WEBVTT - Is a four-day work week in our future?

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Claire Harvey.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>It's Friday, August fifteen, twenty twenty five. Anthony Albanezi believes

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Australia can help broke a piece in Gaza under a

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabian lead proposal that could see Arab nations send

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in peacekeepers. Tributes a flowing for the beloved film critic

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>David Stratton, who's died at the age of eighty five.

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>He wrote reviews for The Australian for more than three decades,

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>and you can read all about his life and legacy

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>right now at The Australian dot com.

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Dot you.

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>A four day workweek, caps on your superbalance, attacks on

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles. These are some of the ideas being floated

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>for discussion at a big shindick in Canberra next week,

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>an economic roundtable that the Treasurer says will help shape

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>his next three budgets. Today, Political editor Jeff Chambers joins

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>me to work out what's credible and what's crazy. Jeff

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>Chambers is The Australian's political editor and like most people

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>with big jobs, I think Jeff works about seven days

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a week. Would that be right?

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Jeff, I try not to, but I think for most

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Australians they're not sitting there watching the clock. They're trying

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 3>to do the best at their job. And there's no

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 3>real right to disconnect, as some of the unions like

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 3>to suggest that there is.

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, the latest idea from the union movement is a

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>four day working week, but the twister is you'd be

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>paid for five days. Jeff, why are they talking about

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this now?

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Look, the ACTU has predictably rolled out a shopping list

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 3>of completely unworkable ideas and they quite often know that

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 3>they are so radical that they will never actually get up.

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 3>And at the top of that list is this idea

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 3>of four day working week, but you get paid full

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 3>time for the full five days, So it's like, let's

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 3>all work less and take more holidays, which is another

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>one of their proposals that they're floated to increase productivity.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 3>Not quite sure how that works. And this type of

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 3>spooky music radicalism from the ACTU really puts the fright

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 3>into the private sector business industry leaders who attend these forums.

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 3>So the unions have already won the right to disconnect,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 3>which was a very symbolic thing that labor did for them.

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 3>But if you're a small business owner, you never really

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 3>can disconnect just to keep food on the table and

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 3>pay the bills. And for that fact, the very staffers

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>and journalists here in Parliament, but the staffers at work

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 3>for these labor ministers, they often chuckle to me that

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 3>there is no right to disconnect for them. So it's

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 3>all a bit of a show.

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But that's not all, folks. Sally McManus, the boss of

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the Australian Council of Try Unions the ACTU, is also

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>calling for twenty five billion dollars in new or higher taxes,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a limit of one property for negative gearing, changes to

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>capital gains tax and more. McMahon says this is about

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>making life fairer, particularly for young people who can't get

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>into the housing market.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Working people can't live where they work, they can't live

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 2>where they grew up. It is causing an enormous amount

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 2>of pressure for people. And a really disturbing thing is

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 2>is that of study in New South Wales said that

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 2>there will be no grandchildren in Sydney because people between

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the ages of thirty and forty can't afford to live there.

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So why are we suddenly hearing all these new ideas

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>because on Monday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers is kicking off something

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>called the Economic Reform round Table, a summit of business,

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>unions and decision makers aimed at working out how to

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>position Australia for the future. One of the hot issues

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>on the table is artificial intelligence. Obviously we're on the

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>cusp of a huge change technologically, a big leap forward.

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>They're talking about vices that the new Industrial Revolution where

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>suddenly all of us are going to have very eager

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>virtual assistants who are helping us do our jobs. Businesses

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and the government and the Productivity Commission. Also they want

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Australians to adopt generative AI to start using it. Do

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>you think that is how we're actually going to make

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy more productive?

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 3>I think that sort of blanket conversation about everyday workers

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>and businesses using generative AI is probably not that helpful.

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 3>I think talking about the more targeted applications of AI

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>and what that could practically do to allow all of

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 3>us to be more productive in our lives, our day

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 3>to day, both at home and at work, is a

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 3>more practical way forward. And what does that mean? Well,

0:04:56.040 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 3>you really have to actually educate people. And the big

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 3>boardrooms are the big companies. They've got a whole army

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 3>of people that are dedicated to understanding it and how

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 3>to apply it. But then as you get down to

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 3>those smaller businesses, of which we obviously know there's multimillion

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 3>small businesses, the art of this whole process is to

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 3>not leave them behind.

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's another part of the puzzle. The companies creating great

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>AI tools include Google and Meta, whom the government is

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>presently warring with over social media bands for kids. So

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>how to police them without leaving Australia behind on the

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>AI revolution.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 3>These companies are based in America predominantly, but they're in Europe,

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 3>they're in China. We really are watching what Europe and

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>a US are doing in that regulatory space and they

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 3>can't really land it. We really need some of our

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 3>big allies and friends in the West to put some

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 3>systems in place that we can follow. But then we also,

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 3>as little old Australia here, the island nation with a

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 3>much smaller population and smaller economy, we can't be left

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 3>behind in the AI revolution. So it's a really challenging space.

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And what makes it even more challenging is the speed

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 3>of those technological advances.

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I had an example of it this morning. There's a

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>book that I've got to read for work because it's

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a project that we're working on, and it's a big book.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It's one hundred and fifty thousand words. I haven't managed

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to get around to it yet. But one of the

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>AI tools that we're allowed to use here in NewsCorp

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is called Notebook Large Language Model, and you can dump

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>something into it and then tell it to spit out

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a podcast episode for you. You know, this is scary

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for people like me who work in podcasts, but this

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is not something we'd ever published. So this morning I

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>uploaded the book into the AI and I told it

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to make a little podcast episode for me and tell

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>me what's happening in this book? What's it all about?

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the dip Dave today we're unpacking well and

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it generated ten minutes of audio with two AI voices

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about the book and telling me all the main

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>points and what I needed to know and why was

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that significant?

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>They were cheaper, sure, but critically their visas were tied

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to their contracts that made them rich. And I could

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>listen to that while I was driving into the office.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a productivity advance, isn't it. Like that's how we

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>actually harness this technology.

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean in a really simple sense. Yeah, you

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 3>can digest a very complex long report or video or

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 3>audio recording, and the technology is actually getting a lot better,

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 3>even in the space of the last two years. So

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 3>as a journalist, if I'm interviewing someone and the old

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 3>fashioned way was to listen back to the tape and

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 3>tap out the words, the technology is actually really improving

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 3>that it's almost word perfect. But then you can also

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 3>get a summary, and the summaries are quite good. So

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 3>that will make you more productive in a really simple

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 3>way day to day. Now, when you think about students

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 3>at school, primary school, high school, university, and when you're

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 3>thinking about the different professions and how that applies, I

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 3>think that's the important part of the story. Okay, what

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 3>jobs become redundant through this process and how do we

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 3>adapt to that. Are we happy for a call center

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 3>to not be based overseas but to have a really

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 3>amazing AI set up call center that we feel confident

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 3>in And I think confidence in that service and delivery

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 3>is key to getting more and more Australians to adopt

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 3>these types of technologies.

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that the union movement said when

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they asked for this four day week or put it

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>on their shopping list, was that they wanted to be

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>able to reap the benefits of productivity. So this is

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>how workers can enjoy an extra day off a week

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>while AI goes and does some of the tasks that

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>they don't need to do anymore. A really interesting political

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>issue for Jim Chalmers to manage now, isn't it. He

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>needs the unions to be on board with the adoption

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>of AI, presumably, but if their idea is great, we

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>can all take a day off. Is that useful for him?

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 3>We're in such an uncertain space in terms of understanding

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 3>what an economy wide effect AI has. I think if

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 3>you're a government or a treasurer and you want to

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 3>speed up your clean energy revolution to hit your climate

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 3>of renewables targets, if you want to unlock more housing quicker,

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 3>if you want to simplify environmental processes and laws, simplify bureaucracies,

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that for him is a really big top priority.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Is Okay, we've got this ridiculously antiquated system where we

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 3>can't get approvals through quick enough. I think there are

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 3>some genuine divisions in the government in relation to a

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 3>regulatory environment, whether you let it rip, whether some of

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 3>those checks have to be in place. It's really challenging

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 3>to actually impose regulations, expect results from those regulations and

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 3>penalties without holding the country back. So it's a very

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 3>tricky situation for Jim Chalmers.

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Coming up. What about taxes on electric vehicles. Back when

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>this idea was launched, Anthony Albanezi called it a Productivity

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>round Table. Then Jim Charmers changed it to the much

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>more lofty sounding Economic Reform round Table, and that's what's

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>prompted this flurry of ideas from the unions, the Productivity Commission, businesses.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Now the government's saying this will just be an ideas forum.

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>They're not committing to anything. One possible outcome is a

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>road user charge, basically a tax on electric vehicles. The

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>states and territories want this to replace the fuel excise

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the drivers of petrol cars pay. That's a huge source

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of revenue that's dwindling as evs become more popular.

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Particularly if you're in the outer suburbs or in regional Australia.

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 3>We need roads and transport networks that are super efficient

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 3>so that people aren't sitting in redlock and can get

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 3>to work, get home and see their families all the

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 3>rest of it. But without a sustainable system we won't

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 3>be able to have that money to do that. So

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 3>there is a lot of momentum now and Jim Chalmers

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 3>and Anthony Abanezi have more or less said it's happening,

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think in the first instance they might start

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 3>trialing it on say EV trucks, just to try and

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 3>get the technology right before a broader rollout.

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Isn't there a risk though, Jeff that this off kill

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to one of the government's other goals, which is to

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>increase the uptake of EV's, basically make the planet less polluted.

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So the EV Council and advocates for EVS say

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>that any contemplation of a road user charge shouldn't occur

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 3>until thirty percent of new car sales evs. The flip

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 3>side is that there are now settings in place that

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 3>are incentivizing automatically that pushed towards evs, you know, exemptions

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 3>on fringe benefit tax, exemptions on vehicle stamp duty, free regio.

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 3>There is another model you could do as well, which

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 3>would be have fuel excise still in place and have

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 3>a road user charge system. And if they design in

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 3>a way where the road user charge system is less

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 3>ultimately across the year than a fuel car, again that's

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 3>another incentive for people to buy evs or hybrids.

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Chambers is the Australian Political Editor. We'll be all

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>over this roundtable and all the ideas.

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 2>That throws up.

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You can follow it live and read all our analysis

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Australian dot com dot au