WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 16 July

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>From the Sky News Center.

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Paul Murray Live.

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Pricey and hey they're sports fans. Great to

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have your company tonight. James Morrow here filling in for

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Paul and Pal Murray Live. Got another massive show for you.

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And along with all the action at the Republican National Convention,

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got some new footage I'm pretty sure you haven't

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>seen yet of Joe Biden. That'll make you wonder why

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they let him out in front of the cameras at all.

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna have plenty of action right here the

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>man Cave with all your Tuesday Night favorites. Now, let's

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>head to Milwaukee for the Republican National Convention. I mean, hey,

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the only reason to go to Milwaukee anyway, right Sorry, sorry, sorry,

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I kid. If you're watching this in Milwaukee, please send

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>your complaints to me care of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation Ultimo.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, the RNC. A couple of big things. One,

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we saw Donald Trump earlier today for the first time

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>since an assassin's bullet miraculously, and I don't use that

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>word lightly clipped only his ear while he was speaking

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania over the weekend. But that's not all. We

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>also heard the news, the long awaited news of who

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump's vice presidential pick would be, and that was none

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>other than Ohio Senator J. D.

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Vance.

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a look at the moment the news hit

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the floor and Trump walked in with his pick, my.

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 4>Honor to nominate Ohio Senator jd Vance for the office

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 4>a Vice President of the United States of America.

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me throw my cards on the table. I

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>think this was a great choice. Look look at the

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>other options he had. Marco Rubio was a tryhard, had

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>heard of Doug Bergham, and Christy Nome had shot a dog,

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>so they're all out. But even beyond this little process

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of elimination, jd Vance is a spectacular choice. And let

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>me explain why. You see, right now, the normal so

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>called expert political advice for Trump would be telling him

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that he should have gone for somebody who was a

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>so called moderate, somebody who could broaden the base, somebody

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>who could go out there and reassure nervous suburban voters

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that Trump is it nuts that the VP will be

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>there to moderate him and the administration. You know, basically,

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the idea would be that the VP pick would be

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>someone to keep the White House plugged into the blob

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>or the swamp or the deep state, or whatever you

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>want to call that vast freedom killing bureaucracy that Trump

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>has vowed to tear down. But as his his want,

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump went the other way from the experts. And JD.

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Vance is a serious conservative. He's spoken at National Conservatism conferences. That's,

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>by the way, a movement you are going to hear

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about in the coming weeks, trust me,

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and he has. JD. Vance has an incredible resume that

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>has taken him from a childhood in small, absolutely in

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a small, absolutely dirt poor town in southern Ohio, to

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the Marines, to Iraq, to Yale Law School, to venture capital,

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and then to the Senate. This is the American dream.

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>He wrote a book about it, if they made a

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>movie of two called Hillbilly Elogy. Now politically again. Vance

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is a conservative, a conservative populist, and a skeptic on

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the sort of free trade that got in the local

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>economy where he grew up. And he equally detests the

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of neo conservative foreign policy that he saw when

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>he was in Iraq. He signed up, by the way

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>for that after nine to eleven for what was the

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>original so called Forever War. Now for Trump, Strategically picking

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:11.119
<v Speaker 1>this guy enables a few things to happen. Number One,

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it means that Vance can be the attack dog and

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump can run a much more positive campaign. Think John

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Howard and Peter Costello by the way, in Parliament if

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you want an Australian analogy there. But number two, it

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>also means that assuming the Trump Dvance ticket gets into office, well,

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it means that Democrats in Congress, or prosecutors with a

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>grudge or whomever else will be less likely to try

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and impeach Trump and get him out of office. You see,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Vance in the number two seat acts as an insurance policy.

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>If you take down Trump, you'll get the same but

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>worse and in the body of someone who is right

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>now only thirty nine years old. That age, by the way,

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating too. I mean, the torch is really passing

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>here and it shows the huge generational difference here. Remember

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Vance served in the Iraq War. Biden voted for it. Now. Thirdly,

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>this pick gives the Republicans a real narrative of economic opportunity. Again,

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Vance made it out of a dirt poor former factory

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>town to the heights of American success. The Trump narrative

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>will be, let's make this a country where this is

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>possible again. And all of this now brings us to

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the equation, Joe Biden and the Democrats,

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and of course much of the media, which are now

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in absolutely full freak out mode. By the way, speaking

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of the media, I have to show you this fantastic

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>moment from the floor of the convention today. Check out

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>what happened here when some hapless MSNBC correspondent build up

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>young Donald Trump Junior at the convention.

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 3>If the media actually starts being an honest broker talking

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 3>about the things that he did, the prosperity he brought,

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 3>the peace deals that he signed around the world, rather

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 3>than the disaster that we're living right now, I think

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 3>you do everyone in the country big favor. I know

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 3>imigrations at Bortan Jim, I covered the family separation crisis closely.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>When we continue to see policies like separating five thousand

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 3>children deliberately from their parents, you mean the Obama administration

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.559
<v Speaker 3>and which you know they didn't do that, sir, Sure

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 3>will there be a second family separation policy? It's MSDNC,

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 3>So I expect nothing less from you clowns, even today,

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 3>even forty eight hours later. You couldn't wait. You couldn't

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 3>wait with your lives and with your nonsense. So just

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 3>get out of here.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And that, my friends, is how it is done. Meanwhile,

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>this is how it's not done. Look, last night, you

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>recall I talked about how the Democrats have a real

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamental problem now in the wake of the attempted assassination

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump. On the one hand, they say they

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>want to lower the temperature of discourse. We shall be

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>nice and kind, as Joe Biden said from the Oval

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Office yesterday. On the other hand, if the Democrats and

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the left really are serious about lowering the temperature, well

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that means they can't keep calling Trump the second coming

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of Adolf Hitler, who will end American democracy. Now, this,

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of course has put the Democrats in a real tight spot,

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>because if it's true that they really believe that Donald Trump,

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of all people, will suddenly end the two hundred and

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>forty year American experiment in small r republican governance, that

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>all the checks and balances and courts and constraints can

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>be undone by one man. Well, sorry, Democrats, but it

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound like you've got a lot of faith in

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the American system you claim to treasure and venerate. But meanwhile,

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>if the Democrats have to stop talking now about how

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is an absolutely existential and presumably must be

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>eliminated threat to American democracy, well then they'll have nothing

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>left to sell to voters. But fear Now, guess what

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the Great White House brains trust Joe Biden, Kamala Harris Creen,

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Jean Pierre, the chiefs of staff, all of them. Though

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>they've put on their thinking caps, they've gone into solution mode,

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and they've come up with this.

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 4>The view is that Trump and the maga Republican agenda

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 4>is a threat to democracy.

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 5>So how do you get.

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 6>That message across while bringing the temperature down?

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 5>How is that phrasing going to be replaced?

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 7>Is it going to be replaced?

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, look, what I can say is this, we have

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 6>our differences, and it's okay to have our differences, and

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 6>it is okay to speak to someone's record, to speak

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 6>to some one's character.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.079
<v Speaker 1>Well as creag Jean Pierre would say. What I can

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>say is this, it sounds to me like that's code

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 1>for We're just going to keep calling the other guys

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>fascists because hey, we're the good guys, right, We're Democrats. Now,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the Biden White House simply can't be fascists. They'd never

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>put their leader on a blood red set flanked with

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>flags and military people to denounce the opposition is beyond

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the pale.

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 8>Would they Donald Trump and the Maga Republicans represented extremism

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 8>that threatens the very foundations of our republic.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it would never do anything like that, and

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that certainly didn't look at all fascist to me really. Anyway,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that was just a couple of years ago, and of

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>course the message of the Biden White House is still

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the same, Joe Biden, the Democrats good Trump and the

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Republic gets bad. But the messenger, Joe Biden, well, he's

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a little less slick than he was back then because

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 1>while the GOP was having its Milwaukee love in Gosh,

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's the first time of that phrase has

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>ever been used before. The President was giving an interview

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to NBC Let's have a look.

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 2>You called your opponent an existential threat on a call

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 2>a week ago. You said it's time to put Trump

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 2>in the bullseye. There's some dispute about the context, but

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 2>I think you appreciated cross here.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh he didn't say cross hair, so okay, much better that.

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden was also asked if he'd spoken to Kimberly Cheatle,

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the director of the Secret Service, and he appeared to

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>not know that she.

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 4>Is a she.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Is it acceptable you have still not heard, at least

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 2>publicly from the.

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 8>Secret Service director.

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I've heard, John, Have you heard from her publicly?

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 8>Public Crafts sat down in a situation downstairs.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I've heard from him. He said, Well, you know, I

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>got to say, this is a common problem for Democrats

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>these days, not knowing what is a woman I suppose,

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And then there was.

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 2>This traumas said, he's giving you a chance to redeem yourself,

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 2>basically the idea of engaging in another debate.

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 9>We're gonna have another debate.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're gonna have one in September. That's on the books.

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Would you be open to doing one in the next

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 2>few weeks.

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 8>I'm going to debate him when we agreed to debate,

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 8>and I'm going to rebate him in September.

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 2>But if if the opportunity came up to do one

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 2>between now and then, is there is there a sense

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 2>of wanting to get back on the horse.

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 8>I'm on the horse. Where are you, man? I've done

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 8>twenty two major events and thousands of people, overwhelming crowds,

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 8>a lot happening. I'm on the horse. What I'm doing

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 8>is going out and demonstrating Hmerican people that I've command

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 8>of all my faculties, that I don't need notes, I

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 8>don't need telephone. I can go out and answer any

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 8>questions at all.

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>As Bart Simpson might say, yes, Joe, overwhelming crowds in

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>your mind, Look when you're explaining you're losing, and when

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you're having to explain to the American people that as

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>president you really are still compassmentis and up to the job. Well,

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>forgive me for saying this, but just maybe you aren't.

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Now anyway, let's bring in Scott News senior political reporter

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Trudy McIntosh, who joins us direct from Washington, d C. Trudy,

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>good evening to you. Thank you so much for coming

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>on Paul Murray Live tonight now from Washington. All the

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are in Milwaukee. I guess the Democrats are still

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in DC. What has been the reaction to Trump's selection

0:12:55.960 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>of JD. Vance as running mate.

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 7>Jdvan's a fascinating pick here, I think emblematic though of

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 7>the modern Republican story, the fact that he was never

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 7>Trumper back in twenty sixteen, goes on to become Donald

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 7>Trump's running mate this time around. We're already seeing these

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 7>clips James running on repeat on morning television here in

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 7>America of what he said about Donald Trump back in

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 7>twenty sixteen, that he like in Donald Trump to Hitler,

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 7>that he even mused at one point about potentially voting

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 7>for Hillary Clinton in twenty sixteen. Ultimately, though Republicans don't

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 7>believe this is going to hurt JD.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 9>Vance.

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 7>He's had a real transformation since that point. What we've

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 7>seen many Republicans do. Donald Trump is now the Republican Party,

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 7>and JD. Bans is a fully signed up member to that,

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 7>a part of the Mega Mega brand. I should say,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump's eldest sons apparently quite instrumental in convincing their

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 7>father to pick JD. Vance for this spot on the ticket.

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 7>I think fascinating as you were saying, James, that they

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 7>didn't Donald Trump didn't feel the need to go with

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 7>essentially like a token pick. A token woman to try

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 7>and win over the woman vote an African American candidate either,

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 7>to try and shore up that support. He feels pretty

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 7>assured in his own position, picking JD Vans as a result.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I mean this is an interesting point do

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you make that they're trying to push this idea that well,

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>he used to be against Trump and now he's for

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump to the point where he's his VP pick. But

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if all of the voters that are up

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for grabs right now are the swing voters, the Republicans

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>are all locked in hard behind Trump. I mean, you're

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of saying to a swing voter, what you're not

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed to change your mind.

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 7>Exactly. And also that's the very point of what Republicans

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 7>are trying to do here, flip people who voted for

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 7>Joe Biden last time, convince them that to vote for

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump this time around. I do think there's actually

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 7>some benefit in picking someone who hasn't always been on

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 7>board with Donald Trump, and there's so many Republicans who've

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 7>changed their mind on him. Think of Nicki Hayley. She

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 7>fought against him in the campaign primaries for some time.

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 7>She's now going to be invited to speak today in

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 7>Milwaukee at the R and C Convention. So even some

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 7>of the biggest Trump haters can have a change of heart.

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Now. Truly, Washington, DC is about as democrat as town

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>as you can get. But is there any sense that

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this assassination attempt on the weekend has started to change

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>anybody in that sort of area's mind. Are you seeing

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>anybody start to speak more positively about Trump? What's the

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>mood on the streets of America right now?

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think there's obviously a lot of sympathy for

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 7>what was an incredibly shocking event to play out on

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 7>live television, the fact that Donald Trump was only one

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 7>slight head tilt away from being killed on the spot

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 7>there at that rally in Pennsylvania. Initially we saw Democrats,

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 7>you know, talking about turning the temperature down, and we

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 7>need to elevate the debate and ensure there's unity. I'm

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 7>listening to Democrats this morning, though they say it's still

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 7>fine to call out what Trump has done, It's still

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 7>fine to call him a threat to democracy. So I

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 7>think some of that initial toning down one of the

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 7>rhetoric will quickly evaporate as we get closer to November, and.

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>There's been some talk in some media out let's that

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are basically despairing right now, that they think

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they're absolutely going to hit the wall when it comes

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>election time in November on November five. Are you picking

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>up any of that sense or do Democrats still have

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>some fight in them? Well?

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 7>I think they've got to try and fight to the end,

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 7>don't they. They can't give up. And Joe Biden certainly

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 7>isn't giving up. He's back on the campaign trail proper today.

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 7>He's in Nevada. But that whole conversation that had dominated

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 7>for that Fortnight since the disaster risk debate has shifted

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 7>for Joe Biden. That's a good thing, he says, here's

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 7>one thousand percent committed to remaining in the race. But

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 7>there's still clearly issues with Joe Biden's fitness for office,

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 7>and Democrats haven't privately changed their mind about them that

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 7>but the fact we have not seen people publicly call

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 7>for it. I also note this morning Democrats are trying

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 7>to speed up this virtual role call process ahead of

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 7>their convention in five weeks. The New York Times reporting

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 7>they want that done in the fort By doing that

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 7>and locking it in. It makes it so much harder

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 7>for Joe Biden to not be the candidate. It seems

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 7>like that's where we're heading, with Joe Biden essentially trying

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 7>to run down the clock here to ensure that he

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 7>can remain on the top of the ticket.

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, Truy macint Senior political reporter, I don't know who

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>would want to replace Joe Biden at this point. It

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 1>seems like a poisoned chalice. Thank you so much for

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>your time. Now I want to bring in our panel tonight.

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined here by Sky News contributor Joe Hildebrand and

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>child and adolescent psychologist Claire Row. Guys, thank you so much. Wow, boy,

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>what are we going to talk about? There's been so

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>little news in the last two days. You know, it's like, yo, gosh, Joe,

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>surely there's a work council we could talk about or

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>something like that.

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 10>That's right, Yeah, don't worries accountable band Christmas holidays, but yeah,

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 10>it's it's it's extraordinary scenes. I think I'm not sure

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 10>what your correspondent said, but we are now getting to

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 10>the point where Joe Biden, having refused to take one

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 10>for the team, a week ago has now been put

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 10>in the position of forcibly taking one for the team,

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 10>namely to go and basically get pummeled. He's just he's

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 10>basically now just an electoral punching bag, and his service

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 10>to the Democrats and the community will be to go

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 10>out there and lose so that whoever is the next

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 10>hope of the Democrats doesn't get handed to hospital pass

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 10>and become spoiled goods. And as to the JD Vance,

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 10>where's the Democrats? JD Vance? You know, where is you know?

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 10>Is it beto ' rourke or is it you know, like,

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 10>why have the Democrats.

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Not Beato Rourke?

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 9>I'm sorry, that's not a bad.

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 10>Peat, you know. And again I'm not sure for America.

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 10>I'm not sure Republicans voters or swinging voters in the

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 10>Midwest are prepared to swing behind a gay president. But

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 10>Pete Butter.

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the problem of Joe with Pete butdhaj

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Edge is that he's gay. I think the problem with

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Pete butdhaj Jedge is that he's done such a lousy

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>job as Secretary of transportee that Americans know who the

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of Transportation is. But Claire you.

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 11>Could have the best candidate there and you could tap

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 11>them on the shoulder now and I would say absolutely,

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 11>that's right.

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 9>Kamala Harris, No, why not, Michelle? Which are you thinking?

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 9>I've got to I.

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Think the I think the analogy is here. This is

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the fort sensible candidate and they're just sending him out

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to be sensible. But the yes. But Claire, I want

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>to ask you, though, this is a really interesting thing

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>because JD. Evance is thirty nine years old, so you

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>know in.

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 11>Terms of there you go, so don't.

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 9>Look anywhere near as good as you.

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And so so with that well as a thirty nine

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>year old yourself, and you can tell us about this,

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 1>what is the this sort of psychology of younger voters?

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this is now one of these moments,

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at it, Kamala Harris fifty nine,

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump seventy eight or seventy nine, Joe Biden a

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>very old eighty one, and I mean that's an eighty

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>one that he's feeling every single one of those years.

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think this goes here? Do you think

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans have got a first mover advantage on younger

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>voters even though younger voters may theoretically be more left

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>wing with that, they're going to say, you know what,

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>these guys, they're kind of representing us. We see one

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of our people up there now.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely, I think it was an ingenious choice. I think

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 11>Trump is a storyteller. And what a story. I mean,

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 11>this is like a Rags to Rich's American playbook story.

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 11>And he's got everything going for him. He's young, he's energetic,

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 11>he's enthusiastic, he's in stark contrast contrast to obviously Biden Harris.

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 11>And I think he's got the you know, given the

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 11>marine connection and the service, he's got the veteran connection.

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 11>I think, as you said before the fact that he

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 11>didn't endorse in twenty sixteen, they can use he's extremely

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 11>articulate and if you can articulate that to that Middle

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 11>America to say, you know, I didn't like Trump either,

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 11>come with me. I changed my mind. I think it's,

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 11>you know, an ingenious, bold choice, but a very good

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 11>one by Trump.

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is Joe too, jd Vance is really

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>he's a you know, he's was a long very active

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter now ex user of he is really current with

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these sort of new and interesting streams

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>and conservative thought national conservatism, which I mentioned before in

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>my editorial, Does this represent kind of a new evolution

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of conservative and Republican thought beyond because there have been

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this sort of tension between the neo Khans and the

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Libertarians and these different groups, it feels to me like

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>there's something new coming through.

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 10>I completely agree with you, and I think the thing

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 10>that strikes me most about Jada Vance is that he

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 10>is someone who I think has been appalled by the

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 10>snobbery and elitism that has overtaken the left in the West.

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 10>And he's comes from a very working class background but

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 10>went to got to an Ivy League university.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 9>He would have experienced firsthand just how up their own

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 9>they are. Obviously work in business as well.

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 10>He's got written a book, and it reminds me a

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 10>lot of myself, quite frankly. I mean, I grew up

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 10>and Dan and you know, but you do.

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 9>You're right, and that's right.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 10>And I was a very active Twitter user and no longer.

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 10>And I think that what I think turned him into

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 10>a Republican and Republican candidate is the same thing that

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 10>I think so many people I know on the left

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 10>mostly privately occasionally probably find just so satisfying about Donald Trump,

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 10>which is not that we like what he stands for,

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 10>whether we agree with all the he's done or even

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 10>his policies necessarily, but he's just sticking it to these uptight,

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 10>horrendous snobs on MSNBC or the like who have have

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 10>become this new upper middle class tertiary assuate left who

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 10>looked down on anyone who doesn't agree with their urbane Will.

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I want to talk about that because you know,

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>we see this shift in the Labor Party, and I

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>think we all know the Labor Party has a big

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>problem with this, and we're seeing this shift in America.

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>I thought one of the most fascinating speeches today was

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>given by the head of the Teamsters union, Sean O'Brien.

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a little bit of a look at what

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>he had to say.

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 4>At the end of the day, the Teamsters are not interested.

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 4>If you have a d R or an I next

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 4>to your name, we want to know one thing, what

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 4>are you doing to help American workers? A fired worker

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:40.959
<v Speaker 4>cannot afford corporate delays, and these greedy employers know it.

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 4>There are no consequences for the company, only the worker.

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Now, when I was a kid, the Teamsters I think

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>endorsed Roald Reagan. There was and there was Jimmy Hoffer.

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And we never did find out in the speech, by

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, what end zone goalposts. Jimmy Hoffer didn't wind

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>up underneath. But you know they will find a little

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>later the campaign. But Joe hildemand I want to stick

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>with you for on a moment with this. You know,

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems like with the Republicans and the Democrats in

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the US, and frankly with labor in name only in

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Australia versus the Liberals, the Party of Capital has now

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>moved to be the party of the left, and it's

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>now the sort of the center right party that's actually

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>representing or seems to care more about people who are working.

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 10>Look, I obviously have been very outspoken in trying to

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 10>about the need for labor to come back to the center,

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 10>to be focused wholly on working families, to leave all

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 10>that stupid identity politics and culture or crap at the

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 10>front door. Others have also been really active about it.

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 10>I know people inside the party have been just gunning

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 10>this like there is no tomorrow. Chris Means is a

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 10>fantastic example in terms of the sort of front of house,

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 10>but also people behind the scenes. I actually think Albo

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 10>has done I know a lot of people won't agree,

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 10>but who watch the show, but I think Albo has

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 10>done a pretty good job of dragging the party back.

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 10>He's ditched a lot of the class war policies, the

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 10>class war rhetoric, and that space is now being well

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 10>and truly marked out and occupied by the Greens. So

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 10>the grains pretending, you know, the Greens are kind of

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 10>half like sort of you know, rah rah, radical revolution.

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 10>But they're also the tertiary educated, affluent, upper middle class

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 10>lefties that I was talking about before, and the seats,

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 10>their seats reflect that.

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 9>And and this is the.

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Thing though, so Claire, I mean, like this is a

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>really interesting thing, is that in our lifetimes, in our lifetimes,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we have seen this shift and basically this reversal of

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the polls from right to left, and the you know,

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>all of the left wing voters, you know, have a

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of money, and people who vote conservative are considered

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>to be uneducated, maybe a little slow whatever. All the

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>insults that we get that I get that, you know,

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>people out there are here and they're nonsense, so complete nonsense.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>But that snobbery, that elite snobbery, has moved from right

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to left. What do you think you couch that?

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well, I think at the end of the day,

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 11>you know, labor is not the old labor that used

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 11>to represent the working class, and this march towards collecting

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 11>working class seats just like the Republican movement. He is

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 11>the same as here. One of the biggest issues I

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 11>think with it is that the left doesn't understand why

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 11>they don't get it. They look at Trump's campaign and

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 11>they look at the movement as I think a lot

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 11>of the left do here, and they really just don't

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 11>understand and don't get what the issue is. And they

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 11>keep driving with the same policies and the same movement,

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 11>and they keep getting the same result. But you're right,

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 11>it's a complete reversal now. And so the inner city

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 11>kind of elite Champagne socialists are all gone left, and

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 11>who are the working class and the outer suburbs left

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 11>to support them?

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 10>Right, Because if you have, if you have a political

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 10>class that comes from that same terse, you educated upper

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 10>middle class elite.

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 9>Quite frankly, they've just never met these people. It's like

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 9>rightful matter.

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 10>Oh no, no, I mean she's never met at Trump supporter,

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 10>let alone understood one like you.

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 9>Just unless you.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Live on the work they've they've come to, you know,

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>fix the pool or you know, electricians.

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 9>Them from across the bridge of them, and.

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>They don't and they don't understand. Well, I don't understand

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>how they can. They can't bring all of their tools

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to the job.

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 10>And if you look at the if you look at

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 10>the good labor guys, the labor right guys who are

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 10>out there in Western City, they live with these people,

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 10>they know them, they represent them. These are good people,

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 10>and you'll notice that they're the ones who are doing

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 10>you know, the most sensible someone like Jason Clair for example.

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 10>But again they're the ones who are being attacked by

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 10>the Muslim voice, the Muslim teals. Now, so again you

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 10>have all these kind of elite either single issue or

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 10>you know, and again the teals. What the teals are

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 10>doing to liberals is moving the liberals to the working class,

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 10>and they are appealing to those vites. I think Peter

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 10>Dutton is now ahead in the blue Columndell.

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's talk about that here, because we have some

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Port News here. More bad news for the Labor government

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in the City Morning Herald today with the latest resolved

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>political monitor pool showing that the Coalition has increased its

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>lead in the primary vote to thirty eight percent. Labor

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>is still stagnating at twenty eight percent. Now, everybody I

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 1>talk to is saying that the cost of living is

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the number one thing, the number one thing. I mean, Claire,

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.719
<v Speaker 1>let's go to you on this yere, because it is

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>this cost of living, the cost of putting food on

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the table, the kids and all of that. It seems

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to me, and I think a lot of people out there,

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Labor doesn't seem to get it. They don't seem to

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>understand it. Then they don't seem to understand that shoveling

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 1>all of this money into the economy is only going

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to make things worse.

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, at the end of the day that this research

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 11>or this poll now has said that over fifty percent

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 11>of people will be voting on the cost of living issue. Now,

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 11>I don't think I always wondered or I always doubted

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 11>that people would warm to Dutton as a person, and

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 11>I don't think necessarily they are warming to him as

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 11>a person. I think This is far more about what

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 11>our Bo's not doing for them than necessarily a massive

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 11>enthusiastic endorsement of Dutch himself. But when you can't put

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 11>food on the table and you can't pay your rent

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 11>at the end of the day, they're going to say,

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 11>we just need to change. And that's that's the movement

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 11>that will happen. They'll just say, we just need a change.

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 11>We can't look ahead with economic doom for the next

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 11>couple of years. We can't see where this is going,

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 11>and economic JOm psychologically is just disastrous that will go

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 11>through nationally and the movement will be just to switch

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 11>to see if someone else can do better.

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, Joe, this is the thing that you know,

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at these numbers here and you think, well,

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>after the voice, which was the big idea that Elbow had,

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it really feels like Labor kind of said, well, all right,

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the voice did it work? What else have we got?

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, oh, well, let's just chuck a bunch

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of money around and hope that someone sticks and hope

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that this is okay.

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 10>But I mean, really like, well, I suppose what it's

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 10>done is, you know, just get rid of that big picture,

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 10>you know, the vision thing, and just work on nuts

0:29:58.120 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 10>and bolt stuff. And I have done some good stuff

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 10>and it diditiness, health and education and housing in the territory.

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 10>And then in terms of the cost of living stuff.

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 10>You know, look, they've done the tax cuts, you know,

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 10>minimum wages have increased, They've done the three hundred power bill.

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 10>Now again, that does run the risk of being inflationary,

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 10>and I would have.

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Joe Jojo, I got to stop in it.

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Three hundred bucks on your power bill? How much has

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>your power bill gone up in the last two years?

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 9>I shut it to think.

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 10>But the point being, it's three hundred dollars better than

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 10>it would have been.

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 9>It means that, you know, it would have been.

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Better if they weren't shoveling all of this money into

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>making power extension renewables.

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 11>Individually, it's not going to do anything, but on a

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 11>national level of inflation, it's going to push inflation up.

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 11>And that's the problem. And whether people see that and say, oh,

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 11>that's great, thank you, I mean, I do think that

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 11>people want a magic want and I do think that

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 11>they just want the problem fixed.

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 10>And that's right, and often the left thing they can

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.239
<v Speaker 10>do that, which is why the Greens say things like, oh,

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 10>we'll just make it illegal for landlords to raise the

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 10>rent and this will fix the rental crisis.

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 10>So there is a tendency on the left to think

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 10>that you know, you can you know, I think rich

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 10>I have this great line about GoF Whitlam's frustration when

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 10>the economy wouldn't do what he told it to.

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 9>I think there is there is a bit of a

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 9>problem there.

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 10>And you don't understand what poor keating cause the sort

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.479
<v Speaker 10>of animal forces. You don't have that instinct as to

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 10>how you can nudge.

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>All those animal forces clear. You You know, you're a psychologist,

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>your child an adolescent psychologist. But you would see a

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of families and so on in your work, just

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in very broad terms, what is the mood of the

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>community that you were picking up through your practice? Are

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>people nervous tents to present?

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 11>I was gonna say, panicking, panicking? Panicking? I think that

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 11>there are one rate rise away from really thinking we

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 11>need to sell the family home, we need to move.

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 11>In my experience, the families I'm seeing in middle class

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 11>Australia are quitting extracurricular activities for kids. These are school holidays.

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 11>At the moment, they're not going to the movies, they're

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 11>not doing things. They're trying to stay at home, so

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 11>they are tightening their belts. But that's what we what's

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 11>what we need to happen, that's what the RBA.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 9>Wants to happen.

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 11>And it's that tension between I mean, I think interest

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 11>rates are probably still too low. I think we should have,

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 11>you know, got a bit harder earlier and squashed this.

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 11>But it's that tension between that versus the stimulus that

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 11>Albany is trying to trying to put in there to

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 11>make us all feel a bit better that he's listening,

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 11>and that tensions there. But generally, speaking with families, I

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 11>think it's panic. I think they're okay now, just but

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it could survive if it got any worse.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 10>I guess yeah, I'm like, I'm incredibly anxious about it,

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 10>and I'm my income would be in the top, you know,

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 10>three percent or something like that, and so you know,

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 10>I just think, holy crap. You know, I remember what

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 10>it's like being poor, with like like a stone in

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 10>my stomach. I do not want to go back there.

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 10>And again, to your point, about the demonization of Peter Dutton.

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 10>This is I'll do a Simpson's reference for you. I

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 10>think when Selma has to take Bart and Lisa to

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 10>Krusty World, yes, and Marge, as you sure you won't

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 10>mind going with Aunt Selma and Bart, Simpsons said to

0:32:58.160 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 10>get to Crusty.

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 9>World, ride with Satan himself. And this is why the

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 9>left get it started.

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 10>Wrong when I think that by demonizing someone like Peter Dotton,

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 10>lie that Deamon is Donald Trump, the electric's gonna go.

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 10>The electric doesn't height the electric. If anything, he told

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 10>politicians equally thinks they're all live.

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>So what you're saying, Joe Hildred, you're saying that Peter

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Dunton is at Selma. Yes, okay, well you'll be so

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's so that's a rit of defamation coming tomorrow

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>for you, not for me anyway, Thank you so much.

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Stick with us. Joe and Claire are gonna be back

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with us the next bit of the show, So don't

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere. A lot more to go into, particularly this

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>whole idea. Do the Greens think they're gonna be the

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>new Labor Party? I'd love to see that stick around.

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Paulburray Live after the break, Welcome back to the program.

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>James Morrow here sitting in for Paul Murray live tonight.

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Got a great panel here on the set. Here, political commentator,

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Daily Telegraph columnist Mad about Town, Jack of All Pray

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe hilde Ran. Now I think we say I'm sorry, Joe,

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this is twenty twenty four. We say media sets worker, now,

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. And child adolescent psychologist Claire Rowe. Now,

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>let's keep talking about domestic politics here. I absolutely laughed

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>when I saw this story. I felt like, I don't

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:19.879
<v Speaker 1>know why they were running it. I kind of felt

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>he was free publicity for the Greens. But Green's leader

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Adam Bant has given a bizarre interview to The Australian,

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially declaring himself king of the Left. I've got a

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of Peter Griffin, sort of even my had here

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>with a big sort of sheath across him. As if

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not a saun after title. He's described Labor as

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a sent to right party and has promised to replace

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>him as the country's only social democratic alternative. Now, Joe,

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it sounds on one level like he's being

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of threatening, but on another level, let's be really

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>contentious here. Let's play with an idea that we were

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>just talking about. Is there something you the idea that

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>labor is actually really is now? Is set right?

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 10>Ye?

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, that's represented, big buddy, upper middle class certainly. Dare

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I even say, dare I even say the illiberal.

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.439
<v Speaker 10>Interests I've read that? I thought, thank you, Adam Band.

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:17.919
<v Speaker 10>My work here has done no what I want labor

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 10>to be and what it should be, and what I

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 10>think they're trying to is the party of mainstream working Australia.

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 10>It has sensible mainstream values, it's tolerant of people of religion,

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 10>and it represents hard working people, people who are actually struggling

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.800
<v Speaker 10>to make ends meet, rather than appealing to the whims

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 10>and whimsies of upper middle class indulgent Marxists and virtue

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 10>signaling identity politarians like the Greens, for example. So the

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 10>problem is the noisy Left, as we have said before,

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 10>have become that, and these the Twitter left, if you

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 10>want to call them that, the inner city left, the

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 10>sort of people who are having their vigils at Sydney University,

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 10>the sort of people, quite frankly, who even get to

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 10>Sydney University. I was one of them when I was

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 10>at Melbourne University. I know how odious we are. I'm

0:35:58.400 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 10>glad we grew.

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 9>I grew out of it. Adam bat This is not new.

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 10>This is not just him getting drunk and calling the

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 10>Australian and saying, boy, I've got an excluss for you.

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 10>This is very much part of their plan. They've been

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 10>saying it for a long long time. It is, potentially,

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 10>if labor is not smart, an existential threat to labor,

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 10>as much as the teals are an existential threat to

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 10>the coalition.

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 9>What it means, however, is it could if played right,

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 9>it is doing labor of favor.

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 10>In other words, it is carving out all those really

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 10>annoying greenies, the extinction rebellion mob. If once they win

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 10>those seats and start to sandbag those seats, labor doesn't

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.760
<v Speaker 10>have to worry about them anymore, which means that labor

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 10>can shift to the right on social issues, on economic

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 10>issues or whatever and focus more.

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, okay, fine, that's all very good, just to me

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>so that that labors will do it, you know, great stuff,

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, rah rah labor. It is it labor wonderful,

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. But let's put but clear. I mean, let's

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:55.479
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to the real fundamental question here, which

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.439
<v Speaker 1>is the Greeds, you know, and the idea of them

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 1>being a mainstream party. Now don't have their platform in

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 1>front of me, but I think an awful lot of

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>things that they tend to stand for. You know, well,

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>let's just say pro Palastinian, but that's a kind of

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a very nice code word for saying like, you know,

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.919
<v Speaker 1>this whole sort of weird queers or Palestine. Hey, isn't

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>hamas wonderful kind of thing? You know, all sorts of

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:25.280
<v Speaker 1>other crazy loopy things, you know, all of the energy stuff,

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>all of the transport stuff, all of the all of

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the you know, stuff that I would think would concern

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>an awful lot of our viewers tonight, and probably a

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:35.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of your page drug legalizing, you know, all drugs,

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>all of that stuff. About the only thing the Greens

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>seem to stand for that would be of benefit to

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>up middle class folk like yourself would be, Hey, we're

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>going to ban any development near anybody in any sort

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of you know, nice inner West sort of neighborhood of

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Claire Row. Obviously, this sort of stuff, I mean, this

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of really be serious that's delusional.

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 11>I mean, it's completely delusional that they are sent left

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 11>party in it their center left, who's hard left? I mean,

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 11>doesn't get worse than that. I'm not sure, but I

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 11>mean I think that the only people who think that

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 11>they're center left, there's a small pocket of elite kind

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 11>of inner city people. And from what I see, unfortunately

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 11>and dangerously sorry and from what I see it dangerously,

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 11>it's a lot of young people. When I talk to

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 11>a lot of young people, they think that the Greens

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 11>are very sensible. And I think that is this because

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 11>they don't have any lived experience, or they don't have

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 11>any knowledge thinks about education system of hard socialist regimes,

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 11>or is it just because I think Adam Bann comes

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 11>out with these really lofty statements that sound really, as

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 11>a twenty year old, really lovely.

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:44.879
<v Speaker 9>So r if you don't know.

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 10>How the economy works, you don't know that forcing you know,

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 10>landlords to not put up that's wrap is not going

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:52.720
<v Speaker 10>to have a terrible impact on housing supply.

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 9>Courts say oh yeah, no, they should just make my

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 9>landlord not.

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:56.959
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so I think that that will be their base.

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean that's it was like all these

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>kids that haven't got paycheck yet and has seen you know,

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>all those big lines where they take out all of

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the texts. Hey Claire, well I got you here. I

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to you about another yet another one

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of these social media articles. Another article in the Telegraph

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:15.720
<v Speaker 1>today talking about raising the minimum age limit for social

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>media to stop kids, in this case, developing anxiety. Now,

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a lot older than sixteen and know that you

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 1>can get a fair bit of anxiety just by hanging

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:27.359
<v Speaker 1>out on the phone. Claire, talk to us a bit

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 1>more about this, especially though, like I remember being a

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>kid and being a kid, you know where I grew up.

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Drinking age was twenty one, and guess what, we still

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of managed a way around it. How do you

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>actually propose, how do they actually propose to you? That

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is it realistic? And my concern is that all of

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>these sort of limits are giving the parents an easy

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:50.879
<v Speaker 1>way out.

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:54.800
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's giving parents permission and confidence to say no,

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 11>you can't have it. And that's why I've come around

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 11>to supporting it. I didn't use to because I don't

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 11>think government should be our our lives and telling us

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 11>how to parent. But now I think it's that disastrous

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 11>that parents aren't taking their responsibility. Kids will get around it.

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:09.840
<v Speaker 11>Some kids will still have social media at twelve thirteen,

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 11>but there will be a group of kids there in

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 11>the classroom who don't because mum and dad can say

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 11>it's against the law. I actually would go further and

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 11>say it's just smartphones under sixteen, but I'm like really harsh,

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 11>so I would actually say it's like carrying around the

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 11>Internet in your pocket under sixteen.

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>No, go yeah, real quick, your parent, what do you think?

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 9>Any chance, any chance? Any excuse?

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 10>I just if I run out of all other ideas,

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 10>I just tell my kids, I'm calling the police and

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 10>they're going to come around and arrest them.

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 9>You're going to jail.

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 10>And that's the only thing that actually makes them do

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 10>what they're told. So if you can say I've got

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 10>the law on your side, fantastic.

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I like it. Everybody out there. Parenting advice from Jill

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Hildebrand terrify your kids. We have not got the society,

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 1>we have not got the endorsement from the child psychologist here.

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:51.399
<v Speaker 1>But we'll maybe talk about that some other time. Now,

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>don't go anywhere, because next up, well, maybe saying nothing

0:40:55.520 --> 0:41:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is better than seeing anything at all. As MSNBC's anti

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump morning show has been pulled off the air. Can

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:07.879
<v Speaker 1>you feel the winning? Are you tired of winning yet?

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>After the break? Welcome back to Paul Murray Live. James

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Borrow here for the week, sitting in for Paul. Now

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:22.320
<v Speaker 1>let's get the debate going again. Joining me now is

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Victorian Libertarian Party MP David Limbrick and media writer for

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>The Australian Sophie Ellsworth. Guys, thanks so much for coming

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on tonight, so much talking about Sophie. I want to

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about this first story here because I

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>reckon this is such a fascinating media story. Now, there's

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a show in the United States. It's on MSNBC. Apparently

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the Biden Whitehouse's favorite show. It's called Morning Joe.

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It's hosted by Joe Scarborough and they go on with

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:58.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the wackiest, hardest left talking points. It's basically

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 1>like the hard left talking point the day go out

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>through this show. They've pulled it off the air now

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of the Donald Trump assassination attempt, and

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I am fascinated by this that the executives at MSNBC

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>did not trust their host or their guests not to

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 1>say something really classless and in bad taste. Is that

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 1>an indicator of where the left media is in America

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>right now?

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:31.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, James, you know this better than anyone who consumes

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 5>this American news and politics more than most of us.

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:38.879
<v Speaker 5>But this is a real concern that one of their

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 5>major news networks does not trust their own people in

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 5>the wake of this assassination attack on Donald Trump, an

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 5>attempt to assassinate him. This is just unbelievable that the

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:56.399
<v Speaker 5>biggest event of this year in US politics, I would argue,

0:42:56.480 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 5>I think many would say that is the case that

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 5>this show doesn't have the faith in their hosts and

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 5>they guess to speak fairly diplomatically, respectfully about Donald Trump.

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's a very sad state of affairs

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 5>for our media landscape when it stoops to this level

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 5>that we can't even get people on air because we're

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 5>worried what they will say.

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, now, David, I want to continue on this theme here,

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>because of course, we did see that very scary attempt

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to murder the presidential candidate, Donald Trump and potential future

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>president and really changed the course of American and world history.

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of concern in Australia too, that MPs

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:41.880
<v Speaker 1>might be under threat. Now we had Anthony Albanisi speak

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think pretty eloquently the other day about the way

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Australia is. We don't have those security bubbles. But there's

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 1>also been calls for a review into the security arrangements

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for MPs. As an MP, yourself, state MP, do you

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're under threat? Do you feel like you

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.399
<v Speaker 1>need more security? Do you think that we've got it right?

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts?

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:08.359
<v Speaker 12>Well, look, I mean, you know, I don't personally feel

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 12>under threat because everyone likes libertarians. But what's been happening

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 12>with this, the way that moral posturing from the left

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:24.480
<v Speaker 12>primarily has been happening. Everything is an existential threat. So

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 12>if you think about global warming, you know, if we

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 12>don't do it, they say everyone's going to die. If

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:31.919
<v Speaker 12>we think about Palestine, if you don't agree with them,

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 12>we're going to be committing genocide. If you think about

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:38.399
<v Speaker 12>you know, all of these other issues, if you don't

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 12>agree with it, then the world's going to end. It's

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 12>only a matter of time before someone does the moral

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 12>calculations on that and thinks that violence is the answer.

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 12>Violence isn't the answer, and we need to pull back

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 12>on this stuff and say, hang on, the world isn't

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 12>going to end, and maybe we need to be more

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:56.320
<v Speaker 12>considered about these things.

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:56.879
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Look, I get your points there about the world panic,

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and we do live in an age when everything gets

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 1>taken up to eleven on a moral panic level. But

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Sylvie Ellsworth, though these security arrangements apparently they have not

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>been really reviewed since the nineteen seventies. Is there any

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 1>harm and at least looking and saying, you know, have

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we got the settings right? They haven't been changed in

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 1>forty or fifty years.

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think so, James. I don't see what harm

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:29.399
<v Speaker 5>it can cause. I mean, in politics here and overseas,

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 5>we've seen some very serious threats. Obviously with the US

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:36.760
<v Speaker 5>president that was shocking situation. Sorry, the former US president

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump, that was a shocking situation. We saw a

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 5>tax here on our MP's offices, including my local MP,

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 5>Labor MP Jewish Man Josh Burns, which was shocking. You know,

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 5>I'll drive past his office most days and it's all

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:55.279
<v Speaker 5>boarded up. You can't even see his office now, it's

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 5>behind boards. I mean, that's how grimid he is here.

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 5>In Melbourne. So I really don't see what harm it

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 5>can be to review these type of arrangements. But as

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 5>David said, I mean he's a politician himself, he doesn't

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 5>personally feel threatened, but I think there may be some

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 5>politicians out there who do feel threatened, and that's a

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:20.879
<v Speaker 5>very serious situation that we should take steps to try

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 5>and rectify.

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, that's exactly right, and it is interesting where

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>some of those threats come. But you know, other issues

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:31.399
<v Speaker 1>too occupying us. And one other thing that keeps coming

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 1>up is the cost of living in inflation. My paper,

0:46:34.080 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the Daily Telegraph has had a new report here which

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>has found that the basic cost of groceries, so not

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the inflation rate, the official inflation rate, but the basic

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>cost of groceries has served by more than fourteen percent

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 1>since last year, Sophie. This means that most Australia's supermarke

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>runs have gone up by about a third since the

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 1>year before that. Olive oil, for example seven ninety nine

0:46:56.800 --> 0:47:00.120
<v Speaker 1>last May now fourteen dollars. Who on Earth can for

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the stuff? Solfy.

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's really hard, James. As we all know, the

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 5>cost of living pressures are real. We've all feeled them.

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:15.399
<v Speaker 5>Everyone who goes into the supermarket has noticed. I doubt

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 5>they'd be a single person in this country who hasn't

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 5>noticed that prices are going up. And I think people

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:23.399
<v Speaker 5>just have to be really cautious of what they are

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 5>throwing in their trolleys, paying attention to prices, reading things

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 5>really basic stuff, but the unit pricing costs, and looking

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:33.280
<v Speaker 5>at no name labels.

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:35.359
<v Speaker 11>But sure, we just have to really watch our.

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 5>Pennies because everything is going up, and it seems that

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 5>some of these things are going up far too quickly.

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>They are going up far too quickly. But David Librick,

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you know you just said before, you're a libertarian, so

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got a very specific economic agenda. What should be

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>being done from that point of view to bring down

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the ridiculous cost of getting a sack of groceries home.

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 12>I think that many people point the finger at supermarkets

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:08.239
<v Speaker 12>because that's the interface where most people you see prices.

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 12>But I think it's wrong to point the finger at

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 12>the end thing in the price chain. My understanding was,

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:16.759
<v Speaker 12>last time I looked at Woolworth's net profit margins are

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 12>about two and a half percent. GST alone is ten

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 12>percent on top of that, you've got diesel xise, you've

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 12>got payroll tax, you've got land tax, you've got stamp duty,

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 12>and then you've got the government borrowing, printing and pumping

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 12>cracklads of money into the economy. We're going to have

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:32.920
<v Speaker 12>to lich is causing inflation.

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So cut taxes, cut spending, cut pumping money into the economy.

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what you're saying there. Thanks so much

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Ellsworth, David Librick for your time. Really appreciate here

0:48:43.640 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>on Palmary Live. Now, don't go anywhere. The Late Debate

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is next and I'll see you tomorrow night. James Borrow

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:51.399
<v Speaker 1>here hosting for Palmary Live.