WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 26 March

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome the Late Bait.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Great to have your company on the Late Debate. I'm

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 2>James Macpherson with Liz Storer and Caleb Bond coming up.

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Woolworths are selling shopping bags for twenty dollars a piece

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 2>and people are buying them. What cost of living crisis.

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about what's going on there.

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 3>You don't have one, James. I saw you carting your

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 3>stuff in with it tonight.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I get resentful every time I have to pay twenty

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 2>five cents for a paper shopping bag that then breaks

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 2>as I walk across the road, scattering my groceries, and

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 2>that's happened.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 4>Bored and don't buy them. I will carry an insane

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 4>amount of groceries.

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be to the car. What about

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>you know you have you open someone's boot or you

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 2>get in an uber and they've got just a boot

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 2>full of like shopping bags that.

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 4>They everyone's got that cupboard at home.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 2>I buy the paper bags that I get angry about

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 2>it every time. Anyway, we'll talk about that a little later.

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Clearly we're stirred up on that subject. Plus when we

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 2>look at tomorrow's papers. Peter Dutton and now since he

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 2>will cut the fuel excise good news for motorists and

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>a local council are ex signs at a city garden

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.919
<v Speaker 2>advising people, in fact, pleading with people, please don't spread

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 2>human remains here. We'll get to that a little later,

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>but first you would have seen on television those advertisements

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 2>offering the chance to learn about your ancestry through genetic testing,

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 2>and like me, you've probably been tempted. I mean, who

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't want to find out their backstory and maybe discover

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>if they've got some sort of, you know, exotic history.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 2>One of the pioneers of this technology is a company

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.919
<v Speaker 2>called twenty three and Me. It started in San Francisco

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 2>back in two thousand and six, and over the past

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty years they've collected saliva samples from more than fifteen

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 2>million people whose DNA they've stored on company databases. Now

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 2>here's where it gets interesting. Twenty three and Me the

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>company are now facing bankruptcy, so to avoid that, they're

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 2>looking at selling the company, which then raises the question

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>does the buyer get access to millions of people's DNA?

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.399
<v Speaker 2>And who is this buyer? And what will they use

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the information for the chairperson of twenty three and Me

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>is trying to assure clients that it's not going to

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 2>be a problem no matter who buys the company. He

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>released a statement saying we are committed to continuing to

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 2>safeguard customer data and being transparent about the management of

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 2>user data going forward, and data privacy will be an

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 2>important consideration in any potential transaction. Which doesn't exactly fill

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 2>you with confidence, It certainly didn't fill the Attorney General

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>of California with confidence. He released a statement urging Californians

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 2>who have given their DNA to this company to take action.

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 2>In a statement, he said, given twenty three and Me's

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>reported financial distress, I remind Californians to consider invoking their

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 2>rights and directing twenty three and ME to delete their

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>data and destroy any sample of genetic material held by

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>the company. Of course, it may already be too late,

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 2>because in an undercover interview, Nate Johnson, the policy advisor

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>for the US Treasury, said that this company's major shareholders

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 2>are all pharmaceutical companies who've already had access to people's

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 2>DNA data. Here he is, then.

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Figure out what you were I actually did that.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 5>I should do that, though, do not give your information they.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 4>Saw it, do they sell it to pressure something? Study

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 4>meet Nathaniel Johnson, a policy advisor for the United States

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Department of the Treasury.

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 5>There's a clause in the country says like.

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 3>The information sure there is.

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 5>So set all their share a like pharmaceuticals. We're still

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 5>with this pharmacipical and is for company's based in the country,

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 5>And pharma recipal means in other countries they plant the

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 5>property of like Administry of Defense and rush or like

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 5>by change.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 2>So obviously this story raises all kinds of ethical questions. Liz,

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you ever been tempted to spit into a tube, send

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 2>it to some company and find out if maybe your

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 2>part Spanish or German law.

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Never and it genuinely boggles my brain that anyone is

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 4>up for this. There is nothing more private than your

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 4>personal DNA data. And this company actually just a few

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:39.559
<v Speaker 4>years ago had a five month security breach that met

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 4>millions of their customers. Nobody knows where the data's even gone,

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 4>but millions of them had their personal data. Almost seven

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 4>million customers had their data just out there flapping around,

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 4>and that resulted in twenty three and me paying out

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 4>a thirty million dollar settlement. So that quote there from

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 4>the CEO just laughter. You can't laugh any harder. I

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 4>was like, oh, but we're going to keep it secure, mate,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 4>you haven't historically Anyway. This is a story that should

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 4>make everyone sit up and take note, because what this

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 4>means is the fate of millions of Americans. DNA is

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 4>now subject to a court supervised sale. I don't know

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 4>about you, but who's buying it? Who is that interested

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 4>in your DNA? Indeed, you would notice that bloke, they're

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 4>referred to the shareholders of twenty three and me And

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 4>guess who the top shareholders are? Black Rock and Vanguard

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 4>the world the's largest investment companies. And if you're sitting

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 4>at home going well, I used Ancestry, so that's different. No,

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 4>that was brought out in twenty twenty by Blackstone, another

0:05:56.000 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 4>very large investment company, was bought for four foero point

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 4>seven billion dollars. Again, the question remains, why are these

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 4>guys so interested in getting their hands on your DNA data.

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.239
<v Speaker 4>It's a very very pertinent question to be asking. Someone's

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 4>profiting off it and it's not you. And only a

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 4>brief look at Blackrock and Vanguard's many, many, many entanglements

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 4>and their clients. Shows that they have a lot of

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 4>these pharmaceutical companies, that's what he's referring to there within

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 4>their paddock. So it stands to reason, where is this

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 4>DNA now? Has it already been sold off? That is

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 4>what this report from James O'Keeffe is alluding to. So

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 4>you've got this state supervised sale pending, but the suggestion

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 4>here is that a lot of it has already been

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 4>sold off. And if what Johnson said is even remotely

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 4>true in that clip there, this is that is DNA

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 4>being sold to private companies. This is a massive issue

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 4>of national security type importance. And how you ask, Well,

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 4>a man by the name of Jason Crow, he's a

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 4>member of the House Committee on Armed Services and House

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. This was some years ago,

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 4>but he was raising this issue, perhaps quite prophetically. He said, quote,

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 4>that's what this is, where you can actually take someone's DNA,

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 4>you know their medical profile, and you can target a

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 4>biological weapon that will kill that person or take them

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 4>off the battlefield, or make them inoperable. The bottom line is,

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 4>why why would anyone just be like, oh, yeah, it's

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 4>just about genealogy, It's just about finding out my family history.

0:07:55.720 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 4>I cannot understand how millions of people are that naive.

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 6>And that's I've always said that I wouldn't do it

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 6>because who knows where my DNA is getting en up?

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 6>I mean twenty three and meters until this point has

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 6>already done fifteen deals with pharmaceutical companies to share the

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 6>DNA data that they had. Glaxosmith Klein paid three hundred

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 6>million US dollars in twenty eighteen to get access to

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 6>five million people's DNA, So they're already profiting off this DNA,

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 6>which is.

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 3>A sacred thing.

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 6>It's like your fingerprint, right, it is your unique identify Now,

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 6>in some ways that identifier isn't totally unique, because we

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 6>know people have been linked to crimes that they didn't

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 6>actually commit because perhaps the coppers had your brother's DNA

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 6>and all of a sudden, they think you've committed a crime,

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 6>but it was actually someone else. And that's the other

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 6>thing I've always wondered, Well, what's to stop a government

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 6>anywhere in the world trying to get hold of this data,

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 6>whether they do it through the courts or they buy

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 6>it or whatever. So here I am, and I'm not

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 6>saying I'm planning to commit any crimes that would require

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 6>the police to gain access to my DNA. But in

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 6>twenty fifty, when Comrade General Albow is still running the

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 6>country and he's finally decided it's my time to go

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 6>to the Gulag and you're going to put me up

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 6>on some Trump DAP charges, and he gets my DNA

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 6>from ancestry dot com or twenty three and me, what

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 6>am I going to do about it? I mean, why

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 6>would you voluntarily give that over to anyone else when

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 6>you don't have to. I get that people want to

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 6>trace their family trees, et cetera, But like.

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 3>Could you make it any easier.

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 6>For you to become a target of private companies or

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 6>governments or whoever it might be with nefarious intent?

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>It is so dumb that there's an interesting story Becker

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 2>from twenty eighteen where police have been searching for decades

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 2>for he was called the night Stalker or the Golden

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 2>State Killer, someone who had raped and murdered dozens of

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 2>women in the seventies and eighties, and they've been completely

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 2>unable to find this guy. So police got DNA and

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 2>they went into eed match and they looked at they

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>found twenty possible great great grandparents. They narrowed it down

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 2>to two suspects and eventually found the person using one

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 2>of these ancestry websites to track down the killer so

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 2>governments can access it.

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 4>They do.

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it's good. Sometimes it's a nefarious.

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Purpose, and they're happy for that to make it into

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 4>the media because it's like, oh, look, this is a

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 4>positive thing. Never mind that we compromise the DNA data

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 4>of millions of people in order to just be like, hi,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 4>excuse me, ancestry dot com, excuse me twenty three and

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 4>meter well where the government, where the law enforces. So

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 4>it's in safe hands with us. Just hand it over,

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 4>won't you that that's fine? No, it's not fine. Like

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 4>I said, nothing is more private than your personal genetic info.

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 4>And you have no idea how someone can webonize.

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 2>That you'd wanted insurance companies well, exactly, I want it.

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's lots of I mean, the.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Track your driving if they get DNA.

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, And that's the next thing.

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 6>They'll be refusing health industans on the basis of your

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 6>DNA because they'll do the genomic testing and they'll work

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 6>out that you've got a family history of breast cancer

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 6>or whatever it is, and then they'll start denying you insurance.

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 6>That's where this is going. That's why this stuff is

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 6>so valuable. I mean, you know, I worry about giving

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 6>my bloody idea if I go into a nightclub or

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 6>a registered club or something. No, I don't get but

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 6>I have been to nightclubs. We're in order to get

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 6>in the door, they scan your ID before you go in.

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 6>Presumably you know, if you cause a raucus or something,

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 6>it then means they've got your stuff on record. But

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 6>I'm like, what's the rules here? Are you going to

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 6>destroy that at any point? Do you just now have

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 6>my photograph and my address on record forever?

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 3>And what do you like? Seriously, I worry about that.

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 6>And some people are willing to hand their DNA over

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 6>to a private company.

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't get it.

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 6>I'll tell you one thing else I don't get. Well,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 6>I do actually get it. I know why the federal

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 6>government is doing it, but gee, it makes me uncomfortable

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 6>is that they have started getting influences involved in their

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 6>election and budget coverage. There were influences, thirteen of them

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 6>to be specific, who were allowed into the federal budget

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 6>lock up yesterday. Some of them had their flights and

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 6>accommodation paid for by the ALP. The Labor Party wanted

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 6>the social media influences there, ranging from people who do

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 6>money podcasts to people who get maker living in notoriety

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 6>out of modeling swimwear and activewear. I mean, they're the

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 6>sort of people that you want to be taking your

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 6>budget advice from, of course, but they want them in

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 6>the room and will pay for their flights and accommodation

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 6>to get them there, presumably because they want positive coverage.

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 6>I mean, why else would you be paying for them

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 6>to be there. Take a look at some of the

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 6>content that these excellent influencers produced yesterday.

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately, it's not about me. It's about the audience that

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I have cultivated, who are engaged progressive Australians who give

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a talk about the future of this country. And he

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to use me to speak to them. What gives

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>you hope? You no better than anyone in Australia right now?

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>What gives you hope for the next generation? Not just

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>as a politician but.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 3>As a person?

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:19.199
<v Speaker 2>Can I get a signature? They keep Jim away from it?

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, how pathetic is that?

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Or excuse me for our next minister. Can I have

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>your autograph please?

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 6>I mean you're supposedly there to cover the budget, not

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 6>to be a sicker fan. You heard the first woman,

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 6>of course, saying, the Prime Minister is using me to

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 6>talk to you.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the.

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Jiggy is up.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 6>She's just said it. The Prime Minister is using her

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 6>as a mouthpiece to run the ALP line to people

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 6>and they will pay your flights and accommodation if you

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 6>will do it.

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 3>And ab had that softball.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 6>Question that the second woman, Oh, what gives you hope

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 6>for the future. I mean, what gives elbow hope for

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 6>the future is that he just bought a four million

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 6>dollar cliff top mansion at Copa Cabata, and if it

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 6>all goes sour, he'll be able to go there and

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 6>enjoy the rest of his life outside of politics. This

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 6>makes me really uncomfortable because we all know there are

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 6>media outlets that are friendlier to the government and others

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 6>that are unfriendlier to the It's always been thus we

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:18.839
<v Speaker 6>know that.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 3>But any media outlet that wants to.

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 6>Go and cover the budget pays its own expenses.

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>The Labor Party, the Liberal Party, whoever.

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 6>Does not pay for journalists to come along and cover

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 6>the budget. And that's for a very good reason, because

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 6>if the politicians aren't paying you to do your job,

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 6>you can at least do your job with a sceric

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 6>of integrity and independence. Surely, the moment a political party

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 6>literally starts paying in kind, as it is in this case,

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm not saying he's five grand to come to the budget,

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 6>but will pay for your flights and accommodation. Surely they

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 6>then expect in return some positive coverage that, as far

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 6>as I'm concerned, is cash for comment. I try to

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 6>do that on this network or on radio. I'm up

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 6>before Akma for not declaring that because it's an advertising deal. Essentially,

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 6>are these people not doing advertising deals with the government.

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Of a question? Where did they get this idea from? Caleb?

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't this a Trump administration idea?

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, he certainly spoke to a lot of podcasters.

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Famously allow influencers into the White House press briefing rooms.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Now this is interesting because don't the Albanezi government continually

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 2>criticize Peter Dutton for copying from Trump's playbook and accusing

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 2>him of Trumpian politics. And here's the Labor Party lifting

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 2>an idea straight from Donald Trump. I should point out

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>we've got to be careful not to be hypocritical, because

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 2>I think when Trump did this, we all said, oh,

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>this is great. He's opening it up to the new media.

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Now Albanese is doing this and we're like, oh, this

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 2>is dodgy. I had no issue.

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 6>I have no issue letting them come in. If they

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 6>want to do coverage, that's fine. But it's when they

0:15:56.080 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 6>start being paid by the government or a political party problem.

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Some of these people have got clear biases. Sarah Ferguson,

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 2>who's famous on Instagram, was one of the thirteen influencers

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 2>invited by government ministers handpicked. She on her Instagram talks

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 2>about things like how to convince your grandparents not to

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 2>vote for Peter Dutton. I can't imagine why albany'ze has

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 2>invited her to cover the budget.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 4>She's already on board, she's already peddling the message. But look,

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 4>this is incredibly smart. The difference with what Trump's team did,

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 4>obviously was to go on these podcasts that are millions

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 4>of followers in the States. Both he and jd Vancey,

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 4>his VP, did this, and it was incredibly effective because

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 4>much like Australia. In America, the younger generations are completely

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 4>disengaged from politics, but they watch these influences, they watch

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 4>the podcasters. So what the Albanezy government is doing here

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 4>is incredibly smart. None of these young people are reading

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 4>the paper, none of these young people are following any

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 4>pollies on any of the socials, but they're following these influences.

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 4>So it's very likely that whatever these influencers say is

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 4>going to be the only exposure that those young people

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 4>get to Australian politics and the state of the nation

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 4>in the lead up to the election, in the lead

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 4>up to the day that they'll go to the ballot box.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 2>You know what Anthiobenes is going to do next, He's

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 2>going to get contestants from Maps to go with him

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 2>on the.

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 4>That really can it does?

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.479
<v Speaker 6>It worries me about where politics is going though, and

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 6>the greater body politic because you know, of course, as

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 6>I said before, it's always been us. There are elements

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 6>of the media that are friendly to the left and

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 6>not so friendly to the right, and people will tend

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 6>to gravitate towards sources of media that they think confirms

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 6>their biases. We all know that, and it's always been

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 6>that way. That's fine, it's a free market.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 3>But I feel like now, you know, previously it least

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 3>there would be people in here.

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 6>On Sky News, we have lefties who come on and

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 6>talk to what is largely a conservative audience because we

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 6>feel like, you know, we've actually got to provide a

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 6>bit of balance here. But that doesn't exist on social media.

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 6>And of course, with algorithms the way they work on

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 6>social media, they will continually feed you stuff that they

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 6>think you want to see. So it just reinforces and

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 6>reinforces and reinforces whatever your existing.

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Biases are and doesn't challenge you in any way.

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 6>So if it becomes influences that people get all their

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 6>information from, and social media is feeding them what the

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 6>algorithm thinks they want to see, they're never going to

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 6>be exposed to anything the side. And so you don't

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 6>actually know why you think what you think. You just

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 6>think it because that's all you've ever seen. And I

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 6>think that's a really dangerous place to be.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of danger. In today's episode of are the Left

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 4>just a dangerously violent bunch of whack jobs? The Dems

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 4>with their twenty seven percent approval rating in the states.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 4>At the moment, I've decided the way they're going to

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 4>dig themselves out of this hole is to launch a

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 4>speaking tour featuring the most radical elements in their party,

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 4>namely Rep. AOC and Bernie Sanders. They're going on a

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 4>speaking tour speaking against oligarchs, and it doesn't take a

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 4>genius to figure out who those oligarchs are, namely Musk

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 4>and Co. They're doing this, of course, in conjunction with

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 4>the domestic terrorists currently running rife on elon Musk's biggest company, Tesla,

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 4>in which sixty percent of his wealth is wrapped up.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 4>So his AOC speaking at her own rally and check

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 4>out what someone in the crowd yells out.

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>That his campaigns big his how nice there and all

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of us are allowed to behind.

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 4>Because a French Revolution reference with that sign on the

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 4>stage is a okay if you're the Democrats. Notice the

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 4>distinct absence of any like oh whoa whoa, no mate

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 4>where we're not about that though. She just continues on

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 4>like nothing happened. Let's check in with another Democratic Rep. Shelby.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:35.360
<v Speaker 4>She's Jasmine Crockett and not a violent person at all.

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 4>You'd think to watch this interview.

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that you punch.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you punch.

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 7>I think you're okay, you you okay, we're punching, you know,

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 7>I think and I love Colin, and I think towards

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 7>the end he started to punch a little harder.

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>But like it's sare rules.

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 7>I mean, like this dude has to be nuts over

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 7>the head, like hard, right, Like there is no niceties

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 7>with him, like at all, Like you go clean off

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 7>on him, right.

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it's perfectly okay to threaten physical violence against the

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Secretary of State because we don't like him. He's on

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 4>Trunk's team. So yeah, just whack him in the head

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 4>as hard as you can. And before you think this

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 4>is just limited to the radicals in the Democratic Party,

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 4>some of the most popular talk show hosts in the

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 4>United States of America are also featuring these stories regarding

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 4>the takedown of Elon Musk to massive applause in their audiences.

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 2>They're taking to the streets or the parking lots.

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 8>Could I be FBI and ATF now investigating multiple cases

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 8>of possible arts and targeting tesla's and cyber trucks.

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 2>This dramatic video shows multiple cars and flames.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 7>Police say the attacker used molotov cocktails. It's the latest

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 7>and more than a dozen instances of our sin.

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Cyber trucks were set on fire in Kansas City, and

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 2>earlier this month, shots fired at a Tesla dealership in Oregon.

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Cyber trucks on fire in Seattle. Wow, you guys like

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 2>pettiacts of domestic terrorism.

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 4>Hardly call that a petty act. But you could tell

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 4>that even the host was a little taken aback by

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 4>the enthusiastic enthusiasm of the crowd there as they watched

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 4>people's cars just go up in flames. Check out Jimmy Kimmel,

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 4>he is one of the head honchos of late night

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 4>TV in the States, trying to make it funny and

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 4>suggesting that well, Elon Musk should have thought about this before.

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 3>He lined with Trump, when you pull out a chainsaw

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 3>to celebrate firing thousands of people diget mad.

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just you know, my.

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 4>God, I mean, they are mad. They might start burning

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 4>your businesses to the ground with Molotov cock downs. You

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 4>know what were you expecting, Elon mask, Ladies and gentlemen,

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 4>the Party of Joy and Tolerance just supporting the physical

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 4>takedown of not only Elon Musk as a person references

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 4>to guillotining is fine, and whacking people in the head

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 4>is perfectly fine as hard as you can, mind you,

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 4>because well they deserve it. We hate these people.

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 6>Two words January sixth. I mean, we never heard the end.

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 3>Of January sixth. They stormed the capital. It was an insurrection.

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 3>How dare they this was violence. They're trying to overthrow democracy.

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 3>This is what the right does.

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 6>They can't accept the results of a democratic election, and

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 6>now we have this. We have them going around setting

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 6>cars on fire, bombing car dealerships, saying that people should

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 6>face the guillotine, going around some of the attendees at

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 6>these rallies, going around saying that, you know, Donald Trump

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 6>should swing like Mussolini, on and on. It goes, oh, yeah,

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 6>that's fine. I mean, January sixth was so bad that

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 6>Donald Trump should be not allowed anywhere near the White

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 6>House ever. Again they get a result they don't like,

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 6>they want to start killing people and destroying property. I mean,

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 6>they thought they had the moral high ground. They don't

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 6>have the moral high ground. They have told on themselves

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 6>so hard it's not funny. They are demented in the

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 6>way they are carrying on about this.

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 3>It was a democratic election. You lost it. Get over it.

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 2>He gave us two words. I'll give you three. Trump

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 2>assassination attempt. The Left have learned absolutely nothing from that. Remember,

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 2>in the wake of that, there was a general agreement

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 2>everybody needs to just tone it down, wind back the language.

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 2>And here the Democrats have ramped it right back up.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 2>But aren't these the people who say words are violence.

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Don't they get all upset about a Trump tweet. That's

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 2>the end of the world if Trump tweets something nasty

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 2>or mean. And here they are calling for people to

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 2>be slapped in the head, for people to be guillotined,

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 2>and cheering for the destruction of a great American business. There,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 2>democracy is just ranked.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, you speak of an assassination attempt. Someone did a

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 4>pop fox with people who are lining up to go

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 4>to this Bernie Sanders AOC rally, and three people in

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 4>this same pop Fox were all like, yeah, off with

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 4>his head. Literally, these guys said, oh, dead fascist is

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 4>the only good fascist. These people are hell bent just

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 4>saying off with their heads basically.

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 2>And we saw an interview where a lady is asked

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 2>at one of these rallies. Do you support violence? She's

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 2>just no, I don't support violence. But we've done everything

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 2>we can and they just don't listen to us. So

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 2>it's all we've got left, which is violence.

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 6>But the base bit is they don't even realize what

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 6>they're doing or what they're actually advocating for. It was

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 6>like we showed a video recently, didn't we of all

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 6>these people going around saying, Elon Mussa, go back to

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 6>where you came from. I mean, you know, for years

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 6>and years they've carried on about how that's a racist slur,

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 6>and all of a sudden, they're using it against people

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 6>they don't like, like they are literally the thing they

0:25:58.119 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 6>say they hate.

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, while left these to kill Donald Trump. Donald Trump

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 2>is resisting the urge to kill his national security advisor

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 2>after a massive security leak, the Trump administration was planning

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 2>and then carried out a missile strike on Hohoti rebels

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 2>in Yemen, and so they got together a chat group

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 2>which comprised people like the Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Vice President JD. Vance. It was all put together by

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.479
<v Speaker 2>the National Security Advisor Michael Waltz. Now in putting together

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 2>this chat group on the messaging app Signal. Michael Waltz

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 2>somehow invited a journalist from the Atlantic magazine into this

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 2>highly secure, supposedly chat group where they're talking about this

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 2>missile strike among other things. Now will show you some

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 2>of the text messages in just a moment, but to

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 2>have a listen to the National security advisor explain how

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 2>this all happened. How was it that on this chat

0:26:55.920 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 2>group where they're discussing a missile strike against terrorists, this

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 2>is highly classified material that an Atlantic journalist ends up

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 2>part of the group.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 8>These were principles and and a couple and a couple

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 8>of staff that were coordinating as you saw, having a

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 8>policy discussion, as as we went forward, and then just

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 8>in the days before what was an incredible strike.

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know this guy.

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 8>I know him by his horrible reputation and he really

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 8>is a bottom scum of journalists.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 3>I take full responsibility.

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 8>I built the I built the group to my job.

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Is to make sure everything's coordinated. But how that's a cute.

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I don't mean to be pedantic here, but

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 8>how did the number have you ever had have you

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 8>ever had somebody's contact that shows their name and then

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 8>you have an and then you have somebody else that mistake. Right,

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 8>You've got somebody else's number on someone else's contact.

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 3>So of course I didn't see this loser in the group.

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 3>It looked like someone else happens.

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 2>To me all the time, kind of bonded on my phone,

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 2>like get this store, I answering, it's just the weirdest thing.

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 6>How could you think that was a genuine ecat when I.

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Should, Oh, yeah, haven't you ever had it?

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 6>No? I mean normally I need someone, I'm like, what's

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 6>your number? What's your name? And then I press their

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 6>name and their number comes up. I mean, it's never

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 6>happened to me, literally never.

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Here's Donald Trump but defending his national security advisor.

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he should apologize. I think he's doing

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>his best.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 8>It's equipment and technology that's not perfect, and probably he

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 8>won't be using it again, at least not in a

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 8>very refuge.

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>You sor, I agree with you.

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 8>Let's get everybody in the.

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Room, Caleb. If this was the Biden administration, we would

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 2>be going crazy on this, calling for heads to roll.

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I think the American public understand there are going to

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 2>be mistakes. Trump's not the Messiah. He's just a very

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 2>naughty boy. He's going to get some things wrong. But

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 2>I think what the public want is just honesty when

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 2>you stuff up, don't do what the National Security Advisor

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 2>did then and just come up with these ridiculous excuses

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 2>or the other thing that the administrator is doing is

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 2>they're blaming the journalist and smearing him. And admittedly this

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 2>journalist doesn't have a particularly great track record, Liz, you

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 2>might talk about that in a moment, but surely the

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration should just be honest and maybe keep the

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 2>advisor on, but admit it was a massive stuff up.

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 2>If it ever happens again, you are gone. But just

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 2>be honest with people.

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, you're right.

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 6>If it was the bad administration, we'd say this bloke

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 6>should be gone. I mean, how could you possibly do this.

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 6>I get that leaks happen and whatever, but.

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 3>This is a bad mistake.

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 6>Now, in this case, they'll get away with it because

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 6>it was after the fact, essentially, and there was nothing

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 6>in it that's terribly damaging to the Trump administration. So

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 6>the dog will bark and the caravan will move on.

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 6>But imagine if there had been contents in those messages

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 6>that was dangerous in any way. Now, of course, a

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 6>journalist has to make a call in that situation whether

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 6>it is in the national interest to.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Report what is in front of them.

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.479
<v Speaker 6>In this case, fine to report essentially because it didn't

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:06.239
<v Speaker 6>lead to anyone's death or put anyone in danger. I mean,

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 6>as a journalist, this is the story I would wish

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 6>would happen to me of all the chat groups I

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 6>could ever end up in as a journal I'm like, yes,

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 6>please put me in that one, because it's a great yarn.

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 6>But these kind of mistakes should not happen. I know

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 6>mistakes happen, but they just should not happen at all.

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 6>And anyone who does something like that and then tries

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 6>to say, well, don't you have people's names with other

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 6>people's phone numbers in their phones, I think that's a

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 6>cop out and he needs to.

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 4>Go well, this is quite literally possibly the most insane

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 4>national security story of the last fifty years. In this chat,

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 4>they were talking about weapons that would be deployed, they

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 4>were talking about the targets, and they were talking about

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 4>attack sequencing. So this falling into the wrong hands would

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 4>have been one you mentally bad. But what I want

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 4>to draw people's attention to is the fact that JD Vance,

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 4>who was in this chat, was very much opposed to

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 4>these strikes in Yemen. So you've got Jeffrey Goldberg, the

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 4>journo who finds himself in this chat. He said, I

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 4>didn't think it could be real. I literally sat in

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 4>my car, thinking, well, if it's real, the bombs will

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 4>start falling, and then I'll no. And then he tells

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 4>the story. He's sitting in his car, checks the time,

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 4>and sure enough, googled Yemen and the bombs had started falling,

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 4>at which point he realized, I'm actually in a legit hack.

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 4>This isn't some sort of weird people trying to hoax

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 4>me here. I'm in there with Trump's top team, privy

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 4>to all the private one would hope, well, not clearly,

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 4>not really, and then proceeded to share screenshots. But JD

0:31:57.520 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Vance I got to take my hat off to him here,

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 4>he texted at eight sixteen team, I am out for

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 4>the day doing an economic event in Michigan. But I

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 4>think we are making a mistake. Three percent of US

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 4>trade runs through the Suez, forty percent of European trade does.

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 4>There is a real risk that the public doesn't understand

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 4>this or why it's necessary. The strongest reason to do

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 4>this is, as Poters said, to send a message. He

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 4>says he's not sure the president is aware of how

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 4>inconsistent such a move would be with his current stance

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 4>on Europe. He also speaks to the risk of severe

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 4>spikes in oil prices. He finishes by saying, I'm willing

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 4>to support the consensus of the team and keep these

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 4>concerns to myself, but there is a strong argument for

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 4>putting this off for at least a month. So my

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 4>bit two biggest concerns about this security leak was firstly,

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 4>to recap the contents of that chat. They didn't think

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 4>the whoties were a real threat, not in this particular

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 4>strike that they were doing. They didn't think Americans would

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 4>understand the strikes. For that very reason, they didn't. They

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 4>did it anyway to send a message, and they did

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 4>it on an unencrypted chat on signal. You can't make

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 4>this stuff up. But the part that I think everyone's

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 4>missing here, Yes, the leak's a big deal, but the

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 4>real scandal is waging war in a foreign country without

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 4>congressional approval. You're normally supposed to let your mates know

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 4>what's happening. It's supposed to go to a vote. None

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 4>of that was happening. These were just a pile of

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 4>warhawk neo cons being like, yeah, bomb them and then

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 4>texting each other being like strong start, congratulations mate was

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 4>auto like just mind blowing stuff.

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 6>And it's an interesting window as well into obviously how

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 6>much control Trump has of the people around him, because

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 6>you've got the vice president saying to a group of

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 6>people who he presumably thinks are not going to relay

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 6>this back to the President that he's not entirely sure

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 6>this is the right thing to do. He obviously thought

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 6>he was in comfortable company there. But you would like

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 6>to think that in that case the vice president would

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 6>be going off and having those conversations with the President

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 6>and saying, actually, this is my advice on this situation.

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 6>It would seem that Trump basically says jump and other

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:27.439
<v Speaker 6>people say how high.

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure that's always the best way.

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Student note, I'm happy to keep my concerns to myself.

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Et.

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Prudent bearing the lighter world.

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 6>Don't you hate it when you've got someone else's name

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 6>on top of a different person's number, Hey, let's talk

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 6>about air travel, right Coantus is saying, can you believe it?

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean I would had gone off contus entirely.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 3>But the CEO of the new CEO.

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 6>Of Quantus, Vanessa Hudson, has actually seen something quite sensible.

0:34:57.520 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 6>We'll see whether she actually backs this up with action,

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 6>but she says that it's quite possible that air travel

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 6>will become quote so expensive that it's something for the

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 6>privileged if they continue to follow through with their net

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 6>zero targets. Now, Quantus is aiming to buy twenty thirty

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 6>have ten percent of their fuel a sustainable aviation fuel.

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 3>This is not jet fuel, which is kerosene.

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 6>It's green stuff that is currently three to five times

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 6>more expensive than jet fuel. So their plan is ten

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 6>percent by the end of the decade. Britain has already

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 6>mandated ten percent by the end of the decade, the

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 6>EU is mandated six percent by the end of the decade.

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 6>And further on in Quantus's plans is that they'll be

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 6>using sixty percent of this sustainable aviation.

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Fuel by twenty fifty.

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 6>But because it is so expensive, someone's got to pay

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 6>for it. So who's going to pay for it? It's

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 6>going to be you in air fares. Airbus has come

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 6>out with the same concerns as well, saying that we

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 6>will very likely hit a point where traditionally, over time

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 6>airfares have been going down. And I know it might

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 6>not feel like that domestically, but if you follow the trajectory,

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 6>particularly for international flights, they have over recent decades on

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 6>average gone down, but we will reach a point where

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 6>they will start to go right back up again because

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 6>you've got to pay for the world to be decarbonized. Now,

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 6>the entire aviation sector plans to be net zero by

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 6>twenty fifty, and if they're going to do that with

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 6>this sustainable aviation fuel, then it looks like we're going

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 6>to be paying for it, just as we're paying for

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 6>it through the nose with our power bills, which we

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:37.919
<v Speaker 6>were told would be two hundred and seventy five dollars

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:42.760
<v Speaker 6>cheaper but aren't because we've gone headfirst into renewable energy.

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 6>I mean, they might actually be able to achieve net

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 6>zero because no one's going to fly anyway because they

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 6>won't be able to afford to the only people will

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 6>be flying around of those who can afford private jets.

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 6>But again, this is the reality. This is what happens

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 6>when you pursue net zero. Someone has to pay for

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 6>it and it ends up being the average punter who

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 6>go to afford.

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Virgin Airlines have just announced sustainable flights out of Proserpine

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 2>in Queensland where they're using thirty to forty percent of

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.280
<v Speaker 2>the mixture of this fuel. At what struck me, Liz

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 2>was the mayor of the Wit Sunday's Rye Collins. So

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 2>this is perfect Virgin flying with this sustainable fuel which

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 2>is three to five times more expensive out of Proserpine

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 2>because we've got the great barrier reef here and so

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 2>we want sustainable tourism. I thought you are mad because

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 2>there's a great barrier reef in Cans, isn't there? So

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't you just howk a flight to Cans if it's

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be cheaper? So this is just meant to

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 2>sand or they can fine you to within fifteen minutes

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 2>of your home. We're going to go to a break

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 2>when we come back with what's making news tomorrow, including

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton's plan to cut the fuel excise that's coming

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 2>up in this run. Welcome back for Peter Dutton gives

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 2>his budget apply speech tomorrow, but tomorrow morning's papers have

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 2>already got details of what he's proposing. Lit This is

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a winner.

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 4>With all and Sundry on the front page of the

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 4>Daily Telly Pump it Up reads the splash drivers will

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 4>save about seven hundred and fifty dollars on petrol if

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 4>the Coalition wins government, with Peter Dutton pledging to have

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:24.720
<v Speaker 4>the fuel excise for twelve months, setting up an election

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 4>contest on cost of living measures. Mister Dutton will use

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 4>his budget reply today being tomorrow to announce a twelve

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 4>month halving of the fuel excise at a cost of

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 4>six billion, after Labor gave Australians a five dollars per

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 4>week tax card in Tuesday night's budget. How do you

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 4>like them apples, Labor? I mean, do you want five

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 4>bucks a week or do you want seven hundred and

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 4>fifty bucks of what you're currently forking out for fuel?

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 6>Well, well it is better on a weekly scale that

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 6>comes at to forteen dollars and forty three cents yessage,

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.399
<v Speaker 6>three times as much as we were going to get,

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 6>and you would hope it would come in to being

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 6>straight away as opposed to having to wait a year

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.320
<v Speaker 6>for it, so it wins on all of those counts.

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 6>And I said last night, it's all good and well

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 6>for the coalition to say they're not going to follow

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 6>through with the promise that the alb and Easy government

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 6>made in terms of tax cuts, but they've got to

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 6>come through with something else better. I think this gets there,

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 6>but again, you know, it's all sort of fiddling around

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 6>the edges. Okay, so we'll have the fuel excise for

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 6>twelve months, Well.

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 3>What about beyond that?

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 6>I mean, why does the fuel excise need to be

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 6>as high as it currently is? And why can we

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 6>not start talking about some real tax reform, not about all.

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, change things for five minutes.

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 6>Why can we not actually talk about some real tax

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 6>reform that means the government takes less of your money.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Just on the last night's budget announcements, I had to

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 2>laugh at Anthony alban Easy today he was asked about

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 2>you know this five dollars a week tax cut that

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 2>starts middle of next year, and he was asked, why

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 2>are you rushing it through now, you know when it

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 2>doesn't apply to the middle of next year, And he said,

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 2>because I wanted to provide Australians with certainty, which I thought, Man,

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 2>five dollars, you just want to be sure when that

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 2>five bucks a week is going to be in your pocket.

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 4>So I'm certain of something. What do you think?

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 3>So certainly?

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 2>All of the light, that's a good idea.

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 6>Let's go to the front of the odds. We're more

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 6>on this tax theme. Bracket creep wipes tax cuts.

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 3>This is the problem.

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 6>The average taxpayer stands to lose almost five thousand dollars

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 6>due to inflation fueled bracket creep by twenty twenty nine.

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 6>Despite Labour's latest round of tax cuts, with the federal

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 6>budget increasing reliance on the so called stealth tax disproportionately

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 6>affecting low income owners, Jim Charmers unveiled a fresh round

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 6>of income tax cuts and Tuesday's federal budget, which of

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:54.479
<v Speaker 6>course we know will reduce the existing six percent tax

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:58.720
<v Speaker 6>rate on income between eight thousand, eighteen two hundred bucks

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 6>and forty five grand to fifteen percent from mid next year.

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 3>But this is the problem.

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 6>Bracket creep eliminates all of this tomorrow. It's these are

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 6>not real tax cuts we're talking about here, And that's

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:16.320
<v Speaker 6>what I mean when when I talk about genuine tax reform.

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:20.320
<v Speaker 6>Can we talk about a way that Okay, the tax

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 6>regime may be completely different to the way it looks

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 6>right now, but can we have one that involves the

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 6>government not just taking more and more and more and

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:31.439
<v Speaker 6>more and more of your money and pretending they're giving

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 6>you a tax.

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 3>Cut because they're not giving you a tax cut, they're just.

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 6>Recouping it later on while saying they're giving you a

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 6>tax cut. And he was asked today, the treasurer, all

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 6>this extra money, about four hundred billion dollars worth in

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 6>increased tax receipts over what was estimated that you got

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 6>in your term of government, Why did you not do

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 6>something to change the debt? You know, why are we

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 6>in the same position we were before when you've made

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 6>four hundred billion dollars extra out of us.

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't have an answer to that. They've they've you know, done,

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 3>you know what against the.

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Wall with And if the bracket creep doesn't destroy your

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 2>five dollars a week tax cut, then inflation will by

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 2>the time we get to the middle of next year. I'm

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 2>not sure what five bucks is going to buy. The

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 2>right things are going half a coffee, half a coffee,

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 2>half coffee, probably decaf.

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.919
<v Speaker 6>Anyway, I didn't know we're going to do another story

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 6>on the front of the oars, but let us do it.

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to find.

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 6>Treasure, a blue lotto windfall. See, I will run with

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 6>it here. Jim Chalmers has stridently rejected claims he squandered

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 6>almost three hundred and fifty billion dollars of windfall revenue

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 6>games despite the budget forecasting a decade of defericits as

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 6>labor moved to which Peter Dadden by trying to ram

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 6>legislation through Parliament to set up an election fight over

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:48.879
<v Speaker 6>a five dollars a.

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Week text cut that issue.

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 6>It is The issue I was just talking about is

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 6>that he was asked about, you know, how are we

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.240
<v Speaker 6>in a situation where you can make that much money

0:42:57.560 --> 0:42:59.760
<v Speaker 6>and just essentially go Will it went puff?

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know where it went.

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 6>I mean he was saying in the budget speech last

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 6>night that they banked seventy percent of this increased tax review.

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, why what have they done with it?

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean, if you're not paying down debt, what's the

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 6>point in banking all this extra money you've taken from us,

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 6>except to say, well, you know, we had two surpluses

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:21.720
<v Speaker 6>in my term of government. So how we only because

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 6>they took all the money from us in our commodities,

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 6>et cetera.

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 2>Please all right, let's go to the front page of

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the Townshill bulletin a curious story, not over our dead Bodies,

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 2>reads the headline Thornty issue over scattering ashes in park.

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Townsville City Council has been forced to put up signs

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 2>in Queen's Gardens after staff were confronted by multiple instances

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 2>of human remains being scattered or discarded in the gardens.

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 2>The council spokesman said Townsholl's much loved Rose Garden had

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 2>become a popular spot for people to scatter ashes. Now,

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 2>we haven't been able to access the rest of this

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 2>story to find out the detail as to why the

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 2>council is so upset about this, because in Queensland it

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 2>is legal to scatter your ashes in public places, including

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 2>council owned parks. Queen's Park in Townsville is very beautiful.

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 2>I can only imagine maybe the council have read about

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Mount Panorama where an indigenous groups scattered some ashes and

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 2>automatically declared that the sacred site. Maybe they're worried they'll

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 2>lose the Queen's garden. Now someone's going to scatter Grandma's

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 2>ashes their enclaimate.

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 6>Well, if there's anywhere that they try to, you know,

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:30.759
<v Speaker 6>sort of decolonize it to be Queen's guardens, wouldn't.

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 2>It be exactly?

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, seriously, if.

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 6>You can't go and scatter your loved ones ashes somewhere

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:38.240
<v Speaker 6>that they loved being, I'm.

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 3>Just going to check out of this world.

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 6>What's the point anymore? We cannot have nice things anymore.

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 6>It's such a basic thing. Is there anything that the

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 6>council won't interfere with if they get the opposite?

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Are right? Most people would be doing this at the

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 4>request of the decease, like that where I'd like to

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 4>have my remain scattered, No, says the count.

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, Granny, The council says no.

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 4>To the front page of The Herald's son teals fall

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 4>off support slides for Monique Ryan and Zoe Daniel tell

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 4>us more. Peter Dutton and the Liberal Party are within

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 4>striking distance of recapturing Victoria's two till seats, according to

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 4>new polling, with the cost of living the biggest issue

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:25.399
<v Speaker 4>driving voters. Polling of almost eight hundred people in cou

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:28.799
<v Speaker 4>Yong shows Monique Ryan's vote has dived and she is

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 4>just hanging on, while a similar sample in Goldstein reveals

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Zoe Daniel is way behind Liberal rival Tim Wilson. Well, well, well,

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 4>we've been saying at nauseum, this is going to be

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 4>a very interesting election when it comes to how the

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:49.720
<v Speaker 4>Teals do last election, of course, there were an unknown entity.

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 4>They were the new kids on the block, and everyone

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 4>was keen to give them a go. How are people

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 4>feeling just a few years later.

0:45:57.960 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 3>I hope this is true.

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 6>I just really hope this is true because I've been

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 6>people have been asking me privately, are the Teal's going

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:07.800
<v Speaker 6>to fall over? And I've been saying no. I don't

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:10.320
<v Speaker 6>think this election will be the end of the Teals.

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 6>I think that's another election away. They've still got some

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:15.799
<v Speaker 6>wind in them. For the first time in my life.

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 6>I hope I'm wrong about that.

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 3>I hope this pollings are right.

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I thought Nick Ryan's husband was removing Liberal signs because

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 2>they were in illegal places, But it turns out they're

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.439
<v Speaker 2>just doing really bad in the polling. Who knew were

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 2>to go to a break when we come back well

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Worth shopping bags. They're selling them for twenty bucks and

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 2>people are buying them. That's in a moment, welcome back,

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 2>well calib The funny thing happened in the Senate today.

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:42.320
<v Speaker 6>I know, you know, sometimes they say that Parliament seems

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 6>like a zoo. Today it seemed like an aquarium. There

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:49.879
<v Speaker 6>was certainly some fishy behavior from Green Senator Sarah Hanson Young.

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:52.240
<v Speaker 6>I'm sorry to say. She comes from my home state

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 6>of South Australia. We hadn't really heard much from her recently.

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:57.719
<v Speaker 6>She just sort of seemed to be flitting around in

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:00.640
<v Speaker 6>the world. I don't know, but today she decided to

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 6>do something very strange and well, take.

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 9>A look on the eve of the election, had you

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:14.360
<v Speaker 9>sold out your environment credentials throwing often stinking and attention

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 9>salmon hats in salmon Senate Shair Hats Young removed the

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:22.800
<v Speaker 9>prop from the chamber.

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 3>And they say fish rots from the head.

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 6>I noticed that one had its head removed, probably to

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 6>signify the brains missing from most Green senators and supporters.

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, seriously, we've got.

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 6>A bloody salmon in the Senate. Surely you can do

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 6>better than that. I remember what was it I'm trying

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 6>to remember if it was Wilson, Tucky or who it was.

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:46.280
<v Speaker 6>Someone once took a pipe bomb or a fake pipe

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 6>bomb into the Senate, fronting up to estimates, complaining about

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 6>the state of security in Parliament House and he's like, well,

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 6>look what I brought in today, and.

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Now comes his pipe bomb to prove his point.

0:47:56.800 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 6>I mean, yes, it's amusing, but I thought we were

0:47:59.000 --> 0:47:59.799
<v Speaker 6>a bit better than that.

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 2>At least the salmon didn't smell as bad as the

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Green's policy. So there's that. Well, shopping centers like Woolies

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:09.840
<v Speaker 2>and Coals, they've got revenue in the bag. Quite literally,

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 2>they're selling bags. We used to get plastic bags for free,

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 2>then they sold us paper bags. Now Woolworths are selling

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 2>tote bags to fashion conscious shoppers for twenty dollars just

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:25.320
<v Speaker 2>so you can carry your milk home in that. People

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 2>are so loving them. They're selling out and reselling on

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:33.919
<v Speaker 2>email BA baby, ba bail the dollars. They're designed by

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 2>Anya Hindmarch, who's designed these bags for supermarkets all over

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the world. What I loved is Woolworth's a really upset

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 2>about them being resold. They put out a statement saying

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:47.359
<v Speaker 2>the resale of these items is clearly unacceptable and does

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 2>not meet our expectations and those of the wider community.

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 4>Liz, they're just sad they're missing how They're like, wait,

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 4>you're reselling them for six See, we've got to up

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 4>our prices.

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Why don't they just do it?

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 6>I mean, why are they complaining about someone else being

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 6>able to make a buck? I mean, if you fancy

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:09.800
<v Speaker 6>a supermarket complaining that someone else's profit was too high.

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, here we are struggling to pay for our groceries.

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:14.439
<v Speaker 6>They want twenty bucks for a bag, but it's those

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 6>nasty people on Ebays.

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 2>Someone should find out how much money they're making from

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 2>selling all these bags. That's it from us to stick around.

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Coming up is the readA Penney Show. Good Night,