WEBVTT - Q&A before round 1! (LIVE) | Breaking Even with Al Paton

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, Welcome to a very special, live panic edition

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of Breaking Even with Al Peyton honor to the Supercoach

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>AFL podcast feed. At time of recording, there is about

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to do the mess on my head. About thirty

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty one hours until the first lockout of the twenty

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five AFL Supercoach season. There's plenty happening, and the

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>big point of this show is to get your questions answered,

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so we'll get through as many as we can. I've

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>got a bunch of socials already and you can leave

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>them below because we are going live and I'm el

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Peyton of course and joining me patch. How you're feeling,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how would you rate your Supercoach team at

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the moment on a scale of zero? Everything set, just

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>totally come and zen ready for the season to start

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>through to ten, changing it every five minutes, total disarray,

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>unrecognizable looking squad.

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.639
<v Speaker 2>Of fifty thousand, which is the amount of money I'm

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 2>going to win at the end of the season.

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 3>It's actually feeling far more settled.

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Than it was forty eight hours ago. It's feeling good.

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 2>It's feeling settled. How are you well? How are you

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 2>feeling less than forty eight hours before we start locking

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 2>in players.

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it probably a day ago. I was

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit all over the shop, but I feel like

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I've found my spot in the last overnight and just

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>down to maybe one or two that I'm shopping and

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 1>changing just to seeing it looks good like that. Then

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I flipped the other way and that looks good too,

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and just need to make a decision. But I suppose

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing we know is that you know, things can

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>get thrown into disarray bit when the teams come out

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night, But were really the focus is on Thursday

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>night you need to have your Richmond and Carlton players

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>locked in. Then we get a little bit more time

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>with a rolling lockout to maybe just take a deep

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>breath and make sure the rest of the team looks good.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>But I suppose you know, we want to have our

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>structures and things ready to go, and I guess you

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>know you need Plan A and Plan B and Plan C,

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, funny things can happen around teams.

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Done they can, they can?

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I think, I think holistically before we start getting into questions,

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>and there are heaps of them. We've got plenty flooding

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>in already, yeah. I think generally the thing you want

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 2>to be changing last minute as rookies, and that's about it.

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to be making big structure changes. You

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be suddenly leaping, you know, fitting two

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 2>extra mid prices in or changing your primos around.

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, I think.

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Generally we're just kind of looking at the rookies and

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 2>that's hopefully everything is relatively settled before that, and that's

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 2>why we're here today. We're hopefully going to help people

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>get a bit settled. But we've got something. We've got

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 2>the injuries first.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well I will mention first you mentioned rookies, and

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>people will have noticed, i'm sure on the podcast and

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Code Sports YouTube feeds just so much content pumping out

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 1>in the last week or so leading into the first

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>look out of the season that includes a special rookie

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Bible from our experts the feeds, and then Dan Batton

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>got on last night, so make sure we go back

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and watch and listen to that if you haven't already

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to get the loadown on their picks for the cheapies

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>this year, but I'm sure we'll touch on those a

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>bit today, So like subscribe all those great things, but

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>As you said before we get into questions, we do

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>have a regular segment every week on this show. Every

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>stupid coach needs to manage injuries like a pro. This

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is the HbF injury report. Let's get into it. Perhaps

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>plenty of interesting names as we count down to Round one.

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I've got plenty on here, try and get through them quickly.

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Bo Allen interesting from the West Coast, obviously potentially popular

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>rookie pick in the back line. Illness may miss round one,

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>but it does throw up some interesting looping possibilities for

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>people who want to try that. Elijah Hewitt. They're saying

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he is available despite being out of their last preseason

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>match with some soreness, so he should be available for us.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>The Saints say rowand Marshall and Jack Sinclair will play

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in round one, so keep it close out on the teams,

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>especially with some popular rookies that that might impact Gold Coast.

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Sam Flanders not going to play round one. He'll be

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>back in round three, so if you got him in

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>your team to take him out, I think he' still

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in about twenty percent a team, so make some late

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>adjustments there. The Bulldogs put out an injury report which

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>had five or six weeks down for Marcus bonson Peli

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>with his calf injury, so obviously you can't start him,

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but we'll be.

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Sarching complex calf injury, which is my least favorite type

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 2>of calf injury.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't sound good. So yeah, we'll keep an eye

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on him when he returns, obviously, but tests for Ed

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Richards and Bailey Dale at the Dogs for this week's

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>game against the Kangaroos. Connor Rosie did some kind of

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>weird toe thing in a match tim the other day

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>which was going around on social platforms, but he's okay

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>according to the power, so feel free to pick him

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in your team. Tom Lynch out of concussion protocols, doesn't

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>there any other injuries at time of recording. Can't guarantee

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>nothing will happen before the game starts on Thursday night,

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>but he's okay. One week for Kieran Briggs though with concussion,

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>they said there were some you know, they tested to

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>see if he had any neck issues, a pretty horrible

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>incident in the game on Sunday. He was okay from

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that point of view, but will be in the concussion

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>protocols for a week. So that means that Lockie Keith

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>will be rocking I think for the Giants, and Tom

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Green is down as a test which is one we

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>will be watching closely. I mean I had him in

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>my team for a while early in the preseason. Won't

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>be bringing back, but it might impact one of the rookies

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that the fewers have got in the back line in

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>James Leaks. So yes, keeping a close eye on the

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>GWS teams and of course all the teams when they

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>drop on Thursday night. All right, do you want to

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>get into some questions that's what they did all about.

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes we do.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 2>We've had questions go out, We've had some come in

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 2>earlier this week from Twitter or x and we'll start

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 2>tackling some of them and then we'll go into the

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 2>comments that have come in live. So should we should

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 2>we get started?

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, let's get into it because as you said,

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it's plenty to get through. We don't want to keep

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody here all day. But frog A kicking yourself saying

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Chera or Perim and viable or mirages. They just something

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>that's teasing us and super Coach that will blow up

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in our faces like plenty A mid Price has in

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the past, I mean, it seems like the mid prices

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>this year are a bit more reliable than in the past.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Or is that just do we fall for that every year?

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I think we fall for that every year. But you know,

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 2>do you look back and you're like, you know, did

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 2>picking mid prices ever work for those people in the past,

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 2>and there is no But it could just work for us.

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>It could just work for us this year. I think

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Perrami's in my side. I certainly think he's definitely value.

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Adam Cherer I've never been sold on, but everyone who

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I know who follows Carlton thinks that he's ready to go.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I think the preseason showed what he's capable of. I

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 2>think they're both viable. I'm not convinced either is a mirage,

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 2>so happy.

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 1>I think Perryman very safe yea, I don't think actually

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>had a heap of tackles the other day, but still

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>scored in the nineties and I think he's going to

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be safe for around that most weeks. Chair is a

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a risk, obviously given his injury history,

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>but I've certainly been sucked in by his preseason in

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the early fixture of the Blues. Hopefully he can put

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>up some good scores early and then if something happens

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we deal with it then. So yeah, I've got both

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of them at the moment, Fraser saying Matt Flynn R too,

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>Yes or no. Yeah.

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 2>We've had a lot of questions about Matt Flynn and

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 2>I've been toying between starting him at R two or

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 2>starting at the flex. I think think I think if

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 2>he's close to a must pick at the value he's providing,

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't quite like going with him at R two

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 2>yet because you don't necessarily have the backup, and you know,

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 2>having him in the flex means it if it goes wrong,

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>you can downgrade him, upgrade him.

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 3>If you've got some cash.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 2>You've got a lot more flexibility from the flex, which

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 2>is really nice. But at R two your options are

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 2>far more limited. So that's the reason I haven't gone there.

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>But I do think.

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 3>There's the big risk possibly big reward there.

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 2>The flip side as well is if you want Tom

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 2>d Koning and one of Cherry are gone, then it

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:39.559
<v Speaker 2>gets very hard to then pick Flynn.

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 3>You can't have him on the bench.

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I mean it depends on the rest of

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 2>your team, but I don't think I think it's viable.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 2>There's every chance the person that wins Super Coach this

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 2>year starts Flint at R two and he becomes what

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Cherry did last year. So I certainly don't think it's

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 2>a bad decision to start him at R two, but

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>proceed with caution, maybe have an exit plan.

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I mentioned the Lair and Dossie there

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>had a very intricate setup of picking Luke Jackson in

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the forward line so he could click him into the

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>ruck if something happens to Flynn. So he's obviously put

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of thought into that. And yeah, I think

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you that if you're brave enough to

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>do it and it pays off, that could be a

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>winning move. But it is it is fraught with danger,

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, sometimes you have to have to take risks

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to it. He's in my flex at the moment, you know.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right that we have to pick him.

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Just haven't quite got the the bravery to go with

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that too. And it's so hard when you want, like

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you say, you've got Gorne, you got Cherry, you got

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>t DK. You want to try and fit them all

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>in there. So it does get tricky. But yeah, it could.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>It could definitely pay off. Nick says, with so much

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>good value, how many primos are we starting with? So

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I suppose it comes down to your definition

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of primos. I mean I've got I think two players

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>over six hundred k. But then if a sort of

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>squint and say I reckon he could be a keeper,

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>then you know, the total goes up a lot, a

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 1>lot higher. But when you know how many do you

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>think from the the very top end of the shelf.

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 2>From the six six hundred k plus, I have three

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 2>at this stage. I've got Cheesel Neil and Max Gorn

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 2>who just oscillates between him and Cherry over and over.

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 2>But in terms of primos, I think like a guy

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>like Andy Brayshaw counts to promo. I think Clayton Oliver

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 2>counts to primo. This year, I've got a Zaiwangen in

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 2>D two. Jack McCrae, I think he is a primo.

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 2>We had a question as well about Jason Hill Francis

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 2>and Isaac Rankin. I think both of them are primos.

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I have both of them. I think he can lock

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 2>those guys in pretty quickly, So yeah, I think they

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 2>certainly scope to start more of those four hundred k guys,

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:40.839
<v Speaker 2>we've seen Will Day and Finn Callahango nuts early. I

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 2>think there's certainly scope to start them. Whether or not

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 2>we finish with them is a different question. And you know,

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>we've had Joven on several shows so far this year,

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the winner from last year, Jove in May, and he's

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 2>said that he, you know, last plays like Olli Wines

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 2>certainly weren't you know, top class uber primos, but they

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>got the job done for him. So yeah, I think

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 2>it very much depends on what your definition of primo

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 2>is and what you know what.

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a very difficult question to answer.

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 2>But I'm still trying to make sure I've got guys

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 2>that are in that top echelon that are just save

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 2>captaincy options through the season.

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good point. You want to at

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>least have a couple of those guys that you can

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 1>put the C in the VC on each week. And

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Nathan has asked who is your D two And this

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>plays into exactly what you were just talking about, And

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>really my premo account, I guess, is really oscillated because

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>do I go with someone like Dane zorco at D

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>two who came in about a week ago, and I

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>really love that idea. And then now I'm sort of

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>wavering and could I save a bit of cash by

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>picking at Jordan Clark or an Asia Wangling Manganina Miller

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>there and that gives me some more money to get

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a Finn Calahan type in the midfield. So I'm really

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>i'ming an ring between those two. But if I look

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>at my team at this moment, it is n at

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>WM at D two for me. And I mean Jordan

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Clarke's been there too, that those two are most interchangeable.

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But what are you, well, does your say look.

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 2>At the moment, Yeah, Nazza wagon and Malera is there

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>for me at the moment as well. Jordan Clark has

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 2>floated as well, but that he's been one of the

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 2>most consistent guys that have just been in my team

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 2>through the whole preseason.

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not in a rush to jump off.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, happy, then you're not attempted to go with Azco

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>or one of those other no sort of guys. And

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you know she's that we all love.

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, Zorko is very old and it's going to

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 2>fall apart. And I said that all of last year

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and it didn't happen. But it's just like he's thirty six.

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 2>They'll have to rest him. Kiddy Coleman will come back

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 2>at some stage during the season. How that affects him

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 2>remains to be seen. That there's a lot of value

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 2>back there with guys like Perryman and Frasier and Roberts,

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 2>who I think is certainly someone we need to jump

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 2>on board. I think Roberts is very much a Locke

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 2>agree with the phantom on the lair there, So I

0:11:56.080 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 2>think there's enough other value around that I don't feel

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 2>like Coats and Master by any means.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with that. I think just got very

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>seduced by the early fixture where they play Richmond and

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>West Coast, I think in the first four games, so

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you could get some really big numbers out of him.

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But then, as you say you are, you know we're

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be making lots of trades as the season

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>goes on, and do you really want to be worrying

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>about thirty six year old guys doing and that you've paid,

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, six hundred grand for in the back line.

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 1>So that's sort of I've moved away from him a

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit just in the last probably twenty four hours,

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, you can certainly put some big scores on

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the board earlier. I mean, this is we won't get

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>go to fight down the rabbit hole. But the Phantoms

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>team is up on all the Coach Sports and on

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the Super Coach chap click on the news tab. There

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is final teams in and he's definitely going down the

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>road of going for just the guys who can put

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>up some huge scores early on which last year turned

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>out to be, you know, gave people a big head start.

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>But the other way of looking at it is that

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you know it is a long season. Those best ada

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>there's only three best ating rounds early and yeah, you're

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>picking guys for the first three or four rounds or

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>for the whole year. But it's one of those ones

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that we probably won't know which is the right approach

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>until around twenty four and then we look back and think, oh, yeah,

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that was obviously we should have all done it that way.

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 2>We should have all done it that way. All right,

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>let's do some quick fire ones. We've had a lot

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 2>of guys where they just want a rating. Do they

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 2>want yes or no? Maybe on these guys I'm going

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 2>to just hit you with a bunch of them. Tom Stewart, no,

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>might get tagged. Yeah, Max Holmes, uh, Paul these.

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Last game was I don't know what happened there, but

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>apart from that, I really like him, So yeah we

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>say yes, yep.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Jeremy McGovern, I did.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Think about this, but then when I was just because

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>that D two has been hard. But I mean, if

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Zorka, you can't pick, can you again?

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>They're just they're very expensive. If there was some value there,

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could take a risk.

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, Elijah Hewittt we've spoken about if named, I

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 2>assume you're you pick him.

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I think so, yeah, just at the price end bit

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of DPP as well. Yeah, I think he's just handy

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to stash there at maybe M eleven yep. Trent Rivers, No,

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>not for me. I think Melbourne has like that Midfield

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>experiment is it was we'll get a bit of time

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in there, but now for tracks back they want to

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>play ed Langdon in there now as well. Harvey Langcot's

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>going to try and get some some center bounces. So

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's enough there to get his scoring

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>up to what we'd need.

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Simeons are from the lair. His boy Jakesonaligo

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 2>been a question on whether you rate him.

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think he's a good player. I'm just sort

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of steering clear of Adelaide midfielders really because there's just

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>so many of them that it's hard to know any

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>given week he'll get the scores and you know, the

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>most most cbas and all that kind of thing.

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then the last one was a toss up,

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 2>would you rather Bailely Smith or Riley Sanders from DESI.

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got Bailey Smith. But yeah, this is an interesting

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>one because I mean he basically was picked, you know,

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>when Team Picker first opened, and he hasn't moved out

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of my team ever since then, because you know, all

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the obvious reasons that we thought this guy's going to

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>be one of the best picks in Super Coaches year.

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll go to Geelong playing in the midfield. He's cheap.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>But I mean we've hardly seen him since then, so

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I can understand why people are a little bit nervous

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that canceling or you know, postponing opening round game. That

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>was the one thing that would have been useful to

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>actually get a look at him hopefully playing a full

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>game and see what his role is and knowing that

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>he's fully fit. So yeah, I don't. Yeah, I'm not

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>not as locked in as I was. He's still there.

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I still think at the price, you know, he's going

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to deliver great value, but he's probably not. You know,

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I think McCrae and Daniel I could definitely see being

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>top six forwards and they'll be there for the entire season. Bears.

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Just yeah, I'm just not really sure what we're going

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to get from him. He could average hundred wouldn't stop me,

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but if he averaged ninety three that probably wouldn't be

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a big shock either.

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've got impaied for that nine hit to ninety

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 2>five range. And I think he certainly value. I think

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 2>he's a he won't let you down too much as

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 2>a pick, but he's one that I'm just I'm fading.

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 2>He's not in my team at the moment, not because

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a terrible pick. I just prefer to

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 2>spend the money elsewhere. It's just like I've gone up

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 2>to Isaac Rankin and I would rather ranking than barely Smith.

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Just with the way my team shuffled round, so I yeah,

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I still don't really trust Bevo, and I'm not entirely

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>sure how Sanders will play out long term, but I

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>certainly think to start the season he'll be quite good.

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 2>There've been a lot of questions on rookies, and we're

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>obviously very keen for teams to drop tomorrow night. But

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 2>instead of going through that, we'll direct you once this

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 2>episode finishes. Go listen, Go check the official Super Coach

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 2>feed and the Code Sports YouTube. There is an official

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 2>rookie just everything you need to know last minute rookie

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>guide there from the Phantom and Dan Batton, who have

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 2>answered all of the rookie questions far better than we

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 2>can or will be able to. So I'll point a

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of the questions.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Hold you up for a Second's going to just ask you,

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>how many rookies have you got on the field in

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>fens and the forward line.

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Two and two in defense and the forward line, one

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 2>of them being Jackson Pryor down back and then Sam

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 2>poul Pepper at the moment is in my forward line.

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 3>This is a bit more security.

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I think we've got slightly more than we were panicking about.

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I just feel slightly better about them than a lot

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 2>of other people do.

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting. Yeah, I mean I've got one in one.

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's something I've been doing and throwing on

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and again. As you say, when teams come out, that'll

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>help a bit, But especially in those early best dating rounds,

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>those sort of lower scores are going to drop out anyway.

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>So if that gives you cash to spend up elsewhere,

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's the way to go.

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and across the board, my rookies are just a

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit more expensive as well. I listened to the

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 2>lair they're talking about having more expensive guys on the bench.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 2>I've got nath Thradriscoll and leave By Ashcroft on my

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 2>midfield bench and Isaac Kacka on the forward bench. So

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I would rather be paying up for rookies that will

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 2>be there the whole way through the season, or the

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 2>whole way through the early part, rather than possibly going

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 2>for like a hy Boxhel or a Lucas Campa Rally

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 2>who maybe might not be there for as long we

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Yep, No, that's fair and that's up. Yeah. I mean

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you get someone summed off as we saw with children

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the other day, and it just just kills them in

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of cash generation and points obviously, So if you

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>can find guys that we think will be safer, yeah,

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>probably he's worth paying.

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so.

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 2>The only other questions there was a few on the

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 2>younger Essendon guys a LAS artists covered in that rookie podcast,

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 2>but I assume you're starting him, and then Ben is

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 2>also asking about Ben Hobbes.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean it should defer to you as

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>as the bombs man, I mean, he got plenty of

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>CBA's in the practice match. Was that the aiming series

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>or the other one? And he is cheap. I think

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>he's in the two hundreds.

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Isn't he. I'm just getting that two sixty.

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Two and he's a forward, so that sort of similar price.

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I've got Hugo Garcia down there, who's I think two

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>forty five, so it's around the same mark. I mean,

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if he's getting, you know, set of bounces, that's kind

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>of his go and can score okay, But where do

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you see him fitting in in when this actually names

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>their best site?

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Who knows?

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 2>I really couldn't, like I struggled to name the best

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty three now at the moment, and I think Ben

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Hobbs is very much on the periphery of it. There's

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 2>a chance that if he has a bad game and

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 2>then he's out, will set a field comes in. He

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 2>might be the sub they used him ass a sub

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 2>a little bit last year, could be subbed off as well.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know.

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Just we've got, you know, guys like Garcia and Caleb

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Daniel around. I think they're probably options i'd be going

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 2>for instead. The only other question before we can move

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 2>on for live questions to come in Nick Dekos, what

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>did he make of that opening round Debarcle from the Pies?

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Do do you jump up him? Off him if you've

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 2>got him.

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I was initially in the camp of note because you

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>know you're picking him for the whole season. If he

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.479
<v Speaker 1>drops a little bit in price doesn't really matter. But

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I have actually taken him out now, just thinking like

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it is a money game, and if you pick him

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and play over six hundred and whatever K is now

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and other people can get him for fifty k cheaper

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>than that, that is an advantage that everybody gets on

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you because you know that's fifty k that they've been

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>able to spend somewhere else. So the timing of it

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>can get tricky like it's you know, we were talking

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier today on off are about to Finn Callahan and

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you know, do you wait until after

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>his buy and then try and get him in because

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>they have the early buy and his price won't move

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>until round three and all that sort of thing. But

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>then you still have to have the trades and the

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>money at the right time to make it happen. So

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to say, I'll just get to take us

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>after his buy, but then you'll still be close to

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>six hundred thousand dollars and you know that early in

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the season, I don't know that that's going to be

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>such a simple maneuver. But if you get points on

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the field somewhere else through you know, it's spreading that

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>money around now and then maybe it's around six or

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>seven when the planet's aligned and you can you know,

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd certainly be targeting him to try and get him in,

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to be a finished team for certain

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think that is what I'm going to try

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and do. Whe whether I can actually you know, make

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>it happen, We'll wait and see, you know, you know,

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>heaps of things are going to come up and you

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>know we'll be trying to get Bontempelli and around the

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>same time and all these kinds of things. But at

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>the moment he's not in for me.

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, fair enough. Should we go to some live questions now?

0:20:58.480 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Do you want me to read him outor do you

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 3>want to read him out?

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Or how we how we we can drop it Jane

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 1>if you like. But Haru wants to know about Jordan Dawson.

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I was already mentioned my sort of philosophy on Crow's midfield.

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he is probably under price, but still just

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the nervous about probably going to be highly fluctuating scores.

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he can put up some really big ones,

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>but he might have some some ones on the other

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>side as well.

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the scaling king where he does a lot in

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 3>last quarters.

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 2>But also if he gets thrown forward then he might

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 2>disappear for half a foot year. So there's He's certainly

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 2>a brilliant footballer, very much a MISDI fix it kind

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 2>of situation. I think his value, but I think as well,

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 2>we've seen a lot of guys come through. You know,

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 2>you look at Callahan or Callahan day, sorry, share a

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 2>few of these other options and kind of if you're

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 2>going to them, you probably can't afford as well the

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Dawson types. So I think he's very easy to fall

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 2>out of your side on that front.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 3>I like him.

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 2>I think he's been an out of my team. I

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 2>hope he has a very good year, should bounce back.

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, that fluctuation you mentioned means that he's probably

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 2>going to be cheap at some point when he has

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 2>one odd game, so certainly that a must start.

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I.

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Like this like this from Wayne Jayden short is like

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>finding an old magazine under the car seat. I know

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't thought, I want to talk me out of it.

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 3>You're the Richmond man. Are they going to play and

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 3>kick Chip Mark? And he'd well, she gulled up.

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean at a mouse went on the Club

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>podcast a week or so ago and did say that,

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's trying to teach the players to you know,

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>really the Richmond way with the under dimmer was to

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>just get it and get it forward at all costs.

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And now maybe we need to learn we're not that

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>same team anymore. Slow it down, sometimes have different gears,

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that is a style that they can try

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>and to pull it a little bit more. I mean,

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>it looked like in the preseason they did attempt that

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but I wouldn't say it was a

0:22:56.240 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent successful. So I think he's again he's one

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of these guys that will be value. He's priced at

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>eighty two I think from last year. I'm sure he

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 1>will do better than that, But I'm not sure that

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>he's a He's never been a He's never scored over

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and a season, never everaged over a hundred,

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of ninety eights, And he could potentially

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>get back up there. And if he does, then he's

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you could have him as your last defender

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year. It'd probably be okay.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I'm just I don't know. I mean, Richmond

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>just makes me very nervous. I don't know how big

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, how many points Richmond players are going to

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>score as a rule this year. So yeah, yeah, I

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have him at the moment. But yeah, I can see.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Why people are thinking, Yeah, I agree, he's just a

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 2>background noisy here that we've just got some questions coming

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 2>in live from your house. Yeah, kind of in the

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 2>same boat where you know, you mentioned he could be

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>that last defender, but also Periman could be that last defender.

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 2>And there's a world where Roberts is that last defender

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>as well, and you like, you know Frasier's same mold.

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 2>How many of them do you start? How many of

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 2>them do you keep? I don't have him in I

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 2>also like, don't have the mental afforditude to watch his

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 2>score fluctuate every week. I just can't do it to myself.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>So that pre season game was a classic, wasn't We

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>had about one hundred a half time and then barely

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>touched it after that, So I think there'll probably be

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a bit of that over the course of the season.

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 3>I will not be doing that to myself this season.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, who else have we got?

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 3>On?

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Thoughts on ed Richards? So we did well. I don't

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>know if it came through because there was some ticket

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>shues early, but I think he's down as a test

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>was mentioned in the HbF injury report. But if he

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>plays do we like Ed Richards? It would have been

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>nice to see him through the preseason, especially no bond

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for Law. Obviously, we saw a little bit of him

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>in the midfield last year and it was great, So

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>is there enough there to go on?

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I think there there is certainly the role it'd shown.

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, Bevo loves him and thinks he's a really

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 2>good footballer, and that's kind of enough to you know,

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 2>get him, get him a decent look. He's two came

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 2>more expensive than kind of Rosie though, And I don't

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 2>know if you're picking a guy who hasn't really had

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 2>a clean run at over someone like Rosie and if

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at the Balldold. So there was a question

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 2>that came through before that I saw about Libertore who

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 2>I think I'd rather if you're picking someone from that

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 2>dog's midfield's you know, Sander's up forward or I think

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe liber has slightly more runs on the board and

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>has also not been interrupted this preseason, so I think

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 2>that's yeah, I wouldn't be picking Richard's but he's not.

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 3>I like him. He's a good footballer. He will be fine.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with that. In a comment here from

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a good friend, Abdul is, well he's got no money

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:34.479
<v Speaker 1>left to the bag. Sorry, I don't if we can

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>really help with that one.

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 2>This is one that if you if you can just

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 2>transfer me just one hundred thousand dollars in real money.

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Then I'll sort you out.

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin asking here when I know a few people wrestling

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>with his Cherry v Gorne. So the Phantom has brought

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Gorn in. I think you might be a Gorn man.

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 1>I've got Cherry there. I have looked closely at that fixture.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 1>And obviously we know what happened the other day with

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Kieran Briggs going down. He's going to miss this week

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the Giants played Melbourne mexicourn you think. I think the

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Phantom said might eat Lucky Keith alive, which could happen.

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>But is that enough to pick him for the whole season?

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a little bit more expensive. We know how good

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Cherry was last year. Actually, I think Fanto might have

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>found a way to fit him both. So that is

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that the answer? You just picked the two?

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, if you don't pick them, then you've

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 2>got to watch Tom de Cooning score three million points

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 2>over for the first four games of the season. So

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm still a bit up in the air. I've currently

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 2>got gone. I've had Cherry for a long period of time.

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I had Gorne and Cherry and was fading Deconing for

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 2>a little bit and then that made me feel physically ill.

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 2>So I think I think Gorne scores more in the

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 2>opening five weeks. He's got GWS with no Briggs North

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Melbourne's so Cherry will be a tough match up an

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 2>aging Jared Wits Sam da cooning against Geelong and again

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 2>could feast an ungodly amount and then Essendon, who a

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 2>difficult to score against from a perspectives.

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know.

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I think Gown's got He's got a very good opening run,

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 2>but I think both of them will be top three

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 2>rucks by the season's end.

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you can't really go wrong with either, to

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>be honest. But yeah, as you say, Gorne, you know,

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>expects some pretty big numbers early on. He has a

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>weird history of not scoring very well around one, but

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that all continue this weekend this

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>he might.

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Be a lu Cryan, is he?

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. Yeah, I've got Cherry. But yeah, either either

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>are good and they probably are going to be the

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>top two rucks at the end of the year. We

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>see what happens with TDK. But then yet, like he's

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna have some big numbers earlier, So pick your poison now.

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>The question here about Roberts being a trap. I don't

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>think he is. Feels like Coxsville experiment a bit and

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>move stuff around, But I mean, I think the good

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>thing from roberts point view the other day was that

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>he actually did he have one kick in for the game,

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:52.719
<v Speaker 1>so he wasn't relying on getting all the kick ins

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>to score. He positioned himself nicely in the back pockets

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>so him when Blake he took the kickings, he generally

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>kicked them to Roberts who could then get a mark

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and get some points for that, and then sixty meters

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>up the field where he pretty much hit a target

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 1>every time. So yeah, it actually showed that he's got

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a few different ways to score. He gets a few

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>more pick inscts might make it even a bit easy

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>for yep.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 2>And if he plays in the midfield, he's got pedigree

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 2>from like a junior level that he scored points for

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 2>fun and the Sam flonderrade ends, so shout out to Phantom.

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>This is an interesting question from Zach. Should I get

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Petraker or is it too risky. He's just a little

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>sneak peak reveal and when I put my team reveal out,

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>he is currently my m two. Is that crazy? I

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>just feel like he's been forgotten by everybody. I mean,

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously his preseason hasn't been ideal, but it didn't look

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like he mister beat when he came back for their

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Amy Series game. And if I can't quite afford Gone,

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll get the next best thing when he gets a

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand hitouts this weekend and pick Clary and Petraka in

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>my midfield.

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I think if he works for you by structures, then yeah,

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 2>he's a good pick. I think he looks back, He

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 2>looks back, he looks fit. Lock him in.

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Good.

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for that confirmation. I like that question about

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Cherit if Walsh plays, so we think Welsh will come back.

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out that seems probably in a few hours.

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But does that ruin Chera as a pick, do you think?

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think they all still work pretty well

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in there, and I mean especially against Richmond.

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't see that being a massive issue for Chair.

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I think the issue with Chair is the competition between

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 2>him and Day and Callahan and Oliver. You can't have

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:35.719
<v Speaker 2>all of them. There was a question before about how

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 2>many is too many? And I think two is a

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 2>good amount and three. I don't know how I feel

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 2>about three. Chair is at the bottom of my rankings

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 2>of the four of them.

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So does Clary count see one of the three?

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, I think if you've got Clary, Day and Callahan,

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 2>you're starting to stretch it depending on, you know, not

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 2>having enough rookies or not having enough firepower from from

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 2>guys who will be top eight mids. I think these

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 2>guys are kind of in the fifteen ish range. Yeah,

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I just I don't like the idea of going in

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of them, and Nature is at the

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 2>bottom of that list for mine, just because I see

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 2>more upside in the others. But I don't think he's

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 2>a bad by any means his value. He will score well,

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 2>he'll you know, should play vague. Injury concerns also play

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 2>into that he's got a history of him Yeah, history

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 2>of injuries. So a little bit worried on that front.

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>A couple more quick ones here, Marshall. He agrees with

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you help Pepper saying better than Lynch. They're both around

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the same price in the forward line. And I don't

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>mind that just as a you know, just absolutely rock solid.

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You can't imagine you've ever been the sub or anything

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>like that. So she'll put up you know, sixty seventies

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:52.479
<v Speaker 1>every week and that's enough to make some money.

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Tom Lynch will have Game three scores twenty one because

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 2>he's playing as full forward in a Richmond side.

0:30:58.880 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 3>And I love Tom Lynch.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a you know, if he was in

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 2>a better team, he would be an absolute lock. But

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I just think Richmond will be sorry, I'll so woeful

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 2>this year that I don't really want a bar of

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 2>anything other than rookies.

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, full forward for Richmond this year is

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>probably the worst scoring role you can think of in

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>super coach. Maybe you know, small forward or forward pocket

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>for Richmond would be worse. So what does that make you?

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of Sam Laylor now that he's

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>going to play. Obviously, he looked really good in that

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>practice match against the Eagles, was probably Richmond's best player,

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and then he got injured right at the end. But

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>now they're saying he's back over two hundred k. I

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think I could walk out for that, you know,

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>having seen so little of him. But I think he

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:42.719
<v Speaker 1>actually will go pretty well. But with all those other

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>expensive rookieses. We probably don't need him. I don't think no.

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 2>And the fact that he's mid only he means he's

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>competing against a bunch of other guys and that, yeah,

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 2>he's just further down the list. If someone you know

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 2>looks really good will be a great player, just if

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 2>he's playing splitting his time up forward. For Richmond, he

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 2>will have games where he kind of disappears and doesn't score,

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 2>and that's really bad for cash generation. He want guys

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 2>that he's consistently scoring. Yeah, you could do worse, but

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I yeah, not for me, not over the likes of

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, looking at Nathan drisk Or, Levi Ashcroft, Lajah Statis,

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Fino Sulomon, ed Allen All at the same price point,

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 2>said dre pro if he's not the sub, yeah, I

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 2>just think all of those guys are ahead of him.

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but we had a couple of games to look

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>at him, and if he turns out his scores, yeah,

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>two chances to start the year. We can make a

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>switch after round two. This is an interesting question, Dodgie

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Malacca asking why is Harry Boyd still in sixty percent

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of teams when Marshall is coming back. I mean, I

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>think the answer is because he's ninety nine thousand dollars.

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I definitely wouldn't have him anywhere near the field on

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>two or on the flex, which a few people were

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>playing around with earlier on in the preseason and we

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>thought Marshall might miss the start of the year. He's

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>probably fine for the rock bench, given that's not many

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>other options there, But I'm not sure how many games

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he's actually going to play. I mean, you're probably just

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>sticking him there. I think he's a loophole for now,

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, hopefully he comes in at some point,

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe Ross tries to mix things up at some point

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and with all some Killers' injuries he gets a run.

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I'm not sure he's going to play too

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>many games alongside Rowan.

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, agreed.

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the fact there aren't any other standout

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 2>options is probably part of it. But yeah, I think

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 2>when teams are released tomorrow night at that number will

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 2>go down a fair bit, especially if someone like Archer

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Readers named, then I think we'll see a pretty big

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 2>fix over. But yeah, there's there's no real other options

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 2>at this stage, so that's that's probably why.

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't reach probably the name I'm looking for

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>on the teams. If he is name for the Eagles

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>did a bit of a sort of backup rocking in

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the preseason and he's got ruck forward, So yeah, it

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be the worst yet to check on the bench

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>there if you have a few extra dollars. But yeah,

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the nine y nine k is is very appealing. What

0:33:57.800 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about a quick draft A latter question. We know you're

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a big supercoach. Draft men, which of these rucks would

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you pick Boyd, Soldo or Stanley some match.

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 2>We are scraping in the bottom of the barrel in

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 2>the draft, I would hope, So you hope you don't

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 2>have pick three? Jeez, that's maybe Stanley if you can

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 2>handcuff a ruck. If you've got Raley O'Brien, then take

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 2>someone like McAndrew I think would be better. But I

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 2>think Soldo is probably the best chance to get a run.

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Him or Stanley would be the two I'd be looking

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:32.760
<v Speaker 2>at for draft.

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, not a lot of great often there. I've

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>got a few more questions quickly to try and get through.

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Question from Martin here SDK or assuming means a frasiers

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in Joel Fraser from the Dogs, so both in that

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.479
<v Speaker 1>sort of three hundred thousand dollars range in the back line.

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>There was a bit of a rush to SDK when

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>we heard the news he was going to play ruck

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>for Youlong, and then he did in a practice Mansion

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>was not that good, scored pretty horribly. They sort of

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>shared the ruck between him and Blitzers and he's been

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the game at full back and didn't

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>seem like a great super coach move. But he did

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>actually play in the rock last year a few times

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and scored all right, sort of in the nineties. I

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>think even that game when his brother completely dominated, he's

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 1>still actually scored okay. So if that's something you know,

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.479
<v Speaker 1>if he's named in the ruck tomorrow night, is there

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>some value there or What do you think of JOELH. Frasier,

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>who has looked pretty good for the Dogs in the preseason,

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>but he's only ten games into his AFL career.

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I'd be I'd rather Frasier of the

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 2>pair of them. I just think he's got more upside

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and he's got a role that's just more more set

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 2>and more reliable to get him some points decooning depending

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 2>on who's rucking against might have a mayor or might

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 2>be able to do what his brother does, and you

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 2>get some tackles, we get some possessions. My main worry

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 2>with deconning is just having watched Geelong mess around in

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the Rocks for ten years, I just have no faith

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 2>that Chris Scott is going to not bring Ree Stanley

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 2>back in round three and then you know, ditch Ree

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Stanley again in round you know five, and bring in

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 2>what's the young Edwards? Whoever the young ruck is like

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 2>they're just Conway.

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Or somewhere down there on the Injurviet. Yeah, it's just.

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 3>A mess and I don't want to bar off it.

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.399
<v Speaker 2>And you know, if if you take the puntner comes off,

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 2>then incredible. But I think it's just too big of

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 2>a risk for my liking as well. We've had some

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.320
<v Speaker 2>questions come through from Instagram as well, Max Murray asking

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 2>if Bailey Humphrey is one to watch. He had twenty

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.839
<v Speaker 2>touches against Sydney and lots of cbas, have you got

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 2>any interest in Bailey Humphrey as a cheapish forward option.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean not as a starting pick. I like him

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>as a player and I'll in this one we can

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on. He's shown in the past that

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 1>he can score pretty well with some sort of high

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>impact board type. But I remember I actually didn't have

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>him that year when he came in the year and

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>he put up some really good scores. And it seems

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>like three or four games in a row he like

0:36:58.120 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>kick the winning goal or did something crazy at the

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>end of it. You know, all this extra scaling. So

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's just you know, his superpower. But yeah, just

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just to watch for me at this statue.

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Yep, agreed.

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Any others there someone asking about Luke Ryan Craig saying

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if he's worth it at DE two, and I mean

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think my short answer is no, just because he's

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>so expensive, but I think he was still scoring, Okay,

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he's probably the ownership is quite low considering he'd probably

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:26.879
<v Speaker 1>be your top six defender at the end of the year.

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just, you know, we're all trying to get the

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>best value we can out of every pick. And I

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>mean even we're paying up for Cheesel because we think

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>he can match or a potentially even go better than

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>last year Ryan averaged. I think in the end it

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>was aout one hundred and fifteen after being insane in

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the year and then tailing off

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit towards the end. And that's the worry that

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you pay that much money for him

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for one fifteen average and he averages one of six

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>or something, that's still fine, but yeah, there's more sort

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of points for dollar doesn't look so great.

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the crux of it, where you know,

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 2>most people only have space for one release and Guy

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:02.879
<v Speaker 2>and Harry, She's all looks like he'll be that guy Ryan,

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 2>we'll score one hundred and sixty in round one because

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 2>he always does.

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Just every year he just pops off. Some people will

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 3>flock to him.

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 2>But I think if your old fan will get him

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 2>for we'll get him for much cheaper throughout the year.

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's that's the reason I'm not starting him. I

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 2>think he's a very solid pick.

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Yep, I agree with that. So I think we should

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>wrap up here with this question that there's a few

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>people buy something similar, and it is the first year

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we've ever had to deal with this, so to be honest,

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>we don't know the answer. We're guessing a bit. But

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Herman asking who is the best flex option, another ruck

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>or a mid And my kind of answer is that

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I think in an ideal world, I'd have him like

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a mid forward sitting there. But just the way that

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>it's panned out, we've got all these rucks that we

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:51.320
<v Speaker 1>want to pick. You know, I want to get t

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Dk in with that run with him solo rucking. I'd

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>love to pick Gorn and Cherry, but can only fit

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>one of them in. And then you've got Flynn, who

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we know in the past. Cheap rucks can be the

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.720
<v Speaker 1>best cash cows in super coach because you've got access

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to all those points. You're at every center bounds just about.

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>You're getting hit outs, you're getting tackles and stoppages, clearances

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and all these sorts of things that just you know,

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not that hard for I mean not hard. You

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>know it's got to be in April football. But do you

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>see these backup racks coming and they can quite often

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>score seventies and eighties. You know that much easier than

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I se Hm Laylo, who's got to do

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it playing in the midfield or in the half forward

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>or other players who are getting subbed on or off.

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're not so much subbing ruckman out of

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the game. So I think I have to find a

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>spot for Clint. If it looks like he's going to

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>be the number one ruck at West Coast, which we

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think he will be, I guess we'll see the teams

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 1>hopefully that pans out. So for me, flexes the spot

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>for him. So I'm a little bit, you know, I

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of don't love the fact that by doing that

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>year sort of he has to be there. You have

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to pick him in your best twenty three every week

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>because there's no way to move him unless he's swapping

0:39:57.680 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>him with a BOYD or someone at three, whereas if

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got to a DPP there you can move players

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>around to try and get your best players on field

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>each week. But having said that, you know your rock ruckman,

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>who starting ruck is going to be probably in your

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>best team every week anyway, and then hopefully he can

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>just make a heap of money in the first sort

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of seven or eight rounds and then we can use it.

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You see how the flex plays out for the rest

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of the year in terms of you know who the

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>best players are to roll through there. But it's a

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of a sort of a confusing answer but at

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 1>the moment, yeah, it's many Flinn for me.

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd also have Flynn in there, But throughout most

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 2>of the preseason, I've tried to have a forward mid

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 2>like a Lajah Few.

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 3>It's been sitting there for a long while.

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Isaac Kaco, who's the third most popular flex player, as

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 2>revealed on the Lair this week. You know, those guys

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:41.919
<v Speaker 2>I think give you the most flexibility, and I think

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 2>they're you know, by seasons, and.

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 3>I'll look to have a mid forward in that position.

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Someone like a you know, someone with a massive ceiling ideal,

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 2>like a Shay Bolton type possibly would I think be

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 2>the ideal person to sit in that flock spot.

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:00.840
<v Speaker 3>That the type of player.

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, as as you said, just the value from

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Matt Flynn is just like not something that we can ignore.

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 2>He's not somebod who can sit on the bench. He's

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 2>not someone I trusted r too, So he's in the

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 2>flax and that's just kind of you know, what the

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 2>new position lets us do.

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:18.320
<v Speaker 3>But I think long.

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Term, you know, in any other year, someone like Hugo

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Garcia maybe could have been the perfect option there, But

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Flynn is just undeniable from where I see it.

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:30.280
<v Speaker 2>But if it was the choice of giving Matt Flynn

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 2>any position, I'd be giving him mid forward.

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that flex, Yeah, ideally exactly. So everybody, thank you

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in. Thanks, we got through a heap of

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:41.800
<v Speaker 1>questions here. There's more there. We didn't have time for everybody,

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>but we will be back tomorrow. Well, I will be

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 1>back tomorrow night for the live teams show here. I

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>think the Phantom is going to jump on for a

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>special Round one sort of panic addition, we'll get the

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>teams tonight, I guess from the Richmond Carlton game, and

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.359
<v Speaker 1>then we'll have all the teams tomorrow for the full

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Round one. And it's just crazy that it's so close

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>after you know, weeks and weeks and weeks. I remember

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>when team pick are opened and no, this team looks

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Now we're sort about a point where we

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 1>have to lock in some choices and actually stick by them.

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, enjoy those unlimited trades where they last, because

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 2>there's not long left now before you have to lock

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 2>it in and those trades become worth their weight in gold.

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 3>So nervous, excited, keen for just lockout the start.

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Yep, Thanks everybody for listening, Thanks Patch for jumping HbF,

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, plenty more content to come. As I said,

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:38.879
<v Speaker 1>live show tomorrow, heats and content on the site. Team

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>reveals a consensus, team, cheat sheets, all kinds of things.

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Fill your leagues and let's get into it. Supercoach is

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>almost Yeah, let's still seem