet

0:44:21.580 --> 0:44:26.299
<v Speaker 2>another head of state, it's usually lower order protocol that

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:29.540
<v Speaker 2>someone else is there. But I guess it signals that

0:44:29.700 --> 0:44:33.890
<v Speaker 2>the president wants a good relationship with his Beijing counterpart.

0:44:34.210 --> 0:44:36.350
<v Speaker 14>Yes, he regards himself and Putin as the sort of

0:44:36.410 --> 0:44:38.930
<v Speaker 14>three equals of the world. A US president hasn't done

0:44:38.950 --> 0:44:42.630
<v Speaker 14>this since 1962 when Kennedy went out to greet Harold Macmillan.

0:44:43.010 --> 0:44:48.940
<v Speaker 14>But I think Xi wants a quiet, stable summit. He

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 14>wants nothing to happen. He doesn't want any military fighting

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 14>breaking out. Ructions over Taiwan. Certainly ructions over Taiwan. His

0:44:56.340 --> 0:44:57.700
<v Speaker 14>red line is going to be to try and get

0:44:58.060 --> 0:45:02.630
<v Speaker 14>Trump to sell out Taiwan. But I can't believe that

0:45:02.670 --> 0:45:05.129
<v Speaker 14>John Lyons was saying on the ABC that Chinese haven't

0:45:05.170 --> 0:45:09.939
<v Speaker 14>been providing satellite intelligence to or energy precursors to the Iranians.

0:45:09.980 --> 0:45:12.100
<v Speaker 14>They just get away with blue murder and the ABC's

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:12.940
<v Speaker 14>there to megaphone them.

0:45:13.780 --> 0:45:16.020
<v Speaker 2>If he had not gone out to the tarmac, he

0:45:16.060 --> 0:45:19.420
<v Speaker 2>would have been criticised. He's been criticised by Democrats for

0:45:19.460 --> 0:45:24.450
<v Speaker 2>going out to the tarmac. Where would Americans, the general public,

0:45:25.070 --> 0:45:27.969
<v Speaker 2>be on this, given we've got midterms coming up? Would

0:45:27.989 --> 0:45:29.310
<v Speaker 2>it even be on their political radar?

0:45:29.940 --> 0:45:30.420
<v Speaker 1>Not really.

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:32.620
<v Speaker 15>I think they're just so focused on the domestic issues

0:45:32.700 --> 0:45:35.870
<v Speaker 15>and feel that that's been inadequately served. That's where he's

0:45:35.910 --> 0:45:38.250
<v Speaker 15>been slipping in the polls and in the support. But

0:45:38.330 --> 0:45:40.310
<v Speaker 15>as it relates to China, the Trump doctrine has always

0:45:40.330 --> 0:45:43.530
<v Speaker 15>been he wants to get along with everybody, even adversaries,

0:45:43.590 --> 0:45:44.220
<v Speaker 15>even rivals.

0:45:45.620 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 2>The... Jaw, jaw, not wall, wall.

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:50.020
<v Speaker 15>Yes. And the agenda is very contained, as you said,

0:45:50.060 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 15>for this. There might be a little bit of a

0:45:51.100 --> 0:45:53.380
<v Speaker 15>trade truce or an extension of that trade truce, but

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 15>it's broadly symbolic pageantry to say we are the world order.

0:45:57.140 --> 0:45:59.420
<v Speaker 15>And we, it was also deliberate that he did not,

0:45:59.500 --> 0:46:01.259
<v Speaker 15>Xi Jinping did not go to the UN, which is

0:46:01.300 --> 0:46:03.830
<v Speaker 15>happening in that same week, skipped it, went straight to Washington.

0:46:03.870 --> 0:46:06.049
<v Speaker 15>So they're sort of telegraphing that we are the world order,

0:46:06.110 --> 0:46:08.090
<v Speaker 15>not the UN, and we have to normalise relations.

0:46:08.670 --> 0:46:12.740
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Talk to me about Ukraine. We saw Vladimir Zelensky,

0:46:13.500 --> 0:46:17.100
<v Speaker 2>meeting a number of leaders, including obviously Prime Minister Albanese.

0:46:17.900 --> 0:46:21.280
<v Speaker 2>When and how does this Ukraine-Russia war end?

0:46:21.410 --> 0:46:25.090
<v Speaker 14>Well, the end is, in the short term, is quite obvious.

0:46:25.110 --> 0:46:28.509
<v Speaker 14>This is what Zelensky is going for. And the US administration,

0:46:28.550 --> 0:46:30.390
<v Speaker 14>at least Rubio seems signed up to, and that is

0:46:30.430 --> 0:46:35.130
<v Speaker 14>a ceasefire in place. Now, the Ukrainians reckon that the

0:46:35.150 --> 0:46:38.739
<v Speaker 14>Russians won't stop killing their civilians in the cities. So

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 14>they've invented these new drones which shoot down Russian drones.

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:48.089
<v Speaker 14>They've also decided to hit all Russian infrastructure, including refineries,

0:46:48.410 --> 0:46:51.910
<v Speaker 14>as far away as Siberia, hoping that the Russians will

0:46:51.930 --> 0:46:56.050
<v Speaker 14>lose export income and give up. And finally, they've really

0:46:56.110 --> 0:47:00.190
<v Speaker 14>pushed the Russians in the northern Donbass and reconquered 200

0:47:00.190 --> 0:47:05.339
<v Speaker 14>square kilometres near Lyman. So the Ukrainians force it but

0:47:05.380 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 14>have a reasonable demand ceasefire in place.

0:47:08.930 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 2>And then President Trump invites him, Putin, to the G20

0:47:13.700 --> 0:47:14.260
<v Speaker 2>in December.

0:47:14.850 --> 0:47:18.450
<v Speaker 15>Yes, in Miami, obviously raises eyebrows, but it goes back

0:47:18.489 --> 0:47:20.940
<v Speaker 15>to the previous point with Xi, where he does view that,

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 15>that no matter who you are, adversary, rival, competitor, we

0:47:24.260 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 15>want to normalise relations, certainly with a nuclear power.

0:47:26.540 --> 0:47:27.219
<v Speaker 9>Even Mamdani is meeting.

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.570
<v Speaker 15>Yes, even Mamdani and a nuclear power, which is Russia.

0:47:30.650 --> 0:47:33.549
<v Speaker 15>So it is about re-engaging on the stalled negotiation talks,

0:47:33.570 --> 0:47:36.130
<v Speaker 15>but it also is about normalising relations. That is Trump's doctrine,

0:47:36.150 --> 0:47:38.330
<v Speaker 15>and that's why he invited him to Alaska last year,

0:47:38.350 --> 0:47:39.310
<v Speaker 15>and he's inviting him again here.

0:47:39.430 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Quick one, media ban, White House media ban.

0:47:42.730 --> 0:47:45.170
<v Speaker 15>The judge ruled this was expected, that you can't do

0:47:45.190 --> 0:47:47.529
<v Speaker 15>that because of the First Amendment, and I think Trump

0:47:47.550 --> 0:47:50.470
<v Speaker 15>will just spin it as, well, they deserved it, needed

0:47:50.489 --> 0:47:52.840
<v Speaker 15>to teach them a lesson, and that's part of, I think,

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:54.500
<v Speaker 15>his act and his forte.

0:47:54.820 --> 0:47:59.799
<v Speaker 2>So they'll come back in, but he will be slow

0:47:59.820 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 2>to give questions perhaps.

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:03.820
<v Speaker 15>And he will be insulting, which some would say they deserve.

0:48:04.860 --> 0:48:05.910
<v Speaker 14>He thinks they'll be chastened.

0:48:07.150 --> 0:48:07.310
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:48:07.650 --> 0:48:07.930
<v Speaker 9>All right.

0:48:07.969 --> 0:48:09.669
<v Speaker 2>We'll see if they are. Thank you very much.

0:48:10.130 --> 0:48:10.330
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:48:10.510 --> 0:48:13.549
<v Speaker 2>Have a lovely weekend, everybody. Enjoy your break. Enjoy the

0:48:13.610 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 2>footy of whatever type you like to watch. Up next,

0:48:17.300 --> 0:48:18.910
<v Speaker 2>of course, James McPherson. I'll see you Monday.