Speaker 1: Lately, General Man, welcome to the late Debates.
Speaker 2: Well, great to have your company on the Late Debate.
Speaker 2: James Macpherson with Liz Storer and Caleb Bond. We all
Speaker 2: know climate catastrophists want us to eat meat grown in
Speaker 2: a lab, but it's going to get worse. They want
Speaker 2: us to eat butter, milk and cheese grown in a
Speaker 2: lab as well. We'll talk about that a little later
Speaker 2: if we can bear it. Plus, when we look at
Speaker 2: the papers, Queensland labor on track to record their worst
Speaker 2: vote in one hundred and thirty one years come the
Speaker 2: October election, and the Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs
Speaker 2: accused of ignoring concerns about soldiers who've been exposed to
Speaker 2: brain injuries because of explosions. But first, Joe Biden, interviewed yesterday,
Speaker 2: said there is only one reason he would ever consider
Speaker 2: dropping out of the US presidential race.
Speaker 3: Is there anything that you would look to you personally,
Speaker 3: not anybody else, not other pundits, not even perhaps family
Speaker 3: members that you would look to to say, if I
Speaker 3: see that, I will reevaluate.
Speaker 4: If some medical condition it emerged, if somebody, if doctors
Speaker 4: came to me said you got this problem.
Speaker 5: That problem.
Speaker 2: Well, the Lord works in mysterious ways, because just twenty
Speaker 2: four hours later, Lo and behold, I was just on the.
Speaker 6: Phone with President Biden and he shared his deep disappointment
Speaker 6: at not being able to join us this afternoon. He
Speaker 6: just tested positive for COVID.
Speaker 2: Now, this shock diagnosis came at the same time that
Speaker 2: Nancy Pelosi shared data showing he would be smashed by
Speaker 2: Trump in a November election, and longtime supporter Chuck Schumer
Speaker 2: reportedly advised him he needs to step aside. All of
Speaker 2: a sudden, he's got COVID. But the COVID wasn't so
Speaker 2: bad that he couldn't breathe all over restaurant patrons and
Speaker 2: his own secret service. You tell Joe Biden is a
Speaker 2: one man super spreaders.
Speaker 7: These are live images of predident Biden in Las Vegas?
Speaker 1: Are you so?
Speaker 7: I'm just sort of giving the thumbs upright there? So again,
Speaker 7: he has tested positive for COVID.
Speaker 1: They say he.
Speaker 7: Had a running nose, that he was not feeling well
Speaker 7: early today. Oh and he's gone up those steps. It
Speaker 7: looks like he paused there just a moment, didn't it.
Speaker 2: Calebin Liz. It's all just a little too convenient, isn't it.
Speaker 5: Where's his musk? Joe much gone? Joe, Seriously, what's going on?
Speaker 5: He does not have COVID. I do not believe that
Speaker 5: Joe Biden has COVID. This is the equivalent of when
Speaker 5: we talk about euthanasia, people talk about dying with dignity.
Speaker 5: This is killing his with dignity because he's already set
Speaker 5: it up. He said, if the doctor says that I
Speaker 5: should should get out of the race, that's the one
Speaker 5: thing that causes me to get out of the race.
Speaker 5: He now goes off for a week. He comes back
Speaker 5: in a week. The doctors have told me that I'm
Speaker 5: poorly and that I cannot campaign to the fullness of
Speaker 5: my ability. Therefore I have to drop out. I'm convinced
Speaker 5: that's what's going on here, because why was he getting roud?
Speaker 5: So that restaurant footage was like just before it was
Speaker 5: announced that he had COVID. So he's in an enclosed space,
Speaker 5: shaking hands, breathing all over people. Right, So did he
Speaker 5: wake up in the morning and go, ah, feel a
Speaker 5: bit off, but it's okay. I'm going to go out
Speaker 5: and campaign and then later today I'll tell people I
Speaker 5: have COVID or did he not have COVID And then
Speaker 5: they just sort of dropped that one out of nowhere.
Speaker 5: And then you see the footage of him going up
Speaker 5: well barely going up the stairs onto the plane there,
Speaker 5: and that's you know, you could argue he's either got
Speaker 5: the worst case of COVID ever.
Speaker 1: You know, now that's just normal stare climbing.
Speaker 5: Well, it's normal stair climbing for batter I don't think
Speaker 5: he has COVID.
Speaker 2: It's all calculated absolutely. I mean, he's going to drop out,
Speaker 2: not because of his terrible debate performance, not because of
Speaker 2: the polls. He's going to do it for the good
Speaker 2: of the country because he must defeat tradical condition campaign.
Speaker 1: Medical condition, because Alzheimer's in Parkinson's wasn't enough of a
Speaker 1: medical condition for him to resign gracefully. But check out
Speaker 1: the lovies on CSNBC, Joy Reid and Jim Saki saying, well,
Speaker 1: hang in a minute, if Biden pulls up from this,
Speaker 1: then he's just as triumphant as Trump is after surviving
Speaker 1: a bullet. Check it out.
Speaker 8: Donald Trump is an elderly man who, for whatever reason,
Speaker 8: was given nine seconds to take a iconic photo ap
Speaker 8: during an active shooter of that situation.
Speaker 5: Weird situation.
Speaker 2: We'll figure that out one day.
Speaker 8: But his survival of that and bouncing right back and
Speaker 8: going right to his convention is being conveyed in the
Speaker 8: media world as a sign of strength. This current president
Speaker 8: of the United States is eighty one years old and
Speaker 8: has COVID. Should he be fine in a couple of days?
Speaker 8: Doesn't that convey exactly the same thing that he's strong
Speaker 8: enough older than Trump to have gotten something that used
Speaker 8: to really be fatal to people his age. So if
Speaker 8: he does fine out of it and comes back and
Speaker 8: is able to do rallies, isn't that exactly the same
Speaker 8: Do me a favor.
Speaker 1: Trump survives a bullet and it doesn't take him out.
Speaker 1: Biden has been stopped by a virus, and they would
Speaker 1: have you believe, oh well, Sang sang, apples and apples.
Speaker 1: Of course, the internet wasted no time in meming this
Speaker 1: up to the max, putting Biden's head on what was
Speaker 1: Trump's iconic photo with instead of the American flag waving
Speaker 1: in the background, the LGBTQ flag. I've beat COVID, therefore
Speaker 1: I two and pumping my fist in victory and everyone
Speaker 1: should respect me just as much. But of course the
Speaker 1: two camps now are chalk and cheese. You've got the Republicans.
Speaker 1: I've never seen them this united. This is the most
Speaker 1: united Republican National Conference you've ever seen. They are all
Speaker 1: rallying behind Trump, zero division, everyone's just glad he's alive.
Speaker 1: Even his former haters are taking the stage at the
Speaker 1: RNC to say, I give this man my full endorsement. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: you've got the Democrats, who one by one in the
Speaker 1: previous weeks have been saying, we're actually begging our leader
Speaker 1: to resign. I mean, there is no apples compared with apples.
Speaker 1: As much as MSNBC is obviously trying to appeal to
Speaker 1: the lowest common dominator America, he's a similar hero if
Speaker 1: he survives COVID. It's just not working, and the polls
Speaker 1: show that loud and clear.
Speaker 2: Can you imagine the Democratic Convention with Biden. I mean,
Speaker 2: everyone's going to be waiting for him to die mid speech.
Speaker 2: But they definitely need something to change things up because
Speaker 2: the Republicans have got all the momentum. They can't go
Speaker 2: with Biden. They need something completely different that's going to
Speaker 2: invigorate support going to generate interest and talk.
Speaker 5: Trouble is, I don't think they will get something completely different.
Speaker 5: They'll probably get Kamala Harris. And the problem for the
Speaker 5: Dems at the moment is that why would you, if
Speaker 5: you're someone of talent within the Dems, why would you
Speaker 5: want to put yourself up to run against Trump? Right now?
Speaker 5: You would feel like you're literally just a lamb to
Speaker 5: the slaughter. I'm going to be sacrificed here for the
Speaker 5: good of the party. You don't really want to do that.
Speaker 5: You don't want to burn gas you have in the
Speaker 5: tank that you could then spend in twenty twenty eight, when,
Speaker 5: of course Trump won't be part of the equation anymore.
Speaker 5: So I think you do just end up with Kamala.
Speaker 5: And I know when Dan Tomorrow was talking about before
Speaker 5: on PML that Kamala probably will play better with suburban
Speaker 5: women and some demographics. But that doesn't mean that she
Speaker 5: makes up enough to go and beat Donald Trump. But
Speaker 5: how desperate are they to be running lines like Joe
Speaker 5: Biden beating COVID, a virus that has a survival rate
Speaker 5: of somewhere around ninety nine percent, And I know it
Speaker 5: gets worse as you get on. But a virus with
Speaker 5: a survival rate of about ninety nine percent is equal
Speaker 5: to a bloke who nearly copped a bullet in the head.
Speaker 5: He is a hero if he gets up in a
Speaker 5: week's time and is like, I beat COVID. I mean,
Speaker 5: I just thought that was a thing that people did
Speaker 5: in normal life. Right, well done, Joe, Oh you'd a
Speaker 5: shnookems you did such a good job. Like It's got
Speaker 5: scenes of Jill after the debate where she went on
Speaker 5: stage and was like, you answered all the questions, you
Speaker 5: had all the answers, like your beat COVID buddy?
Speaker 2: Who I mean Donald Trump took a bullet for the
Speaker 2: country and Joe Biden took a sneeze for the country
Speaker 2: that same.
Speaker 1: Same I could barely tell the difference. Well you can
Speaker 1: tell the difference, though, is watching this man either get
Speaker 1: upstairs or get downstairs? Here he is also after the
Speaker 1: COVID announcement, the president is very sick. Everyone read alert.
Speaker 1: He's disembarking Air Force one. In this footage at one
Speaker 1: point he stops and kind of goes goys, no hands.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's just incredible. You can see he
Speaker 1: is struggling, kind of pretending to be waving to crowds
Speaker 1: that aren't there.
Speaker 2: It's two steps at a time, and then he pauses
Speaker 2: to catch his breath.
Speaker 1: No heads, as he's just disembarking the plane's there's nobody there.
Speaker 1: And watching him struggle in this footage just to get
Speaker 1: into the car as a human being watching a fellow
Speaker 1: human being, that in and of itself is painful. He's
Speaker 1: got to try quite a few times just to heave
Speaker 1: himself up into the car.
Speaker 2: And this is the problem they've got this footage here,
Speaker 2: compared to Trump being hit by a bullet and then
Speaker 2: immediately standing to his feet and thrusting his fist into
Speaker 2: the air. I mean, you could not get two more
Speaker 2: completely different men, and no one who's got COVID. He's
Speaker 2: got long COVID. He will survive, but his campaign will not.
Speaker 5: I'll tell you what. If he's got COVID, he's got
Speaker 5: the worst case of COVID.
Speaker 1: But again, like you say it, no mask So if
Speaker 1: you have COVID, play the part, at least masker.
Speaker 5: It's done.
Speaker 1: We're supposed to take your claim seriously. At least put
Speaker 1: on the one piece of paraphernalia. That announces to everyone. Yes,
Speaker 1: I'm sick at the moment, and I'm doing my best
Speaker 1: not to spread this respiratory virus. Let's revisit the Director
Speaker 1: of the Secret Service now shell we because of course
Speaker 1: she's been under fire for the fact that the assassination
Speaker 1: attempt was so successful until it wasn't. Yesterday she said,
Speaker 1: oh it was. We couldn't put Secret Service on the
Speaker 1: roof that the shooter climbed onto because it was a
Speaker 1: sloped surface. We then showed you a lot of footage
Speaker 1: of different Secret Surface on very sloped surfaces. Most roofs
Speaker 1: are slope services. Director of the Secret Service, well, today
Speaker 1: it has come to light that yes, indeed, the Secret
Speaker 1: Service did know of the whereabouts of the shooter quite
Speaker 1: a while before he pulled the trigger. Check out this
Speaker 1: timeline published by ABC. This apparently is their own timeline
Speaker 1: according to the FBI director, his deputy director, and the
Speaker 1: head of the Secret Service. According to their own notes,
Speaker 1: Crooks was identified as a person of interest a full
Speaker 1: sixty two minutes before the shooting took place. How many
Speaker 1: times have I said, they knew he was on the roof,
Speaker 1: they knew he had a rifle. One of the cops
Speaker 1: even went up there and said, hey, mate, what are
Speaker 1: you doing up here on the roof with a rifle,
Speaker 1: at which point the shooter trained the rifle on the cop.
Speaker 1: There is absolutely no claim. They're not even trying to
Speaker 1: make you believe anymore that the Secret Service did not
Speaker 1: know this shooter was there. They knew his intentions, they
Speaker 1: knew his whereabouts. And how else can anybody explain the
Speaker 1: fact that between him pulling the trigger on the first shot,
Speaker 1: he was just twenty six seconds later he was dead.
Speaker 1: They'd shot him in the head.
Speaker 5: And in fact, they now saw that the photograph that
Speaker 5: we had all been looking at of those Secret Service
Speaker 5: agents who were stationed on a slope roof behind the
Speaker 5: President that we all thought were the ones that had
Speaker 5: shot him in the head, were not the ones that
Speaker 5: had shot him in the head. There were actually four
Speaker 5: different sets of snipers they had, and it wasn't them.
Speaker 5: They haven't yet told us which ones actually took him out, though,
Speaker 5: But I can't get over Kim Cheatle, the head of
Speaker 5: the Secret Service, took herself down today to the Republican
Speaker 5: National Convention.
Speaker 1: You was the one place he would not show your
Speaker 1: face right now.
Speaker 5: Why would you do that right? Like that's literally saying
Speaker 5: come at me, guys, And well, that is exactly what
Speaker 5: they did.
Speaker 9: You the past.
Speaker 5: And you are around the president, the President of Protection
Speaker 5: to the Climate. I mean, she's an incompetent leader of
Speaker 5: the Secret Service and clearly has very little brains left
Speaker 5: whatsoever to think that it would be a good idea
Speaker 5: to rock up to the RNC today that she wasn't
Speaker 5: going to get some sort of reception like that. And
Speaker 5: we showed you that timeline before of the shooter's arrival
Speaker 5: and the fact that people knew he was there. Take
Speaker 5: a look at this vision. This is vision out of
Speaker 5: the US or the shooter there following this timeline. It's
Speaker 5: been filmed. They knew he was there, and yet nothing
Speaker 5: was done.
Speaker 10: The man who captured it all not wanting to show
Speaker 10: his face on camera.
Speaker 1: He says he was.
Speaker 10: Trying to capture the crowd and take it all in.
Speaker 10: But if you take a closer look, you'll notice someone
Speaker 10: in the background. The timestamp is five oh six and
Speaker 10: the video appears to show twenty year old time as
Speaker 10: crooks working near a building just past the secure parameters
Speaker 10: of the event itself. As a video pans to the crowd.
Speaker 10: You'll notice law enforcement vehicles stationed in the area, as
Speaker 10: well as the camera moves back towards the building. Crooks
Speaker 10: appears to be seen again blank and you may miss it,
Speaker 10: but it likely shows Crooks was in the area for
Speaker 10: more than an hour before the shots were fired.
Speaker 5: I mean, calm on, this is ridiculous.
Speaker 1: So you're coming round to my hypothesis now. Could not
Speaker 1: have happened without helped that it was in fact allowed
Speaker 1: to happen. There is no other explanation a reasonable person
Speaker 1: can reach. Once you add up all the facts and figures,
Speaker 1: there's simply no other rational explanation.
Speaker 2: It's even worse than we explained because on that timeline
Speaker 2: of mistakes and mishaps by the Secret Service, we said
Speaker 2: that he was spotted with a rangefinder, which everyone knows
Speaker 2: is used by hunters to termined distance for shooting. He
Speaker 2: wasn't just spotted with that. He went through a metal
Speaker 2: detector and they found it on him but allowed him
Speaker 2: to continue in kept an eye on him. But then
Speaker 2: when he left the secured area, and of course the
Speaker 2: building he shot Trump from was outside the secured area,
Speaker 2: they sort of lost track of him and then ten
Speaker 2: minutes before Trump got up to speak, they were on
Speaker 2: him again, regarding him not just as suspicious but as
Speaker 2: a threat, which begs the question why was Trump ever
Speaker 2: allowed to get up to speak? The Secret Service director
Speaker 2: at Chettel she had better protection from the Secret Service
Speaker 2: at the Republican convention than Trump had at his rally.
Speaker 2: And in that vision we saw where she's being chased.
Speaker 2: We didn't quite show the end of that, but she
Speaker 2: actually goes into the women's toilets to avoid being chased
Speaker 2: by the Republican politicians. So well, that was her refuged.
Speaker 5: Well, she was able to do that because she was
Speaker 5: at one place where they would actually have women's toilets
Speaker 5: and that only women would be allowed to go into them.
Speaker 1: Suddenly at Republican.
Speaker 5: After a national convention. But you cannot deny that these sticks,
Speaker 5: It just absolutely sticks. Now from what angle that might
Speaker 5: have came, who knows whether, because you know, it's been
Speaker 5: really weird. Obviously you've had the a lot of dims,
Speaker 5: and even in that clip we played earlier of joy Read,
Speaker 5: she sort of suggests, you know, why was he was allowed?
Speaker 5: Trump that being was was allowed to stand up for
Speaker 5: nine seconds and show his fist when there was an
Speaker 5: active shooter situation, by which she is suggesting that the
Speaker 5: whole thing was a set up, I said, to benefit
Speaker 5: Donald Trump. But you have to ask the question when
Speaker 5: you have not just one, not just two, not just three,
Speaker 5: not just four, not just five, not just I mean,
Speaker 5: we're talking about dozens of such obvious missteps and mistakes here.
Speaker 5: Surely you'll forgive some of them, but it cannot all
Speaker 5: be a coincidence. Something is dodgy here, who it was from,
Speaker 5: who knows, But it raises so many questions, and.
Speaker 1: Their bullshiness is something that should be paid attention to
Speaker 1: because all of them know. Like I said last night,
Speaker 1: I can't believe no one's head has rolled. No, there's
Speaker 1: been no resignation, no firing, even though this has been
Speaker 1: such an abject failure on every level. Why because they
Speaker 1: know that unless Trump wins in November, there will be
Speaker 1: no consequences. There will be no consequences. If he wins,
Speaker 1: of course, then he can pursue what on earth happened here.
Speaker 1: Right now is busy on the campaign trail, but as
Speaker 1: president of the United States, he'll be able to seek
Speaker 1: very serious investigators onto what actually occurred, and let's not
Speaker 1: forget how close this man came to losing his life.
Speaker 1: Check out the angle. All sorts of AI have gone
Speaker 1: to town on this, just showing the rate at which
Speaker 1: he turned his head. That saw instead of a bulls
Speaker 1: eye through his skull, he lost a bit of his ear.
Speaker 1: That is how close he came to losing his life
Speaker 1: had he not turned around. To refer to a chart
Speaker 1: regarding the amount of illegal immigration that has occurred on
Speaker 1: the watch of the Biden administration, this one they were
Speaker 1: using AI, using the video that they had of him
Speaker 1: to show the angle, the tilt of his head, and
Speaker 1: how it actually saved his life. All of us can't
Speaker 1: wait for more details to come out, because it's just
Speaker 1: going from bad to worse and becoming more and more obvious.
Speaker 1: This was some kind of a stitch up. How big
Speaker 1: the stitch up was, who knows, but I believe time
Speaker 1: will tell.
Speaker 5: I'm just so glad to be living in a timeline
Speaker 5: where we get to look at things like this and
Speaker 5: talk about them on TV every night. I think I
Speaker 5: said this last night. You literally couldn't script this stuff.
Speaker 5: It is so damn good. Now, of course, Biden, we
Speaker 5: know a supposed has COVID, so he's out of the
Speaker 5: way for a little while. But his campaign put out
Speaker 5: a new ad today. They decided that the way to
Speaker 5: go after Trump is to talk about abortion. Now they're
Speaker 5: basing a lot of this, not only on Trump himself,
Speaker 5: because of course Trump has previously said that it should
Speaker 5: be left up to the states, and that's a position
Speaker 5: I agree with. It is a federation in which states
Speaker 5: ought to have the independence to make their own policy
Speaker 5: and legislative decisions. Whereas his VP pick jd Vance has
Speaker 5: opened up the idea before this is previous to him
Speaker 5: being appointed as Trump's VP pick, that perhaps there should
Speaker 5: be some kind of national rule. Well, they've decided that's
Speaker 5: the thing they're going to go after. Now this is
Speaker 5: the new ad.
Speaker 11: When roe v Wade was overturned, immediately I just thought
Speaker 11: about being twelve. And first thing I was told to
Speaker 11: you when I saw that positive pregnancy test.
Speaker 1: Was you have options.
Speaker 11: And you know, if roev Wade would have been a
Speaker 11: return sooner, I wouldn't have heard that. And then it
Speaker 11: had me thinking that there's someone who doesn't get to
Speaker 11: hear that. Now, girls like me across the country are
Speaker 11: suffering their futures are being ripped away.
Speaker 1: Trump and JD. Vance don't care about women.
Speaker 11: They don't care about girls in this situation.
Speaker 5: But hang on a minute. Trump has not called for Trump,
Speaker 5: the man who's running for president, has not called for
Speaker 5: a nationwide ban on abortion. He's ruled that out. He's
Speaker 5: just said that it should be left up to the states.
Speaker 5: So the choice still exists. You're never going to have
Speaker 5: every state of the United States having a ban on abortion.
Speaker 5: It will continue to exist in the United States forever more.
Speaker 5: And they set it up as this argument of well,
Speaker 5: it means that Trump and JD. Vans don't care about women.
Speaker 5: When did we get to the point that they don't
Speaker 5: care about women? Because Trump's perspective is that it should
Speaker 5: be up to states to make their own decisions about
Speaker 5: their own law.
Speaker 2: You sound surprised that the Democrats tell lies and manipulate.
Speaker 2: Not surprise, I mean the ad they use the most
Speaker 2: extreme example. You can imagine, a girl is raped by
Speaker 2: her father and gets pregnant to her dad at age twelve,
Speaker 2: and then they say this is happening to girls all
Speaker 2: across the country, which clearly is an exaggeration. Then they
Speaker 2: imply that there is a certain group of people who
Speaker 2: happen to believe a baby in the womb is a
Speaker 2: human life, and they have zero sympathy for someone in
Speaker 2: that situation, to the point where they actually don't even
Speaker 2: care about that girl or anything that happens to her.
Speaker 2: And this is how we got to the situation in
Speaker 2: the first place, where we've got a presidential candidate shot
Speaker 2: in the head. This demonizing of anyone who disagrees on
Speaker 2: a policy issue or has a different worldview. Therefore you
Speaker 2: must be evil, you must hate people, and therefore you
Speaker 2: are somehow the other. And the Democrats are just continuing
Speaker 2: down this same line, which shows you know, Trump's changed
Speaker 2: his demeanor in his attitude since the assassination attempt. The
Speaker 2: Democrats have changed nothing. They're continuing down the same street
Speaker 2: that got us the violence on Saturday.
Speaker 1: Yeah, of lies, manipulation. This, as you rightly explain, this
Speaker 1: is based on a complete lie. It's simply not true.
Speaker 1: If that girl were to be in the same situation
Speaker 1: tomorrow or somebody else, God forbid, she would also be
Speaker 1: told you have options. Sadly, girls in such situations are
Speaker 1: not made aware of the other options available to them,
Speaker 1: which means that they can give birth to a child
Speaker 1: and send it on to a very, very loving family.
Speaker 1: Much like in Australia, the list in America to adopt
Speaker 1: is extremely long. Everyone has far more options than to
Speaker 1: kill your child when faced in such a catastrophic situation.
Speaker 1: I don't deny that, but Donald Trump's campaign isn't even
Speaker 1: bothering to talk about how bad Biden is anymore. Here's
Speaker 1: latest ads, simply saying, I am unifying the country, I
Speaker 1: am fighting for us. I am going to do everything
Speaker 1: within my power to stick it to the elites here.
Speaker 12: It is the only crime that I've committed is to
Speaker 12: fearlessly defend our nation from those who seek to destroy it.
Speaker 12: The more that a broken system tells you that you're wrong,
Speaker 12: the more certain you should be that you must keep
Speaker 12: pushing away. They want to take away my freedom, because
Speaker 12: I will never let them take away your freedom. They
Speaker 12: want to silence me, because I will never let them
Speaker 12: silence you.
Speaker 10: They're not coming after me, They're coming after you.
Speaker 5: And I just happen to be standing in their way,
Speaker 5: and I will never be moving. On November fifth, twenty
Speaker 5: twenty four, justice will be done.
Speaker 1: We will take back our country, and we.
Speaker 5: Will make America break again.
Speaker 1: Really speaking, is the father of the nation. The Democrats
Speaker 1: were always like, oh, where the ones unifying Australia and
Speaker 1: Australia definitely not Australia nor America. But this was their argument,
Speaker 1: where the unifiers. Trump is the divider. Oh, he's so divisive,
Speaker 1: and it's looking like the exact opposite. And everyday Americans
Speaker 1: are waking up to that reality, especially after four years
Speaker 1: of a Biden administration, and when you watch ads like
Speaker 1: that and you see Trump pumping his fist in the
Speaker 1: air and defiance even after being shot seconds earlier, and
Speaker 1: then you compare him to Biden, who can't get through
Speaker 1: a single speech nowadays without seriously cringe moments. The choice
Speaker 1: is pretty clear for every day Americans. Here's Biden speaking
Speaker 1: recently at the NAACP convention, and you're not going to
Speaker 1: be able to get through this without either laughing or
Speaker 1: at least winsing.
Speaker 9: I dare say, Joe, you may not have a Congress. Well,
Speaker 9: guess what y'all told me. I couldn't pass the Inflation
Speaker 9: Reduction Act. Y'all told me I couldn't face it anyway,
Speaker 9: Be Dizney, We're gonna bring rents out. As I said,
Speaker 9: we're gonna.
Speaker 5: Build two million affordable homes.
Speaker 9: The cap run increases of five percent a year, so
Speaker 9: corporate landlords can't God anyway, I don't get going. I'm
Speaker 9: gonna get very upset.
Speaker 1: The full legth actually goes for longer, where some troll
Speaker 1: on the internet is just throwing through every single part
Speaker 1: of the speech where he just kind of tape us off,
Speaker 1: forgets what he's saying, and is like, well, anyway, and
Speaker 1: most recently in another interview, he couldn't remember the name
Speaker 1: of his own Minister of Defense.
Speaker 4: It's all about it's all about tuning people in dignity,
Speaker 4: and it's about making sure that.
Speaker 5: We want coming.
Speaker 4: For example, look at the heat on getting it because
Speaker 4: I who named in the fans for black man, because
Speaker 4: of the people I've named.
Speaker 1: Because of the people I've named, I don't remember their names,
Speaker 1: but I know that they're black, and I.
Speaker 2: Think it's really important to treat people with dignity. And
Speaker 2: then he forgets his Defense secretary's name and refers to
Speaker 2: him as the black man. I mean that's not particularly dignified.
Speaker 11: Is it.
Speaker 5: Well, look, I think for Biden it's anyway, No, No,
Speaker 5: I just going back to the campaign ad that the
Speaker 5: ad from Trump. I love it so much because it's
Speaker 5: a return to how political campaigns used to be run, right,
Speaker 5: And if there's anything good to come out of someone
Speaker 5: trying to shoot Donald Trump in the head, I think
Speaker 5: it's that it has reset politics in the United States
Speaker 5: a little bit and has taken them back to a
Speaker 5: slightly more conciliatory place because it's made things real.
Speaker 2: It's taken one side back to yes.
Speaker 5: But even if you look at that abortion ad, as
Speaker 5: full of nonsense as it is, it's not as hard
Speaker 5: as what you would expect them to be going right now,
Speaker 5: like you would expect if if Donald had not been
Speaker 5: shot at there would just be ads NonStop about Donald
Speaker 5: orrige man bad. They'd still be on the lines about
Speaker 5: he's a threat to democracy. You're never going to be
Speaker 5: able to vote again. As Robert de Niro said, all
Speaker 5: of that has sort of gone away because they know
Speaker 5: they can't use that so much anymore.
Speaker 2: But they've gone to abortion because abortion is the only
Speaker 2: other real issue they've got exactly, and even their abortion issue,
Speaker 2: as you rightly pointed out, is completely.
Speaker 5: As well based on rapids. But we used to campaign.
Speaker 5: Political campaigns used to be based on this is what
Speaker 5: I am going to do for you, as opposed to
Speaker 5: this is why the other side is bad, and we've
Speaker 5: been very guilty of it in Australia most recently as well.
Speaker 5: I mean you look at most campaigns since probably about
Speaker 5: two thousand and four and they've all been based on
Speaker 5: why the other guy is bad. And you can go
Speaker 5: to remember those ads of Johnny Howard with his nose
Speaker 5: coming out as though he were Pinocchio, Who do you trust?
Speaker 5: Who do you trust? Who do you trust? Then you
Speaker 5: had the Kevin ruddads of him as a lemon, and
Speaker 5: you know, on and on it has gone. Whereas once
Speaker 5: upon a time it was a Hawk campaigning in nineteen
Speaker 5: eighty eight about let's stick together, let's see it through
Speaker 5: Joe by Elkia.
Speaker 2: Sorry I got to pick up though the Kevin rudders
Speaker 2: a lemon.
Speaker 5: That was true? Well yeah, it was sure, sure it
Speaker 5: was true. But Joby Shenderson campaigning back in the eighties,
Speaker 5: you know, Joe for Queensland, and it was not about
Speaker 5: the other sides bad. It's about this is what I
Speaker 5: am offering you. And that's what Trump is doing in
Speaker 5: that ad and if we can get back to that
Speaker 5: style of politics, I will be so happy because it
Speaker 5: means we can talk about policy as opposed to why
Speaker 5: someone else is terrible and he should be the point
Speaker 5: of politic.
Speaker 2: I reckon, Joe Biden has been listening to you, because
Speaker 2: take a look at this. Biden almost ate Donald Trump's
Speaker 2: campaign line almost.
Speaker 9: So tonight, I'm asking every American to recommend to make America.
Speaker 5: So make America a great again.
Speaker 2: Fantastic. Well, since we're talking about the political attitudes in Australia,
Speaker 2: let's talk about a Guardian Essential poll published recently that
Speaker 2: found three quarters of Australians believe, wait for it, drum roll,
Speaker 2: MPs enter politics to serve their own interests. Now you
Speaker 2: would have thought the poll found seventy five percent of
Speaker 2: Australians reckon politicians are there for their own interests and
Speaker 2: twenty five percent of Australians completely misunderstood the question So
Speaker 2: what do you reckon?
Speaker 5: Liz?
Speaker 2: This is absolutely true. I actually think the majority. This
Speaker 2: is not You're going to criticize me for this and
Speaker 2: say I'm naive, and I think most people start off
Speaker 2: with a mission and quite idealistic. Then they become frustrated
Speaker 2: because they find this is nothing like I thought it
Speaker 2: would be. There's so much bureaucracy. Then they become cynical,
Speaker 2: and then they think, well, I might have sort of
Speaker 2: get something out of it for myself. I think there's
Speaker 2: a progression. I don't think people go in there to
Speaker 2: get something initially for themselves. I think most people, all of.
Speaker 1: Them, start right noh you describing someone who starts out
Speaker 1: as a conviction politician and then rose jaded over the years. Now,
Speaker 1: that does happen, but they don't all start out bright eyed,
Speaker 1: bushy tailed, oh dealistic. I just want the best for
Speaker 1: the nation. If they did, we would be in a
Speaker 1: much better place than we are now. And that is
Speaker 1: why cynicism amongst Australians toward politicians is as an all
Speaker 1: time high. Another part of that poll was basically asking
Speaker 1: them are you satisfied with Australian politics? Only thirty seven
Speaker 1: percent said yeah, yeah, we think that actually it's not
Speaker 1: all that bad. I was surprised that that was that
Speaker 1: high because when you look at the amount of lies
Speaker 1: that we're told, when you look at all the corruption
Speaker 1: that graces our headlines week in week out of Polly's
Speaker 1: being caught out in outright lives when you look at
Speaker 1: the policies that they're pushing that we know without being experts,
Speaker 1: they are going to be detrimental to our country's prosperity,
Speaker 1: not just for us but for generations to come. Oozzi's
Speaker 1: are more and more waking up to the fact these
Speaker 1: guys aren't our friends. They don't even seem on side.
Speaker 1: And how many times do we have to be lied
Speaker 1: to by the government before we believe the government is
Speaker 1: lying to us.
Speaker 5: The people you're talking about, James, I think most of
Speaker 5: and they do exist, most often come from minor parties
Speaker 5: or their independents or their people who come from a
Speaker 5: business background and get parachuted into a safe seek because
Speaker 5: the party thinks it's good to get someone like that
Speaker 5: in the high profile exactly, so they go in there.
Speaker 2: But we think the majority of people in major parties
Speaker 2: are in Therefore.
Speaker 5: I'll get to that Sie, I'll get to that Noes sect.
Speaker 5: Those people go in there and actually want to achieve
Speaker 5: something because they've run, particularly on a goal. If you're
Speaker 5: an independent, you've got something, you want to stand up
Speaker 5: for your community. There. As a former businessman, you're going
Speaker 5: in there to get stuff done, because that's what I've
Speaker 5: done my whole life. But unfortunately, a large portion of
Speaker 5: the people who make up the major parties, the Liberals,
Speaker 5: the Nationals, the Labor Party, have worked in politics their
Speaker 5: whole lives before they go into politics as a politician.
Speaker 5: They starting university in student politics. And if I can
Speaker 5: be perfectly frank, anyone who's been involved in student politics
Speaker 5: should be banned from running for real politics as far
Speaker 5: as I'm concerned, because what it's not if they.
Speaker 1: Did leave UNI and become business if you.
Speaker 5: Can prove life in the middle take but what it
Speaker 5: proves about those people is that they were more obsessed
Speaker 5: with the politics of politics before they got into it
Speaker 5: than they were with actually achieving goals. So these people
Speaker 5: started with student politics and university usually go on to
Speaker 5: become staff They joined the Young Labor or the Young Libs,
Speaker 5: then they become a staffer in someone's office, then they
Speaker 5: become a ministerial advisor, and then eventually they get given
Speaker 5: the seat that they sort of worked for their whole lives.
Speaker 5: So what they have done their whole lives is work
Speaker 5: towards their goal of being in politics because of course,
Speaker 5: politics is show business for ugly people. They didn't go
Speaker 5: there to change the world. They went there because they're
Speaker 5: obsessed with the idea of it.
Speaker 1: Have you ever been a member of the lay party
Speaker 1: of either party? Have you ever been a member of
Speaker 1: any party?
Speaker 2: If I was, I would not disclose it on national
Speaker 2: fat that's.
Speaker 1: Fair, but I certainly have for many years. No longer,
Speaker 1: also for many years, But that that is how it works.
Speaker 1: The case knows who is in line for every single seat.
Speaker 2: So granted, but do you think that's more the case
Speaker 2: on the left who typically have been much work experience,
Speaker 2: whereas in the col and there's far more who have
Speaker 2: had careers, and yes they've gone into politics early. But
Speaker 2: could you not make the decision I want to make
Speaker 2: a difference in this country as an independent, I'm really
Speaker 2: not going to make any difference at all. So my
Speaker 2: option really is to join a major party if I
Speaker 2: want to make a difference.
Speaker 5: Why can't you have that actual But still, if you
Speaker 5: really wanted to make a difference, you don't find somewhere
Speaker 5: else to do it. For most people, I think because
Speaker 5: you can make more difference outside of the team than
Speaker 5: you can inside the team, and look, sure, sure there
Speaker 5: may be more people in the Coalition who have business
Speaker 5: experience behind them, but of course in the Labor Party
Speaker 5: there are many other ways to get your way there,
Speaker 5: the union movement for instance, No doubt, right, No, there
Speaker 5: are so many people in the Coalition who got to
Speaker 5: Parliament by working their way up through the ranks, starting
Speaker 5: in an electric and then moving into a ministerial office.
Speaker 5: That's how it works. We just breed more and more
Speaker 5: and more of the same people from the same mold
Speaker 5: who are obsessed with politics, not obsessed with outcomes. And
Speaker 5: when you have people who are obsessed with politics, they
Speaker 5: don't care about what the outcome is. They care about
Speaker 5: the fun that they get to have in Canberra. Now
Speaker 5: very quickly before we go. I don't know about you,
Speaker 5: but I feel claustrophobic if I am in a small space.
Speaker 5: That's why I have insisted on having this studio expanded
Speaker 5: when I came and joined Sky News, because I didn't
Speaker 5: want to work in a small studio. And they did
Speaker 5: it just for you. They did. Indeed, thank you very
Speaker 5: much to the boss.
Speaker 2: As they you're motivated completely by self interest, that's right.
Speaker 5: I don't hide from that. I'm not politicians about gods
Speaker 5: are for self interest. I want to get paid, and
Speaker 5: they have allses and things like this, But how would
Speaker 5: you like to live in this thing here? Now, it's
Speaker 5: a pod. I think they call them a tiny apartment,
Speaker 5: So I'm describing as I don't know, you could call
Speaker 5: it an apartment. I mean it's literally you can't stand up,
Speaker 5: and you can't stand it. You crawl into it and
Speaker 5: you lie down. It's basically a bed with walls around it.
Speaker 5: They're being rented out in Sydney now for three hundred
Speaker 5: dollars a week. Three hundred dollars a week for that
Speaker 5: That is extortionate, But I suppose it proves exactly how
Speaker 5: bad the housing crisis is that someone is willing to
Speaker 5: pay three hundred dollars a week for I don't know,
Speaker 5: a bed and a shared bathroom and a shared living space.
Speaker 2: They should make politicians live in those pods until the
Speaker 2: housing crisis.
Speaker 5: Now I'm with you, now, I'm.
Speaker 1: With they stayed in one of these, and it's.
Speaker 2: Not that bad you've stayed in one of those.
Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely, because the whole idea of you're only going
Speaker 1: in there to sleep, right, And this is in the CBD,
Speaker 1: so backpack has come. You put your backpack in one
Speaker 1: of their locked cupboards. It is showered amenities like shared
Speaker 1: amenities rather if you toilet showers, et cetera. But then
Speaker 1: you just crawl in here to sleep. You've got your laptop,
Speaker 1: You've got Wi Fi if you want to watch a movie.
Speaker 1: I stayed in there for a week, and can I say,
Speaker 1: in terms of cheap of accommodation, you could do worse.
Speaker 5: You could do worse, But I like rocket around the
Speaker 5: house with no clothes on in the more. You can't
Speaker 5: do that in there.
Speaker 1: Well, that's the last AIRB can say.
Speaker 2: Those pods, if they're not successful for accommodation, they could
Speaker 2: just use them as a cemetery.
Speaker 11: There.
Speaker 2: That's small. We're going to go to a break. When
Speaker 2: we come back, we'll look at the papers. Welcome back.
Speaker 2: Let's take a look at what's making news in tomorrow's papers. Liz,
Speaker 2: you've got the Daily Telegraph.
Speaker 1: The police, you indeed, the police are in trouble. Drunk
Speaker 1: Clock got special treatment from the fourth Say it ain't so.
Speaker 1: Webb's car crash. A senior police officer who allegedly downed
Speaker 1: more than twenty standard drinks before crashing his car. Has
Speaker 1: thrown the New South Wales Police Force into disarray with
Speaker 1: claims of special treatment, alleged cover ups and a loss
Speaker 1: of confidence in the upper echelon of the force. This
Speaker 1: was a high ranking officer known only as ab we
Speaker 1: don't even get to know their names, allegedly crashed an
Speaker 1: unmarked police car on the North Connects ramps in May
Speaker 1: of twenty two twenty three, then fled and it sounds
Speaker 1: like he obviously hasn't been punished a very fitting way
Speaker 1: at all. So it just goes to show these guys
Speaker 1: tasks with the very job to Obviously, if anybody else
Speaker 1: tried this, they get the full force of the law.
Speaker 1: Seems to have gotten off very lightly.
Speaker 5: Indeed ab ilyad to believe stands for absolutely blotto, which is.
Speaker 1: What he would have been.
Speaker 5: That's a lot of shit, But I've done that before
Speaker 5: and I wouldn't have even been able to put the
Speaker 5: keys in the ignition of the car, let alone operate
Speaker 5: the bloody thing. But so they've made a number of
Speaker 5: misconduct fundings against him, which is fair enough. But the
Speaker 5: coppers themselves, as in the police force, has escaped most
Speaker 5: of the criticism because after this happened. It's standard practice.
Speaker 5: Someone gets caught, you know, that far over the limit,
Speaker 5: they've had twenty standard drinks. Usually they put out a
Speaker 5: press release and say that, you know, someone had crashed
Speaker 5: their car at zero point three or whatever the reading was.
Speaker 5: And having been a police reporter, that's pretty standard to
Speaker 5: get those sort of press releases. This fellow crashes his car,
Speaker 5: no thing press release, and the report found that that
Speaker 5: was not misconduct. I mean, I don't know how it isn't.
Speaker 5: To be perfectly frank, it sounds like in every respect
Speaker 5: this bloke got away lightly and in some ways they
Speaker 5: tried to cover it up. How can you get away
Speaker 5: with it?
Speaker 1: And Commissioner Karen Webb found out about it straight afterwards
Speaker 1: and took six months to refer it on is something
Speaker 1: that maybe maybe we should look into this, Maybe this
Speaker 1: guy should be investigated. I mean, every time I hear
Speaker 1: the name Commissioner Karen Webb, it's another catastrophe.
Speaker 5: And by the way, they gave him another car. I mean,
Speaker 5: look at you, I believe one.
Speaker 1: Do you guys think this is female privilege? Because I
Speaker 1: think if Karen web was your average male police commissioner,
Speaker 1: we've seen many of them in the state, she would
Speaker 1: be gone ski by now. First, there was the tasering
Speaker 1: of the very elderly grandmother in an old person's home
Speaker 1: just last year. I mean, I don't want to reel
Speaker 1: off all her faux pas, but it's a long list
Speaker 1: and it's a short show. But it strikes me as
Speaker 1: very strange that she still has her job, Come what may.
Speaker 2: I was talking to police officer recently and I made
Speaker 2: a joke about Karen Webb, assuming the police officer would
Speaker 2: share my disdain for the commissioner. And this police officer
Speaker 2: said to me, actually, she's very well liked amongst the police,
Speaker 2: maybe because of stuff.
Speaker 5: Like that.
Speaker 1: Get away with murder.
Speaker 2: But this police officer was at pains to point out
Speaker 2: the public perception of her and the perception of her
Speaker 2: within the force were two very different things.
Speaker 1: All that matter. Public perception of her as commissioner, You've
Speaker 1: got a very public role. Sure, members of the force
Speaker 1: not so much. You're just doing your day to day duty.
Speaker 1: But someone who is this unpopular as commissioner, I'm just
Speaker 1: surprised she's still got her job. And I do wonder
Speaker 1: if it's not just female privilege that she still is
Speaker 1: New South Wales Commissioner.
Speaker 2: I mean this is a while ago, but do you
Speaker 2: remember when Christine Nixon in Melbourne. I mean she was
Speaker 2: at the hairdressers when all sorts of things were going on,
Speaker 2: and she didn't get a free pass for that.
Speaker 5: No, No, I suspect probably more what's happening is if
Speaker 5: she's well liked within the force. We know that there
Speaker 5: are so many problems at the moment with attracting police officers.
Speaker 5: To drag a police commissioner out of her office and
Speaker 5: then try and install someone else would probably cause disruption
Speaker 5: within the force, and that's the last thing that a
Speaker 5: state government would want at the moment. So they're sort
Speaker 5: of between a rock and a hard pluss.
Speaker 2: Well, let's go to the Career Mail in Queensland. The
Speaker 2: front page reads exclusive polling election countdown begins as voters
Speaker 2: back in Chris a fully King David. The Career Mail
Speaker 2: has anointed him early King David awaits David Christo fully
Speaker 2: is on track to become the next Premier of Queensland
Speaker 2: in one hundred days from today. With an exclusive new
Speaker 2: poll revealing Labour's primary vote has plunged to its lowest
Speaker 2: level since before Federation. The LNP have fifty seven percent
Speaker 2: of the primary vote, Labor just forty three percent. The
Speaker 2: LMP need fourteen seats to win government, but on current
Speaker 2: trends they'll pick up twenty three seats, including seven held
Speaker 2: by current ALP ministers. And this is in spite of
Speaker 2: the fact that Giggles Miles has actually sort of been
Speaker 2: doing okay with people recently, and there's polling about a
Speaker 2: month ago that offered a little bit of encouragement to
Speaker 2: the Labor Party. So this sort of squashes that. The
Speaker 2: other interesting thing about this article, which I find difficult
Speaker 2: to understand, two thirds of people polled said they would
Speaker 2: vote on promises made in this current election rather than
Speaker 2: casting judgment on the past nine years. I would have
Speaker 2: thought the issue or the referendum in this instance would
Speaker 2: be Labour's performance over nine years have completely stuffed up
Speaker 2: the state. But people are willing to ignore the last
Speaker 2: nine years and clean slate would vote on what's being
Speaker 2: offered right now.
Speaker 1: Maybe that was hard respect that was what Labor was
Speaker 1: hoping for when Anastasia Palichet was swapped out four miles.
Speaker 1: That's why parties do this, to be like, oh, look
Speaker 1: we're a brand new government, all the same people. You've
Speaker 1: just redistributed the chairs the deck chairs of the Titanic.
Speaker 1: But this is a ten percent swing away from labor
Speaker 1: since the last election. I don't think that the Courier
Speaker 1: mal is being dramatic in saying this could be a
Speaker 1: generational loss for labor because it looks like they're about
Speaker 1: to fall off a very steep cliff. And who knows
Speaker 1: when we'll hear from them again when it comes to
Speaker 1: Queensland government.
Speaker 5: Send me a packet of tissues. I really need to
Speaker 5: drive eyes right now. Let's go to the Herald's Sun
Speaker 5: where it says tomorrow blast faboos and blast it right
Speaker 5: into my mouth. Thanks. Some alcohol companies have been slammed
Speaker 5: for a spike in the use of sneaky marketing tactics
Speaker 5: that exploit health Just drinkers, oh no. A report from
Speaker 5: the Cancer Council of Victoria found virtue marketing, which highlights
Speaker 5: of product's nutritional benefits, eco friendliness or plays to a
Speaker 5: bar's social conscience, has increased in Australia by almost twenty
Speaker 5: percent in a decade. What are we going to do?
Speaker 5: I mean, the other day, the Cancer Council in Victoria
Speaker 5: was telling the state government that they should ban advertisements
Speaker 5: for fast food from their new metro train network. Now
Speaker 5: they're saying that alcohol brands should be banned from advertising,
Speaker 5: for instance, that their beer has twenty percent less carbs
Speaker 5: than another beer. I don't think someone walks into a
Speaker 5: bottle shop, well, say your teetotaler, and you're like, wow,
Speaker 5: bea has less carbs in it. Now I'm going to
Speaker 5: be a beer drinker. All it means is that if
Speaker 5: you want to buy beer, you might go we'll a'll
Speaker 5: opt for the slightly more healthy one hubs in it.
Speaker 5: I don't know what difference this makes.
Speaker 2: Here, exactly absolutely all right, We're going to go to
Speaker 2: a break. When we come back. You've heard about meat
Speaker 2: in a laboratory. What about milk, cheese, butter? All of
Speaker 2: that in just a moment. Welcome back to our spacious
Speaker 2: Sky News studio. All thanks to Caleb Bond who put
Speaker 2: in the special request. Done Caleb, Liz. The world is
Speaker 2: going to die because of climate change. Is there anything
Speaker 2: we can do to prevent global boiling?
Speaker 1: We need to cut down on our dairy and meat
Speaker 1: consumption because it is absolutely ravaging the planet. We all
Speaker 1: know that agriculture is the number one industry the climate
Speaker 1: communists have in their site, and who better to help
Speaker 1: out the world with this than Bill Gates himself. He's
Speaker 1: got a company called Savor, and he's very about their
Speaker 1: fake butter, which he claims is, Oh, it tastes like
Speaker 1: the real thing. Let's hear from the man himself. He says,
Speaker 1: the process doesn't release any greenhouse gases, and it uses
Speaker 1: no farmland and less than a thousandth of the water
Speaker 1: that traditional agriculture does. And most important it this fake
Speaker 1: butter tastes really good like the real thing because chemically
Speaker 1: it is. Notice he's not saying that it's got any
Speaker 1: nutritional value or what it does to the human body.
Speaker 1: I mean, I am so sick of vegans and the
Speaker 1: like or vegetarians then just coming up with these fake
Speaker 1: chemically like, oh, this is a meat substitute, this is
Speaker 1: a butter substitute. This is some sort of milk. We've
Speaker 1: squeezed it out of a manot, but we're calling it milk.
Speaker 1: I mean, these processes are so chemical laden, and then
Speaker 1: they want you to believe, oh no, this is just
Speaker 1: as good as the real thing. This is just as
Speaker 1: good as butter. I think my innerds will know the different.
Speaker 2: There is something even worse than lab made butter, and
Speaker 2: that is pre prepared meals that have a shelf life
Speaker 2: of twenty five years. US food wholesaler Costco have produced
Speaker 2: what they're calling an emergency food bucket. If food bucket
Speaker 2: should put you off in the first place, it's one
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty meals that will last twenty five years.
Speaker 2: People are calling it an apocalypse dinner kit. Will show
Speaker 2: you an image. There it is. There's the bucket. It
Speaker 2: contains potato pie, quimi, pasta and vegetables, tiaki, rice, vanilla pudding.
Speaker 2: You buy it today and you eat it in what
Speaker 2: would that be twenty forty nine caves.
Speaker 1: Only one hundred and fifty meals in twenty five years.
Speaker 5: I'm not sure about this look. I might even take
Speaker 5: the bloody fake butter over that to if that can
Speaker 5: last twenty five years. I'm pretty worried about what the
Speaker 5: hell is in it. But you know you can pry
Speaker 5: my butter from my cold dead hands. Have you ever
Speaker 5: seen a fat French person? They don't exist. You know
Speaker 5: why because they eat meat and they eat butter, rich
Speaker 5: fatty food.
Speaker 2: On that note, We're going to go get a snack
Speaker 2: ustick ground. Coming up is the Readependent Show