1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,000 Speaker 1: Now the former leader of the opposition. Here the Liberal 2 00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:06,720 Speaker 1: Party leader, former Liberal leader David Spears maintaining he is 3 00:00:06,960 --> 00:00:10,160 Speaker 1: the victim of a digital hoax and a video of 4 00:00:10,200 --> 00:00:13,920 Speaker 1: him snorting white powder on his kitchen bench, he says, 5 00:00:14,080 --> 00:00:17,919 Speaker 1: is a deep fake. It was apparently recorded in June 6 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:21,239 Speaker 1: this year, while he was still the leader. He claims 7 00:00:21,360 --> 00:00:25,320 Speaker 1: it's not him. He has never taken illicit drugs. The 8 00:00:25,360 --> 00:00:27,720 Speaker 1: new Liberal leader, Vicentasia, have been in the job a 9 00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:32,360 Speaker 1: couple of weeks now is urging mister Spears to report 10 00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:35,520 Speaker 1: it to police. This is a little bit of Vincentasia. 11 00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:38,760 Speaker 2: Any suggestion of this kind of activity is of concern 12 00:00:38,800 --> 00:00:41,560 Speaker 2: to me and my party takes these matters very seriously. 13 00:00:42,120 --> 00:00:44,239 Speaker 2: This is a matter for mister Spears, and if it 14 00:00:44,360 --> 00:00:48,160 Speaker 2: is faked, mister Spears should refer it to the appropriate authorities. 15 00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:51,239 Speaker 2: It would be inappropriate for further comment and to all 16 00:00:51,280 --> 00:00:52,480 Speaker 2: the facts are known, all. 17 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:56,440 Speaker 1: Right, so indeed, and I think that's a sensible thing 18 00:00:56,520 --> 00:00:59,560 Speaker 1: to do if it is a fake. And David Spears 19 00:00:59,560 --> 00:01:05,240 Speaker 1: absolutely maintained, he says he's horrified by the image. Then 20 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:08,280 Speaker 1: never done drugs, he says, And if it's a fac 21 00:01:08,319 --> 00:01:10,720 Speaker 1: as he says, it is he needs to take it 22 00:01:10,760 --> 00:01:12,720 Speaker 1: to police. That has to be the first thing to 23 00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:15,840 Speaker 1: He should be at the police station now making a report. 24 00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:19,440 Speaker 1: The Premier, Peter Malinowskis was asked about it on the 25 00:01:19,480 --> 00:01:20,800 Speaker 1: Sky News not long ago. 26 00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:25,559 Speaker 3: Look, last night I was totally consumed by the news 27 00:01:25,560 --> 00:01:27,960 Speaker 3: that was emerging that the federal government was going to 28 00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:32,080 Speaker 3: adopt our policy on social media, and then the other 29 00:01:32,160 --> 00:01:38,240 Speaker 3: news broke from the Alained Advertiser regarding the former leader 30 00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:40,280 Speaker 3: of the Opposition what he was allegedly doing while he 31 00:01:40,319 --> 00:01:43,000 Speaker 3: was leader of the Opposition. I just don't have a 32 00:01:43,000 --> 00:01:45,640 Speaker 3: comment to make on this, or I'll leave that this 33 00:01:45,680 --> 00:01:49,480 Speaker 3: should these matters, this dysfunction, This is exclusively a matter 34 00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:51,480 Speaker 3: of the South Australian division of the Little Party. 35 00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:53,160 Speaker 2: Well, there's a deep fake. 36 00:01:53,920 --> 00:01:56,600 Speaker 1: If it's a deep fake, it's all about problem, isn't it. 37 00:01:57,080 --> 00:01:58,279 Speaker 3: If it's a deep fake here. 38 00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 2: So one final one here then should if it is 39 00:02:03,520 --> 00:02:07,680 Speaker 2: a deep fake, should David be referring this to police? 40 00:02:08,440 --> 00:02:11,440 Speaker 3: Of course, of course that would be very serious. 41 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:14,040 Speaker 1: All right, that's a Premier speaking with Laura Jays on 42 00:02:14,040 --> 00:02:17,280 Speaker 1: Sky News just a short while ago. Let's put all 43 00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:20,360 Speaker 1: this to Professor Nigel fair professor of cyber security at 44 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:23,079 Speaker 1: Monash University. And I think Laura Jays hit it right 45 00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:25,840 Speaker 1: on the head there, Nigel that if this is a 46 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:29,280 Speaker 1: deep fake, it is a problem for every single person 47 00:02:29,320 --> 00:02:33,320 Speaker 1: on this planet, let alone. David spears, yes. 48 00:02:33,480 --> 00:02:36,360 Speaker 4: And good morning. Absolutely it is and we're seeing more 49 00:02:36,440 --> 00:02:38,880 Speaker 4: and more of this use of technology in Again, that's 50 00:02:38,960 --> 00:02:41,840 Speaker 4: assuming it is a deep fake. Whether it's image based, 51 00:02:41,880 --> 00:02:45,840 Speaker 4: whether it's video based, whether it's voice based. There's lots 52 00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:48,959 Speaker 4: of deep fake technology out there being used by people. 53 00:02:49,680 --> 00:02:51,960 Speaker 1: Where do we go with it? How do we protect ourselves? 54 00:02:53,160 --> 00:02:56,079 Speaker 4: Well, like a lot of things online, it's getting harder 55 00:02:56,080 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 4: and harder to be protected. And the government has a 56 00:02:59,480 --> 00:03:02,680 Speaker 4: Commonwealth Government has a bill going through the Parliament regarding 57 00:03:02,919 --> 00:03:05,800 Speaker 4: the use of deep fakes in a sexual content. So 58 00:03:05,840 --> 00:03:09,359 Speaker 4: they're trying to bring in legislation that will provide prison 59 00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:12,960 Speaker 4: sentences for people that create it and also people that distributed. 60 00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:16,640 Speaker 4: But that is only for sexual offense matter only, not 61 00:03:16,760 --> 00:03:17,640 Speaker 4: for things like this. 62 00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:22,600 Speaker 1: I suppose the other side of it too. Deep fakes 63 00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:24,560 Speaker 1: could be used to get someone out of trouble if 64 00:03:24,600 --> 00:03:27,520 Speaker 1: they have done something inappropriate and then then just claim 65 00:03:27,520 --> 00:03:30,360 Speaker 1: it's a deep break. How do you prove that it's not. Huh, 66 00:03:30,400 --> 00:03:31,720 Speaker 1: it works both ways, doesn't it? 67 00:03:32,120 --> 00:03:35,440 Speaker 4: Well? Absolutely, And I see this is where we're headed 68 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:38,520 Speaker 4: to with particularly public figures. When something happens that they 69 00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:41,560 Speaker 4: don't like, it's going to be almost abates which have 70 00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:43,960 Speaker 4: nothing to see here. It was a deep fake, it 71 00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:47,200 Speaker 4: was technology. Let's move on, and you're going to have 72 00:03:47,280 --> 00:03:50,160 Speaker 4: real deep faking and have people just peddling that as 73 00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:53,040 Speaker 4: a used for what happened and it didn't really happen. 74 00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:57,480 Speaker 1: Is the strict penalties if these people can be caught, 75 00:03:57,480 --> 00:03:59,480 Speaker 1: and I suppose there might be some doubt there. I 76 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:04,280 Speaker 1: guess occasionally they will be, but harsh, really harsh penalties 77 00:04:04,320 --> 00:04:06,080 Speaker 1: the answer here to try and prevent it. I mean, 78 00:04:06,120 --> 00:04:08,040 Speaker 1: it seems as little else that we'll be able to 79 00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:08,560 Speaker 1: be done. 80 00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:12,840 Speaker 4: Well, yeah, it would be difficult to work out who 81 00:04:12,920 --> 00:04:14,960 Speaker 4: did it, but there is a lot of metadata behind 82 00:04:15,040 --> 00:04:17,640 Speaker 4: the image. So every time we just take out a 83 00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:20,120 Speaker 4: photo through our phone, there's a lot of metadata like 84 00:04:20,200 --> 00:04:24,719 Speaker 4: geo vocation device that was taken on day and time stamps. 85 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:27,839 Speaker 4: You know that the resolution of the picture. There's lots 86 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:30,320 Speaker 4: of information that could be collected if you've got the 87 00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:34,080 Speaker 4: original image. And also that metadata at the back and 88 00:04:34,080 --> 00:04:36,919 Speaker 4: the will also be altered, indeed a deep faith. And 89 00:04:36,920 --> 00:04:39,320 Speaker 4: that's why it should go to the police, because they'll 90 00:04:39,360 --> 00:04:41,640 Speaker 4: be able to determine whether there was any doctoring of 91 00:04:41,680 --> 00:04:46,200 Speaker 4: the image from those those properties. But you know, we 92 00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:49,279 Speaker 4: penalties are great, but it is hard to enforce, and 93 00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:51,719 Speaker 4: I kind of think we need to just keep this 94 00:04:51,800 --> 00:04:54,520 Speaker 4: conversation going of what it means to participate in the 95 00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:56,960 Speaker 4: online environment, both the goods are bad and indifferent. 96 00:04:58,080 --> 00:05:00,480 Speaker 1: There's probably lessons to be learned in here too, I 97 00:05:00,480 --> 00:05:03,840 Speaker 1: imagine for young people, especially on social media. And you know, 98 00:05:03,880 --> 00:05:07,200 Speaker 1: we know of, for instance, school kids getting into trouble 99 00:05:07,240 --> 00:05:11,239 Speaker 1: creating deep fakes of classmates or teachers in various forms, 100 00:05:11,279 --> 00:05:15,520 Speaker 1: and there's always a lesson to be learned in that 101 00:05:15,640 --> 00:05:17,760 Speaker 1: about just how careful you need to be. What you 102 00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:21,880 Speaker 1: put up on social media is there forever somebody could 103 00:05:22,240 --> 00:05:24,040 Speaker 1: keep a copy of it, Someone you don't even know 104 00:05:24,120 --> 00:05:26,320 Speaker 1: could keep a copy of it, and it comes back 105 00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:29,000 Speaker 1: to haunt you years, maybe even decades later. 106 00:05:30,120 --> 00:05:33,560 Speaker 4: Oh could haunt you when you know, it's nothing unusual 107 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:36,360 Speaker 4: for employers that he's starting to look up social media 108 00:05:36,480 --> 00:05:39,520 Speaker 4: pages of the potential employees sort of get a gist 109 00:05:39,520 --> 00:05:42,359 Speaker 4: of who they are and what they are and the 110 00:05:42,440 --> 00:05:45,000 Speaker 4: type of person they may be employing. So, as you say, 111 00:05:45,040 --> 00:05:48,400 Speaker 4: the Internet never forgets, and a lot of people do 112 00:05:48,480 --> 00:05:51,160 Speaker 4: these things, sometimes ingest or thinking it was a good 113 00:05:51,200 --> 00:05:55,000 Speaker 4: idea at the time, not realizing that the long term 114 00:05:55,360 --> 00:05:58,080 Speaker 4: dis benefit to it and also the long term hurt 115 00:05:58,240 --> 00:06:00,839 Speaker 4: that it might cause to someone else, whether they just think 116 00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:03,560 Speaker 4: that was the case at the time. So we do 117 00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:06,200 Speaker 4: really need to talk to people of all ages about 118 00:06:06,360 --> 00:06:09,560 Speaker 4: that participation online and what it really means in the 119 00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:10,239 Speaker 4: long term. 120 00:06:10,520 --> 00:06:13,320 Speaker 1: Laws often catch up to technology. We've seen this over 121 00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:16,839 Speaker 1: the last couple of decades, where you know, the social world, 122 00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:20,080 Speaker 1: the tech world is way ahead of where governments around. 123 00:06:20,080 --> 00:06:23,920 Speaker 1: Do we need to catch up on deep thanks, Well. 124 00:06:23,640 --> 00:06:26,040 Speaker 4: We do, and to your point, we never will catch 125 00:06:26,080 --> 00:06:27,880 Speaker 4: up because by the time we catch up on this, 126 00:06:27,920 --> 00:06:31,279 Speaker 4: there'll be something new. If we had this conversation two 127 00:06:31,360 --> 00:06:33,520 Speaker 4: years ago, we wouldn't have thought that such a thing 128 00:06:34,080 --> 00:06:36,800 Speaker 4: would be so mainstream now. But it is. As I 129 00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:40,840 Speaker 4: said before, it's not just images, it's video. There's criminals 130 00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:44,159 Speaker 4: using grabs of people's voices that I've thought to be 131 00:06:44,279 --> 00:06:49,120 Speaker 4: them and do scams and other criminal activities. So The 132 00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:52,599 Speaker 4: problem is with technologies. As you say, it raises ahead 133 00:06:52,720 --> 00:06:55,560 Speaker 4: and laws behind it. We want to make our laws 134 00:06:55,800 --> 00:07:00,359 Speaker 4: as technology neutral as possible to take it, you know, 135 00:07:00,560 --> 00:07:02,200 Speaker 4: account to what's going to come next. 136 00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:05,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, indeed, And do you advise governments? Do they come 137 00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:09,680 Speaker 1: to you and ask you for information and advice for legislation? 138 00:07:09,760 --> 00:07:10,920 Speaker 1: You're laughing, So I take it. 139 00:07:11,040 --> 00:07:16,080 Speaker 4: No, no, no, Look, I put in semi regular submissions 140 00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:20,920 Speaker 4: when the government coursed the submissions around these sorts of 141 00:07:20,960 --> 00:07:23,360 Speaker 4: things that posits by the phone, isn't. 142 00:07:23,120 --> 00:07:26,920 Speaker 1: Wrung not beating a path to your door? Maybe they should, Nigel, 143 00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:30,840 Speaker 1: I mean, you know it's your professor of cybersecurity. I 144 00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:32,920 Speaker 1: reckon you'd know a thing or two about it. 145 00:07:34,200 --> 00:07:36,920 Speaker 4: Yeah. Well I've been doing this for twenty one years ago, 146 00:07:37,080 --> 00:07:39,120 Speaker 4: back to DEEG when I was in the police, so 147 00:07:39,360 --> 00:07:41,800 Speaker 4: and a lot has changed in the time. But always 148 00:07:41,840 --> 00:07:45,240 Speaker 4: happy to talk to government of any favor of any jurisdiction. 149 00:07:45,480 --> 00:07:47,680 Speaker 1: All right, good on your Nigel, appreciate the time as always, 150 00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:50,560 Speaker 1: Thank you, Thank you. Professor Nigel fair there who is 151 00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:54,120 Speaker 1: a professor of cybersecurity Monash Uni. Connie Bernaros has been 152 00:07:54,160 --> 00:07:57,560 Speaker 1: ahead of the curve. She had legislation before State Parliament 153 00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:00,920 Speaker 1: some months ago to tackle the issue of deep fakes. 154 00:08:00,960 --> 00:08:04,120 Speaker 5: Kindie, good morning, Good morning, Matthew, and good morning to 155 00:08:04,120 --> 00:08:04,560 Speaker 5: your listeners. 156 00:08:04,640 --> 00:08:08,120 Speaker 1: Now, David Spears says, absolutely a deep break. Certainly not him, 157 00:08:08,160 --> 00:08:11,200 Speaker 1: never done drugs, never done coke, never done anything like this, 158 00:08:11,840 --> 00:08:15,760 Speaker 1: and it's not him, gosh that you know, as I 159 00:08:15,760 --> 00:08:17,400 Speaker 1: said earlier, that could be any one of us in 160 00:08:17,440 --> 00:08:18,040 Speaker 1: this situation. 161 00:08:19,120 --> 00:08:19,440 Speaker 4: Matthew. 162 00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:21,280 Speaker 5: Remember the first time I came on and spoke on 163 00:08:21,320 --> 00:08:24,080 Speaker 5: your program about this, I'd said that we could, you know, 164 00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:27,920 Speaker 5: literally grab an image of you or me today and 165 00:08:27,960 --> 00:08:32,960 Speaker 5: turn it into a very sexually explicit image, and to 166 00:08:33,040 --> 00:08:35,960 Speaker 5: the general viewer, they would not be able to tell 167 00:08:36,320 --> 00:08:39,240 Speaker 5: if indeed it was a real image or not. It 168 00:08:39,280 --> 00:08:42,520 Speaker 5: wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if this were a 169 00:08:42,559 --> 00:08:47,360 Speaker 5: deep fake. They can be very sophisticated. Like you said, 170 00:08:47,440 --> 00:08:51,400 Speaker 5: we struggle to keep up with technology in our law making, 171 00:08:52,520 --> 00:08:56,080 Speaker 5: and the bill that I've introduced into Parliament we'll deal 172 00:08:56,120 --> 00:08:59,360 Speaker 5: with precisely this sort of this sort of material, if 173 00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:03,920 Speaker 5: indeed it were a deep fake, if it's sexually explicit, 174 00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:10,720 Speaker 5: if it's designed to degrade or humiliate somebody, then the 175 00:09:10,760 --> 00:09:14,240 Speaker 5: production of that material, the distribution of that material, the 176 00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:17,319 Speaker 5: threat to distribute that material would be subject to new 177 00:09:17,400 --> 00:09:20,400 Speaker 5: offenses in line with other offenses that we already have. 178 00:09:21,840 --> 00:09:25,559 Speaker 5: It's another of us keeping pace with technology. 179 00:09:25,080 --> 00:09:28,800 Speaker 1: All right, So this would take I imagine a renowned urgency, 180 00:09:28,880 --> 00:09:31,679 Speaker 1: a renewed urgency in state parliament. Are you expecting that 181 00:09:31,720 --> 00:09:34,040 Speaker 1: your legislation from here? Where will it go? 182 00:09:34,720 --> 00:09:34,920 Speaker 4: Yeah? 183 00:09:34,960 --> 00:09:38,000 Speaker 5: Look, it's been introduced in the Upper House, as I said, 184 00:09:38,120 --> 00:09:42,000 Speaker 5: and I've been engaging in discussions with the government. I'm 185 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:45,439 Speaker 5: very very confident that the government is indeed very committed 186 00:09:45,440 --> 00:09:48,440 Speaker 5: to this issue. So I expect that bill to pass. 187 00:09:49,040 --> 00:09:51,760 Speaker 5: I also think that there will be further changes that 188 00:09:51,840 --> 00:09:55,320 Speaker 5: the government will explore around deep fakes that will be 189 00:09:55,360 --> 00:09:59,840 Speaker 5: the subject of the end result of the consultation period 190 00:09:59,840 --> 00:10:02,720 Speaker 5: that they're undergoing at the moment. So there's two there's 191 00:10:02,720 --> 00:10:05,920 Speaker 5: two elements to it. This is the first place, and 192 00:10:05,960 --> 00:10:07,880 Speaker 5: I think one that we can deal with very quickly 193 00:10:08,679 --> 00:10:11,920 Speaker 5: and efficiently, and I think we ought to because we 194 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:16,160 Speaker 5: can see that this stuff is it's rampant, Matthew, and 195 00:10:16,200 --> 00:10:22,560 Speaker 5: it's impacting people's lives. You know, nobody should be If 196 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:25,680 Speaker 5: I give you one example, and I think your previous 197 00:10:25,720 --> 00:10:27,600 Speaker 5: speaker alluded to the fact that we don't know whether 198 00:10:27,720 --> 00:10:33,160 Speaker 5: legislation always works. Remember the explosion of sex thing where 199 00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:39,000 Speaker 5: people were sending intimate, sexually explicit photos and images and 200 00:10:39,240 --> 00:10:43,640 Speaker 5: videos of their former partners and so forth. That was 201 00:10:43,679 --> 00:10:47,080 Speaker 5: a huge problem. We introduced legislation to deal with that, 202 00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:51,600 Speaker 5: and now most people know that if they share one 203 00:10:51,640 --> 00:10:55,640 Speaker 5: of those images or videos and it is reported to police, 204 00:10:55,880 --> 00:10:59,440 Speaker 5: there is a significant criminal penalty that attaches to it. 205 00:10:59,480 --> 00:11:03,280 Speaker 5: So you know, it's it's education. It's worked well in 206 00:11:03,320 --> 00:11:05,719 Speaker 5: schools in terms of educating young people that this is 207 00:11:06,280 --> 00:11:09,080 Speaker 5: not on, and this is precisely the same. It's just 208 00:11:09,120 --> 00:11:12,120 Speaker 5: another layer of technology that we have to catch up to. 209 00:11:12,360 --> 00:11:15,240 Speaker 1: All right, now, do you think penalty should be even 210 00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:18,959 Speaker 1: harsher than maybe what you've allowed for in legislation for 211 00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:22,720 Speaker 1: this to dissuade people? I mean, our tough penalties the 212 00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:24,120 Speaker 1: answer here to stop people doing this. 213 00:11:24,760 --> 00:11:27,640 Speaker 5: Well, tough penalties are because once there's one or two cases, 214 00:11:27,679 --> 00:11:31,000 Speaker 5: people generally learn that this behavior isn't is on. Now 215 00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:33,240 Speaker 5: you know, our penalty is always four within sort of 216 00:11:33,280 --> 00:11:37,120 Speaker 5: just some sort of you know, they're on par with 217 00:11:37,240 --> 00:11:40,360 Speaker 5: other similar sorts of offending what we're doing now is 218 00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:45,440 Speaker 5: creating new offenses, adding them to existing similar offenses, So 219 00:11:45,480 --> 00:11:47,400 Speaker 5: you would expect that the penalties would be on par, 220 00:11:47,559 --> 00:11:51,720 Speaker 5: and they are significant penalties that we've that we've introduced. 221 00:11:51,760 --> 00:11:55,640 Speaker 5: So even just the threat to distribute invasive depiction would 222 00:11:55,679 --> 00:12:01,280 Speaker 5: carry a maximum of I think it's and I'll just 223 00:12:01,280 --> 00:12:02,920 Speaker 5: have to double check, but I think it's two years 224 00:12:02,960 --> 00:12:08,760 Speaker 5: under my legislation, or ten or twenty thousand dollars depending 225 00:12:08,800 --> 00:12:10,680 Speaker 5: on the actual fence. So there's a range in there, 226 00:12:11,000 --> 00:12:13,680 Speaker 5: but there's no question that they work. If you're stupid 227 00:12:13,800 --> 00:12:16,760 Speaker 5: enough or careless enough, or reckless enough to engage in 228 00:12:16,760 --> 00:12:19,240 Speaker 5: this sort of behavior to the detriment of another person, 229 00:12:20,400 --> 00:12:22,240 Speaker 5: then of course there should be penalties, and they should 230 00:12:22,280 --> 00:12:22,720 Speaker 5: be severe. 231 00:12:23,040 --> 00:12:25,600 Speaker 1: It's two years enough. I mean, you could potentially wreck 232 00:12:25,640 --> 00:12:28,840 Speaker 1: someone's career, you could wreck their life, and you know, 233 00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:31,000 Speaker 1: today World suicide Day, you don't want to think of 234 00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:34,040 Speaker 1: the unthinkable, but potentially that's something that could happen as 235 00:12:34,040 --> 00:12:36,079 Speaker 1: well as a result of someone being malicious. 236 00:12:36,679 --> 00:12:39,760 Speaker 5: And the irony is today I call it irony. But 237 00:12:39,920 --> 00:12:42,560 Speaker 5: you know, that's the one thing that's always lost in 238 00:12:42,600 --> 00:12:46,000 Speaker 5: all of these discussions, isn't it a massive, because once 239 00:12:46,120 --> 00:12:49,439 Speaker 5: this material is out there, the damage is dumb. You 240 00:12:49,480 --> 00:12:53,120 Speaker 5: can't claw back it's there. That footprint is there forever, 241 00:12:53,920 --> 00:12:56,240 Speaker 5: and the damage is dumb, and that person's going to 242 00:12:56,280 --> 00:13:00,720 Speaker 5: have to deal with this. Whoever, they are always going 243 00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:04,400 Speaker 5: to have to deal with this regardless. So I think 244 00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:07,120 Speaker 5: that the penalty should be significant. I'm mindful that when 245 00:13:07,160 --> 00:13:09,839 Speaker 5: we draft these there's a range that we put penalties in. 246 00:13:10,200 --> 00:13:12,320 Speaker 5: But look, that's something I'm open to discussing with the 247 00:13:12,320 --> 00:13:16,040 Speaker 5: government in terms of where that penalty should sit. But ultimately, 248 00:13:16,120 --> 00:13:17,840 Speaker 5: like you said, we have to be concerned about the 249 00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:21,920 Speaker 5: person at the end of this, and no longer are 250 00:13:21,920 --> 00:13:25,080 Speaker 5: we dealing with you know, you know, the idea that 251 00:13:25,120 --> 00:13:30,840 Speaker 5: someone has to be physically assaulted in person by another person. 252 00:13:30,960 --> 00:13:36,120 Speaker 5: This is equally invasive and traumatic for an individual. It's 253 00:13:36,160 --> 00:13:38,800 Speaker 5: not more particularly agree it's accessible to the world. 254 00:13:38,960 --> 00:13:41,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right, exactly right, and that's hard to claw 255 00:13:41,800 --> 00:13:44,400 Speaker 1: it back, as you say, just about impossible once reputations 256 00:13:44,440 --> 00:13:47,520 Speaker 1: are tarnished in this way. As somebody at one point 257 00:13:47,559 --> 00:13:50,720 Speaker 1: said that, you know, a lie runs around the world 258 00:13:50,920 --> 00:13:53,240 Speaker 1: before truth gets out of bed and pulls its trousers on. 259 00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:55,760 Speaker 5: So absolutely, there we go all. 260 00:13:55,760 --> 00:13:58,400 Speaker 1: Right, Connie Banarus, appreciate your time, thank you, thank you, 261 00:13:58,679 --> 00:14:04,679 Speaker 1: and Connie Baros uper how say best. MP and legislation 262 00:14:04,760 --> 00:14:06,960 Speaker 1: already before State Parliament been there for a couple of 263 00:14:07,000 --> 00:14:10,160 Speaker 1: months to tackle the issue of deep fakes, just ahead 264 00:14:10,160 --> 00:14:12,520 Speaker 1: of the curve. And this image today front page of 265 00:14:12,600 --> 00:14:16,520 Speaker 1: The TiSER a video part of a video that purports 266 00:14:16,559 --> 00:14:20,720 Speaker 1: to show former Liberal leader David Spears snorting coke in 267 00:14:20,760 --> 00:14:24,600 Speaker 1: his kitchen and he is adamant it is not him. 268 00:14:24,600 --> 00:14:27,400 Speaker 1: We've asked him for a comment this morning and at 269 00:14:27,480 --> 00:14:29,320 Speaker 1: least to find out whether he's been to police yet, 270 00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:31,080 Speaker 1: because if it is a deep fake, as he claims 271 00:14:31,120 --> 00:14:33,360 Speaker 1: it is, he absolutely must go to police.