Speaker 1: Being your non sky news Ostrulia starts.
Speaker 2: Now a lot of.
Speaker 1: This is outside. Good morning and welcome to outsiders. It's Easter,
Speaker 1: glorious Easter morning here in Sydney. I hope you are
Speaker 1: having a wonderful Easter Sunday wherever you are in this
Speaker 1: wonderful nation of ours. And what with it being holy
Speaker 1: weak and the most important day in the Christian calendar,
Speaker 1: I thought we should check in on how the spirituality
Speaker 1: is faring in the modern world.
Speaker 3: Hi, I am Reverend Lazarus Justice Jamison, and I am
Speaker 3: proud to be the co founder of Profane Holiness Community Care.
Speaker 4: Yes, that's the good Reverend Lazarus, a member of the
Speaker 4: prog agressive Christian Alliance. But how should we address her.
Speaker 1: My pronouns?
Speaker 3: Are they them? I am a trans masculine dyke here
Speaker 3: in Portland, Oregon, but I am from Saint Louis, Missouri.
Speaker 3: I am a trans refugee.
Speaker 1: Well, it's true, in this day and age, we all
Speaker 1: could do with some spiritual care.
Speaker 3: Trans people deserve ritual like kinky folks deserve spiritual care,
Speaker 3: right leather poly folks, sex workers, like everybody else left
Speaker 3: behind deserves community.
Speaker 1: I wonder if they'll be putting on a community Easter
Speaker 1: egg hunt. Should be fun. In the meantime, let's grab
Speaker 1: the latest Outsiders news.
Speaker 4: I have me onswer it.
Speaker 1: Well, Rita and Caroline here in the studio on this
Speaker 1: wonderful ease the morning. Caroline want to ask you, We've
Speaker 1: seen some very important things happening. There's an election going on,
Speaker 1: there's all sorts of things to this says. For The
Speaker 1: big issue of the day is, of course, that the
Speaker 1: alban Easy government has managed to get vegamite back into
Speaker 1: a cafe in Canada. This is the great world event
Speaker 1: that here we in Australia focus on as the rest
Speaker 1: of the world worries about things like doing trade deals
Speaker 1: with Donald Trump. We've got vegemite into a cafe in Canada.
Speaker 1: What a success story.
Speaker 4: Everyone across Australia will be breathing a great five relief
Speaker 4: this morning that their breakfast spread is safe in Canada.
Speaker 4: You know, it's the age old question, marm I vegimind
Speaker 4: which one are you going to pick? I'm so glad
Speaker 4: that Albanizy is covering the hot topics and everyone worrying
Speaker 4: about how they're going to pay the next mortgage payment.
Speaker 4: Or their energy bill will be hugely relieved.
Speaker 1: Well, let's have a look at Albert getting all excited
Speaker 1: about the.
Speaker 5: Vegamite and I want to thank Mark Karney in his
Speaker 5: office and his team for ensuring that for the Australian
Speaker 5: cafe owner Light and War can once again have veggiemite
Speaker 5: back in his Cafli back on the agenda.
Speaker 1: I mean, on a more serious note, Reata in Caroline.
Speaker 1: What I spotted over the last couple of days was
Speaker 1: the Italian leader, Prime Minister Georgia Maloney not only hosting
Speaker 1: JD Vance there in Italy, but also she first before that,
Speaker 1: was at the White House talking to Donald Trump getting
Speaker 1: good trade deals for Italy, obviously improving relationships between those
Speaker 1: two nations, closing those bonds. Have A listened to the
Speaker 1: White House.
Speaker 6: The goal for me is to make the West great again,
Speaker 6: and I think we can do it together.
Speaker 7: We can.
Speaker 1: Make the West great again. Rita. This is what this
Speaker 1: is what they're focusing on while we're making vegimite great.
Speaker 8: Yes, I'm sure selling maybe what one or two jars
Speaker 8: of vegemite in Canada.
Speaker 9: You know a jar lasts how long? It is comical, But.
Speaker 8: It's not because here we have a leader, one of
Speaker 8: the most, if not the most popular leader in Europe
Speaker 8: right now, Georgia Maloney. You think the European media isn't
Speaker 8: as unhinged about Trump as our media is. They are,
Speaker 8: But she's not backing down. She's done the work. She's
Speaker 8: articulated those same positions that the Trump administration has about
Speaker 8: protecting Western values, about identifying what the.
Speaker 9: Real enemies are, and.
Speaker 8: Doing something about illegal immigration, doing something about preserving your
Speaker 8: country's culture and living standards. And she is not shy
Speaker 8: unlike our politicians in saying we're going to make the
Speaker 8: West great again. She's not worried about Oh no, no, no,
Speaker 8: what if they make Trump comparisons, What if they malign
Speaker 8: me as some sort of you know, mini Trump.
Speaker 9: No, because she's done the work.
Speaker 8: I think our politic on the conservative side are just
Speaker 8: not bold enough. They're not clear enough in articulating what
Speaker 8: makes them different from labor. And that's why they're so
Speaker 8: terrified when the media or the left make these Trump comparisons.
Speaker 8: They think, well, this is it. We're going to lose
Speaker 8: the election if people see us as suy.
Speaker 1: It just drives me nuts. How stupid the entire approach
Speaker 1: of the Liberal Party, the coalition has been during this election.
Speaker 1: Don't say we didn't warn you on this show for years.
Speaker 1: They should have picked up from the voice. They should
Speaker 1: have embraced Trump. They should have been there like leaders,
Speaker 1: genuine leaders like Malonia. What a great thing to say,
Speaker 1: Let's make the West great again? Can you think of
Speaker 1: a greater thing to be saying and aspiring for your
Speaker 1: nation Italy? You know the heart of the Renaissance. So
Speaker 1: much traditional and wealthare of Western civilization to be embracing
Speaker 1: the concept of saying, let's make the West great again.
Speaker 1: Our political leaders in the cost on the so called
Speaker 1: right hardly are spooked by the words make Australia great
Speaker 1: against spooked.
Speaker 4: By taboo to one kill country, to be insane for indeed,
Speaker 4: Western civilization. How did it become taboo?
Speaker 1: Because they listened to the left, They listen to the
Speaker 1: ABC reason they.
Speaker 8: Let them set the agenda, They let them set the race.
Speaker 8: They are so terrified of people who are never going
Speaker 8: to vote for them, hating them, that they are trying
Speaker 8: to appease people instead of And then you were seeing
Speaker 8: in Australia the vote on the right fracture and they
Speaker 8: can't afford to do that. We saw that happen under
Speaker 8: Malcolm Turmpule, it happened with Scott Morrison at the last election.
Speaker 8: You have that right flank of your base fracturing.
Speaker 1: You're done.
Speaker 9: You've got to keep.
Speaker 8: The true believers on board and then you've got to
Speaker 8: bring on their swinging voters. Now, if you want to
Speaker 8: bring on the swinging voters, the culture war issues can
Speaker 8: be effected. But right now in Australia, we've got tax issues,
Speaker 8: We've got bracket creep, we've got this assault against mum
Speaker 8: and dad property investors who want to build wealth. So
Speaker 8: we've got to talk about negative gearing. We're going to
Speaker 8: talk about removing the capital gains concession. Where are the
Speaker 8: Liberals on these Where are they hammering home that the
Speaker 8: Left are going to stop you building wealth, providing financial
Speaker 8: security for your family. They're going to make it harder
Speaker 8: to pay the bills. This is an ideological war from
Speaker 8: the left where they don't want your ordinary Australian, your
Speaker 8: mum and dad landlord to be able to build wealth.
Speaker 8: They want to demonize them. We're seeing this happen in
Speaker 8: Victoria at a much greater rate, but it is an
Speaker 8: ideology that is very prevalent and if we do have
Speaker 8: a minority government with Labor and the Greens, the Greens
Speaker 8: have been clear in where they stand on the issue
Speaker 8: and it is going to be disastrous for housing policy
Speaker 8: in this country. And again not seeing any sort of
Speaker 8: scare campaign from the coalition. The scare campaigns are coming
Speaker 8: from Labor who are in power. I mean it's like
Speaker 8: the opposition is forgotten that their opposition that they're doing
Speaker 8: this positive campaign. No, you want Australians to throw out
Speaker 8: a first term government, you better show them what they're
Speaker 8: doing wrong. You better be very clear and your scare
Speaker 8: campaign about how this country is in the wrong track
Speaker 8: and what you're going to do about it.
Speaker 9: I'm not seeing that.
Speaker 8: And I think it's almost now becoming too late, because.
Speaker 1: It's never too late. But every word of what you're
Speaker 1: saying is true. And we did warn the Coalition on
Speaker 1: the show for the last two years of the trap
Speaker 1: they were walking into. Look at the way the left
Speaker 1: treats the coalition. The ABC, you know, have a look
Speaker 1: here at Sarah Ferguson, one of the stars of the ABC,
Speaker 1: and here she is contemptuous, patronizing to a former minister,
Speaker 1: a shadow minister, Michael Sooka, just to have a look
Speaker 1: at this, and this is this is who the coalition
Speaker 1: think they need to win over. Have a look.
Speaker 10: I'm going to ask you one more time, and everyone
Speaker 10: is listening to me, ask this question, how many social
Speaker 10: and affordable houses will you build?
Speaker 2: Well, we will fund social and for right.
Speaker 11: That's it.
Speaker 4: You're not getting an answer.
Speaker 6: We are building fifty five thousand social and affordable homes
Speaker 6: over five years, twenty eight thousand, Well, twenty eight thousand
Speaker 6: of those homes.
Speaker 5: Michael, what would.
Speaker 4: Your mother say hearing you interrupt her?
Speaker 2: Just I've been interrupted the entire time.
Speaker 6: Just please, it's okay. I'm unflappable, Sarah. I've done this
Speaker 6: my third my third run at this this week.
Speaker 4: If you want, we are not in a public house.
Speaker 4: Let's move on.
Speaker 1: Let's move on.
Speaker 4: Well, you know, here's me. Let's here's your mother say
Speaker 4: the hauling behavior appalling you think your host this program?
Speaker 8: I'm sorry, no, think about your mother, Rowan.
Speaker 9: What an extraordinary thing for an.
Speaker 8: ABC host to say to a shadow minister, to say
Speaker 8: to anybody, really, to an adult man talking to.
Speaker 9: An adult woman.
Speaker 8: Clara O'Neill isn't some child on a playground that's being
Speaker 8: picked on by, you know, the bully boy. She is
Speaker 8: a minister in the other an easy government, with a
Speaker 8: senior portfolio, and she's debating her shadow. She doesn't need
Speaker 8: ABC host to jump in there and say, what would
Speaker 8: your mother think about this? Hectory and then she asks
Speaker 8: a question to Suka, who begins to answer it, and
Speaker 8: immediately she cuts him off. It's like it was comical, comical,
Speaker 8: it's so patronizing. But I think more than just being comical,
Speaker 8: it's disturbing because obviously we're paying a billion dollars a year,
Speaker 8: we expect the ABC to be impartial. I don't think
Speaker 8: we expect it anymore, but it.
Speaker 4: Is in their charter. And yet the bias from Sarah
Speaker 4: Ferguson was in full display because when it happened the
Speaker 4: other way, when Clara O'Neill interrupted Michael Suker, there were
Speaker 4: no warnings of what would your mother say about this?
Speaker 4: You're going straight to detention, young lady like that. It
Speaker 4: was so school mamish. I mean, it was actually quite difficult.
Speaker 8: But what she did point out, I'm sorry, Caroline, she
Speaker 8: did point out we're not in a public house, public house,
Speaker 8: out of touch the test.
Speaker 9: You know that doesn't partic house.
Speaker 4: Maybe if you're called the ABC, it's.
Speaker 1: Called a part.
Speaker 9: This isn't a public house day, but.
Speaker 1: The rudeness with which the ABC treat any coalition. And
Speaker 1: I watched the debate which was on the ABC the
Speaker 1: other evening. I watched it so that the rest of
Speaker 1: the nation did not have to obviously, but again in
Speaker 1: the same patronizing treatment of Peter Dutton, with David Spears,
Speaker 1: who used to work here, sort of saying do you
Speaker 1: accept the climate change? He's responsible for the weather you're
Speaker 1: seeing right now around you, and Peter du Peter Duttan
Speaker 1: was of course about the mantra and say, oh, yes,
Speaker 1: I accept that we're seeing impacts of climate change. I mean,
Speaker 1: this was just insane stuff. But this is what you've
Speaker 1: got to do for the ABC. If we had some
Speaker 1: kind of Trumpian leadership, if we'd seen you know, what
Speaker 1: Peter Dutton should have said is no, you know I
Speaker 1: don't believe, stand up for what I believe. But what
Speaker 1: Zuoka should have said is, Sarah, no one is watching
Speaker 1: your show. Your ratings are falling, which is why we're
Speaker 1: going to abolish you. When we did the government and
Speaker 1: your mother and your mother will probably be pleased because
Speaker 1: she's probably watching outsiders right now. That's what he should
Speaker 1: have said.
Speaker 9: You know what, that is what is missing.
Speaker 8: And I think Michael Suka would be one of the
Speaker 8: few MP's who would be up to that time.
Speaker 1: It would be exactly he.
Speaker 9: Would absolutely but obviously.
Speaker 1: The coalition weren't gun shy, and now.
Speaker 8: So gun shy as you said earlier, this enterprise that
Speaker 8: essentially apologize or explain herself for saying that she wants
Speaker 8: to see Australia be great again. I mean, this is
Speaker 8: what it's been reduced to. And if you want to
Speaker 8: fight an election campaign on your knees, then good luck
Speaker 8: to you.
Speaker 9: You ain't going to win.
Speaker 8: Conservatives only win when they fight from a position of strength,
Speaker 8: and we saw that in the Voice referendum.
Speaker 9: Against all odds. We know it can work.
Speaker 8: Despite everything you hear, Australians are overwhelmingly sensible. They're overwhelmingly
Speaker 8: I shouldn't say overwhelmingly, but they are still majority conservative leaning.
Speaker 8: Even in Victoria we saw the Voice defeated despite the
Speaker 8: fact that the No camp had very meager resources to
Speaker 8: fight that campaign compared to the S side, So.
Speaker 9: It is dual.
Speaker 8: It is completely achievable, and they are botching it.
Speaker 1: Rowan and as not as if there aren't genuine issues there.
Speaker 1: Caroline tell us about Morgan Cox, who was on Q
Speaker 1: and A a few weeks ago. We played to clip
Speaker 1: here on outside is complaining about the housing problems. He's
Speaker 1: actually taken his protest into his own hands. He's camped
Speaker 1: outside Albanese's infamous Copa Cabana beach house where his Albo
Speaker 1: Cabana there.
Speaker 4: It is, yes, his tent that he's set up now.
Speaker 4: Morgan Cox was a rare voice of common sense, I
Speaker 4: think you can say.
Speaker 9: On the ABC.
Speaker 4: He was a dad who appeared in the audience of
Speaker 4: Q and A a few weeks ago talking about his
Speaker 4: housing situation. He's he has a one year old child.
Speaker 4: He said that the rent has gone up, they can't
Speaker 4: meet their rent payments, and he's they're at risk of homelessness.
Speaker 4: He works two jobs. He's it's not like he's unemployed
Speaker 4: or struggling to find work. He is in work. He's
Speaker 4: in two jobs in fact, and he's still kind of
Speaker 4: pulled his rent. So he's After that Q and A appearance,
Speaker 4: he did appear on our own Paul Murray Life. Let's
Speaker 4: take a look at what he had to say that
Speaker 4: I think we have the grab. Okay, we don't have
Speaker 4: that grab.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 8: We also made the powerful point that we're in this
Speaker 8: situation because of successive governments bringing in hundreds of thousands
Speaker 8: of bisy free. Yeah, and the alban Easy government has
Speaker 8: super charged that they brought in what arount a million
Speaker 8: in two years. So what you think we're not going
Speaker 8: to have a housing crisis and we've got all sorts
Speaker 8: of supply issues where we've got unions making the construction
Speaker 8: of homes so expensive. There is just so much at
Speaker 8: landish regulations, red tape, green tape, black tape.
Speaker 9: So we don't have the supply.
Speaker 8: We've got a million coming in in a couple of years,
Speaker 8: and you've got Australians like that working two jobs facing homelessness.
Speaker 1: And where was the coalitions come out with the policy too?
Speaker 1: I think reduce immigration by twenty five percent. I mean,
Speaker 1: come on, guys, I mean talk about timid and talk
Speaker 1: about you come out and you say lack us slamming
Speaker 1: the door shut for two years, no immigration for two years,
Speaker 1: because we're way ahead of ourselves in two years time. Well,
Speaker 1: then look at maybe opening the doors a little bit.
Speaker 1: But this we're going to cut it back honestly drives me.
Speaker 1: Nice Carol. I wanted to ask you as well about
Speaker 1: the story about the Teals. The Teals these I have
Speaker 1: more to say about this later on the show. The
Speaker 1: Treacherous Teals, all about integrity. What a bunch of frauds.
Speaker 1: This lot are The best thing that could come out
Speaker 1: of this election, in my opinion, is every single one
Speaker 1: of those Teals gets defeated. They're far better candidates. You've
Speaker 1: got Tom White there in Perth. You've got all sorts
Speaker 1: of great candidates who should be taking the place of
Speaker 1: the Teals. But tell us about this push polling, these
Speaker 1: tricks that they're up to, this sort of Simon Holmes,
Speaker 1: the court dabbling away in the background.
Speaker 4: There, Well, Rowan and reader, you may remember that the
Speaker 4: Teals came out against push polling so accused it of
Speaker 4: being a dirty tacting. Now this is, of course, where
Speaker 4: under the guise of conducting a legitimate survey, you get
Speaker 4: a call, you get a text message asking you a
Speaker 4: number of questions about your political opinions, but they're loaded
Speaker 4: questions and they're leading you. Sometimes they've got their very
Speaker 4: opinion based and then leading you to a political opinion
Speaker 4: rather than just gauging your political opinion. So there was
Speaker 4: a story that came out this week about how robo
Speaker 4: calls were being made in Zoe Daniel's seat of Goldstein
Speaker 4: in Victoria and they were asking these really loaded questions
Speaker 4: basically about the Barnaby Joyce and Matt Cannavan of the
Speaker 4: Nationals and how they support apparently that they're against, you know,
Speaker 4: abortion rights and they're going to lead to a rollback
Speaker 4: of abortion rights. And really, would you support the coalition
Speaker 4: more if the Liberal Party moved away from the Nationals?
Speaker 4: That was the question. Now what I've discovered is that
Speaker 4: in curtain, these same sort of questions and more were
Speaker 4: being put to voters in that Perth seat where Kate
Speaker 4: Cheney another Teal, is the MP. And I've got a
Speaker 4: couple of examples of these messages that are being sent
Speaker 4: to voter. It's another clear example here of push polling.
Speaker 4: One of them asks very similar to that robo call
Speaker 4: with Zoe Daniel, would you be more likely to vote
Speaker 4: for the Liberal Party if it distance its olf from
Speaker 4: the National Party And the extreme agenda of its MPs.
Speaker 4: Extreme like Barnaby Joins and Matt Canneban opposed taking actor
Speaker 4: who are posed taking action on climate change and want
Speaker 4: to roll back abortion rights. Reply with strongly agree, disagree, etc.
Speaker 4: Another message said the Liberal leader. Liberal Party's leader Peter
Speaker 4: Dutton has announced his intention to build seven nuclear power
Speaker 4: plants that experts will say will take fifteen to twenty
Speaker 4: years to build and cost hundreds of billions of dollars
Speaker 4: to support or oppose those plans. Now, clearly these are
Speaker 4: not just engaging people's political opinion. They're trying to influence
Speaker 4: opinion and from the very people who say they're a
Speaker 4: party of integrity, they're a party of honesty. They're spamming.
Speaker 4: They're spamming people. There's political well wors pinat.
Speaker 8: It's dishonesty because normally when you get spam, you know
Speaker 8: it's spam, you know it's advertising. But this is so underhanded,
Speaker 8: it is so dishonorable and for a party, and they
Speaker 8: are a party who were basically formed to stand up
Speaker 8: to you know, the bastards in Canberra, to bring back integrity,
Speaker 8: to be transparent and be a conservative option. Remember that
Speaker 8: was the whole cell. They weren't supposed to be options
Speaker 8: for Labor and Greens voters. They were supposed to be
Speaker 8: options for disenchanted Conservative voters. This party is to the
Speaker 8: left of Labor. They are very comfortably could be sitting
Speaker 8: in the Greens. There are another shade of grea and
Speaker 8: that's how the coalition has to treat them. Whether you
Speaker 8: love them or loathe them, they're not a conservative y' toxic.
Speaker 4: Point out that though Daniel did say that she didn't
Speaker 4: put out the robocall, and maybe that's the case with
Speaker 4: k Cheney, but according to line paper sources, Climate two
Speaker 4: hundred is responsible.
Speaker 11: For that.
Speaker 1: And they're behind the line.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Anyway, let's move on from the toxic tials bestly. I
Speaker 1: hope the Nation moves on from the toxic tials. Joining
Speaker 1: us here on the desk is a candidate in the election.
Speaker 1: Always like to give candidates a shot on getting their
Speaker 1: bit of publicity out there. One Nation candidate for the Hunter,
Speaker 1: Stuart Bond. Stuart, great to have you here in the studio.
Speaker 1: Thanks for taking time off from getting down from the
Speaker 1: Hunter to be with us. I wanted to pay you
Speaker 1: this clip. Now. This I mentioned before the debates on
Speaker 1: the ABC or the debate on the ABC. Here's Albanzi
Speaker 1: who's suddenly an expert in marine life apparently. But anyway,
Speaker 1: answering a question, have a listen about your read.
Speaker 12: Proper community consultation and any environmental approvals. Some of the
Speaker 12: concern is not real. Whales are being unable to steer
Speaker 12: their way around in the vast specific ocean around a
Speaker 12: wind tower is not right.
Speaker 1: So Stuart, here's the Prime Minister talking about your region
Speaker 1: where the whole issue of windmills is a big issue.
Speaker 1: Is he right or wrong?
Speaker 13: Look, I'm not needy debate whether his right or wrong
Speaker 13: about the whales. I'm no marine signs either. But I
Speaker 13: can say that we're shipping coal from the Upper Hunter.
Speaker 13: We're going down past how I'm now closed down Ladell
Speaker 13: Ladell coal fire power station, past the gas firepower station
Speaker 13: that has no gas, pass the proposed wind turbine farm,
Speaker 13: sending it up to Japan so they can make cars
Speaker 13: from Toyota and Suzuki, high value Electronics, Panasonic Sony, and
Speaker 13: they're shipping it back to us and selling into US.
Speaker 2: So it's just madness. The whole thing doesn't make any
Speaker 2: sense to me people in the Hunter, So.
Speaker 1: What would you work? What's one nation's position regarding the Hunter.
Speaker 2: We need to.
Speaker 13: Build new clean cul Foi power stations as our aging
Speaker 13: fleet is retired. So it's slated that by twenty thirty
Speaker 13: eight there will be no caul Foi power stations left
Speaker 13: in New South Wales. Now the Liberals have got a plan.
Speaker 13: I don't believe it's a good plan because it pushes
Speaker 13: it out to about twenty fifty. Right do we get
Speaker 13: a solution to this problem? There's a big hole in
Speaker 13: that plan and that hole needs to be plugged up
Speaker 13: with what works.
Speaker 2: And what works is clean cul foid power stations.
Speaker 9: Reader, well, what is the solution to the inner city?
Speaker 8: Though that might all be great for the Hunter and
Speaker 8: people there accept that, but we've got.
Speaker 9: The inner city who are thinking.
Speaker 8: The world's about to end, global warming is going to
Speaker 8: see their community is destroyed. There is this inspirational fear there.
Speaker 9: Is, it's almost this religious fur over they have.
Speaker 11: It is climate change.
Speaker 9: So how do you combat that?
Speaker 8: Because that is going to be the reason why the
Speaker 8: Coalition is refusing to move away from Paris from zero.
Speaker 8: They are terrified of that inner city flank just revolting.
Speaker 13: Well, look, I mean the beatings are going to continue
Speaker 13: until morale improves. You can see that. You can see
Speaker 13: the price of everything increasing and increasing. And this is
Speaker 13: what's about leadership is you make a moral, you make
Speaker 13: an argument, and you see if you're right. Now, what
Speaker 13: we're being exposed to is a massive experiment on the
Speaker 13: Australian people, our economy.
Speaker 2: We talk about being.
Speaker 13: A renewable energy superpower. Such a thing does not exist
Speaker 13: anywhere else in the world. Okay, we export, we sorry
Speaker 13: burn seven percent of the coal that we export, So
Speaker 13: we are currently powering enough sending enough coal overseas to
Speaker 13: power another fourteen Australias. Now I propose that we keep
Speaker 13: it here. We burn it here, we power Australia. We
Speaker 13: give our citizens cheap, reliable electricity.
Speaker 2: That we know that works.
Speaker 13: We had a functioning manufacturing industry when we were mining
Speaker 13: coal with horses. Right now, we use six hundred ton
Speaker 13: excavators to send out three hundred and fifty.
Speaker 2: Ton dump trucks in a minute and a half, and
Speaker 2: we have the.
Speaker 13: Largest coal export terminal in the world in the Hunter.
Speaker 2: We have the best coal miners in the world.
Speaker 13: You know another thing is a lot of people don't
Speaker 13: know is that thirty two out of the thirty nine
Speaker 13: coal mines in New South Wales are set to close.
Speaker 13: What's twenty forty right, by twenty fifty there will be none.
Speaker 13: Now this we have been mining coal in the hunt
Speaker 13: for two hundred and twenty years. It was New South
Speaker 13: Wales first export. You know John Sutherland, Captain John Sutherland.
Speaker 13: He landed in Newcastle and seeing the coal in the cliffs.
Speaker 13: And since that day we've been mining coal. And I
Speaker 13: propose we have the cleanest, best coal in the world.
Speaker 13: People want it, we should give.
Speaker 1: It to them.
Speaker 4: You know, you ran back in twenty nineteen for One
Speaker 4: Nation as well, and you've got you did pretty well,
Speaker 4: you got almost twenty two percent of the primary vote.
Speaker 4: But then you had this falling out with Pauline Hanson.
Speaker 4: What happened and how did you guys kiss a makeup?
Speaker 2: Look? You fight with.
Speaker 13: Family, you know, and anyone who knows Pauline knows that
Speaker 13: she's a tough operator.
Speaker 2: Right, And so we had a disagreement for led about some.
Speaker 13: Industrial relations legislation that I didn't feel was explained properly
Speaker 13: to the electorate. Now, in the end, it didn't have
Speaker 13: a great effect on what was there, but it really
Speaker 13: crueled the party in the area and I didn't feel
Speaker 13: that the messaging was right on it, so I went
Speaker 13: out Iran as an independent. The Labor Party increased their
Speaker 13: margin by only by one percent, right, and so they
Speaker 13: went from thirty seven up to thirty eight, so they
Speaker 13: didn't improve much. Now we're back. That was a COVID election.
Speaker 13: Now we're back to jobs and energy, and we've seen
Speaker 13: what three years of labor has done.
Speaker 2: And I can tell you the next three years are
Speaker 2: going to be no better.
Speaker 13: And I was telling Joel Fit's given this when I
Speaker 13: was arguing down here with him before I was on
Speaker 13: with Daren Giants, and I was saying to him, you know,
Speaker 13: and he's talking about safeguard mechanisms and as if the
Speaker 13: safeguard mechanisms are there to protect our coal miners and
Speaker 13: cold fi peril station, the safeguard mechanism is there to
Speaker 13: protect net zero, right.
Speaker 2: That's important. It is a carbon tax put.
Speaker 13: In by the Liberals, but it's been pushed as the
Speaker 13: Labor Party say this is protecting our industry.
Speaker 2: It is not.
Speaker 13: It is destroying our industry and we need to expose
Speaker 13: it for what it is, and I've called Dan Rappacolie
Speaker 13: out the local member up there.
Speaker 2: There needs to be a debate in this.
Speaker 13: Country about the future of coal mining in our coal
Speaker 13: fire peril station.
Speaker 4: Can I just ask you about some of your past
Speaker 4: comments which have got you in a little bit of
Speaker 4: hot water. You said in twenty nineteen it came out
Speaker 4: that you'd said the only thing worse than a gay
Speaker 4: person with power is a woman. You've obviously got a
Speaker 4: woman boss now and Collien Hanson you cast out though
Speaker 4: on the port Arpa massacre question, the death of Aama
Speaker 4: bin Laden and nine to eleven. It sounds very much
Speaker 4: like you're conspiracist.
Speaker 13: Yes, it would when you take things out of context,
Speaker 13: when you sit there and talk to a camera and
Speaker 13: put your points of view across and then you take
Speaker 13: tiny little snippets and jam it into a hit piece
Speaker 13: and then.
Speaker 2: Put it out on the news.
Speaker 4: But do you not say those things?
Speaker 13: But you've got to get it in context, right, You've
Speaker 13: got to get it all in a flowing conversation.
Speaker 2: If someone takes a snippet of what you've.
Speaker 13: Said here and then wax it out and says all
Speaker 13: that she's a lunity.
Speaker 2: Right. You've got people.
Speaker 13: Say I don't believe the news, don't believe news, and
Speaker 13: when they do a hit piece on.
Speaker 2: You, they're like, well, we've got to believe the news.
Speaker 13: If that's a hit piece, you know, if you want
Speaker 13: to ask me about a specific circumstance.
Speaker 4: So the only thing, the only thing worse than a
Speaker 4: gay person with power as a woman.
Speaker 2: That was made as a joke.
Speaker 13: And I don't think that I would have run for
Speaker 13: a party run by Pauline Hanson if I had a
Speaker 13: problem with women. She's the strongest woman that I know,
Speaker 13: and my wife.
Speaker 2: Is probably the second strongest person I know. And my
Speaker 2: life is run by women.
Speaker 14: Right.
Speaker 13: I've got a three year old and a seven year
Speaker 13: old and in the moment three olds to the boss.
Speaker 1: So I want to get back to the Wales.
Speaker 2: Wales.
Speaker 1: I do because for the simple reason of course, if
Speaker 1: you're going to win the seat and the Hunter, you're
Speaker 1: going to win over coal miners. You're going to win
Speaker 1: over the coal miner families and those people and the
Speaker 1: workers and the blue collar workers that labor has just
Speaker 1: trashed and destroyed. Can you win over those who were
Speaker 1: of the environmental left? Who are now appalled, you know,
Speaker 1: places like Port Stephens and Newcastle by the windmills and
Speaker 1: the devastation of the environment that Chris Bowen and the windmills,
Speaker 1: et cetera at sea are putting. Can you win those people?
Speaker 2: Yes?
Speaker 13: And I believe there's all these satellite communities that are
Speaker 13: out there that are fighting these battles, and they're fighting
Speaker 13: them individually. Now it's sad we went out to a
Speaker 13: solar factory.
Speaker 2: That's being put on these people's land.
Speaker 13: And the one of the major problems is is the arteries, right,
Speaker 13: are they onto DC produced DC power. They can't be
Speaker 13: plumb directly into the grid because it's AC so all
Speaker 13: of these transmission lines that need to go in, they're
Speaker 13: all a parallel grid, right, and we've got to be
Speaker 13: run to transform the stations so they can be put
Speaker 13: into the current grid. So these projects are just invading
Speaker 13: people's farmland and they didn't vote for this, right.
Speaker 2: And if you move.
Speaker 13: These wind turbine projects from out in the ocean, you
Speaker 13: are moving them onto someone else's property out west.
Speaker 2: Okay, it is devastating some of these communities.
Speaker 13: You don't have to say there's no bond put down
Speaker 13: it's really important that farmers understand.
Speaker 2: I think you've talked about this before.
Speaker 13: Read the fine print of these contracts, because in them
Speaker 13: they're put up by four hundred and six hundred ton
Speaker 13: crawler cranes. In twenty years time you are going to
Speaker 13: have to hire those cranes again to pull these things at.
Speaker 2: Your costs, at your cost.
Speaker 8: See commissioning these Each individual windmill is astronomy.
Speaker 13: You get a subsidy to put them up, you do
Speaker 13: not get a subsidy to pull them down.
Speaker 1: Stewart candidate for the Hunter. Great to chat to you,
Speaker 1: great questions there and great answers, So all the best
Speaker 1: and good luck on the crusade there Dutch. After the
Speaker 1: break reader's reality check, Thus we're going to chat to
Speaker 1: Rachel Wong about the extraordinary UK Supreme Court decision last week.
Speaker 1: You're an Outsiders back in a ticket.
Speaker 8: You're watching Outsiders with your hosts Rowan Dean, Caroline Marcus,
Speaker 8: and I'm Rita Pana here.
Speaker 9: And soon we'll be delving.
Speaker 8: Into the landmark ruling in the UK Supreme Court that
Speaker 8: defines what a woman is.
Speaker 9: But first, this week was a momentous one.
Speaker 8: This week we heard for the first time in a
Speaker 8: long time from the man who was the most powerful
Speaker 8: leader in the world. Joe Biden made his first public
Speaker 8: speech since he left office in January, and folks, it
Speaker 8: was as awful as you'd expect.
Speaker 9: Confirming again that this puppet president was never really in charge.
Speaker 8: I think this guy was the commander in chief, making
Speaker 8: decisions that reshaped America. He doesn't even know to wait
Speaker 8: for the music to stop before he starts speaking.
Speaker 7: Thank you.
Speaker 4: Green or girl.
Speaker 7: Who deserve help and paid for me.
Speaker 8: Yes, he was just going to deliver his full SMA
Speaker 8: with the music blaring, even though no one could hear him,
Speaker 8: had to abruptly cut the music.
Speaker 9: And what a speech it was.
Speaker 15: I remember pulling in into the parking lot and I
Speaker 15: had never seen I had never seen hardly any black
Speaker 15: people and scranting at the time when and I was
Speaker 15: only going in fourth grade, and I remember seeing the
Speaker 15: kids going by at the time called colored kids, and
Speaker 15: I must gone by.
Speaker 7: It's about respect. It's about being able to look at
Speaker 7: kidney and say, honey, it's going to be okay, and
Speaker 7: meaning that's what you're all about.
Speaker 15: That's what the legislation is about.
Speaker 7: It's about dignity, simple dignity.
Speaker 15: Everyone, Everyone deserves to be treated with dignity, regardless of
Speaker 15: the standard, regardless of economic tigery, regardless of who they are.
Speaker 8: Yes, classic Biden, incoherent whispering to shouts of righteous anger.
Speaker 4: You know the thing.
Speaker 8: This was the puppet president who plunged America into dangerous
Speaker 8: culture wars. He didn't know what a woman was, who
Speaker 8: wanted children to be prescribed powerful puberty blocking drugs. The
Speaker 8: man who allowed millions into the country illegally two million
Speaker 8: a year under his disastrous presidency, The man who demoralized
Speaker 8: the working and middle class with Biden nomics, high inflation,
Speaker 8: crazy energy policies, and who's foreign policy was just incoherent,
Speaker 8: pathetically weak, and expensive.
Speaker 9: The overwhelming majority of.
Speaker 8: The media is back on their anti Trump crusade, forgetting
Speaker 8: the role they played in propping up this puppet president,
Speaker 8: pretending his cognitive decline was some sort of right wing
Speaker 8: disinformation tactic.
Speaker 9: But we remember, and no matter.
Speaker 8: How hysterical the leftist media become in their coverage of Trump,
Speaker 8: Americans who voted for change have never been happier.
Speaker 9: Here is CNN.
Speaker 2: I hear all.
Speaker 16: These stories, all these articles, all the Trump voters they
Speaker 16: regret what they did back in twenty twenty four. I'm
Speaker 16: here to tell you very few of them regret what
Speaker 16: they did back in twenty twenty four. What are we
Speaker 16: talking about Trump voters looking back at twenty twenty four.
Speaker 2: We got a new poll up.
Speaker 1: The poll was conducted this month.
Speaker 16: What percentage would change their vote to a different candidate.
Speaker 16: We're talking just two percent, just two percent.
Speaker 2: That's not even a white spun the road.
Speaker 16: And then there's this additional one percent who say they
Speaker 16: would rather not vote. We're talking overall under five percent
Speaker 16: might or would have changed their vote Donald Trump voters
Speaker 16: back in twenty twenty four. The bottom line is, for
Speaker 16: all this talk of Trump voters regarding their vote in
Speaker 16: the numbers, it really just doesn't show up.
Speaker 4: There you go.
Speaker 8: Trump voters couldn't be happier, because whether it's stopping illegal immigration,
Speaker 8: deporting criminals, imposing tariffs, or fighting back against the left's
Speaker 8: culture wars, Trump is doing precisely what he said he
Speaker 8: would now to the weeks.
Speaker 9: Other momentous moment and involves.
Speaker 8: Some self delighted narcissists in designer spacesuits floating around in
Speaker 8: space for eleven minutes and thinking they're Neil Armstrong.
Speaker 11: I have so much gratitude that we're able to be
Speaker 11: able to do this.
Speaker 1: It's not about going to space.
Speaker 9: It's about what we bring back. This journey really is
Speaker 9: about healing.
Speaker 10: It's just about my healing takes me to a starve.
Speaker 9: Dreams don't have deadlines. And she said, I'm gonna stick
Speaker 9: my head out the window.
Speaker 11: He's six ticking up.
Speaker 17: Screece if he is ringing about.
Speaker 9: Oprah watching her best friend go to space.
Speaker 18: Welcome to space, ladies, or shall I say astronauts one?
Speaker 3: Two three?
Speaker 4: Tamir's in space?
Speaker 1: Who?
Speaker 8: Yes, they're the original woohoo girls. Don't you dare not
Speaker 8: treat these rich and famous, over privileged ladies like their
Speaker 8: achieved some wondrous feet. If you don't respect what they've
Speaker 8: just done, well you may be a sexist.
Speaker 3: Oh my god.
Speaker 4: Whenever a man goes out, it was called a plate,
Speaker 4: it was called a journey.
Speaker 9: A ride implies it, it's something frivolous.
Speaker 17: There was nothing frivolous about what we did.
Speaker 9: Yes, it was frivolous.
Speaker 8: Gale, and the carry on afterwards was even more absurd.
Speaker 8: We saw less carry on from real astronauts that were
Speaker 8: rescued by SpaceX last month after more than eight months
Speaker 8: stranded in space. Let's hear from a songstress and Kamala lover,
Speaker 8: Katie Perry.
Speaker 19: This whole journey is not just about going to space.
Speaker 19: It's the training, it's the team. What you're doing is
Speaker 19: you find you're like really finding the love for yourself
Speaker 19: because you've got to trust in yourself on this journey.
Speaker 19: And then you're feeling the love when you come down
Speaker 19: for sure, and you're feeling that strength. So I feel
Speaker 19: really connected to that strong, divine feminine right.
Speaker 9: Now, the divine feminine. Yes, these ladies thought floating.
Speaker 8: Around with their hair and make up perfectly done and
Speaker 8: woohooing on Laura Sanchez's boyfriend spaceship's going to change the world.
Speaker 9: The delusion here is next level.
Speaker 18: I hope they can see the unity that we modeled
Speaker 18: and replicate that and understand that we weren't just taking
Speaker 18: up space. We were making space for the future. And
Speaker 18: for me, like Gale said, this wasn't a ride, who
Speaker 18: wasn't a destination. It was a journey and it was
Speaker 18: a supernatural one.
Speaker 8: Yes, these ladies weren't making they weren't taking up space
Speaker 8: they were making space. Caroline, you're really empowered. Do you
Speaker 8: feel like you are just reborn as a woman.
Speaker 4: But if this is what being a woman is, and
Speaker 4: we're going to talk about that in a minute, I
Speaker 4: want no part of it.
Speaker 8: They had got starting space or more months, don't to
Speaker 8: start identifying as whatever that is not. These women exemplify
Speaker 8: so much of what is wrong with the modern left,
Speaker 8: this celebrity left over for Leach, hopelessly out of touch,
Speaker 8: self delighted flogs, suffering from delusions of grandeur.
Speaker 9: And I'm going to end with a bit more of
Speaker 9: Katie Perry.
Speaker 8: The reformative narcissism here is something to behold.
Speaker 11: It's almost impressive, unbelievable.
Speaker 1: While Katie Perry was discovering the divine feminine, a UK
Speaker 1: Supreme Court was actually deciding what a woman is. Finally,
Speaker 1: we have known on this show, and have talked many
Speaker 1: times on this show about the fact that a woman
Speaker 1: is a biological woman, but the UK Supreme Court has
Speaker 1: just caught up with that fact this week. Big news.
Speaker 1: We'll be chatting later to Esther Krak who about the
Speaker 1: English the story behind that, but far more importantly is
Speaker 1: right here in Australia's someone who has been cracking the
Speaker 1: Bubbly because she has fought so hard on this very
Speaker 1: issue for so long. As of course, Rachel Wong, Rachel,
Speaker 1: great to have you here in the studio, Big Day.
Speaker 1: We were going to have the Bubbly out, but we're
Speaker 1: not allowed to. I'm sorry about that. But what does
Speaker 1: this mean? You've been fighting this battle? And more importantly,
Speaker 1: are we now behind legally behind Britain?
Speaker 10: Oh, We're definitely legally behind Britain. Well, I'm just trying
Speaker 10: to regain the brain cells I think I might have
Speaker 10: lost from watching those clips monson genuine female empowerment and
Speaker 10: strides for women. So this case is huge. I can't
Speaker 10: overstate how significant it is and how far Australia is
Speaker 10: now behind. I mean, there have been people, including our
Speaker 10: own Sex Discrimination Commissioner, who has tried to underplay the
Speaker 10: meaning of this. So this is just the UK, this
Speaker 10: is just their Equality Act. There are huge similarities between
Speaker 10: the Equality Act and the UK and the s Excrimination
Speaker 10: Act in Australia. This case is a huge win form
Speaker 10: over there. It is effectively restored their sex based rights.
Speaker 10: It's confirmed what we've all known most of US have
Speaker 10: known for a very long time that biological sex is real,
Speaker 10: that human beings cannot change sex, that men can never
Speaker 10: be women, and in terms of real world practical consequences,
Speaker 10: it means that men can no longer self identify or
Speaker 10: identify into women only spaces, women only sports, women only services.
Speaker 10: So it's huge, But yes, Australia as miles behind.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 8: Peter Dutton was asked about this the Conservative Alternative as
Speaker 8: for Prime Minister and he skipped it. He was worried
Speaker 8: about answering this. I think we've actually got the clip
Speaker 8: and said, yeah, what do you think about the groundbreaking
Speaker 8: decision in the UK Supreme.
Speaker 9: It's an election, he said, It's not an election issue.
Speaker 4: It's not in front of his.
Speaker 8: From because we are now becoming an outlier.
Speaker 14: We have.
Speaker 8: In Melbourne we've got a sexual predator, someone who attacked
Speaker 8: women and children housed in a women's prison. I mean,
Speaker 8: this is something that around the world has seen governments
Speaker 8: for We saw Scotland change in leader because of this issue.
Speaker 8: It has happened here just with that little debate. Why
Speaker 8: do you think Australia or our politicians are so hesitant
Speaker 8: to tackle this issue?
Speaker 10: Oh God, I mean, there's a host of reasons. I
Speaker 10: think the big one is that they seem to just
Speaker 10: be terrified of the activists who have taken over our institutions, media, government, everything, healthcare, education.
Speaker 10: They've sort of infiltrated everywhere. And to be honest, I
Speaker 10: think that fear is somewhat founded, because you know, we've
Speaker 10: seen obviously people getting canceled, We've seen women dragged for
Speaker 10: tribunals and courts for valification and dissemination for saying that
Speaker 10: men cannot be women. But I also think that it
Speaker 10: is somewhat not found in the sense that the ordinary
Speaker 10: person thinks of stuff as ridiculous. The ordinary person knows
Speaker 10: the mean can evy woman. They know that human beings
Speaker 10: canot change sex, and so I think if the politicians
Speaker 10: actually talk to the people prosecuted the argument, which isn't
Speaker 10: that hard to make, yes, that women deserves six base rights,
Speaker 10: they deserve in their only spaces, then I think that
Speaker 10: there showing population, the is showing people would actually say
Speaker 10: that makes sense, that's right.
Speaker 1: Will let me remind you, Rachel. I probably don't need
Speaker 1: to remind you, but you're a good friend and our
Speaker 1: good friend as well. Catherine Deeves was an elected you know,
Speaker 1: stood as a candidate, was a candidate at the last election,
Speaker 1: and the Liberal Party silenced her from speaking about this issue,
Speaker 1: which is an issue she's been passionate about and she
Speaker 1: deserves to also be congratulated or be celebrating this victory.
Speaker 1: Just to check my Peter Dutton impression, let's have a
Speaker 1: look at the real thing and see how very good
Speaker 1: it was very good one.
Speaker 20: That's a matter obviously it's been before the British courts.
Speaker 20: I haven't seen the detail of the case and it's
Speaker 20: not something that I think front of mine's at this
Speaker 20: election pretty good.
Speaker 4: Really well, it's not everyone in in the Liberal Party.
Speaker 4: I mean Senator Claire Chandler has been a huge supporter.
Speaker 4: She tried to bring about a change to the Sex
Speaker 4: Discrimination Act a few years ago, but it was voted down.
Speaker 4: Pauline Hanson, as I revealed in my documentary recently about
Speaker 4: this issue and how it's impacting women's sports, is bringing
Speaker 4: legislation before the parliament again, she said after the new
Speaker 4: parliament forms. But Rachel, I mean we've seen a few
Speaker 4: cases in fact in court this week. I saw you
Speaker 4: at a hearing for Kierly Smith, the political advocate who
Speaker 4: has been taken to court by two trans athletes, trans
Speaker 4: football players who are taking action suing her for vilification
Speaker 4: because she basically said they cannot play in women's sports.
Speaker 4: Men cannot be women. Do you think that the case
Speaker 4: in the UK will have an impact on how our
Speaker 4: judges rule here? I mean.
Speaker 10: How a judges here is really going to depend on
Speaker 10: our own laws and how they're interpreted. And so with
Speaker 10: cases like Kerales who's been sued for qualification, with cases
Speaker 10: like sALS who's been sued for discrimination, it will depend
Speaker 10: on how the judges interpret the laws. And the question
Speaker 10: is in Australia is are our laws currently being interpreted
Speaker 10: incorrectly in the sense that actually we do have sex
Speaker 10: based protections like they have in the UK, like they
Speaker 10: always had, but which were interpreted incorrectly and applied incorrectly
Speaker 10: by activist institutions and put in.
Speaker 9: Place in policies.
Speaker 10: Or is it the case that our parliaments have actually
Speaker 10: done the dirty on women across Australia and actually a
Speaker 10: raise women's sex based rights. And so that's the question
Speaker 10: that needs to be answered. I think what's absolutely disgraceful
Speaker 10: is that it is input on the shoulders of women
Speaker 10: to fight these cases through the couse to try and
Speaker 10: get judgments in favor of women, in favor of their
Speaker 10: sex based rights, when our politicians could actually just step
Speaker 10: in and they could in actual legislation that this is
Speaker 10: the amendment, the Gulard amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act
Speaker 10: in twenty thirteen, which have really muddy the waters around
Speaker 10: women's expat rights. Or they could introduce legislation and clarify things,
Speaker 10: but they haven't because they're gutless and honestly, this week
Speaker 10: with Peter Dubban's comments, I was so disappointed because the
Speaker 10: UK decision, it was an open goal for him to
Speaker 10: be like, look look at the common sense over in
Speaker 10: the UK, look at what they're doing. We can do
Speaker 10: this too, But instead he just completely fonds.
Speaker 8: It's incredible because this is an eighty twenty issue, perhaps
Speaker 8: it's a ninety ten issue, yes, where ninety percent of
Speaker 8: the population has been abandoned not just by laborer and
Speaker 8: the Greens.
Speaker 9: But by the coalition, the activist class.
Speaker 8: All of the politicians are siding with these radical.
Speaker 9: Gender theorists against the.
Speaker 8: Overwhelming majority opinion that is biological reality exists. Men shouldn't
Speaker 8: be in women's sport, men shouldn't be in women's shelters
Speaker 8: and prisons and change rooms like these are not controversial views,
Speaker 8: and yet our conservative politicians are too scared to take
Speaker 8: a stand on this.
Speaker 1: It's an issue that would win. It's across the across
Speaker 1: the spectrum, particularly in the western Southern And sorry, we're
Speaker 1: running out of time at Rachel great news, terrific, keep
Speaker 1: up the great fight. Many so many Australians, men and women,
Speaker 1: and there's only men and women we now know behind
Speaker 1: you here Australia.
Speaker 10: One of the few journalists Sky News actually platform in
Speaker 10: this issue and talking about it because it's so incredibly
Speaker 10: important in so many and the media class, the political
Speaker 10: class have ignored it.
Speaker 8: So we're really well, they haven't completely ignored it, because
Speaker 8: I regularly see articles that are incoherent, that are deliberately
Speaker 8: mangled because they want to respect they then pronouns, so
Speaker 8: they're turning like it is just nonsensical, and they've seen
Speaker 8: them do this even with convicted criminals who have decided
Speaker 8: for a bit of attention seeking, I'm not identifying as
Speaker 8: they then respect my pronouns and they will and they
Speaker 8: will deliberately mangle the English language.
Speaker 9: To do so. So the media is part of the
Speaker 9: activist class when it comes.
Speaker 1: To keep up the fight. Rachel, Great, We're happy easter
Speaker 1: coming up after the break. We've got some net zany
Speaker 1: wakademia for you here on outside is bagnetic. You're watching
Speaker 1: outside is an happy easter, So good to have you
Speaker 1: with us on this beautiful Easter morning. Well, net Zany,
Speaker 1: now here's this is the world of climate alarmism, climate
Speaker 1: doomsdaysm ooh, here's how you go about putting off your voters,
Speaker 1: those who would naturally vote for you. Have a listener to, mister.
Speaker 20: I believe in climate change and that is a reality.
Speaker 20: It's why we've adopted our position in relation to zero
Speaker 20: by twenty fifty.
Speaker 1: I believe in climate change. Blah blah blah blah blah blah. Seriously, seriously,
Speaker 1: maybe the ABC, I'm going to vote for you. The
Speaker 1: Guardian readers, I'm going to vote for you. The Sydney
Speaker 1: Morning Held Herald readers, I'm going to vote for you.
Speaker 1: That is just insanity, That is net Zany. This country's
Speaker 1: prosperity is being destroyed by the net zero agenda. Full stop.
Speaker 1: You cannot talk about the cost of living, reader and
Speaker 1: Caroline unless you're prepared to debate getting rid of the
Speaker 1: net zero restrictions, subsidies, etc. Which are destroying our economy.
Speaker 8: If I had a dollar for every time I've said
Speaker 8: this on Sky, i'd have I don't know, six to
Speaker 8: seven hundred dollars, and I'm getting sick of repeating it.
Speaker 8: But you cannot have a cost of election, sorry, cost
Speaker 8: of living election and not tackle the energy issue.
Speaker 9: It is the number one issue.
Speaker 8: It goes into everything we purchase, It goes into It's
Speaker 8: not just the household bills that are crippling. It is
Speaker 8: every product you purchase. It's every manufacturer, it's every business.
Speaker 8: It's every restaurant you go to that as struggling to
Speaker 8: pay their energy bills. This is the most significant issue,
Speaker 8: and yet it's.
Speaker 9: They're just being half pregnant with it. You can't be
Speaker 9: half pregnant.
Speaker 8: You've got to say we are priorities ties in cost
Speaker 8: and reliability above emissions, and we're unapologetic about it.
Speaker 9: We are not We're not going to apologize to climate alarmist.
Speaker 8: Anyone who has climate change or emissions as a top
Speaker 8: three issue isn't voting for the coal issue as sooner
Speaker 8: they realize that, the easier it will be for them
Speaker 8: to actually articulate a clear position. I think this obsession
Speaker 8: with winning back the Till seats is again seeing them
Speaker 8: disregard the outer suburbs, the region.
Speaker 1: Seats by agreeing with the Teals, by saying the Tals
Speaker 1: are idiots because of this from.
Speaker 4: A purely political perspective, like put aside all the crazy
Speaker 4: ideology stuff, how can you win back people when you're
Speaker 4: just presenting a much lighter version of what the alternative is.
Speaker 9: So you're preventing Yeah, I say weaker.
Speaker 8: I think weally want to even these things, and if
Speaker 8: you want to base your vote on it, then you
Speaker 8: want someone who is a true believer and who's strong.
Speaker 9: And Labor believe this stuff.
Speaker 8: So you've got to respect Labor for actually putting forward
Speaker 8: policies that they believe in. The Coalition, on the other hand,
Speaker 8: are putting forward policies that they're half believing that they
Speaker 8: kind of you know, are on board with, but they
Speaker 8: see some issues.
Speaker 9: It was like for.
Speaker 8: When ten months they couldn't come to a position on
Speaker 8: the Voice, they would come up with objections to it, but.
Speaker 9: They couldn't say, nah, this is a bad idea. It
Speaker 9: took ten months.
Speaker 1: And then when they did the landslide, thinking what's the lesson?
Speaker 1: What's the lesson we should have learn from the Voice?
Speaker 21: I don't know, guys, have we got some focus on
Speaker 21: charts or the ABC said that I believe in climaty oh,
Speaker 21: I've been I believe in I mean, seriously, did you
Speaker 21: want to win this selection?
Speaker 1: It drives me.
Speaker 4: Nuts speaking of the Voice and of the teals and
Speaker 4: renewable energy. There's a story today in the Daily Telegraph
Speaker 4: that our own Peter Kredlin has investigated along with James Willis,
Speaker 4: one of their reporters on the newspaper, about how comedian
Speaker 4: Dan Ilich, he's a lefty comedian and writer, does a
Speaker 4: lot of TV stuff. He's been receiving six hundred thousand
Speaker 4: dollars almost from the Climate two hundred to push anti
Speaker 4: coalition campaigns, to push renewable energy. Almost six hundred thousand.
Speaker 4: This was in the last election, a half a million.
Speaker 4: We don't know how much he may have received in
Speaker 4: this election. He's refused to answer questions about it, and
Speaker 4: we won't get the AEC. The Electoral Commission's log until
Speaker 4: later this year, well after the election. But he's the
Speaker 4: director of a company called It's Not a Race, and
Speaker 4: I've obtained a Facebook page that he used to have
Speaker 4: birth for this company. Then he changed it, he phoenixed
Speaker 4: it into a referendum supporting page, and then it became
Speaker 4: another page called Goal with a Wind. It was a
Speaker 4: pro offshore wind in the Illawarra south of Sydney, New
Speaker 4: South Wales.
Speaker 9: It made it lotable, little skips.
Speaker 4: Very profitable. It had six and a half thousand followers
Speaker 4: on the page, and it made it look like it
Speaker 4: had that many supporters six and a half thousand followers
Speaker 4: on the Facebook page for offshore win because it used to.
Speaker 8: Be pitiful million.
Speaker 1: We've got to take a short break.
Speaker 4: Late to discuss more genuine to many local supporters.
Speaker 1: Monique Ryan's nonsense the other day about not being able
Speaker 1: to say whether or not politicians should be declaring who's
Speaker 1: paying to endorse them? Don't go anywhere. Plenty more to
Speaker 1: come up here on outside back in eighty Hello, and
Speaker 1: howas you're watching Outsiders with the radiant Treeta Panahee, myself
Speaker 1: Ruandin and the delightful Caroline Marcus comming in for James Morrow.
Speaker 1: Great to have Caroline here. I was intrigued by this
Speaker 1: article in the Australian newspaper during the week saying that quote,
Speaker 1: A depleted Hamas is so low on cash that it
Speaker 1: cannot pay its fighters. Take that in, A depleted Hamas
Speaker 1: is so low on cash that it cannot pay its fighters.
Speaker 1: So much for the lefty clap trap that there's no
Speaker 1: point killing terrorists because for every Hamas fighter you kill,
Speaker 1: another one pops up. No, not true, less money coming in,
Speaker 1: fewer terrorists. It's a pretty simple equation to get your
Speaker 1: head around. Hamas used the flow of humanitarian and commercial
Speaker 1: goods to build new income streams. According to Arab, Israeli
Speaker 1: and Western officials, Hamas also has used overseas cash m
Speaker 1: to buy humanitarian goods that has then sold in Gaza
Speaker 1: and turned back into cash. The officials said Hamas was
Speaker 1: nearing a liquidity crisis before the January cease fire brought
Speaker 1: an influx of aid into Gaza, giving the group a
Speaker 1: chance to refill its coffers. The Israelian Western officials said,
Speaker 1: so those pathways closed when Israel sealed Gaza's borders. To
Speaker 1: humanitarian supplies in March. So what a surprise. It turns
Speaker 1: out the terrorists rely on cash to pay many of
Speaker 1: their fighters. As I said, let's cash, fewer fighters. Let's
Speaker 1: not forget a few things now. It has been shown
Speaker 1: repeatedly and unequivocally that there were and may still be
Speaker 1: very strong links between the United Nations Relief and Works
Speaker 1: Agency ANOIR and HAMAS, which allow me to point out
Speaker 1: I've been warning about four years on this show, and
Speaker 1: indeed this show was the first to raise this issue
Speaker 1: nearly a decade ago, an one of the main suppliers
Speaker 1: of so called humanitarian aid and to Gaza. Not only
Speaker 1: have many ANWA employees been found to be active members
Speaker 1: of HAMAS, but ANOA themselves were linked to schools in
Speaker 1: which young Ghas and children were taught to hate Jews
Speaker 1: and how to murder them, some even acting terrorism raids
Speaker 1: out in school plays and other ceremonies. Let us not
Speaker 1: also forget that it was these women, the teals, the
Speaker 1: so called Party of Integrity, aleeg Respender, Kate Cheney, Monique
Speaker 1: Ryan Zari Steggel, Zoey Daniels, Sophie Scamp who all eagerly
Speaker 1: signed this letter, this letter in which all the Teals,
Speaker 1: every single one of them, demanded the Australian government urgently
Speaker 1: find other ways yes this letter, to deliver humanitarian aid
Speaker 1: to Gaza, or otherwise to restore hummanitarian aid funding to
Speaker 1: ANOA with Australian taxpayers hard earned money. This despite years
Speaker 1: of repeated warnings about the now proven links between some
Speaker 1: Hamas and AUNOIR members and the horrific pay for slave
Speaker 1: policies where yes, Hamas pay cash and other awards for
Speaker 1: the murder of Jews. Trump is now canceled more than
Speaker 1: one hundred million going annually to Aunwar, but tens of
Speaker 1: millions of dollars carry on flowing into unwise coffers, largely
Speaker 1: thanks to Penny Wong resuming funding with the support and
Speaker 1: eager encouragement of the Teals. In my opinion, this country
Speaker 1: needs to purge the poisonous, toxic Teals out of the
Speaker 1: political system altogether. They are a danger to our democracy.
Speaker 1: Sanctimonious individuals who pretend they operate on some higher moral
Speaker 1: plane of caring for the environment, when in fact all
Speaker 1: they do is represent the base, grubby interests of the
Speaker 1: renewables lobby and those greedy investors who rely not on
Speaker 1: genuine market success but on siphoning off endless taxpayer funded subsidies.
Speaker 1: Can Next week spectat Australia which I'm the editor, I
Speaker 1: argue that the Coalition can still win this election. Yes,
Speaker 1: I'm an optimist, I always have been. I believe that
Speaker 1: to be the case. That is, I'm sorry to say,
Speaker 1: despite the Coalition themselves and the very very poor campaign
Speaker 1: they have run, which we've been talking about, but it
Speaker 1: is never too late. They can win. But to do
Speaker 1: so they need to put Jacintin and perjymper Price and
Speaker 1: Andrew Hasty to the forefront of the campaign in the
Speaker 1: remaining two weeks. Do it now? Do it today? We
Speaker 1: need the plain talking, common sense Jacina to expose the
Speaker 1: vast waste of misdirected money, even corruption within certain parts
Speaker 1: of the so called First Nations industry. And with Chinese
Speaker 1: warships circling our coastlines and Russians looking for an army
Speaker 1: base in Indonesia, we need Andrew Hasty, a former SAS officer,
Speaker 1: on the frontline arguing for our defense. Do everyday Australians
Speaker 1: really yearn for three more years of this mob of
Speaker 1: undergraduate socialists running or should I say, ruining our beautiful country?
Speaker 1: Do we want our kids to be even further trillions
Speaker 1: of dollars in debt? Do we want three more years
Speaker 1: of heart failure every time we open our electricity bill
Speaker 1: and it has gone higher and higher and higher to
Speaker 1: satisfy the climate insanity, ideological madness of Chris Bowen and
Speaker 1: the Greens and the toxic teals. Do we seriously want
Speaker 1: unrealized capital gains on our super being taxed by Labour's thieves?
Speaker 1: Do we want changes to negative gearing and capital gains?
Speaker 1: Do we want man to tread net zero emissions reporting?
Speaker 1: Do we really want more and more unemployment and all
Speaker 1: the shall despair and tragedy that inevitably accompanies unemployment? Do
Speaker 1: we really want three more years of ever increasing hardcore
Speaker 1: left wing culture was nonsense? Just imagine how arrogant and
Speaker 1: emboldened the likes of union hacks Tony Burke and Katie
Speaker 1: Gallagher and Murray Watt and voice agitator Malanderie McCarthy will
Speaker 1: be if Labor gets a second term minority or majority.
Speaker 1: Do we want truth telling and treaties? Prepare yourself, your family,
Speaker 1: your loved ones, your colleagues and your hopes and dreams
Speaker 1: for unabashed union power on steroids. Penalty rates on steroids,
Speaker 1: driving more and more cafes, shops, and small businesses, restaurants
Speaker 1: to the war. Business bankruptcies already at the highest on record.
Speaker 1: We'll see business bankruptcies on steroids, red green and black
Speaker 1: tape throttling the nation and our future prosperity. Do we
Speaker 1: want more ghastly windmills up and down beautiful coastlines? Do
Speaker 1: we want transmission lines and solar factories devastating our farmlands
Speaker 1: and our natural bush? Do we want indigenous activism on steroids?
Speaker 1: What's going to be closed next? What mountain? What beach?
Speaker 1: Do we want? Pro Palestinian street chaos on steroids? Hatred
Speaker 1: of traditional Australia on steroids, Our proud history being trashed
Speaker 1: and vandalized because that is what these people represent. We
Speaker 1: have seen this labor government and its so called values
Speaker 1: on display for three years and they are ugly, myopic, divisive, racist,
Speaker 1: anti Israel and economically devastating. More lies, more stupidity and
Speaker 1: more arrogance awaits us if they get back in, as
Speaker 1: Caroline will detail shortly. This week we saw Labour's Attorney General,
Speaker 1: Mark Dreyfus preference the Greens as number two on his ticket.
Speaker 1: That tells you everything you need to know about what
Speaker 1: Liz had head if Labor is re elected. Albanesi Albow
Speaker 1: maybe a buffournish, in articulate clown, but particularly but politically,
Speaker 1: he is a dangerous undergraduate socialist who has never held
Speaker 1: what you or I would call a decent, productive job
Speaker 1: in the free market, and who has displayed hardcore communist sympathies.
Speaker 1: Let nobody ever forget this is the real, unvarnished, unblemished,
Speaker 1: raw and authentic Anthony Albanesi caught on film. I don't
Speaker 1: know about you, but I didn't spend my youth out
Speaker 1: on the streets marching against Israel and the Jews, unlike Albo.
Speaker 1: I was too busy earning a crust, setting up my
Speaker 1: own business, paying my own way in the world, employing people,
Speaker 1: priding myself when never taking a red scent from the government.
Speaker 1: But look at Albert. Does a leopard ever really change
Speaker 1: its spots? Just take a look at how eerily eerily
Speaker 1: similar that demonstration albo Is filmed in his youth is
Speaker 1: to what we have witnessed time and time again for
Speaker 1: the last eighteen months on our streets and our universities
Speaker 1: under this man's leadership for sixty seventh Strike Sunday Pro
Speaker 1: Palestine Chance Echo through Melbourne CBD. Do the Australian people
Speaker 1: seriously want three more years of this malarkey? I don't
Speaker 1: think so. It's Easter and we're all having a beautiful weekend.
Speaker 1: But if you're having those family lunches or conversations, do
Speaker 1: you best try and explain to those who are gullible
Speaker 1: enough to believe Labour's lies or the teals fraudulentcy, that
Speaker 1: there is a real choice at this election, and that
Speaker 1: choice is between a future of crippling debts, impoverishment, a
Speaker 1: pathetic nation dominated by greedy, corrupt unions, undergraduate socialism and
Speaker 1: left wing lunacy, or a chance at reviving this nation's
Speaker 1: economic prospects. So we can, to coin phrase, the coalitions
Speaker 1: stupidly and foolishly seem terrified to utter make Australia great again.
Speaker 1: My only question to those who don't want to make
Speaker 1: Australia great again? What do you want to do the opposite?
Speaker 1: In which case I've got the perfect slogan for you.
Speaker 1: Vote Labor, Greens and teals and make Australia worse again.
Speaker 1: Joining us now, Esther Craku in London. Esther, great to
Speaker 1: see you and thank you so much for staying up
Speaker 1: later as you do to come on outside as we
Speaker 1: certainly do appreciate it. So great news. This week we've
Speaker 1: been talking about the ramifications for Australia, but the UK
Speaker 1: Supreme Court ruling something Esther, you've talked about many times
Speaker 1: we've talked about together on this show and others. Helloa you,
Speaker 1: I thought we have to have that ruling, legal ruling,
Speaker 1: but I'm delighted to tell you that essolate you for
Speaker 1: one now in the UK you are a woman because
Speaker 1: you are a woman, So congratulations. But where did this
Speaker 1: come from? What's the background and what's been the reaction
Speaker 1: in the UK to the ruling that a woman is
Speaker 1: a biological one.
Speaker 17: Well, the reaction has.
Speaker 22: Been obviously one of celebration, but in many corners, you know,
Speaker 22: horror and amusement by the Labor government which for some
Speaker 22: reason didn't see this coming.
Speaker 17: This all started because.
Speaker 22: For Women's Scotland, which is a women's group based in Scotland,
Speaker 22: I decided to take a case up to the Supreme
Speaker 22: Court asking them to clarify what a woman is for
Speaker 22: the matter of legal issues when it comes to women's spaces,
Speaker 22: for example, women in hospitals, in terms of policing and
Speaker 22: all of that. And the Supreme Court, contrary to popular belief,
Speaker 22: didn't create legislation. It just reiterated what legislation already had existed,
Speaker 22: visa vid. The twenty ten Equality Act, which said that
Speaker 22: actually what it meant in the Equality Act when it
Speaker 22: referred to as women to women was actual biological women.
Speaker 17: There's no other kinds of women.
Speaker 22: And the reason why this is called such a stir
Speaker 22: is because trans individuals and transactivists have argued that since
Speaker 22: the passing of the Gender Recognition Act in twenty two
Speaker 22: thousand and four and the ability of trans identifying individuals
Speaker 22: to have a gender Recognition specificate which is just a
Speaker 22: piece of paper, really that their legal sex was recognized
Speaker 22: as whatever they identified with and therefore in law they
Speaker 22: are women, which, of course the Supreme Court said, actually, no,
Speaker 22: the GRC is just a document to recognize your trans
Speaker 22: identifying status. But that does not mean that is a
Speaker 22: magic wand which somehow makes a man a woman.
Speaker 17: No amount of tucking, makeup.
Speaker 22: Or witchcraft is going to make a biological man a woman,
Speaker 22: and thankfully the Supreme Court has just said so.
Speaker 17: It shouldn't have got this far.
Speaker 22: The actual controversies around whether the Supreme courtureal even this
Speaker 22: is a very strong one.
Speaker 17: Because Parliament is sovereign in the UK.
Speaker 22: The Supreme Court is one of those sort of archaic
Speaker 22: remnants of Blair's government where he tries to subvert the
Speaker 22: sovereign the sovereignty of Parliament at every given turn. However,
Speaker 22: we do welcome this one sensible decision by this court
Speaker 22: of unelected judges that we still don't know how to
Speaker 22: get rid of, because it's drawn a line in the
Speaker 22: sund and it's saying, moving forward, this is how public
Speaker 22: policy must operate.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 22: If we have to have a woman's only spaces and
Speaker 22: then other that's fine. I'm pretty sure men wouldn't mind,
Speaker 22: because they don't seem to face any significant threats from
Speaker 22: transmen as women do from trans women. But this is
Speaker 22: this is a very important step because enough is enough.
Speaker 22: We've had so many discussions around this, and women are
Speaker 22: rightly agitated by the fact that are hard fought for
Speaker 22: spaces and rights are being trampled upon by people who
Speaker 22: somehow feel like they can circumvent the law or create
Speaker 22: new legislation out of nothing.
Speaker 8: Great, well, there's already moves according to the Male. The
Speaker 8: Scottish Males front page.
Speaker 9: Says ministers ministers.
Speaker 8: In What's at plot to defy trans ruling. So obviously
Speaker 8: these labor ministers, who are very much on board with
Speaker 8: this radical gender ideology, want to subvert this ruling.
Speaker 9: What's going to be the reaction from.
Speaker 8: The public, because I would have thought this landmark decision
Speaker 8: was enormously popular with most Brits.
Speaker 22: Well, yes, this is one of the things that's going
Speaker 22: to prove to be a pr disaster for labor. Would
Speaker 22: you believe that the labor government has had very little
Speaker 22: to say about this, even though in effect of all
Speaker 22: aspects of prosibility, from education to policing to healthcare, They've
Speaker 22: had very little to say about this and what this
Speaker 22: means for the UK going forward and whether they're going
Speaker 22: to draft new guidelines other than we welcome the ruling.
Speaker 22: It's no surprise that Kirstamo's on holiday during this week,
Speaker 22: even though this ruling has been anticipated for months. I'm
Speaker 22: sure he didn't want to be caught on doing any
Speaker 22: press where he has been asked what is a woman?
Speaker 22: And because he seems to be one of a few
Speaker 22: people that think that one percent of the female population
Speaker 22: has a penis, so cinly this is going.
Speaker 17: To be a pr heading for the Labor Party.
Speaker 22: And if you've, if for some reason you've run out
Speaker 22: of things to dislike the Labor government for oh, I
Speaker 22: don't know, housing crisis, high energy bills, lack of policing,
Speaker 22: the fact that hundreds of strange men from really random
Speaker 22: parts of the world are turning up on our shows
Speaker 22: on a daily basis. I mean, you can just add
Speaker 22: the fact that they don't actually respect or believe that
Speaker 22: women do and should exist in their own right to
Speaker 22: that list.
Speaker 4: Oh well, a line we could say much the same
Speaker 4: about our own government and opposition here as well as do.
Speaker 4: I want to move on to the talks between a
Speaker 4: Cirkia Starmer and Donald Trump. They've discussed having ongoing and
Speaker 4: productive trade talks. Obviously, this is after Trump imposed unveiled
Speaker 4: his ten percent tariffs on the UK and a higher
Speaker 4: twenty five percent rate for imports of car, steel and aluminium.
Speaker 4: Is the hope that sir Starmer will be able to
Speaker 4: reverse some of those or how do you think those
Speaker 4: two will get on.
Speaker 22: So it's been interesting that we've been seeing a drip
Speaker 22: feeding of this kind of like the pending deal between
Speaker 22: the UK and the US on the trade front. And
Speaker 22: it's certainly something that the Kiss Starmer's PR team are
Speaker 22: really trying to push because, like Boris Johnson, when things
Speaker 22: are not going great at home, you try and get
Speaker 22: a win on the FEI in a first runt. He
Speaker 22: did the same with Ukraine, and Kis Starmer is not
Speaker 22: trying to do the same.
Speaker 17: With the US.
Speaker 22: The reality is, though we keep hearing about this wonderful deal,
Speaker 22: when Kis Starmer and his government primarily are really trying
Speaker 22: to cozy up to the EU, which Donald Trump doesn't
Speaker 22: have a lot of patience for. So I don't have
Speaker 22: a lot of faith that there's going to be some
Speaker 22: great deal in the making. And we also know that
Speaker 22: the American government, according to what they're saying, has over
Speaker 22: seventy countries lined up trying to make a trade deal
Speaker 22: with the US. Quite frankly, the UK a small fish
Speaker 22: in the grand scheme of things. I mean, they're complaining
Speaker 22: that the America's tariffs on our steel industry is going
Speaker 22: to make us uncompetitive. Guess what we've done that all
Speaker 22: by ourselves. We have the highest energy prices in the
Speaker 22: industrial world. Our steel market is highly uncompetitive because it's
Speaker 22: too expensive to produce anything here or to employ people here.
Speaker 22: Net zero is killing us. We've managed to kill off
Speaker 22: our own industries by ourselves. The American tariffs are not
Speaker 22: going to do anything for an industry that barely exists
Speaker 22: in its own right. So there are many things that
Speaker 22: the UK government has to set right. And looking to
Speaker 22: Donald Trump to somehow save us with what will probably
Speaker 22: be not a very good deal on our end is
Speaker 22: not going to cut it, and Kiss and his government
Speaker 22: have to do a lot of soul searching if I
Speaker 22: had to recommend anything. The probably most horrific thing that's
Speaker 22: dragging down the British.
Speaker 17: Economy at the moment is net.
Speaker 22: Zero and our high energy prices and the fact that
Speaker 22: our government has said or done nothing about it, and
Speaker 22: to make matters worse, has made the glorified inbecile.
Speaker 17: That is Ed Millerband, the.
Speaker 22: Energy Secretary, who couldn't be more detached from reality. He
Speaker 22: keeps saying that that zero is going to reduce our
Speaker 22: energy bills.
Speaker 1: Guess what.
Speaker 22: Since twenty ten the UK has invested over three hundred
Speaker 22: and fifty billion pounds into renewable energy, and our energy
Speaker 22: prices keep.
Speaker 17: Going up and up. When pro tell are we going
Speaker 17: to see these cheap energy bills? No one knows esther.
Speaker 1: If you think Ed millerband is a clown, wait till
Speaker 1: you meet our very own Chris Bow. And I mean
Speaker 1: we can beat that. We can't often beat Britain, but
Speaker 1: on that, on that instance, actually they're pretty much now.
Speaker 9: Irk cool, I reckon this is bad.
Speaker 8: Yeah, the numbers have been plunged into energy poverty in
Speaker 8: the UK is shapeful.
Speaker 1: It really is just wanted to ask us to quickly about.
Speaker 1: It is easter, and yet we've seen these kind of
Speaker 1: massive pro Palestinian marches which you quite understandably upset a
Speaker 1: lot of people on Good Friday and so on, tell
Speaker 1: us about this.
Speaker 22: So this latest protest in South End and Essex happened
Speaker 22: during passover, which you would really think there would be
Speaker 22: limits to these sorts of process, but apparently not.
Speaker 17: And this only happened in front of many synagogues that.
Speaker 22: Are actually being told well, the police told these protesters
Speaker 22: to avoid these areas because obviously they're observing their religious holidays. Now,
Speaker 22: funnily enough, it looks like the British police have completely
Speaker 22: given up because actually, not only do they not give
Speaker 22: permission to these protesters, they didn't do anything when these
Speaker 22: protesters decided to go ahead at a time when this
Speaker 22: country is celebrating significant religious festivals like Easter, like Passover.
Speaker 22: This cultural enrichment we've been told we've been getting because
Speaker 22: of diversity, it's still lacking.
Speaker 17: We're still looking for it because.
Speaker 22: For some reason we're seeing these hateful marches that are
Speaker 22: actually advocating for a lot of terrorists, assigned terrorist groups
Speaker 22: in the UK, on the streets of towns in our country.
Speaker 22: So it's really just a completely horrifying situation. I cannot
Speaker 22: believe how much this country has changed within the last
Speaker 22: fifteen to twenty years, and this is just one of
Speaker 22: the symptoms of it.
Speaker 8: Now, I'm on board with everything you just said. Just quickly,
Speaker 8: just back on the tariff issue. This is big deal
Speaker 8: for the UK. The US is your biggest export partner.
Speaker 8: I think around fifteen percent of everything you export goes
Speaker 8: to the US is kiss star in any sort of
Speaker 8: position to negotiate an advantageous still because he has said
Speaker 8: some things in the past, plenty of his ministers have
Speaker 8: said things that have put them on the wrong side
Speaker 8: of the Trump administration.
Speaker 17: Well not really, I think.
Speaker 22: Actually Kiirsalmer's biggest problem is his own cabinet and his
Speaker 22: cabinet picks. He has people like David Lammie who's hopeless
Speaker 22: as for and seconds and ad miller Band who have
Speaker 22: no idea what they're doing and who again it looks
Speaker 22: like like many in the Australian government have never had
Speaker 22: a proper job in their lives.
Speaker 17: So actually what is.
Speaker 22: Really the albatross around at kis Starmer's next is the
Speaker 22: people that he has around them now. Unfortunately, it looks
Speaker 22: like instead of trying to cozy up to the Americans
Speaker 22: and get a favorable deal, they look like they're going
Speaker 22: to be closing up to China because our trade with
Speaker 22: China actually has been increasing about ten percent every year
Speaker 22: and they have a stronger foothold in our financial services.
Speaker 22: Next year are regulations on steel laps, which means as
Speaker 22: we're anticipating an influx of Chinese steel, which is to
Speaker 22: be expected because we would probably be the only large
Speaker 22: steel markets left after Donald Trump's tariffs and certainly the
Speaker 22: EUS tariffs, So it doesn't really look like, you know,
Speaker 22: Kisam is going to get much out of the Americans,
Speaker 22: and he's going to pivot towards China, which has many
Speaker 22: national security implications, and not to mention the fact that
Speaker 22: we have basically crumbled our own domestic industries to the
Speaker 22: extent that we have no choice but to rely on
Speaker 22: the Chinese.
Speaker 1: And there you going need Zara again, Esta Cracking, Thanks
Speaker 1: so much for chatting to us. Happy Easter to you
Speaker 1: there in London, and we'll speak again soon. Plenty more
Speaker 1: to come up here on Outsiders after the break, don't
Speaker 1: go away back in a tick.
Speaker 4: Welcome back to the Outsiders. I'm Caroline Marcus here today
Speaker 4: with my brother from another mother, Arantine and my sister
Speaker 4: from another mister Rita panahy Well. Mark Dreyfus is not
Speaker 4: only Australia's Attorney General, our most senior Jewish member of government.
Speaker 4: And there's a Yiddish word which in another time may
Speaker 4: have been used to describe someone who reached such a
Speaker 4: high office. Mensh. It means a good person, moral, decent, upstanding.
Speaker 4: But there's another foreign word that comes to mind about
Speaker 4: the top law officer in the country, Kappo. It's a
Speaker 4: German word for the Jewish concentration camp inmates who collaborated
Speaker 4: with the Nazis to survive. And that's the word that
Speaker 4: struck me when I learned Mark Dreyfus, again, our most
Speaker 4: powerful Jewish Australian, had betrayed his own people by striking
Speaker 4: a deal with the Greens. Mister Dreyfus has told supporters
Speaker 4: to preference a Greens candidate. Now, of course, I'm not
Speaker 4: saying that Dreyfus is in fact literally collaborating with Nazis
Speaker 4: in case anyone who's can used, but it's a backflip
Speaker 4: and a betrayal to Jews to hear Dreyfus has done
Speaker 4: a preference deal despite previously slamming the fringe Protest Party
Speaker 4: for encouraging criminal damage of MP's offices and for failing
Speaker 4: to condemn her Maas.
Speaker 23: Does Harmas need to be dismantled?
Speaker 24: Listen, The situation with Hamas is that it has nothing.
Speaker 24: I can't keep repeating it again and again. It has
Speaker 24: nothing to do with Palestinian statehood and Palestinian self.
Speaker 1: Now, the question was we have that.
Speaker 24: The Palestinians need to decide where they want to go.
Speaker 23: So if they choose Hamas, that's okay.
Speaker 24: David, that is such. What can I say, Like, we're
Speaker 24: creating this hypothetical.
Speaker 1: Scenario, should it be dismantled?
Speaker 24: Hamas is an organization that exists in the region that
Speaker 24: we are talking about here, right, Who is going to
Speaker 24: who will dismantle it?
Speaker 23: Sure you're able to say where you'd like to see them.
Speaker 24: Gone, and it's not up to me to see who
Speaker 24: should be.
Speaker 4: Gone or not. Ladies and gentlemen, the Greens in a nutshell.
Speaker 4: But fast forward to an election campaign and now Dreyfus
Speaker 4: is how to vote cards instruct supporters to mark two
Speaker 4: for Greens candidate Matthew Kerwin, a regular at pro Palestinian rallies,
Speaker 4: who has vowed to use his platform to support sanctions
Speaker 4: and an arms embargo on Israel, and who himself attended
Speaker 4: an anti Israel protest outside Housing Minister Claire O'Neill's office
Speaker 4: last year, the exact type of protest for which Dreyfus
Speaker 4: has previously denounced the Greens. So why this backflip? Alike
Speaker 4: the Capos and the Nazis, Dreyfus doesn't need the Greens
Speaker 4: to survive. I Zick's his seat is a safe flavor electorate,
Speaker 4: which he holds on a very cushy nine point five
Speaker 4: percent margin. In fact, the electorate is named in honor
Speaker 4: of another Jewish Australian, Sir Isaac Isaacs, Australia's first Jewish
Speaker 4: Attorney General, Justice of the High Court and Governor General.
Speaker 4: Drapers's fellow Victorian Jewish MP, Josh Burns, had already shown
Speaker 4: an easy alternative to preferencing the Greens, announcing he's running
Speaker 4: on an open ticket, meaning he's not preferencing anyone. Even
Speaker 4: that seemed like a cop out when Burns could have
Speaker 4: made a genuinely strong statement by putting the Greens last.
Speaker 4: But my god, it short beats preferencing them over every
Speaker 4: other candidate. Adding Kosh assault to the wound, Drapers's treachery
Speaker 4: was revealed over passover the holiday that marks the Jewish
Speaker 4: people's liberation from slavery in Egypt. You may remember that
Speaker 4: part of the Bible when Moses pleads with the Pharaoh
Speaker 4: to let my people go, a plea more literal today
Speaker 4: than at any other time in history with many hostages
Speaker 4: Israeli hostages still in Gaza. The Executive Council of Australian
Speaker 4: Juris Alex Ridgen, questioned how such a prominent Jewish Australian
Speaker 4: could give legitimacy to the behaviors of the Greens. He said,
Speaker 4: it is bitterly disappointing that a senior member of the
Speaker 4: government and an eminent Jewish Australian could see fit to
Speaker 4: instruct his supporters to put a too next to a
Speaker 4: party that has done more to vilify the Jewish community
Speaker 4: than any party in Australian history. It's particularly hard to
Speaker 4: fathom when you consider Drefus is the son of a
Speaker 4: Holocaust survivor himself. His father escaped Nazi Germany as an
Speaker 4: eleven year old boy. He's a man who lost three
Speaker 4: great grandparents in the horrors of that real genocide. He
Speaker 4: spoke about that at Sky News's anti Semitism summit a
Speaker 4: couple of months ago, but he lost the crowd, some booing,
Speaker 4: some walking out when he pointed the finger at the
Speaker 4: opposition and media outlets like ours.
Speaker 25: Anti Semitism cannot and must not be weaponized in the
Speaker 25: pursuit of votes. It must not be weaponized in the
Speaker 25: pursuit of newspaper sales or TV ratings either.
Speaker 4: For his part, his leader Anthony Alberanizi, has repeatedly ruled
Speaker 4: out striking a deal with the Greens, but he doesn't
Speaker 4: always know himself where he stands.
Speaker 12: Be really clear again, if you ask me, do you
Speaker 12: rule out governing and coalition with the Greens?
Speaker 1: She answered that is no.
Speaker 4: That was a gaff apparently, but it's probably the first
Speaker 4: time the PM's been truly honest in this campaign, even
Speaker 4: if it was unintentional. Contrast the mixed messages from this
Speaker 4: government with the decisiveness of Peter Dutton when it comes
Speaker 4: to the issue of Israel and combating extremism on our
Speaker 4: own shores. The Opposition later this weekend vowed to defy
Speaker 4: the International Criminal Court by welcoming Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanya,
Speaker 4: who to Australia should he become PM. The ICC issued
Speaker 4: arrest warrants for mister Netanyahu in November, meaning he risks
Speaker 4: arrest if he steps foot in any of the one
Speaker 4: hundred and twenty four nations that sign the statute establishing
Speaker 4: the Court, and that includes Australia. Dutton said, I will
Speaker 4: never follow the albanezy path of seeking to find political
Speaker 4: advantage in demonizing people of Jewish heritage and the Israeli government.
Speaker 4: And that's what stinks about Dreyfus's preference deal. He's seeking
Speaker 4: political advantage at the expense of his community's and that
Speaker 4: isn't a word foreign or otherwise for how despicable. That is.
Speaker 1: Terrific. Caroline Well joining us now live from North Carolina
Speaker 1: is our great friend Shamika Michelle, political commentator. There in
Speaker 1: the heart of trump Land, Schmaker. It's always great to
Speaker 1: see you. I'm just going to play you a little
Speaker 1: clip of Donald Trump's Easter message.
Speaker 26: Just have a listen as we approach this joyous Easters,
Speaker 26: and I want to wish Christians everywhere a happy and
Speaker 26: beautiful and blessed holiday. America is a nation of believers.
Speaker 26: We need God, we want God, and with his help
Speaker 26: we will make our nation stronger, save for greater, and
Speaker 26: more prosperous, and much more united than ever before.
Speaker 1: So, Shamika, a much stronger kind of Christian message than
Speaker 1: we've heard over the past four years. What did you
Speaker 1: make of that message? And how is Trump going so far?
Speaker 1: Is he living up to your expectations.
Speaker 14: Four months in, you know, I think a brush with
Speaker 14: death will do that will cause you to say something greater.
Speaker 14: Has allowed me to stay here for a longer period
Speaker 14: of time, So I've actually seen a change or a
Speaker 14: greater message of God from Trump this go round, and
Speaker 14: I'm really enjoying it. I think four months seeing he's
Speaker 14: doing exactly what we elected him to do, we're all excited,
Speaker 14: and we know that it's not going to be an
Speaker 14: easy road. There may be some bumps, it may be
Speaker 14: a bit of a roller coaster, because of course, as
Speaker 14: we knew all along, the Democrats would try to fight
Speaker 14: him tooth and nail and just be a burden and
Speaker 14: be in the way. But we are ecstatic about what
Speaker 14: he's been doing. Trump, jd Vance, and especially Eli Musk,
Speaker 14: They've been doing a great job at just trying to
Speaker 14: get America on track and to make it great again
Speaker 14: all over again, because we know Barden came in and
Speaker 14: tore up a lot of the things that Trump had
Speaker 14: started already.
Speaker 9: But we're getting back to normal.
Speaker 8: Reader well, as they say, karma is a bitch, and
Speaker 8: Letitia James may find.
Speaker 9: That out the hard way.
Speaker 8: The new York Attorney general is now being referred for
Speaker 8: criminal prosecution, accused of fraud, essentially lying to banks to
Speaker 8: get preferable interest rates, saying she lived in one statement,
Speaker 8: she lived in another. Even suggestions Shamika that she pretended
Speaker 8: she was married to her father to get a better
Speaker 8: interest rate.
Speaker 9: So it just told me.
Speaker 1: About this check was the one who prosecuted.
Speaker 8: Of course, Letitia James is the Attorney general in New
Speaker 8: York who was elected on a platform of getting Trump,
Speaker 8: and she came up with these trumped up excuse the
Speaker 8: partner chargers to prosecute him in New York.
Speaker 9: God, what's the licensed on that case?
Speaker 14: You know, if Karma is a bit, her name must
Speaker 14: be Latsha Karma James. Because we can't stand this woman here.
Speaker 14: She has been a thorn in Trump's side. It seems
Speaker 14: as if she was elected simply to cause him trouble
Speaker 14: to wreak. Have it so many times here in the
Speaker 14: United States, they make black women, the Democrats make black
Speaker 14: women the face of this foolishness. It happened with Latisha James,
Speaker 14: It happened with Fanny Willis and Georgia Here this is
Speaker 14: what happens now we see Jasmine Crockett being the face,
Speaker 14: always having something to say, always complaining, always playing the
Speaker 14: race card, as if we look to black women to
Speaker 14: be the superheroes and save everything, when if you look
Speaker 14: at the black community alone, they have torn it to
Speaker 14: pieces black women, So I you know, I don't understand
Speaker 14: why they continue to push them out, but I think
Speaker 14: it gets the people all excited. I am really looking
Speaker 14: forward to see what happens with this case. I want
Speaker 14: to see Letitia James go down the bed that she.
Speaker 9: Or the grave she dug for Trump.
Speaker 14: I hope that's the one that she has to rest
Speaker 14: in because she has just been a terror this entire time,
Speaker 14: and she was only elected to do this. So I
Speaker 14: know more things will continue to come out about this case,
Speaker 14: but I'm hoping that she actually goes down behind it.
Speaker 1: Camelin, Well, we heard.
Speaker 4: From Joe Biden for the first time in a while
Speaker 4: yesterday Sjamika when he wasn't drowned out by the sound
Speaker 4: of music before he actually realized that had to be
Speaker 4: cut first. His first feed since leaving the White House,
Speaker 4: and he's accused Donald Trump an Elon Moss of taking
Speaker 4: a hatchet to Social Security and he calls. He called
Speaker 4: it a sacred promise that had been broken that seventy
Speaker 4: three million Americans rely on each month. What did he
Speaker 4: make of that speech and that comment.
Speaker 14: You know, I'm shocked that shady Pines actually lets him
Speaker 14: out for a little bit to even do former president duties.
Speaker 14: I don't think Joe Biden knows what's going on. Of
Speaker 14: course he didn't then, and I'm pretty sure it's even
Speaker 14: worse now. This is just a scare tactic that they've
Speaker 14: been using.
Speaker 9: They used it during the election.
Speaker 14: They used this same scare tactic when Trump was in
Speaker 14: office before. This is just what they do. They continue
Speaker 14: to say, Oh he's gonna do this, or oh he's
Speaker 14: going to do that, and nothing ever comes of it.
Speaker 9: It's the same as the Russia Russia Russia hopes.
Speaker 14: It's the same as there's no laptop with Hunter Biden.
Speaker 14: This is what they do. So I'm just hoping people
Speaker 14: don't buy into it.
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 14: Earlier in the election, I don't know. You guys, remember
Speaker 14: right after Trump was elected, they had everyone scared that
Speaker 14: they were going to lose food stamps or lose Medicaid,
Speaker 14: students would lose their federal grants to go to college.
Speaker 1: This is the same thing to me.
Speaker 14: And unless you see seventy three million people crying in
Speaker 14: the lines, you know, saying we can't eat, our social
Speaker 14: security is gone. This is just another tactic and we're
Speaker 14: used to it, and we're just sick of the games
Speaker 14: that democrats play.
Speaker 1: So, Shamika, speaking of formerly prominent black women, we now
Speaker 1: learn that Kamala Harris paid a fortune to the likes
Speaker 1: of Cardi B and Beyonce and I was an opera
Speaker 1: to promote her and to say what great supporters they
Speaker 1: were of hers during the election campaign. It's now turned
Speaker 1: out that they were paid, you know, hundreds of thousands,
Speaker 1: or tens of or even millions in some cases. What's
Speaker 1: been the reaction in a matter to this revelation is
Speaker 1: are people surprised? Or is it what you come to expect.
Speaker 14: It's what we've come to expect. But I think the
Speaker 14: reaction is laughter.
Speaker 1: You mean to.
Speaker 14: Tell me that you brought in people who dance around
Speaker 14: half naked on stage, cursing and talking about nothing couldn't
Speaker 14: win you the election. We're shocked, you know, we're laughing
Speaker 14: right in her face for actually trying this. Because this
Speaker 14: is what the Democrats do. They think so many black
Speaker 14: people have no type of aspirations, no type of intellect
Speaker 14: that they can't they can't speak to us about policies.
Speaker 14: This is why they lost and I hope that they
Speaker 14: continue to do this.
Speaker 9: I hope in twenty twenty eight they bring out.
Speaker 14: Whatever rapper is hot, whatever rapper is walking around naked
Speaker 14: at that time, to just continue to play in our
Speaker 14: faces so they can lose another election and then whine
Speaker 14: and say it was racism or misogyny or whatever excuse
Speaker 14: instead of saying we are idiots and we did a
Speaker 14: terrible thing by choosing this route.
Speaker 1: Fantastic Jamaka Michelle. So great to chat to you as always,
Speaker 1: and thanks for coming on on Easter Sunday here in
Speaker 1: Australia and Saturday there in America. Thanks so much, Jamaker.
Speaker 1: Have a great Easter coming up after the break. Canberra
Speaker 1: clown Show. Lots more here and Outsiders coming up in.
Speaker 2: A sick.
Speaker 1: Roll up, roll up step right this way. It's the
Speaker 1: wackiest show on Earth. It's the Traveling Canberra Circus, currently
Speaker 1: performing to excited crowds the length and breadth of the country.
Speaker 1: Some of the circus acts are so desperate to attract
Speaker 1: the crowds that they even steal the placards from the
Speaker 1: other circus acts, such as this clown who is married
Speaker 1: to Australia's most famous clown act, Doctor Monique, and her
Speaker 1: amazing thieving teals.
Speaker 3: Hi, mate, what are you doing?
Speaker 2: I'm taking a yeah, beg you perdin, I'm.
Speaker 1: Paging a sign out?
Speaker 25: What are you doing that for?
Speaker 6: Because it's on public land.
Speaker 1: And I'm not saying here I am, who are you?
Speaker 14: Or you wearing a seal T shirt.
Speaker 1: I'll start to film you are you Monic Ryan supporter?
Speaker 1: And here she is herself. You'll be shocked. You'll be
Speaker 1: on the edge of your seat as doctor Monique accuses
Speaker 1: professional commentations such as myself, I guess or being in
Speaker 1: the pay of the Liberal Party.
Speaker 27: Well, I would argue that some of the right wing
Speaker 27: press in this country should come with a verification from
Speaker 27: the Liberal Party, because I do think that much of
Speaker 27: what is put into the press, and the right wing
Speaker 27: press in particular, has been fed to it by my
Speaker 27: political opponents.
Speaker 1: Oh Monique, what a silly billy you are. The reason I,
Speaker 1: for one criticize you is not because I'm being paid
Speaker 1: to do so, but because you are such an appalling
Speaker 1: MP and a menace to this country. But I digress, Monique,
Speaker 1: you don't need me to make a fool of you
Speaker 1: when you do such a job of it yourself.
Speaker 23: We're talking about paying. We're actually paying for content. Do
Speaker 23: you have a problem with that?
Speaker 27: Look, I think we're paid to generate the content that
Speaker 27: we're putting in front of the voters. I'm not sure
Speaker 27: that there's a big issue there.
Speaker 23: But should it be clear to voters people who are
Speaker 23: looking at this content that it's paid for by the politician?
Speaker 27: I don't really have an opinion on it.
Speaker 11: Really, I think, well, you.
Speaker 23: Think voters deserve to know that if someone they're watching
Speaker 23: is saying great things about a politician, whether they're being
Speaker 23: paid by that politician.
Speaker 27: I have to go to some thought. It's not something
Speaker 27: I've given great thought to myself. Obviously I haven't engaged
Speaker 27: in anything like that myself.
Speaker 23: You have to give that some thought.
Speaker 27: Well, I would think that it would be clear. I
Speaker 27: don't know. I'd have to give you some thought.
Speaker 11: Done.
Speaker 1: Uh oh, I have to think about oh yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1: The most excruciating sixty seconds of Australian political history, right,
Speaker 1: there talk about humbug stupidity, and yes, it appears those
Speaker 1: virtues signaling sanctimonious women who bang on about integrity are
Speaker 1: about as hypocritical on ethics as they are on the climate.
Speaker 1: Twit this character the tilS Bengali Simon Holmes a Court
Speaker 1: has been named an article by the Australian newspaper quote
Speaker 1: a labor linked climate charity, the Smart Energy Council, has
Speaker 1: been receiving thousands of dollars from clean energy firms blacklisted
Speaker 1: in the United States over concerns they use slave labor,
Speaker 1: with the Green Lobby Group and its senior advisor, Simon
Speaker 1: Holmes a Court having visited a Chinese company accused of
Speaker 1: forced labor practices. Ah, can't you just feel the integrity
Speaker 1: oozing out of every pore of those teals? I repeat
Speaker 1: and no, Monique, nobody has paying me to say this.
Speaker 1: If you do only one thing at this election, turf
Speaker 1: out the toxic teals, every sanctimonious, insufferable one of them.
Speaker 1: And by the way, don't be fooled by the way
Speaker 1: these appalling individuals are now desperately trying to avoid the
Speaker 1: word teals. Yes, it has become toxic and they're desperately
Speaker 1: calling themselves independence, which is just another electoral roosts from
Speaker 1: these serial fraudsters.
Speaker 6: Seriously vote independent because independence works for women.
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, head clown under the burly Griffin Big Top was
Speaker 1: caught out again this week fobbing us off with his
Speaker 1: hilarious excuses. He has so many of them, who can
Speaker 1: forget this gem.
Speaker 12: I've been traveling in the car, so I haven't been advised.
Speaker 1: About Yes, and here he is again. I reckon we
Speaker 1: could compile a whole book of Albos's best excuses. Have
Speaker 1: a listen.
Speaker 12: No, we are seeking further information from Indonesia, as you're aware.
Speaker 12: As you're aware, I've been traveling from Hobart to here
Speaker 12: with you or on a different plane.
Speaker 1: Yes, much like Alboso's clown car. It appears Albosa's official
Speaker 1: lead jet doesn't have any telecommunications on board. I wonder
Speaker 1: how they ever found Tasmania. But the best comedy trio
Speaker 1: this week was, of course our old favorites, the World's
Speaker 1: Greatest Treasurer Wayne Swan. That line always gets a good
Speaker 1: before the missandrast Prime Minister Julia Gillard and the woman
Speaker 1: who will be Labour's next leader. Tanya Plibasek. Mister Swan
Speaker 1: put this photo, this weird photo out with the background
Speaker 1: mysteriously having been erased. So what was it that was
Speaker 1: so embarrassing they had to remove it from the shot? Well,
Speaker 1: it didn't take the online salutes long to find out
Speaker 1: where these three working class heroes were so proudly standing together.
Speaker 1: Was it outside, Oh, I don't know, the Balmain Basket
Speaker 1: Weavers Cooperative? No? Was it outside the Wayala Worker's Canteen. No,
Speaker 1: it was outside the ultra exclusive champagne and caviare swilling
Speaker 1: Quantus chairman's lounge. Unearned privilege. Thy name is labor? What
Speaker 1: do you call it when the blue collar kids are
Speaker 1: let loose amongst the champagne and caviar crowd.
Speaker 28: Let's ask oasis lefty lunacy?
Speaker 1: You're watching outside of so much lefty lunacy. It never
Speaker 1: never stops. But here's a bit. Haven't listened to George
Speaker 1: Clooney now explaining why.
Speaker 9: He tried to rewrite history? Is what he's trying to
Speaker 9: do wrong.
Speaker 29: It was a civic duty because I found that people
Speaker 29: on my side of the street. You know, I'm a Democrat,
Speaker 29: was a Democrat in Kentucky. So I get it. When
Speaker 29: I saw people on my say the street, I'm not
Speaker 29: telling the truth.
Speaker 2: I thought that was time to people still out here
Speaker 2: for that. Some people.
Speaker 7: Sure, you have to take a stand.
Speaker 29: If you believe in it, take a stand, stand for it,
Speaker 29: and then deal with the consequences.
Speaker 1: So that was George Cliney trying to justify why he
Speaker 1: turned on Joe Biden. Rita.
Speaker 8: Well, his timeline there a civic duty, give us a break, Georgia,
Speaker 8: and we know what happened. He actually hosted a fundraiser,
Speaker 8: Hollywood fundraiser for Joe Biden, where Joe appeared completely out
Speaker 8: of sorts, had to be helped off stage by Barack Obama.
Speaker 8: Did George Cliney come out there and say it's my
Speaker 8: civic duty to say this man is not up to
Speaker 8: the task, he can't be president, let alone run again. No,
Speaker 8: he waited another two weeks. There was then the infamous
Speaker 8: election performance from Joe Biden, the debate against Donald Trump,
Speaker 8: the infamous meltdown there.
Speaker 9: Even then he didn't say anything.
Speaker 8: It was only two weeks after when Biden was clinging
Speaker 8: on for dear life, refusing to step down that Clooney
Speaker 8: rumored to be pressured by Barack Obama penned that New
Speaker 8: York Times piece. And they're all trying to rewrite history.
Speaker 8: They're all trying to pretend they are.
Speaker 9: Therefore, it's not like.
Speaker 4: There weren't signs even before that Democratic fundraiser. Like we've
Speaker 4: been talking about it four years on Sky News and
Speaker 4: on this program Outsiders. The cognitive decline, the dementia very
Speaker 4: clear to anyone with eyes and ears, except for George Clooney,
Speaker 4: who continued to push this guy as the leader of
Speaker 4: the free world. So where was his sense of civic
Speaker 4: duty then the last few years?
Speaker 1: There is now speaking of Donald Trump, of Biden, speaking
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump, his great story that the director of
Speaker 1: the original Home Alone, because before he was even before
Speaker 1: the Apprentice, Donald Trump was always doing all sorts of
Speaker 1: things popping up in movies. He popped up in in
Speaker 1: Home and Alone, the story about the kid who was
Speaker 1: stunned Home Alone, to Home Alone two, and the director
Speaker 1: of that now wants to edit him out of the movie.
Speaker 1: There is Donald Trump back in the day Home Alone
Speaker 1: two and Rita. The director now wants to edit him
Speaker 1: out because he is embarrassed by Donald Trump and his movie.
Speaker 9: Not the hyperbole here.
Speaker 8: The hysteria of how crazy this Chris Columbus is is
Speaker 8: that he fears that if he does this, he will
Speaker 8: be deported from the US.
Speaker 9: It's become an albatross for me. I just wish it
Speaker 9: was gone. I mean, just what a self.
Speaker 8: Important lunatic is this man? But this just exemplifies Hollywood.
Speaker 9: Exactly they are.
Speaker 4: Maybe they can put a trigger warning on it, you know,
Speaker 4: the case anyone is triggered by then this film, be careful,
Speaker 4: you may get triggered.
Speaker 2: But you know that.
Speaker 1: I also want to I never like to hear businesses
Speaker 1: going under, because that's happening far too often. In Anthony
Speaker 1: Albanize is Australia. But there is a vegan shop which
Speaker 1: is struggling, Caroline, and I guess we have to.
Speaker 4: Well, apparently lots of vegan businesses and in the industry
Speaker 4: is suffering as a whole. And they've said that they
Speaker 4: struggle to put a finger on why why.
Speaker 9: That might be.
Speaker 4: I don't know why non meat products as meat alternatives
Speaker 4: are not popular, as.
Speaker 8: Meat is delicious and vegan alternatives are gross.
Speaker 9: I know that could be could be part of the reason.
Speaker 9: It may not, It may be material.
Speaker 8: You know what, I don't like to hear about any
Speaker 8: business struggling, but kind of could see this not coming.
Speaker 1: So you know, this is the end of the whole
Speaker 1: work agenda, because this is what happens. If you attach
Speaker 1: virtue to your business, ultimately you will lose because businesses
Speaker 1: should be about selling products that people.
Speaker 4: Mounting cows on a big.
Speaker 2: Exactly, there we go.
Speaker 1: That's it for outsiders for this Easter Sunday. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much for spending your Easter with us. We certainly
Speaker 1: do appreciate it. A lot's happening during the week. Of course,
Speaker 1: you've got the Reata Panahe Show every night at eleven o'clock.
Speaker 1: Great show, you must watch it. Download terrific stuff there.
Speaker 1: And then of course you've got Friday. You've got the
Speaker 1: world according to Rowan Dean, You've got James Morrow, You've
Speaker 1: got Rita Pane here again. What more could you ask for?
Speaker 1: Happy Easter,