Speaker 1: Two bearings into very high levels of audience participation.
Speaker 2: And that makes a chill run down.
Speaker 1: Yes, I know, I always sit well back at those shows.
Speaker 1: It's roesque for me.
Speaker 2: From The Australian. This is the weekend edition of The Front.
Speaker 2: I'm Claire Harvey. For some of us, summer in Australia
Speaker 2: means the beach, the cricket and a cold beer. For
Speaker 2: the sophisticated readers of our review section, summer also means
Speaker 2: the start of something even more scintillating festival season. First
Speaker 2: on the calendar is the Sydney Festival, and today I
Speaker 2: chat with my colleague Rosemary Neil. She's a Walkley Award
Speaker 2: winning writer and a shortlisted author, about one of the
Speaker 2: most anticipated shows at the festival, Dark Noon, complete with
Speaker 2: a cast of black actors in whiteface.
Speaker 3: It could have been a bad Lion King.
Speaker 2: This is Lumba Malango, but through.
Speaker 3: The process we chose the West End as our frame.
Speaker 2: He's the co director and choreographer of Dark Moon, which
Speaker 2: was created by Danish director To Beering. Dark Noon tells
Speaker 2: a story of race dislocation and violence. When Malungu says
Speaker 2: it could have been a bad Lion King, well that's
Speaker 2: the risk you take with an all African caste and
Speaker 2: a lot of singing. But this story is set in
Speaker 2: of all places, America's Wild West.
Speaker 3: We are the peopleations what we are.
Speaker 1: Dark Moon is a retelling of the story of America's
Speaker 1: Wild West from an outsider's perspective. In Dark Noon, the
Speaker 1: audience sitting up the front almost become cast members. They're
Speaker 1: called upon to take part in a square dance. They're
Speaker 1: called upon, more controversially, to take part in a mock
Speaker 1: slave auction. And this is all part of the broader
Speaker 1: retelling of the settling of America's Wild West from the
Speaker 1: perspective of outsiders. The key roles are performed by mostly
Speaker 1: black South African actors in whiteface and bad blonde wigs.
Speaker 1: And so I asked you about that. I asked, are
Speaker 1: you being intentionally provocative there? Because obviously white actors in
Speaker 1: blackface is absolutely forbidden, and for good reason. And he
Speaker 1: sees it the whiteface as a logical extension of reversing
Speaker 1: the conventions of the history and the storytelling and of
Speaker 1: the cowboy genre, and in particular its romanticized view of
Speaker 1: frontier history.
Speaker 2: Tue Bearing describes it like this, in Europe right now,
Speaker 2: debate is raging about immigration, largely from Africa and the
Speaker 2: Middle East, and it's reshaping the politics of the continent.
Speaker 2: But it's not so long ago, just in the past
Speaker 2: two centuries that vast waves of migrants were leaving Europe
Speaker 2: to try and improve their circumstances in America. They encountered
Speaker 2: indigenous people and all sorts of other outsiders, Chinese gold miners, women,
Speaker 2: and of course enslaved Africans. By using a South African cast,
Speaker 2: obviously he brings a whole lot of other history into
Speaker 2: this story. What do you think that adds to this
Speaker 2: very multilhit story.
Speaker 1: Well, the South African cast do tell their own stories
Speaker 1: at the end. They take some of the sort of
Speaker 1: motifs that you see throughout the performance, So toy guns
Speaker 1: are going off all the time, for instance, and they
Speaker 1: talk about the role of gun violence during and after
Speaker 1: apartheid and their personal experiences of it.
Speaker 3: I saw many many guns when I was young, and
Speaker 3: this is not a Western movie. For me, is different.
Speaker 3: It was life people who were slottering each other in
Speaker 3: front of me. The most perverse thing about a part
Speaker 3: date that it was law that no black person should
Speaker 3: hold hands or kiss or engage in that relationship with
Speaker 3: a white person.
Speaker 2: Another lad that we're going to be adding to it
Speaker 2: at the Sydney Festival is Australian audiences watching this in
Speaker 2: a place where we have our own very complex history
Speaker 2: of violence settlement. Is there particular relevance do you think
Speaker 2: for an Australian audience.
Speaker 1: Yes, in the sense that it is challenging that sort
Speaker 1: of Churchillian idea that it's the victors who get to
Speaker 1: tell and control the history. So I suppose an equivalent
Speaker 1: would be an aboriginal cast telling a theatricalized story of
Speaker 1: the first Fleet and also the dispossession, the frontier massacres,
Speaker 1: the good and the bad really come.
Speaker 2: That's what the most famous American musical of the past
Speaker 2: decade did. Hamilton used a black and brown cast to
Speaker 2: tell the storyory of the American Revolutionary War and the
Speaker 2: Founding Fathers. Does this bring Hamilton to mind for you?
Speaker 1: There are definite parallels there, and I guess it's part
Speaker 1: of a broader move to give a greater range of
Speaker 1: people voices and a questioning of who gets to tell
Speaker 1: what stories. Of course, that can sometimes cross into censoriousness
Speaker 1: and political correctness. I feel in that you have people saying, well,
Speaker 1: certain groups own these stories, and I don't agree with that,
Speaker 1: but certainly hearing from voices that have been excluded or
Speaker 1: forgotten or marginalized in riches a culture in Hamilton is
Speaker 1: an example of that.
Speaker 2: It's a movement that we're seeing play out in all
Speaker 2: sorts of different ways in the arts at the moment.
Speaker 2: So the new series of wolf Hall, The Mirror and
Speaker 2: the Light is going to include a much more diverse
Speaker 2: cast than the first season of wolf Hall. That this is,
Speaker 2: of course, is the telling of the story of Thomas Cromwell,
Speaker 2: the senior advisor to Henry the Ape in the Tutor
Speaker 2: Court in the sixteenth century in England. Ah at last.
Speaker 1: A man born in a more lowly state than myself, Cromwell,
Speaker 1: I knew to know something about you that I didn't like.
Speaker 2: Swear to be true and faithful. What's your view, Rosie,
Speaker 2: about diversity in casting and how hung up we are
Speaker 2: and how hung up we should be.
Speaker 1: I think it's been a revolutionary move and on the
Speaker 1: whole a good move. Every now and then there might
Speaker 1: be a context I can think of an Australian TV drama.
Speaker 1: I won't name it. You know, a rough outback town
Speaker 1: that years ago you would have characterized as a bit
Speaker 1: of a redneck town that sort of was presented as
Speaker 1: this multicultural paradi not paradise, but you know, a melting pot.
Speaker 1: And it just didn't ring true to me, much as
Speaker 1: the performances were very good, Michelle, and may I have
Speaker 1: this stance. On the other hand, when I watched Bridgeton
Speaker 1: you mean my Lord, Initially, you know, I sat thinking, well,
Speaker 1: you have black people playing aristocrats here, but the reality
Speaker 1: is that black people were enslaved by these same aristocrats
Speaker 1: in America, if not in Britain at the time. And
Speaker 1: is that historical denihalism a good thing? But on the whole,
Speaker 1: it's a fantasy. It's a romantic fantasy, and so I
Speaker 1: think it was exciting to see the casting done in
Speaker 1: that way. I interviewed a young Australian actress of color
Speaker 1: who'd got a lead role in a musical and that
Speaker 1: had normally gone to white performers. She'd said at drama
Speaker 1: school she just assumed she'd only have a career as
Speaker 1: a supporting actress, never as a lead. And when you
Speaker 1: hear that directly from someone a young person who's full
Speaker 1: of talent, working hard, that that's how they saw their
Speaker 1: career going as a university student. You think, well, that's
Speaker 1: just wrong. So on the whole, I think it's a
Speaker 1: good thing. I can understand when people think that perhaps
Speaker 1: the context is being a little distorted, suggesting that four
Speaker 1: or five hundred years ago in England that yes, there
Speaker 1: was this multicultural harmony and that racism wasn't the huge
Speaker 1: disabling force that it was for a lot of people.
Speaker 1: But then a lot of drama relies on the audience's
Speaker 1: suspension of disbelief. In any case, no James Bond film
Speaker 1: would work if we all sat there interpreting his talent
Speaker 1: for stunts. Literally, if we didn't suspend our disbelief, we
Speaker 1: wouldn't enjoy it.
Speaker 2: No, he manages to emerge from the sea in a
Speaker 2: wet sea, unzip it and have a perfectly pressed in
Speaker 2: a suit or underneath.
Speaker 4: Yes, here's perfect, exactly, Yeah yeah.
Speaker 2: Rosemaryneil is an absolute machine churning out the stories for
Speaker 2: our review section, and every one of them is told
Speaker 2: with her characteristic expert touch. You can read Rosie's work
Speaker 2: and all the rest of the country's best coverage of
Speaker 2: the arts by picking up the Weekend Australian at your
Speaker 2: supermarket or servo, and anytime at the Australian dot com
Speaker 2: dot a slash review