WEBVTT - Bruce Lehrmann’s $2m headache

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>You can listen to the Front on your smart speaker

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>every morning to hear the latest episode. Just say play

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the news from the Australian. From the Australian, here's what's

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Front. I'm Claire Harvey. It's Friday, June twenty eighth.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Olympic Sports will get a half billion dollar windfall from

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>taxpayers in the lead up to Brisbane twenty thirty two.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>This morning's major funding announcement comes just a month before

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>kickoff at the Paris Olympics. You can read that story

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>by John Stenzolt right now at The Australian dot com

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>dot au. Police have swooped on bombshell claims in The

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Australian about the disappearance of Bromwyn Windfield. Unsolved homicide detectives

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>have done a lengthy formal interview with former neighbor Judy Singh,

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>who says she saw Bromwin's former husband John Winfield, driving

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>with something that looked like a corpse in the back

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of his car. John Winfield has denied any wrongdoing. A

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>new episode of Headley Thomas's podcast Bromwin is live now

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>at bromwynpodcast dot com. Bruce Lammon does not have a

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, but he's just been slapped with a

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>two million dollar legal bill for his failed defamation action

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>against Network ten and its exiled star Lisa Wilkinson. Ten's

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>had to fork over more than half a million dollars

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to Wilkinson and Brittaney Higgins's new husband, David Charraz, has

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>set his sights on Federal Court Justice Michael Lee or

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that's in today's episode.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 2>It is common ground that the applicant is a man

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>of modest means.

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Those are the words of Justice Michael Lee talking about

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Lahman, the man he declared was, on the balance

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of probabilities, a rapist. Lee tore apart Lahman's reputation in

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>his judgment, saying the former Liberal staffer was a practiced liar,

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>so intent upon his own gratification that he had sex

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>with Britney Higgins without any regard for whether or not

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>she consented. Lahman is appealing that finding. The judge said,

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>although Network ten and Lisa Wilkinson's story about Britney higgins

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>was deeply flawed as journalism, he believed Higgins's account of

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the rape and questioned Lairman's judgment in bringing the case

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>at all, having.

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Escaped the lines dead. Mister Lehrmit made the mistake of

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 3>coming back for his head.

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And now the judge has landed a new blow on Laman,

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>declaring he will have to meet some of Ten and

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Wilkinson's immense legal costs, even if he doesn't appear to

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>be rolling in cash. We've used a voice actor to

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>bring you the words as spoken in the Federal Court

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday.

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 2>It is not suggested that there is any real likelihood

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 2>that he'll be in a position to pay a substantial

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 2>costs order.

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Lee asked Ten and Wilkinson's lawyers if they could agree

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>on a lump sum amount Lahman should pay and agree

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.679
<v Speaker 1>to restrict their claim to this amount. Ten agreed two

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. Ten told the judge it has spent three

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>point six million dollars to date on invoices from their solicitors.

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Bart had applied a discount partly to reflect the fact

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have a total win. The judge found their

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>journalism wasn't reasonable. Laman quibbled with Ten's figures, including the

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>number of solicitors who worked on the case. A voice

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>actor is reading the words spoken by Lahman's lawyer, Paul's

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Violence in court.

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Your honor might notice that there's three to four five

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 4>solicitors who have been engaged at least three to four

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 4>full time in the matter. No explanation is given in

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 4>the affidavit as to why three to four solicitors have

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 4>been required to run the matter.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Paulse Violence said, when the judges associate sends an email

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to the firm representing Ten, it's copied to five solicitors.

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>He asked, are they all charging the client to read

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>an email simultaneously. Lehman's lawyers also raise the fees charged

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>by Ten's leading senior council, Matt Collins KC eleven thousand

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars per day in court. That's in excess of the

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Federal Court's National guide to council fees, which has a

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>top rate of seven thousand, six hundred and fifty dollars

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>per day. Remember Suchrisanthu SC the council for Wilkinson, was

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>charging the comparatively bargain rate of eight thousand dollars per

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>day in court. The judge said he thought Collins's fee

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>was reasonable, especially when compared to layde in commercial litigation,

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>such as disputes between two companies.

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>The daily rate of mister Collins is at the top

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 2>of the range of fees charged by members of the

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 2>defamation bar but given his seniority and experience in the area,

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 2>this is to be expected.

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>The judge said this of Colin's rate, it'd.

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Be cheap as chips if it were commercial work at

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 2>his level of seniority.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Network ten has another bill to pay a portion of

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the costs incurred by Lisa Wilkinson on her own legal representation. Remember,

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Wilkinson is still an employee of Network ten. Laman sued

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>Ten and Wilkinson, and although Ten tried to have Wilkinson

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>agree to be represented by their lawyers, Wilkinson strongly believed

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>she needed her own. In fact, well before this matter

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>came to court, she'd engaged one of the country's most

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>famous defamation barristers, Sue Chrisantho sc and a different firm

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of solicitors to the one Ten was using suspicion because

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>when the litigation was looming, Wilkinson's relationship with Ten had

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>completely deteriorated. Wilkinson made a speech to the logies in

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>which she heralded Brittney Higgins bravery and the.

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 5>Truth is this honor belongs to Britney. It belongs to

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 5>a twenty six year old woman's unwavering courage. It belongs

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 5>to a woman who said enough.

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>That speech caused a furious act Chief Justice Lucy McCallum

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to declare Wilkinson had endangered Bruce Lahman's right to a

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>fair trial. She was removed from her role at current

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Affairs show the Project.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 5>I have decided that it's time to reprioritize a few

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 5>things in my life. And after almost fifteen years of

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 5>the early alarm of Breakfast TV, and now another five

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 5>years here at the Project desk, I'm looking at how

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 5>I want the coming years to play out, both professionally

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 5>and personally. So Frompton I right, I am stepping back

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 5>from hosting the show.

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And she believed Ten didn't live up to its offer

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to find exciting new on air projects for her. The

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>trust was eroded further when Ten tried to persuade Wilkinson

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>if she was insisting on having her own lawyers to

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>drop the ones she'd already chosen. That was because Ten

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>had been told their likely star witness, Brittney Higgins, wouldn't

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>cooperate with Chris Hanfu. Here's what Higgins solicitor Leon's Wire

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>told Ten in an email, it's not his voice.

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 6>For the avoidance of any misunderstandings, Brittany has instructed me

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 6>not to assist lawyers and counsel currently retained by Lisa

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 6>Wilkinson to defend civil claims commenced by Lerman against Lisa Wilkinson.

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 6>I am not prepared to work with Lisa's current senior

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 6>counsel under any circumstances.

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Ten eventually asked Wilkinson to let another senior barrister, Brett Walker,

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>sc to give her advice on whether she needed her

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.239
<v Speaker 1>own lawyer. Walker told Wilkinson to stick to her guns

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and to stick with Chris Anthu during the trial. This

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>question of costs caused Ten serious damage because it was

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>refusing to pay Wilkinson's bills as they were invoiced. During

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the trial, Wilkinson brought a cross claim against Ten, which

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>was heard by Justice Lee. That cross claim threw up

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of stuff Ten didn't want in the public domain,

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>including the fact it had given legal advice to Wilkinson

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and okayed her Loki speech. Wilkinson was originally seeking more

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>than one point eight million dollars from Ten. Ten offered

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>just under six hundred and eight thousand dollars in court

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday, Ten said it had decided that was too

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>generous and offered to agree on a figure of just

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>under five hundred and forty nine thousand. The judge and

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Wilkinson both agreed. That leaves the court to still decide

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>how much of Wilkinson's fees Bruce Lamban should have to pay,

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and that it's been sent off to an independent referee.

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, what Justice Michael Lee is getting up to

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>outside the courtroom. Our subscribers are the first to hear

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>all the updates in this lengthy legal saga. Class there's

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>expert analysis, exclusive content and a dedicated app. Check us

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>out at the Australian dot Com dotu and we'll be

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:37.839
<v Speaker 1>back after this break. The defamation action brought by Bruce

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Lahman against Network ten and Lisa Wilkinson featured a cast

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of colorful characters, but none appear to have intrigued Justice

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lee more than David Schiraz. Breshnia, Higgins's new husband,

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>was conspicuous by his absence from the lengthy proceedings. He

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>was never called by the prosecution or the defense to

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>give evidence. A trial bart his name popped up again

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and again. That's because Sharaz was the driving force behind

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the Project's interview with Brittany Higgins, in which she alleged

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>she'd been raped inside Parliament House in twenty nineteen and

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that it was covered up by senior members of the

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Coalition government. That claim has been vehemently denied by former

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>ministers and staff.

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 2>And so I would, I would try and raise it,

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and I would try and bring it up.

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 6>Then it was always it always sort of came back

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 6>to sort of being a me issue, and I said,

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 6>if you can't deal with it, then you can leave.

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Sharaz pitched the story to Lisa Wilkinson in an email

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>with the subject line me too. Liberal Party Project pitch

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and so Justice Lee asked counsel repeatedly over the course

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of the trial if Sharaz would enter the witness box

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and if not, why not. The judge said he was

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like Elijah, always welcome but never showing up. The judge

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>was invoking the Jewish tradition of leaving a cup of

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>wine and a chair at the passover table for the

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>ancient prophet who ascended to heaven in a flaming chariot.

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that when Elijah returns, it's a sign

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the Messiah is coming.

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 3>The motivations of mister Sharaz in selecting the journals to

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 3>tell on user story were manifest, and rather than this

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 3>motive being a course of some degree of circumspection, mister

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Lewellen and Miss Wilkinson indicated their willingness to assist in

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the political use of the allegations, as Miss Higgins and

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 3>mister Sharaz intended.

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a snippet of the criticism leveled at David Sharaz

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 1>by Michael Lee. On August nine, the Distinguished Judge will

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>sit down with the former ABC chair Eite Buttrose for

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>what's being touted as a candid conversation about the intersection

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of media, law and society at the national conference of

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>an organization called Women in Media. Tickets cost almost five

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars a pop, and David Scharaz has questions about

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>what attendees are signing up for. According to reporting by

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>The Australian's Stephen Rice, Scharaz wrote to the conference organizers

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>demanding to know if the defamation case was on the agenda.

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>They reportedly told Sharaz they didn't expect Lee to discuss

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the case specifically, but Charaz wasn't satisfied. A voice actor

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is reading his response.

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 4>So he will not discuss the Laman case for which

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 4>he has made his name and for what you're looking

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 4>him for.

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>The spokesperson for Women in Media told The Australian what

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Justice Lee talks about is up to him. We've used

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a voice actor. The content that Justice Lee chooses to

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>share with attendees is a matter.

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 2>For Justice Lee.

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>While we appreciate people might have their own views about

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>speakers at the conference, programming decisions are a matter for

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Women in Media. You can keep up with the latest

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Laman legal saga at The Australian dot Com

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>dot a U thanks for joining us on the front

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this week. Our team is Kristen Amiot, Leah sam Mclaw,

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Burton, Jasper League, Tiffany Dimack, Matthew Condon and me

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Claire Harvey.