WEBVTT - Danica De Giorgio | 5 December

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News Australia.

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 2>This is Technique de Georgio.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 3>Hello and welcome to the program.

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 4>Coming up tonight, Anthony Alberesi's medicare stunt during the election

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 4>backfires as it's getting even more expensive to see a

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 4>specialist in this country. Also tonight, disaffected Liberals and Teals

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 4>reportedly in talks to form a new center right movement,

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 4>claiming the party is being taken over by Conservatives. I'll

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 4>speak to MICHAYLEA Cash about it shortly, And Australia's Sex

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Discrimination Commissioner still can't define.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 3>The first word in her title.

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 4>I'll play you Anna Cody's latest disastrous comments from Senate estimates.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 4>But first tonight, there's a case that has gone in

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 4>front of a New South Wales court that I think

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 4>has been a gross miscarriage of justice and racially motivated.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 4>It involves police officer Benedict Bryant. Now this is a

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 4>case that makes you wonder why anyone would bother enrolling

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 4>in the police force if they risk being charged just

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 4>for doing their job. Last week, the forty seven year

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 4>old police sergeant was found guilty of dangerous driving occasioning

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 4>the death of Aboriginal teenager Gai killaney Wright.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 3>In February twenty twenty two. The sixteen year old was.

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Riding a stolen trail bike in Sydney's Inner Suburbs when

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 4>he hit an unmarked vehicle being driven by Officer Bryant.

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 4>Now CCTV footage showed the team traveling around sixty eight

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 4>kilometers an hour in a forty kilometer an hour zone

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 4>in a bikelane. Sergeant Bryant created a roadblock with his

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 4>car and at the same time Gi calaney Wright went

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 4>through a red light before hitting a barrier at the

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 4>end of the bike lane, causing him to become airborne

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 4>and he crashed into Bryant's parked vehicle. The teenager suffered

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 4>critical head injuries and died in hospital the following day.

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Now the prosecution alleged Bryant had effectively establish.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 3>A roadblock without reasonable grounds.

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Judge Jane Culvers said given the sergeant's experience, he should

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 4>have known that positioning his vehicle that way would lead.

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>To a real risk of a collision.

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Despite the fact the teenager crashed into the parked vehicle,

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 4>not the other way around. Benedict Bryant's lawyer, Paul McGirr

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 4>explained the judge's decision this morning on two GB and

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 4>have a think about whether this is fair.

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 2>What she found was that he should have foreseen that

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 2>this young person riding over seventy kilometers in a bicycle

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 2>lane on a stolen trial bike and he had a

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 2>helmet on, but certainly should have known that he wouldn't stop,

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 2>he wouldn't slow down at the markings, was on the

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 2>wrong side of the actual bicycle laying markings came to

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 2>that raised part. Should have known that he wasn't going

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>to stop, that that was going to ignore a traffic light,

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 2>was going to ignor a left turn arrow that was

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 2>in the bike lane, was going to ignore a ballard,

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.399
<v Speaker 2>a raised bollard up to about ten centimeters concrete and plastic,

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 2>and was also going to ignore sorry gathering and also

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 2>ignore a too high me to high red plastic bollards.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Now, obviously you can foresee things happening. For example, if

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 4>you are driving and there is an intoxicated person staggering

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 4>on a footpath with one foot on the road, then

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 4>you're probably going to slow down your vehicle in anticipation

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 4>that that person may come onto the road. That to

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 4>me is fair and reasonable to assume, but nobody's a

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 4>mind reader, so it beggars belief in my view that

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 4>a judge would think that a police officer would have

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 4>had to have foreseen a myriad of possibilities in a

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 4>split second, like ignoring bollards in order to have prevented death.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 3>This really is truly staggering.

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Judge Jane Colver said, the accused so seriously failed to

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 4>properly they managed the vehicle that he created a real

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 4>danger despite the fact he didn't hit the teenager. The

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 4>teenager crashed into his patrol car, which was part and

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 4>now the sergeant will learn his fate in April and

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 4>faces up to ten years behind bars, his career over

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 4>in a flash for doing his job, a twenty two

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 4>year career down the drain. Why bother becoming a police officer?

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 4>What is the point if you cannot even fulfill your

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 4>basic duties without the risk of being charged because the

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 4>standard has been set now. In fact, criminal law researcher

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Talia Anthony even told the ABC quote, given that we

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 4>now have this new standard possibility, maybe the prosecutors will

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 4>be emboldened to bring higher offenses in charging police officers.

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 4>In the future emboldened. And here is Benedict Bryant's lawyer

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 4>on that these.

0:04:56.160 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Are split second decisions. On that basis, that would mean

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 2>no police officer would ever engage in anything to do

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.679
<v Speaker 2>with a criminal because they simply should know what they're

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 2>going to do. That's the danger of the job they face.

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of police officers would be thinking to

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 2>themselves it might be just easy to sit in the

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 2>station and let this happen.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 4>And look, we already have a youth crime crisis as

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 4>it is, and this teenager was no saint. He had

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 4>been breaking into homes and stealing cars and the trail bike. Now,

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 4>of course his death is tragic, of course it is,

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 4>but he was engaging in illegal activity at the time.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 4>And we have a courtroom criminalizing police for doing their job.

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 4>And the question has to be asked, would the case

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 4>have gone to court had the teenager been white. The

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 4>Department of Public Prosecutions had conducted an investigation into the

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 4>incident and Benedict Bryant was initially cleared of any wrongdoing.

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't until last year when a new South Wales coroner,

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 4>who had been investigating the teenager's death as a death

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 4>in custody, referred the matter back to the DPP and

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 4>charges were laid. And now this case has become a

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 4>race issue because the teenager was Aboriginal, and we've seen

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 4>this play out before, albeit in different circumstances. It happened

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 4>in the Northern Territory. Constable Zachary Rolf was charged with

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 4>the murder of Aboriginal teenager Kumenjay Walker in twenty nineteen.

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 4>Walker stabbed Rolf in the shoulder with scissors as he

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 4>attempted to arrest him after Walker had earlier threatened local

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 4>officers with an axe. Rolf than fatally shot Walker, and

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 4>he was prosecuted. A jury has since cleared the now

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 4>former officer of murder, agreeing that he was acting in

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.679
<v Speaker 4>self defense. But it's the same wokism and race based

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 4>politics that is playing out in our courts. Do white

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 4>police officers ever really stand a chance when faced with

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 4>Aboriginal criminal offenders who, in rare cases die as a

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 4>result of police.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 3>Being forced to do their job.

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Did Benedict Bryant stand a chance the day he made

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 4>that decision, based on his more than twenty year career,

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 4>to form a roadblock, Well, if you ask Principal Legal

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 4>Officer of the Aboriginal Legal Service, Nadine Miles. She says

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 4>the guilty verdict confirms Bryant caused the death of the teenager.

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 4>She told the SBS there is a particular lack of

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 4>accountability for police who cause harm to Aboriginal people. The

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 4>conviction of Benedict Bryant breaks with this trend and is

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 4>an important step in the right direction. It is critical

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 4>that police are held accountable for their actions. The community

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 4>should be able to trust that they will be safe

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 4>when interacting with police. It is shameful that the actions

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 4>of some police officers show this trust is not earned

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 4>or warranted.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Police don't stand a chance. Well.

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Anthony Albanezi peddled the biggest lie throughout the election campaign

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 4>when he flapped about his Medicare card day in, day

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 4>out and told you that his little green card is

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 4>all you'll ever need to see the doctor for free.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:03.559
<v Speaker 5>This little green and gold card.

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 6>This scene here your Medicare card as this little green

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 6>and gold piece of plastic.

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 5>This your Medicare card, A Medicare card.

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, it was all a stunt, wasn't it. The majority

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 4>of Australians believed it that seeing a GP was going

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 4>to be free and easy under Labor, and believed a

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 4>scare campaign that the Coalition would make cuts to Medicare.

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Yet how difficult is it to find a bulk billing

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 4>practice in this country that does not charge you a

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 4>gap fee. It's about as difficult as waiting for our

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 4>power bills to come down under the renewables only fantasy.

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 4>Healthcare under Labor is not cheap, not freely available as

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 4>you were promised it would be, and it's getting worse

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 4>if you need to see a specialist, out of pocket

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 4>costs for specialist doctors and our crippling consumer budgets. According

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 4>to Medicare data, the average gap fee charge to patients

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 4>has risen from forty nine dollars fifty six in twenty

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 4>ten to eleven to one hundred and seventeen dollars eighteen

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty three to twenty four, more than triple

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 4>the rate of inflation now. The Health Minister Mark Butler

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 4>has asked his department to provide wide ranging advice on

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 4>reform options, and according to The Australian, that would include

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 4>more transparency like forcing doctors to list what their fees

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 4>are and cloring back Medicare subsidies that go to specialist

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 4>doctors who charge what is deemed as excessive. Well, i'd

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 4>ask what is labour trying to do here? I mean,

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 4>are they actually seriously going to ask specialist doctors to

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 4>take a pay cut? Are they going to regulate doctors'

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 4>billing practices? Really, there are suggestions that that in itself

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 4>would be a constitutional matter. Someone has to pay in

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 4>the end, and we can see where it's going. It's

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 4>going to be the taxpayer who ends up being left

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 4>to fill the gap.

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be you.

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Who ultimately foots the bill because how else is labor

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 4>going to do this? Despite the fact Albo told you

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 4>healthcare was going to be cheap with your little green card,

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 4>and the Opposition is rightly asking questions today.

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think one of the biggest lives of the

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 7>last election campaign, Pete was that all you would need

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 7>to access quality healthcare in this country was going to

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 7>be your Medicare card. The Prime Minister had backdrops, had

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, jackets t shirts, pulling his card out at

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 7>every available opportunity. And the reality is Australians are paying

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 7>fifty bucks out of pocket on average to see their

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 7>GP and one hundred and seventeen dollars on average to

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 7>see specialists.

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 3>Now for many many.

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 7>Australians, particularly those with young families, where you might need

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 7>additional visits or more than just one.

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 8>That is out of the reach of family budgets.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and the Health Minister Mike Butler was out spitting

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 4>tricky figures today.

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 9>There were eleven million free visits to the GP last

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 9>month compared to seven million month before, so last month

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 9>an additional four million free visits to the GP because

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 9>of our investments making a huge difference to the access

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 9>to healthcare and affordability.

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 4>The reality is bulk billing rates have only slightly shifted

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 4>from a year ago. Health Department officials told Senate estimates

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 4>yesterday the official bulk billing rate for GP visits rose

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 4>from seventy seven point seven percent in October to eighty

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 4>one point two percent last month, But between July and

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 4>September last year, bulk billing rates sat at seventy seven

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 4>point six percent, So really the needle has barely moved

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 4>in twelve months. Yet Labor announced it would spend eight

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 4>point five billion dollars of your money to deliver eighteen

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 4>million more GP visits a year, and don't forget its

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 4>goals for the policy were merely based on an aim.

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 4>The funding was to be spread over four years and

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 4>only aimed to deliver bulk billing rates of ninety percent

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 4>by twenty thirty in two elections time. That little green

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 4>card was nothing more than a labor con Well, Australia's

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Sex Discrimination Commissioner is still having a real doozy of

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 4>a time defining the first word in her title.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Here. She was in.

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 10>October lesbians, trans women, non binary. There are a range

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 10>of people who identify as women who are women.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Did you mean that biological males can be women men?

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 10>I think that we have different language that perhaps you're

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 10>using that I would use. So I don't understand the

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 10>term biological men.

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Anna Cody told the same committee the reason she couldn't

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 4>distinguish between male and female was that she wasn't a scientist.

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 11>Can someone who was born an ex y chromosomes changed

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 11>to xx chromosoans a male change to female?

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 10>I don't believe so, but I'm not a scientist.

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.719
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's getting worse for and A Cody, a public bureaucrat,

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 4>paid four hundred thousand dollars a year in Senate estimates

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 4>this week.

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 3>This is how she defined her.

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 12>Role, Senator, my role is as the Sex Discrimination Commissioner

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 12>to advocate for gender equality and also for the rights

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 12>of LGBQTI plus community.

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Well props to her for at least an open admission

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 4>that she really has no clue as to what the

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 4>role of a sex discrimination commissioner actually involves, because this

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 4>is not a sex discrimination commissioner. This is clearly an

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 4>advocate for the LGBTQI plus community on a tax payer wage.

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 4>And a Cody even went as far as to blame

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 4>conservative media recently like us here at Sky News, claiming

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 4>she's been the victim of a one sided campaign for

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 4>her advocacy for the trans community. And look now that

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 4>she's had two months to reflect on the term biological

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 4>man does and a Cody know what a biological man

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 4>is now? Senator Leah Blythe tried to get an answer.

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 12>Senator, I'm not a medical expert. I'm a human rights advocate.

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 12>As I've just said, I advocate for gender equality and

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 12>for the rights of LGBQTI plus people. That's my role

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 12>under the Sex Discrimination Act.

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 4>So first, she tells us she can't define what a

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 4>biological man is because she's not a scientist. And now

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 4>she tells us she can't define what a biological man

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 4>is because she's not a medical expert. Now I don't

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 4>know about you, but I'm really struggling to get my

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 4>head around this.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 3>How does she not know what anyone is?

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Then she claims to be an advocate for the rights

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 4>of the LGBTIQ plus people. What is she to find

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 4>a trans person as? Then how does she know what

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 4>they really are if she's not a scientist or a

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 4>medical professional. And I'd love to tell you it ended there,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 4>but it didn't.

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 13>Do you accept that there's a clear criteria that exists

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 13>to distinguish between male and female.

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 12>The Sex Discrimination Act does not define man or woman.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 12>It has an inclusive definition of women that includes all women.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 12>So that is First Nations, women, women from culturally and

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 12>racially marginalized backgrounds, trans women, lesbians, women with disability.

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 4>Inclusive definition of women. How many versions of women are there?

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Senatoralia blythe gave Anna Cody one more go?

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 12>So how would you define a man? It's not defined

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 12>under the Sex Discrimination Act. And my role, as I've said,

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 12>is to uphold gender equality under that Act.

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 4>And this nonsense went on for ten minutes. And look,

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 4>I've shown this before, but I'm going to show it again.

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps Ana Cody could do with a basic biology lesson

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 4>from the movie Kindergarten Cop.

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 11>Boys have a penish, Girls have a vagagina.

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 10>Thanks for the tip.

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 4>And you don't need a scientist or a medical expert

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 4>to tell you that.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's get into the day's news. Now.

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 4>There's been another nail in the coffin for Labour's renewables

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 4>only fantasy. It's been revealed its most recent advice on

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 4>its twenty thirty five emissions targets was partly informed by

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 4>a German study that has now been retracted. Environmental experts

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 4>are warning its skewed data significantly overinflated the possible economic

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 4>damage of climate change. Joining me nowut for more on

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 4>this is Graham Lloyd, the Environment editor with the Australian.

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Graham good to catch up. Thanks for joining me. Tell

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 4>us what has actually been retracted from that study and

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 4>what this now means for Labour's twenty thirty five targets.

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 14>Well, good evening. It was a major study from a

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 14>recognized institute that was published in one of the leading

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 14>scientific journals, and it claimed to have analyzed economies over

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 14>a forty year period and extrapolated what the impact of

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 14>rising carbon dioxide emissions would be, and it said by

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 14>the end of the century there will be reduce by

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 14>sixty two percent, which is an extraordinary amount. They've had

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 14>to go back and admit, well, really, rather than a

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 14>forty year period, the figures were skewed by what happened

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 14>in Ubekistan over a period of four years, and the

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 14>correct figure would in fact be twenty percent, not sixty.

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 14>But it really gets worse than that because the study

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 14>itself is based on the worst case scenario on emissions,

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 14>and there's a general agreement of understanding that that worst

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 14>case scenario is something that's not going to happen. So

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 14>really you're taking the worst cast scenario, you're extrapolating it

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 14>and using skewed to figures from a short period of

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 14>time in Uzbakistan and saying this is the impact on

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 14>the global economy. So that paper has been withdrawn. They

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 14>say they will be resubmitting it, but in the meantime

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 14>it's been used to justify actions across a whole range

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 14>of places, including advice to the federal government.

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's just extraordinary as it is. Expert after

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 4>expert will tell you that Labor can't reach its twenty

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 4>thirty targets. Now we know that twenty thirty five was

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 4>based on a report which has now been redacted. You know,

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 4>I just think it's absolutely bizarre. Now let's go to Victoria.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 4>Agl has pulled the pin on its offshore wind ambitions

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 4>over there, Graham, this is the problem because we know

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 4>that two other wind farm projects have already been shelved,

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 4>so it's not going well. How big of a blow

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 4>is this to Victoria's efforts, in particular to phase out

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 4>coal in favor of renewables.

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 14>Well, it's a very significant problem, indeed, because Victoria has

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 14>said a central part of its ability to meet its

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 14>expectations as coal shots is offshore wind. And what we're

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 14>seeing is one by one, offshore wind projects are falling

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 14>over primarily because of cost and a lack of infrastructure

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 14>and things that have been well known and understood by

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 14>anyone who's paying attention. So it's looking like if there

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 14>is to be any offshore wind, it's going to be

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 14>extremely expensive and heavily subsidized by government, and a lot

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 14>of companies are saying, well, the risk is too great,

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 14>these projects are not viable for them, so they're out.

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Look, it's not good, and I mean it's not just

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 4>happening in Victoria, it's happening across the country.

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 3>I've lost count of the amount of.

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Projects that have either gone bust or have been delayed

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 4>in recent months alone. That this renewables only magic carpet

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 4>ryde just keeps failing at every turn. I want to

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 4>go to this report by the Australian Energy Market Commission.

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 4>It's warning that electricity prices are projected to jump thirteen

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 4>percent by early next decade unless the rollout of Labour's

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 4>net zero policies are accelerated. As I mentioned Graham, this

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 4>whole rollout is being underpinned by eight twenty thirty by

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 4>that target. Yet we've got experts warning we're not going

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 4>to get there. So what are the odds of the

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 4>role at actually being able to be accelerated in the

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 4>first place.

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 14>Well, I think this is the thing that the rollout

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 14>has basically stalled in terms of large scale renewable energy projects.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 14>There's really been a log jam where they've been announced,

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 14>but they're not getting financial sign off, and a large

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 14>part of that is because the authorities have been unable

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.959
<v Speaker 14>to deliver the interconnectors and other infrastructure that will enable

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 14>it to happen, and prices are going up every minute

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 14>people wait. So in terms of accelerating the role out,

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 14>this is something that the federal government has been trying

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 14>to do for some time and without success. So unless

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 14>there is a resort to much more authoritarian measures, if

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 14>you like, to railroad objections and to underwrite the finances

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 14>of these things, it's very hard to see these targets

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 14>being met. And if there isn't the role out, as

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 14>the electricity authorities are now saying, well, prices are going up.

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, I mean we see it with our power

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 4>bills every time we open it, so don't we Grahm Lloyd,

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 4>good to see you as always, Thanks very much for

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 4>joining me. Well joining me now live is the Shadow

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Foreign Affairs Minister, Michaulia Cash, Senator. Nice to see you,

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 4>thanks for joining me. Let's start with the ISIS Bride saga.

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 4>Tony Burke is still silent on what occurred in that

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 4>June meeting with charity Save the Children, which had been

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 4>helping get the Isis brides back to Australia.

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 3>I know that you tried very hard.

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 4>In sett estimates months ago when it was revealed that

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 4>the brides had already arrived here. You tried to get

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 4>a straight answer from Labour to no avail. Now these revelations,

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 4>what does a public deserve to know here about what occurred?

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 15>Well, Deanika, the obvious answer is the public deserve the

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 15>truth from both the Prime Minister and Tiny Burr. I

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 15>say that sarcastically, though, because you and I both know

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 15>the Albanesi government has almost become incapable in most areas

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 15>of policy in telling the truth.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 8>But these are the facts.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 15>Tony Burke had a secret meeting with Save the Children

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 15>in relation to the return of the Isis brides and

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 15>kicked out the note taker, and yet now refuses to

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 15>tell the Australian people what actually happened in that meeting.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 15>I mean, you don't get to have it both ways,

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.959
<v Speaker 15>and you now have the Department saying well, actually Tony

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 15>Burke said that he would find a way to bring

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 15>those Isis bride home. I mean Tony Burke's explanation, Danika

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 15>no longer passes the pub test. These were not backpacker's

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 15>stranded overseas. These were the wives of ISIS terrorists, men

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 15>who had committed some of the most grotesque atrocities this

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 15>world has ever seen. So Burke has a secret meeting,

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 15>kicks out the note taker. You don't kick out the

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 15>note taker, Daneka, unless you don't.

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 8>Want it on the books. Doesn't tell the Australian people

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 8>what went on.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 15>And you now have the notes I have them here

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 15>from the Departmental Secretary that say this got to find

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 15>a way. Politics harder at this end of term. Public

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 15>pressure makes it harder. This the success of the first

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 15>Cohort will be great after we've got them home. So

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 15>for Tony Burke to sit back and not actually now

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 15>tell Australians what actually occurred in this secret meeting, Why

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 15>you're through the note taker out? What have you got

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 15>to hide? It doesn't pass the pub test.

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 3>No it doesn't.

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 4>And the fact that the don't say that the talking

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 4>about the success of the first Cohort. And you're right,

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 4>these women left Australia. They betrayed our values when they

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 4>left here to go on this g hardy Rome ants

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 4>and we deserve to know what role labor played in

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 4>this effort to get them back here. So no, I

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 4>think you're spot on and just on that point, because

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 4>these isis brides, they don't represent our values, which leads

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 4>me on to the next topic of migration.

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Susan Lee has promised that a plan will be announced

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:20.199
<v Speaker 4>before Christmas orbeit with no figure as such, to reduce

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 4>overseas migration. Moderate Liberal Senator Andrew McLaughlin has condemned what

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 4>he says is inflammatory and irresponsible language, particularly pertaining to

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 4>the phrase mass migration. Now, Senator, you've been very strong

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 4>on migration, and this whole issue is a term.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Mass migration inflammatory in your view.

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 8>I don't believe it is no In fact, you can

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 8>call it what you like. These are the facts.

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 15>The Albanese labor government brought him one million people over

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 15>a period of two years, in the middle of both

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 15>a housing crisis and a cost of living crisis. This

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 15>is not about atteching migrants. We are one of the

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 15>most successful multicultural nations.

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 8>In the world world.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 15>This is squarely about the failure of the Albanese government's

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 15>migration policies.

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 8>They've turned on the migration tap.

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 15>They haven't put in place the appropriate infrastructure. Too many

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 15>people in too short a times, Janeka, The Australian people

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 15>do not need to be lectured about terminology. They live

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 15>the reality of labours too many people in a short

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 15>period of time. Every single day they look at their rent,

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 15>they look.

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 8>At their mortgage, they look at the.

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 15>Fact that their kiss or even them cannot get into

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 15>a house. We are a country that welcomes migrants. We

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 15>do it with open arms. But at the same time

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 15>we need to be adult enough to be able to

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 15>have a sincere conversation about the fact that this government

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 15>has brought in too many people too quickly and it

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 15>is having a detrimental.

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 8>Impact on the Australian people.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 15>I'm a pretty split plain speaker, Danika, and quite frankly,

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 15>it's as simple as that.

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's it, and you're right. The problem is not

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 4>with migration. We are a nation of migrants. The problem

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 4>is with mass migration. We have had too many people

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 4>come into this country under labor and we continue to

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 4>do so.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 3>That is a problem.

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 4>There is nothing inflammatory or nothing wrong about it. I

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 4>do hope we get to a point where we can

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 4>have a proper debate about it.

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Senator.

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 4>An interesting story in the AFR today that momentum is

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 4>building among disaffected Liberals and Teals for a new center

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 4>right movement. There are concerns by some who spoke to

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 4>the paper anonymously that the Liberal Party is becoming irretrievable

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 4>as a force thanks to a Conservative takeover. And the

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 4>last straw was the net zero decision. What do you

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 4>make of this?

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 15>Well, in the first instance, I had to laugh because

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 15>I've never heard a teal be called to someone from

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 15>the sin to rise, so I found that most amusing.

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 15>But what I would say is this, at the end

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 15>of the day, the Liberal Party in the National Party

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 15>is the coalition are the only serious alternative to Labor.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 8>We are not irretrievable.

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 15>What we do need to do, though, is put place

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 15>policies give you Australian people what I like to call

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 15>a potent political choice.

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 8>We have done that.

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 15>In relation to energy, we have dumped It's gone, I

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 15>hope never to be seen again, the disastrous net zero policy.

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 15>So the Australian people now have a choice. Labor who

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 15>worship the net zero number. They couldn't give a toss

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 15>sden acre about the impact on Mum and Dad, Australia

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 15>or the coalition who will put Australians first. We will

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 15>put your job first. We will put your energy security first.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 8>But more than.

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 15>That, we will put the prop you pay on a

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 15>daily basis first. That is a true political choice, as

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 15>you've also alluded to. Though, we will shortly release our

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 15>immigration principles and I assure you, decender of Jonathan Duniam

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 15>who is doing an utterly outstanding job. This is going

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 15>to again be a potent political difference and Australians will

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 15>have a choice two big issues.

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 5>Energy.

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, potent political difference. Immigration, potent political difference. That's what

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 15>the Liberal in the National Party need to offer to

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 15>the Australian people.

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Absolutely, our clear difference is needed.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Mcayley cash great to catch up as always, Thanks so

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 4>much for joining me on the show.

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Appreciate it. Coming up after the break.

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 4>One Nation claims it's on the brink of another two

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 4>high profile appointments as well as Barnaby Joyce that a

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 4>war with my panel next.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back. Well.

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 4>One Nation riding high in the polls right now and

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 4>on the brink of recruiting. Barnaby Joyce is planning to

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 4>make more high profile recruitments next year. According to reports

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 4>in nine newspapers, Chief of Staff James Ashby is so

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 4>confident with how things are going that he has revealed

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 4>the party has plans to unveil a second high profile MP,

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 4>not Joyce, who will join as soon as January, with

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 4>a third high pro far recruit penciled in for March.

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Joining me now is forming new South Wales police minister

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 4>David Elliott and former Liberal senator Holly Hughes. Welcome to

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 4>the both of you, Thanks so much for joining us.

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Holy any ideas, any names you want to throw up?

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Who do you reckon? It might be over.

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 16>It's quite a tantalizing little you know, tippit that Ashby's

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 16>putting out there. So no, I should have text him

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 16>and see if you had given me a heads up.

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 16>But na, I've got absolutely no idea. I mean, I'm

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 16>sure the Liberal Party's got a few people they'll probably

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 16>be happy to pack up and send. But whether or

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 16>not that's where they are, who knows.

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I just find it fascinating. I guess you know

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 4>they're riding high in the polls. As I said, eighteen

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 4>percent was their primary vote. David in the last News poll.

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 4>That's pretty good eighteen percent. But do you think they

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 4>can sustain that between now and an election.

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 11>Well, as they say in politics, the trend is your friend. Yeah,

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 11>and we have seen this trend go on. We all

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 11>know the reasons. I mean, it's been it's been a

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 11>long time coming. Paul Enhanson has rebranded herself, she's rebranded

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 11>the party, and we've seen right across the Western world

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 11>in democracies right across the Western world that that sort

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 11>of conservative populist mantra is in high demand and young

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 11>young men and women are going to probably start looking

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 11>at what the other options are.

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, that's actually true because the polling that came

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 4>out this week said that more young males are turning

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 4>to one nation and we actually saw that in the

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 4>US election, where the younger vote was turning to Donald Trump.

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 4>So I just wonder there's obviously an appeal there for sure.

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 4>And now look, let's turn to the federal and state governments.

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 4>They'll soon spend more than fifty billion dollars a year

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 4>servicing a record level of debt, according to the Independent

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Parliamentary Budget Office. Net debt held by the state's territories

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 4>and federal government will reach one point one trillion next

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 4>financial year. Holly, before the pandemic, it was at five

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 4>hundred and fifty one billion.

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 3>How did it now get to more than one trillion.

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 16>Well, this is a government that likes to spend, spend, spend,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 16>and now that we've got so many labor governments around

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 16>the country as well, they're all investing in this sort

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 16>of tax and spend mantra. They're more interested in redistribution

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 16>rather than creation of wealth, and they seem to have

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 16>zero regard for raining in the spending, boosting productivity and

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 16>getting the budget under control. You know, they haven't seen

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 16>a massive expenditure plan they don't love yet and it's

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 16>all Australians. They're going to be paying for this long

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 16>into the future. But to have this level of dare

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 16>I mean, it's almost budget repairs, almost getting to a

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 16>point of beyond us. It's just insanity unless there's going

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 16>to be some real, real cuts back on spending. And

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 16>I just can't see the political will coming from anywhere

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 16>to do that.

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 14>No.

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean Jim Chalmers has already said he's not worrying,

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 4>is quite calm. He thinks, you know about spending as

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 4>it is, David. But in the end it is going

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 4>to be generations to come that are going to have

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 4>to pay for all this record debts.

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 11>Well that's right, our generation generation next, we inherited the

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 11>keeping debt. I mean, Jim Chalmers is treating us like

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 11>mugs if he thinks there's nothing to be concerned. Public

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 11>and private debt are okay if you've got an asset

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 11>to realize. If you've got an asset there to think that, well,

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 11>that's what the debt is about. That's what I've got

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 11>to for my money. But when you consider that twenty

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 11>five years ago Peter Costello and John Howard had his

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 11>debt free and now we've got a trillion dollars worth

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 11>of liability, well then that is something that my grandkids

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 11>should be worried about when eventually they come about.

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it is certainly a concern. I mean a trillion extraordinary. Now, look,

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned this at the start of the show. There's

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 4>a case that has gone in front of a New

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 4>South Wales court that I think has been a gross

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 4>miscarriage of justice involving police officer Benedict Bryant, an Aboriginal

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 4>teenager riding a stolen trail bike crashed into his patrol car,

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 4>which was part and he subsequently died. The officer has

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 4>been found guilty of dangerous driving occasioning the death and

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 4>faces up to ten years behind bars. David, I'll start

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 4>with you on this as a former police minister yourself,

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 4>what do you make of what's occurred.

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 11>Well, we talk about why people are going to one nation.

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 11>This is why because they feel disenfranchised from the parliamentary

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 11>and the political and n judicial process. I mean, where

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 11>is the political air cover coming for these poor cops?

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 15>Where is it?

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 11>And the whole notion of a person running from police,

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 11>being in police custody, or being in custody at all

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 11>is laughable. No reasonable person could say that the laws

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 11>of criminal justice, of custody or laws and the obligations

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 11>of the law enforcement agencies would apply to a kid

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 11>that's running away. It is tragic, it is absolutely tragic.

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 11>But I'm disappointed that there's no political air cover coming

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 11>for the police because this is just going to push

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 11>even more people towards Pauline Hanson.

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 4>And also I just wonder whether people will I think

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 4>twice before joining the.

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 11>Police they are anyway, the police Commission here in New

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 11>South Wales has already said he's on a recruiting drive.

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 11>But that's in every vocation at the moment.

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, of course.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Look, I mean, obviously it's tragic what happened, Holly, but

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what are your thoughts on this case.

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 16>I don't think it's disgraceful. I think it's absolutely disgraceful judgment.

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 16>I can't see how it will hold up on appeal.

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 16>As David said, this kid was not in custody. To

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 16>treat it as a death in custody is just ludicrous.

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 16>And police is supposed to do their job. No one

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 16>seems to be talking about the lives that were put

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 16>at risk by the actions of this teenager and the

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 16>behavior that he was embarking upon. Yet that all seems

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 16>to be forgotten and forgiven, and the pile on for

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 16>the police. I think it's disgraceful. You haven't seen a

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 16>police minister or the premier out advocating this. This is

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 16>just appalling. And why would you join the police or

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 16>encourage kids to join the police. This is how they

0:34:57.400 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 16>trade it.

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I completely agree, and it's now a twenty two

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 4>year outstanding Korea all down the drain for this officer

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 4>and he faces ten years behind bars. I mean, gosh,

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 4>what do you say now? This one here concerned me

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 4>a bit. Retailers and unions want facial recognition technology adopted

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 4>in a bid to crack down on violent repeat offenders.

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 4>New Zealand has successfully trialed it in a number of

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 4>retail settings, and actual retail crime incidents involving knives have

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:28.720
<v Speaker 4>fallen twelve percent in ten months now. This technology captures

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 4>data for a fraction of a second before deleting it

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 4>if no match is made with a repeat offender. Now,

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm all for catching repeat offenders, David, but I'm not

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 4>sure about facial recognition technology because it hasn't gone well

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 4>in trials in the past.

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.359
<v Speaker 11>Well, it hasn't. I'm cautiously optimistic. Like Ai, I think

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 11>we've got to make sure that we always consider it.

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 11>I mean, it's used to great effect in Las Vegas.

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 11>The NPI capture a lot of people in Las Vegas

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 11>when the casinos are using facial recognition technology. London is

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 11>using it by the very extensive CCTV. So I'm cautiously optimistic.

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 11>If it makes the life of the frontline work are

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 11>a little bit safer and it reduces the length of

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 11>time that police need to invest in investigating. Well, I'm

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 11>cautiously optimistic, but yeah, we need to make sure. Like

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 11>anything in modern society, we've got to make sure there's

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 11>plenty of safeguards.

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Now, look, I agree, Holy how would you feel about

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 4>retail about this sort of technology being used in retail settings?

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 16>Doesn't it feel a little Orwellian like this? You know,

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 16>this whole big brother is all the time. I just

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 16>I find it all a little bit uncomfortable. But I

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 16>take David's point. Anything that makes people's lives a bit

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 16>safer that are working on the front line is important.

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 16>But we see breaches in these kinds of security systems

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 16>and hackers and I just you know, the safeguards would

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 16>need to be absolutely in place before I think most

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 16>Australians would accept this.

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, that's a fair call.

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:58.959
<v Speaker 4>Before we let you both go, David, let's talk about

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 4>your column this week in the day Telegraph. When I

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 4>when I read the headline this morning, I think, WHOA

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.280
<v Speaker 4>where is he going with this? There's a first for everything.

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 4>You listed a couple of your firsts in your life.

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, wow, g rated of course, Well.

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 11>Though, it was all very clean because the family show

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 11>and my mother and law watches it. When I was

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 11>writing it, actually it was I realized that without with

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 11>the exception of my first drink, everything else was traumatic.

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 11>My first job was traumatic, my first even my first

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 11>kiss was a little bit traumatic when you consider the.

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Read the article.

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 4>If you want to know about david sur kiss by

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 4>the way it's detailed.

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 11>Well you know I didn't initiate it as you'd appreciate.

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, look, I mean, good on you for being so

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.280
<v Speaker 4>so reading Telegraph. You want to know about David's first

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 4>All in there, David Elliott, Holly Hughes, We've got to go.

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much for joining me.

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 3>On the show.

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, Half the Break, a shopping week for the Sussexes,

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Prince Harry Boom while mocking Donald Trump. As Meghan's Christmas

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 4>special flops on Netflix, Samara gil joins me live from

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 4>London next.

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Welcome Back, Well. Nigel Faraj has slammed the.

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 4>BBC after refusing to take a question from one of

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 4>its reporters at a Reform UK conference. It comes after

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 4>he was accused of racism by the Guardian dating back

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 4>to when he was thirteen years old would you believe

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 4>have a listen.

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 11>The schoolmates of yours who have said that comments you

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 11>made they viewed as racist and offensive.

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>The double standards and hypocrisy of the BBC are absolutely astonishing.

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 1>At the time I was alleged to have made these remarks,

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>one of your most popular weekly shows was the Black

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and White Minstrels. The BBC were very happy to use blackface.

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:41.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with you, thank you, he said.

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 3>They were lying and it sounds like that from Scott.

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm really until you apologize for all of your output,

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>your appalling output at the same time that I'm accused

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of saying these things, which I deny. I'm not speaking

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to you all right.

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 4>Joining me now is Samara Gill, host of Triggered with

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 4>Samara Gill. Nice to catch up as always. How long

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 4>is the left wing media going to pedal.

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 3>These racism claims for for goodness sake?

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 6>Exactly, Dniger. Honestly, you can hardly blame Nigel Farrage. The

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:16.760
<v Speaker 6>BBC has spent years sneering at him, caricaturing him, deplatforming

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 6>anyone who dares to share a stage with him, and

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 6>they expect some sort of polite fireside chat from him.

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:26.359
<v Speaker 6>After all, this no no, no Farage simply served them

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 6>this sort of long overdue.

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 5>Helping of accountability.

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 6>And it sort of reminds me of what Trump did

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 6>when they were found to have doctored videos of him

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 6>to make him look like he incited violence.

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:42.399
<v Speaker 5>So I say good Enfarage for pointing.

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 6>Out the hypocrisy, because they've been waving their sanctimonious finger

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 6>at him for years and now they've tried to pin

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.879
<v Speaker 6>him for allegations from when he was a thirteen year

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 6>old schoolboy. And this is at the time when the

0:39:56.200 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 6>BBC was pumping out blackface, racist tropes, phobic punchlines, all

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 6>in their primetime slots. So if anyone needs to apologize,

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 6>it isn't Farrage, it's the BBC, which is a total

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 6>mess at the moment.

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 3>Yep, no, you're you're right.

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 4>The BBC is in a mess, and yet the Left

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 4>love to peddle this racism narrative and it's just tiresome

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 4>and quite frankly boring. Look, let's talk about the sussexes.

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 4>They've had a shocking week. We'll start with Prince Harry.

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 4>He tried to be an amateur comedian on The Late

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Show with Stephen Colbert where he mocked Donald Trump and

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 4>it failed.

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:32.280
<v Speaker 12>He was booed, have a look su the obsessive royalty,

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 12>So why.

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Not hold on, hold on, look, Look, I wouldn't say

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we're obsessed with royalty.

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:46.839
<v Speaker 3>Really, I heard you, I heard you elected a king.

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:51.320
<v Speaker 3>That's a fair party.

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 4>Look, Samara, Harry needs to be saved from himself at

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 4>this point.

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 5>It is so depressing.

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 6>Harry actually came from being a guest speaker at a

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 6>real estate conference in Canada to that CBS appearance. Please

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 6>don't ask me what he knows about Philip State.

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:11.879
<v Speaker 5>I mean he's literally a trust fun kid. I don't

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 5>think he's owned anything work for in his life.

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, to get boot on Stephen Colbert's show as

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 6>he goes and sort of sticks his grubby little fingers

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 6>into American politics.

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:23.280
<v Speaker 5>Something he knows nothing about.

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 6>By the way, is sort of this humiliation ritual of

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 6>the highest order. I mean, this man is self exiled,

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:34.800
<v Speaker 6>self pitying, and he's increasingly allergic to dignity.

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 5>It seriously takes.

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 6>Real talent to make an American studio audience, which usually

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 6>very nice to the royals, boo you, but you know

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 6>he's a once in a generation overachiever in the art

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 6>of an alienation. Danika genuinely and cannot get lower.

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 4>No, well, I mean just when you think that he

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 4>can get lower, when the Sussexes can, they just somehow

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 4>shock us. They tag it to one other level and

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 4>look in a shock to no one. Speaking of shocks,

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Meghan Markel's Netflix Christmas special has been a flop of

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 4>epic proportions. Who would have thought It's been met with

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 4>skathing reviews and when you see clips like this, Samara,

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:13.760
<v Speaker 4>you're not surprised.

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Have a look, so Christmas crackers?

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:19.879
<v Speaker 6>Have you been doing them for a long time?

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 12>Well, living in the UK, it is just such a

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 12>part of Is it a.

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 5>Big part of the culture over there.

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 7>For Christmas holidays?

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 2>For sure?

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 8>Oh that's cool.

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 3>Oh, typically people cross arms into it.

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 4>No way, you're doing it with the other person, Yes,

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 4>and they all pulled at the same time, so the

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 4>goss it actually does feel really connected a moment of community. Yeah.

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 7>The way that I really served to know them was

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 7>they would always have almost a fortune cookie size joke or.

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 4>Riddle a Sahara, She's making it out like this is

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 4>some sort of incredible revelation that people cross arms and

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 4>crack Christmas crackers.

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 3>What is she thinking, seriously?

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean her word salad is worse than Kamala hours

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 6>they have. Everything she says just doesn't make sense. And

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 6>that guest Willgadera, the one that was just on screen

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:08.879
<v Speaker 6>now summed it up the best. He said, here's where

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 6>people get it wrong. I think people are trying so

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 6>hard to impress the people they've invited over that they

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 6>forget the reason the people are actually there, which was

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 6>sort of a direct assault on Meghan's try hard behavior.

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:22.839
<v Speaker 5>But you're right.

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 6>It's had terrible reviews, one star from the Telegraph. They've

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 6>said Meghan's Christmas special is quite mad, a little bit sad,

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:35.280
<v Speaker 6>and the Times has said that is the Sussex Christmas Crackers.

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's such a strange sort of turn of

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 6>events where she's deciding to share just a tiny bit

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 6>of her life in England and putting an essential oil

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 6>for her three year old into a Christmas cracker and

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 6>missing the whole point of a Christmas cracker, which is

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 6>you don't know who's gonna win the Christmas Cracker. I mean,

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 6>it just shows you how misguided she is with sort

0:43:57.360 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 6>of both Australian.

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 5>United KINGDM culture.

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 6>She clearly had no idea what she was going into

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 6>and it's all just some sort of consumerism best for her.

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 4>No, And I wonder what they like when they say

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 4>roll the cameras, act natural, and that's her trying to

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 4>act natural. So no, wonder it's been an absolute flop.

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Samara Gil great to have you on as always. Thanks

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 4>very much for Jonah on the show. Back at a

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 4>moment with the winners and losers of the week, including

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Hugh Jackman and Kate Hudson's surprise appearance at an Aussie

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:27.840
<v Speaker 4>puff and how desperate the housing debate has become.

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 3>That's next.

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 4>It is that time of the week where we sought

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 4>the winners from the losers, and helping me to do

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 4>that is Sky News contributor Louise Roberts. Louise, good to

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 4>see if they see joining me now. Your winner this

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 4>week is a young couple who got into the property

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 4>market without help.

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 13>That's right and they should be celebrated for this. But

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 13>this story's absolutely gone off. So there are a young

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 13>couple two women who bought a half million dollar apartment

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 13>in Mount Druett, on their own. They haven't had help

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 13>from the bank of mum and dad. They haven't really

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 13>leaviash anything apart from good old fashion hard work and

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 13>say one of them has been working since she was

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 13>twelve years old, the other one since she was eighteen.

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:06.880
<v Speaker 13>But the story has gone gang buses because people are

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 13>accusing them of being spoiled brats, NEPO babies, having rich

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 13>parents who sort of secretly helped them out, and none

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 13>of this is true. Now, I do understand this is

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:19.839
<v Speaker 13>probably a reflection of the broader resentment about getting onto

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:22.720
<v Speaker 13>the property ladder. But these people have bought their first

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 13>home completely of their own volition and just through hard work.

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 13>So I think we should be celebrating that because so

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:32.360
<v Speaker 13>often young people are castigated because they can't budget and

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 13>they don't want to put the work in to actually

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 13>say for a deposit. But this couple, I think my

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 13>hat's off to them. They're definitely my went of the way.

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 3>They would just be happy for other successes. Absolutely, it's

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 3>a huge achievement.

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 4>So bad it is very difficult to get into the

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 4>housing market as a first home buyer.

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Just be happy for others.

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:51.760
<v Speaker 13>They're not sort of you know, on government handouts. They've

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.399
<v Speaker 13>done it furely from hard work. And one of them,

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 13>Jamie Jackson, said, you know, we're going to enjoy our home.

0:45:57.200 --> 0:45:59.360
<v Speaker 13>I don't care if people exactly.

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 3>That's why wouldn't you celebrated? So, you know, great role model.

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Put on them great role models, and I congratulate them. Now,

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 4>I thought this was really cool. I had to give

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 4>my winner this week to Hugh Jackman and Kate Hudson.

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 4>They rocked up to an Ossie pub actually it's called

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Old Mates in New York, and they started singing Sweet

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Caroline and the lighting pub goals.

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 3>Have a look. I mean, wouldn't you just love to

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 3>be in that crowd? Now?

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:33.800
<v Speaker 4>They the co stars played members of a Neil Diamond

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.479
<v Speaker 4>tribute band. It's part of their new movie song Song Blue.

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 4>I think I read somewhere it's based on a true story.

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:41.440
<v Speaker 4>But anyway, that pub is co owned by Ossie comedians

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Hamish Blake and Andy Lee. But I just thought right,

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 4>and you know, he's not a pub classic two, it's

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:47.320
<v Speaker 4>a classic classic.

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 13>Good for Ossie's abroad to be supporting each other in

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 13>that way. And actually I went to the Oprah Show

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 13>last night. She referenced these two doing the Sweet Caroline

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 13>who actually we ended last night singing Sweet Caroline this

0:46:57.560 --> 0:47:01.279
<v Speaker 13>all the tour people. Oh, it's definitely a meme at

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 13>the moment. But yeah, Hugh Jackman, what a great ambassador,

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 13>isn't he?

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh, isn't he the best? Amazing? And I actually really

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:06.280
<v Speaker 3>like Kate Hudson.

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:09.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm always thought that she was a great actress as well,

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 4>just like her mother, exactly, just like Goldie. Now your

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 4>loser while we were just talking about the Duchess of

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 4>Sussex having a terrible week, isn't she? And now she's

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:20.720
<v Speaker 4>decided she's going to launch an eighteen dollar chocolate range

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 4>at the same time as her father is fighting for

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 4>his life.

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:25.279
<v Speaker 13>Yes, you just couldn't make that story, I really could she.

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 13>I mean they have been estranged since twenty eighteen before

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:31.359
<v Speaker 13>Harry and Meghan got married. He did, I think, make

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 13>some silly decisions around posing for pictures, getting measured up

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 13>for his wedding suit, and releasing private correspondence leisurely off hers.

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 13>But Meghan to actually release these eighteen dollars chocolate bars,

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 13>knowing full well that her father, who's now in the Philippines,

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:50.000
<v Speaker 13>is very ill in hospital. He's been in ICU, he

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 13>has he's had surgery. There's another blood clock situation, I believe,

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:57.440
<v Speaker 13>and his son Thomas Markle Junior, who is her half brother,

0:47:57.480 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 13>has said that all we want is for Meghan to

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 13>show her father some compassion.

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 3>So it does beg the question.

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 13>Yes, you know there's some bad blood and some bad

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 13>issues between them, but if your father is on life

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 13>support and hospital, you're not ignoring it and you're not

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 13>got full steam ahead trying to flogs in chocolate.

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Take your time, Pick your time.

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Plus that dreadful Christmas special that she's released this week,

0:48:19.640 --> 0:48:23.520
<v Speaker 4>so always bad timing for Megan. Now my loser this week,

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 4>I've got to give it to parents who won't be

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:27.760
<v Speaker 4>allowed to parent under the social media ban for under sixteens.

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:29.840
<v Speaker 4>It was revealed in Setate estimates this week that they

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:32.840
<v Speaker 4>could find their own social media accounts restricted or blocked

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 4>if they allowed their own children to use them.

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:35.279
<v Speaker 3>Have a look at this.

0:48:36.080 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 8>We would expect that Google would assess that.

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:39.360
<v Speaker 9>So they block my account.

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 8>So if I was allowing my child as a parent

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:44.959
<v Speaker 8>to use my account to look at content, they block

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 8>my account.

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 10>They may you're going to restrict the right parents the

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 10>user of the account.

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:53.000
<v Speaker 3>How about let parents parent Louise.

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 13>Well, apparently that's not allowed, is it. Although I think

0:48:55.560 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 13>overall the band is a good idea, you have to

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 13>allow some discretion. If parents want them kids look at

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 13>their phones. You cannot block the phone of the parent.

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 13>That's just just dictatorial.

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Exactly what are we? China?

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Russia? Come on at Lawy's Roberts. Good to see you us.

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:11.839
<v Speaker 4>Always have a nice weekend. Thank you so much.

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 3>We'll see you soon. That's it from me.

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Are we back on Sunday night at seven for Deneka

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 4>and James stay with us.

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Up next is Steve Price. Good night,