Speaker 1: On scorn Lives Australia.
Speaker 2: This is the Wider Penalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panety Show coming
Speaker 3: up tonight, Senator for Team of Payments humiliating social media foil.
Speaker 3: The panel will be with me to discuss that and
Speaker 3: plenty more. Shortly, we'll look at the state of the
Speaker 3: media in the US.
Speaker 1: We trust in the mainstream media plummeting to new Low's
Speaker 1: and later in the.
Speaker 3: Hour we'll look at which Hollywood A listers are caught
Speaker 3: up in the black Lively justin Baldoni, legal staush and
Speaker 3: left is Losing. It features plenty of hate and bile
Speaker 3: from the unhinch Left.
Speaker 4: Mac the lightis get a reddit a Coma, the welcomer
Speaker 4: becut the road here.
Speaker 5: We'll check here, but they won't check out.
Speaker 3: Let's start with the Labor candidate for the seat of Dixon.
Speaker 3: Ally France is the radical left to selected to take
Speaker 3: on Peter Dutton. She has run against Stutton previously and
Speaker 3: she's active on social media and has been for years.
Speaker 1: Let's check out some of her work.
Speaker 3: She reposted this image on x depicting Peter Dutton as
Speaker 3: a Nazi charming in twenty eighteen, she reposted this commentary
Speaker 3: from John Sedka, where he says Dutton is racist, and
Speaker 3: just two years.
Speaker 1: Ago she posted a link to a.
Speaker 3: Story claiming that Peter Dutton would cut the NDIS budget
Speaker 3: to pay for nuclear submarines, labeling him a monster. Now,
Speaker 3: the PM was asked today about all this, and he
Speaker 3: said that Ali France is an extraordinary human.
Speaker 6: Ailey France is an extraordinary Australian And I don't know
Speaker 6: what your toy to like more than a decade ago
Speaker 6: or what have you.
Speaker 7: I have no idea.
Speaker 6: She is an outstanding human being.
Speaker 3: Joining me now for more on this is Institute of
Speaker 3: Public Affairs Senior Fellow and chief Economist Adam Crichton and
Speaker 3: Menzie's Reach Search Center Senior fellow Nick came, Adam, I'll
Speaker 3: start with you.
Speaker 1: That's not everything.
Speaker 3: Back in twenty sixteen, she realposted a comment on x saying, Wow,
Speaker 3: the Turnbull government is backing and openly racist apartheid regime
Speaker 3: ahead of the US and New Zealand. This was in
Speaker 3: reference to Israel. And they're an increasing number of labor
Speaker 3: MP's and candidates, Adam, who look like they'd be quite
Speaker 3: comfortable sitting in the Greens.
Speaker 1: Yeah, look, certainly that's true.
Speaker 7: I mean, for me, one of the salient facts from
Speaker 7: this campaign, it's just a number of extremists in the
Speaker 7: Labor Party who are standing four seats that they could
Speaker 7: actually win. And there's this real strong anti Israel street
Speaker 7: that I never thought really existed in the rank and
Speaker 7: file of the Labor Party so much it clearly does.
Speaker 7: It's very disappointing. But just the other point I'd make
Speaker 7: is I somewhat agree with the Prime Minister when he says,
Speaker 7: you know, tweets from a long time ago, we shouldn't
Speaker 7: focus on them too much. I mean, I'm sure we've
Speaker 7: all tweeted stupid things in the past or things that
Speaker 7: we regret. I probably have, and I think it's one
Speaker 7: of the that quality of people don't go into politics
Speaker 7: as they're just terrified that there's something they've done in
Speaker 7: the past that will struck them out.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's a good point, but Nick, we're not talking
Speaker 3: about just a decade ago. There's a posts from just
Speaker 3: a couple of years ago where she's calling Peter Dutton
Speaker 3: a monster. Now we hear a lot about being divisive,
Speaker 3: dehumanizing language that sounds like a fairly dehumanizing language in
Speaker 3: my book.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I'm not prepared to make excuses for this woman,
Speaker 6: as Adam seems to be. I'm speaking as a man
Speaker 6: of course, with an absolutely clear Facebook and Twitter record,
Speaker 6: because I hardly use the things. But all classes people
Speaker 6: aren't they They completely lack any originality whatsoever, outcome the same
Speaker 6: old things, the Nazi tweets, the Hitler stuff, the racist stuff.
Speaker 6: Does anybody actually take any of this seriously? Does it
Speaker 6: mean anything to the ordinary voters in the seed of
Speaker 6: Dixon who will make their decisions based on much more
Speaker 6: grounded things like the cost of living and the cost
Speaker 6: of fuel and everything else, and that they know Peter
Speaker 6: Dutton and his character has been a member for that
Speaker 6: seat for more than twenty years. I think it's all
Speaker 6: a bit of a sideshow, except, as Adam rightly points out,
Speaker 6: it does give us an insight into the sort of
Speaker 6: people who are joining the Labor Party now presumably joining
Speaker 6: Labor rather than the Greens, because they quite like the
Speaker 6: idea that they may one day get into government, which
Speaker 6: is not a luxury you enjoying the Greens Party, But
Speaker 6: you know they are way way out there on the
Speaker 6: fruit cake fringe and you can see how Albnizi has
Speaker 6: so easily allowed the party to be dragged to an
Speaker 6: anti Israel stance in a quite a horrible manner, probably
Speaker 6: one of the most disastrous things that have happened under
Speaker 6: this government, and.
Speaker 3: It's happening right in his seat when you look at
Speaker 3: his preferences. We reported last night on the Prime Minister
Speaker 3: finding himself in a preferencing scandal, with Green's candidate Hannah
Speaker 3: Thomas being listed as number two on the PM's how
Speaker 3: to Vote card, despite the fact that she has blockaded
Speaker 3: his offers, claimed Israel is guilty of genocide, and has
Speaker 3: demanded the Prime Minister blacklists the only Jewish state and
Speaker 3: expel its ambassador from Australia. She's held up signs like
Speaker 3: this at pro Palestinian rallies, and The Australian reports today
Speaker 3: that Hannah Thomas was part of a long running protest
Speaker 3: outside Anthony alban Albanese electorate office. The protest was labeled
Speaker 3: appalling by the Prime Minister. He said it has no
Speaker 3: place in a democracy. Nick Anthony Albanezi refuses to change
Speaker 3: or even explain this how to vote card he has
Speaker 3: rewarded here a radical activist for her radical activism. It's
Speaker 3: hard to take his claims seriously about how bad these
Speaker 3: protests are for democracy when he's put her number two
Speaker 3: on his ticket.
Speaker 6: It's hard to take anything that comes out about Neal's
Speaker 6: mouth seriously right now. But I mean his idea, his
Speaker 6: attempt at nonchalance. You know, oh, this is nothing to
Speaker 6: do with me. You know, I don't even know this
Speaker 6: woman's name. I mean, do you really believe that? That's
Speaker 6: a very unconvincing story. But he also came out yesterday
Speaker 6: and said, well, of course, you know, I'm above preferences
Speaker 6: because I don't need preferences to be elected. I was
Speaker 6: elected on fifty three percent of the vote last time round,
Speaker 6: as if preferences are for lesser human beings. But I'll
Speaker 6: tell you what he should be careful because when he
Speaker 6: was elected to parliament in nineteen ninety six, there were
Speaker 6: eighty five MPs in Parliament who didn't need to go
Speaker 6: to preferences. In the last election, there are only fifteen.
Speaker 6: Every seat is getting unless and less safe. The electorate
Speaker 6: is very, very volatile, and I think the voters you
Speaker 6: take for granted are the ones that they are going
Speaker 6: to come round and dammaghue in the end.
Speaker 3: Now someone who was a labor senator. They were very
Speaker 3: proud of her before they chucked her out of the
Speaker 3: party senator for Team payment of WA. She's been mocked
Speaker 3: online for appearing to use AI to come up with
Speaker 3: a tweet to rile up those on the right and
Speaker 3: generate some online activity, and it seems like she's forgotten
Speaker 3: to delete the AI prompt from the post that she
Speaker 3: ended up sharing on x Let's have a look at
Speaker 3: how she apparently asked AI. I don't know if it's
Speaker 3: chat gp grock what she has used here to write
Speaker 3: her a post that would trigger right wing nut jobs.
Speaker 3: Here's the full tweet as it appeared. Apologies for the confusion.
Speaker 3: Here's an example of a bait tweet to drive engagement
Speaker 3: from right wing nut jobs.
Speaker 1: R wnjays.
Speaker 3: For Team of payment tied of politics, as you also
Speaker 3: are mine. That's why I'm standing with Australia's Voice for
Speaker 3: Climate Action, housing and real change? Are you with us?
Speaker 3: Hashtag ospol So the whole thing went up, Adam, Is
Speaker 3: she genuinely that clueless? Is this some sort of I
Speaker 3: don't know, performative art. Is it some sort of a troll.
Speaker 3: I mean, I do recall a few weeks back she
Speaker 3: was praising the Iranian regime for its treatment of women,
Speaker 3: So I don't know, maybe she really is just that clueless.
Speaker 7: Well, I think this gets back to my point earlier
Speaker 7: about the quality of people going into politics for whatever
Speaker 7: reason and has fallen a great deal. And this is
Speaker 7: just an extraordinary example of incompetence, and not just not
Speaker 7: just at a personal level. For her, it's presumably, you know,
Speaker 7: it's her Twitter account, but as a senator, she gets
Speaker 7: four to six staff paid for by the taxpayer, all
Speaker 7: on good money, and actually you know she probably gets
Speaker 7: extra personal staff as well, So I don't really know
Speaker 7: how this got through. They're obviously incompetent as well her staff.
Speaker 7: They should be kind of watching what she's tweeting, or
Speaker 7: at least overseas. So look, it's just a sad indictment
Speaker 7: of the astrology is just one more.
Speaker 3: The only smart thing that they did, her team or
Speaker 3: herself was responsible for this was not deleting, because once
Speaker 3: you delete, you confirm precisely what's happened.
Speaker 1: It's an admission of guilt.
Speaker 3: Nick, I mean, we are laughing at this we're mocking this,
Speaker 3: but she's in the Australian Senate, just sitting in the
Speaker 3: upper House. And you do wonder why Labor selected her
Speaker 3: of all the candidates that had available to them.
Speaker 1: They were very.
Speaker 3: Proud to have a young Muslim woman in a h
Speaker 3: jab in the Senate, and I wonder if she wasn't
Speaker 3: wearing a hi jab whether she would have been selected.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 6: I mean, she seems unable even to think up a
Speaker 6: very short insult. She has to get the computers rolling
Speaker 6: to do one for her. I mean, it's extraordinary. It's
Speaker 6: not I It's Shakespeare or anything, is it. You know,
Speaker 6: it is very very low grade stuff. And it just
Speaker 6: goes to the fact that these are not serious people whatsoever.
Speaker 6: How they got into the Senate, Well, they got in
Speaker 6: through preference deals, didn't they. I mean nobody but that
Speaker 6: many Greens and Senators straight off. She just slips in
Speaker 6: on the back of lazy preference deels from Labor and others.
Speaker 6: And it's an absolute disgrace. I mean, you remember that
Speaker 6: the description of the Senate as unrepresentative, swill I think
Speaker 6: it's even even more unrepresentative than ever before.
Speaker 3: Yes, one of poor Keating's great lines there. We do
Speaker 3: miss some of his gems.
Speaker 1: And now I wanted to get your.
Speaker 3: Thoughts on this piece from Robert gob Leeson in the
Speaker 3: Australian newspaper today on Donald Trump's tariff strategy.
Speaker 1: He writes that today I.
Speaker 3: Deliver controversial but underlying good news. There is an economic
Speaker 3: justification for what Trump is doing.
Speaker 1: He is not mad.
Speaker 3: Behind the Trump tariffs and the country to country discussions
Speaker 3: are serious global economic and defense issues which are rarely discussed.
Speaker 3: As the economic burdens on America grow with global GDP
Speaker 3: outpacing American GDP, America is finding it more difficult to
Speaker 3: underwrite global security. The US wants its defense burden reduced
Speaker 3: by increased expenditure from those benefiting from the American security umbrella.
Speaker 3: This includes Australia. Nick, he is stating the absolute obvious there,
Speaker 3: but it is obvious points that have seemed to be
Speaker 3: lost on so many commentators. This is something Donald Trump
Speaker 3: campaigned on, is something has spoken about for decades. It
Speaker 3: should come as no surprise now whether you back this
Speaker 3: or not, this is very much part of his America
Speaker 3: First strategy.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I'm looking forward to hearing Adam's analysis of this.
Speaker 6: Is a much more accomplished economist than I am. But
Speaker 6: it's seems to me that that yes something. As Robert
Speaker 6: Cobb leaves some points out, there are many challenges to
Speaker 6: the US economy going forward. One is to maintain its
Speaker 6: position as the reserve currency. Fine, we understand that, but
Speaker 6: I don't think this blood instrument of tariffs is going
Speaker 6: to get there. Yes, we shouldn't be surprised. This is
Speaker 6: what Trump said from the beginning. We should have taken
Speaker 6: him seriously. But I'm far from convinced this is a
Speaker 6: way or that this sort of this sort of cartoony
Speaker 6: picture that we point about we paint of the blue
Speaker 6: collar American workers out of a job, put out of
Speaker 6: a job by China. It's all too simplistic and one
Speaker 6: sided for me. I mean, American consumers, like consumers here,
Speaker 6: have benefited enormously from cheap Chinese goods that we would
Speaker 6: have been able to make in such quantities ourselves. So yeah,
Speaker 6: you know, this tariff's good. You know free trade bad
Speaker 6: is it's certainly not good for Australia. And I'll leave
Speaker 6: it to Adam to put some economic flesh on the
Speaker 6: bones on that argument.
Speaker 3: Well, economists Stone like Tariff's Adam. But the failure is
Speaker 3: of globalization cannot be overlooked.
Speaker 1: This is something that JD.
Speaker 3: Vans has spoken about extensively, certainly Donald Trump. They have
Speaker 3: seen American manufacturing decimated. And this notion that you can
Speaker 3: get developing countries to make things cheaply whilst more advanced
Speaker 3: countries just come up with the innovation. It hasn't worked
Speaker 3: out that way. The developing countries very quickly work out
Speaker 3: how the innovation works. And that especially when you've got
Speaker 3: a country like China that just steals the intellectual property,
Speaker 3: that is a rogue economic superpower now that doesn't play
Speaker 3: by the rules.
Speaker 7: Yeah, look, certainly, I think overall I agree with Nick,
Speaker 7: but you've got to look at the distribution of economic
Speaker 7: growth over time too. And this is kind of going
Speaker 7: to your point. So the US has experienced, you know,
Speaker 7: dramatic GDP per capita growth overall, but amongst certain communities,
Speaker 7: the communities that vote for Donald Trump, the cheap TVs
Speaker 7: and radios and iPhones, they just don't compensate for the
Speaker 7: loss of dignity from a job, and it often leads
Speaker 7: to abuse and even death in some cases. And these
Speaker 7: communities are decimated. They're very angry. Okay, they've got cheap stuff,
Speaker 7: but actually they're probably rather more expensive stuff at a job.
Speaker 7: Although I don't think these tariffs will necessarily work, but
Speaker 7: the US is going to try to bring back some jobs.
Speaker 7: It'll probably bring bring back some manufacturing jobs. I don't
Speaker 7: think it'll bring back many, but let's just wait and see.
Speaker 7: I mean, the elites have been wrong about pretty much
Speaker 7: everything over the last ten years, so they've formed a
Speaker 7: consensus that this is a disaster. Well, it probably won't
Speaker 7: be a disaster. Then if they think it's going to
Speaker 7: be a disaster, all a focus on the stock market
Speaker 7: in the media. Trump supporters couldn't care less about the
Speaker 7: stock market. They don't own any shares. They're poor people.
Speaker 7: Most people that arewn stocks vote Democrats, so I don't
Speaker 7: think that's much of a problem. You know. The one
Speaker 7: other point that I would make, and I think it's missed,
Speaker 7: is that I think this is just a revenue raising
Speaker 7: exercise to some extent. The only way that the US
Speaker 7: can reduce its extraordinary deficit is by imposing tariffs. Because
Speaker 7: the Congress is never going to increase taxes. It will
Speaker 7: not pass a law to increase taxes. But the president
Speaker 7: he's got one lever and that is tariffs that he
Speaker 7: can unilaterally increase these tariffs even at a ten percent
Speaker 7: rate on everything. It's three hundred billion dollars a year.
Speaker 7: It's a lot of money.
Speaker 1: It's a lot of money.
Speaker 7: So it will help close that gap. And if you're
Speaker 7: not going to close the gap, or how else you're
Speaker 7: going to close the gap, So you've got to think
Speaker 7: of some other way, whether you cut spending or whether
Speaker 7: you increase other taxes. But there will be a financial
Speaker 7: collapse otherwise, So they have to do something.
Speaker 3: They have to do something. And what we're looking at
Speaker 3: this massive economic realignment. It is a medium to long
Speaker 3: term projector, and people are expecting results within days or
Speaker 3: a week.
Speaker 1: That is not just reasonable. Rule out.
Speaker 7: It's not been idealized.
Speaker 1: No, and there has been a lot of.
Speaker 7: What's going on. That's it to say different things, But look,
Speaker 7: we do have to wait and see. As you say,
Speaker 7: your core point is, you know we're only a few
Speaker 7: months into this presidency. Let's give it three years at least.
Speaker 3: Well, and we talked about the Trump voters not really
Speaker 3: being too concerned about the share market fluctuations, and something
Speaker 3: like the bottom fifty percent in the US only hold
Speaker 3: around one percent of those shares, so it is not
Speaker 3: a huge concern. And there's this been representation in the
Speaker 3: media that you know, Trump's there for the billionaires and
Speaker 3: the top end of.
Speaker 7: Town, and opposite has been the case.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, and that has been the case for now for
Speaker 3: several years, where those who are the most affluent are
Speaker 3: increasingly voting left and those who are working class aspirational
Speaker 3: are voting right.
Speaker 1: And I'm seeing that right here flipped.
Speaker 7: They've completely I don't think they've flipped as much here yet.
Speaker 7: Now in the US they have completely flipped basically, And
Speaker 7: actually the liberals here have to work out whether they're
Speaker 7: going to be a working class party or not. I
Speaker 7: still think they try to have their feeding beatin yes.
Speaker 1: And I think that's why they're failing.
Speaker 3: I think that is precisely why they're failing, because you
Speaker 3: can't be all things to all people. And I think
Speaker 3: their desperation to win back a few of those till
Speaker 3: seats in the affluent in the suburbs has completely nick
Speaker 3: frustrated their messaging and their ability to come up with
Speaker 3: policies that clearly differentiate them from labor to be bold,
Speaker 3: to be strong on these policies because they know some
Speaker 3: of that retric is not going to be popular in
Speaker 3: the affluent inner suburbs, but it will be very popular
Speaker 3: in the outer suburbs and in regional areas.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I mean, the politicians are going to be successful
Speaker 6: in this modern era of those that are able to
Speaker 6: straddle that divide between the university educated, largely in a
Speaker 6: metropolitan elite, and ordinary practical people who do other jobs
Speaker 6: for a living. So you know, we all know what
Speaker 6: that divide is. We all know how hard it is
Speaker 6: increasingly hard to bridge that divide because they seem to
Speaker 6: want quite opposite things in many regards. I think when
Speaker 6: the ships are down, know that certainly not alban Easy
Speaker 6: or Dunton have managed to do that. Whether it can
Speaker 6: be done, I don't know. I'm beginning to doubt whether
Speaker 6: we end up with a political system here which really
Speaker 6: has essentially two parties nominally on the center right, like
Speaker 6: much of Europe does. Who knows where this goes, but
Speaker 6: right now they're both at historic lows on primary votes
Speaker 6: and that's the reason.
Speaker 3: Now let's go to the UK and Prime Minister Keir
Speaker 3: Starmer has finally admitted that a woman.
Speaker 1: Is a biological female.
Speaker 3: It took a ruling from the UK Supreme Court for
Speaker 3: him to have enough courage to say this, do you
Speaker 3: believe a trans woman is a woman?
Speaker 8: Look? I think the Supreme Court has answered that question.
Speaker 8: But I think look, a woman is an adult female,
Speaker 8: and the Court has made that absolutely clear. I actually
Speaker 8: welcome the judgment because I think it gives real clarity.
Speaker 8: It allows those that have got a drop guidance to
Speaker 8: be really clear about what that guidance should say.
Speaker 1: Nick has changed his churn.
Speaker 3: It wasn't too long ago when he was claiming that
Speaker 3: some women have a penis and some don't have a cervix,
Speaker 3: and he was very, very confused when that question was
Speaker 3: put to him.
Speaker 1: Now he's very clear.
Speaker 3: I mean, it seems astonishing that a grown man needs
Speaker 3: a Supreme Court ruling to know something a child understands.
Speaker 6: Think all this over complicated, reader, I don't get it.
Speaker 6: This man's got a doctrinate in law, I think from
Speaker 6: Oxford University. I believe you'd have thought that he would
Speaker 6: have enough knowledge of the world at his age to
Speaker 6: come to that conclusion that about what a woman was
Speaker 6: long before the Supreme Court had to pass a ruling
Speaker 6: on it. I don't know whether it's just being a
Speaker 6: lawyer or whatever it is. I mean, I don't think
Speaker 6: the guy is stupid. I think they're just so caught
Speaker 6: up with this narrative and so frightened of their own shadows,
Speaker 6: so frightened of being criticized by this quite rabid, mad
Speaker 6: radical group of zelots that have been pushing this particular
Speaker 6: line that I just don't think they have the courage
Speaker 6: to to stand up against the trend. But anyway, anyway,
Speaker 6: thank goodness for the Supreme Court ruling, and thank goodness
Speaker 6: the Prime minist for Great Britain has accepted it.
Speaker 3: Yes, it's good to see he's accepted it. But I
Speaker 3: do recall when Peter Dutton was a this question after
Speaker 3: that Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Ruling, he kind of dodged it.
Speaker 3: He really just did not want to talk about it.
Speaker 3: He said, it's not an issue for us, it's for
Speaker 3: the UK. It is an issue for us because the
Speaker 3: very same narratives, the very same activism and bullying that's happening,
Speaker 3: is happening right here. In fact, I would argue Australia
Speaker 3: is considerably worse because we really haven't had the debate
Speaker 3: because our conservative politicians have been to Gutlass to take
Speaker 3: a position on this.
Speaker 9: Yeah.
Speaker 7: The only comments that I'd make there is just firstly
Speaker 7: the mere fact the UK Prime Minister is even talking
Speaker 7: about this sort of stuff. Just where the best is
Speaker 7: right now?
Speaker 10: Really?
Speaker 1: What must China and Russia?
Speaker 7: And you know, veryou do.
Speaker 3: You imagine Vladimir Putin being asked this? Can you imagine
Speaker 3: Vladimir Putin being asked, you know, can women.
Speaker 1: Have a penis?
Speaker 3: I mean this was a question that has been posed
Speaker 3: to Kirstarmer in the past.
Speaker 7: You've just said it into silliness and just I'm really
Speaker 7: surprised he didn't see it on that question and be
Speaker 7: empactic because it's such an easy wind and politics. Maybe
Speaker 7: ninety percent of people don't think transfermtter women. Yeah, so
Speaker 7: why not go with that? Win some votes on cultural
Speaker 7: issues which at least don't you know, they don't cost
Speaker 7: a budget anything, so go with them.
Speaker 3: Well, this is one of the reasons I don't understand
Speaker 3: why the Coalition hasn't really leaned into the so called
Speaker 3: culture wars, because one they're on solid ground.
Speaker 1: The majority is with them. Just about every one of them,
Speaker 1: and two, they don't cost.
Speaker 3: Billions, and we are facing a record debt. We're in
Speaker 3: a cost of living crisis. So if he makes some
Speaker 3: promises based on values as opposed to spending, I think
Speaker 3: that's a win win. Now, before you two go, we're
Speaker 3: going to have to talk about Prince Harry and the
Speaker 3: deepening rift with.
Speaker 1: His father, King Charles.
Speaker 3: This is the court case over the removal of police
Speaker 3: protection for Prince Harry. A royal inside has told us
Speaker 3: Weekly this has been terrible for Harry's relationship with Charles.
Speaker 1: Harry blames Charles.
Speaker 3: And thinks he can intervene, but Charles can't, and it
Speaker 3: just continues Harry's narrative that he's been cast at Adam.
Speaker 3: This ginger winder is just a victim. He's just an
Speaker 3: endless victim.
Speaker 1: Iman. He's just got the most. Really, he is blessed.
Speaker 3: He's got a wife who's got two healthy kids. He's
Speaker 3: got this insane lifestyle based on I don't know, just
Speaker 3: the luck of his birth. It's not like he's doing
Speaker 3: a great deal of work to justify here. The millions
Speaker 3: is earning, and yet all we see from him is
Speaker 3: endless winging.
Speaker 7: Look, look that is true, I think he's lost a
Speaker 7: great deal of respect in the UK and around the world.
Speaker 7: But I must say the more broad point is when
Speaker 7: I'm asked about the Royals on TV, I never really
Speaker 7: know what to say, and it kind of makes you
Speaker 7: want to be a Republican. Oh no, God, for the
Speaker 7: I mean, I voted for the monarchy in back in
Speaker 7: ninety nine nine, my first vote. But these stories, I'm like,
Speaker 7: oh my god, this family about Nick.
Speaker 3: Does it make you feel like a Republican when King
Speaker 3: Charles or Prince Harry's names I mentioned.
Speaker 7: Quite the opposite.
Speaker 6: When you see the human frailties of the royal family
Speaker 6: and the people in and around the monarch, you know,
Speaker 6: it just shows the stability of the system that it
Speaker 6: endures all this because it is bigger than the individuals,
Speaker 6: and I think that and the monarch is not above
Speaker 6: the law. So I think it's a wonderful system. It's
Speaker 6: lasted a long time. I wish sometimes that some of
Speaker 6: the members of the royal family would use their profile
Speaker 6: for better and more positive purposes than this. But frankly,
Speaker 6: as a father, I think I just find it tragic
Speaker 6: that a relationship can break down like this and seemingly
Speaker 6: be irrepaarable, apparently because of the foolish behavior of one person.
Speaker 3: Yes, are you blaming this entirely on Megan Mark? Are
Speaker 3: you because I think Prince Harry, I think escapes a
Speaker 3: lot of the blame. This is a man who's forty
Speaker 3: years old, who's abandoned his family, who's aired his dirty laundry,
Speaker 3: who has just behaved appallingly. And because I don't know,
Speaker 3: Meghan is seen as more unpleasant than he is, she
Speaker 3: cops all the blame and he kind of scapes through.
Speaker 6: I wasn't blaming Meghan. He is, as you say, he
Speaker 6: is a forty year old man. He is responsible for
Speaker 6: his own actions and if he's surely driven by his wife,
Speaker 6: and that's a pathetic excuse.
Speaker 3: Oh, Adam, Kricht and Nikota, thank you so much for
Speaker 3: your time tonight. Still to Karma, Left is losing our class.
Speaker 10: We'll look at the state of the media in the US.
Speaker 3: We trust in the mainstream media plumbers into new Low's.
Speaker 10: Adam Coleman joins me, next, you're.
Speaker 3: Watching the readA Panny Show, and it's time for Left
Speaker 3: is losing it And let's start with a particularly toxic
Speaker 3: brand of Christianity that appears to be devoid of God
Speaker 3: and goodness but full.
Speaker 1: Of hate and loathing.
Speaker 3: Here is Atlanta preacher and far left lunatic Jamal Bryant
Speaker 3: dehumanizing half the country by calling Republicans roaches.
Speaker 2: Roachers only start running when you turn the lights on
Speaker 2: at long and the lights are out, They're gonna be
Speaker 2: comfortable eating your sirih'll y'all ain't say nothing clamoring in
Speaker 2: your cupboard. But when you turn the light on, all
Speaker 2: the roachs gotta start moving. I came to give a warning,
Speaker 2: Ela must The light is getting ready.
Speaker 4: To come on, Donald Trump, the light is getting ready
Speaker 4: to come on, shakey fast. The light is getting ready
Speaker 4: to come on, Macca. The light is get ready to
Speaker 4: come on. The welcome because the road jet built check gear,
Speaker 4: but they won't check out. The lights are coming on.
Speaker 3: Really, we need to seriously consider making asylums great again.
Speaker 1: And in case he.
Speaker 3: Thought this was an isolated incident, this preacher is notorious
Speaker 3: for bile filled race faiting rants.
Speaker 5: I feel bad for them than the White House who
Speaker 5: are in the tap dancing for Massa. When bot tie
Speaker 5: shinnen and grinned, laughing like nothing that funny.
Speaker 2: I ain't a freed of the spooks that said at
Speaker 2: the door, these runaway slaves hiding in the White House.
Speaker 3: Talking about race obsess simpletons. Let's hear from singer John Legend.
Speaker 1: First, he says he wants Trump to be the comforter.
Speaker 3: In chief, like the leader of the free world is
Speaker 3: supposed to be some sort of therapist for lefties losing it.
Speaker 3: And then he goes into a demented die tribe about
Speaker 3: white supremacy.
Speaker 1: Your comforter.
Speaker 4: You know, why do you think that.
Speaker 11: He's latched onto diversity so much?
Speaker 1: Oh, he's a bigot.
Speaker 12: So it's a belief that there's a hierarchy of racial
Speaker 12: groups and that his group is superior, genetically superior. He
Speaker 12: believes that whenever he talks about competence and qualifications, any
Speaker 12: white man will do for him. Look at the last
Speaker 12: guy who was Secretary of defens He was a four
Speaker 12: star general, supremely qualified black man. And then see who
Speaker 12: he puts in after him. That's the level of bigotry
Speaker 12: that he has. Any white man is better than that.
Speaker 1: What a contemptible liar he is.
Speaker 3: You want to know why America is divided, it's clowns
Speaker 3: like him, and talking about clowns, it's been a while
Speaker 3: since we heard from this dude. Dylan Mulvainey now claims
Speaker 3: that he told his mother he was born in the
Speaker 3: wrong body when he was just four.
Speaker 13: Came out to my mom at age four as a
Speaker 13: girl and what did you say? I said, I think
Speaker 13: God made a mistake and put a boy into a
Speaker 13: girl into a boy's body. And you know, she said,
Speaker 13: God doesn't make mistakes. But you know a number of
Speaker 13: years later, we made it to where we need it
Speaker 13: to be. Now, what's shere? As journalists?
Speaker 3: Natalie Winters well and truly puts this sin in heck
Speaker 3: in his place when he questions whether nationally is a
Speaker 3: real journalist.
Speaker 12: To the people and I'm sure you see this online
Speaker 12: every single day, who say you don't deserve to be
Speaker 12: here because you're not a real journalist, what's your response
Speaker 12: to them.
Speaker 9: Well, I'm pretty sure the group of people in there aspect,
Speaker 9: what was that four years covering for someone who was
Speaker 9: essentially dead? And that's being charitable in my description of
Speaker 9: him as president by the name of Joe Biden. So
Speaker 9: to all those people who are apoplectic over having new
Speaker 9: media voices, you guys feel and that's why we're here.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is political commentation and author of the
Speaker 3: new book The Children We Left Behind, Adam Bate Coleman
Speaker 3: Adam Nashalie Winters makes an excellent point there journalists have
Speaker 3: long the public's trust, so many journalists from the mainstream
Speaker 3: media who were complicit in the cover up of Joe
Speaker 3: Biden's cognitive decline.
Speaker 14: Yeah, Natalie makes a great point that basically the media
Speaker 14: is not representing the people. You know, what they're trying
Speaker 14: to do in that CNN piece is basically trying to
Speaker 14: spit on new media, trying to discredit them. They're trying
Speaker 14: to show that the Old Guard, like the CNNs, like
Speaker 14: the msnbcs and so on, the NBC News, they're the
Speaker 14: ones who are deserving of having the honor of being
Speaker 14: in the White House. But the Old Guard cares about
Speaker 14: the Old Guard's institution more than it cares about actually
Speaker 14: reporting what is going on and being fair with their
Speaker 14: reporting to the American public. So what not only is
Speaker 14: expressing is what a lot of Americans have bought for
Speaker 14: a long time, which is why they're turning to new media,
Speaker 14: which is why they're getting their news elsewhere instead of
Speaker 14: turning on the television, going to the New York Times,
Speaker 14: They're coming to alternative media. Excuse me, alternative media sources,
Speaker 14: because it's far more honest, at least somewhat reliable.
Speaker 3: And these alternative media sources are gaining enormous audiences. You
Speaker 3: look at some of the numbers listening to podcasts and
Speaker 3: others like Natalie and really you look at the MSNBC audience,
Speaker 3: the CNN audience, they're being left behind and sticking with
Speaker 3: the media, and why trust in the mainstream media has
Speaker 3: plummeted to record lows. The executive producer of Sixty Minutes,
Speaker 3: Bill Owens, has resigned. He blames the supposed loss of independence. Now,
Speaker 3: this comes after President Trump's ten billion dollar lawsuit after
Speaker 3: claims that Sixty Minutes grossly misedited and interview with Kamala
Speaker 3: Harris during the election campaign at the direction of the
Speaker 3: Harris campaign. Now, we were among the first report on
Speaker 3: that deliberate misleading edit.
Speaker 1: Let's just have a quick look.
Speaker 3: This is how Kamala answered a question.
Speaker 7: But it seems that Prime Minister Netanya who is not listening.
Speaker 15: Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted
Speaker 15: in a number of movements in that region by Israel
Speaker 15: that were very much prompted by or a result of
Speaker 15: many things, including our advocacy.
Speaker 11: For what needs to happen in the region.
Speaker 3: Typical incoherent, meandering word salad with no substance there from Kamala.
Speaker 3: But look at what sixty minutes actually put to air.
Speaker 8: But it seems that Prime Minister Netanya who is not listening.
Speaker 15: We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary
Speaker 15: for the United States to be clear about where we
Speaker 15: stand on the need for this war to end.
Speaker 3: Sharp, succinct, strong and really adam incredible antics there from
Speaker 3: sixty minutes. For the executive producer to blame loss of
Speaker 3: independence for his resignation.
Speaker 1: It's almost comical.
Speaker 3: They have acted as the Democrats propaganda.
Speaker 1: M for years.
Speaker 14: Yeah. Absolutely, I mean that's obviously with long pieces that
Speaker 14: sixty minutes does, they have to do some editing, but
Speaker 14: that's a massive edit that is trying to do the
Speaker 14: best that they can, which she's not even really answering
Speaker 14: the question. They just had it in a very coherent,
Speaker 14: short statement, and it just covers up how grossly unprepared
Speaker 14: she was to run for president. And to be sort
Speaker 14: of fair to her, she only had a few months
Speaker 14: to run. She was pushed into the spotlight to run
Speaker 14: after Joe Biden was too senile to actually move forward.
Speaker 14: But if they listened to the American public and stop
Speaker 14: trying to say, well, if we are fair about the
Speaker 14: cognitive decline of Joe Biden, it helps Trump. But that's
Speaker 14: not what the media is there for. They're not there
Speaker 14: to pick winners and losers. They're there to tell us
Speaker 14: who's winning and who's losing.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, Now let's check in with MSNBC. We're host Simone Sanders.
Speaker 3: Townsend claims that black Americans will be the next to
Speaker 3: be deported. She seems to think that black citizens are
Speaker 3: somehow going to be part of the deportation program.
Speaker 16: To me, that is why Kilmar Albergo Garcia's specific case,
Speaker 16: the case of the gentleman who's a makeup artist out
Speaker 16: of California, who was also sent to that person.
Speaker 1: That is why the.
Speaker 16: More the seventy five percent of the folks who have
Speaker 16: been sent the men who have been sent there that
Speaker 16: don't have criminal records, that is why it's so important
Speaker 16: because if they could do it to them, if they
Speaker 16: could snatch students off the street without any pushback or record.
Speaker 11: They will do it to any of us.
Speaker 16: It to be very clear, it's gonna be the people
Speaker 16: of color and vulnerable communities.
Speaker 11: That are next them on it.
Speaker 5: I think that's right, and that's certainly part of why.
Speaker 3: The African American community is so strongly behind the supporting KILMA.
Speaker 1: We are not for this.
Speaker 7: Yeah, because as you just said.
Speaker 1: If they're going to whisk them away, what are.
Speaker 7: They going to do with us?
Speaker 1: Hey, you got Coleman.
Speaker 3: Are you living in fear of ice knocking on your
Speaker 3: door and deporting you despite the fact that you are
Speaker 3: a citizen?
Speaker 14: No, no, I'm not. And what he just said that
Speaker 14: the black communities behind No, black leftists are behind this,
Speaker 14: which is a very small percentage of Black Americans that
Speaker 14: live in this country, especially the upper class types who
Speaker 14: appear on MSNBC.
Speaker 7: So this fear.
Speaker 14: Mongering about Black Americans being scared, guess what when you
Speaker 14: show Black Americans the facts about this guy being associated
Speaker 14: with gangs, this guy which everyone acknowledges he was here legally.
Speaker 14: Black Americans know what legal immigration has done to their jobs.
Speaker 14: Black Americans have seen their neighborhoods being torn apart, being
Speaker 14: split up, being segregated because of illegal immigration. So this
Speaker 14: idea that Black Americans are behind Kilmar is foolishness. It's ridiculous. So, no,
Speaker 14: Black Americans aren't as stupid as they're projecting us to be.
Speaker 14: That we're hanging in fear that ice is going to
Speaker 14: knock on our door, when the vast majority of Black
Speaker 14: Americans have been here longer than any other demographic. So no,
Speaker 14: we're not going anywhere, and we're not scared. This is
Speaker 14: all just nonsense.
Speaker 3: Now I've played a little of Jamal Bryant, Preacher Jamal
Speaker 3: Bryant in left is losing it. He's a repeat offender
Speaker 3: in that regard. He's attacked black Republicans in the past
Speaker 3: and the most racist terms, and now this man of
Speaker 3: God is calling Republicans.
Speaker 11: Adam.
Speaker 3: Tell me about this brand of Christianity and how much
Speaker 3: influence it has amongst the black community.
Speaker 14: Well, in certain areas, you know, he's I believe he's
Speaker 14: based in Atlanta. In certain areas he has a lot
Speaker 14: of influence. Unfortunately, But if you were to see the
Speaker 14: image from that video at the podium, what is it? It's
Speaker 14: a communist fist holding the cross right, which is blasphemous.
Speaker 14: This is not something that should be allowed or should
Speaker 14: be accepted. But he is part of what they call
Speaker 14: Black liberation theology, which is essentially a firm for Black Marxism. Right,
Speaker 14: so they uphold civil rights and all these cliche terms,
Speaker 14: but they also talking about capitalism and the bad parts
Speaker 14: of capitalism and all these different things. It centers black
Speaker 14: identity in front of Christ. And I say this as
Speaker 14: a Christian that whenever you try to serve two masters,
Speaker 14: you're not going towards Christ, You're going towards something else.
Speaker 14: So Jamal Bryant, he may be renowned and people love
Speaker 14: this man, but they don't realize is that he's using
Speaker 14: the Black American as He's basically using the image of
Speaker 14: black Americans as a skin suit to further Marxist ideas
Speaker 14: or Marxist like ideas. So no, I do not support
Speaker 14: what he has to say. And especially when you have
Speaker 14: churches getting highly involved in politics for their own personal gain,
Speaker 14: that is not.
Speaker 1: What they're there for.
Speaker 14: The House of God is there to push people towards Christ,
Speaker 14: not towards the Democratic Party.
Speaker 3: Well said, Now, before you go, tell me about your
Speaker 3: new book, The children we left behind. It's a deeply
Speaker 3: personal work and highlights cultural issues in the West around
Speaker 3: family separation. Have we lost our willingness to sacrifice for.
Speaker 1: Our children at them?
Speaker 14: I think many of us have. You know, in the
Speaker 14: Western world we glorify individualism, and I'm a proponent of individualism,
Speaker 14: but as long as it's healthy and it's balanced. Too
Speaker 14: much of a good thing and become a bad thing, obviously,
Speaker 14: But as parents were supposed to sacrifice, we're supposed to
Speaker 14: sacrifice for our children. The problem that I'm seeing is
Speaker 14: that our obsession with individualism intersects with our need to
Speaker 14: sacrifice for our children, and so parents get to act
Speaker 14: like children, be whimsical, do whatever they want to do,
Speaker 14: drag their kids along, and as they're dragging their kids,
Speaker 14: they expect their children to respond like adults. And that's
Speaker 14: not how things are supposed to work. So, yes, the
Speaker 14: book is a culture critique about the selfishness of parents,
Speaker 14: but it's also to talk about my story as a
Speaker 14: child who was left behind by my father and what
Speaker 14: I had to deal with, suicidal ideation, depression, being admitted
Speaker 14: into a mental health hospital, homelessness, poverty, all these different things,
Speaker 14: all stemmed from endly separation, not having him there, having
Speaker 14: my mother struggled to take care of two kids. So
Speaker 14: these are real circumstances that a lot of Americans and
Speaker 14: actually throughout the Western world especially are facing.
Speaker 3: Absolutely this sounds like a fascinating work. The children were
Speaker 3: left behind, Adam Big Coleman, thank you so much for
Speaker 3: your time tonight.
Speaker 1: Thank you still to come.
Speaker 10: Well.
Speaker 3: Look at which Hollywood A listers are caught up in
Speaker 3: the Blake Lively Justin Valdoni legal staff. Kinsey Schofield is
Speaker 3: up next Welcome back joining me now celebrity and royal
Speaker 3: commentator Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey A sources revealed in The Daily
Speaker 3: Mouth that Blake Lively's buddies Taylor Swift and Hugh Jackman
Speaker 3: will definitely be served this week with subpoenas for the
Speaker 3: actress's legal fight with her It ends with US CO
Speaker 3: star Justin Baldoni. This legal battle is got an a
Speaker 3: list cast.
Speaker 11: Yeah.
Speaker 17: I would file this under what a nightmare for Blake
Speaker 17: Lively and Ryan Reynolds because what it tells other people
Speaker 17: is that if they associate closely with them, they could
Speaker 17: end up in this kind of uncomfortable situation as well,
Speaker 17: So there were reports circulating that all was well with
Speaker 17: Blake Lively and Taylor Swift. Now I'm starting to believe
Speaker 17: that those were likely started by Blake Lively and not true,
Speaker 17: because this is the last place these celebrities want to be.
Speaker 17: This is the last you know, kind of chaotic court
Speaker 17: case that they want to be involved in.
Speaker 3: It has been so damaging for this once golden couple,
Speaker 3: Black Lively, Ryan Reynolds, they really were they it couple,
Speaker 3: and now they've both just become subjects of mockery. Can
Speaker 3: they recover from this once this case is done and dusted,
Speaker 3: Can they I don't know, rebuild their image, have some
Speaker 3: sort of a project where they redeem themselves because it's
Speaker 3: hard to see how that's going to happen right now.
Speaker 11: Well, they think they can, because you're seeing it. They're relentless.
Speaker 11: The fact that.
Speaker 17: Blake Lively, in the middle of being one of the
Speaker 17: world's biggest villains, manages to land on the Time one
Speaker 17: hundred's Most Influential list, you know, that's strategy that's pr
Speaker 17: working behind the scenes overtime. So they think they can
Speaker 17: and they're certainly trying to recover. But I don't think
Speaker 17: I think it would take years.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think Time magazine really just did that as
Speaker 3: almost a troll, as just a way of getting some
Speaker 3: attention and getting some discussion around their list, because really,
Speaker 3: who cares about their list these days? Now, let's talk
Speaker 3: about Barack and Michelle Obama. They've been facing all sorts
Speaker 3: of rumors around divorce and problems in their relationship. Well,
Speaker 3: they've been spotted on a dinner date in Washington, DC,
Speaker 3: the first time they've been seen together in public in
Speaker 3: more than four months. And this comes as Michelle finally
Speaker 3: revealed why she didn't attend Donald Trump's inauguration with her husband.
Speaker 3: She claims that her absence was an example for young
Speaker 3: women out there to start practicing different strategies for saying no,
Speaker 3: I mean okay, kidsy. She also wasn't there for Jimmy
Speaker 3: Carter's funeral. Was that also a message to young women
Speaker 3: to start practicing different strategies to say no?
Speaker 17: Yeah, The song's more like an attempt for Michelle Obama
Speaker 17: to rewrite history, similar to Megan Mircle's podcast Not Enough
Speaker 17: Interest or Reach for Michelle to change this pre existing
Speaker 17: perception with her podcast What We witnessed in Michelle not
Speaker 17: attending President Trump's inauguration wasn't a unique act of bravery
Speaker 17: or a new strategy. It was a pity party. She
Speaker 17: didn't get her way. Try to get your melt down
Speaker 17: a deeper meaning.
Speaker 3: Now, Justin Bieber's disturbing antics at Coachella have fueled concerns
Speaker 3: over his mental health. One of his longtime friends, Ryan Good,
Speaker 3: has told Haamsey that he now believes the singer is
Speaker 3: in a cult. Kinsey, We're seeing all this footage of
Speaker 3: him where he seems to be over refreshed, affected by something.
Speaker 1: Should fans be concerned? He certainly doesn't look healthy.
Speaker 11: I don't think he looks healthy either.
Speaker 17: I mean, I'm going to continue to put a significant
Speaker 17: amount of blame on his parents. Week two of Coachella,
Speaker 17: Justin's father ah how much fun he was having week
Speaker 17: one online and met him there with Justin's fifteen year
Speaker 17: old half brother to play. Justin was seen smoking a
Speaker 17: huge joint next to his little brother. His father seems
Speaker 17: totally irresponsible. He also runs an Instagram account for Justin's
Speaker 17: six year old little sister, where he posts cheerleading and
Speaker 17: bikini photos of her and an analysis of this little
Speaker 17: Girl's Instagram account estimated that twenty percent of her followers
Speaker 17: are accounts registered as male, almost entirely between the ages
Speaker 17: of eighteen and thirty four. Jeremy Bieber, It's time to
Speaker 17: grow up and protect your children.
Speaker 1: That is disturbing.
Speaker 3: I mean, why would you be sharing content like that
Speaker 3: of a six year old child? That is, and what
Speaker 3: they did with Bieber just basically handing him over to
Speaker 3: music industry figures very jubious ones like p Diddy and
Speaker 3: I think we're gonna hear a litt more Kinz about
Speaker 3: what Justin Bieber suffered during those years when he was underage.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the royals.
Speaker 3: Prince Harry and Meghan Markel have been spotted riding around
Speaker 3: the Big Apple with a four car motiicade, including two.
Speaker 1: Unmarked police cars.
Speaker 3: This is just weeks after the Duchess was slammed for
Speaker 3: being over the top with security, Kinsey, Do they think
Speaker 3: they're heads of state? Why do they need a four
Speaker 3: car motiicade?
Speaker 11: Clearly, Prince Airian Meghan Michael's.
Speaker 17: Obsession with status isn't impressing anyone. A real influence doesn't
Speaker 17: need a spotlight or a four car motorcade. They spend
Speaker 17: so much time trying to look important. I wonder if
Speaker 17: they ever stop to actually contribute to something legitimately important.
Speaker 17: What new charity initiatives reader have Prince Harry joined since
Speaker 17: stepping down as a working royal.
Speaker 11: No new charities.
Speaker 17: I haven't heard Meghan Markel mention arch World Charity one
Speaker 17: in the last two months. We just see them getting
Speaker 17: cut off from charities. So I would say, start doing
Speaker 17: good and maybe people will respond to you differently.
Speaker 3: Now, speaking at the time one hundredth Summit, Meghan admitted
Speaker 3: that she's made mistakes.
Speaker 1: She said that.
Speaker 3: While releasing three products at the same time, she decided
Speaker 3: to give herself the space and grace to make mistakes,
Speaker 3: as she knows she's not going to get it right
Speaker 3: every single day. Oh god, could she'd be more insufferable, Kinsey.
Speaker 17: No one cares about Megan's packaging or terrible taste in
Speaker 17: brand names. You know, she keeps pretending she hasn't done
Speaker 17: anything wrong, making the last few years of Prince Philip's
Speaker 17: and Queen Elizabeth's lives a living hell. Her silence on
Speaker 17: such cruelty speaks volumes, and while she may not take responsibility.
Speaker 17: The consequences have found her anyway. People don't like her,
Speaker 17: so she can, you know, try to act humble and
Speaker 17: try to act like she's you know, taking some responsibility
Speaker 17: with quote unquote mistakes. Acknowledge the hurt you cause to
Speaker 17: the British royal family.
Speaker 3: George Clooney keeps making headlines and this is a strange one.
Speaker 3: Has given Donald Trump some rare praise. He commended the
Speaker 3: President's charisma, but at the same time he predicted that
Speaker 3: Trump will go away while discussing the future of the jet.
Speaker 3: I don't know why we keep listening to this clown
Speaker 3: because he has got everything wrong in the past decade.
Speaker 3: He even had to go at Meghan Kelly recently, and
Speaker 3: I would say that's very unwise indeed, because she'll head back,
Speaker 3: and she'll head back hard.
Speaker 17: I think that that hair day is doing something to
Speaker 17: the brain cells.
Speaker 11: But file under wish for thinking.
Speaker 17: I imagine that you'll agree with me when I say
Speaker 17: Trump might go away, but the MAGA movement is here
Speaker 17: to stay. Donald Trump has completely transformed the Republican Party
Speaker 17: and his legacy will be hard to shake.
Speaker 1: Absolutely.
Speaker 3: And if they're worried about Donald Trump, wait till they
Speaker 3: get a hold of JD. Vans because he's Trump plus
Speaker 3: twenty percent and that might have just eight years of
Speaker 3: a vance presidency to deal with before you go quickly
Speaker 3: or a massive country star. The a lot of Australians
Speaker 3: won't know him unless their country fans Jelly roll. The
Speaker 3: Tennessee Board of Parole on Tuesday recommended a pardon for him.
Speaker 1: What's the latest on his case?
Speaker 3: Because he's had an incredible rise from prison to now
Speaker 3: being an absolute darling of the music industry.
Speaker 11: Well due to his criminal record.
Speaker 17: Every time he travels it takes a team of lawyers
Speaker 17: in a mountain of paper work to secure his entry
Speaker 17: into different countries.
Speaker 11: So this decision could really change his life.
Speaker 17: He has said that this is incredible. He called the
Speaker 17: Board's decision you know, amazing and said I pray this
Speaker 17: goes through. But today is special for me regardless, because
Speaker 17: we have seen his life transformed and I think that
Speaker 17: he should be able to go out and tell the world.
Speaker 3: Absolutely KINSI scophil, thank you for your time and that's
Speaker 3: it from me.
Speaker 1: Up next is Newsnight.
Speaker 3: I'll see you tomorrow night for ift, he's losing it
Speaker 3: at nine