WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 24 April

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>On scorn Lives Australia.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 2>This is the Wider Penalty Show.

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panety Show coming

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 3>up tonight, Senator for Team of Payments humiliating social media foil.

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 3>The panel will be with me to discuss that and

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 3>plenty more. Shortly, we'll look at the state of the

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 3>media in the US.

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>We trust in the mainstream media plummeting to new Low's

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and later in the.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Hour we'll look at which Hollywood A listers are caught

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 3>up in the black Lively justin Baldoni, legal staush and

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 3>left is Losing. It features plenty of hate and bile

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 3>from the unhinch Left.

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 4>Mac the lightis get a reddit a Coma, the welcomer

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 4>becut the road here.

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 5>We'll check here, but they won't check out.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's start with the Labor candidate for the seat of Dixon.

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Ally France is the radical left to selected to take

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 3>on Peter Dutton. She has run against Stutton previously and

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 3>she's active on social media and has been for years.

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Let's check out some of her work.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 3>She reposted this image on x depicting Peter Dutton as

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 3>a Nazi charming in twenty eighteen, she reposted this commentary

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 3>from John Sedka, where he says Dutton is racist, and

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 3>just two years.

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Ago she posted a link to a.

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Story claiming that Peter Dutton would cut the NDIS budget

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 3>to pay for nuclear submarines, labeling him a monster. Now,

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 3>the PM was asked today about all this, and he

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 3>said that Ali France is an extraordinary human.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 6>Ailey France is an extraordinary Australian And I don't know

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 6>what your toy to like more than a decade ago

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 6>or what have you.

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:47.559
<v Speaker 7>I have no idea.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 6>She is an outstanding human being.

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now for more on this is Institute of

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Public Affairs Senior Fellow and chief Economist Adam Crichton and

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Menzie's Reach Search Center Senior fellow Nick came, Adam, I'll

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 3>start with you.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>That's not everything.

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Back in twenty sixteen, she realposted a comment on x saying, Wow,

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the Turnbull government is backing and openly racist apartheid regime

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 3>ahead of the US and New Zealand. This was in

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 3>reference to Israel. And they're an increasing number of labor

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 3>MP's and candidates, Adam, who look like they'd be quite

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 3>comfortable sitting in the Greens.

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look, certainly that's true.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 7>I mean, for me, one of the salient facts from

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 7>this campaign, it's just a number of extremists in the

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 7>Labor Party who are standing four seats that they could

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 7>actually win. And there's this real strong anti Israel street

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 7>that I never thought really existed in the rank and

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 7>file of the Labor Party so much it clearly does.

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 7>It's very disappointing. But just the other point I'd make

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 7>is I somewhat agree with the Prime Minister when he says,

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, tweets from a long time ago, we shouldn't

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 7>focus on them too much. I mean, I'm sure we've

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 7>all tweeted stupid things in the past or things that

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 7>we regret. I probably have, and I think it's one

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 7>of the that quality of people don't go into politics

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 7>as they're just terrified that there's something they've done in

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 7>the past that will struck them out.

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a good point, but Nick, we're not talking

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 3>about just a decade ago. There's a posts from just

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago where she's calling Peter Dutton

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 3>a monster. Now we hear a lot about being divisive,

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 3>dehumanizing language that sounds like a fairly dehumanizing language in

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 3>my book.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm not prepared to make excuses for this woman,

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 6>as Adam seems to be. I'm speaking as a man

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 6>of course, with an absolutely clear Facebook and Twitter record,

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 6>because I hardly use the things. But all classes people

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 6>aren't they They completely lack any originality whatsoever, outcome the same

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 6>old things, the Nazi tweets, the Hitler stuff, the racist stuff.

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 6>Does anybody actually take any of this seriously? Does it

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 6>mean anything to the ordinary voters in the seed of

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 6>Dixon who will make their decisions based on much more

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 6>grounded things like the cost of living and the cost

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 6>of fuel and everything else, and that they know Peter

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 6>Dutton and his character has been a member for that

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 6>seat for more than twenty years. I think it's all

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 6>a bit of a sideshow, except, as Adam rightly points out,

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 6>it does give us an insight into the sort of

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 6>people who are joining the Labor Party now presumably joining

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 6>Labor rather than the Greens, because they quite like the

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 6>idea that they may one day get into government, which

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 6>is not a luxury you enjoying the Greens Party, But

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 6>you know they are way way out there on the

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 6>fruit cake fringe and you can see how Albnizi has

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 6>so easily allowed the party to be dragged to an

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 6>anti Israel stance in a quite a horrible manner, probably

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 6>one of the most disastrous things that have happened under

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 6>this government, and.

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 3>It's happening right in his seat when you look at

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 3>his preferences. We reported last night on the Prime Minister

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 3>finding himself in a preferencing scandal, with Green's candidate Hannah

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Thomas being listed as number two on the PM's how

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 3>to Vote card, despite the fact that she has blockaded

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 3>his offers, claimed Israel is guilty of genocide, and has

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 3>demanded the Prime Minister blacklists the only Jewish state and

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 3>expel its ambassador from Australia. She's held up signs like

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 3>this at pro Palestinian rallies, and The Australian reports today

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 3>that Hannah Thomas was part of a long running protest

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 3>outside Anthony alban Albanese electorate office. The protest was labeled

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 3>appalling by the Prime Minister. He said it has no

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 3>place in a democracy. Nick Anthony Albanezi refuses to change

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 3>or even explain this how to vote card he has

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 3>rewarded here a radical activist for her radical activism. It's

0:05:55.160 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 3>hard to take his claims seriously about how bad these

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 3>protests are for democracy when he's put her number two

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 3>on his ticket.

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 6>It's hard to take anything that comes out about Neal's

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 6>mouth seriously right now. But I mean his idea, his

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 6>attempt at nonchalance. You know, oh, this is nothing to

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 6>do with me. You know, I don't even know this

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 6>woman's name. I mean, do you really believe that? That's

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 6>a very unconvincing story. But he also came out yesterday

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 6>and said, well, of course, you know, I'm above preferences

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 6>because I don't need preferences to be elected. I was

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 6>elected on fifty three percent of the vote last time round,

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 6>as if preferences are for lesser human beings. But I'll

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 6>tell you what he should be careful because when he

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 6>was elected to parliament in nineteen ninety six, there were

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 6>eighty five MPs in Parliament who didn't need to go

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 6>to preferences. In the last election, there are only fifteen.

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 6>Every seat is getting unless and less safe. The electorate

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 6>is very, very volatile, and I think the voters you

0:06:57.800 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 6>take for granted are the ones that they are going

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 6>to come round and dammaghue in the end.

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Now someone who was a labor senator. They were very

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 3>proud of her before they chucked her out of the

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 3>party senator for Team payment of WA. She's been mocked

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 3>online for appearing to use AI to come up with

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 3>a tweet to rile up those on the right and

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 3>generate some online activity, and it seems like she's forgotten

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 3>to delete the AI prompt from the post that she

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 3>ended up sharing on x Let's have a look at

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 3>how she apparently asked AI. I don't know if it's

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>chat gp grock what she has used here to write

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 3>her a post that would trigger right wing nut jobs.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Here's the full tweet as it appeared. Apologies for the confusion.

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Here's an example of a bait tweet to drive engagement

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 3>from right wing nut jobs.

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>R wnjays.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 3>For Team of payment tied of politics, as you also

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 3>are mine. That's why I'm standing with Australia's Voice for

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Climate Action, housing and real change? Are you with us?

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Hashtag ospol So the whole thing went up, Adam, Is

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 3>she genuinely that clueless? Is this some sort of I

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 3>don't know, performative art. Is it some sort of a troll.

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I do recall a few weeks back she

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 3>was praising the Iranian regime for its treatment of women,

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know, maybe she really is just that clueless.

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think this gets back to my point earlier

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 7>about the quality of people going into politics for whatever

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 7>reason and has fallen a great deal. And this is

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 7>just an extraordinary example of incompetence, and not just not

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 7>just at a personal level. For her, it's presumably, you know,

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 7>it's her Twitter account, but as a senator, she gets

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 7>four to six staff paid for by the taxpayer, all

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 7>on good money, and actually you know she probably gets

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 7>extra personal staff as well, So I don't really know

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 7>how this got through. They're obviously incompetent as well her staff.

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 7>They should be kind of watching what she's tweeting, or

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 7>at least overseas. So look, it's just a sad indictment

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 7>of the astrology is just one more.

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 3>The only smart thing that they did, her team or

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 3>herself was responsible for this was not deleting, because once

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 3>you delete, you confirm precisely what's happened.

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's an admission of guilt.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Nick, I mean, we are laughing at this we're mocking this,

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 3>but she's in the Australian Senate, just sitting in the

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 3>upper House. And you do wonder why Labor selected her

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 3>of all the candidates that had available to them.

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>They were very.

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Proud to have a young Muslim woman in a h

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 3>jab in the Senate, and I wonder if she wasn't

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 3>wearing a hi jab whether she would have been selected.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, she seems unable even to think up a

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 6>very short insult. She has to get the computers rolling

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 6>to do one for her. I mean, it's extraordinary. It's

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 6>not I It's Shakespeare or anything, is it. You know,

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 6>it is very very low grade stuff. And it just

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 6>goes to the fact that these are not serious people whatsoever.

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 6>How they got into the Senate, Well, they got in

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 6>through preference deals, didn't they. I mean nobody but that

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 6>many Greens and Senators straight off. She just slips in

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 6>on the back of lazy preference deels from Labor and others.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 6>And it's an absolute disgrace. I mean, you remember that

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 6>the description of the Senate as unrepresentative, swill I think

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 6>it's even even more unrepresentative than ever before.

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, one of poor Keating's great lines there. We do

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 3>miss some of his gems.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>And now I wanted to get your.

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Thoughts on this piece from Robert gob Leeson in the

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Australian newspaper today on Donald Trump's tariff strategy.

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>He writes that today I.

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Deliver controversial but underlying good news. There is an economic

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 3>justification for what Trump is doing.

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>He is not mad.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Behind the Trump tariffs and the country to country discussions

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 3>are serious global economic and defense issues which are rarely discussed.

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 3>As the economic burdens on America grow with global GDP

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 3>outpacing American GDP, America is finding it more difficult to

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 3>underwrite global security. The US wants its defense burden reduced

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 3>by increased expenditure from those benefiting from the American security umbrella.

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 3>This includes Australia. Nick, he is stating the absolute obvious there,

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 3>but it is obvious points that have seemed to be

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 3>lost on so many commentators. This is something Donald Trump

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 3>campaigned on, is something has spoken about for decades. It

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 3>should come as no surprise now whether you back this

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 3>or not, this is very much part of his America

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 3>First strategy.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm looking forward to hearing Adam's analysis of this.

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 6>Is a much more accomplished economist than I am. But

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 6>it's seems to me that that yes something. As Robert

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 6>Cobb leaves some points out, there are many challenges to

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 6>the US economy going forward. One is to maintain its

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 6>position as the reserve currency. Fine, we understand that, but

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 6>I don't think this blood instrument of tariffs is going

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 6>to get there. Yes, we shouldn't be surprised. This is

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 6>what Trump said from the beginning. We should have taken

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 6>him seriously. But I'm far from convinced this is a

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 6>way or that this sort of this sort of cartoony

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 6>picture that we point about we paint of the blue

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.599
<v Speaker 6>collar American workers out of a job, put out of

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 6>a job by China. It's all too simplistic and one

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 6>sided for me. I mean, American consumers, like consumers here,

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 6>have benefited enormously from cheap Chinese goods that we would

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 6>have been able to make in such quantities ourselves. So yeah,

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, this tariff's good. You know free trade bad

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 6>is it's certainly not good for Australia. And I'll leave

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 6>it to Adam to put some economic flesh on the

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 6>bones on that argument.

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, economists Stone like Tariff's Adam. But the failure is

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 3>of globalization cannot be overlooked.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>This is something that JD.

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Vans has spoken about extensively, certainly Donald Trump. They have

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 3>seen American manufacturing decimated. And this notion that you can

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 3>get developing countries to make things cheaply whilst more advanced

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 3>countries just come up with the innovation. It hasn't worked

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 3>out that way. The developing countries very quickly work out

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 3>how the innovation works. And that especially when you've got

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 3>a country like China that just steals the intellectual property,

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 3>that is a rogue economic superpower now that doesn't play

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 3>by the rules.

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, look, certainly, I think overall I agree with Nick,

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 7>but you've got to look at the distribution of economic

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 7>growth over time too. And this is kind of going

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 7>to your point. So the US has experienced, you know,

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 7>dramatic GDP per capita growth overall, but amongst certain communities,

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 7>the communities that vote for Donald Trump, the cheap TVs

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 7>and radios and iPhones, they just don't compensate for the

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 7>loss of dignity from a job, and it often leads

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 7>to abuse and even death in some cases. And these

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 7>communities are decimated. They're very angry. Okay, they've got cheap stuff,

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 7>but actually they're probably rather more expensive stuff at a job.

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 7>Although I don't think these tariffs will necessarily work, but

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 7>the US is going to try to bring back some jobs.

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 7>It'll probably bring bring back some manufacturing jobs. I don't

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 7>think it'll bring back many, but let's just wait and see.

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean, the elites have been wrong about pretty much

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 7>everything over the last ten years, so they've formed a

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 7>consensus that this is a disaster. Well, it probably won't

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 7>be a disaster. Then if they think it's going to

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 7>be a disaster, all a focus on the stock market

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 7>in the media. Trump supporters couldn't care less about the

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 7>stock market. They don't own any shares. They're poor people.

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 7>Most people that arewn stocks vote Democrats, so I don't

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 7>think that's much of a problem. You know. The one

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 7>other point that I would make, and I think it's missed,

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 7>is that I think this is just a revenue raising

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 7>exercise to some extent. The only way that the US

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 7>can reduce its extraordinary deficit is by imposing tariffs. Because

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 7>the Congress is never going to increase taxes. It will

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 7>not pass a law to increase taxes. But the president

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 7>he's got one lever and that is tariffs that he

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 7>can unilaterally increase these tariffs even at a ten percent

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 7>rate on everything. It's three hundred billion dollars a year.

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 7>It's a lot of money.

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of money.

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 7>So it will help close that gap. And if you're

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 7>not going to close the gap, or how else you're

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 7>going to close the gap, So you've got to think

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 7>of some other way, whether you cut spending or whether

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 7>you increase other taxes. But there will be a financial

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 7>collapse otherwise, So they have to do something.

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 3>They have to do something. And what we're looking at

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 3>this massive economic realignment. It is a medium to long

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 3>term projector, and people are expecting results within days or

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 3>a week.

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>That is not just reasonable. Rule out.

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 7>It's not been idealized.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>No, and there has been a lot of.

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 7>What's going on. That's it to say different things, But look,

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 7>we do have to wait and see. As you say,

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 7>your core point is, you know we're only a few

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 7>months into this presidency. Let's give it three years at least.

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, and we talked about the Trump voters not really

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 3>being too concerned about the share market fluctuations, and something

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 3>like the bottom fifty percent in the US only hold

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 3>around one percent of those shares, so it is not

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 3>a huge concern. And there's this been representation in the

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 3>media that you know, Trump's there for the billionaires and

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the top end of.

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 7>Town, and opposite has been the case.

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, and that has been the case for now for

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 3>several years, where those who are the most affluent are

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 3>increasingly voting left and those who are working class aspirational

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 3>are voting right.

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm seeing that right here flipped.

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 7>They've completely I don't think they've flipped as much here yet.

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 7>Now in the US they have completely flipped basically, And

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 7>actually the liberals here have to work out whether they're

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 7>going to be a working class party or not. I

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 7>still think they try to have their feeding beatin yes.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's why they're failing.

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that is precisely why they're failing, because you

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 3>can't be all things to all people. And I think

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 3>their desperation to win back a few of those till

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 3>seats in the affluent in the suburbs has completely nick

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 3>frustrated their messaging and their ability to come up with

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 3>policies that clearly differentiate them from labor to be bold,

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 3>to be strong on these policies because they know some

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 3>of that retric is not going to be popular in

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 3>the affluent inner suburbs, but it will be very popular

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 3>in the outer suburbs and in regional areas.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, the politicians are going to be successful

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 6>in this modern era of those that are able to

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 6>straddle that divide between the university educated, largely in a

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 6>metropolitan elite, and ordinary practical people who do other jobs

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 6>for a living. So you know, we all know what

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 6>that divide is. We all know how hard it is

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 6>increasingly hard to bridge that divide because they seem to

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 6>want quite opposite things in many regards. I think when

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 6>the ships are down, know that certainly not alban Easy

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 6>or Dunton have managed to do that. Whether it can

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 6>be done, I don't know. I'm beginning to doubt whether

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 6>we end up with a political system here which really

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 6>has essentially two parties nominally on the center right, like

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 6>much of Europe does. Who knows where this goes, but

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 6>right now they're both at historic lows on primary votes

0:17:58.960 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 6>and that's the reason.

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Now let's go to the UK and Prime Minister Keir

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Starmer has finally admitted that a woman.

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Is a biological female.

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 3>It took a ruling from the UK Supreme Court for

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 3>him to have enough courage to say this, do you

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 3>believe a trans woman is a woman?

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 8>Look? I think the Supreme Court has answered that question.

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 8>But I think look, a woman is an adult female,

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 8>and the Court has made that absolutely clear. I actually

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 8>welcome the judgment because I think it gives real clarity.

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 8>It allows those that have got a drop guidance to

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 8>be really clear about what that guidance should say.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Nick has changed his churn.

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't too long ago when he was claiming that

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 3>some women have a penis and some don't have a cervix,

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:49.199
<v Speaker 3>and he was very, very confused when that question was

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 3>put to him.

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Now he's very clear.

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it seems astonishing that a grown man needs

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 3>a Supreme Court ruling to know something a child understands.

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 6>Think all this over complicated, reader, I don't get it.

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 6>This man's got a doctrinate in law, I think from

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 6>Oxford University. I believe you'd have thought that he would

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 6>have enough knowledge of the world at his age to

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 6>come to that conclusion that about what a woman was

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 6>long before the Supreme Court had to pass a ruling

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 6>on it. I don't know whether it's just being a

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 6>lawyer or whatever it is. I mean, I don't think

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 6>the guy is stupid. I think they're just so caught

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 6>up with this narrative and so frightened of their own shadows,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 6>so frightened of being criticized by this quite rabid, mad

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 6>radical group of zelots that have been pushing this particular

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 6>line that I just don't think they have the courage

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 6>to to stand up against the trend. But anyway, anyway,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 6>thank goodness for the Supreme Court ruling, and thank goodness

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 6>the Prime minist for Great Britain has accepted it.

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's good to see he's accepted it. But I

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 3>do recall when Peter Dutton was a this question after

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 3>that Supreme Court.

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Ruling, he kind of dodged it.

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 3>He really just did not want to talk about it.

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 3>He said, it's not an issue for us, it's for

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 3>the UK. It is an issue for us because the

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 3>very same narratives, the very same activism and bullying that's happening,

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 3>is happening right here. In fact, I would argue Australia

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 3>is considerably worse because we really haven't had the debate

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 3>because our conservative politicians have been to Gutlass to take

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 3>a position on this.

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 7>The only comments that I'd make there is just firstly

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 7>the mere fact the UK Prime Minister is even talking

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 7>about this sort of stuff. Just where the best is

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 7>right now?

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 10>Really?

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>What must China and Russia?

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 7>And you know, veryou do.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 3>You imagine Vladimir Putin being asked this? Can you imagine

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Vladimir Putin being asked, you know, can women.

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Have a penis?

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean this was a question that has been posed

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 3>to Kirstarmer in the past.

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 7>You've just said it into silliness and just I'm really

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 7>surprised he didn't see it on that question and be

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 7>empactic because it's such an easy wind and politics. Maybe

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 7>ninety percent of people don't think transfermtter women. Yeah, so

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 7>why not go with that? Win some votes on cultural

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 7>issues which at least don't you know, they don't cost

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 7>a budget anything, so go with them.

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is one of the reasons I don't understand

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 3>why the Coalition hasn't really leaned into the so called

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 3>culture wars, because one they're on solid ground.

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>The majority is with them. Just about every one of them,

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and two, they don't cost.

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Billions, and we are facing a record debt. We're in

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 3>a cost of living crisis. So if he makes some

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 3>promises based on values as opposed to spending, I think

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 3>that's a win win. Now, before you two go, we're

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 3>going to have to talk about Prince Harry and the

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 3>deepening rift with.

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>His father, King Charles.

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 3>This is the court case over the removal of police

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 3>protection for Prince Harry. A royal inside has told us

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Weekly this has been terrible for Harry's relationship with Charles.

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Harry blames Charles.

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 3>And thinks he can intervene, but Charles can't, and it

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 3>just continues Harry's narrative that he's been cast at Adam.

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 3>This ginger winder is just a victim. He's just an

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 3>endless victim.

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Iman. He's just got the most. Really, he is blessed.

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 3>He's got a wife who's got two healthy kids. He's

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 3>got this insane lifestyle based on I don't know, just

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 3>the luck of his birth. It's not like he's doing

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 3>a great deal of work to justify here. The millions

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 3>is earning, and yet all we see from him is

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 3>endless winging.

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 7>Look, look that is true, I think he's lost a

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 7>great deal of respect in the UK and around the world.

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 7>But I must say the more broad point is when

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 7>I'm asked about the Royals on TV, I never really

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 7>know what to say, and it kind of makes you

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 7>want to be a Republican. Oh no, God, for the

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I voted for the monarchy in back in

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 7>ninety nine nine, my first vote. But these stories, I'm like,

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 7>oh my god, this family about Nick.

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Does it make you feel like a Republican when King

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Charles or Prince Harry's names I mentioned.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 7>Quite the opposite.

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 6>When you see the human frailties of the royal family

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 6>and the people in and around the monarch, you know,

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 6>it just shows the stability of the system that it

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 6>endures all this because it is bigger than the individuals,

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 6>and I think that and the monarch is not above

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 6>the law. So I think it's a wonderful system. It's

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 6>lasted a long time. I wish sometimes that some of

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 6>the members of the royal family would use their profile

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 6>for better and more positive purposes than this. But frankly,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 6>as a father, I think I just find it tragic

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 6>that a relationship can break down like this and seemingly

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 6>be irrepaarable, apparently because of the foolish behavior of one person.

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, are you blaming this entirely on Megan Mark? Are

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 3>you because I think Prince Harry, I think escapes a

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of the blame. This is a man who's forty

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 3>years old, who's abandoned his family, who's aired his dirty laundry,

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 3>who has just behaved appallingly. And because I don't know,

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Meghan is seen as more unpleasant than he is, she

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 3>cops all the blame and he kind of scapes through.

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 6>I wasn't blaming Meghan. He is, as you say, he

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 6>is a forty year old man. He is responsible for

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 6>his own actions and if he's surely driven by his wife,

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 6>and that's a pathetic excuse.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Adam, Kricht and Nikota, thank you so much for

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 3>your time tonight. Still to Karma, Left is losing our class.

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 10>We'll look at the state of the media in the US.

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 3>We trust in the mainstream media plumbers into new Low's.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 10>Adam Coleman joins me, next, you're.

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Watching the readA Panny Show, and it's time for Left

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 3>is losing it And let's start with a particularly toxic

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 3>brand of Christianity that appears to be devoid of God

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 3>and goodness but full.

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Of hate and loathing.

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Here is Atlanta preacher and far left lunatic Jamal Bryant

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 3>dehumanizing half the country by calling Republicans roaches.

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Roachers only start running when you turn the lights on

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 2>at long and the lights are out, They're gonna be

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 2>comfortable eating your sirih'll y'all ain't say nothing clamoring in

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 2>your cupboard. But when you turn the light on, all

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 2>the roachs gotta start moving. I came to give a warning,

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Ela must The light is getting ready.

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 4>To come on, Donald Trump, the light is getting ready

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 4>to come on, shakey fast. The light is getting ready

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 4>to come on, Macca. The light is get ready to

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 4>come on. The welcome because the road jet built check gear,

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 4>but they won't check out. The lights are coming on.

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 3>Really, we need to seriously consider making asylums great again.

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And in case he.

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Thought this was an isolated incident, this preacher is notorious

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 3>for bile filled race faiting rants.

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 5>I feel bad for them than the White House who

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 5>are in the tap dancing for Massa. When bot tie

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 5>shinnen and grinned, laughing like nothing that funny.

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I ain't a freed of the spooks that said at

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the door, these runaway slaves hiding in the White House.

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Talking about race obsess simpletons. Let's hear from singer John Legend.

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>First, he says he wants Trump to be the comforter.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 3>In chief, like the leader of the free world is

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be some sort of therapist for lefties losing it.

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 3>And then he goes into a demented die tribe about

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:58.959
<v Speaker 3>white supremacy.

0:26:59.040 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Your comforter.

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 4>You know, why do you think that.

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 11>He's latched onto diversity so much?

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh, he's a bigot.

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 12>So it's a belief that there's a hierarchy of racial

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 12>groups and that his group is superior, genetically superior. He

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 12>believes that whenever he talks about competence and qualifications, any

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 12>white man will do for him. Look at the last

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 12>guy who was Secretary of defens He was a four

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 12>star general, supremely qualified black man. And then see who

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 12>he puts in after him. That's the level of bigotry

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 12>that he has. Any white man is better than that.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>What a contemptible liar he is.

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 3>You want to know why America is divided, it's clowns

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 3>like him, and talking about clowns, it's been a while

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 3>since we heard from this dude. Dylan Mulvainey now claims

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 3>that he told his mother he was born in the

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 3>wrong body when he was just four.

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 13>Came out to my mom at age four as a

0:27:55.680 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 13>girl and what did you say? I said, I think

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 13>God made a mistake and put a boy into a

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 13>girl into a boy's body. And you know, she said,

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 13>God doesn't make mistakes. But you know a number of

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 13>years later, we made it to where we need it

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 13>to be. Now, what's shere? As journalists?

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Natalie Winters well and truly puts this sin in heck

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 3>in his place when he questions whether nationally is a

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 3>real journalist.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 12>To the people and I'm sure you see this online

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 12>every single day, who say you don't deserve to be

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 12>here because you're not a real journalist, what's your response

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 12>to them.

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.199
<v Speaker 9>Well, I'm pretty sure the group of people in there aspect,

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 9>what was that four years covering for someone who was

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 9>essentially dead? And that's being charitable in my description of

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 9>him as president by the name of Joe Biden. So

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 9>to all those people who are apoplectic over having new

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 9>media voices, you guys feel and that's why we're here.

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now is political commentation and author of the

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 3>new book The Children We Left Behind, Adam Bate Coleman

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Adam Nashalie Winters makes an excellent point there journalists have

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 3>long the public's trust, so many journalists from the mainstream

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 3>media who were complicit in the cover up of Joe

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Biden's cognitive decline.

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, Natalie makes a great point that basically the media

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 14>is not representing the people. You know, what they're trying

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 14>to do in that CNN piece is basically trying to

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 14>spit on new media, trying to discredit them. They're trying

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 14>to show that the Old Guard, like the CNNs, like

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 14>the msnbcs and so on, the NBC News, they're the

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 14>ones who are deserving of having the honor of being

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 14>in the White House. But the Old Guard cares about

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 14>the Old Guard's institution more than it cares about actually

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 14>reporting what is going on and being fair with their

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 14>reporting to the American public. So what not only is

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 14>expressing is what a lot of Americans have bought for

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 14>a long time, which is why they're turning to new media,

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 14>which is why they're getting their news elsewhere instead of

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 14>turning on the television, going to the New York Times,

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 14>They're coming to alternative media. Excuse me, alternative media sources,

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 14>because it's far more honest, at least somewhat reliable.

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 3>And these alternative media sources are gaining enormous audiences. You

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 3>look at some of the numbers listening to podcasts and

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 3>others like Natalie and really you look at the MSNBC audience,

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the CNN audience, they're being left behind and sticking with

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 3>the media, and why trust in the mainstream media has

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 3>plummeted to record lows. The executive producer of Sixty Minutes,

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Bill Owens, has resigned. He blames the supposed loss of independence. Now,

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 3>this comes after President Trump's ten billion dollar lawsuit after

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 3>claims that Sixty Minutes grossly misedited and interview with Kamala

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Harris during the election campaign at the direction of the

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Harris campaign. Now, we were among the first report on

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 3>that deliberate misleading edit.

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's just have a quick look.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 3>This is how Kamala answered a question.

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 7>But it seems that Prime Minister Netanya who is not listening.

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 15>Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 15>in a number of movements in that region by Israel

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 15>that were very much prompted by or a result of

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 15>many things, including our advocacy.

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 11>For what needs to happen in the region.

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Typical incoherent, meandering word salad with no substance there from Kamala.

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 3>But look at what sixty minutes actually put to air.

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 8>But it seems that Prime Minister Netanya who is not listening.

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 15>We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 15>for the United States to be clear about where we

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 15>stand on the need for this war to end.

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Sharp, succinct, strong and really adam incredible antics there from

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 3>sixty minutes. For the executive producer to blame loss of

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 3>independence for his resignation.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>It's almost comical.

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 3>They have acted as the Democrats propaganda.

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>M for years.

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 14>Yeah. Absolutely, I mean that's obviously with long pieces that

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 14>sixty minutes does, they have to do some editing, but

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 14>that's a massive edit that is trying to do the

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 14>best that they can, which she's not even really answering

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 14>the question. They just had it in a very coherent,

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 14>short statement, and it just covers up how grossly unprepared

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 14>she was to run for president. And to be sort

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 14>of fair to her, she only had a few months

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 14>to run. She was pushed into the spotlight to run

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 14>after Joe Biden was too senile to actually move forward.

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 14>But if they listened to the American public and stop

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 14>trying to say, well, if we are fair about the

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 14>cognitive decline of Joe Biden, it helps Trump. But that's

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 14>not what the media is there for. They're not there

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 14>to pick winners and losers. They're there to tell us

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 14>who's winning and who's losing.

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, Now let's check in with MSNBC. We're host Simone Sanders.

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Townsend claims that black Americans will be the next to

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 3>be deported. She seems to think that black citizens are

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 3>somehow going to be part of the deportation program.

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 16>To me, that is why Kilmar Albergo Garcia's specific case,

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 16>the case of the gentleman who's a makeup artist out

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 16>of California, who was also sent to that person.

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>That is why the.

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 16>More the seventy five percent of the folks who have

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 16>been sent the men who have been sent there that

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 16>don't have criminal records, that is why it's so important

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 16>because if they could do it to them, if they

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 16>could snatch students off the street without any pushback or record.

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 11>They will do it to any of us.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 16>It to be very clear, it's gonna be the people

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:06.479
<v Speaker 16>of color and vulnerable communities.

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 11>That are next them on it.

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 5>I think that's right, and that's certainly part of why.

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 3>The African American community is so strongly behind the supporting KILMA.

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>We are not for this.

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, because as you just said.

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>If they're going to whisk them away, what are.

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:19.439
<v Speaker 7>They going to do with us?

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you got Coleman.

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:24.879
<v Speaker 3>Are you living in fear of ice knocking on your

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 3>door and deporting you despite the fact that you are

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 3>a citizen?

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 14>No, no, I'm not. And what he just said that

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 14>the black communities behind No, black leftists are behind this,

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 14>which is a very small percentage of Black Americans that

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 14>live in this country, especially the upper class types who

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 14>appear on MSNBC.

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 7>So this fear.

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 14>Mongering about Black Americans being scared, guess what when you

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 14>show Black Americans the facts about this guy being associated

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 14>with gangs, this guy which everyone acknowledges he was here legally.

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 14>Black Americans know what legal immigration has done to their jobs.

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 14>Black Americans have seen their neighborhoods being torn apart, being

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 14>split up, being segregated because of illegal immigration. So this

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 14>idea that Black Americans are behind Kilmar is foolishness. It's ridiculous. So, no,

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 14>Black Americans aren't as stupid as they're projecting us to be.

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 14>That we're hanging in fear that ice is going to

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 14>knock on our door, when the vast majority of Black

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 14>Americans have been here longer than any other demographic. So no,

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 14>we're not going anywhere, and we're not scared. This is

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 14>all just nonsense.

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Now I've played a little of Jamal Bryant, Preacher Jamal

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Bryant in left is losing it. He's a repeat offender

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 3>in that regard. He's attacked black Republicans in the past

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 3>and the most racist terms, and now this man of

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.040
<v Speaker 3>God is calling Republicans.

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 11>Adam.

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Tell me about this brand of Christianity and how much

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 3>influence it has amongst the black community.

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 14>Well, in certain areas, you know, he's I believe he's

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 14>based in Atlanta. In certain areas he has a lot

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 14>of influence. Unfortunately, But if you were to see the

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 14>image from that video at the podium, what is it? It's

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 14>a communist fist holding the cross right, which is blasphemous.

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 14>This is not something that should be allowed or should

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 14>be accepted. But he is part of what they call

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 14>Black liberation theology, which is essentially a firm for Black Marxism. Right,

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 14>so they uphold civil rights and all these cliche terms,

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 14>but they also talking about capitalism and the bad parts

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.240
<v Speaker 14>of capitalism and all these different things. It centers black

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 14>identity in front of Christ. And I say this as

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 14>a Christian that whenever you try to serve two masters,

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 14>you're not going towards Christ, You're going towards something else.

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 14>So Jamal Bryant, he may be renowned and people love

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:13.760
<v Speaker 14>this man, but they don't realize is that he's using

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 14>the Black American as He's basically using the image of

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 14>black Americans as a skin suit to further Marxist ideas

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 14>or Marxist like ideas. So no, I do not support

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 14>what he has to say. And especially when you have

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 14>churches getting highly involved in politics for their own personal gain,

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 14>that is not.

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>What they're there for.

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 14>The House of God is there to push people towards Christ,

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 14>not towards the Democratic Party.

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 3>Well said, Now, before you go, tell me about your

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.320
<v Speaker 3>new book, The children we left behind. It's a deeply

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 3>personal work and highlights cultural issues in the West around

0:37:54.600 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 3>family separation. Have we lost our willingness to sacrifice for.

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Our children at them?

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 14>I think many of us have. You know, in the

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 14>Western world we glorify individualism, and I'm a proponent of individualism,

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 14>but as long as it's healthy and it's balanced. Too

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 14>much of a good thing and become a bad thing, obviously,

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 14>But as parents were supposed to sacrifice, we're supposed to

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 14>sacrifice for our children. The problem that I'm seeing is

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 14>that our obsession with individualism intersects with our need to

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 14>sacrifice for our children, and so parents get to act

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 14>like children, be whimsical, do whatever they want to do,

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 14>drag their kids along, and as they're dragging their kids,

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 14>they expect their children to respond like adults. And that's

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 14>not how things are supposed to work. So, yes, the

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 14>book is a culture critique about the selfishness of parents,

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 14>but it's also to talk about my story as a

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 14>child who was left behind by my father and what

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:59.280
<v Speaker 14>I had to deal with, suicidal ideation, depression, being admitted

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 14>into a mental health hospital, homelessness, poverty, all these different things,

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 14>all stemmed from endly separation, not having him there, having

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 14>my mother struggled to take care of two kids. So

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 14>these are real circumstances that a lot of Americans and

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.760
<v Speaker 14>actually throughout the Western world especially are facing.

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely this sounds like a fascinating work. The children were

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 3>left behind, Adam Big Coleman, thank you so much for

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 3>your time tonight.

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you still to come.

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 10>Well.

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Look at which Hollywood A listers are caught up in

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the Blake Lively Justin Valdoni legal staff. Kinsey Schofield is

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 3>up next Welcome back joining me now celebrity and royal

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 3>commentator Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey A sources revealed in The Daily

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Mouth that Blake Lively's buddies Taylor Swift and Hugh Jackman

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 3>will definitely be served this week with subpoenas for the

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 3>actress's legal fight with her It ends with US CO

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 3>star Justin Baldoni. This legal battle is got an a

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 3>list cast.

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:16.760
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 17>I would file this under what a nightmare for Blake

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 17>Lively and Ryan Reynolds because what it tells other people

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 17>is that if they associate closely with them, they could

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 17>end up in this kind of uncomfortable situation as well,

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 17>So there were reports circulating that all was well with

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 17>Blake Lively and Taylor Swift. Now I'm starting to believe

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 17>that those were likely started by Blake Lively and not true,

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 17>because this is the last place these celebrities want to be.

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 17>This is the last you know, kind of chaotic court

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 17>case that they want to be involved in.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 3>It has been so damaging for this once golden couple,

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Black Lively, Ryan Reynolds, they really were they it couple,

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 3>and now they've both just become subjects of mockery. Can

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 3>they recover from this once this case is done and dusted,

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:16.399
<v Speaker 3>Can they I don't know, rebuild their image, have some

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:21.399
<v Speaker 3>sort of a project where they redeem themselves because it's

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 3>hard to see how that's going to happen right now.

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 11>Well, they think they can, because you're seeing it. They're relentless.

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 11>The fact that.

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 17>Blake Lively, in the middle of being one of the

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 17>world's biggest villains, manages to land on the Time one

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 17>hundred's Most Influential list, you know, that's strategy that's pr

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 17>working behind the scenes overtime. So they think they can

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 17>and they're certainly trying to recover. But I don't think

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 17>I think it would take years.

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think Time magazine really just did that as

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 3>almost a troll, as just a way of getting some

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:05.279
<v Speaker 3>attention and getting some discussion around their list, because really,

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 3>who cares about their list these days? Now, let's talk

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 3>about Barack and Michelle Obama. They've been facing all sorts

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 3>of rumors around divorce and problems in their relationship. Well,

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 3>they've been spotted on a dinner date in Washington, DC,

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 3>the first time they've been seen together in public in

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:27.360
<v Speaker 3>more than four months. And this comes as Michelle finally

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 3>revealed why she didn't attend Donald Trump's inauguration with her husband.

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:36.439
<v Speaker 3>She claims that her absence was an example for young

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 3>women out there to start practicing different strategies for saying no,

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean okay, kidsy. She also wasn't there for Jimmy

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Carter's funeral. Was that also a message to young women

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 3>to start practicing different strategies to say no?

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, The song's more like an attempt for Michelle Obama

0:42:56.160 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 17>to rewrite history, similar to Megan Mircle's podcast Not Enough

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:04.240
<v Speaker 17>Interest or Reach for Michelle to change this pre existing

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 17>perception with her podcast What We witnessed in Michelle not

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 17>attending President Trump's inauguration wasn't a unique act of bravery

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 17>or a new strategy. It was a pity party. She

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 17>didn't get her way. Try to get your melt down

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 17>a deeper meaning.

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Now, Justin Bieber's disturbing antics at Coachella have fueled concerns

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 3>over his mental health. One of his longtime friends, Ryan Good,

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 3>has told Haamsey that he now believes the singer is

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 3>in a cult. Kinsey, We're seeing all this footage of

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 3>him where he seems to be over refreshed, affected by something.

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Should fans be concerned? He certainly doesn't look healthy.

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 11>I don't think he looks healthy either.

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 17>I mean, I'm going to continue to put a significant

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 17>amount of blame on his parents. Week two of Coachella,

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 17>Justin's father ah how much fun he was having week

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 17>one online and met him there with Justin's fifteen year

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 17>old half brother to play. Justin was seen smoking a

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 17>huge joint next to his little brother. His father seems

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 17>totally irresponsible. He also runs an Instagram account for Justin's

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:19.359
<v Speaker 17>six year old little sister, where he posts cheerleading and

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 17>bikini photos of her and an analysis of this little

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 17>Girl's Instagram account estimated that twenty percent of her followers

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 17>are accounts registered as male, almost entirely between the ages

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 17>of eighteen and thirty four. Jeremy Bieber, It's time to

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 17>grow up and protect your children.

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 1>That is disturbing.

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, why would you be sharing content like that

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:48.359
<v Speaker 3>of a six year old child? That is, and what

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 3>they did with Bieber just basically handing him over to

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:58.239
<v Speaker 3>music industry figures very jubious ones like p Diddy and

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:01.320
<v Speaker 3>I think we're gonna hear a litt more Kinz about

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 3>what Justin Bieber suffered during those years when he was underage.

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the royals.

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Prince Harry and Meghan Markel have been spotted riding around

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:17.240
<v Speaker 3>the Big Apple with a four car motiicade, including two.

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Unmarked police cars.

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 3>This is just weeks after the Duchess was slammed for

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:25.399
<v Speaker 3>being over the top with security, Kinsey, Do they think

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 3>they're heads of state? Why do they need a four

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 3>car motiicade?

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 11>Clearly, Prince Airian Meghan Michael's.

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 17>Obsession with status isn't impressing anyone. A real influence doesn't

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 17>need a spotlight or a four car motorcade. They spend

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 17>so much time trying to look important. I wonder if

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 17>they ever stop to actually contribute to something legitimately important.

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 17>What new charity initiatives reader have Prince Harry joined since

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 17>stepping down as a working royal.

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 11>No new charities.

0:45:56.880 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 17>I haven't heard Meghan Markel mention arch World Charity one

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:03.240
<v Speaker 17>in the last two months. We just see them getting

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 17>cut off from charities. So I would say, start doing

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 17>good and maybe people will respond to you differently.

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Now, speaking at the time one hundredth Summit, Meghan admitted

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 3>that she's made mistakes.

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 1>She said that.

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 3>While releasing three products at the same time, she decided

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 3>to give herself the space and grace to make mistakes,

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:29.439
<v Speaker 3>as she knows she's not going to get it right

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 3>every single day. Oh god, could she'd be more insufferable, Kinsey.

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.800
<v Speaker 17>No one cares about Megan's packaging or terrible taste in

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:40.359
<v Speaker 17>brand names. You know, she keeps pretending she hasn't done

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:44.000
<v Speaker 17>anything wrong, making the last few years of Prince Philip's

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:47.840
<v Speaker 17>and Queen Elizabeth's lives a living hell. Her silence on

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 17>such cruelty speaks volumes, and while she may not take responsibility.

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 17>The consequences have found her anyway. People don't like her,

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 17>so she can, you know, try to act humble and

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:02.320
<v Speaker 17>try to act like she's you know, taking some responsibility

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:05.799
<v Speaker 17>with quote unquote mistakes. Acknowledge the hurt you cause to

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 17>the British royal family.

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 3>George Clooney keeps making headlines and this is a strange one.

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Has given Donald Trump some rare praise. He commended the

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 3>President's charisma, but at the same time he predicted that

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Trump will go away while discussing the future of the jet.

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why we keep listening to this clown

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 3>because he has got everything wrong in the past decade.

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:35.440
<v Speaker 3>He even had to go at Meghan Kelly recently, and

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I would say that's very unwise indeed, because she'll head back,

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 3>and she'll head back hard.

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 17>I think that that hair day is doing something to

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 17>the brain cells.

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 11>But file under wish for thinking.

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 17>I imagine that you'll agree with me when I say

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 17>Trump might go away, but the MAGA movement is here

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 17>to stay. Donald Trump has completely transformed the Republican Party

0:47:57.080 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 17>and his legacy will be hard to shake.

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.719
<v Speaker 3>And if they're worried about Donald Trump, wait till they

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:08.400
<v Speaker 3>get a hold of JD. Vans because he's Trump plus

0:48:08.440 --> 0:48:11.359
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent and that might have just eight years of

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 3>a vance presidency to deal with before you go quickly

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:20.799
<v Speaker 3>or a massive country star. The a lot of Australians

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 3>won't know him unless their country fans Jelly roll. The

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Tennessee Board of Parole on Tuesday recommended a pardon for him.

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 1>What's the latest on his case?

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Because he's had an incredible rise from prison to now

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 3>being an absolute darling of the music industry.

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 11>Well due to his criminal record.

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 17>Every time he travels it takes a team of lawyers

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 17>in a mountain of paper work to secure his entry

0:48:48.120 --> 0:48:49.239
<v Speaker 17>into different countries.

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 11>So this decision could really change his life.

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 17>He has said that this is incredible. He called the

0:48:56.480 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 17>Board's decision you know, amazing and said I pray this

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:02.800
<v Speaker 17>goes through. But today is special for me regardless, because

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 17>we have seen his life transformed and I think that

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:08.279
<v Speaker 17>he should be able to go out and tell the world.

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely KINSI scophil, thank you for your time and that's

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 3>it from me.

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Up next is Newsnight.

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:18.239
<v Speaker 3>I'll see you tomorrow night for ift, he's losing it

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 3>at nine