WEBVTT - Time to consider an SMSF?

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>James Kirkby. Welcome aboard everybody. Whoa what a week? So

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>here we go. Trump's Liberation Day has arrived. Ten tariffs

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>right across the board for everything coming into the US. Now,

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>just so you know the general tariff rate, you know

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>at the moment it's about two and a half percent,

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's a quadrupling of tariffs going into the US.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a change to the world order as we know it.

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And Australia got no exemptions whatsoever. That's worth pointing out too.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>That was announced. We don't know what's going to happen

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>to markets, right, but it was announced after the Wall

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Street in this says closed. But now Jones futures as

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we speak to you middle of Thursday are down three percent.

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And I want to put forward a show to you

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to which hopefully you might listen to in conjunction with

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday's show, because every now and again there is a

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>theme that dominates markets and we zone in on it

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's worth bearing with us when we do this.

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>If you recall about a year ago we covered artificial intelligence,

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a fair bit before it became a very

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>generally covered issue. It was probably more like a year

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half ago. And this again is one of

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>those themes that's going to change how your super operates,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>how your investments operate. It is crucial. So listen to

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Cameron if you can. From Tuesday's show. You know one

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>of the things you think about how tuned in he is.

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And if you listen to the show, you know that

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>he literally knows Trump. He has been in the Oval Office,

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>He's been at all the rallies. He met the point

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that Adon Musk wouldn't last a year. And here we

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are forty eight hours later, and there are reports this

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>morning that Mosk is, in the delightful phrase of Anthony Scaramucci,

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>heading for the wood chipper. So what does it all

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>mean for you, the active investor? I have a top

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>financial advisor this morning. He's on the top the Barons

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty list. It's Hugh Robertson of Centaur.

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 2>How are you, Hugh, I'm good, James, how are you going?

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Interesting times?

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You pick your moment, You pick your moment to come

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>on the show, or tell you that. I want to

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>just look for the listeners now, have in some ways

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of cover the big picture about Trump on what's

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>going on, and it's all come to pass, and I

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's you know, I think it's safe to say

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>it was worse and more severe than people might have

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>hoped in terms of what he's doing in terms of

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>closing the doors basically to free trade around the world.

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And I want to look in two ways. It's simply

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously anybody can do and make what they

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>wish of it for their investing. But let's just have

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a look at super and let's split it into two parts.

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Your super if you have big Super, and anyway, what

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>big super is doing is always interesting, even if you

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>don't participate in Big Super. And then we'll also look

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>at smsfs and their reaction. But I suppose the immediate question, Hugh,

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>which I certainly would be worried that our major super

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>funds in Australia have gone big basically on the US,

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>have lifted their bets on the US and you can

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>see the proportion of stocks that they hold there has

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>risen and they have dropped their cash levels as well

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>at the very same time just as this is happening.

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just one of those times where I think the

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>power of the independent investor is at its best because

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>you can move. But what's your impression of big super

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>major super funds and their approach to these historic days

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>so far?

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 3>When you get times of great volatility, you want to

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 3>probably be invested a little bit closer to home, where

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 3>you feel you have.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 2>A little bit more control.

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 3>When you look at the big super funds, I think,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 3>as an example, Australian Souper now sins about seventy percent

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>of its inflows overseas, so that will be impacted by

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 3>the tariffs at a pretty grand scale. And I think

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 3>as we see more of this industry consolidation of the megafunds,

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 3>the big industry funds, they're going to dwarf. They're going

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>to be so big in size that they're going to

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 3>dwarf the ASX itself. So it's going to be a

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 3>continual thing that they're going to have to allocate money

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 3>overseas just so that they don't move markets with one

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 3>single investment. So I think you'll see more global exposure

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 3>and you're going to see more in the unlisted space.

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 3>So probably two areas that scare most investors right now.

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I might suggest yeah, well, we know for a variety

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. It's all come through in various ways. The

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Standing, for instance, as sell that thirty percent of

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the AX is held by Big Super. So okay, fair enough,

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, they a hit saturation point and they must

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>move abroad. But the thing I'm a bit concerned about

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is the nature of their exposure to the share market

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and the nature of our Big Super choices for people,

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the classifications, you know, we're balanced where what people think

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is balanced has actually got a fair spin skew towards growth,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a fair skew towards the share market. And the share

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>market was good for Big Super for years and years.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. They've lifted their exposure to the US.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>The US is the worst performing market in the world

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>so far this year. It's down about five five and

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a half percent so far. Our market's down about four

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. The European markets are actually up

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>about six percent. Point I'm making is is there something

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of a reckoning perhaps coming for not so much for

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>Big Super, but for people who thought they're super funds

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of knew something no one else did. They were

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>doing so well for so many.

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Years yes, it needs to be because now earnings are

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 3>going to be.

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Impacted by tariffs.

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 3>You've got price expansion that's happened over the past few

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 3>years that hasn't necessarily kept up with the earnings growth.

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 2>So you're globally, you know.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Especially the US market is expensive on you know, the

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 3>fundamental metrics, and where you where might your opportunities be,

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe in Europe or in Asia. You're probably not getting

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 3>much of an allocation into.

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 2>Those asset classes.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 3>So it's going to be in it's going to be

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 3>a difficult uphill road for investors in big super funds

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 3>over the next sort of three to five years, you'd imagine,

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 3>especially with the volatility that a Trump presidency usually brings.

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you think people should do? Obviously we're going

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>to get people asking, as we always do times of

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>severe stress, whether they're in an appropriate setting in their

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>big super fund. And this issue of definitions, and you

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's obscure, folks, it's not. This is so important.

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>There's no legal definition on these super funds allocation. So

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you go into your big super fund number one and

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you have your choices and one's conservative and one's balanced,

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and one's growth. But the fact is, you know that

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>growth is really spins towards shares and balanced is a

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>lot more turned towards shares and a lot less balanced

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>than you might think in the classical sense of the world.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And I can prove this to you because the ratings

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>agencies they actually ignore, often ignore the classification the bonds

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have calling them balanced, and they define them as grilled.

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And they're right to do so. Am I on the right? Check?

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Here?

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Am I making? Am I over the top on this one?

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Here? No, you're right.

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 3>There was a big industry fund a while ago that

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 3>used to call it self balance that had ninety two

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 3>percent in growth assets. There's no one in this world

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 3>that would think that's balanced, you know so. And that's

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 3>part of the regulatory regime where they need to hold

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 3>these big funds to account a bit more.

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Which we're starting to see. We're starting to see that

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 2>there's you know, they've lost a bit of shine.

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 3>But I think from the investor point of view, going

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 3>through a market like now, you've really.

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Got to focus on your cash flows.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 3>If growth has been great for the past few years,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 3>and what I mean by then in your shares you

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 3>had the capital appreciation, what you're seeing now is how

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 3>are we going to get that income from shares? How

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>are we going to get cash flows? So probably more

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 3>important than ever in times of uncertainty is that we're

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 3>going to go and get paid those dividends, whether Australian

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 3>or global, And that's probably one things where when you're

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 3>in those big megafunds or industry funds, they don't pay

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 3>out the dividends. That just keeps getting reinvested back into

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the unit price. So I think there's a really big

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 3>difference there for people to appreciate that it's pretty valuable

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 3>now to be able to extrapolate that income out of

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 3>your investments. Both your growth assets shares and property and

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 3>your defensive assets are fixed interest in cash.

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So what should people should they We're not telling people

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>what to do, it's not advice information only, but I

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 1>expect people should review at least whether they are comfortable

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>with the positions that they have taken, and they might

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>go an extra yard and find out exactly what their

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>allocation means. What does balance actually mean because it can

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>mean different things. I mean, our super's definition of balance

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 1>could be different than hestes, which could be different than holsplus.

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 3>And I think clients and investors would just assume that they're.

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 2>It's the same for all of them.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's a really good point, James, that

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 3>you've got to really look behind, you know, look behind

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 3>the label and actually spend a little bit of time

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 3>investigating it because there might be something that you're not

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>comfortable with as your risk tolerance or even your capacity

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 3>to take risks right now if you're nearing into retirement.

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Yes, are they all? Can I paint them more of

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the same brush By that, I mean, are the big

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>private ones than none, the retailed ones as we call them,

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the whatever, the amps of this world, other colonial et cetera.

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Is the issue similar with them.

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 2>You've usually got a little bit more choice there.

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>To be fair to them, you've got a bit more choice,

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 3>So you can break it down. They usually don't have,

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, a set standard fund that you're in nowadays,

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 3>so usually you'll get options there. You know, you might

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 3>have over one hundred different investment options there that you

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 3>get to choose from, and you can kind of choose

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 3>your asset allocation a.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Little in a little bit more of a bespoke manner.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 3>So again, though for any single person, you know, outside

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 3>we all know that outside of your house, your super

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 3>is your biggest asset. So you've really got to spend

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 3>the you know, spend an hour on it, looking for

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 3>looking through and understanding it and not to you know,

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 3>or talk to someone that can give you that advice

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 3>as you know that education might save you, you know,

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 3>possibly tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars.

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, really valuable folks. So I mean, we've had this

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>point on the shore before, but there's times for it.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>It's really matters. Don't assume you understand what the definition

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is of growth or balance. Have a look, have a look.

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not that complicated, all right, It's really not that

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 1>complicated that that your fond it could be a lot

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>more exposed to shares than you realize if you just

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>assume that balance means balanced in the sense that you

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and I understand balance to be. And as Hughes pointed out,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.319
<v Speaker 1>there is a major fund that had ninety percent of

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>their holding some shares and they were classified as balanced.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, can I just say, every time

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I bring this up in print, I get a you

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 1>know that they're on like in two minutes complaining about

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>this and that it's all fine. Well, I don't think

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it is all right now. Also, Hugh, while we're talking

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>about this, one of the big issues of late in

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>super and in Big Super. And when I say Big Super,

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean all those big industry funds and all those

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>big retail funds that many people have their life savings in.

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>There's all sorts of scandals and letdowns going on at

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the moment in terms of standards. Right Joe Longo, head

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of ASIK, has said they're the poster child of poor

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>corporate governance. That's a spectacular line. I don't forget that

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty fast. And we had all this stuff with death

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>benefits and disappointments and court actions Australian Super aera in

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>their SeaBus are in there. There's a blockout in Hester

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>where you can't even get at you through the site

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>for fifty days because they're doing a technology change over.

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But here's what I want to point I'm leading to.

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>There used to be an enormous amount of funds. There's

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>mergers happening all the time. Art For instance, the second

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>biggest fund is the second biggest fund because it's a merger,

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a recent merger of Sun Super around the old Queensland

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>super Now. Mercer says that there's still about ninety significant

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>super funds that's going to shrink to about twenty. And

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the issue I want to bring up you is when

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you're in one of these funds that's a target, you

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>can have a lot of headaches and complications and bureaucracy

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>drive you completely nuts. If you happen to be unfortunate

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>enough to be in a small fund that's taken over.

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Find out a giant fund but at one hundred billion

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in assets, just buys your fund that had sixty billion

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in assets, and it gets two lines in a newspaper

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>one day, and that's about it. You might even miss it.

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:14.239
<v Speaker 1>But all sorts of things happen afterwards as that consolidation happens,

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and it will happen. It has to happen because they

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>need the scale and they need the technology investment to

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>stay at the level they're at. What's the sort of

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>upsides and downsides of that consolidation where the world we

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>know of big super funds is going to shrink fast,

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is shrinking fast into a handful of key players.

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 3>I think you definitely lose innovation, there is competition around you,

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 3>You lose innovation and if you think, you know, we've

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 3>got an aging population, we should be spending more money

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 3>on designing better retirement outcomes for our clients. And how

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 3>the investors and the members of these super funds. I

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 3>think that's one that everyone will feel at the individual level,

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 3>it is a race of the bottom with costs. So

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 3>we're just trying to reduce fees, and then you get

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 3>these substandard service levels.

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 2>You get these issues.

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Around death payments and pension payments. So you know they've

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 3>done a really good, you know, run on ad saying

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 3>that it's all about cost, but you know, clients, do

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, do value good service?

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Still?

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 3>People do value service, and I think that's something that

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 3>needs to lift within those funds. And I think you're

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 3>also going to see that they're going to become a

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 3>victim of their own success in the fact that they're

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 3>going to be so large that the way they invest

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 3>you lock yourself into very average returns.

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting. We really flushed out out another day that point, Q,

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's very interesting, and because as you see, if

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you become it's like the old thing about the issue,

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>if some company or factor dominates and it's then it

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes the average if you know what I mean, very

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to be better than average if you represent the

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>average as those handful of funds will do sooner or later. Okay, look,

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>well take a short break. I want to bring up

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting point now about Trump, about this sort

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of inflection point we have in market. So where we

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>sit markets down five percent for the year or so

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>after a whole polygod years when you could just close

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>your eyes your fond are bringing in double digits every year.

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's time to take a look at self managed

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>super funds and who they might shoot back in a moment. Hello,

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Australian's Money Post little podcast. James

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Kirby here talking to Hugh Robertson of Centaur Financial Services,

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>operates up in the Gold Coast. There with the beautiful

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Gold Coast hinterland outside his window. Now, Q, you would think,

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>damn good time for the self managed super fun sector

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to parade their wares. I mean I have a self

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>managed super fund. I don't. There are times when there

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>were times in the when the super funds were big.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Super funds were knocking it out of the park, you know,

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>ten eleven, twelve percent, and you were saying like, gee,

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we get ten or eleven twenty percent and

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to think or do anything. You know,

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>why am I doing it now? This year? I feel

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>so much better, you know this feeler this year I have.

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I am nimble, may I say? And I was able

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to move in and I bought gold DTF for instance,

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, relatively significantly for the size of my fund,

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>for instance, a few months ago. And I'm so glad

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I did. I'm so glad I did because I couldn't

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>think of anything else worth buying at the time. Now

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they're perfect, but the point I'm making is,

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is this a climate where the attractions of a self

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>managed super fund, knowing their limitations and their difficulties and

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the work involved in them, they may they may look

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>more attractive.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, one hundred percent.

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 3>And we've done the same chimes within our business where

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 3>we've not always been.

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not being necessary to have an SMSF.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 3>We've been able to kind of get that those good

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 3>investment outcomes without having a self manation shuper fund.

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 2>But I think now control.

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 3>We've got this geopolitical uncertainty both within Australia and abroad.

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 3>So I think without having control over you know what

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 3>we said before, the second biggest asset you own is important.

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 3>The administration isn't what it used to be. Technology is

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 3>taken care of a lot of that, the costs aren't

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 3>as expensive as you may think, and just that element

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 3>of control, and it probably coincides with the rise of

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 3>ETFs and.

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 2>In particular thematic ETFs.

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 3>But now you can really tailor the portfolio to something

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 3>that you know, you're comfortable with. You're not relying on

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a manager to allocate to gold, you know. If you

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 3>want that for that peace of mind of that inflation protection.

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>You just buy and good. Yeah, And I mean, really

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>one's as good as the other. They're just reproduced the price,

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>assuming that they're they're the same setting it that they're

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>all on hedged or whatever, and they're not playing any

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>games around leverage.

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's I think it's a very valid

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 3>statement to consider looking at them at them now.

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 1>The other point I wanted to make was that the

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>big supper fonts had been dropping their cash levels going

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>into what was clearly and obviously a very difficult time.

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Have we only notion about cash and smsfs and whether

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they were being more defensive.

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 3>Yes, we're from our perspective, are the clients of ours.

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 3>We took profits the end of last year. Markets were good.

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 3>You know, you always harvest some of those returns and

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 3>you wait for winter. There was the uncertainty. Remember when

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Trump got in, the markets were pretty bullish to begin

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 3>with around the tax cuts and very much pro business agenda.

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 3>But as we've now sort of got through a little

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 3>bit of that and we've seen you know, the impact

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 3>of tariffs, there's this little bit of uncertainty. So for us,

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 3>we've had the correction of ten percent. You know, now

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 3>we're actually waiting for today to be a time to

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 3>actually start looking back in markets via a dollar cost average.

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 3>So remembering when you're in an SMSF, you don't need

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 3>to if you wanted to take an allocation, let's say,

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>for example, NASDAK and you wanted a five percent allocation,

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 3>you don't need to take five percent today. You can

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 3>do one percent today, one percent next week and slowly

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 3>build up.

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Your positions and deploying that capital as per.

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Something that you're comfortable with is really intelligent in volatile markets.

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>One or two things I want to I'm bouncing around,

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>but I'm at the same time it's very interesting. I

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>hope for listeners too. There's big picture and a small

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>picture here in terms of SMSF as an option and

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>then options within smsfs. But just to go back to itself,

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>what's the working number you have? I come into you

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 1>and I said, off to start in an SMSF and

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you see, well, listen, you really can't start it without X.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>What's your number? As logan Roy says.

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>It would always be a number of names.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 3>I think when you look at it, it used to

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 3>be seen as around five hundred thousand, but over the

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 3>last couple of years that's come down to two hundred thousand.

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 3>And that again coincides with the rise of ETFs technology

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 3>lowering the costs. And it's also this you talked about

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 3>it previously, around things around administration. If you want to

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.719
<v Speaker 3>get contributions into super before end of financial year, you know,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.719
<v Speaker 3>with the big funds, it can be quite difficult to

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 3>meet their timelines, whereas in a self managed super fund

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 3>you can do it the day before in June twenty nine.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 3>So there's things around that where there's a bit more

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 3>flexibility around the self managed super fund that I think,

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 3>and it's been interest too. The research is shown that

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 3>younger people are opening them as well, So it's not

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 3>just someone with a really big balance, it's someone that

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 3>actually wants to take control of it. Which makes a

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of sense to me because it's you know, it

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:50.959
<v Speaker 3>is going to be such a big investment for you

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 3>with your mandated SGC and the caps that you've got

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 3>to put money in that.

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Why wouldn't you want to have more control over that?

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Well? Yeah, twelve percent of the year money by low

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>having to go into super when you say two hundred thousand,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that sounds very low to me. Is that imagining an

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>ETF heavy SMSF Basically.

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you'd be able to keep your costs down via that,

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 3>and it's also then you can use your software nowadays

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 3>that does a lot of the heavy lifting from the

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 3>reporting requirements, and even the accountants and the audits now

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 3>are quite well priced, so that that tends to be

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 3>as around between two hundred and two fifty was your

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 3>break even cost of having an SMSF versus the industry ones?

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'll just say to listeners, I mean, as I said,

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm skeptical on that one folk, So I think it

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>would be much higher than that myself. However, I'm talking

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>about a fully diversified SMSF where you're doing all sorts

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of things. It's not just ETFs. It could be sharedes,

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>it could be young securitized model just it could be

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>property direct.

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, you're going up there.

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 3>Back to that the notion that was and that was

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 3>more what portfolios looked like when around the early twenty

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 3>twenty to twenty one twenty two, and that number then

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 3>was closer to five hundred thousand.

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, thank you, Hugh. All right, now, one thing

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to zone in on on the SMSFS, which

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is relevant to all listeners, but if also on SMSFS,

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and Hugh mentioned at the start about income

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>we need income. Income will become more important defensive assets.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Have you noticed you that the big banks are now

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>paying eight percent franked except Comebank, Well, the top three

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>A and Z, West, BAK and now are between seven

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and eight percent fully franked dividend yield as we speak.

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>If you bought them today, Comebank is less than four percent.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 3>And if I was invested in those, I wouldn't really

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 3>be worried about the capital volatility because the eight percent

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 3>is going to meet my income needs.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, especially from a retiree.

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>That's right. If you're a retiring and you're getting the

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>absolute maximum bank for your you grossed up to Frankie,

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll be even higher than seven or eight.

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Wuld it And yeah, and if you're an accumulator, it's

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 3>not bad to be reinvesting those and really getting that

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 3>snowball of compound growth working for you either.

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, very good. All right, now there's a lot there

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to digest. I hope that was all useful to you.

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to go to questions because we've got great

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>questions back in a moment. Hello, welcome back to the

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Australian's Money Puzzle on Deliberation Day. Deliberation Day broadcast Liberation Day.

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>By the way, as if you don't know, is what

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump is calling, He's Tariff's Day. All right, question, Luke,

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts in education bonds, particularly their tax advantages.

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I am seeing claims of a thirty percent bonus. This

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>works great if my six year old and four year

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>old can be beneficiaries. I'm sure of how it may

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>change under tax loan. A long time out of five

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>financial advisers don't like these when they're on the show.

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of them?

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Here?

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I've just given you context, right, just.

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 2>In fairly fair, I'm in the eighty percent. Okay, look

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 2>they I see how it works.

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 3>But the fees, you've got a factor in the fees,

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 3>You've got a factor in the inflexibility of it. And

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 3>a thought that I've had around that is would you

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 3>not be better off and the kids are better off

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 3>getting the money when they're eighteen in the adult tax rates.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 3>So given the ages of the children, you might be

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 3>better off salary sacrificing into super. And when the kids

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 3>go on to university or whatnot and get that debt,

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 3>you could probably compound the return better through putting the

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 3>money into Super taxed at fifteen percent on earnings, and

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 3>then upon retirement there might be a few years later

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:58.959
<v Speaker 3>until your age sixteen can access it.

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 2>You could then pay that off for them.

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>What about the argument that if you're topped out, if

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you're lucky enough to have topped.

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Up, and I would probably then use my non concessionals.

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't over education bonds.

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I've never we've never really been a big user

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 3>of them. The range of investment options was never great.

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.199
<v Speaker 3>The tax you know, the examples there that you can

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 3>find online look good. But at eighteen, you know, I

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 3>think of myself with four children, ten, eight, six, and four,

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 3>and even though I've got what sixteen years until I'm sixty,

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I still and my kids go to private school. I

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 3>still haven't thought about there hasn't been enough benefit there.

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>But you so like someone who would have thought it through,

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>both as a professional and privately. Okay, very interesting, all right,

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope that's useful to you, Luke. We're not dismissing

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>them out of hand, but I just find, Luke, every

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>time I put this in front of an advisor on

0:25:56.200 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the show, they are not supportive of them. Okay, that

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is they are they believe there's better value to be

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>had elsewhere with your money. All right, Andy, And the

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>context of Andy question interesting because you know, in the election,

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>which we are in the middle of an election campaign,

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>people a sort of struggling to find differences between the

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>two parties. I don't mean we know they're different big government,

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>small government and all that, but precisely on financial measures

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>or investment measures and in housing. The big ticket from

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the Albanasa administration is the Shared Home Ownership scheme, which

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>whereby the government will put up thirty percent for an

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>existing house forty for a new and you share ownership

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>with them. You know, that's their one and the Coalition's

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>one is Super for Home Deposit, where you can get

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>up to fifty thousand out of your SUPER to buy

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a house which you of course own entirely yourself. Now

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Andy's question, is the First Home Super saving scheme worth

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the effort? I believe it is quite come plex, But

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>more recently I came across someone who had used it

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and had no complaints at all. The First Home Super

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Saber scheme, by the way, about thirty five thousand people

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>have used it. It's the lowest participation of the various

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>first home schemes, like the Guarantee scheme, but it is

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a scheme where Super one way or another was being used,

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or a super money that might have gone into Super

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>has been used. Have you used it, Hugh, have you

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>come across it?

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you know?

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it worth the effort to tunnel through the bureaucracy

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to make it work.

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 3>In its current format. I'm not a big advocate for it.

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 3>I didn't mind what the Coalition put forward, though, I

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 3>thought that there was an element there that you know,

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 3>part of the gains would have to go back into

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the super as well.

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, to be fair, Yeah, to be fair, just to

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>finish off on that coalition. Think about the fifty thousands

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you can take off to buy your house. When you

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>sell the house, if they distick, the fifty thousand must

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>be replaced back into your super isn't that right? Yeah,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>which is the point people forget?

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think that that method people are still

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.719
<v Speaker 3>you don't want to just rob your super fund, you know,

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 3>you don't want to take it out of there in

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 3>it not go back. I'm not a fan of the

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 3>co ownership model, and you know, we still want people

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 3>to be able to afford houses, but I think that's

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 3>more on that.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 2>We just need to be able to build more.

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Houses, yes, supply to yeah, taking out super. Okay, So

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>there you are, and the first home super skate Saber

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>scheme it's there. People do make it work for them.

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they make it work for them because people

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>will try anything that's available on this and I think

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the shared home equity scheme will be popular by the way,

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I do, so will super from you from so will

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>housing deposits from your super They'll both fly because people

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>will try anything, even the FHSS. All right, final questions

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>from Rowan. There is usually quite a delay between the

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>RBA cutting the official indust rate and banks passing those

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>cuts through. Yes, does the RBA take into account banks

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>usual delays when deciding when to cut rates. I wouldn't

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>think so, Rowan. For what it's worth, there's no law

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that says they must. In fact, the RBA has no particular, written,

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>explicit power to tell the banks to follow the official rate.

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a guideline and the banks are pretty fast and

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>putting up the deposit rates. It's got to give them

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>full credence for that, don't you So they wouldn't. Basically

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't. I don't think so. I mean maybe if

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they were thinking about it really finally, and maybe there

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>was atrocious behavior, they might.

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 4>But what do you think you I went and had

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 4>a quick research for this and it was an Z

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 4>and NAB have typically taken ten days to cut to cut, and.

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Westpac has taken typically fourteen.

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 3>And again there's no it's a commercial reason for them,

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, they don't have to. RBA's kind of meant

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 3>to be you know, somewhat an independent, but they take

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 3>it into account. And I think even when you compare it,

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, a thirteen day delay on a five hundred

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars loan cost forty five dollars.

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>More assuming they cut. There's two things there isn't there.

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>There's the fourteen days, but then there's do they give

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole cut? Which they don't always And again they

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. A short answer roman is they don't

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>have to, and it wouldn't be it wouldn't be a

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>top factor for them in their deliberations, that is, if

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they ever cut again. Oh yes, so the economists tell

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>us they're going to cut again, And I know I'm

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>terribly cynical about it. I hope, so I'll tell you, well,

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't be. I wouldn't be building it into

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>my plans. Would you be building a recut into your plan?

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 2>To you?

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>No, right, there you go question without notice. I should

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>have warned you. I was going to hit you with

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that one, but then I should have warned you. But

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>all the questions I hit you that I didn't line

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you up for. And that's because you're very good to

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>talk on the show and We know you can handle

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>them all and you did very well as usual. Thanks

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>very much, Hugh Robertson of Centaur Financial.

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Services, Thank you very much for having me, James.

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Great to have Hugh on the show again. Okay, folks,

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>keep those questions, comments, observations, complaints. Happy to see them

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>all the money puzzle at the Australian dot com dot

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>u send them in, record them if you like, on

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a voice memo and send them in as an email.

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear them. We're collecting them. Talk to

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you soon.