WEBVTT - Sharri | 30 June

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News. This is Sharry.

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Good Evening, and welcome to the show.

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caleb Bond filling in for Sharry Marks and this

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 3>week he's what's coming up on the program tonight. Paul

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 3>Keating's thinly veiled swipe at Labor over their super tax plan.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 3>He might just be protecting his legacy, but he does

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 3>make some good points. I'll discuss that in just a moment.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 3>Glaston bree as you just saw, has made headlines for

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 3>all the wrong reasons. This week, Alex Rivtchin will explain

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 3>why chanting death Death to the IDF isn't appropriate at

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 3>a music festival, though I think that's probably pretty self explanatory,

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 3>and as Donald Trump saved TikTok, he seems to think so.

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 3>The US President has announced that he's found a buyer

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 3>for the Chinese owned app Generation Zed. I can imagine

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 3>will be overjoyed, though not so much me. Kosher Garter

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 3>on that a little later. Well, Former Prime Minister Paul Keating,

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 3>as I said before, took a veiled swipe at the

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 3>government today over its tax on unrealized capital gains in superannuation.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 3>We know he's been private critical, but this is the

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 3>first time, the architect of compulsory super, the man who

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>devised and envisaged this system, has taken a public swipe

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 3>at his own party for thirty three years later, basically

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 3>trying to dismantle what he fought for. From tomorrow, July one,

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 3>the compulsory rate of SUPER will increase.

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Half a percent to twelve percent now.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Keating sent out a statement today that read, tomorrow, thirty

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 3>four years after I nominated a twelve percent wage equivalent

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 3>as the appropriate level of compulsory contribution into superannuation, the

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 3>system finally matures. This means that every young person joining

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the workforce this year will begin and remain at twelve

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 3>percent of superannuation contributions throughout their entire working life. And

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.559
<v Speaker 3>this is where things get interesting, he continued. This level

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 3>of contributions and compound earnings will guarantee personal super accumulations

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 3>in excess of three million dollars at retirement, reducing the

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 3>call on the age pension on the Australian budget to

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 3>two percent of GDP by the twenty fifties. He specifically

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 3>points out that every new employee in the country will

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>be on the road to more than three million in

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 3>their super account.

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 2>That is not a coincidence.

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 3>That is Keating taking a veiled but pointed swipe at

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the Albanese government and its Treasurer Jim Charmers, who happens

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 3>to be doctor Charmers, because he did his PhD on

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Paul Keating. Now, the government, of course, is planning to

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 3>increase the superannuation tax from fifteen percent to thirty percent

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 3>on earnings above three million dollars and tax unrealized capital

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 3>gains in those superfunds. That is, if an asset increases

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 3>in value, you pay tax on that quote unquote profit

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>even though you haven't actually made any physical money yet.

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 2>And that three.

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Million dollars, as we know, is not indexed. It stays

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>at that number in perpetuity. Now, this is the first

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 3>public intervention by the former PM on this issue, but

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 3>he's been privately seething about this for a year. The

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Financial Review reported in August last year that in private

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 3>talks over the past month, mister Keating has told industry

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 3>super executives and union leaders that the government's refusal to

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 3>index the three million dollar threshold to increases in inflation

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 3>is unconscionable. According to people familiar with the discussions who

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 3>spoke to the AFR on the condition of anonymity. The

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 3>paper reported that Keating has said any new tax shouldn't

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 3>kick in until at least five million, not three million,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 3>and he was particularly worried about the three million dollar

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>figure not being indexed. It wrote, in private conversations with

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 3>a wide circle of people, mister Keating suggested that an

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 3>unindexed limit on tax concessional superannuation would condemn super to

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 3>becoming a low to middle income scheme, completely at odds

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 3>with the universal scheme he introduced with the Superannuation Guarantee

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen ninety two. That is, Superannuation would lose its

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 3>university out which mister Keating apparently regards as key to

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 3>its strength, national appeal and longevity, the same qualities that

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 3>have underpinned Medicare. That could eventually lead to a lack

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>of political support and even the scrapping of compulsory superannuation,

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 3>which would destroy Keating's legacy and hurt the superbalances of

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 3>low income earners. The Australian's business columnist Robert got Libson

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 3>wrote last month that according to super funds, Keating was

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 3>quote unquote white hot with anger. He wrote a number

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 3>of those funds now believe, as a result of receiving

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 3>an air full of that keating anger, that in due

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 3>course the former prime Minister and Treasurer will go public

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 3>with a withering blast against charmers, more intense than ever

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 3>directed to a cabinet minister. Now, today's statement wasn't a

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 3>withering blast, but it was a shot across the bow.

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 3>He fired the warning shot got Libson also wrote that

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 3>former ACTU President Bill Kelty, an other of the US

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 3>the architects of compulsory super, was likely to come out

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 3>publicly and he since has a Fortnight Ago he told

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 3>The Australian that I think taxing unrealized capital gains is

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 3>bad policy. It distorts the effective tax changes your income flows.

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 3>And if it was on superannuation generally there would be

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 3>a revolution about it. It would destroy Super. Of course,

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Labor argues this as just a tax on the rich

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 3>because it kicks in a three million, But as Kelty says,

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 3>bad policy is bad policy for rich or poor, and

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 3>this is the most important element of keeping statement today.

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 3>This is not just a tax on the rich. It

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 3>is a tax that will affect average income earners in

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 3>just a few decades. The government well knows that bracket

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 3>creep has helped generate record tax revenue in the past decade.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Ten years ago, income tax receipts were two hundred and

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 3>fifty eight point eight billion dollars. This financial year, according

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 3>to the budget, there'll be four hundred and ninety seven

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:05.799
<v Speaker 3>point six billion dollars. That's ninety two point three percent

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 3>more than a decade ago, nearly double, and it's also

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 3>one and a half billion dollars more than was predicted

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 3>in the mid year economic update, and over the forward estimates.

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Next financial year, it'll be five hundred and twenty two

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 3>point seven billion, twenty twenty six, twenty seven, five hundred

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 3>and forty seven point five to two billion, twenty seven

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 3>to twenty eight, five hundred and seventy billion, twenty eight

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine, three hundred and five point three five billion,

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 3>nearly one hundred and eight billion dollars more in income

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:40.239
<v Speaker 3>tax receipts over the next four years. This has become

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 3>the dirty secret of successive federal governments. Inflation and pay

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 3>rises naturally increase wages, but the tax rates don't move

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.559
<v Speaker 3>so proportionately, you end up paying more income tax without

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 3>the government effectively raising taxes. Let's not forget that sham

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 3>tax cut that Doctor Chalmers announced in the budget before

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 3>the election that the lowest tax bracket of sixteen percent

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 3>would drop to fifteen percent on July one next year

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 3>and fourteen percent in twenty twenty seven. Now, that's meant

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 3>to cut two hundred and sixty eight dollars from your

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 3>tax in twenty twenty six twenty seven, which has equal

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 3>to about five dollars a week a cup of coffee

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 3>if you're lucky, and that's meant to increase to five

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and thirty six dollars in twenty seven twenty eight. Now,

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the most recent data collected by the Australian Bureau of

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Statistics from August last year put median weekly earnings at

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 3>one thousand, three hundred and ninety six dollars. So that

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 3>comes to seventy two thousand, five hundred and ninety two

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 3>dollars a year. And if you received a pay rise

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 3>of three percent this year, which is in line with

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 3>the budget's forecast for the wage price index this financial year,

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 3>that of course ends tomorrow, you'd now be earning seventy

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 3>four thousand, seven hundred and eighty dollars, on which you'd

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 3>pay fourteen thousand, seven hundred and eighteen bucks of tax.

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Wages are predicted to rise by three and a quarter

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 3>percent next financial year, so that to take the median

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 3>tick over seventy seven thousand, on which they'd pay fifteen

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 3>and a half thousand dollars in tax. And in twenty

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty six to twenty seven that financial year, which is

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 3>when you get that first tax cut, wages a fore

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 3>cast to go up another three and a quarter percent,

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 3>which will put the median wage annually at seventy nine thousand,

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 3>seven hundred and fifteen dollars. Now, under the current tax regime,

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 3>you'd pay sixteen thousand, two hundred and ninety seven in tax.

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Doctor Chalmers nice man that he is well not two

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 3>hundred and sixty eight bucks off that, So that brings

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 3>it to sixteen thousand and twenty nine dollars. So, despite

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 3>being told you'll get a two hundred and sixty eight

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 3>dollars tax cut tax cut, the average Australian will actually

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 3>be paying one thousand, three hundred and eleven dollars more

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 3>income tax when this alleged tax cut kicks in than

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 3>they are today and that is why they don't want

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 3>to index the increased tax rate on superannuation, because they

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 3>know more and more people will eventually fall into this

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 3>three million dollar category and they will cree more and

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 3>more money off the top until eventually average income earners

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 3>are included. That is the plan. It is part of

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 3>the deal. If it wasn't the plan, that have included

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 3>indexation from the start. I know the Treasury said, oh, well,

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 3>a future government can deal with that in the future.

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 3>They want a future government to deal with it. They

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 3>could do it now, but they choose not to because

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 3>they want the money. So let's hope this isn't the

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 3>last we hear from keeping on this. As I said before,

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 3>he's fired the first shot, but now he has to

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 3>keep up the fight because the only people who can

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 3>possibly convince doctor Chalmers to change course are those in

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 3>the Labor Party itself. That it's nearly two years ago

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 3>that sixty percent of Australians voted no to an Indigenous

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 3>voice to Parliament, but we know states have pressed on

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 3>with their own ideas. South Australia has its own voice.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Victoria is going to entrine one in law. As we

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 3>found out from the Premier Dissenter Allen today. Now their

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 3>thing will be called the First People's Assembly, which it

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 3>does already exist. It's a private, not for profit company

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 3>that's been around since twenty nineteen that was designed to

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 3>represent Indigenous people in negotiations with the state government over

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 3>a treaty, which is another thing that shouldn't happen. But

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 3>now Allan says this should be a permanent part of

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 3>government in Victoria, and she was asked the obvious today,

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 3>didn't we say no to the boys?

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 4>The key difference to the referendum that was put nationwide

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 4>a couple of years ago is that was changing the constitution.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 4>This is not changing the Victorian constitution. It's simply taking

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 4>a common sense approach sitting the First People's Assembly, an

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 4>ongoing representative body into our existing parliamentary structures. But the

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.719
<v Speaker 4>significant change is it'll be a body where we will

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 4>be listening taking on their advice.

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 3>It's not in the constitution, therefore its common sense. I'm

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 3>not quite sure I follow. Alan also refused to answer

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 3>questions today about what powers this voice would have, but

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the expectation is that it will be much the same

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 3>as the one in South Australia. Which means it'll be

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 3>able to have a say in all laws and government

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 3>policies that affect Indigenous Victorians. But of course every law

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 3>and every policy affects Indigenous Victorians because.

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 2>All laws affect all people. So that would.

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Effectively give them carte blanche to interfere in absolutely anything

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>and everything that it wants to. When they had the

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 3>first election of the first People's Assembly in twenty nineteen,

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 3>which is only open to Aboriginal people, as I'm sure

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 3>you understand, only two thousand people voted. They had another

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 3>election in twenty twenty three, and wow, they managed to

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 3>double the number of voters to four thousand, two hundred.

0:11:55.840 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 3>That's ten percent of the Aboriginal voting population in Victoria.

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Ninety percent did not vote. And meanwhile, thirty three people

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 3>are put on this body at a minimum of ninety

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 3>six thousand, nine hundred and forty six thousand dollars each

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 3>nearly one hundred thousand dollars each a year, at least.

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>For one or two days work a week.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 3>That's what it said when they sent out the application

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 3>forms for twenty twenty three. And Jacinta Allen wants to

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 3>enshrine this thing in law I mean on a pro

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 3>rata basis. These people, some of them elected on buggrual votes,

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 3>are paid more than an MP. I mean, if they're

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 3>doing one day a week pro rata, they're earning more

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 3>than the premiere. For God's say, gee whiz. This isn't equality,

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 3>this isn't reconciliation. It's division. It's racism. It is a

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 3>separate and well funded class of people. How much money

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 3>do you think flows through to the communities, the people

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 3>who really should have it. But if you're one of

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 3>the privileged thirty three on this body, one hundred k

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 3>a year and they want to enshrine this in law,

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 3>what a joke. For more on Nervous Business with Paul Keating,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm joined now by Sky News host Joe Hildebrand on

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.839
<v Speaker 3>the desk and the Institute of Public Affairs Saxon Davidson.

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Joe, it seems pretty clear that Keating.

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 3>Is not happy with the direction that well we all

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 3>thought he is a great fan. Dr Chalmers is going

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 3>and as I said before, it's the first time he's

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 3>publicly said anything about this.

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 6>Look, Paul Keating blowing up is one of the great

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 6>time on a traditions of Australian politics, and people in

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 6>the Labor Party are obviously very used to it. They

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 6>always listen to what he has to say, but they

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 6>also take it with a grain of salt. I actually

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 6>think when Paul Keating and Bill Kelty and people from

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 6>that generation who I do think was the sort of

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 6>greatest generation of Labor Party leaders, I think you do listen,

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 6>and you should listen. I'm surprised that the government is

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 6>being quite so stubborn on this issue. It strikes me

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 6>that this is a policy that you could very easily

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 6>just get rid of all the kinks, blast away all

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 6>the opposition simply by carving out things like the family

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 6>farm or small family businesses if you're investing in your

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 6>own business, and also indexing it. And the Greens have

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 6>actually suggested the Greens want to lower it to two million,

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 6>so we don't do that. They're crazy little trots, but

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 6>they've suggested indexing it as well. And you know, when

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 6>the Greens are kind of being a bit more sensible

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 6>than Dare I say it, I can't say it, but

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 6>you know this is something you know, you shouldn't really

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 6>die in a ditch over. So I think there's a

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 6>bit of sort of there's a bit of pride I

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 6>think the treasurer has where it's sort of, you know,

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 6>doesn't want to compromise. But after pride, as a good

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 6>book says, comes to fall, and.

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's not forget sex.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 3>And that he was Paul Keating basically the last great

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 3>reforming economic treasurer we had in this country, and of

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 3>course the guest he came in under Howard and Alden Costillo,

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 3>but there were significant changes made by Hawk and Keating.

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 3>He understands the superannuation system what it was designed to do,

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 3>because he designed it better than anyone else. If he's

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 3>saying this could potentially destroy superannuation in the long run,

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 3>you think the.

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Labor Party would take some notice. You would absolutely think so.

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 7>And Paul Keating is right to question the nature of

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 7>these changes, particularly because it's unfair to the first real

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 7>beneficiaries of superannuation that you're going to change it in

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 7>this matter, and also unfair to future generations. This change

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 7>basically embeds bracker creep into super in the same way

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 7>that it is embedded into income tax. It's anti aspirational,

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 7>it's against the basic tenants of super that it's supposed

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 7>to benefit you after you retire, not in double basically

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 7>the tax on people over three million dollars. But this will,

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 7>of course, because it's embedding bracker creep, this will own

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 7>increase the tax base of super and unfairly tax future

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 7>generations of Australians.

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, let's hope Keating doesn't give it up now. It

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 3>was the best story going around last week. This street

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 3>sweeper in Melbourne who successfully challenged his sacking from DARREBN

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Council for objecting to acknowledgment of country for a toolbox meeting.

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 3>For heaven's sake, well, James McPherson, he's filling in on

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Bolt this week. Of course, my mate from the

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 3>late debate, he tracked him down this evening.

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Take a look.

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 8>I just thought it was overdoing it, like we're at

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 8>a toolbox meeting, no special occasion or anything like that,

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 8>and I just thought it's getting overdone, Like.

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 2>If you gain eight meetins.

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 8>You're probably going to get acknowledgment of the countries.

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>And he's right.

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 3>A new IPA survey has found that fifty six percent

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 3>of people think welcomes to country have become divisive. Saxon,

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 3>of course you are at the IPA. You commissioned this

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 3>polling no great surprise.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I think this result.

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Not at all.

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 7>Australians don't want to be divided by race, and this

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 7>pole just reinforces that belief. We obviously saw that sixty

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 7>percent of Australians rejected the Voice to Parliament in every

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 7>state plus the Northern Territory, and we just saw a

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 7>very similar result with this polling. Fifty six percent of

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 7>Australians believe that that welcome and acknowledgment of countries is divisive,

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 7>because how could.

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>It not be.

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 2>You're being welcomed to your own country.

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 7>And I just think that people have just had a

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 7>gutful of this racial divisionness in this country. And I

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 7>think that the states that are continuing to pursue Voice

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 7>to Parliaments like we've just seen in Victoria and that

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 7>we saw with South Australia should stop it because the

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 7>Australians had their say, they don't want this, and it

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 7>should stop immediately.

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 3>I know you and I talked about this last time

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 3>on a Sunday Showdown, Joe, but it's just.

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 2>It's at the point now everyone is sick of it.

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 3>Just wind it back, you use it judiciously where it

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.719
<v Speaker 3>feels a pro pre it and otherwise don't do it.

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 3>People won't complain if they don't feel like what they're

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 3>being like.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 6>I noticed that Saxon is conveniently ignoring the very strong

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 6>showing the voice Scott in the act and a number

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 6>of teal seats which are suffering from the most tremendously

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 6>acute Indigenous disadvantage in the country. I mean, the poor

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 6>Indigenous community of Double Bay is I mean, you can

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 6>me they're so they're so disadvantaged you can't even see them.

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 6>It's just white people everywhere. I mean, that's that's colonization

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:31.719
<v Speaker 6>for you, isn't it.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I did once ride in a column many years ago

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 3>that the closest many of these people who carry on

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 3>about Indigenous afees have ever been to an Aboriginal person

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 3>is being in their beamer and dad.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 6>And I think that is exactly the point. The point

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 6>is that this has become a sort of performance. I

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 6>don't find it device or offensive or anything like that.

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 6>And perhaps ironically, given what sort of started the latest

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 6>iteration that I think probably a welcome to country on

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 6>Anzac Day is one of the more profound occasions where

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 6>you could do it. But the idea that you somehow

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 6>sort of absolve all your white guilt just by saying

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 6>a few words that you're reading from a bit of

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 6>paper in front of you at the start of every

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 6>HR meeting or every you know, I mean, what does

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 6>that do? I think whenever you're looking at indigenous policy,

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 6>there is a terrible gap that terrible things have been done,

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 6>often unintentionally, but we've got to acknowledge there is a

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 6>massive gap that we've got to fix. And every single

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 6>thing you do in this area, you should just be thinking, right,

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 6>what good.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 2>Is this going to do?

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 6>What is what problem is this going to fix? How

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 6>is it going to fix it? Anything that doesn't do

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 6>anything is just a waste of time and space.

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it probably does as much good as giving

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 3>thirty three people one hundred k each to sit on

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 3>their first people's well Again.

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 6>I think you'll find that these are often the people

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 6>who are the least disadvantage indigenous community.

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 3>The Daily Telegraph had this story today that the only

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 3>money in the New South Wales state budget to combat

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 3>smoking was two point four million dollars for vaping. The

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 3>paper reports that the money quote has been set aside

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 3>this year in the budget to maintain the government's pave

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 3>app platform, designed to help young people quit vaping. I

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 3>didn't know there was such a thing, Joe, you're a

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 3>vapor I'm not sure.

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 6>I'm zero point one percent of Australians who actually purchased

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 6>their legally.

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's the real problem, right, you know.

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure they're with this app for vaping or whatever,

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 3>but you can't tackle the problem for as long as

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 3>the federal government allows legal tobacco to flood into the

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 3>country because their exercis is too high, and they won't

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 3>regulate vapor.

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 6>I think you're looking at two labor governments on two

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 6>different sides of the Labor Party. One is more ideologically

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 6>driven and is trying to do the right thing, but

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 6>is actually making the problem worse in pursuing it because

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 6>it is driven by ideology and not by pragmatism. And

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 6>then you've got another in the New South Wales government,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 6>which is purely practical, which is unclouded by any kind

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 6>of ideology, and they clearly have seen that it's just

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 6>not working and they are just sitting this one out.

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 6>They are just quiet quitting on this one and they've

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 6>just decided they're not going to throw cops at it

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 6>when they could be busting other criminals, and not showing

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 6>to throw millions of dollars when they not won't work.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 6>But they have to do a kind of, you know,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 6>a token thing to show they're sort of on board.

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 3>And this is what really annoys me about it, sex

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 3>is that it's not the state's fault that illicit tobacco

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 3>has exploded in this country. It's the fault of the

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 3>federal government who jacked up the excise and refused to

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 3>properly regulate vapes, and then the states are meant to

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 3>clean up the mess for them. I don't think it's

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 3>their job to do so.

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 7>No, you're exactly right, and I agree with Joe that

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 7>the new South Wales labor government is far more practical

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 7>and pragmatic about this issue than the federal government. The

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.719
<v Speaker 7>basic point is is that the onerous taxes, excise taxes

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 7>on cigarettes and the regressive regulations with tobacco and vaping

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 7>in general is causing this black market and this sort

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 7>of organized crime in tobacco markets to flourish. There are

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 7>a lot of parallels with the nineteen twenties probitioning period

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 7>of alcohol where you saw a black market thrive and

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 7>organized crime to flourish, and now you're seeing the same

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 7>in the twenty twenties with tobacco. I mean, it's just

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 7>ridiculous the sort of violent crime you see, particularly here

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 7>in Victoria, regarding tobacconists and vaping and illicit cigarettes. And

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 7>I just think that the federal government needs to take

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 7>a step back, see what's happening, and allow the states

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 7>to function properly with policing.

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 2>And not have to deal with all this crime.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 3>Ye indeed, very quickly before we move on. China's ambassador

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 3>to Australia has worn camera against boosting defense spending on

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 3>a sourbriet.

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 2>He wrote in the Odds today, good reason to do easily.

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Recently some countries hyped up the circle Gina threat narrative,

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 3>proclaiming to significantly increase diffentsic spendaches and even inside it

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Australia to follows suit I noticed really not thirty seconds.

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 3>So the PM was asked about this today by reporter

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 3>from the Odds about whether it was interference, to which

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 3>the PM said, well didn't you run the column?

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 2>So the PM's editude seems.

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.479
<v Speaker 3>To be will attack the media for reporting what people

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 3>say instead of saying maybe China shouldn't be tell like,

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 3>I think the PE is.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 6>Having a bit of fun enough, and when you see

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 6>these kind of supposed barbes, there's always a little smile

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 6>on his face. But I don't think the PM will

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 6>be instructed by China or the US on how much

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 6>it spends on defense, at least not publicly. And I

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 6>think that it will quietly follow the US's lead far

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 6>more than it follows China's.

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's hope they do so. Joe Saxon, thank you

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 3>so much for your time to right all right now,

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm now. The well known Glassonbury Music Festival was on

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 3>in England over the weekend. I heard Steve Price confirm

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 3>earlier that he's never been. I'm sure it'll be shocked

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 3>to hear that I haven't either, but I don't think

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 3>I'll be rushing there anytime soon After this dross from

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 3>a legit artist Bob Villain, I'm sure you've already seen it,

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 3>but have a.

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 9>Look to the idf idf ID.

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 3>His real name is Pascal Robinson Foster. By the way,

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 3>I guess you can see why changed his stage name,

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 3>but that garbage was broadcast live by the BBC and

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 3>rightly it's been called out by the organizers and British

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister Saki Istama. He wrote, there is no excuse

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 3>for this kind of appalling hate speech. The BBC needs

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 3>to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast. Let's

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 3>bring in our Executive Council of Australian Jury CO Chief

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 3>Executive Alex Rivchen. Alex, I mean, of course we've got

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 3>to acknowledge the fact that this was done at a

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 3>music festival, and a music festival was where October seven started.

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you could fail to be much more offensive

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 3>than this.

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 5>You're right, Caleber. I mean it's incredible the fact that

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 5>these people could have so little historical awareness, so little compassion,

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 5>that at a music festival when, as you said, almost

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 5>four hundred Israelians were butchered dancing at a festival. Now

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 5>they're using their festivals to preach hatred and chant for

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 5>death and it's just extraordinary. It's as though this is

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 5>a has Bala rall in downtown root and on a

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 5>music festival in Somerset. The fact that people would be

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 5>compelled and like sheep go along with these chants by

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 5>these little known artists who are trying to drum up

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 5>attension calling for death to people. But this is what

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 5>happens when you deal with fanatics, and fanatics have a

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 5>characteristic of them that they eventually reveal who they are.

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 5>And this movement, which really swelled post October seven, it

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 5>began by calling for ceasefires as though it wanted peace

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 5>and was anti war. They very quickly dropped that and

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 5>turned to donning their cafirs and chanting for Palestine. Then

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 5>they started cheering on a Ranian rockets and hoodie drones.

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 5>And now they've gone a step even further. Now they're

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 5>openly calling for death. This is what they are and

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 5>it's not merely glassen with the same chant was heard

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.239
<v Speaker 5>on the streets of Melbourne just last night. So this

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 5>is something that's with us in our society and around

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 5>the world, and until we see serious consequences, commercial consequences,

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 5>criminal consequences, this is going to.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 10>Go on and on and on.

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 3>And this is the thing that I just it to me,

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 3>is that the crowd was just shouting it back, seemingly

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 3>not even thinking about it. I mean, I find it

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 3>hard to believe that you could get such a large

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 3>group of people together who all feel the same way

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 3>about that thing. But like sheep, as you say, in

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 3>that circumstance, they just shout it back as though it

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 3>has no meaning, as though it's just a normal thing

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.959
<v Speaker 3>to say. I mean, do they think it's edgy or

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 3>has it just seeped into the culture now that that

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 3>is an entirely acceptable thing to shout at a music festival.

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:36.959
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, we know from history that when you have

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 5>a mob, a large group of people, and you kind

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 5>of shed personal responsibility and you take on anonymity and

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 5>you can behave into a different way, you get swept up.

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 5>And even if you don't necessarily hold those views, even

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 5>if you didn't come into that crowd intending to chant

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 5>death towards a group of people, you get swept away.

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 5>And we saw it with Nazis, we saw it with

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 5>you know, clan rallies. It's that same sort of group

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 5>dynamic where people take on the ideology of sometimes a

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 5>small minority people of fanatics, and that's what we're seeing here.

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.479
<v Speaker 5>But whether it's a lot of people that support this

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 5>or a small minority, everyone who stood there waving those

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 5>flags and going along with those chants best personal responsibility.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 5>We're responsible for own actions that are own conduct. And

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 5>they could have booed, they could have shown displeasure with it,

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 5>but they didn't. They're either silent or they went along

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 5>with it. And I think that reveals something really nasty

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 5>about the crowd there, but also wider society, you know,

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 5>the apathy, the complicity, the moral fold, the unwillingness of

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 5>people to see evil for what it is and to

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 5>stand up to it.

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, now, of course, after successfully ending the war between

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Israel and Iran, the US prison is now pushing for

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Israel and Hamas to have a Ceasari posted on truth

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Social make the deal in Gaza, get the hostages back,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 3>and this was him over the weekend saying he thinks

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 3>that a deal could be imminent.

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 11>I think it's close. I spoke with some of the people.

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 11>It's a terrible situation that's going guy. So he's asking

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 11>about and we think within the next week we're going

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 11>to get.

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Us alex wishful thinking or potential reality.

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 5>Look, it's difficult to know. I mean the president has

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 5>said similar things early on, and you know he pledged

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 5>upon taking office to bring the water or close and

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 5>that's been elusive, and he's applied diplomatic pressure. You know,

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 5>as we saw with Iran, he can show us power

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 5>in very extravagant, spectacular ways. But when you're dealing with

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 5>a phote like Hamas, which is you know, psychologically unstable

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 5>in their calculations, which wants death of a life, which

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 5>will yield up its own civilians to pursue its propaganda aims,

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 5>it's difficult to know how they can be compelled to

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 5>actually release the hostage and end this war and surrender

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 5>on conditioning. They're not a conventional fighting force that accepts

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 5>defeat and moves on, so it's difficult to see how

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 5>this plays out. But we know that we've gotten into

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 5>where we've gotten through power and through a demonstration of

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 5>Israeli force, and you know, the attention is shifted somewhat

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 5>from that theater of war. We've been focused on what's

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 5>happening in Iran, But every day Israelis are fighting bravely

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 5>and they're falling in combat. Every day the hostages remain

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 5>in captivity in the most hellish circumstances imaginable, and we

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 5>fight for them and we pray for them, and we

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:26.959
<v Speaker 5>hope they'll be home soon, and we hope that this

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 5>war does end. But I think it will take the

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 5>complete dismantlement of Hamas to a point where they see

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 5>no way out and will rather accept surrender or exile

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 5>for their leadership. I think that's the only way we'll

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 5>get to a conclusion here.

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Just finally, New South Wales, we will. In p Anthony Roberts,

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 3>his office was vandalized over the weekend. Some pathetic low

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 3>life was seen on CCTV footage allegedly spitting on the

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 3>glass at the front of the office before writing if Israel.

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean for goodness?

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 3>So I thought we'd given up on this stuff a

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 3>while ago, but there were still dopes running around doing alex.

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 5>Look. I think pathetic low life is an apt characterization

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 5>of this sort of individual, someone who's so filled with

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 5>hatred and is so petty and looking for their own

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 5>emotional nourishment that they would spit on an electorate office,

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 5>on an inanimate object and vandalize it in this sway.

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 5>But it's criminal conduct. And you know, in this instance,

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm less concerned for the Jewish community. We've put up

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 5>with a great deal more than this. We've dealt with

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 5>fire bombings and boycotts and what's happening to our brethren

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 5>in Israel. But I'm concerned more for the state of

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 5>our democracy because this is another act which I think

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 5>dissuades as strange from participating in our democracy and running

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 5>for public office. I mean, who would want to put

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 5>themselves in the firing line of people like that? And

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, John Howard once said that politics was the

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 5>only game in town. But I think increasingly people will

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 5>look at this sort of thing and think, you know,

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 5>I'll do something else with my life. But ultimately it's

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 5>our represent democracy that suffers for it.

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, Alex Trifan, thank you for joining me, and I'll

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 3>give you a tip as well. If you think vandalizing

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 3>MP's office is going to change anything, mate, you are

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 3>so stupid.

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Just give it up.

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Still to come, Labour's renewables plan is looking more and

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 3>more like a pipe dream.

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Who would have thought that anything serious?

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Graham Lloyd will join me later to discuss, but first

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Foreign Minister Penny Wong jets off to Washington for the

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Quad talks. But with the to do list as long

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 3>as the flight itself, will she really be able to

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 3>achieve all that much LNPMP. Garth Hamilton will weigh in.

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Next interesting story in the Career Mail today about a

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 3>teacher at a special school in Redcliffe, north of Brisbane.

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 3>She was on long service leave when Cyclone Alfred hit

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 3>in March, so she wasn't at work, but the school

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 3>ended up being shut for three days and all the

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 3>staff were put on special leave. So she argued that

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.719
<v Speaker 3>she should be given special leave for those three days

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 3>and then given back the long service leaf, but the

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Education Department said no, so she took it to the

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Queensland Industrial Relations Commission and they ruled that she can't

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 3>get her long service leave back basically because she was

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 3>already on leave, which meant she wasn't expected to go

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 3>to work and the only reason her colleagues got special

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 3>leave was because they were otherwise expected to go to work.

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. To me, that seems a bit unfair.

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Her colleagues were given effectively three extra days off free

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 3>of charge, So it seems a bit petty to me

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 3>for the Education Department not to just give her a

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 3>three days back.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 2>How hard can it be?

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, Penny Wong is flying to Washington this week to

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 3>meet her counterparts from the US, Japan, and India. This

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 3>meeting could not come at a more pressing time. Albanezy

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 3>courses so far failed to secure a meeting with the

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 3>US president or a tariff exemption, but it also comes

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 3>as Australia refuses to boost defense spending and of course

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 3>was late to support Trump's strikes on Iran. With me

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 3>now as MP Garth, Hamilton Garth, it's going to be

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 3>an interesting week for Penny Wong, particularly being in the same.

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Room as Marco Rubio.

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 3>And in the same room as Marco Rubio, it's about

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 3>the closest we can get at the moment to having

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 3>someone directly ask the administration if we can get a room,

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 3>get in a room, sorry with Donald Trump.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Surely she's asking that question this week.

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 9>Look, i'd very much hope so, and I can sincerely

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 9>say that's what we need, That's what Australia needs. We're

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 9>going through a period where the US Australian relationship is

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 9>in a period of degradation, and I think this could

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 9>actually come to define mister Alberze's time as our Prime minister.

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 9>We're seeing that relationship slip away. I'm not presumptuous enough

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 9>to give any wrong advice. But if I would, I'd say, look,

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 9>take a leaf out of Bob Hawk's playbook. This was

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 9>a guy who really a labor leader, who really put

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.959
<v Speaker 9>the US relationship first. He was willing to stand up

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 9>against the anti American elements of his own party. Compare

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 9>that unfortunate mister Albanzi on his front bench. He's got

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 9>Don Farrell who was openly questioning whether the US even

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 9>are our best. So I think there's a way that

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 9>labor can do this. Australia needs them to. We really

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 9>do need them to. We're only at the start of

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 9>a three year term goodness with this relationship. Can't afford

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 9>to get any worse than a little tip. I don't

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 9>think mister Trump is for changing. I don't think he

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 9>is in a position where he thinks he needs to

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 9>change anything about how he's engaging with us. We're going

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 9>to have to adapt to that. Penny Wong's got a

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 9>lot on her shoulders right now.

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, and of course I'm sure there will be talk

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 3>about the decision at NATO last week for every country

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 3>but Spain to increase the defense spending to five percent.

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 3>We've said, we're not interested in even getting to three

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 3>and a half percent. I mean to walk into that

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 3>room at the QUAD. It just makes us look pathetic,

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:44.720
<v Speaker 3>look sadly.

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it does.

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 9>And this is a no brainer. Our closest trusted ally,

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 9>the only country that we can genuinely trust, will stand

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 9>side by side with us should we find ourselves imperilled.

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 9>They're asking us to increase our spending. I don't think

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 9>that's a non reason ask given everyone will say this,

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 9>The Prime Minister himself will say this all the time.

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 9>We're in a period of heightened geopolitical uncertainty. Surely the

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 9>correct response for us, without the US asking us to

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 9>do so, is to increase our defense spending to be ready.

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 9>We've seen the Ukraine gives us an incredible example of

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 9>what's happening in terms of technology change in defense. We've

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 9>gone through a time where we have drone warfare. Now

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 9>we've got anti drone warfare. The world's are changing place

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 9>rapidly in defense. We need to be making those investments

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 9>to make sure that I think we can look our

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 9>allies in the eye and say we're carrying our share.

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I took about meetings of course, as

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 3>I've said, the PM hasn't managed to cop on with Trump.

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 3>But I mean it looks like Albanezi is going to

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 3>meet with the Chinese President, Jijingping next month in Beijing,

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 3>which will be the fourth meeting he's had with Gi.

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 3>And I know he didn't technically choose to meet Gi

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 3>before Trump. But it kind of goes to the point,

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 3>doesn't that our relationship with the United States is nowhere

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 3>near as strong as it should be, and we're certainly

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 3>giving off the overture that we're much closer to China

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 3>than we are to the US will use flash. China

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 3>ain't going to step in and protect us in the conflict,

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 3>but the US will.

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.839
<v Speaker 9>I think there's a very clear perception problem that mister

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 9>Albert Easy is facing. You know, if I'm positive, I

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 9>think it's important we do have a strong relationship with China.

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 9>I always remind people during the Cold War, we continue

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 9>to sell wall to Russia. You know, even in the

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 9>depths of the Cold War, we were reaching out making

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 9>sure that we had that trade established and secured. We've

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 9>got some important trade with China we need to keep

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 9>on the table. That's okay, that's important. The perception at

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:49.879
<v Speaker 9>the moment, though, is that we're being set aside by

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 9>the US and that we are leaning a little bit

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 9>too closer to China. And when we see the Chinese

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 9>ambassador come out and tell us we shouldn't be increasing

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 9>our defense spending and in that particulicular argument, we're siding

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 9>with China and not the US. Goodness me, it looks bad.

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 9>It looks very, very bad. And I think we need

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 9>to be making a very clear demonstration that we sit

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 9>right beside the US, that they are our ally and

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 9>we do so because that's the right thing for us,

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 9>not because the US are leaning on us, because it's

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.760
<v Speaker 9>our choosing. It's what we want and what we understand

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 9>is best for the Australian nation.

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, and we believe in protecting ourselves. You'd think

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 3>that'd be a pretty basic thing, but hard to get

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.800
<v Speaker 3>through their minds, it would seem Garth Hamilton, thank you,

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 3>mate for joining me as always. Coming up after the break,

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 3>jen Z's breathing a sigh of relief after Donald Trump

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 3>announced he's found a buyer for TikTok Kosher Garda will

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 3>clue us in on how he plans to save all

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 3>of that later, and cracks are deepening in the Albanese

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 3>government's green dreams.

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 2>What a surprise.

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 3>The Australian's Environment editor, Graham Lloyd will explain the damage

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 3>that the collapse of yet another hydrogen project will cause next.

0:37:58.400 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Deliberations in Erin Pattison's death kept Mushroom trial began the safteroon.

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 3>I think the whole country will be hanging on for

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 3>this verdict. They put up black bunting around her house

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 3>this afternoon, so.

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 2>We're at the business end now.

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 3>The jurors are basically locked in the court and then

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 3>their hotels for as long as it takes them to

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 3>reach a unanimous decision. Skyne News reporter Georgie Dickerson has

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 3>been following the case in Morwell.

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 2>She filed this for as little earlier Caleb.

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 12>The final twelve jurors has been decided and they are

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 12>the ones that will ultimately decide the fate of Aaron Pattison.

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 12>Now this trial has now entered its tenth week. Ten

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 12>weeks ago. We did start with fifteen jurors and that

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 12>was always going to be brought down to just twelve.

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 12>As for why they do this, they start with a

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 12>larger number in case a jura falls unwell if they

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.320
<v Speaker 12>or if they have to be dismissed from the trial,

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 12>and that happened a few weeks ago. There were allegations

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 12>that one dura had been speaking to family and friends

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 12>about the trial, so they were dismissed. Now today it

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 12>was picked at random. Two men were dismissed, leaving just

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 12>twelve people. This was seven men and five women are

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 12>now the ones that will decide the fate of Aaron Pattison. Now,

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.280
<v Speaker 12>in terms of how they reach this verdict, it must

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 12>be a unanimous verdict. They will deliberate from ten thirty

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 12>am with a break at lunch until four point fifteen

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.359
<v Speaker 12>in the afternoon. But they don't go home. When they

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 12>came into court today they had to bring their luggage

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 12>and each day after court finishes, they go back to

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 12>a hotel in an undisclosed location and that's where they stay.

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 12>They don't have access to any media, Internet or even

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 12>their phones. This is to ensure that a fair trial

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 12>takes place.

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 12>In terms of this, they will then come back here

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 12>each day to deliberate. The judges warned and said that

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:56.439
<v Speaker 12>there are strict conditions in place for these jurors. While

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 12>they can discuss the trial here in court with all

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.720
<v Speaker 12>of the jurors, they aren't to discuss it in small

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 12>groups back at the hotel. Now, in terms of what

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 12>to from here and how long this will take, well,

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 12>it's anyone's guess. It has to be a unanimous verdict.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 12>They need to take into account the four different charges,

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 12>three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder.

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 12>And so this trial and this jury will then continue

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 12>to deliberate until they come back with that unanimous verdict.

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 12>But Caleb, it has been a long ten weeks for

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:33.800
<v Speaker 12>these jurors. Fifty three witnesses have been present in this trial,

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 12>and now it's down to the pointy end. We'll all

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 12>be waiting here when we received that message and ultimately

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 12>find out if she is guilty or not guilty in

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 12>this highly anticipated trial here and more.

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, ten weeks, it's been a hell of a trial.

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Plenty more to come.

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 3>We will keep you updated, of course, right here on

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Sky News. Now it must be a day ending in

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 3>why the Albinizi government's renewable energy aginder had another major

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 3>reality checked today with the cancelation of the country's biggest

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 3>green hydrogen project that Lee Developer confirmed that it pulled

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 3>out of the twelve and a half billion dollar Central

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Queensland hydrogen project over the weekend, which all guarantees it's dead.

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.359
<v Speaker 3>With me now is the Australians Environment editor Graham Lloyd?

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Graham always talk of green hydrogen. Even a

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 3>couple of months ago, the Prime Minister was.

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Still talking it up.

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 3>How we were the envy of the world. Have we

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 3>actually got a single one of these projects up?

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.840
<v Speaker 13>Well, all good evening, Caleb, but the short answer is no,

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.280
<v Speaker 13>nothing past a real bench scale testing.

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Same story around the rest of the world.

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 13>And out of a one hundred billion dollar pipeline of

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 13>projects that were going to make us a renewal energy superpower,

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 13>none of them have actually taken flight. So it's a

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 13>big reality check for hydrogen and the failure of this project,

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 13>which is the largest in the country is it's very illustrative.

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 13>It was really going to supply the industrial city of

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 13>Gladstone with renewable hydrogen to keep the industry going.

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Now that's obviously not going to happen.

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 13>So that raises some very awkward questions about the future

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 13>of aluminum smelting and other things in that district.

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean it's all over now, baby Blue. But

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 3>when does the government admit it.

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, certainly they're slow to call it off.

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:38.280
<v Speaker 13>The change here has come about because of the election

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 13>of the LNP government in Queensland.

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>They had a look at the books.

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 13>It was being sponsored by a state owned electricity company.

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 13>That company needed more money and the state government said no,

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:56.800
<v Speaker 13>this is a fool's errand and throwing good money after bad.

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 13>So once they pulled out, the overseas back has lost

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:03.919
<v Speaker 13>confidence as well and it's not going ahead. But we're

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:07.479
<v Speaker 13>still yet to hear from the federal government that they've

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 13>got a plan B or they even acknowledged that things

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 13>have us die as in fact they.

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Are well there.

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:16.280
<v Speaker 3>While we're talking about energy, the Energy Minister Chris Bowen

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 3>announced a review into gas market regulations today.

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 10>And today I'm releasing the terms of reference and a

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:30.839
<v Speaker 10>consultation paper about making sure that Australian government policy holistically

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:35.399
<v Speaker 10>instead of having three different mechanisms, holistically is looking at

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 10>ensuring the efficient supply of gas to industrial users, to

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:42.320
<v Speaker 10>domestic users and to the energy system.

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 3>In basic terms, what's in this what will it do.

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 13>They're looking now at the supply of gas for the

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 13>domestic market, and it's been like a slow flat freight

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 13>train coming that there's a shortage in the domestic market

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 13>and something needs to be.

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Done about it.

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 13>To a large extent, the government has hid behind the

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 13>hope that our hydrogen fuel will become available and it

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 13>will replace the need for gas.

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's now.

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 13>Obvious that's not going to happen, so there needs to

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 13>be an urgent effort to increase the domestic stocks. The

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 13>Energy minister there is saying he's going to have a

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 13>review into all the policy, and the thing that can

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 13>be drawn from it is it's likely that future developments

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:36.120
<v Speaker 13>will have to contain a domestic reservation, so they will

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:39.280
<v Speaker 13>have to supply gas to the domestic market.

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>But the trick is to get those projects off the ground.

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, I don't think that's a bad thing necessarily, but

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:49.279
<v Speaker 3>how many time do we see reviews and nothing happens afterwards?

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Graham, thank you so much for your time. Don't go anywhere.

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 3>We'll turn to the United States to get the latest

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 3>on Trump and his secret TikTok buyer right after this

0:44:56.760 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 3>quick break. Don't know whether you saw the press conference

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 3>with US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint chiefs of

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Staff Chair and General Dan Kaine on Thursday night. We

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:09.839
<v Speaker 3>took it helived during the late debate. It was pretty

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary how General kin went through how the bunker busting

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.280
<v Speaker 3>bombs used in around work and how they were developed.

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 2>And Hegseth was seething.

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:19.880
<v Speaker 3>He was absolutely seething over the leaked report into the

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 3>effectiveness of the strike. He read a bits that were

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.360
<v Speaker 3>published in the media that said it was a low

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 3>confidence report. Let's bring a nawska and use contributor Kosher Garda.

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 3>In response to all of that, Kosher, Donald Trump is

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:35.800
<v Speaker 3>now saying that if he wants to, he could compel

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the journalists to report it on it to reveal their source.

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:42.800
<v Speaker 14>Yes, great with you, quieleb. I think it'll be a

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 14>little bit tricky for him to do that because we

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 14>do have the First Amendment in the US, which has

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 14>the strongest protections in the world against the press, even

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 14>press that is adversarial, not always honest. There are trust

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 14>is at an all time law. It is very difficult

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 14>to compel them to reveal their sources. So it may

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 14>just be rhetoric and and bluster from him. However, there

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 14>is value in intimidation and putting pressure on him. More

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 14>likely he's going to probably find success by trying to

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:10.800
<v Speaker 14>trace the leak or within the government, within the Pentagon

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 14>who did it. This has been a problem. We've seen

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 14>a low level person leak the Dobs decision at the

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 14>Supreme Court, and there have been other leaks. So it

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 14>would actually be good for the country, I think if

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 14>they can snuff out who that is internally within the

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 14>government and make an example so that these types of

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:24.720
<v Speaker 14>leaks don't keep happening.

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you know it's the leak's fault, it's not

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:27.839
<v Speaker 3>the journalist's fault.

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 2>We should note meanwhile, Trump said that he's found a.

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Very wealthy group of people, that's his word, to buy TikTok,

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 3>which would potentially save it from a ban in the

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 3>United States, and he sort of kept putting this ban

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 3>off every ninety days. Do we have any detail about

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 3>who these people are, where they're from, what the deal

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 3>might be.

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 14>Not much, I think classic Trump style. He's dangling it

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 14>out there and saying he'll reveal it in two weeks.

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 14>We do know from the past six months or so,

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 14>there have been a few different very wealthy investors that

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 14>have pressed interest. Kevin O'Leary, who's one of the Sharks

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 14>on the American version of Shark Tank and very successful investor,

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 14>has been putting together a consortium of investors, institutional and

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 14>personal ones, and they've or individual investors and they've been

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 14>the only group that's put out a public offer, So

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:19.240
<v Speaker 14>it could be them. Others like Elon Musk, Larry Ellison,

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 14>founder of Oracle, Steve Manuchin who worked in the Trump

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:25.319
<v Speaker 14>administration before as a billionaire. All of them have at

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 14>different points mentioned that it might be them. I think

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.959
<v Speaker 14>the key also is the Chinese Party Communist Party has

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 14>what's called a golden share in TikTok, so they have

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 14>veto rights to block who TikTok decides to divest it to.

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 14>So that's another angle that I think Trump is juggling

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 14>and trying to find a group that can buy this

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 14>at a fair price and also appease changing Ping's golden share,

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:49.880
<v Speaker 14>and we'll see what happens in a couple of weeks.

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:51.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it's just a shame that he didn't invoke

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 3>the band at some point and try to force him

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:54.800
<v Speaker 3>to do things a little earlier.

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Of course, what we're talking about.

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:58.719
<v Speaker 3>Trump's big beautiful bill made it through the Senate, but

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 3>we know it had its career, including from within the

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Republican Party. One of them we know, of course, is

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:07.879
<v Speaker 3>he's ex best friend, Trump's expst friend to Elon Musk,

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 3>who went on his platform mix over the weekend and

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 3>said it will destroy millions of jobs in America and

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 3>cause Immitt strategy cam to our country utterly insane and destructive.

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 3>The process, though, by which this thing was passed, was

0:48:21.000 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 3>creite extraordinary, though kosher it was.

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:27.400
<v Speaker 14>They're using this reconciliation process, which is the only mechanism,

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:28.719
<v Speaker 14>and you can't use it too many times. You can

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 14>basically use it once in a term that allows them

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 14>to get it through with just a simple majority fifty

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 14>percent or fifty one percent of the votes, whereas otherwise

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 14>they'd have to meet a sixty percent threshold. And that's

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:41.400
<v Speaker 14>next time possible, just given how divided the country is

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 14>right now. So it's squeaked by but the skin of

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:46.759
<v Speaker 14>its teeth, not everything in it is going to make

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 14>everybody happy. Elon Musk's gripe with it is that it

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 14>doesn't cut spending deeply enough. This is true. However, the

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 14>Trump team is prioritizing immigration enforcement over spending cuts. And

0:48:57.160 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 14>it has the greatest funding for immigration enforcement that's ribbon

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:03.320
<v Speaker 14>passed by Congress for the wall, for more ICE agents,

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:07.880
<v Speaker 14>for more deportation related mechanisms and needs that they have.

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 14>So that's what he's prioritizing. And you know it's not

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 14>some spending, but not as much as we would like.

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:13.879
<v Speaker 14>But you know, life is about trade offs, and that's

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 14>a tradeoff he's made, indeed.

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 3>And it does come with text cats to Koshergata. Thank

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 3>you so much for your time, and that's all we

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 3>have time for tonight. I'll be back here tomorrow at

0:49:21.800 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 3>eight o'clock, but stay tuned, of course. The Great Man

0:49:23.760 --> 0:49:24.919
<v Speaker 3>Paul Murray in the Man Cave