WEBVTT - Is property inside super doomed?

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. Welcome aboard everybody. You would think now with

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>property expected to rise over the next two years, I

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>saw a report from Bank of Queensland economists Moncton during

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the week saying, you know, he expects ten to fifteen

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>percent gains in the next two years, that it would

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 1>be an ideal time to consider property investment, which I

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>think it may be. But the issue I think on

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the table for everybody just now is the structure in

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>which you own property. And many people have put in

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>this fifty billion at least worth of property inside Super

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder this week, with what's going on, whether

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>those people have made a mistake. My guest today is

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Stuart Weems of the pro Solution Private Client Group and

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the Investopperly podcast. We've been talking to each other about

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>these changes. It's time that we did a podcast on it.

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Hawai is Stuart.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm really well, James, thanks for having me back.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You're welcome. Let's te x explain to people. First of all,

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>like that property holding property inside Super, it's been great

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that you can put that on the table. There's two

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>types of property you might hold inside Super, but they

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>called business real property. That's if you had a business,

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>their business premises can go in Super. That was always

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a terrific advantage which a lot of people liked. More recently,

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, with the long profitable history of residential property,

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>people have been putting residential property into Super. I have

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>done it now. The issue is, of course, that two

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>things have happened right that make it less attracted than

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it used to be. The banks withdrew to some degree,

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and mid rates very expensive for people to have property

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>inside Super. This is before we talk about the Super tax, folks.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So what to explain to listen to everyone if you

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>could about property and Super, the good, the bad, and

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the ugly if you.

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Like, Yeah, sure, James. And one of the main attractions,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 2>or I guess why people are so attracted to investing

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 2>in property inside Super is that if they get into

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 2>pension phase, you know, in retirement, that they can go

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 2>and sell that property and as long as they're below

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the transfer balance cap, which in a few weeks time

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 2>will be two million dollars per person, they won't pay

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>any capital gains tax. And everyone knows, you know, property

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>compounds and great capital growth, and that's where most of

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 2>my return is going to be. So if I buy

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a million dollar property today, in twenty years time, you know,

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 2>hopefully at seven point two percent, they'll be worth four

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 2>million dollars. I make a three million dollar gross capital

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 2>gain and I pay no tax. That's super attractive, and

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I think James, that's the main attraction of people want

0:02:59.919 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 2>to invest in property inside SUPER.

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people I talk to younger people who

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>are thinking of but also love the idea that they

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>have money in SUPER, which in many ways they feel

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they can't exploit if you like, or access. Obviously they

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.399
<v Speaker 1>can't access it till they tirement could be thirty years away,

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>forty years away. But they can use the money in

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>their super as a deposit, which they may not have.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Most people don't have a deposit for a property in

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>cash around the house, in the spare bank accountant there,

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it is in SUPER. So that's the other I suppose

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is that the other attraction.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And it's a very transparent way of investing your SUPER.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, if you're putting industry fund, it's

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 2>very difficult to kind of work out how it's invested.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 2>But if you've got a self marriage super funded and

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 2>you go and buy an investment grade unit or something

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 2>like that. You can drive past it, you know where

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 2>it is, you can really monitor its performance, and it

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 2>gives people, you know that bricks and mortar. Of course,

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>property is half the volatility of the share market. That

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 2>gives people a bit of comfort as well. But we

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 2>should talk about the negatives well, because fossible.

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't it a mainstream Why are I is ended

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>up in advertised? Why are the banks not offering loans

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in this area.

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a complex structure, and I don't think the banks.

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, typically that you're borrowing, the loan amounts are

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>lower because you're borrowing so seventy percent, whereas someone investing

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 2>property outside they typically borrow the full cost, so the

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>loan amounts, the average loan size is the lower, and

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of administration from the bank's perspectives. So

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I just think they view it as not a profitable

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 2>part of the market, and they pulled out, you know,

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 2>around this sort of just after the GFC, really a

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of them started exiting. I wouldn't be surprised if

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 2>they come back into the market, though, particularly if there's

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a resurgence in terms of demand for

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 2>borrowing because it's been it hasn't been that popular, I

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 2>guess over the last few recent years.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>But who's doing the lending.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Mostly mortgage managers, so they aren't eighty i's deposit institutions.

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's a bit of a red flag for people

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 2>because a lot of these small mortgage managers offer offset accounts,

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 2>just like we have outside of super But just be

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 2>careful with that because they're not going to get the

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 2>government guarantee because they're not a bank. So it's okay

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 2>to borrow from these people, and most of them they're regulated,

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 2>they're safe, but just don't put too much cash with them.

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>You're saying you can borrow from them because they're not guaranteed,

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>so they're in trouble if they go wonder. But if

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you put money in, you're in trouble. Is that what

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>y you?

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 2>A blinder? They'll sell their loan book, right, so you're

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 2>not really at risk that that's not such a problem.

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 2>It's really the cash side.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But I know you say the banks might come back

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>into the business if property starters lift, as many people

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>expect it will, but isn't there something of a sword

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>hanging over the whole thing anyway about the allowance to

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>be like, for want of a better word, that you

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>can borrow to buy property and super that you can that,

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>because isn't there isn't there a question mark that never

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>goes away. But whether the government will just close down

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the ability to use your super fund to borrow for property,

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it could do.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think. I mean it changed in nine

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 2>or was it? I said no, it was even before

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 2>that was a Howard government thing, wasn't it. So it's

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>been around for a long time. I don't think, you know,

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's much evidence that it's really been misused.

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 2>Of course, there's always going to be people on the

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 2>fringe that overborrow and do something silly and lose money.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think in the main, you look at the

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>numbers that are published in terms of the assets that

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 2>are associated with these borrowing arrangements and the debt the

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 2>equity is substantial. You look at those numbers, you go, whow,

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 2>it's been great for investors. So I don't think it's

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>going to go away, James, unless it starts being misused.

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>About the Greens in Parliament. The Greens, who will have

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the balance of power in this past said, as part

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of their support for the new supertax, which we'll do

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>it's soon that they want this band the ability of

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>super funds to borrow. They wanted banned SMSs to borrow.

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So isn't that a threat?

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, it could be, but what will happen to pre

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>existing arrangements? So you used to be able to have

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 2>a bit technical but it used to be able to

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>lend money into your own super funds. You didn't have

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 2>to have a borrow from a third party a bank,

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 2>but they closed that down, you know, your ability to

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>be able to do that many years ago. But the

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>existing arrangements, if they're there, can remain in place. So

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess my feeling would be if they did ban it,

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 2>it'd be as of today, we can't do that anymore.

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 2>But anyone that has that pre existing arrangement, it's probably

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 2>going to be quarantined or avoided from that, which I

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 2>mean maybe then, you know, if people are contemplating it,

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe do it sooner rather than later if that's the case.

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think there's any reason to ban it.

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So what we've said so far. If you're listening

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're thinking of going using your superfund that's self

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>managed super fund, that would be of course to invest

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in property. As Stuarts explain, there's a couple of issues.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Their rates are high. They are the highest you can

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>find in the market for a variety of reasons, one

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of them being a lack of competition in the market

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>because the big banks aren't in there. Also, then this

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>whole issue of whether you're allowed to continue to use

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>your superfund and have the super fund borrowed to buy property.

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>It's been under question for a long time. There was

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a report a few years ago by David Murray which

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>was very powerful that it should be banned. It didn't

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>actually get happen, and interestingly, the AP has never said

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that they would, but the Greens are saying that they

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>want it banned as part of their support for the

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>new supertax. So this is what we know so far.

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>But we also know, as you say, it's your people

0:08:56.040 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>are very usefully profitably using super to invest in property,

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>either business property what they call business real property, or

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>residential property. Across the country. There's at least fifty billion

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>out there in that category. The big question, folks, is

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>whether now on top of these restraints that are there,

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the new supertax will really finish this off in terms

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of whether it's worth the effort. We're going to talk

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:40.599
<v Speaker 1>about that after the break. Hello and welcome back to

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the Australians Money Puzzled podcast. James Kerby here, but Stuart Wiims,

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>regular contributor of course to the Wealth section in the Australian. Stuart,

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>let's talk now, let's really examine whether property is still

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>worth it in Super. And before we do, one thing

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we didn't mention in the first segment was I remember

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you saying on the a few weeks ago, and I'd

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 1>like you to just run this through once more. I

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>remember you saying, why would you have it in Super anyway?

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Because outside Super the negative gearing is so much better.

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Could you explain how that all works?

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean one of the attractions I said, I

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 2>think most people who attracted is to avoid paying capital

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 2>gains tax in retirement, which is a great saving. But

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 2>there's always another side to the coin. With most things

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 2>when we make a financial decision, and the downside to

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 2>gearing inside Super is that the tax rate is much lower.

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a flat fifteen percent as we know, whereas outside

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 2>of Super, you know, going to pay somewhere between thirty

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 2>and forty seven percent. It just means that the negative gearing,

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 2>the tax benefit associated with holding that property is much

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 2>higher outside Super. And that is really valuable because obviously

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 2>a saving today is worth a lot more to me

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 2>than a potential saving in twenty years time when I'm

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 2>going to retire. So when you model this out, James,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 2>and compare the lower level of gearing inside Super, you

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 2>know you can only borrow, so for seventy eighty percent,

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 2>you've got to put some cash in together with the

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>highest higher interest rates. Interest rates are about one to

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 2>one and a half percent higher inside Super compared to outside,

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and then lower negative gearing. It offsets the capital gains

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 2>tax savings. It's about neutral when you balance it all

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 2>out compared to you know, investing property outside Super versus

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 2>inside Super. So I think people need to be really

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 2>careful about, you know, if that carrot is dangled in

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 2>front of their eyes, say, look, you're not going to

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 2>pay any capital gains tax, that's great, But what am

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I forgoing in order to achieve that outcome?

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like an opportunity cost. So you're saying, listen, yes

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>you forget that property. If you had bought it as

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a present, you're paying forty seven percent tax. You've got

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>no tax bricks. Your entire expenses come to two thousand dollars.

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>If you had a property in there, you could add

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>that could multiply by ten by twenty. Okay, So you're

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>saying it's neutral. The perfect time to ask the question.

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was, it's noutral, it was beautifully balanced.

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And now here comes the new supertax. Okay, very briefly, folks,

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you have got a grasp on it. But

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>just to recap the new tax, which is du believe

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it or not, to effectively begin on July one, covering

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>its first financial year to July one, twenty twenty six,

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>when they start to collect on this tax, for people

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>with amounts over three million and super, the tax will

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>be imposed. It's a new tax. It's fifteen percent, and

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>if you recall, there's already a tax of fifteen percent

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>once it goes over once you have more than two

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>million and super starting July one, under this new law,

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>once you have over three million in super, there's an

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>extra fifteen percent and it's based on realized gains. That

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>means the paper value of the property that you had

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>thought you were holding for twenty years inside your super account.

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>You could get a bill to be paid by you

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>each year on the paper notional theoretical gain of that property.

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And if the Greens have there ware, the threshold will

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>drop from three millions two million. And if they don't indexit,

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>which they don't plan to, many more people will be

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>brought into the net every year. God feeling Stewart about

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>let's assume that old's going to happen. Everything tells us

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen. The government are in a very

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>strong position. They don't have to really buckle for anything

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>just now they've just been reelected. What do you think.

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 2>The other thing too, James, is that you pay fifteen

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 2>percent tax on the unrealized gain. But then when you

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 2>come to sell that asset, you were taxed on the

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 2>original cost base of the assets, so you'll pay ten percent,

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 2>So essentially you'll end up paying twenty five percent.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>It can be clarify. That's if you sell it before

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you retire.

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 2>That's well, that's if you sell it before you tire.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Correct or you're over the transfer balance cap, so you

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 2>have more than two, which is probably going to be

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 2>the case, of course, because the tax kicks in at three.

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 2>So you're going to pay somewhere between fifteen and twenty

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 2>five percent in capital gains tax as a result of

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 2>these tax which is look and look are you're going

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 2>to I saw something over the weekend that the average

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>top ten self managed super funds on average told four

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty million dollars or something like that in them.

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think anyone sitting here going, well, they

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't pay twenty.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Five I mean, unfortunately, it's because of these people that

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole damn thing has been yet through and it's

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to get at this what we don't know but

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this tiny number of people with enormous amounts and super

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that are legally in there by the way, But of

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>course no one can stand. No one's going to stand

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on a hill to defend them because it doesn't stack up.

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing, it becomes the everyday tax situation

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for property and super So does it as it stand,

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>really undermined the attractions of property and super Well.

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I did some financial modeling using a scenario that I

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 2>think is really realistic. So if you have a couple

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 2>that they're in their mid thirties, have one hundred and

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 2>sixty thousand dollars of super each, so three hundred and

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty all up, they go and buy a million dollar property,

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 2>borrow seventy percent in a self managed superfund, it should

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 2>work out okay for them. That is that their balance

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 2>should be only the north of about three million dollars

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>by the time that they get into their sixties, which

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 2>will give them some flexibility to withdraw any excess amounts

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 2>if they needed to. But the key assumption here is

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 2>that the both spouses have equal superbalances, which means they

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 2>own fifty percent of the self managed superfund throughout their

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 2>entire working career. Unfortunately, that assumption is unlikely, very unlikely.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Normally we see in where we have a couple, Normally

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 2>one of those couples will have a lot more super

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 2>than the other, either because they've got different incomes, of course,

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>or because of matern leave, all these sorts of things.

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 2>So for the average person in their thirties, they're thinking, hey,

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I've got a really long runway twenty years, I should

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 2>just go on gear into property. They need to be

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 2>really careful because I think in many situations they'll be

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 2>caught by this three million dollar tax. And one of

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the downsides to gearing into property is illiquidity. You know,

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 2>So if I have a big bill or a big

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 2>tax bill that need to pay, how am I going

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 2>to pay that without selling the asset? So I think

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 2>people need to be very careful with this. And I

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 2>think if you overlay what we spoke about in terms

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>of you know, lower negative gearing, higher interest rates, lower

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 2>overall gearing inside super this is just another element to

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I think make it look less attractive for the average

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>average Australian.

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and the couple you mentioned, what they'd have to

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>do was contribute bayond equal each year as well to

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>try and manage the two portfolios basically individual portfolios, to

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 1>watch the caps which are looming.

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Yep, that's right, because if one's contributing a lot more

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 2>than the other, of course, then they're going to own

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 2>they'll have a greater share in terms of member balance

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 2>of that self managed super fund. So it's difficult. You

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>could start off when you buy this asset thirty five

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 2>you do have very equal incomes, but what happens in

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>ten years time. When you don't, it's going to be

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 2>too easy to fall foul of this cap, particularly since

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 2>it's not indexed exactly.

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So you could have a couple where they've been together

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>for all their lives and one person contributed more so

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that person goes over the individual cap. The other person

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't anywhere remotely near that cap, but the couple at

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>such their household get hit with the tax. That's, as

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you say, and one of the kind of planks that

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>make property less attractive now and super on the basis

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 1>that this tax comes through in the way that it

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is planned. Okay, yeah, difficult got time, difficult time for people.

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It's really a pity that this has been restrained in

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>so many ways and is met so complicated and in

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>many ways people may think they need to pay big

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>fees to even understand what the rules are. But I

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>think if you track it, folks, we are covering it

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>very carefully, and if you do tune in to this

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast and some others we have done both on the

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>tax and on property, I think you can make your

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>own mind up. Which is a very good time to

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you that we are going to do especial on

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the new Supertax on Thursday this coming Thursday with Hugh Robertson. Okay,

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>now I have some really good questions, very good questions

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that I want to let you know about some clarification,

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>useful news about the solar and batteries program which everyone

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>was so interested in a couple of weeks ago, with

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>James Gerard's an update on that. Okay, back in a moment, Hello,

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. James Kirby

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>here with Stuart Whims of the pro Solution Private Clients

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Group and the Investoppaly podcast. You weren't involved in this,

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Stuart Williams, but James Gerard was, who's regularly on the show,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's something of he's very interested. He's a financial

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>advisor like you are. But I don't know if you're

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>as interested in cars and batteries and all that sort

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of thing as James is. And we did a special

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>on what's available to anybody basically under the new government

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>scheme there's for renewables and encouraging incentives in this area.

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>The incentives were on the home battery and on the

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>electric cars. The electric cars is ovated lya see one

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent deductible the batteries. Basically, many people one in

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>three households have a solar panel in Australia, thanks mostly

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>to incentives in the past, but only three percent of

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>them have battery. So the new scheme for the government

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>is basically cuts the cost of a battery in half.

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a federal scheme and James basically round the numbers

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and in whatever state you're in, if you couple what

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the government is offering along with your local state offering,

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.959
<v Speaker 1>you'll get your battery cost cut in half. But we

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>weren't really clear still when it started, so for what

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it's worth, the federal government solar battery scheme goes live

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>on July one. I just thought i'd let you know

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>about that that actually comes. I just come into me

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>this morning from one of the industry players there. Okay,

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>now question Liam. You want to read Liam's question? Yeah?

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Liam writes, I love the show, wondering if you

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 2>or your guests have any views on the approach for

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 2>people who just bought a house. I'm in a position

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 2>of being able to pay an extra eight hundred dollars

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 2>per month into my mortgage offset, which is doable until

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I have kids. Given the high interest rates, I would

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 2>have thought that's best to do. It doesn't make sense

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>to split the extra.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Dollars, Okay, I never advice here Liam, of course, on

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the information. Does it make sense to less paying into

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage off set? What do you think?

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 2>I think what Liam say is maybe split it towards

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 2>something else. I'm not really sure, but really the mortgage

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 2>offset is really the best place to park any spare

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 2>cash because if you think about it, for two reasons. Firstly,

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.959
<v Speaker 2>it's a risk free return. Like if you invest in

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the share market or put it somewhere else, you know

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 2>you're going to take some risk you're not really certain

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 2>what the return will be. But in a mortgage offset account,

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 2>you're definitely going to save six percent to whatever your

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 2>interest rate is. Secondly, it's not taxable, so you know,

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 2>if you're paying an average tax rate of thirty percent,

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 2>for example, to earn a six percent return after tax,

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 2>you need to earn eight and a half percent, and

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 2>you need to earn eight and a half percent on

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 2>a risk free basis, it's just not going to happen.

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Why so, for anyone that has any spare cash and savings,

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 2>it put parking in a mortgage off set is really

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 2>the best way to go unless you're willing to, you know,

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 2>take a very long term timerize and of course and say, look,

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 2>I want to put that money into equities or property

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 2>or whatever it might be.

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, terrific assuming that you have spare cash, and good

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for you, Liam you're thinking ahead. I remember the mortgage

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>off set, so I remember thinking they sounds so good

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>if I only had spare cash to put into them

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. Okay. Question from John J O

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>N John So he says, I'm feeling tightly squeezed on

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>my variable home nun with A and Z and as

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a fresh first home buyer, it's eating sixty two percent

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of my income. I met recently to ask for a

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>better deal, and I was told no chance, no discussion.

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I stated that currently three of the big banks are

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>offering a five point eight four percent variable rate, significantly

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>lower than my one. So what the response was? A

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and Z wants to move customers and new clients onto apps. Okay,

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>so John says, given the resistance of the banks to

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>adopt work from home arrangements themselves due to them being

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>considered impractical, isn't it a bit rich to force customers

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>effectively to move to work from face to face interactions

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 1>with the bank to virtual coaches bolstering their other worldly profits.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>By that, he means very big. I suppose. Yes. Okay,

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Look I'll take all that on board. John. I think Stuart,

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you've always said that that people should rock up to

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the banks. And I do not need to pick one

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>bank here over another because it's one person in one bank.

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>There's millions of these transactions. But you are firmly you

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>told me, and I did this and it worked that

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>if you go to a bank and you ask for

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 1>a better offer, they will, but you must use certain

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>magic words. What were the magic words again?

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right, you ring them up, and so what

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I if I was, John, I'll ring them up and say,

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm just about to sign my discharge authority because my movie.

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the magic word.

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, is going to refinance me to ing you're putting

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 2>IMNG because I typically have They've got a really low

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of ASIC variable rate. So I'm about to refinance

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 2>to IOD. But I just wanted to check if you

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 2>could give me a better rate. But here's the additional tip, James,

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 2>that I didn't previously discuss with you. It's really strange

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 2>that bank pricing so when they'll have a pricing tool

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 2>and they'll work out whether they can match the rate

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 2>and say yes or no, but they can change from

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 2>week to week. So, given John's repayments about sixty two

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 2>percent of his income, I'm going to take a guess

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>to say he's probably trapped today and Z he probably

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 2>can't refinance elsewhere because he's got too much dead or

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 2>not enough income, etc. But the people that you call,

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 2>which is the retention team, don't know that. They're not

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be wise enough to know that you can't refinance.

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 2>So that's why I say to John, say, you know,

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to refinance to ID even if that's not possible.

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 2>But if you're not successful today, ring back in two

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 2>or three weeks time, because it might be a no today,

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 2>but it could be a yes just in next week

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 2>or the week after or whatever. So be persistent with it.

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Depending on the team's targets inside the bank, then what's

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>happening in the bigger, wider world. And of course that's

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>not for an individual John, that's for all the John's

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>in the world out there. It's a very general observation

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>that stet is making. Okay, have a look at the

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>final question from Jeff if.

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 2>You would, yes, Jeff, right, So, I'm interested in how

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 2>portfolios are balanced by giving weight to property and infrastructure.

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 2>My understanding is this asset class is supposed to bring

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 2>a more conservative diversification into a portfolio. But is it

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>actually the case when it's most commonly achieved by investing

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 2>in funds comprising of listed property investment companies. If so,

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>is it fair to say then that this asset class

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 2>would be more categorized, more correctly categorized as equities, and

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 2>as such would remain exposed to equity market fluctuations.

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a great question, Jeff, it really is. I mean,

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you would think if if we talk regularly on property,

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:06.479
<v Speaker 1>especially on the Tuesday show, why don't we talk about reads,

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>why don't we talk about property funds? Well, this is

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.479
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Direct property is direct property. We started at

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the start of the show talking about why you might

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>have a property. By that, I mean bricks and mortar

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>number twenty two railway cuttings that you own in your fund,

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a share or a holding in a

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>variety of listed property shares, And if you look at

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the big super funds, industry funds and retail funds, their

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>property is direct property. They own, you know, the office

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>block down town. They don't own that. The value of

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that block in shares in a listed company. And if

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>there is a crash or a serious market reversal, the

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that they are property in underpinned by real asseense

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>does not make much of a difference. They fall just

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>like everything else. So I think the JEF is I

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>think basically what Jeff saying is correct that as an

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>asset class, if it's listed, it's it's listed, So it's

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the listed security. So it's a share even if it's

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>underpinned by property. What do you think maybe okay, yeah, yeah, okay,

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the other put up the other.

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 2>So let's decide if it should be defensive or in

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the growth part of the portfolio. So to be a

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 2>rate a real estate investment trust, you need to earn

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 2>seventy five percent of your income from rental income, or

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, eighty percent of assets on the balance sheet

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 2>are from real property, and that must distribute ninety percent

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 2>of that income each year. So really, what we're actually

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 2>investing in is something that is very much property heavy

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 2>in these sorts of investments, and now, of course they're

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 2>traded every day. But the idea behind reads and infrastructure,

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 2>property and infrastructure is that you will get most of

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 2>your return in income. With a little bit of capital growth.

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the capital will keep up with inflation, but most

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 2>of your return is income. And when you look at

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 2>the index a Vanguard's Austraining Property Fund, eighty percent of

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 2>your return over ten years has been income. So it's

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 2>done what it should do. It's done what it says

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>on the team.

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>You're buying a rent rule, You're buying a.

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Rent role, and that's why it's more it's considered in

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 2>more of a defensive asset rather than a growth asset.

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 2>But if you have a look at the performance, the

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 2>best indicator was when interest rates surprisingly. I say surprisingly

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 2>because the RBA said they weren't going to move it,

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 2>but surprisingly moved in twenty two and sort of spook

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 2>the market. What you saw then is the Vanguard Index

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 2>fund dropped about twenty three percent in that twenty two

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 2>calendar year. You look at the unlisted funds, most of

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the values hadn't changed yet. Now the Vanguard Index Fund

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 2>has actually recovered. It's almost back to where it was

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 2>before interstrates dropped, whereas unlisted property trusts haven't yet recovered.

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 2>They probably will over the next twelve months. They lag,

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 2>they lag. So what the listed companies will tell you

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 2>is what's going to happen to these the prices of

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 2>these assets, even though it hasn't yet happened. But you

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.719
<v Speaker 2>still do get that look through exposure into that market,

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 2>albeit more in a real time basis as opposed to

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 2>if you had unlisted assets.

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's a really good answer. Yes, so yes, it

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>does give you access to property. It is underpinned by property.

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>They never actually knew that there was such strict sort

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of legal constraints around reads for property trust to call

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>themselves such. And then as you make the point that

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>so you're getting that exposure, it really is property exposure.

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>The difference between the block in Martinplace that's in a

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>listed fund and the block that's in an unlisted fund

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is that the listed fund, its share price will move

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>faster and it will react faster instantly, probably to what's

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>going on in the world, while the unlisted one will

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>react eventually. So once a pointer to the other.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think that price discovery from an investor

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 2>is a really valuable thing, right because if I've got

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 2>an unlisted asset, I'm really relying on the manager and

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 2>the value and the auditor of that fund to make

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 2>sure they're representing what's actually happening. But if I'm investing

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 2>in something that's a listed asset, that price discovery that's

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 2>happening each day when they're buying and selling chairs gives

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 2>me a lot of comfort that it's really reflecting its

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 2>current value.

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, very good, very interesting, Thank you very much, Stuart

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Wiims a pro Solution Private Line Group. Loveing to have

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you on the show. My pleasure, always good to have

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you on the show. Stewart, terrific. All right, now, folks,

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>stand by for a Thursday's show where we will have

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a few Robertson who is on the Baron's top one

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to fifty financial advisors, but he is. We're going to

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>do a special on the new Supertax. We have to

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the correspondence has just mushroomed. Is that the right world

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>flourished on the back of this? So many questions people

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>have asked, I think what I'm going to do? Actually,

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole show will just be your questions about it

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and in that way hopefully we will really get a

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>clear understanding of what it's all about. Okay, keep the

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>emails coming, the money puzzle at the Australian dot com

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>dot au. Ok soon