Speaker 1: On scoring US Australia.
Speaker 2: This is the Wider Panalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Riata Paney Show coming
Speaker 3: up tonight, Big Australia by Stealth. A record one point
Speaker 3: one five million migrants settled in Australia since the Albanezy
Speaker 3: government came to power. Dan Wilde will join me shortly
Speaker 3: to discuss that and more. Also tonight Army Horrowitz, Darren
Speaker 3: Grimes and Adam B. Coleman, who has a message for
Speaker 3: Raygun And sadly we have more unintentionally hilarious.
Speaker 4: Footage of her dancing you can.
Speaker 3: Call it that, and an extended version of lefties losing it,
Speaker 3: including lefties laughing at other lefties.
Speaker 5: I know you guys are objective over there, that you
Speaker 5: just report the news as it is.
Speaker 1: Oh, I know a CNN makes.
Speaker 4: It, and I know that that's supposed to be a
Speaker 4: live life.
Speaker 5: I wasn't supposed to be, but I guess it is.
Speaker 3: Let's bring in Deputy Executive Director of the Institute of
Speaker 3: Public Affairs Dan while Dan. Let's start with Peter Dutton
Speaker 3: demanding a total ban on arrivals from Gaza as the
Speaker 3: Albanese government prepares to bring in a permanent visas scheme
Speaker 3: for Palestinian refugees. Peter Dutton told Sky News he has
Speaker 3: doubts about the current screening process if people are.
Speaker 6: Coming in from that war zone and we're uncertain about
Speaker 6: identity all their allegiances. Hamas is a listed terrorist organization.
Speaker 6: They've just committed an atrocity against the Jewish people, the
Speaker 6: biggest attack on people of Jewish faith since a Holocaust,
Speaker 6: and that the government wouldn't be conducting checks. I don't
Speaker 6: think people should be coming in from that war zone
Speaker 6: at all at the moment. It's not prudent to do so,
Speaker 6: and I think it puts our national security at risk.
Speaker 3: Prime Minister Anthony ALBERNIZI isn't worried.
Speaker 7: Well listen at the security agencies when it comes to
Speaker 7: national security and the Director General Mark Burgess will play
Speaker 7: a cretic corole in that. And I seem to try
Speaker 7: to bring people together, not always looking for a wedge
Speaker 7: or to divide.
Speaker 3: But dan, wasn't it the AZO boss Mike Burgess who
Speaker 3: said being having sympathies towards her mass wasn't a deal
Speaker 3: breaker if you want to come here as a refugee.
Speaker 8: Well, exactly and I think it's pretty rich for the
Speaker 8: Prime Minister to say that he wants to bring people together.
Speaker 8: I mean his main policy was the divisive voice to
Speaker 8: Parliament that he spent his first eighteen months on. Look,
Speaker 8: Peter Upton spot on the concerns that he is raising
Speaker 8: are the concerns of mainstream Australians, which is, why would
Speaker 8: you bring people in from a war zone when there
Speaker 8: is no amount of assurance that can be given to
Speaker 8: their identity, where they've been, what they've been doing. I
Speaker 8: don't understand why you would do that. At this time
Speaker 8: we know that Labor is their migration policy and their
Speaker 8: national security policy. It's not based on our national interests,
Speaker 8: but based on winning and holding seats in Western Sydney.
Speaker 1: That's the problem.
Speaker 3: That is a problem, and immigration again is on the agenda.
Speaker 3: The Albineazi government is being accused of running a Big
Speaker 3: Australia by Stealth program by letting in record breaking amounts
Speaker 3: of migrants. James Morra reveals in the Daily Telegraph that
Speaker 3: a record one point one five million migrants have settled
Speaker 3: in Australia since Labor took power, with nearly one third
Speaker 3: of Australia's population now being born overseas. That's up from
Speaker 3: twenty two percent in nineteen eighty three, and it's far
Speaker 3: higher than than many other countries are Canada.
Speaker 4: And the US.
Speaker 3: These demographic changes are rather dramatic. Are we ensuring that
Speaker 3: there's assimilation, that we've got people here who have shared values?
Speaker 8: Well, unfortunately not. I mean something's gone very wrong over
Speaker 8: the last couple of years with the migration program. The
Speaker 8: current intake of this government, which has only been there
Speaker 8: for about twenty six months, is already higher than the
Speaker 8: entire Hawk Keyting government, which was one hundred and fifty
Speaker 8: six months. So to put that in context, this is
Speaker 8: truly unprecedented dramatic search to our population problems, which is
Speaker 8: per capita growth is going backwards. There's the social problems
Speaker 8: where we have this social cohesion issue which is clearly
Speaker 8: in display. And the political problems which, as we discussed before,
Speaker 8: you've got the tail wag and the dog with labor
Speaker 8: focused on the electric rather than the national interest. So
Speaker 8: I think Australians understand that, yes, migration can be very
Speaker 8: important to our nation and has been, but the current
Speaker 8: system simply is not.
Speaker 3: Working no, and I think people are feeling that in
Speaker 3: various ways. It's not just housing, it's not just hospital
Speaker 3: waiting lists. It's just across a whole bunch of issues
Speaker 3: that impact just about every household.
Speaker 4: But i'd have a.
Speaker 3: Look at the top ten countries where migrants are coming from.
Speaker 4: A few surprises here.
Speaker 3: Nearly one in five are coming from India, twelve percent
Speaker 3: from China.
Speaker 4: Then we've got the Philippines, Nepal and Columbia. Those two
Speaker 4: surprised a few people.
Speaker 3: And rounding up the top ten, we've got UK New Zealand.
Speaker 3: I'm sure we'll be in their Vietnam and Pakistan and Thailand.
Speaker 3: So a diverse range of countries. But the question is
Speaker 3: the numbers and whether we can absorb them because housing
Speaker 3: approvals and we're just not building enough homes to how's
Speaker 3: the people coming in here permanently?
Speaker 8: Well, that's right, and a lot of those mirgrants are
Speaker 8: also international students. And we know that the international student
Speaker 8: market is basically a racket for vice chancellors.
Speaker 1: You know the massive increase that we've had.
Speaker 8: They claim it's a massive export industry, but a lot
Speaker 8: of the students are here working. If you're working in
Speaker 8: the local currency, spending in the local currency.
Speaker 1: It's not an export.
Speaker 8: So there's a real problem with the universities and their
Speaker 8: alliance on international students.
Speaker 3: Now, Australian Sports Commissions CEO Kieren Perkins, a swimming gray,
Speaker 3: has told the project we should be proud of Ygum,
Speaker 3: the breakdanswer and what.
Speaker 4: He called her awesome display at the Olympics.
Speaker 9: In all of the commentary and the dialogue that's gone on,
Speaker 9: you know, all the keyboard worries and haters out of there,
Speaker 9: get back in your box. We are Australia, We are
Speaker 9: Australian to have one of our athletes so proud to
Speaker 9: wear our uniform and then to bring what's unique about
Speaker 9: us to the international stage. We should all be proud.
Speaker 3: But in comments on the project's own Instagram page, proud
Speaker 3: is the last thing of is a feeling right now.
Speaker 3: One comment is said Raygun's display was insulting and shameful
Speaker 3: at a display of privilege and appropriation, and another said
Speaker 3: it's not hating to say the performance stank and there
Speaker 3: must have been some females in Australia that could do better.
Speaker 3: We'll be talking to a breakdancer aficionado who's really into.
Speaker 4: This sort of stuff. A little bit later in the program.
Speaker 3: But Dan, I've got to say, I don't appreciate Australians
Speaker 3: being bullied into silence. What we can't be critical of
Speaker 3: something as public as.
Speaker 4: An Olympic performance when the whole world's laughing at it,
Speaker 4: We're not allowed to.
Speaker 1: I don't get. I mean, the judges game, it's z right.
Speaker 8: So it's not as if the judges said it was
Speaker 8: a great performance and people making fun of.
Speaker 4: It go bully them, not us.
Speaker 1: It was objectively a bad performance.
Speaker 8: I don't understand those who are defending I've got no
Speaker 8: problem with her as a person. I don't understand why
Speaker 8: is she there at the Olympics. Why is that sport
Speaker 8: at the Olympics? And couldn't the money that was invested
Speaker 8: into that particular sport be in the views elsewhere? So
Speaker 8: it just seems such a strange scenario, and I sort
Speaker 8: of being gas lip.
Speaker 1: So it was so awesome, it was so good? It
Speaker 1: wasn't it was It wasn't a good.
Speaker 3: Performce I genuinely believe, and I'm not saying this to
Speaker 3: be bold or hyperbolic, I could do better. I have
Speaker 3: one hundred percent confidence. Give me half a day I
Speaker 3: could put together a better routine. So and a lot
Speaker 3: of people feel that way. So when you're looking at
Speaker 3: something at Olympic level and you think you can do better,
Speaker 3: there's a problem.
Speaker 4: Now let's talk about the Elon Musk.
Speaker 3: Donald Trump interviewed went for two hours. The media, I've
Speaker 3: got to say, we're not impressed USA today or amongst
Speaker 3: the media slamming it. They call it, called it an
Speaker 3: unmitigated disaster between listen to this a right wing loon
Speaker 3: and a fascism curious billionaire. They also said he was rambling,
Speaker 3: babbling on about crowd sizes and immigration and President Joe
Speaker 3: Biden and whatever else seemed to pass through his mind,
Speaker 3: and just a whole lot of other nonsense. But the
Speaker 3: numbers don't lie. The number of people who've listened to
Speaker 3: that interview, who have heard parts of it or all
Speaker 3: of it is enormous. I think, by any measure, it
Speaker 3: was an enormous success if you want to get your message.
Speaker 1: Across well exactly.
Speaker 8: And you know, one of the key parts of a
Speaker 8: democracy is for candidates to engage in open form discussion,
Speaker 8: I mean a two hour discussion. Trump will routinely do
Speaker 8: rallies that are one two plus hours. Whether you like
Speaker 8: him or not, reality is that he's probably been one
Speaker 8: of the most open and transparent presidential candidates we've seen,
Speaker 8: and we need to have more of these long form
Speaker 8: debates and discussions, not less. I mean, Kamala Harris won't
Speaker 8: even front a ten minute interview, let alone do a
Speaker 8: two hour sit down.
Speaker 1: So you know which one is better for democracy?
Speaker 4: Well?
Speaker 3: Absolutely, And the fact that so many topics were discussed
Speaker 3: in a very casual manner with two people speaking, I
Speaker 3: think it just gave a great insight into where that
Speaker 3: candidate stood on a range of issues. And that's what
Speaker 3: you want as a voter. You want to know what
Speaker 3: the candidate is going to do in offers. Now, just
Speaker 3: before he left for yet another holiday, President Joe Biden,
Speaker 3: remember him, he sat down with CBS and he again
Speaker 3: pushed that lie about President Donald Trump calling white supremacists
Speaker 3: in Charlottesville very fine people.
Speaker 10: So now Nazis and white supremacists come out of in
Speaker 10: America with torches carrying Nazi banners fresh ones of the
Speaker 10: then President Trump and said, what do you think you said?
Speaker 10: They're very fine people on both sides. I knew that,
Speaker 10: I knew I had to do something, and that's how
Speaker 10: I decided to run.
Speaker 3: I cannot believe we are still hearing this absolute lie
Speaker 3: that has been debunked over and over again, because the
Speaker 3: whole thing's on video, we're still hearing it, and there
Speaker 3: was no pushback from that interview. In fact, he reinforced
Speaker 3: that lie. It's a hoax and a lie. Even the
Speaker 3: left wing Snopes, the fact checking side, has belatedly acknowledged
Speaker 3: it's a lie. And let's go to the tape, because
Speaker 3: this is what President Trump actually said.
Speaker 11: And you had people and I'm not talking about the
Speaker 11: neo Nazis and the white nationalists because they should be
Speaker 11: condemned totally, but you had many people in that group
Speaker 11: other than neo Nazis and white nationalists.
Speaker 3: Okay, they should be condemned totally. So he was talking
Speaker 3: about the people who were we had that protest because
Speaker 3: they didn't want a statue to come down.
Speaker 4: I would argue those people.
Speaker 3: On the right side of history, and there were very
Speaker 3: fine people amongst them. They're not the neo Nazis. That's
Speaker 3: like pretending that the Women's March in Melbourne were all
Speaker 3: neo Nazis because a bunch of idiots turned up and
Speaker 3: gate crash their protest. I can't believe this lie is
Speaker 3: still still got currency now in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 8: Well exactly, and when you actually look at the whole clip,
Speaker 8: it's Trump said the exact opposite, the exact opposite of
Speaker 8: what they accused him of. I think that the hope
Speaker 8: that we do have is with social media, with Twitter
Speaker 8: and with others, this is actually being uncovered. You know,
Speaker 8: twenty or thirty years ago, we never would have known, yeah,
Speaker 8: that this was all a hoax and this was all
Speaker 8: a lie. But the reality is, I think more and
Speaker 8: more people, particularly what happened in COVID and other things,
Speaker 8: a lot more people are beginning to realize that the
Speaker 8: mainstream media is not always.
Speaker 1: What it seems.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, Dan will thank you so much for your time
Speaker 3: this evening.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is gb News host and founder of
Speaker 3: Reasoned UK, Darren Grimes.
Speaker 4: Darren, we will get.
Speaker 3: To the two tier police and justice system shortly, but first,
Speaker 3: three white police officers have won their racial discrimination case
Speaker 3: against Thames Valley Police after a judge ruled they were
Speaker 3: unfairly passed over for promotion because of their race. A
Speaker 3: superintendent at the force was told to improve diversity amongst
Speaker 3: senior staff by appointing an Asian sergeant to the rank
Speaker 3: of detective inspector, despite being warned about the legal risks
Speaker 3: of not holding a competitive process. The sergeant had not
Speaker 3: even reached the rank of inspector before they were put
Speaker 3: in this senior role. Darren, and finally some accountability for
Speaker 3: these DEI policies.
Speaker 12: Absolutely, yes, And ultimately we said, when it comes to
Speaker 12: the police force, you know, that is putting people at risk, right,
Speaker 12: that is putting people in positions and promoting them out
Speaker 12: attain when perhaps they are aren't worthy for promotion. You know,
Speaker 12: those who had been passed up for the role actually
Speaker 12: passed up, is putting it too lightly blocked from applying
Speaker 12: for the role. They had been there nineteen and twenty
Speaker 12: six years. That's a long time to build up experience
Speaker 12: in a role as difficult as frontline policing, to actually
Speaker 12: build up the skills and capabilities to understand what a
Speaker 12: police force actually needs. And they're told, well, because of
Speaker 12: the color of your skin, no thanks, mate. Now, I
Speaker 12: don't know about eu RITA, but I was brought up
Speaker 12: to believe that that was a thing called racism right,
Speaker 12: and this DEEI needs to die because it ultimately is
Speaker 12: racism and it's putting us all at risk.
Speaker 3: It is it is blatant racism. It's systematic institutional racism.
Speaker 3: I love the left, love talking about institutional racism until
Speaker 3: it actually exists and they.
Speaker 4: Ignore it or promoted.
Speaker 3: Now let's talk about this clash between Humsa Yusef and
Speaker 3: Elon Masker. They're in a war of words. It's getting
Speaker 3: pretty ugly. This was a fairly extraordinary attack, if you
Speaker 3: asked me, from the former First Minister of Scotland. He
Speaker 3: called Musk one of the most dangerous men on the
Speaker 3: planet and he also tweeted on Musk's own platform that
Speaker 3: he is a dangerous race beta who must.
Speaker 4: Be helped to account for his actions.
Speaker 3: Darren, it seems a little bit rich for him to
Speaker 3: be calling anyone else a race beta. You said it
Speaker 3: is going to be remembered for that infamous white men's speech.
Speaker 12: Well, absolutely yes, and I mean, of course Scotland. Elon
Speaker 12: Musk pointed this out, Scotland being a majority white country
Speaker 12: that has given Humsy use of so very much in
Speaker 12: his life. You know, he was made at the top
Speaker 12: job he was given the top job in that whole
Speaker 12: entire land. Now, what really gets me about Scotland in
Speaker 12: particular is that this is a country that is one
Speaker 12: of the drug capitals of Europe. It has really quite
Speaker 12: low numerous and literacy skill sets, and yet we're focusing
Speaker 12: on the whiteness of people's skin, as if there's nothing
Speaker 12: more important to be getting on with within a country
Speaker 12: like Scotland. I think he is actually one of the
Speaker 12: most divisive politicians to ever come out of that nation.
Speaker 12: I think Elon Musk is absolutely right to call him
Speaker 12: out on that, and that actually the two stories that
Speaker 12: we've already discussed today, I think go to the very
Speaker 12: heart of the problem that is rampant throughout the West.
Speaker 12: It isn't just isolated to the United Kingdom, you know this,
Speaker 12: This is this kind of pernicious ideology that is racist
Speaker 12: in its fundamentals, is actually driving a wedge between ethnic groups,
Speaker 12: and I think it's partly responsible for the unrest that
Speaker 12: we've seen on the streets recently, and I worry that
Speaker 12: that's going to get worse and worse if the kind
Speaker 12: of divisive, really quite awful politician comes to use, if
Speaker 12: actually manages to win the d win the argument. He said,
Speaker 12: he's going to leave Britain Rita. I tell you what,
Speaker 12: I know a fair few people that will chip in
Speaker 12: a few bob here and there to actually help that,
Speaker 12: you know, get off the ground, that flight off the ground.
Speaker 4: As long as it's the one way to get now.
Speaker 3: The kiss Dama government is falling through on their pledge
Speaker 3: to lock up rioters and protesters who took to the
Speaker 3: streets earlier this month to protest immigration and asylum seeker policies.
Speaker 4: Among those to be thrown.
Speaker 3: In prison is fifty one year old Gary Harkness, who
Speaker 3: was given a twelve month sentence for his role in
Speaker 3: these riots, and with even the judge acknowledging he did
Speaker 3: not behave violently. The judge said, I quote here, it
Speaker 3: cannot be leveled at you that you hit, neither have
Speaker 3: you thrown anything. Neither is it said that you spat
Speaker 3: at anybody. But it is accepted by you that you
Speaker 3: were a party to this disorder and I have to
Speaker 3: sentence you on that basis.
Speaker 4: And you also know that anyone party.
Speaker 3: To it has to receive a custodial sentence. So we're having,
Speaker 3: essentially Darren here.
Speaker 4: Bystanders Center prison.
Speaker 3: Astonishing that this is happening, and the speed with which
Speaker 3: it's happening.
Speaker 12: Yeah, I couldn't agree more ETA, and that's actually very,
Speaker 12: very troubling. This is all to create a chilling effect
Speaker 12: on speech and debate, if you ask me, the revenge
Speaker 12: seeking that's undertaken of late actually creates a chilling effect
Speaker 12: on being able to discuss the issues that take place
Speaker 12: on our streets, you know, the stabbings that take place
Speaker 12: on an all too regular basis. We've had something like
Speaker 12: twenty six over the last few weeks.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 12: It is an incredible number, and it's an incredibly damning
Speaker 12: indictment on the state of the country. And the fact
Speaker 12: that politicians would rather focus on banging up those who
Speaker 12: were stood as bystanders in these periods of unrest that
Speaker 12: have taken place over recent weeks. I think goes to
Speaker 12: the very heart of the problem. I think this is
Speaker 12: revenge seeking. I think that it is an attempt to
Speaker 12: scare and intimidate people into not speaking out, not and
Speaker 12: it will.
Speaker 3: Dire It will will I can see it having exactly
Speaker 3: that effect, because they're also locking up people for online posts.
Speaker 4: Dan Grimes, thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 12: Always a pleasure to thank you.
Speaker 3: Coming up, the lefties are losing it and Army Howids.
Speaker 4: Welcome back.
Speaker 3: Now it's time for lefties losing it, and I regret
Speaker 3: to inform you I found more raygun Conent, more terrible
Speaker 3: dancing to expose later in the segment. But first, it's
Speaker 3: always funny when lefties laugh at other lefties. And that's
Speaker 3: just what happened on the Stephen Colbert Show when CNN
Speaker 3: anchor Caitlyn Collins appeared as a guest to talk about Trump.
Speaker 3: What else when Colbert made this ridiculous comment, he.
Speaker 13: Knew his attack lines on President Biden. He really has
Speaker 13: struggled with how to go after someone who's twenty years
Speaker 13: younger than him, who is a different gender, a different race.
Speaker 13: It's kind of been this moment where he has not
Speaker 13: been able to call us around a single attack line.
Speaker 5: I know you guys are objective over there, that you
Speaker 5: just report the news as it is.
Speaker 1: Oh, I know a CNN makes it, and I know
Speaker 1: that that's supposed to be a live life.
Speaker 5: I wasn't supposed to be, but I guess it is.
Speaker 4: I guess it is.
Speaker 3: Of course, the biggest laugh st HIV and Gott was
Speaker 3: unintentional there, but even his left the audience recognized how
Speaker 3: hopelessly biased cnny's This is an audience that watches this.
Speaker 5: Yesterday, a Reuter's IPSOS poll had Vice President Kamala Harris
Speaker 5: leading former President Donald Trump forty four to forty two.
Speaker 3: It's oh, looks like it could take on Ossie breakdance
Speaker 3: a ray gun with those moves. But look, I'm just
Speaker 3: happy old Steve O smiling and dancing again because he
Speaker 3: was in a dark place not long ago.
Speaker 4: Remember this, mad Rant. I know how numb we've become,
Speaker 4: but it's not normal.
Speaker 5: No other candidate for the president's he has ever had
Speaker 5: to pause his campaign to.
Speaker 1: Defend himself in multiple courts. And I would like to point.
Speaker 5: Out that in all seven of his cases, no one,
Speaker 5: no one doubts that he did these things. We're just
Speaker 5: sitting around patiently waiting to find out if the wheels
Speaker 5: of justice will grind fast enough for there to be
Speaker 5: any consequences.
Speaker 3: Imagine how unhinged his little echo chamber must be. Newly
Speaker 3: believes the sham cases against Donald Trump are legitimate. You know,
Speaker 3: there's a reason why his poll numbers went up every
Speaker 3: time he was indicted. Even being convicted didn't hurt him
Speaker 3: with most voters. And that's because, despite the efforts of
Speaker 3: CNN and CO, most folks can recognize political persecution when.
Speaker 4: They see it.
Speaker 3: And on CNN they really did disgrace themselves overnight with
Speaker 3: deliberate disinfo after Donald Trump's two hour chat with Elon Musk. Indeed,
Speaker 3: the bulk of the media has been in full propaganda
Speaker 3: mode about the interview. They've been calling it a big flop,
Speaker 3: But the numbers tell another story. Despite technical issues that
Speaker 3: delayed the start, tens of millions and by some metrics,
Speaker 3: hundreds of millions have already listened to part or all
Speaker 3: of the Trump Musk interview.
Speaker 4: But this is how CNN described it, with.
Speaker 14: Forty minutes of silence and then a real apocalypse of politics.
Speaker 14: No matter how you frame it or what causes which
Speaker 14: what was finally said between Donald Trump and Elon Musk
Speaker 14: at last night's A Big X event can largely be
Speaker 14: defined as a rant filled with familiar lies and lines
Speaker 14: of attack.
Speaker 3: Familiar lies and lines of attack? Is she describing his
Speaker 3: scene in colleagues?
Speaker 4: There and scene and we're at it again?
Speaker 3: With this shameless bit of fake news. This is astonishingly dissimist.
Speaker 15: I want to play one exchange that was kind of classic. Well,
Speaker 15: there were a lot of changes that were exchanges that
Speaker 15: were classic Donald Trump, but this one really stuck out
Speaker 15: to us.
Speaker 16: And Nasaki were bombed, but now they're like full cities again,
Speaker 16: so it's likely not something that you know, it's not
Speaker 16: as scary as people think, basically, So that.
Speaker 15: Was more Elon Musk than Donald Trump talking about sort
Speaker 15: of suggesting that what happened almost eighty years ago, I
Speaker 15: think eighty years ago next year, the bombing of Hiroshiama Nagasaki.
Speaker 15: Now it's okay, kind of trying to blow off the
Speaker 15: impact of that, But.
Speaker 4: That was not what they were talking about at all.
Speaker 3: And CNN has deceptively edited that clip and not even
Speaker 3: mentioned that the discussion was actually about nuclear energy and
Speaker 3: why it has a bad name because of nuclear bombs.
Speaker 3: Trump mentioned nuclear energy needs a rebrand. The unedited chat
Speaker 3: CNN cut up was over two minutes.
Speaker 4: Here's a little bit of it unedited.
Speaker 17: There's the bad side of nuclear which is a nuclear war,
Speaker 17: very bad side, but there's also I think nuclear electricity
Speaker 17: designer READI and it's actually you know, people have the
Speaker 17: sphere of nuclear nuclear electricity generation, but it's actually one
Speaker 17: of the safest forms of electricity generation.
Speaker 16: It's just a huge misunderstanding.
Speaker 3: If you listen to the whole discussion, you see they
Speaker 3: weren't saying nuclear bombs and destruction were no big deal,
Speaker 3: as CNN would have you believe. Let's go to the
Speaker 3: UK now, where people are being locked up for so
Speaker 3: called online violence. We can't tell you precisely what most
Speaker 3: of them have posted online, but here's a judge sentencing
Speaker 3: one young man to twenty months in prison.
Speaker 18: You have been committed for sentence having pleaded guilty to
Speaker 18: an offense of publishing written material which is threatening, abusive,
Speaker 18: or insulting, intending thereby to stir up racial hatred. This
Speaker 18: offense is so serious that an immediate custodial sentence is unavoidable.
Speaker 3: Threatening, abusive, or insulting The first one should come with
Speaker 3: criminal consequences.
Speaker 4: You can't threaten.
Speaker 3: People, But since when is insulting commentary something you can
Speaker 3: be chucked in jail for, other than in places like
Speaker 3: China or North Korea, and now the UK. It's the
Speaker 3: same country, incidentally, where someone involved in a machete attack
Speaker 3: that killed a child and walk away from prison after
Speaker 3: just six months. Now let's have a look at woke
Speaker 3: academic and breakdancer Regan, the woman who scored zero for
Speaker 3: all her dances of the Paris Games.
Speaker 4: But we're told she's the best.
Speaker 3: Female breakdancer in Australia and to say otherwise is sexist trolling.
Speaker 3: Here's the Australia's Olympic committees and e mears.
Speaker 19: With trolls and keyboard warriors and taking those comments and
Speaker 19: giving them airtime has been really disappointing. If you don't
Speaker 19: know Rachel's story. In two thousand and eight, she was
Speaker 19: locked in a room crying being involved in a male
Speaker 19: dominated sport as the only woman, and it took great
Speaker 19: courage for her to continue on and fight for her
Speaker 19: opportunity to participate in a sport that she loved and
Speaker 19: that got her to winning the Olympic qualifying event to
Speaker 19: be here in Paris. She is the best breakdancer female
Speaker 19: that we have for Australia.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure if she's even the best breakdancer in
Speaker 3: her family, but let's hear from the woman herself.
Speaker 20: I could be representing Australia. It would be an amazing
Speaker 20: opportunity and just something I never thought would happen.
Speaker 9: But Rachel is even more excited for the next generation
Speaker 9: of Bee boys and Bee girls.
Speaker 20: Already there's a lot more family support for people to
Speaker 20: get in Breaking, because I know people of my generation
Speaker 20: and earlier, you know, their families were generally like, what
Speaker 20: are you doing? Why are you wasting your time with this?
Speaker 3: You should listen to your family. Indeed, listen to anyone
Speaker 3: telling you not to do this.
Speaker 4: Listen to those people, please.
Speaker 3: But Reygan has always had supreme confidence in her abilities.
Speaker 4: Just ask it.
Speaker 21: I think my understanding of musicality going into Breaking was
Speaker 21: very strong. My body awareness, my coordination, my eye for
Speaker 21: technique has been much stronger going into the dance.
Speaker 3: And you can under stand why she may be a
Speaker 3: tad delusional because she kept getting plaudits and awards despite
Speaker 3: having no discernible dancing ability of sports.
Speaker 19: Rachel Gun, thank you so much.
Speaker 21: I think it is just so cool that a Breaker
Speaker 21: has one sports Star of.
Speaker 3: The Year, and sadly copyright issues mean we can't bring
Speaker 3: you her Olympic performance.
Speaker 4: But we can all enjoy some of her other stellar work.
Speaker 8: Much.
Speaker 4: Wow, I have to chair for qualify for the Games.
Speaker 4: I mean, look at that.
Speaker 3: You know what, maybe we can blame her coach Samuel
Speaker 3: Free aka Sammy the Free, who is also her husband
Speaker 3: and a fellow check out these moves. I think we
Speaker 3: know where some of that choreography came from.
Speaker 4: Goodness me.
Speaker 3: But don't you dare mock any of that because Australian
Speaker 3: Sports Commission CEO Kieren Perkins.
Speaker 4: Will call you a keyboard warrior, and all.
Speaker 9: Of the commentary in the dialogue that's gone on, you know,
Speaker 9: all the keyboard worries and haters out of there, get
Speaker 9: back in your box. We are Australia. We are Australian.
Speaker 9: To have one of our athletes so proud to wear
Speaker 9: our uniform and then to bring what's unique about us
Speaker 9: to the international stage. We should all be proud. It
Speaker 9: was an awesome event. It was a great display of
Speaker 9: different thinking. And you know, I'm a huge ray Gun fan.
Speaker 9: She has made us.
Speaker 3: All proud, made you proud, Kieren made the rest of
Speaker 3: us laugh.
Speaker 4: Fancy trying to.
Speaker 3: Bully Australians into not having a laugh over something so
Speaker 3: obviously absurd.
Speaker 4: Give it a spell and talking about having a laugh.
Speaker 3: Jimmy Fallon wasn't letting this comedy gold go to waste.
Speaker 22: Wow Regag's.
Speaker 4: Wow, Rega everyone.
Speaker 15: It's.
Speaker 13: Oh no, Rega, thank you stuff.
Speaker 4: I had to act.
Speaker 2: I had to ask you this.
Speaker 3: How are you feeling since your performance?
Speaker 21: I was like, oh no, no, don't understand, don't burry.
Speaker 17: Up, hey, Regaga, get red.
Speaker 10: Thank you Oga, Regan.
Speaker 1: I see, I see you.
Speaker 23: You speak, you speak through your dance moods.
Speaker 2: I understand.
Speaker 10: Okay, So is there anything else you'd like to tell
Speaker 10: us me?
Speaker 4: I meant you now.
Speaker 3: The Washington Examiner has revealed that Kamala Harris's VP picked
Speaker 3: Tim Walls, called a Muslim cleric who promoted a pro
Speaker 3: Hitler film a master teacher, and admitted they spend time
Speaker 3: together in the past. In addition to spreading anti Semitic,
Speaker 3: neo Nazi materials online, Ima Masad Zaman also shared a
Speaker 3: her mass press release back in twenty sixteen, and has
Speaker 3: shared many anti Israel posts since the October seventh attacks.
Speaker 4: In a statement to see, an Anna.
Speaker 3: Harris campaign spokesperson insisted that Walls and Zaman do not
Speaker 3: have a personal relationship, but here is Walls in twenty
Speaker 3: eighteen clearly saying they do and calling.
Speaker 4: The Imam a master teacher.
Speaker 23: I would like to first of all say thank you too, Imam.
Speaker 2: I am a teacher.
Speaker 23: So when I see a master teacher, I know it.
Speaker 23: And over the time we've spent together, one of the things,
Speaker 23: one of the things I've had the privilege of is
Speaker 23: seeing the things in life through the eye of a
Speaker 23: master teacher to try and get the understanding. Listening today
Speaker 23: to the stories and what it means.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is journalists and documentary filmmaker Army Horowitz.
Speaker 3: Army how well did the Kamala Harris camp Vet Tim Wolves?
Speaker 24: Yeah, I'm sorry, we gotta go back to that Reygun
Speaker 24: thing for a second. I'm sorry I was laughing at
Speaker 24: that entire segment. First of all, Rachel Dratch absolutely hilarious.
Speaker 24: She's in Manhattan Upper West Sider to represent bringing the comedy.
Speaker 24: But look, I'm of two minds. This is more important
Speaker 24: than Tim Walls. I'm two minds. That comes a breakdancing,
Speaker 24: big breakdancing fan. I was taught by the comedian Sindbad.
Speaker 2: I'm embarrassed.
Speaker 24: I went to a breakdancing class when I was a kid,
Speaker 24: So I've allowed.
Speaker 4: To respect for it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know, it's.
Speaker 1: Horrible, it's embarrassing. Truth is the truth.
Speaker 2: Should it be Olympic sport?
Speaker 1: Uh?
Speaker 2: If I'm really good at.
Speaker 24: It, my guess is no, it should not be Olympic sports. Sorry, guys,
Speaker 24: just the way I feel. Okay, back to Tim Waltz
Speaker 24: and neo Nazis and anti Semitic, anti Israel activists. Look,
Speaker 24: did she vet him and then this was surprising? Yes,
Speaker 24: was surprising. No, Look, this just represents what Kamala Harris
Speaker 24: truly feels.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 24: I think this is going to come out more and
Speaker 24: more as she becomes her own person. We're gonna realize
Speaker 24: that she actually finally speaks to the media, if that's
Speaker 24: even possible, will realize what kind of anti Israel radical
Speaker 24: she really is. So this really comforts with that. Did
Speaker 24: he not have a personal relationship, I'm sorry.
Speaker 4: He hosts this.
Speaker 24: Guy five times. Of course he did. Becalled him master Teacher.
Speaker 24: He spent a lot of time this guy. He knows
Speaker 24: exactly well this guy represents. It's sick and it's disgusting.
Speaker 24: But this is just a preview of what we can
Speaker 24: expect the Kabala campaign when comes to Jews and it
Speaker 24: comes to Israel. Look, there's a woman named Lasweena Bargazi
Speaker 24: who she just hired as her deputy counselor. The sween
Speaker 24: has a long history of anti Israel, anti American comment
Speaker 24: She was interviewed with the FBI because of her comments
Speaker 24: about nine to eleven. She wore an orange jumpsuit in
Speaker 24: solidarity with al Qaeda terrorists sitting.
Speaker 2: In our jails.
Speaker 24: This she has a long history of anti Israel, anti
Speaker 24: American positions, yet she is now in the Kamala administration.
Speaker 24: Kamala is hired what they call a Jewish liaison, Elon Goldberg.
Speaker 24: This is a guy who's a j Street anti Israel radical, right,
Speaker 24: This is guy who came out in full throat support
Speaker 24: of the anti Israel, the anti Israel you had resolution
Speaker 24: that Obama while he just abstained, he was actually guy
Speaker 24: who wrote it. So yeah, this is all a preview
Speaker 24: of what we're going to see with Kamal President Kamala
Speaker 24: Harris if it actually happens. So no, I'm not surprised
Speaker 24: at all.
Speaker 3: Oh goodness, may can you just imagine what the Middle
Speaker 3: East is going to look like after four years of
Speaker 3: Kamala perhaps right now, yesterday on Elon Musk's at livestream
Speaker 3: with Donald Trump, Trump spoke about the manner in which
Speaker 3: the Biden administration has mishandled Iran and destabilized the Middle East.
Speaker 22: Iran was broke because they told China, if you buy
Speaker 22: from Iran oil, it's all about the oil, that's where
Speaker 22: the money is. But if you buy oil from Iran,
Speaker 22: you're not going to do any business with the United States.
Speaker 22: And I meant it, and they said we'll passed it.
Speaker 22: They didn't buy other countries Likewise, you want to buy,
Speaker 22: you're not doing business with the United States Army.
Speaker 3: The Biden administration's eagerness to revive the Iran deal has
Speaker 3: emboldened and enriched the Iranian regime.
Speaker 24: Yeah, look, is it surprising that what do you think
Speaker 24: Iran's position visa via election when they tried to hack
Speaker 24: or they did hack Trump's paperwork, they tried to assassinate
Speaker 24: Trump then to go after Biden or Kama they want
Speaker 24: them to be president. Right, that says everything about the
Speaker 24: positions that these two take vis a vis Iran. Right,
Speaker 24: Why do they hate Trump? I don't know. Let's see
Speaker 24: Trump assassay Sulamani, one of their military leaders right, one
Speaker 24: of their terrorists, supporting military people who went directly after
Speaker 24: US interests and Israel's Israeli interests. He killed the Iran Deal,
Speaker 24: which was the ability to give them the ability to
Speaker 24: help build nuclear weapons. He increased sanctions, didn't give them
Speaker 24: loads of cash like the Obama Biden administration, increased economic
Speaker 24: pressure on the country. Like this is why we can
Speaker 24: see what's going on when it comes to Biden and Iran,
Speaker 24: Trump and Iran, and I think what peop will be
Speaker 24: Kamala and Iran. And also let's not forget just you know,
Speaker 24: by the way that after Iran sent over three hundred
Speaker 24: missiles and drones, one of the great attacks on Israeli's
Speaker 24: sovereignty and territory of all time, what did President Biden do?
Speaker 24: He said to Israel, you better not react this, otherwise
Speaker 24: you will lose my support. Can you imagine a President
Speaker 24: Trump said at Israel, I don't think I can, and
Speaker 24: he wouldn't. Yeah, that's why he Ron wants Trump to
Speaker 24: lose and Biden and come on to be president. That
Speaker 24: says a lot about the election. Foreign policy to.
Speaker 3: Be absolutely and Secretary of State Anthony Blincoln is apparently
Speaker 3: delayed his trip to the Middle East due to uncertainty
Speaker 3: in the region, But the expectation is that once he
Speaker 3: does arrive, he's going to be putting more pressure on
Speaker 3: Israel to make concessions to her mass to do a deal.
Speaker 3: Blincoln will be in Egypt, Israel, Jordan, and Katar to
Speaker 3: discuss with partners the need to reach a ceasefire agreement
Speaker 3: that secures the release of all Hostages's statement from the
Speaker 3: State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller army, how should Israel respond
Speaker 3: to this renewed pressure to make concessions and do a deal?
Speaker 24: Yeah, I mean, if Israel didn't respond to pressure in
Speaker 24: the past, a deal would have been done and Hamas
Speaker 24: will still be in power, sending rockets and missiles into
Speaker 24: Israel on a daily basis and probably grabbing more hostages.
Speaker 24: Because all you're doing is incentivizing bad behavior, right, I mean,
Speaker 24: this is look macro micro behavior. Very similar when you
Speaker 24: teach a kid that it can get away with an inch,
Speaker 24: that kids can take a mile. The same thing goes
Speaker 24: with terrorist organizations, and unfortunately that's the situation that they're
Speaker 24: trying to put Israel in. And frankly, look, I think again,
Speaker 24: to go back to Kamala and how she would respond
Speaker 24: this kind of behavior, and how she would respond to Israel.
Speaker 1: Look, she was.
Speaker 24: Giving a speech recently and the chance of genocide, Joe
Speaker 24: raising up from the audience, and her response was not, Hey, guys,
Speaker 24: this is ridiculous, this is a moral shut the hell up.
Speaker 24: She said, Look, if you want Trump elected, then that's
Speaker 24: what you got to continue this chance. That's the way
Speaker 24: she handled it. That's the way she's going to handle
Speaker 24: Israel and Kamas going forward.
Speaker 2: Be prepared.
Speaker 4: Appeasement. Yes. And two Hunter Biden.
Speaker 3: We've got newly released records and interviews revealing that Hunter
Speaker 3: Biden sought assistance from the US government for the Ukrainian
Speaker 3: gas company Barisma, who were eyeing up a potentially lucrative
Speaker 3: energy project in Italy. This is while Joe Biden was
Speaker 3: Vice President. A White House spokesperson has said Joe Biden
Speaker 3: was not aware when he was VP that his son
Speaker 3: was reaching out to the US embassy in Italy.
Speaker 4: Really, how believable is that? Firstly, are me and how.
Speaker 3: Rich for the New York Times to be running this
Speaker 3: story prominently When I were among the media, you suppressed
Speaker 3: the Hunter Biden laptop story when it really mattered, and then.
Speaker 4: Lead up to the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 24: Yeah, you know, I'm gonna miss all the Hunter Biden's
Speaker 24: stories and talking about it.
Speaker 2: That's gone.
Speaker 24: I gotta be honest. I mean, you know, it was
Speaker 24: a big part of what we were doing.
Speaker 1: What we were doing.
Speaker 16: Look, there's of.
Speaker 24: Course this massive hypocrisy when the New York Times and
Speaker 24: the rest of the mainstream media suppressed all of these
Speaker 24: problems and issues when Joe Biden was president, and the
Speaker 24: more they brought it up, the more they realized it
Speaker 24: was suppressed electoral possibilities, so they kept quiet about it.
Speaker 24: But now that Joe Biden is no longer running for president,
Speaker 24: hey we might as well tell the truth and talk
Speaker 24: about the reality of what's going on. So now you're
Speaker 24: seeing these stories come out because Kamala is running and
Speaker 24: not Joe Biden. It's gross, it's transparent, it's obvious. I
Speaker 24: can't believe. Look, if I were them, I was just
Speaker 24: going to just ride on that wagon of saying, hey,
Speaker 24: let's just suppress it, leave it or alone. Why bring
Speaker 24: up now? Just high I let your hypocrisy and your
Speaker 24: failure to live up to your responsibilities before. But hey,
Speaker 24: you know what, I guess, better late than ever, right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, better late than never. Army Horowitz, thank you for
Speaker 3: your time.
Speaker 4: This evening always your pleasure.
Speaker 3: Still to come, I'll be joined by an appalled breakdancing
Speaker 3: expert who'll explain where it all went wrong for ray Gun.
Speaker 4: You're watching the reader Panicky show. Now. A petition has.
Speaker 3: Launched online calling for breakdancer Rachel Gunn better known as
Speaker 3: ray Gun, as well as Australia's Olympic committees and emirs,
Speaker 3: to publicly apologize for ray Gun's awful Olympic performance and
Speaker 3: also they want an investigation into how and why she
Speaker 3: made it onto the Olympic team.
Speaker 4: Joining me now is Adam B.
Speaker 3: Coleman, founder of Wrong Speak Publishing and also an avid
Speaker 3: breakdancing fan. Now, you have written about this issue, you
Speaker 3: know your stuff, and you've insisted that the academic class
Speaker 3: defending Raygun's performance because she's a symbol of their bubble world.
Speaker 4: What do you mean by that?
Speaker 2: Yeah, the bubble world of academia.
Speaker 25: What often happens is they try to cover for each
Speaker 25: other and they see that she has a status of
Speaker 25: having a PhD in some form of dance culture. And
Speaker 25: so for them, they'll do anything to cover for them.
Speaker 25: They'll applaud her for her efforts when the Olympics is
Speaker 25: not about giving it your best effort.
Speaker 2: It's about winning. It's about the best of the best.
Speaker 25: There's meritocracy involved, and from what I can tell, there's
Speaker 25: a level of It doesn't feel like meritocracy looking at
Speaker 25: the qualifiers that led for her to end up there.
Speaker 25: I was just watching it just before we started filming,
Speaker 25: and clearly the person she was going up against was
Speaker 25: better in those last three rounds, and it doesn't make
Speaker 25: any sense to me objectively as to why she was
Speaker 25: chosen over someone who was literally half her age, more skilled,
Speaker 25: has more athleticism than her. You know, for one particular round,
Speaker 25: Rachel didn't even get off the ground. She was physically
Speaker 25: doing floor work. She didn't do anything acrobatic, nothing whatsoever.
Speaker 25: She wasn't nearly as creative. I will say her qualifying
Speaker 25: wasn't nearly as bad as her Olympic performance, but that's
Speaker 25: not a very high bar.
Speaker 7: Well.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there is a sense of entitlement, it seems, and
Speaker 3: I don't know if that is because of her academic background,
Speaker 3: but you did write that she can't PhD her way
Speaker 3: into being a supremely athletic. And you also note that
Speaker 3: internationally breakdancing or breaking is highly competitive. It's athletic, it's creative.
Speaker 3: People have to have enormous skill. So again, how did
Speaker 3: she qualify? You said you've looked at some of those
Speaker 3: qualifiers where her opponents seem to be better. Is it
Speaker 3: so subjective that you know these sort of results can
Speaker 3: happen or would most people who are into their breakdancing
Speaker 3: watching that competition or agree with you that her competitor
Speaker 3: should have made the team.
Speaker 25: I think anyone who is apparently not a judge of
Speaker 25: that competition would come away with the same conclusion as
Speaker 25: me that Reagun is not better than Holy Marley, who
Speaker 25: she was competing against. Objectively speaking, Holly Mally is quicker,
Speaker 25: she is younger, and she's more acrobatic than Reagun is.
Speaker 25: And if I can put this in a very like
Speaker 25: Leyman's way, someone who is just getting into breakdancing can
Speaker 25: only do certain moves, the easier moves. Regan looks like
Speaker 25: she's been she's basically an amateur, whereas Olimali looks like
Speaker 25: she is someone young but clearly more naturally talented than
Speaker 25: regun Is, So it doesn't make a whole lot of
Speaker 25: sense to me.
Speaker 2: I don't know if there's some sort of collusion or.
Speaker 25: Any corruption behind the scenes or anything like that, but
Speaker 25: I'm still dumbfounded by what I just watched.
Speaker 3: Well, I'm not suggesting there's been anything corrupt, just perhaps
Speaker 3: some bizarre decisions made along the way. Now we've learned
Speaker 3: that Reygun is coached by her husband, who is also
Speaker 3: a breaker. I think we've got some footage of his moves.
Speaker 3: I think he's had a bit to do with some
Speaker 3: of the choreography we saw in Paris.
Speaker 4: What do you think of his dance moves? Could this
Speaker 4: be the problem that she need a bet of coach, perhaps.
Speaker 25: Not necessarily that you know, there are moves that she
Speaker 25: is capable of doing, but there are certain things that
Speaker 25: you just clearly can and cannot do. You know, not
Speaker 25: every person who wants to be a gymnast can be
Speaker 25: a gymnast. There's a certain amount of strength you have
Speaker 25: to have, there's a certain amount of skill that you
Speaker 25: have to have that is natural, or you have to
Speaker 25: put an abundant amount of time to overcome where you lack.
Speaker 25: I just don't think by her age to do the
Speaker 25: type of things that she's doing. You know, she's basically
Speaker 25: at a geriatric stage of any breakdancer, and most of
Speaker 25: them last basically into their mid thirties competing wise, and
Speaker 25: maybe the top ones, especially the males, they can go
Speaker 25: a little bit longer. But for her, for her to
Speaker 25: go as far as she did with her skill level
Speaker 25: or lack of skill, is truly amazing to see.
Speaker 3: Well, we are getting a lot of pressure here from
Speaker 3: the media, from members of the sporting fraternity saying that
Speaker 3: you cannot be critical of her or her performance because
Speaker 3: she gave it a red hot go. But you wrote
Speaker 3: it your piece that people are mocking her because of
Speaker 3: her audacity to believe that she deserves to be considered
Speaker 3: one of the best female dancers in the world, and
Speaker 3: her performance was astoundingly bad. Again I'm quoting you there.
Speaker 3: Do we have participations? Trophy is at Olympic level? Is
Speaker 3: this what we're basically talking about. Was saying, well, you know,
Speaker 3: she's older than the other dancers, she's perhaps not as
Speaker 3: experience in actual dancing. She might be experiences and writing
Speaker 3: academic papers about dancing. Is this a participation trophy at
Speaker 3: Olympic level.
Speaker 25: Yeah, and part of me thinks this is a little
Speaker 25: bit of licking the wounds for Australia, you know, because
Speaker 25: it is embarrassing to see.
Speaker 2: So I think the reaction is to say, well, at
Speaker 2: least she gave it a go.
Speaker 7: You know.
Speaker 25: Listen, Australia is not known for its break dancing. You know,
Speaker 25: you hear those type of excuses, But the reality is,
Speaker 25: we wouldn't do this for any other sport, especially in
Speaker 25: Olympic sport. We wouldn't make these type of excuses. The
Speaker 25: reality is that she's not nearly as good as her competition.
Speaker 25: And listen, when it comes to the Olympics or any
Speaker 25: sporting event, someone's going to come in last place.
Speaker 2: So it's not about her coming into.
Speaker 25: Last place, but it's what she did and how she
Speaker 25: represented herself in her capabilities while competing. And like I
Speaker 25: was saying before her qualifying round, you know, to make
Speaker 25: it into the Olympics was actually better than what she
Speaker 25: performed at the Olympics. So and I don't even think
Speaker 25: it was nerves. I think she was trying to be
Speaker 25: overly creative because she knew she's not as skilled as
Speaker 25: the other dancers, but by trying to be so creative
Speaker 25: without the skill makes you look very goofy, and break
Speaker 25: dancing it just completely falls apart. You know, there's creativity
Speaker 25: is very important break dancing, but you have to follow
Speaker 25: it up with something else.
Speaker 3: I think that's the word, Adam, goofy. I think goofy
Speaker 3: sums it up beautifully, Adam Bee Coleman, thank you so
Speaker 3: much for your time.
Speaker 4: This evening, and that's it from May.
Speaker 3: Up next is news, not I'll see you at eleven tomorrow,
Speaker 3: not with Douglas Murray.