WEBVTT - The Media Show | 17 May

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the Media Show with Jack.

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Outing, Hello and welcome to the Media Show. Tonight we'll

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 2>take a look at what the ABC gets in Lever's

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 2>budget and inside fights in the US media. But first,

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 2>this week was all about the budget and Lever's lofty

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 2>economic promises were in the spotlight.

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>So how did our media cover it?

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Alban Easy government is copying plenty of flak for its

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 3>big spending budget, giving three hundred dollars energy rebates to everyone,

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 3>with cost of living relief for every household.

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 4>Jim Chalmers insists this budget isn't about winning votes, but

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 4>we'll take that with a grain of salt.

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 5>Treasurer spends big on budget cost of living relief.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 3>There's energy bill relief and income tax cuts across the board.

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 6>Every Australian household will save hundreds of dollars on their

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 6>power bills.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 2>And of course there were some slogans which went very

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 2>much unchallenged.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>For the most part.

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Alberan Easy took to social media to claim we're giving

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>every Australian a tax cut.

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>So is that true?

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, Labor change legislation to ensure that anyone earning more

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.559
<v Speaker 2>than one hundred and fifty thousand dollars will pay more

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 2>tax than they would have. It is a pretty important

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>detail which meant in the media simply forgot. And aside

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 2>from all of that, because of Australia's inflation crisis, your

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 2>wages have been pushed into higher tax brackets, or, as

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Laura Jay's put it on the Sky News panel, inflation

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 2>driven bracket creep plundered twenty five billion dollars from taxpayers

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 2>this year.

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 7>At the center of your pain is bracket creep. Wage

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 7>increases feel like they are amounting to absolutely nothing, So

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 7>look at this chart. In twenty twenty two, bracket creep

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 7>was worth about half of the increase in personal income

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 7>tax eighteen billion dollars taken from households.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 3>This year, income.

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 7>Tax went up by sixty two billion dollars, and about

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 7>twenty five billion dollars of that was due to bracket creep.

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 7>This third column shows even with Labour's Stage three tax cuts,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 7>the ree jig Stage three tax cuts, they weren't about

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 7>twenty five billion dollars right, but there are still six

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars worth of bracket creep next year alone. Expect

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 7>the opposition to seize on that.

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 2>We also had a stunt where three hundred dollars of

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 2>your money presumably will be paid directly to energy companies

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 2>to lower the power bill. Now, many in the media

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 2>celebrating this cash splash have short memories. It all related

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 2>to this broken promise.

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 8>Ouseholds will benefit by two hundred and seventy five dollars

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 8>on Apple reducing power prices by two hundred and seventy

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 8>five dollars, prices by two hundred and seventy five dollars

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 8>two hundred and seventy five dollars, two hundred and seventy

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 8>five dollars a year, two hundred and seventy five dollars,

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 8>two hundred and seventy five dollars a year.

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>If Labor tries to make the claim that it has

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>kept this promise because of the one off payment, do

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 2>not fall for the spin. The election policy was clear.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 2>It was to lower power prices in perpetuity from twenty

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty five, not artificially lower them once. And this pretty

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 2>much sums up Labour's entire budget. It is a stopgap

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 2>measure with very little long term substance. Well, let's bring

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 2>in our panel now, and we've got media writer at

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 2>The Australian Sophie Elsworth and PR Council's Christy McSweeney. Well, Christy,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.399
<v Speaker 2>why don't we start with you. What did you make

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 2>of the media coverage that you saw and what kind

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 2>of verdict would you place on the public's reaction to

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 2>the budget.

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think the public swide by this false promise

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 5>of we're going to get three hundred dollars. A lot

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 5>of the media reported that it was almost like an

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 5>economic stimulus and people were going to receive three hundred dollars.

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 5>There's not a lot of people out there who know

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 5>that that three hundred dollars is going to be paid

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 5>to the energy company, not to you, and it's going

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 5>to be paid quarterly over two financial years, so it's

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 5>not going to come all once either. And you're right,

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 5>jacket is a one off payment. So like all budgets,

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 5>the devil is in the detail. But there's a lot

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 5>of spin on this one. They're framing it as an

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 5>economic management good and economic good management budget. But then

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 5>another ten years of deficit after this probably so if

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 5>they want to go to an election this year, they

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 5>can and they can say we've delivered two surpluses and

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 5>people feel really good about getting targeted. And I say

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 5>targeted because not everybody's getting what they should get when

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 5>people who are expecting those Stage three tax cuts as

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 5>they were, as they voted for at the election.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's a pretty big point.

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, Sophie, cutting through the spin, how do you think

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 2>the media fared. Were they good at pulling apart some

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 2>of the half truths in the budget?

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, Jack, they're professionals that this, as you know, I mean,

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 4>we have this every twelve months.

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 3>You know, many of us have done budget after budget.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 4>But it's cutting through all the spin that is the

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 4>key and breaking it down and what it means for you, I,

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 4>the viewer, the listener, whoever. But I thought there was

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 4>some great headlines during the week. There was one on

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 4>the front of the head at the front of the

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Herald Sun that read jim flation, which I'm not so

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 4>sure the Treasurer.

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Would have liked that one.

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 4>But this three hundred dollars rebate for energy was really

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 4>dominating because it's a very simple policy to explain, it's

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 4>very easy for people to understand, and then the headlines

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 4>dominate on that.

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>But let's remind.

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Viewers, Jack that the Albanezi government did promise that energy

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 4>prices would drop by two hundred and seventy five dollars

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:58.359
<v Speaker 4>and they have not done that.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 3>So this is a way to counter that. Say, you're giving.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 4>More of a rebate, but this rebate is only one off,

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 4>so it will only cover these increasing power costs for

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 4>one calendar year or one year, should I say, and

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 4>then the problems.

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Are back to where they started.

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 4>So this is a lot of spin in this budget,

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 4>but we get that from both sides of politics.

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Well said, But moving on now. Even though it was

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 2>a serious cost of living budget, some labor MPs thought

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 2>it was all one big joke. Now, Christy, I want

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 2>to bring you in here for me watching this video,

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 2>and it did generate some headlines because it was a

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>bit confronting. We're on one hand saying people are doing

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 2>it tough. We've got this tough budget where we're having

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 2>to provide relief to energy bills. People are struggling with rent.

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 2>A lot of that's immigration driven, and the people who

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 2>are running the country are doing these bizarre dances where

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 2>they're kicking their feet up as if I don't know

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 2>what to make of it, What are your thoughts?

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 5>This is an absolute thing that people trapped inside a

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 5>bubble think is funny. It's an absolute in joke, and

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure a lot of MPs and other people in

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 5>the building thought it was clever, thought it was leading

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 5>into the zeitgeist about TikTok videos. I'm sure people in

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 5>the building could understand the relevance of the autumnal changes

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 5>of the budget tree and so forth. But to people

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 5>out there, they are thinking, why are we sending people

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 5>to Canbra to dance in a courtyard on budget day

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 5>when I can't pay my bills, when everything at the

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 5>supermarket is costing me more, when I'm not better off

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 5>than I was two years ago. Since you came to

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 5>government and you're dancing around a tree.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, good point, Sophie Elsworth. Your thoughts was it an

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 2>own goal?

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Jack? I just don't think it's the time for it.

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's nice to see politicians have a little

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 4>bit of fun. They're generally pretty serious, but when they're

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 4>putting out social media content that you know, looks like

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 4>they're having a bit of a.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Wow of a time.

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, Australian economy, households are suffering. There's no denying

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 4>that people are feeling the strain and I think a mum.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 3>And dad household out in the Burbs.

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 4>Who is struggling to pay their mortgage in their power

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 4>bill would look at that and just go These people

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:29.679
<v Speaker 4>have no idea.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's asinine, it's stupid, the need to get back

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to work. But now to a great scoop by our

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 2>panelist Sophie Elseworth at The Australian who sought it through

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>the budget papers only to find that the audience at

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the ABC.

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Is expected to plummet.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 2>Sophie reported the budget papers say the ABC's combined weekly

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 2>audience reach, which is a target of sixty seven percent

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 2>in this financial year, is expected to fall to sixty

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 2>three percent. It is expected to drop again in the

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four five financial year to sixty two percent,

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 2>a result blamed on soft and used web services. Now,

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 2>while audiences are dropping, the national broadcaster is actually pocketing

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 2>even more of your cash, with the one point one

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 2>nine billion dollar budget getting a fifty eight point five

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 2>million dollar top up next year. Wages at the ABC

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 2>will also rise by nine percent as well. Now let's

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>bring Sophie back into discuss. Now, Sophie, the thing that

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 2>jumped out at me is they're blaming this concept of

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 2>a soft news web market for the shrinking audiences.

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean in this context? So what are

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 1>they trying to say.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, they're trying to say that, you know, news services

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 4>are seeing a decline in audience. Now, we know that

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 4>it is challenging time for media outlets, whatever platform they

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 4>are on. But the thing is, we give the ABC

0:09:55.360 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 4>about one point two billion dollars annually in government funds,

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 4>So it's expected that they keep the audience engage because

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 4>they're getting an awful lot of bucket of cash dropped

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 4>at their front doors every year.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Now this is not happening.

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Their audience will decline to sixty three percent reach and

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 4>then a further decline to sixty two percent reach. Now,

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 4>I would argue, it's not about budgetary issues at the

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 4>ABC that's seeing an audience decline. It's about their content Jack.

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 4>We talk about it on this show week in Wakeout.

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Even Paul Barriot the Media Watch was calling out some

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 4>of their coverage with the Bondi murders. They are not

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 4>getting to issues, they are not covering news events properly,

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 4>and then viewers and listeners and readers are tuning in elsewhere,

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 4>So they have a.

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Problem with engaging their audience.

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 4>And I would argue it's because of the content and

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 4>the quality of the content in some instances that they

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 4>are pushing out.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I couldn't agree well, and Christy, obviously the ABC

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 2>does some amazing work in the regions. Where I think

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 2>they've gone wrong is dedicating so many so much headcount

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 2>in to say the TikTok division, and they're obviously trying

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 2>to do it because you get these easy, cheap views

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 2>there and then they can report back in you know,

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>the Senate estimates and everything that their audience share has

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 2>gone up, but the views aren't equal. It's not the

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 2>same as capturing a big audience in a regional area

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>as getting this bizarre audience on TikTok with these cheap

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 2>views for essentially just covering memes and jokes.

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 5>That's exactly right. And you know, I grew up a

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 5>regional Australian and I grew up watching the ABC, and

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm grateful and I'm thankful for the work they do

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 5>in bringing representation of regional Australians to the rest of Australia.

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 5>But there's not enough of a concentration on that regional

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 5>Australians would be mortified to see what the ABC does

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 5>in the city. If they tuned in to ABC Sydney

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 5>in the mornings and heard the host promoting wanting Sydney

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 5>siders to engage in a game of tag. People do

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 5>not want to list into that content. The news direction

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 5>is dropping dropping if concepts such as that are major

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 5>promotions to engage in audience. It used to be the

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 5>best investigative journalism in Australia. It still is in parts

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 5>of the regions, but not when you're tuning on in

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 5>the city stations.

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Well said, and now to the Walk LEAs, which is

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 2>taking a very brave stance by standing up against the

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 2>evil fossil fuel companies. The Australian reports that the Media

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Awards event has acted its partnership with Australian oil company

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 2>and Pole, claiming they will only work with companies which

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 2>have a quote tangible benefit to humanity. Sophia, I want

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 2>to bring you in here because you've written this story.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 2>The thing that I was confused about. The insinuation appears

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 2>to be that fossil fuels provide no tangible benefit to humanity.

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you thought as well?

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's basically what it's saying, Jack, And this uproar

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 4>happened last year when the cartoonists, a group of cartoonists

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 4>were quite disgusted that the Walkleys had one of its

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 4>major sponsors as Ampole, and then further fallout occurred after

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 4>an SMH article said that the founder, Sir William Walkley

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 4>of Ampole, who also helped create The Walkleys, held racist

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 4>views in a column written newspaper in the nineteen sixties.

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 4>So they're basically now cutting off or biting the hand

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 4>that feeds them and this is not going to end. Well,

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 4>they've ended, they're ending their relationship with amp Pole. But

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 4>I think this is virtue signaling at its finest, and

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 4>Daily Telegraf cartoonist Warren Brown said to me in this story,

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 4>how are these cartoonists who are so outraged going to

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 4>get to.

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 3>The Walkley Awards? Are they going to.

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 4>Arrive in a tesla or on a solar powered pogo stick?

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 3>This is a bit of virtue signaling and it's probably

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 3>gone too far.

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 5>Jack.

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the irony is that the announcement would have been

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 2>written on a computer which is powered by energy from

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuels. Bunch of hypocrites. We're going to take a

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>quick break. When we're back. Albanesi gets into media trouble

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>with one of his tenants.

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back.

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albanzi also made headlines this week after The Daily

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Telegraph revealed he was evicting a tenant from an investment property.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 6>So my landlord is Anthony Albanesi, right, the Prime Minister,

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 6>and look full disclosure. Albet's been a really good landlord.

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 6>I like Albow I noted for him in the last election.

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 6>I'm supportive of a lot of the things that he does.

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 6>I'm very confused by this, and I guess I'm disconfused

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 6>by the circumstances that again I wasn't given the opportunity

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 6>to potentially look at other.

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Options increasing the rent.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 6>And I was particularly confused by the reason that the

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 6>estate agent, which was that the landlord was considering selling

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 6>the property.

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So what did Albanesi say in response?

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 4>I wish him well, but.

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 8>I am allowed to make changes which are a direct

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 8>result of the changes that have happened.

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 7>In my life from where I was ten years ago.

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Seems fair enough to me. And while Flanagan was claiming

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 2>that Albert was his landlord, the truth may be more complicated.

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 2>News dot COM's Sam Maiden reports that comedian Chrissy Flanagan,

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the ex partner of the man that Anthony Albanesi is

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 2>trying to evict from his investment property, has sensationally revealed

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 2>that she remained on the lease even after she moved

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 2>out in order to keep the rent down. Now let's

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>bring the panel back in Christy. First of all, just

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 2>starting with the scenario, just in general, who do you

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 2>think is in the right here? I've got a lot

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>of sympathy for Anthony Albanesi. I think that this bloke

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 2>has had very low rent for a very long time

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and it's his prerogative to maximize his rent sell the property.

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But he's getting a lot of flat. The story has

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>taken wings.

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 3>The story's got.

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 5>A few twists and turns, hasn't it. And I love

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 5>that the Daily Telegraph went out to do this story

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 5>against the Prime Minister and the talent they found was

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 5>so complimentary of the Prime Minister, was almost an ad

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 5>for what a good bloke Anthony Albanize is, So they

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 5>didn't quite get what they were after there.

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 3>So the Telly have been.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 5>Really happy with the story taking another turn today about

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 5>multiple leaseholders and who actually is the tenant here? But

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 5>Anthony Albanize in his response, he's replicating the response of

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 5>every person in Australia who owns investment properties and is

0:16:55.920 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 5>looking at state governments put in legislation on the rights

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 5>of renters and listening to politicians talking about rent moratoriums.

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 3>And so forth. It is an asset class.

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 5>It should be treated as such, like every other asset

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 5>class in Australia, and the Prime Minister has just proved

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 5>that point. He's allowed to do with his property what

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 5>he wants, but he's been really good about keeping the

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 5>rent down for this small business owner during and post COVID.

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 5>I think we you know, I have some sympathy for

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 5>the PM on this one as well.

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean Sophie.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Obviously the tenant, Flanagan hasn't been that critical of Albanesi,

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 2>and he's more talking broadly about the rights for renters

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 2>in general. Seems to kind of be where he's fallen

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 2>his position, But it has ended up hurting Albanesi in

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 2>some demographics, I would argue, and I think that this

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 2>renterers maybe a little bit entitled. He's had very low rents.

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 2>If I was here, I'd be thanking Albanesi for all

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 2>those years of support.

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, Jack, there's a few things here, I think to unpa.

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes, the Prime Minister is entitled to sell any asset

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 4>classes that he has, and he's obviously looking at doing that.

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.239
<v Speaker 4>He's well within his rights. But I would argue the

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 4>timing of this is not great for the Prime minister.

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 4>When the government's all about, you know, helping out renters,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 4>they're struggling out there. The timing of this, it's turned

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 4>into a media you know, you know, whole drama really.

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 3>As a result of this that could have been avoided

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 3>if this was done at a different time.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 4>It's right in the middle of federal budget week and

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 4>it just doesn't look like the Prime Minister is practicing

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 4>what he preaches. He's basically saying the tenant's got to go,

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm selling my property. He's well within his rights to

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 4>do that. But I think people are going, you're sort

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 4>of saying one thing but doing another.

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps, Yeah, it's a good point. He should have waited

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 2>until after the budget. It's a cost of living budget,

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 2>and I guess it comes back to you. You know

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 2>that video we played of dancing MPs You've got to

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 2>walk as well. You can't just say the right things,

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>You actually have to practice what you preach. And I

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 2>can see that there is area for him to be

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 2>criticized there.

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Anyway.

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's move on now to the US, where Trump's hush

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 2>money trial is in full swing. And to stop Trump

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 2>from talking publicly about the trial in a way which

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 2>could be perceived to be intimidating witnesses, the judge placed

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 2>a gag order on him, but that didn't stop a

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 2>few wild press conferences taking place as his supporters found

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 2>a loophole.

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 9>Some of Donald Trump's allies joined him in New York

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 9>yesterday for his criminal hush money trial. Outside of court,

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 9>they said, what Trump can't because of the gag order

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 9>in place on the former president. You just saw both

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 9>Senator j. D. Vance of Ohio and Senator Tommy Tarbarwell

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 9>of Alabama said they're just there to support a friend,

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 9>but both then criticized Trump's former fixer, Michael Cohen. Vance

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 9>also attacked the judge's daughter, unfounded claims made by the former.

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>President, Christie.

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring you in here. I mean, it's been such

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 2>a circus this entire trial. I did find it very

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 2>funny that Trump always finds a way you could put

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 2>a gag or order on him. The insinuation appears to

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 2>be that he sent out his supporters to say what

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 2>he would say if he legally could and didn't want

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 2>to go to jail.

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 3>America.

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 5>Wow, And I will say that Republican politicians are basically

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 5>lining up to prove loyalty to Trump.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 3>They would do anything.

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 5>I'm surprised that there are not more of them there

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 5>following this legal circus around the United States, to turn

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 5>up and back Trump and make statements in his support

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 5>to gain loyalty from him.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 3>There are people in.

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 5>The Publican party who have spoken out against Trump in

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 5>the past who are now changing their mind, who are

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 5>absolutely making statements adverse to what they had said previously,

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 5>or because they know Trump's reputation for people who are

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 5>loyal to him.

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 3>And will back his point of view.

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 5>That's not uncommon in politicians the world over, but I

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 5>think this is a really extreme case here in the

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 5>United States, with Republicans falling over themselves to do anything

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 5>they can to show loyalty to Donald Trump at this

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 5>point of the electoral cycle.

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So for elseworth your thoughts.

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh, look, isn't he clever?

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 4>Hat He's managed to get around this in what appears

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 4>to sending out.

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 3>His allies to speak for him.

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 4>Watch out, because obviously, with this US election, Trump is

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 4>going to do absolutely everything he absolutely can to make

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 4>sure he can defeat Joe Biden.

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 3>And this is just one step that he's saying. I

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 3>won't be gagged. I will get around this.

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we'll see how the strategy of potentially infuriating the

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 2>judge plays out. I can't imagine it will help him

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 2>too much, but look, staying on US politics, Joe Biden's

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 2>upcoming See an End debate with Donald Trump may have

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 2>a few restrictions to help the sitting president. Fox News

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 2>reports that Biden's camp wants no audience, a limitation on

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 2>media organizations, and candidate Mike's to be muted when their

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 2>time runs out. Now, Christie, let's bring you back in here.

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind the idea of candidate Mike's being muted

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 2>the moment that the time goes out. But the reason

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 2>they're doing it is because in twenty twenty, Joe Biden

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 2>was getting talked over, Trump was fighting back, and it

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 2>created this ferocious talk fest. What do you think, what

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 2>do you think about these rules?

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 5>It's not unusual for the party of essentially the front runner,

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 5>even though in this case, I don't think he is

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 5>to come to a debate preparation with rules, and that's

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 5>the president's prerogative. But they're obviously trying to safeguard Joe

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 5>Biden from making gaffes and from talking too much, which

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 5>is unusual for a debate where they're trying to contain

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 5>his ability to speak.

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Elseworth, what are your thoughts.

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 3>This signals to me that Joe Biden is worried.

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 4>He's worried of having a debate with Trump, and I

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 4>think he's worried that Trump will win the debate, and

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 4>that's why his officers come out and made these restrictions

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 4>on the debates.

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 6>Jack.

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 2>So for you, Christy, thank you so much for joining

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 2>me tonight. That's all the time we have for tonight.

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 2>That's it for me. Up next is lefties losing it.