WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 25 November

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Lately.

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 2>General, welcome the late base.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 3>Well, thanks for joining us for a brand new week.

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm James Macpherson with Liz Staer and Caleb Bond. We've

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 3>got a lot to get through tonight, including Florida police

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 3>who catch a car thief and then taunt him online.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 4>Appropriate or inappropriate.

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.240
<v Speaker 3>We'll show you the video and you can decide. Plus,

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 3>when we look at what's making news tomorrow, The Australian

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 3>has got a front page exclusive detailing just how bad

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 3>the economy is under Jim Chalmers spoiler alert. It's worse

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 3>than you could possibly imagine. And you know those protests

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 3>in Newcastle yesterday with the climate change protesters. One of

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the people arrested was released on bail despite the fact

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 3>she had sixteen previous charges for similar offenses. All of

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 3>that when we look at the papers. You know, I

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 3>always thought it was the job of police to protect

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the public, but a UK police policy ours transgendered officers

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 3>to strip search women risks, turning police from protectors into predators.

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>The British Transport Police policy means that male officers who

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 3>identify as female can require a woman to strip naked

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 3>and then submit to a search. Now critics are calling

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>it state sanctioned sexual abuse, and it's pretty easy to

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 3>understand why. But when all of this came to public attention,

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 3>unbelievably the police have defended the policy saying it's in

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 3>line with equality laws.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Can you believe it? That just goes to demonstrate how.

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Badly abused the word equality is these days.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 4>In addition, police.

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Said, well, a woman always has the right to object

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>if she feels uncomfortable, which puts the onus on the

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 3>woman to protect herself from the police. And that's if

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 3>she realizes in time that she's being strip searched by

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 3>a biological male. In a addition, if she's got the

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 3>courage to challenge a police officer who's arresting her when

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 3>she's in a very vulnerable position. The other thing that

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 3>occurs to me, Lizen Caleb, is that if you question

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the sex of a police officer who's arresting you in

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 3>the UK the way things are, you're likely to be

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 3>charged with a hate crime to go along with your

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 3>strip search. This risks the safety of women, It brings

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 3>the reputation of the police force into disrepute, and as

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 3>I said, instead of seeing police as protectors, it invites

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 3>the public to imagine police officers as predators.

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 4>It almost feels like the whole world has lost its mind.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Police officer Sky Marden, who identifies as a woman, also

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 3>thinks that the world has lost its mind, except we

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 3>both can't be right. I'll let you watch and you

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 3>can work out who's right.

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>We are capable of so many amazing things.

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 2>But yet.

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty three we can fly helicopters Thune lass. But

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>yet the minutes somebody says, Hi, I'm trans I'm not binary,

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just different.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 2>The world it loses its.

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 4>Mind, lose. It's hard to disagree.

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 3>The world has certainly lost its mind, just not quite

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 3>in the way Officer Marden might imagine.

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 5>May if that guy tried to strip search me, one

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 5>of us would be leaving that encounter with no teeth

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 5>and a permanent limp, and it would not be me. Honestly,

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 5>I know we are the weakest ex ladies, but it's

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 5>amazing what adrenaline can do. The fact that the Transport

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 5>Police have tried this on when the National Police the

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 5>NCCP tried this on in January and were forced to

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 5>withdraw it because the Tory government at the time a

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 5>bit different now that we're four and a half months

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 5>into a chair Starmer government, the Tory government at the time,

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm kicked up such a fuss that the NCCP said,

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 5>oh okay, look we'll withdraw that the Transport Police have

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 5>done this in the knowledge that that is what happened

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 5>in January. So I hope very much that Brits rally

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 5>once again and make sure they kick up enough of

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 5>a storm.

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:22.799
<v Speaker 2>To turn this over.

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 5>Also, the question that absolutely boggles me every time something

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 5>like this happens is who is making these decisions. It's

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 5>always nameless, faceless bureaucrats.

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 6>It's always this invisible higher up.

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 5>So no one gets blamed, no one gets shamed, no

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 5>one gets named when something inevitably goes wrong.

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 6>Down the track.

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 5>And isn't this a galling reminder? In the UK it's

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 5>called the Gender Recognition Act, so that's what the Transport

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 5>Police are referring to when they say, well, look, this

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 5>is just in line with the current laws. This is

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 5>a galling reminder that when each of our states pasts

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 5>exactly the same legislation saying you can change your birth

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 5>certificate to reflect whatever gender you think you are at

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 5>the time, and everyone was told, were we all told, Oh,

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 5>what harm is it going to be?

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 6>It's just a piece of paper.

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 5>This goes to show you that's what the police are

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 5>relying on. They're saying, Look, if they've changed their birth

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 5>certificate or they have one of those gender change recognition

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 5>pieces of paper, that means they identify as a female,

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 5>and they get to feel women up under the guise

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 5>of a strip search, Whether women like it or not,

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 5>it is utterly outrageous. How much time and effort, the legislation,

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 5>the debates, the very fact that we're talking about it

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 5>yet again this evening. How much time governments and media

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 5>are spending on such a tiny minority the population. But

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 5>when fifty percent of us know that our rights are

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 5>being absolutely rail roaded by this tiny percentage, we've got

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 5>no choice but to fight for basic reality.

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 2>If I may briefly interrupt a serious discussion which I

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 2>will come back to for small moment of levity, are

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 2>we really taking advice on these sorts of things from

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 2>someone who thinks that we're flying helicopters on Mars. Here

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 2>is a police officer sky Morden. Again.

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 7>You know we can fly helicopters on Mars. But the

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 7>minute somebody says I'm trans, I just want to go

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 7>and buy a pint of milk and be myself and

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 7>not cause anybody any grief. The word literally seems to

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 7>me to lose its MinC.

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you can find me the job application

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 2>to go and fly helicopters on Mars, I'm all on

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 2>board with it. But we had this discussion last week

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 2>about to the first transgender person who's been elected to

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Congress in the US, and there was a real put

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 2>forward to strict women's toilets for funnily enough biological women,

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 2>and there was this great human cry about that, No,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 2>is it discrimination, et cetera. And the point I made

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>last week was that you are well within your rights

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to be a transgender person. I couldn't give two hoots

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 2>if you were transgender or not. But it is when

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>you start saying I am transgender, therefore my rights trump

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 2>everyone else's rights that we start to have a problem.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 2>And that's what this is talking about. There's no reason

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 2>you can't be a transgender police officer, but perhaps there's

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 2>certain duties that you just can't do as a transgender

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>police officer. And if a woman is being stript searched

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 2>or whatever the search might be by a transgender police officer.

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, knowing how this stuff is treated, and the

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 2>fact that according to the coppers, it's all good and

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 2>well for someone who is a biological male to be

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 2>searching a woman. Why would you, as a biological woman,

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 2>actually want to put your hand up and say I'm

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 2>not comfortable with this, because someone's going to jump down

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 2>your throat and say that you're discriminating against them. Right.

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>That's the problem here, is that you can't actually stand

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 2>up again.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, a lot of women because they are very conscientious,

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 5>and most women will just forbear something that they are

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 5>wildly uncomfortable with. I'm certainly not one of those, but

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 5>the wallflower types, people like my mum, would just be utterly.

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 6>Frozen and not know what on earth to do.

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 5>In such a situation. And I would say go so

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 5>far as to say that would be the majority of

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 5>women just trying to be polite in the situation, not

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 5>really sure, Like you say, Mac, no one wants to

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 5>be that person being like, hang on a minute, are

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 5>you transgender?

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 6>It is considered wildly polite in.

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 5>Today's society, and yet they're the ones this tiny minority

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 5>that are allowed to make women feel like, my goodness,

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 5>we have no rights left when you're allowed to strip searcher.

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 4>How bad it is.

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 3>In twenty twenty two, the UK police actually said if

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 3>you disagree with gender ideology, you.

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Should not be in the police s force.

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 3>So could you imagine trying to challenge that. But the

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 3>whole argument is dishonest. For instance, we heard the police

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 3>officer say, why can't a transgender person just go to

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 3>the shop and buy a pint of milk? Except're not

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 3>talking about that. Weactly right, strip search people. So that's

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 3>a false equivalency. And the other dishonest part, and this

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 3>is the nub of the issue.

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Whilst everwes we're.

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Insisting that trans women are women, we're always going to

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 3>have these problems. So you've got to come right back

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 3>to the basic premise, can you or can you not

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 3>change your gender? Answer that question and everything flows from that. Exactly,

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 3>if you get that wrong, everything is wrong. If you

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 3>get that right, then everything will be right. That's the

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 3>question that has to be determined once and for all.

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 5>And lastly, the question has to be asked, how many

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 5>trans transport police do you have UK like or.

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 6>Are your people are your higher ups in that system?

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 6>Liter just picking apart the shreds.

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 5>Of decency left in society because you can't tell me, oh,

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 5>we've got hundreds of them and we're standing up for

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 5>their rights and this is about equality. You've probably got

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 5>a handful in total if that, And were they even consulted,

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 5>because if they're decent human beings, they'd say, actually, I'm

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 5>happy to pass on the strip searching women. I can

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 5>understand that they would be wildly uncomfortable with that. You've

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 5>got to ask yourself who is making these decisions.

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 6>Nobody in their right mind would support this.

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 5>Nobody on the street, even the most avid I'm for

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 5>the trans movement supporter would be like, oh, hang on

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 5>a minute, yeah, that's a bit, especially if we're talking

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 5>about DV victims, women who have oh my goodness, I mean.

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Well virchasing bureaucrats is the answer to that. But who

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 2>would have thought that in the mid twenty twenties, questions

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 2>like what is a woman would be the things that

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 2>really bring our politicians unstuck. Speaking of politicians and the

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>UK years, Stamer's government is just going from strength to strength.

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 2>That would seem they've been in power for about four

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 2>and a half months now, after sweeping the Tories out

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 2>of power. It was a landslide, it has to be said.

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 2>But Britain's are having a little bit of buyer's remorse.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 2>They've set up a petition, an official petition on the

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 2>UK Parliamentary website which now has just shy of two

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 2>million signatures. Can you believe it, saying we want another

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 2>general election please. We have had it with this kire

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 2>two tier kre or a free gear kre as he

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 2>was called at one point when it came at all

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 2>these freebes he was taking. We've had enough of his government.

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 2>If you look at the recent polling. Actually I mean,

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 2>but you're in night. Four and a half months they

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 2>have been in power, they're now three points behind the Tories,

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 2>having four and a half months ago absolutely swept the country.

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Seventy percent of Britains now say they are worse off

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 2>under the Starma government and no wonder. I mean the

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 2>budget that this government handed down. They jacked up the

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 2>national insurance contributions that employers have to make it similar

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 2>to income tax. Of course, we told you the story

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 2>last week about how they're going after farmers in the UK.

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Family farms will now have to be part of inheritance tax.

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 2>It is no wonder that people in the UK would

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 2>be saying, get us the hell out of here. And

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 2>you can addenter that one of the other promises they made,

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 2>which was we will close down Margrant hotels. Now you

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 2>would know because we've talked about it here. Margaret's coming

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 2>across the channel to come over on boats, much like

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 2>we were dealing with here about a decade ago. They

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 2>get into the UK and then they have to be

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 2>put up somewhere and they have been put up in

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>hotels to the tune of about four point two million

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 2>pounds a day. And the Starmer government said we will

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 2>shut these down, and I'm pleased to report that they have.

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 2>They shut seven down last month, but they opened fourteen

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>new ones up, so they're actually, yes, sleep shutting them down,

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 2>but they're expanding the number of hotels. Is it any

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 2>wonder that they're going now we want another election. This

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 2>is going so badly for and a half month in.

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 4>They want out.

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Keir Starmer's popularity rating was plus eleven points right after

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 3>the election. It's now minus thirty eight, so he's dropped

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 3>forty nine points in four months. Caleb mentioned byers remorse

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 3>it was the lowest voter turnout in twenty years.

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 4>There's an old adage, what is it?

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 3>You might not be interested in politics, but politics is

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 3>definitely interested in you. So if you don't turn out

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 3>to vote, it's no good. Four months later saying, oh,

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 3>we should have another election so I can make my

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 3>voice her. But it reminded me Sunday just gone was

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 3>seventeen years since Australia decided, you know what, we're a

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 3>bit bored with John Howard, why don't we elect Kevin Rudd?

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.559
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 3>And I know, but there's so many parallels with a country,

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 3>and I know the Tories were horrible, but people elected Kiirstarma,

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 3>who is much like Stalin Liz, but without the personality.

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, which is why someone took to the internet to

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 5>put together this very interesting infographic for you all. They're saying, look,

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 5>he ticks all the boxers, persecution of farmers, high taxes,

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 5>state corruption, the list goes on and well it is

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 5>gallingly similar. They're not kidding you on, but can I

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 5>get up that map of where.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 6>These petition signees are coming from? Again, because this is

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 6>really important.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 5>As Caleb said, we've currently got under two million, just

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 5>under two million, and this thing, this petition has only

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 5>been up for forty eight hours, so you can imagine

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 5>how much bigger this petition.

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 6>Is going to get.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 5>So if we can just get the map up here,

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 5>which tells MPs who must be currently quaking in their

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 5>boots where these petitions are coming from, I imagine there

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 5>are a lot of nervous backbenches.

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 6>This is the people's revolt in the UK. Ladies and gentlemen,

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 6>we are watching it in real.

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 5>Time and if you are an MP sitting in the

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 5>House of Lords, you are watching that map with great

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 5>interests because your constituencies are telling you we want you

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 5>the heck out. It's been four and a half months.

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 5>We've already had enough. Call another general election. We have

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 5>lost trust in this government. Do it again. We need

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 5>a do over. And you know who would do really

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 5>well if that actually happened is our mate Nigel Farage

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 5>because his party's popularity Reform UK has gone from strength

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 5>to strength. It is literally just skyrocketed in the last

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 5>four months since the election, as people have realized the

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 5>extent of the socialist tyrannical government that they.

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I said before that Labor is now three points behind

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 2>the Tories. Reform UK is only six points behind Labor,

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 2>so they're at about I think they're at seventeen percent,

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Labors at twenty three twenty four or something and the

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Tories are at like twenty six twenty seven. So Reform

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 2>UK has actually come through as a very strong third

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 2>player in the UK and I'd be very interested to

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 2>see when they go to another general election, probably not

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 2>one caused by this petition. It probably should be said

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 2>what will happen whether you end up in a sort

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 2>of coalition between Reform UK and the Tories or how

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 2>it all works out. But they are just going through

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 2>the roof because people have gone, hang on a minute,

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 2>we wanted an alternative to the Tories, but we didn't

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 2>get what we wanted.

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 3>And you pointed out a very important point, and that

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 3>is that despite the excitement about this petition, it actually

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 3>has zero power. The UK is stuck with kiirs Arma

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 3>for the next four and a half years, so then

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 3>they'll get their election, but not before and so not

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 3>because of a petition.

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.479
<v Speaker 5>No, it just means that it does bring on a

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 5>debate in the House.

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 6>That's all it means, because.

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 5>That petition is on the government's own website where they

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.479
<v Speaker 5>make the pledge that any petition getting over one hundred

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 5>thousand signatures will then.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 6>Go to a debate.

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.479
<v Speaker 5>Well, I can't wait to watch that one. I'm stucking

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 5>up on popcorn. Back to Australia now, where we all

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 5>know the Combating Misinformation Disinformation.

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 6>Bill is now dead in the water and we can

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 6>all breathe a collective sigh of relief.

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 5>But as I always say, when we dodge these bullets,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 5>never forget that they tried.

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 6>This is when government shows their hand.

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so the bill didn't get up, But you know

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 5>what they want now, don't you they You know what

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 5>kind of country we'd be living in with zero freedom

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 5>of speech if they had their way.

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 6>Now all eyes are on this.

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 5>Oh, we're protecting kids and we're banning kids under sixteen

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 5>and from certain sites on the Internet. Now, I have

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 5>said from day one in this campaign, it's got nothing

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 5>to do with protecting children because you've known that social.

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 6>Media is really bad for kids forever.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 5>There are mountains of research and you've done nothing about it.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 5>But you pass your Digital ID Bill and about two

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 5>weeks later, all of a sudden, you were wildly concerned

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 5>with the welfare of children on social media and you

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 5>had to mount legislation to do something about it.

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 6>Coincidence, I think not.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 5>And who shares my opinion none other than Elon Musk,

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 5>who very recently shared a tweet by our own Prime

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 5>Minister which was growing, Oh we're introducing this bill today,

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 5>Elon must rightly writes, seems like a backdoor way to

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 5>control access to the Internet.

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 6>By all Australians. Riddle me this.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 5>If this is about protecting children, why, as Senator Matt

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 5>Canavan discovered today, why isn't porn hub the biggest pornography

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 5>platform in the world. Why isn't it included on the

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 5>list of websites that kids will not be able to access?

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 8>Returning to Center Rood's question, what is porn hub category

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 8>covered by it? What wouldn't it be It's just it's

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 8>just explicit material. But it's yeah.

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 9>It's covered, So is cover The first thing of sixty

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 9>sixty three C. One A is that the platform sole

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 9>or significant purposes to enable online social interaction.

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 8>But if YouTube's covered and there's a video sharing for

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 8>non explicit content, video content. What wouldn't pornhub be cover

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 8>It's porn covered.

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 4>I think they have very different purposes.

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 5>If you are not protecting children from pornography, you're not

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 5>protecting children at all. I once wrote a submission for

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 5>a Minister for Child Protection to a certain committee that

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 5>was doing an inquiry into the effects of pornography on

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 5>a child's brain.

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 6>And let me tell you, it messes them up.

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 5>Properly, has the same effect as literal drugs.

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 6>I kids you not. I can send you the paper.

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 6>If you're curious, just email me.

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 5>But here we are, just a week sittings week left,

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 5>and everyone's wondering, Okay, how is this bill going to work?

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 6>Well, here's Akma telling us.

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 5>No, No, that whole digital ID thing that you're worried

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 5>about that's got nothing to do with anything we think.

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 10>I know you said it clarity, but I'll go so important.

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 5>No, there'll be no link to the digital ID it's

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 5>the voting off limits won't be there.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 2>This has nothing to do with the digital idea. But

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 2>are what you want to allow platforms to use it?

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 5>There's no requirement for platforms to use the digital ID system.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 8>We've got to pass the Lord, once I go through

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 8>the SAT, that's it. Got I get to touch it again?

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 8>Does not there anything in the law that says that

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 8>that says the Saticus's nothing on this law that says that. Okay,

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 8>thank you.

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 6>How do you like the double speaker?

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, we're not requiring them to use digital ID. We're

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 5>just threatening these platforms with massive fines and massive penalizations

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 5>if they don't age verify everybody. So how else are

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 5>they supposed to do it?

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 6>Then?

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 5>And as Matt Canavan just found out for you, Thanks

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 5>thanks again, Matt, brilliant work.

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, actually there's no other way to do it. How

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 6>else are you going to do it?

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 5>They're threatening punishment, But how else are these platforms.

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 6>Supposed to do it?

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 5>And there's no laws to stop the ES Sagetycommissioner from

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 5>requiring it. I just can't believe we're this close to

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 5>them ramming this through both houses and they still can't

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 5>give a straight answer about the most simplest bits.

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 2>And even if it is not digital ID, there are

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 2>many other dangerous and worrying techniques that they could use

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 2>to verify your age. Of course, one of them is

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 2>facial recognition technology. Now we talked last week about the

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 2>fact that a number of companies, companies Bunnings came out

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 2>and the good guys had got in trouble for the

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 2>fact that they used facial recognition in their shops and

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 2>not told people about it. Bunnings was hauled over the

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 2>calls by the Privacy Commissioner over this. And of course

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the great issues with facial recognition is that

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 2>it has to collect your facial data. It's called biometric data,

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 2>and that is extremely valuable because it tells you a

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of things. It's like having your fingerprint. I mean,

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 2>if you wouldn't feel comfortable handing your fingerprint to Mark Zuckerberg,

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 2>why would you feel comfortable handing your biometric data to

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Mark Zuckerberg. This can be used all over the world

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to link you to all sorts of things. Matiman was

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 2>just over in China. Wait until you find out what

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 2>they doing over there at the moment in terms of

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 2>facial recognition and other tracking. But again this question was put,

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 2>could facial recognition be part of it? And the answer

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 2>is yes.

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 10>The trial will invite the participation of Australians, including young Australians,

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 10>in order to test how a variety of technologies and

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 10>methods work. Not all of these required documentations. Some of

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 10>these would be facial age estimation or other biometrics. Some

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 10>of these can rely on where and person's email is

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 10>used elsewhere on the internet as and.

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Of course you know Facebook already recognizes faces per se

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 2>to tag someone that sort of recognizes that they're already there.

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.719
<v Speaker 2>But this is assessing your face to work out what

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 2>your age is. It has to look in very fine

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 2>detail that your face. It then collects that What happens

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 2>to that data after that eye as it's sitting on

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 2>some American servits somewhere. Who knows what's going on with

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 2>this whichever way you cut it. The data that they're

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 2>potentially collecting is data that is valuable to someone else,

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 2>but at a social media company or a hacker or

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 2>whoever it might be, that I shouldn't have to hand

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 2>over to use the Internet.

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.959
<v Speaker 4>And that's the great irony of this legislation.

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 3>It's purported to be all about protecting people, and yet

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 3>it's rife for abuse, as you just.

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 4>Plainly pointed out.

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 3>And it's always a bad law when the bureaucrats responsible

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 3>for crafting the laws are confused about it themselves and

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 3>can't answer basic questions. It should absolutely be thrown out.

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 3>One of the strange things about left leaning politicians around

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 3>the world at the moment, and they all have these

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 3>things in common. They're more committed to their own leisure

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 3>time than they are leadership. Remember when there were massive

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 3>pro there's a lot of violence in Ellis Springs, and

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Albanzi, I think, flew in for like a couple

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 3>of hours.

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 4>And then he spent three days at the tennis. Remember that.

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 3>And then the other thing about politicians is they're all

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 3>committed to gestures, but not really to anything of substance,

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 3>and certainly not governance. It's happening all around the Western world,

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 3>and it certainly happened in Canada over the weekend. A

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 3>brilliant example of this hypocrisy by politicians where Prime Minister

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Justin tred to.

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Trudeau, thank you.

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 3>You won't believe what he was doing while Montreal was

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 3>literally on fire with anti israel protesters setting fire to cars,

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 3>smashing windows, burning effigies of the Israeli Prime minister. Will

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 3>show you the protests first, they I'll show you what

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 3>the Prime Minister of Canada was doing. But this is

0:25:31.359 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Montreal Friday night, absolutely horrendous for Jewish Canadians. But while

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 3>all of that is happening, here's the Prime minister. He's

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 3>at the Tayler Swift concert. Aside from being a shocking, look,

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 3>how do you think it would make Jewish Canadians feel

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 3>when Montreal is absolutely got anarchy happening in.

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 4>The streets directed at Jewish people.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 3>You've got people calling for the Final Solution to be

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 3>used against Jews, and there's the Prime minister of the

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 3>country at a Taylor Swift concert. At the very least,

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 3>you get out of there as soon as you know

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 3>what is happening and you provide some leadership. But we're

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 3>seeing this all around the Western world. As I said,

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about Keir Starmer earlier, who's only been in

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.239
<v Speaker 3>office four months. He spent twenty six days out of

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 3>the country on international trips, which is reminiscent of airbus

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 3>elbow we used to pull our prime minister. This is

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 3>a theme right around the Western world, these left leaning

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 3>leaders who just seem very committed to, you know, appearances

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 3>and not that interested in governing.

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, you might say for Trudeau, burn baby burn disco inferno,

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 2>because that seemed to be what he was up to

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 2>on the weekend, right, I mean, it's so crazy to

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 2>think that as a leader, you wouldn't think that the

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 2>first thing you should be doing. And he didn't come

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 2>out and later issue a tweet the next day. That

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 2>fixes very much. That fixes everything up when you know

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 2>there is serious civil unrest in your country in Montreal,

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 2>which as an MP he represents, his seat is in Montreal. Right,

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 2>So here's four hundred kilometers down the road at a

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Swift concert, not in his own city, going out

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 2>there to say, pull your heads in heads, this is

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 2>not how we do things in a civil society. No, No,

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 2>he'd much rather be a Taylor Swift concert dancing around.

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 2>That's not leadership. Now, he knows that he's about to

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 2>be turfed out when they go to an election. He's

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 2>had his time, and to be quite frank, he doesn't

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 2>give a toss what's going on in his country now

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 2>because he said it all up and it's burning and

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 2>who cares. Someone else is going to go in and

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 2>fix it. But it's just the most basic optics, right.

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 2>If they are are massive protests, riots, is what they were,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, fire bombs, cars on fire, shop windows being

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 2>smashed up, etc. You've got to be out there doing

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 2>something about it. He doesn't think so, though.

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 5>And even if you're not out there doing something about it,

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 5>and you're just at home, say tweeting, the last thing

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 5>you want to do is being seen at a constant

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 5>rancing around with a few young chicks for crying out loud.

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 5>Tell you the guy who probably will be PM come

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 5>next year of Canada, we hope, is the leader of

0:28:55.960 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 5>the opposition, Pierre Polivier. He tweeted this in response to

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 5>Trudeau's tweets, saying, oh, this is unacceptable. Well, Pierre was

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 5>said you at surprise.

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 6>We are reaping what you sew.

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 5>This is what happens when a prime minister spends nine

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 5>years pushing toxic work, identity politics, dividing and subdividing people

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:23.959
<v Speaker 5>by race, gender, vaccine, status, religion, age, wealth, etc. On

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 5>top of driving people apart, you systematically break what used

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 5>to bring us together, saying Canada is a post national

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 5>state with no core identity. He goes on to talk

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 5>about the military, the economy.

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 6>It's a very long.

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 5>Tweet and it's a call to arms, and it ends

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 5>with the simple line of call a general election because

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 5>you are going out and we all certainly hope that

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 5>is the case. In Canada, the polls reflect that it

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 5>will be, so something else to smile about into the future.

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 6>And here there's another one for you. Trump, now that

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 6>he is once again president elect.

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 5>He did this last time he was in office, he's

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 5>doing it again, saying anyone who's transgender in the military,

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 5>you're going home. And he's talking about fifteen thousand currently

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 5>active members of the military. He's saying, we are simply

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 5>not having this, not on my watch. They will be

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 5>medically discharge, which would determine that they are unfit to serve.

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 5>So America can celebrate because it means on January twentieth,

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 5>they'll be saying goodbye to all of this crap.

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 11>We must set our sites higher and focus on intentional

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 11>inclusivity because there are still far too many people out there,

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 11>not just LGBTQ individuals, that feel marginalized, shut out, or

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 11>discriminated against. So for all of you out there, I

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 11>ask you to set out your symbols of pride, share

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 11>your pronounce in your email. Particularly if you're a person

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 11>who doesn't think they need to.

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 5>Now plenty of critics have come out and says, look,

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 5>every single department of our military are failing in their

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 5>recruitment targets, much.

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 6>Like owls here in Australia.

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 5>Why would you do this at such a time We

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 5>need everyone. Trump's like, nope, we do not need people

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 5>who purport to this ideology and have indeed very much

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 5>overrun the military.

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 6>Again, it sounds familiar, doesn't it Australia. Yes, sadly, yes,

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 6>overrun the military.

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 5>With a pile of ideological crap instead of as the

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 5>new Secretary of Defense says peak heads there, he's just like, mate,

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 5>unless you are a war making machine, we don't care.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 6>We don't care. You do not get to join the military.

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.719
<v Speaker 5>We are about one thing, and one thing alone, that

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:52.959
<v Speaker 5>is waging war if and when needed.

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 6>If that is not your number one, then don't come well.

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 3>As you said, the activists have claimed, if you remove

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 3>fifteenths transgendered servicemen, you're going to leave the military short

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 3>and recruiting numbers are bad. But has ever occurred to

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 3>them The reason recruiting numbers might be bad is because

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 3>they've allowed all this diversity, equity and inclusion stuff into

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 3>the military. Typically, the military is attractive to young white conservatives.

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 3>And if you look at recruiting numbers in the US military,

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 3>in twenty eighteen, forty four thousand young white men joined

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 3>the military, compared to twenty twenty three just twenty five

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 3>thousand young men. And over the last five years, the

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 3>number of white men joining up to serve their country

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 3>has fallen every single year. This might be the thing

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 3>that turns recruitment around, because, as you said, Liz, young

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 3>men want to join the military to fight and to

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 3>defend their country, not to be berated over what pronouns

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 3>you use on your email. And as for the new

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Secretary of Defense, he's criticized the military for being weak, effeminate,

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 3>and spending money on gender realignment rather than non fighting

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 3>America's enemies. This is a good move by Trump, which well, actually,

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I think turn recruiting numbers around.

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, I mean, let's be serious here, I've got

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 2>a bung foot in my left leg is about an

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 2>inch shorter than my right leg. As far as I'm aware,

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 2>that would exclude me from ever serving in the military,

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 2>at least it used to. Maybe this so desperate these

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 2>days that they wouldn't care. But generally that would preclude

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 2>you from being able to sign up to the military.

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 2>So if I've got that, which is a pretty minor

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 2>physical disability, why would someone who has a diagnosable mental

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 2>condition which is gender dysphoria and potentially has then gone

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 2>through a medical surgery that then requires lifelong attention and

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 2>medications and whatever to continue through that. Why would you

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 2>then say that that is someone of the capability and

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 2>strength that we want in the military. I think it's

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 2>as simple as that, right. But turfing all transgender people

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 2>out of the military, Let's be real, ain't going to

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 2>really do anything unless you rebuild the whole thing, roots

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 2>and branch, because it's not just transgender people, it's all

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 2>the other bureaucrats and whatever that exist within the defense

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 2>force system that allow this kind of ideology to flourish.

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 2>You have to kick every single one of those people

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 2>out unless you are in the military for the express

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 2>purpose of defending your country and not I don't know,

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 2>getting people to wear rainbow pins, which is what's gone

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 2>on in the ADF here in Australia. Get out, get out,

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.919
<v Speaker 2>don't even wait to fire them, Donald Trump, that's his thing, right,

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 2>You're fired that's what he needs to go and do

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.760
<v Speaker 2>in the military, make the military strong again. Now, the ABC,

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 2>as we know, loves to crap all over our own country.

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 2>What else would a national broadcast to do? Then tell

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 2>us everything that we have wrong? And again it's that

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 2>wore old chestnut Australia Day. Now. The suggestion this time

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 2>is that the Australia Day honors, which of course are

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 2>announced Australian of the Year, etc. Are an ounced on

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 2>January the twenty fifth, the day before Australia Day, so

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 2>then it can be celebrated on Australia Day itself. Well,

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 2>that's not comfortable for some Aboriginal people because, being the

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 2>racist nation that we are, Aboriginal people get nominated for

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 2>many of these awards and they then feel like they

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 2>can't accept them because they would then have to stand

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 2>up the day before Australia Day to accept it. I mean, sorry,

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 2>riddle me that we are such a terrible nation that

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 2>we are recognizing Indigenous people on our national day and

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 2>they can't accept it because that's bad. Apparently it's a

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 2>period of mourning or something. This article from the ABC

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 2>actually noted one bloke, Rodney Dillon. He is a Palowa

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 2>elder who it says here has actually accepted a nomination

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 2>for the awards twice. But he says that it's not

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 2>uncommon for people to feel uncomfortable and that there are

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Aboriginals Australia around Australia who feel like

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 2>that as well. Well, clearly he didn't feel uncomfortable enough

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.879
<v Speaker 2>to participate in the colonial system when he accepted those

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 2>nominations on two occasions? Did he? But trust the ABC

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 2>to be lecturing us like it's two months away Australia

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Day and they're already banging this drum.

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 3>It's such a manufactured story, right, because when I read it,

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking, well, who are these indigenous leaders who are

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 3>being nominated for awards and are really conflicted about accepting them?

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 3>And they only found two who were nominated for Young

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Tasmanian of the Year twenty twenty five.

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:32.479
<v Speaker 6>Tasmania doesn't count. We all know that.

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 5>And all the other people the article were people Tasmanian who.

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Were nominated and gleefully accepted the nomination. Remember Keith Williams

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 3>back in August, he's the chair of the ABC. Williams, sorry,

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Kim Williams. He said He said that he wanted the

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 3>ABC to focus on hard news stories, not on these

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 3>soft lifestyle stories. But this story featuring a couple of

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 3>young Tasmanians of the Year nominees. This was the lead

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 3>story on the website today on the ABC. Completely tell

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 3>you about the ABC's prioritized over actual news that Australians

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 3>need to understand, rather than this race baiting division that

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 3>the abc'd love to indulge in.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 6>It's so not worth talking about.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 5>I just want to use my time once again to say, honestly, Tasmanians,

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 5>I love you guys. I went through Tania two years

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 5>ago for the first time ever and I was literally

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:26.760
<v Speaker 5>speechless at the beauty of the place. So yeah, that's

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 5>that's how much I consider talking about the ABC.

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 6>We're talking about the should we should we know? ABC?

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, Well yes, we're just the ABC's bagger off. But

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 2>should we note before we go to a break, it's

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 2>going to be very hot day in Sydney tomorrow, New

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 2>South Wales all over the shop going to be quite warm.

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 2>So what should you do when it gets hot? Not

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 2>turn on your air conditioner? Yes, that is another whore

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 2>old chestnut that has come back. The latest advice from

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the Energy Market Operator is that due to the fact

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 2>we have three coal fired power stations out of use

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 2>at the moment because of course all the money has

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 2>been going into renewable energy, so the coal fired power

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 2>stations haven't been kept up to standards, so they have

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 2>to go offline so they can do the necessry work

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 2>on them so that we can actually get some power

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 2>out of them. They won't be available on one of

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 2>the hottest days of the year so far, and so

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 2>we may well have blackouts across New South Wales. I

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 2>mean this happens without fail every summer now and now

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 2>it's not even summer. It's in winter as well. Because

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 2>there's a really cold day, don't turn on your heating.

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 2>We're meant to be living in a first world country here,

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how do we tolerate this that if there

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 2>is one hot day we can't turn our earcorns onto

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the desired temperature because we might run out of power. Well,

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 2>we're running out of power because of this bloody green dream.

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I just can't believe we to be thirty three degrees

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 3>in Sydney on Wednesday, and the Australian Energy Market Operator

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 3>is asking industry could you please cease operations on Wednesday

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 3>so we don't have statewide blackouts doubts country have we

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:09.240
<v Speaker 3>got where we're telling our manufacturers please don't make anything today.

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 3>We need to conserve power. It's absolutely unbelievable. We're going

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 3>to go to a break. When we come back, we'll

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:18.240
<v Speaker 3>look at what's making news tomorrow, including just how bad

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 3>the economy is. The Australian's got a front page exclusive.

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk about it in just a moment. Welcome back.

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:28.919
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a look at what's making news tomorrow and Caleb.

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 3>The Australian does not have good news regarding the economy.

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 2>It does not home drawn and courted, it says. The

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 2>Albanezi government is presiding over the longest household recession, with

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 2>GDP per capita going backwards for the past six quarters,

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:46.720
<v Speaker 2>in a trend that exceeds any period in the past

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 2>fifty years, and economists worn is likely to continue as

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Alberinezi seeks to steer the political gender back to

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 2>cost of living this week before Parliament rases for the

0:39:56.440 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 2>long summer break. Official statistics show the household recession, which

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 2>began in the March quarter of twenty twenty three is

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 2>a risk of becoming entrenched. Now, you may remember some

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 2>ads that the Coalition ran during the last election it

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 2>won't be easy under alban easy, and it had that

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 2>awful song there's a hole in your bucket, dear labor,

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 2>dear labor. Well there's not a hole in labour's bucket,

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 2>it should be said, because they've been turning around surpluses.

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 2>There's a hole in your bucket as a result of labor.

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 2>But don't fear two hundred and seventy five dollars off

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:36.240
<v Speaker 2>your power what's that one? We gave you three hundred

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.919
<v Speaker 2>dollars off your power bill with the rebate. I mean,

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 2>this is just living proof, it absolute proof of exactly

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 2>what this government has done to the economy. They have

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 2>trashed it. They cannot go to an election and argue, oh,

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, so we pulled inflation back. It's all looking

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 2>good now. Okay, sure you reduced inflation a little bit,

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 2>but I have less money in my pocket than I

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 2>did three years ago. And that's what I'm going to

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 2>vote on the basis of.

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I love the statement they're going to come back to,

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, focusing on the cost of living.

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 4>They spent a year focusing on the voice. All of

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, I.

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Realize we'd better do something about the cost of living.

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 3>This is front of mind, this is our major focus.

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.399
<v Speaker 3>Then they got distracted by the Misinformation Bill. Now there's

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 3>that social media thing. Oh we've got an election coming up.

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 3>We better get back to cost of living. My favorite

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 3>part of this article, and this is why the government

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 3>have got so much trouble, it says Jim charm Was

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 3>on Monday defended the government's record on economic management, but

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:37.280
<v Speaker 3>acknowledged his The acknowledgment household experience was not necessarily reflected

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 3>in the economic and inflation numbers. That is absolutely right.

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter what they say about the numbers. Everybody

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 3>goes to Coal's and when they start scanning their groceries

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 3>because the coal staff won't do it for you, you all

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden get a shock at just how bad

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 3>things are. So the government can say whatever they like.

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 3>We're the ones who are going to the store. We

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 3>know you've got to basically sell a kidney to afford

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 3>the week's groceries.

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, bring on the next selection.

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 2>And that's precisely why they keep importing all these margrants

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 2>despite telling us that they want to reduce the number

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 2>of margrants because officially there is no recession. They know

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 2>that it'd be really bad for business, but just quietly.

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 4>There is actually.

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 2>One another story on the front of the Elves tomorrow.

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 2>University leaders to take a haircut. Unbelievable million dollar salaries

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 2>for vice chancellors are set to end with a new

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 2>university watchdog to peg their pay to that of top

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 2>public servants. Federal Education Minister Jason Clare will announce the

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 2>first National Expert Governance Council within days to set independent

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 2>rules for executive remuneration. He said the council would also

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:46.320
<v Speaker 2>crack down on systemic wage theft from academics and lecturers.

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 2>And was it a and U last week that we

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 2>talked about where the vice chancellor had asked all of

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 2>the start if they would be willing to take a

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 2>pay cut so that they could get their budget back

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 2>in order. Well, here is mister Chalmers to say, actually, no,

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:01.839
<v Speaker 2>the one is going to take the pay cut. Thanks,

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 2>mister clear don't give mister Charmers any credit for any

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 2>of this. But actually I don't think that's a terrible idea.

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Normally I'm not on board with government interference. But it

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 2>should be noted the government gives a lot of money

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 2>to universities. Were a lot of.

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 5>Money quiet diversities, and what do we get for it?

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:26.359
<v Speaker 5>The friends international students over Aussie's every single flip in time.

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 5>Why because the internationals pay a lot more, and they

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:31.720
<v Speaker 5>pay up front.

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 6>They're not interested in us. We just fund them through

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 6>the nose, and then.

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:38.439
<v Speaker 5>When our kids want to go to UNI, they get

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 5>turfed out the door in favor of the international students.

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 5>To the front page of the Newcastle Herald. Now from

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 5>port to court protesters out on bail tell Us More, a.

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 6>Woman with sixteen previous charges.

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 5>Related to protest activity and a man with similar convictions

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 5>in multiple states have been released on bail after being

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:05.839
<v Speaker 5>arrested during a blockade of the new Castle Harbor. Every

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 5>time I read one of these, I'm reminded, oh, just

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 5>as well, we've got those new butte really cracking down

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 5>hard on these protests, the laws here.

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 6>In New South Wales.

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 5>And then you read something like this, realize these are

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:24.399
<v Speaker 5>absolute repeat offenders and they just get to do it

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 5>again and again and again.

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 6>So is this going to be the time that we

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 6>see these.

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 5>De butte rarely cracking down hard on these young protesters.

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 6>Is it actually going to happen this time?

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:38.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, it you ought to because they keep getting away

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 2>with it, which just says to everyone else, will go

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 2>for your life. And if we bring up the front

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 2>page again there just look at the average age of

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 2>the people in that photograph who were at the protest.

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:52.919
<v Speaker 2>Since they've got nothing else to do, they're retired, they're

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 2>sitting at a Oh, just go and join a protest.

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 2>What happened to knitting once upon a time you took

0:44:57.920 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 2>up knitting? Now they all gone bloody protest.

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 3>The focus of this article the woman who's got previous

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 3>charges and has been released on bail. The court was

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 3>told she was already on bail related to an alleged

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:13.439
<v Speaker 3>unauthorized protest on a railway. She was subject to two

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 3>community based court orders and had sixteen charges relating to

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 3>unauthorized protest activity.

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 4>The police prosecutor.

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Said she has a propensity not to comply with court orders.

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:27.439
<v Speaker 3>Is a bit of an understatement, and the magistrate said,

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 3>I share your concerns and granted the lady bail. Absolutely unbelievable.

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 3>We're to go to a break when we come back.

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 3>A Florida police officer who capturees a car thief and

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 3>then taunts him on social media. Not quite sure if

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 3>it's appropriate or not, but certainly taught the young man

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 3>lesson will show you in just a moment. So I'm

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 3>trying to work out if Joe Biden's staff were just

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 3>unintentionally funny or if they really do hate Kamala Harris

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:58.400
<v Speaker 3>and were brilliantly trolling her.

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Have a look at this tweet for the official White

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 4>House account.

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:05.239
<v Speaker 3>There's a photograph of Kamala Harris waving goodbye as she

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 3>gets on a plane, and the caption reads building a

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 3>brighter future for every American as she flies off.

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:14.279
<v Speaker 4>Into the sunset.

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't know whether this was intentional or not this

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 3>but I reckon maybe Jill Biden was the one who

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 3>tweeted that.

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:23.320
<v Speaker 6>I wouldn't be surprised. Check this out.

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 5>One reporter in the White House has had the temerity

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 5>to ask, where the heck is Kamala?

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 6>We have not seen her since the election.

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 5>Check out what the Press secretary had to say to Hawaii.

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 10>While Dancy staffers are just wondering what they're going to be.

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 12>Vice president has taken time off to go spend time

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 12>with her family. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 12>She has worked very hard over at the last four years,

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 12>and her taking a couple of days to be with

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 12>her family good for her.

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 5>How could you possibly question that she's just taking some

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:02.959
<v Speaker 5>time with her to Florida Now where check this out.

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 5>These sheriffs literally catch kids stealing cars and then post

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:11.240
<v Speaker 5>about it on their socials.

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:14.359
<v Speaker 6>With the kid in the video.

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:17.759
<v Speaker 5>In this case sat down leaning against the car that

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 5>he stole and got caught in while the sheriff just

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:23.239
<v Speaker 5>tells you all about it.

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:24.480
<v Speaker 2>His catch of the.

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 7>Day, y'all say.

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 13>Lucy County sheriff keeps hears the juvenile companion thought they

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 13>were going to come through Saint Lucy County with the

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 13>stolen vehicle with a Broward Task Force on their tail.

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 13>Scat packs up them down and wants to shout out

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 13>to the Broward County Sheriff's office. I'll see all the

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 13>county Sheriff's office, even.

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 6>The backing music. It's so good.

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 5>Compare the pair with our Queensland cops who are like, look,

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 5>even though we've got record breaking amount of kids stealing

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:55.320
<v Speaker 5>a record breaking amount of cars.

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 6>We're not even allowed to chase them.

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 5>These guys are like, here's the car that they.

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 6>Stole, here's them down on the ground. We got him,

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 6>Here's the car that I caught him in.

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:09.760
<v Speaker 3>I love, I sympathize, but I'm not sure it's appropriate.

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this kid hasn't yet gone to court. Isn't

0:48:12.080 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 3>he innocent until proven guilty? I know, I know, but seriously,

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:20.839
<v Speaker 3>isn't the principle still one that should apply out from

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 3>behind this?

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 2>There is? I know, but you've still got to be

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:26.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a halfway there's a halfway house here then, I

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 2>mean in that video, of course the kid was blurred

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 2>out right, but there's a halfway house. You can familiate.

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 2>You can humiliate, Yeah, but you can humiliate the kid

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 2>just put a mask on him or something like, don't it.

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 2>There must be a way to do it. I get

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 2>what you're saying, because and of course in Australia we

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 2>can't identify youth offenders, so there's all sorts of different

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 2>rules about it. But maybe it should be part of

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the bit that if you are convicted of the crime,

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 2>that they then go and film the video and then

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:56.839
<v Speaker 2>the minute you turn eighteen and it can become part

0:48:56.880 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 2>of the public record you put it out there. I

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know, but what we do know is that what

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 2>we're doing at the moment does not work in this

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 2>country and any alternative option we should be looking at

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:09.359
<v Speaker 2>rather than the one we talked about last week, which

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 2>was they're going to treat stealing cars as an addiction.

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:13.799
<v Speaker 2>Come on, the.

0:49:13.760 --> 0:49:17.839
<v Speaker 6>Americans, name and shame. It's called personal responsibility.

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 3>We got to go, but stick around. Coming up in

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 3>just a moment is the reader Penehy Show.

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Good Night,