WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 15 August

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>On scoring Zostronia. This is the Wader Paney Show.

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panehy Show. We

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 2>have a massive program for you tonight. Joining me shortly

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 2>one of the finest thinkers of his generation Douglas Murray,

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 2>who is currently under attack in the UK with left

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>US activist demanding his arrest. Also tonight the latest local

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>international news with Nick Kata and Kosher Gator, and later

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 2>in the hour Royal and Celebrity news with Kinsey Schofield

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and the segment that goes viral each and every night

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 2>millions of people watch this left He's losing it.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, your dog is so cute? Can I

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 3>pat her oh Day is actually non binary? But you

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 3>can pet bay?

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Have you Blake Thinks brilliant model gaining as gender dogs.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Joining me all the way from Bosnia is Mensi's Research Center,

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Senior Fellow and senior col with the Australian newspaper, Nick Cater. Nick,

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 2>let's start with the ABC and it's unrelenting leftist activism

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 2>and bias. Have a look at this from Sarah Ferguson

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 2>this week. This is in her interview with Nancy Pelosi,

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 2>former Speaker of the US House. The Trump derangement syndrome

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>here is off the charts.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump poisoned American politics in a new way. He's

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 5>clearly taken America to a dark place. Do you also

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 5>hold him responsible for the dark place that he took

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 5>your family to with the terrible attack on your husband

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 5>in your home?

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Nick?

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Did you forget that it was Donald Trump who was

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 2>almost assassinated about a month ago?

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 3>And I must point out.

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 2>This is the same ABC reporter who spent a considerable

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 2>amount of our money pushing the thoroughly debunked Russian conspiracy

0:01:57.880 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 2>theory in a three part series.

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Do we ever get any accountability for that?

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 2>But just tell me what you think about the ABC

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and they're unashamed activism.

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I think Trump arrangement syndrome is said in there,

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and I suggest that we send some vans with suitably

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>protected health workers to actually take them out and swap

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>them and test them. But I think you'd find it's

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty much one hundred percent and there's no known cure

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for it except perhaps taking them out of the ABC

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and parking them in front of Sky News for a week.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, the point here is if Sarah Fergus's logic

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>is that Donald Trump's rhetoric in some way incited some

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>individual to go and beat up Nancy Bloni's husband and

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>all those terrible things that happen. That is a long bow.

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>But you could equally well say that going around talking

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>about Trump taking America to a dark place, some poisoning

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>politics is actually going to incite other individuals to go

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>and to make a potshot at him, as one did.

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Because if you really think that Trump is the Antichrist,

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, the absolute enemy of mankind, then what won't

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you do to stop him? So I think this idea

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that in I mean, I'm not a great believer in

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that inflammatory rhetoric does these things. I think

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that's down to individuals who make those decisions. But if

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.839
<v Speaker 1>you're going to go with that logic, Sarah, then you'd

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>better watch your own language.

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, these people can't even follow their own stupid rules.

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 6>There.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 3>The double standards are many.

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Now let's go to Cabra and the unedifying outbursts we

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 2>saw today. Here is our Green Senator Sarah Hanson Young

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 2>heckling the Nationals David Little Proud while he was addressing

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 2>the media.

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 7>Peter Darton has laid out a pathway more so than

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 7>what many of Palestine's o neighbors.

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 8>Would maybe say something about the children that are being.

0:03:55.560 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Slaughter Why don't you say something about the children being slaughtered?

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 3>That's what she said. If you couldn't hear it.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 2>And in the Lower House we had at till MP's

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Alie Stegel, independent till whatever she is, she called the

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 2>opposition leader racist.

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 4>I would like to share is the human story, the

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 4>real story about some of the people we're talking about,

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 4>the lives they're talking And I would ask you to

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 4>be silent.

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 7>I have the floor.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 3>Order we hurt you in silence. You can hear me

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 3>in silence. Order stop being racist.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 7>The opposition order.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, it was an offensive and unparliamentary remark.

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 8>It should be withdrawn.

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Is a description of language being racist and unparliamentary remark.

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Nicka, how do you see the conduct of Stegel and

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Hans and Young.

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Look, this may be a wild theory fritchart, but I

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>wonder if actually Stegel and Hanson Young in some strange

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>way are actually on the Peter Dutton team campaigning to

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>get him elected. Because this you couldn't buy this sort

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of publicity. Really, if you're Peter Dutton, you know, ordinary working,

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>decent people out there, Australians, patriotic Australians are right on

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>board with Peter Dutton. There are no votes in what

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Albanezi is proposing, which is basically open doors of Palestinians.

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>People want their borders protected. They can see that when

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you get seventy five percent of people in Gaza apparently

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>an opinion poll who support hamas well, you know, are

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we just going to be lucky and just get that

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent who don't? Of course not. So you know,

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>ordinary decent, patriotic Australians are right behind Peter Dutton. And

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>every time you get these sort of displays of I

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know, virtue signaling in his ear, then it just

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>adds to people's concerns and puts them behind him. So yeah, no, no,

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>no marks to Sali's Stegel or ra Hanson Young for

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that well.

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton. Peter Dutton is coppying it from the media

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 2>as well. No surprises there. He was asked this on

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 2>nine today. He was asked whether he's a heartless racist.

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Have a listen, good to see it are you heartless?

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 7>A heartless racist? Do you have any humanity?

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 2>All he could do was laugh there and collect his thoughts.

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how else do you respond.

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 1>To a question like that, Nick, No, I mean you

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>put that question to be do you have any humanity?

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't quite know if i'd know what to say. Look,

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>it is ridiculous, but it's like all these things. Really,

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>do you know if we were to have a referendum

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>on this tomorrow, you know how to referendum? Theoretically? Should

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we let in guards and refugees or people who claim

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>their refugees without being able to check their bona fides?

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>The result would be an emphatic no. It would make

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the voice reference of look tiny.

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 7>You know that.

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know Peter Dutton is clearly with the majority

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Australian people. But having to battle against this

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>huge tide of wokeness that pours out of Fairfax and

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the ABC and the Parliament and SBS and every other pace,

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's got to keep his head above water.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But if he can do that, I think he can

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>win this issue, no problem.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh absolutely.

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I think he's used to getting harsh media treatment, but

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that treatment is going to.

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Be far worse than he's ever seen.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>He is the opposition leader now, the polls of Titan

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 2>is within a winning margin, and he's coming out strongly

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 2>with these conservative positions after the success of the no

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>campaign for the Voice, and I think the media campaign

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 2>against him is going to intensify.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Nick.

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Now, before you go, I want to play you this

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 2>clip that the Marla Harris campaign have released is just

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>again so authentic and real.

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Have a look.

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 7>I called you, Tim, Yes, you didn't answer, Tim.

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 9>I know, I know the what happened, the most important

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 9>call of my life. It popped up and we didn't

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 9>recognize the caller a D and it went to A

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 9>went to voicemail.

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Hey, Tim, it's Kamla. I really want to

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 3>talk to you, Nicka.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 2>We've run out of time, and thank God, because I

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know how much more of the Kamala and Wolves

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I can stomach. Nick Kita enjoyed Bosnia. Thanks for your

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 2>time this evening.

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Is author of international best sellers, including The War on

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the West and The Strange Death of Europe. One of

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 2>the finest thinkers of his generation, Douglas Marian Douglas, you

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 2>are right now under attack. The left in the UK

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 2>are trying to cancel you. They want you banned from

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 2>tver appearances. They want you to stop writing for publications

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 2>like The Spectator. But it hasn't stopped there, led by

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the likes of Alistair Campbell, He's a supposed former journalist

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 2>turned to Tony blas spokesperson New Labor spokesperson.

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 3>He and others are.

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Wanting you arrested and charged for offensive commentary also known

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 2>as telling the truth. What is going on in the UK?

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 2>And do you fear that police are scrutinizing your tweets

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>and interviews and things you've written.

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 7>Well, all that caused this was the fact that I've

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 7>used my eyes in recent decades, and I've also used

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 7>my pen, and I have described what has happened to

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 7>my country of birth, Great Britain, and the continent of Europe,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 7>and indeed the way to develop world and the challenges

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 7>that come through illegal and legal mass migration. That's not

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 7>all migration, but illegal and legal mass migration. Interestingly enough,

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 7>this interview that seems to have coursed this breakdown from

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 7>Alistair Campbell was one in which I simply said what

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 7>I describe in the strange death of Europe as happening

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 7>is indeed what is now happening. And I said this,

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 7>as many people have noted, not in a spirit of glee,

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 7>but in one of deep lamentation. I never wanted to

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 7>be proved right on this, and it gives me absolutely

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 7>no joy to have been proven right that the importing

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 7>of very large numbers of people illegally and legally from

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 7>very different cultures into a society which totally fails to

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 7>integrate them will lead to massive problems, including at some

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 7>point a massive backlash. Now it's interesting Alistair Campbell should

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 7>have been one of the ones to try to start

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 7>this pile on. Of course, Alistair Campbell was part of

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 7>the Labor government that in the late nineties and early

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 7>two thousands massively ramped up illegal and legal migration into

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 7>the UK. He's actually one of the architects of this problem,

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 7>a problem which one of his colleagues at the time

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 7>described as being deliberate. See one of his colleagues said

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 7>he came out of meetings about this issue with a

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 7>very clear feeling that the Labor government of Tony Blair

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 7>wanted this mass movement of people into the UK to

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 7>quote rub the rights nose in diversity. Well, of course

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 7>all these things had unexpected consequences, but Alistair Campbell is

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 7>one of the people responsible for them. I'm only responsible

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 7>for pointing out the facts and the lamentable situation that

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 7>he got our country into. There's a couple of other

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 7>things very quickly, Rita. Of course, this man Campbell is

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 7>best known for his lying dossier about WMD in Iraq,

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 7>which helped bounce Britain and other countries into the Iraq War.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 7>So if he had any kind of sense of decency,

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 7>he would have disappeared from public life for a long

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 7>time ago. He was, also, of course, a person who

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.719
<v Speaker 7>hounded doctor David Kelly to suicide. And that's one of

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 7>the really interesting things about Alistair Campbell. He's an unbelievable

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 7>bully and a hack. And one of the things about him,

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 7>like most hacks and bullies of his kind, he thinks

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 7>that he can hide behind, as he always does, the

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 7>claim that he himself is very mentally fragile. One of

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 7>the interesting things about that is he can chase people

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 7>like David Kelly to suicide. But if you criticize Alistair

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 7>Campbell for his frequent bursts of utter insanity. He says

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 7>that you are using his mental health against him. He's

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 7>a totally sick individual on every possible level. I make

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 7>no apology for pointing out the terrible things that he

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 7>and his friends did to my country.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, your greatest crime appears to be that you were right.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 2>You wrote about this years ago. You warned about what

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 2>was going to happen in the Strange Death of Europe.

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 2>You were right when you warned of the unrest that

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 2>would come in books like The Madness of Crowds and

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 2>The War against the West. And as the great Thomas

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Sow wrote, people will forgive you for being wrong, but

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 2>they will never forgive you for being right. And what

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 2>you talked about that mass migration. We've got that discussion

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 2>happening right here in Australia. We've had record numbers coming

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 2>in legally. But if they're not assimilating, if they don't

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 2>share your values, as we've seen in the UK, you're

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 2>going to have these problems and just trying to stomp

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 2>it out with two tier policing and a justice system

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Douglas isn't going to solve the underlying issue.

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 7>No, absolutely not. I mean, as I said for many

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 7>years the mass movement of people, often who dislike the

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 7>culture they're moving into intensely, and that always amazes me.

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 7>I don't understand why people would move to societies that

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 7>they dislike very much, but lots of numbers of people do,

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 7>mainly just because they want to be in a system

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 7>which can reward of them at least to some extent financially,

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 7>either through welfare or through the economy, that works far

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.599
<v Speaker 7>better than the countries that they've fled from. But if

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 7>you bring people from very strong cultures, with very strong

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 7>ethnic identities and religious identities into countries are completely apologetic,

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 7>how toowed self shamed and embarrassed about their past, as

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 7>is the story that has been pushed on the people

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 7>of Australia in recent years, as has been the story

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 7>pushed on the people of Britain, Europe and America in

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 7>recent years. You don't have a hope of integrating people.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 7>So yes, all of this stuff is absolutely predictable. It

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 7>doesn't require a profit. It just requires people with their

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 7>eyes open and a willingness to tell the truth. And

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 7>I hope that people do have their eyes open and

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 7>continue to tell the truth as I will, and I'm

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 7>not going to be intimidated by any of these people

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 7>who should have so much guilt on their consciences. I

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 7>would be surprised that they dare to show their faces

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 7>in public again.

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, along with you, the other great enemy of the

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 2>left right now appears to be Elon Musk, particularly amongst

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the political media activist class.

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Look at this.

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Deranged piece in the Guardian where else with the headline

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 2>you know who else should be on trial for the

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 2>UK's far right riots, Elon Musk? That was the headline,

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 2>and the piece goes on to call Musk one of

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the world's most prolific enemies of truth. This assault against

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 2>free speech in the UK is really quite sinister and

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 2>I've got to say effective. Of course, it's not going

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 2>to silence the likes of Elon Musk, but the average

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 2>person may refrain from posting something on their Facebook page

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 2>when they see people being arrested for online posts for

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>things that are considered offensive, not just threatening or abusive,

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>but just offensive. It seems to be a line that

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 2>you can't cross.

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, absolutely, including retweeting videos of things that have happened.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 7>The interesting thing about Jonathan Friedland of the Garden He's

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 7>a very obscure figure. He's not at all known outside

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 7>of the small amount of the left wing in the UK.

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 7>But of course, to think that somebody like him would

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 7>have the audacity to claim that the British authority should

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 7>arrest an American citizen. I mean, I don't know if

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 7>Jonathan Friedland knows his history. I assume he does. He's

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 7>a relatively intelligent man, but he should know that America

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 7>fort quite significant war in order that American citizens would

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 7>not in fact be under the writ of British law.

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 7>And thank goodness, Elon Musku isn't, And thank goodness, he

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 7>has the guts to continue, like a number of the

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 7>rest of us, to say what is the truth. The

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 7>interesting thing, by the way, about two things to say

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 7>about Jonathan Friedland and this ridiculous piece. One is that

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 7>Jonathan Friedland actually, after noticing the success of the Da

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 7>Vinci Code and other sort of rather low boilerplate novels,

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 7>started writing novels himself under pseudonym, and one of them,

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 7>published in twenty seventeen, is an extended wet dream about

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 7>the idea of the assassination of President Trump. It's extremely open.

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 7>That's the only skill of the book such as it is,

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 7>is that it's an excitable book for people who would

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 7>have loved to see Donald Trump getting assassinated. On that principle,

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 7>of course, inmperhaps the American authorities you ought to ask

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 7>for the extradition of Jonathan Friedland writing a crappy genre

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 7>novel under a pseudonym in which he dreams of the

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 7>assassination of President Trump. Of course, it would be ridiculous

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 7>to do so, because nobody would read his book. But

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 7>the other thing to be said about these people is

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 7>that they just have this satalitarian authoritarian instinct which they

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 7>just can't get rid of. They think everything should always

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 7>go their way. They think they should be the censors

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 7>of the town square. And the reason why you see

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 7>so much of the media running against Elon Musk at

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 7>the moment is that they recognize that his platform Twitter

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 7>is beating all of them of them in all of

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 7>the stakes the media absorption around the world, and that's

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 7>very scary for some of these old media who can't

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 7>keep up and don't have very many readers, like The Guardian.

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 7>But you know, it is a very important thing you

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 7>mentioned their reader that in actual fact and Roan Atkinson

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 7>no less said that it's in a speech eleven years ago.

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 7>It's perfectly possible. You see that people like me, billionaires

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 7>like Elon Musk, will be able to get through this

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 7>era and will survive it. And I certainly plan to,

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 7>and I'm sure and know that Musk does as well.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 7>But what about, as you say, the person who does

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 7>not have the platform that I have or the means

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 7>that Elon Musk has, What about them? When as is

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 7>happening all the time at the moment in the UK

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 7>police forces that have not solved one burglary, yes you

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 7>heard that right, not one burglary in recent years, and

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 7>knocking on people's doors and arresting them for Facebook posts,

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 7>for retweeting things. Sure, there is some people who've said

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 7>some horrible things and disgraceful things in recent weeks, but

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 7>oh my, the priorities of the British police, you know,

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 7>they are really treading into very very dangerous or Wellyan

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 7>waters I it turns out, and the rest of the

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 7>public in Britain can't trust them to solve a burglary.

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 7>Would I trust them to police my speech? No? I

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 7>don't think so.

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 2>No, No, And the treatment you're receiving the treatment Elon

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Musk is receiving is what Donald Trump has been copying.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 3>For some years now.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 2>And he's a two hour chat with Elon Musk had

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the media triggered. It did reach an

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 2>enormous audience despite having technical issues at the start.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 3>But look at some of the media coverage we were

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 3>treated to.

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 2>This is from USA Today starts with this line for

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 2>a fascism curious billionaire who loves cuddling up to right

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 2>wing loons, I mean, and it got progressively worse from

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the from their Douglas Trump's call the media the enemy

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 2>of the people, and sadly it seems there are many

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>in the industry who seem desperate to live up to

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 2>that tag.

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 7>These are just dying entities. I mean, USA Today is

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 7>such a failing newspapers. There's a spin as as a

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 7>loo role and it's just an unbelievable rag now and

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 7>almost no information in it unless you want to follow

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 7>the baseball, which lots of people do. But in terms

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 7>of news, it's just the worst possible way to absorb news.

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 7>But they just have an agenda and they just show

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 7>it more and more. They describe Elon Musk as a fascist.

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 7>They describe the former president of the United States. Maybe

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 7>the next president is a just just a right wing loon.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 7>And you know, these these people you can just you

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 7>can write their headlines and their articles before the event occurs.

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 7>And I'm sure some of these people do. I bet

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 7>that guy decided to do that. And you know, of

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 7>course they don't point out that it seems, whatever your

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 7>criticisms of Donald Trump, he did this very lengthy conversation

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 7>with Elon Musk. It's rather more than we've seen from

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 7>Kamala Harris in recent weeks. But of course they don't

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 7>mention that. They don't note that because it's just the

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 7>backing chorus of the Democratic Party. That's all these these

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 7>dying media brands are. The public can see it for

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 7>what it's worth. And if you want a little bit

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 7>of dying left wing media commentary with your baseball results,

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 7>I suppose you can go to us A today. But

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 7>it turns out most of the world is going to

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 7>ex Twitter.

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, the reach of that interview is astonishing, unlike really

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 2>anything you see elsewhere. Now one two, before you go play,

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 2>you a little clip from the Stephen Colbert Show featuring

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 2>CNN anchor Caitlin Collins. What is curious here or well please,

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 2>is the crowd reaction when Colbert makes this claim.

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 10>I know you guys are objective over there, that you

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 10>just report the news as it is.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I know a CNN makes it.

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 7>And they're not. That's supposed to be a live life

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.239
<v Speaker 7>I wasn't supposed to be, but I guess it is.

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Douglas even his leftist crowd just burst out laughing at

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 2>that claim that CNN just reports the news. They're just

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 2>straight down the line, unbiased, and this diminishing trust in institutions,

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 2>including the media, the police we've spoken about, and judiciary increasingly.

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 2>It's not healthy, but I think in a way it

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 2>is healthy that people are actually getting awareness of some

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 2>of the double standards that exist.

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 7>Oh yeah, absolutely. I mean this institutional distrust is as

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 7>I've said to you before, Rito, we've discussed this. It's

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 7>about the fact that the public can see through these institutions.

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 7>If a police force doesn't solve berg even go to

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 7>the scene of a crime, but it does go for

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 7>a Twitter x post.

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 6>You know, there's a.

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 7>Problem of priorities in the police force, likewise in the media.

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 7>When you see the coverage of things like CNN. It's

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 7>not just that it's biased in its stance. Not everything,

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 7>by the way, occasionally there's something on CNN that's relatively

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 7>good and relatively impartial. But the thing is, but what

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 7>they actually choose, they what gives it away time and

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:28.479
<v Speaker 7>again is what they choose to focus on. They choose

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 7>to focus on things that boost the narrative that they have,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 7>whether that's foreign policy, whether it's the war in Ukraine

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 7>or the war in Israel in Gaza, or whether it's

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 7>things domestically, whether it's just puffing up their candidate to

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 7>get her into office in November. And I was delighted

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 7>to see that. I mean, I don't I just can't

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 7>watch Stephen Colbert most of the time. Almost nobody does.

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 7>But I mean, you know, started off as a media

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 7>now he's just become one of these sermonizers, boring sermonizers

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.479
<v Speaker 7>of the American left in what used to be late

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 7>night com swats. But it was wonderful to see that

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 7>his audience was wayser than he was and knew more

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 7>than he did, and laughed in the face of the

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 7>idea that CNN simply attempts to report the truth.

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 3>It was.

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 2>It was the best moment of the whole interview and

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.239
<v Speaker 2>unintentionally funny. Douglas Murray, thank you so much for your

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 2>time this evening.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 7>Great pleasures always, thank you.

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 3>Still to come.

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a bumper edition of the Left Is Losing Ed

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 2>and some surprising data for Donald Trump. Welcome back. Now

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 2>it's time for Lefties Losing Ed. We're going to have

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 2>some stella carmala content for you shortly, but first a

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 2>trigger warning for all the sensitive souls out there. The

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 2>following clip we'll have Lefties Lose It. Here is Pastor

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Gino j expressing his disdain for those who don't know

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 2>what a woman is, including President Joe Biden.

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 3>Remember him, he is apparently still president.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 7>Congressman in Congress trying to find what a woman is?

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 7>What is a woman? It's your mama? Make sure dat

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 7>what's a woman? Your mama?

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 11>President by joining in on a conversation, is a woman?

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 7>Is your mother?

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 5>Man's past eighty?

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it?

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 7>You mean her? Tell me you past eighty?

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 3>You don't know your your mama and your.

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 7>Wife is a woman.

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Hallelujah. Now here is a woman who.

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Should be listening to the good pastor, because I can

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 2>guarantee you she won't be able to answer the question

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 2>what is a woman. Let's hear from Delta Airlines top

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 2>d I officer that's diversity, equity and inclusion and her

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 2>plan to make air travel more woke and gender inclusive.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 6>Then we're beginning to take a hard look at things

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 6>like our health announcements. You know, we welcome ladies and gentlemen,

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 6>and we've asked ourselves as that as gender inclusive as

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 6>we want to be. You know, we're looking at some

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 6>legacy language that exists in some of our employee manuals

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 6>and getting to the root of the way some things

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 6>are described.

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Now let's go to the UK and the so called

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 2>anti racism protest.

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 3>That's not what they actually are.

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 2>And some of those attending cannot even distinguish between illegal

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 2>or legal migration or what taxpayer money is being spent on.

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Listen to this young virtue signaling ignoramous is.

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>The anti immigration or illegal immigration?

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 8>What do you say, I don't think anybody's illegal.

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 7>I hear this a lot.

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 5>What means refugee is not illegal because people aren't illegal, of.

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Course, but when they come into the country about passports,

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 2>what can you do about that?

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 5>We can welcome them in their refugees, their asylums.

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 3>So because they're fleeing persecution.

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 10>And how do you feel about the tax payer having

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 10>to pay for that?

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:57.959
<v Speaker 7>The taxpay doesn't pay for that.

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 5>Answering a question, The tax pay doesn't pay for league immigrants.

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, times are hard and inflation is biting. But if

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 2>you rely on tips for your income, perhaps don't be

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 2>an entitled prat like this.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Next dude, thank you. I just want to say, it's

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 3>a nice house.

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 6>For a five dollars tip, you are.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 3>It looked like it was delivering one pizza there. How

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 3>much of a tip did he expect?

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 2>Now, talking about entitled young men, these two mysscreens really

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 2>are deplorable watches. They laugh when court vandalizing a shop

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 2>owner's outdoor space, even as he tells them how much

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 2>it costs him.

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 12>Are you serious, man?

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Man?

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Are you serious?

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 10>I paid sixteen care for this whole place to set.

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 10>It's twenty five thousand dollars. Fine, So I go forward

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 10>this video to the cops and see what they're gonna do.

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 2>They have absolutely no fear of the police there or

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they are on camera committing crimes.

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, is vandalism still a crime in Blue States?

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Now to a regular on this segment, and frankly, I've

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 2>missed her.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 3>She may no longer be on the view, but.

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 2>She keeps bringing the goods, and her Trump derangement syndrome

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 2>shows no signs of improvement.

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Here is Rosie O'Donnell.

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 12>Are you watching this moron speak? Can he form a

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 12>coherent sentence? He is the worst thing that ever happened, period,

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 12>and he's just babbling like an incoherent He's.

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Like doctor Doom. He's the worst thing.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Now to another lefty celebrity losing it. Here is how

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Lebron James treats a young fan.

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 7>I'll do that.

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Awful awful. He ain't no Jordan, that's for sure. He's

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 3>more the male.

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Meghan Rapperno remember her, I've missed her too. Here she

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 2>is at Seattle's Pride parade, refusing to answer a very

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 2>simple question.

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 13>You're US women's soccer team famously lost to high school boys.

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 13>You really think it's fair for these same boys to

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 13>be competing in girls sports? Why should trans people compete

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 13>against young girls?

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you know I think that they're going to get hurt.

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Are they gonna get her?

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 12>Oh?

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 2>How clever to take a drink so she doesn't have

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 2>to answer. Yes, Meghan supports trans women. I am men

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 2>competing against women, even though an under fifteen boys squad

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 2>smashed the national team.

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Now let's have some Kamala action. And she really is.

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 2>An intellectual, a leader of rare ability and courage and principle.

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 3>So much principle.

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 12>I'm gonna get mad when we have an Attorney general

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 12>who is trying to resuscitate the war on drugs?

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, can we talk?

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 12>And he thinks the greatest evil that mankind has ever

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 12>seen is marijuana. It's like I've said this and you've

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 12>seen this in my emails. Leave Grandma's medical marijuana alone.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>So this is the same woman who convicted almost two

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 2>thousand people for marijuana violations and send many of them

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 2>to prison.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Did she think no one would remember that? Well, the

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 3>bulk of the American.

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Media has forgotten, and Kamala herself seems to have a

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 2>a few memory issues.

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 3>How dare we speak? Merry Christmas? How dare we merry Christmas?

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Everyone?

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And the Vice President seems to think that one pumps

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 2>electricity into an ev an electric vehicle like you pump

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 2>gas into a regular car.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Watch this hilarity. And there's no sound or film.

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 14>There is nothing.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 11>I used to every.

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Morning filling our tents.

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 11>You usually can smell it, and you can hear it.

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 3>You can hear the guzzling sound, none of that.

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 8>So how do I know it's actually working?

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I wonder how many hours she would stand there just

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 2>holding the bowser. And let's now go to a non

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 2>binary dog. Watch this and try to figure out if

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 2>the owner is serious or mocking the painfully woke.

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to think it's the latter. Oh my god,

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 3>your dog is so cute? Can you pet her?

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 12>Oh?

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 11>Day is actually non binary, but you can pet if

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 11>you guess.

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 6>It's really not againing misgender dogs.

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 2>And let's end lefties this week with this classic bit

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 2>of comedy from Stephen Hughes about being offended.

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 3>This never gets old.

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 14>Having a live in democracy, but I never want to

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 14>be offended again. Well, you're an idiot.

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 7>How do you make a law about offending people?

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 14>How do you make an offense to offend people? Being

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 14>offended is subjective? How has everything to do with you

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 14>as an individual or a collective or a group or

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 14>a society or a community, your moral conditioning, your religious beliefs.

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 14>What offends me may not offend you, and you want

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 14>to make laws about this. I'm offended when I see

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 14>boy bands, For God's sake, it's a val offense of offended.

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 14>The corporate shills posing his musicians to further a modeling career,

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 14>and frankly, I'm disgusted. But what am I going to do?

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 7>Call the cops? Hello, it's May again.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 14>They're on the telly this time.

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 7>Five of them.

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>That's it.

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:09.479
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, white suits dancing like girls.

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 14>That's them. Five minutes, I'll be out the front, traumatized.

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 3>By now, we'll be looking at more.

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Left is losing it content with my next guest Guy

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 2>news contributor Kosher, geta Kosher.

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's start with.

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 2>CNN, and they're typically anti Trump content, but there was

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 2>a dose of reality in amongst that TDS and it

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 2>came from an unlikely source. Polster Frank Luntzu's no Trump fan,

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 2>but he can't hide this trend. This data is remarkable.

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 15>But I assure you that Donald Trump is doing better

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 15>among the average union member, not teachers unions and not

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 15>the unions for government, but everybody else. The trades people

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 15>work in their hands. He's doing better among them than

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 15>any Republican has done in decades. This is not going

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 15>to be a problem for him. The union leadership is

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 15>more divided from their membership, and the louder that it gets,

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 15>the greater the divides are going to come in and

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 15>my focus groups. And this is remarkable to me. The

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 15>union membership says they don't speak for me. And I've

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 15>been doing this now since nineteen I hate to say this,

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 15>eighty nine, nineteen ninety. I've never had union people publicly

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 15>say they don't speak for me.

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 2>Kosher, that was sobering news for the panel. What do

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 2>you make of those insights?

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 8>That's probably the best news Trump has received in the

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 8>last two weeks, where there's been a lot of discussion

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 8>about the era coming out of the balloon as the

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 8>race resets. For Kamala Harris, the key for him is

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 8>the working class and that comment about the treaties to

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 8>the Australian parlance, you know, goes straight to that he

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 8>won them by some remarkable margin in twenty sixteen. I

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 8>think it was thirty six points highest ever in history

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 8>that group. He lost a little bit of that in

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty, but still had a huge margin. And right

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:00.479
<v Speaker 8>now some pools are saying that Kamala Herra, who's actually

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 8>really shrunk that margin for him even more and that

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 8>is the key to his victory. So if true, and

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 8>if you can continue to build on that, that is

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 8>going to be what is on his path to two

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 8>seventy and it was I think, so I'll bring news

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 8>as a result of that fabersion and.

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Panel and very interesting to that divide between the average

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 2>union member and their leadership. And you wonder how sustainable

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 2>that model is where you're paying your dues to people

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 2>who really are not representing your interest and don't like you,

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 2>and don't like you but like union members. Trump is

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 2>also enjoying a level of support from Hispanic voters Republicans

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 2>that seldom.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 3>See you've ever seen.

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 2>The latest ge pole, the National g poll commissioned by

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Fox News shows that Trump is leading Kamala but just

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 2>one percent amongst the national vote, But when you look

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 2>at the Hispanic voters, the lead is six percent, fifty

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:58.360
<v Speaker 2>two to forty six against something back in twenty and sixteen.

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 2>If you suggested this, he'd.

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Be thrown into some sort of an asylum Kosher.

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 8>The Hispanic vote is really interesting because it's the fastest

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 8>growing demographic in the US and Trump has made in

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 8>roads with them. I think Bush actually did quite well

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 8>with them, maybe surprising to many, and then after that

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 8>Republicans don't do that well. Trump did. He raised and

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 8>grew his support with them in twenty twenty versus twenty sixteen.

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 8>And if that trend holds, given that group is growing

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 8>and they are in some of those battleground states, there

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 8>are certainly pockets of them, it could be quite interesting.

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 8>I think, you know it as policies on the economy

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 8>and all of that. A lot of them are small

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 8>business owners, and that resonates with them. Also, it's a personality,

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 8>sort of that machismo aspect of the Trump personality I

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 8>think resonates a lot certainly with Hispanic men.

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 2>And I think also when it comes to the culture wars,

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 2>because that demographic tends to be socially conservative. They do

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 2>not like all this pronoun indoctrination in schools, all the

0:36:56.520 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 2>extremes that elements of the left, particularly in the Democrats,

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 2>have gone. I think that would be leaving a lot

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 2>of them uncomfortable, and not just Hispanic voters, but a

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of other migrant groups. And this is something again

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 2>the left, the media activist don't seem to understand. There's

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 2>a marked difference between legal migrants and illegal immigrants, and

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 2>legal migrants are often the ones who are most vehemently

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 2>against illegal.

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 8>Immigration, absolutely because they know what it's like to have

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 8>gotten in and what a gift it is to come

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 8>from the countries that they come from and to be

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 8>in here. And they're probably even more offended I think

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.280
<v Speaker 8>by others from where they come from, cutting the line

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 8>and crossing aver legally.

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Especially if they don't have those shared values, that don't

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 2>have the work ethic. Perhaps that's I think all part

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 2>of it. Now, let's talk about the economic credentials of

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris's VP pick. A prominent business leader and Shark

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 2>Tank host Kevin O'Leary has slammed Team Walls's record as

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:55.280
<v Speaker 2>governor of Minnesota.

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 10>I'm looking at the track record of an individual came

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 10>into a state and wiped out job creation. He wiped

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 10>out job creation in professional in manufacturing, in accounting, in

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 10>every subcategory. You look at those jobs moved to South

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 10>Dakota and North Dakota the South Dakota job rate right

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:14.879
<v Speaker 10>now is four times that of Minnesota, and Minnesota only

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.760
<v Speaker 10>creates jobs in services that are funded by the government

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 10>healthcare and social services. Every other sector is in decline.

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 10>He's also added a surcharge of one percent one hundred

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 10>basis points on top of nine point eight percent taxes

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 10>on individuals that are retiring, and of course they're leaving

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:31.320
<v Speaker 10>the state in drones kosher.

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 2>That seems to be true for many leftist governments, including

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 2>right here in Australia, particularly here in Victoria, the job's

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 2>growth tend to be taxpayer funded jobs whilst businesses are fleeing.

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 2>And that data comparing North and South Dakota to Minnesota

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 2>is very interesting.

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:51.720
<v Speaker 8>It is, and indeed some would say that's by design

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 8>with left leaning governments and not by defect, because it

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 8>shures up their power structure if you have more and

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 8>more people dependent on the government, including for their jobs.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 8>The thing that the US has, it's really built in

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 8>structural advantage that is lust. So here is it has

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 8>fifty stats, so there's more of that option for mobility

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 8>interestate mobility than there is given Australia structure. And you

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 8>see that where Minnesota, I think is in the top

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 8>fifteen states without flowing migration people fleeing, So New York

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 8>California are at the top top and Minnesota is just

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 8>as that mentions, and it definitely accelerated under his watch

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 8>for a lot of his policies, economic, COVID and everything else.

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 8>So I think that's a point that the other team

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 8>should keep heading on.

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 2>And they think it's a coincidence that many of the

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 2>top ten states that citizens are fleeing from tend to

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 2>be blue and the ones they go to tend to

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 2>be red. Florida, Texas, Tennessee one of the biggest beneficiaries

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 2>of that domestic migration. And you mentioned New York, California, Minnesota.

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Now let's talk a little bit more about Tim Walls

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:57.760
<v Speaker 2>is also under fire for a massive COVID nineteen fraud

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 2>that happened under his watch as minnesot So to governor.

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 2>More than two hundred and fifty million dollars of federal

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 2>money was defrauded, and it was one of the largest

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 2>pandemic era fraud schemes anywhere in the US. The alleged

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 2>perpetrators used a Minnesota based nonprofit organization called Feeding Our future,

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 2>which the Minnesota Department of Education was supposed.

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 3>To be overseeing.

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 2>They did a very poor job of that overseeing. It

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 2>said astonishing that this went on for so long on

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 2>such a grand scale without it being nipped in the barge.

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:32.919
<v Speaker 3>And you looked at the details.

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:36.879
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't a particularly sophisticated program. You would have thought

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 2>it would have been spotted early.

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 8>Yes, I think you know. It goes to just wonder

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 8>as much money slashing around as there was, especially in

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 8>the week of COVID, and there's no accountability with these

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 8>blooded organizations. Things that shouldn't slip through the cracks do

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 8>or people look the other way, or they're hamstrung, or

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 8>what other reasons are. Politically, I'm not sure this one

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 8>will land as potently against Waltz as others, because it's

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 8>more of an indirect indatementleadership in overall, he was overseeing

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 8>the stage, but he wasn't in the nitty gritty of

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 8>this particular thing. There are far more other direct indictments

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 8>of him, as we just discussed the mass exodus people

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 8>leaving Minnesota and his policies on various issues.

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, putting tampons in boys' restrooms, you've got the stolen

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 2>valor our shoe, we've got him talking up socialism as

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 2>being neighborly.

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 3>The list is long.

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris, as you mentioned, she is flying at the moment,

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 2>getting enormously that positive press, doing so much better in

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:34.280
<v Speaker 2>the polls than Joe Biden was. But is this Wall's

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 2>decision going to cause her damage because there just seems

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 2>to be more and more that comes out with him,

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:41.720
<v Speaker 2>and you wonder if he was properly vetted.

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 8>I do think that the vetting is an issue because

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:47.279
<v Speaker 8>of how this whole thing went down, and they were

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 8>pretending to support Biden for as long as they did,

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:51.439
<v Speaker 8>and then this last minute switcher Russ. Now you've got

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 8>what would happen in eighteen months condensed in ninety days.

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 8>So I'm sure they knew these things, but they didn't

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 8>have the time to really vet it. And these people,

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 8>she herself, had never been through a competitive primary process

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 8>or anything else. So it's plenty there. As you say,

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 8>it's a long list, but she's got this clear strategy.

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 8>You're running out the clock, getting very favorable media and

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:13.720
<v Speaker 8>new media, and that seems to be what's on the ballot.

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:16.879
<v Speaker 2>I think she's counting on a honeymoon all the way

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 2>to November. Koshagata, thank you so much for your time

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 2>this evening and still to come. Harry and Meghan lose

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:28.240
<v Speaker 2>another staff member, plus Elon Musk and jk Rowling accused

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 2>of cyber harassment.

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 3>By controversial boxer Eman Khalif.

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 2>You're watching the Rita Panehy Show, joining me now is

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 2>entertainment and world reporter Kinsey scho Filled. Kinsey, let's start

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 2>with another member of the Sussex team quitting. Harry and

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 2>Meghan have lost their chief of staff, Josh Kettler, just

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 2>three months after he came on board, and just dayser

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 2>to the quasi royal tour of Columbia.

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 3>They've gone to Columbia.

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Really, Paople Magazine, who we know are very close to

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 2>the couple, insis the depacha was mutual?

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Is that the whole story?

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 11>I do not believe that this is the whole story.

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 11>In fact, you know this is the same man that

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:22.320
<v Speaker 11>Harry and Meghan's team said was instrumental in the success

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 11>of their Nigeria trip. So why cut ties so close

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 11>to your Columbia adventure? Just a month ago you and

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 11>I talked about this, Prince Harry lost Dominic Reed, the

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 11>Invictus Games original CEO. He resigned within days of Prince

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 11>Harry accepting the controversial Pat Tillman Award on national television.

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 11>I don't think that was a coincidence, you know. I

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 11>believe we're at eighteen employees gone under Harry and Meghan

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 11>since twenty eighteen, and that does not count domestic health

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 11>and terminated members of their security detail. So we're seeing

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 11>a pattern here. It appears to be a clear sign

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 11>of ineffective leadership and a toxic workplace.

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 2>And we've saw that same patsion when they were in

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the UK, and that was really never fully addressed. Was

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 2>it precisely why they lost so many stuff? What happened

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:15.320
<v Speaker 2>with those bullying allegations? This sort of bad luck seems

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:16.320
<v Speaker 2>to follow the couple.

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 11>What's interesting to me, too, is to your point about

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 11>People Magazine. A former Archwall employee recently told People Magazine

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 11>that Megan really wanted Prince Harry to get over some

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 11>of this litigation and look forward and move on. We

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 11>know how ironclad those NDAs are, So it goes to

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 11>your point that People magazine is getting access to people

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 11>through Harry and Meghan that someone would be courageous enough

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:45.839
<v Speaker 11>to talk to them and make Meghan look good by

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.399
<v Speaker 11>saying Meghan wants to focus on the future and move

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 11>past some of the drama and just look forward. So yeah,

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 11>I think that this is just going to continue to

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 11>happen and till this couple looks in the mirror and

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 11>realizes perhaps they're problem.

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Variety magazine has revealed that Algerian boxer Imman Khalif, who

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 2>spark controversy along with a Taiwanese fighter for getting Olympic

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:18.800
<v Speaker 2>gold in Paris despite having X Y chromosomes, are also

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 2>known as being male. Well how's this for hootspa. He's

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 2>now filed a cyber bullying lawsuit against X in France.

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 2>In the criminal complaint file to French authorities, Khaliff names

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 2>JK Rowling and Elon Musk and alleges acts of aggravated

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 2>cyber harassment on the social media side Kinzia, JK Elon.

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Are they in trouble? Could they be going to prison? Yeah?

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean yes and no.

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 11>We're seeing people's doors beaten down over I mean tweets

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 11>in the UK, so anything is possible today. Quite honestly,

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I'm terrified. I think this is just a

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 11>PR stunt. If I'm being honest with you, Elon and

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 11>JK could literally buy the Olympics, so they haven't. They

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 11>have so much money. They'll put up a good fight.

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 11>But I think this pursuit lacks credibility.

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 3>It's yeah, it's astonishing.

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 2>And you know what, if they want to submit to

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:23.720
<v Speaker 2>a chromosome test, then I'll be right there fighting along

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:26.720
<v Speaker 2>them if they come back as XX. But we're told

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:30.320
<v Speaker 2>they've tested x Y and they did not appeal that ruling.

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Now let's talk about news side Axius, they found that

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the Kamala Harris campaign has been editing news headlines.

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:41.359
<v Speaker 3>And descriptions within Google. This is in.

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Search ads that make it appear like the Guardian, CBS

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and other major news sites are pro Kamala. The ads

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 2>include links to real articles, but the headlines and supporting

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 2>texts have been altered to read as they support Harris's campaign.

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Objective teams but Kinsie of good as side. This seems

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 2>to be an enormous waste of money for the Harris team.

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Why would they bother manipulating headlines when the media is

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 2>already cheerleading their every.

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 11>Move well, because clearly they're greedy. But the wildest part

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 11>about this is that it's perfectly acceptable behavior under Google's

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:24.000
<v Speaker 11>terms and conditions. I mean, it's clearly misleading the tactic,

0:47:24.480 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 11>but unfortunately the tactics does not violate their policies because

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 11>the fake ads are labeled as sponsored. The Guardian says

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 11>that they intend to approach Google about this, that they're

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 11>not comfortable with the Harris campaign manipulating their headlines in

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 11>this way. But the more frequently Kamaliest team engages in

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 11>dishonest behavior, the more likely it is that these inconsistencies

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 11>are suspicious actions will will be noticed by people. It's

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 11>going to be easier for others to catch on. So

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 11>I'm hoping that this becomes a bigger story because if

0:47:56.960 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 11>the Trump campaign did this, I can't imagine the hell

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 11>that would ran in on them.

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 2>If the Trump campaign did this, we would not hear

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:10.839
<v Speaker 2>the end of disinformation, misinformation threats to democracy. It would

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 2>be a massive scandal, But I think this will be

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:19.359
<v Speaker 2>overlooked by most. Let's talk about the Backstreet Boys star

0:48:19.640 --> 0:48:23.839
<v Speaker 2>Backstreet Boys A Nick Carter. He's suing the woman who

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 2>accused him of being a rapist. He's seeking two point

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:32.319
<v Speaker 2>five million in compensation for defamation KINSI.

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:35.439
<v Speaker 11>You know, Rita, I'm not sure this is a great

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:38.359
<v Speaker 11>look for Carter. I had to cover a recent documentary

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 11>that went into these allegations, and while it had first

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 11>hand accounts from some of the alleged victims, the audience

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 11>walked away not completely convinced of his guilt. You know,

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 11>then people forgot. This is the Barbara Streisand effect, where

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 11>you're bringing it back up again and now you've magnified it.

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 11>I think pr wise, this is a risky move. But

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 11>he might have looked at the Giant trial and thought

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 11>I can do something similar.

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:09.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is a very good point, but Johnny Depp

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 2>did have a win there that the case against him

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 2>was such a mess. But I think your advice here

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:22.280
<v Speaker 2>is very good. Indeed, these allegations haven't tainted his reputation's

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 2>reputation greatly, So to go through this, I think there's

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a risk that he's actually going to come out of

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 2>it more damaged than when he went in, even if

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 2>he ends up winning. And we know this sort of

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 2>court action is also very costly at kinsisco Field. Thank

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:41.879
<v Speaker 2>you so much for your time this evening, and that's

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:44.479
<v Speaker 2>it from me. I'll see you tomorrow, and I for left.

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 2>He's losing it at nine point thirty pm up. Next

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 2>is Newsnight