Speaker 1: On Skyeleves Ostrodia.
Speaker 2: This is the Wader Panalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Reader Paney Show coming
Speaker 3: up tonight. Should the Liberal Party change or compromise its
Speaker 3: values to appeal to female voters. Patrick Carline will be
Speaker 3: here to discuss the day's top headlines. The Great Douglas
Speaker 3: Murray on the Deadly Consequences of Leftist policies will be
Speaker 3: joining us before the first ad break, Kosher Gaida on
Speaker 3: the Latest from the US, and later in the hour
Speaker 3: They Always Droll. Alex Stein on the star studded musical
Speaker 3: that features a black actress portraying Jesus and left He
Speaker 3: is Losing. It features more than one aging has been
Speaker 3: including actor Sean Penn.
Speaker 4: You think he'll try to stay on?
Speaker 5: I think he might try to destroy the world by
Speaker 5: the before he before he ages out of life.
Speaker 3: But first, Some of the Liberal Party's biggest stoners are
Speaker 3: threatening to pull their funding after the devastating loss on
Speaker 3: the weekend. Donors are long term supporters of the Liberal
Speaker 3: Party have lashed out of the disorganized election campaign and
Speaker 3: at Peter Dutton's labor Light small target policy platform, saying
Speaker 3: that after that performance, they're no longer interested in giving
Speaker 3: the Libs financial support. Billionaire Robert Milner, the chairman of Soulpatz,
Speaker 3: said it's been a disaster. I will be seriously thinking
Speaker 3: about whether I ever donate again. I don't know where
Speaker 3: they go to from now. It was a very poor campaign.
Speaker 3: Stockbroker Angus Eightken, one of the largest Liberal donors, said
Speaker 3: I have zero interest in donating further to the Liberals.
Speaker 3: They need a wholesale clear out to work out what
Speaker 3: they stand for instead of these me too style quasi
Speaker 3: labor policies to do not well against these poor outcomes.
Speaker 3: Labor as generators is astounding, but the lack of policies
Speaker 3: from the Liberal Party was completely hopeless. Among the criticism
Speaker 3: was that the coalition failed to effectively campaign on cutting
Speaker 3: Labour's wasteful green energy spending and on stopping Labour's dangerous
Speaker 3: plans for unrealized capital gains tax. Joining me now for
Speaker 3: more on this. As News Corps senior writer Patrick Carly
Speaker 3: and Patrick, this is precisely the advice they should be
Speaker 3: listening to instead of the media hacks telling them to
Speaker 3: veer further left. They ran a labor l like policy.
Speaker 3: It didn't work. It doesn't work in Wa, doesn't work
Speaker 3: here in Victoria, and it certainly doesn't work federally as
Speaker 3: we've just seen.
Speaker 6: Well, it was uniform, wasn't it. Australia rejected the coalition,
Speaker 6: It wasn't victorious Ay or Queensland. And I think those
Speaker 6: daughters make a very good point. We're coming off a
Speaker 6: first term government that wasn't particularly good. Anthony ALBERNIZI is
Speaker 6: never going to be Bob Hawk. There was a lot
Speaker 6: of errors made through that turn, so it's plenty to prosecute,
Speaker 6: and they just could not effectively sort of launch a
Speaker 6: campaign that made you think, well, he's a vision here
Speaker 6: that's different to the Labor Party that's been in power
Speaker 6: and made a lot of mistakes. It was fragmented, we're
Speaker 6: hearing now it was so chaotic behind the scenes. It
Speaker 6: was all on the run policy and nobody bought it.
Speaker 3: Now, Patrick, you mentioned chaos, and here is further details
Speaker 3: of the chaos within the Liberal Party and the lead
Speaker 3: up to the election, with insiders revealing that major energy, housing,
Speaker 3: and defense policies were worked up on the run during
Speaker 3: the campaign and it showed the National gas Reserve policy,
Speaker 3: senior College and ministers royally given about three hours notice
Speaker 3: that Peter Dutton planned to unveil the gas policy, and
Speaker 3: the announcement was made before the final version of the
Speaker 3: modeling from Frontier Economics was available. That reportedly saw Liberal
Speaker 3: campaign staff chasing the final version of the report from
Speaker 3: director Danny Price, who was found to be in New
Speaker 3: Zealand with his phone turned off. Patrick. When the report
Speaker 3: was mainly finally made public some twelve days after Peter
Speaker 3: Dutton's budget speech, it didn't exactly show the cost savings
Speaker 3: that were promise. I mean, this is such a monumental mess.
Speaker 3: When they needed to be bold and strong, they were
Speaker 3: weak and incoherent.
Speaker 6: Look, I think that's right. I mean if you go
Speaker 6: back to last year, or even the year before Peter
Speaker 6: Dutton announced nuclear policy, which you sort of thought, well,
Speaker 6: that's whatever you think of it, that's bold, that's game changing.
Speaker 6: Are we going to have a referendum on energy? And instead?
Speaker 6: Where he get these sort of half baked sort of
Speaker 6: ideas on the run and the modeling didn't even pan
Speaker 6: out to accord with what Peter Dutton had promised. You
Speaker 6: can't be doing that. This election was not a surprise.
Speaker 6: They've had three years to sort of work on this
Speaker 6: and to get it right, and to believe in things,
Speaker 6: and to convince the electorate that this is a bold
Speaker 6: alternative and they failed on all of those levels.
Speaker 3: We had Senator Alex Antikon on Sunday on Outsiders, and
Speaker 3: he said that some of their policies resembled mobile phone plans,
Speaker 3: where you get a special deal for twelve months, you
Speaker 3: get a cut or discount on the fuel ex size.
Speaker 3: How is that going to convince people to throw out
Speaker 3: a first term government? And you mentioned nuclear policy. It
Speaker 3: was a point of differentiation, but it doesn't come intil
Speaker 3: the twenty thirties. If they won and they ran away
Speaker 3: from that policy. Throughout the campaign, they were too scared
Speaker 3: to articulate their position because there were attacks, which they
Speaker 3: should have expected. Of course they're going to be attacks.
Speaker 6: Well, I think I'm convincing is a word that sort
Speaker 6: of springs to mind for me, because in the end,
Speaker 6: when they look to be in doubt, they sort of
Speaker 6: copied what the ALP had done, or did a version
Speaker 6: of the ALP, and at the same time they sort
Speaker 6: of alienated certain sections of the community. They weren't a choice,
Speaker 6: they weren't doing anything different, and they weren't doing anything better.
Speaker 6: It looked like a campaign where they really were doing
Speaker 6: it on the run and they really didn't know what
Speaker 6: they would striving to do.
Speaker 3: Now to an interesting piece in the Australian Financial Review
Speaker 3: by Tricia jar on the woes facing the Liberal Party.
Speaker 3: She writes about the error of thinking that to appeal
Speaker 3: to women, to appeal to professionals and millennials, the Liberals
Speaker 3: must change or compromise their values. She writes tax policies
Speaker 3: that encourage growth, housing policies that enable choice, immigration policies
Speaker 3: that contribute to Australia's prosperity, and a disciplined approach to
Speaker 3: public spending that contains ballooning debt for the next generation
Speaker 3: should be bread and butter issues for Liberals and one
Speaker 3: that can have cut through with all demographics. She makes
Speaker 3: an excellent point there because I think the easy thing
Speaker 3: to do, which is what we're hearing now from all
Speaker 3: the grifters and the like, is they are wanting to
Speaker 3: push through their pet projects, so they want to have
Speaker 3: gender quotas. They want to essentially turn the Liberal Party
Speaker 3: into labor We already have a labor party. If people
Speaker 3: want to vote for labor, they vote for labor, give
Speaker 3: them a choice. But the point made in this AFR
Speaker 3: piece I think is spot on women and millennials. They're
Speaker 3: not some weird demographic. If you give them sound policies,
Speaker 3: it will appeal to them as it appeals to every
Speaker 3: other demographic.
Speaker 6: Well, it was women in those marginal seats on in
Speaker 6: the outer suburbs of the capital cities that they really
Speaker 6: had to win over, and they sort of lost them
Speaker 6: from day one virtually or literally, which they're working from
Speaker 6: home policy, which basically said a lot of these women
Speaker 6: were working from home to save money because they're in
Speaker 6: the cost of living crisis, they were making ends meet,
Speaker 6: and they sort of come in and basically have this
Speaker 6: policy that alienates them from the outset. That's when the
Speaker 6: election was lost. Basically, it's easy to say that after
Speaker 6: the event, but they never got that back and they're
Speaker 6: basically it was the same with the young people and
Speaker 6: indeed for all taxpayers. I mean, the coalition's tax policy
Speaker 6: was costlier to the average taxpayer than the ALPS. I mean,
Speaker 6: what do they believe in, what do they stand for?
Speaker 3: Well, we'll wait and see, because I think it's going
Speaker 3: to be crucial the next leader of the Liberal Party.
Speaker 3: If they go the wrong way that then they can
Speaker 3: have many more years of pain. The rebuild needs to start,
Speaker 3: and needs to start very quickly. Patrick Carlin, thanks for
Speaker 3: your time. Joining me now is best selling author Douglas
Speaker 3: Murray's latest book on democracies and death cults has just
Speaker 3: hit the shells. Douglas, let's start with sickening cases of
Speaker 3: abuse and neglect of vulnerable children ignored by authorities in
Speaker 3: the name of anti racism or so called progressive ideology.
Speaker 3: The front page of the New York Post today says
Speaker 3: it all kids doomed. ACS's that's Administration for Children's Services
Speaker 3: progressive agenda led to seven child debts. Douglas, the cases
Speaker 3: here are sickening kids, abuse, long term staved, mistreated, and
Speaker 3: the paper says they're victims of an agency stubbornly committed
Speaker 3: to a progressive ideology that considers removing children from a
Speaker 3: troubled home, no matter how abusive, to be cruel and
Speaker 3: even racist, leaving too many children to fend for themselves
Speaker 3: and sadly, Douglas, I think this is not just a
Speaker 3: problem in New York, but in many parts of the
Speaker 3: Western world.
Speaker 1: That's right, Greta. I mean, it's an unbelievably shocking story.
Speaker 7: You would have thought that, you know, of all jobs
Speaker 7: that local government authority is meant to see through and
Speaker 7: commit to, you'd have thought that the looking after caring
Speaker 7: for the most vulnerable in society would be something that
Speaker 7: everybody could just agree on as a priority.
Speaker 1: But as the New York Post.
Speaker 7: Says, the ACS in New York is one of many
Speaker 7: such agencies across the US and indeed across the west
Speaker 7: of the Western world that really regards ideologies of other
Speaker 7: kinds as trumping that and especially the so called anti
Speaker 7: racist ideologies and all of the diversity equity stuff that
Speaker 7: actually those things trump child's safety. That, as the Post says, today,
Speaker 7: people who should be caring for these children instead are
Speaker 7: in hark to this ideology that says, to interrupt the family,
Speaker 7: even a family where child's being abused is in some
Speaker 7: way it's self abusive because it could be racist. This
Speaker 7: is really where the rubber hits a road on ideologies.
Speaker 1: Like the whole di thing.
Speaker 7: The question is like, are you going to pursue this
Speaker 7: ideology all the way, even at the expense of vulnerable
Speaker 7: children or are you going to have other priorities.
Speaker 1: I would hope after the attention that.
Speaker 7: These horrific cases have now got more people who should
Speaker 7: be making childcare a priority will do so instead of
Speaker 7: these absolutely inappropriate and wildly unuseful ideologies.
Speaker 3: You would hope so. But as we've seen in the
Speaker 3: UK with the Grooming gang scandal, the lessons haven't been
Speaker 3: learned there, where vulnerable young girls were just abandoned by
Speaker 3: authorities in the name of community cohesion and PC agenda.
Speaker 3: Now staying in the UK, an extraordinary story is unfolding
Speaker 3: there with revelations that an Iranian terror attack was just
Speaker 3: hours away from being launched on British soil before it
Speaker 3: was foiled by counter terrorism officers. British police arrested eight people,
Speaker 3: including seven Iranian nationals, suspicion of terrorism offenses. The UK
Speaker 3: Telegraph reports that authorities feed the attacks on a specific
Speaker 3: premises was imminent, and there is speculation Douglas that the
Speaker 3: target may have been a synagogue or another target link
Speaker 3: to the Jewish community. This is Douglas, certainly a frightening development.
Speaker 7: It is very frightening, but sadly not surprising. Iranian terrorists
Speaker 7: have targeted people in a bewildering array.
Speaker 1: Of countries by now.
Speaker 7: They of course famously carried out bombings of Jewish community
Speaker 7: center in South America some years ago in New York City,
Speaker 7: in Brooklyn elsewhere, Iranian government assassins tried to kill again
Speaker 7: just a year or two ago, a very brave Iranian
Speaker 7: exile who is critical of the regime. They tried to
Speaker 7: kill this young woman in America. The Iranian government's most
Speaker 7: prominent media outlet boasts about this just the other week.
Speaker 7: As I wrote in the Post the other day, just
Speaker 7: the other week, the editor of one of the main
Speaker 7: organs of the Iranian revolutionary government, who has the ear
Speaker 7: of the Supreme Leader and is generally regarded.
Speaker 1: As being a spokesman for.
Speaker 7: Him, said that it was still the intention of the
Speaker 7: Iranian government to put a bullet in the skull of
Speaker 7: President Trump, and he said hopefully that day will arrive soon.
Speaker 1: It is amazing.
Speaker 7: We'll wait and see what unfolds in the UK about
Speaker 7: this tera sal and its prospective targets, but I don't
Speaker 7: think anyone should be that surprised by it. Iran has
Speaker 7: been put pumping terrorists obviously around the whole the region
Speaker 7: it's in. But the revolutionary government's also been trying to
Speaker 7: carry out assassinations with impunity in America in other countries
Speaker 7: for years now. I do wonder when we'll start to
Speaker 7: take them seriously and actually do anything in response.
Speaker 3: Meanwhile, Douglas kirs Starmer continues to obsess about the threat
Speaker 3: from the so called far right. Now, Nigel Faraja's Reform
Speaker 3: Party had a stunning resulted council and by elections on Thursday.
Speaker 3: The party is now taking control of ten local councils,
Speaker 3: won two mayoral races and added a fifth MP to
Speaker 3: its ranks. Forages, hailing reforms triumph as unprecedented. He says
Speaker 3: it's the end of the two party rule in the UK.
Speaker 3: Is he right? He's taking votes from Labor and the Tories,
Speaker 3: Douglas Well.
Speaker 7: Nail Varas has done this before, of course, he led
Speaker 7: the Brexit Party and indeed U kept us stunning electoral
Speaker 7: successes principally back then in the European Parliament when Britain
Speaker 7: was still a member of the EU.
Speaker 1: So there are two.
Speaker 7: Things I think people have to bear in mind when
Speaker 7: they look at these. One is that they are local elections.
Speaker 7: Turn out tends to be low and it tends to
Speaker 7: be the case that people punish incumbent parties, So that's
Speaker 7: definitely the case. It was an undoubtedly successful night for reform.
Speaker 7: That doesn't necessarily mean though, that Reform can see that
Speaker 7: through at a general election. As you know, Reta, the
Speaker 7: whole setup and as Night Parage know is better than anyone,
Speaker 7: the whole setup of the first past the post system,
Speaker 7: which is intended to give strong governments and sometimes does.
Speaker 1: But the whole point.
Speaker 7: Of it really is that an insurgent party like those
Speaker 7: that Nigel Farag has led for some thirty years now,
Speaker 7: it is effectively it's very hard at general elections to
Speaker 7: break through. You see the number of votes that were
Speaker 7: needed or the number of votes that haven't the last
Speaker 7: general election per Reform MP as opposed to the number
Speaker 7: of votes per Labor MP, and I mean it's way off.
Speaker 1: So we'll see.
Speaker 7: There are, of course, of more than four years to
Speaker 7: go till the next general election in the UK. The
Speaker 7: problem that Farage obviously is principally is not to Labor
Speaker 7: or it definitely does chip away it Labors vote and
Speaker 7: did do. Here the principal threat is to the Conservative Party.
Speaker 7: If the Conservative Party cannot see off threat from Pharage
Speaker 7: and Reform, then they really don't deserve to exist.
Speaker 1: But it should be possible for the Conservative Party to
Speaker 1: see them off.
Speaker 7: It's just that the Conservative Party has to first of all,
Speaker 7: have policies that can outflank Nigel Farage's policies, and secondly,
Speaker 7: of course to find some way back into the public
Speaker 7: trust after thirteen fourteen years of Conservative governments, for instance,
Speaker 7: saying that they were going to lower migration whilst seeing.
Speaker 1: Migration go through the roof.
Speaker 7: It will take quite a long time for the electorate
Speaker 7: to forgive the Conservative Party for that, I think. But
Speaker 7: the Conservative Party will have to address that question, and
Speaker 7: it'll have to do so much faster than they're doing
Speaker 7: at the moment.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 3: Douglas, I can't wait to get your take on this
Speaker 3: bizarre interaction involving the BBC chairman Samir Shah, who is
Speaker 3: asked whether Hermas are terrorists. Now much frivolity and squirming
Speaker 3: and giggling follows.
Speaker 2: One last question just for you as an individual, Samir,
Speaker 2: do you consider her Mass to be a terrorist group?
Speaker 1: I have to.
Speaker 9: Answer that in terms of the way we currently what.
Speaker 2: Do you think they are. Do you think they're a
Speaker 2: convocation with happy little squirrels and want that?
Speaker 1: I don't think that.
Speaker 9: But but I'm here as a chairman of the BIST
Speaker 9: as an individual enter, I can tell you what I
Speaker 9: think when I'm right now to the world. I am
Speaker 9: the chairman of the BBC, and we have taken the
Speaker 9: view as a board that would continue to use the
Speaker 9: word terrorist only with attribution.
Speaker 1: That's the position weake.
Speaker 2: Although I think you think they're terrorists.
Speaker 3: Douglas. If he thinks they're terrorists, then why doesn't he
Speaker 3: say so? I would hardly think it's a controversial opinion.
Speaker 1: Isn't it bizarre?
Speaker 2: Eat?
Speaker 1: I mean, it's not hard to call hamas terrorists, not.
Speaker 7: Just because they are, because they're designated as much in
Speaker 7: the UK and most other Western countries. I mean, what's
Speaker 7: so difficult about that? I think, really, what we see there,
Speaker 7: I could quite believe the sort of jolly.
Speaker 1: Squirming of same sha on that.
Speaker 7: I mean, you know, he's talking about people who have
Speaker 7: been busily murdering other Palestinians in recent days, and who
Speaker 7: of course for years have tried to commit genocide against
Speaker 7: the Jewish people, and say they want to wipe the
Speaker 7: Jewish people off the face of.
Speaker 1: The earth and everyone else next.
Speaker 7: Now, I mean, I can't see why any of that
Speaker 7: is such a sort of squirmingly funny matter to Samir Shah.
Speaker 7: I'd like to see him laugh his way through an
Speaker 7: interview about any other genocidal group that wanted to wipe
Speaker 7: out any organization or group of people from the face
Speaker 7: of the earth.
Speaker 1: It's very, very strange behavior. All I can think of.
Speaker 7: Is that Samir Shah, the chairman of the BBC, is
Speaker 7: trying to squirm out of that because he's aware of
Speaker 7: the number of his colleagues or employees underneath them at
Speaker 7: the BBC who think that Hamaz are some kind of
Speaker 7: liberationist movement who shouldn't be smeared with the terrorist label,
Speaker 7: and that if he Samir Shah is too strict about
Speaker 7: saying that Hamaz are terrorists, then he'll have hell to
Speaker 7: pay from the newsroom floor and from junior reporters and
Speaker 7: junior editors and so on.
Speaker 1: It's really quite despicable.
Speaker 7: It's not a difficult one that at all, But yes,
Speaker 7: I mean, it tells us about what he's swimming in
Speaker 7: the BBC that that is a difficult question to answer.
Speaker 7: You know, I'd love to see him do it on
Speaker 7: any other group. As I say, I mean, I don't
Speaker 7: know if he finds al Qaeda as chortlingly funny as
Speaker 7: he does Hamaz or ic It or anyone else.
Speaker 1: But it tells you an awful lot.
Speaker 7: About the way in which the BBC just contorts itself
Speaker 7: on these really quite straightforward questions. But yeah, I completely
Speaker 7: recognize the thing he's swimming in. It's a newsroom and
Speaker 7: an organization that finds it incredibly hard to actually call
Speaker 7: Jimaz what they call themselves.
Speaker 3: That I think he would have taken far more seriously
Speaker 3: a question like can a woman have a penis? Because
Speaker 3: he wouldn't want to be oh laughing at that. That
Speaker 3: would be a very serious, sober analysis. Before you go, Douglas,
Speaker 3: I have to get your take on Prince Harry's latest
Speaker 3: media interview. He's sat down and again moaned about the
Speaker 3: state of the relationship with his family. He says King
Speaker 3: Charles will not take his calls, and Prince Harry apparently
Speaker 3: is desperate for reconciliation, but King Charles is rejecting efforts
Speaker 3: to reconcile. Why do you think that is, it's.
Speaker 1: Really pitiful, I have to say, reach to a very sad.
Speaker 7: Prince Harry, as I've said to you before, had a
Speaker 7: great opportunity when he turned his life around, joined the
Speaker 7: British Army and served with distinction in Afghanista.
Speaker 1: He had a real chance to make a hell.
Speaker 7: Of a go of it with his life and to
Speaker 7: be a role model and to encourage other people, including
Speaker 7: other young men who may have lost their way, to
Speaker 7: find themselves on a good path.
Speaker 1: And then he veered way off it.
Speaker 7: And you know now when he says that members of
Speaker 7: his family don't want to take his calls, I mean,
Speaker 7: it's very hard to know whether he realizes why that
Speaker 7: might be.
Speaker 1: Because the reason it might.
Speaker 7: Be is that whenever any member of his family speaks
Speaker 7: to him, they might find what they said either written
Speaker 7: up in another book or relayed in interviews with the
Speaker 7: BBC and other channels. So you know, it's a very
Speaker 7: peculiar thing that's going on at Prince Harry's head, and
Speaker 7: I feel very sorry for him if he can't grasp this.
Speaker 7: If people around you know that you're likely to run
Speaker 7: and broadcast what they say in private to the world,
Speaker 7: then yeah, they might be reticent in speaking to you,
Speaker 7: and the way to mend that isn't to go on
Speaker 7: television and relay the fact that they're not speaking to
Speaker 7: you at the moment. I mean, if he said, I
Speaker 7: want to reconcile with my father, and they'll do anything
Speaker 7: that requires, but I think it should be done away
Speaker 7: from the cameras and without any spare volume twos or
Speaker 7: anything like that, and there'll be no cooking shows involved.
Speaker 1: It's just a family matter.
Speaker 7: If he did that, maybe he could actually make this
Speaker 7: reunion that he wants. But this is the worst way
Speaker 7: to go about it. I can't imagine who is actually
Speaker 7: advising Prince Harry, other than possibly for his wife, because
Speaker 7: I think only she could give him pr advice this bad.
Speaker 3: I think it is Megan. I mean, this is straight
Speaker 3: from her playbook. It seems to go to the media
Speaker 3: to whine about something that is just going to make
Speaker 3: that problem far worse. And is now claiming that they
Speaker 3: never claimed the royal family or any members of it
Speaker 3: were racist. They're trying to completely rewrite history and memory.
Speaker 3: Hold that Oprah interview Douglas, It's been a pleasure. Thanks
Speaker 3: for your time tonight.
Speaker 1: Great to see you, Rita, Thank you.
Speaker 3: Still to come at left he is a losing ed
Speaker 3: plus violence, scenes and special guests that this year's met
Speaker 3: Gala boor Koshan Gator joins, men, you're watching the Rita
Speaker 3: Panny Show and it's time for lefties losing ed. Now
Speaker 3: we all remember Neil Young humiliating himself by firstly boycotting
Speaker 3: Spotify in protests against Joe Rogan after trying to get
Speaker 3: the world's most popular podcaster canceled for so called misinformation
Speaker 3: during the COVID era. He wrote, they can have Rogan
Speaker 3: or Young, not both. Yes, he wrote that in an
Speaker 3: open letter, the silly, old, delusional four was back at
Speaker 3: Spotify with his tail between his legs. Seems money trumped
Speaker 3: his principles. Now he has launched another protest with a
Speaker 3: song and basting elon mask. So let's see what he's
Speaker 3: singing here. He's singing what it's doesn't that Yeah, okay,
Speaker 3: that's as bad as I expected. If you're wondering what
Speaker 3: he's saying there, because it's very hard to tell. The
Speaker 3: lyrics are if you're a fascist, get a tesla, it's electric.
Speaker 3: It doesn't matter. I'm going to play you the next
Speaker 3: ten seconds. I think that's all we can stomach for
Speaker 3: one day. Get ready to cringe some more.
Speaker 2: You're as.
Speaker 3: Somehow that next ten seconds was even worse than the first.
Speaker 3: And the lyrics there and I have to tell you
Speaker 3: the lyrics because it just sounds like incoherent wailing. But
Speaker 3: what he's saying there is, if you're a Democrat, taste
Speaker 3: your freedom, get whatever you want. Taste your freedom. Profound
Speaker 3: profound stuff. Now, let's check in on some leftyv lefty violence.
Speaker 3: I hate it when they turn on each other. Here
Speaker 3: is veteran Democrats strategists and Trump de ranged loun James
Speaker 3: Carville talking to a junior Democrat strategist and Trump de
Speaker 3: ranged Vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, David Hogg.
Speaker 3: Grab the popcorn, folks, this is fun.
Speaker 10: I think it is abominal that an official of a
Speaker 10: political party who is being paid or supported by that
Speaker 10: political party to go out and raise money to defeat
Speaker 10: members of the same party. I think that's a jack
Speaker 10: assery of the highest level. James, can you tell me
Speaker 10: you want if you want to beat Republicans, of which,
Speaker 10: of course lefties never do. They never even run against them.
Speaker 10: That's one thing I'm not into beating Democrats. I'm into
Speaker 10: beating Republicans, and I just I'll tell you right to
Speaker 10: your face. I think it's abominal that you have anything
Speaker 10: to do with the DNA.
Speaker 3: Oh it gets better. James Carville is extra spicy here.
Speaker 10: I called on Joe Biden to drop out of the
Speaker 10: race in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1: Where were you?
Speaker 10: Where was the young cool generation coming? Did they step
Speaker 10: in there and say something? I spoke out against the
Speaker 10: horrific language of identity politics? Where was everybody else?
Speaker 11: What is your plan to deal with our abominable approval rating?
Speaker 1: When elections? When elections?
Speaker 3: Oh so good? Now, let's hear from Hollywood has been
Speaker 3: short pen and listen to this absolutely one hinged rant
Speaker 3: about Donald Trump. This is the most asinine analogy you'll hear.
Speaker 12: Oh yeah, And I do think it's a reasonable theory
Speaker 12: that Donald Trump is not unlike the spouse of someone
Speaker 12: who leaves him, perhaps for another, who then murders their
Speaker 12: former partner because.
Speaker 5: If they can't have her, nobody can. I think Donald
Speaker 5: Trump and his soleib sism may have that relationship with
Speaker 5: the world, and that this destruction is in part a
Speaker 5: power play, and also a literal intention of his final out.
Speaker 1: You think he'll try to stay on.
Speaker 5: I think he might try to destroy the world by
Speaker 5: the before he before he ages out of life.
Speaker 3: Now do you think there was any pushback, any pushback
Speaker 3: against that madness from Jim Acosta or Eric Fang Fang
Speaker 3: so well, No, Instead we got this from the man
Speaker 3: who had an affair with a Chinese Communist Party spy.
Speaker 3: The nerve of this dude, this is just more tedious lunacy.
Speaker 13: In the history of dictators or those who aspire to
Speaker 13: be dictators. There's never a succession plan, right, There's never
Speaker 13: And that's what worries me is if he doesn't believe
Speaker 13: there's somebody who can protect him, that you will see
Speaker 13: him ratchet up. You know what he's willing to do
Speaker 13: to the country.
Speaker 3: These people are nuts and massive hypocrites. Because I remember
Speaker 3: Sean Penn, this is a dude who actually loves real
Speaker 3: death spots, real brutal dictators, like the one who helped
Speaker 3: destroy Venezuela. Yes, near Marxist Sean Penn was very fond
Speaker 3: of cozing up to the Venezuelan dictator who goes chevertz
Speaker 3: oh Will.
Speaker 5: Wishing nothing but that great strength he has shown over
Speaker 5: and over again.
Speaker 1: It is only possible to be so inspiring as he is.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he's talking about the dictator there. Seriously, now, I
Speaker 3: tell you TEDS is a chronic condition. Indeed, if you
Speaker 3: believe the president, it is a fatal condition.
Speaker 14: They suffer from a thing called TDS.
Speaker 1: Do you know what that is?
Speaker 15: TDS. It's a horrible, horrible terminal disease. It destroys the mind.
Speaker 15: It destroys the mind before the body, but the body
Speaker 15: eventually goes TDS is Trump Derangement syndrome.
Speaker 3: He really is the funniest president we've ever had, and
Speaker 3: probably the most miserable first Lady we've ever had is
Speaker 3: Michelle Obama. This woman can't find anything to be joyful about.
Speaker 3: We've heard her wing incessantly about well everything on her
Speaker 3: low rating podcast. She has even found a way to
Speaker 3: complain about the financial cost of being the first family.
Speaker 16: It's expensive to live in the White House. There's many
Speaker 16: people don't know. I mean much is not covered. You're
Speaker 16: paying for every food and every bit of food that
Speaker 16: you eat. You you know, you're not paying for housing
Speaker 16: and the staff in it, but everything even travel. If
Speaker 16: you're not traveling with the president. If your kids are
Speaker 16: coming on a bright Star, which is the first Lady's plane,
Speaker 16: we had to play pay for their travel.
Speaker 8: To be on the plane.
Speaker 16: It is an expensive proposition.
Speaker 3: Let's bring in Sky News contributa kosher gata Kosher. The
Speaker 3: Obamas went into the White House with mega assets. They're
Speaker 3: now worth somewhere between seventy to two hundred and fifty million,
Speaker 3: and Michelle Obama continues to push this grievance politics. Is
Speaker 3: there no one in a in a circle? He'lls telling her,
Speaker 3: this just looks terrible. You look so entireled and.
Speaker 17: Miserable, seemingly not really his fascinating. And you know there's
Speaker 17: toundaff and then there's torn deaf.
Speaker 8: This is just beyond the.
Speaker 17: Pair, like, oh, we have to pay for our daughter's
Speaker 17: travel and on.
Speaker 8: A private jet on a private.
Speaker 17: Pay pace for i know, with secret service and everything else.
Speaker 17: And yeah, most of us, if we're traveling with our
Speaker 17: kids to any corporate event, yeah, the employer doesn't pay
Speaker 17: for our kids when we go and travel. So just
Speaker 17: the tourn deff is really funny. She's criticized Barack Obama
Speaker 17: a lot too on this podcast.
Speaker 3: This is what's been interesting. She barely has anything positive
Speaker 3: to say about her husband, which in itself is raising eyebrows.
Speaker 17: Yeah, and that's what's interesting about the grievance because there's
Speaker 17: the you know, the boilerplate grievance that they all do
Speaker 17: about racial injustice and social injustice, but in her case
Speaker 17: it's personal like having to pay for things or you know,
Speaker 17: her husband and.
Speaker 3: Marriage decade of unhappiness right talked about, you know, bad decades.
Speaker 17: She seems like an unhappy person. I don't want to
Speaker 17: do armchair psychoanalysis somebody, but it really seems that way.
Speaker 17: And it seems to be the language that she's most
Speaker 17: fluent in, the language of grievance, since it keeps coming
Speaker 17: out day in and day.
Speaker 3: Well, I think she's finding through the data sets she's
Speaker 3: getting for a podcast, if anyone in her circle is
Speaker 3: honest enough to tell her the truth, the figures aren't good.
Speaker 3: I mean, that should tell her something. Despite the enormous
Speaker 3: publicity she's receiving now, I played clips of Kamala Harris's
Speaker 3: first major speech since the election loss. Here is a
Speaker 3: mercifully short eight second reminder. Who saw that video From
Speaker 3: a couple of weeks ago, the one of the elephants
Speaker 3: at the San Diego Zoo during the earthquake. And here
Speaker 3: is Steven Miller with a message for Kamala Harris and
Speaker 3: the broken Washington press Corps. This is a powerful rebuke.
Speaker 11: The only thing Americans want to hear from Kamala Harris
Speaker 11: is an apology for joining Joe Biden. Remember she was
Speaker 11: the Borderzar, joining Joe Biden in aiding and abetting the
Speaker 11: invasion of our country. And We're never going to stop
Speaker 11: talking about this because what they did to this country
Speaker 11: is unforgivable. It is an eternal stain on the Democrat Party.
Speaker 11: Every day we read another story, every day we arrest
Speaker 11: another alien they let into this country, who raped a child,
Speaker 11: who beat a woman with an inch of her life,
Speaker 11: who murdered a mom, who murdered a dad, who trafficked
Speaker 11: drugs into this country, who trafficked fentanyl into this country,
Speaker 11: who were responsible for dead and slaughtered Americans. And I
Speaker 11: don't know what's broken in the Washington press corps that
Speaker 11: none of that moves them emotionally. The only thing that
Speaker 11: gets some exercise is do we need to have more
Speaker 11: trials for terrorist supporters? We'd have more trials for gang bangers.
Speaker 11: We'd have more trials for legally alien invaders, even though
Speaker 11: Congress and the Constitution clearly say that you can expel
Speaker 11: invaders and illegal aliens quickly, efficiently, and properly kosher.
Speaker 3: The Democrats continue to advocate for an MS thirteen gang banger,
Speaker 3: or Maryland Dad as they prefer to call him, but
Speaker 3: we will hear very little from them, As Stephen Miller
Speaker 3: said there about the victims of criminals who have come
Speaker 3: into the country illegally, and that is an enormous shortfall
Speaker 3: in the Democrats' moral compass. It's like, whose side are
Speaker 3: you on? Look at the way they've advocated for this
Speaker 3: lone criminal. Multiple Democrats have gone down to El Salvador
Speaker 3: to meet with him to advocate on his behalf. But
Speaker 3: we don't even hear them mention these American victims of
Speaker 3: some of these really violent criminals who walked across the
Speaker 3: bord unchecked millions in Biden's four year term.
Speaker 17: It's almost like there's two different realities that we're living in,
Speaker 17: or that they're living in versus the real world. And
Speaker 17: I don't know how much of it is TDS Trump
Speaker 17: arrangement syndrome that anything where there's success, that success for
Speaker 17: the American people, they just cannot give credit where credit
Speaker 17: is due or how much of it is. It doesn't
Speaker 17: affect them because they all live in very nice, gated
Speaker 17: communities on the coast, so they don't have to live
Speaker 17: with that reality. So it's out of sight, out of
Speaker 17: mind for them, or it's just resistance. And now the
Speaker 17: judicial activism and lawfare is kind of their last line
Speaker 17: of defense to try and do that and give due
Speaker 17: process to people who exercised no due process when they
Speaker 17: came into the country, but they apparently deserve it on
Speaker 17: their way out, and that's just the they're lying on.
Speaker 3: That would mean you would have these cases given the
Speaker 3: millions that have come through for twenty thirty years. I mean,
Speaker 3: it is just completely ridiculous to suggest that they have
Speaker 3: to exhaust a legal process as if they're American citizens
Speaker 3: any titled.
Speaker 17: To this right makes makes absolutely no sense. And there
Speaker 17: I think there's strategies to run out the clock. Yeah,
Speaker 17: because we've only got three and a half years left
Speaker 17: of this administration. Who knows what will happen in twenty
Speaker 17: twenty eight, and this is going to a head about
Speaker 17: the judicial branch and the executive branch, and it is
Speaker 17: possible that you might see a point where the executive
Speaker 17: branch doesn't comply with an order, and that is going
Speaker 17: to be the so called constitutional crisis.
Speaker 3: Now, Steven Miller, who you just heard from there, is
Speaker 3: in line to be elevated to President Trump's next National
Speaker 3: security advisor. Mike Waltz was ousted from the role last week.
Speaker 3: This is a move that would be enormously popular with
Speaker 3: the Trump based Kosher Stephen Miller is very well regarded.
Speaker 17: Indeed, he is the OG when it comes to immigration.
Speaker 17: This very strong, legally, very smart lawyer, really seems to
Speaker 17: believe in this issue. There's all these means how the
Speaker 17: Trump administration in his orbit inner circle, we're plotting for
Speaker 17: four years about their return and what they'll do. And
Speaker 17: he's always at the top of that as somebody who
Speaker 17: just came up in strategy exactly what statutes are going
Speaker 17: to rely, exactly what eeos are going to do. And
Speaker 17: he understands that immigration and border security is national security.
Speaker 17: That is one of the core tenets of it. And
Speaker 17: so him if he is elevated to that position, I
Speaker 17: think it's going to bring a very interesting flavor.
Speaker 3: Now, the met gala was on earlier today, and naturally
Speaker 3: there were scenes of violence, with anti Israeli activists attacking
Speaker 3: pro Israeli activists and Kosher. One of the attendees of
Speaker 3: this seventy thousand dollars ahead get together was Kamala Harris.
Speaker 10: Now.
Speaker 3: She was wearing an outfit described thusly by Vanity Fair,
Speaker 3: a bespoke black and cream silk off white dress featuring
Speaker 3: color blocking and a dramatic trailing sleeve, as well as
Speaker 3: a black scarf that doubled as a diminutive train for
Speaker 3: the look. It's also been compared to the iconic New
Speaker 3: York favorite dessert, the black and white cookie. That's a
Speaker 3: bit harsh. On a more serious note, Kosher, Kamala Harris
Speaker 3: is positioning herself to write again, and the polls show
Speaker 3: that out of that very shallow talent pool, she is
Speaker 3: the front runner at the moment.
Speaker 17: In her defense, she's not an unattractive lady, so I
Speaker 17: think I probably would have done one more fitting with address.
Speaker 17: But I think the black and white can look quite elegant,
Speaker 17: so I think she just maybe missed the mark a
Speaker 17: little bit.
Speaker 8: But it wasn't terrible she is a front runner.
Speaker 17: I think it's recency biased, just because she was in
Speaker 17: the limelight, you know, for such a long period of time,
Speaker 17: and was elevated to that role once things get serious
Speaker 17: eighteen months or so from now, two years from now,
Speaker 17: and you're going to see the likes of Gavin Newsom
Speaker 17: or Josh Shapiro or Wetchend Whitmer, other people Mark Kelly
Speaker 17: throw their hats into the ring. I think all of
Speaker 17: that's going to recalibrate, and nobody can forget that she
Speaker 17: has never won anything anytime she's run for any election
Speaker 17: other than DA and Senator in California.
Speaker 8: But that's kind of a foregone conclusion.
Speaker 3: If you're done well, yeah, if you've got a D
Speaker 3: next to your name, Ananimate carbon Rod can get elected.
Speaker 3: Before you go, let's talk a little bit about Prince
Speaker 3: Harry has been busy trying to write history.
Speaker 1: You accuse members of your family of racism. You don't
Speaker 1: even well of the British press said that, right.
Speaker 8: I did. Megan never mention the races.
Speaker 7: She said there were troubling comments about about his skin color, right.
Speaker 16: Concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be
Speaker 16: when he's born.
Speaker 8: What who is having that conversation? There is a conversation
Speaker 8: to hold up the several conversations.
Speaker 16: There's a conversation with you with Harry about how dark
Speaker 16: your baby is going to be?
Speaker 3: Yes, Harry and Meghan made that a major theme of
Speaker 3: their Docco reality series is really what it was kosher?
Speaker 3: Now they want to claim it was all the work
Speaker 3: of the evil media, that they were just talking about
Speaker 3: unconscious bias. I mean these cement games they're playing, No
Speaker 3: one's falling for it.
Speaker 8: No one's falling for it.
Speaker 17: There is a blueprint for it, whether it's everybody pretending
Speaker 17: that nobody knew about Joe Biden's mental decline or this.
Speaker 17: They tend to memory hold things and think we're not
Speaker 17: paying attention. We live in the day and age of
Speaker 17: videotape and social media, and that footage over there is
Speaker 17: never going to be forgotten, both what she said and
Speaker 17: Oprah's bad acting, which is like what nobody's gonna never
Speaker 17: forget that.
Speaker 8: And he can try to rewrite history all he wants,
Speaker 8: It's not going to.
Speaker 3: Work, kosher. Thank you so much for your time, colociator.
Speaker 3: Still to come, the Star Studed musical featuring a black
Speaker 3: actress portraying Jesus. Alex steins up next Welcome back now
Speaker 3: the usual suspects, the Democrats and their propaganda round. The
Speaker 3: bulk of the mainstream media had another meltdown over this
Speaker 3: amusing image of President Donald Trump as the next Pope,
Speaker 3: obviously a little bit of fun and frivolity thanks to
Speaker 3: the Wonders of AI. Acording to some, it's hugely offensive
Speaker 3: to Catholics.
Speaker 17: See Catholics, we're not so happy about the image of
Speaker 17: you looking like the Pope.
Speaker 4: Oh, I see.
Speaker 14: You mean they can't take a joke. You don't mean
Speaker 14: the Catholics, You mean the fake news media, not the
Speaker 14: Catholics loved it. I had nothing to do with it.
Speaker 14: Somebody made up a picture of me dressed like the
Speaker 14: Pope and they put it out on the internet.
Speaker 3: Johnny me Now is comedian and host of Primetime with
Speaker 3: Alex Stein on Blas tav Alex, you're a Christian? Were
Speaker 3: you offended by that image? Do you know many Catholics
Speaker 3: who are outraged by that image?
Speaker 1: Well, a lot of people don't know this.
Speaker 18: You know, my last name is Stein, but I was
Speaker 18: actually raised as a Christian. I was baptized and you
Speaker 18: know what, as a Christian, that is not disrespectful whatsoever.
Speaker 18: It is satire. And I honestly believe that, you know,
Speaker 18: Donald Trump, he knew all about it, and I think
Speaker 18: he was trying to position himself a little bit because
Speaker 18: I don't think there are any actual prerequisites to be
Speaker 18: the Pope.
Speaker 1: So could you imagine Pope.
Speaker 18: Donald Trump, the world would actually it might actually get
Speaker 18: fixed pretty quick. If that was the case.
Speaker 3: I can't see that happening. Yeah, maybe after his presidency
Speaker 3: he can turn his hand to being the next Pope. Now,
Speaker 3: there may be a few Christians who are offended by
Speaker 3: this next production, and I'm tipping that's what the creators
Speaker 3: are hoping for. This isn't just fun and frivolity, is it.
Speaker 3: You got Adam Lambert joining the Castle of Jesus Christ
Speaker 3: Superstar the Hollywood Ball playing Judas, and guess who is
Speaker 3: playing Jesus. It's Cynthia Arrevo. That sounds like fun, Alexa,
Speaker 3: Will you be making a trip to Hollywood for Opening Night?
Speaker 8: No way.
Speaker 18: It's like Dylan Mulvaney's book, Nobody's going to go see
Speaker 18: this play? Nobody by Dylan Mulvaney's book, I mean, it
Speaker 18: is going to get covered by you know, Sky News,
Speaker 18: Fox News, the liberal media because it is interesting. But really,
Speaker 18: I don't think that anybody actually wants to go see
Speaker 18: that horrible production. So Jesus Christ Superstar being extra gay
Speaker 18: and extra DEI I mean, give me a break. I
Speaker 18: just do not think people are going to be clamoring.
Speaker 10: Up for that.
Speaker 18: And you consider over half the country likes Donald Trump,
Speaker 18: so over half the country is not going to like
Speaker 18: it regardless, So I really don't see it being a
Speaker 18: financial success.
Speaker 3: Now. Rapper and music mogul Sean P. Did He Combs
Speaker 3: was in court for jury selection Todays. He's facing five
Speaker 3: criminal counts, including sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion,
Speaker 3: transportation for purposes of prostitution, and racketeering conspiracy Alex. If
Speaker 3: he's ultimately found guilty, he may never see the outside
Speaker 3: of a jail cell again. He may die behind bars.
Speaker 18: No, and that is a sad reality that is probably
Speaker 18: going to happen. And listen, I am not on Puff
Speaker 18: Daddy's side whatsoever. The tape of him beating his fiance
Speaker 18: at the time is absolutely disgusting, but it is absolutely
Speaker 18: crazy to think that Puff Daddy is going to go
Speaker 18: to jail for sex trafficking, for throwing parties people all
Speaker 18: willingly went to, you know, influential people went to these parties,
Speaker 18: you know, similar to these Epstein parties. So there's just
Speaker 18: a lot of weird stuff at play, and it's kind
Speaker 18: of sad that, you know, a guy that was once
Speaker 18: arguably the top rapper, top producer, you know, in the
Speaker 18: entire industry, is now going to potentially, you know, die
Speaker 18: behind bars. It's just a very tragic story and I
Speaker 18: don't even think Hollywood could have written it.
Speaker 3: Well it's a self inflicted tragedy. But you're right, there
Speaker 3: were a lot of high profile, very famous people who
Speaker 3: attended these parties. Are we expecting to hear any of
Speaker 3: those names in course? Are they fearful of what may
Speaker 3: be revealed throughout this trial?
Speaker 18: I mean, I would think that they would be very nervous.
Speaker 18: You saw Jay Z going after you know, Tony Bobbolenski
Speaker 18: and you know Tony Buzzby. I forget the Texas attorney,
Speaker 18: but I'm just saying there's a lot of influential celebrities
Speaker 18: that could go down with the ship. And I know
Speaker 18: that they want tucked auty to take some sort of
Speaker 18: deal so that he doesn't have to actually go to court.
Speaker 18: So but that he knows that, he knows that he
Speaker 18: has a little negotiating power, and that's why he hasn't
Speaker 18: accepted the plea deal, because he knows that he can.
Speaker 18: You know, he knows where the berries are bodied, he
Speaker 18: knows where the bodies are buried, you know, metaphorically.
Speaker 3: Well, I hope that's just a metaphor, Alex. He's alleged
Speaker 3: to have taped so much of this debauchery, so you
Speaker 3: do wonder what is out there, what the police FBI
Speaker 3: have in custody, and if it features some of the
Speaker 3: famous people that we know attended these parties. Now, let's
Speaker 3: lighten things up a tad with this amusing story told
Speaker 3: by former Alabama football coach the Great Nick Saban about
Speaker 3: what happened in the Oval office.
Speaker 4: He's got this very big, good looking auspicious box on
Speaker 4: his desk that has a red button on top. And
Speaker 4: one of the players said, is that what you want
Speaker 4: some missiles with? And he said, well push it and
Speaker 4: find out what player said, No, I don't want to
Speaker 4: do that. He said, go ahead, go ahead, go ahead,
Speaker 4: push it. See see what happens. Find out. So Rashaun
Speaker 4: Evans finally got the guts up, went over, pushed the
Speaker 4: red button. Some lady came in with a coke on
Speaker 4: a tree.
Speaker 3: Oh, we're getting all these amusing stories. We've got people
Speaker 3: within the football fraternity. You are no longer terrified of
Speaker 3: being associated with Trump, being pictured with Trump. It's a
Speaker 3: very different dynamic than just a few years ago during
Speaker 3: his first term.
Speaker 18: Now and Rita, I graduated from LSU Louisiana State University,
Speaker 18: and you know, so it tells you that I'm not
Speaker 18: the smartest guy in the world, but Alabama's our rival.
Speaker 18: And even though that I detest Alabama, hearing this story
Speaker 18: and hearing you know, you know, coach Shaban talking about
Speaker 18: how they thought it was so funny, and Trump basically
Speaker 18: trolled the Rashawn Evans or the player to press the button,
Speaker 18: thinking that he was going to start nuclear war. I
Speaker 18: love it. I'm so happy that he rolled Alabama.
Speaker 1: This is the president we wanted.
Speaker 18: Joe Biden doesn't have that sense of humor. Joe Biden
Speaker 18: doesn't have any funny, funny buttons or gimmicks to play
Speaker 18: on the Alabama Crimson tie So that's why we love
Speaker 18: Donald Trump, because he's a man of you know, pizazz
Speaker 18: in style and Greece.
Speaker 3: I love that the players still press that button, even
Speaker 3: suspecting that it could launch some sort of a nuclear
Speaker 3: weapon somewhere. He still was curious enough to press to
Speaker 3: press the button. Now, finally, I know Americans think that
Speaker 3: Australia is just full of deadly creatures. You have no
Speaker 3: idea how we survived day to day, and this next
Speaker 3: story might just reinforce that IDEA South Australian family has
Speaker 3: helped rescue eight great white shark that was stuck in
Speaker 3: shallow waters. These pictures are quite remarkable. Three locals teamed
Speaker 3: up with a nash core and his eleven year old
Speaker 3: son to move this three meter long shark, the deadly
Speaker 3: shark there is a great white into deep water and
Speaker 3: savor Alex. This story is peak Australia, isn't it.
Speaker 18: I know Ozzie's are just fearless, and that's why a
Speaker 18: lot of Americans I think we like Ozzie's and we
Speaker 18: get along so well because they're kind of just like
Speaker 18: people from Florida. They're insane. They're willing to save a
Speaker 18: shark This is a typical, you know, occurrence that happens
Speaker 18: in the state of Florida. So there's a lot of
Speaker 18: similarities and that's why, you know, listen, when you see
Speaker 18: on TikTok those big spiders though, read it. That is scary.
Speaker 18: We see that in America and we think there's all
Speaker 18: these big spiders. But everybody talks about how great Australia is.
Speaker 1: So I need to be there.
Speaker 18: I'm going to be there at twenty five.
Speaker 3: The spiders a big and wonderful, can't waite. Alex Stein,
Speaker 3: thank you, And that's all the time we've got. I'll
Speaker 3: see you tomorrow night at eleven. Up next it's Newsnight.