WEBVTT - ROUND 20 REVIEW: 'THEY SHOULD START NOW!'. Why the Tigers need to dump Luai

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, welcome back, everybody to another edition of Code

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>NRL on a Monday, where we're breaking down the big

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>stories from the weekend. We're going to look at why

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the West Tigers were so bad? Were the Dragons ripped off?

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>And then really exploring was this blunder round two point

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>zero again? And what can the NRL do to fix

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the bunker? And for many of my haters, they'll be

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>really excited because fozball is starting to look like fraud ball,

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>though I deny it. I'm joined by Dean Bulldog, Richie Bulldog.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>How I I'm good, Champion, You're very good. I'm very good,

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and Fatima Cando, how are you good?

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>How are you?

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm good and I'm Alex. By the way, also known

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>as NRL Soapbox. So a lot's going on this weekend.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at the West Tigers and why they were

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>so putrid? Fatima, why were the West Tigers so bad?

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 3>I think we just saw sort of a culmination of

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 3>what's been going on there the last couple of weeks.

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Post game, a couple of player spoke so they weren't

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 3>distracted by the Luais saga. During the week, they prepared

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>really well but they came out very flat out of

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Theo's not a lot of energy given the Bulldogs were

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 3>red hot from the start, and I think that had

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 3>them on the back foot. But yeah, the body language

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 3>wasn't great from them, was it?

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the bulldogs what's missing in the stories. The

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Bulldogs were fantastic, but the Tigers were absolutely putride.

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 4>What did you make of it?

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Bulldogs? Yeah, they're poor, they're out of form, they're down

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 2>on confidence. This is not the first time they've been bad.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 2>They've won two from eleven. They are a rabble at

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 2>the moment. There's no way of sugarcoating what's going on

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>at Concord other than saying it's a rabbel. We've got

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 2>players who are there who are reading headlines about their leader.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 2>Their leader wants to go to P and G and

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 2>then the club says we're back him, and they say

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 2>we don't want you anymore. We're going round and around here.

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 2>And the side that started with five from seven and

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>all these people were saying this is a year and

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I said at the time, I said, wait, keep your

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>powder dry. They are not a final side. They do

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>not have a finals roster. It's crystal clear, and people

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't want to believe that. That's fine. Since then, they've

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 2>fallen off a cliff. They're gone again. The fifteen year

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 2>drought continues, and the club is let's be honest, let's

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 2>cut to the chase here, the club is becoming embarrassed.

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Like you, well, it's embarrassing. The results are embarrassing. If

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 2>you don't make the semifinals for fifteen years, that is embarrassing.

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 4>It's definitely embarrassing. I'll concede you on that.

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But what about West Tigers Fans will say, we've been

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>hammered by injuries and that's why.

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's got injuries.

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 4>But they've been absolutely slaughtered.

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 2>By everyone's got injuries. And you know what, the good

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 2>clubs build rosters that can overcome injuries. I'm not saying

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't play a key role, of course it does.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>But the good clubs get by and they've got the

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>depth and the positional versatility to cover for injuries, and

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the Tigers don't have that.

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Just on that point, I know we're going to talk

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.119
<v Speaker 3>about the Broncos later, but you know, the Broncos were,

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 3>by that assessment, aren't a good club because they were

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 3>decimated by injuries and they didn't have the roster and

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 3>the depth to sort of keep them in the final

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 3>spight even though technically the still live. But just back

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 3>on the Tigers, it's got to take its toll. You know,

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 3>only twelve months ago, what fifteen months ago now, a

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 3>similar situation happened with Lachlan Galvin, you know, and that

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of derailed this season when Lewis agreed to go

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 3>to p ANDNG. It was I can't remember, with around seven,

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 3>around nine, but it was a shark's game where they

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 3>also lost Adam Dewey and Samuel Feinnu for a long time.

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 3>They were without Appy Corus Sale there for a long

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 3>time as well due to suspension. So I really think

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 3>because they do like a bit of depth, that injuries

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 3>have hurt them. But the way they sort of feel

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 3>that that spark about them, yes they're a confidence team

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>is just completely gone. How much of that has to

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 3>do with Jerome Louai. I guess we'll find out this

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 3>week because this week they potentially without Adam Dewey and Latu.

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 2>That's where I want to know, is it Jerome Lewai?

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 2>And if it is Jerome Lewai, who's following him, because

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 2>do you want to follow a bloke who wants to

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 2>leave your club?

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's easy, like okay, So Jerome Lewi demands attention

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and he that's just who he is. He's an outspoken personality.

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I think when you look I looked at the weekend,

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>he looked like a frustrated leader. He's meant to be

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the chief enthusiast officer of the chief energy officer, and

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you could see him chastising the players. So I don't

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's so much about the players are off him.

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Leui's off the situation. Like he was so

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>frustrated in that game. There were some people, even Bulldogs,

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that were saying maybe the West Tigers should drop Lewis

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.239
<v Speaker 1>it's not working. Well, I did a piece this morning

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in Bulldog's Bite and I said, I don't know if

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>for Tim you did something on the Tigers as well,

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>So we'll come back to you in a moment. What

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I said is the last four games they've scored twenty

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>two points. So if Jerome's key role is to ignite

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>that attack, it ain't working.

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Yep. That's an average of just over five points a game.

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 2>So apart from the off field distractions someone in that club,

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 2>and I eat, let's basically say it's Jerome because he's

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 2>their key Manah, he's their million dollar player. He's not

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 2>doing his job because that side is stagnant and pedestrian.

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well that is a good point because of all

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 3>the injuries that have necessarily had a lot of opportunity

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 3>with their first choice swine. They had that against Cannipy

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 3>and they weren't able to fire a shot. What does

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Benji do with Jerome Lewai? Does he start looking to

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 3>the future now? I mean when Jerome addressed the media,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 3>he said himself like he's had that discussion with Benji

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 3>and if it gets to the point where Benji feels

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 3>like he's no longer the guy for the job, like

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.679
<v Speaker 3>he's happy for Benji to go with those young guys,

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 3>it's not going to be this week because, like I said,

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Dewey and latsu Fa it looks like they're going to

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 3>be suspended. This is the week though, for Jerome to

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 3>answer that question like is he the guy that people

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 3>want to follow? This is going to be the week

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 3>where he sort of you know, he's got no option

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 3>but to find a way to gather a nice this group,

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and you know, I do agree looking at Lui and

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>how frustrated he is that he's probably just off the

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 3>situation as a whole.

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Alex Twiles little Yeah, I love that.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 4>That was awesome, Jush.

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Current and Jamn seven towards the end. I mean, he's

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 3>a passionate guy, Tini, but.

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 4>You don't you don't see that ever level.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.799
<v Speaker 3>Of frustration, and Benjie said that it probably epitomizes exactly

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 3>what the club is going through. There's this element of

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 3>frustration and if they can't shake it, things are about

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>to get worse for them.

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, the Tigers, they wanted to push ahead without Jerome. Correct, yeah,

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 2>next you can go. Yeah, so tomorrow is now today

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>for the Tigers. If that's their theory, then let's start now,

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 2>let's start now, bring some young I think it's crazy

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 2>to Jerome Louis what you're saying about the injuries because

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 2>they can't do it this weekend. But I'm thinking, is

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>that the way forward?

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's crazy. I think he should get more scrutiny.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's another twelve players on the pitch that weren't

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>putting in the effort. They were terrible in that first half.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So Jerome definitely has to sholder some responsibility. But those

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>players like that's the issue with the Tigers right now,

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>not just Jerome Lewi. It's the team's not putting in

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the effort. They're letting their coach down. All right, let's

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>move on from the abysmal West Tigers and talk about

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>how impressive the Bulldogs were. I have been saying, and

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>thousands of Bulldogs have been saying, this is the spine

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that they should have Seano Sullivan game managing it, kicking

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>two forty twenties I think was all over the place,

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>freed up Galvin to actually just play creative, attacking footy.

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the spine that Sialdo should have gone with

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>at the start of the season, because sometimes the boring

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>choice is the right choice for team.

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 4>What did you make of the Bulldog spine?

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it was a boring choice. Look at

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 3>how they played their attack. It was probably the most

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 3>exciting they've looked all seasons. So yeah, I made a

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 3>point of it last week that when short O'Sullivan came

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 3>on for Stephen Crichton, he set up straightened their attacks

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 3>and set up two tries right at the death there.

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 3>And what I found like worked really well for them

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 3>was he and Galvin just seemed to understand what the

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 3>other was doing. They would switch in and out of

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 3>first receiver. I mean to me that his second footy

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty was far more impressive than the first one because

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 3>he noticed that his team was on the back foot,

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 3>needed to get them out of trouble the way he

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 3>straightens the attack and opens space up for their edges.

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 4>And now that the.

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Preston back kick ours back as well. Yeah, and Burton,

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Burton's been playing really worse. I know he thinks he's

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 3>a five eight moving forward, but in that team, his

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 3>best position at the moment is probably a center. The

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 3>question is, because Sero has been experimenting all season, and

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll put it to you, Bulldog, does he go back

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>to his critter experiment, which he seemed to really champion,

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 3>or does he stick with sure No Sullivan.

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the answer, but my opinion would be

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 2>he sticks with Ose Sullivan. I think it worked.

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 4>He's got to do it, mate.

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 2>He's been mucking around this spine from this point last year.

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 2>He's been doing for twelve months. Yeah, and I get

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Sero doing it. He's trying to find the right combination.

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he's done it, maybe he's finally found he's a

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>pure half. O'Sullivan. He's not elite, he's not let's not

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 2>He's not going to be a million bucks a year player,

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>but he's a pure half. He kicks well, as Fatima says,

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 2>he struts up the attack. Galvin played better with him

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>in the solid but with Critter back, I would put

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Critter back to the centers. I leave Burton and I

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 2>think Tuala is the one to probably miss out. Whether

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 2>he goes out onto the wing to be confirmed, But

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I think after all the changes, all the experimentation, all

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the condemnation, I think maybe Soirello's finally found the harves

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 2>combination to take him into the final.

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 4>Sean O'Sullivan definitely played half back in that game. We're agreed.

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 4>He wasn't playing six.

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So why are the Bulldogs continuing to put seven on

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Galvin's back? Do you think it's a pride thing?

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know whether it's a pride thing. I just

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 2>don't think they found or they didn't think they had

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 2>found a pure seven to take over from Galvin. Yeah, yeah,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and look a lot of people are critical of Seano

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Sullom because he's sure he's what would you say, he's

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 2>not a makeshift play. That's probably unfair, but yeah, he's

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 2>not a first choice pick every week, is he? But

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 2>now yeah he should be. Yeah, he's been given the chance,

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 2>he's taken it. If you're going to give him Bake

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>a chance and he performs, well, then you've got to

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 2>support him.

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Bulldogs fans will be frustrated because they've had

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Seaun O'Sullivan available to them all year they needed. He

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't elite, That's why I say he's boring. He's not

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a star. He's meant to be in reserve grade and

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>back up. But they didn't have a proper game managing halfback,

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>which is what they needed. And O'Sullivan's fantastic. He may

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>not be elite, but he's unbelievable at following the game

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>plan that the coach gives him, which in his postmatch

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>interview you talked about that we did video on. This

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly intelligent. Joey John's back in the day he

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>said he was the smartest footballery's seen. So this is

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>not some schmuck that the Bulldogs have in reserve grade.

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a guy who could really help them.

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 3>And if he's the guy that brings the best out

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 3>of Lochland Galvin and allows him to play that sort

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 3>of instinctive style that we that everyone thinks Lochland Galvin is,

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 3>then yeah, he's got to be the guy that goes there.

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 3>But again, going back into the Pride question, is Galvin

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 3>still wearing the number seven jumper out of Pride?

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe a little bit.

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm begging cam Serroaldo please keep Sean o' sullivan

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>playing half back and just switch the numbers. It's okay

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to admit you got it wrong. The Bulldogs looks so

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>much better when Seawan oh sullivan's playing half back.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not even wrong. So he didn't fish. It's not wrong,

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 2>per se. It's experimenting, try the right combination. I'm with you,

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 2>I change it, but it's a matter of saying I

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 2>got it wrong. But my experiment here, there and everywhere,

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 2>this is what we're finally come down to. So I

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>don't know what it's be getting wrong, but I think

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 2>it's about I would totally let's change it and let's

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 2>stick with it.

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 1>I would totally concede on that, except Saldo has been saying, no,

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>this is our spine. He hasn't said, hey, we're on

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a twenty four month experiment experimentation journey. He's kind of gone, no,

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Galvin is our seven. And then as time has gone on,

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there's the realization he's just an excellent number six.

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 4>That's my thought. Well, Broncos thought this day would never come.

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>After I think eight consecutive losses, Brisbane Broncos, that defending

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>champions have finally won a game, one that no one

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>expected that they would win. They showed up put in

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>maximum effort for Tima. Can the Broncos make the eighth?

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, watching them play, they almost had shades of the

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Broncos that went on that surge at the end of

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 3>last year. But they have a really, really tough run

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 3>and I think they've left it too late. In their defense,

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 3>they were close to full strength. I think there were

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 3>a couple of guys still missing. But I think it

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 3>showed really that they have really really been hurt this year.

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Their title defense has been hurt by the fact that

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 3>they've had significant injuries pretty much a year.

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 4>But do you think they can make it? The run's

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 4>too hard.

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>But then again, who knows if they come out and

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 3>play the chip on their shoulder, because they absolutely did

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 3>come out and play with the chip on their shoulder,

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know whether they lifted or found that

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 3>extra year because Penrith was the opposition incredible scalp by

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the way, Yeah, amazing, you know, after going so horribly wrong.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 3>I just think they're run. They've left it too late

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 3>and their runs too hard.

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And the other key difference is that Reese Walsh blitzed

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it like he's been missing in action for a few months.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I reckon if he played like that and was playing

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>for Queens and they would have won three nil. It

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>was back to twenty twenty five Grand Final run Reese Welsh.

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>He was electric everywhere, dominating one of the best teams

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in the comp bo.

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 4>Do you think the Broncos can make it? No?

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 2>No, in a word, yeah, no, okay, and then follow

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 2>up the team is right, they've left it too late

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 2>to go win every game. They're on eighteen points. Yeah,

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys won twenty four and eighth position, so they're

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 2>still six points outside. Can they do it again? Skill wise? Possibly?

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 2>But I just don't think because you've done it one year,

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 2>it gives you can't blunt I think you can do

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 2>it the next year. It's too hard regularly, it's too

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 2>hard to be streaming together six seven, eight wins. It

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 2>was a gentle reminder on two fronts of how good

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 2>they are, and it's also a gentle reminder of how

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>they've fluffed their lines this year because that side that

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 2>we saw beat the Panthers should be playing finals footy.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 4>They definitely should be.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I also think it does show there's been a lot

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of noise about Michael Maguire, that he's perhaps lost the

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.359
<v Speaker 1>dressing room, that the boys aren't playing for him. That absolutely,

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in the past month, I feel like it's true. That's

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a team that's playing for their coach, their high maximum effort,

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>they're showing up, they're in the collision, they're giving them everything,

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and they piped a team that they should never have beaten,

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>especially when they're on an eight game skid, Bulldog. Do

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you think this silence is the noise around Maguire?

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely? I think it should should I think it should

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 2>and what will happen probably two different things. Madge, wherever

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>he goes as a human headline, he can't escape it Madge,

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 2>it's under the part before round one this year, outreached,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 2>he lost the World Club Challenge and ben Terre walks

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>out and he's already on the skids out of the Joy.

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>He's a defending Premiere coach. So no matter what Madge does,

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>there always going to be critics out there and that's fine.

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>But look, he'll be there next year as there's no

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 2>doubt in my mind that Madge will start the year.

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Whether he finishes the year, I guess it's like any

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 2>professional sporting organization. It will come down to results. But

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 2>he's got surely he's got the runs on the board

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 2>from last year. To have a year where they don't

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 2>make the finals and all sits well as opposed to

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 2>going let's get the noose.

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 4>Out and get him out of the Joy. Yeah, it's ridiculous.

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>It's even a topic of conversation, but it is a

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have been calling for his head. Let's

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>move on to the Panthers. Should Panthers fans now be worried?

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's three losses out of their past four.

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>They've lost to three teams that when they played them

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>were outside of the eighth. Is there any is there

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>any concern here for Panthers fans.

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 3>For Teama, oh, I had to double check the fact

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 3>that it had been three from four losses. It's sort

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 3>of creeped up, I think on most fans because they've

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 3>been so dominant for so long this year. No, I

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 3>think I still think it's it's them and Daylight Second.

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 3>To be honest, there's probably a couple of other clubs

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 3>that are going under the raider a little bit like Crenula,

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 3>though I don't know whether Cronulla had what it takes

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 3>to be a Grand finalist. But No, I think once

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 3>their full strength and once they get to that point

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 3>the end of the season, I think they'll be fine.

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 4>It goes to show how I think there's a muscle

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 4>memory there for them.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like they just know how to do it, and

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they know they often do this in the middle of

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the season. They kind of drop games or they don't

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't play their full squad.

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Origin obviously affects them.

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>It goes to show how unbelievable they are as a team,

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're one of the least for one of the

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>teams in the worst Formula comp right now, and no

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>one's questioning can Panthers.

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Do it no problem whatsoever with Penrith losing a couple

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 2>of games. It happens during a year sometimes, you know what,

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 2>it's not a bad thing just to pull back the

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 2>jets for a couple of weeks and then they'll go again.

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 2>We know what they can do, we know how they

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 2>can find another level.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a traffic I think they're just deceiving

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 4>the commentary.

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm a bit like I think before this run of

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 2>losses the gap between Penrith and the closer side was

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 2>as big as it's been in their tenure.

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think they.

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Are clearly ahead of the rest. If you want to

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 2>go through and look, okay, Penrieth from the Grand Final

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 2>right around that, who do they play? There's not that

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 2>many options. The Roosters will be close, the Warriors. I'm

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>still yet to be convinced and win a Grand Final.

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Darks are emerging, but we know Corla do in September.

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 2>That's lose. There's other clubs sort of sniffing around, but

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm not convinced that there's a horde of teams coming

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 2>to get the Panthers.

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you'd asked me, a couple of weeks ago

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 3>would have said the Dolphins. But sixty six points. I

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 3>mean it was incredible bounce back on the weekend. But yeah,

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 3>it's really hard to pick it. I worry about the Warriors,

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 3>whether they might run out of steam, you know, But

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 3>my gut feeling is it might be the Warriors.

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's tough for the Warriors right because they've

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>been a perennially failing club that no one's believing them

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 4>But what else can they do?

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>They're winning games, they're playing great footy, they've been hammard

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>by injury.

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 2>They get two finals. They were if they got that

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 2>top two fifinishes, that's right, I go bang at Hard.

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>But they win that, then they in the primin final

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 2>back at Hard. You know the side that Penrith would

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 2>fear most, Yeah, the Broncos.

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah they were. They're not going to do that.

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 2>That's side that Britain send out each week, which is

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:35.959
<v Speaker 2>packed full of origin players. They're the side they can

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 2>beat Penrith. They showed it last year. Obviously they won't

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 2>be there, but that's the one team I think Penrith

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 2>will be having a little gent to look over their shoulder, right.

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, I reckon the Warriors are going to be there.

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they're actually playing fantastic footy. They we talk

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.479
<v Speaker 1>about teams getting hit by injury. They they've certainly been hammered,

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>but they've found the depth in the squad to keep

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>getting results and if they get that home final, I

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>think they're a shoeing for the Grand Final.

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:56.719
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Whilst on the topic of the Warriors in their victory

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>over the Dragon, there was another storyline that popped up

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>all over the weekend. Plenty of coaches talked about it.

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Fans across the country were furious at what's been going on. Fatimi,

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>You've called it blunder round two point zero. The Bunker

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>once again fails the standard that fans require of it.

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Tell me how many mistakes or what kind of absolute

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>blunders did the Bunker mat this weekend.

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 3>I can't tell you a definitive job, but there felt

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.719
<v Speaker 3>like a couple of howlers like you mentioned in that

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Warriors Dragon gave you a feel for the Dragons because

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 3>they put they paid with so much heart, put in

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 3>so much effort. In the end, it was a couple

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 3>of refereeing decisions that I think cost them. So one

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 3>of the most contentious ones was the Dallan Waturny's ears

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 3>neck try that was clearly off a last pass that

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 3>was forward and so and I know we don't want

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 3>to open the can of worms with a bunker ruling

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 3>on forward passes, but I still maintain on the last

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 3>pass of a try, I think the bunker should be

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 3>able to have a look.

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so that was why shocker.

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.479
<v Speaker 3>That was a shocker. And then Paul vow Home, who've

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 3>been having a go out all year on this podcast,

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 3>got absolutely stiff on an escort penalty when you could

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 3>hear the bunker saying, oh that vow deliberately changes his

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 3>line to running to tain to a picky I think

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 3>it was when you see the replay, he was literally

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 3>just turning around to see where the ball was going.

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 3>And I think they the Warriors took a penalty goal

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 3>on the back of that. So yeah, a try that

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 3>went against them, a penallly that went against them, and

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 3>in the end I think it might have cost.

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Them the game.

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And there was some unformu There was also the unfortunate

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>one where Ceta too is me that line break, he gets,

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the ref calls play on it gets the bunker calls

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>are back saying it's a tackle, but then the momentum's

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>gone for the Dragons. The Warriors have a fully set line,

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>so Dragons fans will feel ripped off. My hot take

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is that they still weren't going to win, like they

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>needed the fifty to fifty calls to go their way

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to maybe steal a win. The Warriors were just definitely

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the better site. Doesn't mean the Dragons were bad, just

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that the Warriors are an excellent team. The Dragons shouldn't

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be embarrassed about the performance that they.

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Put on refereeings.

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>The referee should like it wasn't just in this game,

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly with the bunker Bulldog.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Did you happen to catch that? Was it on? Nat Butcher?

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 4>That tackle? The the comb over? I think he called

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 4>it Fatima.

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 2>I saw it. I can't believe what I saw, but

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 2>I did unfortunately saw it was a day off too. Yeah,

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 2>so I'm trying.

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. You're feeling smug after defending laws.

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 4>You just want to enjoy the spoilers.

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it was an absurd penalty. It was ridiculous.

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 2>It was embarrassing for the game. Hopefully we never see

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 2>such a.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But that's the issue though, isn't it bulldog like? We

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>are seeing these issues pop up time and time again,

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And so.

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Who who is making that call? Is that? Is that

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 2>in his ear? Is that a touchy you reckon? Or

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 2>is it the referee? That one was a referee on

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 2>field from memory? Yeah? Yes, So I mean how does

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 2>he see that and think that's a penalty? How does this?

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>How does this happen?

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, something like that shouldn't happen because when you have

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 3>situations of illegal or foul play, right like, especially if

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>it's a high tackle the rest of it, the bunker

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 3>can intervene when it's being looked at and decide force.

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's moderate force the rest of it. Blah

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 3>blah blah. Yeah, that should have been a situation where

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 3>the bunker should have also gone. Actually, hold on, there

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 3>is no But.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a rule thing, though, isn't it? Like they're not

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>allowed to currently in how the game's operating. The bunkers

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it can only step in on offenses that are worthy

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:19.479
<v Speaker 1>of report. So when I'm suspecting, maybe I'm assuming wrongly.

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't expect referees to be perfect, right, So then

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:25.959
<v Speaker 1>how many errors do you think is a referee can

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>make in a game and it'd be a good performance.

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So here's my rationale. I'm going to throw this one

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>out there. I got hammered online for it. If you

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>watch a good game of footing, you'll probably see at

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>least eight errors and a bunch of mistackles. Like a

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>really great game of footy is at least going to

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>have eight errors, say ninety percent completion rate from both teams,

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be an amazing game with a bunch

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of errors. Now, the referee is involved in every single play,

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 1>so I reckon a good ref performance includes eight to

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>ten errors.

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Thoughts I disagree. I'm more concerned about the level of

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 2>the eight to ten. If you're referring to a player

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.239
<v Speaker 2>laying on the board a bit longer, I can live

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 2>with that. It's an error, but it's more the cleanup. Again,

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 2>they've got to watch out for. And look, referee is

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 2>a human. We all love the kicking refs. I've kicked

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>mess for thirty exactly, and they get it wrong a lot.

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, if you ask the NRL,

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 2>they've got the KPIs and the stats there which show

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 2>that the referees are striking success at about ninety six

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven. Yes, if you want to believe those stats exactly.

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 2>But I'm just saying we're never ever going to get

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the perfect game because there's human error involved. Even though

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 2>the bunker, which I hate, yeah's still going to someone

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 2>in there, still at the button. Yeah, and he's a

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 2>human being, So it will never be perfect. I don't

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 2>mind the smaller errors. We just have to live with them.

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 2>We have since done one hundred and eight yea, And

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 2>it's like, but it's the tackles on the weekend and

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 2>some of the decisions over there. I want to say,

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the TACKLEMN Butcher tackle and some of those Dragons runs,

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 2>they were just poor. And the game's better than that.

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be better than that, and it's got

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 2>to be more professional.

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So if the bunker is officiating poorly and we're getting

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>frustrated and we are seeing these clangers or these howlers

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>or these flunders, what are some ideas on how we

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>fix this?

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 2>You've got you're not going to fix Yeah's impossible.

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:12.239
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I think there's some ways to fix it.

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing, like, as Bulldog mentioned, the their KPIs

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 3>and how well they're actually doing is actually quite high.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 3>It's just the fact that there are clangers just about

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 3>every single weekend, which is why we're talking about it.

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how because of the human element, if

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 3>there is a process that's going to eliminate every single

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 3>human error unless we turn referees into AI referees, I don't.

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 4>Know the robots.

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 1>But don't you feel like the fans in the football

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>community are owed more like should here's my thought. Should

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the NRL reveal to us the scorecard of how they

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>how they judge referee performances. I'm not saying give the

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>scorecard for that ref I'm just saying, let us know

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>why you're saying the refs are performing at a high level.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 2>They could. But the KPIs are very complex. Yeah, I've

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 2>seen that, Michelle. It's very complex, and to go through

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 2>a game means with that complexity, it would be quite

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>an arduous. So Graham and as he did for a

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 2>few years, brief front up every Monday and explain decisions.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I felt like he was I feel like he gassed

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>lit a lot though, didn't he like he was always defending.

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's such a subjective game. You can look at

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.199
<v Speaker 2>a decision, go that's bullshit, that's wrong. But technically Anathon

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 2>might say, you know what that is right, It's like

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 2>a ruck and mall in rugby union. Yeah, thirty two

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 2>different decisions. You can make twenty of them one and

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 2>then aiding the reverse. There's no right or wrong, they're

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 2>both subjective.

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 3>So doing defense in that situation because when he used

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 3>to have his briefings, I attended quite a few of them.

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 4>Now, very paw, did you survive.

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 3>No, But if the view was that the referee got

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 3>it wrong, they would concede.

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, and you know what, hopefully well I

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 2>won't be need to, but younger than you'll be sitting

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 2>here in ten years time, and you know what, we'll

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 2>still be talking about refereeing.

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I guess that's it's possible to around.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 2>We've tried him and we've got the bunker now, our

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 2>games worth billions of dollars. We've been bluing about referee

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 2>since don ure nay, and it's going to continue. Well,

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 2>that's my argument, no excuses, don't get me wrong. I'm

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 2>not sticking out no, no totally just saying, but to try

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 2>to totally eradicate the referee in their errors it's impossible.

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>That's why I feel like the sentiment, the negative sentiment

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a waste of energy because it's

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to like there's things we can do to

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>tweak it, but they're not going to be perfect.

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 4>They are going to make it.

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 2>You just hope as a supporter that it will roll

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 2>around and by the end of the year at fifty

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 2>to fifty to fifty.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And onto our new segment BS Messages of the Week,

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>where we hear from you the fans, about what's really

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>got you hot, what's got you riled up, what's some

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>bullshit that you want to call out. We've got some

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>great ones this week. This one comes from Keith in Sydney.

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Hello to you, Keith. He says, ticket prices of NRL

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>games some Thursday night games are more expensive than concerts

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>for international bands and magic that your real name. Pretty

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Cool from Queensland says buying a round of beers at

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the footy game is giving off just one round is

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>enough vibes our fans getting priced out at the footy Bulldog.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 2>It's been a bugbear of mine for one hundred years.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 2>It's the price of going to a game of football.

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 2>But the crowds are massive, so they are still going.

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 2>People will complain. I get that, and times are tough.

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 2>We're all watching our pennies at the moment, but they

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 2>are still going to the game. That's why clubs are

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 2>promoting memberships. You can buy a membership and get four, six, eight,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 2>twelve games and they are a lot cheaper than buying

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 2>a one off ticket. But I hate it. I think

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 2>it's a working class game. Well certainly was a working

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 2>class game, and I think all fans should be able

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to take their kids to the footy and go as

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a family and enjoy those memories and moments that having

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 2>a sluggy for two three hundred bucks. Sadly, it's live entertainment.

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 2>You go to any concert these days, the prices are

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the same. It's bloody expensive.

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's going to be rough, especially if you're a

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Roosters fan heading to Alion Stadium and you've got Maryvale

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>catering it. You're not going to get a cheap feed

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 1>at the footy anymore. I don't think that's a working

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>class mill. Their Bulldog fans getting priced out for Tima.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, when you think about you know, if you're trying

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 3>to take a family to a footy game. You know,

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 3>some family tickets started about few hundred dollars. Then the

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 3>kids haven't even had their pigs and their hot ships

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 3>set and all their soft drinks. Maybe you want to

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 3>buy a couple of drinks yourself, and then you're looking

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 3>at you know, or maybe five hundred dollars just to

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 3>go to a game of footage, especially in the cost

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 3>of living crisis. Yeah, I do think some families are

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 3>being priced out, though some clubs that are taking the

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 3>initiative to make tickets as affordable as possible. I know

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 3>last year, you know, Canterbury had that ten dollar ticket

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 3>offer and towards the end of the year you saw

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 3>those massive crowds at a core stadium. So yeah, I

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 3>think they are being priced out and clubs should be

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 3>doing more to and sure as many fans as possible

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 3>can accessuse.

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>The problem with also got is we do stick to

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 2>suburban grounds, which I love. But when those suburban grounds

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 2>are full and it doesn't take a lot to fill,

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 2>and Brookie always like, can't they can charge top dollar

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 2>because everyone's cramming to get in. It's okay for the

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Bulldogs for example, or Souse to say cheap tickets. I

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 2>love that, mind you, But they've got sixty thousand empty

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 2>seats so they can put a few more bums on seats.

0:27:56.520 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 2>But while we're at suburban grounds, they have that ability charge.

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 4>High Keith and Magic sorro Man.

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Just the unfortunate reality of the game being so popular,

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the prices aren't going down.

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 4>Mate. Final one from Tony in Bellmere, Queensland.

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>When a try is awarded, Rather than celebrate, I breathe

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a sigh of relief. The ref and bunker over officiating

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is ruining the game? Is it that bad guys? Is

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>it ruining the game?

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 2>Ah, it's not ruining the game. You know what. I

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 2>don't like the bunker. They stick their bibbin, They drive

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>me nuts. They've given me these gray hairs on both

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 2>my temples. Having said that, I think it's still a

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 2>better option than what we had when it was just

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 2>eyes and a touch judge. Blunders were being made left,

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 2>right and center. Back then. Of course, we didn't know

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the blunders were being made because we didn't have fifty

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 2>eight thousand cameras at every game, and we just moved on.

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 2>It was a different world back then. But I think

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 2>ultimately as much as the Bunker gets in our face

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and I wish they'd leave us alone, at times, it

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 2>is a more accurate game in terms of decisions being made.

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Tony, you would be much more furious if we

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the bunker, and those senior match officials like

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you would be pulling your hair out if you've got

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>any minds going anyway. Okay, so that wraps up our

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>BS segment. If you want, we want to hear from

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>your fans. We want to start talking about what's what's

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>got you? What what's got you riled up? Head to

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>cod sports dot com dot au. You can't miss it

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a NOBS section. Click on there, submit your answers or

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>submit anything that's giving you a grievance and we'll talk

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>about it on the show. That wraps it up for

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>us for this week. Thanks so much everyone. We'll catch

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you next Monday.