WEBVTT - ROUND 22 REVIEW: 'ONLY THE SHARKS & ROOSTERS CAN BEAT THE PANTHERS'. Why it's now a three-team race

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, welcome back to another episode of Code NRL Monday's podcast.

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:12.039
<v Speaker 1>There's a bunch of stories coming from the weekend, including

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>some embarrassing matches and some disastrous floggings. Were also going

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to analyze today the state of the game. There were

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>some weird things that happened on the weekend. I'm sure

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you've noticed them. I'm joined today by Fatima Kadoo. How

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>are you, Fatima good? How are you very good?

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 2>Thank you?

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I rushed straight over to Dean Bulldog Ritchie, how are

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you Bulldog good?

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Buddy you, I'm very good.

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Alex also known as nrol Soapbox. We're going to

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>get straight into it. There's been some huge news regarding

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Lorie Daily's coaching tenure and perhaps a strong standout candidate

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>has emerged for the new South Wales coach. Bulldog. What

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>do you make of it?

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's big story.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 3>This morning, Loriie finally officially and formally decided that he

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 3>would announce that he is stepping down as Blues coach.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 3>Obviously it was on Laurie's horizon during the series, but

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I think the fact that they won Game three so well,

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>so convincingly, so emphatically and against all odds. Yeah, at

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Lourie thought, you know what this is it? This is

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 3>my perfect way to leave. It's an ideal exit for him.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 3>He goes out with one win, my loss in the

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 3>last two years since his return, and it does leave

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 3>the door open for Matt King to take over as

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Blues coach. Matt's been an assistant there for at least

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 3>the last two years. Everyone's got a huge rap on

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 3>Matt King. Boyd Cord is another candidate, as is Brett White,

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 3>but I think you'll find.

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 2>That it will be Matt King's job.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 3>So huge news to come out of the Blues that

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Matt King, the former winger, terrific player, great football brain,

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 3>well respected inside the New South Wales camp and certainly

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 3>a bloke that Laurie endorsed get the job, will be

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 3>the next new South Wales coach.

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So many New South Wales fans might not know about

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Matt King as a coach. He's been in the assistant

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>system a long time. What kind of his credentials or

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>why would New South Wales Rugby League be so keen

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>on him.

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, he's been in the camp.

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 3>He obviously knows the structures, he knows the systems, he

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 3>knows the players. He's at the Roosters, where, of course

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>you don't get much better grounding than that. He's been

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 3>at the Melbourne Storm. There is a better ground in

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 3>than the Roosters. It's Melbourne Storm. So he's come through

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>the right channels to be a great coach. He's a

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 3>first grade coach in waiting. I think Matt's just at

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the point now where waiting for the next vagacy to

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 3>come up. His name will no doubt come come forth,

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 3>will be put forth and you'll find if king E

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 3>can pull off an Origin victory next year, then he stops.

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Just go right through that very roof with sits above us,

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 3>and he will be coaching I would imagine in the

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 3>inner or for the next two to three years.

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Well that's what I was going to consider, because some

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fans out there, particularly New South Wales ones and Penrith ones,

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>are really lobbying for Ivan Cleary to step into that role.

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Does this create attention for Teama? So if Matt king

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>gets the job and does well, what will happen to

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Ivan Cleary's prospects of coaching New South Wales.

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this.

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Creates a difficult situation? What's your virble on that one.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, now, I was going to ask, all, dog, do

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 4>we know how long you know Matt King is going

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 4>to get if he is the guy who is given

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 4>the job.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 3>No, it's a good question note for TIMA because there

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 3>is this awkward gap year next year, yes, where if

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 3>the coach who we think will be Matt King wins it,

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.119
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be very hard to say, oh, Matt,

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 3>you've done a great job, but you're out because Ivan

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 3>wants to coach.

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean I haven't made it quite clear the day

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 3>he announced he was leaving Penrith after next year that

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 3>he wanted to coach. Representing football, there's only two jobs.

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 3>It's either Australia or the Blues. It'll be the Blues.

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's unfair to say to Matt King,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 3>if you happen to win three Neil next year, you're out.

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 5>So, yes, it's an awkward situation.

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 4>I guess, yeah, it's a Yeah, it is an awkward one.

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 4>But you know, I think I'm with Panthers fans. I

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 4>really would like to see what Ivan Cleary could do

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 4>in the Origin Arena, and it is going to be

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 4>tough on Matt King, especially if he does, you know,

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 4>win next to you series and all of a sudden

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 4>they've gone, oh, you know, we've got Ivan who wants

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 4>to come in. But I agree with Bulldog, like, if

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 4>he does come in as head coach and he does

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 4>win a series, all of a sudden, his stocks rise.

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 4>He is sort of that next crop of up and

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 4>coming coach. Like we've seen guys like Jason Ryles, like

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Josh Hannay, like Sero come through. You know, Matt King

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 4>is sort of that next in line. Yeah, I would

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 4>still if Ivan wants to do it, I would give

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 4>the job to Ivan when he's ready to do it.

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting. I remember talking to Nathan Cleary during Origin

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 4>camp about whether he had a better idea of what

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 4>his father wanted to do post Penrith, and he did

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 4>joke saying, you know, the Pacific Nations are on the rise,

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 4>so you know, maybe that's an option. So who knows

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 4>in what capacity we see Ivan Cleary in, but I

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 4>would love to see him as Blues coach.

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy how the rugby league narrative changes so quickly, right,

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>so not six weeks ago people were hammering Laurie Daily.

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>I was certainly one of them, and Laurie gets the

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>flowers there. He totally embarrassed a lot of us that

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.679
<v Speaker 1>criticized him, But there was talk about how new sois

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Rugby League, But who's going to coach the Blues? Where

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>are the options going to come from? Now They've not

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>only won the series that was meant to be unlosable

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>for Queensland, Laurie gets to retire or move on from

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>this role as a champion, and now not only have

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they possibly got an assistant coach in the wings ready

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to be appointed, they've also got one of the greatest

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>coaches ever in Ivan clearly on the Raider. It's pretty

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>crazy how it changes.

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a funny one that.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 3>Look, we all know clearly how good coach Ivan Cleary is.

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 3>He's one of the greatest of all time, and he's

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 3>won four and he's looking at winning a potential fifth.

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 2>This year and he's still got next year.

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>So if you want to dream on, you can think

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 3>he's looking at six. But does it give him the

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>god given right just to sort of bullock his way

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 3>into that job if Matt King wins next year? Credentially,

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 3>of course, Ivan's a better coach than Matt King, but

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 3>I just don't know whether it's right for him to

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 3>and Ivan won't push his way. He'll apply and no

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 3>doubt he would get the job. All I'm suggesting that

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 3>is if King he does a good job. Is it

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>unfair that Ivan just goes bang smack and he's straight in.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it probably is unfair. It's really tough though, are

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you going to pass back or knock back one of

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the greatest coaches of all time? Absolutely the one series win.

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And also Ivan's not going to want to coach another club,

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So Matt Kings, as far as I know, would have

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.359
<v Speaker 1>head coaching aspirations. He'd want to have a more permanent

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>role in leading a club, bringing Ivan Cleary. And Ivan's

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>got no other prospects, not because he's untalented, but because

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't want them. So I feel like there's a

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sure bet if you get Ivan Cleary and he ends

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>up being a great origin coach new so also the

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>potential to actually build a dynasty there.

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 3>And what if there's a sneaky clause in the contract

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.799
<v Speaker 3>and I'm unaware of this, if there's a sneaky clause

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 3>that if a coach has suddenly given the heave ho

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.119
<v Speaker 3>in the NRL, it probably won't happen, but rugby leagu's

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 3>a strange game.

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 2>Matt King goes into that position.

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Then I'd imagine you have to stand down as origin coach.

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 3>These are all hypotheticals, of course, but rugby leag's a

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 3>very strange game. When you think it's going along smoothly,

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 3>that's when it's at its most dangerous. I don't think

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 3>there's any vacancies coming up, and then all I don't

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 3>think there's any coach under pressure necessarily, but I'm just

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 3>saying if it did happen, I guess I'd have to

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 3>go back to the drawing board and see if they

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 3>can find a new coach.

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure anyone watching or listening won't be reading

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>in between the lines there from Bulldog trying to figure

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>out the cryptic clues on what he's suggesting. Well, it

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>was a tough going for New South Wales fans about

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>two months ago and now we're talking high and mighty,

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's always good to be beat in Queensland and

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 1>feeling in control. I've not been around a long time

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>on this earth, but that was the greatest flogging thrashing

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:14.239
<v Speaker 1>diabolical performance from the Roosters. They absolutely destroyed the Cowboys.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>North Queensland fans are trying to get away from this

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>news right now. Well I'm going to pile on even more.

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just that the Cowboys were horrendous, It's that

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the Roosters were elite. This is the team that we've

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>been kind of waiting for the last six weeks. They've

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>been playing okay footy and just winning, but this week

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.119
<v Speaker 1>they just dominated. They made a statement in that game,

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but it was also a statement for the Cowboys. How

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>terrible were they for Tima?

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Like you said, not in our lifetime and lots of

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 4>other people's lifetimes. I think it's been ninety years since,

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, there's been a slaughter that bad. I just

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 4>don't get the Cowboys. You know, the week before, you

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 4>know they're flying high, they're playing their best footy, which

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 4>is like you know, big forwards, being physical. You know,

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 4>they've got all this talent, this like strike in the

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 4>outside backs, and then all of a sudden they deliver that.

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 4>It's really strange, Like if you talk about Jekkel and Hyde,

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 4>they are that team in the NRL, Like you just

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 4>cannot trust them like I would have said, oh, maybe

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 4>they might, you know, obviously the Roosters were red hot,

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 4>you think maybe they might challenge. But they pretty much

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 4>waved the white flag almost after twenty minutes. And what

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 4>I thought was really interesting. And I know they're still

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 4>what five games to go, and Todd Payton is probably

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 4>sitting in the coaching coaching box going, Okay, this game's done,

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 4>so maybe I will you know, rest guys like Jason Tomlolo,

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 4>like Riboncotto, who I think both played their least amount

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 4>of minutes on the weekend. But at the same time,

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 4>that's almost like, I don't know, I don't want to

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 4>say the coach is waving the white flag on the game,

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 4>but considering where they lacked was in that physical presence,

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 4>in that physicality, they're their two most physical guys to

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 4>take them off the field, to me, just it was

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 4>a really weird option by Todd Payden. But yeah, I

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 4>feel sorry for Cowboys fans because you know, where do

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 4>you go for from here? Having said that, I think

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 4>they play the Titans this week, and if there is

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 4>one team that can somehow have a miraculous bounce back,

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 4>it is the Cowboys. But they are by far the

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 4>most untrustworthy team in the NRL at the moment.

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 3>You touched in that Broncos game for team. And this

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 3>is not making an excuse because what we saw was

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>just abysmal and embarrassing, humiliating.

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 2>You can use any adjective you.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Like, but I just wonder how much stock they put

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 3>into that Brisbane game of the week before.

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 2>That was a tough game. Was eighteen and ten.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it was at full time and maybe it

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 3>had an impact. But again, please don't misguide what I've

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 3>said as an excuse, because it's not.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't.

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Know where they go from here, though, I don't know

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 3>how emotionally and mentally you can come back from that.

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 3>This will really test what's belief that emblem on the

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Cowboys jumping this week yep, because those wins stick with

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 3>you for life.

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking about the season.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>That's a loss that they will remember for the rest

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 3>of their lives because it was utter humiliation and I

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 3>just don't know whether they have what it takes to

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 3>bounce back from that.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think I am.

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 4>Todd Payton said it it was the darkest day for

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 4>the club. So that's now they're you're rightfull like now

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 4>those you know players are tainted with that for the

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 4>rest of the season that you know, they were part

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 4>of the darkest day in the life of the Cowboys.

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I don't know. And it's it's strange because

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 4>a week before I wrote how you know Todd Payden

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 4>was initially his tenure was, you know under the spotlight

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 4>people were talking about, you know, would he be is

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 4>he the right guy to take them forward? They re

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 4>sign him, you know they're going, okay, they're in the finals.

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Heart they have that incredible performance against the Broncos. I write,

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 4>oh my god, look at the look at the turnaround

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 4>under Todd Payden. You know he's got guys like Braden

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 4>Burn's playing their best footy, you know, their physical clearly responding,

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 4>and then they deliver that. So yeah, I don't know.

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Like I said, if there's one team that can bounce

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 4>back from out, I feel like it's the Cowboy. But

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 4>you don't trust that they have the energy or I

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 4>don't know, the consistency to actually genuinely be a finals content.

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Now we have the fifty point rule. If you lose

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 3>by fifty you can't win, so.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 5>That's a light win now or next year as well.

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like for the Cowboys, it's tough. It's like they've

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>just been involved in the most horrific car crash known

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to man and now they have to front up next

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>week and deliver. There's going to be some demons there.

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's hard to flush a game like that.

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>You can flush a game where you make thirty errors

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.479
<v Speaker 1>or a bunch of stupid mistakes, but to get absolutely destroyed.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>It was embarrassing for them. It's going to be tough

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for them to come back. What I will say in

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>their defense, the Roosters in that first twenty minutes were insane.

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It was it was dead and buried by then. They

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>looked on another level. This is the performance that a

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of fans have been wanting from the Roosters to

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>determine their Premiership credentials, and it's in the middle. They

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>were just lethal. Their line speed was so fast, they

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>were running hard, they were dominating the game. Their backs

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>were throwing all the classic Rooster's ball where it's just

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>try and make a try, try and make attack happen.

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Errors be damned, and they really were respectable it doesn't

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>justify a seventy point loss. But the Roosters have turned

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>up and made a real exclamation points to the competition

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be contenders. So then it begs

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the question who can challenge Penrith Bulldog? Who do you reckon?

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Who do you reckon that most likely to challenge Penrith

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>for the title?

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>I think you just answered it. Okay, I think you

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>just danced it.

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 3>I've done Bulldogs by this week on saying it's a

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 3>two horse race. I don't think there's any side out

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 3>there who can reach the elite levels at Penrith and

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the Roosters have achieved in recent times. They've got eighteen

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 3>start of origin players between them. Yeah, that doesn't make

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 3>or break this season. I'm just saying that that gives

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>you an idea of the rosters that these two clubs

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 3>are putting forward. Yes, the Bulldogs are going well and yes.

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 2>Cronulla is on fire. I think they might have won

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 2>nine from ten.

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 3>However, I just see when it comes to the crunch

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 3>the Premium finals, that's when your big guns are looked

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 3>upon to go to another level, and they are the

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 3>two clubs that will do it.

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 2>They are elite rugby league.

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Clubs, big players, big rosters, win big moments.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 4>I was sorry, I'm going to ask you, bull dog.

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 4>So it sounds like you're still not sold on Cronulla completely.

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>No, well that's yeah, that's my because they're going fantastic.

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Don't get me wrong, and I'm not denigrating the Sharks,

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 3>but we've been down this path before with Pala.

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 2>The only way they're going to.

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Convince me and probably another MIDI rugby league fans out

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 3>there is to win the comp but just getting to

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 3>a prelim again and falling over and they've done it

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 3>year after year.

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 5>Fitzi knows it and they get the shits.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>He gets pretty shitty about when they've talked.

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 2>About and remind of it. But there's only one might

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 2>have fixed it. That's winning.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And now I've hammered the Sharks this year for that

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>same narrative that they haven't delivered on that on those

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>big the big stage. However it fitz is right. Making

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a prelim isn't easy. And then if you look at

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the Roosters, okay, they're looking amazing. They're going to contend

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>with Penrith, but there Ivan Cleary is Trent robinson'skryptonite. I

0:13:58.040 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>think they might have had one win recently, but out

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of that, the Roosters just cannot beat Penrith, whereas the Sharks.

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I actually think the two best teams in the comp

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>right now are the Sharks and the Roosters. The Sharks,

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the stats say that they're play the ball speed is

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>three and a half seconds, you know, the average. I

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>call bullshit. I swear they're more often than not getting

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>two second play the balls. Brayley's picking it up from

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the ruck and sprinting through. They look absolutely dynamite. I

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>genuinely think the Sharks need to be in contention for that.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I know you said that they've got a soft run home,

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of their players are confidence players, so

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're going to get more and more momentum,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I generally think the Sharks are more of a title

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>threat than the Roosters, and that's saying something because the

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Roosters look amazing.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, there's been a lot of pressure in the

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 4>last couple of seasons on Nicko Heinz and his combination

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 4>with Braidon Trindle one. He's got this ridiculous goal kicking streets,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 4>so I might just take you back to your bugbear

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 4>about goal kickers. I think it's what thirty one, thirty.

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Two, thirty two, I think it any no right.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 4>But him and braidon Trindle And this was correct the

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 4>last time I checked. Actually, in terms of creating opportunities,

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 4>are the most effective halves pairing in the game. They

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 4>have the between them, have the most triasist than any

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 4>other halves combination.

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Kennedy's been brilliant, Bradley's brilliant. I think Heines is playing

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 3>better than when he won the delim a few years ago.

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Trindle is running the show, Niko's running more. They're just

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 3>chock full of confidence.

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Fitz's got them. Really, they're dialing in. It's kind of

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like this Last Dance scenario. A bunch of players are

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>off contract. They look like they're playing for each other.

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And then another thing that's become much more prominent it's

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>always been around, is the Heines trendle dynamics sometimes that

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they found that hard to manage. Who was Numero Uno?

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Who is the general? And a lot of attention and

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny's gone on the Bulldogs on who they call the

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>seven and who they call a six but the Sharks absolutely.

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>The halfback's actually Braden Trindle. His kicking meters are more

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>than double, maybe even triple. Nico Hines and Niko's runs

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are more than double than Trindle's. So they've worked it out.

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that that key issue of making Heinz the

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>center of attention, putting it all on him, I think

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that's been equalized by how well Bradley's playing, Trindle's playing,

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy's playing. And again they always get overlook. But the

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>forwards a massive, running, fast, hitting hard I genuinely think

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they're the number one chance to beat to top of

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. Moving on from the weekend, and there was

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>some real peculiarities that were occurring within the officiating and

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the interpretation of the rules. We had a sinbin for

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a hairpool. We had two players going off for essentially

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>touching each other. We had a misconversion from right in front,

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>well actually it was a conversion, it was called a miss.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And then there's been big news about the trialing of

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the new kickoff rules. Where the heck do we start, bulldog?

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with Rhyce Walsh.

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yep, the hair pool, yes, oh no, it was ridiculous.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know why he did it. While she

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 3>decided in his wisdom to come charging into a melee.

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't needed in there in the very first place.

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 3>He should stay back at fullback where he belongs, and

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 3>then decides he wants to grab dom young hair. Look, clearly,

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Dom Young's got long hair.

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>It must be nice, don It does get in the way,

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 3>But it was a good old fashioned grab and wrench.

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 3>He deserved to go the sinbin he ultimately got charged

0:16:57.720 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 3>to with. I think it was contry conduct. He faces

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 3>a thousand dollars fine. It was silly, but to me

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 3>it was indicative of the Broncos season, ill disciplined, unnecessary, stupid, silly.

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 3>And this is what the Broncos have had to compete

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 3>with all year. They just kill themselves.

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>See, I saw it a bit differently, Bulldog. I thought.

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I thought Reese had a good argument of a player

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>was attacking his player and he was trying to get

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 1>him off him. Should you pull hair?

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>But what made it annoying to me is that also

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>McEwen from the Knights went off as well. He was

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 1>SimBin as well. And this is definitely one of My

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>most frustrating things that happens within the officiating is that

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>when there's a melee, we can't just have one. We

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>can't have one person do worse. So out of those

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>two things, absolutely pulling the hand from Reese Walsh was

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the worst act. Why are both players going to the

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>SimBin because.

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 3>You're not supposed to go into a melee, but you

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 3>leave it alone. It's none of your business, stay out.

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 3>But they all try to be tough guys and they're

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 3>all tired by their coach. If there's a melee, I

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 3>don't want everyone in there. They all come charging in.

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Then the it's hand bags at ten. Just stay out,

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 3>it's none of your business.

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Move on, stop trying to be tough.

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 5>Guys, piece off, back to your positions.

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and it's it's always been the guy that runs

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 4>in and escalates it. And I think you hear the

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 4>referee saying, you know, I saw you Jumaine. He pretty much,

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, ran halfway across the field to get involved

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 4>in this melee, which is probably you know what got

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 4>him SimBin, just the fact that he went out of

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 4>his way to get involved. But that's always been the rule, right,

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 4>like if you rush in, the third man, the fourth man, whatever,

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 4>you're the one who escalates it, then no, I'm going

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 4>to get in trouble for it.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. Third man in. That's the punish. That's

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>how I always understood the punishment before the last decade.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>The third man in. You've escalated the situation, you should

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>go to the bin. But when we're taking both players,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we're not saying third man. We're saying third man, and

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>whoever the third man is for the other team, they

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>go to the bin. I think it's inconsistent the one,

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the one that was.

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 4>I think you have to like, I get it's not punishment.

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 4>I get Reses Walsh pulled the hair as part of

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 4>the melee, But when you sort of see in isolation,

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 4>I tend to agree with Bulldog that of all the

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 4>things that happened, Recee pulling the hair was probably the

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 4>worst thing to happen in that melee. Like, I'm not

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 4>going to say it's the same as punching somebody, will

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 4>you know they're stuck in a mela. But he did

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 4>go out of his way again to find I know

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 4>Dom Young has a lot of hair, find his hair

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 4>and pull it, like he didn't have to do that.

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, the most agreed. If we're in agreement the most egregients,

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.719
<v Speaker 1>egregious actors hair pulling, then re should go. So my

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>point is like if we go back to the finals

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>last year with the Raiders and Broncos and it was

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a Hudson Young and Reese Welsh, and all Hudson Young.

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Did was say some mean words, whereas Reese.

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Weld put his head into it right. So I absolutely

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and I reckon a bunch of fans will find this

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 1>soone or happens in origin all the time. It's not

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>really a punishment if both teams are punished.

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, are you saying it's done sort of to square

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 4>the ledger? So you know it's one of those situations

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 4>where you know you're taking too much of a risk

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 4>as a ref just to send one off. Yeah, so

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 4>to appease everybody you send.

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Because a man down changes the entire dynamic of the game.

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>When you take a man from each side it means nothing.

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>You might as well leave them on, is my point.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Blow penalty to Newcastle for Reese's hairpool move on. I

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>just hate when they try and make it even and

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>level when both both the incidents were not the same anyway.

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>That's my ramp for this episode. Okay, moving on, we

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>saw a very very interesting conversion attempt where the touch

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>judges actually called it a dismissed, the referee reviews it

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and the ball clearly went over. Fans were pretty miffed

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>about that one.

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Bulldog.

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well it was embarrassing for the game, wasn't It

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 3>was a Royce Walsh kick from right in front.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>It was a low trajectory kick. Excuse me.

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.719
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, sometimes with the background of a crowd, you've

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 3>got the led big screen there, it can be challenging.

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 3>I get it, but it's a one job moment. You

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 3>got one job to do the kicks from right in front.

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 3>It went over.

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 2>It clearly went over.

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 3>It was a step up, and I think it left

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 3>the game more embarrassed than anything else. Fortunately, the video referee,

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 3>we can go to the video referee these days, as

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 3>you just touched on and we sort it out and

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 3>it got fixed.

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, look, I'm told that.

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 3>When there's two touchies they're supposed to make up their

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 3>own mind. Those are the rules. But between now and

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 3>nine one hundred and eight, they've actually spoken behind the

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 3>try line and one will go yes, no goal, no goal,

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 3>So obviously someone's gone no goal, and the second ones

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 3>waved it away.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 2>That's led to the embarrassment.

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting you say that. So I did watch it

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 4>over a couple of times because I wrote about it.

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 4>In the tackle, it looks like Reswalsh not I don't

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 4>know if he trips or sort of shanks the ball

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 4>a little bit, so I don't know if that distracts

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 4>one of the touches seeing that you know it wasn't

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 4>a clean kick from Res Walsh. But if you actually look,

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 4>one of the touchies actually goes to raise the flag

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 4>before then they seem to change their mind. Maybe they

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 4>get the call saying it missed, and all of a

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 4>sudden both of them are waving it away. But yeah,

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 4>for a conversion right in front. Like you said, Bulldog,

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 4>I think it shouldn't happen, and it's more embarrassing than anything.

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 4>And you know, all I've seen on social media is

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 4>the stereotype and the jokes about refs really can't see.

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, I hate to be contrarian, No, I love it.

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I thought gran Ekins, I think was the rep did

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a good job of explaining that it's gone so fast

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we can't see I can understand it. And what's more

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing rep one touch he putting up the flag and

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the other one waving away. It's an embarrassing scenario either way.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Moving on to one that the refs aren't in control of,

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>but will absolutely have significant impact on the game, It's

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>been reported that the NRL are going to trial the

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>team that concedes deciding who kicks off, so they're going

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to change that. They're going to trial it in inconsequential

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>games for teams that can't make the eight fatima. I'll

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>throw to you on this one. Is this a bad call?

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 4>I don't like it, and I don't consider myself a

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 4>purest in any sense of the word, but I just

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 4>think so. The proposed rule is the team that concedes

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 4>can either choose receive the ball or they can kick off, right,

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 4>And the idea behind the kickoff change is to maybe

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 4>hopefully reduce some of the blowout scores that we're seeing right,

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 4>But to me, that feels like just another rule that

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 4>is going to artificially manipulate momentum, and the reality is

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 4>one of the reasons why we're seeing a lot of

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 4>the blowout scores, and I know it's even doubt a

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 4>bit as a season has gone on. Is the change

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 4>to the set restarts, changing it from a forty meter

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 4>threshold to a sixty meter threshold. So that's also sort

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 4>of artificially determined momentum swings in the game. So instead

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 4>of addressing that, come up with a new rule to

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 4>address the blowouts. It doesn't make any sense to me.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 4>But also, if you're the team that's just conceded, why

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 4>should you get rewarded for your bad defense? And the

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 4>flaw in the rule to me is if it's about

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 4>reducing blowout scores or keeping games competitive. Imagine you're on

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 4>a team that you're a team mounting a comeback, You

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 4>score a try, and then all of a sudden, your

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 4>momentum is broken because the team that's trying to hold

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 4>onto their leads going nonah nah, you know we're going

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 4>to receive the ball. So none of it makes sense

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 4>to me. They're going to trial it in some dead

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 4>rubber games towards the end of the season. Again, why

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 4>are we trialing such a significant rule change in games

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 4>that don't mean anything? Like you need to be able

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.959
<v Speaker 4>to see what impact the rule has when there is

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 4>something on the line. So I don't like it. I know,

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 4>I think Wayne Bennett is one of the proponents for it.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 4>I think overall a lot of coaches aren't, you know,

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 4>the biggest fan of it. But I just think we're

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 4>meddling with something that doesn't regular board.

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 3>I think fatima in terms of the chor issue here

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 3>is the set restarts, So maybe that's something that they

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 3>should look at to try to prevent these momentum blowouts

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 3>rather than going to the next level, which isn't the

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 3>problem in the first place.

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 5>Look, look, I get the theory. We don't want blowouts.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Yah, Rugby Leagu's not a blowouts, and momentum these days

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 3>is causing some high scores. But I think you're spot on.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's get the core issue of determined and fixed before

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 3>we start meddling with the issue that's down the track.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've got to get this rant out like this

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>has only occurred because the set, like you mentioned, the

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>set restarts have changed, so the game's getting faster, momentum

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>has become uncontrollable. So what's the problem That rule has

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>created a problem. So instead of fixing the rule that

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't work, We're going to create a new rule to

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>try and mitigate the previously dumb rule that the Neralal

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>just needs to go back to last year's rules. We

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>don't need to change the kickoff. We just need to

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>go back to twenty twenty five's rules. It's killing fans,

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>it's killing the game. We're getting to this point of

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>philosophical pontification and scientific study to try and work out

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>how we can get this game that we love back

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>on track. Just go back to last year's rules. Now

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>onto Bulldog's favorite segment of the episode, the BS Messages

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Week. This is where if something got you

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>riled up, you've got a gripe. You're really pissed off

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>with something that's happening in the NRL. We want to

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>hear your messages. Go to codesport dot com DoD au

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and submit it. It's really easy, front and center, top

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of the page. We want to hear from you. We've

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>got one from Ross in Townsville. I wonder what he's

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be talking about. Fatima my Nan could have

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>put up a better defensive effort. Absolutely pathetic from the cowboys.

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Not happy jam.

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 4>I reckon if you fielded thirteen NaN's from Townsville on

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 4>the weekend. They probably would have put in a better

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 4>defensive effort than what we got.

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So yep, yep, damning, scathing indictment from Fatima there, bulldog,

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>good luck making sense of this one.

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>So the game introduced the six tackle rule in the

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties to even up possession. Now the six again

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>or the six more rule can give aside a run

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of possession. That's from Glenn in Tippery in New South Wales.

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for that specification. So he's saying there like

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we had the six tackle sets came in so we

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>could balance up possession, and now the set restarts are

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>taking away that even contested possession.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not quite sure.

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 3>What Glenn is referring to the six tackled in in

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the nineteen eighties. I think it came in about the sixties.

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 3>So we're now trying to compare apples and origes and

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 3>what's sixty five years ago. I think what Glenn's trying

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 3>to say is it as the game being nullified from

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 3>what we tried to establish sixty years ago.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Glenn, I don't know what you're talking about.

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to keep the sorry against Glenn,

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Sorry mate, Sorry bro. Thanks so much for tuning in. Folks. Again,

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we want to hear from you with a bit more

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>detail from you next time, Glenn, if you want to

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>reach out to us on cod sports dot com, Dadau,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>let's just hear it, guys. We want to talk about

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>what's got you wound up. Thanks again for a great

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>episode and we will see you next week.