WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 15 July

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.000
<v Speaker 1>From the Sky News Center.

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 2>This is Paul Murray Live.

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Danika, and hey, good evening everyone. James Burrow

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 3>here for Paul Murray Live tonight and all through the week.

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 3>And yes it is a huge Tuesday night for you.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 3>But with Albanezy's trip to China, more fallout from that

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Treasury blunder and the new Parliament getting ready to kick

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 3>off next week, Darren Barnett and James Ashby will be

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 3>here to duke it out in a little bit. Plus

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 3>we are going to have the one and only nod

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 3>of Farage. So what do you say? Let's rip in

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 3>a shall we all right? So it's day three now

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 3>of Albo and Jody's big six day trip to China,

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 3>which breaking news. The Prime Minister seems to think is

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 3>even more important to attend than Parliament. A little while ago,

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.959
<v Speaker 3>the PM was captured on an open mic earlier today.

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Assume that's meeting for the first time next Tuesday, one

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 4>week Hawaii. And so I'm here before Parliament has been scheduled.

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 4>I think that can be taken as a sign of

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 4>the importance of the relationship.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Tug the forelock a little more of their Prime Minister

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 3>doesn't it say it all that that he thinks it's

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 3>so important to go to China before going to Parliament's

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 3>But you know what, even with all of that, it's

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 3>not clear to me exactly why this trip is so important.

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, today the Prime Minister met with Chinese President

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Jijin Ping. And by the way, why do we call

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 3>him a president. It's like that applies to some sort

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>of democratically elected official. But anyway, whatever, we'll call him that.

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 3>I watched though, after that meeting that he had with

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the president, the whole press conference the Prime Minister had

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>after that meeting, and well, is there anything new? Did

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 3>the Prime Minister have anything new to report? Has anything

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 3>really changed with our relationship with China? I don't think so.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>But that said, even if the PM has been serving

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 3>up very little in the way of real meat on

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 3>the bone of this or what's supposed to come out

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 3>of this besides maybe some exchanges of business cards, well

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 3>guess what, the press corps that he brought along for

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the ride has been doing their best to hold the

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister to account, because today there was a startlingly

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 3>robust and I think pretty punchy press conference, at least

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 3>again on the side of the press pack and I

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 3>think at times the Prime Minister maybe even wished for

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 3>just a second that he had the sort of control

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 3>over the media that they have in China.

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 5>On the security side, did you think assurances that Australia

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 5>would be better informed in future true about the PLA's

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 5>navy in Australian waters.

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 4>Yes to the former. And secondly, in response of course

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 4>it was president she said that China engaged in exercises

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 4>just as Australia engages in exercises.

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 6>Can I just clarify on that answer that you specifically

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 6>thought that the notification was really the issue that Australia

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 6>had had earlier in the year.

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 4>I said what I said at the time, which was

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 4>that it was within international law. There was no breach

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 4>of international law by China, but that we were concerned

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 4>about the notice and the way that it happened, including

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 4>the li fire exercises.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 3>There we go again, It was not outside international law.

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 3>And I have to keep asking this question, why is

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 3>the Prime Minister always so quick to defend China. Well,

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 3>the press conference went on and the Prime Minister seemed

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 3>to get a little bit testy as well when he

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 3>was asked anything about any about any topic that didn't

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 3>have to do with trade, which is apparently all he

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 3>wants to talk about on this trip.

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 7>Your government's made clear it's concern about China's explained military

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 7>build up. Did you see clarity on China's strategic or

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 7>military intent and did you seek any clarity Would you

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 7>gain any insight into China's plans for reunification with Taiwan?

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 4>The I reaffirmed on Taiwan, Australia's position of support for

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 4>the status quo, on.

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 7>The military build up and what its purpose is, what

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 7>china strategic and military aims are.

0:04:54.960 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 4>Well, you would be surprised if that was brought forward,

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 4>And I'm not sure what you're getting out or what

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 4>you're suggesting might be have been raised, So I'm not

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 4>sure the context.

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 7>Well, your government's raised concerns about the military build up

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 7>and the lack of clarity around what it might be

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 7>used for. Do you feel confident that China is a

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 7>force for peace in the region after this meeting or

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 7>do you?

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, what we did was we put forward Australia's position

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 4>or I did, which is that we want peace and

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 4>security in the region, that that is in the interests

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 4>of both Australia and in the interests of China.

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 3>He really didn't like that question. You can always tell

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 3>what he plays with his glasses and his mouth gets

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 3>as ball because he's really annoyed that someone's asking him

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>a question that he doesn't want to answer, but he

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 3>had to. But of course he also put a little

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 3>bit more distance between Australia and the US Prime Minister.

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 8>Our security partner, the United States regards China as its

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 8>greatest military thing. Read I'd like you if you could

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 8>to say, how do you regard China in terms of

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 8>its threat and particularly has your view on the security

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 8>threat changed as a result of your sitting down with

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.239
<v Speaker 8>the president on the latter.

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 4>No, it hasn't. We have strategic competition in the region,

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 4>but we continue to engage in order to support peace

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 4>and security in the region and stability in the region,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 4>and that's something that we advocate for. That's something I

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 4>advocated for today.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Note the very clear difference in the way Australia regards

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 3>China and China's plans from Australia now. The press also

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 3>asked not one, not two, but three questions about detained

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Chinese Australian Yang Han Jun. But the Prime Minister batted

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 3>those questions away. And as to the outcomes of this trip,

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>well we still seem to be three days in, none

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 3>the wiser.

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 9>You spoke a lot about the importance of increasing dialogue,

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 9>building engagement between businesses. What tangible outcomes are you looking for,

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 9>for example, with a free trade agreement from these talks.

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, you see some outcomes this afternoon. I will travel

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 4>back immediately after this for the leader's meeting with Premier Lee.

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 4>But already what you've seen is a range of business

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 4>to business relationships, if you like, coming forward. Some of

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 4>those have been written about already on the free trade agreement.

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 4>One of the provisions, not unusually in the chapter the

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Chinese Australia Free Trade Agreement that was signed by the

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 4>former government ten years ago in twenty fifteen following the

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:02.239
<v Speaker 4>Comprehensive Partnership that was signed also by the Abbic government,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 4>was as a clause in there for a review that

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 4>will happen because the ten years has clicked in, so

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 4>will engage in that.

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Did that make any sense to you? Do you know

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 3>why he's there? Do you know what's going to come

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 3>out of this? I still don't really after all of that. Now,

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 3>there was more to the press conference, but one thing

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 3>is clear that Chinese government was very happy with the

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 3>outcome of all of this. Now, they didn't raise anything

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 3>about US pressure over our stance on Taiwan, and according

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 3>to the Prime Minister, they also said nothing about the

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 3>port of Darwin either and strategically that makes a lot

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 3>of sense for them, you see, because for Jijin Ping

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 3>and the Chinese Communist Party, their aim is to draw

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Australia closer to Beijing and further away for Washington d C.

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 3>They don't need any of those issues getting in the

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 3>way of that trajectory. And guess what, the Prime Minister

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 3>seems more than happy to oblige on this. But frankly,

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't think this performance on his part is good enough.

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 3>And it wasn't good enough either for Opposition leader Susan Lay,

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 3>the Opposition leader earlier today was in Western Australia, and

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 3>here's what she had to say.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 10>Well, the issue of Australians that are detained in human

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 10>rights and for Dr Jung, this is something that I

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 10>would expect the Prime Minister to raise because it is

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 10>of great concern to many Australians. Also of concern is

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 10>the live firing exercises that took place around our coastline

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 10>in February this year. That was not a respectful relationship

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 10>in terms of not being informed the life firing nature

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 10>and the way that activity took place. That should also

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 10>be raised. And the Prime Minister should speak frankly about

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 10>the increasing influence that China has in the region and

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 10>speak about the importance to Australia of the US relationship.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 10>And while I note that the Prime Minister is making

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 10>this trip to China, we also note that he hasn't

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 10>had conversations or been in the room with President Trump.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 10>And we want a strong, stable, prosperous region and pace

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 10>through strength and returns.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Well said on the part of the Opposition leader. And

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 3>while Albanez he did talk about doctor Yang and the

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 3>live fire exercises, or at least he said so, who

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 3>knows how strongly he represented Australia's interests here. By the way,

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 3>speaking of the Opposition leader, it was also good to

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 3>see her firing up over that revelation in those accidentally

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 3>released Treasury documents that the government is going to miss

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 3>its one point two million house housing target and is

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 3>going to have to raise taxes to get the budget

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 3>into some sort of shape. And also how Treasurer Jim

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Chalmers said that he was well relaxed about all that.

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Here's a bit of what she had to say there.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 10>Measure relaxed about Australians paying more tax What has he

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 10>got planned for them? It's a treasurer relaxed about the

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 10>fact that we are not going to meet a target

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 10>of one point two million more homes. For the young

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 10>Australians that I meet every day, they deserve that dream

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 10>of home ownership, and they deserve a government that backs

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 10>in their aspiration every single day of the week, instead

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 10>of shrugging its shoulders and saying it's okay, we'll take

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 10>the easy way out and we'll just raise taxes.

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Well indeed, and that was well said there, and I

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 3>think they're getting their lines all nice and sharpened up

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 3>for Parliament next week. But let's get back to the

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 3>main issue here, which is of course Albanese's trip to China,

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 3>because again, the Albanese way here is I think very

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 3>dangerous in the long run for US, even if it

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 3>seems superficially attractive in terms of trade and making money

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 3>and keeping the economy ticking. Over look, it's pretty clear

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 3>to me that the Prime Minister has been duchess at

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 3>every step of the way here by the Chinese Communist Party.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Before the meeting. Today, the official China Daily newspaper, a

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 3>mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party that is used to

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 3>signal their positions to the English speaking world, they published

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 3>an editorial that was entitled common Ground Prevails over Differences.

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 3>The editorial went on to say, quote against the backdrop

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 3>of rising tensions between the United States and many countries

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>because of the US administration's recent threat to levy higher

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 3>tariffs on them from August first, Albanesi's visit shows that

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the Australian side has a clearer judgment and understanding of

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 3>China than it had under the previous Scott Morrison government. Well. Morrison,

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 3>by the way, to his credit, laughed at off, saying

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 3>quote having a character reference from the China Daily was

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 3>never one of my foreign policy aspirations. But maybe not

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 3>for Morrison. Albo is a different story. He doesn't see

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the trap that he is walking our country into. For him,

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>he sees this trip as just business.

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 4>The fact that Senior Australian business people led by the

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 4>Business Council of Australia have come here to Beijing as

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 4>well as we're president in Shanghai, and in Australian businesses

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 4>will also be engaged with us in Chungdu. Shows how

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 4>important the economic relationship is and how the Australian business

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 4>community regard this as an important relationship.

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Well you see where this is all going here. I mean,

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 3>this is this kind of weird values free foreign policy

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 3>here that the Prime Minister seems to have that says, well,

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 3>you do business with China, your security from the United States,

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 3>those two things they don't have to come into conflict

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 3>and a thing we find. But it does seem to

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 3>me like business is driving the relationship with China, not

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 3>necessarily those Australian values that Anthony Albanizi is so fond

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 3>of talking about. But this is a really difficult balancing

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 3>act and we wait to see what more comes of

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 3>this series of meetings yet. To me, just the fact

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 3>that Albanizi even had to ask about detained Australian Chinese

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Yang Haan Jung, that should be a clue about the

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 3>sort of regime that we're dealing with. They are not

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 3>a free speech regime. They are a totalitarian regime. They

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 3>are not a liberal democracy. And the fact that Prime

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Minister Albanesi was asked three times about this case should

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 3>also tell him something. Yes, China may be an economic powerhouse.

0:14:55.080 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Yes they may buy our green steel whatever that is. Yes,

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 3>but its system, the system of the Chinese Communist Party

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 3>is fundamentally different. Now I am not saying here at all.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's be really clear here. I'm not saying we have

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 3>any sort of mission or role or need to turn

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 3>China into some sort of liberal democracy. That's not our business.

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 3>That's not our concern. That's the concern of the Chinese people.

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 3>But the fact is that the Chinese government is imperialist

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 3>and it aims to supplant the United States as the

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 3>world leading power, particularly in the Pacific. And if that happens,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, that just is not going to be good

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 3>news for us, no matter how much green steel we

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 3>think we can ship to them. Now, today things are happy,

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 3>there's all this happy talk about business and trade and

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 3>getting rich. But the fact is they may not always be.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Remember COVID, Remember when we said we have to diversify

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 3>our supply lines. Recall that China daily invoked Morrison in response,

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>and when Morrison had his fight with China during that period,

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 3>in response, China issued a list of fourteen points of

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 3>fourteen demands through the press, and they said at the time,

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 3>this is how can you go bad? They said, at

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the time, China is angry. If you make China the enemy,

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 3>China will be the enemy. And you know how our

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 3>wine growers and our coal producers and so many other

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 3>industries suffered. And remember that among the grievances that China

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 3>had against the government during that time, we're funding for

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 3>quote unquote anti China research at the Australian Strategio Policy Institute,

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 3>raids on Chinese journalists and academic visa cancelations, spearheading a

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 3>crusade in multileaer forums on China's affairs in Taiwan, Hong

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Kong and Jinjiang, calling for an independent investigation into origins

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 3>of COVID nineteen, Huawei from the five G network in

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen, and blocking ten Chinese foreign investment deals across infrastructure,

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 3>agriculture and animal husband as husbandry sectors. Sorry about that,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 3>but listen, this is what it's all about. These were

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 3>demands against Australian sovereignty. This is what happens if you

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 3>go against what the CCP wants you to do as

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 3>a nation. They make these demands against our sovereignty. And

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 3>make no mistake, things may seem fine in the here

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 3>and now, and we may get some more trade out

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 3>of this, and that's all great. But China sees themselves

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 3>in this relationship as they do with their relationships with

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 3>other nations in the Pacific, whether it's the Philippines, Vietnam,

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 3>anybody else. They see themselves in the driver's seat. We

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 3>here in Australia, we're passengers. We are the junior supplicants

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 3>in this relationship, at least as far as Jijin Ping

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 3>sees us. Now. Watching the events in the last few

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.479
<v Speaker 3>days in the lead up to the trip, I have

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 3>to ask, does Anthony Albaniazi realize this? Frankly, I don't know. Anyway, Look,

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 3>before we go, there's something else I also want to

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 3>talk about very quickly, and that is the autopen scandal

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 3>engulfing the former Joe Biden administration. Now you may have

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 3>heard about this that for some time there has been

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 3>a controversy over this device called an autopen, which can

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 3>basically replicate somebody's signature, in this case the presidents. And

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 3>it has come out that this autopen was used to

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 3>sign all sorts of things pardons, you see it there

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 3>on your screen, orders, all sorts of different presidential instruments

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 3>that would normally be signed by his own hand. And

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 3>the issue is whether or not Joe Biden when he

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 3>was president, legally signed then instruments such as these parties,

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 3>including thousands of pardons. Now, when President Donald Trump first

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 3>raised the idea, and he did this a long time ago,

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 3>that White House staffers in the Biden administration may have

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 3>hijacked the auto pen and used it to reproduce Joe

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 3>Biden's signature, it seemed like an out there conspiracy theory,

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 3>designed more as a way to capture the vibe of

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden's udderless presidency than a statement of actual fact. Yet,

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 3>as I always like to say, today's conspiracy theory is

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 3>tomorrow's coming attraction. And now the autopen issue has gotten

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 3>a massive airing in the very anti Trump pro Democrat

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 3>New York Times, now getting out in front of what

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 3>is going to be a rather big congressional investigation. Democrats

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 3>have gone there and given the story, and they have said,

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 3>on the one hand, the former president said he was

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 3>across every pardon an order that was signed. Yet when

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 3>you read the article closely, it reveals that in many

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 3>cases the president barely knew what was going on with

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 3>many of these pardons, including some incredibly troubling ones that

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 3>included grants of clemency's for Chinese spies and all sorts

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 3>of other unsavory characters as well. Biden's chief of staff

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Zietz, personally signed off on preemptive pardons for a

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 3>number of people, including doctor Anthony Fauci, remember him, well,

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 3>he had actually also been previously, you'll recall, the coordinator

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 3>of the White House's COVID response during the cod pandemic,

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 3>So who knows about that. But despite all this, Joe

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Biden said, I made every decision, which is reassuring because

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 3>everyone knows the politicians where the pastor president, and certainly

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 3>not Joe Biden. Well, they never shame the truth in

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 3>order to burnish their legacy. So the only reason the

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 3>device was used, apparently was because he said, according to Biden,

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 3>we were talking about a whole lot of people, a

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 3>whole lot of partons that needed to be signed. It,

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 3>even as the former president, who was generous enough to

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 3>give The New York Times a full ten minutes of

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 3>his time over the phone to talk about the issue,

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.959
<v Speaker 3>claimed to be across the issue. The Times account suggested otherwise,

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 3>with it admitting that Biden's staff said the president didn't

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 3>really make the individual clemency decisions, that the staffers executed

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 3>the signings, were not present when he supposedly authorized them,

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 3>and that in many cases these pardons or clemencies were

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 3>granted as part of simply broad categories. Cont the former

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 3>president's claims to The Times, The paper reported that mister

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Biden did not individually approve each name for the category

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 3>of pardons that applied to large numbers of people. He

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 3>and aides confirmed rather extensive discussion occurred, and he signed

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 3>off on the standards he wanted to be used to

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 3>determine which convicts would qualify for a reduction incentence. Turns out,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the only parton Joe Biden did sign with his own hand. Well,

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 3>that was the full part, and he gave to his

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 3>son Hunter, something he had promised not to do on

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 3>multiple occasions before the twenty twenty four election. So this

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 3>is a fascinating story here, and we're going to see

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 3>quite a bit more of it. Donald Trump, though, had

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 3>this to say.

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 11>Look, Yodo Penn, I think is maybe one of the

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 11>biggest scandals.

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 10>That we've had in fifty.

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 9>To one hundred years.

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 11>This is a tremendous scandal. The people on the other

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 11>side of the Resolute Desk I know them, Lisa, the

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 11>Hall Group, and they're no good.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 4>There's sick people.

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 11>And I guarantee he knew nothing about what he was saying.

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I guarantee you.

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 3>That may be so, and I think this is gonna

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 3>be pretty big. But at the same time, it's hard

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 3>to see how apart from further tarnishing Biden's reputation and

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 3>raising more questions about who was really in charge for

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 3>the four years of his presidency, anything here is really

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 3>going to wind up changing. Now, don't go anywhere, because

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 3>after the break, we're gonna be joined by Darren Barnett

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 3>and James Ashby for some fired up Tuesday Night debate. Hey,

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 3>welcome back to the program. We've got a lot to

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 3>unpack here. Thankfully, I'm joined by one of my regulars here,

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 3>one Nation Chief of Staff James Ashby. James Ashby joins

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 3>from Queensland tonight. James, I want to talk to you

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 3>first of all about this trip that ALBINIZI is on

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 3>to China and you're in Queensland, which is of course

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 3>has a big exposure to China in terms of exporting resources.

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 3>But how are you feeling about the broader sense that

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 3>this government is taking with China, that it's all about

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 3>trade and nothing else, and that we can separate the

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 3>very different values in our between our two systems. What

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 3>did you make of the way the Prime Minister conducted

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 3>himself today.

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, it sickens me to see Albanesi embracing gigiping while okay,

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 6>Harvey Bay's got their while watching happening at the moment

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 6>here off central Queensland. Because we've got the Talisman Saber

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 6>operation just happening about fifty to one hundred kilometers north

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 6>of me. We've got effectively we could be running commercial

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 6>ships out of here for effectively what I would call

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 6>Chinese spy watching ships. You know, that's what we could

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 6>go and visit out of our waters, not the whales,

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 6>forget them. Chinese spy ships is sitting off out coast

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 6>and Albaniz. He thinks that he's in the good company

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 6>of a friend over there in China. I don't see

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 6>that We've got thirty five thousand troops training for something

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 6>very serious in what I think will happened within certainly

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 6>my lifetime. China's made it very clear they want dominance

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 6>across the globe and.

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Australia is part of that.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 6>So you know, the bloke he's embracing is the very

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 6>man we're probably going to go to war with over

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 6>the next few years.

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, and I just said, you know, as I

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 3>said to my editorial a few moments ago, I really

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 3>feel like the Prime Minister is kind of walking into

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 3>a trap here, is being so flattered and being told,

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, you're wonderful. You get us the previous guy, Morris,

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 3>and he didn't get us at all. And I would

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 3>have thought that being praised in the China Daily, which

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 3>is basically the kind of official mouthpiece for the CCP,

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 3>that would be ringing alarm bells and saying, hey, hang on,

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 3>maybe we're getting a little too cozy here.

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, Scott Morrison put it quite bluntly today, he never

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 6>aspired to appear in that newspaper for obvious reasons. It

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 6>is a mouthpiece of the communist China propaganda m and

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 6>that's precisely why no Australian should be proud of that.

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 6>Alban Easy on the other hand, he's bought thirty copies

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 6>and intends to send it to the Canberra frame its

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 6>he wants it in every ministerial office. That news article,

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 6>it's not something to be proud of. Look, I understand

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 6>the relationship Australia has to have for trade, but getting

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 6>cozy with China when they've made it abundantly clear that

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 6>they want world dominance. They're prepared to buy favor in

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 6>countries just off our coastline here throughout the Pacific regions,

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 6>and in actual fact they're trying to buy their way

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 6>into this country.

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>We had to pass legislation in twenty twenty one.

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 6>Scott Morrison, to his credit, discovered that China was trying

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 6>to nuzzle its way into Australia with the Belton Roade initiative,

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 6>something that the Victorian government had signed on to. And

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 6>I think unless that legislation had passed on a federal

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 6>level blocking the Belton Rode initiative, I think other states

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 6>probably would have taken up borrowings from what is DMed

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 6>a developing nation, and yet they've got more than one

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 6>point two trillion dollars invested in loans across the globe

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 6>to desperate nations who can't borrow from other parts of

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 6>the world.

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, that's exactly right, James, and I just want

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 3>to bring in now former Labor advisor Darren Barnett. He's

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 3>also joining us this evening here. Darren, we've seen the

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister in China. He's been praised by China daily.

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 3>He seems to be rather enjoying the flattery and thinking

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 3>that he can keep this all about trade and not

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 3>the different value systems that these two governmental systems hours

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 3>of theirs have. Are you a little concerned? And I

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 3>know that you're coming from the labor side, but do

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 3>you think the Prime Minister needs to be wary about

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.640
<v Speaker 3>walking into a trap of flattery here?

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 12>He does. That's true. Look, I think it was a

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 12>very kind of glorious day in terms of prestige and

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 12>pomp and ceremony and the like, so there is a

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 12>danger of that. I note that in his press conference

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 12>there are a couple of questions came on human rights matters.

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 12>There are a couple about other behaviors of China, whether

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 12>it be their live fire exercises in the team or

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 12>c for example. Strangely, the port of Darwin apparently did

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 12>not come up during the conversation with Premier See. However,

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 12>the trade relationship is important and it's difficult to get

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 12>the balance right that I know. James spoke of Scott Morrison.

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 12>He did have a very strong view on China. But

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 12>the downside of that there were some trade tariffs and

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 12>sanctions put in place on various industries and it's taken

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 12>a few years to unwind, so it's a difficult path

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 12>to walk. I think Anthony Albanezi actually I thought he

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 12>did pretty well in his press conference today, to be honest.

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 12>He coped very well with the questions. He seemed in

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 12>control of it. But equally these are the questions about

0:28:55.960 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 12>human rights and other military matters. Those questions won't go away.

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, they won't. And you know the other question,

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 3>of course it's not going to go away, is how

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 3>prepared are we for any potential future conflict chat Defence

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Minister Angus Taylor had some words today about our defense spending.

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's have a listen to that.

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 13>Anthony Alberineze has put himself in an impossible position because

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 13>he's not worth spending what is necessary to make sure

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 13>that we have the defense force we need for what

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 13>he had himself has said is the most challenging strategic

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 13>environment since the Second World War.

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 3>And James Ashby, I mean, he's right. And if you

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 3>even if you take Donald Trump and his demands for

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 3>the increases in defense spending out of the equation, your

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 3>pretend he didn't exist. You know, there's still the whole

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Defense Services Review that Labor commissioned last year, which has

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 3>a whole swag of things that we need to be

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 3>doing that we're not doing. And yet I find that

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 3>there's this real reluctance on the par of Labor to

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 3>admit that even we should be doing what their old

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 3>review said they should be doing.

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>It's funny.

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 6>This is a government that has no problem increasing year

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 6>upon year the ndies by eight percent, and yet cannot

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 6>come to terms with the idea of raising the defense

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 6>of this nation with a mere three percent. It is

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 6>something I just scratched my head over All the time

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 6>they find money for everything else but not defense.

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>They feel as.

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 6>Though, that we're going to have these friends like America and.

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:36.719
<v Speaker 1>The UK come to our defense.

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 6>I'm not so sure America will be there if China

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 6>does strike. I certainly, you know, I can't blame President

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 6>Trump for suggesting that we have to review our spending.

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Three percent is.

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 6>A small amount of in comparison to some of the

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 6>other cost blowouts that we're seeing across the country. And

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 6>at the end of the day, it is for the

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 6>protection of every single person in this country.

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.479
<v Speaker 3>Well, and you know it is true too. You know again,

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 3>I always say sometimes when there's these contentious matters, don't

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 3>think about Donald Trump, think about the broader situation here.

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Presidents at least as far back as Obama and probably

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 3>before that, have all been concerned about allies, particularly NATO

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 3>free riding off the United States not spending enough. Darren Barnett,

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, is there a concern here that we're not

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 3>doing Again, take Trump out of the equation, pretent he

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 3>didn't exist. If Trump didn't exist, would you be in

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 3>favor baby of saying, yeah, actually, two percent, that's too

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 3>low here because there is this deteriorating security situation in

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the Pacific.

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I agree with you. I think you will see

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.959
<v Speaker 12>an increase in defense spinning. I don't think anyone can

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 12>who's not inside the tent can reliably put their finger

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 12>on number, but sure, I think it will happen, particularly

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 12>given the AU have gone to five percent, it's gonna happen.

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 12>I can understand why they wouldn't have made that announcement

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 12>just before going on a trip to China. So I

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 12>think in the fullness of time, you'll say that number increase.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 12>It's just difficult to say what that number will be.

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, of course they did have the budget there

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that they could have had a bit of a chat

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 3>about that too before the election. But anyway, let's put

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 3>that one aside for the moment, because we all seem

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 3>to be in furious agreement. But I don't think we're

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be in a furious agreement over this story

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 3>which has just broken on the Australian website. And there's

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 3>a body called the Administrative Review Tribunal. It is the

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 3>successor to this thing called the AAT and it is

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 3>this kind of hearings venue and a lot of things

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 3>have decided. There are a lot of immigration cases, a

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of other sort of governmental matter is quite important matters.

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.719
<v Speaker 3>They've got a new head in this new body that

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Labor replaced the old body with, who turns out to

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 3>have been a volunteer for tlmp K. Cheney has said

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of things online about Scott Morrison, calling him

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 3>a blank wit and said the Liberal Party are a

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 3>bunch of misogynists toe rags James Ashby. You know, they

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 3>said that they were getting rid of the old Administrative

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Appeals Tributa because this was some whey that Conservatives were

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 3>given jobs to each other. This seems like this is

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 3>a complete stitch up where they are now giving this

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 3>whole new Administrative Review Tribunal over to all of their

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 3>pals on the left. Am I wrong?

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>No, You're not wrong at all.

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 6>You summed it up really well that the way that

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 6>this AERT is stacked is no different to the way

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 6>that they accused the Coalition of doing it under the

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 6>aat one slight acronym change there. But at the end

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 6>of the day, these positions are determined by the Attorney General,

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 6>it's taken to Cabinet, and Cabinet.

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Just rubber stamps it.

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 6>This woman has clearly had some form of relationship with

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 6>the Labor government. She says she was a former liberal,

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 6>but it's like Matt Kean saying he was, you know,

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 6>he's under the wing of Anthony Albanez in these days,

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 6>some liberal.

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's how it happens.

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 6>But the art quite literally for a lot of people

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 6>at home, they've probably never even heard of this organization.

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 6>They overtime, overturn ministerial decisions, and so you know, the

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 6>importance of this organization is there to try and get

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 6>rid of, in particular bad buggers who are in this country.

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.879
<v Speaker 6>You know, they could be illegal asylum seekers, or they

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 6>could have committed.

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Crimes while here and we under the.

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 6>Laws have the right to kick them, our minister has,

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 6>but they can appeal and they go through this organization,

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.760
<v Speaker 6>and they're the ones that are keeping so many feral

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 6>individuals who shouldn't be in this country here. That's purely

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 6>what this organization does. And this woman is an appointee

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 6>of this labor government.

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the thing that I'm concerned about, Darren, is that,

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 3>as James Ashby said, this body does review a lot

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 3>of immigration decisions. I've seen a lot of the cases

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 3>that go through there, you know, and a lot of

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 3>the people who go through they claim asylum, and they

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 3>commit terrible crimes, and then they're allowed to stay often.

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 3>And I feel there's a concern here that even if

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 3>this woman says she's not anti conservative, the bias of

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 3>this body will go towards applicants, towards people wanting to stay,

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 3>towards people we don't want in the country. And how

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.399
<v Speaker 3>is this any better than whatever they claim was going

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 3>wrong with the old Aaight?

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 12>I'm not aware that there's any sort of demonstrable bias

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 12>in the new body, But I agree with James, and

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 12>I agree with you.

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 3>That furious agreement tonight, guys.

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 12>I agree on you in part. I agree that it's

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 12>a bad look that punishing one mob because it's too

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 12>far leaning one way and then going doing the exact

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 12>same in reverse, that will leave a bad taste in

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 12>the mounds of voters and the public. That is absolutely true.

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 12>But I think the bigger cautionary tale here it's a

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 12>bit like a few years ago when there was an

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 12>SBS journalist who express their own view on Twitter. If

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 12>you're going to be working for a body tied to government,

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 12>don't say silly things, don't call people names, don't And

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 12>even if you hold that view privately, private views of

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 12>private views, but you should not expect to be in

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 12>a government funded position. If you start calling people names

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 12>like that, it's not acceptable. And whether it's either pub

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 12>test or a parliamentary test, it's not good enough. So

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 12>people need to lift their game if they want those

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 12>types of jobs.

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, look, I think that's right, and I think

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 3>that if it's some sort of thing where you're going

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 3>to be impartial, like in a judiciary type of thing,

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 3>you especially shouldn't be doing that sort of thing. Gents,

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 3>before I let you go, another fascinating story here. You're

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:50.240
<v Speaker 3>both political strategists. I want your opinions on this. Here

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Giselle Capterian who was going to almost be the new

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Liberal member for Bradfield. She fell at the last rule

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 3>by twenty six voter to Nicolette Bell. She is going

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 3>to appeal this to the Court of Disputed returns. James Ashby,

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 3>do you think this is a wise course for Zell

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Capitarian and the Liberals or is this something that they

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 3>should just let go and try harder next time?

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 6>Reminds me of Maxwell Smart mister, maybe that much. Look,

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 6>she's obviously got a case. Otherwise you wouldn't go to

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 6>the High Court. It's the Court of Disputed Returns. I've

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 6>obviously got some evidence that they want reviewed by the

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 6>High Court. Look, time will tell. It will be a

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 6>very fast outcome this. It's not going to take months.

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.359
<v Speaker 6>It will be heard very quickly. So I wish you're

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 6>all the best of luck. But at the end of

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 6>the day, you can miss out on these seats by

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 6>one or two votes, and sometimes the recounts can turn

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:56.879
<v Speaker 6>it all around. And that's precisely what's happened here. So look,

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 6>I'll leave it up to the courts.

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 3>Darren, what do you think very quickly? Why I here

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 3>to take this off.

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 12>It's already we've had teams of scrutinies. Go I have

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 12>all the votes a couple of times, I'd be very

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.760
<v Speaker 12>surprised if there's got to be a change in the result.

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 12>But well, if I've just lost by twenty six votes,

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 12>I'd probably have a crack at some sort of review

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 12>as well.

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Fair enough, and there are some fives and some bases

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 3>they say it could be going one way or the other.

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:21.879
<v Speaker 3>James Ashby, Darren Barnett, thank you so much for your

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 3>time this evening. Great to see you as always. Now

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 3>stick around, you're not gonna want to miss what's coming

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 3>up next. We have none other than the legendary Nogal

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Farage joining me live from London right here after the break.

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Good time for the man who's never borry.

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to the program. James Morrow here sitting in

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 3>for Paul Murray Live. And it's a great honor for

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.240
<v Speaker 3>me to be in the chair tonight because I'm pleased

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 3>to say that I am joined now by none other

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:59.439
<v Speaker 3>than Reform UK leader Nago Farage. Nigel. Great to see,

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 3>it's been a lot long time. Great to see you.

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Want to have a chat about a lot of things

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 3>here tonight, But one thing here is what's going on

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 3>with President Macraw of France and President Trump of the

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 3>United States. Because it seems that while President macrn was

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:18.959
<v Speaker 3>given the full royal treatment on his recent stage visit

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 3>to the UK, dining with the King and parading through

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 3>local towns like some sort of visiting royalty and even

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 3>getting to deliver a speech to Parliament, well it appears

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 3>that when the President comes by soon he has been

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 3>given a bit of a downgrade. He's only he's not

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to address Parliament following Macron's much

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 3>more shall we say, bountiful trip, Nigel, this seems a

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 3>little bit of an embarrassing treatment here what happened in

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 3>the special relationship?

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 2>James had a very good to talk to you again. Yes,

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean Macron was here like an emperor, I'd say,

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 2>an emperor an open top carriage sitting next to the

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 2>ca through the streets of windsor grand dinner, as you say,

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 2>addressing Parliament, and then right at the end of press

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 2>conference at which he admonished us and said, how dare

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you vote for Brexit? You stupid people. It's making you poorer,

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 2>it's making your borders more open. I mean literally lecture

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 2>us in the most astonishing way. Yet the Donald, who's

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 2>back on his second visit, will be stuck down in

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 2>windsor he'll get to spend loads of time with the King.

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 2>But that's pretty much about it. It tells you everything

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 2>you need to know about the globalist labor government. They

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 2>might be nice about Trump in public because they want

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 2>to avoid punitive tariffs, which has worked to a certain degree,

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 2>but basically Kirstarmer wants us back in the European Union,

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 2>back as part of the whole Davos international set, and

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 2>really his behavior towards these two says it all. And

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 2>America is our most important ally. Without America we are defenseless.

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 2>And yet labor just don't seem to understand that.

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, they don't seem to understand that here in Australia either.

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 3>It does seem shocking to be given the buddy buddy

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 3>image that here. Starmer tried to presented the G seven

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 3>the other week in Canada. But I want to ask

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 3>you about this, Nigel, because apparently you say you're going

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:19.799
<v Speaker 3>to push for Parliament to be recalled in September to

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 3>let Trump come and address the MPs. What sort of

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.280
<v Speaker 3>response are you getting to this oture?

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, Regular address both houses of Parliament. Clinton address

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:39.320
<v Speaker 2>both houses of Parliament. Obama addressed both houses of Parliament.

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:43.280
<v Speaker 2>And this is a president any second term. So Parliament

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 2>is due to go into recess on the sixteenth of September.

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump arrives on the seventeenth of September. Not very difficult.

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.919
<v Speaker 2>I would suggest to keep parliament open for one extra day.

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 2>I've made my views on this very clear. I'm awaiting

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 2>a response from the government. I'm not holding my breath,

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 2>but I'm awaiting a response. Yeah, I'm waiting a response.

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Then at once it Yeah, it's look, I doubt it

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 2>will happen, but it's wrong.

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think you're right to push for it in

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 3>any case. And another thing though, I noticed this in

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 3>the headlines here because I saw this video going around

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 3>social media of a resurface clip of a labor mp

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 3>claiming the UK sho accept refugees until the saturation point.

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.839
<v Speaker 3>Now this has been going on. Have a look at

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 3>the scrab here. Twenty thousand is not enough, thirty thousand

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 3>is not enough.

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.919
<v Speaker 2>Seventy seven percent of the population say we cannot take

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 2>immigration at current levels saturation point. I'm sorry, we simply

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 2>can't accept countless millions.

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 7>Does it matter if we have to wait another week.

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 2>For a hospital visit current accident and emergency crisis that

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 2>we've seen this winter in our hospitals.

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 3>I thought this laborer lady, really, is this how they

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 3>think it doesn't matter if you have to wait for

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, a hospital because somebody has just come out

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 3>from overseas. Seriously tell us about this. This must be

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:14.760
<v Speaker 3>why reform is doing so well at the moment.

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it doesn't matter. Your taxes go up. What's the

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 2>problem you have to wait another week for the hospital.

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 2>What's the problem A foreign gang steals your kid's mobile phone.

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:29.399
<v Speaker 2>Don't worry about it and don't say anything otherwise you're

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:32.280
<v Speaker 2>a really bad human being. I mean, they are away

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:35.719
<v Speaker 2>with the fairies, these people. This woman, Rachel Maskell is

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 2>a Labor member of Parliament for the Ancient City of York.

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think you saw in that video, you know,

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 2>the two visions, what I think, what she thinks. And

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 2>I think, as you say, that's why reform at the

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 2>moment is doing really rather well, because what we represent

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 2>is plain common sense.

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 3>That's the sort of thing that we could use a

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 3>bit of here in this country. Nigel. But before I'll

0:43:56.560 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 3>let you go here, another story here about you know,

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 3>because I say to everybody in Austorry that the UK

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 3>is like the early warning system for everything in Australia

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 3>and we just need to pay attention and not do

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 3>this stuff. The Center for Social Justice think tank the UK,

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 3>has reported that now people who are on the full

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 3>whack of benefits in the UK, they get twenty five

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 3>hundred pounds more per year than somebody who's actually going

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 3>to work every day on the minimum wage. No wonder

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the UK's economy is slowing without any productivity or incentive

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 3>to go to work.

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, I mean two massive problems. Number one, we've

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 2>frozen threshold which people start paying tax and therefore, yeah,

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 2>being on benefits, on disability benefit is better than working

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 2>on minimum wage. That's absolutely crazy. The other thing is

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 2>a million more people are on disability benefits, which means

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 2>you've got a bit of depression and you've been diagnosed

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 2>on a ten minute zoom call with your local general practitioner.

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 2>We are and let me say this, we are over

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 2>diagnosing mental illness. We are taking issues like mild depression,

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 2>taking issues you know, such as things that are wrong

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 2>in your personal life, and we're classifying that as mental illness.

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 2>We're telling people they're victims, We're putting them on disability

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 2>benefit and they'll probably never work again. And I'm not

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 2>underplaying the seriousness of genuine mental health problems. But it's

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 2>over diagnosis ADHD in kids, you name it. It's a disaster.

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:38.760
<v Speaker 2>So please learn from.

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Us, Nigel. Is the over pathalization of absolutely everything. We

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 3>have very similar problems in here in Australia. Nigel Roger,

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. Always a pleasure to speak with you.

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Great to see you here. Now, everybody stick around because

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 3>after the break, I want to be back with a

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 3>final thought.

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Good evening.

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:04.919
<v Speaker 3>James Mara here is sitting in for Paul very live,

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 3>and wasn't that fun having Naja Farage here? He is

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 3>always a hoot. Now I want to just bring you

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 3>this quick thought about this story that's been making the

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 3>rounds before we go. And you know the old expression, well,

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 3>happy wife, happy life. There's a new variation on that,

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:25.399
<v Speaker 3>of course, it's happy wife, happy Ukraine. Now we've all

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:31.240
<v Speaker 3>heard about Donald Trump changing his position on valium reputin Russia,

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 3>giving aid to Ukraine and threatening Vladimir Putin with one

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent tariffs if in fifty days he doesn't settle

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:45.880
<v Speaker 3>this business in Ukraine and make peace. But the rationale

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 3>for this and why he changed his mind, that's pretty interesting,

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 3>and as I'm going to show you in a minute,

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 3>it has a bit of historical president President. Here's Donald

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump saying why he changed his mind on aiding Ukraine

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 3>and putting sanctions on Putin.

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:06.799
<v Speaker 11>My conversations with him are always very pleasant. I say

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:10.280
<v Speaker 11>he's not a very lovely conversation, and then the missiles

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 11>go off. That night, I go home, I tell a

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 11>first lady and I spoke of Vladimir today. We had

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 11>a wonderful conversation. She said, Oh really, Uh, another city

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:25.840
<v Speaker 11>was just headed. So it's like, look, he's uh. I

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 11>don't want to say he's an assassin, but he's a

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 11>tough guy.

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 3>It's funny if it wasn't so serious. It sounds almost

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 3>like a kind of a sitcom there, you know, donaldon

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Melaia and the White House making policy. But here's what

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 3>I thought was really interesting about this. I was watching

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 3>that clip today and I said to myself, this feels

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:49.920
<v Speaker 3>like something I've heard before. And it turns out, in fact,

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 3>this is not the first time this sort of thing

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 3>has happened, that a first lady has had such profound

0:47:56.960 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 3>influence on foreign policy. Back in Night nighteen ninety nine,

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Hillary Clinton remember her well. She revealed the reason why

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 3>she started speaking to her husband Bill again after that

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Monica Lewinsky affair, when they had endured eight months of

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 3>marital silence. According to a biography of Clinton published by

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Gail Sheehy, that year, Hillary resumed talking to her husband

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 3>only when she phoned him and urged him in the

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:30.760
<v Speaker 3>strongest terms to begin bombing Serbia. The President began bombing

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 3>within twenty four hours, and the marriage, to whatever extent

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 3>it was, was saved. Funny how history works. And here's

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 3>the late debate