WEBVTT - Sharri | 5 May

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News.

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Sharry Good Evening, Big Show tonight. Liberal politician

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Holly Hughes blasts the Coalition campaign for failing voters and

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 2>she unloads on Angus Taylor.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 3>She'll be on live tonight.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Also on the show, our scoop that the Nine network

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 2>paid a key witness in the Ben Robert Smith case

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred thousand dollars in hush money to stop her

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 2>going public with allegations of misbehavior against Nick mackenzie. This

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>bombshell revelation tonight is the latest in our ongoing reporting

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and we'll have all the fallout from the federal election.

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Minique Ryan has now.

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 2>Retracted her winning Coupyong as final vote counting continues, and

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Adam Bant could lose his seat as the Greens face

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>a well deserved wipe out. All of that coming up,

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>but let's start tonight with the recriminations and fallout from

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 2>the look.

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 3>The result was a shock.

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Not one polling company predicted the size of this win.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Nor any commentators.

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>In fact, the only person in Australia who came close

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>to predicting this shock result was Albin Easy himself. Now

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>he thought he'd win majority government with eighty plus seats

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 2>under his belt, but not even he thought he'd win

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 2>eighty six or eighty seven seats, as Joel Fitzgibbon told

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 2>Chris Kenny earlier.

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Not made Chris, not Peter Dutton and not Anthony ALBERSI.

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 4>I think the Prime Minister has made that point himself.

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 4>No one saw this coming. The U GUP poll looked

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 4>like an outlier to me. Happy to say how I

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 4>was wrong.

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Now Labour holds eighty seven or so seats in the

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 2>coalition thirty nine, although this will change slightly as final

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>votes accounted. Now, the story behind the size of this

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>election win is actually not Albanesi's popularity, because Labour's primary

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 2>vote only picked up by two percent or just under

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 2>from the last election. Thirty four percent of Australian's voted Labor.

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 2>The story is the monumental collapse in support for the coalition.

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>In total, four point six eight million Australians voted Labor

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 2>and four point three two million voted for the coalition.

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 2>So that's primary votes. So it's a Labor primary of

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 2>thirty four point eight percent and a Coalition primary of

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>thirty two point one percent. Now that's a record low

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 2>for the coalition, and of course these numbers will shift

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>a little because votes are still being counted and some

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 2>seats are having a recount, but after preferences, that takes

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the final two party preferred figure for Labor to fifty

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>four point six percent and Liberal forty five point three percent,

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's a swing to Labor of two point six

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 2>percent on a two party preferred basis.

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Columnist and former Labor State director Cameron Milner makes the

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 2>point in his nightly column tonight that there's lots of

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 2>blowhard analysis and over the top age of albow headlines,

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 2>but despite the two pp vote, Labour's primary remains at

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 2>historic lows. It's only the complete collapse in the corresponding

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Liberal primary that delivers the statistical anomaly. And he says

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 2>that Labour won in seats it never even campaigned in

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 2>some that Albin Easy didn't even visit. And I'll speak

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>to him about the reasons behind this when he's on

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 2>the show later this hour.

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 3>But the reasons for the.

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Coalition's collapse that this election aren't difficult to ascertain. I mean,

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 2>it's what we've been speaking about every night. There's the

0:03:56.000 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump factor, there's the Liberals Week campaign, Labour's demonization

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 2>of Dutton and their lies, poor policies from the Liberal

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Front like the work from Home policy, Labour's scare campaign

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>on Medicare and the six hundred billion dollar cost of

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 2>nuclear and more. Now, the Liberal Party's polling by Freshwater

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 2>predicted a whin of sixty four to sixty six seats.

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 2>As I said on Saturday night, they also predicted reducing

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 2>labor to minority government. Now, there's no doubt about it

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 2>that polling was diabolical, It was wrong and it contributed

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 2>to how bad the campaign was because Dutton was driven

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 2>by the polling when deciding which seats to campaign in

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 2>and where to spend money. Just Enterprise set on air

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 2>earlier this evening that this polling played a big factor.

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot that we have to reflect upon as

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 5>the coalition to determine where all our mistakes are. I mean,

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 5>obviously polling was a huge one, following the polling that

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 5>were presented to us without looking at alternative polling as well.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 2>The work from Home policy, even though it was just

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 2>meant for public servants, it was rejected by most families

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 2>who didn't know that Labour said it would apply to everyone,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 2>and most families do incorporate flexible working into their schedules.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 3>They thought they'd all have to go back into the office.

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm told Jane Hume, with the support of Angus Taylor,

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 2>are the ones responsible.

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 3>For that policy.

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 3>I said on air on Budget Night.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 2>That it would be electoral suicide to oppose Labour's tax cut.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Yet that's exactly what the.

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Coalition did the very next day. It was never a

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>good idea. Labour also ran a tough scare campaign against

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 2>the Coalition. It worked, it was effective, Yet the Liberals

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>took a kinder, more honest approach to Labor. Now everything

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>here that we're talking about that other commentators have spoken

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 2>about tonight, it's all pretty obvious.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 3>It's not rocket science.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 2>It's the fundamental basics of politics that the Liberal machine

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 2>should already know. And so the reality is that it's

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the Coalition that has let Australia down because Australians who

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 2>didn't want to vote for Labor and their radical agenda

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 2>felt they had nowhere to turn. Everyone who was involved

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 2>with this coalition campaign at the senior level, from party

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 2>directors to the pollsters, should now explain why they deserved

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 2>to keep their jobs. They should be on notice because

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>this is one of the worst results for the Liberal

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Party in Australian political history. Reduced to just a small

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 2>grouping in the Parliament, it's a humiliating result and the

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Liberals now have no obvious leader. They're firmly in the

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 2>wilderness once again. Dante and Angus Taylor are the two

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>front runners for the leadership at the moment, but neither

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 2>could credibly claw back some forty or so seats in

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 2>just three years, which means most likely this is now

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 2>another a two term proposition for Labor, so six years

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 2>ahead of Labor governing now. When Parliament sits, there will

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 2>undoubtedly be arrogance from the government benches, despite the fact

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 2>that Labour's primary only ticked up by one and a

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>half or so percent. The Albaneze government will view the

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>landslide red wave as a vindication of their radical agenda.

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 2>They'll overreach now, They'll go too far with unpalatable policies

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>that they began in their first term. This shouldn't be

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>the message they take from the election. It wasn't that

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.559
<v Speaker 2>Australians loved their agenda. It was that they couldn't vote

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>for the Coalition, as The West Australians editorial states, today

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>government ministers will now be prone to thoughts of invincibility

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 2>as they dust.

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Off their policy wish lists. The editorial says this.

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Election was ultimately a rude rejection of a woeful opposition. However,

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>this result will confirm in Albanesi's mind that the past

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 2>three years have been brilliant, stable and inclusive and the

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 2>critics of it are one hundred percent wrong.

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, that would be a bad take.

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Labour portrayed Dutton as overly negative, and in response, the

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Coalition campaign tried to soften his image, both through his

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>tone and language.

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 3>Well, isn't it.

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Ironic that Labor painted Dutton as nasty? But in the

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>end he went too soft while Labor ran the tough

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 2>negative campaigns and spoken disparaging terms about.

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Dutton and it worked.

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Of Course, in hindsight, it was a mistake to try

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 2>and soften Dutton's image and soften the messaging because it

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 2>meant softening the attacks against Labor which are necessary in

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 2>election campaigns. And of course this campaign was also a

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 2>matter of timing. Had it been held in November or December,

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 2>the outcome may have been different. The voter sentiment swung

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 2>rapidly as it did in Canada. Now, if you at

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>home voted for Dudden, it's not the case that you

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 2>were wrong to do so. With the exception of the

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Herald and the Age, every national newspaper editorial endorsed him

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 2>above Albanese's left wing agenda and mismanagement of the economy,

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 2>and for all our Jewish viewers, this result was disappointing.

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>It's a government that failed to tackle or even care

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 2>about anti Semitism, and it sacrificed a community for political purposes.

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 3>And I've got to be truthful.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 2>We can only expect further when it comes to hostility

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 2>towards Israel from the Albanese government, because it looks like

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the Greens will have the balance of power in the Senate,

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 2>potentially led by the anti Israel marine Feruki. One silver

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 2>lining is that Green's leader Adam Bandt is struggling to

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>hold onto his seat of Melbourne and there's a recount

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 2>currently underway.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 3>But when Albinizi inevitably.

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Goes too far, as he's prone to do, I can

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>assure you we will hold them to account every step

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 2>of the way. Now the nine board is under pressure

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>to explain what it knew about a secret payment to

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 2>a key witness in their war crimes case. Now, this

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 2>is a major scandal. Nine paid a key witness in

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 2>the Ben Robert Smith defamation case seven hundred thousand dollars

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 2>in hush money to stop from going public with allegations

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 2>of misbehavior against journalist Nick Mackenzie, now Nine's own witness

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 2>in the Robert Smith case. They claimed she was a

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 2>domestic violence victim sent explosive emails to Nine threatening to

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:20.119
<v Speaker 2>tell the court that the media company had unlawfully obtained

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 2>his privileged legal strategy. She said she had an audio

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 2>recording of Mackenzie and other evidence as proof. In response,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 2>sources told me that Nine paid the witness, known as

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Person seventeen, seven hundred thousand dollars under an agreement with

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 2>a confidentiality clause, buying her silence. Now, this payment was

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 2>made not long before Robert Smith's appeal against the network began,

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and it prevented the downing allegations from being raised in

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>public and potentially forming part of the appeal.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 3>The email from this.

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Woman and she'd had an affair with Robert Smith, her

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 2>email was sent to nine executive Tory Maguire an Executive

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Council Lreena Alec in March twenty twenty three. She wrote,

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 2>and I'm quoting, there is a mountain of evidence of

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Nick telling me what these women were supposedly saying prior

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 2>to giving evidence, which does not align with what Emma

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 2>has now said on oath. How do you explain that

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I also know these women were passing on confidential and

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 2>privileged information to Nick as far back as mid to

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 2>late twenty twenty. What are you going to do when

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 2>all of that comes out to the judge? What are

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 2>you going to do when all of that comes out

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 2>to the judge? She wrote that in an email to

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 2>nine executives. She also claimed there'd been a behind the

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>scenes corrupting of the process, and she said in an email,

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 2>if you have to lie and cheat to win, then

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>you shouldn't be playing the game at all. So this

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>witness of Knights claimed in emails to nine that she

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 2>had relevant information to the court, and instead of dealing

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 2>with the allegations, Nine paid this woman hush money. There

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 2>are questions now about whether the information should have been

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 2>brought to the court's attention Now the unfiled statement of

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 2>claim made by Person seventeen also includes the allegation that

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 2>Mackenzie had obtained Robert Smith's privileged legal strategy. Now, this

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 2>was the audio recording that Person seventeen had, along with

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 2>other evidence.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 4>Daniel d let's go yet again, you quote the movies

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 4>such as myself. They came actively.

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 7>Breaking us on his leadership to you respected you lived

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 7>the miss piece, and yet we're not learning about we

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 7>anticipated most of it.

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 8>One or two things.

0:13:58.400 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Now we know every syst in which she's helped.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 7>But the point there isne.

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 6>Told you that weished to say, like you know, we've

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 6>got this and and they're not hostile to year despite

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 6>your worst views.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 4>They're not.

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:11.599
<v Speaker 9>I shouldn't tell you.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 2>I've just preached my ethics in doing that.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 9>Like this is where like this is the leadership position.

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 7>Now if they knew that, impety knew that.

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Now after we broadcast that recording in March nine, then

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 2>demanded that Person seventeen repay the seven hundred thousand dollars

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 2>hush money and even threatened to sue her despite the

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>fact she was their own witness who they claim was.

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 3>A victim of domestic violence.

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, the latter from Nine's legal counsel, Lorena Alec, accused

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Person seventeen without proof of leaking the audio recording to

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Robert Smith and us at Sky. It says, the nine

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Group requests that your client refund the settlement sum in

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 2>full within fourt in days. If payment is not received

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>by Monday, the seventh of April twenty twenty five, the

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 2>nine Group will commence legal proceedings against your client for

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 2>payment of the debt under contract law. Now, Person seventeen

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 2>sent a return legal letter rejecting the allegations Nine made

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 2>and denying that she'd leaked the audio. Now it's not

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 2>just the audio recording that leads Robert Smith in his

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 2>legal team to believe that his privileged legal strategy was

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 2>unlawfully accessed by night. Telstra records showed that his email

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 2>account was accessed one hundred and one times by his wife,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Emma Roberts close friend Danielle Scott. Robert Smith says that

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 2>one email from his lawyer was flagged and read when

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>he opened his email account, and his ex wife, Emma,

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 2>has admitted that she'd allowed her close friend Danielle to

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 2>access his email accounts, but claimed that it was only.

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 3>In relation to their marriage breakdown.

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 2>But it's also emerged that Nine had access to emails

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 2>about Person seventeen. So we know that Ben Roberts Smith's

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 2>emails were accessed in relation to his marriage in relation

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 2>to Person seventeen, and this raises the question whether they

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 2>were also accessed in relation to other areas of the case. Now,

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Ben Roberts Smith has claimed that Nine's lawyers subpoened specific

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 2>documents that they could only have known about with unauthorized

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 2>access of his account, and his attempts to prevent him

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 2>of Roberts from disclosing confidential information failed at the time

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 2>of the trial. However, further examples emerged in court last

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 2>week that Nine was being told in advance about aspects

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 2>of his legal team's strategy. Now, a text message from

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Danielle Scott to Nick McKenzie made it clear that she

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 2>had information about what Ben's lawyers were.

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Planning to do in advance. Here is that text message.

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 2>It says, heads up MAA that stands for Monica Allen,

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 2>who's Ben Robert Smith's lawyer.

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 3>Heads up, Monica Allen.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Is going to write to the CDPP and notify them

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 2>that your tweet is a breach of the Family Law Act.

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 2>They are also going to apply to the Court for

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 2>a restraint preventing any further publications of that nature being made.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>They are also going to make a second further application

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 2>not to disclose any further material to the respondents fairfacts

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 2>from the Family Court. Now, you don't have to understand

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>everything that's in that message, but what you have to

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 2>understand is that that is Danielle Scott tipping off Nick McKenzie.

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 2>The ben Robert Smith's lawyer, Monica Allen, was about to

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 2>write to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions about his tweet.

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Robert Smith's lawyers had sent him an email that included

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 2>this precise information. Danielle followed it up with another text

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>that said always better to be on the front foot,

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 2>I say, and know what they are planning, and then

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 2>she wrote that mackenzie owed her two beers.

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 3>The court heard last week about Robert.

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Smith's serious concerns and mounting evidence that his privileged information

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 2>was unlawfully accessed by nine. Nine's lawyers told the court

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 2>that no such information had been provided. Nine was warned

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 2>about this allegation by Person seventeen in several.

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Emails and legal letters.

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm reporting tonight, and instead of dealing with

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 2>this potential misconduct, they paid her seven hundred thousand dollars

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>in hush money. The payment was made in January twenty

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. The chair of the board now Catherine West,

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 2>was a director at the time the payment was made.

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 2>And today I put questions to the nine board asking

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 2>what they knew about the allegations from Person seventeen, and

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 2>whether there'd been any internal investigation about the issues they raised,

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 2>and why that hush money payment was appropriate.

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.719
<v Speaker 3>Nine have not responded.

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Adding to Nine's arrogance is this comment mackenzie allegedly made

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to Person seventeen. It's included in the unfiled statement of

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>claim when she was concerned whether she could trust Nick McKenzie,

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 2>she says, given he wasn't a member of the Fairfax board,

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 2>McKenzie allegedly said.

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 3>To her, I am Fairfax.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Now this entire matter looks like a financial cover up

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 2>to protect the reputation of one of their top journalists.

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 2>It's concerning conduct given that Ben Roberts Smith appeals was

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 2>about to start, and it's a corporate minefield for the

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 2>media company. Not long after its reckoning over sexual harassment

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 2>and toxic culture. I'm going to be speaking with vindicated

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 2>veteran Heston Russell about this issue shortly, and I will

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 2>continue to investigate this topic because, as I've said before,

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 2>if dirty tricks were used to bring down one of Australia's,

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 2>if not Australia's most decorated soldier, this is a matter

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 2>that's firmly in the public interest. And Heston Russell's coming

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 2>up shortly, but for more on the election on Saturday,

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring it now Tonight's political panel GXO Strategies director

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Bill Shorton's former chief of staff Cameron Milner, and Scott

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Morrison's former advisor Andrew Carswell.

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Great to see you both. Look, this election was a shock.

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 3>We were both on the you were both on the

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 3>show last week.

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 2>None of us predicted this massive majority for alban Easy.

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Cameron's starting with you. You've written a brilliant column tonight.

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I just referred to it earlier in the show. What's

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 2>your main takeaway from this result?

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think as the week went on, everyone realized

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that Albany is going to become Prime minister. It was

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>either going to be a majority or minority, and I

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>think what's happened is that Middle Australia decided they didn't

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>want the Greens, the revolting Greens, to have the balance

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of power, so they plumb for Labor. And the reason

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>why I say that is that Labour only won seats

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in Middle Australia. They were the outer Easter and Sobers,

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the Perth Metro suburbs, some of the ones in Sydney.

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Labor had massive swings against in his own heartland.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Labour's standing to lose five safest seats at this election.

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So Middle Australia, who hate the Greens, don't stand for

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>their politics, didn't want them to balance of power, voted

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for Labor, holding their nose probably while I did it.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 1>But in the end that was enough to get Albo

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the number of seats. But I think that was the

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>big shift at the end because at the end people

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>realized that Dunton wasn't going to get their albow was

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>so might as well have a majority, so at least

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 1>we'd have the Greens in the power, in the center

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of power.

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we can sit here tonight and say Labour's

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>primary was still among historic lows thirty four percent, even

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 2>though the coalitions is truly diabolical, which I'll get to

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 2>that in a minute, But the reality is, with eighty

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 2>six or eighty seven seats, it doesn't matter what their

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 2>primary is. Andrew Albanize is going to take this as

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 2>a mandate to basically do whatever he wants.

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 6>Well, he certainly will shahurry and he'll ignore the pain

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 6>that has been caused in the last three years because

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 6>he wouldn't. He can't see that anymore. It's been kind

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 6>of washed away by this result, So expect the Hebrews

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 6>to come. But on the flip side, I think this

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:33.479
<v Speaker 6>result you've got to get back to the core reasons

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 6>why we saw the result that we did on Saturday night.

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 6>And I think Australians were deeply angry and frustrated with

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 6>the Albanizi government. But that anger and frustration wasn't enough

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 6>to overcome the fact that they had a major hesitation

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 6>with Peter Dutton. I mean, you can't paper over that

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 6>fact that the coalition had a deeply unpopular leader into

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 6>an election. And you know, yes the campaign was terrible,

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 6>Yes the ads were bad and they were late. Yes

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 6>there was a one man wrecking ball named Donald Trump

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 6>that interrupted the campaign. You can lay all those excuses out,

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 6>but you can't paper over the fact that Peter Dutton

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 6>was unpopular as a leader, and I think that really

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 6>weighed on that vote. And Australians were very happy to

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 6>be convinced, given the pain that they'd gone through, But

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 6>by the end of that last week they just weren't convinced.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting because you know, we've been analyzing the campaign,

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 2>but ultimately Labor had framed.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Peter Dutton for most of his career.

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 2>They'd called him I mean, I don't even want to

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>say it on air, but they called him potato head.

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 3>They'd called him Voldemort. You know, they had.

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Framed him as a racist in the nastiest possible way.

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 2>And this is long before he even became opposition leader.

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 2>So Cameron, you know, perhaps it was almost impossible to

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 2>change voter perceptions of him when he already had that

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 2>image in Australian's.

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Except he won the voice campaigns, so he did have

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a win in the midst of this situation. Four months

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>before polling day, he was in the box seat. He'd

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>actually done the job at the demolition on Albanese's recording

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>government on cost of living. He'd done the job, but

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do his policy team to do and I

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>think Angus Taylor is the biggest, biggest person to be

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.719
<v Speaker 1>blame for this. They didn't do the policy work. They

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't have an answer to the problem. So they asked

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the question, which is are you better off for the

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>three years ago and didn't have an answer for the

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>next three years. So they failed the basic politics one

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>oh one on the policy front.

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Andrew, you were working for Scott Morrison ahead

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 2>of the last election three years ago, which was a

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 2>devastating loss in itself, and you know the Coalition was

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 2>reduced to some fifty seven fifty eight seats at the

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 2>time and that was considered a crushing defeat and Scott

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Morrison was blamed.

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 3>For that for being unpopular.

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 2>But now when you think the Liberals sitting on around

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty nine seats, I mean, this has got it now.

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 3>There's no look. Other people have said to me today,

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 3>you could whin.

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, the way election cycles move at the moment,

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 2>things can change so quickly. It's not out of the

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 2>question they could win in three years time. But you'd

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 2>have to say that's extremely unlikely. Almost it is out

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 2>of the question.

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's extremely unlikely and six years will likely be it,

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 6>maybe even nine, who knows. We saw that certainly after

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 6>Rad Gillard Rad. But really, and someone said this the

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 6>other day, the Liberal Party has a lot of soul

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 6>searching to do, but they've got to find their soul first.

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 6>And you can make the argument that the Liberal Party

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 6>has walked away from its core values. It's not Australians

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 6>that have walked away from conservative conservative economic values. It's

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 6>not Australian households that have walked away from classical liberalism

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 6>in the John Howard kind of mindset. It's the Liberal Party.

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 6>They got up and walked away from it. They chose

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 6>to prioritize other things and not the cost of living,

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 6>not building a stronger economy. I can't believe I didn't

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 6>hear the phrase stronger economy or stronger economic growth through

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 6>the entire campaign. I heard little bits on cost of living.

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 6>But it's a misaligned priority and Australian's just just looked

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 6>at it and turned the volume down. Mmm.

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting because Cameron, by the same token, the

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Federal Labor Party isn't what a lot of traditional labor

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 2>supporters say that it used to be.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 3>It's not a centrist party, it's not a reforming party.

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 1>It's a blank bonde. I mean this bloke is middle management.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>He's actually not governing. I mean he's managing day to

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>day issues. Press conference, her press conference there. This bloke

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:45.719
<v Speaker 1>is not a labor prime minister. I mean he might

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>call himself labor, but it's in name only. Sharik and Hawk, Keating,

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Schiff Lee Whitlam, they were labor reformers. This bloke is

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a performer, not a reformer.

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Great line, great line, Cameron. All right, so where to

0:26:58.480 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 3>from here?

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Carswell, who do you think could be the best

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 2>leader of the Liberal Party now?

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Does it even matter? Is it not even worth talking about?

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, whoever steps in is basically a placeholder for six years.

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 6>They won't be the next Liberal prime minister. I guarantee

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 6>you it's a long way to go six years in opposition. Really,

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 6>the job now is to steady the ship and, as

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 6>I've said before, find the soul of the Liberal Party

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 6>and get things back on track and plug in with

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 6>the voters that have just abandoned them, the voters in

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 6>their traditional suburbs that turn their backs on the Liberal

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 6>Party this campaign. So I think it is either the

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 6>three is Angus Susan or you might have a Scott

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 6>Morrison that comes up the middle in Dan teen who knows.

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 6>But I think one, two, three of the combination I

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 6>think would be in safe hands in terms of steadying

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 6>the ship and getting it ready. And then you have

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 6>to think about next generation. It needs to be the

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 6>next generation of leaders that take the Liberal Party into

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 6>the next election and beyond.

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Yet, of course Andrew Hasty has confirmed that is not

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 2>running for the Liberal leadership. He says he's got three

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 2>young children, but it's not the right not yet, not

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the right time for him as well, and that you know,

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 2>this will be a bit of a marathon. Just to end, Cameron,

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 2>all of the polling companies got this wrong, except for

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 2>you gave was closest at the very end.

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 3>But otherwise all of that, yes, yeah, yeah, oh look

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 3>they do.

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And polling is not exact science. And I mean I

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:28.959
<v Speaker 1>don't blame the Pulses because I think the trend was right.

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean they picked that Albanese was leading this campaign.

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>He was going to become Prime minister. As I said

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in the article today, I think Middle Australia just decided

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to vote for certainty, reject Trump and give labor working

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>majority rather than leading the extreme Greens have the whip hand.

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, Cameron Milner Andrew Carswell, great to see you

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>catch up next Monday. All right, let's return to our

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 2>exclusive that trouble is deepening for Nine after our revelations

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 2>at the network paid their own key witness seven hundred

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars. Now after I break this story on the

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Sky News website yesterday afternoon, it has shocked the legal

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 2>and media industry, and despite attempts by Nine to shut

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 2>down reporting of their hash money scandal, it has been

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 2>covered on the front page of the West Australian and

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 2>on seven.

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 10>News tonight reports tonight Nine paid Person seventeen seven hundred

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 10>thousand dollars to stay quiet before this recording was leaked,

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 10>where Nick McKenzie admits, I've just freasing that this is

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 10>where like this is, according to Sky News reporter shar Remarks,

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 10>and Nine now reportedly demanding the huge payment be repaid

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 10>or they would sue Person seventeen again.

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Nine has refused to respond to my questions about this matter.

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Now to discuss joining me our former Special Forces commando

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Heston Russell Heston, you fought in court.

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 3>To clear your name.

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 2>What's your response when you see a scandal like this,

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 2>hush money to keep a recording quiet?

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, what a mess sharer? And for me it's I

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 9>think the last time I spoke with you about sanctimonious

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 9>journalists who get up there and are willing to hold

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 9>the measuring stick to others. Straight away, we had Nick

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 9>Mackenzie double back and say that he hadn't breached his ethics.

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 9>We had nine immediately issue a statement saying they stood

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 9>by and there's been no ethical misconduct here. Where is

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 9>his measuring stick? On these ethics? And how these journalists

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 9>being allowed to conduct these actions in order to throw

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 9>Australia's most decorated soldier under the bus and try and

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 9>scrubb all the rest of it under table. So I

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 9>think the nine board has a lot to answer to

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 9>the Australian public and this question of ethics and how

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 9>journalists like Nick mackenzie, award winning senior journalists all the rest.

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 9>I don't know if you were able to watch some

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 9>of the Arthur Moses cross examination this week in the

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 9>Federal Court where Nick mackenzie for the first time admitted

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 9>that he read the nine Code of Conduct. This is

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 9>what is occurring. We're having these job He said he

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 9>hadn't that he'd never read it before, never had to

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 9>be the first time, sitting in the witness box under

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 9>cross examination the Federal Court was the first time he

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 9>admitted that he'd read the nine Code of Conduct. So

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.719
<v Speaker 9>we have journalists pursuing this story, trying to throw Australia's greatest,

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 9>most decorated soldier under the bus, without any leash, without

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 9>any bridle, and without any assumably ethics to frame what

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 9>they're doing. And this is the result.

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 2>So you just mentioned that that you think the nine

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 2>bod does have questions to answer about this. Why do

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 2>you think that's the case and what would you like

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 2>to hear from them?

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 9>I would just like to know if they were aware

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 9>that all of this is occurring. I mean, there's seven

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 9>hundred thousand dollars that's being paid, there's all these emails

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 9>and exchanges, and instead of the truth being put forward

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 9>in a case that's meant to be about the truth,

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 9>there seems to have been steps taken to silence this

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 9>person and not to face the facts of some of

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 9>the dirty actions that have been taken.

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.959
<v Speaker 3>Just generally speaking. You know, she was Nine's witness.

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 2>They made claims about her that weren't proven in court

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 2>relating to domestic violence, but then they now have threatened

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 2>to sue her.

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 3>What do you think that says to their treatment of

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:05.479
<v Speaker 3>their own witness.

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, Charie nine also brought in witnesses from Afghanistan and

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 9>all the rest to this case. For me, this is

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 9>the pile of dirt we're looking at. I want to

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 9>see how deep this hole is and how far it goes.

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 9>And again this is my issue coming back to.

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 3>What we gain. No suggestions have been made in.

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 9>My personal opinion and hester Russell's personal opinion. I would

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 9>love to see where the rest of this goes.

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 2>There is now mounting evidence that I outlined in some

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 2>detail at the start of the show that maybe not

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 2>everyone might have been able to follow because it is

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 2>quite complicated, But there is mounting evidence that Ben Roberts

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Smith's emails.

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Or parts of them may have been accessed by others.

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, you know, how much of a

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 2>breach of this to have your emails accessed against you

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 2>in a court case?

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, Again, a lot of this goes back to what

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 9>we've spoken about, the fact that this is a civil

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 9>defamation case. If this was a criminal case being brought

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 9>against Ben Roberts Smith for war crimes, how with these

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 9>actions would be Canadi's criminal actions. And these people have

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 9>a lot more to answer to. So I'm so interested

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 9>to see where the line of ethics, the line of

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 9>legal conduct comes into play here. And you just feel.

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Strongly about this because of what happened to you, your

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 2>own personal experience fighting to clear your name.

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 9>Agreed, My personal experience of what I'm seeing now with

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 9>Ben goes to show that there are elements of austral

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 9>and media who are happy to throw the rule book

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 9>of ethics out the window when it comes to trying

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 9>to pursue Australia's most decorated people who went to war

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 9>and fought for this country and fought for these rights

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 9>that were meant to be defending in our.

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Courts well out of time.

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 2>But I just want to remind everyone at home of

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 2>something you said to me when you first came onto

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 2>an interview a year or two ago, and you said

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 2>that fighting.

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 3>The ABC was worse than fighting the terrorists. It was

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 3>so hard for you to have to come up against that.

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 2>It was such an emotional statement when you made it,

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and it's really stuck with me because as journalists we

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 2>do have a huge responsibility and you know, other people's

0:33:58.000 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 2>lives are at stake.

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 9>Thank you very much for joining me, pleasure, Thanks for

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 9>continuing with the Sharry Now still.

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 3>To come, we'll bring you the latest on account in

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 3>Manique Ryan's seat. Adam Bounce too.

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Plus Liberal politician Holly Hughes won't hold back when she

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 2>unloads in the coalition campaign and she'll talk about what

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 2>happened to her in the lead up to this election.

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 3>She's next. Welcome back.

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now is former Liberal Senator Holly Hughes. Now, Holly,

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 2>you have been waiting to do this interviewed.

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to.

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Disrupt the Coalition's campaign? But you do have a lot

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 2>to say about how the Liberal Party treated you.

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Now, viewers love you.

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 2>You are a strong woman, You've got strong values. How

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 2>do you feel like you were treated by the party?

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 11>There is a you know, everyone talks about this problem

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 11>with women, and you know, I've really struggled that I

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 11>hadn't felt that personally. I'd always been really well supported

0:34:57.040 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 11>by men. But I think what was particularly difficult was oh,

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 11>well we've got rid of you, but don't worry, we've

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 11>got another woman. And I think to all women, that's

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 11>really quite offensive. It's, you know, we're not all the same.

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 11>We do bring different skills and talents and merits to

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 11>the roles. And it was quite dismissive in the sense

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 11>sort of you know, well we've got one set of

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 11>overas and now we've got another, so what does it matter?

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 11>And I think that was really demeaning when that was

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 11>the response I was getting from people that you know,

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 11>I should be fine with this because it's another woman.

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 11>And I remember walking out of the pre selection and

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 11>you can, as you can imagine, it was a pretty

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 11>unpleasant experience. And I was walking out with my husband

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 11>and the state director and this I know his name,

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 11>one of the party members literally came and stood right

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 11>in front of me, right at my face and sort

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 11>of almost yelled at me, well, I hope you're going

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 11>to stay on the ticket at number four. And it

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 11>was it was bullying, and it was rude, and it

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 11>was quite intimid and there are I think just too

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 11>many people that think that it is okay to behave

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 11>that way, and that you know they're invincible and are

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 11>able to do whatever and say whatever they want to do.

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 2>So, just to explain what happened, you were dumped from

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.720
<v Speaker 2>a winnable position on the Liberal Party Senate ticket instead

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 2>another woman was put there instead.

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 7>Who was supported by the hard right.

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 3>At the part of your history, your track record, your experience.

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.280
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I had fourteen years on our state executive,

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 11>eight or so years on our federal executive.

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 7>I've worked in every campaign since two thousand and two.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 3>It's behind this who made that? Who do you hold

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 3>responsible for this?

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 12>Well?

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 11>I know Angus Taylor was sending text messages the night

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 11>before encouraging people to vote for Jess Collins rather than me.

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 11>So when colleagues go against each other like that, it

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 11>makes a very unpleasant experience. So you know it, I

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 11>said to Peter Dutton at the time, I thought it

0:36:56.360 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 11>was a maneuva for leadership aspirations in the future by Angus,

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 11>by Angus. And you know, maybe just the one small

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 11>joy I have is I'm still there till June thirty.

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 11>So while we're in the party room to cast the ballot,

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 11>and you.

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 2>Have heard over the past few weeks that there were

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 2>leadership maneuverings going on even during this campaign.

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 11>I got a phone call today from someone who was

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 11>a very senior person within the organization at the federal level,

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:26.919
<v Speaker 11>and they had received a phone call they were saying

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 11>two to three weeks ago encouraging her to get behind

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 11>sporting Angus for leader. So that was two three weeks

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 11>before the election was finished.

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 7>And I was horrified when.

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 11>The numbers were being done someone Taylor, and I didn't

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 11>hear about it at all during the campaign.

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 7>You know, that wasn't something I was privy to.

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 11>I understand other people have now said that they had

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 11>heard certain things, but this was a phone call I

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 11>got today.

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:56.879
<v Speaker 3>So before you know, while Dartin was still leading, while

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 3>he was still traveling.

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 11>While he most senior nomic person, you know, should have

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 11>been doing everything good to fight with alongside Peter Dutton.

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 7>And look, this is what I was told today Augus Taylor.

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Was doing the numbers for.

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 11>Wasn't the point call didn't come from Angus, but it

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 11>came to support Angus.

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 7>And I mean that is.

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 11>I've talked to you since I've lost my pre selection

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 11>till the to the election you know, very much on message,

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 11>stayed within the team. And I am a liberal and

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 11>I'm still very much committed to liberal values. But I

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 11>think the behavior of some of the people in that

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 11>party room is absolutely reprehensible. I don't think they were

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 11>supportive of Peter dunt. I don't think they did the work,

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 11>and I think they were more interested in their own

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 11>future political ambitions and they were.

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Any wedding selection.

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 12>You know.

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 7>I think that shows from the policy vacuum that we saw.

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 3>So do you have a view, just finally before we go,

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 3>who should be the new leader?

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 9>Well?

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 7>I heard today that apparently Angus Taylor and Dan Tee

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 7>and are going to have a ticket together.

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 11>And I got to say, is a party that clearly

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 11>has a problem attracting the votes of women.

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 7>I'm really not sure putting up too.

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 11>Probably a little bit more than middle aged white guys

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 11>who are both known to be in the hard right

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 11>of the party as leaders, are going to say to

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 11>the Australian people, we've learned any lessons at all. I mean,

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 11>I think if you were one of those people that

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 11>was involved in the monkey pod lunches that used to

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 11>occur personally, I think they should probably head back to

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 11>the monkey pod and stay there for a while and

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 11>let some of the other people who want to really

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 11>get back to Liverpool putty values and being able to

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 11>articulate those to the Australian people.

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 3>We were out of time. We're going to go. But

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 3>is there a name you want to mention?

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:38.839
<v Speaker 9>Oh?

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 11>Look, well, Susan Lazy, the only woman who's running. She

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 11>works incredibly hard, she's incredibly smart and I think she

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 11>do a great job.

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 3>There you go, Holly thinks, thanks for much for your time.

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, still to come the Trump effect, how the

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 2>US president has flipped multiple elections on the head at

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Adam Bounds on the verge of losing his seat, plus

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 2>the count in coup youong, that's after this quick break.

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back, right, let's.

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Turn to where Adam Bounce sets up to and Minique

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Grind's too and joining me out with all the intel.

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Daily Telegraph journalist James Willison, Sky news host Joe Hilda

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:15.439
<v Speaker 2>Brand welcome hello.

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 3>And if there's any glading, Joan, I want to know

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 3>about it. No, no gladstage brutal on because I won't go.

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:27.760
<v Speaker 8>I know there's a lot of very.

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going well at least where you know we're

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 3>almost all in black. Yes, all right, so James tell us,

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 3>tell us about Minnie ryan Sea because she said she

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 3>won this. Now she's had to walk that back.

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 13>I think she came out way too early and accepted

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 13>that she had won this. But at this stage look

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 13>the latest count and this was updated from what I

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 13>can see at about eight o'clock, she's ahead of Amelia

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 13>Hammer from the Liberal Party by about nine hundred and

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 13>ninety two votes.

0:40:57.520 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 7>It's come back in.

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 13>Obviously the libs of being helped by postal votes. It's

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 13>the same with Zoe Daniel. She's just in front by

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 13>about ninety five votes in gold Stein. But in fairness,

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 13>when you look at the other TiAl seats, particularly in Sydney,

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 13>and this was part of the Liberal Party's problem. They

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 13>were desperate to win back either Wentworth or mckiller, and

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 13>I think Wringa is going to be too tough. Instead,

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:22.320
<v Speaker 13>all three seats have been dominated by Allegraspender, Zali Stegel

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 13>and doctor Sophie Scomps.

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 3>I think it was the closest was always going to

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 3>be Coo Young and gold Stein, so both of them

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 3>no final outcomes as yet there's a recount, correct, But.

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 13>I think in fairness though with the redistribution, the redistribution

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 13>helped the Liberal Party a lot like it did in

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:41.879
<v Speaker 13>other parts, and it still hasn't got them close enough.

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 13>So Monik ran it's going to be testing. But I

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 13>think from what I can see, she's in front. Yeah,

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 13>by about nine hundred and ninetywo votes.

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 2>That's still only ninety five votes separating Tim Wilson from

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.879
<v Speaker 2>Zoe Daniels. Amazing, all right, Joe update us on at

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>about seat of Melbourne where he's fighting total.

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 8>Yes, that's an interesting it looks I think he's in

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.959
<v Speaker 8>a world of pain. I wouldn't have thought that, maybe

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 8>even just twenty four hours ago. But so the two

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 8>party preferred was at about fifty two forty eight. But

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 8>the AEC has now gone back and is basically recounting

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 8>all those preference flows. So presumably one of the scrutinies

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 8>there has said, hang on, this doesn't this doesn't look.

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Right, or it's probably Adam Boundchi's demanded that recount.

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 8>It might be the Greens to say, you know, no,

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:26.879
<v Speaker 8>we've got to go back and look at this again.

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 8>But the AAC is definitely you think so, because if

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 8>you're winning, why would you demand a recount?

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:33.359
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 8>But anyway, the recount so they now only counted I

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 8>think about two out of forty five polling places. It's

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 8>only on the day votes that they've got up to

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 8>as well, it's about six thousand votes that they've recounted,

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 8>and so far the Labor candidate is ahead by about

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 8>sixty four percent to about thirty five percent. So the

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:56.319
<v Speaker 8>margin is everygrader obviously that is with it just over

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 8>eight percent of the vote counted. However, one of the

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 8>things that was these all votes on the day and

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:03.240
<v Speaker 8>I haven't yet checked the booth by the word.

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 3>But the and that will be you know what, we

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 3>might know tomorrow if not the next day.

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and the pre pot they count very quickly. But

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:12.879
<v Speaker 8>the prepolts and postals have been favoring Labor and that's

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 8>been the problem. So once they start counting those.

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 3>Again, that would be one silver lining. If Adam batt

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 3>loses history against as well, and you know what the

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:29.240
<v Speaker 3>people so yeah, so tell us which Green and Peace

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 3>have lost?

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 13>This is so Max Chandler Matha is gone. The other

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 13>Brisbane MP, Stephen Bates, is it gone as well, and

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 13>huge swings against them. And I think people were smart

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 13>enough to wake up and realize that the Greens were

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 13>one of the big problems for the government and the

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 13>country in this term of government by blocking legislation around housing,

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:49.839
<v Speaker 13>by slowing everything down, and so we may as well

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 13>have in those areas, I think voters, we may as

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 13>well have a labor majority. But also in my view,

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 13>they spent way too much time on the issues in

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 13>the middle eat and I think they were far too

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 13>aggressive in that space. And you saw signs all wrong

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 13>Sydney for you know, with the Greens saying, you know,

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 13>sanctioned Israel, and they ran on that campaign. I don't

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 13>think people bought it.

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I really think they rejected that on the weekend, which

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 3>is one good outcome.

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 2>But Joe, they will still have control of the Senate

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 2>and this is highly concerning because again they will be

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 2>able to make those left wing, radical extremist demands recognition.

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so it's interesting. So the Green's actually increased their

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 8>primary vote over all across the country, but didn't increase

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 8>it where it matters, which tells you how good they

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 8>are at politics, which is to say, absolutely useless. But look,

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 8>it's always a concern having the Greens in the Senate,

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.839
<v Speaker 8>but the Labor Party can work around them. It's tried

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 8>to work around them with the coalition before. Perhaps the

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 8>chasing Coalition would be more prepared to work with the

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 8>Labor Party to sideline the Greens. And there might also

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:48.720
<v Speaker 8>be other I mean, it's interesting to see what happens

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 8>with Jackie Lambi. There may be an extra one Nation

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 8>senator who knows. So there are probably pathways that Labour

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 8>can get around the Greens, and Labor has shown in

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 8>the past that he is prepared to just say few

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 8>to the Greens and not I mean, Labour hasn't computiate.

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 3>How late were you out celebrating with your mate al

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:05.279
<v Speaker 3>Bow Saturday at night.

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 8>It was a very very modest night because I had

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 8>to go back early and get up and do Sunrise

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 8>next morning. But it's fair to say that I did

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 8>see I did see the AM dial in the morning.

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 8>I think there may have been a few celebratory text

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 8>messages and a few selfies that went around late at.

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 7>Night, and a lot of talk about leaders and all that.

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 13>For now, Look, the Liberal Party will not win an

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 13>election again unless they get rid of some of the

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 13>people that were behind this campaign, the people that you

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:30.759
<v Speaker 13>don't even know about.

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 7>And in Sydney there.

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 13>Were seats they tried to buy, and the Labor Party

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.879
<v Speaker 13>like ben Along Paramatta and read the Labor Party has

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 13>smashed them despite the Liberals doing posters, flying in candidates

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 13>and all that, and voters were smart enough like bringing

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:48.800
<v Speaker 13>candidates from other parts into tears. Yeah, well no, but

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 13>the candidates were some of them had been there for

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 13>a year or two years. They weren't locals, whereas the

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:56.919
<v Speaker 13>three local Labor and Peace had really done a great job.

0:45:57.360 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 13>But there's another issue as well, and there's been talk

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:03.879
<v Speaker 13>about the the Brethren, the religious set and obviously look

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 13>no issue in terms of religion, but there was a

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:09.359
<v Speaker 13>lot of volunteers that were there in those areas, yes,

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 13>and I don't think that helped pick.

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 3>That up again, right, James the list joke, Good to

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:16.399
<v Speaker 3>see you right after the break.

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 2>How the Donald Trump factor impacted on the election? Koshergata,

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 2>would you owin me next? Well, let's bring in our

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Sky News contributor, Koshergata. Kosher Donald Trump completely flipped the

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Canadian election, and now he's being blamed for at least

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:36.800
<v Speaker 2>being one factor in coalition's crushing defeat.

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 3>How is he influencing elections? What's his global trend? Now?

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 12>He is definitely a factor. The Trump effect Schariazu and

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:49.240
<v Speaker 12>others have termed it is real, especially as it relates

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.839
<v Speaker 12>to trade policy and tariffs, which just allows one hundred

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 12>days kind of came out of nowhere. We always knew

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 12>he wanted to do it, It came out of nowhere,

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 12>and it does inject a curve ball in the national

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 12>discourse and the framing of the election for sure. However,

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 12>in my opinion, I wouldn't overstate it. I think he's

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 12>becoming a little bit of a fall guy for people

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 12>who have failed in their electoral prospects to point to.

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 12>That's human nature. He does not affect the fundamentals of

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 12>the internal aspects and affairs of other countries, which is

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 12>cost of blimming and immigration and energy policy in the

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 12>culture wars and all of that. So I think there

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 12>is certainly a blueprint on the plus side that he

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 12>has shown about how the right can really take those

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 12>issues by the jugular and win. And there is a

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:29.360
<v Speaker 12>wide open playing field for those that are able and

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:31.320
<v Speaker 12>willing to do that because there is a swath of

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 12>the elector that wants it. However, insofar as the trade

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 12>and tariff issue, that's one thing where he definitely played

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:37.280
<v Speaker 12>a factor.

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:41.439
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting because there was this global movement away from

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:45.800
<v Speaker 2>woke ideology at the time that Trump was elected, but

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 2>now because of the uncertainty and the chaos that he's presented,

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:53.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, it seems that people are sticking with incumbency.

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 3>As you say, at least that's one factor.

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:59.360
<v Speaker 2>So now Albanezy spoke to the US President today, and

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:01.800
<v Speaker 2>then the President has also come out and said that

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 2>there should be one hundred percent tariff on movies made

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 2>outside of the United States.

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 12>Tell us about this, Yeah, so this is another category

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 12>where you Trump has his baseline view of ten percent

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:16.359
<v Speaker 12>terrorists for every industry, every country, and then he has

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 12>sort of carve outs where there's less or more. And

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 12>the movie industry, in particular Hollywood, it is a big

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 12>industry economically, but it also punches above its weight in

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:27.880
<v Speaker 12>terms of the culture and the influence it has on

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 12>the culture. It is no friend of the right or

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 12>of Trump. He's very well aware of that, and they

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 12>sort of have had this carve out or this easy

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 12>pass is how He frames it where they can go

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 12>make movies abroad, get huge taxism status and other benefits

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 12>from that. All those jobs that go into making movies

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:46.320
<v Speaker 12>go to those other countries, and he's just trying to

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:48.880
<v Speaker 12>bring that back home. Hollywood is the epicenter of it

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:50.839
<v Speaker 12>is in the United States, and so by putting these

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 12>tariffs in place, he's trying to incentivize movies to be

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 12>produced and made much more back in the US.

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, finally also wants to reopen Alcatraz.

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Way here tell us about this.

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 12>So Alcatraz, of course, I was actually just in San

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 12>Francisco last week, famous from the mafia era offshore like

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 12>just off the Bay of San Francisco prison cell. It

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 12>doesn't have huge capacity. I think it has something like

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 12>three hundred beds, and it was closed down in the

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 12>sixties because it was mismanaged and not financially viable. He's

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:22.920
<v Speaker 12>talking about or toying with the idea of reopening it.

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:27.399
<v Speaker 12>Certainly it read the US needs extra prison capacity because

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 12>there's a lot of criminality and illegals. But more so

0:49:29.880 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 12>I think it's the symbolic value of that that he

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 12>is the master of. And there's this framing going on

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 12>about how bad the illegals that are being deported and

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 12>detained and deported are or aren't. And I think he's

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 12>looking at that as a backdrop that would help in

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 12>that battle of the framing that's going on right now

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 12>between him and the media.

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 3>M data right, Kushia Dada, thanks so much for your time.

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 2>And I remember years ago being on a ferry in

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:57.080
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco and going past Alcatraz and having a look

0:49:57.080 --> 0:49:58.480
<v Speaker 2>at it. So there you go, it could be a

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 2>reopened way hearing a right. That's all we've got time

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:03.400
<v Speaker 2>for tonight. I'll be back here at eight o'clock tomorrow.

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:06.280
<v Speaker 2>More fall out from the election. There'll be more stories

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 2>about Ben Robert Smith too, so make sure you tune.

0:50:08.360 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 3>In tomorrow at eight. Here's He'll Murray