WEBVTT - The Olympic-sized property opportunity 

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. Welcome aboard, everybody. Welcome aboard to an increasingly

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>lively and lucrative I think residential property investment market. And

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we've been saying this for some time that it was improving,

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it was coming and here we go. Lots of reports

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>now you'll see talking about not just the fairly good

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>returns in recent times, but strong prospects across the board.

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Now when you look at it more closely, it's the

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>strongest prospects are actually outside the metropolitan cities of Sydney

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and Melbourne, and it is coming down again perhaps to Perth,

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Adelaide and Brisbane. However, folks, the big market, the market

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that's really got the volume and probably the outlook long

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>term I think, and it's come up on the show

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>regularly is Queensland, specifically Brisbane and the Gold Coast where

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of action happening. And if you

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>listened last week's show and Missa Cavello talking about how

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>investors are now increasingly willing and it's increasingly easy to

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>invest interstate. My guest today is an expert on the

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Queensland market, specifically Brisbane. He's based in Brisbane. I know

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.839
<v Speaker 1>him a long time. It's Sam Price of a Templeton.

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a buyer's advocate in the city. Well, you're doing

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>your own thing for about fifteen years now, aren't you, Sam?

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I have Jan Yes, yep, doing my own thing. Had

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the property management for long time as well, and Tim

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 2>planning before that, but just now it's purely buyas agency

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>in buying throughout Southeast Queensland for mums and dad investors

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>as well as a rocketpaths as well.

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>The reason I mentioned that you're doing at fifteen years

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is that I want investors to know first of all,

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>before we talk about the specific attractions of Queensland and

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>certain issues that are happening there. Should find very interesting folks.

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>You do need to know that hasn't always been so good,

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and there was a patch where Brisbane really had it

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>hard as a property investment market due to floods that

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.839
<v Speaker 1>were quite devastating and spectacular really if you were ever

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 1>in the city after those floods, and similarly another issue

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>was overbuilding. So just cut to the chase. In terms

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>of Queensland as a distinct market. To me, these are

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the distinct risks. There are those risks still in place.

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Has anything changed?

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 2>The flooding is definitely still in place. So as we know,

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 2>we had the big floods in twenty eleven in Brisbane,

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 2>then another one only ten years later in twenty twenty two. Yeah,

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 2>they were devastating in Brisbane. I think having two in

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 2>close succession really taught us a big lesson. And although

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>we can't change the flooding and the weather, of course,

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>what we can do is build to accommodate the flooding.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 2>And so since that time, all the buildings that have

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 2>been done that a flood affected, they've kind of taken

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>that into account. So I think we've learned to live

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>with it now, James. So their values have jumped back

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 2>and people are not as concerned about it these days

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 2>as they were. However, Brismoo City Council has been excellent

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 2>in providing information to buyers. They have a like a

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 2>flood report on every property within Brisbane City Council. They

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>have a flood map as well, so when you're buying,

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>always look at the flood map first of all, then

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 2>look at the flood report and it will tell you

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 2>how the different floods and how many meters of centimeters

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 2>of water when over the property if it wasn't affected

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 2>at all. So that's a staple check that you do

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>forever property.

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Would you say that is a distinct feature of the

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Brisbane market as opposed to see Melbourne.

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure about the flood search in Melbourne, but

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I know for Morton and Ipswich the Brismoo City Council

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 2>flood mapping is excellent. It is quite conservative at the moment,

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 2>like there's a lot of properties that are within the

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 2>realms of being flood affected that I don't think ever

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 2>will be, so there is quite a buffer on it. Yeah,

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 2>but then we're only talking about if twenty percent of

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the not even twenty percent probably z it might be

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>like ten percent of Brisbane.

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So it is a small it is, but it tends

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to be very attractive inner city zones by the river

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and where all the apartment blocks are too. It's worth

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>listeners knowing. I can remember looking at a property in

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Brisbane in the Interpilly area after the floods, first floods

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and a lovely place on a park and then the

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>really state agent said I must buy low Point out

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>where the flood reached here. He put his hand up

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>into the air, you know, about six ft high, speechless.

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll never forget it. So I want to start the

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>show just by putting that on the table separately, that

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there was an overbuilding, apartment over building. What situation at

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the moment.

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Now we're in a start of you know, under supply

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 2>for sure for apartments. I think we're back to ninety

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 2>ninety levels of supply coming on line. So it's all

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 2>that I was supplied the ninety nineties and the two thousand,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 2>since that's been all absorbed now and given the cost

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 2>of construction the last you know, since COVID has been

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:09.119
<v Speaker 2>very high and escalating, it hasn't warranted developers to press

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 2>the trigger on building the quick rise. Since COVID of

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 2>property values, I think they've got to a stage now

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>where it's economic to build units. Like if replacement of

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 2>a two bad, two bathroom unit is in excess of

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, one one point two mil, well, now we've

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 2>reached that point where the market will be happy to

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 2>pay that. And therefore there's a lot of projects in

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the pipeline that can now go ahead, which so currently

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 2>and under supply, everything's selling very quickly. Naturally in these times,

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 2>they do over react sometimes and build too many. But

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 2>given it takes three to five years for these buildings

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 2>to get built, we're not going to see that for

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 2>some time. But there are our pockets in Brisbane where

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, you could potentially see it. And even now

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm guarded about recommending clients buying those areas for the

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>perceived you know, over building that could happen. They could have.

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it could happen. So in terms of investor activity

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in Brisbane, is it across the old dwellings or is

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>there still a specific action in houses? Are they still

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>within a price range for investors to get access.

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think a lot of there's two types in

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the vests. One is the one that wants to buy

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 2>in Brisbane okay, and then there's for their own reasons

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 2>and the you know they might live in Brisbane. A

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of people tend to buy where they live. Then

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 2>you've got a lot of investors that deal with properly

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 2>like a commodity, and they'll buy anywhere in Australia. They

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 2>won't need the property and so forth, and those people

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of hunt around. They might be looking in Tansbula,

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Mackay or Melbourne or Sydney or Perth and so forth.

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 2>But for the ones that are buying in Brisbane, it's

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 2>more difficult. If the average buyer Australia wide buying the

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 2>commodity product is really it's between five and seven hundred thousand,

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 2>then if you apply that to Brisbane, stock is a

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 2>bit tight. So you're looking at an inner or middle

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 2>ring unit for that sort of money. And if we're

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 2>looking for a house, we're having a look outside of

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.679
<v Speaker 2>Brisboo City Council into like Ipswich or Morton in areas

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 2>like that. So yeah, there is a sweet spot in

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Brisbane for buying investment properties. I believe James which is

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>not a house for five to seven hundred thousand. It's

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 2>more a middle ring suburb house and land. But for

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>that now you're paying like one point two one point three.

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>But for that it's a six hundred square meter block.

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 2>It's got a postal house on it, so built after

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 2>nineteen forty six, which allows you to knock it down

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 2>in the future. It's eight to ten kilometers from the city.

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 2>It could be north, it could be south, it could

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 2>be an area like Stafford heights, Kepera Michellton on the

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 2>north side, or Macravad's Holland Park SoRs it on the

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>south and that has lent themselves to a high land

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>component of seventy percent of the value at least is

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 2>in the land, good rent for return. We can knock

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>it down in the future and rebuild, which is starting

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>to happen, or we can renovate it, put on a

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>deck and so forth. So that's kind of a sweet

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 2>spot for house any right.

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Tell me compared to when you started in interest and

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>activity in Greater Brisbane Compared to when you started.

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 2>It's definitely picked up a lot of recent times. The

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>last few years. It's more ouner occupiers that I'm seeing

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>at open homes. The investors are still a little bit

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 2>light on. I think the ones following the online social

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 2>media buyas agents are flocking to the different areas throughout Australia.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 2>So the ones I'm seeing at the opens primarily owner

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>occupiers and then probably local investors or people buying from

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 2>into state that have plans to move up here on

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 2>the short term or the long term.

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, tell me, just for our listeners who would be

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>considered who don't live in Brisbane, but would like to

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>consider it and knowing that the fundamentals are so good,

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and knowing that the city has outpeaced the other two,

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the other the larger cities Sydney and midd some time,

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and that the forecasts that have just come out this

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>week from SQM suggested that would continue. Knowing that what

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>are the districts? Do you think investors should start looking

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in this city? You'd have to give us the entire

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>post codelistic because it would take it away. But tell

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>me just the years where you see there's particularly you know,

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>good prospects.

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like for it's probably two one is the

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>investment unit market, so that's sub a million dollars. So

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 2>lately there's been good ones on the five K fringe

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 2>of the city. For seven hundred to tw eighte hundred thousand,

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 2>that's what you're paying for a solid walk up unit

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 2>that's had some work done, it's got low body corporates,

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 2>it's got a good sinking fun there's no lift, there's

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 2>no pearl. It's a smaller complex of six to ten,

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 2>six to fifteen. There's a sweet spot and they're kind

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>of the five K ring from the CBD. Then you've

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 2>got and that can be north to south as well.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 2>And then you've got the Middle Ring suburb by I mentioned,

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 2>which is really it's over a mill now. It used

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>to be like cheaper like everything, but now it's one

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 2>two to one three for that eight to ten k house.

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 2>So they're probably the two sweet spots. There's also in

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the city units. We bought one the other day at

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 2>Kelvin Grove which is near Victoria Park where the Olympic

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Stadium is, and that was six ninety. It was a

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 2>one better but in a small complex of eleven good

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 2>rent return, good capital growth. Given its proximity to the

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Olympic Stadium as well, it was like three.

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Clicks something I really do want to pick up. We're

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>going to take a break, but we've going to talk

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>next about I suppose the big issue, the big theme

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>for Brisbane property folks over the next decade, it's the Olympics,

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 1>quite simply, and it's going to If Sydney in two

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand is anything to go by, we really have something

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. We'd be back in a moment. Hello,

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the Australians Money Puzzled podcast. I'm talking

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to Sam Price of Templeton Property Group. He is a

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Brisbane based buyer's advocate and he has been in the

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>market for some time. Sam. It's very easy, I suppose

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for the analyst to pot out a report and say

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Sydney Olympics, or at least Brisbane Olympics are coming. It's

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be a huge thing for the city. We

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>have clear evidence that prior to the Olympics, in the

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>run up there is strong residential property price patterns in

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>many cities. Our nearest comparable city is Sydney, which was

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>just twenty five years ago, the Sydney Olympics two thousand,

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>where Sydney had a tremendous run up to two thousand

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and actually it lasted for a year or two longer,

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>but it then had a real slump because Olympics were over,

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>because there had been an element of prices being pulled forward.

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Tell me your view about Brisbane and what the Olympics

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>might mean to it for investors.

0:11:56.800 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Good question, James. I think Brisbane's very different than Sydney.

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 2>I know, I don't know exactly where Homebush is, but

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 2>I know it's some distance from the CBD. Brisbane is

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 2>very different. Like if you look at Victoria Park, which

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 2>is where the stadium is going to be built. It's

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>literally two kilometers north of the CBD, close and the

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 2>spring Hill swimming Pool where it's going to get rendov

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 2>it's going to get rebuilt is the Aquatic Center that's

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 2>less than two kilometers and it's going to be a

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>flyer from spring Hill to Hurston and it's going to

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 2>be really integrated with the CBD. So this infrastructure they're

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>building is not at a remote part of Brisbane. It's

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 2>actually in the heart of the CBD where it's close

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 2>to the hospital, close to the rail line. It's really

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 2>going to change the dynamics of the city, not just

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 2>for a short term, but will benefit from it from

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 2>for decades after that as well.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So how do you think that would be different then

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for investors? Do you think there is a I mean,

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I put it to you, do you really think Brisbane

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>can escape that particular issue that will be a run

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>up and then they'll hangover if you like, after the Olympics.

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's probably like a good wedding, James, the next

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 2>morning you'll feel a bit tired and you wonder where

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the money went and things like that, and wasn't worth it,

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 2>but so I think there will be a lull after

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 2>it for a little time. There will be a big

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 2>run up which people can capitalize on for the next

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 2>seven years. There may be a little lull when we

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 2>find our feet, but I think we'll find like even

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 2>if we need thirty there's talking that we need thirty

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 2>thousand trades people to help build all this infrastructure. I

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 2>reckon a lot of them will move to Brisbane for

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 2>the work, follow the money, but they end up staying

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 2>here as well. But I think it's going to ramp

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 2>up the population, build up the right infrastructure to set

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 2>up for the future. There might be a little bit

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 2>of a softening after that, but then I think it

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>will just carry on its merry way with these new

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 2>beautiful stadiums for the cricket and the AFL and football,

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 2>and it'll be a great injection into the Brisbane economy

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>that will benefit for many years.

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>We've had a real debate on the show abou whether

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Brisbane's having just a moment in the sun if you like.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The natural order of things is that prices should be

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Sydney first, Melbourne's second, Brisbane third, as it always was

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 1>for who knows how long. Essentially, some people suggest structurally

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that might be different that actually it may never go

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>back to that order. What do you think? I'm asking you,

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>as a buyer's advocate putting that on the table for me.

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd fall off my chair if he says no. But

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you have to say now?

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I do think that I think Brisbane has its place.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it Zebra. Sydney is just magnificent with

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 2>the harbor and so forth the water. Melbourne has its

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 2>character and its history that Brisbane can never compete with either.

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 2>So I think Melbourne will you don't get it sacked

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 2>together over the next decade and will pick up again.

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 2>So it probably it's rightful place. But Brisbane will be

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 2>at that younger brother that's kind of nipping at its heels,

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 2>and that's setting up the infrastructure. And when people come

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 2>up here like they did after COVID and experience just

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the weather even and the opportunities in Brisbane, they like

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 2>what they see and feel. And the number of people

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>that I've helped buy family homes up here and they

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 2>haven't the bird up here with work because they've been

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 2>brought up here for work, but they haven't known a

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of people and they've really done it for their

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 2>family and for their future. So I think it has

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>its place for that for sure.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>The flips out of this, of course, is that the

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>prices have drifted up much higher. Unemployment rate's more or

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>less the same in the two states. For nothing in

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it where was upart of time? The whole thing was,

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got a job in Melbourne, you couldn't

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>get one in Queensland as easily. The flips out of that,

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, is that you're not getting the internal migration

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you used to. Basically, the person is sitting in the

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>suburban bloc and who was ready to retire in the

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>suburbs of the second biggest city they can't move to well,

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>they certainly can't move as easily as they could. I

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>mean that would be a drag on prices, would it not.

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>In the fullness of time.

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 2>It may well, James, Yeah, because the cost of buying

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 2>and selling it is huge at the moment, and that's

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 2>why I think stock levels so low everywhere, because the

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 2>cost of stamp duty and so forth to such that

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 2>we we're not as mobile, readily selling and buying as

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 2>we used to be. I think that well, Melbourne will

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 2>find its feet. I think there's a lot of investors

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 2>buying in Melbourne at the moment, but whether that changes

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the dynamics of some suburbs that there's an influx of

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 2>investors and you know, you're really mak your money without

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>our occupiers. You know, when they come into an area

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 2>or rejuvenate it, that's where you get the real growth.

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>That you need, that heft in numbers to transform the

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>investor Obviously, even though we have an obsurge of investor activity,

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to transform areas in and by themselves.

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good point. Okay, we have some very

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting issues we want to talk to Sam about in

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the next segment. Have some really good questions and have

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>one on social media influencers, which I think you'll find fascinating, folks,

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>because we've been thinking about them as sort of players

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in the share market, but they are emerging as players

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in the property market. We'll tell you all about that

0:16:52.680 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. Hello, Welcome back to The Australian's Money

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Puzzle podcast. I'm James Kirby with Sam Price.

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Sam.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so in fact I was on I was actually

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>speaking at an ASCIC whatever get together conference some time ago,

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and it was all about influencers, influencers that awkward term

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>for social media players who build up a following, invariably

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with very light credentials, if any, in finance, suggesting how

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.719
<v Speaker 1>people can make money easily and fast, often suggesting how

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.959
<v Speaker 1>people can make money without even thinking or taking any risks,

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>and of course that's impossible. But most of the focus

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>has been in the share market, and to be fair,

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>there's good influencers and bad influence. I want to talk

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>about bad ones here. So what surprised me is I

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 1>didn't really, I really didn't realize that the issue is

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>just as alive in property, and only a few days

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>ago it came to light in a very clear way.

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>There has been a burst of you like of social

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>media influencers in the property market suggesting that people like

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>listeners to the show can get around lending limits, for instance,

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>or LVR limits by creating trusts or family trusts or

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>companies and then going to the bank that way, or

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>going to lend us that way. Macquarie Bank surprised everyone

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>by standing in a few days ago and saying forget it,

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>no more of this, no more, We're closing this whole

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>thing down of lending into companies and trusts. So that

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>was hard evidence actually of both the influencers influence. But

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you what do you think of

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that whole story and does it concern you?

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 2>It does Jomes because of what I've learned in life

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>is that sometimes the people that can best sell things

0:18:55.800 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 2>and not the best to be listened to with. I

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 2>tell people they should be, you know, be very careful

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 2>who they take the advice from. When it's a social

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 2>media of course, and I often think that the people

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 2>that are following them can be can sometimes be quite

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 2>easily led into areas where it is more you're risky

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 2>than the otherwise would think. And a lot I know

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the markets buyers agents are putting people

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 2>in throughout Australia. I don't think a long term hule,

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 2>so you do have to treat it like a penny

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 2>stock where you might jump in for a number of years,

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>but then there is a time in the medium term

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 2>you do have to sell to get out. They're not

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>buying Hull forever. I think a property in Brisbane, like

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it was Charlie Munger or Warren Bofthet used

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 2>to say, you want to buy a company or a

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 2>property that you can put in your bottom drawer and

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 2>figet about for ten years and pull it out and

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 2>toust it off and it's in better shape that it

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 2>was when it went in. And I think property in Sydney,

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 2>some parts of Melbourne and Brisbane there's properties definitely like

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 2>that I'd be happy to hold. But some of these

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 2>other areas that are being sell throughout Australia, I'm a

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 2>little bit a bit sus on whether they will be

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 2>that good whole long term that I think you'd have

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 2>to watch it closely and have an exit strategy for it.

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 2>So it's a different type of investment completely.

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you think some of these buyers agents are in

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>legue as such with the influencers.

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 2>A lot of them are the influencers themselves. I think

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 2>James as agents and they're selling their areas. You know,

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 2>they normally have a particular patch where they like and

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 2>they can rent that up and sometimes refer to pump

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 2>and dump where they can actually change the market because

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 2>they are literally are buying twenty to fifty per months,

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 2>so you just have to be aware of that. In

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 2>Brisbane at the moment, it's in these regional areas and

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 2>pockets of Melbourne and towns will and down where they're

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 2>actually changing the whole market with their attention.

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's really interesting. But let's just let's interrogate what

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>mcquarie implied. They didn't like this, right, So what the

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>influencers are seeing, and let's assume the very best case scenario.

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's assume the listener the reader of the influencer actually

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>has a clue and actually does understand to some extent

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>property market, and then they hear something they've never heard before,

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, you can borrow more and you

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>can be more active, and you can be a bigger

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>investor if you'd go and examine family trust structures or

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>company structures, because it gets around the borrowing limits that

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you've probably already reached if you are an active investor.

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>What's wrong with that?

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 2>I've always been told diversification is key, James. So I

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 2>have to pull out all their money into super and

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 2>put into a two properties that they'd be very concerned.

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 2>I think you should have a mix of stock market

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 2>investments and property. It should almost be fifty to fifty

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 2>in the perfect world. So I'd be very concerned about

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>pulling out all my money into super and putting into

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 2>you know on black Oh.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, well, yeah, I'm not even thinking about taking money

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:49.719
<v Speaker 1>out of Super. But obviously this is an issue in

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that area.

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, but I would seek financial advice on that, James,

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 2>be very careful. I look at the costs of maintaining

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>that company structure or trust is very expensive per year.

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>It is you also, if you're buying in trust, the

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 2>ability to inject more money. I know with super you

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 2>have to When people come to me to buy in

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 2>a super fund, they need to get a certain return,

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 2>which means we're often buying it an a an a

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 2>area where we've got a lower land to value ratio.

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 2>We're getting a higher rent.

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>You mean to get a they have to get a

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>higher running yield? Do they?

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a higher yield to how to hus renovations to

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 2>the property are the so all of a sudden, when

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>they want couple of growth and I put them in

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 2>one suburb, now we're looking at yield and something quite

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 2>modern with an on sweat and paint and within ten

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 2>years old, I'm buying in a different area where I

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 2>can't guarantee the couple of growth that I could in

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 2>that other area. So you're being restricted in what you buy.

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>But back to the trust structure you were seeing, it's expensive.

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I imagine the other issue is that there are investors

0:22:54.040 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>who may not realize that basically cut to the chase,

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not worthy enough to use these I mean, if

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they're that expensive, if they were that easy, everyone would

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>have used them. There's reasons, isn't there that people don't

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>use trust structures.

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 2>She might do it if you've you know, for asset protection,

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 2>if you work for yourself and you secure some money

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 2>away and things like that, or ought to avoid land tax.

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 2>You know, they might put each property in a different

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 2>corporate structure to reduce the amalgamation of the land tax.

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 2>But I think that the costs involve the in and outs.

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it's well worth some people considering. I think

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people that are sold on those ideas

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 2>might not have the gun powder to actually, yeah, pull

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 2>it off successfully.

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and of course immediately making it harder for themselves.

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>The hurdle to success is higher because they've put it

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in a trust structure and there's all the fees attached

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to that and other limitations. Okay, very good. Also, now

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to just if you bear with me and

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>stay with us. We have one or two questions from

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Ross or Uss. After listening to the podcast recently, I

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>told I'd send you an idea. Last month I wrote

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>to the Treasure Jim Chalmer's and I can confirm this

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>idea is being considered by his policy team. How about that, folks, Okay,

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>here's the idea negative gearing should only be available for

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>long term rental properties. Yes, indeed, I don't not a

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>bad idea, as negative gearing sort of proposes go in

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.959
<v Speaker 1>terms of trimming it. In terms of restricting it, there was,

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>of course the two sixteen policy from the ALP that

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be restricted only to new properties, but most

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>people don't want to negatively gear new properties, just broadly

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in principle. What do you think of Ross's idea?

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 2>I think it has some merit. I think by the

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 2>sands of that the government is looking at different options

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 2>to tweat negative gearing and capital gains tax down the line,

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 2>So I think it might happen, and that I think

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I can. How would that influence my buying decisions now?

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 2>So i'd know I do in the best I want

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 2>to go and have five or ten little investment properties

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 2>throughout Australia or should we focus on one or two

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 2>outside the family home of quality residential properties that set

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 2>them up for the future. Because there's two different directions there.

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 2>So I tend to think they might cap the number

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 2>of properties you can have. Do we need ten or

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty investment properties each? Given the rental issues at all?

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 2>So I think they definitely will look into that. Whether

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 2>it's the negative gearing or the percentages or the capital

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 2>gains tax, they will. I think it's inevitable.

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, to be honest with personally, I think it's CGT.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>They'll go first, but let's see, Okay. Final question from Grant.

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for the podcast. I love it. Hypothetically speaking,

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>given the current stock market is at all times high,

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>if you basically he says, you know, he's overexposed to shares.

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Shares have been very good. If you were starting again,

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>how would you deploy them money today? This is this

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>never advice, it's information for Grant and all the grants

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Diversification, as you said at the start, Sam,

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is always warranted. And in your world, I imagine people

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>have too much property and that enough non property assets.

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>But for someone who's had a very good run on

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the market, and the market has been very good for

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a few years, I would suggest to that someone that

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>universal type to consider investment property.

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 2>What do you think and I'd agree you would agree

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 2>of course most people. But yeah, as I said, I

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 2>like the fifty to fifty approach. People have a principal place,

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 2>but then when that is well under control, using the

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 2>equity and that property to buy an investment property. I

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 2>do prefer a quality investment property. It still could be

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 2>in inner city unit, but not an apartment of high

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 2>rise it's a particular type of unit, or a townhouse,

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 2>or getting the one as I said, you can put

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 2>in the bottom drawer and keep it for ten or

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 2>twenty years and well it'll be doing wonderfully when you

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 2>pull it out. So I do like quality investment properties

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 2>rather than playing it as a numbers game.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>James, Okay, very good, And of course, I mean the

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>issue for folks is just to state the obvious. The

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>hard part, of course, is using real property residential bricks

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and mortar as diversification is I completely supported. But the

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>hard part is that the high entry costs, it's very

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>hard to you'd love to go and buy six houses

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>in six states or something. If there was six states

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>you'd love to buy. You'd love to diversify your property,

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's very hard to do because it's a big

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 1>ticket item. And as you could hear from Sam's earlier

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the show, the prices he was talking about

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 1>even across the middle suburbs of Brisbane, they are considerable

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>now compared to most people's diversified portfolios. But a point

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>really worth thinking about. Sam Price, Templeton Group in Brisbane.

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Lovely to talk to you, Thanks for coming on the show.

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Jens, thanks for having me. Good to see

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 2>you again.

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Great to have Sam there. I know him a long time.

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>As I say, he's been through the ups and downs

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and now enjoying the ups of the Brisbane market, which

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>looked like they're going to continue for some time. Okay,

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we have the ACIC Commission Alan Kirkland on the show

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>later in the week. If you want to ask him anything.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>He's in charge of all consumer stuff at ACIK. Now

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it's your chance forty eight hours to do it. Until then.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>The money Puzzle at the Australian dot Com dot au

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>is the address talked to you soon