1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:02,719 Speaker 1: This podcast was recorded on the land of the Gatigel 2 00:00:02,759 --> 00:00:04,080 Speaker 1: people of the Eur Nation. 3 00:00:07,920 --> 00:00:11,040 Speaker 2: Hello and welcome to the Real Story with Joe Hildebrand. 4 00:00:11,119 --> 00:00:15,120 Speaker 2: Another blockbuster episode this week, plenty going on. What is 5 00:00:15,160 --> 00:00:17,759 Speaker 2: the real story with the New South Wales Labor Conference. 6 00:00:17,800 --> 00:00:21,120 Speaker 2: It is the biggest and the best labor conference in 7 00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:23,120 Speaker 2: the country for the nine to nine percent of people. 8 00:00:23,480 --> 00:00:25,439 Speaker 2: They don't give a raths butt for political nerds. It 9 00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:28,600 Speaker 2: is like Christmas. It is awesome, and no national conference 10 00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:30,840 Speaker 2: is not the biggest or the best. It's what happens 11 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:33,760 Speaker 2: in Sydney town Hall that really really matters. Plus what's 12 00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:37,160 Speaker 2: going on with Albow's reshuffle? What is he really trying 13 00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:40,159 Speaker 2: to achieve by demoting one of the ministers for poor 14 00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:42,720 Speaker 2: performance and then putting her in one of the most 15 00:00:42,800 --> 00:00:45,720 Speaker 2: important portfolios. I'll give you the real story behind that. 16 00:00:45,880 --> 00:00:53,600 Speaker 2: All that more coming up. Okay, first, I'm going to 17 00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:55,200 Speaker 2: throw a bit of red meat to all the political 18 00:00:55,240 --> 00:00:57,560 Speaker 2: nerds out there, and quite frankly, if you're listening to this, 19 00:00:57,920 --> 00:01:00,760 Speaker 2: you are a political nerd. This was, of course a 20 00:01:00,840 --> 00:01:05,160 Speaker 2: New South Wales State Labor Conference, which is the best. 21 00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:07,560 Speaker 2: It is awesome. There is, of course a national conference 22 00:01:07,560 --> 00:01:09,480 Speaker 2: that goes on it's nowhere near as fun as what 23 00:01:09,520 --> 00:01:12,880 Speaker 2: happens in New South Wales in Sydney Town Hall. This 24 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 2: is the spiritual home of the Australian Labor Party. It 25 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:18,160 Speaker 2: is also the spiritual home of the New South Wales Right, 26 00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:21,280 Speaker 2: which is the backbone of the Australian Labor Party, or 27 00:01:21,319 --> 00:01:24,920 Speaker 2: at least it is when everything's going swimmingly. And we 28 00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:30,040 Speaker 2: had the Prime Minister Anthony Albanesi address the conference on Saturday. 29 00:01:30,120 --> 00:01:33,280 Speaker 2: There were protesters outside, no one got inside, no one 30 00:01:33,360 --> 00:01:39,920 Speaker 2: stormed the barricades and there was one sole protester, sol delegate, 31 00:01:40,120 --> 00:01:45,039 Speaker 2: who unfilled a Palestinian flag while the Prime Minister Anthony 32 00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:48,200 Speaker 2: Albanesi was trying to talk about anything but Palestine, trying 33 00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:49,920 Speaker 2: to talk about cost of living because he knows that 34 00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:52,440 Speaker 2: that's what everyone wants him to talk about. What did 35 00:01:52,480 --> 00:01:56,120 Speaker 2: happen though, in the middle of the PM's speech is 36 00:01:56,160 --> 00:01:59,919 Speaker 2: that a bunch of delegates from the Electrical Trades Union. 37 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:02,600 Speaker 2: As the PM got up to speak, they got up 38 00:02:02,640 --> 00:02:06,800 Speaker 2: too and walked out. They boycotted the PM's speech. Again. 39 00:02:06,920 --> 00:02:08,720 Speaker 2: Left loves to boycott things because you know, when you 40 00:02:09,480 --> 00:02:12,280 Speaker 2: stand up and walk out on someone, then they're gonna 41 00:02:12,400 --> 00:02:15,040 Speaker 2: suddenly change their mind about everything they've believed in their 42 00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:19,080 Speaker 2: whole lives. Anyway, Albo, who to his great credit, has 43 00:02:19,080 --> 00:02:21,440 Speaker 2: already changed his mind about a couple of things he's believed, 44 00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:26,200 Speaker 2: got up did his speech, you know, rallied the troops. Obviously, 45 00:02:26,240 --> 00:02:28,720 Speaker 2: we've got an election coming up at some point over 46 00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:32,480 Speaker 2: the next nine months, and you know, he needs to 47 00:02:32,560 --> 00:02:36,840 Speaker 2: use this opportunity, the first time that a new South 48 00:02:36,840 --> 00:02:40,360 Speaker 2: Wales Premier and a new South Wales Prime Minister have 49 00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:42,960 Speaker 2: been at the same Labor conference in god knows how long, 50 00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:47,200 Speaker 2: at this historic moment, needs to get the party behind him. 51 00:02:47,200 --> 00:02:49,920 Speaker 2: He's you know, he's flagging the polls. Donte's creeping up 52 00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:52,320 Speaker 2: on him. The coalition is ahead according to a lot 53 00:02:52,360 --> 00:02:54,760 Speaker 2: of polls in two party preferred terms. So he needs 54 00:02:54,760 --> 00:02:56,040 Speaker 2: all the help he can get. And what did the 55 00:02:56,120 --> 00:02:59,799 Speaker 2: left do, those great champions of solidarity, What does this 56 00:03:00,200 --> 00:03:02,800 Speaker 2: rump of the left do to a left wing prime 57 00:03:02,800 --> 00:03:05,919 Speaker 2: minister from the left faction of the Labor Party. They 58 00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:12,359 Speaker 2: get up and they walk out, they turn away, And 59 00:03:12,440 --> 00:03:15,720 Speaker 2: why do they do this? For what noble cause? What 60 00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:19,320 Speaker 2: possible thing could be more important than the sanctity and 61 00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:22,720 Speaker 2: integrity of the great Australian Labor Party and the cause 62 00:03:22,760 --> 00:03:26,239 Speaker 2: of the Progressive Left in Australia. It wasn't the War 63 00:03:26,280 --> 00:03:29,240 Speaker 2: in Gaza. It was the war on John Setca because 64 00:03:29,520 --> 00:03:34,440 Speaker 2: the e tou were upset that Anthony Albanezi was cracking 65 00:03:34,480 --> 00:03:38,840 Speaker 2: down on alleged corruption in the CFMEU. And yes, you 66 00:03:38,920 --> 00:03:41,720 Speaker 2: heard all those capital letters correctly, not even their own union, 67 00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:45,000 Speaker 2: another union that they just happened to like, they're just 68 00:03:45,040 --> 00:03:48,880 Speaker 2: happen to be comrades with, be aligned with. So these 69 00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:52,240 Speaker 2: guys decided, and again, who gives the rats? They can 70 00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:54,560 Speaker 2: get up, they can walk. No one cares that much anyway, 71 00:03:54,600 --> 00:03:57,480 Speaker 2: although it could matter because there's some numbers going on 72 00:03:57,560 --> 00:04:00,320 Speaker 2: I'll tell you about very shortly. These guys just that 73 00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:02,640 Speaker 2: the ditch they're going to die in. The thing that's 74 00:04:02,680 --> 00:04:07,080 Speaker 2: worth trying to humiliate or undermine a crucial speech from 75 00:04:07,080 --> 00:04:10,400 Speaker 2: a prime minister who's fighting for his political life. Is 76 00:04:10,440 --> 00:04:17,839 Speaker 2: that prime minister daring to tackle union corruption. You just 77 00:04:17,839 --> 00:04:20,479 Speaker 2: wouldn't read about it, unless, of course, you read my column, 78 00:04:20,520 --> 00:04:22,480 Speaker 2: in which case you would have literally just read about it. 79 00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:26,279 Speaker 2: So why did the ETU choose not the war in 80 00:04:26,320 --> 00:04:29,279 Speaker 2: Gaza but the war on John Setka to take their 81 00:04:29,400 --> 00:04:33,120 Speaker 2: mighty stand on and to undermine their own Prime Minister 82 00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:35,560 Speaker 2: in his greatest hour of need. Is it just because 83 00:04:35,880 --> 00:04:40,000 Speaker 2: they love the c FMU so very very much they 84 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:43,240 Speaker 2: all get together and gather in the woods and play 85 00:04:43,279 --> 00:04:47,960 Speaker 2: African drums, do trust exercises? I'm not sure. Quite possibly. 86 00:04:49,320 --> 00:04:55,040 Speaker 2: Another possible reason is that if the CFMEU is disaffiliated 87 00:04:56,000 --> 00:04:58,840 Speaker 2: from the Labor Party, they've already suspended it from the 88 00:04:58,880 --> 00:05:01,520 Speaker 2: New South Wales branch, believe that the Right already had 89 00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:05,640 Speaker 2: the numbers there. The difference is that while the New 90 00:05:05,680 --> 00:05:08,880 Speaker 2: South Wales branch is still dominated by the right faction 91 00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:10,960 Speaker 2: of the Labor Party, right with a capital R and 92 00:05:11,000 --> 00:05:13,320 Speaker 2: a small R i E. It is the correct faction 93 00:05:13,400 --> 00:05:19,200 Speaker 2: and thank god it's in charge, the National Conference has 94 00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:24,200 Speaker 2: just recently been taken over by the left faction of 95 00:05:24,240 --> 00:05:29,440 Speaker 2: the party. And how did this happen? This happened because 96 00:05:30,279 --> 00:05:34,600 Speaker 2: the E TOU in every other state and territory of 97 00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:39,719 Speaker 2: Australia is left wing and has been so for a 98 00:05:39,760 --> 00:05:43,080 Speaker 2: very long time, except in New South Wales, where that 99 00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:48,920 Speaker 2: branch of the Union was held by the right. And 100 00:05:49,000 --> 00:05:52,040 Speaker 2: this was the case right up until a year or 101 00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:54,440 Speaker 2: two ago. Let's say a couple of years ago when 102 00:05:54,520 --> 00:05:59,560 Speaker 2: the left took over the right wing branch of the ETU, 103 00:05:59,600 --> 00:06:02,839 Speaker 2: which is the biggest state branch, being New South Wales. 104 00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:07,960 Speaker 2: And it is that takeover that flipped National Conference from 105 00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:12,719 Speaker 2: being nominally dominated by the right by a razor's edge, 106 00:06:13,200 --> 00:06:16,600 Speaker 2: to normally dominated by the left. There's all sorts of 107 00:06:16,640 --> 00:06:20,120 Speaker 2: other comings and goings on which quite frankly impossible to understand. 108 00:06:20,120 --> 00:06:26,160 Speaker 2: But either way, it was that branch, that very same 109 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:29,080 Speaker 2: branch of that very same union that walked out on 110 00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:32,360 Speaker 2: the Prime Minister that were responsible just a couple of 111 00:06:32,440 --> 00:06:37,839 Speaker 2: years ago for flipping the National Conference from the right 112 00:06:38,240 --> 00:06:43,440 Speaker 2: to the left. Well done, well done, you, comrades. Problem is, 113 00:06:43,920 --> 00:06:49,719 Speaker 2: if the CFMEU gets disaffiliated from the party, those numbers 114 00:06:49,960 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 2: could flip back the other way. I haven't actually scribbled 115 00:06:54,120 --> 00:06:55,560 Speaker 2: them out on the back of a beer coaster, and 116 00:06:55,600 --> 00:06:58,719 Speaker 2: I'm not sure you'd probably have to bring Stephen Hawking 117 00:06:58,760 --> 00:07:01,320 Speaker 2: back from the dead in order to do that. So 118 00:07:02,040 --> 00:07:04,760 Speaker 2: this could have profound consequences for the makeup of the 119 00:07:04,920 --> 00:07:06,600 Speaker 2: entire labor parties a whole, because it used to be 120 00:07:06,640 --> 00:07:10,120 Speaker 2: dominated by the right pretty much in the whole country. 121 00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:12,720 Speaker 2: But these have been falling New South Wales is now 122 00:07:12,760 --> 00:07:17,240 Speaker 2: one of the few holdouts of right faction power in 123 00:07:17,280 --> 00:07:20,200 Speaker 2: the Labour Party South Australia as the other main one. 124 00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:22,720 Speaker 2: The rest of the states and territories have pretty much 125 00:07:22,720 --> 00:07:25,200 Speaker 2: gone by the wayside. Victoria because of the clean out 126 00:07:25,200 --> 00:07:29,800 Speaker 2: of the branches under Comrade Dan Chairman Dan has gone 127 00:07:29,840 --> 00:07:33,160 Speaker 2: from right to left. Queensland also because of this weird 128 00:07:33,160 --> 00:07:36,480 Speaker 2: deal that was done between the AW and the former Liquor, 129 00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:42,040 Speaker 2: Hospitality Miscellaneous Workers Union, Queensland has flipped from right to 130 00:07:42,160 --> 00:07:45,040 Speaker 2: left as well. So there's all these sort of weird 131 00:07:45,040 --> 00:07:47,200 Speaker 2: goings on that most people wouldn't realize was even happening, 132 00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:50,520 Speaker 2: but have profound implications for the party. And who is 133 00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:54,640 Speaker 2: the leader of those states. So the left producers Daniel 134 00:07:54,680 --> 00:08:00,480 Speaker 2: Andrews and Jacinta Allen in Victoria, produces Stephen Miles Inland, 135 00:08:00,800 --> 00:08:03,600 Speaker 2: whereas the right produces people like Chris Min's and New 136 00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:06,840 Speaker 2: South Wales and Peter Meltnowskus in South Australia. I'll just 137 00:08:07,480 --> 00:08:09,880 Speaker 2: leave you to be the judge on who's doing better 138 00:08:10,200 --> 00:08:12,800 Speaker 2: in that little scenario. And of course then we've got 139 00:08:13,640 --> 00:08:18,240 Speaker 2: Prime Minister Anthony Alberizi, who is a member he's the lord, 140 00:08:18,880 --> 00:08:22,720 Speaker 2: the overlord of the left faction in New South Wales 141 00:08:22,960 --> 00:08:28,640 Speaker 2: and the nation. But of course he is behaving very 142 00:08:28,720 --> 00:08:32,040 Speaker 2: much as a member of the right winging of the 143 00:08:32,080 --> 00:08:34,120 Speaker 2: Labor Party's become much more moderate. He has become a 144 00:08:34,160 --> 00:08:37,080 Speaker 2: centrist over the past few years. He became a centrist 145 00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:39,280 Speaker 2: when he became opposition leader and out fake Bill Shorton, 146 00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:42,800 Speaker 2: who ironically was from the right but talking like someone 147 00:08:42,840 --> 00:08:45,440 Speaker 2: from the left, and Anthony Albanesi basically said, well, I 148 00:08:45,440 --> 00:08:47,040 Speaker 2: can play that game too. I'm from the left. I'm 149 00:08:47,040 --> 00:08:48,559 Speaker 2: going to talk like someone from the right and be 150 00:08:48,720 --> 00:08:54,480 Speaker 2: more conciliatory to business, less class war rhetoric, less policies 151 00:08:54,760 --> 00:08:57,439 Speaker 2: like the redistribution of wealth if you like, from things 152 00:08:57,520 --> 00:08:59,960 Speaker 2: like banning negative gearing, some of that. And that's how 153 00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:02,960 Speaker 2: Anthony Albanzi one. We'll be talking to the person who 154 00:09:02,960 --> 00:09:06,680 Speaker 2: actually wrote the ALP's policy platform along those lines later 155 00:09:06,679 --> 00:09:08,520 Speaker 2: in the show, so make sure you stick around for 156 00:09:08,559 --> 00:09:12,440 Speaker 2: that point. Being the Labor Party is just very, very weird. 157 00:09:12,440 --> 00:09:15,800 Speaker 2: It's opposite stay. Everyone's behaving like they're the opposite of 158 00:09:15,840 --> 00:09:18,240 Speaker 2: what they actually are. And even within the left faction, 159 00:09:19,440 --> 00:09:22,040 Speaker 2: this is going on. Because I hear you say Hang 160 00:09:22,040 --> 00:09:25,240 Speaker 2: on a minute. These ETU doggates are from the left 161 00:09:25,880 --> 00:09:29,880 Speaker 2: and Anti Albanzi is from the left. Why aren't they 162 00:09:29,880 --> 00:09:33,200 Speaker 2: getting along? Why these ETU doggets from the left walking 163 00:09:33,240 --> 00:09:36,800 Speaker 2: out on the speech of a left faction prime minister. Well, 164 00:09:36,920 --> 00:09:39,720 Speaker 2: there are actually two left factions. Yes, the left faction 165 00:09:39,840 --> 00:09:43,800 Speaker 2: itself is split within itself between the soft left and 166 00:09:43,880 --> 00:09:47,559 Speaker 2: the hard left. The other funny thing is though, that 167 00:09:47,600 --> 00:09:49,920 Speaker 2: the soft left is hard and the hard left is soft. 168 00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:53,360 Speaker 2: So the soft left used to be in charge pretty 169 00:09:53,400 --> 00:09:55,920 Speaker 2: much in New South Wales until a little guy called 170 00:09:55,920 --> 00:09:59,240 Speaker 2: Anthony Alberaneese came along and he basically took over and 171 00:09:59,280 --> 00:10:02,240 Speaker 2: won the top spots because he's just an amazing organizer. 172 00:10:02,280 --> 00:10:06,760 Speaker 2: He just runs the left machine. And he basically began 173 00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:10,079 Speaker 2: his meteoric rise to power through Sussex Street, through being 174 00:10:10,120 --> 00:10:12,439 Speaker 2: assistant General Secretary of the Labour Party and then getting 175 00:10:12,480 --> 00:10:16,559 Speaker 2: into Parliament and then eventually becoming leader of the Opposition 176 00:10:16,600 --> 00:10:19,120 Speaker 2: when Bill Shorten lost the unlosable election in twenty nineteen. 177 00:10:19,160 --> 00:10:20,880 Speaker 2: And now, in case you've been asleep for the last 178 00:10:20,920 --> 00:10:25,280 Speaker 2: two years, he's the Prime minister. So that is Anthony Albanezy. 179 00:10:25,600 --> 00:10:28,719 Speaker 2: He is the leader of the hard left even though 180 00:10:28,720 --> 00:10:32,880 Speaker 2: the hard left is actually softer than the soft left. 181 00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:36,560 Speaker 2: The soft left, also known as the Ferguson Left, is 182 00:10:36,640 --> 00:10:41,360 Speaker 2: the left that the CFMU is a member of, is 183 00:10:41,400 --> 00:10:46,600 Speaker 2: basically foundational too, and so the soft left is the 184 00:10:47,120 --> 00:10:52,800 Speaker 2: faction of all those gentle, caring, soft, warm, and fuzzy 185 00:10:53,240 --> 00:10:55,839 Speaker 2: behaviors on construction sites that you might have been reading 186 00:10:55,880 --> 00:11:00,960 Speaker 2: about in recent weeks and years. So the soft left 187 00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:04,439 Speaker 2: and the hard left, in keeping with all rules of politics, 188 00:11:04,840 --> 00:11:07,720 Speaker 2: hate each other more than they hate everybody else who's 189 00:11:07,760 --> 00:11:10,640 Speaker 2: further away from them politically, which is always what happens 190 00:11:10,640 --> 00:11:12,080 Speaker 2: in politics. You hate the person next to you more 191 00:11:12,080 --> 00:11:13,920 Speaker 2: than you hate the person on the opposite side of 192 00:11:13,920 --> 00:11:18,520 Speaker 2: the political spectrum. And so the ETU, who are aligned 193 00:11:18,559 --> 00:11:21,200 Speaker 2: with or have decided they're in love with the CFMU, 194 00:11:21,600 --> 00:11:26,440 Speaker 2: who are at war within the left faction against their 195 00:11:26,640 --> 00:11:33,040 Speaker 2: sub factional nemesis Anthony Albanezi, decided that they've got to 196 00:11:33,040 --> 00:11:36,200 Speaker 2: get up and walk out in the middle of the 197 00:11:36,240 --> 00:11:39,680 Speaker 2: Prime Minister's speech, exactly the moment where you would think 198 00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:43,199 Speaker 2: they would be wrapped to be in the winner's circle. 199 00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:48,599 Speaker 2: Does that make sense? Absolutely not, God, I love politics. 200 00:11:53,520 --> 00:11:55,840 Speaker 2: The other big story on the weekend of course, was 201 00:11:55,920 --> 00:11:59,480 Speaker 2: the reshuffle, the cabinet reshuffle by the afore mentioned Prime 202 00:11:59,520 --> 00:12:04,360 Speaker 2: Minister Anthony Albanesi, in which, in what was an absolute 203 00:12:04,360 --> 00:12:07,520 Speaker 2: foregone conclusion and the worst kept secret in Australian political history, 204 00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:11,920 Speaker 2: Immigration Minister Andrew Giles was shafted, as was Home Affairs 205 00:12:12,040 --> 00:12:15,240 Speaker 2: Minister Claire O'Neill, who is the senior minister to Andrew 206 00:12:15,320 --> 00:12:17,959 Speaker 2: Giles in the Home Affairs Portfolio, which is a new 207 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:22,840 Speaker 2: super portfolio put together by the previous government in which 208 00:12:22,880 --> 00:12:27,960 Speaker 2: Immigration sits underneath Home Affairs. So far, so good. The 209 00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:32,000 Speaker 2: problem is that, as Immigration Minister, Andrew Giles was effectively 210 00:12:32,040 --> 00:12:36,240 Speaker 2: responsible when the High Court made its decision for allowing 211 00:12:36,440 --> 00:12:42,080 Speaker 2: a whole bunch of immigration detainees who had appalling criminal 212 00:12:42,160 --> 00:12:45,720 Speaker 2: records loose into the community. The Government had no legislation 213 00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:49,319 Speaker 2: ready to stop them from being let out by the 214 00:12:49,400 --> 00:12:52,160 Speaker 2: High Court when it set just one free, they decided 215 00:12:52,280 --> 00:12:55,079 Speaker 2: to just set everybody free for reasons probably best known 216 00:12:55,120 --> 00:12:58,600 Speaker 2: to themselves, and then took their sweet arts time in 217 00:12:58,679 --> 00:13:02,240 Speaker 2: putting together any sort of pol response that would actually 218 00:13:02,320 --> 00:13:05,120 Speaker 2: stop this from happening, that would enable them to be traced, 219 00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:08,880 Speaker 2: that would enable them to be redetained in a way 220 00:13:08,920 --> 00:13:11,720 Speaker 2: that would keep the community safe, and indeed failed to 221 00:13:11,760 --> 00:13:16,560 Speaker 2: have any policy ready, even though the actual judge in 222 00:13:16,640 --> 00:13:19,760 Speaker 2: the court case basically told them that she was going 223 00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:24,280 Speaker 2: to do this. But anyway, I digress. Point being, Andrew 224 00:13:24,360 --> 00:13:26,840 Speaker 2: Giles was always going to get shafted, by which I 225 00:13:26,960 --> 00:13:29,800 Speaker 2: mean moved sideways. And no, it's not a shafting at all, 226 00:13:29,840 --> 00:13:32,080 Speaker 2: because everything's totally fine. He's done a great job, and 227 00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:35,760 Speaker 2: Anthony Albanez's factional ally and apparently helps him with the 228 00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:39,600 Speaker 2: numbers in the left in Victoria. I don't really know 229 00:13:39,640 --> 00:13:41,760 Speaker 2: how that works. I'm not even sure that it works, 230 00:13:41,800 --> 00:13:44,760 Speaker 2: but anyway, that is the stories. Apparently in his inner circle. 231 00:13:45,160 --> 00:13:47,600 Speaker 2: Poor old Albo can't be perfect all the time, and 232 00:13:48,200 --> 00:13:51,599 Speaker 2: so he's gone, and he has gone to a portfolio 233 00:13:51,679 --> 00:13:55,320 Speaker 2: which probably few people even know exists. At Skills and Training. 234 00:13:55,440 --> 00:13:58,040 Speaker 2: You've never heard of it, you've never seen the minister 235 00:13:58,440 --> 00:14:01,160 Speaker 2: who previously represented it. Chances that you couldn't name him 236 00:14:01,160 --> 00:14:03,760 Speaker 2: in a police lineup. And he has now retired, and 237 00:14:04,160 --> 00:14:07,000 Speaker 2: godspeed and all the very best to him and his 238 00:14:07,080 --> 00:14:10,640 Speaker 2: family as he goes. Point being, it's a portfolio that 239 00:14:10,679 --> 00:14:13,160 Speaker 2: doesn't get into the headlines much, if at all, and 240 00:14:13,240 --> 00:14:16,560 Speaker 2: that is exactly where the PM obviously wants Andrew Giles. 241 00:14:16,600 --> 00:14:16,760 Speaker 3: Well. 242 00:14:16,760 --> 00:14:18,880 Speaker 2: At the same time, he can say, look, is not sacked. 243 00:14:19,440 --> 00:14:22,200 Speaker 2: He hasn't been forced to resign. He hasn't even been demoted. 244 00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:25,080 Speaker 2: He's just been moved around. A cabinet reshuffle caused by 245 00:14:25,640 --> 00:14:28,960 Speaker 2: the retirement of two ministers, that being Brendan O'Connor, the 246 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:31,840 Speaker 2: aforementioned Skills minister, who I'm sure you've never heard of, 247 00:14:32,200 --> 00:14:34,960 Speaker 2: and Linda Bernie who you probably have heard of, the 248 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:40,680 Speaker 2: Indigenous Affairs minister, who is retiring now. The other interesting 249 00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:45,320 Speaker 2: move was putting clar O'Neil, who, yes, the buck stops 250 00:14:45,360 --> 00:14:49,240 Speaker 2: with her with this immigration fiasco, but doesn't appear that 251 00:14:49,280 --> 00:14:52,240 Speaker 2: she was actually personally sort of responsible for the handling 252 00:14:52,240 --> 00:14:55,360 Speaker 2: of it. It seems that that was Andrew Giles's stuff up. 253 00:14:55,400 --> 00:14:57,480 Speaker 2: But she is of course left holding the baby, so 254 00:14:57,560 --> 00:15:00,640 Speaker 2: to speak, and she therefore has to carry some of 255 00:15:00,680 --> 00:15:02,680 Speaker 2: the blame. And of course it would be a bad 256 00:15:02,680 --> 00:15:05,000 Speaker 2: look if you've got rid of Giles, look like you're 257 00:15:05,000 --> 00:15:07,760 Speaker 2: sort of throwing someone under the bus to protect the 258 00:15:07,800 --> 00:15:11,440 Speaker 2: senior minister. And so she has had to go as well. 259 00:15:11,560 --> 00:15:14,240 Speaker 2: She's under a lot of pressure and she goes into 260 00:15:14,680 --> 00:15:19,600 Speaker 2: a portfolio that is the very opposite of the skills 261 00:15:19,640 --> 00:15:22,320 Speaker 2: and training portfolio that Giles has gone into, where he 262 00:15:22,360 --> 00:15:25,400 Speaker 2: will spend a very quiet life behind a curtain somewhere. 263 00:15:25,840 --> 00:15:30,280 Speaker 2: She has gone into housing, housing and homelessness. Now normally 264 00:15:30,720 --> 00:15:33,720 Speaker 2: this would also be that kind of backwater portfolio. In fact, 265 00:15:33,720 --> 00:15:36,800 Speaker 2: the last time Labor was in government, this wasn't even 266 00:15:36,960 --> 00:15:40,600 Speaker 2: a cabinet position. Tania Plippa set in fact, who has 267 00:15:40,640 --> 00:15:46,280 Speaker 2: been studiously ignored by Anthony Albertezy in part also because 268 00:15:46,280 --> 00:15:48,680 Speaker 2: of those sort of factional rivalries and the fact that 269 00:15:48,720 --> 00:15:52,000 Speaker 2: she ran as a deputy to Bill Shorten against him 270 00:15:52,040 --> 00:15:57,400 Speaker 2: in the previous Labor leadership challenge. But anyway, she took 271 00:15:57,440 --> 00:16:01,800 Speaker 2: that portfolio the last time Labor was in government and 272 00:16:01,960 --> 00:16:03,960 Speaker 2: came to government from my position, and she made it 273 00:16:03,960 --> 00:16:06,480 Speaker 2: her own. She worked really, really hard and she made 274 00:16:06,800 --> 00:16:09,160 Speaker 2: it fantastic. But it wasn't even in It was a ministry, 275 00:16:09,200 --> 00:16:11,680 Speaker 2: but it wasn't in cabinet the last time around. That's 276 00:16:11,720 --> 00:16:16,160 Speaker 2: how historically sort of second tier this portfolio has been. 277 00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:20,240 Speaker 2: But of course this time round, we've got a house, 278 00:16:20,360 --> 00:16:22,160 Speaker 2: we've got a cost of living crisis, and at the 279 00:16:22,280 --> 00:16:25,400 Speaker 2: very very apex of that crisis is a cost of 280 00:16:25,440 --> 00:16:28,080 Speaker 2: housing crisis to the point where there's a rental crisis 281 00:16:28,120 --> 00:16:31,880 Speaker 2: as well as a housing affordability crisis. It's just crisis, crisis, crisis, 282 00:16:31,880 --> 00:16:33,640 Speaker 2: and it needs to be fixed. We all know that 283 00:16:33,680 --> 00:16:36,240 Speaker 2: the government has reached an agreement with all the states 284 00:16:36,280 --> 00:16:40,760 Speaker 2: and territories to hit this massive target of new housing 285 00:16:40,800 --> 00:16:43,240 Speaker 2: that it is simply not going to hit. In fact, 286 00:16:43,480 --> 00:16:45,200 Speaker 2: New South Wales government has already come out and said 287 00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:47,280 Speaker 2: that we're not going to get there, sorry, and it 288 00:16:47,320 --> 00:16:50,960 Speaker 2: has to do this in partnership with states, and it 289 00:16:51,000 --> 00:16:53,200 Speaker 2: knows it can't. It knows it will almost certainly not 290 00:16:53,240 --> 00:16:55,760 Speaker 2: be able to meet the targets that it has set 291 00:16:55,800 --> 00:16:57,440 Speaker 2: for itself. But it's got a bloody try and it's 292 00:16:57,480 --> 00:17:00,160 Speaker 2: got to get somewhere otherwise it will just be an 293 00:17:00,200 --> 00:17:06,479 Speaker 2: absolute yes crisis. So what has Albow done. He's taken 294 00:17:07,240 --> 00:17:12,080 Speaker 2: a senior minister in a really really senior portfolio, someone 295 00:17:12,119 --> 00:17:13,919 Speaker 2: who has had to kind of you know, watch this 296 00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:17,640 Speaker 2: space sign over their head for many many years. Who 297 00:17:17,680 --> 00:17:20,840 Speaker 2: hasn't it's fair to say, done, or as she could 298 00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:23,639 Speaker 2: have possibly dreamed of in the portfolio, the dream portfolio 299 00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:26,600 Speaker 2: she was given and so he's taken it and basically 300 00:17:26,760 --> 00:17:33,320 Speaker 2: jammed her into this other portfolio which needs an absolute miracle, 301 00:17:33,359 --> 00:17:36,159 Speaker 2: which needs some kind of you know, lightning bolt to 302 00:17:36,240 --> 00:17:38,719 Speaker 2: turn it around and make things happen. And that is 303 00:17:38,800 --> 00:17:41,960 Speaker 2: exactly the sort of minister you want to put there. 304 00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:44,760 Speaker 2: You basically take someone who's had a bit of the 305 00:17:44,800 --> 00:17:48,040 Speaker 2: shine where off they're kind of bauble, and you say, right, 306 00:17:48,440 --> 00:17:52,439 Speaker 2: here is your legacy project. Here is your chance to 307 00:17:52,560 --> 00:17:56,920 Speaker 2: redeem your reputation, to prove your metal, and to stamp 308 00:17:57,040 --> 00:17:59,840 Speaker 2: your name in the history books. And he's done it 309 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:04,600 Speaker 2: for it's the exact same thing he did with Bill Shorten. Again, 310 00:18:04,720 --> 00:18:08,280 Speaker 2: disability was once a kind of backwater portfolio. In fact, 311 00:18:08,560 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 2: it was a portfolio. And again there's a lot of 312 00:18:10,840 --> 00:18:13,520 Speaker 2: history kind of repeating itself. I think Mark Twain said 313 00:18:13,560 --> 00:18:16,320 Speaker 2: history doesn't repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme. There's 314 00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:20,080 Speaker 2: a lot of history rhyming here. Bill Shorten was initially 315 00:18:20,160 --> 00:18:24,480 Speaker 2: really disgruntled when he got a very minor portfolio under 316 00:18:24,760 --> 00:18:27,120 Speaker 2: Kevin Rudd, and he was I think an assistant minister 317 00:18:27,880 --> 00:18:30,679 Speaker 2: with charge of disabilities. But he just went right, that's it. 318 00:18:30,760 --> 00:18:32,679 Speaker 2: And of course Bill Shorton thought he was going to 319 00:18:32,680 --> 00:18:34,800 Speaker 2: be Prime minister one day a lot of people expected 320 00:18:34,840 --> 00:18:37,160 Speaker 2: him to be and he came within a bee's proverbial 321 00:18:37,200 --> 00:18:40,280 Speaker 2: appendage of being prime minister. And here he is, you know, 322 00:18:40,400 --> 00:18:44,080 Speaker 2: schlepping it round and this sort of human affairs portfolio 323 00:18:44,200 --> 00:18:48,200 Speaker 2: at the bottom sort of rung of the ministerial ladder, 324 00:18:48,520 --> 00:18:52,119 Speaker 2: and Shortened threw everything at it. And people remember him 325 00:18:52,119 --> 00:18:55,479 Speaker 2: as being one of the best ministers for people with 326 00:18:55,520 --> 00:18:58,800 Speaker 2: disabilities they'd ever seen. So he took this tiny little 327 00:18:58,800 --> 00:19:02,080 Speaker 2: thing and just threw everything at it. And that is 328 00:19:02,119 --> 00:19:06,640 Speaker 2: exactly what he was tasked with doing. When Albow came around, 329 00:19:06,960 --> 00:19:10,679 Speaker 2: unfortunately for Bill, knock Bill from the top position in 330 00:19:10,720 --> 00:19:14,560 Speaker 2: the Labor Party, and Albo said, right, I'm going to 331 00:19:14,560 --> 00:19:18,120 Speaker 2: take you. I'm going to stick you in the Ndies portfolio. 332 00:19:18,359 --> 00:19:20,560 Speaker 2: You are going to and again, just like housing, you're 333 00:19:20,600 --> 00:19:24,320 Speaker 2: going to fix this thing that's in absolute crisis, the 334 00:19:24,359 --> 00:19:27,520 Speaker 2: worst performing thing in our government and the thing that 335 00:19:27,640 --> 00:19:30,919 Speaker 2: so many millions of people are completely dependent on, just 336 00:19:30,960 --> 00:19:33,240 Speaker 2: like housing, and you are going to go there and 337 00:19:33,320 --> 00:19:34,760 Speaker 2: fix it. And of course, what does Bill Shorten do? 338 00:19:34,840 --> 00:19:37,959 Speaker 2: Goes right, I'll show him so that it might not 339 00:19:38,000 --> 00:19:40,239 Speaker 2: be Prime minister, but this will be my legacy. This 340 00:19:40,320 --> 00:19:44,119 Speaker 2: will be where my name is etched in the history books. 341 00:19:44,640 --> 00:19:46,760 Speaker 2: And so it's actually a really good move. You take 342 00:19:46,760 --> 00:19:51,959 Speaker 2: a portfolio that's the size of whatever it is, and 343 00:19:52,000 --> 00:19:56,199 Speaker 2: you shove a prime ministerial sized ego into it, and 344 00:19:56,240 --> 00:19:58,360 Speaker 2: then you just watch that little thing go. So that's 345 00:19:58,400 --> 00:20:00,760 Speaker 2: the thing he behind that. I think O'Neil is actually 346 00:20:00,760 --> 00:20:03,320 Speaker 2: a very competent minister, and I think she's done a 347 00:20:03,359 --> 00:20:05,879 Speaker 2: lot of other good stuff in home affairs, and she 348 00:20:05,920 --> 00:20:09,119 Speaker 2: was doing great work you overhauling the migration system before 349 00:20:09,160 --> 00:20:13,320 Speaker 2: this scandal landed her feet courtesy of the immigration minister 350 00:20:13,359 --> 00:20:15,879 Speaker 2: below her. So what can I say? Watch this space. 351 00:20:21,200 --> 00:20:24,679 Speaker 2: Another interesting story I saw this week was by the 352 00:20:24,800 --> 00:20:27,640 Speaker 2: Center for Independent Studies, which is a conservative think tank, 353 00:20:27,920 --> 00:20:31,680 Speaker 2: which released a report about what people think about companies 354 00:20:32,000 --> 00:20:34,879 Speaker 2: quote unquote going woke things that are called like the 355 00:20:35,200 --> 00:20:41,040 Speaker 2: traditional bottom line, including environmental and social outcomes, diversity outcomes 356 00:20:41,359 --> 00:20:44,199 Speaker 2: in the company's performance instead of just you know, how 357 00:20:44,280 --> 00:20:49,480 Speaker 2: much profit it makes for shareholders. And it found, perhaps unsurprisingly, 358 00:20:49,600 --> 00:20:52,440 Speaker 2: that most shareholders and most employees didn't really give a 359 00:20:52,560 --> 00:20:55,600 Speaker 2: rats about what a company had to say on social 360 00:20:55,760 --> 00:20:58,680 Speaker 2: or political issues. They just wanted to do their job. 361 00:20:58,720 --> 00:21:00,919 Speaker 2: And get out of there, or if they were shareholders, 362 00:21:00,960 --> 00:21:02,919 Speaker 2: they just wanted the cash, thank you very much. And 363 00:21:02,920 --> 00:21:05,720 Speaker 2: they did all this research that that tracked how much 364 00:21:06,440 --> 00:21:10,640 Speaker 2: people were engaged with the position that the company took, 365 00:21:10,640 --> 00:21:15,000 Speaker 2: how much stakeholders like shareholders or employees were engaged with 366 00:21:15,040 --> 00:21:17,720 Speaker 2: what the company was saying about things like, for example, 367 00:21:17,760 --> 00:21:20,600 Speaker 2: same sex marriage or the Voice to Parliament, and it 368 00:21:20,600 --> 00:21:24,400 Speaker 2: found there was absolutely and there was very minimal engagement. 369 00:21:24,560 --> 00:21:27,920 Speaker 2: Very very few were closely time minority were really closely 370 00:21:27,960 --> 00:21:30,760 Speaker 2: following it, and some kind of you know, kept half 371 00:21:30,760 --> 00:21:33,280 Speaker 2: an eye on it. In other words, any claim that 372 00:21:33,320 --> 00:21:36,600 Speaker 2: these were sort of things that were driven by companies, 373 00:21:36,920 --> 00:21:40,040 Speaker 2: you know, shareholders demanding a stronger stance on climate change 374 00:21:40,160 --> 00:21:43,320 Speaker 2: or by employees wanting the company wanted to be proud 375 00:21:43,320 --> 00:21:45,679 Speaker 2: for the company they worked for, were rubbish. It's just 376 00:21:46,680 --> 00:21:49,520 Speaker 2: it's just the company trying to basically boost its brand 377 00:21:49,560 --> 00:21:52,080 Speaker 2: and say, hey, we're not just an evil corporation. You know, 378 00:21:52,119 --> 00:21:54,360 Speaker 2: we also really care about things. We care about the environment, 379 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:57,760 Speaker 2: we care about you know, First Nations people or whatever. Whatever. Anyway, 380 00:21:57,760 --> 00:22:01,119 Speaker 2: the reason I thought that was very, very interesting is 381 00:22:01,160 --> 00:22:06,159 Speaker 2: because I was pretty closely involved with the campaign for 382 00:22:07,160 --> 00:22:10,360 Speaker 2: the Voice to Parliament, which was an absolute debarcle. Unfortunately, 383 00:22:10,400 --> 00:22:12,919 Speaker 2: I wasn't closely involved enough it would seem, but I 384 00:22:12,960 --> 00:22:14,640 Speaker 2: was a very strong supporter, and I was in touch 385 00:22:14,640 --> 00:22:16,880 Speaker 2: with a lot of the people who were running the campaign, 386 00:22:17,000 --> 00:22:18,919 Speaker 2: and less so with a lot of people who were 387 00:22:18,920 --> 00:22:23,040 Speaker 2: basically sabotaging it with incredibly stupid statements and other people 388 00:22:23,080 --> 00:22:25,840 Speaker 2: who were just so incredibly disorganized that the whole campaign 389 00:22:25,920 --> 00:22:29,320 Speaker 2: fell into a hot mess. And the result of it 390 00:22:29,359 --> 00:22:33,440 Speaker 2: that went basically from about sixty forty people in Australia 391 00:22:33,440 --> 00:22:36,040 Speaker 2: being in favor of a Voice Deparliament before the campaign 392 00:22:36,160 --> 00:22:40,320 Speaker 2: started to about sixty forty people in Australia being against 393 00:22:40,440 --> 00:22:43,919 Speaker 2: the Voice to Parliament by the time the campaign ended. 394 00:22:44,160 --> 00:22:46,080 Speaker 2: And that tells you everything you need to know about 395 00:22:46,119 --> 00:22:49,680 Speaker 2: a campaign when it's actually turning people away from them 396 00:22:50,080 --> 00:22:52,560 Speaker 2: the longer it goes on and the more they see 397 00:22:52,880 --> 00:22:56,440 Speaker 2: of it. And I actually there was a bloke brought 398 00:22:56,440 --> 00:22:58,080 Speaker 2: in sort of late in the game to try to 399 00:22:58,119 --> 00:23:03,560 Speaker 2: fix all these myriad problems, and unfortunately he couldn't obviously, 400 00:23:03,680 --> 00:23:08,240 Speaker 2: but I remember saying to him that it was just 401 00:23:08,359 --> 00:23:10,440 Speaker 2: terrible having all these you know, one of the really 402 00:23:10,480 --> 00:23:13,920 Speaker 2: big problems with the campaigns was all these big corporate 403 00:23:14,040 --> 00:23:17,320 Speaker 2: entities were lending all their support and all their cash 404 00:23:17,680 --> 00:23:20,600 Speaker 2: to this campaign, and this didn't help it at all. 405 00:23:20,600 --> 00:23:23,879 Speaker 2: In fact, it turned people off suddenly. People and again 406 00:23:24,440 --> 00:23:26,720 Speaker 2: there's plenty of reasons for this, but people were saying, 407 00:23:26,720 --> 00:23:28,800 Speaker 2: hang on, this is my decision. I shouldn't be told 408 00:23:28,880 --> 00:23:32,760 Speaker 2: what I should be voting for by you know, Quantas 409 00:23:32,880 --> 00:23:37,000 Speaker 2: or you know, Woolworths or whatever it may be. This 410 00:23:37,160 --> 00:23:41,119 Speaker 2: minus in So people started to clearly say, well, f you. 411 00:23:41,119 --> 00:23:43,080 Speaker 2: You know, I'm just going to flip you the bird, 412 00:23:43,119 --> 00:23:45,440 Speaker 2: because this makes it sound like a sort of elite, 413 00:23:45,800 --> 00:23:50,480 Speaker 2: top down organization or an elite top down movement or 414 00:23:50,520 --> 00:23:54,760 Speaker 2: campaign instead of a grassroots one. It made people feel 415 00:23:54,800 --> 00:23:57,199 Speaker 2: also that something that they might have wanted to do 416 00:23:57,280 --> 00:23:59,080 Speaker 2: out of the goodness of their own heart, they were 417 00:23:59,080 --> 00:24:03,439 Speaker 2: now being let should to or lectured about by people 418 00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:06,520 Speaker 2: buy higher ups, be they in government or be they 419 00:24:06,560 --> 00:24:09,720 Speaker 2: in business, and that kind of just left a nasty 420 00:24:09,760 --> 00:24:11,280 Speaker 2: taste in their mouth. Anyway. So I say to this guy, 421 00:24:11,320 --> 00:24:14,600 Speaker 2: I said, mate, you've got it. Just the corporates are 422 00:24:14,680 --> 00:24:18,280 Speaker 2: killing this campaign. All this corporate support is destroying it. 423 00:24:19,240 --> 00:24:21,800 Speaker 2: And he said, I said, you've got to stop, you know, don't, 424 00:24:21,840 --> 00:24:24,160 Speaker 2: don't try to solicit anymore, don't try to get any more, 425 00:24:24,440 --> 00:24:26,960 Speaker 2: and he goes, mate, mate, we're not, We're not. I know, 426 00:24:27,240 --> 00:24:30,520 Speaker 2: you completely agreed. So the problem is they're all trying 427 00:24:30,520 --> 00:24:34,120 Speaker 2: to jump on board, and it looks worse if we 428 00:24:34,160 --> 00:24:36,120 Speaker 2: say no, no, you can't because it's a bad look. 429 00:24:36,520 --> 00:24:39,359 Speaker 2: Imagine if that got out, and it would just be 430 00:24:39,400 --> 00:24:44,199 Speaker 2: an impossible thing to say anyway. And so that I 431 00:24:44,200 --> 00:24:46,879 Speaker 2: think is the ultimate irony. It wasn't even the campaign 432 00:24:46,960 --> 00:24:50,080 Speaker 2: necessarily itself that was reaching out, and I'm sure there 433 00:24:50,119 --> 00:24:53,640 Speaker 2: was a bit of that quite frankly, but these corporations, 434 00:24:54,119 --> 00:24:58,800 Speaker 2: corporate entities, big organizations trying to say, hey, look everybody here, 435 00:24:58,840 --> 00:25:00,960 Speaker 2: look over here, we're in favor of the and trying 436 00:25:01,000 --> 00:25:04,960 Speaker 2: to attach themselves to this campaign so that it made 437 00:25:04,960 --> 00:25:08,119 Speaker 2: their brand look better and show everybody how caring and 438 00:25:08,160 --> 00:25:12,080 Speaker 2: touching feeler they were. They were like the bloke who's drowning, 439 00:25:13,280 --> 00:25:16,480 Speaker 2: grabbing on to the person trying to rescue him and 440 00:25:16,520 --> 00:25:19,840 Speaker 2: pulling him under the water as well. They became in 441 00:25:19,880 --> 00:25:22,920 Speaker 2: their desperation to sort of jump on board this thing, 442 00:25:23,320 --> 00:25:26,639 Speaker 2: they were actually pulling the whole thing down. And of 443 00:25:26,680 --> 00:25:35,080 Speaker 2: course we all know how that turned out. Our next 444 00:25:35,160 --> 00:25:40,080 Speaker 2: guest is someone who literally wrote the book on labor politics. 445 00:25:40,119 --> 00:25:43,960 Speaker 2: He actually wrote the New Labor platform that they took 446 00:25:44,040 --> 00:25:48,560 Speaker 2: to the twenty twenty two election and got elected as 447 00:25:48,600 --> 00:25:51,600 Speaker 2: a result of He's also a very smart cook. He's 448 00:25:51,600 --> 00:25:55,560 Speaker 2: a Fulbright scholar who was studying in Washington, DC, so 449 00:25:55,600 --> 00:25:57,840 Speaker 2: he knows everything about US politics as well. And he 450 00:25:57,920 --> 00:26:03,159 Speaker 2: was also a war correspondent in Ukraine during Russia's invasion 451 00:26:03,240 --> 00:26:04,760 Speaker 2: of it, so he's got a bit going on and 452 00:26:04,800 --> 00:26:07,600 Speaker 2: he joins me right now, Mission Zelenski, Welcome to the 453 00:26:07,640 --> 00:26:08,840 Speaker 2: real story. How are you, my friend. 454 00:26:08,880 --> 00:26:11,080 Speaker 3: I'm well, Joe. Good to be with you, mage. 455 00:26:10,880 --> 00:26:14,160 Speaker 2: Mate, great to have you. First up, let's just get 456 00:26:14,200 --> 00:26:18,200 Speaker 2: your thoughts on the conference, the Labor conference over the weekend, 457 00:26:18,200 --> 00:26:20,880 Speaker 2: obviously a very big weekend for labor. We had the 458 00:26:20,880 --> 00:26:24,119 Speaker 2: PM and the Premier address the New South Wales Conference, 459 00:26:24,240 --> 00:26:27,680 Speaker 2: which people were worried might explode over the Palestine issue, 460 00:26:27,760 --> 00:26:31,600 Speaker 2: and then of course the PM's reshuffle on the Sunday. 461 00:26:31,920 --> 00:26:32,960 Speaker 2: What did you make of it all? 462 00:26:33,080 --> 00:26:35,680 Speaker 1: Well, it was a little bit anticlimactic. So we arrived 463 00:26:35,720 --> 00:26:36,880 Speaker 1: there early on, which. 464 00:26:36,640 --> 00:26:37,760 Speaker 2: Is a good thing, that's right. 465 00:26:37,960 --> 00:26:39,960 Speaker 3: That's a quiet conference is a good conference, Joe. 466 00:26:40,000 --> 00:26:43,040 Speaker 1: But we arrived there early Saturday morning and there's talk 467 00:26:43,080 --> 00:26:47,480 Speaker 1: of twenty thousand protests that security protocols are very different 468 00:26:47,480 --> 00:26:49,200 Speaker 1: on this occasion. A lot of police and you have 469 00:26:49,280 --> 00:26:51,199 Speaker 1: to have a special code to get in and not 470 00:26:51,280 --> 00:26:54,560 Speaker 1: like in political sense, a little physical code or they 471 00:26:54,680 --> 00:26:55,400 Speaker 1: got sent to you. 472 00:26:55,359 --> 00:26:58,960 Speaker 3: In the mail. Wow, and so but it rained and. 473 00:26:59,040 --> 00:27:04,320 Speaker 1: So yeah, it's Trut's melt and the wet. But so 474 00:27:04,680 --> 00:27:07,199 Speaker 1: as it turned out, there were some protests, but it 475 00:27:07,280 --> 00:27:11,520 Speaker 1: was not as I guess chaotic as are anticipating in 476 00:27:11,640 --> 00:27:14,480 Speaker 1: terms of the conference itself. You mentioned the PM was there, 477 00:27:14,280 --> 00:27:17,560 Speaker 1: the Premier were there. That's actually the first time since 478 00:27:17,640 --> 00:27:20,320 Speaker 1: nineteen forty one that Labour's. 479 00:27:19,960 --> 00:27:20,520 Speaker 3: Had a situation. 480 00:27:20,640 --> 00:27:23,440 Speaker 1: We've had a first term federal government and a first 481 00:27:23,560 --> 00:27:26,040 Speaker 1: term New South Wales state government at the same time. 482 00:27:26,280 --> 00:27:28,000 Speaker 2: Both leaders from the state of New South. 483 00:27:27,800 --> 00:27:33,680 Speaker 1: Wales, Curtin Chiffley and obviously mckel so a bit of 484 00:27:33,720 --> 00:27:36,960 Speaker 1: a quirky history, so a long time and so you 485 00:27:36,960 --> 00:27:38,960 Speaker 1: know in New South Wales has been out of government 486 00:27:39,000 --> 00:27:42,479 Speaker 1: for some time now, and so it was a great feeling, 487 00:27:42,520 --> 00:27:44,199 Speaker 1: to be honest, to have the PM there, to have 488 00:27:44,240 --> 00:27:47,600 Speaker 1: the state premier there, Anthony Alberanezi and Chris Mins. 489 00:27:47,680 --> 00:27:49,440 Speaker 3: It was a really good feeling to be honest overall. 490 00:27:49,640 --> 00:27:51,639 Speaker 2: And what did you make of the walkout of the 491 00:27:51,680 --> 00:27:55,359 Speaker 2: ETU delegates during the PM's a little bit. 492 00:27:55,280 --> 00:27:59,080 Speaker 1: Of I'd never notice that they left, so look, I mean, 493 00:27:59,440 --> 00:28:01,160 Speaker 1: people in time to do it they want. 494 00:28:01,280 --> 00:28:02,600 Speaker 3: I'm not sure if. 495 00:28:04,160 --> 00:28:06,840 Speaker 1: Alleged corruption in the CFMU is the hill you want 496 00:28:06,880 --> 00:28:08,800 Speaker 1: to die on, but if people want to choose to that. 497 00:28:08,840 --> 00:28:11,920 Speaker 1: But ultimately it was a very small cohort of one 498 00:28:12,160 --> 00:28:15,000 Speaker 1: a small amount of one union, and didn't really disrupt 499 00:28:15,000 --> 00:28:15,640 Speaker 1: the conference at all. 500 00:28:15,920 --> 00:28:20,160 Speaker 2: And you're a former top union official yourself, obviously the 501 00:28:20,280 --> 00:28:23,000 Speaker 2: leanings of the unions play a huge role in whether 502 00:28:23,119 --> 00:28:24,960 Speaker 2: or not the right or the left have the numbers 503 00:28:25,359 --> 00:28:28,160 Speaker 2: at both state and federal conference. The right, thank god, 504 00:28:28,240 --> 00:28:31,359 Speaker 2: have the numbers at state level, and the left have 505 00:28:31,480 --> 00:28:34,199 Speaker 2: just got the edge. If the CFMU was to be 506 00:28:34,280 --> 00:28:38,880 Speaker 2: disaffiliated from the Labor Party, would that swing the balance 507 00:28:39,120 --> 00:28:41,520 Speaker 2: back in favor of the right at the national level. 508 00:28:42,480 --> 00:28:44,360 Speaker 1: Maybe make it right in balance again, I don't know 509 00:28:44,400 --> 00:28:48,120 Speaker 1: the exact numbers for the purest playing long at home, 510 00:28:48,120 --> 00:28:49,719 Speaker 1: and I'm sure they're on the edge of their seats 511 00:28:50,760 --> 00:28:56,960 Speaker 1: all three labor factionalism as you are, Joe. But the 512 00:28:56,960 --> 00:29:00,920 Speaker 1: CFMU in New South I was a part of a 513 00:29:00,960 --> 00:29:02,760 Speaker 1: different part of the left, their own part of left 514 00:29:02,760 --> 00:29:06,800 Speaker 1: called the soft left. Nationally, they're in sort of another 515 00:29:06,800 --> 00:29:09,280 Speaker 1: group called the industrial left in Victoria and other parts. 516 00:29:09,280 --> 00:29:13,880 Speaker 1: So the CFMU don't sit within the kind of hard left, 517 00:29:14,080 --> 00:29:16,120 Speaker 1: the Anthey, alb and easy left. They're in a little 518 00:29:16,120 --> 00:29:18,840 Speaker 1: bit of their own subgroup. They do tend to caucus 519 00:29:20,200 --> 00:29:23,400 Speaker 1: with the left nationally, but they have separately voted against 520 00:29:24,560 --> 00:29:26,800 Speaker 1: what the left have wanted in the past. So, for example, 521 00:29:26,880 --> 00:29:29,800 Speaker 1: going right back in history, in the twenty fifteen national 522 00:29:29,880 --> 00:29:32,360 Speaker 1: conference that Bill was leader talking about turnbacks at the time, 523 00:29:32,560 --> 00:29:37,040 Speaker 1: the CFMU voted with the right to make turn brights policy, 524 00:29:37,080 --> 00:29:40,240 Speaker 1: which in the end has become Labour's policy nationally. So 525 00:29:40,960 --> 00:29:42,840 Speaker 1: they move around a bit, but I'd suggest it's tightening 526 00:29:42,920 --> 00:29:44,440 Speaker 1: numbers right up again at a national level. 527 00:29:44,560 --> 00:29:47,720 Speaker 2: That's right. And also the CFMU is factionally split within 528 00:29:47,760 --> 00:29:50,360 Speaker 2: the unit itself, that's right, minding an energy division and 529 00:29:50,400 --> 00:29:55,160 Speaker 2: the construction division. But better stop now before we lose already. Yeah, 530 00:29:56,120 --> 00:29:58,480 Speaker 2: let's go to something that is absolutely never boring, which 531 00:29:58,520 --> 00:29:59,400 Speaker 2: is Donald J. 532 00:29:59,640 --> 00:30:00,000 Speaker 3: Trump. 533 00:30:00,480 --> 00:30:03,400 Speaker 2: How do you see the election campaign playing out now 534 00:30:03,440 --> 00:30:06,680 Speaker 2: that Kamala Harris is at to get their Democratic. 535 00:30:06,600 --> 00:30:11,640 Speaker 1: Carle mallermantum as they say. Look, I think a lot 536 00:30:11,680 --> 00:30:14,600 Speaker 1: of people skeptical of Kamala Harris. 537 00:30:14,920 --> 00:30:18,000 Speaker 3: I'm going to say that if I was choosing candidate 538 00:30:18,000 --> 00:30:18,240 Speaker 3: for the. 539 00:30:18,160 --> 00:30:20,520 Speaker 1: Democrats, and you know my feelings there, I think Donald 540 00:30:20,520 --> 00:30:22,840 Speaker 1: Trump is a clear and present threat to democracy, not 541 00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:24,600 Speaker 1: just the United States but ever around the world. Should 542 00:30:24,600 --> 00:30:27,240 Speaker 1: not be my choice of candidate. However, I think the 543 00:30:27,320 --> 00:30:30,920 Speaker 1: number one mood in the country leading into Joe Biden's 544 00:30:30,960 --> 00:30:34,160 Speaker 1: decision to not stand again for election in twenty twenty 545 00:30:34,160 --> 00:30:37,239 Speaker 1: four for a second term, the move the electorate is 546 00:30:37,280 --> 00:30:40,440 Speaker 1: not so much polarized Republican Democrat, though it is. 547 00:30:40,480 --> 00:30:42,720 Speaker 3: It was very much not these two old blokes. 548 00:30:43,000 --> 00:30:43,240 Speaker 2: Yeah. 549 00:30:43,280 --> 00:30:44,800 Speaker 3: Now, a lot of the focuses not call that the 550 00:30:44,840 --> 00:30:47,600 Speaker 3: double haters, right exactly, and so people like that, this 551 00:30:47,720 --> 00:30:48,360 Speaker 3: can't be it. 552 00:30:48,440 --> 00:30:50,480 Speaker 1: We can't be getting served up a guy we threw 553 00:30:50,520 --> 00:30:54,840 Speaker 1: out once and a guy who's nearly eighty two asking 554 00:30:55,000 --> 00:30:56,760 Speaker 1: to be eighty six at the end of a second term. 555 00:30:56,800 --> 00:30:59,720 Speaker 1: And so I always thought the party that was able 556 00:30:59,760 --> 00:31:02,280 Speaker 1: to break with their incumbent first to be the party 557 00:31:02,320 --> 00:31:04,880 Speaker 1: to get the biggest boost. Now, the Republicans were unable 558 00:31:04,920 --> 00:31:08,560 Speaker 1: to shake Trump through the primaries, but with Biden doing 559 00:31:08,600 --> 00:31:15,880 Speaker 1: an extraordinary service. No politician gives up power willfully soon. Tho, Well, 560 00:31:16,240 --> 00:31:17,680 Speaker 1: I think that would have been right. I actually wrote 561 00:31:17,720 --> 00:31:19,640 Speaker 1: it a column in January of twenty twenty three. It 562 00:31:19,800 --> 00:31:22,520 Speaker 1: just aged very well saying that I think think Biden 563 00:31:22,560 --> 00:31:24,719 Speaker 1: should run again. I think I love Joe Biden as 564 00:31:24,720 --> 00:31:27,800 Speaker 1: a personal hero of mine. It's fantastic politician. Is exactly 565 00:31:27,800 --> 00:31:30,600 Speaker 1: the style of politics that I think, you know, Senate 566 00:31:30,680 --> 00:31:36,000 Speaker 1: Left party should be very working class oriented, very economic 567 00:31:36,040 --> 00:31:40,760 Speaker 1: issues at the forefront. But father time undefeated, right and so, 568 00:31:40,840 --> 00:31:43,760 Speaker 1: but I think it's recast the election. I think with 569 00:31:44,680 --> 00:31:48,360 Speaker 1: Biden going, you can't win an election, Joe. If three 570 00:31:48,360 --> 00:31:50,360 Speaker 1: out of four voters don't believe you have the cognitive 571 00:31:50,360 --> 00:31:52,800 Speaker 1: capacity to be president. 572 00:31:52,520 --> 00:31:55,240 Speaker 2: That's right. Yeah. I don't think there's any doubt whatsoever 573 00:31:55,440 --> 00:31:57,640 Speaker 2: that he should have stood aside. He should have stood 574 00:31:57,680 --> 00:31:59,880 Speaker 2: aside a long time ago, as you have said, for 575 00:32:00,040 --> 00:32:03,160 Speaker 2: even longer than I've been saying. And obviously Joe Biden's listening. 576 00:32:02,920 --> 00:32:06,040 Speaker 3: To I think he tuned out after the factual stuff. 577 00:32:06,040 --> 00:32:11,560 Speaker 2: But if he's back, Yeah, but do you think Kama 578 00:32:11,560 --> 00:32:14,960 Speaker 2: Harris obviously is someone who has not impressed as Veep. 579 00:32:15,920 --> 00:32:17,920 Speaker 2: She's got a big bounce in the poles though, it's 580 00:32:17,960 --> 00:32:20,640 Speaker 2: got that momentum you're talking about. She's now either neck 581 00:32:20,680 --> 00:32:22,400 Speaker 2: and neck or probably marginally ahead. 582 00:32:22,400 --> 00:32:24,000 Speaker 1: Well, there's a new pole of drop today, which is 583 00:32:24,080 --> 00:32:27,400 Speaker 1: very interesting. Arizona Harris is head by two, but in 584 00:32:27,480 --> 00:32:30,000 Speaker 1: Michigan head by eleven. Yeah, Now that could be a 585 00:32:30,080 --> 00:32:32,560 Speaker 1: rogue poll, but I definitely think of what's consistent is 586 00:32:32,560 --> 00:32:35,120 Speaker 1: there's been a surge. Now, whether or not that's a 587 00:32:35,160 --> 00:32:38,240 Speaker 1: complete surge, but fascinating that those are two states that 588 00:32:38,280 --> 00:32:44,440 Speaker 1: are absolutely pivotabal Biden one Arizona and Michigan. Whoever wins 589 00:32:44,480 --> 00:32:46,520 Speaker 1: the election is going to need to carry those states. 590 00:32:46,560 --> 00:32:48,560 Speaker 1: And so I think it's real and I think the 591 00:32:48,720 --> 00:32:51,760 Speaker 1: relief there is a real genuine relief that there's a 592 00:32:51,760 --> 00:32:52,479 Speaker 1: fresh choice. 593 00:32:52,560 --> 00:32:52,760 Speaker 3: Now. 594 00:32:53,960 --> 00:32:55,560 Speaker 1: The way these things tend to go is you get 595 00:32:55,560 --> 00:32:59,239 Speaker 1: a surge, there's a great bit of excitement and then 596 00:32:59,280 --> 00:33:02,600 Speaker 1: people then take a second look. Now Harris will get 597 00:33:02,600 --> 00:33:04,480 Speaker 1: a second look at her, and that people will assess 598 00:33:04,480 --> 00:33:07,520 Speaker 1: her record. Now her challenge is, yes, she's not Joe Biden, 599 00:33:07,560 --> 00:33:10,959 Speaker 1: but she's still carrying his record on inflation. And I 600 00:33:10,960 --> 00:33:14,520 Speaker 1: think really particularly we talked about turnbacks before on the border. 601 00:33:14,680 --> 00:33:17,160 Speaker 3: Yes, the border is a real big problem for the Democrats. 602 00:33:17,200 --> 00:33:21,120 Speaker 1: But I think it shows that switching candidates has paid 603 00:33:21,120 --> 00:33:24,080 Speaker 1: off so far. And I think if Harris goes on 604 00:33:24,120 --> 00:33:25,480 Speaker 1: to win, and it's a big gift. And my friends 605 00:33:25,480 --> 00:33:27,320 Speaker 1: are all mocking me. I said, they said, oh, you 606 00:33:27,320 --> 00:33:30,000 Speaker 1: think Harris can win. I said, look, Biden can't win. 607 00:33:30,360 --> 00:33:33,200 Speaker 1: Harris could win. Yes, And I think that we now 608 00:33:33,240 --> 00:33:35,920 Speaker 1: have a race. But when this is rate written, if 609 00:33:35,960 --> 00:33:38,640 Speaker 1: Harris was to go on and win, I think people 610 00:33:38,680 --> 00:33:42,000 Speaker 1: look back at the choice of JD. Vance as the 611 00:33:42,120 --> 00:33:44,200 Speaker 1: running mate for Trump. I think that was if you 612 00:33:44,240 --> 00:33:46,480 Speaker 1: had it over again. I think Trump's already regretting it. 613 00:33:46,520 --> 00:33:48,960 Speaker 2: I think he's not talking might actually swap him out, 614 00:33:49,000 --> 00:33:50,160 Speaker 2: But I think that's I. 615 00:33:50,200 --> 00:33:51,840 Speaker 3: Mean again, like he might. 616 00:33:52,160 --> 00:33:55,240 Speaker 1: I mean Donald Trump made He's loydal himself and himself 617 00:33:55,280 --> 00:33:59,240 Speaker 1: only it's been challenging for him because now that he's 618 00:33:59,280 --> 00:34:03,120 Speaker 1: picked a hardcore magotype to throw. 619 00:34:02,960 --> 00:34:05,040 Speaker 3: Him off the ticket. 620 00:34:05,560 --> 00:34:07,120 Speaker 1: Trump could probably pull it off, but it would not 621 00:34:07,160 --> 00:34:09,399 Speaker 1: be without risk. But it just shows you that how 622 00:34:09,440 --> 00:34:11,640 Speaker 1: confident they were. That was hubrious, in my opinion, to 623 00:34:11,640 --> 00:34:14,120 Speaker 1: select a guy who doesn't balance your ticket at all. 624 00:34:14,239 --> 00:34:16,839 Speaker 2: Right, he's on this ticket or Donald Trump. 625 00:34:16,600 --> 00:34:20,040 Speaker 1: Right right, right right, and so yeah, if Trump had 626 00:34:20,200 --> 00:34:22,440 Speaker 1: you wouldn't do it. But if you picked Nikki Hayley, 627 00:34:22,880 --> 00:34:24,880 Speaker 1: that would have been a very savvy pick Trump that 628 00:34:24,960 --> 00:34:26,759 Speaker 1: you know what, let's just double down, go for broke, 629 00:34:26,800 --> 00:34:29,840 Speaker 1: and I think it's backfight and all this weird stuff. 630 00:34:30,040 --> 00:34:32,640 Speaker 1: What's really interesting the talking point now that the Democrats 631 00:34:32,680 --> 00:34:35,279 Speaker 1: seemingly are tagging really well on Trump and Advance is 632 00:34:35,560 --> 00:34:37,680 Speaker 1: these guys are kind of weird. They want to take 633 00:34:37,719 --> 00:34:40,840 Speaker 1: away abortion rights, They want to give voting rights to 634 00:34:41,120 --> 00:34:44,520 Speaker 1: people who have children, like you said, should be voting 635 00:34:44,520 --> 00:34:46,680 Speaker 1: on the behalf of your kids, like in a college. 636 00:34:47,400 --> 00:34:47,680 Speaker 2: Odd. 637 00:34:48,080 --> 00:34:51,600 Speaker 1: All these weird policies around women's reproductive rights, around family 638 00:34:51,680 --> 00:34:54,440 Speaker 1: rights all a bit odd. And this Project twenty five 639 00:34:54,640 --> 00:34:57,720 Speaker 1: twenty twenty five stuff, which is really kind of batty 640 00:34:58,040 --> 00:35:00,720 Speaker 1: kind of stuff. I think that's now getting the public conscious. 641 00:35:00,960 --> 00:35:05,600 Speaker 2: And Karmala is going really hard on abortion. Biden may 642 00:35:05,640 --> 00:35:07,600 Speaker 2: I don't know if it's because of his Catholicism or whatever, 643 00:35:07,640 --> 00:35:09,759 Speaker 2: but he didn't want to go too hard on it. Yeah, 644 00:35:09,840 --> 00:35:12,440 Speaker 2: she's not afraid to do that. It's probably easier and 645 00:35:12,640 --> 00:35:14,759 Speaker 2: more apt for her to do it as a woman 646 00:35:14,800 --> 00:35:18,800 Speaker 2: as well. Yeah, and its something that's right. Pols terribly 647 00:35:18,800 --> 00:35:20,920 Speaker 2: for the Republicans, doesn't it terribly terribly? 648 00:35:20,960 --> 00:35:21,359 Speaker 3: You see? 649 00:35:21,400 --> 00:35:23,960 Speaker 1: Now, this is the thing around Trump being a great 650 00:35:23,960 --> 00:35:24,520 Speaker 1: election winner. 651 00:35:24,560 --> 00:35:25,719 Speaker 3: He's actually a real big lose. 652 00:35:25,760 --> 00:35:28,320 Speaker 1: He fluked in twenty sixteen, then lost terribly in twenty 653 00:35:28,320 --> 00:35:31,200 Speaker 1: eighteen midterms, lost in twenty twenty, and in twenty twenty two. 654 00:35:31,200 --> 00:35:34,080 Speaker 1: The Republicans got pumped effectively everywhere and all this special 655 00:35:34,160 --> 00:35:37,440 Speaker 1: election since and at top of the ticket of the debate, 656 00:35:37,600 --> 00:35:41,759 Speaker 1: often in special ballots or referenda, has been the question 657 00:35:41,840 --> 00:35:46,080 Speaker 1: of reproductive rights. And even in deep red states like Kansas, 658 00:35:46,680 --> 00:35:50,479 Speaker 1: voters there have said, like, we're not for like sort 659 00:35:50,480 --> 00:35:54,280 Speaker 1: of nineteen forget nineteen fifties, like eighteen hundred style laws 660 00:35:54,320 --> 00:35:55,919 Speaker 1: around reproductive rights for women. 661 00:35:55,960 --> 00:35:59,919 Speaker 3: It's absurd, and so there's no constituency. 662 00:36:00,320 --> 00:36:02,640 Speaker 1: What's happened here is the Republicans have been kind of 663 00:36:02,640 --> 00:36:04,560 Speaker 1: like the dog that called the political car for a 664 00:36:04,600 --> 00:36:09,720 Speaker 1: long time. They've been promising their conservative Bible belt base 665 00:36:09,800 --> 00:36:13,600 Speaker 1: that yeah, yeah, will repeal Roe V. Wade, we'll get 666 00:36:13,680 --> 00:36:15,319 Speaker 1: rid of abortion rights. But they never thought it would 667 00:36:15,320 --> 00:36:16,040 Speaker 1: actually happens. 668 00:36:16,120 --> 00:36:17,800 Speaker 2: Right now, everyone's going. 669 00:36:17,920 --> 00:36:20,640 Speaker 1: And it polls at twenty five percent popularity, So three 670 00:36:20,640 --> 00:36:23,320 Speaker 1: and four people think it's a stupid idea, and rightly 671 00:36:23,360 --> 00:36:24,280 Speaker 1: so it's nuts. 672 00:36:24,360 --> 00:36:27,080 Speaker 2: And this is where the problems have started to emerge 673 00:36:27,480 --> 00:36:30,439 Speaker 2: with Trump and Project twenty twenty five. So Project twenty 674 00:36:30,480 --> 00:36:34,400 Speaker 2: twenty five is this ultra conservative Republican group that is 675 00:36:34,440 --> 00:36:37,239 Speaker 2: actually kind of to the right of Donald Trump. And 676 00:36:37,640 --> 00:36:40,080 Speaker 2: so Trump has actually had to say these guys, I 677 00:36:40,120 --> 00:36:42,400 Speaker 2: think his campaign director actually said, these guys are a 678 00:36:42,400 --> 00:36:45,160 Speaker 2: pain in the ass. They're actually two right wing for 679 00:36:45,239 --> 00:36:45,759 Speaker 2: it in But. 680 00:36:45,760 --> 00:36:49,280 Speaker 1: You know who wrote that platform or Donald Trump's staffers 681 00:36:49,400 --> 00:36:52,840 Speaker 1: right in the first term, and you know who wrote 682 00:36:52,880 --> 00:36:56,680 Speaker 1: the preface to the Project twenty twenty five drum roll 683 00:36:56,800 --> 00:37:00,319 Speaker 1: jd vance. So you can run, but you can't high 684 00:37:00,360 --> 00:37:03,200 Speaker 1: Donald when it comes to Project thirty twenty five, it is. 685 00:37:03,360 --> 00:37:04,160 Speaker 3: It's a problem. 686 00:37:04,320 --> 00:37:06,479 Speaker 1: And so it's interesting that people have been talking about 687 00:37:06,480 --> 00:37:08,800 Speaker 1: twenty twenty five now Project twenty twenty five for a 688 00:37:08,880 --> 00:37:11,080 Speaker 1: couple of years, and it's quite scary and dark. 689 00:37:11,160 --> 00:37:12,720 Speaker 3: It is a real dark view of the world. 690 00:37:13,000 --> 00:37:15,239 Speaker 1: But it's been quite niche and it's now managed to 691 00:37:15,280 --> 00:37:18,280 Speaker 1: make its way into the public consciousness. And the Democrats 692 00:37:18,360 --> 00:37:20,560 Speaker 1: been really trying to find a way to make the 693 00:37:20,600 --> 00:37:23,360 Speaker 1: future democracy central to their campaign. But they've talked a 694 00:37:23,360 --> 00:37:26,120 Speaker 1: lot about Jan six. That's been terrible. It was terrible 695 00:37:26,120 --> 00:37:28,520 Speaker 1: what happened on Jan. Six completely unacceptable, and you know, 696 00:37:28,719 --> 00:37:30,959 Speaker 1: free and fair elections and the peaceful transfer of power 697 00:37:31,080 --> 00:37:35,520 Speaker 1: central to a democracy. But it's backward looking, even though 698 00:37:35,560 --> 00:37:38,839 Speaker 1: I agree it's egregious what happened that day, talking about 699 00:37:38,840 --> 00:37:41,200 Speaker 1: the past elections about the future, and so what twenty 700 00:37:41,239 --> 00:37:43,399 Speaker 1: twenty five is actually look at what these guys want 701 00:37:43,440 --> 00:37:45,759 Speaker 1: to do if they get in. They've got a game 702 00:37:45,800 --> 00:37:47,120 Speaker 1: plan that's quite scary. 703 00:37:46,880 --> 00:37:49,279 Speaker 2: And that's obviously been working for them because the head 704 00:37:49,280 --> 00:37:51,920 Speaker 2: of Project twenty twenty five is basically announced in the 705 00:37:52,000 --> 00:37:54,719 Speaker 2: last couple of days, is just going to follow the lot. 706 00:37:54,840 --> 00:37:56,960 Speaker 2: It's like we're just packing up shop. We're just going 707 00:37:57,040 --> 00:37:59,640 Speaker 2: to disappear, like that of those state, like the Deep 708 00:37:59,640 --> 00:38:02,400 Speaker 2: State or one of those kind of weird spooky stores 709 00:38:02,400 --> 00:38:04,360 Speaker 2: in the Simpsons where they turned around. 710 00:38:05,680 --> 00:38:08,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, look, I think the damage is done on that. 711 00:38:09,160 --> 00:38:13,040 Speaker 1: So they could delete their website, but the documentation will 712 00:38:13,040 --> 00:38:15,919 Speaker 1: live on, and in a way, even just disappearing gives 713 00:38:15,960 --> 00:38:18,320 Speaker 1: it some other added level of mystique or scariness. 714 00:38:18,360 --> 00:38:19,920 Speaker 3: So I think it's in the consciousness. 715 00:38:19,960 --> 00:38:20,160 Speaker 2: Now. 716 00:38:20,960 --> 00:38:23,080 Speaker 1: Trump's quite good at running away from things that he 717 00:38:23,120 --> 00:38:26,160 Speaker 1: wants a distance himself from. But his problem is so 718 00:38:26,320 --> 00:38:29,440 Speaker 1: much of the Republican base rallied around this concept of 719 00:38:29,440 --> 00:38:33,120 Speaker 1: tearing apart of the government, removing people's civil rights, fiddling 720 00:38:33,160 --> 00:38:37,080 Speaker 1: with electoral systems. So I think that's a real, real 721 00:38:37,280 --> 00:38:38,680 Speaker 1: electoral millstone around his neck. 722 00:38:38,760 --> 00:38:40,360 Speaker 2: And we saw that a bit in the midterms in 723 00:38:40,400 --> 00:38:43,160 Speaker 2: twenty twenty two, didn't we When the platform that you 724 00:38:43,239 --> 00:38:45,520 Speaker 2: had to have to get pre selected as a candidate 725 00:38:45,880 --> 00:38:49,840 Speaker 2: by the Trumpian Republican Party was anathema to a platform 726 00:38:49,880 --> 00:38:51,759 Speaker 2: that could get you elected at a general election, So 727 00:38:52,000 --> 00:38:54,320 Speaker 2: people couldn't get people who could win a general election, 728 00:38:54,600 --> 00:38:57,520 Speaker 2: couldn't win the pre selection to run in a general election. 729 00:38:57,640 --> 00:39:00,400 Speaker 3: Correct, suffering from that himself. Correct. 730 00:39:00,400 --> 00:39:02,800 Speaker 1: Then they blew a number of Senate seats and House seats. 731 00:39:03,239 --> 00:39:05,200 Speaker 1: The everyone's talking about there'd be a red wave in 732 00:39:05,280 --> 00:39:07,080 Speaker 1: twenty twenty two because of inflation, etc. 733 00:39:07,360 --> 00:39:10,560 Speaker 3: Didn't happen. Why, quality of candidates too far gone? 734 00:39:10,640 --> 00:39:12,880 Speaker 1: Yeah, they were just really bad candidates in general election, 735 00:39:12,960 --> 00:39:15,400 Speaker 1: because the truth of the matter is, we talk a 736 00:39:15,440 --> 00:39:19,080 Speaker 1: lot about us being polarized, but people still want relatively 737 00:39:19,160 --> 00:39:23,080 Speaker 1: mainstream people to talk about their issues, not about odd 738 00:39:23,120 --> 00:39:25,640 Speaker 1: grievances that are very niche and fringe is just what 739 00:39:25,840 --> 00:39:28,080 Speaker 1: a lot of the MAGA stuff is. It's fringe stuff. 740 00:39:28,120 --> 00:39:31,160 Speaker 2: So Trump has been pulling back and JD. Vance has 741 00:39:31,160 --> 00:39:33,640 Speaker 2: been pulling his head in a bit about stuff that 742 00:39:33,719 --> 00:39:35,320 Speaker 2: he said that was both to the right and to 743 00:39:35,400 --> 00:39:37,839 Speaker 2: the left of Trump. It's this weird, really weird mixed bag. 744 00:39:37,880 --> 00:39:41,319 Speaker 2: But you know, on the abortion issue, for example, you know, 745 00:39:41,400 --> 00:39:43,680 Speaker 2: Trump has said he's not going to ban the abortion pill, 746 00:39:43,719 --> 00:39:46,480 Speaker 2: that a lot is the most common form in the US, 747 00:39:46,640 --> 00:39:49,000 Speaker 2: but Project twenty twenty five wanted to, which is an 748 00:39:49,040 --> 00:39:51,160 Speaker 2: example of why they were far to the right of 749 00:39:51,239 --> 00:39:54,000 Speaker 2: him on what could be a really hot button, bring 750 00:39:54,040 --> 00:39:57,520 Speaker 2: out the vote issue. Let's say Donald Trump does kind 751 00:39:57,560 --> 00:40:00,839 Speaker 2: of continue a pace get rid of Project twenty twenty five. 752 00:40:01,040 --> 00:40:04,640 Speaker 2: He tries to present as a more moderate candidate, which 753 00:40:05,080 --> 00:40:07,640 Speaker 2: I struggled to articulate because it was in the same 754 00:40:07,680 --> 00:40:13,280 Speaker 2: sense as Donald Trump. But he's amazingly charismatic, he's amazingly entertaining. 755 00:40:13,280 --> 00:40:17,200 Speaker 2: He's amazingly good at getting momentum and getting attention. Is Karmela, 756 00:40:17,239 --> 00:40:19,440 Speaker 2: do you reckon at the high watermark? Is this the 757 00:40:19,440 --> 00:40:22,920 Speaker 2: honeymoon the sugar hit? And then it sort of tapers 758 00:40:23,000 --> 00:40:26,080 Speaker 2: down and it's all a question of where it meets 759 00:40:26,120 --> 00:40:28,279 Speaker 2: Trump or how do you think it plays out from 760 00:40:28,320 --> 00:40:28,480 Speaker 2: here on? 761 00:40:28,560 --> 00:40:30,480 Speaker 1: It? Well, it all comes out to swing states, all right, 762 00:40:30,560 --> 00:40:33,000 Speaker 1: And so I think we talked about the Poli Michigan. 763 00:40:33,040 --> 00:40:35,280 Speaker 1: That's interesting because Biden was behind in all the swing 764 00:40:35,320 --> 00:40:37,000 Speaker 1: states after the debate. 765 00:40:37,120 --> 00:40:39,440 Speaker 3: He just called back actually to be in front in 766 00:40:39,600 --> 00:40:40,080 Speaker 3: enough of them. 767 00:40:40,120 --> 00:40:43,400 Speaker 1: So really it's going to come down to Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. 768 00:40:43,560 --> 00:40:45,000 Speaker 2: She's going up to Georgia now as well. 769 00:40:45,040 --> 00:40:48,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, George will be potentially in play because of one 770 00:40:48,640 --> 00:40:50,600 Speaker 1: of the things that had happened over the last four 771 00:40:50,680 --> 00:40:53,960 Speaker 1: years was the softening of support in the vote amongst 772 00:40:53,960 --> 00:40:58,080 Speaker 1: black voters, particularly young black men. So she's called back 773 00:40:58,120 --> 00:40:59,520 Speaker 1: some of that, though not all of us. That will 774 00:40:59,520 --> 00:41:04,239 Speaker 1: bring Georgia with a larger black population. But I think fundamentally, 775 00:41:04,360 --> 00:41:06,040 Speaker 1: I think some of this is going to come down 776 00:41:06,080 --> 00:41:10,640 Speaker 1: to money and organizing, clearly, but also it'll come down 777 00:41:10,680 --> 00:41:13,160 Speaker 1: to is the election about the future. If the election 778 00:41:13,280 --> 00:41:15,400 Speaker 1: is considered to be about the future, then I think 779 00:41:16,320 --> 00:41:19,839 Speaker 1: people will rally around Harris. But if it's becomes a 780 00:41:19,880 --> 00:41:24,560 Speaker 1: referendum on how the Biden predecesdency has gone and whether 781 00:41:24,680 --> 00:41:27,040 Speaker 1: or not if the focus is on that are you 782 00:41:27,120 --> 00:41:29,160 Speaker 1: better off today than you were four years ago, then 783 00:41:29,200 --> 00:41:32,239 Speaker 1: I think then Trump has a chance. But at this 784 00:41:32,360 --> 00:41:36,279 Speaker 1: point it's an even race. I think Harris has had 785 00:41:36,280 --> 00:41:38,959 Speaker 1: a surge that will naturally drop down. The big choice 786 00:41:38,960 --> 00:41:42,760 Speaker 1: for her now is VP, and she's got some interesting choices. 787 00:41:42,840 --> 00:41:45,479 Speaker 3: There's do you go with a balancing option? 788 00:41:45,560 --> 00:41:48,120 Speaker 1: As we talked about an old white guy, right, is 789 00:41:48,160 --> 00:41:50,040 Speaker 1: kind of do you go with the Mark Kelly, who's 790 00:41:50,080 --> 00:41:53,560 Speaker 1: the Arizona Senator, who's a top gun fighter pilot. 791 00:41:53,400 --> 00:41:56,839 Speaker 2: Was going to say, an astronaut's just looking at him. 792 00:41:57,160 --> 00:41:59,280 Speaker 2: He's got the combat jacket yet. 793 00:41:59,000 --> 00:42:02,200 Speaker 1: From a border state, so he understands migration. But then 794 00:42:02,320 --> 00:42:05,279 Speaker 1: people might say, well, does that only highlight the fact 795 00:42:05,320 --> 00:42:12,520 Speaker 1: that as inverted commas, Joe Biden's borders are that Harris 796 00:42:12,600 --> 00:42:14,600 Speaker 1: doesn't have a good record on migration. Do you go 797 00:42:14,680 --> 00:42:18,880 Speaker 1: with someone like Josh Shapiro, who's really charismatic governor of Pennsylvania, 798 00:42:18,960 --> 00:42:22,839 Speaker 1: brilliant having said that he's a Jewish guy, and so. 799 00:42:22,760 --> 00:42:23,200 Speaker 3: There's a view. 800 00:42:23,360 --> 00:42:25,839 Speaker 1: Do you have a minority candidate in a black woman 801 00:42:25,880 --> 00:42:27,520 Speaker 1: at the top of the ticket and a Jewish character, 802 00:42:27,719 --> 00:42:30,040 Speaker 1: a Jewish a leader at the bottom of the ticket. 803 00:42:30,320 --> 00:42:32,319 Speaker 1: What does that then do in Michigan where there's a 804 00:42:32,400 --> 00:42:36,719 Speaker 1: very large Muslim vote there. So it's complex and every 805 00:42:36,800 --> 00:42:40,800 Speaker 1: choice you make there's trade offs. Pete Boudaget is another option. 806 00:42:40,920 --> 00:42:46,760 Speaker 1: He's the Secretary for Transport, brilliant guy, but really probably 807 00:42:46,800 --> 00:42:49,800 Speaker 1: the best communicator in the Democratic Party. But he's also 808 00:42:50,160 --> 00:42:52,840 Speaker 1: openly gay guy. And the question is is America ready 809 00:42:53,440 --> 00:42:57,520 Speaker 1: for I guess a lot of change. He's a black 810 00:42:57,520 --> 00:42:58,879 Speaker 1: woman president and a gay guy. 811 00:42:59,440 --> 00:43:03,239 Speaker 2: Definitely run Pete Bodagig against anyone but Donald Trump. Maybe 812 00:43:03,280 --> 00:43:04,319 Speaker 2: that's right, but when? 813 00:43:04,680 --> 00:43:06,000 Speaker 1: And he's a young guy and he's got time. But 814 00:43:06,040 --> 00:43:08,200 Speaker 1: these are the choices, and all those choices will feed 815 00:43:08,239 --> 00:43:10,040 Speaker 1: into it. You know, if I had to better see 816 00:43:10,160 --> 00:43:13,560 Speaker 1: either Kelly or Shapiro, and you maybe give a Shapiro 817 00:43:13,600 --> 00:43:17,360 Speaker 1: because for Harris to win, she has to carry Pennsylvania. 818 00:43:17,360 --> 00:43:20,120 Speaker 1: If she carries Pennsylvania, Trump's toast pretty much. And so 819 00:43:20,239 --> 00:43:21,160 Speaker 1: Shapiro is very. 820 00:43:21,040 --> 00:43:23,480 Speaker 2: Popular and does the fact that he's Jewish ameliorate her 821 00:43:23,719 --> 00:43:26,280 Speaker 2: hardline stance against Israel. 822 00:43:26,600 --> 00:43:28,279 Speaker 3: Maybe maybe that's right. 823 00:43:28,320 --> 00:43:30,560 Speaker 1: But at the same time, one of the things that 824 00:43:30,600 --> 00:43:33,840 Speaker 1: was a drag for Biden was young voters having been 825 00:43:34,120 --> 00:43:36,600 Speaker 1: very aggrieved about what they were seeing in Gaza, and 826 00:43:36,640 --> 00:43:38,759 Speaker 1: so as a result, you were seeing quite a bit 827 00:43:38,800 --> 00:43:41,120 Speaker 1: of softening in support for Biden. One he's an old 828 00:43:41,160 --> 00:43:43,840 Speaker 1: guy and two, you know, on the campuses, there's a 829 00:43:43,880 --> 00:43:47,239 Speaker 1: lot of support for you know, the Palestinian cause, and 830 00:43:47,280 --> 00:43:52,479 Speaker 1: but particular it's very very large Muslim Arab world diaspora there, 831 00:43:52,560 --> 00:43:56,000 Speaker 1: and they had did there was the writing campaign not 832 00:43:56,320 --> 00:43:57,920 Speaker 1: essentially vote for No. One and that was like one 833 00:43:57,960 --> 00:44:00,080 Speaker 1: hundred thousand people, and you know the vote there is 834 00:44:00,120 --> 00:44:02,880 Speaker 1: only carried by around ten thousand, so they could be 835 00:44:02,960 --> 00:44:03,719 Speaker 1: definitive there. 836 00:44:03,760 --> 00:44:06,600 Speaker 3: So yeah, these things are always and. 837 00:44:06,600 --> 00:44:09,080 Speaker 2: I think more hard young voters have just signed up 838 00:44:09,120 --> 00:44:13,319 Speaker 2: after KRMLO basically picked up the torch. Yeah, registered to vote, 839 00:44:13,320 --> 00:44:17,239 Speaker 2: I should say yeah. Mission Zelinski national Security nerd extraordinaiir 840 00:44:18,120 --> 00:44:25,040 Speaker 2: foreign extraordined air fulbright scholar from Washington, DC, Labor Party insider, 841 00:44:25,600 --> 00:44:29,960 Speaker 2: Labor Party gospel writers outside of these days, a former 842 00:44:30,000 --> 00:44:32,120 Speaker 2: top union official, the power behind the throne at the 843 00:44:32,120 --> 00:44:35,279 Speaker 2: Almighty AWU. Thank you so much for joining us on 844 00:44:35,320 --> 00:44:35,920 Speaker 2: the real story. 845 00:44:36,040 --> 00:44:38,120 Speaker 3: Thanks so much your great opportunity to plug the book. 846 00:44:38,160 --> 00:44:40,560 Speaker 1: Mate, The Sun Will Rise, Available in all bookstores or 847 00:44:40,600 --> 00:44:42,000 Speaker 1: on Amazon or wherever you buy a book. 848 00:44:42,040 --> 00:44:44,600 Speaker 3: Say so much. Joe loves it. He hasn't read it, but. 849 00:44:44,800 --> 00:44:46,240 Speaker 2: Look, couldn't have said it better myself. 850 00:44:46,880 --> 00:44:49,200 Speaker 3: Mate. It's a short read, so be over mercifully quickly. 851 00:44:49,239 --> 00:44:52,239 Speaker 2: If you don't like it. It's so good that I'm 852 00:44:52,280 --> 00:44:53,920 Speaker 2: saying no, do go and get this book. It is 853 00:44:53,960 --> 00:44:58,360 Speaker 2: absolutely fantastic. Speak to cham cheers. As I said, we 854 00:44:58,440 --> 00:45:00,959 Speaker 2: had a super bumper show this this week and we've 855 00:45:01,200 --> 00:45:03,840 Speaker 2: gone right over time. But I do just want to 856 00:45:03,880 --> 00:45:08,120 Speaker 2: get to one question, and that's from Richie Melb. He says, 857 00:45:08,200 --> 00:45:11,960 Speaker 2: is Joe Hildebrand going to comb his hair? No? And 858 00:45:12,000 --> 00:45:14,279 Speaker 2: that's really all we have time for today. Thank you 859 00:45:14,320 --> 00:45:16,160 Speaker 2: so much for listening to the real story. If you 860 00:45:16,320 --> 00:45:18,600 Speaker 2: love what you hear, or even if you just like 861 00:45:18,640 --> 00:45:21,399 Speaker 2: what you hear, it's in the friend zone. Just leave 862 00:45:21,480 --> 00:45:23,120 Speaker 2: us a rating and a review. If you hate what 863 00:45:23,160 --> 00:45:26,200 Speaker 2: you hear, do not tell us soul, Do not put 864 00:45:26,200 --> 00:45:29,239 Speaker 2: it in writing. Take that secret to your grave. If 865 00:45:29,239 --> 00:45:31,400 Speaker 2: you want to reach out to us or ask us 866 00:45:31,400 --> 00:45:34,120 Speaker 2: a question, ask me anything, seriously, that's a good name 867 00:45:34,160 --> 00:45:35,799 Speaker 2: for TV show. Actually, I might just make a note 868 00:45:35,840 --> 00:45:37,600 Speaker 2: of that. You can drop me an email the Real 869 00:45:37,680 --> 00:45:40,800 Speaker 2: Story at Nova podcast dot com dot au, or you 870 00:45:40,840 --> 00:45:43,760 Speaker 2: can just send me a DM on Instagram. My handle 871 00:45:43,840 --> 00:45:47,399 Speaker 2: is at Joe Underscore Hildebrand. And if you can't get 872 00:45:47,520 --> 00:45:49,719 Speaker 2: enough of me, I've got columns of course in the 873 00:45:49,880 --> 00:45:53,640 Speaker 2: Daily Telegraph every Monday and every Saturday until the day 874 00:45:53,800 --> 00:45:55,600 Speaker 2: I die. I'll chat to you next week.