WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 26 February

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Lately. Welcome to the Late Debase.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Great to have your company on the Late Debate. I'm

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 2>James Macpherson with Liz Storer and Caleb Bond. Coming up

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the most unusual drug busts you'll ever see.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 2>You won't believe where the smuggler hid his cocaine. We'll

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 2>show you that a little later. Plus, when we look

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>at the papers speaking of drugs, Victoria's safe drug injecting rooms.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Is there such a thing? Having problems? What a surprise.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 2>Plus story in tomorrow's Australian newspaper about a very unusual

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 2>court case in New South Wales where the prosecutor began

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>by admitting he wouldn't win the case, which of course

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>begged the question why were they there. We'll talk to

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>you about that when we get to what's making news tomorrow,

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>But first, you know, we've done a lot of nanny

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 2>state shows over the past couple of years, but this,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 2>this would have to be the silliest example of government

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>over each I have heard in a long time. For

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the last nine years people have been able to go

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 2>down to North Bondi Beach go for a surf on

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 2>a surfboard provided for free by the Shared Board initiative

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Now it's a group of locals who provide refurbished surfboards

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 2>for anyone to use free of charge. They just leave

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 2>them on the foreshore of the beach in a particular

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>spot and the only condition is when you've finished having

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 2>a surf just bring it back and put it where

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 2>you found it. And it's a great idea. I mean

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 2>for people who get to the beach and think, you know,

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I got my son's screen, I got my hat, I

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 2>got my boards, I forgot my board, doesn't matter. There's

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>a board that you can borrow for free. Or if

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 2>you live at Penrith, for instance, and you don't want

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to lug your board on public transport, you don't have to.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>You can leave your surfboard in Penrith Rock up at

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 2>North Bondai and just borrowed one of these shared boards.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Or if you like Caleb and you've never been on

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a surfboard in your life, but you think never been

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 2>on a beach, that is a bit unfair.

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I will say I have started going to the beach, Yes,

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>I started this year.

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Does this happen just this year?

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 4>I've started going to the Who are you and what

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 4>have you?

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 5>Done with Caleb bon Have you ever serfed?

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I haven't.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you could rock up at North BONDI and think,

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I wouldn't mind trying this out, but

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to put out the coin to buy

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 2>a board. I might not enjoy it or be any

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 2>good at it, which is highly likely to be the case.

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 2>But Caleb could just borrow one of these shared boards,

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>have a try, and if you don't like it, you

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 2>just put the board back. No harm done. It's a

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 2>great initiative, or at least it was until the kill

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Joys at Waverley Council shut it down of concerns from

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>surf life savers about safety and public liability. Local Cam

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Scott said the program's been so popular with locals and

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 2>visitors and we've never had any issues in the past.

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Other forms of surfing are still allowed, including private board hire,

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 2>so I'm not sure why shared boards are being singled

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>out as a safety risk. I understand lifeguards want to

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 2>reduce the risk and that not everyone is an experienced surfer,

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 2>but I've tried to minimize rescue as much as possible,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 2>including reducing the number of boards that can be used

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 2>and making sure all the boards have leg ropes now.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Waverley Mayor Will Nemesh said that he is committed to

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>working out a process to address concerns regarding safety. I'm

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 2>not sure what the concerns are. If someone rocks up

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 2>with their own board, there's no concerns. If someone hires

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>a board, there's no concerns. So why are there concerns

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 2>over the situation where someone shares a board? Lizit that

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 2>makes no sense whatsoever?

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 5>Do you wanna be safe or do you wanna be free?

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 4>It's the same old chestnut every single time.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't matter what we're talking about.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 4>It boils down to that when you've got government intervention

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 4>saying we're doing something utterly ridiculous, which we are telling

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 4>you is completely necessary in order to keep you safe.

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 4>We're back at that exaet same square on the chess board.

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 4>And to be honest, this is one of those ones

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 4>where you're like, Okay, we follow your reasoning to its

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 4>logical conclusion. Going into the surf alone is a safety

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 4>risk and a public liability.

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So what on it?

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 5>Because you can't.

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Guarantee that every single person who enters the surf knows

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 4>how to swim. Indeed, that's the vast majority of the

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 4>cases of drowning that we see here in Australia, or

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 4>people getting caught in rips, et cetera, and so on.

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 4>They're not seasoned beach goers. They don't know what they're doing.

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.239
<v Speaker 4>So this is nonsense reasoning. It's for the same reason

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 4>that we're like, oh, okay, well everybody's got to wear

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 4>a helmet the second you leave your house then because

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 4>anything can happen. And then of course there's the broader

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 4>question of okay, let's say that the government is responsible

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 4>for your safety to what degree and at what cost,

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 4>because that's how we end up with.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 5>Stuff like this.

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 4>How much does it boil down to personal responsibility? If

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 4>you grab a board and go into the surf, let's

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 4>say that's on you.

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, has the Waverly Council got nothing else to do?

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, you've got councils running around Sydney at the

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 3>moment saying that he just jack up the rates by

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent because they can't get their hands on enough money.

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Like I think councils have got a fair bit going

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 3>on at the moment. But no, the Waverley Council is

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.679
<v Speaker 3>going after people who want to go for a surf

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 3>on a shared surfboard.

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why would.

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 3>You try to do any nice things in this country anymore?

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>A bloke says, you know what I think would be

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a good thing to.

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Do to restore surfboards so people who can't afford a

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 3>surfboard I don't want to lag it across the city

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 3>can come and have a surf at the beach. He's

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>trying to do a good turn for people and in

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 3>comes the party purpose at the council. Oh, you can't

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 3>do that because there's public liability problems here.

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 3>The only public liability problems I can think of are

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 3>that the board I don't know snaps in the middle

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 3>of the ocean or something. And then they try to

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 3>soothe the bloke and say, well, you gave me an

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 3>unsafe surfboard.

0:05:57.680 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>You can get.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 3>Public liability insurance of that kind of thing. I'm sure

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 3>the council, if they actually decided they would be helpful

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 3>instead of inhibiting things, could go and say, look, we'll

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 3>work it out.

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll sort all of this out here.

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe the council will even sponsor it so you can

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 3>have a local shed to do some work in Who

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 3>knows we.

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Can make it a community project. No, we couldn't have that.

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 3>This is the most UnAustralian example of government overreach I

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 3>have seen in a long time. If you cannot go

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 3>to the beach and have a surf in Australia without

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 3>being interfered with by the government or a council, we

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 3>have lost the plot.

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, what is going on.

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 3>We like to think that we are a country of

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, free spirited Alaricans, and we've still got that

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 3>convict culture in US. You know, we're sticking it up

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 3>the pommies because we're free and we're not stuffy like them.

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 3>But we are We love rules, We love being told

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 3>what to do. COVID crew exactly, we were all happy.

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>To line up. We are more.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 5>Brid We weren't and I did.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Not the vast majority of people.

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 3>But we are more British than the British in the

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.239
<v Speaker 3>way that we are happy to follow rules and want

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 3>to be governed. I mean, when you have a premier

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 3>like Mark mcgow and in WA who had like dictator

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 3>like approval ratings of ninety one percent or something because

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 3>he shut the borders, I think it proves the point

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 3>we just want to be governed hard.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 2>And there's a time when we're talking about social cohesion

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 2>and we've got so many problems in society. He as

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 2>you said, You've got someone trying to do a nice

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>thing to just help people enjoy themselves. It's free, it's

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>a nice thing to do, but no council can't allow it.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 2>And when the mayor says we're committed to implementing a process,

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 2>God help us. Have you ever come across a government

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.119
<v Speaker 2>process that made anything better?

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Can you imagine if someone decided they wanted to have

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 3>a surf on one of these shared boards and then

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 3>when they get back on the beach, light up a

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 3>dart and have a beer like.

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>That would be all the crime, all the law all.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 3>You can't have a drink on the beach, you can't

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 3>have a darry on the beach, you can't have yourselvelopment.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 4>You'd of course, it just could be a simple matter

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 4>of few counselors being really good mates with the people

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 4>who are heading up the hiring board businesses down at Bondi.

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 4>That was also a thought I had. But to the

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 4>UK now, where Prime Minister Kistarma has announced that he

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 4>is increasing defense spending to two point five percent of

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 4>GDP by at twenty twenty seven. Now, I reckon Brits

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 4>have Donald Dre Trump to thank for this little announcement,

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 4>and I'll.

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 5>Explain why in a bit.

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 4>But certainly watching Kirs Starmer today you wouldn't have guessed it.

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 6>I have long argued that in the face of ongoing

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 6>and generational challenges, European countries must do more for their

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 6>own defense. That is in con travertible a completely reasonable point.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 6>It is a generational challenge, of course it is, but

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 6>one we must now take on.

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 4>I suppose it's just a coincidence that he is echoing

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 4>very much the sentiments of Trump, which Trump has shouted

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 4>from the mountaintops since he ran in twoenty and sixteen.

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 5>He's always considered.

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 4>NATO these leech countries sucking on the tee to the

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 4>United States, and he's always said, you flogs have to

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 4>pull your socks up.

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 5>I'm not funding this by myself.

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 4>You guys have to spend more on your own defense

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 4>spending if you want us to come to your aid

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 4>when you're in trouble.

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 4>He was just last February reminding everyone he still stands

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 4>exactly the same position on the exact same issue second

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 4>time round.

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 7>It it was busted until I came along. I said,

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 7>everybody's going to pay. They said, well, if we don't pay,

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 7>are you still going to protect us? I said absolutely not.

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 7>They couldn't believe the answer, and everybody you never saw

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 7>more money pour in.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Trump's actually demanded that NATO countries increase their defense spending

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 4>to five percent of their economic output. So kirs Dama's

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 4>basically just announced he's inching closer by twenty twenty seven,

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 4>but still.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 5>Falling quite short.

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 4>But here he is addressing the nation once again saying

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 4>this is how I'm keeping Britain safe. Now.

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 8>Our national security faces a critical moment. That is why

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 8>we are increasing defense spending to two point five percent

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 8>of GDP from April twenty to twenty seven, the biggest

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 8>sustained increase since the Cold War. With my government, Britain

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 8>will be secure at home and strong abroad.

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Secure at home, mate, you had over thirty five thousand

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 4>illegals cross the channel and make their way into your

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 4>country last year alone, where they've been living high on

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 4>the hog on the British taxpayer pound. But what I

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 4>do love about what he's doing here is he's taking

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 4>the funds from foreign aid to fit the bill for

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 4>this increase. And I think that is something that all

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Western countries should do. I think foreign aid is completely

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 4>and utterly blown out and rarely does it ever actually

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 4>achieve what the giving country has given it for.

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about the foreign aid argument, Well, well,

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:46.359
<v Speaker 2>they're spending three billion dollars a year housing illegal asylunce

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 2>again through their foreign foreign aid is very low.

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 3>There's an argument to be made that you have to

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 3>pay a certain level of foreign aid to try and

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 3>back off countries like China that spend shed loads around

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the Pacific nations, the Australian example. There's an argument that

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 3>you have to do that to try and repel them,

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 3>but then you kind of end up in a bidding

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 3>war because China has infinite money. Basically we're doing in

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the Pacific exactly, so they say, well, we'll give them

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 3>more money. So we say we've got to give them

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 3>more money. I mean, you could go on and on

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.599
<v Speaker 3>and on and on forever when it comes to that circumstance,

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 3>and perhaps when we come to those circumstances, we should

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 3>be calling in the favors.

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Of some of our allies.

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 3>But our foreign aid spend in Australia is about five

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars, right, I think that's what it was in.

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 5>The last this financial year.

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>But five billion dollars.

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Our military spending last financial year was fifty three point

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 3>three billion dollars, which was two percent of GDP. So

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 3>if you took that five billion away from foreign aid

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 3>and added it to the defense budget, you know, that's

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 3>ten percent you're adding on top, which is not an

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 3>insignificant sum of money to add to it. Now, it's

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 3>already forecast that we will reach two point four percent

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 3>of GDP by twenty twenty seven, twenty eight, So we're

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 3>all sort of heading in the same direction. But we

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 3>have to be heading in that direction. I mean, we

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 3>have never been in a more precara will say never

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 3>is not wrong. In the last forty fifty years, we

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 3>have not been in a more precarious position GOEO politically,

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 3>and all the predictions from the US are that we

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 3>could end up in some sort of conflict with China

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 3>next decade.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Right, that's not far away.

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 3>We're in twenty twenty five now, twenty thirty is in

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 3>five years time. Meanwhile, we're talking about having submarines and

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 3>defense capability ready to go by twenty forty, which will

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 3>be extremely useful. Like we should have been doing this

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 3>teen years ago. It's all good and will to say, yes,

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 3>we're picking up the pace now, and good, we need

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 3>to do it, but let's be real, this should have

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 3>happened a long time ago.

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 2>And that's my criticism of Starmer's announcement. He says, you know,

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 2>this is a generational challenge and we must act. So

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 2>we're going to increase defense spending by two percent. Not

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 2>this year, not next year, but in twenty twenty seven.

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 2>It's an absolute Russia are spending five percent of their

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 2>GDP on defense. Middle Eastern countries are spending five percent.

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 2>We don't know what China are spending, but it's probably

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot more than five percent. And as for foreign aid,

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the best things that Western liberal democracies can

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 2>do for the entire planet is to be strong so

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 2>they can repel authoritarian to talitarian regimes and keep the

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 2>flag of freedom flying. But the other thing I would

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 2>ask Kirstama when he speaks about you know, we're going

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>to defend Britain, tell us what is Britain these days.

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you're making such a mess of it, and

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>with the amount of people you're allowing into the country

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>and then all of the ghettoization. Is that a word, Caleb,

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the segregation that they are promoting through their multicultural policies.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I'd just love to know what he says. We're going

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 2>to defend Britain. How do you define Britain.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, well, it's the country where the top baby name

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 3>for boys now is Muhammad. I think that's probably how

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 3>we define Britain.

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Incidentally, one more thing before we move on, said it's

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 2>about two point one percent of GDP and Australia.

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 3>To two percent at the moment two point four. We're

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 3>heading two in twenty seven twenty.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Eight, which is about what the NDIS will be worth

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 2>in a couple of years. So, I mean, this is

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 2>the most geopolitically, you know, risky time we've had since

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 2>World War Two. And we're committed to spending more money

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 2>on you know, disabilities, some of which are a little

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 2>questionable and that argument has been going for some time

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 2>than we are on defending our borders.

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 4>So that's more valuable than foreign aid because we've got

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 4>genuine Aussies in genuine need.

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 5>What really gets my goat is the.

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Amount of money that Western countries splurge on foreign aid.

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 4>In our case, as we continually laugh about, it's a

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 4>lost cause because China always has deeper pockets. So in comparison,

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 4>Australia is handing out like five bucks in a snag

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 4>to all these countries in the Indo Pacific, being like, hey,

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 4>if something bad happens, please be on our side. Also,

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 4>hot take news flash. If I have to pay you

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 4>to be my friend, if I have to pay you

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 4>to be.

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 5>My ally, you're not my ally.

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 4>The entire concept of foreign aid, because we know it's

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 4>never given out of the goodness of anyone's hearts.

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 5>It is the form of a bribe.

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 4>I am buying your loyalty, which again isn't real loyalty,

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 4>is it.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 5>It's such a.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Flawed concept and it cannot continue.

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 5>If I could be.

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Ruler for a day, I would pull all foreign aid

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 4>because if your country exists due to the forced donations

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 4>of my country's tax payers, then maybe you shouldn't. Maybe

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 4>you shouldn't if you just keep on existing at the

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 4>behest of the wealthier Western countries who are in fact,

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 4>weakening themselves, like you said, mac by keeping up this system.

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 4>It's very strange. Pull it all and let the chips

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 4>fall where they may.

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 2>The only thing it's a worry is the reluctance of

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Western countries to sect refice in order to defend themselves.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 2>And Trumps pointed this out in Europe, right. I was

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 2>really in twenty twenty three, Denmark decided to cancel one

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 2>public holiday so that the poor Danes were only left

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 2>with eleven public holidays instead of twelve. But they canceled

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 2>one public holiday so that they could make an extra

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>six hundred and seventy five million dollars to go towards defense.

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 2>And there was uproar, you can't take away one of

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 2>our public holidays.

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Well what do you want?

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you want a public holiday or do you want

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 2>your freedom? And in the West that's up for debate

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 3>They may take on a laaves, but they will never

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 3>picked out of public holidays. And I think you actually

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 3>hit on a good point though, Liz, I reckon the

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 3>best form of diplomacy we could have is to build

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 3>bunning stores overseas so they can get the snags and

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.719
<v Speaker 3>then they've got a real taste of Australian culture.

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>A while we're.

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 3>Talking about defense, the plot thickens on this business of

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 3>these Chinese warships have been floating down the east coast

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 3>of Australia. Now we know, we talked about last night

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 3>that last Friday they were doing live fire drills off

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the of Australia and we found out about that because

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 3>a Virgin pilot was flying overhead and he alerted Air

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Services Australia will today the military has been up at

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 3>senate estimates and they've corroborated that turn of events. But

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 3>there's another little tidbit that has been included. That's that

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 3>the New Zealand military picked up on it before our

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 3>military picked up on it, even though it took them

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 3>quite some time to do it. I'll give you the timeline.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 3>It was nine to fifty eight am that a Virgin

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 3>pilot on Friday realized that these warships were firing about.

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 3>It was at ten eighteen am that an Emirates pilot

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 3>realized they were firing. It wasn't until eleven oh one

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 3>that the New Zealand Army realized that they were firing

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 3>and then in turn let us know. But of course

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 3>we already knew because not because our military had worked

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 3>it out, but because a Virgin pilot had worked it out.

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 3>The other thing is that the Prime Minister last week

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 3>was saying we had received noticeification that this was going

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 3>to happen. Then the story became, oh well, the notification,

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, didn't come fast enough.

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>We didn't know in time that it was going to happen.

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 3>But now we keep hearing more and more this week

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 3>from different outfits, the military and Air Services Australia and

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 3>the New Zealand military that they were the ones who

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 3>let us know.

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Is the Prime Minister.

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 9>There were two areas of notification. One was from the

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 9>New Zealand vessels that were tailing.

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 2>We're cooperating.

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 9>We've been monitoring the vessels in the area by both

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 9>sea and by air, so that occurred and at the

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 9>same time, through the channels that occur when something like

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 9>this is occurring, air services got notified as well.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 3>When the occurrences are occurring, the people who see occurrences

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 3>occur to tell us that it's occurred.

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>What the hell was is he talking about there? But

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>he's lied.

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 3>He said that at the same time as the New

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Zealand military was telling us it was going on Air

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Service as Australia told us it was going on.

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Nine to fifty eight am was.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 3>When Virgin phoned it through to Air Services Australia, who

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 3>then told our military. It was more than an hour

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 3>later at eleven oh one that the New Zealand military

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 3>told us that they had seen it. It didn't happen

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 3>at the same time at all. He's petered up and

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 3>saying there's questions to be answered.

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 10>There are really significant questions that need to be answered here.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 10>If there was an incursion across into our warders and

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 10>Defense didn't know about it, or the Defense Minister didn't

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 10>know about it, we need to ask those questions and

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 10>they should be answered, and frankly, the Prime Minister should

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 10>stand up and explain what is a very significant event

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 10>and for.

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>What it's worth.

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand's Defense Minister, due to the Collins it doesn't

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 3>seem to be terribly perturbed by any of this.

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 11>I've talked to the Chief of Defense Force this morning

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 11>because I've heard that there was some report that there

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 11>was some delay and we're just going to find out

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 11>quite what that wash.

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Some reporter there might have been at Oh look, I've

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 3>asked a maybe we'll find out what was going on.

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we talk about the fact that we need

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 3>to boost our defense spending. We just don't seem to

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 3>take these things with any seriousness. The Prime Minister can't

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.239
<v Speaker 3>get his story straight. One minute, it was you know,

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 3>we had warning, Then we find out there was no warning.

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Then we're told that our allies warned us at the

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 3>same time as the commercial pilots, which is not true.

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 3>The commercial pilot's warned us at least an hour in advance.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Can we not get this stuff right?

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm not quite sure what's happening here. There seem to

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 2>be two possibilities. A. Anthony Albanezi is just not across

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the detail, and he's quite famous for that. The other

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 2>possibility is Anthony Albanezi is desperate to avoid any sort

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 2>of confrontation with China at all. He's desperate to avoid

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 2>any circumstance in which he might have to step up

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and actually do what Remember Tony Abbott once said he

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 2>was going to shirt frontront Vladimir Putin. Can you imagine

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Oldenezy's shirt fronting anybody. He's desperate to avoid that

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.719
<v Speaker 2>and so he just lies. And the problem with that

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 2>is when you get the prime minister of the country

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 2>lying to the populace about issues of national security, that's

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 2>a pretty major breach of trust. And second, it signals

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 2>to the Chinese keep doing this stuff because no one

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 2>other than the Prime Minister of Australia itself will run

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>cover for you.

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think China already knows that it can keep

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 4>doing this stuff.

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 5>It has occurred quite regularly.

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 4>We have one of these stories at least, let's say,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 4>once every three months, and yet they get slapped on

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.239
<v Speaker 4>the risk for it because our politicians have to do

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 4>the obligatory.

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 5>Please don't do that. That wasn't very nice. And then

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 5>last time.

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 4>We show the Chinese spokesperson giving their version of the

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 4>story to their people saying no, Australia was the aggressor

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 4>in international waters.

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 5>They fired flairs at us and.

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 4>We were just trying to It was utter nonsense, But

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 4>that is what they do, and if you read their

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 4>state run media, that is all they do.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 5>And think of it.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 4>If this is the motley crew that we've got now,

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 4>while China is flexing but not doing anything overtly aggressive,

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 4>can you imagine if we were actually under attack, even

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 4>a small attack.

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 5>This would be the.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Same motley crew at the helm. Goodness knows what we'd

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 4>be commentating on. Then we certainly wouldn't be laughing about it,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 4>because we wouldn't have the luxury.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 3>We probably wouldn't know that the Chinese had landed in

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Australia until either the Aboriginal people over in wa worked

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 3>out whether it be there for four days with their

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 3>drones or a virgin pilot flying overhead, or maybe the

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 3>New Zealand military would realize sharing.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 5>It all over X That is how we'd learn.

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 4>They'd be filming it on their iPhones and we'd be

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 4>like all things.

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Forget Anthony Albanezi, forget the New Zealand Defense Minister. Someone

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 2>who's actually making a tiny bit of sense on this

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 2>is Jackie Lamby.

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 5>They're staying their distance.

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 12>They're very scared of Tasmanian's mate.

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 11>I'll tell you.

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 12>Now where we have our own secrecy thing going on

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 12>down here. They don't want to come anywhere, and as

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 12>sure as hell doesn't want to come anywhere any of

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 12>the top one. Jackie Lamby's here. I want to keep

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 12>everything really calm here. This is nothing new I just

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 12>want these time of people to know. The Chinese always

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 12>trying to stick out their chest.

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, they're like the little boy the co wolf.

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 12>They never do the right thing. So if you're going

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.959
<v Speaker 12>to expect to tell they're doing live firing, you know

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 12>they're not mates of ours.

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 2>This is what they do there, you go. They won't

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 2>go near Tasmania because they wouldn't want to mess with

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Jackie Lamby. We just need a few more Jackie Lamby's

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 2>spread across the top end in Australia. We say Calor

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 2>was just you're telling.

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 3>Me was the first leader of China to actually visit Tasmania.

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it was not too.

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Long ago, so the story might not be correct. Maybe

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Jackie wasn't in town.

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 4>How she talks about it though, like this is nothing new,

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 4>Like don't worry about it happens all the time. You know,

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 4>another day and I'm a little something something from China.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 4>She said that several times, pretty.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Much the safety of Tasmanians because she is there and

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 2>on the job.

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Could just give him tazzy. It happens all the time.

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn our attention to more serious matters. We talked

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 2>last week about a documentary aired on the BBC called

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Gaza How to Survive a War Zone. Now, the documentary

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 2>was purportedly about how ordinary Palestinians were coping with the

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.959
<v Speaker 2>conflict in Gaza, and it was told through the eyes

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 2>of a fourteen year old boy. Well, it was later

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 2>revealed that fourteen year old boy was not just any boy,

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 2>is the son of a senior Hamas government official. Remember,

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Hamas is a terrorist organization. So it was very difficult

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 2>for the BBC to claim that this was impartial or

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 2>this was a fair and balanced look at the lives

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 2>of Palestinians. As I said, it was the son of

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 2>a Hamas official. Well, since that revelation, there's been more

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 2>controversy about this documentary put together by the BBC. It's

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 2>now been revealed they deliberately and repeatedly edited interviews from

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Palestinians to make those Palestinians seem I don't know less,

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 2>jew Haiti. Let me read to you from an investigation

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 2>by the Telegraph in the UK. They write, the Telegraph

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 2>can reveal that on at least five occasions when they

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 2>were interviewing local Palestinians the words Yahad and Jahadi. I

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 2>guess that's how you pronounce it. They're Arabic words for

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Jew or Jews were changed to Israel or Israeli forces,

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 2>or were removed from the subtitles all together. So when

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Palestinians interviewed talked about the Jews, BBC changed it to

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 2>read Israelis or they just removed references to Jews completely.

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 2>The article goes on to say an interviewee praising Yahya Sinwa,

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 2>the Hamas leader for quote jihad against the Jews, was

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 2>also mistranslated as saying he was fighting Israeli forces. Now

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 2>a little lesson on the nuances of Hamas speak. There's

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 2>a massive difference between waging ghard against Jews and fighting

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Israeli forces. When you're waging g hard against Jews, it's

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 2>a holy war to destroy and eradicate the Jews everywhere.

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 2>So when the BBC make this little editorial decision, they're

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 2>not just mistranslating somebody. They are deliberately misrepresenting the ideology

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>of Palestinians. Palestinians, they claim, are everyday people. Here's just

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 2>a little example of how the documentary was manipulated.

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 5>We have a simulatum or kenje. Well, have a simulatum

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 5>or Jehad.

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 2>The leader of the Conservative Party, Kemy Badenoch, is now

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 2>saying that this BBC documentary needs to be fully investigated

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 2>to find out if any money went to Hamas. Remember

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 2>BBC as the public broadcaster. Hamas is a terrorist organization.

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 2>When you've got the son of a senior leader and

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 2>you've got such obvious edits to misrepresent what is actually

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 2>going on, it makes you wonder. And she's saying the

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Anti Terrorism Task Force should probably have a good look

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 2>at this.

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't even a good job.

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Like that clip we showed there where in the written

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 3>translation that sees.

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Battle instead of g had, you could hear the woman

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>saying she had.

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Now, I don't know how many people don't know what

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 3>the word g had means, but like it is the

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 3>word example of China run interference for a terrorist organization

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 3>that I've ever seen, like we saw right through that

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 3>one BBC. But of course what they're trying to do

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 3>is remove the religious element of the war and simply say, oh, well,

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, these are two groups of people fighting over

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 3>a piece of land for no particular reason, and there

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 3>have been more deaths on one side and therefore that's

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 3>a bad thing. It is in so many ways a

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 3>religious war. That's why they're talking about jihad. It is

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 3>an ethno religious war. It is in some ways over

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 3>the land. But you don't just want the land to

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 3>expand your country for the hell of making your country bigger.

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 3>It's because there are ancient disagreements over who has the

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 3>right to that land. That is the point of why

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 3>this war is going on, and that is what the

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 3>BBC doesn't want to answer.

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the fact that they had the son of

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a hamas.

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Leader is the Hammas administr I should say, as the

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 3>narrator of the thing. And they supposedly didn't know that,

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 3>and then they've gone and fiddled with the translations and

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, no one knew that that was happening.

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what are we paying a public broadcast for.

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 3>If I'm watching a doco on the BBC and the

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 3>BBC has a history of producing excellent documentaries Louis throu etc.

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 3>This is well below what you would expect of the BBC.

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 3>But it would seem clear they had an agenda to

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 3>run here. And Badnock has a very good point. Was

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 3>there any money that changed hands? In the production of

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 3>this documentary. How did you manage to get that sort

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 3>of access?

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>How did you manage to end up with the son

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of a hamas.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Minister fronting the thing without there being some kind of Lincoln.

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Just one little thing to what you said. You're right,

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 2>it's very religious in nature, and you said it's also

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 2>about land, but the land is actually a religious issue

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 2>as well. Exactly, you've got the what is it the mosque,

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 2>what do they call it, the Dome of the whatever,

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the Dome of the Rock mosque built on top of

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 2>where the ancient Jewish temple was. The whole thing is

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 2>religious and as you said, they've tried to whitewash that.

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Denny Cohen, the BBC's former television chief, said to the

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Telegraph that there's clearly deep rooted prejudice within the BBC,

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.959
<v Speaker 2>and he accuses the BBC of seeding antisemitism in the

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 2>UK with this kind of rubbish, that they're actually making

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 2>things even worse and they're promoting antisemitism for a public

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 2>broadcast and to be doing this is just quite outrageous.

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, when you look at the makeup of the UK

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 4>now you do wander. We always bash on about how

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 4>our politicians are shilling for the Muslim vote. Here in Australia,

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 4>you can bet your bottom dollar they're doing the same

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 4>over there.

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 5>There are a massive.

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Muslim contingent in the UK right now and it's only growing.

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 5>So you do wonder how many of those now work.

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 4>For the BBC, Because when we're talking about a documentary

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 4>like this, you know that this has gone through level

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 4>after level of editing. How many people were involved in

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 4>the production of this, How many people would have been

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.239
<v Speaker 4>aware of these edits, How many people would have been

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 4>aware that this was the son of a, like you said,

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 4>a Hamas minister, not just your average Palestinian boy running around.

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 4>But I got to say, these stories, when they make

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 4>it into the media and it's pretty rare, are some

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 4>of my favorites because I hope that it serves to

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 4>remind people that this is what the media does.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 5>This isn't a once off.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 4>This is the tip of the tip of the tip

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 4>of the iceberg, Beryl. I mean it was just last

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 4>year we found out our own national broadcaster had literally

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 4>deliberately edited footage that they put to air in order

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 4>to make it look like our soldiers had committed war

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 4>crimes overseas.

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 5>Wrap your head around that.

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 4>I find that incredibly offensive and you should too. And

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 4>do you think that's just oh, two examples plucked out

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 4>of the ethor these are just the ones that we

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 4>end up finding out about. Can you imagine how much

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 4>of this goes on.

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 5>It was just a few weeks.

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Ago we were talking about the fact that USAID had

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 4>been busted for funding over six two hundred journals across

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 4>seven hundred and seven media outlets, seven of which are

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 4>they eight media outlets in Ukraine.

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 5>These guys have.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Fingers in so many pies and they are stewing information.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 5>All over the world like this.

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 4>This happens so regularly and people are just kept in

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 4>the dark. The amount of power the media has is incredible.

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 2>The misrepresentation of what's happening in Gaza by the BBC

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 2>is becoming almost a joke. It's that frequent. I mean

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 2>recently I heard them describe the you know that you've

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 2>got the exchange right, so Hamasa giving up the hostages

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 2>and in exchange, there's hundreds of Palestinian prisoners, most of

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 2>whom have been convicted of terrorism offenses, being released. And

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 2>yet the BBC described the Palestinian prisoners as hostages, and

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 2>so this just goes on and on and on, to

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the point that you just would not trust the BBC

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 2>on anything regarding the Gazan paper, and it.

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Seems to be a lot of the British media in

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 3>general at the moment. I think it was Channel four

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 3>Good Morning Britain recently had a special on, you know,

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 3>the liberation of Alschwitz, the eightieth anniversary of and they

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.879
<v Speaker 3>failed in the story to mention that any Jews were

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 3>at our Schwitz. I mean, how on earth do you

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 3>manage to do that. Some good news though, back in

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 3>the US, Donald Trump has somehow managed to take a

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 3>lot more questions in his first month as president then

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden.

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Did I know you've.

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Fallen off your seat, you dropped your cup of tea?

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 3>You can't believe it's real, but it is a sorry

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 3>one thousand and nine questions to be precise, Trump has

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:55.959
<v Speaker 3>asked from journals since he came to the top job,

0:34:56.280 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 3>compared to one hundred and forty one from Joe Biden.

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 3>We remember how those Biden press conferences used to go.

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 3>It was something like this, Just when you thought it

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 3>would end, it didn't. In fact, I think that one

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 3>went on forever because Joe Biden forgot what was actually

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 3>going on in that circumstance. But now we have Donald

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 3>Trump just riffing with report as, having fun, answering their questions,

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 3>no holds bard because he knows how to talk to

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 3>an audience, in this instance, talking about some hats a

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 3>fan had seen.

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 11>You give me all of them.

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 9>Look see that.

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 7>Trump was right about everything.

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 11>Just came in.

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 7>Somebody said, I said, this was sent in by a fan.

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, I think we should make.

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 7>Some of them right, but we were pretty much.

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 3>You want one?

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Are you allowed to take away?

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 7>Because he'll consider And I know him well, I'm a

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 7>sort of a stiff, I said, Brian, you're not a

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 7>sy He'll take other things, but not a pretty hand.

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 3>All making jokes about the Gulf of Mexico being renamed

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the Gulf of America.

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 7>I'm just admiring it. As I look at it, I'm

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 7>getting terry. But I don't want you to say. Trump

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 7>broke down.

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And started cry, how beautiful is that? Look at the shoreline,

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Look at that.

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 3>So for all the talk of Donald Trump is an

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 3>enemy of democracy. Donald Trump hates the media. Donald Trump

0:36:57.800 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 3>hates journalists.

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>He clearly has.

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 3>A lot more respect and time for journalists than the

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 3>previous president did because he can actually answer the questions

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 3>that they have to usk.

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>He said.

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden only answered one hundred and forty one questions

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 2>in his first month. That surprises me. I thought that

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 2>was for his entire term. But you've got to understand

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and forty one questions in a month for

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden, one hundred and eleven of those questions were

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 2>regarding what flavored ice cream he was eating at the time.

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 5>Very easy.

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 4>I've always said about politicians facing the press is not

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 4>hard if you are the genuine article, and Trump is

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 4>someone who knows himself to be the genuine article.

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 5>Whether you like him or not is irrelevant. He's standing there,

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 5>it's like, ask me anything. He's fearless.

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 4>He just he'll come up with something or he knows

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 4>the answer. So it makes sense that he's blown previous presidents,

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.439
<v Speaker 4>including Obama, who only took one hundred and sixty one

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 4>in their inquiries over his first month in office.

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 5>So it's not just the ailing.

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 4>Biden that he blew out of the water. Even the

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 4>great orator of Obama has also just been dwarfed in

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Trump shadow.

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 2>The other interesting part of this is there's been a

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 2>lot less White House press briefings under Trump in the

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 2>first month, I think four compared to about sixteen under Biden,

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 2>which just demonstrates the fact that Trump is incredibly capable

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 2>and considers himself to be the best spokesperson for his administration. Biden,

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 2>of course, they just tried to keep him hidden. So

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 2>there you go. The enemy of democracy turns out to

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 2>be the most transparent, open president that we've had in

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 2>quite some time. We're going to go to a break.

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 2>When we come back, we'll look at what's making news tomorrow,

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 2>including a very unusual court case in the District Court

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.280
<v Speaker 2>of New South Wales where the prosecution begins by adminning

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 2>they can't win. All of that in a moment, Welcome back.

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a look at what's making headlines tomorrow. We'll

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 2>start with Victoria's Herald Sun newspaper, where the headline reads

0:38:55.760 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 2>three sorry, violent drug addicts force government agency to move. Now,

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 2>the Dan Andrews government opened a drug clinic in North

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Richmond back in twenty eighteen, and they had a four

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 2>year trial, after which they decided to make it permanent.

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 2>The problem, of course, was it was right next to

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 2>a primary school. Well, get a look at what's happened,

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 2>it says, in a major embarrassment for the Allen government,

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 2>a state agency is moving out of its Richmond office

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 2>after repeated cases of staff being subjected to physical assaults

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 2>and verbal abuse from users of the nearby drug injecting room. So,

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 2>of course parents at the local school, which is just

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 2>thirty meters from the drug injecting room, are saying, we've

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 2>been banging on about this since twenty eighteen. Why would

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 2>you put this near a school? Here, you've got government

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:47.760
<v Speaker 2>workers saying they can't put up with the drug addicts

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 2>and the rubbish that's going on nearby. Back in twenty

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, there was a dead body found near the

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:58.439
<v Speaker 2>school after somebody overdosed. There's constant drug paraphernalia left all

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 2>over the place. This would seem to confirm everything that

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 2>those Richmond residents were worried about. If it's not good

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:07.839
<v Speaker 2>enough for government workers, how on earth is it good

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 2>enough for primary school kids.

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, and you know it's all good for the public

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 3>servants who can just up and go somewhere else. Through

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 3>In a bit of trouble if you're the school right

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 3>and to think that it wasn't Allen, it was Daniel Andrews.

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 3>But this government wanted to put another injecting room on

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 3>Flinders Street in the city, opposite Flinders Street Station. What

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 3>do they think would have happened then? I mean that

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 3>end of Elizabeth Street. That the intersection of Elizabeth Street

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 3>and Flinders Street is bad enough as it is, with

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 3>drunkards and dragged up people and whatever, homeless people hanging around,

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 3>walking around, shouting, abusing people.

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And carrying on.

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 3>That is bad enough as it is without saying, oh,

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 3>We're going to put another injecting room up the road.

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 3>If these public servants can't hack it in Richmond, how

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 3>do you reckon? The workers of the Melbourne CBD.

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Would have been able to hack it if the government

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>got their way.

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, seriously, let's go to the St Alien tomorrow where

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't get much better.

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a bizarre story. Why are we here, judge

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>asked prosecutor.

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.399
<v Speaker 3>Who admits he can't win a new South Wales Crown

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Prosecutor told the District Court in an opening address that

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 3>the case had no prospect of success. In an extraordinary

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 3>admission that prompted the judge to offer the prosecutor the

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 3>chance to seek advice from the private bar before proceeding.

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 3>In a devastating blow to the state's prosecution office, the

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 3>prosecutor said the prosecution could not exclude the possibility.

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>That there was a reasonable excuse for the.

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Alleged crime, and therefore there was no hope for a conviction.

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 3>Asked by District Court Judge Andrew Golfax, how do you

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 3>win the matter.

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:47.280
<v Speaker 1>The prosecutor replied, we don't.

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Judge went on to ask, then why are we here?

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there is enough real crime going on in

0:41:56.480 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 3>the world without the DPP off to court to run

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 3>cases where the prosecutor can see they don't have.

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>A chance of conviction.

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 3>This is public money being spent running cases that will

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 3>come to nought.

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Why are we doing this?

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Is there almost a case for the defendant to then

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 2>sue the DPP or so, I don't know, harassment through

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 2>all of this trouble and landing him in court when

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 2>they acknowledge they haven't got a hope in hell of winning.

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 2>Although the punishment maybe exactly, I reckon the defendant will

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 2>be a little upset if you wouldn't want to have

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 2>paid your defense lawyer a whole lot of money only

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:41.880
<v Speaker 2>to find the prosecution are going to defend me. I

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:43.720
<v Speaker 2>should never have engaged the defense.

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:46.800
<v Speaker 3>But the prosecutor opened by saying that the defendant was

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 3>a man of good character.

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is not the way to start a cases.

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 4>It's money well spent by the taxpayer.

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 5>If more money well spent, it.

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 2>Could have just been the prosecutors con used thought for

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:02.240
<v Speaker 2>a second he was the defense.

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:03.959
<v Speaker 3>Because I've been doing a review into all this stuff.

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 3>They found eleven cases where prosecution guidelines had not been

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 3>adhere to.

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Seriously, it is an absolute joke.

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:15.800
<v Speaker 3>They call it a justice system. It's not a justice system.

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.240
<v Speaker 3>If this is the way they are behaving, speaking of justice,

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 3>someone wants some sacrificial LAMB said to le Sue law firm.

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 3>We talked about this last night, but there's been an

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 3>update over at Slater and Gordon. The executive who says

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 3>she was falsely accused of sending a malicious quote unquote

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 3>email to Slater and Gordon's staff is expected to take

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 3>legal action against the top tier law firm after it

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 3>allowed the crisis to escalate despite clear early indications the

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 3>email had been manipulated. This was the former interim Chief

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:52.479
<v Speaker 3>People Officer, Mari Ruitz Matheson, who was implicated in having

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 3>sent out this email that included everyone's review details and pays,

0:43:58.040 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 3>so that went out over the weekends to everyone at

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Slade and Gordon could look at everyone else's pay.

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 1>She says she didn't do it.

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 3>Now she's thinking of suing a law firm because it's

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:09.240
<v Speaker 3>all gone to crap.

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this just gets better and better.

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Who would have thought that the goings on of a

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:17.320
<v Speaker 3>law firm in Sydney could beat almost any other story

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 3>going around at the moment for entertainment.

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 1>This is true entertainment.

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like it's got a few more twists and

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:24.959
<v Speaker 2>turns to go before that story runs out of gas.

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be interesting to watch it.

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:29.280
<v Speaker 4>They need to make an episode of Suits where this happens.

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:31.360
<v Speaker 5>There's some swanky law firm.

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Then everyone gets an email and finds out what everyone's

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 4>learning before we go to a break to the Voice

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 4>of Tasmania. The Mercury plug in two fifty thousand dollars.

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Grants of up to fifty thousand are now available to businesses,

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 4>community groups and local government agencies for the installation of

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 4>public electric vehicle charging infrastructure as the Tasmanian government seeks

0:44:55.840 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 4>to accommodate growing demand for evs. Really, really, is the

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:03.800
<v Speaker 4>demand really growing for evs? Can you show us the

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 4>numbers on that, because they're not getting back to us.

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 5>But how do you like this? Fifty grand?

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 4>So they would still have to fork out for the

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 4>actual charger, but the installation, one assumes would be.

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 5>Covered off by this. I looked up how much it.

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Is to install a public EV charger in Australia and

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 4>the interweb says somewhere between forty thousand and one hundred

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 4>thousand dollars.

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:32.880
<v Speaker 5>And that's just the installation.

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:34.800
<v Speaker 1>That is extraordinary.

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 3>To put in a charger for an electric car cost

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 3>that amount of money. We wonder why people aren't buying

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:43.320
<v Speaker 3>these things. Oh, it's the panacea, it'll save the planet,

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 3>but it'll seem you broke in the meantime. I just

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 3>cannot get over that it would cost that much money

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 3>to put a plug in the ground, and.

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 2>When you consider how inefficient they are. I mean, you

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 2>can charge one car for what does it take to

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 2>charge a vehicle twenty minutes twenty thirty minutes. Yeah, it's

0:45:58.560 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 2>not a good use of money. We're going to go

0:45:59.880 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 2>to break. When we come back. The most unusual drug

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 2>bust that we've come across for quite a while, we'll

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 2>show you out went down in just a moment. Okay,

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 2>I think we've found the most unusual drug bust of

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 2>the year already. It's only February, but I'm calling it, Caleb.

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>This is it might be the most unusual in a

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>long time. Remember cocaine.

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Cassie, another great Adelaidian who tried to smuggle all that

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 3>cocaine out of Columbia stuffed into headphones. She said, we're

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.719
<v Speaker 3>going to be gifts at her wedding party. Well, this

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 3>bloke has given her a serious run for her money.

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Take a look.

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:37.279
<v Speaker 3>He was caught by Columbian authorities with cocaine. You can

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 3>see they're packed up into small bags in a two

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 3>pay attached to his head.

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Quite clearly.

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 3>He has walked through the scanner and they've gone, hmmm,

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 3>something strange going on here, and they found that the

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 3>forty year old man had two hundred and twenty grams

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 3>of cocaine stuffed into his hair. That would be worth

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 3>upwards of fifty five thousand dollars here in Australia. But

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 3>the authorities have actually deemed that this is a specific

0:47:02.480 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of device. They described it as a Naco wig,

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:07.919
<v Speaker 3>So it is.

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Now a thing.

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 3>There is now a thing stuffing cocaine in your hair

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 3>and putting it on. And I would have thought, James,

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 3>you would be a prime candidate for that kind of

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:18.359
<v Speaker 3>job with your hairline.

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I thought that comment might come kind of interestingly watching

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 2>that vision, I reckon he was more concerned about being

0:47:25.080 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 2>exposed a hairline on the drugs, because the moment they

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:30.959
<v Speaker 2>took the wig off and got the drugs, he mediately

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:33.360
<v Speaker 2>put his cap back on. That was the thing he

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 2>was worried about.

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:35.440
<v Speaker 1>To cover my shame.

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 4>Before we leave you tonight, if you're a fan of

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:43.400
<v Speaker 4>fantasy weddings, have we got one for the history books.

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 4>This couple decided that they would have a Lord of

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:48.800
<v Speaker 4>the Rings wedding, but it got the groom off to

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 4>a terrible start with his in laws.

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Oh direct directly quote him.

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 4>He said, I decided that as the groom, I would

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 4>fully commit to the role of a midie for Lord

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Shakespearean style Old English for the entire day. Her mom

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 4>pulled me aside mid reception, her mom being the mother

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 4>of the bride, and asked me to just talk normal.

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 4>He recounted, I told her verily, I know not of

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 4>what thou doth speak. At the end of the night,

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 4>my new father in law came up to me, said

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:24.839
<v Speaker 4>I had embarrassed the family and made a.

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 5>Joke out of the wedding.

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:30.799
<v Speaker 4>Right after the guy though, if you're gonna pick a

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 4>themed wedding, you've got to commit to it. This guy

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 4>just wasn't letting a letting up.

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:38.479
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, that's all we've got time for, but stick around.

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 2>Coming up is the Reader Penney Show. Good Night,