WEBVTT - The Media Show | 9 August

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Media Show, with Jack outing Hello and

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the Media Show. Tonight we'll take a look

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>at Elon Musk's war with advertisers, labour spreading, cost of living,

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 1>fake news, and a look at the ABC's investigation into

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Network seven. But first, now to the chaos in the UK,

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>with riots spilling into the streets after three young girls

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>were brutally murdered by a seventeen year old who can

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>only be described as pure evil. He was also charged

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>with ten counts of attempted murder, with other victims hospitalized

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>with their injuries.

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 2>The country is bracing itself for more scenes like this.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Police are aware of thirty gatherings and are preparing for

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 2>a day of disorder. An extra two two hundred riot

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 2>trained officers are being deployed to confront whatever comes next.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And the media was quick to blame misinformation for the

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>riots because in the lead up to the rights false

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>information spread that the evil murderer we mentioned as an

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>immigrant and a Muslim. Turns out he was actually born

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in the UK to Rewandan parents and his family was Christian.

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Violin anty immigration riots continue in the UK. The protests

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 3>first broke seven days ago after anti immigration misinformation campaign

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 3>stoked outrage over a stabbing attack that left three children

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 3>dead in northern England.

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But there have also been horrific moments captured by the

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>so called progressive counter protesters. Now this includes Labor councilor

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Ricky Jones, who's actually been arrested for encouraging the murder

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of protesters.

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 4>Children, women, using no friends artist in a smartic, they

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 4>are disgusting?

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 5>Do we need to.

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Cold up and get it alone? Well? Joining me on

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the show this week is skyn New's host Caleb Bond

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and skyn New's contributor Louise Roberts. Caleb, let's STARp with you.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>What is going on in the UK and what do

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you make of this conflict I think between the media,

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the protesters, the social media's role in the early reports

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>which turned out to be erroneous. What's going on?

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Well? May I first point out the muted clapping behind

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 4>that Labor councilor there when he called for throats to

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:19.119
<v Speaker 4>be cut.

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>There were some cheers.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 4>Of I know they didn't quite know what it just happened.

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>But they're like, it's just grinning. What has happened in

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the UK?

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 4>As Nigel Farage pointed out during the week is that

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 4>you have had years and years and years of people

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 4>trying to have an open and sensible discussion about mass migration,

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 4>and every time they've tried to have that discussion, they

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 4>have been accused of being racist and bigoted, etc. And

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 4>a pressure point has been reached on the back of

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 4>misinformation that is alleged to have been spread by other

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 4>foreign powers. And how smart foreign powers to realize the

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 4>disunity that exists within Western nations to be able to

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 4>jump on that and just further that disunity in an

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 4>event like this. But the point you have reached is

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 4>that when you tell people that they are animals or

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 4>they are like animals, they will eventually act like animals.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 4>And that's what they've done because they've gone heck and

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 4>not that we can done violence at all, but what

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 4>they've looked at it and said, well, if I can't

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 4>have the genuine discussion about what's happened to my country,

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 4>I've got to find a way to make my voice heard.

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 4>And that, unfortunately, is what has happened. And the fact

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 4>that the media and particularly the new prime ministers the

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 4>Kistama in the UK, keeps carying on about the far

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 4>right only further stokes this division and the protests that

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 4>we've seen throughout the week, because a lot of these people,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 4>although they act like thugs, wouldn't see themselves as far right.

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 4>They would see themselves as good British people who don't

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 4>like what's happened to their country, and they're out there

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 4>in their mind trying to fight for their country and

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 4>stand up for what they think is right. And so

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 4>when you describe them as far right, it just makes

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 4>them angrier and they go on to protest more. So

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 4>you set it up as the far right and then

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 4>the anti racists, and you put those two together. Of course,

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 4>anti racist implies that they're the good people, and far

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 4>right implies that they're the bad people. It does nothing

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 4>to quill the division.

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a lazy fjorative because they're also labeling every center

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>right political group nowadays, it seems to get the far

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>right label. And then what are we then conflating them

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>with somebody that is doing criminal rioting. I don't think

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that's I actually think it's quite a lazy label. I

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>think just say this person is protesting because of this,

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and reporting where you possibly can. Obviously people quote, but

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the least, let's bring you in. What do you make

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of this whole situation, Well, haven't.

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 6>Lived in the UK for seventeen years. I think the

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 6>main issue is not the migration, it's how they focus

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 6>on the assimilation. As you say, Caleb, any discussion about

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 6>making a unified Britain great Britain, which is as a

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 6>country is shouted down. As you know, you've got both

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 6>sides saying don't destroy my country and the other side saying, well,

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 6>you're being racist because you're daring to raise it. It's

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 6>an idiotic situation really, And also I would say that

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 6>Kirs Darma clearly has not got his own house in order. Okay,

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 6>he's only a month in as the new PM, but

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 6>the fact that a labor counselor is saying what he's

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 6>saying quite happily on camera, knowing he's got a microphone

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 6>shoved in his face and there's people around him, is

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 6>just it just shows that the message about we will

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 6>go after these people it has not gone down to

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 6>the rank and file counselors.

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you can be emboldened by if the

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>media is clearly taking one side in this, and in

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>my opinion they are and every single story is of

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>these evil protesters here on the far right, when there's

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>probably a divergence of political views that have led to

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>them coming out there. Then you get people on the

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>left that are so embolden that they're talking about cutting

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.799
<v Speaker 1>people's throats. I think that's a problem. But look, staying

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>on this story, there were also some hairy moments of

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the report orders on the ground. In one clip that's

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>gone viral, the network cuts away from the reporter as

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Islami game shouting Palestine surround the woman.

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Community leaders have been speaking to the police as well, because.

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 6>But I think apologies for the language you're hearing, but.

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 5>I think you can yeah, I think Becky apologize.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>We need to leave you there, Louise. A lot of

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>criticism actually the network for cutting away rather than staying

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on it. I'm in two minds. I think there's definitely

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a safety issue, and the news desk was saying, we've

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>definitely got security there, But I mean, you've kind of

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>got this opportunity to keep the cameras rolling or what

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>do you think.

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 6>It's the same with any sort of protest or war situation.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 6>Do you keep shooting in filming or do you run

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 6>to safety as well. And I think that reporter in

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 6>particular was very brave the fact she still kept broadcasting

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 6>and trying to illustrate what was going on.

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>She's very calm, was very calm, yes.

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 6>Having been in a few precarious protest situations myself. The

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 6>adrenaline is surging and you're thinking, I want to get

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 6>the news down the line to the camera to my

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 6>news editor. But at the same time, when do you

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 6>pull the pin and actually prioritize your own safety. So

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 6>it's very you have to judge it on the situation

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 6>at hand.

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I think definitely, And Caleb, another reason why this clip's

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so interesting to me is because it has triggered off

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the conversations about the two tiered policing system, the two

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>tiered media coverage in many ways. And yes, there are

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously these awful people on this particular right political side

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of politics that are burning things down, bashing people, doing

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>horrific criminal things, But you've also got people on the

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>other side of the political spectrum who were doing just

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>as egregious things surrounding a female reporter in a very

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>threatening manner, and it doesn't seem to get the backlash.

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>The journalists on the news desk. He wasn't scathing of it.

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 4>What do you make problem with characterizing at all is

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 4>the far right, because it hasn't all been the far

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 4>ll complicated correct And as we saw there, and there's

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 4>there's plenty more footage of it that we've been showing

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 4>on the late Debate throughout the week, there have been

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 4>plenty of Islamic protests as well that have been just

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 4>as violent, just as much violence perpetrated upon the other

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 4>side by Muslim protesters throughout the week, but the media

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 4>doesn't touch that because it comes with the added complication

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 4>of potential Islamophobia and et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 4>In terms of that footage there, and by the way,

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 4>that crew was then followed by those men and they

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 4>had the tires of their van stabbed and let down,

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 4>so they weren't going to let up. In situations like that,

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 4>it is important for that footage to go to wear.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 4>And I think we got the gist of what was

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 4>going on from the little bit that we saw there.

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know, bloke goes up to the camera

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 4>and he's basically making a gun sights at it. I

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 4>would continue taking the footage. I just wouldn't put it

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 4>to air live because that's a really bigin point, because

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 4>what they want is the attention if.

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>There was some violent act I mean, Luis, if there

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>was something horrible that happened. They do have all these regulations.

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>They probably would get in a lot of trouble that

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>would do. So it's all very well for me to

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>say they should have kept on filming. I would like

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to see them release more footage now that we know

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 1>it didn't get to that threshold.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 6>I agree, maybe have the reporter in the studio being

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 6>interviewed by the host and saying what it was like

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 6>to actually be on the scene. I think there's always

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 6>an appetite for from viewers to actually see how hard

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 6>journalists work and actually see the calamity that they have

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 6>to deal with, actually just reporting the news itself and

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 6>in a way that doesn't condone or celebrate what these

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 6>thugs are doing. And clearly that's why they're going after

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 6>a light broadcast. I thinking, fantastic, you can't stop me.

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 6>I can say what I want, but if it's if

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 6>it's recorded and then edited later, that doesn't happen.

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well said, well, now, let's move on to chaotic

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>scenes at the Olympics where the International Boxing Association declared

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>war on the IOC.

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 5>We have forgotten that the Olympic Committee additional committee is

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 5>not a political body. It's not a political organization, is

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 5>a public organization. There so the general public and the

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 5>countries have to take the whole decision, and today, unfortunately,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 5>we are witnessing the failure the death of women female boxing.

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>The media reporting, for the most part, appears to side

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>with the IOC, with publications such as the Sydney Morning

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Herald labeling the press conference fascicle. Now let's bring the

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>panel back into discuss Caleb. There's a few This is

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a really complicated story, but there's a few points that

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I make. The IOC appears to be relying on evidence

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that these athletes are female, based on documents such as

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the passport, whereas on the other hand, the Boxing Association,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>whether or not there is corruption issues or governance issues,

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>they have released times when tests were taken. They've said

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that it came from these water facilities, these places that

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>if you were to accept that all the tests were

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>flawed and there is no chromosomal issue, you would have

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to accept that there's this grand conspiracy that stretches all

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the way from the Boxing Association to each individual testing association,

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>which is wider endorsed. To me, it seems less likely

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that that is happening, and more likely that the IOC

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is only relying on a document as opposed to anything

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a test.

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, well, it's the whole you know, choose between conspiracy

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 4>and cockup. Ninety percent of the time, they're probably going

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 4>to be the cock up, right, because to pull the

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 4>conspiracy off would be a hell of a task. And

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 4>what has troubled me about all of this is that,

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 4>of course the IBA sees that they did the genetic

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 4>testing and it came back with the x y chromosomes

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 4>that would prove biological maleness about these two people who

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 4>seem to be women and are competing as women. It

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 4>would be so easy to fix all of this by

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 4>the IOC taking the same genetic test or imposing the

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 4>same genetic test and coming back with the results, and

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 4>then it would be cleared up. We would all know.

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, both of the competitors could do that.

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>But they have chosen well, and the Boxing Association says

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that they have been threatened because as privacy issues, and

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that's correct.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Legally, there's only so much that they can release.

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But apparently athletes themselves have said, do not release my tests.

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 4>You don't have permission, and you'd wonder why that might be.

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 4>But the IOC could do its own testing and come

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 4>to its own conclusions, and it has chosen not to

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 4>do so. And what has troubled me about the coverage

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 4>is that the media and us as journalists, are meant

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 4>to question everything, even if sometimes those things we are

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 4>questioning might go against our own beliefs or our own ideologies. Right,

0:12:56.280 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 4>the media largely has taken aside that being we're not

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 4>going to ask the question of the IOC, why haven't

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 4>you done your own testing, because we've now decided that

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 4>there are certain sacred cows, and one of them is

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 4>that you can't question someone's gender identity. Both of these competitors,

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 4>as far as we can see, have always lived their

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 4>lives as women's and so we now decide, well, that's it.

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 4>We can't question that.

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>In this age, in the age of identity, in the

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>age where you can be whatever you want, the piece

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of paper saying what you are is not proof. The

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:31.599
<v Speaker 1>science is the proof. Anyway, we're going to take a

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>quick break because when we're back inside Labour's misinformation scandal,

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>now to the Labor Party in Australia, which has been

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 1>pined for spreading misinformation. And this is pretty funny to

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>me because this is the party which wants to enforce

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>strict misinformation laws on you, but doesn't want politicians to

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>be held to the same standard. Sky reporter Riley Sullivan

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>reports Anthony Albanesi ping for spreading misinformation on social media

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with misleading costs of living claims. While Australians are doing

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a tough battling inflation and insane mortgage repayments, our Prime

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Minister thought it was a smart idea to brag on

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>social media about his government. He published a picture of

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a CD album cover sprooking his cost of living relief actions,

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and there was a backlash. X users fact checked the

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>PM and found that most of the policies he claimed

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that were winter cost of living relief measures hadn't even

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>started yet. Albanize continued his horror week with a tough

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>interview from Pete Stefanovic, who pointed out on live television

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that homeowners would not get interest rate relief in part

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>because labor had a spending issue.

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 7>Are Australians facing higher rates for longer because of big

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 7>spending federal and state budgets.

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's not what they've said, Peter, with respect.

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 7>And well, this is the quote here from the RBA.

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 7>Public demand is forecast to be stronger than previously expected

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 7>reflecting recent public spending announcements by federal and state government.

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying they're wrong. Yeah, that's very different.

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 4>That's very different from from the way that you characterized that, Peter.

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 7>We've made your fiscal policy, budget policy works arm in

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 7>arm with monetary Well that's not working at all because

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 7>the RBA and Treasury are brawling at the moment.

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That's not true, Peter.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 7>Well you're saying completely different inflation.

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>No, we're no, we're not. Louise what a brilliant but

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>brutal interview.

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 6>By Peter did very well indeed, Yet.

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, cost of living is this issue

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>which is plaguing everybody in Australia globally as well. What's

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the thought process behind doing up at a CD. By

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, the people who are doing this, his massive

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>team of media minders, they're on good Wickeds. They probably

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have an issue with cost of living personally sitting

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>from there their places in Canberra. But to do that

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and brag, is that an effect of media strategy?

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think dj Elbow is from this one totally

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 6>out of control and at his own hand.

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's got the headline sorted a CD.

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 6>Who under thirty knows what a CD is? I would

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 6>say as well, but cost living is not a joke.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 6>It is never a laughing matter.

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Globally.

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 6>I cannot think of a world leader who would actually

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 6>use this as some sort of parody or some sort

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 6>of spin argument to sort of say, hey, look what

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 6>the great work we're doing to help you while you're

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 6>at the supermarket look at your receipt and going, oh

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 6>my god, I've just spent five hundred dollars on what

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 6>I can't even see that I'm going to actually cover

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 6>the food for the family for the rest of the week.

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 6>So it's just a complete ignorance of what the average

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 6>person in Australia is dealing with.

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and Caleb, I mean there's another element to this

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>as well, this interview that Pete Stefanovic had with Alban Easy.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>He's pushed on this this tension point that they have

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>with the RBA, and we know there was a tension

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>point because the RBA said one of the factors was

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>stronger government spending and then in the inquiry it was

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>repeated again the guff moment, spending across multiple levels was

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a factor. How dare this bloke stand here and say

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>that that is a false characterization on live television.

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 4>I know, Well, it's just an out and out lie,

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 4>isn't it. And the great problem that Alban Easy in

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 4>the Treasure Jim Chalmers have is that Michelle Bullock, the

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Governor of the Reserve Bank, has turned out to be

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 4>a very effective communicator in terms of the media war

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 4>in trying to win the hearts and minds of people

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 4>in terms of where cost of living is going and

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 4>where their interest rates are going, and where inflation is going.

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Michelle Bullock has been able to communicate the RBA's view

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 4>so succinctly and in such a straightforward way that Philip

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 4>Low never could that. I think most people can look

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 4>at it and see that the Prime Minister is making

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 4>things up and to them.

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>As tough as she's not scared by the fact that

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>they are.

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 4>Pushing back, and I was skeptical about her to begin with,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 4>because I thought we'd be better off with an RBA

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 4>governor who hadn't spent most of their work career inside

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 4>of the RBA, because I think that was the problem

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 4>with Philip Low. But she's actually shown herself to be

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 4>a very shrewd operator and a great communicator, which is

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 4>what we needed at this particular point in time. But

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 4>for the Prime Minister to think brag about measures that

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 4>haven't even come into place yet and lie to Pete

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 4>steffin Avick, I mean a fact check a CD is

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 4>about as useful as the measures that he's touting on

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 4>that cover there, because who's got a CD player anymore?

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Like then, the symbolism of that alone was like, what

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 4>are you paying these people for?

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Bunch of bunch of boomer media advisors that reminiscing really

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>bad stuff. Look, let's move on. Because Elon Musk has

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>declared war on activist advertisers who pulled money away from

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>conservative platforms on news sites. The New York Post reports

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the left leaning advertising cabal, accused of conspiring to suppress

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>conservative outlets, was reportably disbanded on Thursday, just days after

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk's ex slapped the group with a federal anti

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>trust lawsuit, let's bring the panel back in now, Luise

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>to have this massive body which is responsible for directing

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>advertising funds for them to be accused of anti trust

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>violations and then to just delete it. That's not a

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>great look, Well it's not.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 6>But also the irony of someone like Elon Musk and

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 6>the platform he runs and what he allows to be

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 6>distributed on that platform, it beggars belief that he would

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 6>go after a standard's authority given what standards he applies

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 6>to his own own commercial network in a way. So

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 6>I just think is typical sort of megalomaniac billionaire owner

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 6>over a platform like that who doesn't like what he hears,

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 6>so he launches legal action and to what end.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he definitely does not like being criticized. I'm definitely

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more sympathetic with him because we do

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>get targeted by some of these groups, and look, sometimes

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>we do make mistakes, and sometimes the criticism against us

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>is fair, but sometimes times there are people that have

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>very nefarious genders that group together and that was the

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>problem with GM and now there is an attempt for

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>them to escape accountability for these perceived violations of antitrust.

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not they did, we won't really know because

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they've broken up the organization.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I think that's probably the best case scenario

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 4>out of this, is that even if the case eventually

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 4>comes to nought, it's resulted in the breaking up of

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 4>the organization. Because look, I don't have a particular problem

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 4>with commercial operators banding together to spend their advertising money

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 4>with one mob or another, because that's just the free market, right.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 4>And if someone decides that their company's values don't aly

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 4>with aligned, sorry with a media outlets values or a

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 4>social media company's values, and they shouldn't be forced to

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 4>advertise with them. What needs to happen on the other side,

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 4>And have often said this about the right, and it's

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 4>often the right that gets targeted by the left in

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 4>terms of these boycotts, is the right has to do

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 4>the same back to the boycotts, because the lift is

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 4>very good at boycotting. It's been a tactic they've used

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 4>for a long time. But the right doesn't tend to

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 4>do it back. And so I would say to viewers

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 4>of this network or users of X or whatever, if

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 4>an advertiser decides to boycott a network or a media

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 4>outlet or a social media platform that you like to use,

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 4>boycott the advertiser back because they can spend their money

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 4>where they want, but you can also spend your.

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Money bud your bud light found that exactly hard well.

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 4>As consumers, I think have to use a bit more

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 4>of our own power to fight back against this stuff.

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Well said. We'll see how that plays out, but moving

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>on now. Four Corners Louise Milligan has a site set

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>on Network seven and the investigation promises to be must

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>watch TV if this promo was anything to go by.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 6>Is one of the most soul crushing places you can

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 6>work in Smoke and Mirrors.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Channel seven likes to portray itself as a family.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 6>I think it's a very dysfunctional family.

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>In Silence for Life Breaking seven Silence, the fear is

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>visceral and I haven't seen anything like it.

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't just call it the second Charts Club.

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd call it the third, fourth, and fifth Charts Club.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 2>They shouldn't be in business if that's what they're doing

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 2>to young women. How do they sleep at night?

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 6>Four Corners Monday.

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>ABC, Louise the Music it hasn't me a bit scared.

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think?

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, this has been a story about misbehavior and media organizations,

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 6>has just dominated the headlines the last six months, hasn't it.

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>But I will watch it.

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 6>But I do feel a bit nervous when a publicly

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 6>funded broadcaster is going after commercial network and investigating them,

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 6>because there's most certainly a few skeletons in the ABC closet.

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'd argue that's a very good point, Caleb, your thoughts.

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Look, you could probably do this story about almost any

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.479
<v Speaker 4>broadcast or any media organization, any company.

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>In any bank exactly for that matter.

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 4>All I will say though, is that so there may

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 4>be a reason miss Milligan goes after see as an

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 4>aggrieved former staff member of Channel seven herself.

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a good point. Well, Caleb Luise, thank you

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>so much. That's all the time we have for tonight.

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us. Up Next is Lefties Losing It.