WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 9 September

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Paul Murray Live. You know me very well, Shari.

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:10.110
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. We've got a big show ahead tonight.

0:00:10.140 --> 0:00:12.110
<v Speaker 1>It's fight night when it comes to the debate section

0:00:12.150 --> 0:00:14.790
<v Speaker 1>of this evening's program. I guarantee you're going to love

0:00:14.810 --> 0:00:17.270
<v Speaker 1>the rumble that happens inside the man cave. The wonderful

0:00:17.290 --> 0:00:19.590
<v Speaker 1>Megan Kelly is here, where there's an awful lot of

0:00:19.610 --> 0:00:21.870
<v Speaker 1>stuff happening in the United States. But can we start

0:00:22.790 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>with Anthony Albanese going full Trump? What do I mean? Well,

0:00:26.750 --> 0:00:28.700
<v Speaker 1>as you know, Donald Trump, whenever he doesn't like what

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.780
<v Speaker 1>the media reports, what does he say? Fake news.

0:00:31.860 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Fake news.

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Fake news. Fake news. Well, to the scandal that is

0:00:36.220 --> 0:00:40.300
<v Speaker 1>of the government's own making, half a billion dollars that

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.650
<v Speaker 1>just happened to end up in mostly Labor seats. We

0:00:43.670 --> 0:00:47.090
<v Speaker 1>showed you this last night in detail. Centre for Public Integrity,

0:00:47.150 --> 0:00:49.710
<v Speaker 1>this is a non-partisan group. They've whacked libs when they're

0:00:49.750 --> 0:00:51.710
<v Speaker 1>in government just as hard as they're whacking the government.

0:00:52.190 --> 0:00:53.870
<v Speaker 1>And they were able to work out that of the

0:00:53.910 --> 0:00:56.570
<v Speaker 1>half a B4 billion dollars that was put into a

0:00:56.630 --> 0:00:59.470
<v Speaker 1>slush fund, and I say slush fund because it wasn't just, oh,

0:00:59.510 --> 0:01:02.910
<v Speaker 1>here's the community projects. You apply for them, best one wins. No, no,

0:01:03.190 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you had to be invited to apply. And guess what

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.860
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the result was? And as I showed

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.220
<v Speaker 1>you last night, there is a golf club in regional

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.940
<v Speaker 1>Victoria that's full of asbestos, desperately needs a little bit

0:01:16.970 --> 0:01:19.450
<v Speaker 1>of financial help. But when they went to the local MP,

0:01:19.490 --> 0:01:22.750
<v Speaker 1>the local MP says, sorry, you haven't been invited because

0:01:22.890 --> 0:01:26.610
<v Speaker 1>the money's going to the Marrickville Golf Club, of course,

0:01:26.709 --> 0:01:29.790
<v Speaker 1>in the Prime Minister's home electorate. Now, remember, all of

0:01:29.850 --> 0:01:32.630
<v Speaker 1>this was just outrageous when it was the Liberal Party

0:01:32.730 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and the money was a lot less than Now, remember,

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.819
<v Speaker 1>Bridget McKenzie was in a world of trouble because she

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:43.330
<v Speaker 1>was a member of a shooting club that got some

0:01:43.350 --> 0:01:45.110
<v Speaker 1>of the money from the then federal government. She was

0:01:45.130 --> 0:01:47.450
<v Speaker 1>the minister at the time. Well, guess who was a

0:01:47.530 --> 0:01:51.630
<v Speaker 1>member of the Marrickville Golf Club? Anthony Albanese. It is

0:01:51.670 --> 0:01:55.230
<v Speaker 1>apparently undeclared, but he was out and about today saying, oh,

0:01:55.290 --> 0:01:57.110
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't matter. I don't really go. It doesn't really

0:01:57.150 --> 0:02:00.660
<v Speaker 1>matter to me. Well, then why are they getting the cash? Anyway,

0:02:01.100 --> 0:02:03.340
<v Speaker 1>he decided to, as I say, go the full Trump

0:02:03.460 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and he was going the media and didn't the loveys

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.550
<v Speaker 1>love a fight of left on left where he was

0:02:09.610 --> 0:02:12.530
<v Speaker 1>cracking into the ABC who, as I told you last night,

0:02:13.070 --> 0:02:16.470
<v Speaker 1>centred this on the 7.30 program and have been doing

0:02:16.490 --> 0:02:20.830
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong coverage about this all day because it stinks.

0:02:21.370 --> 0:02:25.410
<v Speaker 1>It's half a billion dollars of taxpayers' money spent that

0:02:25.630 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>ends up with the Labor Party in the oh-so-convenient marginal

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>seats that they either won or want to win at

0:02:31.620 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the next election. Here he is doing his best orange

0:02:35.660 --> 0:02:36.580
<v Speaker 1>man impersonation.

0:02:36.580 --> 0:02:41.060
<v Speaker 3>15 years ago, someone decided to say, oh, we'll make him.

0:02:41.020 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>An honorary member. I don't have a card.

0:02:44.340 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't go in there.

0:02:45.260 --> 0:02:48.750
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been in there for years. The ABC were

0:02:48.850 --> 0:02:54.060
<v Speaker 1>told this. And the ABCs should do better. Oh! Now,

0:02:54.090 --> 0:02:58.220
<v Speaker 1>of course, the ABC will not turn on the Prime Minister.

0:02:58.280 --> 0:02:59.900
<v Speaker 1>It's just a way of him trying to say, here

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:05.900
<v Speaker 1>I am, being strong to everyone. Remember, the fundamentals here

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:12.109
<v Speaker 1>is how do you feel about a half-billion-dollar fund being invented...

0:03:13.100 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to advantage the political party of the day that is

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.489
<v Speaker 1>also the government of the day. Now, theoretically, if there

0:03:19.530 --> 0:03:25.470
<v Speaker 1>was $ 500 billion that they decided was for 150 electorates

0:03:25.610 --> 0:03:28.340
<v Speaker 1>around the country for the local MP to be able

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.540
<v Speaker 1>to work out what is the best way of spending

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.420
<v Speaker 1>the money, we'd be having a different chat. But instead,

0:03:34.940 --> 0:03:38.010
<v Speaker 1>we are talking about this And this is a story

0:03:38.050 --> 0:03:40.010
<v Speaker 1>that as much as the Prime Minister and many of

0:03:40.070 --> 0:03:42.630
<v Speaker 1>his media mates would like to minimise it, is not

0:03:42.650 --> 0:03:45.630
<v Speaker 1>going to go away. And ironically, one of the people

0:03:45.670 --> 0:03:48.110
<v Speaker 1>who is prosecuting this is the lady who had to

0:03:48.170 --> 0:03:50.940
<v Speaker 1>give up her job when she was caught in all

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of this back in the Liberal government. Bridget McKenzie.

0:03:54.180 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Trust in our political system is dependent on ministers, governments

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.140
<v Speaker 2>and parliamentarians upholding the highest standards. I would hate to

0:04:02.180 --> 0:04:04.750
<v Speaker 2>think that I am the last minister in this Westminster

0:04:04.790 --> 0:04:09.350
<v Speaker 2>system to actually resign. over a perceived conflict of interest

0:04:09.570 --> 0:04:12.190
<v Speaker 2>and an upholding of the Ministerial Code of Conduct.

0:04:13.010 --> 0:04:15.410
<v Speaker 1>But we know you can lie to Parliament like the

0:04:15.470 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Finance Minister did, but Albo will look the other way.

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:23.659
<v Speaker 1>You can behave like Jim Chalmers, there were no problems.

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>You can travel wrought, all the accusations here and thereof,

0:04:28.110 --> 0:04:30.870
<v Speaker 1>like an Annika Wells, nothing to see here, no problems.

0:04:31.589 --> 0:04:32.950
<v Speaker 1>We can go through the list. You can be as

0:04:32.990 --> 0:04:34.990
<v Speaker 1>clueless as Claire O'Neill and no, no, no, there'll be

0:04:35.029 --> 0:04:37.250
<v Speaker 1>no admissions of failure, even when it is half a

0:04:37.330 --> 0:04:40.300
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. And it is not the ABC. It is

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>not News 24. It is the Centre for Public Integrity

0:04:43.820 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>that's calling him out. Dennis Shanahan, as always, sharp and

0:04:47.540 --> 0:04:52.870
<v Speaker 1>on point, makes the observation here that Albo's response to

0:04:52.910 --> 0:04:56.469
<v Speaker 1>the story has now turned it into a different story.

0:04:56.550 --> 0:04:59.670
<v Speaker 1>Remember the cover-up always being worse than the crime? Well,

0:04:59.690 --> 0:05:02.580
<v Speaker 1>what are we talking about here? Well, the independents are

0:05:02.620 --> 0:05:04.930
<v Speaker 1>now sinking their teeth into this. Now, of course, are

0:05:04.950 --> 0:05:07.250
<v Speaker 1>they still of the centre-left? If they had to choose,

0:05:07.570 --> 0:05:09.789
<v Speaker 1>who would the government be after the next election? They

0:05:09.810 --> 0:05:12.570
<v Speaker 1>will choose Labor. They will choose Anthony Albanese. This is

0:05:12.610 --> 0:05:15.450
<v Speaker 1>no great bake-up for the left. But this is a

0:05:15.490 --> 0:05:18.980
<v Speaker 1>moment where the so-called integrity people actually have to call

0:05:19.060 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>out the integrity of the government. Monique Ryan asked this

0:05:23.420 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>question in Question Time today.

0:05:26.060 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 5>Don't you agree that government spending should be based on

0:05:29.220 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 5>merit and need and should be transparent rather than being

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.589
<v Speaker 5>based on retaining and winning marginal seats?

0:05:36.570 --> 0:05:40.450
<v Speaker 1>The Prime Minister's response. Remember, the new broom, the transparent one,

0:05:40.490 --> 0:05:42.630
<v Speaker 1>the one who wasn't going to do politics like those

0:05:42.850 --> 0:05:43.710
<v Speaker 1>evil Liberals.

0:05:46.350 --> 0:05:51.750
<v Speaker 3>The three projects that are referred to in my electorate, I...

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.190
<v Speaker 3>Hesitate to find anyone who would regard them as not

0:05:56.230 --> 0:05:59.390
<v Speaker 3>being worthwhile. Honorary membership, someone made a decision.

0:06:00.089 --> 0:06:01.130
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a card.

0:06:01.190 --> 0:06:03.029
<v Speaker 6>For two years, membership is $ 5.

0:06:02.890 --> 0:06:05.470
<v Speaker 3>We'll get him two years membership.

0:06:06.210 --> 0:06:11.550
<v Speaker 1>For two years! See, again, look over here. Ha, ha, ha, ha. Oh,

0:06:11.830 --> 0:06:13.330
<v Speaker 1>and he plays this game. Remember, he did it with

0:06:13.350 --> 0:06:16.770
<v Speaker 1>the ISIS brides all the time. Very, very clever with

0:06:16.830 --> 0:06:20.970
<v Speaker 1>his language. The point is not about the Maryfield Golf Club.

0:06:21.730 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>The point... is half a billion dollars, $ 400 million of

0:06:28.630 --> 0:06:31.660
<v Speaker 1>which ends up where the Labor Party wants it to go,

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>supposedly a fund for every part of the country. Hence

0:06:36.020 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>why the difference of $ 409 million to $ 120 million to

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:48.070
<v Speaker 1>$ 23 million matters. Now, David Pocock is making the most

0:06:48.110 --> 0:06:52.420
<v Speaker 1>of this, as he rightly should, in the Senate today. Now,

0:06:53.060 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>what about this? Yesterday, he decided to ask about this.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.230
<v Speaker 1>The Minister for Finance, Katie Gallagher, yes, one of the

0:07:02.260 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>mean girls, the one who lied to the Parliament when

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.050
<v Speaker 1>it came to her knowledge in and around all allegations

0:07:07.510 --> 0:07:11.130
<v Speaker 1>way back when about what may have happened in an

0:07:11.210 --> 0:07:17.570
<v Speaker 1>office under the former Liberal government. You get the whole story, right? Well,

0:07:18.310 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>she as the Finance Minister is in charge, essentially, of

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.550
<v Speaker 1>how federal government money is spent by the federal bureaucracy.

0:07:25.580 --> 0:07:29.070
<v Speaker 1>So she would be very much across this process. And

0:07:29.110 --> 0:07:31.890
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, monies that are supposed to be to the

0:07:31.930 --> 0:07:35.810
<v Speaker 1>benefit of community projects should be to communities everywhere, not

0:07:35.830 --> 0:07:38.750
<v Speaker 1>just ones that have a Labor or might get a

0:07:38.830 --> 0:07:42.710
<v Speaker 1>Labor MP. So he, of course, asks the question. This

0:07:42.770 --> 0:07:46.810
<v Speaker 1>is what he posted on social media. And unbelievably, when

0:07:46.870 --> 0:07:50.100
<v Speaker 1>she asks for receipts... And he tries to put them

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.300
<v Speaker 1>on the table. Guess what the Labor Party didn't want

0:07:53.420 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to see?

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.700
<v Speaker 7>So the minister says this isn't pork barrelling. We haven't

0:07:57.740 --> 0:08:00.740
<v Speaker 7>targeted marginal seats. And then the report that shows that

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 7>nearly half the money that the government made in election

0:08:03.180 --> 0:08:06.380
<v Speaker 7>commitments went to marginal seats. When I try to table that,

0:08:06.620 --> 0:08:07.490
<v Speaker 7>the government says no.

0:08:07.850 --> 0:08:09.030
<v Speaker 1>You can't table the evidence.

0:08:10.030 --> 0:08:12.870
<v Speaker 7>Labor Party that said in opposition that the coalition were

0:08:12.890 --> 0:08:15.050
<v Speaker 7>pork barrelling. They get into the hot seat and they're

0:08:15.070 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 7>doing the exact same thing. It does not cut it.

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 7>We have to do better as a country and we

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 7>deserve better as a country. We should have governments that

0:08:22.020 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 7>make election commitments that are based on need, not based

0:08:24.980 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 7>on the seats that they want to win or the

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.090
<v Speaker 7>seats that they want to hold. This is damaging our democracy.

0:08:30.450 --> 0:08:33.630
<v Speaker 1>And then when he tried to table the very report

0:08:33.670 --> 0:08:35.470
<v Speaker 1>that did not come from the ABC, that did not

0:08:35.530 --> 0:08:38.620
<v Speaker 1>come from News 24, that did not come from a

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.339
<v Speaker 1>super sleuth on the internet, instead from, and I repeat,

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.980
<v Speaker 1>the Centre for Public Integrity, the non-partisan group that has

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:47.500
<v Speaker 1>given it to the Libs just as hard as they

0:08:47.540 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have now given it to Labor, guess what the government did?

0:08:50.420 --> 0:08:54.270
<v Speaker 1>They used their numbers to say, no, you can't table

0:08:54.650 --> 0:08:58.910
<v Speaker 1>the very report that is the receipt. I'm going to

0:08:58.929 --> 0:09:03.369
<v Speaker 1>show it to you for the third time. $ 400 million

0:09:03.470 --> 0:09:07.929
<v Speaker 1>magically ends up in the Labor Party pot. Everyone else, look,

0:09:07.929 --> 0:09:10.429
<v Speaker 1>$ 100 million isn't bad for the coalition, but are you

0:09:10.490 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>kidding me? Now, normally, at this time of the night,

0:09:13.929 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm ripping and tearing about how the 6pm news lets

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 1>you down. It didn't tonight. And a reporter that I

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.100
<v Speaker 1>have been plenty critical of for plenty of time actually...

0:09:24.260 --> 0:09:28.710
<v Speaker 1>saw this for what it was. Andrew Proban on Channel 9.

0:09:28.710 --> 0:09:31.130
<v Speaker 1>This is how he is explaining. Now, of course, he

0:09:31.150 --> 0:09:33.050
<v Speaker 1>has to find a way to make it seem like

0:09:33.110 --> 0:09:35.310
<v Speaker 1>both sides are as bad as each other. Remember, this

0:09:35.370 --> 0:09:39.590
<v Speaker 1>is more money and an even more bent process, but still,

0:09:40.370 --> 0:09:44.090
<v Speaker 1>this is what they finally talked about on the 6pm

0:09:44.130 --> 0:09:45.209
<v Speaker 1>news tonight.

0:09:46.500 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 8>Whereas the sports rort scandal involved a selection process that

0:09:50.380 --> 0:09:55.099
<v Speaker 8>was corrupted by politics... Labor's infrastructure grants program seemed to

0:09:55.140 --> 0:09:59.090
<v Speaker 8>have no process at all except to curry political favour.

0:09:59.620 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 4>Sports rots was pork barrelling by deception. This is pork

0:10:04.260 --> 0:10:05.540
<v Speaker 4>barrelling by design.

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.770
<v Speaker 1>So one of the ways that political scandals live on

0:10:09.910 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>is what name you end up giving them. Now, whether

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.620
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be Albo's pork barrelling, Albo's barrel

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of pork, whether it's going to be Labor's slush fund,

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:21.710
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. If you have suggestions, please send me

0:10:21.730 --> 0:10:26.890
<v Speaker 1>an email, paul at news24. com. au, paul at news24. com. au. But it's

0:10:26.910 --> 0:10:30.030
<v Speaker 1>yet another example about this government taking the piss with

0:10:30.150 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>other people's money, half a billion dollars. They had to

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>demand the head when it was of a political opposite,

0:10:40.140 --> 0:10:43.660
<v Speaker 1>but when it is them, it's fake news. Pay attention.

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.599
<v Speaker 1>This is about the overall picture, because as soon as

0:10:46.620 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you argue about the Marrickville Golf Club, well, he's going

0:10:50.020 --> 0:10:52.300
<v Speaker 1>to go off and pretend that this is just a

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.470
<v Speaker 1>very small matter. It ain't. It's half a bee for

0:10:54.510 --> 0:10:58.950
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. And where does this money come from? Well,

0:10:59.010 --> 0:11:01.470
<v Speaker 1>I think we all know the good people of Australia.

0:11:01.530 --> 0:11:04.390
<v Speaker 1>The single largest source of government revenue at the federal

0:11:04.410 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>level comes out of people's pay packet. Not company tax,

0:11:08.179 --> 0:11:11.599
<v Speaker 1>not the GST. Of course, at the state level, if

0:11:11.620 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you buy and sell things, you end up paying things

0:11:13.540 --> 0:11:16.380
<v Speaker 1>like a stamp duty. If you run a business, you've

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>got things like payroll tax. Well, are we all sitting down?

0:11:21.340 --> 0:11:22.990
<v Speaker 1>Because one of the reasons why the government thinks they

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.390
<v Speaker 1>can get away with spending half a billion dollars in

0:11:25.429 --> 0:11:29.910
<v Speaker 1>this fashion is because government's tax take is up 60%

0:11:29.910 --> 0:11:35.969
<v Speaker 1>since COVID, 60%. Now, they're going to argue, well, we

0:11:35.990 --> 0:11:37.540
<v Speaker 1>were sort of a four-fifths of bugger off for a

0:11:37.580 --> 0:11:39.740
<v Speaker 1>couple of years there, so this is all just false.

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.819
<v Speaker 1>Let me show this to you. Australia's combined annual federal, state,

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:50.189
<v Speaker 1>local government tax take has leapt 61% since COVID to

0:11:50.190 --> 0:11:56.250
<v Speaker 1>$ 893. 4 billion. Stamp duties, payroll tax, company tax skyrocketing more

0:11:56.290 --> 0:11:59.390
<v Speaker 1>than double the rate of GDP growth, according to the

0:11:59.410 --> 0:12:05.100
<v Speaker 1>official figures. Jim Chalmers... gets a forecast from Treasury to

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>become Australia's biggest income-taxing Treasurer with a share of GDP

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.460
<v Speaker 1>of 18.6% this financial year. He's got more money than

0:12:12.580 --> 0:12:15.179
<v Speaker 1>ever before, yet he's still running a deficit and they

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.540
<v Speaker 1>still have to invent new ways to claw money back

0:12:18.620 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>because they need to create slush funds like what we're

0:12:21.620 --> 0:12:24.460
<v Speaker 1>talking about here. In fact, let me show you this.

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.780
<v Speaker 1>In terms of taxation revenue, federal, state, local government, you see,

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:34.660
<v Speaker 1>the years 19 and 20, the year before pandemic. The

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>two after, well, what's happened since? Through the roof. And

0:12:39.460 --> 0:12:42.589
<v Speaker 1>that is just the taxation. Once we throw in the

0:12:42.870 --> 0:12:46.030
<v Speaker 1>payroll tax, the stamp duty tax, the goods and services tax,

0:12:46.370 --> 0:12:49.350
<v Speaker 1>look what's happened. Now, yes, has there been an awful

0:12:49.370 --> 0:12:51.490
<v Speaker 1>lot more people that have come to the country, about

0:12:51.490 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>1.4 million since this government came in? Sure. But are

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.179
<v Speaker 1>they making the most of bracket creep? Are they finding

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.969
<v Speaker 1>new ways to tax you? You betcha. So no wonder.

0:13:04.530 --> 0:13:07.210
<v Speaker 1>They've got more money than ever before, yet they think

0:13:07.290 --> 0:13:11.780
<v Speaker 1>no accountability about how they spend it. This is red hot,

0:13:12.140 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>whether they like it or not, whether they like the

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>news source that talks about it or not, or whether

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.530
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a pain in their backside for

0:13:21.550 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a little while. It should be. It's a disgrace. I

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.220
<v Speaker 1>hope that the Tiffany Teals, that the independents keep the

0:13:27.260 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>fight up about it. I hope that this is not

0:13:29.580 --> 0:13:32.870
<v Speaker 1>just a box-ticking exercise from the normally compliant media to say,

0:13:33.070 --> 0:13:35.350
<v Speaker 1>here's the one example where we held them to account.

0:13:35.790 --> 0:13:39.850
<v Speaker 1>Do it again tomorrow. Do it again tomorrow. The likelihood,

0:13:39.870 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, is most likely they won't, but still, we'll

0:13:42.780 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>keep on it. Oh, and while the government has more

0:13:45.940 --> 0:13:49.290
<v Speaker 1>money than ever before, finding new ways of spending it,

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:54.459
<v Speaker 1>including completely unaccountable ways like the rort that's happening right now,

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:55.980
<v Speaker 1>I'll come up with a good name, and when we do,

0:13:56.080 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>we'll stick with it. Guess what? Despite some signs of

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>economic slowdown, the Reserve Bank looks like it will increase

0:14:03.380 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>interest rates again. So, yes, the great working public that

0:14:07.300 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is paying more tax than ever before, that is the

0:14:09.580 --> 0:14:13.370
<v Speaker 1>biggest source of revenue to the government... whose biggest asset

0:14:13.410 --> 0:14:16.069
<v Speaker 1>is their house, whose bill has gone up 15 times

0:14:16.110 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>since this government came to office, get ready to pay

0:14:20.060 --> 0:14:24.260
<v Speaker 1>more again. But nothing to see here, nothing to see here.

0:14:25.300 --> 0:14:30.340
<v Speaker 1>Flag burning is a culture war and letting people take

0:14:30.340 --> 0:14:34.660
<v Speaker 1>$ 2, 500 of their own superannuation will somehow ruin everyone's retirement.

0:14:35.540 --> 0:14:39.750
<v Speaker 1>This government and the way they are swimming in cash

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:45.980
<v Speaker 1>Yet spending it for purely political reasons, purely political reasons,

0:14:46.380 --> 0:14:48.380
<v Speaker 1>is something we could take a couple of days to

0:14:48.420 --> 0:14:51.610
<v Speaker 1>talk about. Let's see whether ADD kicks in and the

0:14:51.630 --> 0:14:55.230
<v Speaker 1>news agenda moves on or people can follow the money

0:14:56.150 --> 0:14:58.710
<v Speaker 1>because there's too much of it being misspent. But it's

0:14:58.750 --> 0:15:04.310
<v Speaker 1>other people's money, so they don't care. The future of

0:15:04.350 --> 0:15:06.510
<v Speaker 1>the country is, of course, being played out in our

0:15:06.590 --> 0:15:08.830
<v Speaker 1>schools each and every day. Are they too far to

0:15:08.870 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the left? Yes. But this is not about that. I

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.580
<v Speaker 1>have told you for years about one of the biggest

0:15:15.620 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>problems in Australian classrooms, which is discipline in the classrooms.

0:15:19.980 --> 0:15:22.990
<v Speaker 1>And every time, because there'll be somebody watching, I was

0:15:23.010 --> 0:15:24.610
<v Speaker 1>a horror of a kid. I got sent out plenty.

0:15:24.630 --> 0:15:27.090
<v Speaker 1>I got suspended a couple of times. Mine is not

0:15:27.370 --> 0:15:31.150
<v Speaker 1>a great school behaviour story. Which is perhaps why I

0:15:31.730 --> 0:15:35.210
<v Speaker 1>feel guilty as the kid who mucked up about what

0:15:35.290 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I did to all of the kids around me because

0:15:39.180 --> 0:15:42.830
<v Speaker 1>I was... carrying on like a two bob watch well

0:15:42.850 --> 0:15:47.110
<v Speaker 1>yet again today we have an example of just how

0:15:47.170 --> 0:15:51.830
<v Speaker 1>poorly australian classrooms are being controlled 30 years after i

0:15:51.870 --> 0:15:56.050
<v Speaker 1>left high school yes i know but also academic performance

0:15:56.670 --> 0:15:59.620
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent by state

0:15:59.630 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and federal governments to so-called improve our education well take

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a look does this look like an improving education system

0:16:07.510 --> 0:16:09.570
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to science, yes, there's been a little

0:16:09.590 --> 0:16:12.090
<v Speaker 1>bit of a blip up. But when it comes to reading,

0:16:12.610 --> 0:16:16.100
<v Speaker 1>down in 20 years. When it comes to maths, down

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in 20 years. And I think part of this is

0:16:20.780 --> 0:16:26.300
<v Speaker 1>because we have lost control of the classroom. Now, long

0:16:26.340 --> 0:16:29.180
<v Speaker 1>gone are the days of the cane, rightly so. But

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.380
<v Speaker 1>even when I was acting up like a two-bob watch,

0:16:31.660 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't able to do it for very long because

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>any and every teacher would boot you out of the

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>room and if it kept going on, you'd be off

0:16:37.820 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to the principal, you'd get suspended, and no matter what

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>bitching and moaning I gave to my parents, they doubled

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.210
<v Speaker 1>down on the punishment of the school because that's the

0:16:46.250 --> 0:16:49.790
<v Speaker 1>way it's supposed to work. But nowadays, that is not

0:16:49.850 --> 0:16:52.830
<v Speaker 1>the way that it works. The reality is, is that

0:16:53.150 --> 0:16:55.870
<v Speaker 1>too many parents are too soft on their kids and

0:16:55.890 --> 0:16:58.710
<v Speaker 1>they back their kids in... to be too out of

0:16:58.730 --> 0:17:02.110
<v Speaker 1>control with teachers who they seek to punish whenever the

0:17:02.150 --> 0:17:05.109
<v Speaker 1>teachers try to discipline the classroom. And again, I'm not

0:17:05.150 --> 0:17:08.070
<v Speaker 1>talking about six of the best. I'm saying to Johnny

0:17:08.330 --> 0:17:12.389
<v Speaker 1>and Julie, shut up. Again, let's have a look at

0:17:12.450 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>global standards and how Australia compares. This is a first

0:17:16.390 --> 0:17:19.020
<v Speaker 1>world country with hundreds of billions of dollars, but we

0:17:19.060 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>have lost the fight for discipline. Noise and disorder. We

0:17:23.460 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>are well and truly above the international average. When it

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:35.150
<v Speaker 1>comes to spend more than two hours daily on screens, Australia,

0:17:35.609 --> 0:17:37.870
<v Speaker 1>in a world of pain because we are spending more

0:17:37.890 --> 0:17:41.390
<v Speaker 1>time on the screens, reports that students do not listen

0:17:41.410 --> 0:17:44.830
<v Speaker 1>to what a teacher has said in all science lessons,

0:17:45.030 --> 0:17:47.750
<v Speaker 1>we're worse than the rest of the world, has skipped

0:17:47.770 --> 0:17:50.369
<v Speaker 1>at least one day of school in the past two weeks.

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.580
<v Speaker 1>Look at that number at the bottom. If all of

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:55.979
<v Speaker 1>that information, just look at the bit at the bottom.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Why?

0:17:57.740 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Why? Because they're sick? Because they're anxious? Maybe. Because they're

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>wagging or they're taking the piss? Probably. This doesn't cost money.

0:18:09.020 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>We have chosen discussion over discipline. We have chosen the

0:18:15.990 --> 0:18:21.490
<v Speaker 1>rights of the child over the stability of the classroom

0:18:21.609 --> 0:18:25.630
<v Speaker 1>at a wider level. Now, I get very frustrated with

0:18:25.730 --> 0:18:29.129
<v Speaker 1>much of the political ideology of much of our education system,

0:18:29.369 --> 0:18:36.550
<v Speaker 1>but I have maximum, maximum empathy for teachers who are

0:18:36.590 --> 0:18:39.889
<v Speaker 1>having to deal with kids who are not disciplined at

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.139
<v Speaker 1>home and they have virtually no power to discipline them

0:18:43.180 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>at school. And what do you learn at school? At

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a certain point in time, you start to notice what

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone else can get away with and then you start

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:58.220
<v Speaker 1>to go, Well, what's the point in playing along? This

0:18:58.260 --> 0:19:02.369
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take money. This takes resolve. Now, there are teachers

0:19:02.590 --> 0:19:06.490
<v Speaker 1>who work in incredibly disruptive areas who have been able

0:19:06.510 --> 0:19:10.690
<v Speaker 1>to crack this nut. The state education ministers at every

0:19:10.730 --> 0:19:13.910
<v Speaker 1>level and the federal should be talking to them. How

0:19:13.950 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>do you do it? How can we do it more?

0:19:16.940 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>For all of our looking to the international community on

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>so many other issues, could we start to look at

0:19:22.460 --> 0:19:25.590
<v Speaker 1>it when it comes to education? Could we go and

0:19:25.650 --> 0:19:29.420
<v Speaker 1>find the head of the Singaporean education system and get

0:19:29.460 --> 0:19:30.980
<v Speaker 1>them just to sit up the back of the average

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>class in suburban Australia and then have a look at

0:19:34.859 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>their suggestions of how we run a classroom? We are

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.390
<v Speaker 1>failing our kids and the kids end up failing the tests,

0:19:42.730 --> 0:19:46.050
<v Speaker 1>which means they are not starting life at their optimum.

0:19:47.070 --> 0:19:50.429
<v Speaker 1>We have taken a world that used to be school

0:19:50.470 --> 0:19:54.139
<v Speaker 1>was the microcosm of the greater world, where there were

0:19:54.300 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>authority figures, where there was a punishment to be afraid of.

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>When you got caught doing something wrong, that was the

0:20:01.220 --> 0:20:06.380
<v Speaker 1>end of the conversation, and instead we've turned it upside down.

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.669
<v Speaker 1>Those kids, of course, become adults. Those adults have their

0:20:09.730 --> 0:20:13.210
<v Speaker 1>own kids and the problem goes down the toot. If

0:20:13.250 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you're a teacher with ideas, send the emails, okay? Paul

0:20:17.060 --> 0:20:23.699
<v Speaker 1>at news24. com. au. Paul at news24. com. au. Now, let's talk about these

0:20:23.740 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>social media laws which are on their way because I've

0:20:25.940 --> 0:20:28.179
<v Speaker 1>got to say, on the face of it, do I

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.590
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with Australians being able to have a

0:20:30.670 --> 0:20:33.210
<v Speaker 1>button to decide that if they're on Instagram, all you

0:20:33.250 --> 0:20:36.190
<v Speaker 1>see are the people you follow or a button that says, ah,

0:20:36.230 --> 0:20:37.630
<v Speaker 1>show me some of the other stuff on the internet.

0:20:37.930 --> 0:20:40.730
<v Speaker 1>I don't really have a problem with that. But as always,

0:20:40.850 --> 0:20:42.889
<v Speaker 1>there's devil in the detail. And the devil in the

0:20:42.930 --> 0:20:46.700
<v Speaker 1>detail here is a very specific power which the government

0:20:46.740 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to give itself to be able to go after

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the things it doesn't like on the internet. Sarah Henderson

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.780
<v Speaker 1>is the shadow communications minister. She joins us now from Canberra.

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:58.909
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the overall in a second. Lovely to

0:20:58.940 --> 0:21:02.210
<v Speaker 1>see you, Senator. Let's talk about what is inside the

0:21:02.250 --> 0:21:05.270
<v Speaker 1>bill here and what is the power the minister wants

0:21:05.330 --> 0:21:06.570
<v Speaker 1>to give herself here.

0:21:09.180 --> 0:21:11.270
<v Speaker 6>Well, Paul, great to join you this evening.

0:21:12.010 --> 0:21:15.670
<v Speaker 9>We all want to see online harms and very serious

0:21:15.930 --> 0:21:20.060
<v Speaker 9>online harms not exposed at all, particularly to children. We

0:21:20.140 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 9>want tougher action to empower parents. But this proposed digital

0:21:25.460 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 9>duty of care law is extremely dangerous because it gives

0:21:31.900 --> 0:21:37.619
<v Speaker 9>the minister unfettered powers to make regulations without parliamentary oversight

0:21:38.090 --> 0:21:42.070
<v Speaker 9>in relation to categories of harm or serious harm. So

0:21:42.109 --> 0:21:46.550
<v Speaker 9>that means that the minister could make a decision, again,

0:21:46.609 --> 0:21:50.909
<v Speaker 9>without parliamentary oversight, about any material that she thinks is

0:21:51.690 --> 0:21:54.889
<v Speaker 9>is not appropriate or, in the case of children, harmful

0:21:54.930 --> 0:22:00.129
<v Speaker 9>to children. So just imagine material denying the existence of

0:22:00.250 --> 0:22:06.180
<v Speaker 9>climate change or questioning gender ideology. It is really quite

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.060
<v Speaker 9>frightening because there are no guardrails, there are no safeguards,

0:22:10.540 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 9>and that's why this is a very, very significant threat

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:13.939
<v Speaker 9>to free speech.

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.510
<v Speaker 1>But also, why does she need the power? Because, theoretically,

0:22:16.550 --> 0:22:18.970
<v Speaker 1>kids have been banned from these platforms.

0:22:20.290 --> 0:22:21.510
<v Speaker 6>Well, that's exactly right.

0:22:22.550 --> 0:22:25.629
<v Speaker 9>She needs these very wide powers, as she would say,

0:22:26.470 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 9>because the social media ban is not working. It, of course,

0:22:30.300 --> 0:22:35.460
<v Speaker 9>only relates to social media platforms. That's been a disaster. Yes,

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.260
<v Speaker 9>there was all the right intent, which we also backed,

0:22:38.660 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 9>but it's been very poorly designed. It's been very badly implemented. And,

0:22:44.300 --> 0:22:47.970
<v Speaker 9>of course, there's very high rates of noncompliance. So this

0:22:48.070 --> 0:22:52.170
<v Speaker 9>is just another example of Annika Wells rushing legislation into

0:22:52.210 --> 0:22:55.409
<v Speaker 9>this parliament, not doing the hard work. And, of course,

0:22:55.890 --> 0:22:59.010
<v Speaker 9>we know that this is a Trojan horse, Paul. We

0:22:59.070 --> 0:23:03.170
<v Speaker 9>saw what happened with the Misinformation and Disinformation Bill. That

0:23:03.270 --> 0:23:08.949
<v Speaker 9>was a very, very scary way of regulating Australians' online speech,

0:23:09.150 --> 0:23:12.130
<v Speaker 9>and this is take two all over again.

0:23:12.690 --> 0:23:15.859
<v Speaker 1>So the reason why I always get very nervous about

0:23:16.300 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>individual power sitting with a specific minister is because at

0:23:22.460 --> 0:23:24.890
<v Speaker 1>some point in time, it is going to be somebody

0:23:24.930 --> 0:23:29.490
<v Speaker 1>who is the complete opposite ideology that you may have

0:23:29.530 --> 0:23:32.010
<v Speaker 1>at any one time, right? So if you're somebody who

0:23:32.050 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>currently is hardcore lefty, thinks that Libs never will get

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>back in power, how good is this going to be? Well,

0:23:37.980 --> 0:23:40.300
<v Speaker 1>guess what? At some point in time, this ends up

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.340
<v Speaker 1>with the political opponent. Someday this ends up with the Greens,

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.330
<v Speaker 1>God forbid. Someday this ends up, you know, whatever. In

0:23:48.420 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>any version of this. And my issue is that Obviously,

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.260
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to find excuses for garbage on the internet.

0:23:55.300 --> 0:23:57.660
<v Speaker 1>I've spoken about it, like we all have, about the dangers,

0:23:57.700 --> 0:24:00.500
<v Speaker 1>the manosphere, all of that stuff. I'm completely aware of

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.610
<v Speaker 1>all of that. But I think that we've seen, through

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.109
<v Speaker 1>things like the Communications and Media Authority at times, having

0:24:07.210 --> 0:24:12.710
<v Speaker 1>nebulous discussions about good taste or these sorts of things, right?

0:24:12.990 --> 0:24:16.050
<v Speaker 1>There's 28 million versions of what the word harmful is.

0:24:16.430 --> 0:24:19.649
<v Speaker 1>There's 28 million versions, and we keep being told that

0:24:19.869 --> 0:24:24.270
<v Speaker 1>silence is violence and all these other definitions and backdoor words.

0:24:24.690 --> 0:24:27.110
<v Speaker 1>So rather than the obvious, which is harmful, okay, should

0:24:27.130 --> 0:24:31.650
<v Speaker 1>we be doing things that are stopping the depiction of abuse? Yes, yes, yes.

0:24:31.990 --> 0:24:33.660
<v Speaker 1>But then we start to get into all the other stuff.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.300
<v Speaker 1>When it's somebody's eight-hour-a-day job, five days a week, to

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>look for threats, they start inventing them.

0:24:41.790 --> 0:24:43.130
<v Speaker 6>Well, Paul, that's exactly right.

0:24:43.190 --> 0:24:45.570
<v Speaker 9>And we don't quibble with some of the very serious

0:24:45.630 --> 0:24:47.590
<v Speaker 9>harms that are outlined in this bill.

0:24:47.650 --> 0:24:48.409
<v Speaker 6>So things like.

0:24:48.290 --> 0:24:54.149
<v Speaker 9>Pornography, terrorism material, child sexual abuse. There's absolutely no debate

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 9>about that sort of horrific material. But where we have

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:03.540
<v Speaker 9>very deep concerns is the minister's unfettered ability to decide

0:25:03.580 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 9>what is harmful. And that could mean almost anything. In

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.940
<v Speaker 9>relation to children, she's got very broad powers. And then,

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 9>of course, there's also an obligation on online services to

0:25:16.420 --> 0:25:20.889
<v Speaker 9>basically safeguard against any sort of harm. They've got a

0:25:20.950 --> 0:25:24.810
<v Speaker 9>proactive duty to do so. And when you're talking about

0:25:25.170 --> 0:25:29.430
<v Speaker 9>fines of up to $ 100 million, you can only imagine

0:25:29.450 --> 0:25:34.290
<v Speaker 9>that online services will make conservative decisions because they don't

0:25:34.690 --> 0:25:36.660
<v Speaker 9>want to risk these major fines.

0:25:37.230 --> 0:25:39.950
<v Speaker 6>And so that is another fetter on free speech.

0:25:40.310 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 9>And as for Annika Wells, I don't know whether you

0:25:42.650 --> 0:25:47.100
<v Speaker 9>caught her interview with Laura Jays this morning, an absolute

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 9>train wreck.

0:25:48.020 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I have no doubt.

0:25:48.660 --> 0:25:54.220
<v Speaker 9>She didn't even know whether news media websites were in

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 9>or out. She finally agreed that news media websites are

0:25:58.859 --> 0:26:03.859
<v Speaker 9>included in this bill. So there's no exemption for journalism,

0:26:03.980 --> 0:26:07.719
<v Speaker 9>for media websites, Of course, which is a fundamental tenet

0:26:08.060 --> 0:26:11.340
<v Speaker 9>of our democracy. It's a real mess and it's another

0:26:11.420 --> 0:26:16.940
<v Speaker 9>example of the insidious, extreme left agenda of the Albanese government.

0:26:17.300 --> 0:26:19.500
<v Speaker 1>Oh, 100%. I mean, also, we've seen, right, where the

0:26:19.540 --> 0:26:22.220
<v Speaker 1>government declares what truth is, and we saw that in

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:26.090
<v Speaker 1>and around COVID, a more pronounced scenario in the United States. Well,

0:26:26.109 --> 0:26:29.490
<v Speaker 1>of course, that being a health matter, the idea of harmful... Again,

0:26:30.650 --> 0:26:32.890
<v Speaker 1>you've got to test the principles of these things, right,

0:26:32.930 --> 0:26:36.830
<v Speaker 1>and the broader issues... around them how they can be

0:26:36.869 --> 0:26:40.630
<v Speaker 1>misinterpreted that's part of the process here so again we're

0:26:40.650 --> 0:26:42.609
<v Speaker 1>not going to negotiate this publicly here but if it

0:26:42.670 --> 0:26:45.110
<v Speaker 1>ends a very tight list of things as you say

0:26:45.150 --> 0:26:47.190
<v Speaker 1>pornography all the rest of it then okay maybe there's

0:26:47.210 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a conversation but one last thing here um again devil

0:26:50.500 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in the detail i'm always fascinated by this which is

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>so under the rule which would say i can press

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:57.100
<v Speaker 1>a button and all i will see on my instagram

0:26:57.140 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>feed is the people that i follow Let me guess,

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.409
<v Speaker 1>is there an exemption for political communication? Is there an

0:27:02.470 --> 0:27:04.889
<v Speaker 1>exemption that Annika Wells might be able to pop up

0:27:04.950 --> 0:27:07.770
<v Speaker 1>in my feed still? That those Labor backbenchers who spend

0:27:07.810 --> 0:27:10.290
<v Speaker 1>all day every day making social... Is there a secret

0:27:10.330 --> 0:27:13.060
<v Speaker 1>little backdoor where it doesn't apply to the people in

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the building you're in right now?

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 6>Wouldn't that be wonderful?

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.330
<v Speaker 9>Of course, Annika Wells gave an interview where she talked about,

0:27:20.850 --> 0:27:23.070
<v Speaker 9>you know, we've got to turn the algorithm off because,

0:27:23.090 --> 0:27:28.210
<v Speaker 9>you know, no-one trusts even government anymore. And I would say, Annika,

0:27:28.690 --> 0:27:31.629
<v Speaker 9>no-one trusts you because you are the worst lying government

0:27:31.650 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 9>we've ever had in power, including the horrific lies of

0:27:35.940 --> 0:27:37.780
<v Speaker 9>this Prime Minister.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 6>No wonder no-one trusts you.

0:27:40.180 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 9>So, look, we're very open-minded about this whole discussion about

0:27:43.380 --> 0:27:48.330
<v Speaker 9>turning off government... the profile or the content recommendation algorithm.

0:27:48.369 --> 0:27:50.710
<v Speaker 9>We think that much more work needs to be done. And,

0:27:50.750 --> 0:27:54.230
<v Speaker 9>of course, when this was announced yesterday by the Prime Minister,

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:58.060
<v Speaker 9>he talked all about, my feed, my way, we're going

0:27:58.080 --> 0:27:59.620
<v Speaker 9>to make sure that we can.

0:27:59.540 --> 0:28:02.180
<v Speaker 6>Protect your feed. But guess what?

0:28:02.420 --> 0:28:07.110
<v Speaker 9>There's nothing in the bill which actually... outlines that particular power.

0:28:07.490 --> 0:28:11.470
<v Speaker 9>That is another regulation making power.

0:28:11.170 --> 0:28:11.850
<v Speaker 6>Of the minister.

0:28:12.369 --> 0:28:15.909
<v Speaker 9>So look, there's a lot of smoke and mirrors, but fundamentally,

0:28:16.650 --> 0:28:19.199
<v Speaker 9>we have to protect free speech in this country.

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 6>It's a fundamental part of our democracy, Paul.

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.380
<v Speaker 9>This is a serious threat to free speech.

0:28:24.859 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 6>And if the government is not.

0:28:26.140 --> 0:28:31.830
<v Speaker 9>Prepared to move on these incredibly important issues, I mean,

0:28:31.930 --> 0:28:33.010
<v Speaker 9>this is a disaster.

0:28:33.150 --> 0:28:34.170
<v Speaker 6>It cannot be supported.

0:28:34.170 --> 0:28:37.270
<v Speaker 1>100 per cent. I'm not interested in Annika Wells' versions

0:28:37.330 --> 0:28:38.990
<v Speaker 1>of thumbs up and thumbs down because she can't even

0:28:39.030 --> 0:28:41.130
<v Speaker 1>add up or she's... All right, thank you very much, Senator.

0:28:41.150 --> 0:28:43.630
<v Speaker 1>I do appreciate it. Senator Sarah Henderson there is the

0:28:43.670 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Shadow Communications Minister. There's something in this. There really is

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>something in this. Again, they want to keep it all

0:28:48.980 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>at the headline. The joy is they've actually got to

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.010
<v Speaker 1>produce the bill and the details that are inside it.

0:28:53.060 --> 0:28:55.340
<v Speaker 1>Let's see where all of this process goes. It's messy,

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's one... worth talking about. We will debate that

0:28:57.580 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and a whole lot more in a moment or two's time.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.580
<v Speaker 1>I told you it's fight night. Oh, the man cave's

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:03.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be rocking in a moment or two's time.

0:29:03.910 --> 0:29:05.930
<v Speaker 1>Does one of our guests think this is a rort

0:29:06.550 --> 0:29:11.850
<v Speaker 1>or delivering on election commitments? This will be fun. More

0:29:11.870 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in a sec. Thank you very much for watching. We'll

0:29:19.020 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have to put off the fight in the Man Cave

0:29:20.100 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>for another time, but we'll still have a fight. Don't worry.

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Linda Scott joins us now from Canberra. Lucy Zelich was

0:29:24.340 --> 0:29:25.940
<v Speaker 1>ready to look her right in the eye and have

0:29:25.980 --> 0:29:27.700
<v Speaker 1>a go here in the Man Cave. We'll put her

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.110
<v Speaker 1>off for a week, though. Lovely to see you both, ladies.

0:29:30.270 --> 0:29:33.110
<v Speaker 1>All right, Lucy. So the government comes up with half

0:29:33.130 --> 0:29:36.350
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars that they decide to send mostly to

0:29:36.370 --> 0:29:38.770
<v Speaker 1>where they want it to go politically, yet the Prime

0:29:38.790 --> 0:29:41.030
<v Speaker 1>Minister's kind of trying to do... fake news around all this.

0:29:41.070 --> 0:29:41.550
<v Speaker 1>What do you reckon?

0:29:42.490 --> 0:29:45.150
<v Speaker 4>Oh, might this be the time we disagree?

0:29:45.170 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 10>Ooh!

0:29:45.810 --> 0:29:48.370
<v Speaker 5>And I upset a couple of viewers. I don't know,

0:29:48.430 --> 0:29:49.950
<v Speaker 5>I get beat up vibes around this.

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:50.650
<v Speaker 1>Really?

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I get a little bit of beat up vibes.

0:29:53.340 --> 0:29:55.380
<v Speaker 5>You know, and I know that a lot of comparisons

0:29:55.420 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 5>have been made to the situation that occurred with Bridget

0:29:57.560 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 5>McKenzie when she was forced to resign over the sports

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 5>rules affair. But at that time as well, I think

0:30:02.580 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 5>PM &amp; C had declared that she had breached ministerial rules.

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 4>It would be very.

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 5>Interesting to see what would happen with this if it

0:30:08.790 --> 0:30:10.570
<v Speaker 5>went to PM &amp; C and it had to go

0:30:10.610 --> 0:30:14.730
<v Speaker 5>through similar checks and balances, but this just felt a

0:30:14.930 --> 0:30:17.910
<v Speaker 5>little bit like it was clutching, given that it's his local.

0:30:17.610 --> 0:30:19.580
<v Speaker 4>Golf club, he doesn't go.

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.620
<v Speaker 5>Is there much in this, Paulie?

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not pretending that the membership to the golf

0:30:23.860 --> 0:30:26.620
<v Speaker 1>club is the hook of which all of this sits on.

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about how does it work that half a

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:33.290
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars... which is supposed to be for community organisations,

0:30:33.510 --> 0:30:37.990
<v Speaker 1>ends up $ 400 million in Labor seats versus $ 123 million

0:30:38.070 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in Coalition seats. Linda, what exactly is the best defence

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of this? Because I have no doubt you've got it

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:44.090
<v Speaker 1>for me.

0:30:46.210 --> 0:30:49.890
<v Speaker 11>Well, look, as you know, I hate to agree with Lucy... No!

0:30:49.970 --> 0:30:51.990
<v Speaker 12>but I actually do agree with her here.

0:30:52.310 --> 0:30:54.470
<v Speaker 11>And I think it is important to call out, right,

0:30:54.540 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 11>this is a grant program that is designed to allow

0:30:57.380 --> 0:30:59.460
<v Speaker 11>government to meet their election commitments.

0:30:59.500 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Invitation only.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 11>It is assessed independently by public servants for value for

0:31:03.980 --> 0:31:06.140
<v Speaker 11>money and for aligning with the promise.

0:31:07.030 --> 0:31:09.010
<v Speaker 12>My understanding is it was found to be.

0:31:08.890 --> 0:31:13.230
<v Speaker 11>Value for money and committed to by Minister King, whose

0:31:13.290 --> 0:31:15.590
<v Speaker 11>electorate is not the electorate of Grainley where the golf

0:31:15.610 --> 0:31:16.090
<v Speaker 11>club was.

0:31:16.110 --> 0:31:16.730
<v Speaker 10>No, no, no.

0:31:16.750 --> 0:31:19.590
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not talking about the freaking golf club. Come on, mate.

0:31:19.830 --> 0:31:22.020
<v Speaker 1>It's half a bill. That's what I'm talking about. If

0:31:22.020 --> 0:31:22.540
<v Speaker 1>400 million.

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's money to fix a leaking.

0:31:25.980 --> 0:31:27.860
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, I'm not talking about this anymore... that

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:29.020
<v Speaker 1>was literally.

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 12>Pumping poo into a local river, right?

0:31:31.540 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>OK, I'm talking about what everyone can see on screen, Linda.

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 11>of public money. I'd love to meet them, right? But

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:42.340
<v Speaker 11>this is a grant program designed for governments to, you know,

0:31:42.660 --> 0:31:46.020
<v Speaker 11>fulfil their election commitments with probity and transparency and value

0:31:46.060 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 11>for money.

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 10>Either.

0:31:47.750 --> 0:31:51.670
<v Speaker 11>The Coalition thinks the government should not uphold their election commitments,

0:31:51.870 --> 0:31:54.340
<v Speaker 11>or they do. If they do think they should, because

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.940
<v Speaker 11>they're in the House every day here in Canberra saying,

0:31:57.180 --> 0:31:57.700
<v Speaker 11>uphold your.

0:31:57.620 --> 0:32:00.500
<v Speaker 12>Election commitments, how do they think the government should do it?

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:02.940
<v Speaker 11>They should do it through this grant program with rules

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.010
<v Speaker 11>that is assessed by public servants as being value for

0:32:06.050 --> 0:32:07.930
<v Speaker 11>money and in line with the commitment, right?

0:32:07.950 --> 0:32:08.070
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:32:08.090 --> 0:32:10.530
<v Speaker 11>So governments have to have a way of making commitments

0:32:10.590 --> 0:32:12.470
<v Speaker 11>about public money and then delivering them.

0:32:12.930 --> 0:32:16.140
<v Speaker 12>And if they can't, they can't... They can't hold their promises.

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:18.340
<v Speaker 1>All right. So I'm going to test this talking point, okay,

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 1>which is because Stephen said the same thing last night, right?

0:32:21.500 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So the collective mind is working heavily on the red

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:27.860
<v Speaker 1>side of the desk, right?

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 10>Okay.

0:32:29.220 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 11>And Lucy, who's definitely not on the red side.

0:32:32.580 --> 0:32:34.100
<v Speaker 4>To be fair, I'm talking about the golf club.

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 12>I don't speak to you. She's just, yeah.

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Here we go. To the man with the red

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>jacket on. Okay. Here's the deal. There are 150 electorates

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.100
<v Speaker 1>in the country of which Labor ran in 150 seats,

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>which meant they made a promise in 150 seats, right? Correct?

0:32:47.500 --> 0:32:49.670
<v Speaker 1>We'd all agree that's the case? Correct. Right? They won

0:32:49.670 --> 0:32:52.530
<v Speaker 1>94 of the 150 seats, which is a lot, but

0:32:52.570 --> 0:32:57.510
<v Speaker 1>it's not as much as everyone can see here, where

0:32:57.510 --> 0:33:00.670
<v Speaker 1>400 million of the 500 million ends up only in

0:33:00.710 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the 94 seats that Labor had a focus on. That's

0:33:03.780 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>my point, Lucy. The whole point, right?

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:06.580
<v Speaker 10>Now.

0:33:07.210 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Every single one here. Am I coming out against the

0:33:10.100 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>spending on the swimming pool?

0:33:11.900 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 13>No.

0:33:12.300 --> 0:33:16.500
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, if this was $ 400 million that went

0:33:16.540 --> 0:33:17.780
<v Speaker 1>where the Libs wanted it to go.

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:19.540
<v Speaker 4>Oh, they'd be making a big deal out of it.

0:33:19.580 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>That's my point.

0:33:20.300 --> 0:33:22.390
<v Speaker 4>And let's highlight that point, right, because it is a

0:33:22.420 --> 0:33:23.230
<v Speaker 4>very fair one.

0:33:23.370 --> 0:33:25.250
<v Speaker 5>I think what gets a lot of people's noses out

0:33:25.290 --> 0:33:27.910
<v Speaker 5>of joints is the level of hypocrisy that is leveraged

0:33:27.970 --> 0:33:30.930
<v Speaker 5>at situations and in situations like this. So when we

0:33:30.950 --> 0:33:33.410
<v Speaker 5>cast our minds back to when Bridget McKenzie was forced

0:33:33.450 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 5>to step down, Alba was going hard for her, right,

0:33:36.380 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 5>saying she's got to go, she's got to this, she's

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:38.620
<v Speaker 5>got to that.

0:33:38.820 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And credit to the Teals, at least they are being

0:33:40.940 --> 0:33:43.010
<v Speaker 1>level on this, right? At least they're going in both

0:33:43.070 --> 0:33:45.330
<v Speaker 1>directions here. Let's see how long it lasts.

0:33:45.390 --> 0:33:45.550
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:33:45.980 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>All right? They're going to steal back in Labor anyway.

0:33:48.020 --> 0:33:49.959
<v Speaker 5>Wait till a climate change issue pops up and then

0:33:49.980 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 5>we'll watch them get off kilter. But there is that

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 5>issue of pork barrelling, which has been something that occurs

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.900
<v Speaker 5>within politics and has for a very long time.

0:33:59.100 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 4>We have to admit that.

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.340
<v Speaker 1>I'm off in the wrong place. You can always send

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>me that email.

0:34:02.900 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't think you're off in the wrong place.

0:34:04.540 --> 0:34:06.420
<v Speaker 1>I'm not being sensitive. I'm saying you can send me

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.140
<v Speaker 1>an email because this is an open communication program. We

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>like it. All right. Linda, the social media stuff, I

0:34:11.660 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much you just heard there of the

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>shadow minister.

0:34:14.540 --> 0:34:14.700
<v Speaker 10>Again.

0:34:15.350 --> 0:34:18.890
<v Speaker 1>On the headline of stuff, I've got kids and I'm also,

0:34:19.290 --> 0:34:20.830
<v Speaker 1>you know, a victim of the doom scroll like everyone

0:34:20.850 --> 0:34:22.509
<v Speaker 1>else in the middle of the night, okay? I don't

0:34:22.550 --> 0:34:25.770
<v Speaker 1>have any problem with a button that says I'm only

0:34:25.790 --> 0:34:27.569
<v Speaker 1>going to follow and I'm only going to see what

0:34:27.610 --> 0:34:30.180
<v Speaker 1>Lucy posts and I'm only going to see what Linda

0:34:30.219 --> 0:34:32.859
<v Speaker 1>posts and I'm only going to sit with my mates. Fine, right?

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:36.219
<v Speaker 1>No problem. I don't think most people will end up

0:34:36.260 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>choosing what else is around because that is the way

0:34:39.300 --> 0:34:41.380
<v Speaker 1>it works on YouTube and Spotify and all the rest.

0:34:41.580 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>The only way you learn about something outside of your

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>own little column is is generally that way. However, the

0:34:47.340 --> 0:34:50.910
<v Speaker 1>specific power for the minister to decide what is harmful,

0:34:50.950 --> 0:34:56.330
<v Speaker 1>do you have any concerns if, let's imagine, Barnaby Joyce

0:34:56.610 --> 0:35:00.170
<v Speaker 1>became the communications minister in the next parliament and he

0:35:00.230 --> 0:35:03.990
<v Speaker 1>had individual power over what is harmful on the internet,

0:35:04.330 --> 0:35:06.850
<v Speaker 1>how would you feel about that, Linda? Because that is

0:35:07.250 --> 0:35:10.089
<v Speaker 1>what we're being told is the consequence of the bill.

0:35:11.989 --> 0:35:13.569
<v Speaker 11>Well, look, I'm here in Canberra this week trying to

0:35:13.590 --> 0:35:16.049
<v Speaker 11>meet with Barnaby Joyce about superannuation. He's not taken up

0:35:16.070 --> 0:35:16.710
<v Speaker 11>my offer to meet.

0:35:16.790 --> 0:35:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'd like to have a conversation with him.

0:35:18.310 --> 0:35:20.689
<v Speaker 12>Barnaby, answer her call. Let me say that on Sky News.

0:35:21.390 --> 0:35:21.870
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, News 24.

0:35:21.850 --> 0:35:23.430
<v Speaker 1>Please, please.

0:35:24.130 --> 0:35:26.570
<v Speaker 12>Sorry, News 24. My apologies. But I do want to

0:35:26.610 --> 0:35:29.629
<v Speaker 12>say this, Paul. I think that the digital.

0:35:29.430 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 11>Duty of care is a really important legislative principle that

0:35:33.940 --> 0:35:37.020
<v Speaker 11>countries around the world are now looking at and that

0:35:37.060 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 11>countries like Australia should legislate for.

0:35:39.060 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 4>So I really welcome that. Spoken like a true communist.

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 11>LAUGHTER But I do understand that the devil is in

0:35:44.260 --> 0:35:44.990
<v Speaker 11>the detail, right?

0:35:45.010 --> 0:35:45.110
<v Speaker 10>Sure.

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.430
<v Speaker 11>I do understand that, you know, we've got to have

0:35:47.469 --> 0:35:51.549
<v Speaker 11>protections around news. We've got to have protections around journalism.

0:35:51.590 --> 0:35:54.390
<v Speaker 11>We've got to have protections around these things. But it's

0:35:54.430 --> 0:35:57.140
<v Speaker 11>a very hard thing to legislate and it's a very

0:35:57.180 --> 0:35:59.959
<v Speaker 11>hard path to weave through. So, I mean, I'll speak

0:35:59.980 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 11>very honestly with you. I think we've got to find

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 11>a way through here. But what I don't want to

0:36:04.620 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 11>see is.

0:36:06.020 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 12>A whole bill with a digital duty of care knocked

0:36:09.489 --> 0:36:10.569
<v Speaker 12>over because.

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:13.739
<v Speaker 11>The stuff that is being served up, as you say,

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 11>you know, to my teenage sons, to your children, it

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.910
<v Speaker 11>is socially, morally, ethically unacceptable.

0:36:21.010 --> 0:36:21.770
<v Speaker 12>It is dangerous.

0:36:21.790 --> 0:36:23.989
<v Speaker 11>It is changing young people's brains in a way that

0:36:24.050 --> 0:36:26.469
<v Speaker 11>is so unhelpful for them and their future lives and

0:36:26.510 --> 0:36:29.489
<v Speaker 11>those of every other Australian. We have got to do

0:36:29.570 --> 0:36:33.170
<v Speaker 11>something about this and it is really urgent. The social

0:36:33.210 --> 0:36:35.410
<v Speaker 11>media companies need to take more responsibility.

0:36:36.190 --> 0:36:38.230
<v Speaker 1>But also, right, I would argue that the brain rot

0:36:38.250 --> 0:36:41.260
<v Speaker 1>that exists on reels and shorts, right, that I often

0:36:41.300 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>end up walking into the room and barking at the

0:36:43.500 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 1>kids because it's some, you know, person dressed in pink

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>unboxing something. Just the crap. There's so much garbage in

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:51.919
<v Speaker 1>and around the internet. But again, a whole other bunch

0:36:51.940 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that's harmful. Luce, again, normally we hold hands,

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>but your thoughts on this?

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.740
<v Speaker 5>I think this is just as, you know, Peter Credlin

0:36:59.780 --> 0:37:01.989
<v Speaker 5>put it, this is the Trojan horse. I think the

0:37:02.030 --> 0:37:03.649
<v Speaker 5>whole phrasing around.

0:37:03.350 --> 0:37:07.630
<v Speaker 4>This digital duty of care, this just sounds like insanity

0:37:07.670 --> 0:37:08.630
<v Speaker 4>to me, quite frankly.

0:37:08.730 --> 0:37:10.330
<v Speaker 5>And I think a lot of that was revealed this

0:37:10.390 --> 0:37:13.340
<v Speaker 5>morning in what was a car crash interview between Laura Jay's..

0:37:14.060 --> 0:37:17.310
<v Speaker 5>and their communications minister, Annika Wells, where she effectively revealed

0:37:17.330 --> 0:37:20.410
<v Speaker 5>that news organisations would be caught up in the algorithms.

0:37:20.430 --> 0:37:20.790
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, of course.

0:37:20.810 --> 0:37:23.410
<v Speaker 4>There have been so many instances where.

0:37:23.230 --> 0:37:25.530
<v Speaker 5>I've been scrolling through and I see a news service

0:37:25.550 --> 0:37:27.820
<v Speaker 5>that I don't follow, journalists that I don't follow.

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:29.919
<v Speaker 4>This would be captured by all of this.

0:37:29.940 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Correct, correct.

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:34.060
<v Speaker 5>And, again, as Linda rightly put, the devil is in

0:37:34.100 --> 0:37:36.219
<v Speaker 5>the detail, but we're starting to see more of these

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 5>details emerge... And I'm not agreeing with them. I don't

0:37:39.510 --> 0:37:42.590
<v Speaker 5>think that any of this is actually going to protect children.

0:37:42.910 --> 0:37:45.069
<v Speaker 5>I think if you're that damn concerned about what your

0:37:45.110 --> 0:37:48.170
<v Speaker 5>children are being exposed to, get them off it completely.

0:37:48.570 --> 0:37:50.450
<v Speaker 4>You are the parent. You are the authority.

0:37:50.469 --> 0:37:53.230
<v Speaker 1>But also, to me, the children excuse, as given by

0:37:53.270 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the Minister, haven't you already introduced a ban that means

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the kids aren't there? We've already got legislation. It's been

0:37:57.140 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>banned for under 16. By the way, you mentioned that

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 1>conversation between Laura and the Minister for Freebies, the Minister

0:38:03.380 --> 0:38:05.540
<v Speaker 1>for Ooshies, the one with So many free tickets that

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:06.500
<v Speaker 1>she's got them on herself.

0:38:06.540 --> 0:38:09.390
<v Speaker 4>She's not going to New York, though, remember? She's not going.

0:38:09.410 --> 0:38:12.190
<v Speaker 1>So guess what? I found the tape and here it is.

0:38:13.830 --> 0:38:18.470
<v Speaker 11>If you were turning off the algorithm, that would change

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:20.460
<v Speaker 11>how news websites would be seen, would it not?

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:23.380
<v Speaker 12>Well, you as a user.

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:26.110
<v Speaker 13>would be making a choice about whether you wish to

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.230
<v Speaker 13>follow the algorithm or whether you wish to follow your

0:38:28.290 --> 0:38:31.850
<v Speaker 13>following feed, which is your friends and the online creators

0:38:31.890 --> 0:38:33.820
<v Speaker 13>that you choose to follow. So if you choose to

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:38.590
<v Speaker 13>follow News24 on your following feed, you'd see it.

0:38:39.489 --> 0:38:42.050
<v Speaker 1>Oh, so sassy. Always sassy. She had no idea.

0:38:42.310 --> 0:38:42.489
<v Speaker 12>None.

0:38:42.630 --> 0:38:45.910
<v Speaker 1>Zero. Zero. That she was talking about. Now, there's something

0:38:45.930 --> 0:38:47.430
<v Speaker 1>that I should talk about and I desperately want to

0:38:47.450 --> 0:38:49.390
<v Speaker 1>talk about with both of you, which is, again, the

0:38:49.510 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>crazy side of the internet, the abusive side of the internet.

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:55.140
<v Speaker 1>And there are, and I've talked about this plenty of

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:59.420
<v Speaker 1>times before, way too many threats that are made against

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.060
<v Speaker 1>people in the public eye and the types of threats

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.469
<v Speaker 1>that women receive in the public eye are a disgrace.

0:39:04.930 --> 0:39:07.790
<v Speaker 1>The idea that because you disagree with somebody, oh, here's

0:39:07.810 --> 0:39:13.390
<v Speaker 1>the reference to... Assault, right? The worst possible physical violations,

0:39:13.450 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>all the rest, disgusting, right? Disgusting. Now, I would love

0:39:19.300 --> 0:39:22.860
<v Speaker 1>a system where the most hateful stuff that is typed

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.610
<v Speaker 1>somehow is killed before it even can make it online,

0:39:25.870 --> 0:39:30.100
<v Speaker 1>but sadly, it exists. So, Linda, how do we... deal

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>with this? Because it is a disgrace. It is not OK.

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>If I could jump in front of a comment that

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:38.069
<v Speaker 1>hurts any of my friends, I gladly would. But both

0:39:38.110 --> 0:39:40.569
<v Speaker 1>of you have been on the end of it. So

0:39:41.070 --> 0:39:42.630
<v Speaker 1>what is the potential solution here?

0:39:44.620 --> 0:39:46.500
<v Speaker 11>Well, Paul, I don't want you to jump in front

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:48.900
<v Speaker 11>of anything because I don't want you to be unsafe either.

0:39:48.980 --> 0:39:52.370
<v Speaker 12>But I do think it's important to... Thank you.

0:39:52.890 --> 0:39:55.630
<v Speaker 11>you know, call out that it continues to be a

0:39:55.670 --> 0:39:58.430
<v Speaker 11>problem and it does seem to be increasing. There's an

0:39:58.469 --> 0:40:02.230
<v Speaker 11>incredible article today talking about some of the sad arrests

0:40:02.310 --> 0:40:05.780
<v Speaker 11>that have been made by people who have made threats

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.380
<v Speaker 11>against elected representatives in, you know, state and federal parliaments.

0:40:09.780 --> 0:40:12.060
<v Speaker 11>I had a few death threats when I was in

0:40:12.590 --> 0:40:14.810
<v Speaker 11>council at the City of Sydney. But I have to say,

0:40:15.170 --> 0:40:17.890
<v Speaker 11>even as a person who's left politics now, you know,

0:40:17.930 --> 0:40:22.149
<v Speaker 11>who serves only on boards, Even there I get sometimes

0:40:22.670 --> 0:40:24.810
<v Speaker 11>pretty violent, aggressive threats.

0:40:24.850 --> 0:40:26.710
<v Speaker 12>So it's pretty astonishing to me.

0:40:26.770 --> 0:40:28.649
<v Speaker 11>I just wanted to call out that I do think

0:40:28.710 --> 0:40:32.730
<v Speaker 11>this is occurring for women in a range of roles,

0:40:32.870 --> 0:40:34.220
<v Speaker 11>not just politics.

0:40:34.780 --> 0:40:36.280
<v Speaker 12>And, you know, whatever we can.

0:40:36.140 --> 0:40:38.700
<v Speaker 11>Do to ensure that, you know, going to work is

0:40:38.780 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 11>a safe space, whether that's here in Federal.

0:40:40.739 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 12>Parliament or elsewhere, you know, in a boardroom or in

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:44.500
<v Speaker 12>a shop in Woolworths.

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.670
<v Speaker 11>You know, you're seeing workers get abused even in, as

0:40:47.710 --> 0:40:49.930
<v Speaker 11>their union has called out the SDA, even in kind

0:40:49.969 --> 0:40:52.930
<v Speaker 11>of retail stores. Like, this has just got to stop.

0:40:52.989 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 11>People deserve to be safe. If people feel, you know, angry...

0:40:57.580 --> 0:40:59.339
<v Speaker 11>Can we get into sport or something?

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 12>Go for a run, you know? Just please don't take

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 12>it out on other people.

0:41:03.500 --> 0:41:05.910
<v Speaker 1>And, again, anyone who decides to be rude to these

0:41:05.930 --> 0:41:08.589
<v Speaker 1>two ladies, guess what you've just triggered, this bloke, all right?

0:41:08.750 --> 0:41:10.550
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but you can do it because, you know what, whatever.

0:41:10.590 --> 0:41:13.230
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. I don't care. I've got to go.

0:41:13.290 --> 0:41:15.910
<v Speaker 1>A lady who's, well, certainly immune to the world of

0:41:15.969 --> 0:41:18.469
<v Speaker 1>internet commentary is our dear friend Megan Kelly. We're going

0:41:18.489 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 1>to have a chat to her about... Some of these

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.730
<v Speaker 1>jurors have started to talk in this crazy story about

0:41:23.750 --> 0:41:25.770
<v Speaker 1>the lady who admitted to killing her kids, but they

0:41:25.910 --> 0:41:28.260
<v Speaker 1>didn't think she should be found guilty. This is crazy.

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:35.529
<v Speaker 1>More in a sec. It's our favourite time of the

0:41:35.550 --> 0:41:36.950
<v Speaker 1>week to talk to our favourite person in the world,

0:41:36.969 --> 0:41:38.890
<v Speaker 1>the one, the only, the wonderful Megan Kelly. Megan, lovely

0:41:38.930 --> 0:41:41.629
<v Speaker 1>to see you. So we're starting to hear from some

0:41:41.650 --> 0:41:44.410
<v Speaker 1>of the jurors that were in the case and couldn't

0:41:44.450 --> 0:41:47.840
<v Speaker 1>make a decision about whether the mother accused of killing

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 1>three of her own children was guilty of murder or not. Now,

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:55.919
<v Speaker 1>she admitted, of course, to killing those kids, but postpartum depression, well,

0:41:56.260 --> 0:41:58.420
<v Speaker 1>it seemed to play a massive factor in the case.

0:41:58.480 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>What are they saying?

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 12>Oh, M.G.

0:42:01.300 --> 0:42:04.580
<v Speaker 10>So now as we go to air here, the three

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 10>of the jurors have sat down with one woman who

0:42:08.300 --> 0:42:12.029
<v Speaker 10>wants us to be clear that she is a journalist

0:42:12.190 --> 0:42:15.629
<v Speaker 10>who is a commentator, not a reporter. So she sat

0:42:15.670 --> 0:42:19.270
<v Speaker 10>down with three of the jurors and I believe one

0:42:19.290 --> 0:42:22.290
<v Speaker 10>of them is the foreperson. And this is this was

0:42:22.330 --> 0:42:24.270
<v Speaker 10>her tease for the segment, which is all we have

0:42:24.310 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 10>right now. Quote, One of them, the jurors, said they

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 10>were so impressed that if they needed representation, they would

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:36.459
<v Speaker 10>hire Kevin Reddington, Lindsay Clancy's lawyer. They said they thought

0:42:36.500 --> 0:42:41.850
<v Speaker 10>the prosecution showed no compassion during the trial. And Ronnie

0:42:41.910 --> 0:42:46.130
<v Speaker 10>talked a lot about how managing those deliberations was harder

0:42:46.230 --> 0:42:46.790
<v Speaker 10>than her.

0:42:46.730 --> 0:42:48.830
<v Speaker 4>Work as a fifth grade teacher.

0:42:50.230 --> 0:42:53.660
<v Speaker 10>Oh, like the pesky one holdout who really wanted to

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:59.020
<v Speaker 10>hold the mother who murdered her three children accountable. Scold, scold, scold,

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 10>which it's, it all makes perfect sense now how these

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:06.410
<v Speaker 10>11 little tisk tiskers couldn't get the one dude who

0:43:06.450 --> 0:43:09.390
<v Speaker 10>was like, I'm voting to hold her accountable.

0:43:09.630 --> 0:43:12.029
<v Speaker 4>I think she's guilty. I'm not buying this nonsense and

0:43:12.050 --> 0:43:12.469
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going.

0:43:12.390 --> 0:43:15.700
<v Speaker 10>To vote non-guilty by reason of criminal defect or insanity. Um,

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 10>that they basically, in the end, found a clever way

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 10>of getting him by saying.

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:23.720
<v Speaker 4>He expressed a doubt. He expressed a doubt.

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:28.029
<v Speaker 10>But he refuses to apply the standard of reasonable.

0:43:27.550 --> 0:43:32.069
<v Speaker 4>Doubt to that doubt. Daddy, that's what they ran to

0:43:32.090 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 4>the judge with. Oh, Daddy, please make our brother behave

0:43:35.860 --> 0:43:37.299
<v Speaker 4>and do what we told him to.

0:43:37.980 --> 0:43:42.129
<v Speaker 10>And the judge was spot on understanding this sounds like

0:43:42.150 --> 0:43:45.250
<v Speaker 10>a dispute of fact. He's got a doubt, but it

0:43:45.290 --> 0:43:47.230
<v Speaker 10>doesn't rise in his mind to the level of a

0:43:47.310 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 10>reasonable doubt. And that's absolutely normal for any jury deliberation.

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:57.100
<v Speaker 10>Reasonable doubt, beyond all reasonable doubt, doesn't mean beyond all doubt.

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:01.740
<v Speaker 10>It's an important, very important, relevant distinction in the jury room.

0:44:02.070 --> 0:44:04.550
<v Speaker 1>Now, also, let's talk about her lawyer, because her lawyer

0:44:04.650 --> 0:44:08.410
<v Speaker 1>is now openly asking for a pardon from President Trump,

0:44:08.550 --> 0:44:11.170
<v Speaker 1>which is weird, because I thought she wasn't guilty, according

0:44:11.210 --> 0:44:13.370
<v Speaker 1>to the lawyer. And there's a chance of a plea

0:44:13.410 --> 0:44:16.690
<v Speaker 1>deal because of how the jury was locked up. What's

0:44:16.710 --> 0:44:17.270
<v Speaker 1>going on there?

0:44:17.530 --> 0:44:19.569
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean, I think they're going to say, their

0:44:19.610 --> 0:44:23.150
<v Speaker 10>position is probably, we all agree she should be committed

0:44:23.190 --> 0:44:27.100
<v Speaker 10>to a mental health institution. And... let's just have a

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 10>deal that says that, Mr.

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:29.100
<v Speaker 1>Prosecutor.

0:44:29.780 --> 0:44:33.320
<v Speaker 10>And the prosecution has been saying, I don't agree. I

0:44:33.380 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 10>disagree to disagree. I don't believe she belongs in the

0:44:37.580 --> 0:44:41.090
<v Speaker 10>mental institution. I believe she belongs in jail because we're

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:43.150
<v Speaker 10>at risk of her going into the mental institution and

0:44:43.170 --> 0:44:48.830
<v Speaker 10>then five, 10 years, or even sooner, some woke head

0:44:48.850 --> 0:44:51.770
<v Speaker 10>of the mental institution says, oh, she's not like the

0:44:51.810 --> 0:44:52.490
<v Speaker 10>rest of them.

0:44:53.050 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 12>She's not, you know, self-immolating.

0:44:56.150 --> 0:44:58.230
<v Speaker 10>The problem that the prosecution couldn't get past in this

0:44:58.250 --> 0:45:03.740
<v Speaker 10>case was that her mental unwellness did come on suddenly,

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.540
<v Speaker 10>and it was, whatever, six months after the birth of

0:45:06.580 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 10>her child, and she was saying the right things about postpartum, postpartum,

0:45:10.420 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 10>and she did, in Lindsay Clancy's defence, reach out to

0:45:13.890 --> 0:45:16.370
<v Speaker 10>many people for help and didn't get the adequate help

0:45:16.410 --> 0:45:16.770
<v Speaker 10>she needed.

0:45:17.010 --> 0:45:19.350
<v Speaker 1>Can you believe it's a year in the next couple

0:45:19.370 --> 0:45:22.350
<v Speaker 1>of days since he was murdered? Who knew that he

0:45:22.430 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was the load-carrying beam of... the 2024 election. So much

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 1>has fallen apart on the right side of politics since.

0:45:30.900 --> 0:45:33.589
<v Speaker 1>How are you feeling a year on from losing your mate?

0:45:34.489 --> 0:45:37.890
<v Speaker 4>It's hard to believe. It really does feel surreal to me.

0:45:37.910 --> 0:45:42.029
<v Speaker 10>I remember him so clearly coming on the show when

0:45:42.070 --> 0:45:45.060
<v Speaker 10>he would pop up and his manner and the banter

0:45:45.100 --> 0:45:50.069
<v Speaker 10>we'd have off air. He was constantly doing 12 different things.

0:45:50.210 --> 0:45:52.830
<v Speaker 10>You know, like Charlie, he would answer a question, then

0:45:52.850 --> 0:45:54.730
<v Speaker 10>you'd see him like searching something up on his computer.

0:45:54.770 --> 0:45:56.930
<v Speaker 10>He wanted to get ammo for his point, even live

0:45:56.969 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 10>on the air with you, like try to advance the

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:00.799
<v Speaker 10>case and keep the audience up to date on the

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:05.660
<v Speaker 10>last minute twists and turns of every story. And it's just,

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 10>there's so many aspects of it. You know, like now

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 10>I know Erica. I didn't know Erica when Charlie died,

0:46:10.910 --> 0:46:13.290
<v Speaker 10>but now I know Erica. And I think like the

0:46:14.270 --> 0:46:16.890
<v Speaker 10>the intense pain that she's had to deal with this year,

0:46:16.969 --> 0:46:20.129
<v Speaker 10>the intense responsibility. And then I try to separate that

0:46:20.190 --> 0:46:23.180
<v Speaker 10>from my own feelings of loss, which obviously don't compare,

0:46:23.219 --> 0:46:25.839
<v Speaker 10>but I just, you know, there's that too. And then

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:28.140
<v Speaker 10>the feelings of loss for, as you point out, the

0:46:28.180 --> 0:46:34.339
<v Speaker 10>conservative movement. You know, I've asked myself 10,000 times how

0:46:34.380 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 10>this past year would have gone differently for Republicans if

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:40.689
<v Speaker 10>Charlie had lived. I miss him for so many reasons, Paul.

0:46:40.730 --> 0:46:42.870
<v Speaker 10>I miss his own guidance to me. I miss his

0:46:42.930 --> 0:46:45.410
<v Speaker 10>own friendship to me. I miss his leadership. I miss

0:46:45.450 --> 0:46:50.390
<v Speaker 10>his affability, his sense of humor, his just willingness to

0:46:50.450 --> 0:46:54.029
<v Speaker 10>engage anybody. He shared what you and I share, which

0:46:54.130 --> 0:46:58.670
<v Speaker 10>is he would talk about a controversy that one of

0:46:58.710 --> 0:47:01.670
<v Speaker 10>his friends got in, but he would not rip on

0:47:01.690 --> 0:47:04.670
<v Speaker 10>the friend. He never would have been shamed into breaking

0:47:04.850 --> 0:47:09.410
<v Speaker 10>up with anybody at another person's demand. And you and

0:47:09.469 --> 0:47:12.770
<v Speaker 10>I both know that is very rare and very hard

0:47:12.870 --> 0:47:16.330
<v Speaker 10>to do. But he knew because he was subjected to it.

0:47:16.350 --> 0:47:19.430
<v Speaker 10>Charlie was one of those controversial figures on the planet

0:47:20.130 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 10>because he did speak very frankly about some issues that

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 10>affected the left, right? He was maybe a little less

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 10>frank when it came to right-wing criticism, but when it

0:47:28.780 --> 0:47:30.630
<v Speaker 10>came to the left, he would let you have it.

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 10>And that made him completely loathed by some section of

0:47:34.219 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 10>the left who didn't see the other side of him,

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:39.609
<v Speaker 10>which was all humanity. So my only hope is that

0:47:40.030 --> 0:47:44.390
<v Speaker 10>in the fullness of time, people, even his detractors, will

0:47:44.410 --> 0:47:47.110
<v Speaker 10>see who he was. Like, it kind of bums me

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:50.240
<v Speaker 10>out that the Charlie Kirk clips, they're not as ubiquitous

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:51.020
<v Speaker 10>on the air anymore.

0:47:51.780 --> 0:47:56.020
<v Speaker 4>They're not all over X. They're not being exchanged.

0:47:56.100 --> 0:47:58.719
<v Speaker 10>I don't know if they're still changing people the way

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:01.180
<v Speaker 10>they did in the months after he died. And I

0:48:01.219 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 10>just feel like, well, it's going to be up to

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:06.069
<v Speaker 10>the rest of us to try to keep him alive,

0:48:06.110 --> 0:48:07.030
<v Speaker 10>his message alive.

0:48:07.550 --> 0:48:08.969
<v Speaker 4>The real Charlie Kirk protected.

0:48:09.570 --> 0:48:14.299
<v Speaker 10>And then secondly, try to continue the spirit and the

0:48:14.430 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 10>overall mission of bringing, yes, the conservative movement together, but

0:48:18.860 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 10>also beyond that, to some extent, mankind, definitely Christians. He

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:29.009
<v Speaker 10>was a very important voice for keeping Christians on the

0:48:29.050 --> 0:48:34.130
<v Speaker 10>right path. And he would say Judeo-Christian tradition, alive, bound together,

0:48:34.570 --> 0:48:37.509
<v Speaker 10>and focused on the right items that we can agree on.

0:48:37.969 --> 0:48:41.830
<v Speaker 10>That is a Herculean challenge, as it turns out. No wonder,

0:48:41.850 --> 0:48:44.700
<v Speaker 10>you know, it took somebody like Charlie to do it

0:48:44.739 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 10>without us noticing. And now it's just going to be

0:48:47.580 --> 0:48:49.779
<v Speaker 10>a team effort to try to everybody pick up the

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:52.440
<v Speaker 10>mantle and try to do him some justice.

0:48:53.620 --> 0:48:56.219
<v Speaker 1>Beautifully said. Well, again, sorry from all of us, mate.

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:57.590
<v Speaker 1>Lovely to catch up with you and look forward to

0:48:57.620 --> 0:48:59.290
<v Speaker 1>seeing you next week. Thanks, Paul.

0:48:59.469 --> 0:48:59.790
<v Speaker 6>See you soon.

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 1>That is our show for tonight. Thank you very much

0:49:07.700 --> 0:49:11.970
<v Speaker 1>for watching. All the highlights at news24. com. au. See you again tomorrow.

0:49:12.010 --> 0:49:12.660
<v Speaker 1>Here's the late debate.