WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 1 May

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.760
<v Speaker 1>The Sky Center. This is Paul Murray Live.

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Can I get evening again? Welcome to the last show

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 2>before a nation defining election, a fork in the road

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 2>where we will all find out which direction we are

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 2>headed in Tonight stated a race deep data, hardcore politics.

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 2>This is about trying to see where the trends are,

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>where they're not, where the fault lines are in all

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>of the different electorates. It's going to get very detailed.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>But I know you love it. I know you can

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:32.959
<v Speaker 2>handle it, and I know we're all looking forward to

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 2>this thing getting behind us as fast as possible. Now,

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I've got to say, when it comes to elections, I

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>do have a little bit of a saying that everyone

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 2>around me gets a little bit bored of saying. And

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 2>it's a version of a quote that you've heard many

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 2>times before. But the message is pretty simple. Expect the worst,

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>but hope for a surprise. That way, you are not

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be a blubbering mess if the exact opposite

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>of what you want to happen happens. But there's always

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 2>a moment well you can say, you say that was interesting,

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Thank goodness. This is the feeling that I had in

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty nineteen. It's a feeling I had in twenty twenty two,

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 2>and it's a feeling I have going into twenty and

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 2>twenty five. Eighteen million people will make their decision about

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 2>which way we are going to go as a country.

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Every piece of data and all information would suggest that

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 2>we are about to see the reelection of this government.

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 2>The question is not whether they are re elected, but

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>will they have their own majority as they currently do,

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 2>or will they have to negotiate with somebody else to

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>get the majority to be in a minority.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>As for Peter.

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Dunton, he says that the internal polling, the information that

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 2>he is getting, the same information that was right in

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty and nineteen when everyone else was wrong, was telling

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>him that there is a lot more fifty to fifty

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>bounces of the ball, and yep, they can all go

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 2>his way or they can all go the other way.

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 2>But that's his belief about what's happening right now. We

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>know that there's been a massive surge in the support

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>for Paul Enhnsen and one all over the country. And

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>that matters because she's been around for thirty years. She

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 2>hasn't mucked about it at all. We all know how

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>she stands. We all know how she feels, and she

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 2>wants you if you vote one Nation to put the

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Party second. As I have said, if you are

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 2>going to go a minor party, then you have to

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 2>choose a government with what you do at number two.

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Also arm yourself with the information. So in the case

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of one Nation, it is vote dot one nation, dot org,

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 2>dot au, or you can go searching for how to

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 2>vote Labor, how to vote Liberal, how to vote Green,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.679
<v Speaker 2>how to vote Okay. You can go to a website

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 2>like vote dot one nation, dot org dot au. You

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>can get your how to votes and it doesn't matter

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>whether there's a volunteer there or not. It means you

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 2>don't have to engage with the people who say vote

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 2>for your local doctor, cart immigration, all the stuff that

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 2>they say as you're walking in think of the children.

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 2>You've made your decision, you've got your information, download how

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 2>to vote before you go and vote tomorrow or of

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 2>course on Saturday, where the majority of people will at

0:02:55.760 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 2>this election. Meantime. Of course, in terms of the things

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 2>that we've got to talk about here is again if

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 2>those internal polls are correct, then again we're going to

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 2>see this quite Australian's effect. We'll all see what happens.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 2>As for Albow, and if he wins, well, he's got

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 2>one hell of a machine around him. In my view,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be one that's built on lives. But

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.119
<v Speaker 2>if it is what the majority of people have gone for,

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 2>as Richo says, the mob is always right. Tonight, State

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 2>of the Race tonight, Kroger, Conroy Murray, no one holds

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 2>back all of it hardcore politics Tonight on the show.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I think we may all not feel great after Saturday,

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 2>but you'll certainly feel good tonight as we start to

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>get a bit of an indication, including even into the

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 2>betting markets, about which seats they think are going to

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 2>be changing at this election. Those blokes in a moment

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 2>or two time, as we like to do at the

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 2>start of each and every show, two days to go.

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 2>We've basically been on an election footing since the start

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 2>of the year. The super long campaign is almost over

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 2>according to the in An Electoral Committee Commission. Sorry, five

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>point four million people have already voted. Now I thought

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 2>that we're on our way towards half of all people voting.

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 2>There's eighteen million people on the register, so that'd be

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 2>nine million. We are well short of that. Let's add

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>another million once today's numbers come in. Because this is

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 2>all a bit of a lagging number. I don't think

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 2>we're going to get anywhere near the nine million, which

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 2>means has this sort of two election campaigns. There's one

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 2>that crests the two weeks before in order for early voting,

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>and then there is the one that goes all the

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 2>way up to election day. When it comes to the

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 2>locations that have been voting early, the seat of Griffith,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 2>which is currently held by the Greens, has the most

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>number of people turning up to one of their prepole locations. Bowman,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 2>Dawson and Fadden all LMP seats in Queensland where are

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 2>are which again on a good night for Libbs is competitive,

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 2>but whether the Poles are correct that things have gone

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>back Labour's way in New South Wales means something's going

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 2>on there that there's a certain amount of vote that's

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 2>being banked there. Maybe a bit sick of how many

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 2>door knocks they are getting in Flinders in Victoria, a

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Party seat in Macon in South Australia, a Labor

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Party seat Capricornia in Queensland as well as Herbert in Queensland,

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>both with the LNP and Gorton. So it's rare fulle

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 2>fifty to fifty, but a little bit more when it

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 2>comes to the LNP, but certainly massive overrepresentation of Queensland.

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.239
<v Speaker 2>Who knows which way they are going to vote. Now,

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 2>there's another little factor here that I need to tell

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you about, which is there are about three million postal votes. Now,

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 2>these will not be automatically counted on election night. You

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 2>are able to make sure that it is posted by

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 2>but me election day and then yes, there's a couple

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 2>of days for the mail to get there, but put simply,

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 2>you basically have to have it in the mail by Friday.

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 2>But there's three minion votes on top of all of

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 2>those others. So maybe we can start to say about

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>that nine million number. But the postal number is about three. Now,

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 2>the pre pole votes, they all get counted on Saturday night,

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the postal votes some and then and there's that little

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 2>bit of a lag. Remember, because we live in a

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 2>bizarre system, there's not a lot of counting. In fact,

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's any counting on the Sunday, but

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 2>I'll double check for you before I'm done. So we

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 2>have to wait a few days. So there will be

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 2>places like previously been along at the previous election Herbert

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 2>a couple of elections ago. Although Herbert is certainly strong

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 2>LNP territory. Now with the great Philip Thompson, they're a

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 2>great hope of the site and a great future, very

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.119
<v Speaker 2>much front row performer for the Lnp's a wonderful bloke.

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 2>He's turned what was a couple of one hundred seat

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>majority for the Labor Party into a big thumping lead

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 2>for himself and there's no expectation that will be anything

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 2>but that in and around Townsville. But let's have a

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 2>look at where people have asked for the postal vote. Now,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 2>this of course could be for a whole collection of reasons,

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 2>but put simply, this is a lot of people, say

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 2>a nursing homes disability, meaning they can't go to the polls. Now,

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 2>we went and had a look at this today that

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of these seats you can see that

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>quite a few Labor, quite a few LNP, a lot

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 2>more in Victoria, kind of a fifty to fifty game

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 2>between Victoria and Queensland. There you can see that already

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 2>half of the postal votes in Carwell, in Bonner, in Dunkley,

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 2>in Aston have all been returned along with Deacon and Casey.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 2>There's still more than half of the postal vote to

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>come in in Blair, in Goldstein, in Fadden and in McEwen. Again,

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that the AAC updates these numbers each and

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 2>every day, so again on election day we'll have a

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 2>bit more of a picture about just how much is

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 2>out there, apart from what has happened early. That, of course,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 2>all happens on the day when you go to the

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 2>local school, democracy, sausage, all the rest of it. That's

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>all on the day. Postals a little bit of a bleed.

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 2>After the election will be able to start to do

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>the numbers on all of that. There are some big

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 2>and complicated computers that do all of that, which means

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Tom Connell is able to make the call and he

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>is best in the business. He shoot away the competition,

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's be honest. He has absolutely stepped into his own

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 2>his best in class. He in my view, is the

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>single reason why you have to be watching Sky News

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>on election night. Now we have a great panel and

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll be part of things and there'll be a great conversation.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>But Tom and the way that he reads the numbers,

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>he is deeply just passionate about this stuff and he

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>hates when I pile the pressure on. But he is

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>that damn good all right, So he will have all

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of those calculations in his head. As what the leaders

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 2>were doing today, well, unsurprisingly, they're all making their final pitches.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>No more big announcements, no more policies. It's all about

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 2>pretending I'm the underdog. No, you're the underdog. I'm the underdog. No,

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm the underdog. So the bloke who a pole came

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 2>out today, by the way, saying they would win eighty

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 2>three seats, the same newgu poll that told us earlier

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 2>in the year the Coalition would win seventy three seats.

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 2>And I do love this Labor Party trick. Whien you

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 2>turn up with TV cameras to a school, they all

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>go nuts because it's the TV cameras, not the Prime minister.

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 2>But it's a good old fashion trick and people always

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 2>fall from it. Looks good a couple of days out

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 2>from an election. But he's elbow pretending he's not confident

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>about what everyone But maybe you think is going to

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 2>be the winner.

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 3>We take nothing for good it no prime minister has

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 3>been re elected in this country having served a full

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 3>term since two thousand and four. We have a mountain

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 3>to climb. We have a mountain to climb, and it

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 3>is difficult for Labor to be re elected.

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 2>It's been difficult for every politician to get re elected.

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Now I found thin Albanez. He does win the election,

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 2>either majority or minority, will be the first Prime minister

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 2>to be successfully re elected since Howard in two thousand

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 2>and four. Now, it has been very tumultuous ten years

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 2>of course, rud Gillard, Rad Abbot, Turnbull, Morrison, where we've

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 2>had this scenario where the expectation has been and we've

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of got a little bit too used to what

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 2>is not the normal. The normal is multiple terms for

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 2>one prime minister. Before Howard it was Hawk, and before Hawk,

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is the way Australia generally works. So

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 2>it feels like if there is the return of this government,

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>there is a sort of a return to normal in

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 2>terms of the expectations. The X factor in and around

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 2>this election was that for a very significant amount of

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 2>time in this first term they've been behind in the polls,

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and unlike as I've explained to you before, unlike the

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Libs who got ninety seats in twenty thirteen and then

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 2>they pissed that away with Malcolm Turnbul in twenty sixteen,

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 2>and unlike Rudd again in and around ninety seats and

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>they pissed that away with Julia Gillard in twenty ten.

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 2>This guy doesn't have a massive backbench. So what will

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 2>be interesting for us to talk about tonight is if

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the Labor Party takes a couple of steps forward. Okay,

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 2>they might win some seats, but they're not going to

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 2>end up going back to the sorts of margins that

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 2>previous elections have been fought on. But again that's zero

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 2>some game you either win or you lose. The rest

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 2>of it is just analysis. As for Peter Dunnam where

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 2>he was, he is absolutely confident he has the data

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 2>that he has been given by the Liberal Party. Remember

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 2>that he is informed by the Freshwater Organization who have

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 2>been polling in the Australian Financial Review, and their last

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 2>public polling, which was a couple of weeks ago, now

0:10:57.960 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 2>it says they could win as many as ten seats.

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 2>On top of that, there's whole bunch of fifty to

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 2>fifty calls, which is why he is saying, if you

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 2>are a Liberal supporter, do not give up. Do not

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 2>vote for somebody else back in the bloke you'd want

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>to be the prime minister. Don't make the assumption about

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 2>what your neighbor is going to do.

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.479
<v Speaker 4>I feel confident, I feel good about where our candidates

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 4>are and we've selected some amazing people. Our candidates have

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 4>got a higher name idea than some lazy sitting labor members.

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 4>They have done more work, they're more connected with their

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 4>local electrics and that's why I think you'll see a

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of surprises seat by seat on Saturday night.

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Again, there is the national game, there is the demographics game.

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>There is the insight from polling. But the only way

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 2>to know is, of course, to ask every person in

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Australia to turn up on a day and make their choice,

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 2>or two weeks before, or maybe a couple of days after.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>In terms of postals. Now, one thing that has been despicable,

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 2>and it has been despicable this entire campaign, which has

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 2>been the obvious attempts of the media to continue the

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 2>arrangements that they have enjoyed for the past three years.

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the most corrosive forces in news reporting,

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 2>or sports reporting, or business reporting or showbiz reporting is

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 2>access and the need to be nice to the people

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>who you are reporting on in order to continue to

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 2>be able to report upon them. When it comes to

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 2>things like federal elections national politicians, it should be not

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 2>necessarily an aggressive or totally adversarial relationship, but there should

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 2>always be a year but that exists in the media.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 2>But as we have shown you night after night after

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 2>night for the entirety of this election campaign, and in

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 2>and out of most of the time that we've been

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>on air for the past fifteen years, we just show

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 2>you the tapes that are freely available each and every night.

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 2>And now let's look back at the soft questions the

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister has received from a media who seems pretty

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 2>comfortable with the way the country is being run.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Now you've spoken to Premier Mens about getting the rabbit

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 5>os Italians.

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>All those issues are about the polls and the men

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>him being on your side.

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 6>Are you concerned though, about the possibility of a protest

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 6>folk emerging that people think that maybe is going to

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 6>win pretty comfortably.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 4>What does I say about your opponent, You think that

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't know the price of a.

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Passed the halfway point in the campaign, the polls look

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>increasingly positive for labor. That's positive for the coalition. You

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>must be getting confident now if you're going to the

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>find two weeks.

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 6>Should the Commonwealth spend anything on helping WA secure a

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 6>NRL site?

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 7>Do you think that more park O fortunate?

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 8>Mad Joe Exotic from the hit series Tiger King is

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 8>on a more serious note is he's serving a prison

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 8>sentence for a murder and has been convicted of animal abuse.

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 8>He's also just endorsed you on Instagram. How do you

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 8>feel about that?

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 2>How did you get time to watch adolescence on the campaign?

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 9>Are you cocky or confident ahead of the labor.

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Law report today that your campaign share as welcome the

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 2>baby girl for the world?

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>How much maternity leaders who we're going to get and

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>any message for new parents.

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Don't want to upset the apple cart because they believe. Firstly,

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 2>I may be ideologically that this is the team that

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 2>should be winning, but their guess is that this is

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the team that was going to win. You've seen how

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 2>they have not pushed back on the how many times

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 2>they've lied about how many things I know, but we

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 2>had to have a rolling count of Peter Dutton and

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 2>how many times he had gone to a petrol station.

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 2>God forbid, he was in advocacy of what proved to

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 2>be one of the most popular policies of this election.

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Showed you those numbers last night coming from the Red

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Bridge organization. Compare that to the daily dance between the

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 2>media and Peter Dutton. Now again, it's not all meant

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 2>to be cuddles all the time, But compare the tenor

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 2>of the garbage that you've just heard being asked of

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 2>the man who wants three more years after three pretty

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 2>difficult years for the average Australian to the bloke who

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 2>is saying he wants to put the country back on track.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:57.359
<v Speaker 2>This seems just personal.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 10>What does it say about ability of you saying on

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 10>as Liberal leader after the election if a candidate in

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 10>a key marginal seat things is actually a selling point

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 10>that you could shuffle off.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 2>She's called you a monster these what is your action?

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 9>A lot of your campaign has been at petrol stations,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 9>You've been in trucks.

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 11>You when you speak to about.

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 9>Female dominated industries like education, you talk about the work agenda?

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 4>What are you offering modern working women?

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 10>You're not a dentist or an engineer, but I suspect

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 10>that you'd take their advice on their subjective expertise. But

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 10>last night, when you were asked about climate scientists, you

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 10>said you accepted climate change was happening, but you couldn't

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 10>bring yourself to say that you trusted climate scientists.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 6>Why should people vote for you when you give the

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 6>air of a guy that's turned up not having turned

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 6>his homeworking on time.

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 12>Can you tell us how intense your fights with Barnaby are?

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 2>How can you be taken seriously in the Pacific?

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>If all of your policies hating? What's your message to

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>South Australian voters, particularly in brief being stared watching their

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>retirement savings be wiped away? Today? Who were worried about

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you becoming Donald trumple.

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 9>You've been criticized for borrowing Trump and tactics.

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe borrowing Trumpian tactics? Do you believe accite.

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 8>This for these from your candidates are damaging the little

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 8>Now yesterday's debt you.

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Said you don't know President Donald Trump. How would you

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>get that deal? If you don't even know the guys pre.

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Poll starts tomorrow about fifty percent of people expected to

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 2>vote before May three.

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 7>Can you pull it back from here?

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the Australian stock market is higher than

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 2>it was at the start of this campaign. It is

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 2>certainly higher than the dips that were there because of

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the tariffs. Basically, if you did nothing with your money

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 2>in the past month, you are in front. But because

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 2>for a couple of days or your retirement serving East

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump. This has been the way that it has

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 2>worked every single day, in part because those people know

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 2>that if Dunton was able to get onto defense, well

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 2>that means the government's going to have to you know, sorry,

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 2>get onto offense. Then the government's going to have to

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 2>be on defense. And we know that Albo when he's

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 2>on defense in the past couple of years, has been terrible.

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>It has been unbelieved Ball and I have no doubt

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 2>you've been yelling at the television like I have been

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 2>for the past few days. But it is the way

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 2>that it is. And this is a generation of journalists

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 2>who think this is the way that it is done.

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 2>But there is a hall of shame of those who

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 2>deserve to be called out specifically for some of their

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 2>behavior and some of what I believe to be some

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty low hits that they took, including of course Tim

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Lester from Channel seven the day after we learned that

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton's father had had a heart attack. I interpreted

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 2>this question as him basically blaming Peter Dutton for his

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>father's heart attack.

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 12>Campaigns are pressure events for candidates like yourself, but they're

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 12>pressure events for families of candidates too. Do you worry

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 12>your dad is not being helped and might even have

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 12>been harmed by the fact that he's worried about you.

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Proben used to work at the ABC, but then

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 2>there was great outrage when he was sacked by the ABC,

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 2>so he had to have a job, which meant Channel

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.479
<v Speaker 2>nine came to the rescue and he proved that he

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 2>was just as ABC, but this time the ABC with ads.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the way that he again tried to bend

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 2>a moment in the campaign where it was all about

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Trump and when you sent a nampaginper Price, a spectacular

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>woman who deserves to have all of the attention and

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 2>at some point into the future, all of the power

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 2>that the Australian government can have because she wants to

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 2>help people that most people in the media would step

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 2>over if they saw them on a Friday night. This

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 2>was the story from a few weeks ago.

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 9>We can make Australia rate again.

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that an ode to Donald Trump?

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 7>No?

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 9>If I said that, I don't even realize I said that.

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 11>But no, But similarities with the Trump campaign not ending there.

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 9>Race, gender, sexuality, None of that is going to matter.

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 9>What's going to matter is the right person.

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>For the job.

0:18:53.920 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 11>The senator vowing to vigorously pursue government efficiency and conservative bugbears.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 9>Are learning indoctrination as opposed to our education. We will

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 9>conduct an audit into the spending in indigenous affairs, ridiculous

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 9>grants like colonizing.

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 11>Breastfeeding, outlining a wish list of radical change.

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 2>But of course we have access to the tape of

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 2>the press conference that he was at. This is what

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 2>she actually said, and then you see the Frankenstein treatment

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that he did to present to the audience who didn't

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.959
<v Speaker 2>see it live. But trust him to tell them what

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 2>actually happened.

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.479
<v Speaker 9>I'm so proud to be able to stand beside and

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 9>to ensure that we can make Australia great again, that

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 9>we can bring Australia back to its former glory, that

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 9>we can get Australia back on track. We're hearing from

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 9>students that they are learning in doctrination as opposed to education,

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 9>that they're being forced to have to provide a welcome

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 9>to country within their essays for crying out loud, and

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 9>they if they don't don't provide an appropriate form of

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 9>welcome to country or acknowledgment of country, that they will

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 9>be marked down. We have announced policies around the fact

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 9>that we will conduct them audit into the spending in

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 9>Indigenous affairs and the Indigenous Affairs portfolio. We will establish

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 9>a rule commission in the sexual abuse in Indigenous communities

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 9>because we know that Indigenous children experience the highest rates

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 9>of exposure to domestic and family violence.

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 2>It took a few weeks into the campaign before the

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 2>seven thirty Reports host Sarah Ferguson made her way into

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 2>the media Hall of shame because this is the treatment

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 2>that she gave to the Shadow Housing Minister. God forbid, interrupted, clueless,

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Clear O'Neil.

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 6>We are building fifty five thousand social and affordable homes

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 6>over five years twenty eight thousand, twenty eight thousand of

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 6>those homes, Markels, what would.

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Your mother say hearing you interrupt her? Just I've been

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>interrupted the entire Please it's okay.

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 6>I'm unflappable, Sarah. I've done this my third run at

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 6>this this week.

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 2>But what did you say when Claire O'Neil was interrupting

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Michael Suka.

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 5>Thousand short of what the cold? That's not right, Michael,

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 5>labour and not going to be all one point two?

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 5>That's the labor under Claire's watch. We're delivering fewer homes

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 5>that we've had for well Over.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's absolutely untrue.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Again Michael, and they get to deliver a single home

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 5>that's also True's well, we will fund so sure.

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>For that's it. You're not getting an answer.

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 5>You let an answer out of me through the Affordable

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 5>Housing Bond aggregator. We supported thirteen thousand homes wrong, So.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Did you build thirteen?

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 7>Did you build thirteen higher than?

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And then today all the rooms are that Michael tried to.

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 2>And then have the many questions asked in the four debates,

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 2>and it was good to see four different debates. I

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 2>don't think you got worse than this, mister.

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 9>We don't see a lot of your softer side. Do

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 9>you think that your your time as a police officer

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 9>led you to have a black and white view of

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 9>the world.

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe. And then, by the way, Andrew Proben,

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>who did the report about the debate, turned around and

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 2>used the answer of Peter Dunden to the question where

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 2>he talks about his time as a police officer, because

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 2>he was asked about his time as a police officer

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 2>to then say and Peter Dunton says his time as

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 2>a police officer would mean that he would be better

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 2>dealing with Donald Trump. Now I get it. There's a

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 2>show on Channel two that's done this for a long

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 2>time that no doubt will turn around and have the

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 2>greatest hits of things that I've had to say. But

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 2>the difference between me and the people who go to

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 2>those events is that they are the independent journalists. It's

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 2>pretty obvious that they weren't in all of this, maybe

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 2>because they ideologically prefer one over the other, but more

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 2>likely it's because they didn't want to upset the apple cart.

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 2>They didn't want to do anything that would hurt their

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>proximity to power, because if they have the closeness to

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the power, then the power will reward them with a

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 2>little pat on the head, a little bit of news

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 2>here and there, an exclusive every now and then, the

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 2>chance to interview the Prime minister. Thankfully, there have been

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 2>heavy hitters that have pushed back. I highlight my colleagues

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 2>here at skuy News, and Andrew Clenell with the interviews

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 2>he's done today and his question at the National Press Club.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 2>My colleague Chris Yulman here ats sky News as well,

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 2>and his unbelievable strength when it comes to calling bs

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to power and electricity and the bowen

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 2>of everything. But is anyone surprised that when most people

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>get their information from places other than this program, this station,

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 2>our websites that we're sitting where we're sitting tonight. The

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>polls basically sit somewhere between fifty two forty eight or

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 2>fifty three forty seven. If it's fifty two forty eight,

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 2>it's basically a repeat of the last election. Labor wins,

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 2>but only just if it's fifty three forty seven. They

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 2>will win clearly and increase the number of seats and

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 2>all the people who will be there to be rewarded.

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe one or two of the media, people

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 2>who are probably yelling at the TV right now, just

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 2>like we have been yelling at them. Now, before we

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 2>get into state of the race, I want to talk

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 2>about the fault lines that exist in our community, the

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 2>fault lines which will decide the election. But simply we

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 2>know that people under fifty, generally speaking, vote to the left.

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 2>People over the fifty will generally vote to the right. Now,

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 2>sometimes this can become a little bit more or a

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit less, but at this election, I went through

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 2>the actual electoral role and counted, well, the AAC countered

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 2>for me, but the number of people in each and

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 2>every seat. And at this election, there are two fault

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 2>lines that matter. Are you under the age of fifth

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 2>or over the age of fifty? Are you male or

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>are you female? And yes, there are a couple of

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 2>thousand people who describe themselves as intermediate, But for the

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 2>point of the conversation, age and gender are going to

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 2>be the big fault lines.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Here.

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 2>To give you an idea about maybe why we're sitting

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 2>at fifty two forty eight or fifty three forty seven.

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>There are four hundred and eight thousand more voters under

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the age of fifty across the country. Than over the

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 2>age of fifty. That would mean there are theoretically more

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 2>people voting to the left because they are under the

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 2>age of fifty. We also know that in the polling

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 2>that women are tending towards the left rather than the right,

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 2>and nationally there there are four hundred and twenty seven

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred and twelve more women. Now, obviously you can

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 2>be both female and under the age of fifty, but

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 2>the point here is that there is a many hundred

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 2>thousand vote advantage to what we are being told in

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the polls are sections that are going to vote to

0:25:55.840 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 2>the left Labor, Green's Socialist Alliance deals. Why is this

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 2>election competitive at all, then, Paul, Well, let me explain,

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 2>because both major parties have got marginal seats. Now, obviously

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the older you vote, the more likely you are not

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 2>to be voting labor. So in seven of the ten

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 2>seats that are their most marginal seats, people are over

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the age of fifty. The saving grace, however, could be

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 2>that there are in nine of the ten seats more

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 2>female voters. In these labor marginal seats. In terms of

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 2>the Liberal Party, they think they can hold on to

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 2>seats because eight out of ten of those seats have

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 2>people over the age of fifty that are the majority voters,

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 2>but they may lose to tels or outright to labor

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 2>because there are more female voters in every single one

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 2>of those seats. In fact, in some of those seats

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 2>there is a ten thousand vote difference between people under

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the age of fifty and over the age of fifty.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 2>When you come down to one percent seats, two percent seats,

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 2>guess what that really matters? All right, stay to the race.

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to it right now, deep dive into data.

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't matter what you kind of think is going

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 2>to happen. It is important to go and have a

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 2>look at all of it. We will do it right now,

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 2>all right, or we need to do Send me an

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 2>email to poultsgudews dot com dot A you thanks for watching,

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for the journey. I'll be there on Saturday night,

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and you know what, I'll be here on Sunday night,

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 2>and I'll be here in three years time, and I'll

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 2>be here in six years time. You get the point.

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 2>We're not going nowhere. Fight fight, fight baby all day,

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 2>every day.

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 7>More on a second.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 2>Lots of little traditions that we get used to and

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 2>over fifteen years were built, many of them up. One

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 2>of them is that the last time we are on

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 2>television before an election, we have a conversation with two

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 2>blokes I spend a lot of time with on the phone,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time with personally, arguing and discussing about

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 2>this and about that and what do you think of this?

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 2>And have you seen that? They of course are legends

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 2>of their party, none other than Stephen Conroy and Michael

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 2>Crowd gentlemen, both are in Melbourne. I wish I was

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 2>there with you now, but alast the man cave it

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 2>does not take care of itself. Lads, how do we

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 2>feel apart from results all the rest of it? Right?

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the time where rubber hits the road. What's

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 2>it like when you are either in head office or

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 2>sitting around a cabinet table a couple of days out,

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 2>regardless of all the information. What's it like just before

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 2>an election? Michael?

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 7>Mate? It's chaos, to be honest. Everyone everyone's got an opinion.

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 7>Everyone will tell you why that one was wrong and

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:36.479
<v Speaker 7>you should have done this, and we should have been

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 7>doing that, and donors haven't sent their money in. Candidates

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 7>complaining people are sick. On the other hand, if you're winning.

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 7>If you're winning, it's very different. It's like, oh, mate,

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 7>aren't we magnificent? Those advertisers adds were great candidates, magnificent,

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 7>best candidates we ever had, policies, fantastic state directors, wonderful,

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 7>The leader's a genius. So the answer is to your question,

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 7>it depends whether you're winning or not, mate, And it's

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 7>a very different response that Stephen.

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Of course, apart from anything else that being a candidate yourself,

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 2>but being in the Senate it means you have responsibility

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 2>for people downstairs. Is this the time when the person

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 2>who's basically running in order to do how to vote?

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Forms in Liberal Party seats that have never turned in

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 2>about four hundred years. I think I'm still a chance.

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm a chance. Somebody at the pub said they're voting

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 2>for me for the first time.

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>No candidate. Latis sets in very quickly, and I can't

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>tell you the amount of times I've had the candidates

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in Higgins, which was traditionally and incredibly safe seat Peter

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Destale's a member. They'd find out and say, look, it's

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>on the swing. Is on. I've been knocking on the doors.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You can feel it from the conversations and you just go, yeah, no, no,

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>if we will get more recent and you put the

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>phone down and you just forget about it. That is

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that is an absolute normal in all parties, not just

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>label in all parties, because to run, you've got to

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have a genuine sense of self belief. Otherwise you couldn't

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>put yourself out there. And so that sense of self

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>belief really takes over during a campaign. And you know,

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got on people for doing it. And now I

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>was lucky enough to stand a few times, but it

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>really there has some very funny phone calls.

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, look in terms of your predictions and all of

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 2>that game right where we're going to deal in data

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and all of that. But we'll get to in a second, right,

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 2>but let's deal with medi Scare versus super Scare. All right.

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Both are very effective. One is very late in the game.

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 2>One was very frontloaded and helped change the conversation in

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 2>those early months. Which one is going to be most

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 2>potent going into this absolute final run And now that

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 2>we know that the majority of people will be voting

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 2>on election day, yep, super Scare hasn't been running for

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 2>weeks and weeks and weeks, but Jesus running hard and

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the next couple of days, Michael, but.

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 7>It is running hard. But those with superbalances over three

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 7>million are not that many. Those with a Medicare card

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 7>are quite plentiful, so medicares are much more effective weapon.

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 7>I'd say this about this election. I don't think I've

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 7>ever said anything like it. My first election was nine

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 7>to sixty nine when I handed out for John Gorton

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 7>as a twelve year old. I've never said anything like it.

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean the dishonesty, the lies that Albani's in charmers

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 7>have told, the appalling mistakes they've made on budget figures.

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 7>They make things up, they repeat them, they keep repeating them.

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 7>Phil Coury and others know right and say this is wrong.

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 7>They just keep repeating them. The six hundred billion, it's

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 7>a blatant lie. So I don't think Labour can be proud.

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 7>It's a dirty If they win, it's a dirty victory.

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 7>It's a very dirty victory. And when that happens, you

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 7>will get clobbed at the next election. So one of

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 7>the reasons Short lost in nineteen wasn't just because of

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 7>the tax rises. He proposed, but because people felt badly

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 7>that they'd been conned by him in sixteen.

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Good point.

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 7>So Albanez, if he wins on Saturday, he's going to

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 7>have a legacy of people saying, mate, you condus, right,

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 7>you condus on medicare. It was never going to be abolished, cut,

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, slashed, burned, nuclear was never going to cost

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 7>six hundred. You just go through the whole list of

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 7>these things. So medicare is very effective. But you know,

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 7>if you win an election by praying on the elderly,

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 7>the infirmed and the sick, by basically scaring the living

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 7>daylights out of them that their healthcare is going to

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 7>be affected by Peter Dutton, you shouldn't very feel proud

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 7>of yourself, mate, you really shouldn't. That's a race to

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 7>the political bottom and he should be ashamed. Albanize.

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, Stephen, in terms of the super scared side

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 2>of things, we read an article yesterday suggesting that this

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 2>could be the difference between majority minority. This could be

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 2>a giant flip of an awful large amount of seats,

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 2>because of course it's not just the people who have

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 2>that three minion, but it's about the younger people who

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 2>will end up tipping in superannuation for a longer working life,

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 2>hoping to be able to warn enough money at some

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 2>point in time that that three million is the number

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 2>that they'll be able to play a plunk with down

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the track. What's either your defense of the MENI scare

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 2>or what is your fear of the super scare?

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Well on the super scare. The thing that's totally distracted

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>from the ability for avoiderbles to get it up has

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>been that Donald Trump's behavior in the US has seen

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>people super innuation from being smashed. People have opened up,

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>had a look on their fifty thousand dollars worse off

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>because of Donald Trump. So it's been hard to get

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>your attention onto. As Michael says, there's not that many

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>people now, but everyone who's got it he has been

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>losing money immediately in front of their eyes. So I

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's really back in the He's going to run

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>that did is cell?

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 2>The all ordinaries is up on where it was a

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 2>month ago.

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Up. No, But you know, people remember going down a

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>lot more than they remember going on. So I think

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a small niche issue that's been drowned up by

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>other impacts on the superannuation front on many care I

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>think I think Michae always being unkind Albow came out

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>from Christmas break and he was firing and all cylinders

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>he hadn't had. He wasn't in a way that he

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been firing for probably eighteen months since the voice.

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>He came out. But it wasn't just he came out

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>firing and all cylinders. And I've got to give it

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>enormous credit to someone most of you have never heard of,

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Paul Erickson, correct, the ALP national secretary and campaign director.

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So Albou came out. He came out with women's health policy.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>So he had about three different health policy initiatives that

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed and then to springboard into the Labour's the only

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>party that will protect these. We will protect Medicare, we

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>will protect these new initiatives, and so Labor have brand

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>equity around Medicare. And if you wanted all these new initiatives,

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you had to keep protecting Medicare to take advantage of

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>all these new initiatives. So yes, they've run hard. Peter

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Dutton unfortunately has a track record and one of the

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>great problems you have when you move from government to

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>opposition is you're still carrying the baggage from when you

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>were in government. It doesn't matter which ministry you have,

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 1>and it's particularly difficult if you were the minister where

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>people can say, remember he was voted by the AMA

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the worst health minister they've ever had. He did these

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>cuts and so you know he'll do it again. So

0:35:55.440 --> 0:36:01.280
<v Speaker 1>often you need to have people leave to allow fresher

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 1>people who weren't part of previous governments to be able

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>to come through and say we're going to, you know,

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>make changes that was someone else, it wasn't me.

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, and can I say can I say to that

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 2>to that point as well? Right that? You know, if

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 2>it's fifty three forty seven and we're talking about a

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 2>re elected government with more seats than it went going in,

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 2>then I think you've got to start looking towards the

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 2>things like the News World's Labor Party, who only had

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>one one member of his shadow cabinet, was even an

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 2>MP in the one in the government that Kanely was

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 2>leading and got flushed because Labour's got their line and

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 2>length on all of this stuff, and we'll see what happens.

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 2>That said, you know, it is rather selective about what

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 2>the media will let you get away with. And I've

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 2>got to say here, Stephen is a bloke who you

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 2>know again tonight looks like he's playing with the better hand.

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you agree with some of my observations of the media.

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Do you agree with just some that there's just the

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 2>idea that the bloke can stand there and say things

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 2>we all know not to be true. But because we

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 2>now live in this world and it's ever been us,

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 2>but still it's more aggressive. Right If the question comes

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.479
<v Speaker 2>from Channel seven, Channel nine won't report it. If something

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 2>happens on Sky News, then ABC pretends it never takes place.

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 2>And that is now happening in the round in terms

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 2>of these journalists in the previous generation of journalists, where

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 2>we've still got people like Edrick Lenell and Phil Koury

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 2>and Chris Human around when they saw that somebody was

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:26.399
<v Speaker 2>onto something, you'd step back and let them have a crack.

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 2>But it seems like both leaders elbow started it doesn't

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 2>finish finish off with them as well. This sort of

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 2>one question a day thing and please don't upset Daddy

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 2>seems to have been a rather successful tactic. But Father

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Piss Week for those of us watching on right.

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now, look, I've been surprised at the gallery are

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>prepared to let whoever is up the front dictate in

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>such a way that they're not able to push a point.

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's cute Osta Albow and Dutton for

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>being able to I won't use the word train, but

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, don't forget. This is not you some blow

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:08.720
<v Speaker 1>called Joebielki. Peterson used to talk about feeding the chucks.

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>This is not a new phenomenon. But what I think

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about the media is that there has

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>been a fundamental structural change. This is the first campaign

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>where you can say that the Courier, Mail, the Daily Telegraph,

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the Herald's Son, the advertiser in Adelaide have not been

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>able to control the debate. My daughter eighteen years old,

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>she has never watched the six o'clock news. So it's

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>not just those tabloids in Channel nine, Channel eleven, Channel nine,

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Channel seven, Channel ten. They are not the leads anymore.

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, if there was a big story, then everyone

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>else was forced to. Notwithstanding the point you're making, Paul

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>about and which is true that people won't report each

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>other's stories, but they they don't dominate the discourse, particularly

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>for people under the age of forty, because that has

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>really changed structurally.

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 2>Which brings me to those fault lines right about. You know,

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 2>basically a way of just reading the world. And again,

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I know, not all people under fifty, not all people over,

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 2>not all men, not all, but as a way of

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 2>trying to divide the ag MENI people to try to

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:29.919
<v Speaker 2>work out which way things are going to go. That's

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the way that I'm choosing to do it. In terms

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 2>of literally looking at the number of people that are

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 2>enrolled in what seat, where is that an advantage or

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 2>a disadvantage to you? And again, the picture of this election,

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 2>more people under the age of fifty than over the

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 2>age of fifty, more women than men. In terms of

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:49.399
<v Speaker 2>the marginals. If Labor's going to lose seats, it's going

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 2>to be because of the seats that are currently marginal,

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 2>seven out of ten of them have over fifty percent sorry,

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 2>over fifty year old. If the Liberals are going to

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 2>lose seats, it's going to be because in those seats,

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 2>ten out of ten have more female voters. What do

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 2>you think about this as a way of trying to

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 2>carve up the pie. And again, demographics can be difficult,

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 2>and that's why we end up with things like that

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 2>you GOV poll where they go and do a survey

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and then they mix it in with all the people

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 2>that are around and you get up a sou flew

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:25.240
<v Speaker 2>that says, two months ago the liberal parties winning seventy

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.320
<v Speaker 2>three seats and today the Labor Party is winning eighty four.

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:30.439
<v Speaker 2>But as a way of cutting it, have I cut

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:34.240
<v Speaker 2>it reasonably well Michael to understand what might be happening here?

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 7>Yes, and no, it makes a lot of sense what

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 7>you're saying. And the press are obsessed with describing elections

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 7>by these individual demographics, and that's the answer to the election.

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 7>The real answer is this, if you are winning the

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 7>policy debate, you will win the election. Right unless your

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 7>a government's expiring after the India term. You've been there

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 7>twelve thirty four in years. You will win if you

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 7>win the policy debate and you convince people as to

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 7>the merit of your policy prescription.

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But as you know, you've got to start that debate early.

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 7>And can I just make one of the points Stephen

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 7>makes me laugh when you talk about Paul Ericks and

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 7>the federal director lower party. We're going to give him

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 7>great credit this, Paul Erickson Blake. I laugh because mate,

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 7>in the Liberal Party, it's an article of faith. If

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 7>you win the election, the leader's a genius and no

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 7>one really mentions the Federal director. If you lose, it's all.

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:34.840
<v Speaker 1>The fault of the Federal director.

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:39.720
<v Speaker 7>So reading between the lines from James Campbell's wonderful article

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.439
<v Speaker 7>in the Herald Sun today and the Daily Telegraph today,

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 7>reading between the lines, you get the impression that some

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 7>people are unhappy with the Federal Director and maybe the

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 7>Liberal Party hasn't run a good campaign. All that and

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 7>you know it's no good and I think, but hang on,

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 7>this guy, Andrew Hurst is a federal director. He was

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 7>the Federal Director in nineteen and everyone told me he

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 7>was a complete genius. The answer is he was a

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 7>genius in nineteen, but in twenty five he is not. Listen,

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 7>that's all nonsense, right, What Stephen's saying is nonsense. Right.

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 7>You win and lose elections depending on the performance of

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 7>the Parliamentary Party and the parliamentary leadership over the previous

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 7>three years. A federal director, a state director, right, whoever

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:22.400
<v Speaker 7>they are, the ADVERTI of the agency, the bootstrappers, the candidates.

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:26.280
<v Speaker 7>They can only hang on the performance of the parliamentary party.

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 7>If the parliamentary party doesn't perform, you can have the

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 7>state director from or federal director from heaven, you won't

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 7>win the election. Right in nineteen what happened, Bill Shorten

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 7>played on our home turf because he had all these

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 7>four hundred billion dollars of tax increases. So of course

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:43.919
<v Speaker 7>we were in a good campaign. We won the election.

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 7>He played on our home turf. Everyone told me the

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 7>federal director was a complete genius, and so be careful

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 7>about these these these you know, you know Monday morning

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 7>quarterbacks that say it was this, it was that.

0:42:57.280 --> 0:42:57.320
<v Speaker 8>No.

0:42:57.440 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 7>Look, if the parliamentary leadership performance, they don't perform, you

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 7>don't win. That's the bottom line. Don't start blaming the start.

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 2>But I listen to the people around him. You get

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the result of the past two years. Someone somewhere got

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the other side of his year and changed.

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:17.400
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right, Yeah, all right, down trajectory before Christmas.

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Correct, ignore Murferu, pay attention to Paul Ericks and perhaps

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 2>would be the advices of the future, or maybe they'll

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 2>just get into the thing where we only have to

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 2>do that with a couple of months to go all right,

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 2>quick break back with more or start getting into the

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:34.439
<v Speaker 2>seat predictions. Next two things we can all agree on. One.

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't it awesome that in the Turnbull Times they had

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 2>to publish a poll that said the least popular of

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the former prime ministers was Malcolm Turnbull. Second midnight tonight

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 2>the TV had stopped. All right, now, a lot of

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 2>people have been sending me he must go, and there's

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 2>lots of more Labors and liberal eights to look. One

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:52.399
<v Speaker 2>of the advantages when you decide when the election is

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 2>is you know when the first day will be and

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 2>when the last day will be. There's only so much

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:58.760
<v Speaker 2>time and you can book into that time. So surprise, surprise,

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing what you're seeing. Its TV stations picking winners.

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 2>A rare moment of defense for my business, as I

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 2>occasionally ignore the hand that feeds. We are here with

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Steve Conry, with Michael Kroger. It's fun to watch anyway

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 2>for people it seems to have worked over fifteen years.

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:15.399
<v Speaker 2>May be. So for the next look, let's get into

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 2>some quick, some speed round stuff here. I want to

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 2>talk about the Polar coaster because someone's going to be

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 2>really wrong here. Now, Yes, they're starting to kind of

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 2>get between fifty two forty eight or fifty three forty

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 2>seven or margin de vera means we're all technically within

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 2>six points. Okay. The people that are doing the internal

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 2>polling for the Labor Party are the people behind the

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 2>news pole. That doesn't mean Newspole is working for the

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Labor Party. And the people that are doing the internal

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 2>polling the Liberal Party the ones doing the freshwater poling

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 2>which is turning up in the Financial Review. Now, I

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:49.279
<v Speaker 2>have mentioned that they've kind of been shushed for a

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:51.359
<v Speaker 2>while at certain points in time. In fact, their last

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:54.239
<v Speaker 2>pole said that the Libs would win ten seats at

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 2>this election. Well, this is the pole that has just

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 2>been released tonight in the Financial Review, and each the

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 2>most generous of the fifty fifty split to the coalition,

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 2>suggesting that it's more fifty one and a bit to

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 2>forty nine and a bit as opposed to sorry forty

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 2>eight and a bit as opposed to the fifty two's

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 2>and the fifty threes. Thirty seconds from each of you

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 2>about the polar coaster.

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 7>Your thoughts, Michael, Well, look, if the fifty two forty

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 7>eight is correct, then alban Eesi is back, because that'll

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 7>just show a minute swing against him, fifty one and

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 7>a half forty eight and a half. There's a bit

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 7>over half swing against him, which means the Coalition win

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 7>a few seats. What I don't know is this, I

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 7>don't know how much there's a shy dutt In Vader

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:46.840
<v Speaker 7>effect like there is with conservative parties around the world.

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 7>I don't know how much people have been fooled by

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 7>the campaign. I don't know whether in the last week

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 7>people think I've just I've been conned by Albanizi. I

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 7>don't want to be a mug And I don't know

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 7>how much the press differences from the conservative right parties

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 7>are going to how much that's going to increase. So

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 7>normally we've got sixty four percent of one Nation, sixty

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:13.360
<v Speaker 7>two percent of UOP straight Trumpet, and seventy two percent

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 7>of libertarian I think they could all be in the eighties.

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 7>So there's another one or save percent. I don't know

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 7>how much that's going to increase. So there are some

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 7>factors which might mean the coalition vote is quite a

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 7>bit better. And finally, in some of these marginal seats,

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 7>I wonder whether our candidates have done very well, and

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 7>whether the Labor vote is actually increasing in its own

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 7>safe seats, because there have been big swings against lab

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:39.839
<v Speaker 7>particularly in Victoria and its own seats in the twenty

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 7>two election. Maybe that's come back to labor and not

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 7>so much in the marginals.

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 2>All Right, sports bet has put out a list of,

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 2>according to their betting markets, who they think is going

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:51.959
<v Speaker 2>to win seats. This is all parties, independence and the rest.

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:55.399
<v Speaker 2>And guess what, it's bugger all. It's basically exactly where

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 2>we are. A couple this way, a couple that way.

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:00.399
<v Speaker 2>If we can bring that up guys at to see

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 2>he was a lot of wins for the coalition, but

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 2>these are people who were elected at the last election

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 2>as coalition MPs. Those independent seats would just essentially go

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:11.800
<v Speaker 2>back to where we were. The only games for the

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:15.280
<v Speaker 2>coalition would be winning from the Greens in and around Brisbane,

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 2>winning from Gilmour on the south coast of New South Wales,

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 2>winning Aston, which of course was the seat lost at

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:24.880
<v Speaker 2>a by election, which means you're back to the number

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 2>basically sort of plus two from the twenty twenty two election.

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 2>In terms of labor, they would be able to gain

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 2>a seat from the Greens, and in terms of Labor

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 2>taking a seat anywhere else, I can't see it in

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 2>that list. But again Labor Party suggests that some of

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:46.839
<v Speaker 2>this polling might put them in and around and even

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 2>that positive polling in Freshwater puts them bang on seventy six.

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 2>So lads, tell me dark horses, weird predictions. Give me

0:47:55.760 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 2>your thirty seconds so everyone can replay the tape on Monday. Stephen, Look, I.

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Think it's a really interesting contest in foul. That was

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the seat that Christina Kanneely ran in and she lost

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to a high profile Independence. But there's a lot of

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:19.920
<v Speaker 1>talk around Labor maybe just picking that seat back up.

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one to watch on election night.

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 7>All right, Michael, Well, the most fascinating seat in the

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 7>country is McNamara, where Josh Burn's income at Labor MPs

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 7>under threat from the Liberals and possibly the Greens. If

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:38.839
<v Speaker 7>he comes third, which he may well do, then his

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 7>preferences may elect the Greens, which would horrify a lot

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 7>of people. I think the one thing we can say

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:47.719
<v Speaker 7>is mate. When the three of us get together next week,

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 7>we're going to say to each other that was totally unexpected.

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 7>Whatever it was, there will be some shock results. There

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:57.799
<v Speaker 7>will be some shock results on Saturday night that no

0:48:57.880 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 7>one saw coming and we will be absolutely bewilders to

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 7>how various things happened. So what those are, we don't know,

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 7>but there will be some absolute shock results which will

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 7>surprise everybody.

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Yep, bloody oath all right. I think a little shy

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 2>thing here is just pay attention to some of the

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Teal vote that might be a little higher than people

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 2>think in Queensland only because published polls they're up seven

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 2>points on where they were at the last election. One nation.

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 2>I think they are going to go way above where

0:49:23.760 --> 0:49:26.760
<v Speaker 2>they were at the last election, and preferences means again

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 2>some thing's become more competitive. But if the government's re elected,

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 2>guess what, that's what always happens. We're the first term government.

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you guys, do appreciate it. We'll see you again

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:37.239
<v Speaker 2>and I'll see on Saturday night for the coverage up.

0:49:37.280 --> 0:49:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Go Yankees.