WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 5 October

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>This is Paul Murray Live.

0:00:03.900 --> 0:00:08.650
<v Speaker 2>Paul Murray Live. Thank you, Shari. Kayla Bond filling in

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>for Paul in the man cave for the next two weeks.

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Here's what's coming up tonight. Jim Penman, that's the Jim's

0:00:13.700 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 2>mowing man, he reckons Australians aren't having children because we're

0:00:17.100 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 2>getting too much dopamine elsewhere. I'll tell you a little

0:00:19.700 --> 0:00:21.990
<v Speaker 2>bit more about that later. Plenty to talk about with

0:00:22.050 --> 0:00:24.530
<v Speaker 2>Sam Birrell and Nick Rees on the panel tonight. Ben

0:00:24.610 --> 0:00:27.190
<v Speaker 2>Carroll says he wouldn't do a deal with the Greens

0:00:27.230 --> 0:00:31.110
<v Speaker 2>to form government in Victoria. And Chris Bowen's pre-cop cop

0:00:31.290 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 2>is underway. I'll talk to Shadow Energy Minister... Dan Tehan

0:00:35.460 --> 0:00:38.979
<v Speaker 2>later on. But while I'm mentioning COP, we've seen a

0:00:38.979 --> 0:00:40.930
<v Speaker 2>little bit of vision out of this thing tonight. Now,

0:00:41.210 --> 0:00:44.590
<v Speaker 2>keep in mind that we're doing this thing in Fiji

0:00:44.650 --> 0:00:47.470
<v Speaker 2>and we're paying tens of millions of dollars for it.

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:53.300
<v Speaker 2>So far, we've spent upwards of $ 20 million, I think

0:00:53.300 --> 0:00:56.620
<v Speaker 2>$ 6 million we spent on hotel rooms, that they told

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 2>us that's fine, we'll recoup that from the people who

0:00:58.740 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 2>then eventually use those hotel rooms, but it's a bit

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:03.940
<v Speaker 2>of a problem if no-one actually turns up, and they

0:01:03.980 --> 0:01:06.580
<v Speaker 2>do seem to be a little light on numbers. But

0:01:06.670 --> 0:01:10.850
<v Speaker 2>is it any surprise when even the guy who organised

0:01:10.970 --> 0:01:14.850
<v Speaker 2>all of this, Chris Bowen, the climate change minister, not

0:01:14.930 --> 0:01:16.030
<v Speaker 2>even he wants to be there?

0:01:17.770 --> 0:01:21.300
<v Speaker 3>To the price of food on the tables in places

0:01:21.340 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 3>where many may never have heard of Fiji.

0:01:26.060 --> 0:01:29.100
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he is dozing off. Have a look at him.

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:31.830
<v Speaker 2>We did all of this. We've been paying for all

0:01:31.850 --> 0:01:34.650
<v Speaker 2>of this. He organised all of this as a vanity

0:01:34.709 --> 0:01:37.509
<v Speaker 2>project because, of course, we didn't get to have the

0:01:37.569 --> 0:01:40.890
<v Speaker 2>real cop that went to Turkey, even though we were

0:01:40.940 --> 0:01:44.350
<v Speaker 2>told by Chris Bowen when he went overseas a year

0:01:44.390 --> 0:01:46.330
<v Speaker 2>or two ago to try and stitch this thing up

0:01:46.410 --> 0:01:49.780
<v Speaker 2>that we had the deal in the bag. No. Turkey

0:01:49.820 --> 0:01:52.340
<v Speaker 2>got the real cop that would have been held in Adelaide.

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.580
<v Speaker 2>So we ended up with this thing in Fiji so

0:01:55.620 --> 0:02:00.190
<v Speaker 2>that Chris Bowen could be the president of negotiations, whatever that.

0:02:00.070 --> 0:02:01.930
<v Speaker 3>Is, and he's asleep.

0:02:02.410 --> 0:02:07.380
<v Speaker 2>I mean... Honestly, the whole thing is just pathetic. We've

0:02:07.420 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 2>done all of this for you, mate, and you don't

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.500
<v Speaker 2>look like you want to be there. Anyway, I thought

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.019
<v Speaker 2>that was exceedingly funny. And, of course, I talk about

0:02:16.060 --> 0:02:18.660
<v Speaker 2>the cost of it. He doesn't want to own up

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:20.299
<v Speaker 2>to the cost of all of this.

0:02:21.580 --> 0:02:23.620
<v Speaker 4>Well, certainly it is a good spend of Australia's taxpayers' money.

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.700
<v Speaker 4>This is our most important diplomatic engagement in the Pacific,

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 4>certainly this term, probably for longer than this term. It's

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.730
<v Speaker 4>out of the $ 147 million allocation in the budget for

0:02:33.850 --> 0:02:35.890
<v Speaker 4>increased Pacific engagement on climate issues.

0:02:35.930 --> 0:02:36.570
<v Speaker 2>That's a good thing.

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 4>The reports of around $ 20 million.

0:02:39.900 --> 0:02:44.180
<v Speaker 2>Are in the ballpark. They're in the ballpark? Why don't

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.739
<v Speaker 2>you just tell us what you're spending? I mean, he

0:02:46.780 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 2>committed another $ 7 million or thereabouts for renewable projects in

0:02:51.100 --> 0:02:54.100
<v Speaker 2>the Pacific today. What are we actually getting out of this?

0:02:54.870 --> 0:02:57.810
<v Speaker 2>I mean, can you tell me one concrete thing that

0:02:57.830 --> 0:02:59.700
<v Speaker 2>we're getting out of it? I know that We need

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>to do diplomacy in the Pacific because we're worried about

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 2>China and all this sort of stuff. But really, putting

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 2>on a pre-cop conference, the cop you have when you

0:03:09.370 --> 0:03:12.690
<v Speaker 2>can't have a cop, it is a cop-out in Fiji

0:03:13.110 --> 0:03:17.330
<v Speaker 2>to self-aggrandise. Why? What are we getting out of it?

0:03:17.310 --> 0:03:20.970
<v Speaker 2>$ 20 million, I know, in government terms, is small biggies.

0:03:21.590 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 2>They drop that sort of money every day. But in

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:29.340
<v Speaker 2>a cost-of-living crisis... interest rates going up, you're feeling the pinch.

0:03:29.860 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot that can be done with $ 20 million.

0:03:33.780 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 2>But in government land, you go and blow it on

0:03:36.100 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 2>things like that and letting Chris Bowen travel overseas all

0:03:39.580 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 2>over the shop as the cop president of negotiations. Again,

0:03:43.180 --> 0:03:46.410
<v Speaker 2>I still don't know what that actually means. And you

0:03:46.430 --> 0:03:48.230
<v Speaker 2>look at that money and you go, well, surely you

0:03:48.250 --> 0:03:51.650
<v Speaker 2>get some important people in the room to have a chat. Well, no,

0:03:52.330 --> 0:03:56.350
<v Speaker 2>only two leaders from outside the Pacific have turned up

0:03:56.410 --> 0:03:58.750
<v Speaker 2>to this thing. But Mr Bowen says, well, we didn't

0:03:58.790 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 2>expect any different.

0:04:01.390 --> 0:04:04.450
<v Speaker 5>Have you had any last-minute confirmation of attendance from world

0:04:04.490 --> 0:04:08.150
<v Speaker 5>leaders for the summit? Yeah, and Sally, I think it's

0:04:08.190 --> 0:04:12.220
<v Speaker 5>important to note that pre-cop is normally a pretty pedestrian affair.

0:04:12.250 --> 0:04:15.180
<v Speaker 1>World leaders do not normally attend pre-cop at all. Prime

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.620
<v Speaker 1>Ministers and Presidents normally do not come to pre-cop. We

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.580
<v Speaker 1>have some coming.

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah, Sally. Goodness sakes. If it's a pedestrian event,

0:04:25.300 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>why are we paying $ 20 million for it? As I say,

0:04:30.230 --> 0:04:34.489
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing was a vanity project for the climate

0:04:34.529 --> 0:04:39.150
<v Speaker 2>change minister, Chris Bowen. $ 20 million, at least, up the

0:04:39.170 --> 0:04:42.450
<v Speaker 2>wall on it. But it's a really pedestrian event. It

0:04:42.510 --> 0:04:47.020
<v Speaker 2>is just all so exceedingly pointless. And not even he

0:04:47.700 --> 0:04:50.970
<v Speaker 2>looks like he wants to be there. Now, we're often

0:04:51.029 --> 0:04:53.810
<v Speaker 2>told that education is one of our biggest exports. You know,

0:04:53.830 --> 0:04:57.370
<v Speaker 2>international students are so important to this country. And, of course,

0:04:57.510 --> 0:04:59.650
<v Speaker 2>it is one of our biggest exports, not as a

0:05:00.070 --> 0:05:04.030
<v Speaker 2>physical thing, but as something that we produce in this country,

0:05:04.050 --> 0:05:06.350
<v Speaker 2>something that we give to the rest of the world.

0:05:06.390 --> 0:05:09.750
<v Speaker 2>That is education. But the importance of that has clearly

0:05:09.770 --> 0:05:13.860
<v Speaker 2>become so overstated that it is now affecting the quality

0:05:14.380 --> 0:05:16.820
<v Speaker 2>of what is produced in universities. Have a listen to this.

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.260
<v Speaker 2>This is a story... in the News Corp papers today

0:05:20.420 --> 0:05:25.020
<v Speaker 2>about just how much universities have changed because of international students.

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 2>It says, quote, An Adelaide mother said she was horrified

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.670
<v Speaker 2>after her daughter had a catch-up class in the fourth

0:05:31.730 --> 0:05:35.510
<v Speaker 2>year of her undergraduate medical degree and reported that almost

0:05:35.710 --> 0:05:39.669
<v Speaker 2>all the students in attendance were international. The tutor, she

0:05:39.710 --> 0:05:43.950
<v Speaker 2>was told, spoke Mandarin throughout. It comes as new data

0:05:43.970 --> 0:05:46.980
<v Speaker 2>reveals international students now make up almost one in three

0:05:47.020 --> 0:05:50.750
<v Speaker 2>tertiary students in Australia... most of them from China, India

0:05:50.830 --> 0:05:54.530
<v Speaker 2>and Nepal. Australia's intake is almost triple the average for

0:05:54.570 --> 0:05:58.690
<v Speaker 2>comparably wealthy nations. And this is the mother being quoted here.

0:05:59.330 --> 0:06:01.820
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what a reasonable percentage of international students

0:06:01.860 --> 0:06:04.260
<v Speaker 2>would be, but if we have a number that is

0:06:04.300 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 2>influencing teaching, then it's too many, said the mother of

0:06:07.900 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the student. Our domestic students, our kids, should not be

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 2>compromised by other students. I mean, that is ridiculous. How

0:06:15.779 --> 0:06:19.830
<v Speaker 2>can we have university classes, lectures... being taught in this

0:06:19.930 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>country to Australian students in Mandarin because so many of

0:06:24.580 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>the students in the classroom are international. I mean, there's

0:06:28.460 --> 0:06:31.380
<v Speaker 2>nothing wrong with having foreign students. It is, of course,

0:06:31.420 --> 0:06:34.260
<v Speaker 2>a compliment to Australia that all of these people want

0:06:34.300 --> 0:06:37.429
<v Speaker 2>to come from overseas to get an education in our country.

0:06:37.450 --> 0:06:40.469
<v Speaker 2>It means that we're giving a good education and they're

0:06:40.490 --> 0:06:42.370
<v Speaker 2>getting some of the best in the world in Australia.

0:06:42.710 --> 0:06:45.190
<v Speaker 2>That's great. But we also have to think about the

0:06:45.250 --> 0:06:48.770
<v Speaker 2>kids in Australia... who want to go to university. They

0:06:48.850 --> 0:06:53.070
<v Speaker 2>also deserve to get a good education. But clearly, the

0:06:53.110 --> 0:06:57.029
<v Speaker 2>quality is slipping, and universities are even being lenient with students,

0:06:57.110 --> 0:07:00.530
<v Speaker 2>particularly international students, because, of course, they want to get

0:07:00.630 --> 0:07:03.100
<v Speaker 2>their money. This is also from that article in the

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.659
<v Speaker 2>News Corp papers today. One professor who asked to remain

0:07:06.779 --> 0:07:10.860
<v Speaker 2>anonymous for fear of retribution said that while international education

0:07:10.900 --> 0:07:14.700
<v Speaker 2>served a valuable form of soft power, high enrolment had

0:07:14.780 --> 0:07:21.660
<v Speaker 2>compromised academic integrity... surrounding deferred exams. He's then quoted, these

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:26.060
<v Speaker 2>occur when students miss a scheduled proctored exam because of illness.

0:07:26.100 --> 0:07:28.730
<v Speaker 2>Students who are sick on their exam day are being

0:07:28.790 --> 0:07:33.530
<v Speaker 2>allowed to sit an inadequately invigilated deferred exam in their

0:07:33.590 --> 0:07:35.510
<v Speaker 2>home country. For those who are not aware of the

0:07:35.570 --> 0:07:40.990
<v Speaker 2>word invigilated, it means proper oversight. To be clear, local

0:07:41.030 --> 0:07:45.290
<v Speaker 2>students are also sitting inadequately invigilated deferred exams in The

0:07:45.330 --> 0:07:47.790
<v Speaker 2>main reason they are not being forced to attend campus

0:07:47.830 --> 0:07:50.990
<v Speaker 2>for a proper exam is that the university is reluctant

0:07:51.030 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>to have such rules when there are lots of students overseas.

0:07:55.100 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>So we have students studying at Australian universities, being able

0:07:59.860 --> 0:08:02.460
<v Speaker 2>to take exams in their home countries, and they're not

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.370
<v Speaker 2>properly supervised because they call in sick on the day

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.010
<v Speaker 2>of an exam. And because of that, the unis are

0:08:10.050 --> 0:08:12.790
<v Speaker 2>too scared to make the Australian students sit their proper

0:08:12.830 --> 0:08:15.500
<v Speaker 2>exams too. Because of course they can't be seen to

0:08:15.540 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 2>have a double standard. I mean this is clearly a

0:08:18.500 --> 0:08:21.260
<v Speaker 2>system that is open to being rorted, that is open

0:08:21.300 --> 0:08:25.310
<v Speaker 2>to being abused, cheating, all sorts. And yet nothing seems

0:08:25.350 --> 0:08:28.230
<v Speaker 2>to be done about it because, oh well, education is

0:08:28.290 --> 0:08:32.090
<v Speaker 2>one of our biggest exports. The real problem is that

0:08:32.190 --> 0:08:35.970
<v Speaker 2>universities have lost sight of their actual purpose. They've become

0:08:36.010 --> 0:08:39.710
<v Speaker 2>money-making machines. They can get an international student in, paying

0:08:39.750 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>full-toed odds. You know, they do in many cases. It

0:08:43.270 --> 0:08:47.780
<v Speaker 2>would seem, prefer to have them over a local student

0:08:48.300 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 2>because it makes them cash money. Of course, every business,

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 2>every operation has to make money in order to do

0:08:53.460 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 2>what it does. But let's not forget that universities receive

0:08:56.820 --> 0:09:00.900
<v Speaker 2>huge amounts of public funding. That is funding from the taxpayers.

0:09:00.940 --> 0:09:03.900
<v Speaker 2>It's not government money, it's your money. It's my money

0:09:04.370 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 2>that's being given to these universities. And we do that

0:09:07.580 --> 0:09:09.459
<v Speaker 2>because we want people in this country to get a

0:09:09.460 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>good education and we want this country to be a

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 2>better place. We want to train up the doctors and

0:09:14.420 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the lawyers and whatever else for the future of this country.

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.500
<v Speaker 2>But the balance is out of whack now. The universities

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:26.180
<v Speaker 2>care far too much about enriching themselves rather than enriching

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 2>the country and the students who go there. I mean,

0:09:29.500 --> 0:09:31.980
<v Speaker 2>just think about it for a moment. You have young

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:36.260
<v Speaker 2>Australians going to universities and reporting that the classes are

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:40.470
<v Speaker 2>being taught in Mandarin. I mean, that's clearly not what

0:09:40.650 --> 0:09:43.330
<v Speaker 2>is best for the country. It's not about what's best

0:09:43.370 --> 0:09:45.949
<v Speaker 2>for the country. It's about what's best for the university.

0:09:46.830 --> 0:09:49.870
<v Speaker 2>And that's not the point of a university existing. And

0:09:49.890 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 2>if that's how universities are going to operate, then they

0:09:52.660 --> 0:09:55.420
<v Speaker 2>don't deserve to be funded in the way that they are.

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:59.380
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they should be there to make this country better.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 2>not to make another country better. And that's not to

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 2>say that we shouldn't take international students, but it is

0:10:05.620 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 2>to say that the first priority of an Australian university

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:14.380
<v Speaker 2>should be to improve Australia. Between 2015 and 2024, on

0:10:14.460 --> 0:10:18.340
<v Speaker 2>average across the OECD, the share of international students rose

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.630
<v Speaker 2>by four percentage points. In Australia, it rose by 16

0:10:22.630 --> 0:10:26.060
<v Speaker 2>percentage points. The only other country with a higher proportion

0:10:26.100 --> 0:10:29.900
<v Speaker 2>of international students relative to the total student population in

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the world is Luxembourg. Australia has the second highest concentration

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 2>of international students in the world. And that's not necessarily

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.569
<v Speaker 2>in and of itself a bad thing. But it certainly

0:10:41.610 --> 0:10:43.910
<v Speaker 2>is a bad thing when that starts to affect the

0:10:44.030 --> 0:10:47.849
<v Speaker 2>quality of a university's output and the quality of education

0:10:48.110 --> 0:10:52.540
<v Speaker 2>that Australian students receive. The rot, I think, really started

0:10:53.220 --> 0:10:56.540
<v Speaker 2>under the Gillard government when they uncapped university enrolments. They

0:10:56.580 --> 0:10:59.660
<v Speaker 2>basically said, come one, come all, everyone should go to university.

0:11:00.330 --> 0:11:04.910
<v Speaker 2>And it's made university almost an extension of someone's school education.

0:11:05.470 --> 0:11:08.830
<v Speaker 2>Going into uni is now for many students not just

0:11:08.870 --> 0:11:13.150
<v Speaker 2>an option, but almost an expectation. It's kind of suggested

0:11:13.210 --> 0:11:16.030
<v Speaker 2>in school that you ought to go to university after

0:11:16.050 --> 0:11:18.660
<v Speaker 2>you finish school. But the reality is there are a

0:11:18.660 --> 0:11:21.550
<v Speaker 2>lot of kids who aren't suited to university and shouldn't

0:11:21.590 --> 0:11:23.710
<v Speaker 2>be going to university. They should be going off learning

0:11:23.730 --> 0:11:26.449
<v Speaker 2>a trade or doing something practical. But many of them

0:11:26.550 --> 0:11:28.430
<v Speaker 2>feel like they have to go to university or that

0:11:28.450 --> 0:11:31.229
<v Speaker 2>they should go to university, and they end up dropping

0:11:31.330 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>out because they don't really want to be there. Not

0:11:34.300 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 2>that the university cares, because they get the money anyway.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.100
<v Speaker 2>If you enrol, you're there for at least a year.

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 2>The university gets its funding, and that really would seem

0:11:43.460 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 2>to be all they care about. We need... to fix this,

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.900
<v Speaker 2>and we need to fix it now, because the universities

0:11:49.940 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 2>are greedy enough as it is, and if we keep

0:11:52.179 --> 0:11:55.489
<v Speaker 2>letting them get away with this, well, they'll clearly only

0:11:55.550 --> 0:11:59.569
<v Speaker 2>become greedier. And the universities would be hoping that we

0:11:59.630 --> 0:12:02.050
<v Speaker 2>keep the tap of international students on, because we're not

0:12:02.110 --> 0:12:05.370
<v Speaker 2>having babies. I mean, the royal we, of course. You

0:12:05.410 --> 0:12:07.910
<v Speaker 2>and I are not having babies, though who knows? The

0:12:07.950 --> 0:12:10.709
<v Speaker 2>night is young. But we have a big problem with

0:12:10.730 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the birth rate. Now, to be fair, it isn't new.

0:12:13.420 --> 0:12:16.170
<v Speaker 2>We haven't achieved the replacement rate that is expected the

0:12:16.210 --> 0:12:18.589
<v Speaker 2>number of children that women need to have in order

0:12:18.610 --> 0:12:21.569
<v Speaker 2>for the population to replace itself for about 40 years

0:12:21.630 --> 0:12:24.890
<v Speaker 2>in this country. But it is now at historic lows,

0:12:24.980 --> 0:12:26.700
<v Speaker 2>which is part of the reason, of course, that we're

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:30.860
<v Speaker 2>so reliant on migration. If we're not producing people here,

0:12:30.900 --> 0:12:33.099
<v Speaker 2>then we get them from somewhere else. And there are

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of implications for that. I mean, if someone

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.580
<v Speaker 2>is born here, let's say he goes off to work

0:12:37.620 --> 0:12:40.210
<v Speaker 2>at 14 and spends most, if not all, of his

0:12:40.260 --> 0:12:43.970
<v Speaker 2>working life working in Australia... it means that he spends

0:12:44.010 --> 0:12:46.660
<v Speaker 2>his whole working life contributing to the tax pot of

0:12:46.700 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 2>this country, and that's the tax pot from which all

0:12:49.340 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the services and the welfare and the health care is paid.

0:12:52.100 --> 0:12:53.700
<v Speaker 2>So when the kid who was born here and works

0:12:53.740 --> 0:12:55.719
<v Speaker 2>here his whole life gets to old age and he

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.710
<v Speaker 2>needs to use health services more or draws on a pension,

0:12:59.309 --> 0:13:01.810
<v Speaker 2>he's spent his whole working life contributing tax to the

0:13:01.850 --> 0:13:04.930
<v Speaker 2>pot from which that is paid. Whereas if someone moves

0:13:04.950 --> 0:13:07.070
<v Speaker 2>to this country when they're 40 and then they retire

0:13:07.090 --> 0:13:10.220
<v Speaker 2>at 67 or whatever it might be, when they need

0:13:10.250 --> 0:13:12.980
<v Speaker 2>health care and if they need a pension... they have

0:13:13.010 --> 0:13:16.900
<v Speaker 2>spent less time contributing into that pot from which that comes.

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 2>It's entirely likely that a migrant costs the country more

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.060
<v Speaker 2>in the long run because they have contributed less in

0:13:23.100 --> 0:13:26.900
<v Speaker 2>tax to this country over their lifetime. And this isn't

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.650
<v Speaker 2>just a problem in Australia. It's a problem across the

0:13:29.690 --> 0:13:32.069
<v Speaker 2>Western world. It's a problem across a lot of Asia.

0:13:32.670 --> 0:13:34.890
<v Speaker 2>Most of the countries with a positive birth rate, that

0:13:34.950 --> 0:13:39.110
<v Speaker 2>is natural population growth without the need for migration, are

0:13:39.150 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 2>in sub-Saharan Africa and some countries in the Middle East.

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 2>So these are, by and large, countries where conditions aren't

0:13:45.460 --> 0:13:47.660
<v Speaker 2>great and there's not a lot of birth control, and

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 2>also countries where it's basically, literally, populate or perish. Well,

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.300
<v Speaker 2>Jim Penman reckons he has a solution. He is Jim

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 2>of Jim's Mowing and all the other Jim franchises. He's

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.260
<v Speaker 2>just written a book on his theory as to why

0:14:01.300 --> 0:14:03.230
<v Speaker 2>the birth rate is so low. Take a look.

0:14:04.190 --> 0:14:07.410
<v Speaker 6>He's built an empire out of mowing lawns. Now Jim

0:14:07.450 --> 0:14:10.970
<v Speaker 6>Penman wants to reverse Australia's falling birth rate.

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 7>The brain becomes adjusted. It becomes adjusted to this surge

0:14:15.300 --> 0:14:17.460
<v Speaker 7>of dopamine and it becomes less sensitive.

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.260
<v Speaker 6>In his new book, the businessman sells his theory that

0:14:21.300 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 6>we're having fewer children because we're getting much more dopamine

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 6>than we need. He says social media, junk food, alcohol,

0:14:29.540 --> 0:14:33.140
<v Speaker 6>pornography and sex is overstimulating Aussie brains.

0:14:33.750 --> 0:14:39.180
<v Speaker 7>Ordinary things of life like family, children, work, faith, community

0:14:39.220 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 7>become less and less appealing.

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.220
<v Speaker 6>Australia's fertility rate has fallen to just under one and

0:14:44.260 --> 0:14:47.700
<v Speaker 6>a half children per woman, well below the replacement rate

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 6>of 2.1.

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.190
<v Speaker 2>Now look, I thought alcohol and sex often led to babies.

0:14:53.140 --> 0:14:55.460
<v Speaker 2>sexist sort of you know integral to the whole thing

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 2>now i'm not sure how much of his argument i

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:00.500
<v Speaker 2>buy that it's about the fact that we have too

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 2>much dopamine effectively what he's saying is that there are

0:15:03.540 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 2>all these other things in our lives that we can

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 2>do and so by comparison to that having children doesn't

0:15:09.970 --> 0:15:12.230
<v Speaker 2>give us the high that it once did i'm not

0:15:12.310 --> 0:15:15.070
<v Speaker 2>sure that is entirely right i mean ask anyone who

0:15:15.130 --> 0:15:17.290
<v Speaker 2>has children they will tell you it's the best thing

0:15:17.330 --> 0:15:22.260
<v Speaker 2>they've ever done There is a natural, innate, biological desire

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 2>built into us to have children. It's more or less

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:28.150
<v Speaker 2>built into every species because we've evolved that way. If

0:15:28.190 --> 0:15:31.470
<v Speaker 2>we don't procreate, we die as a species. And generally,

0:15:31.710 --> 0:15:34.310
<v Speaker 2>we are designed to not let that happen. But I

0:15:34.330 --> 0:15:36.229
<v Speaker 2>think there might be a kernel of truth in it

0:15:36.810 --> 0:15:39.330
<v Speaker 2>because we are more distracted than we've ever been. We

0:15:39.380 --> 0:15:43.620
<v Speaker 2>are busier than we've ever been. We're bombarded with more information.

0:15:44.290 --> 0:15:48.250
<v Speaker 2>than we ever have been. Communication is constant. You don't

0:15:48.270 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 2>have to wait for a letter or a telegram to arrive.

0:15:51.250 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to wait for the morning paper or

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.540
<v Speaker 2>the afternoon paper. You just send an email or a

0:15:56.580 --> 0:15:58.660
<v Speaker 2>text message or you pick up the phone or you

0:15:58.700 --> 0:16:01.260
<v Speaker 2>pick up your smartphone and see what's going on in

0:16:01.300 --> 0:16:05.820
<v Speaker 2>the world. Go on social media. Everything is instant. And

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.650
<v Speaker 2>to some degree, that does lead to instant gratification, which

0:16:08.730 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 2>may give some validity to Jim Penman's dopamine argument. I

0:16:12.790 --> 0:16:15.700
<v Speaker 2>do worry that technology in the world has evolved much

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:19.420
<v Speaker 2>faster than the structure of our brains has, and so

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 2>that maybe we're not fully equipped to live in the

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.540
<v Speaker 2>world in which we now live. But as it relates

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 2>to having children, I think there are two big problems.

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 2>In order to have children, number one, you need connection.

0:16:31.300 --> 0:16:33.780
<v Speaker 2>That is, you need to find someone to have children

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 2>with and someone that you want to have children with.

0:16:37.190 --> 0:16:40.470
<v Speaker 2>And two, you need the right economic conditions in which

0:16:40.490 --> 0:16:43.070
<v Speaker 2>to have children. And so maybe we should think about

0:16:43.170 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>why across the Western world, where we are allegedly wealthy,

0:16:48.060 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 2>we are having fewer children than ever. Firstly, on connection,

0:16:53.100 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 2>we live in a world more connected than ever. Thank you.

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.330
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to technology. I mean, you can talk to anyone

0:16:59.370 --> 0:17:02.430
<v Speaker 2>in any part of the world at any time, and

0:17:02.470 --> 0:17:07.420
<v Speaker 2>yet we're more disconnected than ever. An October 2022 survey

0:17:07.900 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 2>of loneliness found that more than a third of Australian

0:17:10.820 --> 0:17:14.859
<v Speaker 2>adults felt lonely in the week prior. Those aged 18

0:17:14.859 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>to 24 reported the highest levels of loneliness. According to

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 2>the Black Dog Institute, depression among young Australian adults increased 72%

0:17:25.300 --> 0:17:30.770
<v Speaker 2>in the 14 years to 2022. Something is very clearly wrong,

0:17:31.030 --> 0:17:33.510
<v Speaker 2>despite all these ways we now have to connect with

0:17:33.550 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 2>each other. we are less connected than we've ever been.

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 2>So that's a real problem. If people are feeling lonely,

0:17:40.859 --> 0:17:44.460
<v Speaker 2>and particularly young people are feeling lonely, and people aren't meeting,

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.300
<v Speaker 2>then they're not finding the opportunities to find a partner

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.060
<v Speaker 2>with whom they would have children. And of course, there's

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:53.820
<v Speaker 2>an app for everything now. You know, I want to

0:17:53.859 --> 0:17:55.740
<v Speaker 2>find a partner, get on an app, swipe, swipe, swipe.

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.899
<v Speaker 2>It's like a smorgasbord, right? And you might be messaging

0:17:59.900 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 2>10 different people, and you're not really invested in anything.

0:18:03.180 --> 0:18:06.330
<v Speaker 2>It's just not working. But even those who do find

0:18:06.369 --> 0:18:09.070
<v Speaker 2>a partner with whom to have children, I think, struggle

0:18:09.109 --> 0:18:13.430
<v Speaker 2>to justify having children today. And that is an economic question.

0:18:14.070 --> 0:18:16.190
<v Speaker 2>This goes back to what I was talking about last

0:18:16.250 --> 0:18:20.070
<v Speaker 2>night about single-income families. Having and raising children just used

0:18:20.130 --> 0:18:23.090
<v Speaker 2>to be easier. You used to be able to do

0:18:23.130 --> 0:18:25.630
<v Speaker 2>it with a parent at home, usually mum, just like

0:18:25.670 --> 0:18:30.090
<v Speaker 2>my childhood, but now that's virtually impossible for most Australian families.

0:18:30.109 --> 0:18:32.830
<v Speaker 2>A lot of young couples don't own their own home

0:18:33.190 --> 0:18:35.830
<v Speaker 2>because they can't afford to. For a lot of people,

0:18:36.050 --> 0:18:38.669
<v Speaker 2>the right conditions for saying, I feel like I'm in

0:18:38.690 --> 0:18:42.190
<v Speaker 2>a good place to start a family, simply don't exist.

0:18:42.910 --> 0:18:46.250
<v Speaker 2>People delay having families now, particularly because women are in

0:18:46.290 --> 0:18:49.150
<v Speaker 2>the workforce. And don't take this to be me saying

0:18:49.190 --> 0:18:51.470
<v Speaker 2>that women should not be in the workforce. But I

0:18:51.510 --> 0:18:53.810
<v Speaker 2>think we also need to be upfront about the fact

0:18:54.090 --> 0:18:56.550
<v Speaker 2>that women being in the workforce, to the extent that

0:18:56.590 --> 0:18:59.030
<v Speaker 2>they are, and almost being expected to be in the

0:18:59.070 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 2>workforce in a way that they weren't 50 years ago,

0:19:02.330 --> 0:19:04.810
<v Speaker 2>has had an effect on the family unit and the

0:19:04.869 --> 0:19:08.250
<v Speaker 2>desire for people to start families. And if that works

0:19:08.310 --> 0:19:10.790
<v Speaker 2>for you, that's great. But I think there are a

0:19:10.790 --> 0:19:13.270
<v Speaker 2>lot of people and a lot of couples who would

0:19:13.410 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 2>love to have children, or maybe they have one child

0:19:16.420 --> 0:19:19.859
<v Speaker 2>and they'd like to have more, but the economic circumstances

0:19:20.180 --> 0:19:23.550
<v Speaker 2>and the circumstances of their lives prevent them from doing it.

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.290
<v Speaker 2>And so it's great that we're a world-leading economy and

0:19:27.310 --> 0:19:30.210
<v Speaker 2>we're all allegedly so wealthy, But in all of this

0:19:30.310 --> 0:19:32.689
<v Speaker 2>economic growth, I think we've lost sight of things that

0:19:32.770 --> 0:19:36.500
<v Speaker 2>really do matter to humanity. How can it be that

0:19:36.540 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 2>we have all these advancements and yet when it comes

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 2>to the most basic biological desire to further your family line,

0:19:44.670 --> 0:19:48.609
<v Speaker 2>we've made things harder? It's something that as the West

0:19:48.650 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 2>we have to confront and we have to confront it fast.

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 2>Because if we don't do something about it, if we

0:19:53.940 --> 0:19:57.220
<v Speaker 2>don't figure out what's going wrong, it will eventually be

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the end of the West. Now apparently first class cabins

0:20:02.180 --> 0:20:04.609
<v Speaker 2>are disappearing from international flights. And you might look at

0:20:04.630 --> 0:20:07.010
<v Speaker 2>this story and say, ah, well, who cares? I can't

0:20:07.050 --> 0:20:09.270
<v Speaker 2>afford to fly first class, so it doesn't matter. But

0:20:09.790 --> 0:20:11.870
<v Speaker 2>I think it does actually matter. It's not so much

0:20:12.369 --> 0:20:15.409
<v Speaker 2>just about the fact that first-class cabins are disappearing, but

0:20:15.450 --> 0:20:17.970
<v Speaker 2>what it says about airlines in general and also just

0:20:18.490 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 2>service more broadly in the way that we deal with businesses.

0:20:22.220 --> 0:20:25.300
<v Speaker 2>This is via Robin Ironside, who's the aviation writer at

0:20:25.340 --> 0:20:30.379
<v Speaker 2>The Australian. First-class cabins are rapidly becoming an endangered species

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 2>on aircraft as airlines instead opt for a front-row business

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:38.030
<v Speaker 2>plus offering to keep passengers wanting a little bit extra happy.

0:20:38.590 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Air New Zealand, United Airlines, American Airlines and Oman Air

0:20:42.380 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 2>are among those who have upgraded their first row with

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 2>more space, enhanced privacy and exclusive amenities. Qantas appears to

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 2>be following suit with its design for a new internationally

0:20:53.560 --> 0:21:00.690
<v Speaker 2>configured A321XLRs arriving from 2028 featuring roomier first row seats

0:21:00.770 --> 0:21:03.770
<v Speaker 2>than the rest of the business class cabin. And why

0:21:03.790 --> 0:21:06.710
<v Speaker 2>are they doing this? Well, why do you think? Because

0:21:06.770 --> 0:21:10.139
<v Speaker 2>it makes them more money. The article goes on..... and

0:21:10.180 --> 0:21:12.490
<v Speaker 2>also require more cabin crew. That's all very expensive for airlines,

0:21:12.510 --> 0:21:13.370
<v Speaker 2>Mr Trim said.

0:21:30.150 --> 0:21:32.820
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, we've seen business class get better

0:21:32.859 --> 0:21:35.699
<v Speaker 2>and better over the years with the sliding privacy doors

0:21:35.740 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 2>and the lie-flat beds and aisle access for everyone. So

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 2>why would you bother with first class? The addition of

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 2>business plus seats also meant extra dollars for airlines able

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.500
<v Speaker 2>to charge a premium on already high business class fares

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:50.739
<v Speaker 2>for the privilege of sitting in the front row with

0:21:50.790 --> 0:21:54.179
<v Speaker 2>added benefits. So what you do? is take a top-end

0:21:54.220 --> 0:21:56.619
<v Speaker 2>product and then make a version of the product below

0:21:56.660 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 2>it that's slightly better than it used to be, and

0:21:59.180 --> 0:22:01.139
<v Speaker 2>then you try and sell that as the top-end product.

0:22:01.570 --> 0:22:03.570
<v Speaker 2>And then, of course, you charge a premium for that

0:22:03.890 --> 0:22:06.330
<v Speaker 2>slightly better product that isn't as good as the product

0:22:06.350 --> 0:22:08.649
<v Speaker 2>that you used to have at the top end, and

0:22:08.690 --> 0:22:13.030
<v Speaker 2>you make more money for delivering less. And as I say,

0:22:13.109 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, it may not bother most people because most

0:22:15.660 --> 0:22:17.420
<v Speaker 2>people can't afford to fly first class.

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:18.220
<v Speaker 1>It's a luxury.

0:22:19.030 --> 0:22:21.690
<v Speaker 2>But it's not just first class where this stuff is happening.

0:22:21.970 --> 0:22:23.930
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the service you get from airlines in general,

0:22:23.990 --> 0:22:25.709
<v Speaker 2>I think, is far worse than it used to be.

0:22:26.210 --> 0:22:28.230
<v Speaker 2>The quality of the service on board is worse than

0:22:28.270 --> 0:22:30.090
<v Speaker 2>it used to be. But the cost of the product

0:22:30.130 --> 0:22:33.430
<v Speaker 2>doesn't decrease at all. We're paying more and getting less.

0:22:33.450 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look at Jetstar. From next year, they're going

0:22:36.619 --> 0:22:40.379
<v Speaker 2>to charge you extra to have overhead carry-on baggage. And

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 2>they say that's to make the service better. I mean,

0:22:42.740 --> 0:22:46.140
<v Speaker 2>what rubbish. It's all about selling you the same product

0:22:46.420 --> 0:22:48.770
<v Speaker 2>that they've always sold you but being able to make

0:22:48.810 --> 0:22:51.610
<v Speaker 2>more money out of it. And it's not just the airlines.

0:22:51.830 --> 0:22:54.889
<v Speaker 2>It's like shrinkflation when you go to the supermarket, when

0:22:54.910 --> 0:22:57.109
<v Speaker 2>the packet of biscuits might cost the same as it

0:22:57.190 --> 0:23:01.909
<v Speaker 2>used to, but now it's 150 grams instead of 200 grams. Everywhere,

0:23:02.070 --> 0:23:05.649
<v Speaker 2>everyone is cutting corners and the service gets worse and

0:23:05.670 --> 0:23:09.550
<v Speaker 2>the products get smaller. How long can this actually go

0:23:09.650 --> 0:23:11.990
<v Speaker 2>on for? I mean, how long until the size of

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:13.859
<v Speaker 2>a block of chocolate gets down to the size of

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.419
<v Speaker 2>a chocolate bar? Once you've worked out how to make

0:23:16.770 --> 0:23:19.090
<v Speaker 2>more money by getting rid of first class and having

0:23:19.190 --> 0:23:21.950
<v Speaker 2>premium business instead, then where do you go from there?

0:23:22.530 --> 0:23:24.870
<v Speaker 2>What's the next thing that you compromise or get rid

0:23:24.970 --> 0:23:28.710
<v Speaker 2>of or change in order to make more money? Surely

0:23:28.750 --> 0:23:32.190
<v Speaker 2>this is all ultimately a race to the bottom. I mean,

0:23:32.290 --> 0:23:34.689
<v Speaker 2>you know, on a Qantas domestic flight, you used to,

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 2>as standard, get a hot meal. Now you're lucky to

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 2>get a snack or a sandwich. They haven't made you

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 2>fare any cheaper, have they? And I don't know if

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 2>this is airlines responding to us or us responding to airlines,

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 2>probably both. But to me, the world has just become

0:23:49.580 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 2>a little too casual. I mean, flying used to be

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.910
<v Speaker 2>an exciting thing. People would get dressed up to go

0:23:55.970 --> 0:23:57.990
<v Speaker 2>on a plane or go to the airport and the

0:23:58.030 --> 0:24:01.930
<v Speaker 2>service on board matched it. It felt important. You felt important.

0:24:02.410 --> 0:24:04.629
<v Speaker 2>But now it's a bit like, oh, well, it is

0:24:04.690 --> 0:24:07.390
<v Speaker 2>what it is. You know, people get on planes looking

0:24:07.430 --> 0:24:09.990
<v Speaker 2>like they just rolled out of bed. And if that's

0:24:10.010 --> 0:24:12.130
<v Speaker 2>the way you're acting and that's the level of effort

0:24:12.470 --> 0:24:15.550
<v Speaker 2>that you put in, then I suppose you can't really

0:24:15.650 --> 0:24:18.370
<v Speaker 2>expect a great deal of effort from those serving you either.

0:24:18.390 --> 0:24:21.550
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we all wonder, where's the effort and the

0:24:21.590 --> 0:24:26.270
<v Speaker 2>service gone? But where's our effort gone? I suspect this

0:24:26.310 --> 0:24:28.290
<v Speaker 2>is just a symptom of the way that the world

0:24:28.350 --> 0:24:30.889
<v Speaker 2>has gone. We don't put in the same effort that

0:24:30.930 --> 0:24:33.129
<v Speaker 2>we used to, and we don't put the same importance

0:24:33.190 --> 0:24:36.990
<v Speaker 2>on things that we used to. Presentation used to be important.

0:24:37.369 --> 0:24:40.470
<v Speaker 2>Appearance used to be important. Now you have people rocking

0:24:40.530 --> 0:24:43.810
<v Speaker 2>around the office in sneakers. If that's the sort of

0:24:43.890 --> 0:24:47.090
<v Speaker 2>effort that's now permissible in the office, then is it

0:24:47.150 --> 0:24:50.230
<v Speaker 2>any surprise that that would flow onto the way that

0:24:50.250 --> 0:24:54.090
<v Speaker 2>businesses treat us? I don't know. Maybe I'm an old

0:24:54.150 --> 0:24:58.130
<v Speaker 2>fuddy-duddy yearning for days that don't exist anymore. But I'd

0:24:58.210 --> 0:25:01.710
<v Speaker 2>say look around you and ask yourself, are we really

0:25:01.910 --> 0:25:05.590
<v Speaker 2>any better off for being this way? All right, stick

0:25:05.630 --> 0:25:07.650
<v Speaker 2>around after the break. There's plenty more to talk about

0:25:07.670 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 2>with our panel tonight, including Ben Carroll's pledge... that he

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 2>won't accept any support from the Greens and why he

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.939
<v Speaker 2>says Jess Wilson should do the same with One Nation.

0:25:16.020 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Don't go away. Caleb Bond in for Paul this week.

0:25:23.060 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get into the panel. Joining me now,

0:25:24.859 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Nationals MP Sam Birrell and Melbourne Lord Mayor Nick Rees.

0:25:28.340 --> 0:25:32.380
<v Speaker 2>Good to see you both. Stories just dropped on the

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Sydney Morning Herald and The Age in the last couple

0:25:34.660 --> 0:25:38.230
<v Speaker 2>of hours. The coalition is set to announce a migration

0:25:38.770 --> 0:25:42.869
<v Speaker 2>plan tomorrow and quite a serious plan by the sounds

0:25:42.970 --> 0:25:46.150
<v Speaker 2>of it. The SMH has been told that the coalition

0:25:46.190 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 2>would reduce migration in the first year of government, if

0:25:50.180 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 2>it were to win an election, to 100,000. Sam, what

0:25:53.020 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 2>more can you tell us?

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Not much more than that, Paul.

0:25:58.380 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 8>I'm not going to, sorry, Caleb, I'm not going to

0:26:00.020 --> 0:26:03.959
<v Speaker 8>speculate on what's yet to be announced. We will have

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:08.370
<v Speaker 8>a migration policy that is sensible. It reduces migration to

0:26:08.410 --> 0:26:11.730
<v Speaker 8>sustainable levels but won't affect the way that the economy

0:26:11.790 --> 0:26:14.969
<v Speaker 8>operates in Australia. So we do need skilled people and

0:26:15.010 --> 0:26:18.550
<v Speaker 8>working holidaymakers to come here and work. But there is

0:26:18.570 --> 0:26:21.469
<v Speaker 8>a lot of people on temporary visas here and we

0:26:21.510 --> 0:26:22.590
<v Speaker 8>need to get that under control.

0:26:23.170 --> 0:26:25.689
<v Speaker 2>I mean, 100,000 is even less than what One Nation

0:26:25.710 --> 0:26:30.190
<v Speaker 2>was originally talking about, right? So it's a pretty serious cut.

0:26:30.430 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's good, but it's a pretty serious cut.

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:39.100
<v Speaker 8>Well, again, Caleb, it's speculation that the age and the

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:40.699
<v Speaker 8>Sydney Morning Herald have come out with.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.050
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to comment on it.

0:26:42.460 --> 0:26:47.070
<v Speaker 8>We will make an official announcement when we've finalised that,

0:26:47.150 --> 0:26:48.210
<v Speaker 8>and that will be very soon.

0:26:48.609 --> 0:26:50.750
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, we'll look forward to that tomorrow. Jonathan

0:26:50.790 --> 0:26:53.739
<v Speaker 2>Dunyon will be here with me tomorrow night. Nick, what

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 2>do you make of it?

0:26:55.650 --> 0:26:58.050
<v Speaker 5>Oh, look, I'm worried that when it comes to immigration

0:26:58.369 --> 0:27:00.220
<v Speaker 5>at the moment, we've got a race to the bottom

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:00.859
<v Speaker 5>going on.

0:27:01.580 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we all agree we need, you know.

0:27:04.140 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 5>Strong borders and a well-managed migration scheme, but whipped up

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:14.270
<v Speaker 5>by xenophobia and populism by One Nation, you've now got

0:27:14.330 --> 0:27:20.350
<v Speaker 5>the coalition cutting immigration to levels which will harm Australia.

0:27:20.990 --> 0:27:22.750
<v Speaker 1>You know, Sam lives in Shepparton there.

0:27:23.010 --> 0:27:25.060
<v Speaker 5>I wouldn't be surprised if he has tomatoes thrown at

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.659
<v Speaker 5>him when he walks down the street tomorrow. Tomatoes that

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.979
<v Speaker 5>are rotting on the vines in his electorate because we

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 5>don't have enough people to pick them, to harvest the crops.

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:36.919
<v Speaker 1>And why don't we have enough people?

0:27:36.980 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 5>Because we're not bringing enough people into our country to

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.010
<v Speaker 5>do all the work we need done in this country.

0:27:42.530 --> 0:27:46.830
<v Speaker 5>So we can, this country's been built off the back

0:27:47.150 --> 0:27:52.850
<v Speaker 5>of a large and successful migration scheme. Why that suddenly

0:27:52.930 --> 0:27:56.310
<v Speaker 5>needs to change is beyond me. It's the damaging impact

0:27:56.490 --> 0:27:59.730
<v Speaker 5>of Pauline Hanson and populism in Australia, and it's going

0:27:59.750 --> 0:28:02.070
<v Speaker 5>to affect our economy and our livelihoods.

0:28:03.250 --> 0:28:05.350
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a conflation of two different issues, though.

0:28:05.390 --> 0:28:08.390
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's one thing to say migration numbers should

0:28:08.410 --> 0:28:11.050
<v Speaker 2>be at a certain level, but we can also talk

0:28:11.090 --> 0:28:13.260
<v Speaker 2>about that independently in terms of people who obviously end

0:28:13.340 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 2>up staying in this country for a very long time,

0:28:15.700 --> 0:28:19.900
<v Speaker 2>independently of people, Sam, who come and do temporary work, right?

0:28:20.619 --> 0:28:23.260
<v Speaker 2>And that seems to be where the federal government, Labor,

0:28:23.980 --> 0:28:27.939
<v Speaker 2>is now trying to slash numbers, is backpackers and temporary workers,

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.260
<v Speaker 2>which to me doesn't make any sense. That's not the

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:32.429
<v Speaker 2>real issue here, is it?

0:28:34.030 --> 0:28:36.030
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, you're right. It's a conflation.

0:28:36.170 --> 0:28:38.690
<v Speaker 8>And if Nick knew anything about Shepparton, he would know

0:28:38.730 --> 0:28:42.430
<v Speaker 8>that I'm not going to get tomatoes thrown at me tomorrow.

0:28:42.710 --> 0:28:43.930
<v Speaker 3>Shepparton is one of a.

0:28:43.930 --> 0:28:46.350
<v Speaker 8>Place that's been built on migration and it's very successful.

0:28:46.730 --> 0:28:48.910
<v Speaker 8>But the people who are here who have migrated would

0:28:48.990 --> 0:28:52.670
<v Speaker 8>even say that migration needs to be orderly and it

0:28:52.690 --> 0:28:54.790
<v Speaker 8>needs to be controlled and we need to bring the

0:28:54.830 --> 0:28:57.230
<v Speaker 8>right people with the right skills to the right places.

0:28:57.750 --> 0:29:00.810
<v Speaker 8>And that has not what's been... That has not been

0:29:00.850 --> 0:29:04.770
<v Speaker 8>happening in recent times. And, you know, we've got an

0:29:04.830 --> 0:29:08.890
<v Speaker 8>excess of people in cities and not enough people in

0:29:08.930 --> 0:29:10.270
<v Speaker 8>regional areas to do the work.

0:29:10.330 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 3>So it needs a reduction, but it also needs a rebalancing.

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Can I also ask you as well, Nick? Clearly, we

0:29:17.260 --> 0:29:20.580
<v Speaker 2>have an issue with housing in this country, and that's

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of what this is tied to. Do you

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 2>think it's unfair to say that we shouldn't bring people

0:29:26.340 --> 0:29:28.900
<v Speaker 2>in at a rate faster than we have the ability

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:29.420
<v Speaker 2>to house them?

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 5>No, I think we should bring people in in a

0:29:34.340 --> 0:29:39.210
<v Speaker 5>way that can obviously allow for people to be properly housed.

0:29:40.540 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 5>I think the housing challenges we face in Australia are

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:48.900
<v Speaker 5>only in some small part, however, due to the immigration level.

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:55.180
<v Speaker 5>I think construction costs, supply chain issues, and planning issues

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:59.959
<v Speaker 5>are a much bigger explanation. Certainly, you know, in previous

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.590
<v Speaker 5>times in our history, we have been able to accommodate,

0:30:03.610 --> 0:30:08.230
<v Speaker 5>in percentage terms, significantly larger influxes than we've had in

0:30:08.290 --> 0:30:11.930
<v Speaker 5>recent years and very successfully house those people and see

0:30:12.010 --> 0:30:15.850
<v Speaker 5>Australia get bigger and and better and stronger as a result.

0:30:16.110 --> 0:30:18.030
<v Speaker 5>Just to pick up one of Sam's points, though, I

0:30:18.150 --> 0:30:21.650
<v Speaker 5>strongly support Sam when he says we need an orderly,

0:30:22.290 --> 0:30:27.420
<v Speaker 5>strong and well-regulated immigration system. But what we're seeing at

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:31.670
<v Speaker 5>the moment is an overreaction to a large number of

0:30:31.730 --> 0:30:34.950
<v Speaker 5>people coming here in the years after COVID. Those first

0:30:35.010 --> 0:30:37.290
<v Speaker 5>two years, there was an attempt to play catch up.

0:30:37.850 --> 0:30:39.950
<v Speaker 1>And I think probably things were overdone.

0:30:40.490 --> 0:30:43.930
<v Speaker 5>Ever since then, we've seen immigration numbers cut back very significantly,

0:30:43.970 --> 0:30:48.790
<v Speaker 5>something around 40%. Now we're seeing this ridiculous business of

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.950
<v Speaker 5>immigration numbers being cut back so far that we actually

0:30:52.110 --> 0:30:53.310
<v Speaker 5>don't have the workers.

0:30:53.330 --> 0:30:55.450
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to have the workers in Australia to

0:30:55.490 --> 0:30:57.670
<v Speaker 1>get the essential jobs done. You know, you want to

0:30:57.690 --> 0:30:59.430
<v Speaker 1>get help at a hospital. You want someone to cook

0:30:59.470 --> 0:31:00.210
<v Speaker 1>your meal at a restaurant.

0:31:00.230 --> 0:31:02.510
<v Speaker 5>You want someone to pick the fruit there in Shepparton

0:31:02.630 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 5>and harvest the crops Well, guess what? It's immigration that

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.239
<v Speaker 5>drives all that great work that we need to.

0:31:08.220 --> 0:31:10.620
<v Speaker 1>Build our nation. So I think this is a really.

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 5>This is a bad move by the Coalition, and I

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:17.700
<v Speaker 5>think our whole political system at the moment is over-indexing

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.750
<v Speaker 5>in the response to some high immigration levels of a couple.

0:31:21.590 --> 0:31:22.050
<v Speaker 1>Of years ago.

0:31:22.390 --> 0:31:26.470
<v Speaker 2>Well, yes, numbers were high directly after COVID, and they've

0:31:26.490 --> 0:31:29.170
<v Speaker 2>been lower than that since then, but also the government

0:31:29.210 --> 0:31:32.670
<v Speaker 2>has failed to meet its target basically every year post that.

0:31:32.690 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you go back and look at the... the

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 2>budget papers from the first budget that Jim Chalmers handed

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:41.430
<v Speaker 2>down in 2022, and they were predicting a little over

0:31:41.430 --> 0:31:45.410
<v Speaker 2>$ 200, 000 a year. That has simply not happened. So it

0:31:45.450 --> 0:31:47.610
<v Speaker 2>has been at much higher levels than was expected, and

0:31:47.670 --> 0:31:49.570
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of people would be quite happy

0:31:49.610 --> 0:31:52.250
<v Speaker 2>to see a pause or a significant reduction for a

0:31:52.290 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 2>short period of time to try and get that back

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 2>in order. You mentioned, Nick, about things being big. Of course,

0:31:57.980 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 2>one of the big discussions... over the past week has

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:03.350
<v Speaker 2>been about government spending. And it would seem this is

0:32:03.380 --> 0:32:06.190
<v Speaker 2>starting to cut through as an issue. I went through

0:32:06.210 --> 0:32:10.330
<v Speaker 2>that Redbridge poll last night that appeared in today's financial review,

0:32:10.830 --> 0:32:14.790
<v Speaker 2>showing that people are now rating economic management as one

0:32:14.830 --> 0:32:16.990
<v Speaker 2>of their top issues when they're looking at the things

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 2>going on in the country. The Prime Minister and the

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Treasurer are both taking a big hit in terms of

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 2>their personal approval ratings. In the past month, as these

0:32:27.100 --> 0:32:30.340
<v Speaker 2>issues of interest rates and government spending have been floating around,

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Jane Hume had another whack today. Take a look.

0:32:35.550 --> 0:32:38.490
<v Speaker 9>The Labor government keeps telling us that it's doing a

0:32:38.550 --> 0:32:41.470
<v Speaker 9>great job on savings, but for every $ 2 that it

0:32:41.510 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 9>has saved, it's spent an additional $ 3. This is a

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 9>government that's spending at pandemic levels, but outside of crisis times.

0:32:51.150 --> 0:32:53.990
<v Speaker 2>Is this something that the opposition, Sam, is going to

0:32:54.170 --> 0:32:56.969
<v Speaker 2>keep pushing on because you think it is working? It's

0:32:57.010 --> 0:32:59.470
<v Speaker 2>having some cut through the government spending line?

0:33:01.100 --> 0:33:02.980
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. It's having an inflationary effect.

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.900
<v Speaker 8>Now, of course, it's not the only thing that's causing inflation,

0:33:06.940 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 8>but it's a significant part of it. This is a

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:14.140
<v Speaker 8>very big spending government and we're seeing inflation rising.

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Now, those two things aren't separate. They are connected.

0:33:18.020 --> 0:33:21.140
<v Speaker 8>And you just need to look at the recent history

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.300
<v Speaker 8>of Australia. I mean, Howard and Costello had the debt

0:33:24.340 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 8>paid off. And since then, things have gradually got out

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.860
<v Speaker 8>of control. I commend the previous coalition government on attempting

0:33:33.660 --> 0:33:35.830
<v Speaker 8>to get the debt under control. But of course, then

0:33:35.850 --> 0:33:40.010
<v Speaker 8>the COVID pandemic hit and obviously governments were forced to

0:33:40.070 --> 0:33:43.390
<v Speaker 8>spend money to try and manage that situation. But at

0:33:43.470 --> 0:33:47.630
<v Speaker 8>some point, reality has got to hit. And Australia's got

0:33:47.650 --> 0:33:50.890
<v Speaker 8>to get its budget and its spending into balance. And

0:33:50.930 --> 0:33:52.970
<v Speaker 8>that's just not happening at the moment. And as you

0:33:53.010 --> 0:33:59.010
<v Speaker 8>saw with the intergenerational report, deficits are forecast well into

0:33:59.030 --> 0:34:00.710
<v Speaker 8>the future, and that's not something we should be leaving

0:34:00.730 --> 0:34:01.430
<v Speaker 8>the next generation.

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 6>Indeed.

0:34:02.660 --> 0:34:05.300
<v Speaker 2>And, I mean, Nick, you obviously have to... You look

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:08.379
<v Speaker 2>at a council budget every year and run over all

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 2>of these things. I think it's incumbent upon all levels

0:34:10.940 --> 0:34:13.900
<v Speaker 2>of government to rein in their spending a bit, because

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:18.489
<v Speaker 2>public spending... now, as a percentage of GDP, is the

0:34:18.590 --> 0:34:21.529
<v Speaker 2>highest it has been in 40 years, and that is

0:34:21.630 --> 0:34:23.010
<v Speaker 2>clearly posing a big problem.

0:34:24.500 --> 0:34:25.700
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look, I agree, Caleb.

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.989
<v Speaker 5>Economic management and strong financial management needs to be the

0:34:29.110 --> 0:34:32.010
<v Speaker 5>building block of good government for all governments, no matter

0:34:32.030 --> 0:34:35.049
<v Speaker 5>their persuasion. I'm proud to say at the City of

0:34:35.090 --> 0:34:40.420
<v Speaker 5>Melbourne we've just delivered our second surplus budget in two years.

0:34:40.700 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>That might not sound a lot, but it wasn't that

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:43.219
<v Speaker 1>many years ago.

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.899
<v Speaker 5>We were running, you know, $ 70 million deficits and heading

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:48.219
<v Speaker 5>towards a quarter of a million dollars, a.

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:50.700
<v Speaker 1>Billion dollars in debt.

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:54.509
<v Speaker 5>So I've always understood that having a strong government financial

0:34:54.969 --> 0:34:57.489
<v Speaker 5>managed budget is the bedrock of then being able to

0:34:57.510 --> 0:35:02.779
<v Speaker 5>do good things that the community expects governments to do. Look,

0:35:02.980 --> 0:35:07.259
<v Speaker 5>at a federal level, I think both the Coalition and

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 5>the Labor government have had their own misdemeanours when it

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:15.379
<v Speaker 5>comes to budget management in recent years. I would say

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.620
<v Speaker 5>I think Australia's finances are better managed now than most

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.980
<v Speaker 5>other countries in the OECD. But, look, I would like

0:35:23.020 --> 0:35:26.620
<v Speaker 5>to see more discipline on that front, and so that's

0:35:26.660 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 5>a good debate for us to be having in politics

0:35:28.380 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 5>at the moment.

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think they need to catch on. The

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:33.910
<v Speaker 2>federal government just needs to catch on. I know that

0:35:34.700 --> 0:35:37.630
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister and the Treasurer both are at pains

0:35:37.670 --> 0:35:40.430
<v Speaker 2>to admit that they get anything wrong, but I don't

0:35:40.469 --> 0:35:42.969
<v Speaker 2>think this is going away. For as long as inflation

0:35:43.010 --> 0:35:46.069
<v Speaker 2>remains above where it should be... and the RBA keeps

0:35:46.130 --> 0:35:49.530
<v Speaker 2>putting up interest rates, you know, it's turning the screws

0:35:49.610 --> 0:35:52.070
<v Speaker 2>on the people who can afford to pay for it

0:35:52.150 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 2>the least. And at some point, I think there's going

0:35:54.780 --> 0:35:56.750
<v Speaker 2>to be a revolt, and the government has to realise that. Now,

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 2>of course, gents, you're both in Victoria. We're less than

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.660
<v Speaker 2>two months away now from the state election, which, of course,

0:36:03.700 --> 0:36:06.780
<v Speaker 2>we're all excited for. People like me will be hoping

0:36:07.180 --> 0:36:11.610
<v Speaker 2>that the Andrews-Alan-Carroll government finally gets its comeuppance. But I

0:36:11.630 --> 0:36:15.870
<v Speaker 2>thought it was interesting today, Sam... to see Ben Carroll,

0:36:15.890 --> 0:36:19.170
<v Speaker 2>of course, the Premier, saying that he would not do

0:36:19.330 --> 0:36:20.950
<v Speaker 2>a deal with the Greens. Take a look.

0:36:22.110 --> 0:36:24.870
<v Speaker 5>If you end up with more seats than Jess Wilson,

0:36:24.890 --> 0:36:27.270
<v Speaker 5>but minority, you'll accept Greens votes, won't you?

0:36:27.330 --> 0:36:29.370
<v Speaker 1>No, I've ruled that out completely.

0:36:29.390 --> 0:36:31.469
<v Speaker 2>You'll accept their votes? No, we have ruled that out.

0:36:31.489 --> 0:36:33.509
<v Speaker 2>You'll go to another election rather than accept their votes?

0:36:33.650 --> 0:36:39.149
<v Speaker 2>We are out there making sure we win Greens seats. Now, OK,

0:36:39.170 --> 0:36:41.970
<v Speaker 2>we're going to go win Greens seats, whatever. If push

0:36:41.989 --> 0:36:45.370
<v Speaker 2>comes to shove... We seriously meant to believe, Sam, that

0:36:45.570 --> 0:36:47.890
<v Speaker 2>he would sit there and go, actually, I'm not going

0:36:47.910 --> 0:36:50.130
<v Speaker 2>to form a government. I will not form a government

0:36:50.170 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 2>because you didn't elect me in a majority. It's just stupid,

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:54.380
<v Speaker 2>isn't it?

0:36:55.989 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't believe that. I think he'll try and

0:36:58.440 --> 0:36:59.620
<v Speaker 3>form whatever government he has.

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 8>You know, and the Labor government, I've obviously lived my

0:37:04.980 --> 0:37:07.489
<v Speaker 8>whole life in this state and I've seen a Labor

0:37:07.550 --> 0:37:10.410
<v Speaker 8>government very much influenced by Greens policy run the state

0:37:11.030 --> 0:37:13.950
<v Speaker 8>for the past 14 years and it hasn't been overly successful.

0:37:14.950 --> 0:37:15.149
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:37:17.530 --> 0:37:20.410
<v Speaker 8>he's right that you'll wait and see what happens after

0:37:20.430 --> 0:37:22.669
<v Speaker 8>the election. And, you know, we want to win green

0:37:22.710 --> 0:37:24.810
<v Speaker 8>seats and the coalition will say the same thing. But

0:37:25.210 --> 0:37:26.790
<v Speaker 8>he will try and form a government with the Greens,

0:37:26.870 --> 0:37:29.110
<v Speaker 8>I believe, if he has to. I mean, what's he

0:37:29.130 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 8>going to say? Let's go to another, immediately another election.

0:37:33.140 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 8>I can't imagine that happening.

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I just don't understand, Nick, the political imperative to say

0:37:38.660 --> 0:37:41.140
<v Speaker 2>that you would never do a deal with another party.

0:37:41.460 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, surely the thing you say, and he wants

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:45.660
<v Speaker 2>Jess Wilson to rule out any deal with One Nation

0:37:45.700 --> 0:37:47.730
<v Speaker 2>as well, which, again, would be completely stupid for them

0:37:47.750 --> 0:37:50.230
<v Speaker 2>to do. Surely the thing you say is, I am

0:37:50.310 --> 0:37:54.109
<v Speaker 2>focused on forming a majority government, but we'll see where

0:37:54.130 --> 0:37:56.270
<v Speaker 2>the chips lie after the election and then we make

0:37:56.330 --> 0:37:59.129
<v Speaker 2>our decisions. Because if you ultimately do have to do

0:37:59.170 --> 0:38:02.029
<v Speaker 2>a deal to form a minority government in order to

0:38:02.090 --> 0:38:03.330
<v Speaker 2>form a government, you look stupid.

0:38:04.870 --> 0:38:06.410
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it was a very bold move by

0:38:06.450 --> 0:38:09.100
<v Speaker 1>Ben Carroll today and it will be fascinating to see

0:38:09.140 --> 0:38:13.540
<v Speaker 1>how Jess Wilson responds. I don't think it's good for

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:18.310
<v Speaker 1>Victoria to have, you know, a Labor government beholden to

0:38:18.330 --> 0:38:21.150
<v Speaker 1>a party that's not a party of government in the

0:38:21.190 --> 0:38:23.090
<v Speaker 1>same way as I don't think that it would be

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>good for.

0:38:25.050 --> 0:38:27.730
<v Speaker 5>the Liberal Party and the Nats to be in some

0:38:27.810 --> 0:38:30.750
<v Speaker 5>sort of arrangement with One Nation. I think that would

0:38:30.770 --> 0:38:35.390
<v Speaker 5>be an absolutely terrible thing for Victoria. And so I

0:38:35.430 --> 0:38:39.930
<v Speaker 5>think taking a strong position on, you know, playing footsies

0:38:40.210 --> 0:38:45.380
<v Speaker 5>with parties of the political extreme is a very bold move.

0:38:45.500 --> 0:38:47.940
<v Speaker 1>And now the The ball.

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:49.660
<v Speaker 5>Is in Jess Wilson's court to see if she will

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:55.550
<v Speaker 5>make a similarly brave, bold and necessary declaration herself to

0:38:55.790 --> 0:38:59.230
<v Speaker 5>not form any sort of political arrangement with One Nation

0:38:59.270 --> 0:39:01.650
<v Speaker 5>to form government in Victoria for the good of Victoria.

0:39:01.910 --> 0:39:05.230
<v Speaker 2>So you really think, Nick, that if push came to shove,

0:39:06.010 --> 0:39:08.260
<v Speaker 2>Ben Carroll would say, let's go and have another election

0:39:08.700 --> 0:39:11.330
<v Speaker 2>rather than do a deal for minority government with the Greens? Yes.

0:39:11.890 --> 0:39:14.570
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what he indicated today through his remarks.

0:39:15.010 --> 0:39:19.190
<v Speaker 5>And as I said, Caleb, instead of focusing your attention

0:39:19.530 --> 0:39:23.469
<v Speaker 5>on Ben Carroll, I think it's now important to ask

0:39:23.489 --> 0:39:28.649
<v Speaker 5>Jess Wilson the same question. Will she commit to not

0:39:28.770 --> 0:39:33.340
<v Speaker 5>forming an arrangement with One Nation? Because I know Sam

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:36.790
<v Speaker 5>and I very strongly would agree that that would be

0:39:36.830 --> 0:39:38.110
<v Speaker 5>a very bad thing for Victoria.

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:40.710
<v Speaker 2>Well, Sam, I've only got a minute, but you're responsible.

0:39:40.850 --> 0:39:43.090
<v Speaker 8>Well, I agree, but what if they go to a

0:39:43.090 --> 0:39:45.390
<v Speaker 8>second election and get the same result? Do they go

0:39:45.410 --> 0:39:48.500
<v Speaker 8>to a third election? I mean, was Julia Gillard supposed

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:50.959
<v Speaker 8>to go to a..... or Tony Abbott go to another

0:39:51.020 --> 0:39:55.210
<v Speaker 8>election in 2013? You know, they had to do something. Look,

0:39:55.290 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 8>I desperately want a coalition majority and I think that's

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.420
<v Speaker 8>what will happen. I think that, you know, the way

0:40:00.460 --> 0:40:02.820
<v Speaker 8>to rule this out is for a coalition to present

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 8>a very strong policy platform, which they're doing, and to

0:40:05.620 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 8>get elected in their own right.

0:40:06.700 --> 0:40:11.530
<v Speaker 3>And I believe that will happen. But I think, yeah, making.

0:40:11.330 --> 0:40:13.910
<v Speaker 8>Pronouncements about what you might do after November the 28th

0:40:14.010 --> 0:40:15.450
<v Speaker 8>is maybe a bit premature.

0:40:16.050 --> 0:40:17.930
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what I think too. You know, there's a

0:40:17.989 --> 0:40:19.830
<v Speaker 2>lot of water to go under the bridge between now

0:40:19.850 --> 0:40:22.859
<v Speaker 2>and then. Sam Rees, Nick Rees, sorry, not Rees. Good

0:40:22.900 --> 0:40:26.089
<v Speaker 2>to see you both, as always. All right, coming up,

0:40:26.190 --> 0:40:30.469
<v Speaker 2>more on Chris Bowen's COP31, the eye-watering sum that we

0:40:30.510 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 2>may be footing for the event. Plenty more to talk

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 2>about that. The bloke is asleep, as I showed you earlier.

0:40:35.820 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Dan Tien will have his thoughts after the break. Caleb

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Bond in for Paul. I showed you earlier that vision

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:50.339
<v Speaker 2>of Chris Bowen at the pre-cop-cop rubbish that he's putting

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.650
<v Speaker 2>on at the moment. There he is, basically dozing off.

0:40:53.930 --> 0:40:56.770
<v Speaker 2>That's how exciting it would seem to be. Joining me now,

0:40:56.830 --> 0:41:00.830
<v Speaker 2>Shadow Energy Minister Dan Tehan. I'm assuming that's why you're

0:41:00.890 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 2>not there, because you'd be in a similar sort of state.

0:41:06.390 --> 0:41:09.950
<v Speaker 10>Well, he's obviously had a big day, Caleb. No leaders

0:41:09.989 --> 0:41:12.450
<v Speaker 10>have turned up, so he's been by the pool on

0:41:12.469 --> 0:41:15.980
<v Speaker 10>the banana lounge, sipping a few cocktails.

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, wouldn't you if you were in Fiji?

0:41:17.219 --> 0:41:20.460
<v Speaker 10>Everyone's dreaming of what the meeting might be like if

0:41:20.500 --> 0:41:24.819
<v Speaker 10>some leaders had have turned up. I mean, you seriously

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:31.209
<v Speaker 10>can't make this stuff up, can you? It's beyond farcical.

0:41:31.330 --> 0:41:34.410
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty funny. Well, it's funny to some degree because,

0:41:34.469 --> 0:41:36.489
<v Speaker 2>of course, you know, we're looking at vision of of

0:41:36.550 --> 0:41:40.010
<v Speaker 2>Chris Bowen basically nodding off there. But it's not funny

0:41:40.430 --> 0:41:43.529
<v Speaker 2>because we're paying for it. All of this stuff has

0:41:43.570 --> 0:41:48.780
<v Speaker 2>basically been a great big vanity project for Mr Bowen

0:41:48.860 --> 0:41:53.500
<v Speaker 2>to fly around the world as the COP31 president of negotiations,

0:41:54.100 --> 0:41:58.300
<v Speaker 2>whatever that actually is. And when he's asked today about

0:41:58.340 --> 0:42:02.469
<v Speaker 2>exactly how much money has been spent on this thing.

0:42:02.489 --> 0:42:06.650
<v Speaker 2>He can't tell us. He dances around the number. I

0:42:06.710 --> 0:42:08.390
<v Speaker 2>played it earlier, but I'll play it again.

0:42:09.630 --> 0:42:11.650
<v Speaker 4>Well, certainly it is a good spread of Australia's taxpayers' money.

0:42:11.690 --> 0:42:14.720
<v Speaker 4>This is our most important diplomatic engagement in the Pacific,

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:18.259
<v Speaker 4>certainly this term, probably for longer than this term. It's

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.779
<v Speaker 4>out of the $ 147 million allocation in the budget for

0:42:21.900 --> 0:42:23.940
<v Speaker 4>increased Pacific engagement on climate issues.

0:42:23.980 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 2>That's a good thing.

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:29.740
<v Speaker 4>The reports of around $ 20 million are in the ballpark.

0:42:30.969 --> 0:42:37.910
<v Speaker 2>Why can't he just tell us what's been spent? Sorry,

0:42:37.930 --> 0:42:42.580
<v Speaker 2>you still got me, Dan? Yeah, I've got you back, Caleb.

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 10>Sorry, the line's just gone a bit patchy, but you're

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 10>absolutely right around the cost. The fact that he will

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:55.020
<v Speaker 10>not be up front with the Australian people as to

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 10>what this is costing is appalling. And we know it's

0:42:59.500 --> 0:43:05.470
<v Speaker 10>probably $ 25 million just for all the accommodation and everything

0:43:05.550 --> 0:43:12.609
<v Speaker 10>else there at Fiji and Tuvalu. $ 150 million in total.

0:43:13.270 --> 0:43:17.010
<v Speaker 10>And that includes, and we shouldn't forget this, setting up...

0:43:17.340 --> 0:43:22.580
<v Speaker 10>an office of the presidency in his own department staffed

0:43:22.660 --> 0:43:28.890
<v Speaker 10>by 35 people. I mean, this has gone completely to

0:43:29.150 --> 0:43:34.450
<v Speaker 10>his head. I mean, if his ego could solve climate change,

0:43:34.690 --> 0:43:37.300
<v Speaker 10>there'd be no emissions left in the globe.

0:43:37.739 --> 0:43:39.220
<v Speaker 2>But sadly, it can't.

0:43:39.340 --> 0:43:43.540
<v Speaker 10>All it costs is the Australian taxpayer spending an absolute

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 10>fortune 150 million in a cost of living crisis.

0:43:47.660 --> 0:43:49.780
<v Speaker 2>I i did write a few weeks ago that they'd

0:43:49.989 --> 0:43:52.250
<v Speaker 2>spent six million bucks on all those contracts for the

0:43:52.310 --> 0:43:54.330
<v Speaker 2>hotels in fiji so that they could put all of

0:43:54.370 --> 0:43:57.530
<v Speaker 2>mr bowen's hot air in there and stop them escaping

0:43:57.590 --> 0:44:00.290
<v Speaker 2>into the atmosphere but i'm not sure it's done us

0:44:00.310 --> 0:44:03.850
<v Speaker 2>any good and the whole thing's being headlined by julia

0:44:03.890 --> 0:44:09.830
<v Speaker 2>gillard and jacinda ardern as well Can you imagine coming

0:44:09.890 --> 0:44:12.310
<v Speaker 2>from another country to go to Fiji to listen to that?

0:44:12.750 --> 0:44:15.150
<v Speaker 2>What are we actually getting out of this? That's the

0:44:15.170 --> 0:44:17.670
<v Speaker 2>bit that I'm confused about. What are we getting out

0:44:17.690 --> 0:44:17.890
<v Speaker 2>of this?

0:44:20.700 --> 0:44:23.819
<v Speaker 10>Well, the sad reality is we're getting nothing out of it.

0:44:24.060 --> 0:44:27.500
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it is nothing but a talk fest. And

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:32.180
<v Speaker 10>you can see the bureaucrats. It's sort of, yes, minister-like. Oh,

0:44:32.580 --> 0:44:35.489
<v Speaker 10>we're not getting any leaders coming. What can we do?

0:44:35.590 --> 0:44:37.989
<v Speaker 10>As a matter of fact, leaders who said they were

0:44:38.030 --> 0:44:39.730
<v Speaker 10>coming are pulling out.

0:44:40.210 --> 0:44:40.890
<v Speaker 2>What can we do?

0:44:40.910 --> 0:44:44.430
<v Speaker 10>Oh, let's invite some former leaders. Oh, and who will

0:44:44.450 --> 0:44:48.469
<v Speaker 10>we get? Oh, We'll get Julia Gillard and Jacinda Ardern.

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, it's a joke.

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 10>It's a complete and utter joke. So they get to

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:57.259
<v Speaker 10>go there. We don't know what taxpayers' expense or not.

0:44:57.300 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 10>We think that the taxpayers covered their accommodation as former leaders.

0:45:03.590 --> 0:45:07.469
<v Speaker 10>And heaven only knows what they were talking about. And,

0:45:07.810 --> 0:45:11.730
<v Speaker 10>you know, for Chris Bowen, no wonder he's nodding off,

0:45:11.930 --> 0:45:15.250
<v Speaker 10>because he must be just sitting there thinking, you know,

0:45:15.270 --> 0:45:18.810
<v Speaker 10>I had these grandiose dreams of what this would be like,

0:45:19.150 --> 0:45:24.410
<v Speaker 10>me sitting there as President of COP negotiations with, you know,

0:45:24.670 --> 0:45:29.900
<v Speaker 10>President Trump and President Xi and, you know, Putin and

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 10>all these global leaders sitting around and we're all talking

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:36.010
<v Speaker 10>about how we're going to reduce emissions.

0:45:36.870 --> 0:45:37.590
<v Speaker 1>And he's left.

0:45:38.250 --> 0:45:41.930
<v Speaker 10>to nothing. And I think, you know, that's why we've

0:45:41.969 --> 0:45:45.290
<v Speaker 10>got these two former leaders now turning up. I mean,

0:45:45.310 --> 0:45:49.110
<v Speaker 10>the whole thing, it's an embarrassment, it's a diplomatic embarrassment,

0:45:49.430 --> 0:45:55.180
<v Speaker 10>and it's an expensive diplomatic embarrassment for the Australian taxpayer, sadly.

0:45:55.620 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, emissions are being produced this week. I don't think

0:45:58.739 --> 0:46:02.430
<v Speaker 2>there's too much question about that. Quickly, David, I talked

0:46:02.450 --> 0:46:06.739
<v Speaker 2>about this last night, but David Shoebridge, David Dan is

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:09.779
<v Speaker 2>your name, David Shoebridge is on the mind. He was

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:12.540
<v Speaker 2>saying yesterday, and it's in the Aus today, that it

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 2>would seem the Greens are going to push back on

0:46:14.300 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 2>more renewable energy projects where they think that they are

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:22.550
<v Speaker 2>environmentally dangerous or they're being built in the wrong places.

0:46:22.670 --> 0:46:25.590
<v Speaker 2>I thought for a long time that greenies ought to

0:46:25.630 --> 0:46:28.150
<v Speaker 2>be more concerned about the environment that they are when

0:46:28.190 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 2>it comes to renewable energy projects. What have you made

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:31.660
<v Speaker 2>of his comments?

0:46:34.110 --> 0:46:37.270
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Caleb, I'm going to have to apologise because the

0:46:37.370 --> 0:46:41.410
<v Speaker 10>line has just dropped out and I just cannot hear you.

0:46:42.210 --> 0:46:45.660
<v Speaker 10>But I'll say this about David Shoebridge. If he wants

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 10>to help us stop Labor's reckless renewable rollout, we're all

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:54.800
<v Speaker 10>for it. But the proof will be in the pudding.

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:57.380
<v Speaker 10>But I think we're going to have to call it

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:01.700
<v Speaker 10>now because sadly the line is just, it's so faint

0:47:01.780 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 10>I really can't hear you.

0:47:03.300 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm sorry, mate. We'll try and fix it

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:07.580
<v Speaker 2>up and get you on another time. Dan Tehan, good

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 2>to see you as always. All right, the late debate

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:12.359
<v Speaker 2>is not too far away. I'll be back in just

0:47:12.430 --> 0:47:19.009
<v Speaker 2>a moment. Don't go anywhere. Now, we know that a

0:47:19.050 --> 0:47:22.009
<v Speaker 2>lot of the media is obsessed with One Nation at

0:47:22.070 --> 0:47:25.910
<v Speaker 2>the moment. Anything happens, something's going on. I mean, I

0:47:25.930 --> 0:47:28.489
<v Speaker 2>talked last night about this business where Mark Nicholson at

0:47:28.530 --> 0:47:31.690
<v Speaker 2>the Victorian campaign launch over the weekend said, you know,

0:47:31.710 --> 0:47:34.580
<v Speaker 2>if I had it my way, Jacinta Allen and Daniel

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.660
<v Speaker 2>Andrews would be in jail by Christmas. And then the

0:47:36.700 --> 0:47:41.009
<v Speaker 2>media earnestly reported, whoa, there was a pledge they'd promised

0:47:41.140 --> 0:47:43.649
<v Speaker 2>to lock up the former premiers, which is, of course,

0:47:44.430 --> 0:47:47.589
<v Speaker 2>never what happened. But it just seems to be anything

0:47:47.610 --> 0:47:50.469
<v Speaker 2>involving One Nation, they will look for any way to

0:47:50.610 --> 0:47:55.690
<v Speaker 2>denigrate them. And again today, a story about an office

0:47:55.730 --> 0:47:59.590
<v Speaker 2>building purchased by Gina Reinhart that is going to be

0:47:59.690 --> 0:48:02.720
<v Speaker 2>leased by One Nation... for their headquarters.

0:48:03.300 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 5>And, of course, the.

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:07.100
<v Speaker 2>Implication is that somehow this means that Mrs Reinhardt has

0:48:07.460 --> 0:48:09.859
<v Speaker 2>bought out One Nation or something or that they're doing

0:48:09.900 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 2>some sort of sweetheart deal. Well, Barnaby Joyce confirmed today

0:48:15.140 --> 0:48:18.779
<v Speaker 2>that they were paying the market rate on rent for

0:48:18.820 --> 0:48:23.870
<v Speaker 2>that building. Who cares who owns the building? It's just

0:48:23.910 --> 0:48:26.529
<v Speaker 2>to try and create a salacious, oh, you know, there's

0:48:26.550 --> 0:48:28.270
<v Speaker 2>a billionaire behind One Nation.

0:48:28.290 --> 0:48:28.650
<v Speaker 5>Seriously.

0:48:29.210 --> 0:48:32.049
<v Speaker 2>Seriously. Get over it. It was the same when they

0:48:32.090 --> 0:48:35.430
<v Speaker 2>did it with the plane. Gina Reinhart gave One Nation

0:48:35.469 --> 0:48:37.430
<v Speaker 2>a plane. I mean, you've got to get around the country.

0:48:37.870 --> 0:48:41.350
<v Speaker 2>Who cares if someone spends their own money how they

0:48:41.370 --> 0:48:43.950
<v Speaker 2>want to spend their own money? No skin off my nose.

0:48:44.350 --> 0:48:46.140
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for joining me tonight. I'll be back here

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:49.339
<v Speaker 2>same time, same place tomorrow. I hope to see you then.

0:48:49.460 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Here's the late debate.