WEBVTT - Credlin | 11 August

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Peto Quedlin Live from year twenty four.

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Good evening, Welcome to the program.

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Here's what's coming up tonight on Predline, Question Time back Today,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Labour's migration reset in the housing crisis, topping the agenda,

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 3>all the analysis with Tuesday Night regular our political editor

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Clennell coming up their legal migrant crisis.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 2>In Britain deepens.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Mega Dinghy's now been used to facilitate hundreds of people

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 3>at once to cross the English Channel. Sophie Ellsworth will

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 3>join me plus befoll that continues over Anthony Albanesi's smutty

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 3>comments about the Japanese Prime Minister, the ambassador doubling down

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 3>a bit, calls for a personal apology. Our Prime minister

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 3>still refusing and rates on hold today, but no end

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 3>to the uncertainty for Australians who just want a break

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 3>from cost of living pressures.

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 4>We've already raised three times and we will go again

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 4>if we need to.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 3>The first Census Night is tonight and everyone's been encouraged

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 3>by the government to fillate your form so that the

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 3>data you provide can.

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Be used to deliver the services that you want.

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Now and into the future. In the right locations around

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>our country. At least that's the official line. But if

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 3>you don't think the activists use the census as a weapon,

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 3>then you are kidding yourself. And if you think that

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the independence of this tray and Bureau of Statistics means

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 3>that the government has no hand in how tonight's census

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 3>document is shaped, and think again there too. The Albanezy

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 3>government has its fingerprints all over this census.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 2>While the ABS.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Will tell you that they draft the questions and they do,

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 3>the government is absolutely involved in the topics this year.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 3>As an example, that was the Albanezer government that asked

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 3>for a question to be included about gender and sexual orientation. Yes,

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Labor put that in. Here is Jenny Telfer, the ABS

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 3>General Manager in charge of the census, could bumi exactly

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 3>this today in an interview with my colleague Kieren Gilbert.

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 5>Politicians shape this? Have there been any has there been

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 5>any political input to some of these questions, like around

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 5>sexuality and so on.

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 6>So the way the content and the questions work in

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 6>the Australian Census, it is the Australian government who decided.

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 7>The topics that we include in.

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 6>The census, so they make that decision, and then they

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 6>request the ABS to design a set of questions, a

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 6>set of response options that statistically will give us the

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 6>best data.

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 3>So, while I tried hard, Jenny telferd there refused to

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 3>disclose which minister or ministers perhaps prime ministers told them

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 3>to include those questions on gender.

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 5>When you say the government suggested this change or this

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 5>addition on sexuality, which minister does that Who in the

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 5>government makes that recommendation or that direction to the ABS?

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, the ABS actually makes a recommendation based on everything

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 6>we hear through that consultation process. We make a recommendation

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 6>to government on the topics we think are important to

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 6>include in the census, and then the government ultimately makes

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 6>that decisions.

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 5>But the direction itself that just comes from government, not

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 5>from is it the minister's office. I'm just trying to

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 5>work out where it is.

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 6>Australian government decision to include particular topics and to retain

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 6>particular topics on the census for.

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 2>They're try didn't it.

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's look again at the very issue of religion. Now,

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 3>as I've shown you over recent weeks, this is an

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 3>important topic and one where the activists have really been

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 3>busy in recent years to this point, here's the former

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 3>founder of the Sex Party if campaigning hard for the

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 3>no religion vote tonight.

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:09.119
<v Speaker 8>You know, when I was younger, I went to Sunday School,

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 8>I was christened, I was confirmed. I even growing up

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 8>dreamt I was going to become a nun. But I'm

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 8>not religious now. And so when you're asked on the

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 8>census this week, what is your religion If you're not religious, now,

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 8>mark no religion.

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 3>As I said before, the order of the questions on

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 3>the paper tonight matter as well. And the fact that

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 3>the no religion box is the first box you can

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 3>select when you get to the question, well that advantages

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 3>those running that argument. You saw it there from Fiona

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 3>Pattern that increasingly Australia is a secular nation because the

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 3>first spot on any ballot benefits the donkey vote. That's

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 3>why in an election campaign, when names are drawn out

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 3>of the ha for a spot on the ballot paper,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 3>every candidate wants to be the first name at the top.

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 3>And so when you have a question about religion and

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 3>that top spot goes to the no religion camp or

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 3>they benefit absolutely. As I discussed last night with polling

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 3>expert doctor Dorian von Freehold.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 10>The current census framing is somewhat peculiar in that it's

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 10>a checkbox question where the first option is no religion. Now,

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 10>being a guy with a PhD in consumer psychology having

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 10>lectured many a course on research methodologies, that's a rookie era.

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 10>You fall straight into what's called the primacy effect, which

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 10>means that the first option visible to respondence gets a

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 10>disproportionate amount of eyeballs and is more likely to be selected.

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Now, when pushed, the ABS say that no religion up

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 3>the top because it was the box that achieved the

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 3>greatest vote at the last census. But how disingenuous is

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 3>that at the last census in twenty twenty one, if

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 3>you want to measure just one religion against no religion,

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 3>in fact, it was Christianity that received the greatest vote.

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Christianity reported the ABS was the most common religion in

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Australia with forty three point nine percent of people identifying

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 3>as Christian Now contrasts that with no religion that recorded thirty.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Eight point nine percent.

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 3>So if the order is determined by the largest number

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 3>of responses, so why isn't Christianity at the top of

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 3>tonight's census form well because of the way the question

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 3>is framed.

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:53.119
<v Speaker 2>That's why.

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 3>Because rather than give Australians a Christian box to tick,

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 3>the ABS breaks down the Christian faith church by church,

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.239
<v Speaker 3>and so that means the Christian vote on the form

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 3>tonight gets split. And because it is split rather than

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 3>contained in a single box, the no religious crowd or

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 3>they stay at the top.

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 2>See why the frame of a question matters as much

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>as it does. It's just like political polling.

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 3>The question you ask can be as important as the

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 3>answer you get. Now also understand this too. Of all

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>the religions listed on the sensus form, it is only

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 3>only the Christian faith that is broken down by denomination,

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 3>so broken down church by church. No other religion gets

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 3>this treatment. The ABS, as an example, does not split

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Islam into its distinct branches of Sunni Islam or Shia Islam.

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Nor does the census split Hindu into its various denominations. Heck,

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 3>for that matter, the ABS doesn't even split out the

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 3>no religion box either.

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Does it.

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>If it was consistent, the AVS would have a box

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.239
<v Speaker 3>for the atheists, perhaps one for the agnostics as well.

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 3>See what I mean? What also concerns me with this

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 3>question on religion. Is the message we send as a

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 3>country by leaving Judaism off the list of specified religions

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 3>and requiring Jewish Australians to record themselves under other at

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 3>a time in our nation's history where anti Semitism's never

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 3>been worse, I would have thought that including Judaism on

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 3>the form would be a powerful message that Jews matter

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 3>and yes, you can give me all the reasons why

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 3>statistically other religions are prioritized in terms of population. But

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 3>given the ABS confirming today that the Albanezer government was

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 3>involved in the development of the census, then for the

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 3>government not to take this opportunity to send a signal

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 3>to Australian Jews is disappointing. Now, why this matters as

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 3>much as it does beyond the recording of faith or

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 3>otherwise of Australians, is that census data is used across government, local,

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 3>state and federal and what you measure matters. This data

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 3>on religion will be used to plan for religious schools, hospices,

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>perhaps hospitals of religious faith. It's used to accommodate ceremonies,

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 3>cemeteries and other burial spaces.

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 2>Trust me too.

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 3>It will be used by some to argue for the

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 3>removal of the morning prayer from our parliaments as it

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 3>has been in the past. Even things like laws in

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 3>relation to legalized prostitution and planning rules around brothels, all

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 3>things that have been liberalized in recent years use census

0:09:54.160 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 3>information on religion and faith as part of the political debate. Now,

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not passing judgment on any of these things. My

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 3>point is that when activist campaign for census language changes

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 3>and questions to be included or removed, they don't do

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 3>it out of the goodness of their statistical hearts, but

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 3>do it because they have an agenda to change our country,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 3>and a big part in changing our country is the

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 3>denial of our Judeo Christian foundations. There you go, be

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 3>careful what box you tick tonight. Let's get the headlines

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 3>out of canber now with our reporter Ribbon Spargo.

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 11>Good evening. The opposition leader is facing a divided party

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 11>room over gambling reforms. Five opposition backbenches used a coalition

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 11>meeting today to push for tougher reforms. Four others warned

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 11>against going too far.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I want to make sure that we get the balance right.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>We think that we're nearly there. The conversations will keep going.

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 11>Angus Taylor is negotiating directly with the minister as the

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 11>coalition tries to settle on a position. A podcast in

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 11>which Anthony Albernzi spoke about receiving a gift of melons

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 11>from the Japanese Prime minister is dogging the government. A

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 11>note from the Japanese government to dressing the gaff was

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 11>leaked to The Australian.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Will the Prime Minister apologize to the Prime Minister of

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 4>Japan for his disrespectful behavior.

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 12>I have a very good relationship with the Prime Minister

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 12>of Japan.

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 11>The Opposition leader also sought to pressure the Prime Minister

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 11>over housing.

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 13>Will the Prime Minister finally admit Labour's broken promises on

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 13>capital gains tax and negative gearing have made millions of

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 13>Australian homeowners worse off.

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 11>I want people to have the opportunity to be the

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 11>first in their family to own their own homes. That

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 11>is something which is part of the great Australian dream.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 11>Ministers are refusing to concede. The government's changes to negative

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 11>gearing and capital gains tax have led to the subsequent

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 11>fall in House prices.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 3>For as I said Parliament. Of course that returning today

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 3>first question time after a very long winter break and

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 3>who better than the next scares Andrew klanaul our political

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 3>letter to at News twenty four to pull it all

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 3>apart Andrew Opposition today they went the Prime Minister about

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 3>his comments on that podcast. Will get to those in

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 3>a moment. But the feach today from the Coalition in

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 3>question time really was housing.

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 13>Labour's toxic taxes have tanked the housing market. Labour's broken

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 13>promises on capital gains tax and negative gearing have made

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 13>millions of Australian homeowners worse off. Can the Prime Minister

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 13>confirm the average new mortgage holder is paying twenty nine

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 13>thousand dollars a year more in interest alone.

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 14>Rents have reportedly increased by ten percent since the budget

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 14>just three months ago.

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, the Democrat James Carvell famously said it's your me,

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 3>stupid and it was a lot of the economy today.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 2>What did you make of it, Andrew, Well.

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 15>I think that's fertile ground here for your position, and

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 15>I think the government's under pressure and you can see

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 15>it in the way the ministers skate around the fact

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 15>House prices have dropped because partly because of their policies,

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 15>they won't say that, and that's been pretty ridiculous in

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 15>interviews we've done the last couple of days.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's biting out there.

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 15>Whether or last, we'll see, but right now it's not

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 15>a great position for the government. They're being seen to

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 15>fumble a few things, that's for sure.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and also I guess politicians have got big super

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 3>accounts and perhaps wealth in other places and shares elsewhere.

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Ordinary Australians basically have everything they've got locked up in

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 3>their home. That's the biggest as it certainly is for me.

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I suspect it is for you too, So I think

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 3>out there in the suburbs, this stuff bites.

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 15>All everyone says, you know, just a terrible time to sell.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 15>That's what you hear from people who various circumstances have

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 15>to sell. They're really stuck in a bad scenario by

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 15>these policies, that's the bottom line.

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it doesn't.

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 15>Affect enough people to swing meaningful votes unless it persists.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 15>But it is annoying people and they don't like to

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 15>see their paper wealth go down, and they wonder where,

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 15>you know, where it all goes from here and they're

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 15>not convinced that the government's helping enough. And cost of living anyway,

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 15>because inflation is still shooting up, so it's kind of

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 15>has a bit of midterm slump about it. Of course,

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 15>we know last term they had a midterm slump and

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 15>they came back in once.

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>So if I was.

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 15>Opponents of the prime minister, I wouldn't be getting too excited. Well,

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 15>particularly Liberal party down in eighteen percent with the Nats.

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 15>But One Nation's probably the only people who should be

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 15>a bit excited, but they should temper that excitement at

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 15>the moment.

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess last time, though on the center right column,

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 3>there was no one else but the coalition.

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Now there's obviously.

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Another aspirin and preferences make it difficult for a majority

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 3>government to be formed out of the center right. But

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 3>you can see that people are voting with their feet

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 3>are away from the government.

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 2>That's the problem. I think savvy people inside labor get this.

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 3>They're already putting One Nation into a lot of the

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 3>retrick in speeches and elsewhere, and certainly in a campaign sense.

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 3>But I think a lot of them who think that

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 3>they are not at risk from One Nation they've got

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 3>their head in the sand.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>No, Peter. The feeling around here.

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 15>I mean I saw a senior minister today and they're

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 15>asking me about what's going to happen with the Liberal leadership,

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 15>and I said, you need to be worried about one

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 15>nation at the moment, and that person said, yes, we do.

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they're very really awake to it. They're awake

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to it.

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 15>I mean they hear it, and they're electorates, so they're

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 15>well aware of the threat. And you know, the British

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 15>load Parties turned it around by changing horse right with

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 15>someone from outside the parliament. And this is where I

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 15>go back to my Malanowskis theory. I mean, Albanezy will

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 15>go at a time of his choosing. I've no doubt

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 15>about that. But I just wonder if the Labor Parties

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 15>to succeed at the next election or not end up

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 15>in minority government, at least they need something like that,

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 15>a big change like that, as opposed to anyone they've

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 15>got on that front bench. And I'm sure that will

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 15>be throwing things at the TV and their officers listening

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 15>to me say that. But I just think we're in

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 15>an era of politics where requires that sort of thing,

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 15>and so do your one nation and reform movements of

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 15>have created that situation and things are just moving incredibly

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 15>fast in terms of public sentiment. There's so many things

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 15>we can do with technology that people aren't you know,

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 15>they're not happy with the old way of doing things.

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 15>They're prepared to try new things, and that's how the

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 15>electorate's changed, I think.

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 2>And look, I agree with you on Melanowskis.

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 3>He's the best that Labour's got anywhere in the countries,

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 3>but than anybody who's in the Parliament right now. I've

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 3>got something on him in relation to this arial Commission.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 3>I'll get to that a bit later on, but you know,

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 3>I think the Libs would be concerned about him. He's

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the old Labor right and this is why I think

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Labor is crazy to persist with this constant experiment that

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 3>they're getting in Victoria and in Camera by letting the

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.479
<v Speaker 3>left control of the agenda, because the Left is fighting

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 3>the Greens for space as opposed to coming in and

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 3>taking voters off the coalition and obviously increasingly one nation.

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 2>Is this why we're getting.

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 3>This movement into the immigration space and what's happening with

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 3>that because yes, Burk's from the right, but normally from

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 3>the right. I mean he's been signed up to de

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 3>elmen easy for some time. That speech was happening last week,

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 3>then he got rolled and it got canceled. We've got

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 3>this legislation now from one nation on foreign fighters. I mean,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 3>the real rise for one nation and the real fall

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 3>for the government happened after Bondai. And yet labor is

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 3>still very scared to get into this turf.

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 15>Oh, they'll get into it next week. They'll do this

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 15>announcement next week. Yeah, it's only going to be two

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 15>weeks later.

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, I'm hearing they're.

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 15>Going to curb I guess some of this business with

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 15>family reunion off the back of visas. But they'll probably

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 15>cut the student visa intake, the skilled intake except for construction,

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 15>health and defense jobs. That they're not cutting the number

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 15>of permanent which is one hundred and eighty five, or

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 15>net migration, which is two twenty from the budget. But

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 15>they're about three hundred net migrations. So Tony Burk's got

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 15>to outline a bunch of ways he's going to get

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 15>to two twenty.

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And this will be about.

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 15>Trying to instill some confidence in that, and of course

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 15>they say it's got nothing to do with one nation,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 15>I mean pull the other one, you know.

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but they've they've never met a target that they

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 3>have set. They've had a forecast in every budget and

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 3>then nom has been well over the forecasts. So I

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 3>hear that they'll go and announce stuff that people want

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 3>to hear.

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 2>But you know, Pinocchio, please, isn't that what they do

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 2>all the time?

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me?

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 3>And look, both sides to be fair, the coalitions talk

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 3>tough as well. Hanson's number out there on migration is

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and thirty thousand, that's her average. Well that's

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 3>where the Howard government was. That was where I think

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Abbott was promising one hundred and sixty. It's crept up

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 3>after that, and it's gone on and on and on

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 3>to the point that that you know, Morrison Zerra butt

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 3>for COVID, take COVID out, Dutton zero as well.

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 2>All of that was pretty shocking.

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 3>So this has been a long time coming in the

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Australian population and this idea that somehow, you know, that

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 3>they can bury their head in the sand. Both sides,

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 3>both the Coalition and Labor here. I think there's a

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 3>reckoning on migration. I think it is one of the

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 3>biggest issues without a doubt this term and will be

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 3>at the ballot box.

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 15>I mean we've got an aging population and there's there's

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 15>not many solutions in there in terms of like at

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 15>least Peter Costello could point to the baby bonus, right,

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 15>but there's not many solutions on that front. To the government,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 15>it's like they throw their hands up in the air

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 15>and say we have to have immigration not so easy

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 15>to sell, particularly when the housing doesn't move with it.

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well it's propped up.

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 15>Scott Morrison's Budget's plenty of time, which I think is now.

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm equally critical, mate, I'm equally critical, and I was

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 3>tough last night on my side for not putting a number.

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 3>A lot of aspiration out there four or five months ago,

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 3>but no number yet. Let's go to these comments again.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 3>The Prime Minister in trouble about the melon and the

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Japanese Prime Minister have a listen.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Will the Prime Minister personally apologize to the Prime Minister of.

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 13>Japan reject the assertion in the question disburb in Australia

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 13>and Japan have never.

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Been closer or more strategically life.

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 4>Will the Prime Minister apologize to the Prime Minister of

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 4>Japan for his disrespectful behavior.

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 13>I have a very good relationship with the Prime Minister

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 13>of Japan.

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 2>And then this response have a listen.

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 16>Some media interpretations of that episode of that podcast have

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 16>been misinterpreted.

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 17>There has been a sensationalized reporting of something that, as

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 17>the Prime Minister has been very clear about, has been mischaracterized.

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 9>The comments and the remarks from the Prime Minister have

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 9>been misinterpreted. The Prime Minister is very clear that he

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 9>did not mean for those comments to be interpreted in

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 9>the way they have by some media outlets and by

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 9>our political opponents.

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Galligh is also the Minister for Women, not just

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 3>the Finance minister. And please Andrew, he insults us, I

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 3>mean melons that he does this one?

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 2>Come on right?

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Why can't he just fess up when he MUCKs up,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 3>when he stuffs up, when he falls off the stage,

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 3>when he lies. Why can't he ever admit when he's

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 3>got it wrong?

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So I can't believe I have to say this on air.

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 15>But his position is he didn't mean breasts right, that

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 15>he was just juggling actual fruit melons. What do you

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 15>make of that position, Peter.

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Kredlin, Well, they weren't like this, mate.

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 3>He did them up here, you know, when you do

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the melons like that rather than the melons like that.

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Come on, mate, Like we've all been to a footy

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 3>club before you and I grew.

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Up in the real world. We know what that is.

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Every woman knows what that is. And I think we're

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 3>sick of the lies from this bloke. This is where

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 3>the trust and the character deficits so obvious.

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 15>Well, it looks seems to me like he's trying not

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 15>to give the grab where he says that, right, so

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 15>he just keeps saying that and then all not it

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 15>mischaracterize this misinterpreter.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to.

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 15>Be, you know, like if he really wanted to go

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 15>at the attack on it, he should probably just come

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 15>out and say I find any suggestion that that had

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 15>a sexual overturn insulting and just.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Go for it. Like that's probably where he needs to

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>be at.

0:22:58.080 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 15>Otherwise he's never going to be able to sweep at

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 15>as it looks highly offensive he's spoken of the Prime Minister.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 15>Since there's no problem their position is the Japanese have

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 15>no problem. Their position is the ambassador who spoke out

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 15>about it, the former ambassador in the Australian is disgruntled

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 15>and their position is that he didn't mean it the way.

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>He didn't mean it.

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 15>To involve breasts. If I'd have to say that again,

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 15>So that is their position. That's all I can tell

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 15>you and the viewer, and you have to make your

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 15>own judgment on.

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 2>That, and I think people are.

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 3>I'll leave it there, sorry, Andrew, we've had to say

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 3>the breast word on airon boys don't like that, but

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 3>us women are pretty comfortable with it.

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll leave it there, thank you. Let's go to the

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 2>rate decision today.

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 3>No surprises there, the IBA voting to keep the cash

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 3>right on hold four point three five percent.

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Good news if you've got a mortgage.

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 3>But of course there's still underlying pressures in the economy

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 3>and they're not easy, are they?

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Joentymen?

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 3>Now are the independent economists with EQ Economics Warren Hogan? Well,

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 3>she was pretty quick the government today to say that

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 3>rap cut wasn't even discussed at the board meeting, but

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 3>that she says the board will not be afraid to

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 3>raise rates.

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Worry, what do you think?

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 16>Well, I'm surprised they didn't raise rates because the government

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 16>went to great lengths throughout the press conference to emphasize

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 16>the fact that they're probably going to have to. In fact,

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 16>she stated which I sort of couldn't believe, that she

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 16>personally thinks rates are going to have to go higher,

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 16>which is an incredible statement from a Reserve Bank governor.

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 16>So I think the fact that no one was expecting

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 16>it or sorry the markets weren't pricing a rate hike

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 16>today probably made it difficult for them. And they're certainly

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 16>leading the market towards a rate hike in the next

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 16>little while. And they've given us a set of forecasts

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 16>which show essentially the Australian consumer buckling from here on in.

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 16>And of course if those forecasts aren't met, a consumers

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 16>can continue to spend, or various other elements like wages

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 16>come in higher, inflation is a bit higher, then they

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 16>will move. So they've set it all up for a

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 16>rate hike. I think we should be all penciling in

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 16>at least one or two and let's hope that's it.

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 3>We saw yesterday that data from I think it was Westpac,

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 3>one of the Big four anyway, that said their mortgage

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 3>books down by twenty percent terms of applications. If you

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.479
<v Speaker 3>listen to the government today in question time, nothing that

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 3>they are doing is impacting house values. They're not responsible

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 3>for the full in auction clearances. It's nothing to do

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 3>with the budget. Who's telling the truth here, the statistics

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 3>or the treasurer.

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 16>Well, the realities of our housing market are that we

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 16>had the reversal of the rate cuts from last year

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 16>earlier this year, and of course the start of the

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 16>conflict in Iran and the shutting of the Persian Gulf

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 16>had a big impact on what is a very sentiment

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 16>driven market. And then of course the market was starting

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 16>to weaken already, and then the government with no forewarning,

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 16>no flagging, of this radical shift in policy. Really it's

0:25:56.680 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 16>it's a generational type shift brings down in the budget.

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 16>So to be able to identify exactly which of those

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 16>three factors is the most important is hard. But there's

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 16>no doubt that the market was slowing and the government

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 16>has given it a really big kick. So you know,

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 16>even if there's merit in these changes, which some economists

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 16>think there are, other people don't, the fact is I

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 16>think their timing was terrible and I think the standout

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 16>feature of this market is just the collapse in turnover

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 16>or transactions. Prices are falling, that's not unusual. They could

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 16>get worse, but the transactions and the market have collapsed

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 16>in a way we haven't seen before. And that's why

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 16>the industry itself is hurting so much.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me.

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 3>About work from home because in Victoria it's not just

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 3>the government controlling whether their public servants work from home

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 3>or not. And they work from home, but the government's

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:49.959
<v Speaker 3>also got laws on the table in relation to private

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 3>sector businesses. Now already under the Fair Work Act, people

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:57.239
<v Speaker 3>have to be flexible for certain circumstances or you know,

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>reasons of kids being sick or whatever. But this will

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 3>be mandated work from home days for the entirement of

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 3>every private sector worker. There's a lot of pushback from business.

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 3>Victoria's belly up bankrupt anyway. It's so far behind the

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 3>other states in terms of getting people back into the

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 3>office post COVID, Brisbane sitting everywhere else's getting busters. Victoria

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 3>is a laggared that the new premier today has pushed

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 3>it on the long finger, says he's not going to

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 3>bring the laws in straight away. Reports today that if

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 3>they do pursue this, one hundred thousand square meters of

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 3>office space in Melbourne will be empty next financial year.

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 3>In productivity, getting Victoria back on its feet, give me

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 3>your estimate or your analysis of work from home.

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 16>Well, in this case, it's just another highly misguided government

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 16>intervention in our economy and in our lives, and it's

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 16>going to backfire severely and rapidly because Victoria, as you

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 16>allude to, is already on the precipice and it needs

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 16>the government to be undertaking measures that help investment, help productivity,

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 16>help get some confidence in the economy. This is not

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 16>going to do that, and the business reaction has been

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 16>visceral in the past week. So you know, Victoria is

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 16>already a standout. Its unemployment rate is increased by twice

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 16>as much as the rest of the country's in the

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 16>last two years and is now over five percent. Its

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 16>inflation is actually lower than the rest of the country,

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 16>which sounds good, but it's actually a sign of a

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 16>weak economy. You know, if they cut this immigration march,

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 16>and in Victoria is very reliant on immigration and population

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 16>growth to keep their economy ticking over, who knows if

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 16>that tips them over or a measure like this, if

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 16>it's enforced in the new year. The fact is Victoria

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 16>can't cannot withstand too many more blows. And of course

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 16>the issue is does that start to affect the rest

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 16>of us. It's a really bad policy.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Well we know it was under Tim Pallace, a former Treasurer,

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 3>that he went to his mates in Canberra and tried

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 3>to get a bailout. Thank goodness, Jim Chalmers didn't do it.

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 3>But I guess the corollary here on this stuff too, productivity,

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 3>work from home, all the other changes hitting Victoria.

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you just upshaw the jobs.

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 3>You'll take the capital and the business out of Victoria.

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 3>You'll send the jobs off to the Philippines, to a

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 3>call center or AI will replace them. It's not that

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 3>you'll get to work from home, it's that you won't

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 3>get to work at all.

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I agree, And look at the first glance, of course,

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 16>this sort of thing just hastens the incentive for businesses

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.479
<v Speaker 16>to move to other states or given what's happening more

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 16>broadly with these tax changes and talk of particularly young

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 16>people looking to set themselves up overseas, to take the

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 16>business overseas, altogether, which is a disaster for the whole country.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 16>Getting young, innovative, forward looking people out of the country

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 16>is not a good thing. To your point, I mean,

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 16>we have got a productivity crisis, which is one of

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 16>the key elements underpinning a declining living standard in this country.

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 16>It's not just that slow boiling frog effect of declining

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 16>living standards. Now we've got political issues with the rise

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 16>of one nation, and of course, in my sense, in

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 16>my judgment, we are just right for some economic crisis

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 16>to suddenly come out of the blue. In fact, I

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 16>think it's the fear that something's going to go wrong

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 16>that's keeping the RBO and hold for the time being.

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 16>But these policies are setting us up for a major issue,

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 16>and of course it's the reverse of everything we've done

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 16>in the last forty years to build one wealthiest and

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 16>best economies with the world's ever seen.

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I will live there on that very cheery note, Warren Hogan,

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 2>thank you. After the break, closer look at the.

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Smoke and mirror strategy of labor and defense spending. What

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 3>are they calling it procurement, dodginess or something like that,

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 3>performative procurement. There you go and Tony abit Jez you

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 3>got criticized for looking at is what one time in

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 3>the parliament? What does he make of the melons in

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 3>alban easy and the Japanese Prime minister that's next, welcome back.

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 3>We know the boats about in the UK, but it's

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 3>escalated enormously in the last couple of days. Hundreds and

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 3>hundreds are in single inflatables at the moment they're crossing

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 3>the channel. Those numbers are up very much yesterday. We'll

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 3>get to that in a moment. Sofi elseworth But now

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 3>to claims the Albaneza government has engaged in performative procurement

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 3>to shore up its dodgy defense credentials after revelations had

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 3>purchased air to wear missiles that he had to enter

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 3>service and aren't even due to be delivered for years.

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Here to discuss this and more former Prime Minister of course,

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Tony Abbott, and now of course the Liberal Party National

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:57.239
<v Speaker 3>President Tony. Let's talk about defense because we you know,

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 3>we look around the world, look obviously at the Straits

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 3>of hor moves in Iran, but you can imagine what

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.959
<v Speaker 3>that would be if China wanted to operate like Iran

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 3>in our region, If we think that's a constrain on

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.719
<v Speaker 3>fuel goodness me to our north. We've got all that

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 3>talk obviously about about Taiwan. What do you make of

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 3>this announcement by the government with these missiles on the

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 3>absolute long finger.

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 14>This is a government which is determined never to commit

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 14>our armed forces to combat, and everything they are doing

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 14>is about saying, well, we're not ready now, but we

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 14>might be ready in ten years time. And frankly it's

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 14>just not good enough. Capable armed forces need to be

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 14>ready to engage in military operations at any time. This

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 14>government wants to ensure that if the Americans ever asked

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 14>us to help, they don't have to say we won't help,

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 14>but they can say we'd like to help, but we

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 14>can't because we haven't got the ability to do so.

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 14>And I go back to the time in Descend twenty

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 14>twenty three when the Americans asked us to send a

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 14>frigate to the Red Sea and we refuse. This is

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 14>the first time since nineteen fifty one when Australia has

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 14>declined to direct American request for military assistance. And as

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 14>I said, it's a sign that this is a quasi

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 14>pacifist government that doesn't want to admit to pacifism, just

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 14>wants to make the armed forces incapable of any serious

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 14>military mission.

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Now, yeah, there's a real push on the use of

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 3>our military for basically natural disaster work, constant humanitarian work.

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 3>But you can't project a security posture unless you've got

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.719
<v Speaker 3>a threaten right, unless you've got the weapon behind your

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 3>back that people know you will use it.

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 14>The government is terrified that in the event of serious

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 14>conflict in our region we might be asked for help,

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 14>and they want to be able to say we'd like to,

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 14>but we can't.

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Is that because the Prime minister's cowered by Beijing?

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 14>There's no doubt that everything this government does is designed

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 14>to appease Beijing. Why didn't we make more of a

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.439
<v Speaker 14>fuss of the Japanese Prime minister when she was here.

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 14>Why didn't she get the chance to address both houses

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 14>of parliament? Plainly, it's because this is a government which

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 14>is terrified of upsetting Beijing. It wants to pretend that

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 14>the relationship has been in a sense stabilized. Well, it's

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 14>only been stabilized because we are basically in full cowtown mode.

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's play a comment from Shingo Yamagami. I know you

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 3>know him well, of course, former Ambassador for Japan to Australia.

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Have a listen.

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 12>This is not a porticon, no Portugal issue at all,

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:51.760
<v Speaker 12>and this shouldn't be treated as a partisan issue simply.

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 12>This is a matter of de corum diplomatic propriety and

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 12>also you know mutual respect.

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 3>Well, you made those comments about the Prime Minister and

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 3>the Japanese Prime Minister, and you'll have seen the brew

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 3>haha over these melons. I made the point of it

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 3>earlier on. I mean, you were skewed in the Parliament

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 3>by Julia Gillard for daring to look at your watch.

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 3>How does he get away with this? How do all

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 3>these labor ministers say it's not sexist? You've seen it.

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Look you're a dad of girl. Come.

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 14>Labour has dreadful double standards. The Prime Minister's comments were

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 14>unbelievably crass. Now he apologized for the observations about Kylie Minogue,

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 14>he should be man enough to likewise apology apologize for

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 14>the observations about the Japanese Prime minister. Look, all of

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 14>us make mistakes, all of us occasionally have lapses of

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 14>judgment and character. But if you don't apologize. It doesn't

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 14>just look like a lapse. It looks like a very

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 14>serious character flaw and very serious lack of judgment, and frankly,

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 14>that's pretty bad in our national leader.

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 3>I just quickly make the point about the ABS and

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 3>the census, and you know people trying to pretend that

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 3>the ABS is independent. Well it is this idea that

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 3>government doesn't have a hand in the questions that get

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.760
<v Speaker 3>on the form and the topics. Well, of course it does.

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 3>That admission today from the ABS is clear. But on religion,

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, they split Christianity out by church almost to

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of diminish its its breadth and deep resonance with Australians,

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 3>No other Hindu, Islam, no other religions split out by

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 3>its various denominations, and that enables no religion, which is

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the largest group, to go to the top. But if

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 3>you put all the Christian churches together tiny, they should

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 3>be at the top.

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 14>Look plainly, there is a green left establishment that doesn't

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.359
<v Speaker 14>like Australia and wants to change the way we are.

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 14>It doesn't like our Anglo Celtic core culture, doesn't like

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 14>Ajudeo Christian fundamental ethos, and they are always fishing for

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 14>evidence to say that we're not really a basically Christian society,

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 14>that we're not really a fundamentally Anglo Celtic culture. And

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 14>this is all of a piece with this. The questions

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 14>you ask determine the answers you get, and to be honest,

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 14>they're waiting the questions to get the answers they want.

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for joining me. Thanks Tony Abbott.

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 3>Remember we said that book he wrote about Australia. Who

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 3>knew that a book, a positive book about our country

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 3>would be so popular? Well, let me tell you it's

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 3>sold almost one hundred thousand copies.

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 2>No other pms at a book like it.

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, after the rate, we'll get to the UK

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 3>channel because that stuff over there is huge at the moment,

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 3>these mega diggies.

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 2>So I for yours worth coming out, all right?

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 3>That push for taxpayers to spend billions of dollars your

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 3>money to hand it to Silicon Valley billionaires to build

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 3>ARTA centers in Australia, that's not on what is it.

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to that in a moment.

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 3>And out of the arrival of more than two hundred

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 3>and thirty people in what's been called a single megadingy.

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:11.359
<v Speaker 2>This is an inflatable used to.

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Cross the English Channel, arriving into the UK early on

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Monday morning and significantly escalating illegal migrant issues. All the

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 3>while the new Prime Minister, who's been there for about

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 3>a fortnite, is on leave here to discuss this and more.

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 3>News twenty four contributor. He's got Australia's European correspondent, Sophie Ellsworth. Well,

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 3>we'll get to the bloke on leave after just getting

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 3>into the job in a moment, Sophie. But this is

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 3>just days after Nigel Farah has said he's going to

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 3>copy the Abbott government template to stop the boats. I mean,

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 3>even in nowadays, I didn't see any sort of inflatable

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 3>device like that. One hundred people or more this would

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 3>be huge news over your way.

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 18>Well it is indeed, Peter. I mean you only have

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 18>to look at the front pages of today's papers in

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 18>the UK. I've got here on the front of the

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 18>Sun not so small boat's crisis, and then on the

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 18>front of the Daily Mail is similar. Front page day

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 18>small boat's crisis becomes a big boat's crisis. They're saying

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 18>that there was two hundred and thirty illegal migrants come

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 18>in on this giant inflatable boat, which is more than

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 18>the typical amount of passengers on an easy Jet flight.

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:28.359
<v Speaker 18>But Andy Burnham, the new Prime Minister, has said that

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 18>the numbers that have come in illegally this year, which

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 18>are about fifteen thousand, are about forty percent down on

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 18>last year. But this is making the whole issue look fascical,

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 18>Peter in the UK, and it's something that's making Britain's

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 18>incredibly annoyed.

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's certainly showing up in Poling.

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 3>So if you're Britain like Australia, I didn't mind migrants

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 3>coming in. Welcome to migrants as long as they joined

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 3>the team. But that's really turning around now. The hostility

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 3>to migration is significant.

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 18>It is, indeed, Peter, because as you know, there's so

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 18>many issues here in the UK, pressures on cost of living,

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 18>pressures that households are feeling every day and they're looking

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 18>for some form of relief, and a lot of Britons

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 18>are angry because they feel that people are coming into

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 18>this country and they're getting a free ride. They're coming

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 18>in illegally and then they're being allowed to be put

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 18>up in hotels and given various amenities, access to healthcare, etc.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 18>And basically put in the system with years until their

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 18>cases have heard of whether or not they should be here.

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 18>But this issue just will not go away. And Andy

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 18>Burnham's only been in office three weeks. He hasn't been

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 18>very prominent on this issue, Pete up, but it is

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 18>one that he is eventually going to have to come

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 18>out and address properly.

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Well is that he'd been there for three weeks, but

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 3>he's already been on leave Sophie.

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>He has.

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 18>Indeed, Peter, he had the first two weeks in office

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 18>and then he took one week off. Now, in fairness

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 18>in August it is recess here for the Parliament. But

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 18>a lot of locals in Britain are really annoyed about this,

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 18>saying he's just got the keys to ten Downing Street.

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 18>Why on earth is he on holiday when we have

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.760
<v Speaker 18>issues all around the country. He's now on a national

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 18>tour going around the country listening to Britain's about their concerns.

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 18>But Peter, he's only been the job a few weeks

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 18>and already the bad headlines are coming.

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Go Bank.

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 3>It is to sit on his backside behind the desk,

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 3>get the briefings and start to work. I think everyone

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 3>knows what the problems are. He doesn't need to listen

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 3>to people that he needs to look at the channel.

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 3>That's number one problem and a whole lot more. I'll

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 3>leave you there, so if you look like you're out

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 3>there enjoying the beautiful British summer, it won't last long.

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Why you've got it.

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 3>We'll catch up again soon after the break. The South

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Australian Premier Peter malanowskis a warning today over ai. I

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 3>tell you I am with him on this. I know

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 3>it's a shock, but I am. I'll get to that

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 3>in a moment. My panel up next. All right, let's

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 3>jump back into it all the issues of the day

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 3>of U twenty four contributors lucy's Zelik and One Nation's

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 3>National executive member Lee Hand said, ladies, and I'll use

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:19.959
<v Speaker 3>that word because I'll require you to follow me here.

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 3>We'll get to a whole lot of issues in a moment.

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 3>But back to melons and the Prime minister and the

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 3>Japanese dignified prime minister. Ours is not so dignified. If

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 3>you were watching a.

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloke go oh melons.

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Like this, would you think were talking about fruit or

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:38.839
<v Speaker 3>would he be talking about breasts, Lucy Peter.

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 17>It's clear and obvious to everyone, right, we knew what

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:46.400
<v Speaker 17>the innuendo was intending there. He played well into the

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 17>podcast as hands when she referenced Pamela Anderson. So it

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:54.800
<v Speaker 17>doesn't take a scientist, Store Einstein, or even someone that's

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 17>on the business or in the business of consistently being

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 17>offended to understand what him meant by those interpretations. I

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 17>note that mister Clenell was very uncomfortable with the term breasts,

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 17>but breasts, hey, that's what we all know that he

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 17>was referring to in that moment. I think it's very

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 17>clear and obvious. So the fact that it took the

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 17>ABC over twenty five days to apologize, and that's now

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:20.399
<v Speaker 17>at last count, I think about thirty something days since

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:22.839
<v Speaker 17>that podcast went to air, and Anthony Albaneze he still

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 17>hasn't acknowledged it, in spite of all the calls for

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 17>him to do so, I think is pretty damaging in

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 17>many ways. I agree with the former ambassador's comments and

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 17>the fact that many of his labor front benches, his

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:38.839
<v Speaker 17>colleagues are arguing that you know, there was nothing wrong

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 17>with it, and it's all just being sensationalized and you know,

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:44.280
<v Speaker 17>taken out of proportion.

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 7>I think he's just.

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 17>Leaning more and erring more on the side of it

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 17>being about politics rather than just being about the truth.

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.840
<v Speaker 17>You made a mistake, front up and apologize. It's not

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 17>that hard.

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 3>And you're right to reference Jean to Ryan Hart theer

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 3>again because Sonaitakahatchi is a woman on the right political right.

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 3>Pauline Hanson's on the right, Jina Righthant's on the right.

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 3>You or aur I am as well. We get no

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 3>such protection. It's not sexism if it happens to us Lee.

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 19>No, it's double standards, right, And it's absolutely appalling and

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:23.320
<v Speaker 19>so disappointing that the head of our state, our prime minister,

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 19>can make inappropriate sexual innuendos.

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 7>No one can mistake this.

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 19>Every Australian, it doesn't matter who you are, understands.

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 7>What this gesture is.

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 19>And the fact that you can't own it, that you

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 19>can't admit that you made a mistake and you continue

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 19>to lie about it, speaks volumes about one's character. And

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 19>I feel very very sorry for our Japanese prime minister

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 19>that she's experienced this and whilst they've come out and said, look,

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 19>we don't believe there was any ill intent.

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 7>Interpret that a little bit further.

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 19>They didn't say that it wasn't inappropriate, It wasn't said

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:02.720
<v Speaker 19>that it was isn't hurtful, And that's how I interpret

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 19>it as well. It's not okay and the Prime Minister

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 19>needs to apologize for his actions because it impacts all

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 19>women those types of comments as well.

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:16.360
<v Speaker 3>And of course it was a podcast in that instance

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 3>he was talking about shagging Carlie Minogue and somehow he

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 3>wasn't talking about breasts in that same half an hour

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 3>of Smart a Kid you not.

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 2>But that's where we are. Let's go to those other

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:29.839
<v Speaker 2>issues that I want to get to now.

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 3>The announcement by the South Australian Premier Peter malnawskis today

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:37.959
<v Speaker 3>it's a royal commission and he's announced into artificial intelligence.

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 3>Now I don't know that I think it necessarily needs

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:43.719
<v Speaker 3>a royal commission, but we need a really big, detailed

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 3>look at AI. We need to set some guardrails about

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 3>it before it gets into Australia. And we've had the

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 3>warnings from AI creators to say we're getting a beast

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 3>now that's going rogue, and if it goes rogue, what

0:45:57.960 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 3>are the consequences?

0:45:58.960 --> 0:45:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Listen to the Premier.

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 20>I'm worried that we're a bit underweight in the policy

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 20>from the policy response that is going to be required

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 20>to make sure we get the balance right between pursuing

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 20>this opportunity where there are very significant productivity gains to

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 20>be made, but also protecting the community from some of

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 20>the risks.

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Out with AI.

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Now I said before Lucy, I'm one hundred percent with him.

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 3>Here we go down the path of social media and

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 3>after the horse has bolted, we see all this harm

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 3>and the suicides of young people. We try and rate

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 3>it in people like me and you and I know

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 3>others have been saying, let's have some rules and protocols

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 3>around AI before we let it loose. That's exactly what

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 3>he wants to do. But all Canberra's talking about is

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity of data centers and the money they might

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:46.799
<v Speaker 3>make and renewable energy.

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to that in a moment.

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Rather than what melanowskis is talking about absolute common sense.

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:55.359
<v Speaker 7>Don't you think I couldn't agree more?

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 17>And I think had many of us had the opportunity

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:01.240
<v Speaker 17>back when social media was just on a rise, Peter,

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 17>if many of us back then had knew what it

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 17>would have become, we would have all been arguing for

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 17>safer and more robust conversations, particularly around the use of

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 17>social media for children, for those you know, those guard

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 17>rails to be explored, and for those conversations to have

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 17>taken place. I don't think anything is lost by investing

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:22.719
<v Speaker 17>some really some serious time, thought and energy into this.

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 17>And Milanowskis has just come back from the United States

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 17>where he established a memorandum of understanding with open AI

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 17>to explore the productivity and the parameters around they can

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 17>improve such matters within the state public service.

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 7>What's to say that we don't require that at a

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 7>national level.

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 17>When you listen to creators like Elon Musk, entrepreneurs in

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 17>this space, they often talk about the fact that the

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 17>horse has already bolted and now trying to keep it

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 17>at a measured pace where the advancements are taking place

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 17>almost weekly is impossible to restrain.

0:47:58.120 --> 0:47:59.399
<v Speaker 7>So bring it on, I say.

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 17>When he makes comments like it'll cost more than three

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 17>million dollars, I'm comfortable with that, considering that they offer

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:08.360
<v Speaker 17>tens of millions of dollars to their local AFL teams

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:11.359
<v Speaker 17>every year, by the way, and.

0:48:11.320 --> 0:48:13.240
<v Speaker 3>I might also add, you know you've got Chris Bowen

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 3>out there wanting to use taxpayer funds through the Clean

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:22.399
<v Speaker 3>Energy Corporation to basically fund data centers provided they use

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 3>renewable power, which taxpayers fund anyway, and the profit in

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:29.320
<v Speaker 3>all of that heads off to Silicon Valley. I mean, Lee,

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 3>why are taxpayers when our hospitals need work, when our

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 3>roads need work, when we should be spending the money

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 3>on our own Are we going to make Silicon Valley richer?

0:48:40.160 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 7>And look, let's just name this up.

0:48:42.320 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 19>This is Labour's plan to double down on net zero,

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:49.239
<v Speaker 19>pure and simple. They're using AI data centers now to

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 19>drive net zero in We know that they have a

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:55.320
<v Speaker 19>target of eighty two percent renewables by the year twenty thirty.

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 7>They're not meeting that target currently, so how can we

0:48:58.480 --> 0:48:58.959
<v Speaker 7>get there.

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 19>We will ensure or that data centers must bring their

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 19>own renewable which is intermittent power to fuel these data centers.

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.839
<v Speaker 19>But way we'll get the taxpayer to fund it, so

0:49:10.880 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 19>it serves their purpose and nothing else.

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 7>It is wrong.

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 19>And if they were genuine about this, let's put it

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:20.400
<v Speaker 19>out to consultation for the actual taxpayer. Let's get some feedback,

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 19>because you go around this country and the majority of

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 19>citizens have deep concerns about these data centers.

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:28.280
<v Speaker 7>On multiple levels.

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 19>So the fact now that the transparency needs to be exposed,

0:49:32.080 --> 0:49:37.440
<v Speaker 19>that this is just driving in labors net zero scam

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:41.400
<v Speaker 19>and using another backdoor at the taxpayer's expense, and it's wrong.

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:42.359
<v Speaker 7>It's simply wrong.

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Spot on, ladies. I love that term gets under the

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:49.839
<v Speaker 3>skin of so many. I'll see you both next week.

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 2>There you go.

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Lucy and Lee are a fantastic That's it for me.

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 3>I've got a chicken roast at home to go home too,

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 3>so I will enjoy and I'll watch Andrew as will you.

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:02.000
<v Speaker 2>He's up next