WEBVTT - The Dogs of Four!

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Daily Telegraph NRL podcast. Oudam Mob's here

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and Pam Whaley. I'll go to you first, because not

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>only was it round twenty one in the NRL, which

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you've just reminded me of nerl W Week one.

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know, we had a couple of upsets as well. Paramatta,

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 2>you'll be very happy to see had a really good win.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>We're back, baby, We're back.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it was.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 2>It was great to see it back in back in action.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And if we're ever invaded, I want the Newcastle Knights

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>defending our homeland because their defense against the Roosters the

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>other night unbelievable.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 2>I know. Yeah, that was a really good game. Actually

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 2>it was a great way to open it up. But yeah,

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>excited to get into it all again.

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can't wait. And Fatima Kado welcome. Hi, you're Raiders,

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>My Raiders back.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 4>They're back, baby, parent they were never really gone.

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Why right, just let it be known if you started, okay,

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens from I can't be held accountable.

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Were the ills in your top eight ladder predictor er

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 4>or w okay, we'll give you that at least in

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.759
<v Speaker 4>the neral W that the title dream is still alive.

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Yea, very much. So you think you can insult me

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>after Paramatta fell off the radar about eight weeks so

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't happen. But we've had a lot to get

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>through because there are a lot I don't know about you.

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Whenever someone says mathematically we can make it, you know

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think they're stuffed. And from now on I'm

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>declaring it. The Broncos cannot make the eight, will not

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>make the eight from here.

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you think about you know, people saying mathematically

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 4>their magic number thirty two, they've got to buy in hand.

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 4>But they also need to win all five games and

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't know whether after seeing them against Canterbury, even

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 4>with a full strength team, I don't know whether that's

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, whether.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 3>They're capable of that.

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Unfortunately for the Broncos, who if they don't make it

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 4>will by far be the biggest disappointment of this year.

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're not going to make the eight. And the

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Bulldogs blew them off the park. They were unbelievable and

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Brisbane everything to play for and the same criticism that's

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>been placed on these guys for the last six or

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks was they're sitting around waiting for something to happen.

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 1>And Okay, now we've got Adam Reynolds back, we've got

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>middles like Pat Carrigan and Payne Hears, and we've got

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this undersized Cannoby pack we're up against. We're just going

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to roll through them. They look like they sat back

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>again waiting for something to happen, and they cannot cop

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>enough criticism, I think for the lack of resilience, the

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>lack of determination to Yeah, as we're seeing. If you're

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>not watching us on YouTube, go and have a look

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>at some of these highlights where the Broncos are letting

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball bounce, they're not first to it. There's no

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.399
<v Speaker 1>urgency in their play. The Bulldogs wanted everything on top

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of them and the Broncos got what they deserved.

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, especially after last week. Obviously they've beat Newcastle

0:02:58.360 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 2>last week and that was kind of the start of

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I think Kevin Walter said in the press conference after that,

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, we've only just we haven't kicked that, we

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>haven't gone through the fence yet. We're just starting to

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 2>kick it down. But and then to be at home,

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 2>a packed crowd, everything to play for their pride, their season, everything,

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 2>and then they were just flat. And that's just not

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 2>really a good enough explanation, is it, Like, why were

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>they flat?

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, maybe make any sense?

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I don't know. I wonder if they've brought

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 4>in too much into this idea that they do have,

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, individual brilliance and strike all over the park

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 4>into what mobs you were saying, just waiting for an

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 4>individual to do something, to come up with, you know,

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 4>Reese Walsh, to come up with a play that flips

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 4>the script a little bit, but it never happened, and

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 4>they were flat and they were beaten through the middle.

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 4>And when I found really interesting is a lot of

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 4>people spoke about this after watching Canterbury. Canobary had a

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 4>game plan to shift the ball and really target their edges,

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 4>and it was obvious that that's what they were doing

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 4>from the get go, But somehow the Broncos didn't adjust

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 4>on the run to that, and I think that says

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot about and Kevin Waltz has mentioned that a

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 4>little bit in the lack of the inability to execute

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 4>his game plans. So if they haven't been able to

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 4>do it during the week, they were never going to

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 4>be able to adjust on the run against Canterbury. I

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 4>mean Catony Saggs had a dig. He's probably at everybody there.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 4>You could say, you know, he probably deserves a bit

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 4>of credit from that game. But yeah, they're just and

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 4>I think the biggest they were so good attacking wise

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 4>last year that the fact that they weren't the best

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 4>side defensively really went under the raidar And I think Canterbury,

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 4>who haven't been the best attacking team so far this year,

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 4>really exposed them.

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 4>So there's a lot of work I reckon to go

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 4>at the Broncos and I sort of like touched on

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 4>it in the tackle yesterday. If you look at how

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Penrith responded to losing the twenty twenty Grand Final, it

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 4>wasn't enough for them to just rely on the talent

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 4>they had in their team, and at the time it

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 4>was stacked with you.

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Know, gun talent coming through.

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 4>They doubled down, they worked harder, they were the fittest

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 4>team in the comp. They worked on their defense and

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 4>they went onto three Premierships and it just looks like

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 4>the Broncos haven't been willing to put in that hard

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 4>work this year.

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well for mine, this cannerby performance is textbook Camon

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Serudo identifying and exploiting weaknesses in defenses. He did it

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot at Penrith and the players brought into what

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>he was doing there. You see here he said that

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>those edges that they targeted the entire time, those those

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>block runners, and you know they're cutting in. Jacob Karraz.

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>What a season he's having and what are really I

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>think he's almost one of the he's got to be

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of first pick kind of guy. He's so important

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to what they do there and the way he's sprung

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>out of the ground because you saw when you know,

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bulldogs bought in Bronze and Cherry and they've you know,

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Blake Taff came around kind of tracy and we didn't

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>know where everybody was going to sit. You've got young

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Blake Wilson's who's a good young player. And Karraz has

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>been named on the wing plenty of times and it's

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>which to the centers. But I think he's he's really

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>come out of his skin this season.

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely pressed pressed big time good coaching, isn't it.

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 2>It's just really if they don't have they're not exactly

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 2>a superstar team. Like if you compare them to the Broncos.

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>They're not, you know, stacked full of sup stars, but

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 2>they've got so many gutsy players and I think I

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:22.679
<v Speaker 2>remember at the start of the year, we were talking

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 2>about the size of the Bulldogs pack and who's the

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 2>who's the big leader there in that pack and they're

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 2>probably sure, you know, a big, big prop or and

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 2>speaking to the Bulldogs about that, they were like, well,

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 2>we just have a bunch of players who are real gutsy,

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of mongrel in us, and we're just

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 2>going to attack as a as a unit. We're smaller,

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 2>we yeah, we're mobile, and that's just going to be

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>our identity and that's what they've kind of made.

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 4>Sarah Sarah was on the radio this morning actually, and

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 4>he spoke a little bit about the attacking plan he

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 4>had and he actually gave all the credit to Jason Taylor,

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 4>who's been in addition to his coaching stuff this year,

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 4>and he sort of said he was the one or

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 4>he's the one who's sort of been responsible in putting

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 4>together our attacking plans and sending that message to the

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 4>players every week. So he gave him a lot of

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 4>credit for that. But I think the biggest talking point

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 4>out of that, which we've missed on, is they did

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 4>that without Stephen Crichton. Yeah, and I think that's a

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 4>really important thing to touch on because there's no doubt

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 4>he's been so influential for them this year. He's out,

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Geral Skelton comes in, you know, it's that next man

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 4>up mentality that maybe in the past, because they lacked

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 4>depth in their roster, they haven't been able to achieve.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 4>And now Stephen Crichton sits out and you can bring

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 4>in someone like Jerras Skelton, who I don't remember what

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 4>he finished with, but I think two hundred plus run meters,

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, and again just another guy who shows he

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 4>can be in NURL, but they've got so much depth

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 4>that he's stuck in reserve grade.

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah. And Travis Main had a story up last

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>week that the Broncos have had to put on extra

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>security and put fences up to stop the fans getting

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>getting to them. You might want to put it up

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>even higher fences because they deserve to come out after

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that weekend's performance that was terrible.

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Wasn't there a season where fans started chucking wooden spirons? Yeah,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 4>they might need.

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Some one the Sea Bowl there, Yeah, they have that

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. So look top eights, I think if you agree,

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I think seven of the eight teams that are currently

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in the I think the top seven teams will be

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in the top eight this year. I've got obviously the Storm, Panthers, Roosters,

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Sharks are there, Canterbury, North, Queensland, Manly and then for

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:37.239
<v Speaker 1>mine on twenty four points you have the Dolphins, Raiders, Dragons,

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and then two points behind that you have the Knights

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and then the Warriors. But I can't see the Warriors

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>making from there. I've got it in a race. I've

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>got four spaces for that one final final spot. What

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think?

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's that's about right. I don't think

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 4>there'll be too much movement from.

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 3>Six and upwards.

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 4>I think the Dolphins are probably having another late season Bay.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 4>They really really really should have won against the Titans.

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>They should have won a week ago. They should have won.

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>They'd be four points clear, they'd be twenty eight points.

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Wayne bennett genius finals campaign before he goes to South

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Paramount might have dodged a bullet here with Bennett. They

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>can't finish a season.

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 3>They can't finish a season.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Get this what's going on?

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I tend to agree with that.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 4>But unsurprisingly when I did my that a predictor, the

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 4>eighth spot went to Canberra for me.

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Pam, and I've got equal yeah, the.

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Same team here, the Nights in eighth. Yeah, I've got

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the Dragons finishing on thirty two points in ninth and

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 2>then the Warriors tenth, Broncos eleventh and the other Dolphins

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 2>dropping out. They've got they do have a rough end

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 2>to the year.

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I like the Dolphins me too.

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Me too, But yeah, just over the weekend they should

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 2>have closed this game out against the Titans. The Titans

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 2>really yeah, just kept fighting for it, didn't they? They

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 2>just wanted it.

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of the team that usually gives up

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>leads the Gold Coast and they keep fighting and des

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Hasler all the critics this season. This is a big win.

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>But where was this side? That was? This saw was

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>eight nil up over many last week, then capitulated the

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>fourteen kneel down here and fought their way back. How

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are you supposed to win a tipping company? Seriously?

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I know, well I don't think any of us are?

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Are we not?

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 3>This year?

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Not this year.

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>No, they had everything to play for here the Dolphins,

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this is their finals hopes on the long lay said,

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>they've got a tough run home going from here. And

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in that slew of teams a couple of weeks ago,

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>they was sort of fifth and sixth, and all they

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>need to do was just get a couple of wins

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>up to get to your thirty two points. I haven't

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>got them there. They were one of my big disappointments

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>from the weekend. Then I thought Kronella were disappointing. I

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>think their edge defense was pretty ordinary and they got

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>shown up again. You know, even the return of Niko

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Hines isn't going to fix that.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 2>How do you have them finishing I.

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Still had them finishing fourth.

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't see their fifth for mine.

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how I was trying to manipulate a

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 1>way I was doing that. Ladder predicted to try and

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>get either the Bulldogs or Cowboys up into that top four,

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.479
<v Speaker 1>because I love that stat of the team that finishes

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>outside the year before finishes in the top four that

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>next season. But owing to their cruisy drawing the way

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 1>home and the points have already got banked. But then again,

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>if they don't start lifting their game. The Sharks, they

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>may struggle, Yeah, well struggle definitely struggle in the finals.

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah they will.

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean they've won one game since round fourteen.

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 3>I think it is so.

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:48.479
<v Speaker 4>No sorry, two games since round fourteen, so they're definitely

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 4>not in form at the moment. Obviously, the work that

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 4>they did at the start of the year has helped

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 4>them stay, you know, in the top four, but you know,

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 4>they do have a softish run home, other than their

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 4>last round game against the Eagles, who are also finding

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 4>a bit of form. So I worry if the ty

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 4>sorry that the Sharks, it's just a bit of a

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 4>groundhog day for them coming into the finals, a bit

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 4>too soft and not really being able to test themselves

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 4>against the two best teams in the competition and Penrith

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 4>and the Storm, which I think, even though we're talking

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 4>about how tight the latter is, I really don't think

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 4>outside of those two there are any genuine title contenders

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 4>at the moment.

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, I think Nathan Clear is returned. I don't

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>think Penrith rest players towards the end of the season.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they've rested them post origin. I think Nathan

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>coming back from mine I think they go through the

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>way they are and they just keep winning games. And

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Cleary was outstanding the Melbourne Storm. I don't know. I

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>was watching this through biased eyes against the Eels the

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>other night when they Paramattic gifted them a couple of tries.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have the possession or the field position, they

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>weren't tackled inside the Eels twenty and let's yet somehow

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they led in that first half. Monster being back, he'll

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>get better. I just for the better performance for me

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>at the weekend was Panthers. And if I was a

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>betting man, I couldn't have enough on Penrith winning that

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>fourth title because obviously I think you're going to top

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 1>two finish for the Storm home final, won't have to

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>travel to Sydney if you keep winning until Grand Final.

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So owing to that saloon passage that they'ven't themselves, they

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>can be there. But yeah, still haven't been proven that

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone can live up to Penrith's expectations at the moment.

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 3>No, well they did.

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 4>James Sushi Harris did pick up a groyd maybe an

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 4>abductor injury in that game, so it'd be interesting to

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 4>see how serious that is obviously they did it again

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 4>without Dylan Edwards is still out with a PCL injury.

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, they just look right now, they just look

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 4>streaks ahead of anybody else.

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm never going to count out in Melbourne though. I

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 2>just think that that's a folly to do that.

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just angry after they beat Paramatta the other night,

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 1>they're going.

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 2>To bounce ye angry at all.

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it's all their fault. But but yeah, I mean

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you saw the week before what they did the Roosters

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as well, you know, and these are these are supposed

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to be the contenders, so you know, the Storm just

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>keep doing what they do. They keep winning. But I

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just I just want them to prove that they can

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>do that against that they've got that. I want to

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>say they've got that next level to go to, which

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Penrith seemed to me lo there they really do have

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>their So.

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 2>They just look like they have so much fun, don't they. Yeah, yeah,

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 2>what is just it really is just fun for them.

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I want you to tell me which games your Raiders

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>are winning. Getting the top eight, let's get through them

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Billmore Sports Ground Bulldogs next week, you've got them winning that.

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we don't.

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Have to laugh, like that home game against mainly the

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>week after I.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Think I got there. I think them losing that one.

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Mainly don't travel well. But okay, right Country Bank Stadium

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>care always run twenty four?

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, can we go back?

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 4>I had them winning against Manley and then newsing to

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 4>the Cows at home right in North que.

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So you've obviously got them beating the Panthers the following

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>week at Joe. I don't have you got them beating

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Roosters the following week. You've got them beating the Roosters.

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 3>We've got to win some games actually.

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And last round Dragons Raiders, that's huge, that could that

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>could be a top eight side, that could.

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Be the top eight decider. But I've got them winning

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 3>that well.

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I had It's and Georgia Lawara in around the eight.

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>If their performance at the weekend was better. What do

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you make of the Dragons? I mean, if they finished ninth,

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of what I've gone mad, I think

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a past mark.

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 3>But at ninth as well.

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Actually this closest Dragons fans having had a really bad

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>run for the last few years. What do you where

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>do you put your finger on it?

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that is. I think Dragons fans would be

0:15:57.840 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>fairly happy with the improvement that they've seen this year.

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Would you would you agree? You do know what Dragons

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 2>fans are like, right, No, I think that I think

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 2>there is there's signs of that those days are kind

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>of over and that there is a new kind of

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.359
<v Speaker 2>eerror under Shane Flanagan. Obviously the weekend was not great,

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 2>but I mean it's Penrith too. I think they will

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 2>have a dig in these last in these last couple

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 2>of rounds. I've got them winning a couple of games.

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Obviously Shane Flanagan made that big call to

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>act Tyrle or Sloan he I'm not happy with his

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>defense and again there's probably a few that could have

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>joined him on from this weekend. And you know they

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>have mixed their former bit this year, the Dragons with them. Yeah,

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>they can lose a big buy a big score, then

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>they can grind out a solid win the week after.

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Flanno has got that ability to get

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>their minds back on the job. But I don't know

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>where they go from here. Because I thought Ben Hunt

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>had a had a poor game.

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, he did have a poor game, and

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 4>that was probably I mean, I was gonna say that

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 4>was the difference, it isn't. I don't think even if

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 4>Ben Hunt had a blinder, and I'm not sure if

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 4>that would have been enough to help them get past Penrith.

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 4>But I think when he's a little bit off, I mean,

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 4>Zachlmacs was a little bit quiet after I think he

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 4>moved to fullback.

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Early in the game.

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, they're a bit of that that Jekyll and

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 4>High team where sometimes they look really good and you

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 4>look at them and you go, wow, like Shane Flangan's

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 4>working miracles there, because you have to remember, I mean,

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 4>I think it was it was a Mick Caranas he

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 4>said they went into the season with the worst roster

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 4>in the competition. I'm not gonna say that the worst

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 4>rusted in the competition.

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But on paper he said. Agree with him. I just

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>this is just what he said.

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 4>So when you look at their team, I mean, you

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 4>probably think they do need a couple of additions for

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 4>next year to help them go to that next level.

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 4>But to go from you know, deep in the bottom

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 4>half of the ladder to in and around that finals conversation,

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a huge improvement for them.

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Mick carrianas adding players for next year, that's

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a nice segue mix story from the Weekend that vow

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Holmes has been granted permission to explore other opportunities He's

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>got twelve months ago when his Cowboys deal with worth

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>about nine hundred massive coin the dragons in the frame

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for him, thoughts, is this a like a.

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Zach Climax replacement thinking type? I don't know, would so

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 3>how much?

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I guess it depends on how much you

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 4>know the Cowboys are footing the bill and how long

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 4>the deal is.

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know. I think they do have a.

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Couple of good outside backs, you know, waiting in the

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 4>lower grades, and then the junior reps coming through. I

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 4>wonder if you add someone like vow Homes, I know

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 4>he's you know, probably towards the latter years of his career.

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know whether.

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I would sort of bea backing the

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 4>future as opposed to you know, somebody like our Homes.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 4>But obviously Shane Flanagan and Our Homes have history together

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 4>from their time at the Sharks, so I have no

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 4>doubt he will do whatever job is required of him

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 4>under Flannagan.

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know what do you think?

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think he's sorry.

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 4>No, I was just going to say, when you've got

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 4>kids like Sevilla Tomali waiting to come through, you thinkaders bound. Well,

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 4>everyone keeps saying, but you know, it's interesting. They've got

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 4>a good crop of outside back so it's just interesting

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 4>that they would recruit on top of them with somebody

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 4>like our Homes.

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 2>I was just going to say, he hasn't He obviously

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 2>hasn't had the best season. I don't think this year.

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 2>In the last couple of years, he's been a bit

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>up and down, but on his day he's very good.

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 2>So if if Onno thinks he can get the best

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 2>out of him in the last couple of seasons, it'd

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>be nice to see him playing his best again. Maybe

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 2>he needs a change.

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he does. But if i'm the Dragons, to your point,

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>if I've got if I'm not prioritizing young guys like

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Civilia Tomaly coming through, if I don't think he's the

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>right thing, no offense of our Homes out a great career.

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>He's coming off a stinker of a season. He's twenty

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>nine years old. He's on nine out of one thousand

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a year, and the only plus for me out of

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>this would be what Shane Flanagan can do as far

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>as increase the player's performance. I don't think it's a

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>great signing for the Dragons. I wouldn't do it.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't hate it, but I don't love it either,

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 4>not when they've got like Tamali, when they've got like

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 4>s I fin now, when they've got a kick called

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Jesse Williams coming through, who are all doing really well

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 4>and impressing. So it just sort of doesn't make sense

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 4>to me, especially if you're trying to build to the future.

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 2>It's not going to save them, right, That's not going

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 2>to be the big change.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Does it have all the hallmarks of He's signed a

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>four year deal, and the last eighty months of it,

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>all the Dragon fans are up in arms saying, we're

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 1>overpaying for this guy and we're not getting a performance

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 1>that's my fee. And I'm being brutally honest because you know,

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve months ago he was playing good football, and even

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>though the Cowboys are going pretty well this year, I

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's had a great year.

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 4>And even if he was playing good football. Is he

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 4>worth eight nine hundred thousand dollars.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Nah, Well that's the decision to make, so we'll see

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>what they do with that. But a bit of market

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>watch news going on because the West Tigers confirmed this

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>morning that Stefano Utoi Kamano is leaving. Still no confirmation

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>where he's going.

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 3>He might not know where he's going, you reckon he doesn't.

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Well there's you.

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Know, Cannoby's sort of been in and out and now

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 4>they're in again. The Dolphins had an offer on the table,

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 4>but as I understand, he rejected that offer. But I'm

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 4>not sure Canabry have actually tabled a physical offer to

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 4>him yet. They've had conversations with him. And it's a

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 4>similar story for Melbourne. He's sort of a high priority,

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 4>but they have to move things around to make it happen.

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Nelson is so for Solomona's only in the last twenty

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 4>four hours come out and said, I've seen all the talk,

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 4>but I'm sort of not going anywhere. And Melbourne have

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 4>had a hard time trying to move him to other clubs,

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 4>and you know, I guess that would come with a

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 4>warning to every other club if Melbourne's trying to move Nelson.

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, you're probably asking why they're doing that. So yeah,

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean maybe he's got an idea of where he

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 4>might like to end up, but I don't know how

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 4>many genuine offers, physical offers he actually has on the

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 4>table right now.

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Let me go to the Bulldogs. Seems like a pretty

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>easy He's got a young family, doesn't sound like he

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to go anywhere. Go to the Bulldogs. Team on

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the up, need a big middle. You've got a style

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of play that seems to be bearing fruit at the moment.

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It just that seems like it seems pretty easy for

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>me if he wants to stay in Sydney and they've

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>got the money in the bank, don't they to pay

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>so I do.

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, seems pretty good fit for me. But he's got

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 2>options there for sure.

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Jeez.

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>That's imagine him at Melbourne.

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, see what Sewan Boors done at Melbourne. Yeah, you

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>guys that just go down there and improve out of

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a really good system them. And that's probably more point

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.719
<v Speaker 1>about Canterbury, is that what camp sud I was doing

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>there at the club. At the moment, good system players

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>are really enjoying their footy, which is what you're saying

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>before about you know, with Penrith, So yeah, that's what

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'd be looking through. And the other interesting

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>one Daniel Tupo, no retirement, two more years.

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Two more years. Well, he's still He's still killing it,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 2>isn't he. He's just kind of evergreen. He just seems

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 2>like he always has been and he always will be.

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 2>He just keeps keeps going backing on.

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 4>I feel like he has an aged one bit in

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 4>the last ten years. That's you know what I mean,

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Like he just hasn't lost you don't you know how

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 4>players get to the end of their career and you

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 4>sort of see them swing down a bit, but not

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 4>none of that orders he now.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Isn't he thirty?

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but it's a two year dealer as well.

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Which obviously losing Joseph Kuso, Swali and Joey Marno, although

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>many might be back to me next year anyway. So

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's rely reliability there for you at the Roosters.

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we know that Nick Politis loves his

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>one club players. He loves the guys that put in

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and two po one of the nice guys in league.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think that'll be Yeah, that's a good result.

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 2>He's had a great career, hasn't He even has just

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 2>been so good for so long. Representative player, everything is

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 2>kids from it.

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 4>From Auburn is one club player.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Still doesn't think he knows.

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we want to remove the eastern suburbs. Something I

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>wanted to bring up that I was brought up to

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 1>me on the weekend was Trijean to Lie still going ahead.

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing lots of try celebrations post try celebrations, but

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't expect to see this at the weekend. Was

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Matt Hardy, former w w E wrestler. Still, I mean,

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm kid in a Kenny store with this because wrestling

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and rugby league, to my great loves. He spotted or

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>had it shown to him the try celebration for Ronaldo

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>mal Taylor, which happened to look a little bit. This

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is his brother, Jeff Hardy for seeing the video. This

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is how Jeff Hardy does his entrance music, comes out,

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>waving his arms round and when Marla Taylor crossed over

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Cowboys, he stood up and looked like he

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>was doing something very similar. So Matt Hardy had seen

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it and then went and copied it. Shortly after, we

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>had another try by kale Ero and it looked a

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit like DX Shaw Michael's Triple h Days, which

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is the if you're not down with d X, I've

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>got two words for you. I'm not going to repeat

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>me he because we're a family podcast. But when you've

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>got a WWE superstar, a wrestling superstar showing highlights to

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>his one and a half million followers on x or

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or whatever, they it's still cool. I thought that

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>was very cool. I enjoyed that.

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 2>It must be a bit of a they love the

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 2>wrestling there at Chronologe and they do. Was it someone

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 2>did the People's Elbow was the other year?

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Well I think it was it last year before. I think, yeah,

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 2>so that went pretty viral too.

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I know nothing about wrestling. I said to

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 4>them when we're talking about about the Multila celebration. I

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 4>was like, oh, yeah, that that we danced that he

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 4>did And was like it's actually.

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure all our listeners Yeah yeah, Well surely that

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>man's a bit of extra cash considering it's gone international.

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah yeah, sports bet maybe added a little bit to

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 4>the pop since it's all.

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 3>For a good cause. But there's been a good one.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 4>Like it's good to see everybody sort of getting into

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 4>it this year. So, I mean some try celebrations, probably

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 4>a bit of work.

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>It's all for charity, for charity, for charity.

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 2>There were some good ones in the NLW actually over

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 2>the weekend Olympics themed ones, there was lots of rowing

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 2>and things like that.

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 1>What was the one on was one on Thursday night?

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Was the was it the camera? Was it? The yeah? Yeah?

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And the sniper sniper, Yeah, that was good.

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Harry Grant did the AFL oh.

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that made me even angrier grinding teeth at

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that rough weekend. Most of them are weekends. Although I'm

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>going to say I enjoyed that Thursday night game. I

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>thought the Sydney Roosters were disappointing the second half. I

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>thought they had all the play for and the Knights

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>just shut them down. The Knights had them covered. I

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think they threw enough Adam in attack. They went

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>down that right side a lot, and Jess Surgis was basically, here,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>go try and get us the win. They got themselves

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>back into that game, but that Knight's defense that just

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>kept coming and coming was unbelievable. There's very little doubt

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>as to why they're premiership faith.

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know they're so physical, they're really hard to

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>get through obviously. But yeah, the Roosters, I think without

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Corbyn Baxter as well, that's a huge loss for them

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 2>and they won't have Sam Bremna for it. Might be

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 2>this week, could be next week. I think they were

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 2>going to give her a couple of weeks just to

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 2>she's super fit rightly, so she came in. She hadn't

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 2>done preseason. She's come in. I think she broke a

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 2>record in one of their fitness tests. So she's just

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 2>an absolute beast. But it's a contact she needs to

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 2>get the like the contact remarkable.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Having her on the coverage of her team's game on

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night with Lara Pitt and the crew, that was

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>that was just cool. I really enjoyed that. Yeah. Yeah,

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>but the Knights. The Knights were great. Can you please

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>give me some good news. Just tell me about the Eels.

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Just make sure I'm not making this up in my head.

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>They were really good coming off the back of last season.

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>That was what a performance.

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 2>They had a dreadful season last year. There's no real

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 2>two ways about it. They were awful, but they didn't

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 2>have their half back for most of the year. They

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't have Elsie Albert, who is an absolute weapon, and

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 2>they both made a huge difference to their team over

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the weekend. But we yeah, but to beat the Broncos

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 2>as well, huge achievement. But they just seemed fit. Yeah,

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 2>seemed really fit. Really mobiles that you know, off the

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 2>back of Elsie's you know, huge runs. They just get

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 2>so much, they get so much space and time. So yeah,

0:28:56.520 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 2>and Rachel's kicking game was great, so yeah, so much.

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, that's why she's my favorite. You start the

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>pod sledging me and gives me makes feel Yeah.

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Great Trai Julia Robinson, she obviously the weapon too.

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah.

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 2>So another tough start to the year for the Broncos,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 2>though it's been a rough weekend.

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 3>For the Broncos in general as a club in general.

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Healing crisis.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I love the Usain Bolt. Yeah, celebration too. That was cool.

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>That's cool, but especially after running ninety five meters for

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it as well. That was being on the end of

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that judicial news.

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we saw the big well, I don't even

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 2>know what you would call it. It wasn't really a

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 2>melee because it was a punch throwne but really disgraceful scene.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 2>So this was a hip drop tackle for him not

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 2>watching this on YouTube. There was a Annetta Claudia Norsala

0:29:57.840 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 2>did a bit of a hip drop tackle here on

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Sherrington and then Kennedy comes in pushes her off because

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 2>that's her little sister, and then it starts this Annetta

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 2>clocks her in the face. This is disgraceful, and then

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 2>she gets pulled back by her ponytail from behind as well.

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 2>It's just foul scenes. No one wants to see this.

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 2>And I made the point today in the paper like

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 2>the NLW is in this position at the moment they're

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 2>not professional yet that they need broadcast numbers. They need

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 2>people to be tuning in. They need that to be

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>able to go professional by the time the next you know,

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 2>broadcast still comes around in twenty twenty eight. This is

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>not the way that you're going to get people to

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>be watching the game. Like if you these players all

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the time are talking about, oh, you know, we're role

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 2>models for the next generation and we really want to

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 2>inspire the next generation, this is not it.

0:30:55.640 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well it's the reason why they clamped down on

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 4>un punching and fighting in the men's game, right, it's

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 4>exactly reproduct. You know, what's the word desirable to as

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 4>many eyeballs as possible, And it's the same thing in

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 4>the in the NROL.

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Want entertaining you can still be, so that rivalry you

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 2>can still have. It's still intense, it's still really physical

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 2>without assault. So it's yeah, So Annetta, she was charged

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 2>twice and she got charged for the hip drop and

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 2>then also for striking, so she's looking at she's looking

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 2>at six weeks in total, but with an early player

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 2>before so to two weeks.

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Which is a massive chunk of the season two when

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you take that into considerations.

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Left.

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm going to come together with you

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on this one. The Raiders were very good in erl

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>W And I'm not being it's not about me, but

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>my favorite player. So I'm a talfa he oh just

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>gone yea tough as nails. I was Denis when she

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>left Paramatta and yeah, they look good again. I think

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>they're Yeah, it was at thirty two twelve over the Tigers,

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>who didn't have a lot to cheer about. But yeah,

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there they could be for a good season.

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders.

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they had a pretty good season last year too,

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 2>So they finished fifth last year, so they were just

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 2>outside of a semi final spot in their first year,

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 2>which was pretty impressive.

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 4>But I mean they had an early sage last year,

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 4>didn't they. Like I was like, oh, okay, yeah, be

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 4>onto something here, but yeah, no, it was.

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 3>It was good to see.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Hopefully they don't burn out this time around.

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 2>What were some of those starts? I was looking at

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 2>some of the starts from someonema the other day, so

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 2>she rapped. It was something like she was up around

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.479
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and seventy meters or something like that, thirty

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 2>six tackles or something. Yeah, crazy, Yeah a try. She's

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 2>so good.

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh and just yeah looking at the highlights. We're just

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>watching now that let's see if this moves up here.

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I just want to see if we're right on target here. Yeah,

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just out we go using the using the width.

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>The way they go the right is they're good. So yeah,

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed first week. So please don't burst my eels

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>bubble next week because as per my ladder predictor, I

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have paramount of winning much before round twenty seven

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Spoon Bowl against the Tigers.

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 3>So you've got the winning spoinball.

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which will be Yeah, did you have them? Who

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>do you happen around twenty seven? Umm?

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh maybe I did go to the Eels winning Spomba.

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I did too.

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Spends how many more injuries? Yeah, between now and but

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I think if.

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 4>I didn't, they would have finished dead last. And I

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 4>think psychologically I was like, Oh, it feels odd to

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 4>have power at the bottom of the table.

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, I'd like to say it's uncommon. But anyway, right,

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to everyone's favorite segment, what are you watching?

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Because I had a really good response from people who

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously don't they just suffer through our inneral jib i

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>just to get the what are we watching? Part? So

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you guys go first, then I'll follow in

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>lay with my disaster movies.

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm watching Homicide New York, which is true crime doco

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 4>on Netflix, and basically or each episode is a new

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 4>sort of crime that they have to mostly murder that

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 4>they know solve.

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Most of them are sort.

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Of in the eighties early nineties when there was like

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 4>a massive crime wave in New York and.

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 3>It's super interesting.

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 4>So it's based in Manhattan, but they're sort of split

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.280
<v Speaker 4>between North Homicide and South Homicide, so there's that rivalry

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 4>between the two homicide squads and there's some fascinating cases

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 4>that just really get you thinking and don't leave you.

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I love a true crime documentary.

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 2>As I've I binged all of this too. I absolutely

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 2>love it. So it's like a they get all of

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 2>the detectives that worked on these pass to explain it

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and then they it's shown as kind of like a show.

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like Law and Order, but it's real.

0:34:58.280 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's really good.

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 4>And my favorite one the one sort of in the

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 4>in the eighties because it's sort of before all the

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:09.439
<v Speaker 4>technology technological advancements in like you know, in police work,

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 4>and so it's like old school police work, you know,

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:12.760
<v Speaker 4>and I love that sort of stuff.

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it like Shake par Altar in Brooklyn nine nine?

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 3>You know what?

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:23.280
<v Speaker 1>No, sorry, that's that's the extent of my TV cop shows.

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 2>So I have recently finished I am Celene Dion. This

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 2>is on Prime video, so just timely, very timely. So

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I watched it actually been a couple of weeks ago.

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm a huge Celandian fan, absolutely adore her. I think

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 2>she's just what a great celebrity. She's so funny, she's

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 2>so talented, she's just a queen, icon and legend and yeah,

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 2>but this documentary was equal parts you know, funny and interesting,

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 2>but it was devastating as well, just to see what

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:59.720
<v Speaker 2>she's you know, she's.

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Been, that she's had to go through.

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, so and then to see her I think

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 2>I think it goes through about an hour and a

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 2>half or so, but it's really really interesting, very heartfelt,

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 2>and a bit distressing actually at times. So just a

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a warning there, but just to it

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 2>gives you some perspective of how incredible her moment was

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 2>at the opening ceremony at the Olympics. What it took

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 2>for her to actually get on stage and perform again amazing.

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I can watch it because it

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>seems I've seen a couple of clips that seem really heavy,

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, from what she's had to go through, that's yeah,

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll probably will watching it now. He won me over.

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 2>It's really good. It's very very good.

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 3>She's the best.

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Right now. So last week I put out the call

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>for disaster movie suggestions. Feller by the name of Tristan

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>got touched with me straight away and suggested Greenland, which

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't heard of before, which and which just bizarre

0:36:56.760 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, I know, Gerard, but la extinction level event

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>basically has to get his family to safety as the

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Earth's about the you know, do you trust.

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Any other man to get your family to safety?

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I always used to get in trouble with my

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>wife because any time we're watching something I didn't really like,

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, you know, this movie needs it needs Arnie

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>coming in and cleaning house, just shorts and again, but

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Butler and Tristan, you bastard squeaky bum time. For about

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>ninety minutes. My kids had their stomachs they were so

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>nervous throughout the entire movie. Yeah, it was too for

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 1>something I hadn't heard of before, really really enjoyable. So

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about meteors ready to destroy Earth and you know,

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to live on through through that, trying to survive that,

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>but also sort of the best and worst of humanity

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>on the back of that, and it touches into that.

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And look, when it comes to disaster movies, I think

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:56.839
<v Speaker 1>they're like pizzas. Even when they're bad, they're good.

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 3>They're good.

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I love I love a good bad movie. So and

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed it.

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:03.399
<v Speaker 3>It's a good bad Yeah.

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm having a crack Attritian. But it's a good

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>crack because there's yeah, there's good stuff to it as well.

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>But someone who told me they I haven't seen yet Arcadian.

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a new Nick Cage film on stand, So let

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>me know if anyone's seen it, if it's if that's worth it?

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 4>But nae yeah, age, Okay, so that's going to going

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 4>to be a good bad movie as well.

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>No, No, there's just good movies.

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 2>When it's Nicholas, the greatest movie of all time, I'm going.

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>To steal the Declaration of Independence. I could watch those

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>movies all time. But the other ones twenty twelve, which

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I've seen, San Andres the Rock, he fits in the

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>same as Butler The Day the Earth was Still self.

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>There's any other suggestions, let me know, but got me

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>think about what have you guys seen the TV show

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:50.280
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix The one hundred?

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 2>No, it's but I know what you mean, but I

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 2>haven't watched it.

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's it about.

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 1>It's it is similar sort of planet Earth destroyed and

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:05.919
<v Speaker 1>there's the survivors are living on a spaceship basically. And

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I won't give way too much for me because so

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>much twist and turn happened from there. But Australian Bob Morley,

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Eliza Taylor, she was Jane on Neighbors years ago and yeah,

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyable. So we watched that a couple of years ago.

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>We've got me thinking about that. I might have to

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>go and rewatch it. But that's that was quite good.

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you guys might enjoy that one. But if

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:30.919
<v Speaker 1>you have any other suggestions on disaster movies or anything else,

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>please again Adam dot Mobs at News dot com dot Au,

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>because they were quite enjoyable watching Greenland. So yeah, well

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll be doing a couple more of ours.

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I enjoyed that people listen to this podcast,

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 2>but don't listen to it, just skip to the end together.

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I had no feedback on any of

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>my crazy takes last week. It was all have you

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:54.240
<v Speaker 1>seen this.

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Feedback onto a great show? Thank you for the recommendation,

0:39:58.040 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see how we go.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Well that's us for this week. We need to go

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and find out which players are going on which clubs,

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>and what's going on with this run home Because there's

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 1>plenty to do, so we'll do it again next week.

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks guys,