WEBVTT - The Media Show | 2 August

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the Media Show, with Jack outing Hello and

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the Media Show. Tonight, we'll take a look

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>at coverage of the Olympics and an end to damaging

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>strikes at nine plus. Later on we reveal the salary

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>of a key media watch staffer. But first, all eyes

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>are on Paris, with one Australian newsroom forking out hundreds

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>and millions of dollars for broadcast rights. But the event,

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>which is supposed to showcase the best athletes that humanity

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>has to offer, has been marred by scandal after scandal

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>which has dominated news headlines.

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 2>It's the self declared Green Games. But while Paris is

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>being busy spooking its carbon friendly credentials, the push to

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 2>go green has left many athletes seeing red.

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 3>We haven't seen this at Olympic Games before. We haven't

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 3>had this amount of complaints about a village in Olympic history.

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>From hard cardboard beds to running out of meat in

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the athletes village. Parisians are seeking to be more climate friendly,

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and they've shifted the focus from the app athletes to

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>poor conditions. But how much of it is about so

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.839
<v Speaker 1>called sustainability and how much is a bunch of cheap

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>beds and bad food a cost cutting initiative. CNBC reports

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>why the Paris Olympics costs so much less than Rio,

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>London or Tokyo. The chief advantage this time can be

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>summed up in two words. Existing infrastructure. Temporary facilities also

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>played a role in keeping costs down. Now journalists blindly

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>accepting that this was all green initiative are just feeding

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you pr talking points. Having less meat on order might

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>seem green, but it's actually way cheaper when you have

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to mass produce food. Make no mistake though, Those processed

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>plant based burgers are horrendously bad for you. It is

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>texturized goo and not something anyone should be eating.

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Joining me this week on the Panels the Australians Darren

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Davidson and two Double Sea hosts Stephen Senetiero. Well, Darren,

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you.

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean, this.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Whole vegan scandal, this is the one thing that I

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>look at. I just cannot believe that they thought that

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>athletes who are every single calorie, they're counting, every single

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>vitamin that they're watching, they've got very specific diets. What

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>on earth were they thinking?

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, it's a shame that everything's becoming politicized

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 6>at the Olympics. They are, as you pointed out, horrendously

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 6>expensive to host and stage, and they leave cities and

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 6>economies with these big kind of legacy cost issues after

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 6>everyone's pat up and gone home. But really everyone should

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 6>be focusing on the credible, herculean efforts and the amazing

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 6>feats that we're seeing that you'd hope that would be

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 6>the main story. And there's some of these incredible young

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 6>athletes who have been training so hard for many years.

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 6>You know, you would really want the focus to be

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 6>on that, and that's where you know, media companies are

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 6>investing their dollars and big amatizing and sponsors are investing

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 6>their dollars, and I think they would hope as well

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 6>that that's where we're the focus is. It's a shame

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 6>that this has become the story that it has.

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and Stephen, I think a lot of journalists are

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>really allowing some of these propaganda points around climate change

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and green initiatives to bleed into their reporting, because yes,

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>lowering the carbon footprint is one thing, but we know

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of companies do this just to save money,

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:24.559
<v Speaker 1>and we're letting them, letting them give these athletes poor conditions,

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>but we're putting this kind of this air of nobility.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 5>Around it, making it seem like a moral good thing.

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 5>What are your.

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 4>Thoughts, Well, look, I think you're right, but I will

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 4>give Paris one will let off here, and that is

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 4>that nobody else wanted to host these games because they

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 4>are too expensive. So the fact that France and Paris

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 4>have actually picked it up and run with it, I

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 4>suppose it's a good thing. We still get to see

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 4>all the athletes, and we're covering the games on our station,

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 4>so you know, we talk about the sport, but you

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 4>know there's a lot going on around these games that,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 4>as Darren says, is just distracting away from what we

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 4>should talk about. Obviously, there was something recently, that boxing

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 4>issue that has distracted away from what should be all

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 4>about the athletes as well. But look, it's the Olympics.

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 4>It's a bit of a circus. Paris at the best

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 4>of times is a bit of a circus. You put

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 4>those two things together and I think this is what

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 4>you get. But I think you've got to remember that

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 4>the Aussies and this could actually play into our favor

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 4>because the Australian Olympic Committee has actually sent container loads

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 4>of our own food over. They've got taco Tuesdays in

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 4>the Australian village on every Tuesday they've sent over. I

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 4>think something like three four and twenty pis so our

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 4>ossie athletes will be fine.

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think there's going to be a lot of

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>top chefs that are humiliated with the kind of feedback

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>and headlines that are coming out because it's the culinary

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.559
<v Speaker 1>capital of the world. I mean they claim they hold

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>themselves up a very high standard. Jack, I'm Italian. Let's

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>be fair and inc Italy is the culinary capital of

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the world. Yeah, well, you guys love to go head

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to head on that. But look, let's stay on the Olympics,

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but move on to another scandal which has dominated headlines

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and left view is extremely confused and angry.

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 5>Well, this was a moment of history.

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 7>It happened earlier today in France, and a major controversy

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 7>too has now erupted out of Paris. An Algerian boxer

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 7>shown in the red uniform, who failed a gender eligibility

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 7>test last year, has now won an opening fight after

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 7>only forty six seconds, her opponents breaking down in tears,

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 7>calling it quote unjust.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Algerian boxer Amin Khalif, who has male chromosomes, ended the

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>fight in just forty six seconds. Now that reports the

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Khalif is inter six as opposed to transgender, and many

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in the media were scathing at the IOC for allowing

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the fight to go ahead.

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 3>A boxer deemed a biological male beating an Italian female opponent,

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 3>with the Italian crying out, I couldn't take it anymore.

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Despite failing that gender test by the International Boxing Association

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 3>and being banned from an international tournament last year, Algerian

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:03.239
<v Speaker 3>twenty five year old Emman Khalif was okayed by Olympic

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 3>authorities to compete, and apparently today it was a very

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 3>one sided fight with Italian Angela Karini, also twenty five.

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 3>After just forty six seconds and several sharp punches to

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>the head, including the nose by Khalif, Karini abandoned the

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 3>faith well.

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>In response to the media reporting, the Algerian Olympic Committee

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 1>came out swinging. They said, the CoA strongly condemns the

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>unethical targeting and maligning of our steamed athlete Iman Khalif

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>with baseless propaganda from certain foreign media outlets. Now let's

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>bring the panel back into discuss I mean, this is

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>again another scandal that the Olympics did not need to have.

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>They probably should have figured out that there was going

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to be this backlash. It is the when we're talking

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>about men or intersects and the advantage over women in sports.

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>When it's violence, when its actual you know, boxing and

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 1>fists been thrown, that is when the public really just

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>does not tolerated. But now you've got a situation where

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>media outlets Darren have spent hundreds of millions of dollars

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to cover the sports and we're not even really talking

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>about the sports anymore.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. Absolutely, I mean that the investment that media companies

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 6>and sponsors have made is that is huge, and this

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 6>is not where they would like, you know, the focus

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 6>to be. And as we were saying earlier, I'd hope

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 6>that the focus of the stories and what we were celebrating,

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 6>these incredible herculeting efforts and the skill and the professionalism

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 6>and the dedication of the athletes. And you know, Mike

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 6>m I've got two infants, two and a half and

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 6>four and a half, and they are obsessed with the

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 6>NPX like they are totally obsessed. They're memorized by the

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 6>gymnastics and things like that. And for me, my reaction

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 6>when I saw that clip, I mean, it's just absolutely brutal.

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 6>It's really ugly, and it's quite upsetting to see this

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 6>boxer on the on the on the canvas, crying about

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 6>being absolutely pummeled by what looks like may have been

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 6>an uneven fight that maybe shouldn't have happened. I don't

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 6>know details whether that's actually been verified or not.

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the reports are intersex and Stephen, the reports

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>are x y chromosomes, male chromosomes. You can't be a

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>woman and have those chromosomes. That's the main point. Was

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>there an advantage? I mean, to Darren's point, you look

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>at the footage, the force behind the punch, the way

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that this woman was hitting the face, and then her

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>reaction breaking down in tears as her Olympic dream is

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>put to an end by this placement. It to me

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>does not seem fair.

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's a couple of things that need to be clarified.

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 4>Angela Careni actually called the fight off herself. She went

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 4>to her corner and said, I'm not doing this anymore.

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 4>After forty six seconds and two punches. That was all

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 4>it took. Because the reality is that this other boxer

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 4>and look, I'm not blaming the other boxer for this,

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 4>because the International Olympic Committee's got to take full ownership

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 4>and responsibility for what happened to here. But Imman Khalif

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 4>was actually banned from women's competition by the International Boxing

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Asation previously. Now, because the IOC has decided to take

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 4>over boxing and shunt the IBA aside, they've made their

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 4>own rules up and they put somebody in this fight now.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 4>Angela Karini is a two time Italian champion. She's not

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 4>adverse to getting punched in the face, that's what boxers do.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 4>But she said to her corner in that moment, I

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 4>have never been punched that hard before in my life.

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 4>Why because she's fighting against an athlete that has a

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 4>superior advantage because of levels of testosterone and X Y chromosomes.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 4>The reality is she was fighting against somebody that should

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 4>not have been in the same category as her, and

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 4>after forty six seconds said I don't want to borrow

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 4>this anymore. That's what happened here, and the IOC has

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 4>got to take full ownership of this, and of course

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 4>they're skating away saying no, it's all the media's fault.

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Move along, nothing to see here. Well, when it gets

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 4>to boxing, now we saw there's two athletes in the

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Zambian football team who played against the Matildas the other

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 4>day that have previously banned from previous competition but were

0:09:56.360 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 4>allowed to play in the Olympics because of the same issue.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 4>Again sanctioning that. But in this case, we're talking about

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 4>pugilistic sport. We're talking about marshall sports where somebody can

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 4>get physically hurt, and that is where you've got to

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 4>at least draw the line.

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 5>That's the point.

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But staying on the Olympics, the United States has shot

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>up in the gold medal tally, but at the time

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we went to air was still trailing behind China. It

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>might be why US media outlets have flipped the metal

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>tally counting method to count total medals equally as opposed

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to the number of golds.

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 5>The Nightly Reports.

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>The official Olympic website ranks countries on golds rather than totals,

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>but several American outlets, including the country's hosts broadcast to NBC,

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>have opted to rank countries on their total number of medals,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>one which moves the USA team up into first place

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and bring the panel back. Now, Stephen, it doesn't get

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>more American than that. If they're not ahead, let's change

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the metrics by which we're measuring and then go Team USA.

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 4>Look, you know my American patriotism.

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 5>Don't get me wrong.

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 4>I think where I'd like to see it's more like

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 4>that here in Australia. But this is just typical American bs.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look, they call this, but the Baseball over

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 4>is the World Series. Nobody else plays in it. You know,

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 4>whoever wins the NFL that was Super Bowl is the

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 4>world champions. I mean, look, they kid themselves on every

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 4>level in America when it comes to this concept of

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 4>American exceptionalism, and this is just another example.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 5>Look good on them.

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 4>If it's only being done in their own media and

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 4>they can live in their own delusion, so be it, Darren.

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Let's bring you in.

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, I'm sure that mythology will change again

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 6>at some point before the end of the games, and

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 6>one way the other they'll be winning.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 5>But if they're down by total metals, they'll flip. Mexico

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't put it past them.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>We're going to take a quick break, but when we return,

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>find out how much the ABC pays producers to make

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>just fifteen minutes of television a week.

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back.

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>There's been an end to strikes which have plagued nine

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>newsrooms and put a dampener on their expensive newspaper coverage.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Now keeping in mind that a large contingent of these

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>reporters put down tools while on an all expense paid

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>trip to Paris, it's pretty ungrateful stuff. And while staff

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>appraising as a victory, they only received a tiny bump.

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 5>Over three years.

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>The AFI reports nine entertainment journalists and editors and production

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>staff have voted to approve a new enterprise bargaining deal,

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>ending a six month standoff that culminated in postponed events,

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>diminished news coverage, and the first strike at the mastheads

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>since twenty seventeen. Let's bring the panel back in, Darren.

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>It was really really bad timing for Nine management that

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>have been dealing Nine as a broader company has obviously

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>been dealing with a lot of scandals separately to this,

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>but then they've forked out hundreds of millions of dollars

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for the games and staff in Paris have put down

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>tools and just walked away.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 6>Look, to be clear, you know, no one is denying

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 6>the rights of workers to join a new you and

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 6>take industrial action. And obviously I worked for one of

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 6>nine's competitors and this is not an opportunistic swing at

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 6>them in any way whatsoever. But the timing was awful,

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 6>like really bad. I mean it kind of showed to

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 6>come and run at such a time during such a

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 6>big size ofic news event, showed an unwillingness to negotiate

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 6>with management and good faith. But the deal that they

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 6>actually put on the table wasn't that bad. I think

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 6>it was about ten point five percent over three years,

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 6>which is a much better deal than most Australia and.

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Now what they're going up to about eleven and a

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>half percent. They've gone through all of that for about

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>an extra one or two percent, Yeah, over three years.

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 6>And the original claim was or ask was twenty percent,

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 6>which is pretty ambitious in this climate. At the moment,

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 6>CPI running at two to three percent. I mean it's

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 6>it's I feel for the advertisers. They've pointed out earlier,

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 6>they've invested so much money.

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>You're a good managing editor, feeling for the advertisers.

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 6>And the readers as well, though more importantly the readers.

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 6>You know, they're denying them the coverage. They're the exclusive

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 6>rights holder. They've abandoned their readers, They've abandoned their advertisers.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 6>And you know that's not a good thing. Why not

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 6>wait until after the Olympics?

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 3>You know what?

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 6>That have really made any difference?

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a good point, Steven. Let's bring you in here.

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the result obviously was a positive result in

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that they are going to get paid a little bit

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>more money, but not not significantly more money. And they've

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>gone through a lot of pain to do that. They've

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>cost themselves. I think of it as a journalist. I mean,

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what greater honor is there to go over to another

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>country and cover the Olympics? To me, I just I

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>cannot rationalize why you would forego five days of that

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, not cover it as well as you

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly could for one or two percent pay. I can't

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>personally rationalize it.

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 5>What do you think, Well, there's a couple of things here.

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 4>I imagine that they're thinking, was let's do it during

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 4>the Olympics, because we've got them. You know, we've got

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 4>them where we want. We got them, we have to

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 4>actually give us what we want. Other world, Yeah, you know,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 4>so I imagine that's why they picked the timing. But

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 4>I've got a lot of friends who work at nine

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Radio who are over there. We're earning considerably less than

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the people at nine newspapers, and they

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 4>are treating this like the greatest.

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 5>Honor they've ever experienced.

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 4>And they're doing a great job, working ridiculous hours. So

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 4>they must be looking at their colleagues over in the print.

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Ar'm thinking, what are you guys thinking? But I've got

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 4>to the bottom of what it really I reckon They've

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 4>looked at what ABC journals are being paid and thought,

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 4>weang on a sec, what are we doing here?

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, definitely to get onto that in a little bit.

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>But Darren, in terms of it's a really good point

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>about the other parts of nine. Obviously this only impacted

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>nine newspapers, but there does appear to be a cultural rift,

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and we saw that the television side of it. You

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>had Karl Stefanovic was in the hotels, Mike Sneezbee is

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>running around with the torch. There appears to be a

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a class warfare going on in the company,

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and it seems to be really hurting. It's leaking out publicly.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, look, I mean not just for veny different the US.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 6>Are there differences. There are lots of journalists. We know

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 6>this because James Madden Austraining has been editor, has spoken

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 6>to loads of journalists within the publishing division over the

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 6>past week and they had just made how this is

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 6>being handled. So they're not actually even unified within the

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 6>newspaper publishing division, much less radio and other parts of television,

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 6>other parts of the business. But as you said earlier,

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 6>like I really feel as well, just personally, for those

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 6>fifteen to twenty journalists that went over there from the

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 6>papers that were handed the assignment of a lifetime won

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 6>a privilege and it's for five days, had to sit

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 6>on their hands and not do anything, and this whole

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 6>thing for them has been for evertonished by the timing

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 6>of this industrial action.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would have been a scab personally. I just

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>want have kept on going. But look, let's move on

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>down to the ABC, which recently got to serve from

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>its former chair eid To Buttros, who admitted she thought

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the broadcaster had a degree of unconscious bias and needed

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to steal itself against criticism. Now, if you miss those comments,

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>take a listen. Do you think the ABC is delivering

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>with regards to objectivity and impartiality?

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 8>I think there is an unconscious bias, and I think

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 8>it's I think there's no harm in presenting both sides

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 8>of an argument, and I don't understand the reluctance of

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 8>some of our interviewers not to do that. We're also

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 8>always unafraid to call out a news corporation, for instance,

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 8>who has who have gone after ABC frontline reporters and

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 8>presenters pretty hard, including may full disclosure. Is that something

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 8>that you think is concerning and does it have a

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 8>sort of chilling, chilling kind of I think quite frankly,

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 8>I think you're too sensitive about NewsCorp you know. And

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 8>if we can't take the critics, if the ABC can't

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 8>take the criticism, well then it just just should give up.

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, the Media Union was unhappy with the obvious being

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 1>pointed out. Ida Butcher's has no relevant role at the

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>ABC any longer, and it comments are insulting to journalists

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.479
<v Speaker 1>who strive for accuracy and partiality as required by the

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>NEAA Code of Ethics every day, and then this great

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>line was published by the Australians. James Madden The Australian

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>asked the Union why it suggested Miss Buttrose, who has

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>worked in the media for more than five decades, was

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>no longer qualified to discuss industry matters. The MEAA did

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>not reply, Let's bring the panel back in, Steven. Let's

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>go to you first on this. I mean, what are

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts.

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 4>The breathtaking hypocrisy. Firstly, I've got to quit congratulate Ida

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 4>for having her come to Jesus moment. One wonders where

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 4>this attitude was when she was the chair of the

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 4>ABC and was actually trying to present the same defense

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 4>that Patricia Carvellis and the meule A are pushing now.

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 4>But good honor for pointing out what is right now.

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 5>The other thing that I.

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 4>Would point out that people seem to miss all the

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 4>time is that and they'll point the finger at news

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 4>or they point the finger at opinion commentators like myself.

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 4>I get paid to offer my opinion based on what

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 4>the news is. Journalists at the ABC, under the ABC's

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 4>charter are paid to deliver straight down the line journalism

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 4>and balance, They don't do that. And the other thing

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 4>people are going to realize is that we the taxpayer

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 4>pay a billion dollars a year to the ABC to

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 4>deliver that charter. Other organizations taxpayers don't have to pay

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 4>for and you don't have to watch, You don't have

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 4>to subscribe this guy if you don't want to. You

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 4>don't have to buy the Sydney Morning Herald or the

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Daily Telegraph or any of these other newspapers. The ABC

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 4>you've got to pay for whether you want like it

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 4>or not, and we should be able to expect a

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 4>higher standard from them that we don't get. But again,

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 4>good on Eider for finally waking up to it.

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a really good point. I mean, the thing

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that I take away from this is that resilience. It's

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>so important. And I think what Ida Butchers is she?

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think she's actually saying the criticism is legitimate.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I think she's just saying, why do you care? And

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I would challenge anyone from the ABC to go and

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>get a job at News Corp And deal with one

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>ayota of the negative vitriol reporters at this company or

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this network, deal with They've got no idea, they get

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a tie it, they get a slightly negative tweet after

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>an interview Darren, and then they just they lose their minds.

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 6>Look, the ABC charter actually demands the journalists and the

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 6>output is impartial, and it seems like they won't really

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 6>accept that, or they're unwilling to accept that. I think,

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 6>you know, as you pointed out as well. Eight she

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 6>left in March as a chair of placed by Kim Williams,

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 6>and it was really ad mission that she's failed to

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 6>deal with this entrenched culture there. But the bottom line

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 6>is that other media companies have a responsibility to hold

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 6>the ABC to account because it's publicly funded by the taxpayer,

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 6>whether they consume the products or not.

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 5>And it's such a good point.

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>If there's inefficiencies of the Department of Health, you're going

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to write about it. Any statutory body should be probed.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, when we were all free to you judge it

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 6>on its performance, and we will and we'll continue to

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 6>do that.

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well said, Well, let's move on now, because the

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>ABC is always crying poor and now we know why

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>media watches a weekly fifteen minute show which spends about

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of its time running grabs from our network

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>when it disagrees with the arguments. The ABC website has

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>eight people listed as working on the program, including an EP,

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the presenter, supervising producer, a story editor, a director to

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>digital producers, and of course a journalist. And today we've

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>got to look at how much at least one of

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>these people are paid. ABC Careers is looking for a

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>new EP, and the base salary is one hundred and

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy five one thousand dollars. Let's bring the panel back in, Steven,

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind that is that is the base salary,

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>and ABC journalists do get paid a bit of a

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:41.239
<v Speaker 1>premium with their super as well, and god knows what

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>other benefits are one hundred and seventy five thousand dollars

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>for just one of those eight positions fifteen minutes of television.

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that a good deal for taxpayers?

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Jack, I just want to inform you, and I'm apologize

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 4>for this, but this will be the last time I

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 4>appear on your program because I'm going to go and

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 4>work at the ABC. My car pass up this opportunity.

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Just there's a couple of things I want to point out.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 4>If I'm just read from the actual ad, we are

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 4>looking for someone with exceptional journalistic talent and creative flair

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 4>who will help create the next chapter of media watch

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 4>a story in history. Well, at least after forty years,

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 4>they're going to try. But the other thing I got

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 4>here was we're looking for someone with a track work

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 4>ord and leading and managing teams of journalists and content makers,

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 4>fine ability to manage oversea and drive high stake stories. Well,

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how high stakes you can get in

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 4>fifteen minutes, and somebody with independence, integrity and grace, that'll dead,

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 4>said doom Jack.

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Seriously, Well said Darren. Your thoughts.

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, look, you know Kim Williams. Recently the ABC chair

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 6>asked for an increase in funding to renew you know,

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 6>particularly radio, which is really struggling at the moment. And

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 6>I think through the lens of that this doesn't really

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 6>strengthen his case, does it. It's they look like they've.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Got remember this next time they ask for more money.

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Darren Steven, thank you so much for joining us. That's

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>all the time we had for tonight.

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Thank you. Next is Flefty is losing it.