WEBVTT - Electric incentives...the sequel

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. Welcome aboard. You know, one of the most

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>popular shows we've had so far this year completely surprise me.

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>You might have heard the episode we did on incentives right,

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Electric incentives we call that show, which was all the

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>incentives that are available for you in relation to clean

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>energy wherever you are in your home or in your car,

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was with James Girard. I've had a lot

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of questions after the show, and so we have to

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>have him on again because there's a lot more to

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about. But just before we do, I also want

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>to talk to James about super tax because I've had

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a fe lot of questions about that too. So let's

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>do the two. We'll just get the super tax and

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll just bring people up to speed as too we are,

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and then we will talk about electric incentives the sequel.

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>How are you, James.

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing well. Thank you, James. Good to be on

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the show today.

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Telling me what's the latest on the supertax you're reading.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>It's been dragging on for a while. It was introduced

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 2>to Parliament twelve months ago and it's in the Senate

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 2>and it looks like the Labor is pretty close to

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 2>doing a deal with the Greens in the cross benches,

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 2>so it's likely to come through as legislation in the

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 2>near future.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, because in effect it starts on July one, right,

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in theory it starts on July one, twenty

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. But they're basically what you The period in

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>which the tax supplies for which the revenue is collected

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>begins on July one, which is a couple of weeks away,

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not surprised they're rushing to do a deed.

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the Greens sound like, well, you know, according

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to the papers, one of which is The Australian, and

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I would take it pretty seriously because they're very plugged

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in at that level. The Coalition won't be doing a

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>deal with Labor on this tax, the Greens will, and

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the Greens it would seem shell shock, perhaps from the

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>negative reaction to how they objected to just about everything

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that went into Parliament in the last parliament, seemed to

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>be agreeable towards the bulk of for Jim Chalmers plans.

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So today's reading all the folks is a it's going

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to happen. B it's going to include on realized games. Yes,

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, a whole damn thing is going

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>to happen and all the consequences, which we'll cover as

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we go. And it may not be indexed. The Greens

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>aren't even pushing for that anymore, which is what they

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>were asking for. They were asking for it to be

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>indexed and to be brought down to two million, but

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>none of that might come to pass as we speak

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>this morning. So look a just a couple of quick

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ones on that tax. James, now that you're here, before

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the electric incentives and everything else that

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>came from that first show, asks why is the government

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>constantly thinking about tax Why don't they ever consider some savings? Well,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>just quickly rambish, they don't. Actually, this government has not

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly focused on bringing in new revenue. And the big one,

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the big ticket item, is the super tax. Two point

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>three billion a year is the alleged total which they

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>will raise from this, and that is the reason I

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>think that they have brought in this tax. They haven't

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>actually brought in many other taxes. In fact, they've cut them.

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe think about the personal income tax. I just hot

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>through these pretty quickly, Tom asks, I have a quirky

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>question in regards to this on realized gains. I think

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I know the answer, But could you theoretically go bankrupt

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>for a debt to the ATO on realize gains on

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>realized gains in your super? Okay, Tom asked, Gems, could

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you go bankrupt on the basis of the tax you

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>were hit with? I was thinking about this. I can't

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>see how you could because you'd have three million in super.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Would you tell me?

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's potentially possible. Reading the legislation Division

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 2>two ninety six, tax is levied to the individual, so

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the individual will get a bill from the tax office.

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>And if the individual has no money to pay, if

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the SMSF for the superinnuation account has lumpy assets in

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>it that can't be liquidated for whatever reason, well then

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 2>the tax office is going to go after you, just

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 2>like they would with any other DEBTA, and that could

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 2>progress through to legal action, which could be bankruptcy proceedings.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not a tabloid here, so let's just say, what

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>would you think are the probabilities of that happening? A

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand to one, A million to one.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Look, so you just have to think about the circumstances

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>that could create that event to occur with the bankruptcy.

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 2>So one, there needs to be an asset there or

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 2>a superannuation balance of more than three million dollars, and

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 2>then there needs to be circumstances where that asset can't

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 2>be sold. Most assets in superannuation funds, even if they're

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 2>property based assets, they can be sold at some stage.

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 2>So it'd have to be something quite unique, such as

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>a closed ended investment trust that maybe has like a

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 2>ten or fifteen year term and there's no liquidity or

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 2>redemption windows within that.

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>You had all your three million super in.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 2>It, exactly. Yeah, it'd have to be something quite niche.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of the chances of someone having.

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 2>That it's relatively low. You have to be quite a

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 2>high risk taker to throw more than three million.

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, come on, put a number on it. Give us

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a number, just tell the audience.

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Sure, that's a less than one percent. You'll be talking

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>like one in a thousand and one in ten thousand

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 2>type thing.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'd say it's what a ten thousand door higher.

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I would put it way way higher. But

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Tom, it's a great question. And if we

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>were the type we could get outraged about that, but

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>we only get outraged about things that matter, and we

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>are outraged enough about the super without coming up with

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary arcane theoretical things. There's enough to worry about in

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>practice with this damn stupid, daft ungainly tax that is

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>silly in so many ways, and not because it's on

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the three million mark, but because of the nature of

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the exercise and the technique of which they are taxing. Okay,

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that will do on the super tax, James,

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>because there's so much we wanted to talk about with

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the electric incentives, and there's such demand public demand out

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>there from our listeners. Would you, just before we get

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>into the questions, briefly explain once more what you said

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in the first show about what's available to you, for instance,

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>as a homeowner and briefly what's available to you as

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a car owner in terms of the incentives available out

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>there for anyone in Australia anywhere at any level to

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>basically go clean energy.

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Sure thing. So for the home at the moment, the

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 2>government does subsidize the cost of solar systems to be installed.

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a few thousand dollars there are state incentives as well,

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 2>but as one of the election promises, Labor came out

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 2>and said, we'll add thirty percent extra reduction in the

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 2>cost of these solar systems, which is quite significant. And

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 2>when you stack the state government and the federal government rebates,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of cases it can halve the cost

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 2>of the system. And so I should clarify we're talking

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 2>about home batteries. I'm saying they're issuing that new thirty

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 2>percent rebate.

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>You made the point that more than three homes I

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>think had solar but only one in only a fraction

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of those homes had batteries, which is what would really

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>make the whole thing come to that.

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 2>That's correct, Yeah, and that comes down to I think

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>when most people crunch the Excel spread sheet, they see

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>that the payback period is usually a give or take,

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>but about five years for a rooftop solar system, but

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 2>the battery can be closer to ten years for that

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>financial payback period. And as such, more people have the

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>solar panels, but they don't have the home battery. Although

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 2>in conversations over barbecues, a lot of people want to

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 2>get the home batteries, but they're waiting for the technology

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>to catch up and get to that point where that

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>the costs come down and the payback period is lesser.

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>So federal government labor have promised to thirty percent reduction

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 2>in the cost of the home batteries. And that's a

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>great thing. Now, So when I requnch the numbers, when

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 2>you add this new rebate there, it gets more compelling.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 2>It's not amazing, but it's more compelling to put the

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 2>home battery in. So I'm assuming that battery installers are

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 2>going to be run off their feet later this year

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 2>as this thing starts.

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Boom business, I know, the boom business created by the

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>targeted incentives of the Albanese administration. Oh key, and those

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the barbecue conversations are over gas barbecues or even collar

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>cues either sort of barbecues. I'm not sure. I don't know.

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm hopeless on anything robotely technical. Okay, now very briefly too.

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>On the electric car. What was the incentive available on

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>electric cars that our listeners may not know.

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>The history is that there's always been a scene callednovated

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 2>leasing where you can salary package vehicles and the way

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 2>that it works is that you use part of your

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 2>pre tax income part of your post tax income, and

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>it's usually a fifty to fifty split to be able

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 2>to fund a motor vehicle as part of your work package.

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 2>And you do it part pre tax, part post tax,

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 2>so basically you don't pay fringe benefits tax. Now, a

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 2>couple of years ago, the federal government said that if

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 2>you purchase an electric vehicle, you don't have to worry

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 2>about this pre tax post tax thing will allow you

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 2>to use.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>You lease an electric vehicle.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>You lease an electric vehicle, yeah, and at the end

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 2>you do have the option to buy the electric vehicle.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>So although the word is least, for all intents and purposes,

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 2>it's your vehicle. You take ownership of it, you wash it,

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 2>you look after it, and then at the end it's

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 2>either sold and if there's any difference on the least contract,

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 2>you have to pay that out or you get cash

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 2>back if the lease residual is less than the payment

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 2>amount that you get for the car. So there's always

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 2>been in place, and the federal government said that we

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 2>want more electric vehicles on the road. So if you

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 2>buy a brand new electric vehicle through this novated leasing scheme,

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to use any of your post tax income.

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 2>You can use one hundred percent of your pre tax

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 2>income to fund the vehicle. And now this is one

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 2>of the best tax breaks going around for high income

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 2>earners using their pre tax income to fund not just

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 2>the financing cost, but the ongoing operational cost of a

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 2>motor vehicle as well. So that's why it's costed the

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 2>government so much money over the past few years since

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 2>this scheme has started.

0:10:53.800 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Terrific So very simply Patrick, cars find a half deductible

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>against your income. But electric cars are one hundred percent

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>if you use an ovated lease standard least package. Yeah,

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's why those that area is booming really interesting

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and explains to some degree the sudden appearance of electric

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>youth all over the place. They are still youths, but

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not as noisy. They seem to be cleaner too,

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, I don't know why. All right, Okay,

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got some great questions from our listeners. We'll take

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a short break and we'll be back. Hello, Welcome back

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>to The Australian's Money Puzzle. James Kirby here with James Gerard. James,

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>can you see the questions? I'll read the first one

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>with David says on that electric car leasing, at the

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>end of the lease, do I hand the old clapped

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>out one back and list a new one who carries

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the cost of the policy issue use the electric cars

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to not appear to have much value. This is a

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>great question, David, and it's why I did say. I

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>have said regularly on the show, you're going to get

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>an electric car, release it because in five years, I

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>mean the technology change in five years and electric cars,

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the five year old electric car is going to look

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>like an antique I reckon in five years time. You

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>think about what's happened in the last couple of years,

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the charging, for instance, the rapid charging, etc. But so

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the first part is does he hand it back or

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>lease a new one? That's up to him, isn't it really?

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 2>It is when you take out these electric car novated leases,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 2>you get to choose how long, so one year up

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to five years are the typical timeframes, and also how

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 2>much of that lease do you want left at the end,

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 2>and that will then dictate whether you pay more or

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 2>less on a monthly basis for that novated lease. A

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 2>really important point that I'd make is that electric vehicles

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 2>no longer cost one hundred thousand dollars like they did

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.719
<v Speaker 2>ten years ago. You can now pick up these Chinese

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>built evs that have been imported in en Mass for

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 2>thirty five thousand dollars on road, and even if that

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 2>thing depreciates more than fifty percent over a couple of years,

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:16.239
<v Speaker 2>it's still someone a compelling proposition compared to the equivalent

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 2>internal combustion engine vehicle where you're having to fill up

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 2>petrol or diesel.

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but would you say that it's better to li

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>sur by?

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 2>The Novata lesne works fantastically, that's game the ability to

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 2>use your pre tax income that there's nothing else like

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 2>it that can provide a similar benefit for the average

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>mum and dad worker.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and fact a few years ago I remember looking,

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but there was very little to choose from at that

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>time on novas a least, it's very little. There was

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's and then there was one or two odd pod

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>cars that you never heard of, And now I see

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>there as an entire menu of them. Okay, thank you, David.

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Great question. Okay you want to read it?

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 2>One from Chris, Yes, Chris, as I had a follow

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 2>up question on the topic of batteries. If I were

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 2>to use this battery to charge my com which I

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 2>primarily use for business purposes, and to power my home office,

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 2>internet lights, computers, et cetera. Can I claim the purchase

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 2>of that battery as a tax right off? I'm answering

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 2>that you are. I don't know the answer. What I

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 2>would say is that anything that we discuss on this

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>show is general information. It's not advised. Go see an accountant, Chris,

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 2>go see an accountant. But my view would be that yes,

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 2>it would be tax deductible because it's linked to your

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 2>ability to generate accessible income, which you're doing working from home.

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 2>So just like you would claim the other things that

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 2>you'd mentioned, you're be able to claim the battery as well.

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think the answer that the answer to your

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>question there would be, Chris, it may be right. That's

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>what we would legally say that to cover ourselves. Legally,

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>we would say it maybe, and obviously our comment on

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it would be it should be right. Partrick, does this

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>set up by that? I presume he means going electric

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>solar allow the property to go off grid or do

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you need to retain an on grid connection. I note

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that in bad weather, the solar generation can be very

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>low and question whether or not battery storage would be

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>sufficient to keep the property powered. Super question cuts to

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the whole debate really about alternative energy

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and clean energy, whether it can sustain obviously at an

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>industrial level, you know, can it do baseload And you

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>can read ten thousand stories on that if you want to.

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of the particular issue, do you know,

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>James or would have you any idea what the consensus

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is on that one?

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 2>I do. I've covered this once or twice in the

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Work section of the Australian breaking down the financials of it.

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 2>So let me spit some facts to Patrick. So the

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 2>average household uses between fifteen to twenty kilo what hours

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 2>of electricity on a daily basis, and these time battery

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 2>systems the capacity is anywhere from five killer what for

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 2>a smaller one up to fifteen killer what hour for

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>a larger system. So on that basic mass, it's going

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to last you like half a day to a day

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 2>on battery only if there's a blackout, So it's not

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>going to last you very long at all. But one

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>thing which we didn't cover too much in our last

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>episode where we looked at solar and battery systems was

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the ability which is not really there right now, but

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 2>it is coming in it's testing. At the moment. Technology

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>and adaptivity is occurring with regards to being able to

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 2>plug your car into the home and power your home

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>from the car, so it's called by directional charge in,

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and some car manufacturers such as Kia and MG they

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 2>have the hardware in the cars to allow that, so

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 2>you can plug the charger in from the home to

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the car and you can send the power from the

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 2>car to the house. But some manufacturers like Tesla, they're

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 2>not there yet. They're promising to provide that technology sometime

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 2>this year, but it's not there at the moment. So

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 2>that is an alternative to get in a home battery

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 2>that that big battery just plumked onto the side of

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 2>your house. You can actually get away from that. And

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 2>if you wait and just see how this technology adapts,

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>in which one becomes a predominant way into the future,

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 2>it might be better to just wait a bit and

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>then maybe buy anyv if that's on the cards, or

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 2>use your existing EV to charge at your home and

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 2>then you don't have to spend eight to twelve thousand

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 2>dollars on a home battery.

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So the car overnight can power the house. I'm not

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>awfully careful here now because I have such a robbery

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>grasp of all this. There's a battery of the car.

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, there's a battery, big battery of the car.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, battery of the car. I'm confident of that battery.

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>What it has is so powerful and has capacity on

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>used in your driving of the car that you could

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>power your house. Has it got that sort of capacity

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in a feasible way to do a full home It does.

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 2>When you look at the home battery system, they're quite large,

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 2>insulated big things, and the batteries in the car you

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 2>don't really see them under the floor, so you assume

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 2>that they're not that large. But actually the capacity of

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>the batteries in the electric vehicles multiple times bigger than

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>the capacity for the home battery systems. I'm not exactly

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 2>sure why, but that's the case. So my electric vehicle

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 2>has a seventy kilo what hour battery capacity, and going

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 2>back to the commonly installed home battery systems that you

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 2>plunk on the side of the house, there between five

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 2>to fifteen, So we can see the really big difference there,

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's not just powering your home from your electric vehicle.

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 2>There's another thing called vehicle to grid and what that

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 2>would do is you can actually send the electricity from

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.959
<v Speaker 2>your car's battery or ev battery back to the grid

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>at times when it's needed, maybe at night times, and

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 2>generate a bit of revenue that way. So that's still

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 2>in the trial phase in Australia.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to try and keep on the main frame here,

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>which is you're saying that we're at a sort of

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a junction in this evolution of electric and battery power

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in the suburban home and car, where it would seem

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>just now, it might in the future be that the

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>house battery goes both ways into the car, or it

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>might be that the car goes both ways into the home.

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? And one could we don't know just

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>now which way it will go.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Yeah, okay, I see that's really interesting, and it

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of changes the economics of the leasing of the car.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it adds to the attraction if it's the

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>case that the car becomes the sort of the engine room,

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>if you like. Of all this really interesting, Okay, very good.

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>We will take a short break and we'll be back

0:19:51.480 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. Hello, Welcome back to the Australian's Money

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Puzzle podcast. I'm James Kirby talking to James Gerard at

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Financial Advisor dot com dot au, who is also I

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>might add, a sincere car geek and in recent times

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>has updated himself to the world of electric cars. I

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask. There's a couple of questions also, James

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and John just going to package together now that came

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>from that first show. The first one is it's criticism

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of the show, I suppose, and of the whole scene

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is that it seems like the whole thing is designed

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>for the homeowner with the standard suburban home with a

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>garage and a bit of space for the car, and

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone else's to some extent left out. Is that true?

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 2>It is absolutely true. There's a group of people who

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 2>don't have the ability to be able to put solar

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 2>panels on the roof and home battery systems in and

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 2>they include people who live in apartment blocks they need

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 2>to vote with the other apartment owners to be able

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 2>to make those decisions. And also people that live in

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:19.239
<v Speaker 2>inner city areas where there's no off street parking, so

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 2>they don't have that ability to be able to in

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 2>all the cases buy the electric vehicle because it's hard

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 2>for them to charge it. I've seen on TV people

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 2>that stuck electrical cords and put them over trees and

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 2>over foot paths to try and charge their evs, and

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 2>councils invariably tell them off due to public liability reasons.

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Right dot, Some concerts make an effort, and I assume

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>they will increasingly do so to provide public charges. I mean,

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that there are such council charges out there

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in public areas that are not in private property. Do

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they work? I mean I hear stories that there's cues

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>for them, that they're vandalized, et cetera. Do they work?

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And are there many of them?

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 2>They do so. In my household, it's a ritual every

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Friday night we go to the same Japanese restaurant at Chatswood,

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 2>which is on the upper north shore of Sydney, and

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 2>we try and park in one of two electric vehicle

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 2>spots which have council charges there, and it's really hard

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 2>to get because they're just so popular. It might be

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 2>one in every four trips that we're able to actually

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 2>charge our vehicle on the street using one of these

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 2>council charges, So I'd say availability of the charger is

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 2>an issue. And then another thing which I'd add is

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 2>that if one of the main drivers for you to

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 2>purchase an electric vehicle wasn't just the financials but also

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 2>the environmental benefits, you have to think, how are these

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 2>council electric vehicle charges generating electricity? It's probably coming from

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 2>the grid, which is still predominantly from coal powered fire

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 2>powered electricity generators, which isn't so great for the environment.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>No, though I suppose the person would say, would argue

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that the core component is feeding, is not decreasing, and

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on that basis in the right direction. Is there only protocol?

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>And this is it just like whoever it gets there first?

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Is can you book them?

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 2>You can't book them, But there are apps where you

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 2>can see around your local area which charges are available,

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 2>which ones are being used, and the cost as well.

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 2>And what I've noticed is that if there are say

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 2>two charges side by side, if one of them is

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 2>being used and you come and use the second one,

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 2>you don't get the full speed of the charger. You

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 2>only get fifty percent because the power gets split. So

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 2>for you to get that faster charge in you need

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 2>to be the only one charge in your vehicle there, right.

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I see, Gee, okay, sounds like there's a fair bit

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to go on the civic side of this, And I

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>suppose to some extent that's an issue of scale. If

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you remember the early days of mobile phone, will I

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>get a mobile phone? Well, only so many people have

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>a mobile phone, you know. But then would you get

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a mobile phone today? Well, of course, you can barely

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>live without it. And maybe that we're coming to that,

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>moving towards that inflection point where it's all the economies

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of scale makes sense around around this issue of clean

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>energy and solar power in particular, above the electric cars

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>second hand value good, no good, hopeless, peaceable. It's always

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a question.

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting because I think that the commonly held

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 2>perception is that they're junk. They're worthless after the battery

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 2>runs out. However, looking at the experience of teslas, which

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 2>have been around the longest for electric vehicle manufacturers, there

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 2>still is an aftermarket for them. People are buying them

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 2>ten years old. They're paying tens of thousands of dollars

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 2>for these teslas with wonky batteries because they're just having

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 2>the batteries replaced, and understand that it can be anywhere

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 2>from ten to twenty thousand to replace the battery. But

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 2>you do that and you've got this electric vehicle that

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 2>will last another ten years with very minimal maintenance required.

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 2>And then if we come back to today's electric vehicles,

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 2>which are circup thirty five thousand for the more budget

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 2>orientated ones, again spend ten thousand dollars on it, and

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 2>then after five years you might pick it up for

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 2>fifteen thousand or so. So someone will spend some money,

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 2>so twenty five thousand, and a lot of people won't

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 2>be able to afford the full thirty five thousand. It's

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money, but they might be able to

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 2>afford and scraped by twenty five so there'll definitely be

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 2>enough to market and an industry there where these electric

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 2>vehicles will be old batteries taken out, those batteries recycled,

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 2>new battery put in, and then they'll be sold again.

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 2>So it quite funny to see or because we don't

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 2>see this at the moment, but the used car dealers

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 2>are going to have more electric vehicles being sold rather

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 2>than just internal combustion engine vehicles.

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And if the old car electric car, it's given

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a battery to d to replace the battery it had

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:49.239
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago. Is that battery almost for sure to

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>be a better speedier, charge faster.

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it'll be comparable, but it'll be lighter. It'll probably

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 2>last for longer as well, because the battery technology has

0:25:58.880 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 2>improved over the.

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Take less time to charge this battery.

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it will take less time to charge depending on

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 2>the hardware of the car. If the hardware within the

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 2>car can be upgraded to match the better specs of

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 2>the battery, yes, But if the hardware is stuck ten

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 2>years ago for the car, well then no, you're stuck

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 2>with the charging speeds ten years ago.

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, the ten year old car can take this new

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>battery anyway, can It is optional whether you upgraded. It

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>will work in the old car. The new battery will

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>work in the old car.

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 2>That's correct. Yeah, it will absolutely work. And I was

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 2>speaking to my local mechanic a little while ago when

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 2>he was teasing me saying that I'm going to be

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 2>replaced by AI over the next ten years.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>And he was teasing you that he would be replaced

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>by AI.

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 2>Are you you were saying that I'm going to be

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 2>replaced by AI. So I gave it back to him,

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 2>saying that you're going to be replaced by electric vehicles.

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 2>You're not gonna be able to service cars anymore. And

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 2>he said something really interesting. He said that I've thought

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 2>about this and I can see it coming. I'm seeing

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 2>less cars come into my workshop because more people are

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 2>buying electric vehicles that don't need the heavy servicing that

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 2>traditional cars will have. He said, but there is a

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 2>developing industry where combustion engine vehicles, so to be clear,

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 2>the petrol and diesel engine vehicles are being repurposed into

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 2>electric vehicles. So it feels there's this industry emerging where

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 2>you'll be able to just take your petrol toy camera in,

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 2>leave it there for a day, and then it pops

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 2>out as an electric vehicle a day later.

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I suppose that's probably happening at the top end

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>luxury messids or whatever rolls roys or whatever. You know,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the car is very valuable and collectors will do anything

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep What they spend on them is unbelievable, so

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.719
<v Speaker 1>they would have no qualms at all or spending whatever

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 1>it takes to make that an electric version of what

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>it used to.

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Be or whatever.

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting. Yeah, I don't know about you being replaced

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>by AI and the mechanic either. I don't know, so

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you could be replaced by AI, and the mechanic could

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>be replaced by a robot. We all have our concerns,

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>none of which I think we need worry about too

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>much if we're good, and that's all you have to be,

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>all right now, Carl. The final question for cup, which

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:11.719
<v Speaker 1>is a considerable question hot water heat pumps and solar

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>hot water. We get right into the plumbing here. You

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>discuss solar panels and batteries, which was great, but I

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>was curious about how hot water heat pumps and solar

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>hot water systems fit into the picture. My possibly outdated

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>understanding is that roughly a third of household power goes

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>into heating water, another third into running the fridge, and

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the rest into everything else. So I'm wondering, ay, are

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you generally better off with solar hot water or with

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>electric water heating powered by roofed up solar, and how

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>do the rebates or incentives compare between those options? James Soluers,

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, James.

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 2>So to be clear, Carl is speaking about the thing

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>that you see on some people's roofs where there's this

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 2>big shiny aluminium looking thing with then these solar panel

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 2>looking things that they come off it. That is the

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 2>rooftop solar And I'd always thought that it was a

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>solar panel then heating up the water inside of that

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 2>water tank that's kept on the roof, but it's not

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 2>actually a solar panel. It's actually tubes and the sun

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 2>hits those tubes which has water in it, and it

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 2>heats up the water inside that tube and then sends

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 2>it back into the big canister. And that's how rooftop

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 2>solar works. And that's starkly different to what Carl's mentioning

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 2>with the hot water pump, which I understand to be

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 2>what you're having your laundry that the water tanks or

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 2>underneath your house or outside the side of your house,

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 2>which you can then separately have solar panels installed on

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 2>the roof which can then power the electric pumps inside

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 2>of those water tanks to then heat your electricity. So

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 2>looking at those two things side by side, it depends

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 2>on the state incentives, which varies from state to territory,

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 2>but generally, as a ruler thumb, you get more incentives

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 2>to put solar panels on the roof than you do

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 2>to put the rooftop sol the hot water system in

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.959
<v Speaker 2>and also on an ongoing basis, it tends to be

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 2>more efficiency with the solar panels paired up with the

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 2>heat pumps or the water tank combo compared to the

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 2>rooftop hot water solar. And the reason is that there's

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 2>a thing called boosting, which is thesefto hot water solar

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 2>things they still have electric pumps in them because if

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 2>there's no sun for a couple of days, well then

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 2>you don't have cold showers. So they still need to

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 2>heat the water up at times, and that can be

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 2>variable when that electric pump kicks in, and it could

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 2>be at peak times, which then you have to pay

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 2>more electricity. Whereas if you have solar panels on the roof,

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you can actually time with the settings, decide when you're

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 2>going to heat up your hot water tank that you're

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 2>keeping your laundry or underneath your house. So the operating

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 2>costs of lower as well. So both are great, But

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 2>i'd give the tick of approval or the winner would

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 2>be the solar panels paired with an internal water tank system.

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and the rebeats and incentives.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Similar similar, yes, similar, bit slightly higher for the solar panels.

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, very good, okay, folks. I do hope that really

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>brings you up to speed on this issue. I know everyone,

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>many people are very interested in this issue. I find

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the electric car story amazing, James. I must say, even

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in the period we've been talking about it, how much

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it's changed and how much it's going to change. And

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>if you had said to me even I remember asking.

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:26.959
<v Speaker 1>I remember telling someone that sooner or later they're going

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to have coal mines powered by alternative energy. And I

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>remember this person just laughing, and that's come to pass.

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>If you had said to me three years ago, there

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>will be electric utes and they will be very popular,

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that they'll be one of the biggest selling utes around,

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I would have said, you must be kidding, and guess

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>what the Give someone a good deal and they will

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>move like lightning. I think they what's it called the

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>byd Uts. It's now the one of the biggest selling utes.

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Shark. I believe it is a shark.

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Yes, that's right, that's the one. So there

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you go. You see, it happens very quickly so you've

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>got to keep up to speed. And James Gerard, I

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>must say financial advisor, car geek and what Heart avelergy

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>expert's the ideal guest to have on the show today.

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, James.

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much. And don't forget whiskey collector as well.

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, sometimes we can almost see that we can peep

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>at that whiskey collection when he does across from home.

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, lovely to talk to you. Keep those questions rolling,

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody the money puzzle at the Australian dot com dot au.

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Talk to you soon.