WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 24 July

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>On scorn Lids Australia. This is the Weader Panete Show.

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Good evening, Welcome to the reader Panahe Show.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Drusso coming up on the show tonight. Democrats

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 3>are gathering in droves, are ready to jump on the

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:19.319
<v Speaker 3>Kamala train.

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 2>But what does she actually stand for?

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 3>Douglas Murray joins me shortly to discuss just that the

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Victorian government is again in the firing line after their

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 3>push to include trans women in an inquiry on women's pain.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 3>Rachel Wong from Women's Forum Australia on that, and of

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 3>course a stellar edition of Left is losing it where

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 3>the Trump arrangement syndrome, Well, it continues to flourish.

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 4>We the people united mobilized and voted down this existential

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 4>threat to democracy and freedom.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 5>That we continue the march progress, that we lay the

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 5>foundation right better future, and that we sought to create.

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Home perfect union.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 5>Progress is possible.

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Flourishing, it really is.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 3>But first joining me now is Deputy Executive Director of

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 3>the Institute of Public Affairs, Daniel Wild. Daniel, we know

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Labour's Future Made in Australia agenda is just its very

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 3>latest boondoggle. Even the OECD suspects it will be a

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 3>field day for lobbyists. We know that government's are notoriously

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>bad at picking winners. Is the OECD on the money here.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 6>Well, Caroline, future made in Australia is really a future

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 6>made in marginal labor seats, because this is what it's

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 6>all about. As you know, it's about politics, not economics,

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 6>and taxpayers are going to be fleeced for no meaningful

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 6>outcome to our society. We can't have a future made

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 6>in Australia under the policy of net zero. Net zero

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 6>is responsible for skyrocketing energy prices, which is offshoring our manufacturing,

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 6>offshowing our heavy industry. And we know that the number

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 6>one winner from policies of netszuro is not Australia, it's China.

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 6>China is the major manufacturer and exporter of wind turbines

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 6>and solar panels. Australia doesn't get any value from the

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 6>exports of that, and it's about China reorientating global economic

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 6>supply chains around it.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 7>So this is a very short.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 6>Sighted, myopic policy that is clearly not in our national interests.

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 3>No, it's not and still on dumb ideas or dumb

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 3>labor ideas which hamper productivity. And Robert god Libsen had

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 3>an excellent piece in The Australian on Labour's recent IR

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 3>changes and the ability they give unions essentially to strangle productivity.

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 2>Within family businesses.

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>What is this reformant and what are the consequences likely

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 3>for business?

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 6>We've got leaps AND's hit the nail on the head

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 6>and he's been discussing this important issue now for some time.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 6>And look, in essence, it would allow unfettered entry of

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 6>unions and union delegates into small business work sites across Australia.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 6>It's on top of the effective outlawing of casual work,

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 6>which is foundational to small businesses across the country. And

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 6>I think it builds on this broader ideological agenda of

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 6>Labor and the Left which is anti small business, is

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 6>anti family business, which is the engine room of the economy.

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 6>But it's also foundational to the Australian way of life.

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 6>You know, small business is about hard work, independence, risk taking,

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 6>reward for effort, all of those values that we should

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 6>encourage in our society. And it further shows Caroline that

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 6>Labor is really now the party of big business, because

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 6>big business will be the main beneficiaries of these changes

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 6>because it will have less competition from small business. So

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 6>we know that small and family enterprises cannot absorb the

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 6>costs of these industrial relation changes in the same way

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 6>that big businesses can. And of course it comes on

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 6>the back of the COVID lockdowns, which hammered small business,

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 6>it helped big business, and so this is just another

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 6>step in the wrong direction.

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, and small businesses can't have a full compliance department

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 3>to deal with all these things, and that's where you

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 3>see that competition evaporate, but still on the economy and

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 3>concerns continue for both inflation and a potential for.

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 2>The employment rate to surge.

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Inflation figures come down at the end of the month,

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 3>but I feel like we're being softened up for a

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 3>bit more bad economic news.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think you're right, Carolina. Unfortunately, you know, six

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 6>months ago we were talking about the next move of

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 6>interest rates was more likely to be down than up.

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 6>Now all the talk is it's going to be up

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 6>and not down. And that's because of two key factors.

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.239
<v Speaker 6>One is out of control government spending at the federal

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 6>and state level. Just look at Queensland one thousand dollars

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 6>subsidies for energy bills. Well, that's going to get pumped

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 6>back into the economy three hundred dollars from the federal government.

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 6>We've also got this problem, Caroline, which is this mass migration,

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 6>unplanned mass migration, which is pumping demand into the economy

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 6>at the same time as our supply is going backwards.

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 6>You know, productivity growth is going backwards in this country,

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 6>so we're less able to generate wealth, we're less able

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 6>to generate prosperity at the same time as we've had

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 6>an unprecedented surge to mass migration, over a million net

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 6>migrants over the last two years, by far, the biggest

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 6>expansion in the history of our nation's population. So these

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 6>are causing surging prices and inflation. It's why Australians are

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 6>feeling all of the pain that they are at the checkout.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 3>And Daniel, is it a question of does this federal

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>government have the tiker or not have the ticker to

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 3>make the big decisions which need to be made.

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>No, they don't.

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 6>They've shown no inclination to deal with the big problems.

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 7>Look on migration.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 6>I know the government's been saying they're going to be

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 6>cutting numbers, but I believe it when I see it.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 6>They haven't really taken on these issues in any meaningful way,

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 6>and that's because fundamentally, the only economic plan of this

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 6>government is to grow the economy by growing the population. Now,

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 6>of course, if you bring more people into a nation,

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 6>the economy will get bigger. You've got a bigger market,

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 6>more people spending money. But the slice of the pie

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 6>that everybody gets is going backwards. You know, we've had

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 6>five consecutive borders of negative per capita economic growth. So

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 6>this mass migration policy is making Australians poorer.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 3>And the minute they reduce migration, that aggregate GDP figure

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 3>will come down along with it. So you know, they

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 3>say that's something they're going to do, but whether ultimately

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 3>they want to see aggregate GDP come down or not

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 3>is a totally different question. Now onto the self evident

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 3>and labor, Energy and Resources ministers across the country are

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 3>now trying to make the case for continued gas supply.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.239
<v Speaker 3>The narrative until recently has been to totally demonize gas.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 3>But I suppose the reality is finally set in.

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's right, Caroline.

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 6>I'd make one exception to that, which is I think

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 6>Madeline King, in all fairness to federal Resources Minister has

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 6>been saying from day dot of this government that we

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 6>need more gas into the market because renewables can't get

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 6>the job done. It shows that net zero does not work.

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 6>It's further evidence of that. We've just seen tweaky forests

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 6>give up on the government subsidized hydrogen. So it builds

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 6>on a series of problems. Clearly, those clear thinkers like

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 6>Madeline King have been rolled in cabinet by Chris Bowen

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 6>and those from the left of the party, and it

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 6>gets to this much bigger issue, which is the short

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 6>sighted policy at the state and federal level. Of course,

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 6>we need baseload power, we need coal and we need

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 6>gas into the system. We need it in there quick.

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 6>Prices are going up dramatically. We've had AEMO warning of

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 6>blackouts this summer. I mean, can you believe it in

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 6>a country like Australia, an abundance of coal, an abundance

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 6>of gas and abundance of uranium, we're talking about load

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 6>shedding and blackouts over summer. That just goes to the

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 6>monumental policy failures that we've seen in this country over

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 6>recent years.

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, absolutely right there, Bang on now, I've only

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 3>got about a minute left for you. But protest is

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 3>at Uwa's curtain. University have got their nickers in or

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 3>not because the university has told them they can't use

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 3>from the river to the siege chair during their protest.

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Daniel, how on earth will they ever survive?

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's right.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 6>I mean you're in Perth, Carolina and I think you know,

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 6>WA has probably been a bit more sensible on this

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 6>issue done on the Eastern seaboard, and I think, you know,

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 6>good on the university for finally cracking down on this.

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 6>I'm not holding my breath for anything from the University

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 6>of Sydney or the University of Melbourne. Look, of course

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 6>people have the right to voice their opinion and to protest.

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 6>You don't have the right to blockade. You don't have

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 6>the right to set up encampments. We know university students

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 6>don't want to go to campus because they don't feel

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 6>it's an environment where they can study and get ahead.

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 6>And I just don't understand for the life of me,

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 6>why are governments funding this. You know, all funding to

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 6>universities that are allowing these kind of protests to take

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 6>place should stop until these universally university vice chancellors finally

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 6>get with the program and understand that university should be

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 6>there for the pursuit of academic excellence, not this vis

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 6>if Retrick from a handful of students.

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, thank you for your insights.

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Wild joining me now, is the author of international

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 3>best sellers, including The Strange Death of Europe, The Madness

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 3>of Crowds. In his latest book, The War on the West,

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 3>Douglas Murray, It's been a huge week in US politics,

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 3>and just when I thought an assassination attempt on a

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 3>former president would be the end of it, it turns

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 3>out it was just the beginning of the wheels coming off. Obviously,

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Biden's resignation didn't just happen. Do we know what went

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 3>on behind the scenes and what ticked him over?

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 7>We very much know what happened behind the scenes.

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 8>Now it's almost a month since Joe Biden had that

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 8>catastrophic debate performance opposite Donald Trump, and many people thought

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 8>that the whole idea of the Democrats agreeing the Democrat

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 8>ticket agreeing to a debate so early, so far ahead

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 8>of the election, might have been an effort by some

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 8>of the Democrats to actually show world what they all secretly,

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 8>turn out have known, which is that Joe Biden was

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 8>far from firing on all cylinders these days. That fact

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 8>that was known by readers of certainly conservative media seems

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 8>to have come as a great shock to some of

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 8>the Democrats and certainly a lot of their supporters. And

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 8>so in the weeks since, there has been an effort,

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 8>first of all privately and then increasingly publicly among senior

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 8>Democrats to signal to Joe Biden, you know it's time

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 8>to leave.

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 7>It's very interesting.

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 8>In the days before Sunday, there was a growing public

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 8>set of statements by Democrats all sort of saying that

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 8>Joe Biden wasn't fit to xyz it the minute that

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 8>he released this strange statement on x formerly known as

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 8>Twitter on Sunday, the moment he released that. Suddenly, now

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 8>all the Democrats are saying, Joe Biden is the best

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 8>of us, He's a true here, this is what leadership

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 8>looks like, and so on. But yes, all the people

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 8>who are currently praising Joe Biden were, of course the

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 8>people who were busily pushing him out in recent days.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 8>It's Nancy Pelosis, Chuck Schumer and many others. The whole

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 8>leadership of the Democrat Party realized that.

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 7>They were running a.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 8>Candidate frankly totally unfit for the office. It was perfect

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 8>clear he couldn't perform the task, He couldn't stay awake

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 8>on television very easily.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 7>No way he was going to run the country for

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 7>another four years.

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 8>Although it does raise a question of exactly who's running

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 8>it now, and the answer is, we don't know.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 2>And that's the point. I suppose.

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 3>He may have dropped out as the nominee, but he's

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 3>still actually the president. And that said, he's canceled a

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 3>number of engagements this week and has extended his trip

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 3>in Delaware.

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 2>We also understand that despite confirmation.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:12:00.080
<v Speaker 3>By his doctor, he only has mild COVID symptoms. What

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 3>on it is going on here?

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, the COVID symptoms might be mild, but none of

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 8>the other symptoms are, as I say, just increasingly obvious

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 8>to people, and in the whole slew of news that

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 8>came out in the last month, just perfectly obvious that

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 8>this was not a candidate at eighty one. Some eighty

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 8>one year olds might be sprightly, but Joe Biden isn't

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 8>among them. I became perfect obvious he wasn't gonna be

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 8>able to last for another four years. Of course, as

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 8>you say, I mean, there's still half a year almost

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 8>for him to go, for him to be running the

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 8>most important country in the world. But there are so

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 8>many questions now, and those people who think that this

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 8>has been a sort of lovely, sort of crowning of

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 8>Kamala Harris as his successor, I think there might be

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 8>a bit more pain to come from within the party

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 8>because not everyone in the Democrat hierarchy is absolutely sure

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 8>that Kamala is their winner in November.

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 3>No, but Kamala Harris has told a rally in Wisconsin

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 3>that she is enough support to secure.

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>The Democratic nomination.

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 9>Here she is announcing it so Wisconsin, I am told

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 9>as of this morning that we have earned the support

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 9>of enough delegates to secure the Democratic nomini.

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 3>But He's Representative Chuck Schumer, is rather awkward announcement, I

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 3>think back in Kamala.

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 10>So, now that the process is played out from the

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 10>grassroots bottom up, we are here today to throw our

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 10>support behind Vice President Kamala Harris.

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm clapping.

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>You don't have to Douglas the Democrats scene. I think

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>more resigned to the fact that Kamala will be the

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 3>nominee rather than excited about it, don't.

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 8>You think, well, I mean, it's hard to see who

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 8>could be excited about it simply on a polls level.

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 8>You know, in the prospective polls of how people think

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 8>they might vote in November, Donald Trump was already beating

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 8>Joe Biden by two points in most polls. He's already

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 8>beaten Kamala Harris by five points. So I don't know

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 8>who would be especially excited about this. Kamilo is obviously

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 8>very excited about it and is going to show her

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 8>enthusiasm in that normal, usual and completely non fake way

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 8>she has of expressing enthusiasm for things principally herself and

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 8>her own words. But she might be an enthusiastic but

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 8>it's hard to see.

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 7>Who else is.

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 8>I watched a speech of her that she gave last

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 8>Thursday in North Carolina, and to say that the content

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 8>of it was vapid is to enormously.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 7>Sort of praise her.

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 8>Really, there's almost no banality that she cannot come out with,

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 8>and what is her vision. It's a sort of sub

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 8>Obama rhetoric with absolutely no detail added on to it,

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 8>and it's not clear what she wants to do, other

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 8>of course, than to go forwards in time rather than

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 8>backwards in time, which is something she's especially passionate about.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 2>But Douglas, do the Dems actually have another choice?

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Is there actually another viable option at this point so

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 3>late in the race, Well.

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 8>It would have to be a really stunning household name.

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 8>There are a couple that are being thrown around, but

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 8>how likely they are to do anything?

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 7>I don't know, you.

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 8>Know, the enormous selfishness actually of Joe Biden and Jill

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 8>Biden and the Biden family and keeping Biden pretending he

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 8>was going to run until last Sunday. The selfishness of

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 8>it actually is that if he'd have said, say a

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 8>year ago, look, I've done my spell in office, I've

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 8>done everything I can. I'm in the twilight of my

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 8>years and it's time for next generation to come along,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 8>there could have been at least a year for Democrat

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 8>candidates to put themselves forward, put forward their prospectives for leadership,

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 8>have an open debate among themselves, and for the best

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 8>man or woman to win. But because Joe Biden harm

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 8>so with such clenched fingers onto the presidency. The fact

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 8>that Jill Biden egged him on even when she must

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 8>have seen did see that he couldn't even walk onto

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 8>a stage without a detailed map of the terrain. It

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 8>suggests that, actually, you know, these people who have been

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 8>saying what patriots they are and so on, have really

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 8>mucked things up for their own political side, their own

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 8>political party.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I could have put that better.

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 3>But back to Kamala, and we have seen snippets of

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris over the course of the.

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Last three years.

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Very few of those snippets have been edifying Douglas. Here

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 3>she is, as Senator upplauding the idea of defunding the police.

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 9>Right now, what we're seeing in America is many cities

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 9>spend over one third of their entire city budget on policing.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 9>But meanwhile, we've been defunding public schools for years in America.

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 9>We've got to re examine what we're doing with American

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 9>tax payer dollars.

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 3>And here she is talking about eliminating private health insurance.

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 11>You support the Medicare for All bill, I think initially

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 11>co sponsored by Senator Bernie Sanders. You're also a cosponder ontt.

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 11>I believe it will totally eliminate private insurance. So for

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 11>people out there who like their insurance, they don't get

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 11>to keep it.

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, the.

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 9>Idea is that everyone gets access to medical care and

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 9>you don't have to go through the process of going

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 9>through an insurance company, having them give you approval, going

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 9>through the paperwork, all of the delay that may require.

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 9>Who of us has not had that situation where you've

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 9>got to wait for approval and the doctor says, well,

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 9>I don't know if your insurance company is going to

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 9>cover this.

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 2>Let's eliminate all of that. Let's move on, and it

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 2>doesn't stop there.

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 3>She also agreed with the hard left representative AOCS push

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 3>to eliminate cars in eleven years.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 12>Sixty minutes this weekend, proudly calling herself a radical and

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 12>she's promoting policies like saying that every single carbon emission

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 12>in the country, every car should be eliminated within the

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 12>next eleven years, everything from a seventy to eighty percent

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 12>tax rate. Do you agree that she could possibly, in

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 12>this ideology of the socialist left, could splinter your party?

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 9>No, you know, I think that she is challenging the

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 9>status quo.

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that's fantastic, Douglas.

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned earlier the Obama talking points without the detail.

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 3>Do we know what she actually believes in and whether

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 3>and to what extent that would form part of any

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 3>democratic policy platform.

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 7>No, we have very little idea of what she believes in.

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 8>Actually, because she Isia says things like that's why we

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 8>need to have the conversation about that. That's one of

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 8>her tricks. Whenever she gets into a corner way, she

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 8>really doesn't know what to say. And the rest of it,

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 8>as I said earlier, sort of banalities. This is somebody who,

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 8>from the clips you just paid, seems to think that

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 8>they can answer the problems of education in America, of

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 8>healthcare in America, of crime in America.

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 7>But there's absolutely no meat on the bone.

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the idea is in that first clip that

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 8>it's an either or in regards to policing or schooling.

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 8>It's not a lack of money that's the problem in

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 8>American schooling. It's a lack of decent teaching and a

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 8>lack of discipline in the schools. There are American students

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 8>in even the poorer states who have more money per

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 8>pupil paid by the state for the education than in

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 8>most countries around the world, and yet they still have

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 8>some of the worst literacy and numeracy rates. That's not

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 8>a failing of funding, that's a failing of the teaching

0:19:54.440 --> 0:20:00.719
<v Speaker 8>unions across America, among much else. Only Mama Harris can

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 8>present these complex problems, pretend the solution to them is

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 8>simply more money and promise to put more money everywhere,

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 8>and make it not at all clear with exactly how

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.719
<v Speaker 8>that money would be of any use. As I say,

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 8>it's all vapid and empty rhetoric, and it's very unclear

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 8>what she actually believes.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 7>She just says what she needs to say to.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 8>Get through the next ten seconds of any interview or speech.

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Which is going to be a huge problem if she,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 3>god forbid, turns out to be the president. But there's

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 3>also been plenty of chatter about who her vice presidential

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 3>candidate may be. A few suitors have started turning up

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 3>being very flattering about Kamala in the.

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Last couple of days. Where do you think this will learn?

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 8>I mean, it's actually not clear to me that the

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 8>most talented people in the party are going to put

0:20:55.880 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 8>themselves forward. Does Kamala Harris, and you know, your name

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 8>on a ticket seem at the moment to be a

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 8>good prospect for you if you're a Democrat, an ambitious Democrat.

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 7>I think probably not.

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 8>I think quite a lot of the people that people

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 8>assumed would get into the race actually won't if she

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 8>is certainly the top of the ticket, because they would

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 8>be the vice presidential running mate to a walking disaster.

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you know, we'll see, there's a long way

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 8>to go. You know, in the next sort of almost

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 8>four months, there will be I mean we've seen just

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 8>the last week.

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 7>You mentioned at the top of the show that just

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 7>the last week has.

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 8>Been unbelievable amount of things happening, from the attempted assassination

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 8>of former President Trump to Joe Biden stepping out of

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 8>the race on Twitter. So almost four months, absolutely anything

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 8>can happen. But I just think that the Democrats are

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 8>kidding themselves but no one else if they think that

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 8>Kamala Harry is a strong candidate.

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's a very very fair call.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 3>And back to where this week kind of started, obviously

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 3>with that attempted assassination of Donald Trump Secret Service head

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Kimberly Chedtles She's finally stepped down overnight. This is, of course,

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 3>following the Secret Services total failure to protect the former

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump at that rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. They had

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 3>one job and they absolutely botched it. Here is what

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Speaker Mike Johnson had to say.

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 13>Our reaction, the immediate reaction to her resignation is that

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 13>it is overdue. She should have done this at least

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 13>a week ago. I'm happy to see that. I'm happy

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 13>to see that she is heeded the call of both

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 13>Republicans and Democrats. Now we have to pick up the pieces.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>We have to.

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 13>Rebuild the American people's faith and trust in the Secret

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 13>Services and agency.

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 3>And it's no wonder she had to go, especially after

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 3>that spectacle that was the questioning by the House Oversight

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 3>meeting on Monday. Quite a sight to behold both Democrats

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 3>and Republicans calling for her resignation.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 2>But I think this was probably my favorite exchange of

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 2>the hearing.

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 14>Would you agree that this is the most serious security

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 14>lapse since President Reagan was shot in nineteen eighty one of.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>The Secret Service?

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sir, I would.

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 14>And you know, do you know what Stuart Knight did

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 14>when he was in charge at the time of the

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 14>Secret Service. Do you know what he did afterwards?

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 2>He remained on duty.

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 14>He resigned. He resigned. What's the difference between your position

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 14>and what Stuart Knight did?

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 15>What I will tell you, sir, is that I am

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 15>dedicated to finding the answers to what happened, and like

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 15>every Secret Service agent, we don't shirk from our responsibilities.

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 2>I will remain on Douglas.

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 3>The hubris that was on display at that hearing was

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 3>absolutely extraordinary. Why on earth did it take so long

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 3>for that reality to set in?

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 16>Well?

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 8>I watched that hearing and came away with a view

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 8>that the now former head of the Secret Services clearly

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 8>decided that her aim in the hearing was to say

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 8>as little as possible whilst presenting herself as being as

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 8>helpful as possible. She wouldn't answer even the most basic

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 8>questions like when did you start preparing for this hearing?

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 8>She said things like well, for the best of my recollection,

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 8>or I can't recall, or there was no skin off

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 8>her nose. If she'd have just said, you know, I

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 8>started preparing the moment I heard, which was six days ago,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 8>or whatever, she seemed to be intent on not giving

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 8>any details in case she could somehow be tripped up

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 8>on them at some later date in the hearing or afterwards.

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 8>And that was just a disastrous tactic. She had repeaterdly

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 8>asked about timelines and it turned out she didn't have them.

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 7>It really was an embarrassment. You know, she was a political.

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 8>Appointee of Joe and Jill Biden, was of close to

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 8>them and respected and liked by them when she was

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 8>in charge of then Vice President Biden's security detail. She

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 8>obviously was not the right person for this job. She

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 8>certainly wasn't the right person to represent herself in front

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 8>of a congressional hearing. And I think it's probably very

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 8>good that she goes.

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 7>She's gone.

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 8>That said, there is an enormous amount that still needs

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 8>to be found out and interrogated about exactly what did

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 8>happen that day at the Trump rally, because there are

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 8>so many security failings that we now know that have

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 8>come out. And as I said last week, this is

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, the world was just too close, by a

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 8>couple of millimeters from something utterly catastrophic happening.

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, and it's very fair that representatives on both sides

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 3>they are want to know what happened, because obviously they

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 3>are all in danger if the Secret Service isn't doing

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 3>what it needs to be doing. Now, one last topic,

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 3>and we know Benjamin Netna who is in the US

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 3>to mate with the government in relation to the.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Ongoing war in Gaza.

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 3>It's been reported that Kamala Harris is going to boycott

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:13.959
<v Speaker 3>netnya who's dress.

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 2>But that's not all.

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Apparently pro Palestinian protesters have invaded the Capitol building. If

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 3>this wasn't so serious, Douglas, it would just be the

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 3>most epic political satup.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, yes, but.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean it is very serious because I mean here

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 8>we see a very important relationship for America and Israel

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 8>being put under strain, not by these nincome poop protesters.

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 8>I mean they should all just be arrested as anyone

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 8>else would be if say they broke into the Capitol building.

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 8>But the thing of putting strain on it is that

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 8>decision by current Vice President Harris not preside over the session.

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 8>I think she's speaking to a high school somewhere in

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 8>Vermont something at the time.

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 7>When she could be presiding that joint session.

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 8>Clearly she is making this more of a political point

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 8>than it needs to be. There has actually always been

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 8>a great bipartisan agreement in the US on the importance

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 8>of the American Israeli relationship. I'm sure the Prime Minister

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 8>nathana Who will speak to that when he speaks.

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 7>On Wednesday, and we'll see.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 8>But's it is a snub actually by Kamala Harris and

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 8>a very bad sign Netania, who's also meant to be

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 8>meeting Joe Biden to express his thanks for Joe Biden's

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 8>support since October. But it's not even clear if that's

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 8>going to happen, because it's not clear if Biden's well

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 8>enough to meet him. It seems so that according to

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 8>reports today, So we'll see. But you know, it should

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 8>be an important time from America and Israel to re

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 8>emphasize the strength of that relationship, and if it is

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 8>politicized by come Harris and others, it'll be to the

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 8>detriment of both countries and a lamentable situation which should

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 8>never have arisen.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 2>No, and I think there's plenty more to come out

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 2>in the wash there. Thank you so much, Douglas Murray.

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 7>Great pleasure.

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.719
<v Speaker 3>Still to come left is losing it, including those fawning

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 3>over Marmala.

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Harris and Adam B.

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Coleman analyzes the left's attempt to rebrand laugh and Kamala.

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Now it's time for left is losing it and as

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 3>we barrel towards a US presidential election, the Dallas turned

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 3>up on the partisan crazy and it is coming from

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 3>absolutely all directions. In the aftermath of former President Donald

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Trump being shot, this is what the president of the

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 3>American Federation of Teachers had to say.

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 17>It is seldom a dramatic event or attack that lets

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 17>fash in the door.

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 18>The violence comes later after they are voted.

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 17>In voting, it's still our best defense against tyranny and fascism,

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 17>and it's our best offense to create the better future

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 17>we dream of, and march.

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 18>For progress is possible, but not guaranteed. When the history

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 18>books are written about this moment, let them record that

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 18>we the.

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 4>People united, mobilized and voted down.

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 5>This existential threat to democracy and freedom, that we continue

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 5>the march progress, that we lay the foundation for a

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 5>better future, and that we sought to create a more

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 5>perfect union progress.

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 8>It is possible.

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 19>Kick marching.

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Hardly softening political discourse in the aftermath of an attempted

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 3>political assassination. And if that isn't an advertisement for homeschooling,

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 3>then I'm not really sure what is now. Moving on

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 3>to Kamala Harris, who many are saying will be the

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Democratic nominee.

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 2>It's fascinating to see how.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 3>The lefty media has ditched Old Joe jumping headfirst onto

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 3>the Kamala train.

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 13>I'm jumping out of my feet over here watching the

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 13>people have been thirsting for this, and.

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 9>I'll just say this, you know, and I'm with Tim, Tim,

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 9>I'm jumping out of my seat higher than you, my brother.

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 7>I'm just gonna say that.

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 19>It was a twinkle in her eye. There was a

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 19>kick in her step that you know when you're a

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 19>vice president. You know, I don't You're not looks you can't.

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 19>You know there's somebody above you, there's somebody you don't

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 19>want to overshadow them.

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 10>You are.

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 19>And this was quite the coming out. And I got

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 19>chills when she said, don't try I know your tape.

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 10>I was blown away.

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 19>I was like, I kind of fell in love with her.

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 19>I thought she was smart, engaging, She's funny, fasting, twikle

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 19>in your eye, punch you in the gun.

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean everything.

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 2>You what.

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 19>I just thought it was a great, great opening act.

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>She looked completely comfortable tonight with the words she was speaking.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>They felt organic and genuine.

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Are we even living on the same planet? And of

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 3>course a switch in the Democratic nomination wouldn't be complete

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 3>without some blame landing with the Republicans. Apparently it's a

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 3>racist to suggest Harris is a dei.

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 19>Higher Republicans have gone so far as to call her

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 19>a dei.

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 7>Hire was just clad out racist.

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 3>This is a pretty unusual allegation given I thought it

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>was one of the few accepted facts.

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 2>On both sides of the aisle. After all, no one.

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Has accused Kamala Harris of being competent. But let's it

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 3>dial up the crazy a bit further.

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Apparently mispronouncing her name is a hate crime.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 16>Heard from inside Republican circles and right wing media that

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 16>the heat campaign against Kamala Harris has begun. You'll notice

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 16>they purposefully pronounce her name wrong, they say Kamala. They

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 16>do it all the time. It is on purpose. But

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 16>the talk is to start that heat campaign and get

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 16>it going and start it churning.

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 3>And over recent days and hours, more people are coming

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 3>out to endorse Kamala Harris, the Clintons, Nancy Pelosi. Then

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 3>there is Meghan Markle, who reportedly wants to endorse Kamala

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Harris as well. Megan is so lacking in self awareness,

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 3>so she doesn't realize that her endorsement is probably more

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 3>like a kiss of death. Perhaps just send her some

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 3>strawberry jam and stay mum. And while the Democrat political

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 3>establishment is getting used to the idea of presidential nominee Harris,

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.479
<v Speaker 3>this blow thinks the presidential nominee should be trans.

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 15>I think we need a transgender president.

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 2>And here's why.

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 15>There is no greater struggle than the English trans You're

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 15>constantly hated, You're constantly people wanting to unalive you because

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 15>just because of who you are. If we had transgender president,

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 15>the world would be a much better place and maybe

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:23.959
<v Speaker 15>all our haters might actually leave the United States instead

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 15>of staying here. We the people run this country, not

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 15>our presidents, not our congressman, not our Senate. Our constitution

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 15>says we the people. So maybe who's with me? We

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 15>need a transgender president. I'm up for anybody else who's

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 15>going to be a candidate.

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Who knew a presidential election a change and nominate, and

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 3>an attempted assassination could produce so much insane material. Anyway,

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:08.720
<v Speaker 3>there you have it. Joining me now is wrong speak?

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:13.479
<v Speaker 3>Publishing founder Adam B. Coleman Adam Kamala Harris has gone

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 3>hard to secure the Democratic nomination in the days after

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden announced his withdrawal.

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 2>What's the latest and does it look like she's got

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 2>that all stitched up?

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 20>It seems like it, But there's a lot that can

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:32.240
<v Speaker 20>happen up until when we make it to the convention.

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 20>You know, there's quite a bit of a possibility that

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 20>they might stroll elsewhere, but there's a lot of momentum

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 20>behind Kamala Harris. That might be the direction that they

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 20>go at the convention. It seems to make the most sense,

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 20>especially from a campaign finance situation. So I would say

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 20>it's more likely that she'll be the nominee, but you

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 20>never know what happens when it comes to the convention.

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 2>And plenty of other names have been floated.

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 3>But some of those perspective nominads, do you think they're

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 3>either eyeing off the vice presidential nomination or just waiting

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 3>holding their breath until next time.

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 20>Yeah, the names that constantly come up like Gavin Newsom

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 20>and other notable names. I think there's a likely chance

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 20>that they're going to wait till next time around. I

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 20>think someone who is likely to win a presidential race,

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 20>like in a full length I don't think they're going

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 20>to want to risk coming in with four months essentially

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 20>until the election comes around to run an entire campaign,

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 20>raise money, so on and so forth. I think it's

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 20>a huge risk for someone who does have presidential ambitions.

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 20>So that's why even more so, I think it's leaning

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 20>more towards Kamala Harris. Pamala was alongside Joe Biden. For

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 20>many voters, they're going to see that Kamala Harris is

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 20>an extension of Joe Biden, but obviously someone who is

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 20>younger and more alive than Joe Biden is. So I

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 20>think it's an easy transition for the Democratic Party to

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 20>move in her direction.

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 18>Now.

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 3>The withdrawal of Biden has definitely changed the landscape of

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 3>the presidential race, that's for sure. Donald Trump has accused

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats of fraud over the Biden swap. Is this

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 3>an acknowledgment that Harris could potentially create some issues for Trump?

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 20>It's possible, but I think Trump has a point. You know,

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 20>they went through an entire primary process, and obviously, you know,

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 20>anybody with two eyes who's paying attention can see that

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 20>Joe Biden was falling apart, you know, cognitively and literally falling,

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 20>and so when it comes to one particular debate, all

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 20>of a sudden, they want to change course, negating all

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 20>the Democratic voters who went out and chose Joe Biden

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 20>as their nominee, and pressuring Joe Biden because there was

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 20>a lot of pushback from the Biden and Biden campaign

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 20>before he left. So in many ways, I've called this

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 20>a democratic coup. You know, they wanted him out because

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 20>the public got to see what he actually look like

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 20>in prime time, and now they get to put in

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 20>place the leader that they want, negating all the people

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 20>who are part of the party, who were part of

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 20>the process. So you know, whether it's Kamala Harris or

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 20>they do some backroom deals to choose somebody else, it

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 20>kind of gets rid of the whole democratic process involving

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 20>the voters.

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, Donald Trump, you know, when

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:35.479
<v Speaker 3>Biden withdrew, he must have known that this was coming.

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that Kamala Harris attack had that hit the

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 3>news wave is really quickly.

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 20>Oh yeah, I think everybody. Everybody suspected that something was

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 20>going on. There were rumors about Joe Biden leaving office

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 20>for about a week prior, and actually I was pretty

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 20>skeptical about him actually leaving because there was so much

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 20>pushback coming from Joe Biden. Every time there is speculation,

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.359
<v Speaker 20>there is another press release that he's staying in place

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 20>and that he's on the campaign trail. So I think

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 20>if you're a good campaign, you prepare for multiple outcomes.

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, And the Democrats, I've been quick off the mark

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 3>to frame Kamala as presidential. She took her nieceus for

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 3>ice cream over the weekend and she's been referred to

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 3>as Momala. How important is this repositioning of Kamala Harris

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 3>in this campaign.

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 20>Yeah, this is a massive pr campaign that's going on.

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 20>There's a lot of excitement. Some of the excitement is

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 20>just the juxtaposition of Joe Biden, who is very much

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 20>so comatose like and here you have someone who is

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 20>much younger, much more vibrant, smiles a lot, you know,

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 20>just on the surface, seems like someone that you should

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 20>be excited over. But Kamala has been hiding for quite

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 20>some time and letting the PR team fill in the blanks.

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 20>But that's the excitement of right now. We'll give it

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 20>some weeks and when she actually starts speaking, if there's

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 20>going to be a debate, which I would hope there's

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 20>going to be a debate between her and Trump. If

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 20>she's a nominee, we get to ask her tough questions.

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 20>But in the meantime, she's going to do a bunch

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.879
<v Speaker 20>of fluff interviews by the mainstream media. She's not going

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 20>to be challenged. She's going to be well prepped to

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 20>show off her personality rather than her policies.

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 2>And she might be well prepped.

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 3>And obviously that talking point about her being younger that

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 3>there has gone.

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 2>All through the media very very quickly. But ultimately she's

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 2>going to have to have a lot more than that.

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:53.800
<v Speaker 20>Oh yeah, absolutely, it's working right now. A lot of

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 20>people are like, look how much money she raised in

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 20>such a short period of time. Like I said, this

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:02.320
<v Speaker 20>is political excitement. It's going to happen. It's going to

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 20>be like this, especially leading up to her nomination. So

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 20>she's going to raise money However, there's going to be

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 20>a point where it's going to slow down and people

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 20>are going to ask questions, Okay, we're excited about you,

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 20>but what do you have to offer us, even coming

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 20>from Democratic voters, because remember they didn't choose her as

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 20>the nominee, so she still has to win them over,

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 20>and for some of them it's not enough to not

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 20>be Donald Trump.

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Correct, And I'm just interested to know in that campaign period,

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 3>say that four months, say that she does get the

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 3>Democratic nomination, when you think about the demographic that she's

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 3>designed to appeal to, how markedly different is her campaign going.

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 2>To be from what would otherwise have been a Biden

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 2>led campaign.

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 20>I think it's going to be different in a sense

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 20>that she's going to appeal more to younger voters. You know,

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 20>not too long ago, she was part of the BET

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 20>Awards and a pre tape showing with Taraji p Henson

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 20>that appeals to a particular demographic of people that Joe

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 20>Biden doesn't necessarily appeal to. So, you know, by virtue

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:13.839
<v Speaker 20>of being younger and also by virtue of being a woman,

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 20>she may appeal to a wide variety of people in

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 20>a different way than Joe Biden was able to. But

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 20>at the same time, this is going to come to

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 20>a point where she's going to need to be challenged. She's,

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 20>you know, this entire process because she's being picked. She

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 20>hasn't been challenged. She hasn't had someone to ask her

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 20>tough questions in quite some time, basically four years when

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 20>she did the vice vice presidential debate. So in reality,

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 20>in the past four years, she's been able to skirt

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 20>any sort of criticism directly from the media or even

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 20>addressing the public about something difficult.

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Now, lastly, and I've got a little under a minute

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 3>for you, but I know you support the return of

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing to the US.

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 2>It has been a powerhouse in the past.

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 3>How does the outcome of a presidential election really impact

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the US's ability to return manufacturing back to home soil,

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 3>I think greatly.

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 20>You have one particular issue. You have China as the issue.

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 20>Donald Trump is bullish on China. Unfortunately the Democrats aren't,

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 20>and that's going to be a key issue when it

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 20>comes to actually bringing back jobs here. The second is taxes.

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 20>Donald Trump is willing to give tax tax bricks to businesses.

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 20>The Democrats haven't been that tax friendly and so that's

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:43.839
<v Speaker 20>going to slow down the opportunities to bring back manufacturing

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 20>over to the United States.

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Adam B. Coleman, thank you so much for joining us.

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 2>This evening still to come.

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 3>Elo Masters's son is dead, killed by the work line

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 3>virus and the Allen government gets it wrong on women again.

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now is CEO of Women's Forum Australia, Rachel Wong.

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Hi, Rachel Look.

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 3>I spoke about this topic on Monday with Chris Kenny,

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 3>but I still can't quite get over the fact that

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 3>the Victorian government wants to include trans women in an

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 3>inquiry on women's pain. I don't know about you, but

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty miffed about the idea of biological men cosplaying

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:35.439
<v Speaker 3>about pain suffered by women and being indulged on an.

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Issue that's as serious as this. What are your thoughts?

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 21>I gues's absolutely idiotic and expensive. I saw one woman

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 21>comment that it's like saying that pain is basically a

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 21>fashion accessory for men who want to be validated as women.

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:54.439
<v Speaker 21>I mean, including men in an inquiry into women's pain

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 21>makes absolutely no sense. Women's and men's health conditions are

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 21>completely different because of the way we're buy it. Logically, Wiet,

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 21>I think that it's an absolute slappened the face to

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:09.280
<v Speaker 21>women whose health has been historically under research and undiagnosed.

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 21>You know, we finally have this opportunity to really dig

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:15.880
<v Speaker 21>deep into what's happening with women's health conditions, and at

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:18.239
<v Speaker 21>this point the government just said, well, actually be it's

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 21>going to conclude men in this as well. I mean,

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:24.240
<v Speaker 21>women are already you know, basically losing our own female

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 21>only spaces, female only sports, female only services, and now

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:29.839
<v Speaker 21>apparently we're not even entitle to our own pain.

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 3>But the thing is ras you're I mean, ultimately we

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 3>need to know what the results are from this study

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:42.359
<v Speaker 3>to be able to improve health care for women. If

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 3>you're not putting the right information in, you're not going

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:46.800
<v Speaker 3>to end up with the right results.

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 21>One hundred percent. And that should be entirely of theous,

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 21>especially to Premier Uson to Alan and Health Minister Mary

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 21>and Thomas, who are both female, who know that women's

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 21>health issues are very different to men's, and you know

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 21>that these issues need to be researched, and if you're

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 21>including men with completely different health issues, then obviously the

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 21>inquiry is going to be tainted.

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 3>And this is in the first time biological men have

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 3>been allowed to run rough shot over women's issues. Australia

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 3>E Safety Commissioner Julian mcgrant came out to accuse Donald

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump and his followers of being misinformation minds online.

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 22>During his presidency, Donald Trump not only savagely abused foos

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 22>online with impunity, but was identified as a major super

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 22>spreader of miss and disinformation.

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:37.400
<v Speaker 3>But this same E Safety commissioner who appears to have

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:41.439
<v Speaker 3>been on quite the mission to censor factual tweets about

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 3>trans women breastfeeding. At what point does this pendulum swing

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 3>back to common sense after the narrative has demanded compliance

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 3>with an obviously anti science position.

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 21>This position from Julian Mangrand is quite ironic, isn't it,

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 21>Because she is someone who is basically saying that men

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 21>can be women, that men can breastfeed, that it's a

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:05.759
<v Speaker 21>hate crime to say otherwise, And yet she's the one

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 21>who's policing misinformation. She's probably not the best person to

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 21>be doing that. And I think it really shows the

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 21>issue with putting in the hands of one person or

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 21>a team of people basically control over truth online. But

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 21>you know, I think that we're already seeing a swing

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 21>back to truth into biological reality. I think some of

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:27.400
<v Speaker 21>these issues, especially the gender ideology ones, have gone too far.

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 21>When we started really speaking out strongly on these issues

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:34.439
<v Speaker 21>several years ago, there weren't many people speaking out. There's

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 21>been a huge shift over the last few years. People

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 21>are willing to rest their livelihoods and to.

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Get sued and et cetera. But they're still.

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:43.880
<v Speaker 21>Speaking out because they're absolutely sick of it. And so

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 21>I think we've definitely seen a seed change on.

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 2>This, yeah, absolutely.

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 3>And even Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Muss said that

0:46:52.120 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 3>he was tricked into giving consent for his child to

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 3>go on puberty blockers, adding that he believes the Woke

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Mind virus figuratively killed his son. This is what he

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:03.320
<v Speaker 3>had to say in an interview with Jordan Peterson.

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So I was straightt into doing this, and it wasn't

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:14.280
<v Speaker 1>explained to me that puberty blockers are actually just sterilization drugs.

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, and so I lost my son essentially. So

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, they they're caught dead naming for a reason,

0:47:29.760 --> 0:47:31.919
<v Speaker 1>all right. And so the reason that's called dead naming

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is because your son is dad. So my son is

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:40.880
<v Speaker 1>aber is Dad killed by the walk mind.

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Virus, and this shows that anyone, no matter how wealthy

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 3>or worldly, can get caught up and caught out in

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 3>the vagaries.

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Of gender ideology.

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 3>You did mention or you just touched on it before,

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:55.400
<v Speaker 3>But are we really seeing more of that pushback from parents?

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 21>I think we are seeing the pushback, and I think

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 21>having someone like or must seek out is going to, really,

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:04.760
<v Speaker 21>I hope, give parents a lot of courage to continue

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 21>to do that, because someone with that kind of influence,

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 21>someone who's probably one of the most intelligent people in

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 21>the world, was captured by this ideology. You know, he's

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.400
<v Speaker 21>admitted that it was a mistake sign those forms, that

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 21>he was tripped, but he's come out and he said that, so,

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 21>you know, I think that that hopefully is going to

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:21.919
<v Speaker 21>be redemptive for parents to know that, no matter where

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 21>they are on their child's journey in supporting them, that

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:25.800
<v Speaker 21>it's not too late to step back and reflect and

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 21>to think, well, maybe this isn't quite right. Maybe I've

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 21>been you know, misled by the medical profession. And I

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 21>think they are the ones that do have a lot

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 21>to answer for here, because they, of all people, know

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:39.359
<v Speaker 21>that human beings cannot change sex, and what they are

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 21>doing to children and young people in the name of

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:44.720
<v Speaker 21>the sencitious ideology is an absolute medical scandal.

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, And when you go back and think about even

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:51.839
<v Speaker 3>the things that JK. Rowling was saying, you know, even

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.719
<v Speaker 3>six months ago, twelve months ago, eighteen months ago, she.

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:57.759
<v Speaker 2>Was really at the forefront of this pushback.

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 3>And it is good to say people like Keylon Musk

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 3>another you know, senior and well known figures starting to

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 3>push back on this because it's much more difficult for

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 3>everyday people to be able to do that. Anyway, thank

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 3>you so much for joining us. Rachel Wong, that's it

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:16.160
<v Speaker 3>for me, up next to his Newsnight, Good night,