Speaker 1: On scor litles ostrodio.
Speaker 2: This it's the Wader Panalty Show.
Speaker 1: Good evening and welcome to the readA Panety Show coming
Speaker 1: up tonight. Controversy at their Olympics as a broadcaster is
Speaker 1: sent home for sexist comments while organizers apologize for that
Speaker 1: god awful opening ceremony. The Victorian government's war against property
Speaker 1: investors intensifies, with landlords facing a thirty thousand dollar bill
Speaker 1: to meet new energy guidelines. Alex Stein will join me
Speaker 1: with the latest from the US, where the Democrat's propaganda
Speaker 1: arm is trying desperately to rewrite Kamala Harris's history, and
Speaker 1: of course, plenty of left is losing it after the
Speaker 1: first ad break, including this dude, never Trump guy.
Speaker 3: I'm a never Trump guy, never liked them. I'm a
Speaker 3: never Trump guy.
Speaker 4: I'm a never Trump guy.
Speaker 1: I'm a never Trump guy. But I warn you not
Speaker 1: all our left is losing it. Are that happy? Some
Speaker 1: are really losing it?
Speaker 5: Henny honey anymore? It's not honey, It's not honey.
Speaker 1: But first, let's bring in Scarna's contributor, prou macswaen Prue.
Speaker 1: We'll get to the scandaled riddled games shortly but first
Speaker 1: the ABC that can't help themselves. The Public Broadcaster's chief
Speaker 1: political correspondent, Laura Tingle has taken another swipe but Opposition
Speaker 1: leader Peter Dutton, accusing him of using trump Pin language
Speaker 1: when discussing nuclear energy.
Speaker 2: The interesting part of this, apart from Peter Dutton's sort
Speaker 2: of somewhat Trumpian language about all of these subjects and
Speaker 2: he's rather loose assertion effects in many of his statements.
Speaker 1: She also claimed Peter Dutton's nuclear policy was just an
Speaker 1: accident of internal factional interparty warfare within the Coalition. And
Speaker 1: I don't know about you, Peru, but it wasn't that
Speaker 1: long ago. I'm sure I remember the ABC cheir Kim
Speaker 1: Williams saying if you don't want to reflect a view
Speaker 1: that aspires to impartiality, don't work at the ABC. How
Speaker 1: impartial do Tingle and mass ound well, not at all.
Speaker 6: And it was interesting that Ida Buttrose, the former chairman today,
Speaker 6: was even quoted as saying they needed to present both
Speaker 6: sides of the story.
Speaker 1: But it seems to be irrelevant to the players.
Speaker 6: Who run you know what is it the animals running
Speaker 6: the zoo? Because Tingle et ol just ignore these directives
Speaker 6: and it seems that Kim Wi Williams and also Ida
Speaker 6: Buttros didn't.
Speaker 1: Have the metal to take them on.
Speaker 6: And so we have this situation where Tingle is just
Speaker 6: being so predictable. Yet again, I don't under same way
Speaker 6: anyone unless you really are an anti liberal person. Why
Speaker 6: would you ever listen to Ma, listen to Tingle, listen
Speaker 6: to cavail Us, any of them, because they're just preaching
Speaker 6: to the converted. People like us just get so irritated
Speaker 6: and just want to throw something at the television or radio.
Speaker 6: But she's so obsessed, but she doesn't make sense either.
Speaker 6: So we have this situation where we're paying her salary
Speaker 6: and she's presenting one side, a one sided view that
Speaker 6: you know half the population do not agree with. And
Speaker 6: you know, it's just very sad. She's been turning into
Speaker 6: a very bitter old woman.
Speaker 1: Well, the ABC is supposed to be there for all
Speaker 1: of us because we all pay for it. It has a charter,
Speaker 1: it's taxpayer funded, it has to be impartial, and it
Speaker 1: just fails to live up to that charter every single day.
Speaker 1: We've got plenty of media companies that are left leading.
Speaker 1: That's fine, you can have all your Guardians and nine
Speaker 1: and ten and whoever you want to have. That's fine.
Speaker 1: They're not relying on the taxpay they don't have a charter.
Speaker 1: We've got pinion shows right here on Sky with all
Speaker 1: sorts of opinion, including conservative ones like ours. But the
Speaker 1: ABC has obligations as a taxpayer funded broadcast, so that
Speaker 1: it just dismisses and coalition governments need to start taking
Speaker 1: notice and actually doing something about it, rather than just
Speaker 1: bitching and moaning endlessly when they're not in power. Now
Speaker 1: let's go to Victoria and the premiere here just to
Speaker 1: Allan has invited us all to join her on a
Speaker 1: trip down the Westgate Tunnel project. She's singing along to
Speaker 1: eighties classics on her way to this tunnel that's costing us.
Speaker 1: I don't know about four billion dollars last I checked.
Speaker 7: And now they're going to.
Speaker 1: Solve me down.
Speaker 8: Oh no, I've got to keep a movement.
Speaker 9: Yeah yeah, we're missing our journey on the eleven point
Speaker 9: six kilometers of brand new, beautiful road.
Speaker 8: And this is incredible.
Speaker 9: Connect so you can see the Westgate Bridge, you.
Speaker 4: Can see the Porter Melbourne, the connections into the city.
Speaker 1: It just really is bringing it all together. Okay, we
Speaker 1: didn't see any of the road there. We did see
Speaker 1: the premiere having a single long She's got a massive
Speaker 1: media social media team. This is the best they can do.
Speaker 1: And I just got to correct myself there. I think
Speaker 1: I said the project costs four billion. No, it's four
Speaker 1: billion over budget and severely late as well. Prove do
Speaker 1: you think that sort of content speaks to the electorate, Well.
Speaker 6: It's telling them that this woman has no idea apart
Speaker 6: from the fact that she's a pretty crook singer as well.
Speaker 1: If she thinks that this is.
Speaker 6: Going to diffuse the absolute horror of the spectacle of her,
Speaker 6: you know, trying to do the sergeant shulds that she
Speaker 6: knew nothing about the CFMMEU. If she thinks this is
Speaker 6: going to deffuse that situation, make her more relatable and
Speaker 6: you know, let's move on.
Speaker 1: Nothing to see here. She's got to be kidding.
Speaker 6: You know, this woman has her antenna is so off,
Speaker 6: and whoever is advising her, you know, love get a grip,
Speaker 6: because honestly, she's got big fish to fry. I don't
Speaker 6: even know how she can even concentrate on driving with
Speaker 6: that voice and that sing along, but with the troubles
Speaker 6: that are going to be ahead with her when she's
Speaker 6: found to be really on the wrong side of activities,
Speaker 6: let's say, with the support of the CFMEU.
Speaker 1: Well, the least her team could have done as they
Speaker 1: were filming that was to turn the camera around and
Speaker 1: show us what she was talking about. Show us this
Speaker 1: road that's costing US billions and is years later. That
Speaker 1: would be nice to see. Now the Paris Olympics are underway,
Speaker 1: we can't bring you any pictures, apologies for that, but
Speaker 1: they haven't been without controversy. We had that disastrous opening
Speaker 1: ceremony that saw world leaders left out in the rain.
Speaker 1: There were technical problems. They were mocking Christianity, including drag
Speaker 1: queens parodying the Last Supper, and then there was young
Speaker 1: children dancing with scantily clad men or trans women. And
Speaker 1: now a US tech company has cut ties with the
Speaker 1: Games over that opening ceremony and a Catholic bishop has
Speaker 1: gone viral for this reaction.
Speaker 10: And it's in Paris, Francis city. I love, I spent
Speaker 10: three years as a doctoral student there. What do I
Speaker 10: but this gross mockery of the Last Supper? France whose
Speaker 10: culture and I mean the honoring of the individual of
Speaker 10: human rights and freedom is grounded very much in Christianity.
Speaker 10: Felt the right thing to do was to mark the
Speaker 10: Christian faith. You know a question I would pause, We
Speaker 10: all know the answer to it. Were they ever dared
Speaker 10: mark is Lam in a similar way?
Speaker 1: And a Paris twenty twenty four spokesperson Prue has apologized
Speaker 1: sort of for that opening ceremony, saying there was never
Speaker 1: an intention to show disrespect to any religious group. Really,
Speaker 1: on the contrary, I think that artistic director Thomas Jorley
Speaker 1: really tried to celebrate community tolerance. Yeah. Really, I don't
Speaker 1: know about you, Prue, but I didn't sort of detect
Speaker 1: tolerance and inclusion in that. I saw just a lot
Speaker 1: of woke, grantstanding and really lame performance. What was your
Speaker 1: opinion of the opening ceremony was certainly very long? You've
Speaker 1: got to say that, Yeah, it was.
Speaker 6: Look, I'm a bit of a Francophile and I love
Speaker 6: the avant garde side of France, So to me, I
Speaker 6: didn't take it the way most people have. You know,
Speaker 6: I thought it was the feast of Dionysius, the Olympic
Speaker 6: god of wine and pleasure, et cetera, and he was
Speaker 6: the father of the Goddess of the Seine, and so
Speaker 6: you know, it was a nod to the Olympic, you know,
Speaker 6: the Greeks, et cetera.
Speaker 1: So that was where I took it.
Speaker 6: But certainly having seen how the Christianity and those of
Speaker 6: religious faith have responded, well, then clearly I'm.
Speaker 1: The naive one and it passed me by.
Speaker 6: And I feel that if they were offended, then they
Speaker 6: deserve an apology. I mean, if you imagine if it
Speaker 6: had been Islam that was mocked, I mean, my god,
Speaker 6: we would have fatis a million miles an hour. And
Speaker 6: you know, so I understand also that there would be
Speaker 6: sensitivity is because frankly, Christianity and Christians are under attack,
Speaker 6: it seems in so many ways. So if that's the case,
Speaker 6: I think it's sad, because overall I really enjoyed it.
Speaker 6: I thought it really did depict what France.
Speaker 4: Is like.
Speaker 1: In the Olympics.
Speaker 6: I don't know that was such a great event for
Speaker 6: the spectators, but the people at home I thought got
Speaker 6: something positive out of it.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm glad you enjoyed it. You are, I think,
Speaker 1: in the what I've heard, you may be the only one,
Speaker 1: judging by some of the commentary. We've heard some of
Speaker 1: the feedback on social media and elsewhere. I just thought
Speaker 1: the whole thing, well, what I saw that I didn't
Speaker 1: watch the entire catastrophe, but what I saw that I
Speaker 1: found just to be underwhelming, lame, the mocking of Christianity.
Speaker 1: I didn't think it was even clever. And you know,
Speaker 1: if you're going to do that, if you're going to
Speaker 1: go in that space and risk offending millions of people,
Speaker 1: then at least be very good about how you do it.
Speaker 1: And I thought he was done in a very clumsy fashion.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I wasn't a fan. But you know, we
Speaker 1: have all sorts of opinions on this program, and I'm
Speaker 1: interested in your opinion too about this next story, because
Speaker 1: the Eurosport veteran Olympic commentator has been sent home. He
Speaker 1: has been condemned for what is been called a sexist
Speaker 1: remark made about Australia's gold medal winning freestyle relay teams.
Speaker 1: Now broadcaster Bob Ballard was heard saying, and I quote here,
Speaker 1: well the women are just finishing up. You know what
Speaker 1: women are like, hanging around doing their makeup, and The
Speaker 1: Daily Mail reports that his commentary partner Lizzie Simmons was
Speaker 1: outraged about that. She said that remark was outrageous and
Speaker 1: he was removed from the commentary team Proof and Euros
Speaker 1: has sent him home. How do you see, It's very
Speaker 1: hard to judge because without actually hearing it and seeing
Speaker 1: if it was setting jest and if there was humor,
Speaker 1: whether it was a serious comment that had some sort
Speaker 1: of a nasty undertone to it. But just reading it
Speaker 1: on paper, to me, that doesn't seem like a I
Speaker 1: don't know, a sacking offense. Is that a sexist remark?
Speaker 1: I don't think it is in that.
Speaker 6: You know, Look, it wasn't a clever remark, you know,
Speaker 6: I think he was very clumsy, But we have to
Speaker 6: also accept that. Thankfully, there's a lot of women now
Speaker 6: who are in sport as commentators, but there's still a
Speaker 6: lot of dinosaur matcho bullfeds that are you know, part
Speaker 6: of the ranks, and I think this bloke falls into
Speaker 6: that rank where they haven't really felt comfortable about saying
Speaker 6: too many positive things about women. And I can understand
Speaker 6: why this team, their supporters and many would be outraged
Speaker 6: by it, But you know, I just think the bloke
Speaker 6: was being a useful idiot in that he was filling
Speaker 6: some time in and thought, oh this, this will make a
Speaker 6: funny joke, when in fact it was just dumb.
Speaker 8: It was.
Speaker 1: But I mean, to me it was a sort of
Speaker 1: a silly comment. I mean, they just want a gold
Speaker 1: medal that can take their time doing whatever they want
Speaker 1: to do. But I don't know. Again, I think it's
Speaker 1: all about tone and delivery and reading it on paper.
Speaker 1: To me, it's a dumb comment. It's not a necessarily
Speaker 1: a sexist comment that deserves to see a veteran commentator
Speaker 1: fired and sent home. But maybe I'll reserve judgment until
Speaker 1: we can actually play the audio there. We can't even
Speaker 1: show you some of these pictures, so many restrictions per McSween.
Speaker 1: But thank you so much for your time. We always
Speaker 1: appreciate your insights. Journing me now is a steem geologist
Speaker 1: professor Ian Plymer Ian. Let's start in Victoria. The government
Speaker 1: is forcing mom and Dad investors to spend upwards of
Speaker 1: thirty thousand dollars in order to make their rental properties
Speaker 1: meeting new guidelines, including switching from gas to electric hot
Speaker 1: water and heating systems. The Victorian Chamber of Commerce and
Speaker 1: Industry warns the new rules risk a further exodus of
Speaker 1: landlords during a rental crisis. Professor, Victoria is sitting on
Speaker 1: hundreds of years of gas reserves. Why are we forcing households,
Speaker 1: including landlords, to switch to electric only.
Speaker 4: Well, it's worse than that. Victoria has thousands of years
Speaker 4: of brown coal, and that brown cop is sitting waiting
Speaker 4: to provide heating and energy for the state. They also
Speaker 4: have significant onshore gas deposits which I don't want to exploit,
Speaker 4: and the significant potential for offshore gas deposits in bas
Speaker 4: Strait and off the Otway Basin. They are very energy retch.
Speaker 4: The only thing Victoria doesn't have is stacks of black
Speaker 4: coal and uranium. So here we have an ideological decision
Speaker 4: not to use gas. Yet the electricity, most of electricity
Speaker 4: which Victoria uses, actually comes from coal. So the argument
Speaker 4: is actually nuts. It is fallacious. There is a little
Speaker 4: bit of energy that comes when the sun decides to
Speaker 4: shine and when the wind decides to blow, that comes
Speaker 4: from solar and wind. That doesn't come when you want
Speaker 4: it to come, that doesn't come at peak times, that
Speaker 4: doesn't come at times when there's a massive sudden surge,
Speaker 4: and energy used. So the whole lot is ideologically driven.
Speaker 4: It's not driven to help the Victorian taxpayers, it's not
Speaker 4: driven to lower people's costs. Is driven out of ideology.
Speaker 4: And if anyone really thinks that they can run a
Speaker 4: restaurant on electric cooking rather than gas cooking, then think again.
Speaker 1: Well, there's so much confusion even in that sector because yeah,
Speaker 1: can you imagine cooking on a walk on an electric
Speaker 1: cook top. But there's supposed to be exemptions, but even
Speaker 1: people within the industry, heavyweights within the industry, are not
Speaker 1: clear on what those exemptions are. So it is an
Speaker 1: absolute mess. In and staying in Victoria, the minister here,
Speaker 1: Lily Dambrosio, She went out to visit a solar farm,
Speaker 1: a new ninety three megawatt project in the final stages
Speaker 1: of construction. She says this project will create not only jobs,
Speaker 1: deliver cheap, reliable, renewable electricity. Do you see it that way?
Speaker 1: I do wonder about the impact of these solar farms
Speaker 1: on the soil, on the lifespan of those panels, how
Speaker 1: often they need to be replaced, what happens with the waste.
Speaker 1: There seems to be so many questions that I don't
Speaker 1: think I've got fulls of answers to well.
Speaker 4: What I see in the second photograph that appeared on
Speaker 4: the screen is a lot of grass. This is clearly
Speaker 4: prime agricultural land which is being destroyed by people seeking
Speaker 4: out subsidies. These people are normally people living outside Australia.
Speaker 4: These people don't care about what price people pay for
Speaker 4: electricity in Australia. These solar facilities, they're not farms, farms productive.
Speaker 4: These are bloodsuckers. They suck subsidies. These facilities use parts
Speaker 4: made in China. They're owned by foreign corporations. They destroyed
Speaker 4: perfectly good farmland. They then pollute that farmland over a
Speaker 4: long period of time with the lead and a cadinum
Speaker 4: and the selenium and the arstic that leads out of
Speaker 4: those panels. And if we had a hailstorm, then there's
Speaker 4: glass spread everywhere. It's not cleaned up. This is not environmentalism,
Speaker 4: This is not sensible energy policy. This is a policy
Speaker 4: to fill people's pockets who may well be mates to
Speaker 4: the labor party in Victoria. Who knows anything goes in Victoria.
Speaker 4: But this is absolutely catastrophic for the average consumer. This
Speaker 4: is pushing up the prices of electricity, and you cannot
Speaker 4: guarantee that you will have electricity at midnight when you
Speaker 4: might need it to keep the freezers going in a supermarket.
Speaker 1: Well, let's just be thankful the CFMM you has not
Speaker 1: opened up any solar farms, because can you imagine that?
Speaker 1: And they're just ugly And when you fly over in
Speaker 1: it and you see a beautiful bit of country be
Speaker 1: scarred by these solar panels, it is just I think
Speaker 1: it's happening to a scale that a lot of Australians
Speaker 1: are not aware of. Now, I want to ask you
Speaker 1: about a piece that was in Bloomberg. Columnist there, Javier
Speaker 1: Blast has written about how coal is still king, with
Speaker 1: two hundred and seventy five metric tons burned every second worldwide,
Speaker 1: and he wonders if talk of coal's demise has been
Speaker 1: greatly exaggerated. The demand for coal in China and India
Speaker 1: in particular is only growing.
Speaker 4: Well, if you smoke certain substances and drink the kool aid,
Speaker 4: you will believe that this attack on coal is closing
Speaker 4: down coal fire generators and closing down the use of coal.
Speaker 4: That is not the case. The numbers share a different story.
Speaker 4: We've had for the last hundred years, about eighty two
Speaker 4: percent of all energy that is used worldwide is from
Speaker 4: fossil fuels. More recently, we've had an increase and the
Speaker 4: amount of coal that's being used. This is driven by
Speaker 4: the amount of steel that's been created and the amount
Speaker 4: of energy that's been created. In Southeast Asia, in India,
Speaker 4: coal is actually on the increase. It is first world
Speaker 4: countries Australia where we are decreasing the amount of coal
Speaker 4: that's being used, making our electricity systems more expensive and
Speaker 4: more unreliable. But we need coal. We can't do without coal.
Speaker 4: We have to have coal to make steel. We have
Speaker 4: to have cheap, reliable, long term electricity to make other commodities.
Speaker 4: Southeast Asia, China, and India are aware of this, and
Speaker 4: they are basically talking the talk when it comes to
Speaker 4: solar and wind and renewables, but they're actually acting, acting
Speaker 4: in the interests of their nation. We're not doing this
Speaker 4: in this country. We are destroying cheap reliable electricity. We
Speaker 4: once had cheap reliable electricity in Victoria. It was one
Speaker 4: of the cheapest in the world. We once in Eastern
Speaker 4: Australia from black cop we had cheap, reliable electricity, again
Speaker 4: some of the cheapest in the world, and on a
Speaker 4: matter of ideology, we have decided not to use this
Speaker 4: and we say, oh, we're doing this to save the climate. However,
Speaker 4: no one has ever shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide,
Speaker 4: which we get from burning cold, no one has ever
Speaker 4: shown that humany missions of carbon dioxide drive warming. So
Speaker 4: the whole house of cards is an ideological cesspit where
Speaker 4: mates of labor, such as the unions, who have got
Speaker 4: a big steak in wind turbines, where mates of the
Speaker 4: establishment are making a fortune from skinning the average punter.
Speaker 1: Alive, Thank you, professor Ian Primer and don't go nowhere
Speaker 1: Still to come Lefties losing it and Alex Stde on
Speaker 1: the disturbing racial segregation trend coming from Carmala headquarters. Welcome back.
Speaker 1: Now it's time for lefties losing it. Let's start lefties
Speaker 1: with a man who identifies as a woman, who tries
Speaker 1: to guilt a woman into not calling the cops because
Speaker 1: she's black. Had this she, as a black woman called
Speaker 1: the cops on a trans woman. It's all about intersectional
Speaker 1: victim wood with these characters. And then when that tactic
Speaker 1: doesn't work, you really loses it. Buckle in. This is
Speaker 1: a wild ride.
Speaker 5: Ran into me because you're a trans phone and.
Speaker 11: You're having a bad I have trans friends, so why did.
Speaker 4: You walk into me like that.
Speaker 8: You're looking for problems and you're a purpose in retagonizing me.
Speaker 4: Am I.
Speaker 1: So I'm going to give you a minute and then
Speaker 1: I'm going to.
Speaker 11: Call the cops because you're you was going in that
Speaker 11: direction and now you're following me to this location, and
Speaker 11: I'm going to stand here.
Speaker 1: For one minute antagonize.
Speaker 5: Okay, what's your name?
Speaker 4: You're a black woman calling her?
Speaker 1: What's your name? Trans woman?
Speaker 4: And I just want you to what's your name? I
Speaker 4: want you to think about that. Okay, you're a black woman.
Speaker 5: Calling a cops.
Speaker 1: Go ahead, trans continue to go on.
Speaker 8: I want you to think about that.
Speaker 1: We're at thirty seven second.
Speaker 8: I'm going to hang I'm going to start recording at
Speaker 8: one minute, and I'm going to call the cops.
Speaker 1: If you're still in my area.
Speaker 5: I have a and you you hit me. It's canny.
Speaker 5: It's not honey anymore. It's not honey. It's not honey.
Speaker 1: We're just gonna impatiently work weak for the clos Yes
Speaker 1: we are. This is getting your hypocrite.
Speaker 5: You're a liberal, yeah.
Speaker 1: As PTSD.
Speaker 4: Okay, today I apologize.
Speaker 1: Oh that's not very lady like, ma'am. And all these
Speaker 1: figures that poor woman accidentally brushed past him. But it
Speaker 1: wasn't over yet, because here come the illegal threats and
Speaker 1: more guilt trips because I.
Speaker 8: Feel I have a lawyer.
Speaker 4: I have two and three lawyers.
Speaker 5: Honey, I will sue your pants I'm gonna I will
Speaker 5: sue your pants off.
Speaker 1: I'm not speaking any more good.
Speaker 5: I risk my life every day getting ready in the morning.
Speaker 1: He risks his life getting ready in the morning. Really
Speaker 1: is he putting his wig on in front of the Taliban?
Speaker 1: Where's the danger? What I do sees a sense of
Speaker 1: entitlement that is off the scale. Now to a man
Speaker 1: that identifies as viper. That's how he identifies on his
Speaker 1: Instagram page. Here is Xavier Drosso, who also identifies as
Speaker 1: part Chinese, and here he explains why the Asian community
Speaker 1: is so successful, particularly here in the West, even when
Speaker 1: they come here with nothing.
Speaker 11: I'm two percent Chinese, so don't tell me I can't
Speaker 11: identify as Asian. When a man with zero percent of
Speaker 11: a vagina can identify as a woman. Now walk with me.
Speaker 11: Full blooded Asians are too humble to do this, So
Speaker 11: let me explain to you why Asian families don't have
Speaker 11: half the issues of you other people. We are the
Speaker 11: wealthiest group, do the least amount of crimes, have the
Speaker 11: least amount of pronoun warriors, and have the lowest unemployment rate,
Speaker 11: while you big backed bombs sit on the couch. We
Speaker 11: Asians emphasize discipline, education and a strong family unit instead
Speaker 11: of the victim Olympics. Notice how you don't see Asians
Speaker 11: complaining about injustices of the past or apologizing for what
Speaker 11: our ancestors did. Why would I feel guilty about what
Speaker 11: Genghis Khan did? Yeah, universities make a score significantly higher
Speaker 11: than other students to get into the same schools. We
Speaker 11: have no choice but to be elite. Oh, if you're
Speaker 11: you're only Asian when it's convenient, And y'all only know
Speaker 11: what a woman is when it's convenient.
Speaker 12: Goofy.
Speaker 1: Now let's hear from the woman who's going to save
Speaker 1: the world from fascism. According to the loop he left,
Speaker 1: here is Kamala speaking out not against radical Islamic terrorism
Speaker 1: and illegal immigration. No no, Here, she says, we must
Speaker 1: have the courage to object to the terms radical Islamic
Speaker 1: terrorism and illegal aliens.
Speaker 3: You have the courage to object when they use that term.
Speaker 5: Radical Islamic terrorism, and the greatest victims of terror also
Speaker 5: have the first reject that illegal alien.
Speaker 1: That was Harris talking at a mosque back in twenty
Speaker 1: and sixteen. And the timing is important because that was
Speaker 1: at the height of Islamic State's reign of terror, where
Speaker 1: they brutally murdered those they considered non believers, where they abducted, raped,
Speaker 1: and tortured thousands of women and children, including his Zidis.
Speaker 1: And there is Camaline twenty sixteen objecting to the term
Speaker 1: radical Islamic terrorism. But that won't stop the enthusiasm from
Speaker 1: the useful idiots off the left. At least this next
Speaker 1: one is a happy camper. This never Trumper likes a dance.
Speaker 1: So many of them are miserable, This one at least
Speaker 1: looks happy.
Speaker 13: So this is really who Donald Trump shows as his
Speaker 13: running meat.
Speaker 3: I'm a never Trump guy.
Speaker 1: I'm a never Trump guy.
Speaker 14: I'm a never Trump guy. Never liked him.
Speaker 3: I'm a never Trump guy.
Speaker 1: I'm a never Trump guy. I'm a never Trump guy.
Speaker 1: Exercise is good and so is humor. Let's have a
Speaker 1: laugh now with comic Nick Peterson. Folks about the benefits
Speaker 1: of having a brain and thinking.
Speaker 15: Fact.
Speaker 14: I used to believe everything I'd see on the news,
Speaker 14: but that's before I discovered a brain.
Speaker 1: A brain is meant for everyday use.
Speaker 13: Those living with moderate to severe stupidity have seen immediate
Speaker 13: improvement in common sense.
Speaker 8: With a brain.
Speaker 14: I thought the government had my best interest at heart,
Speaker 14: and then a friend told me about a brain.
Speaker 13: Talk to your doctor about what news sources you obey.
Speaker 13: A brain may also lower your desire to take life
Speaker 13: altering advice from celebrities.
Speaker 14: Getting lectured about my carbon footprint from people with three
Speaker 14: private jets used to make sense, But thanks to a brain,
Speaker 14: now I can think for myself every day. When my
Speaker 14: disregard for third grade biology began to flare up, I
Speaker 14: knew it was time for a brain.
Speaker 13: Do not try a brain if you're allergic to a brain.
Speaker 13: Common side effects may include accountability discernment, homeschooling your kids,
Speaker 13: a better understanding of economics, awareness of the stupidity of socialism,
Speaker 13: and diarrhea for tethering yourself.
Speaker 14: The reality, the only no brainer is choosing a brain.
Speaker 14: Ask your doctor if the brain is right for you.
Speaker 1: Now we'll be featuring more left is losing it content
Speaker 1: with my next guess. And it didn't take long after
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris was installed as the Democrats presidential candidate for
Speaker 1: the im media to start rewriting her history. Apparently, she
Speaker 1: was never the borders are, she never had the most
Speaker 1: left wing voting record in the Senate, and she was
Speaker 1: never considered a liability in the Biden administration. Those verifiable
Speaker 1: facts are all dismissed as right wing conspiracies, as is
Speaker 1: the fact that she helped raise bail money for thugs
Speaker 1: during the BLM riots. Look at this headline claiming Trump
Speaker 1: falsely accuses Harris of donating to Minnesota Freedom Fund bailing
Speaker 1: out dangerous criminals. Not only did Kamala do just that,
Speaker 1: her tweet is still up chipping out to the Minnesota
Speaker 1: Freedom Fund to help post bail for those protesting on
Speaker 1: the ground in Minnesota. She posts that at the height
Speaker 1: of the BLM riots and guess what. That link is
Speaker 1: still active. You can still donate and there is Kamala's
Speaker 1: smiling face on the donation page and Trump's campaign is
Speaker 1: doing its best to prevent this bit of history being
Speaker 1: memory hold. This is among their most devastating ads.
Speaker 7: Haris sending this out on X if you're able to
Speaker 7: chip in now to the Minnesota Freedom Fund to help
Speaker 7: post bail from those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.
Speaker 7: Thanks to Harris's promotion, the group reportedly raised thirty five
Speaker 7: million dollars in.
Speaker 8: Just a few weeks.
Speaker 9: Darnika Floyd charged with second degree murder for stabbing a
Speaker 9: friend of doub she got out of jail too, a
Speaker 9: twice convicted rapist currently charged with kidnapping and sexual assault,
Speaker 9: and he walks out too.
Speaker 15: The Freedom Fund raked into nation when it was promoted
Speaker 15: by many, including now Vice President Kamala Harris.
Speaker 7: John Michael Tillman shot and killed a passenger on a
Speaker 7: train platform after reportedly being released from jail three weeks prior,
Speaker 7: all thanks to the Minnesota Freedom Fund.
Speaker 9: Donovan Boone was charged with breaking into homehext girlfriend and
Speaker 9: choking her. Freedom Fund bailed him out for three thousand cash,
Speaker 9: and he hasn't shown up for court.
Speaker 3: Since I often don't even look at a charge specifics.
Speaker 15: When I bailed and went out the Henna. The county
Speaker 15: attorney called out the Minnesota Freedom Fund for bailing Moseley
Speaker 15: out of jail twice previously, even though he was arrested
Speaker 15: for having a gun in the courthouse.
Speaker 16: The Minnesota Freedom Fund, which pays cash bail for low
Speaker 16: income criminals, paid Tims's entire ten thousand dollars bail in cash.
Speaker 16: Eleven days later, police found demand leading from the head
Speaker 16: and ears in this alley. Police were able to arrest
Speaker 16: Tins in connection to this violence assault.
Speaker 3: Howard was arrest Jedny charge was second degree murder.
Speaker 8: The Minnesota Freedom Fund acknowledged supporting Howard's.
Speaker 1: Bailed Johanning as the host of Prime Time with Alex
Speaker 1: Stein on Blaze TV, the encourageable text on himself Alex Stein,
Speaker 1: welcome back to the program. Will that add be effective?
Speaker 1: Kamal's support of BLM's radical agenda and they're mostly peaceful.
Speaker 1: Writing and looting surely is a liability. Law and order
Speaker 1: is a big issue, along with inflation and the border crisis.
Speaker 8: Well, Riata here in America they call you the Tucker
Speaker 8: crass and of Australian News. You know you're super famous here.
Speaker 8: I know people probably don't give you enough respect, but
Speaker 8: you are very famous. And Tucker Carlson says the same
Speaker 8: thing as that our whole entire justice system only helps
Speaker 8: out criminals when have bail reform, a system that helps
Speaker 8: out criminals get out of jail, and they don't care
Speaker 8: about prosecuting crime. So it's just sad that you can
Speaker 8: commit to crime in America and get let out of
Speaker 8: jail under no bell or crimes whatsoever. You want to
Speaker 8: show back up tour or you don't have a billbonds
Speaker 8: and that's required to go back to court. So we
Speaker 8: have a rigged system and it's very sad that it's
Speaker 8: affecting people, not only in America, but it's affecting people
Speaker 8: in Australia.
Speaker 1: The crime in some of those cities in the States
Speaker 1: is just out of control, and they've redefined certain crimes
Speaker 1: to not make them crimes any longer, so you can't
Speaker 1: even trust some of the crime stats these days.
Speaker 16: Now.
Speaker 1: Another issue that is concerning me is the Democrats going
Speaker 1: back to their segregationist roots with this new trend of
Speaker 1: race based groups supporting Kamala Harris. There's white dudes for Harris.
Speaker 1: They held a massive video call to support her presidential
Speaker 1: campaign end what they call the culture of masculinity. And
Speaker 1: a zoom event also was held for white women answer
Speaker 1: the Call that took place also in support of Harris,
Speaker 1: and there's also a group called Win with Black Women.
Speaker 1: Do we now have groups set aside based purely on race.
Speaker 1: As a black man presumably prevented from joining white dudes
Speaker 1: for Harris, it sounds like systematic racism.
Speaker 8: Well, Rita, you know this. Joe Biden said that if
Speaker 8: you don't vote for him, you're not black. And you know,
Speaker 8: I just want to say, I'm so thankful that Australia.
Speaker 8: You guys, let me come on Sky News. It's so great.
Speaker 8: But Chris Lilly, one of the greatest comedians of all time,
Speaker 8: you know, as good as any American comedian that's ever been.
Speaker 8: He calls out all of this race and gender nonsense.
Speaker 8: So that's where we're at, is that we're electing people
Speaker 8: based on their race and their gender instead of being
Speaker 8: a meritocracy based on their record of being successful. So
Speaker 8: you know, we're screwed basing everything on the color of
Speaker 8: a person's skin. It's really sadrida. And you know this,
Speaker 8: you're awake to all this nonsense. But I don't think
Speaker 8: the majority of people that are watching, you know, just
Speaker 8: normal TV, realize that this system is effected you personally,
Speaker 8: the people that are watching at home.
Speaker 1: Has there been much backlash to these race based groups
Speaker 1: that have popped up in support of Harris. Is anyone
Speaker 1: objecting to the fact that, you know, you've got white
Speaker 1: dudes and white women and black I mean, why can't
Speaker 1: they just support Kamala together? Why do they need to
Speaker 1: be separated along racial lines?
Speaker 8: Reader, you nailed it. It's all nonsense. Basing everything about
Speaker 8: race is racist. So it's all nonsensing. White people for Harris,
Speaker 8: you know, white women for Harris. It's all nonsense. Harris
Speaker 8: is a Jamaican Indonesian woman, So when they make everything
Speaker 8: about race, it just proves that they're racist. So people
Speaker 8: here in America they could care less about Kamala Harris
Speaker 8: being coming vice president. In my personal.
Speaker 1: Opinion, did you just try to make her even more
Speaker 1: exotic and make her Indonesian? Isn't Indian heritage there kind
Speaker 1: of close Indonesia.
Speaker 8: Indonesian is Jamaican, She's not.
Speaker 1: Indonesia, not that there's anything wrong with that. Yeah, she's
Speaker 1: Indian Indian Jamaican heritage and we love all of it. Now,
Speaker 1: let's talk about the Republicans Vice presidential candidate JD. Vance.
Speaker 1: Here's how to go at Kamala Harris for saying that
Speaker 1: he wasn't a true patriot and he wasn't loyal to
Speaker 1: the USA.
Speaker 3: I saw the other day Kamala Harris questioned my loyalty
Speaker 3: to this country. That's the word she used, loyalty. And
Speaker 3: it's an interesting word, sipify loyalty because there is no
Speaker 3: greater sign of this loyalty to this country than what
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris has done at our southern border. And I'd
Speaker 3: like to ask the Vice president what has she done
Speaker 3: to question my loyalty to this country. I served in
Speaker 3: the United States Marine Corps. I went to a rack
Speaker 3: for this country. I built a business for this country.
Speaker 3: And my running mate took a bullet for this country.
Speaker 3: So my question, Kamala Harris says, what the hell have
Speaker 3: you done to question our loyalty to the United States
Speaker 3: of America.
Speaker 1: Oh, you've got to say, it's a pretty compelling line
Speaker 1: that one. How is that race going with the way JD.
Speaker 1: Vance is being treated? We were looking forward to the
Speaker 1: Vance Harris debates, they're obviously not going to happen now,
Speaker 1: but once we do know her Kamala's running mate, is
Speaker 1: how do you see that contest working have any sort
Speaker 1: of impact or is the vice president really not something
Speaker 1: that people base their votes on.
Speaker 8: Well, Rita, the vice president actually is important. You know,
Speaker 8: these people have to represent the entire you know, constituency
Speaker 8: day base as being president, if you're the vice president,
Speaker 8: you represent the whole entire country. So it is very important.
Speaker 8: And when these people have to do these debates, they
Speaker 8: know if they're going to want to lose and Kampbla
Speaker 8: Harris has never won a debate in her life. She's untalented.
Speaker 8: She basically got a position because she's slept with the
Speaker 8: mayor of San Francisco, Willie Brown, who funded her campaign
Speaker 8: to become you know, District Attorney of California, excuse me,
Speaker 8: Attorney General of California. So yes, she's not talented enough
Speaker 8: to win any debate. And I would love to see
Speaker 8: Jade Vance totally annihilate her, But at the end of
Speaker 8: the day, that's probably not going to happen because now
Speaker 8: she's going to try to do a debate with Trump,
Speaker 8: and Trump will probably say, hey, I will not do
Speaker 8: a debate with her because Obama has not endorsed her
Speaker 8: and the liberal people have not endorsed her. So we're
Speaker 8: having a cluster f for lack of a better word,
Speaker 8: is we need to debate her. But I think they're
Speaker 8: going to use every sort of rule to not have
Speaker 8: to actually debate. So that's the sad thing is I
Speaker 8: hope this happens Rita, but I don't think the debate
Speaker 8: will ever happen until you know November fifth.
Speaker 1: Look, I reckon there will be a debate, but I
Speaker 1: think Trump is going to wait for her to be
Speaker 1: formerly the candidate of the Democrats convention and then you
Speaker 1: debate her, because I don't see what the point of
Speaker 1: it is now. And I don't think we should underestimate
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris because she's not Joe Biden. Yes, she's not
Speaker 1: fantastic either when it comes to displaying those debate talents.
Speaker 1: Tulsa Gabbett absolutely demolished her. But she can learn lines.
Speaker 1: She can rehearse a really sharp, biting line and deliver
Speaker 1: it at the right moment and have that little SoundBite
Speaker 1: for the nightly news, and that's all you need. To
Speaker 1: have some cut through, so I think she's going to
Speaker 1: be far more effective than Biden was during the last debate.
Speaker 8: But they are really Rita, Rita, Rita, I had to
Speaker 8: kill you off. You're much smarter and much more talented
Speaker 8: than Kambla Harris. If you had to debate Donald Trump,
Speaker 8: you might win. You would kill Kamala Harris in a debate.
Speaker 8: I just wanted to know for the Australian audience marching
Speaker 8: out there, Rita, you're a million times smarter than Kamala
Speaker 8: Harris ever could be. So you saying that nice and
Speaker 8: about it always takes you say, because you're so well
Speaker 8: liked here in America, you should be the vice president,
Speaker 8: not Kamala Harris. You would crush her, and so would
Speaker 8: Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: See, flattery will get you everywhere. A good Texan knows that,
Speaker 1: and Alex is a very good Texan. Now before you go,
Speaker 1: I was gonna ask you quickly about Kamala's track record,
Speaker 1: because there's something else they're trying to wipe cleaner. GOV Track,
Speaker 1: which has always been an independent organization. It hasn't been
Speaker 1: left leaning right leaning. It's pretty well trusted and it
Speaker 1: tracks congressional voting records. It said that Kamala Harris had
Speaker 1: the most liberal, that's left leaning record in the Senate.
Speaker 1: That was back in twenty nineteen. Now they've removed that page.
Speaker 1: Thankfully there is archived versions that are being shared on
Speaker 1: x and elsewhere. But it's getting a bit scary at
Speaker 1: the moment that verifiable facts are being memory hold are
Speaker 1: being disappeared.
Speaker 8: Alex Well, Rita. You know why they're memory holding that
Speaker 8: is because they want a candidate that you know, aligned
Speaker 8: more the Middle America, and she does not do that,
Speaker 8: so that's what they liked this. It's just like a
Speaker 8: guy like George Santos. Say what you will about George Santos.
Speaker 8: He might have been, you know, had a dark past,
Speaker 8: but he voted conservative on most of the stuff that
Speaker 8: he voted and he still got kicked out. So they're
Speaker 8: trying to hide the truth. This should wake up everybody
Speaker 8: that's watching. It's not just Australian, it's not just Americans,
Speaker 8: not just English people. That they tried to hide the
Speaker 8: real voting record of our politicians so that they can
Speaker 8: create a new narrative. So that's the reality. That's a
Speaker 8: sad part of this is that yeah, she is liberals. Heck,
Speaker 8: they want to make her seem much she's more in
Speaker 8: the middle when she's not at all.
Speaker 1: Yes, she ain't. No moderate, Alex Stein, thank you so
Speaker 1: much for your time this evening.
Speaker 8: Rita, always a pleasure. Rita. You need to be vice president.
Speaker 8: We need Rita as vice president of the United States
Speaker 8: of America and our country would be a lot better.
Speaker 1: Okay, I'm coming over. I am I was born there,
Speaker 1: so you know I do qualify. So yeah, why not? Yes,
Speaker 1: can be my running mate?
Speaker 7: A right there we go.
Speaker 8: Ok, day long. Please Rita for vice president? Please, Lord
Speaker 8: in Heaven, please.
Speaker 1: Still to come the royal rule William doesn't want to
Speaker 1: follow that could lead to King Harry on the throne. Goodness.
Speaker 1: Mate and global warming activist Meghan Markle takes a private
Speaker 1: jet to the Hamptons for a business summit. You're watching
Speaker 1: the Reader Panny Show and joining me now is entertainment
Speaker 1: and royal reporter Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey, Let's start with. King
Speaker 1: Charles is reportedly clashing with Prince William, not Prince Harry. This,
Speaker 1: I'm Prince William over his refusal to adhere to a
Speaker 1: royal norm. William is refusing to travel apart from his family,
Speaker 1: going against an unwritten rule that the heirs to the
Speaker 1: throne should travel separately. So the King is said to
Speaker 1: have made his son sign a waiver taking responsibility for
Speaker 1: threatening the royal succession? Is this due to concerns that
Speaker 1: we could see a King Harry and Queen Meghan one day?
Speaker 17: I think hell will over before Prince Harry becomes king.
Speaker 17: If you thought January sixth was an insurrection, just wait
Speaker 17: until Meghan Markle tries to be crowned Queen Consort. Sixty
Speaker 17: five percent of the UK dislike her. Newsweek recently ran
Speaker 17: aheadline that said Megan Markle really is surprisingly hated in Britain.
Speaker 17: I think ultimately the King's cancer diagnosis has him frightened
Speaker 17: about his own mortality and he just wants to be cautious.
Speaker 17: But you're absolutely right. These new revelations in Robert Jobson's
Speaker 17: latest book, and you know, those are some interesting details.
Speaker 17: Apparently Prince William's got a little bit of royal rebel
Speaker 17: in him too.
Speaker 1: Well, we don't want to think about this spot. I mean,
Speaker 1: those protocols exist for a reason. It would be it's
Speaker 1: horrible to contemplate. But you've got William as the next
Speaker 1: in line, and then you've got George. Charlotte louis my
Speaker 1: personal favorite. I want him to be king now. And
Speaker 1: if something happens that some disaster befools the family and
Speaker 1: they're all together, then it does go to Harry, doesn't
Speaker 1: It isn't Isn't that the concern?
Speaker 8: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Isn't that part of the reason why they prefer the
Speaker 1: airs not to travel all together, particularly if it's something
Speaker 1: relatively risky like a helicopter trip.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 17: I mean, it's certainly a strategy that they have. I mean,
Speaker 17: this is protocol. They don't like everybody to ride together.
Speaker 17: They don't like everybody to fly together, whether Prince William
Speaker 17: is the.
Speaker 1: Pilot or not.
Speaker 17: You know, I believe that the clash is happening because
Speaker 17: Prince William is the pilot.
Speaker 1: But this isn't.
Speaker 17: This is a rule that has existed for quite some time.
Speaker 17: Even if they were on a train, they would prefer
Speaker 17: that the air and the despair be separated. So I
Speaker 17: think that this is something that might be a little
Speaker 17: bit more exaggerated because of the players involved. We've known
Speaker 17: the King and Prince William to be a united a
Speaker 17: unit basically lately, and I don't really think that this
Speaker 17: is something that they're tearing each other apart behind the
Speaker 17: scenes over, but it's logistics.
Speaker 1: Now. Prince Harry has suggested that Meghan Marko will never
Speaker 1: return to the UK unless she's queen. Perhaps he told
Speaker 1: an interviewer that he wouldn't feel safe bringing her. He
Speaker 1: fears negative tabloid narratives in danger him and his family.
Speaker 12: All it takes is one lone actor, one person who
Speaker 12: reads this stuff to act on what they have read
Speaker 12: and whether it's a knife or acid, whatever it is.
Speaker 12: And these are things that are genuine concerned for me.
Speaker 12: It's one of the reasons why I won't bring my
Speaker 12: wife back to this country.
Speaker 1: There you go, what another slap in the face for
Speaker 1: his homeland. And does he really think that this information
Speaker 1: that he thinks could lead to an attack isn't widely
Speaker 1: available in the US? Swear in the world? Do we
Speaker 1: did have the internet these days? It just seems to
Speaker 1: be a very warped point of view.
Speaker 17: Kinsey, Okay, so this is Prince Harry going after the
Speaker 17: British tabloids and he's trying to he's you know, he's
Speaker 17: a lot of litigation going after the British tabloids. But
Speaker 17: I just, you know, want to remind him it was TMZ,
Speaker 17: an American media outlet, that hid behind bushes to snap
Speaker 17: Catherine the Princess of Wales after she asked for some
Speaker 17: privacy after getting abdominal surgery. You know, it was Thomas
Speaker 17: Matthew Crooks, an American the assassin who attempted to take
Speaker 17: out you know, President Trump, who was googling Catherine the
Speaker 17: Princess of Wales. I'd argue that the UK is safer
Speaker 17: for a family that is fixated on utilizing their royal
Speaker 17: titles than the United States, where we have much different
Speaker 17: gun laws. I mean, after watching this, I just thought
Speaker 17: to myself, Prince Harry is a very catastrophic thinker, and
Speaker 17: it's hard to take someone like him seriously when he
Speaker 17: has this reputation for exaggerating his circumstances.
Speaker 1: Now, meanwhile, we've got climate change warrior Meghan taking a
Speaker 1: private jet naturally to the Hampton's last week to attend
Speaker 1: an exclusive business summit. Is she now business expert Kinsey
Speaker 1: or is she there as part of her new website.
Speaker 1: She's got that strawberry jam empire that you told me about.
Speaker 1: I don't think you called it an empire though.
Speaker 17: No, No, she was definitely picking up tips for her
Speaker 17: stagnant lifestyle business, American Riviera Orchard. She's been doing a
Speaker 17: lot of celebrity networking lately, also seen out with Father
Speaker 17: of the Bride star Kimberly Williams Paisley. But Meghan's got
Speaker 17: a tough road ahead of her because she has to
Speaker 17: convince these people that she wants and needs acceptance from
Speaker 17: that she is not the problematic and divisive character that
Speaker 17: they read about in newspapers.
Speaker 1: Well she might be arguing that, but like you said,
Speaker 1: some in the media are surprised about her lack of popularity,
Speaker 1: but anyone who's been paying attention wouldn't be, because she's
Speaker 1: created this ugly rift between Prince Harry and his family
Speaker 1: and Prince Harry and his country. He was the most
Speaker 1: love royal along with the Queen for so many years,
Speaker 1: and now he's just this figure of mockery and he
Speaker 1: seems to be permanently miserable and winging. He's a different
Speaker 1: man entirely. And I don't blame her for it, because
Speaker 1: you know, he's forty years old. But she had a
Speaker 1: hand in it. Kinsiscofield. Thank you so much for your time,
Speaker 1: and that's all the time we have tonight. I'll see
Speaker 1: you Wednesday night. Tomorrow night, Daniki di Georgia will be
Speaker 1: filling in for me. Up next is Newsnight.