WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 20 May

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Late. Welcome the Late Debate.

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 2>It's great to have your company on the Late Debate.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm James Macpherson with Freileitch and Denika Di Giorgio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 3>Coming up tonight.

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Would you buy toilet paper, toothpaste and tea bags as

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 2>a wedding gift? One major supermarket is betting that you will.

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about that shortly. Plus, when we look at

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 2>what's making headlines tomorrow, I've got to tell you newspaper

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 2>editors are having a field day with the coalition bust up.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 2>We'll show you some of the better headlines that we're

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 2>doing the rounds tomorrow.

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 3>And striking workers on the Snowy Hydro.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Project complaining that their work site has been turned into

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>a jail. We'll get to that soon as well. But first,

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 2>United Nations experts have slammed the Queensland government's tough approach

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>to juvenile crime. The LMP one government promising that children

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>charged with serious crimes like murder would be tried and

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 2>sentenced as adults. This week, the Queensland Government will expand

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 2>that list of serious crimes to about twenty, including attempted

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>murder and rape. But experts at the United Nations will

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>They claim the Adult Crime Adult Time policy is unfair

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>to kids, you know, like kids who kill people. The

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>UN Special Repertoire On Torture wrote an open letter to

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 2>the Queensland government saying many new or proposed state laws,

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 2>including Queensland's Making Queensland Safer Adult Crime Adult Time Amendment Bill,

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 2>incompatible with basic child rights. If passed, the Queensland bill

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>will result in additional adult penalties being applied to children

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 2>for a wide arrange offences of offenses. Now the UN

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>are calling for a child centered approach from Queensland courts

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>when children commit murder or rape. I would have thought

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the point of the court is to be victim centered,

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 2>not cuddling perpetrators, a point that David Chris fully made

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>in regards to the UN telling Queensland how to behave

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>have a look.

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 4>And I say to the United Nations with the greatest

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 4>of respect, this place will govern its laws. This place

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 4>will determine how we keep Queenslander safe, and this place

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 4>will be accountable to Queenslanders, not United Nations boffins. We

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 4>stand up for Queenslanders, not unelected officials.

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 5>A long way from this place.

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Frayers should the Queensland government be kinder to children.

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Who commit murder or attempted murder or rape.

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's pretty clear we need a victim centered approach.

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Just ask one of the many victims of youth crime

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 6>in Queensland. And the reality is that fifty five percent

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 6>of youth crime is committed by serious repeat offenders. Fifty

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 6>five percent. These are not kids that had some sudden

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 6>impulse and didn't think through their actions and had no

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 6>idea what they're doing. These are kids that are in

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 6>a life of crime that will keep reoffending and will

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 6>keep hurting Australians unless they are locked up. And they

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 6>talk about this child's centered approach. We've got to protect

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 6>children's rights. But here's the thing. Rights are contingent on responsibility.

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 7>When you violate.

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 6>Your responsibility to your fellow citizens to treat them how

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 6>you would like to be treated when you murder, rape,

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 6>com in us and a whole bunch of serious offenses,

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 6>Guess what, you don't have the right to claim you're

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 6>just a child and you shouldn't go to prison.

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.839
<v Speaker 8>And a lot of these kids are repeat offenders. Right,

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 8>they go through the system, the justice system, and what

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 8>happens is that they get a slap on the wrist

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 8>and they're back out there. There was even a case

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 8>actually even in New South Wales last year there was

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 8>an eleven year old boy who went to court for

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 8>the seventieth time in his life.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 5>Eleven year old boy.

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 8>So once again, what we're seeing here is a situation

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 8>where the United Nations are just proving themselves to be

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 8>a real irrelevant bunch of hacks.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 5>They just sit in a corner office making these decisions.

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 8>I'd like them to face the families, the victims, those

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 8>who have actually been the victims of home invasions by

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 8>these little devils, or even the family for example of

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 8>Emma Lavelle up in Brisbane who was brutally murdered by teenagers,

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 8>and that case has already been and gone in court.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 8>But these are people, these are the real victims of this.

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 8>And youth crime has actually jumped in Queensland. In fact

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 8>it's jumped all across the country as well.

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 5>The United Nations needs to actually.

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 8>Get back to its basic work and stop intervening in

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.119
<v Speaker 8>issues that actually have nothing to do with them. Because

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 8>youth crime is a serious problem in this country.

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 5>But half of the problem.

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 8>With it is the justice system itself, and not to mention,

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 8>let's not forget the other issue are the parents?

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 5>Where on over the parents?

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 2>You said the United Nations should get back to their

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 2>primary responsibility? Is there are what their primary responsibilities are?

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 2>They've been freelancing on crazy issues for so long. I

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 2>should point out the special repertoire for torture from the

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.559
<v Speaker 2>United Nations is Alice ed which she's actually an Australian woman,

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 2>but she doesn't point out any solutions. And it's this softly,

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 2>softly approached to juvenile crime that's got us into this

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 2>position in.

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 3>The first place.

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 2>He's David Christofooley in Parliament today stressing that this problem

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 2>has been going on for a long time and Queenslanders,

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 2>who voted for a tough approach to juvenile crime have

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>had enough.

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 3>He's going to do something about it.

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 4>We have followed exactly the timeline we outlined to the

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 4>people of Queensland. We said that the first reign of

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 4>changes would be done before Christmas.

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 5>We said there'd be an expert.

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 9>Committee set up and then the second wave of changes

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 9>would come into effect. And we are determined to end

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 9>a youth crime crisis a decade in the making.

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll make one more point, Deneka, and that is if

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 2>adult crime, adult time laws are the biggest issue for

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 2>the United Nations special repertoire on tour right now, then

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I reckon the world is doing pretty well.

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 5>I think we must be doing very very well.

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 8>But look, youth crime is a very very big problem

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 8>in this country and it should not be ignored. So

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 8>you know, these boffins, as David chriso Foley rightly put,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 8>it needs to just get back to their knitting because

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 8>we can't keep going and that youth crime cycle, that

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 8>the cycle of crime.

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 5>Can't keep going.

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 8>But look, let's move on now because it's official. The

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 8>divorce has happened between the Liberal Party and the National Party.

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 8>It is not good. The coalition has now split. Now

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 8>they've split for the first time in nearly forty years,

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 8>and only for the third time since they formed a

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 8>coalition back in nineteen forty nine. And they've only been

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 8>two other splits since. And look, this is really really

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 8>not good. If you have a look.

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 5>At the numbers.

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 8>Now, we'll bring up the graphic that the Parliament numbers

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 8>after that split.

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Look at labor.

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 8>Ninety three seats twenty eight for the Liberal Party, fifteen

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 8>for the NAT's six for the tials. So Labor right

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 8>now are rubbing their hands together saying this is fantastic

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 8>and what we know is another three years of labor

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 8>is an absolute disaster. But the Nationals in today announcing

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 8>their split, have put out a number of different.

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 5>Demands, mainly to do with energy policy.

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 8>Firstly, they want nuclear power, which was obviously something that

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 8>the coalition took to the last election, but it petered

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 8>into the background in the final weeks. They want supermarket breakups,

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 8>twenty billion dollar regional fund as.

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 5>Well as telco services.

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 8>And here was a Nationals leader, David little Proud today

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 8>announcing the decision.

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 10>Our party room has got to a position where we

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 10>will not be re entering a coalition agreement with the

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 10>Liberal Party after this election. What we have got to

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 10>a position is that the National Party will sit alone

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 10>on a principal basis on the basis of looking forward,

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 10>how having to look back and to try and actually

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 10>regain important policy pieces that change the lives of the

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 10>people we represent.

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 8>And look, I can see it from both sides, but

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 8>I also think that David Little Proud is not wrong here.

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 8>Why on earth are they going to wait around for

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 8>the Liberal Party to make policy decisions on key issues

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.679
<v Speaker 8>that are actually affecting regional parts of Australia right now.

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 8>The biggest problem, and as I mentioned earlier, is what

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 8>this means for labor because Labour now are.

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 5>Going to be in government for a very very long.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 8>Time while the coalition is in the wilderness and the

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 8>Libs and Nats sort out all of their drama. And

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 8>it's something a little proud was asked today.

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 5>Happen your hands with Anthony Alberonizia a massive.

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 10>Thing by splitting Yeah, as I said, our first the

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 10>commitment both Susan and I made is that we will

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 10>work together to give her the space. I'm still there

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 10>and the door is still open, but you need the

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 10>time and space to know who you are and what

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 10>you want to be.

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 8>Well, the door is still open, but what is it

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 8>going to take Because it's going to mean that the

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 8>Liberals are going to have to come out with a

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 8>very very firm policy when it comes to energy, in

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 8>particular net zero, dropping those targets by twenty fifty, but

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 8>ensuring that they readopt that nuclear policy.

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 5>Here was Susan Lee.

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>It is disappointing that the National Party has decided today

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to leave the coalition. But the most important thing I

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>want to say is this, the National's door remains open

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and our door remains open, and we look forward with

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>optimism to rejoining at some point in the future.

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 8>And John Howard tonight on Andrew Bolt's program had some advice.

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 11>I am very sorry that this has happened, and I

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 11>urge both parties to work over time to put the

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 11>coalition back together again, because all the history of Australias

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 11>suggests that the glory days of the Liberal Party, the

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 11>National Party, the Old Country Party are when they are

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 11>working together in government. My experience as a Liberal leader

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 11>and as a coalition prime minister is that if you

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 11>have a strong coalition and plenty of trust, you can

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 11>resolve any policy different.

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, here's how I look at this. I don't blame

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 8>the Nationals for what they have done. Do I think

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 8>this is good? No, I think this is an absolute disaster.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 5>I think this is really really poor.

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 8>But in the end, it's actually the Nationals who are

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 8>propping up the coalition right now because the Liberals did

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 8>so poorly during the election campaign, and it's actually the

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 8>Nationals who did very well other than the seat from

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 8>the former Deputy Leader Peren Davy. Other than that seat,

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 8>they actually are propping up the coalition right now. The

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 8>Nationals know what they stand for, they know what their

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 8>policies are. Susan Lee came out last week after she

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 8>was elected as Liberal leader and she was asked about

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 8>nuclear She was asked about net zero by twenty fifty

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 8>and she said, well, I need to consult with the

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 8>party room. I'm not going to make a captain's pick.

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 8>It didn't sound awfully convincing. Albeit she'd only been in

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 8>the job for a couple of hours, but it was

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 8>not convincing to me.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 5>And if this is a.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 8>Serious Liberal party then they're going to have to put

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 8>some serious policies together. Otherwise the future of Conservative politics

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 8>is going down the wayside.

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 6>No look, I think we're being a bit unfair to

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 6>Susan here. I actually think think about where we are.

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 6>Less than three weeks ago the election was held. Her

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 6>mother has tragically passed away. The Nationals have then come

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 6>into the coalition agreement making process with a list of

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 6>four specific policy demands. They also want the ability for

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 6>shadow ministers to break shadow ministerial solidarity and vote against

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 6>the party on contentious issues. Now, I just think that

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 6>is unprecedented. Firstly, and also why now now? Some of

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 6>the nationals are making the argument that if we don't

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 6>assert this now, these policies aren't going to get up.

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 6>But how can you really believe that? Even if you

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 6>look at the numbers of the leadership battle, they were

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 6>really close. I don't think the Liberal Party is ready

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 6>to abandon nuclear or a range of those sort of

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 6>regional Australian policies.

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 7>So I just don't see why they've done this.

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 6>I think it's caused so much more harm than good.

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 6>And David little Proud was questioned about this on Paul

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 6>Murray tonight and this is what he said.

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 10>But the circumstances that Susan had in terms of wanting

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 10>to be able to announce a shadow cabinet, which meant

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 10>a coalition agreement had to be done in the coming days,

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 10>but not being able to give us that comfort or

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 10>guarantee that those policies that we were looking at could

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 10>be guaranteed because she wanted to go through a longer

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 10>elongated period of policy formation that we couldn't sign up

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 10>to her because these are hard fought wings that would

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 10>change the lives of people in region.

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 6>Austrade, but that period of policy formation was one of

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 6>the key planks Susan Lee ran on when she became

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 6>a Liberal leader because there was criticism of the last

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 6>leader that decision making was centralized, shadow minister's backbenches weren't consultant.

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 6>Susan has been very focused in making sure those mistakes

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 6>aren't repeated again.

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 7>James, was there any point to this move?

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, A couple of things.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I disagree with you on Frere firstly, and I want

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 2>to be careful with this because I don't want to

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>be misinterpreted. Everybody is very sad and sympathetic for Susan

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Lee that her mother passed away.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 3>That's a given. That's a terrible thing for any family

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 3>to face. But I have a.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Little bit of a problem with that being used as

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>her mother just passed away. To be fair, she took

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 2>on the leadership knowing her mother was in pellative care.

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I think with the understanding that her mother could pass

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 2>at any moment.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:50.719
<v Speaker 3>So I think you've got a way up.

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Do I want to take on that position with my

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 2>family facing this problem right now? If you take on

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the position, then you take on the position knowing full

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 2>well you may have to deal with this while confronting that.

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you can use that as a where

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 2>the Nationals should have been kinder and weighted. I don't

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 2>think this is a divorce, Frayer. I think this is,

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 2>you know, both parties having some alone time or they

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 2>work themselves out.

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 8>And I just think, it's not you, it's me exactly,

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 8>and not you, it's me. But hopefully we might reconcile

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 8>later on.

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure, but how do you have a relationship

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>with someone who's still trying to figure out who they are?

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's where the Liberal Party are at. They're not

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 2>ruling anything in, not ruling anything out. They've got their

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 2>feet firmly planted in mid air. How do you hold

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 2>hands and walk with that?

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 8>I agree, and I still think this is a problem

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 8>with a liberal party right now is they do not

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 8>know what their policies are.

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 5>But the Nationals are full formed.

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 8>They're going, let's drop net zero by twenty fifty, let's

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 8>reintroduce nuclear and what are the Liberals doing?

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 7>But that's fraggering it out.

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 6>But that's the whole point of the party room. That's

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 6>the whole point of having your shadow ministers. You then

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 6>have those debates. I don't see why they couldn't do

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 6>this in a couple months time, once those debates have

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 6>actually been had. But bringing this now, it's just blowing

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 6>the thing up before they've even got together.

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 8>Doesn't it suggest to you that there are too many

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 8>moderates in the Liberal Party who do not support nuclear

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 8>energy and do not support pulling out of the Powers Agreement,

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 8>And that is that is the problem here, because if

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 8>you keep going down this track.

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 5>The lives are going to be in the wilderness for.

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 8>So many more years to come unless I have actual,

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 8>straightforward and straight down the line policies to differentiate.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 2>And the other issue I have is people saying, well,

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the Nats have blown up the coalition.

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 3>The Liberals blew up the Liberals all by themselves. They

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 3>did a great job.

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 2>And the short poor number of seats they've got in

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 2>the Parliament that you showed the nika A pretty much

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 2>proofs that.

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 6>I Well, it'll be interesting to see how they can

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 6>reunite after this.

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure they will. They'll come back.

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, they have to.

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Love always wins in the end.

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 7>James first and beautiful exactly.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 6>Now moving on to the Australian housing sector is it

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 6>is no secret that this has been a challenging industry

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 6>for Australia for a long time, but some new data

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 6>has revealed some startling statistics. Official productivity data has revealed

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 6>that while dwelling construction productivity has collapsed over the last decade,

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 6>the downturn has accelerated over the past five years, with

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 6>estimates that the supply of new homes is forty percent

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 6>below what is needed to meet demand. Now, what is

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.479
<v Speaker 6>causing this well, a whole range of things, mainly workforce

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 6>shortages in the construction sector and also massive over regulation.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 6>So the Masters Builders Association said that last year there

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 6>was a one hundred and thirty thousand trady shortfall one

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 6>hundred and thirty thousand and around half the price of

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 6>a land and new home build in Australia goes towards

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 6>taxes and regulations. It is honestly a miracle that our

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 6>construction sector is building anything at all at the moment.

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 6>On top of that, you have high interest rates, you

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 6>have high material cost and then you have militant union activity,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.959
<v Speaker 6>particularly the CFMU, which has been shown to drive our

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 6>building costs as much as thirty percent. Now it seems

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 6>like we have layer after layer of problem here. How

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 6>do we begin to unwind this?

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>James Well, my question, Fray is when does a government

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 2>pledge become a government out and out live is the

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Labor government would they promised one point two million homes

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 2>by the end of the decade. According to these figures,

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 2>we'd need sixty thousand new homes every quarter.

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 3>We've never built that many.

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Homes and at the same time we're demanding the most

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 2>we've ever asked of the construction industry. We've got the

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 2>lowest productivity ever in the construction industry and this would

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 2>not be news.

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 3>To the Albanezy government. They would be fully aware of this.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 2>So how can you promise one point two million new

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 2>homes whilst knowing you're asking for something never done before

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 2>from an industry that's never been less productive. It's an

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>out and out lie masquerading as an election problem.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 8>And look, the Master Builders has been very strong on

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 8>this from the beginning. You've got Alberizi coming out promising

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 8>one point two million homes by the end of the decade,

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 8>but there were estimations last year that they would only

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 8>build one hundred thousand homes last year alone.

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 5>So it was so it's so well below the target.

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 5>But overall, you've.

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 8>Got housing affordability at its worst level in more than

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 8>two decades, and building approvals are already at two year lows.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 8>People are being squeezed out of the housing market. We've

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 8>got record migration, well the one point one million migrants

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 8>have come into this country since Anthony Albanesi took office

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 8>three years ago.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 5>Where are you going to house all these people? And

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 5>this is half of and this is half the problem.

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 8>And I just I just had this one more point

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 8>that they there was even predictions that Melbourne alone will

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 8>reach the size of New York City by twenty fifty

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 8>nine million people. Again, where are you going to put

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 8>all these people? We have not planned properly for the future.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 8>The master builders have had it because they're under pressure.

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 8>They're trying to get their tradees and they're not they're

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 8>not being supported by the Anthony Albanesi government. And so

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 8>you know Anthony Albanezi, it's easy for him to say, oh, well,

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 8>look the economy's doing. Oh well, it's a Ponzi scheme

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 8>that's been propped up by Migro just on Melbourne.

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Can you I mentione the population of New York and

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 2>then consider their social policies with the population of New

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 2>York with the culture of San Francisco would.

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Want to live there.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 6>But he picked up on a really interesting point there, Dinaninka.

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.719
<v Speaker 6>The reality is that even if Australia was building at

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 6>our record high rate, which is around two hundred and

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 6>thirty thousand homes a year, it would still not be

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 6>enough to sufficiently house Australians because of the record migration.

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 6>And that is the elephant in the room. No amount

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 6>of housing future funds, no amount of government funding, is

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 6>going to solve the fact that you have a huge

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 6>influx of demand coming in through net overseas migration. In

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty three alone we had over five hundred thousand.

0:19:55.880 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 6>That is like bringing in another Canberra in No amounts

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 6>of construction could actually meet that demand.

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 8>And the other thing is is that nobody ever voted

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 8>for a big Australia policy, but this is where we're

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 8>finding ourselves in and no wonder we can't get people

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 8>into homes. But the other issue, I don't actually think

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 8>it was properly front and Center at the election. I

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 8>know that Peter Dutton did put a policy on the table,

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 8>but I don't think it was prosecuted enough.

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 5>And I also think that if the Liberals want to.

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 8>Be fed income, they should go hard on migration, because

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 8>I do I think that it is a vote driving issue.

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 2>Let's change pace for a moment because I want to

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 2>talk about a drug that has become incredibly popular right

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 2>around the world, including here in Australia.

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 3>There's a miracle drug.

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Ostensibly to treat people with type two diabetes, ozem pic,

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 2>but it's also been found to help people lose weight,

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 2>so it's become very popular. And I get the appealed

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Dane could take your drug, you lose weight. You don't

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 2>have to do other things, just take the drug. But

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 2>get a load of headline which we'll be ringing alarm

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 2>bells for people taking this drug both here and overseas.

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 2>The headline reads, Ozenpic and wigo v have been linked

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 2>to eyestrokes, as the TGA reports ten cases of blindness. Now,

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 2>there's a chemical in this drug that reportedly reduces blood

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 2>flow to the optic nerve and it's been found to

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 2>cause vision impairment and even blindness. As I said, the

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 2>TGA have had ten cases here in Australia. There's about

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 2>nine cases at least that I read of in the

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 2>United States. And so now people are being worn to

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 2>consider whether or not this is an appropriate drug to

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 2>take off label to use as a weight loss stimulus.

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure Freyer, that this is going to worry

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 2>too many people. This is what I imagine the conversation

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 2>will be, Well, there's millions of people taking this drug,

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 2>and we've got what eight examples of people having vision

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 2>impairment here nine overseas, the odds are pretty good. And

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 2>secondary to that, I think most people calculate, you know,

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 2>everything has a risk, right, there's a price for everything,

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and I reckon most people won't worry too much. But

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 2>still a very concerning headline I would have thought.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 6>And it does frustrate me that I spent an hour

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 6>a day in the gym and now other people can

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 6>so injecto Zepik. I'm like, seriously, but if you do

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 6>look at the statistics on a macro level, I do

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 6>think this is an incredible drug, despite some serious side

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 6>effects because obesity in twenty eighteen, it costs the Australian

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 6>economy eleven point eight billion dollars. Around thirty percent of

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 6>Australians are obese. That puts a huge burden on our

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 6>healthcare system. And so I think if there is anything

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 6>that can assist people to lose weight, and this will

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 6>particularly help disadvantaged communities. So for example, in Central Australia,

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 6>among Indigenous people, the obesity rates up around like forty percent,

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 6>if not higher.

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 7>So I think it's a really great drug.

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 6>I just think the way it's being used at the

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 6>moment as an off label drug to basically assist wealthy,

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 6>probably Sydney siders to shed a few kilos'.

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 7>Is probably not ideal.

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 6>Now one of the unintended consequences of this has been

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 6>there's now a shortage of OZM picks in Australia.

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 8>Look, I look, I think that, and I go to

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 8>your point there, Freyer. The problem that I have with

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 8>ozen peak is that OZM peak it is so readily

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 8>available now. You know, I even know people who take

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 8>it just before their wedding, just to shed a couple

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 8>of kilos just before their wedding.

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 3>I how long had you take it before the event

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 3>you take it?

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 8>Maybe a couple of months before you lose a little

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 8>bit of weight then you stop. And I don't agree

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 8>with this, okay, I don't think. And the reason is

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 8>that I know Type two diabetics who have been on

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 8>this drug and it has helped.

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 5>It has done wonders. It has actually lowered their sugar levels.

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 8>But the problem is is that these type two diabetics

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 8>cannot get access to the drug because it is that

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 8>there's such a shortage because everyone is using it as

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 8>a quick fix and I'm talking healthy, young adults using

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 8>it as a quick fix. The other problem is is

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 8>that we still don't know the long term side effects.

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 8>And I mean, if it's causing blindness, that is a problem,

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 8>and I've heard of other people who have had quite

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 8>significant side effects. A lot of digestive issues are a

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 8>complete loss of appetite, and you just don't think long

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 8>term that that is particularly healthy.

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 5>We just don't know. But I do agree to your point, Freyer.

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 8>If it can help people, it can help certain communities,

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 8>go for it if that's what people want to do,

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 8>but take it only if you need it, if you're

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 8>a young, fit, healthy adult.

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 3>Come on, seriously, So what we're talking about medicine.

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to tell you a story that happened to

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 2>me last week, and I want to get your thoughts

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 2>on this because I went to my GP just for

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 2>your general checkup.

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 7>It's okay.

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Not to get the weight loss drug just for my

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 2>general checkup. And he asked me a question I've never

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 2>heard from a doctor before. He said, do you mind

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 2>if I use AI to take notes from our discussion?

0:24:57.720 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 2>And that kind of caught me by surprise, But because

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 2>I like you, I said, yeah, sure, didn't think.

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Too much about it.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've just read today that now one in four

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 2>gps in this country are using AI to write their

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 2>consultation notes. Their argument is that it's faster because, let's

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 2>face it, if you've ever written a doctor's read a

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 2>doctor's script, their handwriting is not great, and I suggest

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 2>they're typing not much better. On top of that, they

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 2>argue it enables them to focus more on you, the patient,

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 2>rather than looking away and scribbling notes.

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 3>The downside, of course.

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 2>And I did ask this, does this mean the Chinese

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 2>Commanist Party now has access to all of our discussion?

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.959
<v Speaker 2>He assured me of privacy, But is anything really private

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.239
<v Speaker 2>these days? Like that The other argument against it is

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 2>when AI is transcribing conversations, it's not always accurate. And

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 2>what if down the track you're reading medical notes that

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 2>have been transcribed inaccurately, and then a diagnosis or medication

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 2>is prescribed on the basis of inaccurate notes.

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Who then is liable? So I guess I'm not a

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 3>fan of it, But that's the first I had heard

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 3>of it last week.

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Now reading it today in the media, this is going

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 2>to be a common thing.

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 6>I think it will be, and there is no way

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 6>we can get around the AI revolution. This will be

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 6>the new frontier in productivity growth because I think we've

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 6>all been in the doctor's office and you see your

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 6>doctor sitting there two finger typing for like half of

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 6>your fifteen minute appointment and you're just seeing the money

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 6>go down the train while you watch them type. So

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 6>anything to speed that up I think is good. But

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 6>it does raise some interesting concerns as well around privacy.

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 6>Can insurance companies subpoena those transcripts to then you know,

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 6>look at more of your records? Are they able to

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 6>be used in court? But there are some other benefits

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.239
<v Speaker 6>of AI in the medical field, So I have a

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 6>friend who had a spinal injury. They went and got

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 6>a radiology report and MRI and it was full of

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 6>medical jargons, so they had no way to interpret it.

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 6>Uploaded it into chat GPT, said analyze this and tell

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 6>me what it means. They got this great report, went

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 6>to the spinal surgeon. The spinal surgeon said, exactly what

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 6>was in the AI report. So there are some definite

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 6>benefits for diagnosing cases.

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Doctors don't want you to go and google things, right,

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 2>because then you become a medical expert and.

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 8>You've become a hypod time, you've become a hypochondriac because

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 8>suddenly you've got every single.

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 5>Day he's under the sun if you use it.

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 8>But look, I look, it does worry me because my

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 8>concern is the privacy aspect, as we mentioned. But I

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 8>do believe that there are benefits to using chat GPT,

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 8>because there was also this article here that says that

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 8>a number of young ossies are using chat GPT and

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 8>almost like as almost like a therapy as a therapy session.

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Now was that good?

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 5>Look you know, look, I actually.

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 8>Don't have a problem with it, because if you're struggling,

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 8>if you know you're struggling, and it's late at night

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 8>and you need something to talk to to help calm

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 8>you down. I think putting a couple of lines into

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.719
<v Speaker 8>chat gpt. This is how I'm feeling. Can you provide

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 8>me with a bit of advice? Chat GPT comes back

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 8>to you and says, take a breath, relax. I don't

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 8>mind it, James, I don't mind it. Now call me

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 8>a bit cuckoo here, but I don't have a problem

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 8>with chat GPT being used as a therapist as a friend.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Far bit from me to call Denika de Giorgio a

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 2>bit cuckoo, but totally con the past that the point

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 2>of these AI configurations is to create dependency. So if

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I was to go to a therapist, the therapist would

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 2>properly advise me, but that the goal would be to

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 2>get me to a point where I no longer be

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 2>am dependent on therapy. But AI its whole modus op

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 2>randi is to keep you in if.

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 5>You agree he do become addicted to it. I always

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 5>say that I do believe it's an addiction.

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 8>But if you can't afford to go and see a

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 8>therapist and you want immediate adverts.

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 5>You've had a bad real ers.

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 8>What if you don't have a friend, James, I mean

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 8>not everybody's a social join the club, maybe for a.

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Walk and talk to someone in the past.

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 5>But maybe some people aren't.

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.479
<v Speaker 8>Maybe some people are genuinely lonely and they need an

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 8>outlet to make themselves feel better than I am all

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 8>for artificial intelligence.

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 5>I do not have a problem with it.

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 7>I'm with you on this one, Dania. I think that

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 7>there's a role.

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 2>It feels like you're ganging up the joke about my weight.

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Now you're ganging up at me on this.

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 7>There is one hundred percent a role for AI. Now.

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 6>I saw a girl on TikTok who told this story.

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 6>She downloaded all the messages between her and her ex boyfriend,

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 6>uploaded them into chat. GBT said, analyze this conversation and

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 6>tell me where he's manipulating me. Then write an essay

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 6>back rebutting all of his points. And she did that.

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 6>She sent it back to Himan speechless. So this can

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 6>result relationship dramas as well.

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 3>The coalition you get the Nationals A.

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 8>David, little crowded artificial intelligence is waiting for you to

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 8>resolve your divorce exactly. Well, look we've got to talk

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 8>about half the City of Sydney Council. I mean, I

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 8>wish they would get a divorce, but no.

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 5>They're still there.

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 8>Now, look, let me just paint a little bit of

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 8>a picture for you. It's a bustling night in Pop's

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 8>Point in Sydney's a fancy eastern suburbs. There's a restaurant

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 8>called Lady Chu. It's a famous Vietnamese restaurant. It's a

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 8>busy night when Lady Chu is visited by a number

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 8>of council rangers. Now, council rangers weren't there to discuss,

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, what's going on.

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 5>It's a busy night. Is everything going okay? No?

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 8>No, is it a picture that we just brought up.

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 8>The council rangers were upset by the pop plants. That's right,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 8>by the fake plants, the fake greenery, everything on display

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 8>that makes the ambiance of this fantastic Vietnamese restaurant just

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 8>so absolutely brilliant. They rocked up unannounced, they say, and

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 8>they meant serious business. Choose plants, Lady Choose plants were

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 8>obstructing the footpath and that is when the owner.

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Lost it.

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:27.479
<v Speaker 8>She whipped out her phone to film an expletive. Layden

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 8>ran to the rangers, who probably wish that they could

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 8>have been anywhere else, and well, we don't have the video,

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 8>but I've got the quotes and I'm going to try

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 8>and read them out to you. She said, I'm trying

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 8>to activate a dead city and you're trying to effing

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 8>shut it down.

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm not an effing naughty school kid, so don't speak

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 5>to me like that.

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 8>And then in a subsequent video, I'm paying effing taxes

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 8>and I'm paying your wages.

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, you certainly get the picture there.

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 8>Now the owner of this restaurant and got on her

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 8>at Naji Chu is her name. She said that she

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 8>escaped communists Southeast China for freedom, only to come to

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 8>a worse ragime. She said, if I have to go

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 8>to jail to change this stupid.

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Law, I will.

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean, good on her, Good on Naji Chew. I

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.479
<v Speaker 8>think for taking a stand. And once again, what does

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 8>this suggest the City of Sydney have absolutely no idea

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 8>what they're doing. I mean, they're going after busy, bustling

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 8>restaurants that actually was putting money into the City of Sydney,

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 8>that is trying to revive the city.

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Which Lets be honest, Sydney's nightlife is absolutely dead as

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 5>it is.

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 8>They're trying to do the City of Sydney a favor

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 8>and instead of focusing on roads, rates and rubbish, they're

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 8>always picking the wrong find this city.

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>I got to say, I'm not a massive fan of

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Vietnamese food, but I would go and eat at that

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 2>restaurant just to support someone who stands up for her

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 2>rights like that. Talk about just getting over getting stumbling

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 2>over little stupid, petty issues. You've got enough problems trying

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 2>to run a small business in Sydney without council rangers

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 2>complaining about the pop plant obstructing the foot path.

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Give me a break.

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 7>It is honestly ridiculous.

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 6>But this seems to be a theme with the City

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:09.959
<v Speaker 6>of Sydney council. They also banned festivals because of climate change,

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 6>because apparently, like standing on the grass is really really bad,

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 6>except there's an exemption to the ban for Invasion Day

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 6>festivals and mightighti grass, So they're keeping the essentials going.

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 6>But it is honestly ridiculous, and they can't complain about

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 6>a dead Sydney when they're the ones killing it.

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you, Hey, just Before we go to

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 2>a break, I've got to show you the latest aircraft

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 2>that the Chinese military are putting on show.

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll show you this because Australia has recently signed up,

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 2>at a cost of about five billion dollars to buy

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty or thirty new Apache attack helicopters, but the rest

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 2>of the world is going with drones. This is a

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 2>new Chinese plane that can fly at high altitude and

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 2>then it releases into the sky up to one hundred

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 2>drones that could be used for surveillance or that could

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 2>be armed with weapons. And you can imagine all of

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, one hundred drones being unleashed. It would completely

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 2>overwhelm an enemy. I find it really interesting that the

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Chinese are doing this kind of weaponry at a time

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.720
<v Speaker 2>when we're buying attack helicopters. The Japanese military have decided

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 2>to do away with attack helicopters in favor of drones.

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 2>The Russian military learned a pretty stiff lesson in Ukraine.

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 2>They've lost thirty seven attack helicopters to the Ukrainians, some

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 2>of them shot down with drones that, of course, are

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 2>millions and millions of dollars cheaper than these very expensive helicopters.

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Australia seems to be investing in old technology while the

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 2>rest of the world is embracing drones.

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, meanwhile, our adf are struggling with recruitment. They've got

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 8>pronouns on their enrollment forms, and we really are leaving

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 8>ourselves exposed in the event that we are attacked me

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 8>while China have got these sophisticated drones.

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 5>That is very concerning.

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 6>And keep in mind Trump has asked the EU to

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 6>raise NATO, sorry, to raise their defense spending to far

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 6>percent of GDP. Australia's is stagnant at just two percent.

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.280
<v Speaker 6>It's not just that we're investing in the wrong things,

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 6>We're not investing in anything at all.

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:10.439
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're going to go to a break.

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 2>When we come back, we'll take a look at what's

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 2>making headlines tomorrow, including the fun newspaper editors are having

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 2>with the coalition split, all of that more in just

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 2>a moment. Well, it's a great week to be a

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 2>newspaper editor, and tomorrow's front pages show they have a

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 2>lot of fun with the Coalition bust up. I'll show

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 2>you a few of tomorrow's front pages. Will start with

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 2>the Adelaide Advertiser. They've gone for noalition divorce, eighty year

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 2>marriage hits the rocks as Nats dump Liberals.

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 3>That's not bad.

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 2>The Canberra Times have gone with an atomic bomb nuclear

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 2>option Libs and Nats blow up the coalition with the

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 2>faces of the two lead is. They're large, but probably

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 2>the best of tomorrow's headlines I think with regards this

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:09.720
<v Speaker 2>particular story is the Courier Mail in Queensland.

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 3>It's not me, it's you.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Coalition divorce, how NAT's broke bad news to lives. It

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 2>reads a little bit like a reality TV show. So

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 2>that's how the coalition bust up is being covered in

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the papers tomorrow. There's a lot of other news making headlines.

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 2>Rape laws overhaul is the second story featured there in

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 2>the Career Mail. The opinions of friends and family of

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:39.919
<v Speaker 2>accused rapists will be given less weight in court under

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 2>major new reforms for sexual assault sentencing in Queensland.

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 2>This comes from recommendations from the Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council, who,

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 2>amongst other things, have advised that there needs to be

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 2>a reduced weight given to character references when people are

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 2>convicted of sexual crimes like rape. Those character references could

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 2>be used to assess someone's suitability for rehabilitation or their

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 2>likelihood to re offend, but should not be given weight

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to sentencing.

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 3>The other recommendation.

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 2>From the Council is that harm done to the victim

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:22.919
<v Speaker 2>needs to be the key factor in sentencing and needs

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.919
<v Speaker 2>to take priority above all else. And a third recommendation

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 2>is that sex offenses against children should be regarded as

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the most serious of sex offenses and sentencing should reflect that.

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure afraid those are the sorts of recommendations

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 2>to be implemented in Queensland that everybody would agree very

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 2>sensible and long.

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 7>Overdue one hundred percent.

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 6>And the thing with character references is, in a lot

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 6>of cases sometimes these crimes literally occur out of the blue.

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.760
<v Speaker 6>There was the high profile case at St Andrew's Cathedral

0:37:56.800 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 6>School where there was no obvious indication before this horrendous

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 6>murder happened that there was any character flaws with the murderer,

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 6>and if anyone had given a reference, they would have

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 6>said he was a pretty good guy. And that was

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 6>what all the witnesses said, everyone who knew him, And

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 6>so I think this is good. Like, we have to

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 6>judge people on their actions, not on what their friends

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 6>and families are going to say about it.

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, because it does carry a lot of weight in

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 8>a court room. So I think it's I think it's

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 8>a good one. Now let's move on now to the

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 8>Gold Coast Bulletin their headline tomorrow is police probe into

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 8>DV post.

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 5>A Gold Coast police officer.

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 8>Is under internal investigation after a Facebook comment on a

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 8>domestic violence rally post said quote, all I see is

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 8>a lot of women sitting around and a lot of

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 8>sandwiches not getting made. Queensland Police Services said it was

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 8>aware of this matter. I mean, look, obviously time and place,

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 8>you just come on, you pick your time, pick your place.

0:38:58.080 --> 0:38:59.439
<v Speaker 5>You don't say stuff like that.

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 8>That's just absolutely ridiculous to be putting on your Facebook

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 8>in the middle of a domestic violence rally, especially in

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 8>Queensland where there have been multiple instances of domestic violence

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 8>where women have allegedly been murdered at the hands of

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 8>their partner.

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 5>I think it's pretty poor taste.

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a very poor taste joke and unfortunately I suspect

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 2>for that officer not the sort of joke that a

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 2>policeman who's dealing with domestic BARANCS issues can be seen

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 2>to be making so.

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 6>And I don't get what he was trying to achieve

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 6>by this, Like, seriously, your job is to protect women

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 6>and to enforce the law, and you really undermine public

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 6>confidence when you make comments like this.

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 7>But moving on to Victoria.

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 6>Now, Victoria's state debt is on track to hit a

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 6>record two hundred billion dollars.

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 7>That's seventy one thousand.

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 6>Dollars for every household, amid serious questions over future spending

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 6>in education, health, justice, energy and transport. Official forecast release

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 6>in Tuesday's budget predict a net debt will continue to

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 6>arise to one one hundred and ninety four billion by

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty eight, with an attached interest bill of ten

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars per year or twenty eight million dollars a day.

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 7>That is truly staggering.

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 6>I feel like, just when we think Victoria can't get

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 6>any worse, they somehow managed to do it again. But

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 6>that figure there, especially the interest bill twenty eight million

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:32.919
<v Speaker 6>a day Victorians are paying to service the existing debt.

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 6>I would feel outraged if I was a Victorian.

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if you get real quiet.

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 2>You can actually hear the cars driving across the Victoria

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 2>ordering in New South Wales and up in the Queensland

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 2>right now, because who would want to live in a

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 2>state where the government is spending that much money from

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 2>taxpayers just serving interest. Interestingly, the Victorian Premier Jacquelin Simes,

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 2>she said, Danika, we're not like Perth, and I know

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.399
<v Speaker 2>you're from Perth and you love Perth. She said, We're

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 2>not like Western Australia where they can just dig up

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 2>wels from the ground. We have to tax people on

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.240
<v Speaker 2>their income and we have the tax property.

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 3>She actually said that, but I didn't think to myself,

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 3>hang on a second.

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I know Western Australia is very rich in mineral resources,

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 2>but doesn't Victoria have gas sitting right under the refusing

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 2>to access.

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 8>And also, let's be realistic, the Victorian government absolutely bugged

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 8>things up during the COVID pandemic.

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 5>Everything was shut down.

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:31.360
<v Speaker 8>So not only have businesses gone broke, the state's gone

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 8>backwards and now people are going to have to play

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 8>higher taxes to repay all of the debts that the

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 8>Victorian government has put that state in.

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 5>I just think it's absolutely appalling.

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 8>Let's move on now to the Australian newspaper tomorrow.

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 5>A couple of stories there. We'll look at this one here.

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 8>RBA flag specter of recession. The RBA has rushed to

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 8>cut the official interest rate by zero point twenty five

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 8>percentage points and considered a half percentage point reduction after

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 8>downgrading economic growth and business investment forecasts on a weaker

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:01.879
<v Speaker 8>global outlook and a slow and household expenditure. The Central Bank,

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 8>which warnted of an outside risk of recession in the

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 8>extreme case of Donald Trump's trade war, lowered its forecast

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 8>for its key measure of inflation. So look, obviously that's

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 8>I think a positive from the Reserve Bank, though I've

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 8>got to say when it comes to inflation though, when

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:17.800
<v Speaker 8>we were talking about migration earlier on, it's been a

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 8>complete Tonzi scheme economy. It's all right for Albert to

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 8>come out and say, well, look we escaped a recession.

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 8>We're all okay, Well, you know that's because of migration,

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 8>but also inflation stayed higher for longer than what it

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:31.439
<v Speaker 8>should have been. But obviously if you're a mortgage holder,

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 8>you would be pleased James that there's a rate cast.

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, one's ever going to complain about a rate cut,

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not sure that that says the economy is

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 2>doing well. The other interesting part of this article, and

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 2>you alluded to it a moment ago, Danika, is that

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 2>the article says a further increase in government spending is

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 2>forecast to make up for the shortfall in business investment growth.

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 2>And that's a really concerning thing when government spending is

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.879
<v Speaker 2>propping up the economy, because you never wind that back.

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Can you get yourself into trouble a la Victoria exactly?

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, over the last three years under labor, the majority

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:11.399
<v Speaker 6>of jobs growth has come from government funded sectors. Our

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 6>entire economy right now is being propped up by government spending,

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 6>and that itself has pushed up inflation. It's kept inflation

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:22.760
<v Speaker 6>higher for longer. It is also leading to a less

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 6>productive economy where labor isn't allocated based on demand from

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 6>the private sector. It's being allocated based on a government

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 6>that just wants to boost its headline GDP figures. And

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 6>ultimately it's Australians that are going to lose out under this.

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 6>And I would also just make the point that one

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 6>interest rate cut does not make up for the twelve

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:46.800
<v Speaker 6>rate rises that have happened under labor, families are around

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:49.839
<v Speaker 6>fifty thousand dollars worse off if they have a mortgage.

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 6>One rate cut is not going to change that.

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 5>No, your spot on it certainly won't.

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 8>Another interesting story on the front page says Snowy workers

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 8>in prison. Snowy Hydro two point zero has been accused

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:05.280
<v Speaker 8>of turning the project into a jail after telling striking

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 8>workers they will effectively be confined to their rooms and

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 8>face discipline reaction if they try and leave the site.

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 8>When they stop work for twenty four hours. Ahead of

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:15.879
<v Speaker 8>workers walking off the job on Wednesday, Future Generation Joint

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:19.280
<v Speaker 8>Venture Deputy project director Kevin Dunning told them.

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 5>Site access would be restricted from five pm on Tuesday

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 5>until six am on Thursday. I mean, look, look Snowy

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 5>two point Oh, let's be realistic.

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 8>I mean the scheme is an absolute disaster as it is,

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 8>but now the workers are apparently in a prison, not

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 8>allowed to leave the site. They can't do anything. Looking

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:39.399
<v Speaker 8>over their shoulder, Am I going to get sacked? What's

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 8>going to happen?

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 3>That's one way to deal with strikers.

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's true. Good point.

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:48.320
<v Speaker 2>As our associate Tim Blair, a Sky News correspondent, remarked,

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:51.320
<v Speaker 2>today the snowy Hydro workers could go on striking, I

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 2>don't think anyone would notice.

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 6>Correct, And they're the ones who chose to strike. So

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 6>if snow we Hydro take some precautions to make sure

0:44:58.160 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 6>they don't destroy the place.

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:00.399
<v Speaker 7>I think that it's their.

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Fault and the project will just be delayed by another

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 2>decade and go to a break when we come back.

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Would you buy toilet paper, toothpaste, tea bags as a

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:12.839
<v Speaker 2>wedding gift? One supermarket is betting that you will. We'll

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 2>talk about that in just a making.

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:21.359
<v Speaker 2>Whenever you're invited to a wedding, you've got to think

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 2>what am I going to wear? And what gift are

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 2>we going to give the happy couple? But Danika One

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Supermarket reckons they've come up with an idea.

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:30.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, you think maybe you might get you know,

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 8>wishing well, you might get a bit of money, perhaps

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 8>some kitchen utensils. There's something something more practical that you

0:45:36.920 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 8>can use when you and your then husband enjoy your

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 8>lives together. But look, Tesco is taking it to a

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 8>whole new level, launching their own apparently useful quote unquote

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:49.760
<v Speaker 8>wedding gift service.

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 5>Now here's some of the options.

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 8>It includes a five pack of twelve rolls of own

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 8>brand luxury soft toilet tissue, toothpaste, refuse sacks, kitchen towel,

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 8>an antibacterial hand wash, as well as shower products. So

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:07.720
<v Speaker 8>the supermarket giant says it's introduce a service after finding

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 8>that many couples actually prefer practical items rather than extravagant gifts.

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:14.720
<v Speaker 5>And according to a Tesco.

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:18.240
<v Speaker 8>Supermarket spokeswoman, she says, while toilet roll and tea bags

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 8>might not immediately seem like the most romantic option, it's

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 8>clear from our research, but these are products that could

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 8>help get married life off to a brilliant start.

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:27.359
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 8>Look, look, I actually don't have I want to see

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 8>the research. I don't have an issue with this, no,

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 8>but I mean what happens if you don't You know,

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 8>you don't have a lot of money. You're starting from

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 8>scratch here, and this could actually help somebody.

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it. Actually, you don't have money when you're

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 3>starting from scratch. You want yeah, but you might not crockery.

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 5>You're not having a big you might not be having

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:48.840
<v Speaker 5>a big wedding. You might just have a quick, little, small,

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 5>little family function. It's very expensive and.

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 8>You just need a couple of items to help you

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:54.760
<v Speaker 8>buy in the middle of a cost of living crisis. James,

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:57.399
<v Speaker 8>come on, I actually do not have a problem with this.

0:46:57.560 --> 0:47:00.799
<v Speaker 2>To be honest, Denika, when you eventure get married, I'm

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 2>going to remember this conversation.

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:06.959
<v Speaker 3>Don't tolet and tea bags what you saw.

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 7>No, I'm with you here.

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 6>Look, I just got married and before my wedding, my

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 6>grandma rocked up to my new apartment with a laundry

0:47:16.800 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 6>basket and some towels and some nice spatula, just some

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 6>kitchen essentials and I still use that laundry basket.

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:26.239
<v Speaker 7>My mother in law.

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:28.879
<v Speaker 2>We've actually got a picture of the gift you got

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 2>from your grand here it is.

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that's amazing.

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 6>You must have loved that my mother in law got

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:40.720
<v Speaker 6>me sprain wipe and sponges, and that it's practical. Maybe

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 6>not as your only wedding gift, but certainly if you're

0:47:43.719 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 6>just moving into a new place, cleaning supplies are a

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 6>great gift.

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 5>I agree.

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:52.280
<v Speaker 6>But moving on now to another fun story. In France,

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 6>there was a horse racer happening and a jockey was

0:47:56.680 --> 0:48:01.479
<v Speaker 6>seen holding on for dear Look at this.

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 12>Go into the Bullfinch and it is Lason who's very

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 12>brave and at the back we have lost Lord Brett,

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.320
<v Speaker 12>Lord brod Lor. Look at Lord Brett's jockey. They're hanging

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 12>on for dear life to Amazon's jockey and horse. Spectacular stuff.

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 7>So he fell off his horse.

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:26.400
<v Speaker 6>He didn't just manage to hold onto his own horse.

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 6>He also managed to grab hold of another horse and

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 6>there was a solid four or five second period there

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:39.960
<v Speaker 6>where he was straddling both horses while going probably what

0:48:40.160 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 6>sixty k's an hour.

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 3>It was an incredible effort, I'll tell you what. And

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:45.800
<v Speaker 3>lucky he didn't injure himself.

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 8>It was very lucky, and it didn't injure the other

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:49.239
<v Speaker 8>jockey as well, the other horse that he was trying

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 8>to pull down.

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:52.360
<v Speaker 2>He'll probably be banned for a couple of races for

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 2>cheating by grabbing onto the other horse, but he saved

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 2>his own hide. That's all we've got time for tonight

0:48:57.719 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 2>stick Around. Coming up is the Reader Penalty Show.

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 3>Good Night, m