Speaker 1: Opinion on Sky News Australia starts now love this is outside,
Speaker 1: Good morning, bonjour, and welcome to Outsiders, the show that
Speaker 1: is to woke identity politics, left wing elitism and virtue
Speaker 1: signaling hypocrites. What Canadian Opposition leader Pierre Poiliev is to
Speaker 1: Justin Trudeau.
Speaker 2: The Conservatives continue to protect the wealthiest intetif supporting Canadians.
Speaker 1: The honorable leader of the Opposition.
Speaker 3: That's a little bit.
Speaker 4: Rich coming from him as he raises taxes on single
Speaker 4: moms for the crime of driving to the grocery store,
Speaker 4: while he treats himself to a jet setting experience where
Speaker 4: the food on the plane of a six day trip
Speaker 4: was two hundred and twenty thousand dollars. Beef brisket personally
Speaker 4: potatoes with truffle oil, beef tenderloin with port wine, sauce,
Speaker 4: breized lambshanks and even cheesecase we keep with pistachio brittle,
Speaker 4: fister speaker, with Canadians lined up at the food bank,
Speaker 4: what's on the menu for this prime minister this summer.
Speaker 1: The best opposition leader in the world and it's the
Speaker 1: pistachio brittle. And now, while little Justin Trudeau digests all
Speaker 1: of that. Let's grab the latest outside his news well
Speaker 1: momentous events. Rita and James the debate. We're going to
Speaker 1: talk a lot about the debate today. We're going to
Speaker 1: talk a lot about many other things as well. I've
Speaker 1: got Brendan O'Neil coming up and so much more. But
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is finished. He is toasty as could put.
Speaker 1: He is a fair tig. It is over for Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: As we've been saying on this show. The big story was,
Speaker 1: of course, the complete shock and dismay and horror and
Speaker 1: surprise of the left wing media and the Democrats are
Speaker 1: going we didn't realize he was a senile, batty old fool. Well,
Speaker 1: they obviously hadn't been watching Outsiders for the last four years,
Speaker 1: where we have shown you repeatedly what this man is
Speaker 1: like and reader and I and James will be talking
Speaker 1: about it more. But for me, for me, it came
Speaker 1: as no surprise what he was like. And I believe
Speaker 1: the fix was in. Obama and his clowns have decided
Speaker 1: the only way to get rid of Biden was to
Speaker 1: humiliate him out of the White House so that they
Speaker 1: can get Michelle Obama in that's what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: That's my prediction. Reacher, do you agree with me what.
Speaker 5: A fourth Obama term? Because a lot of people paying
Speaker 5: attention would know this is their third Obamer term we've
Speaker 5: just been enduring. I don't know if the media is
Speaker 5: a surprise as they pretending to be. I think they've
Speaker 5: just had to finally be honest with their audience because
Speaker 5: they've just watched this ninety minute car crash. So it's
Speaker 5: a bit hard to lie to them and say, oh,
Speaker 5: this is all just right wing conspiracies. These are videos
Speaker 5: that have been manipulated. This is the Republicans being mischievous,
Speaker 5: because that's what they've done for three and a half
Speaker 5: years when we've spoken about the cognitive decline, when the
Speaker 5: very few conservatives who are left in the media have
Speaker 5: said anything about Biden's obvious issues mental health, physical. I mean,
Speaker 5: the man can barely walk and barely talk. He can't.
Speaker 5: It doesn't appear to be able to think clearly in
Speaker 5: a coherent manner, and that has been evident for a
Speaker 5: long time, but they have tried to suppress that. They've
Speaker 5: tried to cover it up. They've been gas lighting the
Speaker 5: American people and finally the game's up. But he has
Speaker 5: agreed to another debate incredibly, so I think whatever cocktail
Speaker 5: of drugs they have him on is going to be
Speaker 5: mixed a little bit better because it's really James.
Speaker 1: Apparently the drugs. The drugs didn't kick in in time,
Speaker 1: but then as soon as it was all over, he
Speaker 1: was out there going firing up.
Speaker 3: Drugs kicked in the next day.
Speaker 1: Exactly.
Speaker 6: It's only a couple of weeks ago that we were
Speaker 6: being told all the videos of Joe Biden's stumbling bumbling
Speaker 6: they were all deep fakes. But now, of course they
Speaker 6: can't deny it because having set all the rules for
Speaker 6: the debate, Biden still failed on an epic scale. Interestingly,
Speaker 6: all the talk post debate is about Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: No one's talking about Donald Trump at.
Speaker 6: All, and so now the election will be a referendum
Speaker 6: on Biden. Trump put out a campaign ad just the
Speaker 6: other day, and what was interesting about it was that
Speaker 6: Trump does not speak on his own campaign ad at all.
Speaker 6: It's simply Joe Biden's speaking and Trump looking at him
Speaker 6: with this expression as to say, what on earth is
Speaker 6: going on with you?
Speaker 1: But when you're right that the you know, the election
Speaker 1: will be not about Donald Trump, it will be absolute
Speaker 1: ever replaces Joe Biden, because I'm sorry, there's no way
Speaker 1: Joe Biden will be will be time.
Speaker 5: I'm sure about that. I'm not sure about that. I
Speaker 5: know because I think he's going to he's not going
Speaker 5: to give this up. The family aren't going to give
Speaker 5: this up, so they'll need to take it.
Speaker 1: From him, and I think that the process of of course, I'm.
Speaker 5: Sure there are moves because they're looking at the polling.
Speaker 5: They're not just looking at the debate. They're looking at
Speaker 5: the polling. You've been paying attention to the polling that's
Speaker 5: been coming out of the states, particularly out of those
Speaker 5: crucial seven swing states. There's a number of polls showing
Speaker 5: Trump winning every single swing state. That is what's worrying them.
Speaker 5: And of course that performance is is just nimely bad.
Speaker 5: But I don't think it is certain that he will
Speaker 5: be replaced. I'm sure there'll be moves to get either
Speaker 5: news them in there, get maybe Michelle Obama. Let's talk
Speaker 5: about witmar who would be an absolute disaster. But all
Speaker 5: of them are going to have this honeymoon period. All
Speaker 5: of them are going to have this glowing media covery
Speaker 5: each in the lead up to the pole, so you
Speaker 5: would imagine they would perform better than Joe Biden, but
Speaker 5: it also would speak of absolute chaos within the White House,
Speaker 5: and how do you replace him without the twenty fifth Amendment?
Speaker 5: Are you going to replace him as president? As well?
Speaker 1: Just going to well, I'll go into this later on
Speaker 1: in the second hour, but it was such an obvious
Speaker 1: media hit jobs. Within seconds of the debate, they were going,
Speaker 1: this is it worst thing ever. He's got to go,
Speaker 1: naming unnamed sources, all of this stuff. It was clearly orchestrated.
Speaker 1: To me, there was no question that we saw it
Speaker 1: during COVID. We see it on climate change, we see
Speaker 1: it on transgender issues. We've come to know how utterly
Speaker 1: corrupt the left wing media around the world, including in
Speaker 1: this country, is utterly corrupt. They follow their talking points,
Speaker 1: they are preached to from above, and they just follow
Speaker 1: the script. And then later on they go, oh really,
Speaker 1: Oh we're surprised yet, that's why you watch this show
Speaker 1: and only this show, because you'll hear the truth here.
Speaker 1: We don't do that here. Let's have a look at
Speaker 1: Biden fighting backer he's gonna get Oh, he's going to
Speaker 1: hang on, As Rita says, let's see how convincing he is.
Speaker 7: I don't walk as easy as I used to. I
Speaker 7: don't speak as smooth as I used to. I don't
Speaker 7: debate as well as I used to. Well, I know
Speaker 7: what I do know. I know how to tell the truth.
Speaker 7: I know I know, I know right from Rome, and
Speaker 7: I know.
Speaker 1: How to do this job. I know how to get
Speaker 1: things done.
Speaker 8: I know, like menis of America's no, when you get
Speaker 8: knocked down, you get back up.
Speaker 1: Gojo doja. Unfortunately, Joe, you're up against the Obama and
Speaker 1: his hacks, and you're up against the entire Democrat machine
Speaker 1: now who'd determined to dynamite you out. So unfortunately, But
Speaker 1: that's been.
Speaker 5: The narrative of the Biden can Post debate, is that
Speaker 5: how can you debate someone who just lies incessantly? When
Speaker 5: Biden was caught in at least fifteen lines during that debate,
Speaker 5: and we've got to also point out the entire conditions
Speaker 5: of this debate were set out for him to succeed,
Speaker 5: so the mics were turned off so there could be
Speaker 5: no banter, which is what Trump's really good at and
Speaker 5: throwing you off your game. That had to was no audience.
Speaker 5: There Again, Trump plays off the audience and gets the reaction,
Speaker 5: so that.
Speaker 1: Joe, who's looking for the audience of the audience.
Speaker 5: Also, every question was framed from a leftist perspective, asking Trump,
Speaker 5: will you accept the election results when we had the
Speaker 5: Democrats not accept election election results.
Speaker 1: I actually thought the team were very, very good. I
Speaker 1: was very impressed by me. No, no, I thought that
Speaker 1: was terrific. I thought were really good games.
Speaker 6: I've got to comment on that click we just showed
Speaker 6: of Biden the day after the debate, and his great
Speaker 6: comeback to convince everybody it's okay is to say, look,
Speaker 6: I can't walk, I can't speak, I can't debate. But
Speaker 6: other than that, I'll be a great president. I mean,
Speaker 6: if that's the best he's got, he's in deep, deep trouble.
Speaker 1: All the there was some good stuff on foreign affairs
Speaker 1: and that in the debate. Here's here's a bit Trump
Speaker 1: kind of didn't possibly articulate it as well as he
Speaker 1: could have either, But listen to this bit on the
Speaker 1: way that Joe Biden has fallen in line with Hamas
Speaker 1: and the Palestinian cause. Which is what Donald Trump was
Speaker 1: talking about. Have a listener.
Speaker 5: Is this a bad Palestinian?
Speaker 1: I love that fate, he said.
Speaker 9: The only one who wants to keep going is Hamas.
Speaker 9: Actually Israel is the one, and you should let him
Speaker 9: go and let him finish a job.
Speaker 10: He doesn't want to do it. He's become like a Palestinian.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable. And the stuff about the border was absolutely superb. Basically,
Speaker 1: Trump's spent most of the debate hammering on the boarder issue,
Speaker 1: which is of course the Democratic Well, this is.
Speaker 5: Another reason I think the debate the moderators were terrible.
Speaker 5: Not only are they both determined anti Trumpers, and I
Speaker 5: think that was evident in the questions they picked, but
Speaker 5: I don't think it was it was it was storm made.
Speaker 1: By house there the debating wasn't. I actually think the
Speaker 1: the way.
Speaker 5: That they barely asked about look at the results. Biden
Speaker 5: was a corpse, Yes, because the.
Speaker 1: Moderate angles showed Biden as a corpse screen thing. If
Speaker 1: they were favoring Biden, they were, why didn't they know
Speaker 1: we all know, Well, no.
Speaker 5: They didn't know. When he wasn't talking, he was going
Speaker 5: to look like an absolutely bewildered, lost skeleton who didn't
Speaker 5: know what day was staring off into space looking here
Speaker 5: and there, so they didn't know that. And often when
Speaker 5: they had that split screen, we saw that the hell
Speaker 5: they wanted in doubt.
Speaker 1: Mostly I thought the questions were fair.
Speaker 6: Did you think I thought that they were pretty fair,
Speaker 6: and they gave Trump a good run. In fact, I
Speaker 6: actually liked this debate in terms of the rules. Future
Speaker 6: debates should follow those rules. There was not talking over
Speaker 6: the top of each other. The moderators allowed people to
Speaker 6: give fair answers. Biden had ten days of training. You
Speaker 6: would have thought they would have taught him to close
Speaker 6: your mouth. It didn't stand there just with your mouth.
Speaker 10: Didn't show.
Speaker 1: Didn't show ten days training, I thought.
Speaker 5: I thought the moderators were absolutely appalling. I thought the
Speaker 5: questions were focused not on the three things that we
Speaker 5: know Americans care about most, which is the cost of
Speaker 5: living crisis. They did have a bit of talk about that,
Speaker 5: the border crisis, which what Trump kept taking his answers
Speaker 5: back to because he knows.
Speaker 1: Sorry read it would just have a quick look at
Speaker 1: him talking about they're killing our citizens on the borders.
Speaker 9: This is we are living right now in a ratznest
Speaker 9: they're killing our peopeople in New York, in California, and
Speaker 9: every state in the Union. Because we don't have borders anymore.
Speaker 9: Every state is now a border. And because of his ridiculous,
Speaker 9: insane and very stupid policies, people are coming in and
Speaker 9: they're killing our citizens at a level that we've never seen.
Speaker 9: We call it migrant crime.
Speaker 10: I call it Biden.
Speaker 1: Migrant crime Biden. But let's also have a look at
Speaker 1: Trump talk and this is serious, and I think it's
Speaker 1: got a lot more serious in the last twenty four hours.
Speaker 1: This we, you know, talk of World War three. It's
Speaker 1: not something you want to talk up, but World War
Speaker 1: three was something Trump referred to. And the reality is
Speaker 1: we are now in a situation where the Chinese, the Russians,
Speaker 1: the Koreans, the Iranians worsen Hesbala, all of them have
Speaker 1: now seen just how weak the US, the leader of
Speaker 1: the free world is. This is serious. We've got seven
Speaker 1: months till we get a new commander in chief of
Speaker 1: the US and we have this Dodo wandering around in
Speaker 1: charge of Western security. Is deadly serious. But his Donald
Speaker 1: Trump on World War three.
Speaker 9: His military policies are insane. They're in sane. These are
Speaker 9: wars that will never end with him. He will drive
Speaker 9: us into World War three. And we're closer to World
Speaker 9: War three than anybody can imagine.
Speaker 1: What we're not hearing in the left media and the
Speaker 1: mainstream media is just how dire the situation is in
Speaker 1: the north of Israel, with Hezwela ready to launch a
Speaker 1: full scale war. Donald Trump was quite accurate James when
Speaker 1: he talked about the fact that Biden's weakness in Afghanistan,
Speaker 1: Biden giving money Rita to the Iranian regime is what
Speaker 1: has prompted the state of the world. Now we are
Speaker 1: in a very precarious situation.
Speaker 5: We are and quote Katie McFarland here, Deputy National Security Advisor,
Speaker 5: served under four presidents, As she said, the biggest concer
Speaker 5: sequence of debate is China, Russia. Iran realized they have
Speaker 5: a narrowing window of opportunity to exploit to US weakness.
Speaker 5: They know Trump will be tough on them, so they
Speaker 5: will press their advantage now while Biden is still in
Speaker 5: the White House, and she said the next few months
Speaker 5: are a period of maximum vulnerability for the US and
Speaker 5: for the world.
Speaker 6: Really absolutely well, there's vulnerability in two fronts first domestically,
Speaker 6: and we need to talk about that because you'd think
Speaker 6: it'd be a pretty precarious time over the next seven
Speaker 6: months in the US because Biden during that debate essentially
Speaker 6: said if you vote MAGA, you are anti democracy. So
Speaker 6: he's labeled half the country anti democracy and he wants
Speaker 6: to run on this is all about democracy, which incidentally,
Speaker 6: if you.
Speaker 3: Replace Biden at this point, how can you then run
Speaker 3: on saving democracy?
Speaker 5: Ran primaries? But the Democrats have voted for their candidate's not.
Speaker 1: Like there wasn't I know, and then some of them
Speaker 1: Wisconsin and others, it's too late Biden will be on
Speaker 1: the ballot.
Speaker 6: So essentially the Democrats are stoking a civil war domestically.
Speaker 6: And that's before we talk about what's happening internationally, which
Speaker 6: of course putin jijingping others.
Speaker 3: As you've mentioned, that time is now.
Speaker 1: It's a terrifying seven months that lie ahead of us.
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, it's terrifying seven months, all right.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: I think there is a lot that has come out
Speaker 5: of that that I think is also a reflection on
Speaker 5: the media. You touched that on that on your earlier remarks,
Speaker 5: but particularly the Australian media because they just follow the CNN,
Speaker 5: MSNBC Guardian talking points uncritically, and we in this station
Speaker 5: have been maligned by the likes of the nine media
Speaker 5: and Bimes Guardian, crist the Senate but saying that we
Speaker 5: have run conspiracy theories about Biden's cognitive decline when we've
Speaker 5: talked about it and we've played videos, unedited videos, mind you,
Speaker 5: and now they're just memory holding all that. It's like,
Speaker 5: oh no, no, yeah, Biden's obviously not okay, but completely
Speaker 5: giving themselves, exonerating their own behavior over the last three
Speaker 5: and a half years, which is demonizing anyone who's actually
Speaker 5: pointed out the truth.
Speaker 1: One hundred percent. Greek later on will show a bit
Speaker 1: of the ABC making complete fools of themselves on a
Speaker 1: related issue. But let's go now to London. The other
Speaker 1: big stories. Of course, how Nigel Farage and his reform movement.
Speaker 1: I touched on it last week, surging in the opinion
Speaker 1: policy election is this coming Thursday. Can watch it here
Speaker 1: on Sky on Friday morning, of course Australian time. But Farage,
Speaker 1: she's sat in the studio with us. He's a great
Speaker 1: bloke and a very talented politician. They are some of
Speaker 1: the polls say Franche could win up to eighten seats.
Speaker 1: Who knows well, I tell you who does know, or
Speaker 1: certainly who knows more than most of us. Brendon O'Neil, Brendan.
Speaker 1: Great to see you as always, you're there in London.
Speaker 1: What an exciting time the debates not but tell us
Speaker 1: and then thank you so much for staying up late
Speaker 1: and coming on outside, as we love having you here.
Speaker 1: What is happening? What's the latest in Britain with Nigel
Speaker 1: Frage and the election?
Speaker 11: Well, Farage has certainly stirred the election up and someone
Speaker 11: needed to. It was the most boring election in British history,
Speaker 11: you know, Rishi Sunak versus Keir Starmer. It was like
Speaker 11: choosing between two bank managers, you know, two cheeks of
Speaker 11: the same butthole, both boring, both gray, both technocratic. There
Speaker 11: was really no choice at all. And then Nigel Frage,
Speaker 11: who initially said he was going to go off to
Speaker 11: America and work with Donald Trump. He then decided to
Speaker 11: throw himself into the election and he has really stirred
Speaker 11: it up. He has brought to the surface all the
Speaker 11: issues that people want to talk about, from mass immigration
Speaker 11: to freedom of speech, to the crazy cult of net zero,
Speaker 11: all of these things that he's promising to get a
Speaker 11: handle on, and he's injected some momentum. And people are
Speaker 11: pleased at the UNI Party because the Tories and the
Speaker 11: Labor are pretty much indistinguishable these days. People are pleased
Speaker 11: that someone is challenging the UNI Party and bringing in
Speaker 11: a different voice to politics.
Speaker 5: Reader now, Brendan, the poll show a Labor landslide is
Speaker 5: pretty much assured. Is Frage's entire strategy a two election
Speaker 5: strategy just to position reform, to bring in the Tories
Speaker 5: that disaffect the Tories into his camp and then really
Speaker 5: have a red hot go next.
Speaker 11: Time It could be I think that's probably what he's thinking.
Speaker 11: You know, a lot of Tories are saying, if you
Speaker 11: vote for Nigel Frage, if you vote for reform, you're
Speaker 11: basically helping Labor get into power. You're ensuring that Labor
Speaker 11: has a massive majority. I don't think that argument lands anymore.
Speaker 11: People are sick and tired off the Tory Party and
Speaker 11: the Labor Party. Lots of people are anyway, and they
Speaker 11: do want something different, They do want an alternative, and
Speaker 11: I think people are perfectly within their rights to vote
Speaker 11: for reform. Even if at this election it won't make
Speaker 11: a massive difference, I think it could build up to
Speaker 11: something bigger at future elections. But you know, people underestimate
Speaker 11: how disastrous a labor government is going to be. You know,
Speaker 11: Keir Starmer and his team, they present themselves as the
Speaker 11: adults in the room, middle of the road, very centrist,
Speaker 11: very sensible, but they are psychopaths. They are political lunatics.
Speaker 11: And the policies they are pursuing in terms of the
Speaker 11: billions of pounds they will spend on net zero, which
Speaker 11: will basically further de industrialize Britain. It will be like
Speaker 11: industrial suicide. They're against freedom of speech and the way
Speaker 11: in which they define Islamophobia basically means we might soon
Speaker 11: have a blasphemy law where you can't criticize this long
Speaker 11: without having the police field or collar. And also they
Speaker 11: don't even know what a woman is. You know, this
Speaker 11: is a party run by a man who says that
Speaker 11: ninety nine point nine percent of women don't have a penis,
Speaker 11: which means he thinks that one in one thousand women do.
Speaker 12: Have a penis.
Speaker 13: These people who don't understand and truth, biology, freedom, industry, growth,
Speaker 13: or any of the other important things of politics, and
Speaker 13: it will be disastrous when they get into power.
Speaker 3: James Brendan Just beck on Nigel Farage.
Speaker 6: I mean he entered the election just a few weeks
Speaker 6: ago and the momentum he's generated has been quite amazing
Speaker 6: in a very short space of time. No matter how
Speaker 6: many seats he wins. Do you think he'll regret not
Speaker 6: having thrown his hat in the ring earlier, because if
Speaker 6: he'd had more time, surely the result could be incredible
Speaker 6: as compared to what it may well be Preps eighteen seats.
Speaker 1: I think you're right.
Speaker 11: I think he probably does regret not going for it sooner.
Speaker 11: And he got a lot of flack when he said, look,
Speaker 11: good luck Britain, but I'm leaving and I'm going to
Speaker 11: I'm going off to America. He got so much flak
Speaker 11: about that, including from me, because I wanted him to
Speaker 11: get involved in the British election. Now he is involved,
Speaker 11: he's making waves, But he could have made bigger waves,
Speaker 11: There's no question about that if he had done it
Speaker 11: earlier and in a bit more of an organized way.
Speaker 11: But the thing that's happening now, the striking thing now
Speaker 11: is that he's getting a lot of momentum, but he's
Speaker 11: also being attacked relentlessly by the mainstream media and the
Speaker 11: political class. The knives are out because these people loathe populism.
Speaker 11: They loathe the gammon, which is how they refer to
Speaker 11: working class voters.
Speaker 1: They are still.
Speaker 11: Scared of the Brexit spirit that was unleashed in the
Speaker 11: referendum vote eight years ago. They hate all these political
Speaker 11: waves that are coming from ordinary people who are sick
Speaker 11: of the mainstream political class, and so they are trying
Speaker 11: to kill off Farage's movement before it really gathers a
Speaker 11: lot of steam. So he's got a lot on his plate.
Speaker 11: He entered the race a little bit too late and
Speaker 11: now the establishment is out to get him. So it's
Speaker 11: an uphill struggle for Forage, but so far he's doing
Speaker 11: pretty well.
Speaker 1: So Brindan, I want to ask you just to quickly
Speaker 1: two things. One is how many Conservatives do you think
Speaker 1: Torris voters are swapping over to reform? But also wanted
Speaker 1: to get your thoughts on Glastonbury, the pop festival where
Speaker 1: you've got the likes of dam Albahn from Blur basically
Speaker 1: touting the Palestinian cause at a pop festival. The Nova
Speaker 1: Pop Festival in October seventh was where Hama's massacred and
Speaker 1: butchered people. And yet these clowns at Glastonbury Pop Festival
Speaker 1: are waving Palestinian pro Palestinian flags. What sort of sickness
Speaker 1: has taken hold of Britain, Brendan.
Speaker 11: You know when I look at the Glastonbury festival, I
Speaker 11: do actually feel a little bit ill. As you say,
Speaker 11: the Nova Music Festival was just eight months ago. Three
Speaker 11: hundred and sixty four people were murdered there. Some of
Speaker 11: the women there were raped as well by a bunch
Speaker 11: of racists, by an anti Semitic army. And now eight
Speaker 11: months later we have another music festival in Glastonbury, one
Speaker 11: of the best known in the world, and instead of
Speaker 11: offering solidarity to their fellow festival goers who were murdered
Speaker 11: just eight months ago, they're waving the flag off the
Speaker 11: anti Semitic army that carried out that mass slaughter. I mean,
Speaker 11: it's such a grotesque spectacle and it really demonstrates how
Speaker 11: thin and shallow and bigoted and racist, so called progressive
Speaker 11: politics has become where they are waiving the flag of
Speaker 11: the people who carried out that killing, rather than offering
Speaker 11: support to the people who were killed. I think it's
Speaker 11: really horrible.
Speaker 1: It's disgusting and Brendan Conservatives swapping to reform is that happening.
Speaker 1: There's been a couple of high profile ones, but broadly.
Speaker 11: Speaking, I think a lot of Conservative voters will switch
Speaker 11: to reform this time, and they'll take a punt on
Speaker 11: reform and see how they do. But you know, remember
Speaker 11: that a lot of labor voters switched to the Conservatives
Speaker 11: in twenty nineteen. Huge numbers of labor voters gave Boris
Speaker 11: Johnson a chance, but then we got COVID and we
Speaker 11: got everything else and that was all a bit of
Speaker 11: a mess. So the lesson of British politics right now
Speaker 11: is that people don't have a political home. They're looking
Speaker 11: for a party that they think gives to their concerns,
Speaker 11: and they're playing around with their votes and they're.
Speaker 1: Trying out different people.
Speaker 11: This time, a lot of them will try out Nigel
Speaker 11: Farage's reform and I think it could have a transformative
Speaker 11: impact on British politics in the long run.
Speaker 5: Well, you mentioned the Boris Johnson's success in getting labor
Speaker 5: voters are here one with in a landslide, but then
Speaker 5: they governed like labor and the energy policies, the environmental
Speaker 5: policies were a big part of that. And you've got
Speaker 5: so many Britians who've been plunged into energy poverty. Now,
Speaker 5: what are Labour going to do in that area? Because
Speaker 5: we know their green dreams are even wackier than what
Speaker 5: Boris Johnson was dreaming up.
Speaker 11: Labor are going to be even worse than the Tories.
Speaker 11: And the Tories have been bad. You know, all the
Speaker 11: nonsense in Britain that I like to talk about, we
Speaker 11: have to bear in mind it all happened under fourteen
Speaker 11: years of Tory rule. All the wokeness or the environmentalism,
Speaker 11: or the transmania, or the that kids have been taught
Speaker 11: in schools, it all happened under a Tory administrations and
Speaker 11: we shouldn't forget that. But the environmental issue is so
Speaker 11: important in Europe right now. You know, we've got farmers
Speaker 11: rising up against these crazy climate change policies, against net
Speaker 11: zero because it's even making it difficult for farmers to
Speaker 11: make food. This is how crazy the elites in Europe
Speaker 11: have become. They want to stop people from being able
Speaker 11: to make food. In Ireland, there is a discussion about
Speaker 11: killing two hundred thousand cows because they're producing too much methane.
Speaker 11: This is basically animal sacrifice, you know, sacrificing animals to
Speaker 11: appease the gods of weather. This is the situation we've
Speaker 11: arrived at. So net zero is a religious cult. It's
Speaker 11: an incredibly destructive cult that will deindustrialize formally industrial nations,
Speaker 11: and labor is at the forefront of pushing this ideology.
Speaker 11: So when they get into power, all that green stuff
Speaker 11: is going to get worse and worse, and I think
Speaker 11: people will rue the day that they put that party
Speaker 11: into downings.
Speaker 1: Brendan O'Neil from Spiked Online. Make sure you subscribe to
Speaker 1: Spiked online to read a lot more of Brendan and
Speaker 1: his colleagues there. Brendan, thanks so much for coming on outside.
Speaker 1: Is always a pleasure to have you here on the show.
Speaker 1: After the break, reader's reality Check and we'll chat to
Speaker 1: Matt Canavan about the big energy debates, renewables, nuclear and
Speaker 1: so much more. Matt Kean might even get a mention
Speaker 1: you never know you like in the tip.
Speaker 5: You're watching Outsiders with your hosts Rowan Dean, James McPherson
Speaker 5: and I'm Rida Panahiers. Soon we'll be speaking to Senator
Speaker 5: Matt Canavan about Indigenous land claims under the Aboriginal Land Act.
Speaker 5: But first, on Friday, Paul Murray and I got together
Speaker 5: to watch the Great Presidential Debate and you can see
Speaker 5: the twenty two minute highlights on all our digital platforms now.
Speaker 5: It's already been watched more than one and a half
Speaker 5: million times on YouTube below. And here's why. Because, unlike
Speaker 5: the rest of the Australian media, the bulk of the
Speaker 5: US media we have been telling you for four years
Speaker 5: about Joe Biden's obvious cognitive declined ass a man who
Speaker 5: has been in public life for more than five decades.
Speaker 5: The decline in recent years is undeniable. It's not due
Speaker 5: to a stutter. It's not a right wing conspiracy. It's
Speaker 5: real and obvious to anyone with eyes and ears. But
Speaker 5: the overwhelming majority of the media has asked you to
Speaker 5: not believe your lying eyes and ears and trust the
Speaker 5: narrative that Joe is fine. Here's the Washington Post and
Speaker 5: the New York Times and ABC all claiming out of
Speaker 5: context and misleading videos are being used to unfairly malign
Speaker 5: Joe Biden as mentally and physically deficient. ABC News told
Speaker 5: you seeing is not believing. No, don't believe what you see.
Speaker 5: These are just out of context videos and they're being
Speaker 5: used to fuel a narrative that President Joe Biden is
Speaker 5: mentally and physically fit for office. End quote. That's what
Speaker 5: they were claiming, and the Democrats in Unison were on
Speaker 5: message pushing the narrative that Joe is fit as sharp
Speaker 5: as attack, never being better.
Speaker 14: He is sharp, intensely probing and detail oriented and focused.
Speaker 1: This is a man who is sharp, who is on
Speaker 1: top of his game, who knows what's going on.
Speaker 3: This guy's tough, he's smart, he's on his game. His
Speaker 3: mental acuity is great.
Speaker 1: This is a very sharper president.
Speaker 15: This is a man that's on his game.
Speaker 1: Is absolutely there's not a problem.
Speaker 10: He's sharp, he's fit, and he's always answering questions. He
Speaker 10: is on the ball.
Speaker 1: He was sharper than anyone I've spoken to. He is sharp,
Speaker 1: he is on top of things. There's out of my
Speaker 1: mind that the president is mentally for farces. Bry has
Speaker 1: proven himself to have his strong memory and he's.
Speaker 5: Completely mentally He's at the top of his game. And
Speaker 5: who could forget Jill Biden with the ladies of the
Speaker 5: view making these claims before the debate.
Speaker 16: American people deserve a debate because you need to see
Speaker 16: your choices. You need to see Trump, and you need
Speaker 16: to see the president, and you need to see the
Speaker 16: differences and my husband's and you're going to see how
Speaker 16: smart he is and the experience he has. And then
Speaker 16: you'll see somebody who, like you're saying, I'm going to
Speaker 16: use Joy's words, can't put a sentence together.
Speaker 5: Yes, she really said, it's Trump who can't put a
Speaker 5: sentence together. Old Joe's never been better, and the media
Speaker 5: fanboys and girls have been ready to regurgitate that message.
Speaker 5: This was Joe Scarborough on MSNBC.
Speaker 17: Now, he's cogent, but I undersold him when I said
Speaker 17: he was cogent. He's far beyond cogent. In fact, I
Speaker 17: think he's better than he's ever been intellectually polytically, because
Speaker 17: he's been around for fifty years. Start your tape right now,
Speaker 17: because I'm about to tell you the truth and f
Speaker 17: you if.
Speaker 10: You can't handle the truth.
Speaker 17: This version of Biden intellectually analytically is the best Biden ever,
Speaker 17: not a close second.
Speaker 3: And I've known him for years.
Speaker 5: Wow, the gas lodging, there is a weapon grade. But
Speaker 5: here is our ult Joe Scarborough, the MISSMBC anchor.
Speaker 18: After the debate, and now is a good time in June,
Speaker 18: thank god, in June and not October. In June, this
Speaker 18: is the last chance for Democrats to decide whether this
Speaker 18: man we've known and loved for a very long time
Speaker 18: is up to the task of running for president of
Speaker 18: the United States.
Speaker 5: He wants Tony for him, wants to replace me. It's
Speaker 5: hard to deny what people have just spent nineteen minutes
Speaker 5: watching a complete train wreck live on television. And it
Speaker 5: wasn't just Biden struggling to complete coherent sentences. It was
Speaker 5: his bewildered state, even when Trump was talking or from prisons,
Speaker 5: people that are from mental institutions in senasl terrorists.
Speaker 9: We have the largest number of terrorists coming into our
Speaker 9: country right now, all terrasts, all over the world, not
Speaker 9: just in South America, all over the world. They come
Speaker 9: from the Middle East, everywhere, all over the world.
Speaker 10: They're pouring in.
Speaker 3: And this guy just left it open.
Speaker 5: He has no idea what is happening. I think probably
Speaker 5: even called him Brandon there and it didn't register. It
Speaker 5: was a long after the debate that the Trump campaign
Speaker 5: released this devastating ad just reminding Americans of who is
Speaker 5: supposedly running the country.
Speaker 15: Well, making sure that we're able to make every single
Speaker 15: solitary person eligible for what I've been able to do
Speaker 15: with the UH, the covid ixcu to be with dealing
Speaker 15: with every day we had to do with UH. Look,
Speaker 15: if we finally beat medicare, we find him and finding
Speaker 15: providing housing for black Americans. The impact on the choice,
Speaker 15: the idea that they're gonna I'm not gonna. I've been
Speaker 15: proposing that everybody they paid the millionaires paid one per
Speaker 15: one percent, so no one. After all, I've not raised
Speaker 15: the cost of Social Security for anybody. For you, I
Speaker 15: got my handicapped, which when I was Vice president down
Speaker 15: to the six And once they get away with the get,
Speaker 15: we're rid of the ability of medicare to me for
Speaker 15: the ability for them.
Speaker 5: That is hard to watch, and there was more of it,
Speaker 5: but anyone who has been paying attention to the president
Speaker 5: wouldn't have been shocked by any of that. The cognitive decline,
Speaker 5: as I've said, has been obvious for some time. You
Speaker 5: bring you evidence of Biden's deteriorating state just about every
Speaker 5: week on this program. And finally, the rest of the
Speaker 5: media is acknowledging what you've known all along, that man
Speaker 5: is not fit for office. But let's end with a
Speaker 5: good laugh. You would have noted the golf banter during
Speaker 5: the debate where President Biden lied about his handicap. Here
Speaker 5: are a couple of Aussie comics, twin brothers, Archie and
Speaker 5: Miles Shepherd, turning that juvenile exchange into comedy gold. This
Speaker 5: is brilliant.
Speaker 9: I'm in very good health. I just won two club championships,
Speaker 9: not even senior, two regular club championships. To do that,
Speaker 9: you have to be quite smart, and you have to
Speaker 9: be able to hit the ball a long way.
Speaker 19: And I do it.
Speaker 3: He doesn't do it.
Speaker 9: He can't hit a ball fifty yards. She challenged me
Speaker 9: to a golf match. You can hit about fifty yards.
Speaker 9: I think I'm in very good shape. I feel that
Speaker 9: I'm as in good as shape as I was twenty
Speaker 9: five thirty years ago. Actually I'm probably a little bit
Speaker 9: lighter look.
Speaker 15: I'd be happy to have a driving contest and him
Speaker 15: the reama. I got my handicap, which when I was
Speaker 15: vice president down to a six. And by by the
Speaker 15: way I told you before, I'm happy to play golf.
Speaker 15: If you carry your own bag, I think you can
Speaker 15: do it.
Speaker 9: That's the biggest lie. He's a six handicap, of all.
Speaker 15: I was an eight handicap, now eight.
Speaker 10: But I have you know, I've.
Speaker 9: Seen this wing.
Speaker 8: I know you wing.
Speaker 1: Let's learn, President Trump, We're going let's not act like children.
Speaker 1: You a specific concern that was fantastic, half clever of
Speaker 1: those guys. Matt Canavan Joins is now Senator from Queensland. Matt,
Speaker 1: always great to see you. I'm sure you enjoyed the
Speaker 1: debates along with the rest of us. Love to get
Speaker 1: your thoughts, but also native title Seriously, what is going
Speaker 1: on in Queensland? It appears that you're giving the state away.
Speaker 1: Does anyone own anything any longer? What's happening to houses?
Speaker 1: I mean, what is going on?
Speaker 10: Well?
Speaker 20: Look, the native title system has been one that has
Speaker 20: largely unaffected people for a generation, but there is now
Speaker 20: this sort of unholy alliance emerging, I think, between radical
Speaker 20: indigenous groups and radical environmentalists that are seeking to lock
Speaker 20: up land and take it away from a nation's development.
Speaker 20: It's not going to people's houses yet, but it is
Speaker 20: going to areas that could be used to build houses.
Speaker 1: In the future, and we do need to do that.
Speaker 20: For example, just near me here, almost an entire island
Speaker 20: as being potentially locked up that until recently was subject
Speaker 20: to detailed development plans for new housing, new tourists, for abilities,
Speaker 20: and I just get the impression that a lot in
Speaker 20: the Left and the Labor Party didn't want that. They
Speaker 20: didn't want a tourism facility, to want people living on
Speaker 20: the Great Bear Reef, so they're quite happy to use
Speaker 20: an indigenous native title system to try.
Speaker 1: And lock all this up.
Speaker 20: There are a lot of problems for the native title system,
Speaker 20: and maybe we should try and fix the existing native
Speaker 20: title areas of dative title grants before we make the
Speaker 20: same mistakes all around our country, because far too many
Speaker 20: native title groups end up with lots of land but
Speaker 20: no ability to use that land, both to improve their
Speaker 20: own lives, but also to improve the productivity and wealth
Speaker 20: of our nation.
Speaker 1: That's got to be fixed, and has one nation to
Speaker 1: put up the idea of some kind of sunset clause
Speaker 1: to native title, because otherwise this will just go on
Speaker 1: forever and ever it want.
Speaker 20: It well, I think what we need to do is
Speaker 20: try and resolve all these issues.
Speaker 1: We should be able to do that.
Speaker 20: This government, the Federal government, has stripped funding from on
Speaker 20: indigenous groups to try and help settle any existing and
Speaker 20: outstanding claims. And so of course they do provide money
Speaker 20: to native title groups to help them lodge claims, but
Speaker 20: obviously the people sometimes on the receiving end of farmers
Speaker 20: and not so much mining companies.
Speaker 1: They can look up.
Speaker 20: Themselves, but farmers often need some help to make sure
Speaker 20: they get the right outcome in these deals.
Speaker 1: And it does take two. Part is it often takes two.
Speaker 20: To finalize these arrangements and so we don't get bogged
Speaker 20: out in court. I mean, after a generation of native title,
Speaker 20: I think we can safely say that the biggest winners
Speaker 20: from it have been lawyers. The biggest winners from that
Speaker 20: out of title have not been Indigenous people.
Speaker 1: They've not been the average Australian citizen.
Speaker 20: It has been the legal class that is happy to
Speaker 20: keep drip feeding and dragging these processes out forever. So
Speaker 20: it does need to be a concern enof to end
Speaker 20: these I don't want to have a sunset clause which
Speaker 20: unfairly restricts access to their rights for some indigenous groups.
Speaker 20: But there just needs to be an effort to make
Speaker 20: sure let's get it all resolved. We should be able
Speaker 20: to do this to only have it's had a deadline
Speaker 20: to doing it within a decade. Hasn't quite come to that,
Speaker 20: but we should be able to do it in a
Speaker 20: reasonable time frame and get it done.
Speaker 6: James Matt there's obviously a lot of public concern about
Speaker 6: these native title claims. But the Career Mail we're reporting
Speaker 6: there's fifteen towns in Queensland where Indigenous groups are trying
Speaker 6: to gain freehold ownership of public land. And what stood
Speaker 6: out to me is that the Queensland government are keeping
Speaker 6: it secret. They're not revealing to anyone exactly where these
Speaker 6: places are. Why is the government not being open about this?
Speaker 6: If they want to allay public fears, surely they should
Speaker 6: be more transparent about these claims.
Speaker 20: Yeah, I can't tell why certain people are doing certain things,
Speaker 20: but I go back to what I was saying is
Speaker 20: that I think there's another hidden agenda here.
Speaker 1: So it's not.
Speaker 20: Surprising that such a group would hide the details if
Speaker 20: they're also trying to hide their underlying agenda, and as
Speaker 20: I say, I think there's a lot of this is
Speaker 20: about trying to lock up large parts of our country
Speaker 20: away from productive investments and developments. I mean, I don't
Speaker 20: mind the idea of giving more rights to those.
Speaker 1: Notive title groups that have land.
Speaker 20: As I said before, what often happens is they get
Speaker 20: access to land, but they can't use it, they can't
Speaker 20: mind it, they can't farm it. And there are some,
Speaker 20: let's face it, mostly white fellows in the city, that
Speaker 20: are quite happy with that deal. That's exactly how they
Speaker 20: want it. So you end up just consigning generations of
Speaker 20: Indigenous Australians into lifelong poverty because they have no access
Speaker 20: to economic resources. And so all of this must be
Speaker 20: transparent because, as I say, if this is an agenda
Speaker 20: to lock up the entire country, that should concern all
Speaker 20: the strains, but definitely would have a huge impact on
Speaker 20: regional and rural austrains. It will not have access to
Speaker 20: economic development that has occurred in the cities.
Speaker 5: Reta, I want to ask you about energy policy in
Speaker 5: this country. The number of people struggling to pay electricity
Speaker 5: bills has jumped eighteen percent in a single year, according
Speaker 5: to the a Triple C Albos blaming the Coalition for it,
Speaker 5: say that their policies and their nuclear strategies is not
Speaker 5: the way forward. What do you say to that, Because
Speaker 5: they've now recruited Matt Kean to a key role and
Speaker 5: he's been presented as a moderate liberal who's sensible on
Speaker 5: this issue. Well, what's your response to that.
Speaker 20: Well, it seems to often be the easiest way to
Speaker 20: get yourself promoted into a high paying job in the
Speaker 20: energy sector is to fail at your previous job. I
Speaker 20: mean Mat came Keen clearly failed. He clearly failed as
Speaker 20: an energy minister. I mean, just after he left his
Speaker 20: energy minister, the new Cpira's government had to hurriedly sign
Speaker 20: a deal to keep the araingqulified POWERstation going because otherwise
Speaker 20: New Southali's lights will.
Speaker 1: Go at it.
Speaker 20: As you say, prices went up massively. The security of
Speaker 20: energy system is now extremely fragile, and Matt key has
Speaker 20: to take responsibility for that. So I mean, I don't
Speaker 20: think this is a moderate approaches in a partisan way.
Speaker 20: I think both the public of labor governments and coalition
Speaker 20: governments have been to blame here for the absolute energy mess.
Speaker 20: We find ourselves in We as a country have been
Speaker 20: installing solar and wind energy at a rate four times
Speaker 20: per person per person terms, four times than in North
Speaker 20: America and Europe. And this is where we've got to
Speaker 20: because we haven't been investing in reliable forms of power.
Speaker 20: Our energy systems now very fragile, very short, and prices
Speaker 20: are going through.
Speaker 1: The roof and matt up your way. One point three
Speaker 1: billion is being slated for a wind farm up in Rockhampton.
Speaker 1: I think it is. I mean, this is the sort
Speaker 1: of huge amounts of money that are going into renewables.
Speaker 1: Yet yet labor mock the coalition's nuclear strategy for being expensive.
Speaker 1: Yet all this money is being spent on these boondoggles
Speaker 1: like wind farms and solar farms. Yeah.
Speaker 20: Well, just in the Quaisine budget the other week the
Speaker 20: Coens and government put five hundred million dollars of taxpayer
Speaker 20: money to that wind farm. Just that taxpayers dollars going there.
Speaker 20: And meanw I just drove back on the Bruce Highway
Speaker 20: from Brisbane yesterday and it's in a shocking state. I've
Speaker 20: never seen it in such a poor state. It is
Speaker 20: a dangerous road. And meanwhile the Queens of Government has
Speaker 20: enough money to put five hundred million dollars to a
Speaker 20: private sector investment that is not working, that is making
Speaker 20: energy system less reliable. And yet we have just roads
Speaker 20: that are at a shocking state just repair. We have
Speaker 20: a health system where you have to wait weeks to
Speaker 20: get basic things done. I know many people have had
Speaker 20: break breaks their arms and legs, takes weeks to get
Speaker 20: a cast.
Speaker 1: What is going on with our country?
Speaker 20: Our country is crumbling before our eyes, and our government
Speaker 20: puts money into fifty cent public transport fairs and hundreds
Speaker 20: of billions of dollars to boondoggles from private investors.
Speaker 1: Why aren't our.
Speaker 20: Governments focusing on the real problems right in front of
Speaker 20: their face? I mean, you've got to expect what they're
Speaker 20: trying to do is distract us, distract us from those
Speaker 20: real things we see in front of our face, the crime,
Speaker 20: the decay in our hospital system. Our ability is to
Speaker 20: keep the lights on, and they get us to fused
Speaker 20: on saving the planet and look over there.
Speaker 1: So don't look at the things I could fix.
Speaker 20: Let's focus on something I can't fix and will never
Speaker 20: be held responsible for.
Speaker 1: Matt Canavan fantastic In two words, what did you think
Speaker 1: of the debate a snoozefest. Actually don't mind it. He
Speaker 1: fell asleep. I don't know.
Speaker 20: I didn't find it all that riveting, to be honest,
Speaker 20: I watched about half of it.
Speaker 1: I couldn't get through it all. There you go, Matt Canavan.
Speaker 1: Always fantastic to have you here on Outsiders. After the break,
Speaker 1: net Zaney Lefty Lunacy, so much more coming up here
Speaker 1: on Outsiders in a tick. You're watching Outsiders, and thank
Speaker 1: you so much for watching Outsiders every Sunday morning. We
Speaker 1: certainly do appreciate it, and thank you again for making
Speaker 1: us the number one show on Sky years Australia. Naw
Speaker 1: net Zany. That's the crazy, insane world of net zero policies.
Speaker 1: We've just been talking about that with Matt Canavan, and
Speaker 1: we'll be talking to j the Sloan about her brilliant
Speaker 1: idea coming up shortly in the show. But Rita and
Speaker 1: James here, we kept being told last year that it
Speaker 1: was the hottest year, hottest year ever in the world.
Speaker 1: Da da da da da da da. Yeah, James, I'm puzzled.
Speaker 1: Not one American US state actually set an all time
Speaker 1: high temperature record. Does this surprise you, James Enlightenment as
Speaker 1: to I'm not a statistist.
Speaker 6: Absolutely shocked roll and I couldn't believe this when I
Speaker 6: read it. But I love the map and the bright
Speaker 6: colors they used to scare us all. Note the red everywhere,
Speaker 6: so you don't pay to detail that.
Speaker 1: We're in the bag or no, no, that's not Trump.
Speaker 6: But if you look at the colors rather than the
Speaker 6: numbers exactly, that's what fills you with fear.
Speaker 3: And that's clearly the time.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 5: This map is a good map because it actually gives
Speaker 5: you the data, and it's got the years where each
Speaker 5: state recorded its highest temperature ever. And if you have
Speaker 5: a look.
Speaker 1: At the year thirty four, the thirties.
Speaker 5: Feature prominently, the tens, the nineteen.
Speaker 1: Nineteen, thirty one, nineteen.
Speaker 5: There's not that much happening in the last twenty years
Speaker 5: as far as temperature records been set in those states.
Speaker 5: And that's I think because we have had this narrative
Speaker 5: here in America, in the uk hosh as much in history. Ever, well,
Speaker 5: how how can you say that, I mean, are you
Speaker 5: talking since temperature records were kept and they're not, and
Speaker 5: then they're not even the holdest for the period temperature
Speaker 5: records were kept.
Speaker 1: So but this hype purposely. You have to be believe.
Speaker 1: You have to have faith in the climate culture. You
Speaker 1: have to believe in it passionately. And another myth of
Speaker 1: the climate cult was debunked this week to do with
Speaker 1: all those sinking nations. Now we've talked about this with
Speaker 1: Ian climate, with people, with all sorts of people on
Speaker 1: the show for many years casting doubt on the narrative
Speaker 1: that all these islands were sinking. Well, the New York
Speaker 1: Times they've had a busy few days, haven't they. We're
Speaker 1: getting rid of Joe Biden, and now they're debunking the
Speaker 1: entire myth of sinking islands as the plan and it
Speaker 1: warms atoll. Nations like the mal Leaves seemed doomed to shrink, James,
Speaker 1: but now they've got a surprising news story. Hang on
Speaker 1: a second.
Speaker 6: Aren't all of the leadership of these islands coming to
Speaker 6: us for money because they're all in grave danger and
Speaker 6: the Australian taxpayer's got to help you jumping up and
Speaker 6: down on the islands trying to make them think so
Speaker 6: they can get more money.
Speaker 10: Now we find out what is it?
Speaker 6: Eighty five percent of them more around that number are
Speaker 6: actually expanding or staying exactly.
Speaker 3: As they are. So I'm sure while we're paying this
Speaker 3: money is.
Speaker 5: Giving a small land in ideally the mal dives, the.
Speaker 1: Mountain areas, more growth, more abundance. Ah.
Speaker 5: I mean, it's again something we've spoken about here, It's
Speaker 5: been reported in the Australian media, and finally the New
Speaker 5: York Times reports this bit of good news, though they
Speaker 5: are perplexed.
Speaker 1: Bot anything to do with climate. You wait long enough,
Speaker 1: you'll hear it on outsiders here first, and then about
Speaker 1: four or five late years, lady, I'll pick it up else.
Speaker 1: Swear lefty lunacy. Now I mentioned this before. This was
Speaker 1: Sarah Ferguson at the ABC trying to pull a fast one,
Speaker 1: which the ABC a fond of doing. They got Marjorie
Speaker 1: Green Taylor, who's a Republican a congresswoman, to talk about
Speaker 1: Julian Assage. Watch what happened.
Speaker 21: You've never accepted the results of the twenty twenty presidential election. Indeed,
Speaker 21: you've lionized people for.
Speaker 22: Sarah, Sarah, aren't we talking about Julian Assange?
Speaker 10: Sarah? Are you?
Speaker 22: Are you even as serious or even a serious interviewer,
Speaker 22: are thought we're talking about Julian Assinge here today. That's
Speaker 22: what you were asking me to come on to.
Speaker 3: Your Australian news show.
Speaker 22: I don't usually do interviews like this because people like
Speaker 22: you can't be taken Seriously.
Speaker 21: What will Donald Trump's MAGA supporters do if he loses
Speaker 21: the election?
Speaker 22: So what does this have to do with Julian Assige? Again, Sarah,
Speaker 22: I think that was the purpose of our interview.
Speaker 21: And if it doesn't go your way of Biden wins,
Speaker 21: will you accept the result?
Speaker 3: Again?
Speaker 22: What does this have to do with Julian as Songe?
Speaker 5: Seriously, it's the REALI That's what we're the potion about
Speaker 5: truth And why would I? What network is this?
Speaker 1: Why would I? What is this ABC in Australia?
Speaker 22: Is she getting her Is she getting any marching orders
Speaker 22: from the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: Defund the ABC? What an absolute model? What an embarrassment,
Speaker 1: a national international embarrassment. We the taxpayers pay for those clowns.
Speaker 1: You saw it there right in front of you. She's
Speaker 1: trying to turn a Julian ASSONNGE interview into the usual
Speaker 1: rubbish about Trump and Biden and Trump how terrible he
Speaker 1: is the same woman Sarah Ferguson, who did a whole
Speaker 1: special on the Russia collusion thing about Trump, all of it. Jake,
Speaker 1: never apologize, reader, defund them, sell them off, turn them
Speaker 1: into a subscription model. The coalition must must, I insist,
Speaker 1: come out and say that the ABC will be turned
Speaker 1: into a subscription model, because only then those people be
Speaker 1: held to account.
Speaker 6: James, I love that it takes an American to say
Speaker 6: what we all think when we turn on the ABC.
Speaker 6: Are you guys serious? Is this even a serious network?
Speaker 6: She verbalized what every Australian who's paying for this stuff
Speaker 6: thinks every time they turn on the ABY.
Speaker 5: Sarah Ferguson needs to account for that ridiculous three part
Speaker 5: series she did about pushing essentially the Russian collusion hoax,
Speaker 5: Trump's links with Russia and this sinister conspiracy that was
Speaker 5: spoken about, which was absolutely false, being thoroughly debunked. It
Speaker 5: was always nothing to it. And if anyone actually bothered
Speaker 5: to read beyond the MSNBC talking points which the ABC
Speaker 5: just seemed to regurgitate yep uncritically, he would have known that.
Speaker 5: But no, in the her three part investigation, I don't
Speaker 5: know if she uncovered the hoax but she pushed the
Speaker 5: same rubbish we've heard from all the anti trumpers in
Speaker 5: the US until they finally acknowledged, Oh, this was a
Speaker 5: nothing burger.
Speaker 1: What she said, Marjorie green Taylor, there was one hundred
Speaker 1: percent accurate. She said, and it only took her a
Speaker 1: few minutes James to figure it out. Is this network,
Speaker 1: the ABC, taking its orders from its instructions from the
Speaker 1: US Democrats? And she was correct. Now I've sat on
Speaker 1: the ABC, I've seen the labor talking sheets and talking
Speaker 1: notes handed around. This is the problem with a state
Speaker 1: sponsored media that follows a left wing agenda. It's time
Speaker 1: to call an end to the fiasco, and Marjorie Green
Speaker 1: Taylor did that. Australians should be furious that we are
Speaker 1: paying a billion dollars for those clowns every year. Put
Speaker 1: them on a subscription model, then you'll see what they're
Speaker 1: really worth. After the break, I'll show you just how
Speaker 1: many Democrats are pressing the panic button after get rid
Speaker 1: of Joe Biden. Now quick Bus will talk to the
Speaker 1: Australian's contributing economics Judith Sloan about renewables in a tick
Speaker 1: h Hello, you're watching Outsiders and you're the worst TV
Speaker 1: host in history. No, you're the worst TV host in history.
Speaker 23: No, you're the worst TV host in history. No, No,
Speaker 23: I've asked all the experts, and you're the worst TV
Speaker 23: host in history. Well, my golf swing is better than yours. No,
Speaker 23: my golf swing is better than yours. And on and
Speaker 23: on and on it went.
Speaker 1: If you watch the US presidential debate on Friday morning,
Speaker 1: that was pretty much as good as it got in
Speaker 1: terms of substantive debate. Indeed, it actually got worse than that,
Speaker 1: particularly over the ridiculous debate about the two candidates golfing prowess.
Speaker 15: Haarima. I got my handicap, which when I was Vice
Speaker 15: president down to a six. And by by the way,
Speaker 15: I told you before, I'm happy to play golf. If
Speaker 15: you carry your own bag, I think you can do it.
Speaker 1: That's the biggest lie.
Speaker 9: He's a six handicap of all.
Speaker 15: I was an eight handicap eight.
Speaker 3: But you an, I've seen your swing.
Speaker 9: I know you swing.
Speaker 1: Let's not act like president. Let's not act like children.
Speaker 1: That was truly weird, great comedy, but very strange for
Speaker 1: a presidential debate, and it certainly made one long for
Speaker 1: the days of presidential debates of old where wits and
Speaker 1: raise the sharp responses were even when it came to
Speaker 1: discussing delicate issues like age.
Speaker 14: You were tired after your most recent encounter with mister Mondale.
Speaker 14: I recall yet that President Kennedy had to go for
Speaker 14: days on end with very little sleep during the Cuba
Speaker 14: missile crisis. Is there any doubt in your mind that
Speaker 14: you would be able to function in such circumstances.
Speaker 24: Not at all, mister true and I, and I want
Speaker 24: you to know that also, I will not make age
Speaker 24: an issue of this campaign. I am not going to
Speaker 24: exploit for political purposes my opponent's youth and inexperience.
Speaker 1: Even Monday cracked up at that gag. Now you know,
Speaker 1: I'm Trump's biggest fan here in Australia, But I thought
Speaker 1: that although he was universally crowned the winner, Trump was
Speaker 1: actually a little disappointing. Sure, we had a couple of
Speaker 1: great moments, and we've played those this morning, but I
Speaker 1: had expected more and he missed several golden opportunities, the
Speaker 1: most obvious of which was when the question of age
Speaker 1: did come up. All he had to do was say
Speaker 1: that the Democrat's own prosecutor Robert Hurr had deemed Joe
Speaker 1: Biden legally too frail and too incompetent to stand trial,
Speaker 1: so how on earth could he run for president? But
Speaker 1: overall I thought Trump was just a little bit too restrained.
Speaker 1: But he did have a couple of absolute classic moments.
Speaker 15: An initiative relative to what we're going to do with
Speaker 15: more border patrol and more cybum officers, President.
Speaker 9: Trump, I really don't know what he said at the
Speaker 9: end of this.
Speaker 10: I don't think he knows what he said either.
Speaker 1: That was the defining moment of the debate, and that
Speaker 1: basically set the hairs running. But I love this. In particular,
Speaker 1: this I thought was his greatest moment was about January six.
Speaker 25: You swore an oath to quote, preserve, protect, and defend
Speaker 25: unquote the Constitution. What do you say to voters who
Speaker 25: believe that you violated that oath through your actions and
Speaker 25: inaction on January sixth, and worry that you'll do it again.
Speaker 9: Well, I don't think too many believe that. And let
Speaker 9: me tell you about January sixth. On January sixth, we
Speaker 9: had a great border, nobody coming through, very few. On
Speaker 9: January sixth, we were energy independent. On January sixth, we
Speaker 9: had the lowest taxes ever, we had the lowest regulations ever.
Speaker 9: On January sixth, we were respected all over the world,
Speaker 9: all over the world, we were respected. And then he
Speaker 9: comes in and when now left that we're like a
Speaker 9: bunch of stupid people.
Speaker 1: That was brilliant. And so is this classic.
Speaker 15: Trump making sure that we're able to make every single
Speaker 15: solitary person eligible for what I've been able to do
Speaker 15: with the with the COVID, I could be with I'm
Speaker 15: dealing with everything we have to do with. Look if
Speaker 15: we finally beat medicare, thank.
Speaker 3: You, President Biden, President Trump, He's right.
Speaker 9: He did beat medicaid, beat it to death.
Speaker 1: That was brilliant, Absolutely brilliant. I'd have liked to have
Speaker 1: seen more of that, but those three were sufficient.
Speaker 10: He won.
Speaker 1: That's all that mattered. But equally, and I say this
Speaker 1: honestly and not facetiously, I thought Joe Biden did much
Speaker 1: better than I expected, not worse. Sure, there were plenty
Speaker 1: of mumbles and incoherent thoughts and pretty creepy ones, as
Speaker 1: we've been showing. But we've known all that, as we
Speaker 1: were saying earlier in as REATA said, we've known all
Speaker 1: that for years here on outside, and we've shown it
Speaker 1: every week. The biggest joke was that everybody, particularly CNN
Speaker 1: and the left wing media and the Democrats, oh, acting
Speaker 1: as if it was all some huge surprise. Come on, man,
Speaker 1: he's been a stuttering, demented fool for the four years,
Speaker 1: as we have frequently pointed out and repeatedly pointed out.
Speaker 1: So how can you suddenly pretend to be surprised about
Speaker 1: how weird, creepy, incoherent and basically just simply not with it,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden Is. I mean, take a look.
Speaker 2: I got hairy legs, that turned that that that that
Speaker 2: that that turn about blonde in the sun, and the
Speaker 2: kids used to come up and reach in the pool and.
Speaker 10: Rub my leg down.
Speaker 2: So it was traded that watch the hair come back
Speaker 2: up again.
Speaker 1: They look at it.
Speaker 7: So I learned about roaches, I learned about kids jumping
Speaker 7: on my lap, and I've loved kids jumping on my lap.
Speaker 1: Well, who can forget these classics?
Speaker 2: Thank you, Boris, and I want to thank that fellow
Speaker 2: down under, thank you very much.
Speaker 15: Beout appreciate the supremise.
Speaker 2: We all these truths to be self evident, oh man,
Speaker 2: and women creative by the go, you know, the you.
Speaker 10: Know, the thing.
Speaker 1: Created by the thing. Sadly, there was nothing quite as
Speaker 1: entertaining as that in the debate. But if you got
Speaker 1: pretty close to classic.
Speaker 15: Joe moments, making sure that we're able to make every
Speaker 15: single solitary person.
Speaker 1: Eligible for what.
Speaker 15: I've been able to do with the with the COVID,
Speaker 15: I just could be with dealing with everything we have
Speaker 15: to do with.
Speaker 1: Look, well, this bizarre bidenism.
Speaker 15: There's a lot of young women to be raped by
Speaker 15: their by their in laws, by the by their spouses,
Speaker 15: brothers and sisters. That's ridiculous, and they can do nothing
Speaker 15: about it, and they try to rest them on their
Speaker 15: cross state line.
Speaker 1: Thank you. A lot of young women have been raped
Speaker 1: by their sister. Okay, that's a novel new crime area.
Speaker 1: Thank you for enlightening us as to that. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: in the debate, Yes, the CN and the CNN anchor
Speaker 1: cut him off before he went any further with that
Speaker 1: particular train of thought or train wreck of thought. And
Speaker 1: that was the other surprise of the debate. And readA
Speaker 1: disagrees with me. But other than one instance and the
Speaker 1: tiresome question about climate change, I thought the CNN hosts
Speaker 1: were very good. I thought the questions were pretty reasonable
Speaker 1: and the interruptions few and far between. Both candidates got
Speaker 1: a fair run during the debate. But then literally literally
Speaker 1: before Joe had even half stumbled off stage, led by
Speaker 1: his wife Jill, it became very quickly clear we had
Speaker 1: all been conned. The debate was, in my opinion, a
Speaker 1: complete stitch up. No, not a stitch up of Trump
Speaker 1: as many had feared, not even a stitch up of
Speaker 1: the audience, but a stitch up of Joe Biden. And
Speaker 1: what a beauty it was. The giveaway was the prescripted news.
Speaker 1: With any prescripted news events is that when all the
Speaker 1: usual suspects in the media start repeating the exact same
Speaker 1: keywords or phrases all at the same time. You saw
Speaker 1: it earlier when Reza showed you all the sharp sharp,
Speaker 1: sharp shop that was talking points, Well, the same thing
Speaker 1: happened here. By the way, it never happens on this show.
Speaker 1: We don't do talking points, unlike the rest of the media.
Speaker 1: But here it was like millions of viewers around the
Speaker 1: world world. I didn't even have time to reach for
Speaker 1: the remote before the Democrat Party's key message came straight
Speaker 1: at me, unambiguous, unequivocal, and deadly for Joe bid.
Speaker 26: Right now as we speak, there is a deep, a wide,
Speaker 26: and a very aggressive panic in the Democratic Party. It
Speaker 26: started minutes into the debate and it continues right now.
Speaker 26: It involves party strategists, it involves elected officials, it involves fundraisers,
Speaker 26: and they're having conversations about the president's performance, which they
Speaker 26: think was dismal, which they think will hurt other people
Speaker 26: down the party in the ticket, and they're having conversations
Speaker 26: about what they should do about it.
Speaker 10: Some of those conversations include.
Speaker 26: Should we go to the White House and ask the
Speaker 26: president's step aside? Or other of the conversations are about
Speaker 26: should prominent Democrats go public with that call because they
Speaker 26: feel this debate was so terrible.
Speaker 10: They do say in moments in the debate.
Speaker 26: Later the President got better and got his footing, but
Speaker 26: then at the end even his closing statement was a
Speaker 26: little halting.
Speaker 10: The contrast between the two case.
Speaker 1: They have it. The fix was in CNN had their
Speaker 1: talking points, and they followed them to the letter. The
Speaker 1: entire left wing media fell into line word perfect panic,
Speaker 1: of course, being the bo'sword panic, mysterious, unnamed Democrat power
Speaker 1: brokers and strategists, ooh, and donors. Here it is again,
Speaker 1: almost word for word.
Speaker 26: I've been talking to a lot of leaders in the
Speaker 26: Democratic Party, elected coalition leaders.
Speaker 25: There's a full on panic about this performance.
Speaker 1: And again, you were out.
Speaker 27: There getting a courus of questions about whether Biden should
Speaker 27: step down.
Speaker 5: There is a panic that is set in.
Speaker 28: Well, there is panic that has.
Speaker 29: Set in among people who have watched this debate who
Speaker 29: are Democrats, people who are strategists, and some even inside
Speaker 29: Democratic campaigns.
Speaker 1: Is there an echo here? And again, I.
Speaker 29: Too was on the phone throughout much of the debate.
Speaker 29: It's Obama, it's the world people with the Democrats, with
Speaker 29: people who were political operatives, with campaign operatives. My phone
Speaker 29: really never stopped buzzing throughout, and the universal reaction was
Speaker 29: somewhere approaching panic.
Speaker 1: Oh. Panic. This one varied a little pain as well
Speaker 1: as panic.
Speaker 19: There is time for this party to figure out a
Speaker 19: different way for it, if you will allow us to
Speaker 19: do that. But that was not what we needed from
Speaker 19: Joe Biden. And it's personally painful for a lot of people.
Speaker 19: It's not just panic, it's pain of what we thoughing mate.
Speaker 1: The print media got their memos too. Here was the
Speaker 1: Washington Post dutifully pushing the panic button as it were,
Speaker 1: Democrats panic over Biden debate, and so to you, the
Speaker 1: New York Times are fumbling performance and a panicking Democrat party.
Speaker 1: Before you could say come on, man, official, well, the
Speaker 1: panic had spread all around the globe, even the Sydney
Speaker 1: Morning Harold Guardian on the Act, and even when CNN's
Speaker 1: Chris Waller strayed from the panic line. Maybe he thought
Speaker 1: it sounded a little too rehearsed. His producers had it
Speaker 1: all up on a strap line underneath him, just to
Speaker 1: make sure you've got an aggressive panic.
Speaker 6: No less, Joe Biden sought this debate at this remarkably
Speaker 6: early time because he knew he was losing and he
Speaker 6: needed to change the narrative.
Speaker 10: And he did change the narrative. He sunk his campaign today.
Speaker 1: And that is, of course, where the narrative now is.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden will be replaced at the forthcoming Democrat convention.
Speaker 1: As I have said several times on this show in
Speaker 1: our discussions, the major threat to Donald Trump has always
Speaker 1: been the risk of the Democrats switching candidates at the convention.
Speaker 1: That's the only way to circumvent Kamala Harris automatically becoming
Speaker 1: the candidate. For sure, she'll put a hand up, but
Speaker 1: nobody wants her and she won't succeed. My opinion, this
Speaker 1: whole debate was staged by the Obama and Clinton forces
Speaker 1: who set a massive booby trap for the Biden White
Speaker 1: House forces, and Jill and Joe walked straight into it,
Speaker 1: or stumbled straight into it. He humiliated Biden in front
Speaker 1: of the entire world. The fix was in from the
Speaker 1: moment Old Joe stepped on stage, Barrick Hussain, Obama will
Speaker 1: now play kingmaker behind the scenes and get the public
Speaker 1: and media to persuade You'll get the public and media
Speaker 1: to do it. That's the cleverness of this strategy. To
Speaker 1: persuade Joe to stand down, and then he'll get the
Speaker 1: public and the media to persuade his other half, Michelle
Speaker 1: to run. Indeed, what a surprise on the morning of
Speaker 1: the debate. Before the debate was a huge piece of
Speaker 1: axios the Washington inside his Bible all about Oh, what
Speaker 1: a coincidence, Michelle Obama, Joe Biden's finished. He's gone. As
Speaker 1: I've been saying and fearing for many months, Trump will
Speaker 1: be up against Michelle Obama. Interestingly, two people who envisaged
Speaker 1: this very scenario that the debate was a stitch up
Speaker 1: of Biden by his own party. We vivek Gramaswami, one
Speaker 1: of the contenders for Trump's VP, talking to Kaylie McInerney.
Speaker 28: So there is this clarion call from the liberal press
Speaker 28: and from some on the left that this shouldn't.
Speaker 1: Be the nominee.
Speaker 30: So tease this out.
Speaker 1: How does this happen?
Speaker 28: He has a disastrous debate performance, there's just public pressure,
Speaker 28: he steps aside?
Speaker 1: Is he forced aside? How does that look?
Speaker 31: I think it's between then and the convention, Kiley. The
Speaker 31: reality is anything can happen before the convention. They've said
Speaker 31: it in August. I believe the other side.
Speaker 3: Actually knows what they're doing.
Speaker 31: If they get another nominee too early, that's enough time
Speaker 31: for vetting, enough time for the honeymoon phase to fade.
Speaker 31: But if they're swapping in another nominee in August, say,
Speaker 31: right around the time of the convention, that's the best
Speaker 31: case scenario for them because you get the honeymoon phase
Speaker 31: with the new candidate without the scrutiny that comes with it.
Speaker 1: That was then predicting that several weeks ago. And finally,
Speaker 1: out of all the damning clips from the debate, all
Speaker 1: those crazy bidenisms we played you over the year, is
Speaker 1: this is the one that went viral seconds after the
Speaker 1: debate and finished Joe Biden off. You'd almost think they'd
Speaker 1: planned it that way.
Speaker 27: Joe, you did such a great job. You answered every question.
Speaker 27: Let me ask the crowd, what did truck do?
Speaker 1: Valet Joe Biden as it were. Let's bring in The
Speaker 1: Australian's contributing economics editor, Do the Sloan Live from the
Speaker 1: Sunshine Coast. Judith. Great to see you as always. You've
Speaker 1: got a sensational piece in this week's Spectator Australia and
Speaker 1: which you call for a future sorry day. Your argument
Speaker 1: is that there's going to need to be a sorry
Speaker 1: day in the years to come because of the destruction
Speaker 1: of the Australian environment by the renewables climate labor quango.
Speaker 1: Tell us about it, Judith, Yeah, look, I think this
Speaker 1: is a great idea.
Speaker 12: So unhas sorry days have become pretty popular. We've had
Speaker 12: sorry days for the stolen generation, We've had sorry days
Speaker 12: for people of use its day care. Sorry days for
Speaker 12: adopted children and the like. And you know, there's a
Speaker 12: big meeting in the equivalent of the Federation Chamber if
Speaker 12: it's not a federal government. Sorry, and you know, people
Speaker 12: you know, cry and weep and great apologies are given.
Speaker 12: I really, actually, even though this may seem satirical, think
Speaker 12: this is a really really big issue because the environmental
Speaker 12: destruction that has been wrought on rural and regional communities
Speaker 12: is unbelievable yet basically unseen by all the inner city
Speaker 12: lovies who are calling for even greater extension of renewable energy.
Speaker 12: You only have to drive around some of these rural
Speaker 12: and regional areas to realize what's happening. You know, there
Speaker 12: are vast turbines, acres of industrial sized solar panels, and
Speaker 12: of course the absolutely ghastly high voltage transmission lines. So
Speaker 12: I actually reckon we should be saying sorry today and
Speaker 12: stopping it. But I think in a decade or two
Speaker 12: there will actually be an official sorry, an official apology
Speaker 12: to rule and regional people.
Speaker 1: Rita.
Speaker 5: What do you see happening in fifteen and twenty years
Speaker 5: other than the apology Because we need baseload power, labor
Speaker 5: greens their dead set against nuclear. How are we going
Speaker 5: to have the lights on when we need the lights
Speaker 5: on if we don't have nuclear, Where do you see
Speaker 5: this situation in fifteen twenty years.
Speaker 12: Well, indeed, I think we will have nuclear because what
Speaker 12: the Labor Party doesn't understand is that the case of
Speaker 12: development of nuclear overseas is unbelievable. A whole lot of
Speaker 12: countries are really pressing the accelerator on this stuff.
Speaker 1: So there'll be some.
Speaker 12: Great lessons, the industry will be thickening up, there'll be
Speaker 12: some great opportunities.
Speaker 1: But here Rita.
Speaker 12: These facilities leave aside the transmission lines. They only last
Speaker 12: fifteen or twenty years.
Speaker 10: But one of the.
Speaker 12: Worst aspects of it is that these renewable investors actually
Speaker 12: they get flipped a lot, but they have never ended
Speaker 12: into an undertaking that they will remediate the land. So
Speaker 12: basically all mining companies do that, certainly do that currently.
Speaker 12: There actually are specific funds in which can be used
Speaker 12: to remediate land when a mine finishes, for example. Not
Speaker 12: so with these renewable energy companies. They'll just leave and
Speaker 12: you know, in due course, maybe the turbine will fall over,
Speaker 12: the solar panels will crack, and what people I think
Speaker 12: of course, in rule and re communities understand is that,
Speaker 12: for example, the turbines are sitting on this massive quantity
Speaker 12: of concrete which is setting them in the ground, right,
Speaker 12: So what happens to that it just sits.
Speaker 6: There, James, I loved your article in the Spectator, but
Speaker 6: there was one part that really intrigued me. You said
Speaker 6: that rural communities, when they're given financial incentives to have
Speaker 6: these renewable plants on their property, part of that incentive
Speaker 6: requires them to speak well.
Speaker 3: Of the development. Talk to me about that, because I
Speaker 3: was intrigued.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's absolutely typical.
Speaker 12: So if you agree to have a renewable installation on
Speaker 12: your property, indeed sometimes the neighbors will get a bit
Speaker 12: of compensation, you have to sign a gag order, right,
Speaker 12: So basically you have to talk favorably about renewable energy
Speaker 12: and say that you love the turbines, and the sheep
Speaker 12: love the turbines, the cattle love the turbines.
Speaker 10: Right.
Speaker 12: And but here's the point, is the point that if
Speaker 12: you violate that gag order, they reserve the right to
Speaker 12: withdraw the monetary compensation. It is absolutely disgraceful. I mean,
Speaker 12: these renewable energy companies are acting like the wild wild West.
Speaker 1: They've got guaranteed cash.
Speaker 12: Flows from the government, they have shortened environmental approval processes.
Speaker 12: They're basically, you know, given the green light over the
Speaker 12: fear subjection of locals. And yet you know, the thing
Speaker 12: is that of the city people, the inner city people,
Speaker 12: that teals the Greens who are buying for more renewable
Speaker 12: energy just turn the other eye when it comes to
Speaker 12: these external costs.
Speaker 1: And Judah, just quickly before we go the you know,
Speaker 1: the debate in Parliament this week is about the cost
Speaker 1: of renewables versus the cost of nuclear. Where you and
Speaker 1: there's lots of you know, misleading, obfuscation and and and
Speaker 1: rabbit holes that people go down. But where do you stand.
Speaker 1: You're an economist, one of Australia's most respected economists. Where
Speaker 1: do you sit on the debate about the cost, the
Speaker 1: genuine cost both to the consumer and to the taxpayer,
Speaker 1: about renewables versus nuclear.
Speaker 12: Well, the IPA has put out some very interesting work
Speaker 12: by Steven Wilson, who is a nuclear expert. And of
Speaker 12: course you're not comparing apples with apples. If you're comparing
Speaker 12: weather dependent energy with twenty four to seven energy you're
Speaker 12: not comparing the same thing.
Speaker 10: Now.
Speaker 12: Their study shows and you won't be surprised to hear this,
Speaker 12: the cheapest form of energy remains coal, right, So yeah,
Speaker 12: in due course we can make nuclear work because it
Speaker 12: is twenty four to seven.
Speaker 1: We have to have energy which is not weather dependent.
Speaker 1: We have to have.
Speaker 12: Base loan energy, we have to have energy that is
Speaker 12: forever on tap, and that really, hopefully is where the
Speaker 12: debate's going. I mean, I think it's actually hilarious that
Speaker 12: they've put in Matt Kean. It is, mind you a
Speaker 12: non job, that job. I mean, you know, chairman of
Speaker 12: the Climate Change Authority. You know it doesn't matter, right,
Speaker 12: But he, as you say, was never convincing when he
Speaker 12: was the energy minister in New South Wales, so is
Speaker 12: he going to be any more convincing there? It just
Speaker 12: struck me as just sheeap politics and it really you know,
Speaker 12: had the sort of duration of a Chinese meal in
Speaker 12: terms of its political impact.
Speaker 1: Well, I think I think Matt Kean will do to
Speaker 1: the labor government, federal labor government what he did to
Speaker 1: the New South Wales Liberal government and basically Torpeo Judah
Speaker 1: Sloan always great to chat to, you a great article
Speaker 1: there in the Spectator Australia. Thanks so much for coming
Speaker 1: here on Outsiders, Coming up lots more, James's what are
Speaker 1: you calling your editorial, James, I don't know. In a tech.
Speaker 3: Welcome back to Outsiders.
Speaker 6: Now, I'm not saying the Victorian Labor government hates your
Speaker 6: wife and daughters, but well you've got to wonder just
Speaker 6: into Ellen's government has just launched a new campaign tackling
Speaker 6: discrimination against transgendered women. The issue here is not whether
Speaker 6: you're trans. People can live their lives as they please,
Speaker 6: but the problem is this advertising campaign is basically sixty
Speaker 6: seconds of emotional blackmail designed to shame women into prioritizing
Speaker 6: the feelings of men above their own personal safety.
Speaker 3: What could possibly go wrong?
Speaker 6: So a woman decides she'd rather not be alone in
Speaker 6: an elevator with the biological man who scowled that her
Speaker 6: from a great height, so she leaves. And this, plus
Speaker 6: presumably the fact there were no pride flags in the elevator,
Speaker 6: makes the trans women very very sad. You know, we
Speaker 6: teach our daughters that they should trust their instincts and
Speaker 6: they should remove themselves from a situation where they feel unsafe,
Speaker 6: But the Victorian government is using your taxes to give
Speaker 6: your daughters the very opposite message. A million years of
Speaker 6: evolution imbuse you with a sense of danger that has
Speaker 6: helped our species survive. Now our girls are being told
Speaker 6: to ignore all that because otherwise a man wearing a
Speaker 6: dress might have.
Speaker 1: His feelings hurt.
Speaker 6: They're literally suggesting it's the job of women to make
Speaker 6: men feel safe. The Victorian government can't afford hospitals, but
Speaker 6: they evidently have plenty of spare cash for misogyny. The irony,
Speaker 6: of course, is that women aren't demanding the right to
Speaker 6: single sex elevators. I dare the government to commission an
Speaker 6: advertisement scolding women for not wanting to share change rooms
Speaker 6: with a man. Of course they won't show you that,
Speaker 6: but they're suggesting, if you're not up.
Speaker 3: For it, you're a bigot.
Speaker 6: So nice, but it's telling that the bloke on the
Speaker 6: tram leaves five women standing while clearing space for the
Speaker 6: gender diverse maile to sit down. Chivalry isn't dead, ladies,
Speaker 6: it's just been repurposed. Everyone now knows that a gentleman
Speaker 6: offers his seat to other guys in frilly shirts.
Speaker 3: It's the kind thing to do.
Speaker 6: But again, literally no one is debating whether transgendered people
Speaker 6: should be in.
Speaker 3: Elevators or on trams.
Speaker 6: Everyone knows the argument is over women's change rooms, but
Speaker 6: the government is too clever to address that one head on,
Speaker 6: so they pretend some perverse equivalence between the tram and
Speaker 6: the toilet to imply that men belong everywhere. I'm not
Speaker 6: sure men belong in women's toilets. Well, I suppose you
Speaker 6: don't think they belong on trams either. So in that scene,
Speaker 6: a trans woman drops a box and a bloke gives
Speaker 6: a hand. It begs a question, by the way, had
Speaker 6: the block no the box drop it was a trans woman?
Speaker 6: Did he assume gender by judging on appearances? It's such
Speaker 6: an obviously right response to help someone anyone who drops
Speaker 6: something that you wonder why they included that scene. Well,
Speaker 6: it's the false equivalence trick all over again. They're softening
Speaker 6: you up for the next scene where a trans woman
Speaker 6: of not small stature wants to run out with the
Speaker 6: girls football team. You're not cool with that. Oh, and
Speaker 6: I suppose you wouldn't help someone with a box either, bigot.
Speaker 6: I love the way they've made the trans woman a
Speaker 6: person of color. If you draw the line at men
Speaker 6: playing women's sports, you're not only transphobic, you're racist. See
Speaker 6: how they do that. They really do hate you. But seriously,
Speaker 6: did you see the size of that person. That's a
Speaker 6: biological man who has no business being on a footy
Speaker 6: field with women. Also, why is she wearing a nosering
Speaker 6: to play football? Literally no one does that. We're showing
Speaker 6: the team celebrating inclusion before kickoff. Curiously, we're not shown
Speaker 6: any tackles all the ambulance arriving fifteen minutes later after
Speaker 6: four women from the opposing team suffer multiple fractures. The
Speaker 6: Victorian government that don't want you to vakee because it
Speaker 6: might give you a cough, are encouraging women to risk
Speaker 6: injury on the football field to protect the feelings of men.
Speaker 6: The other thing they don't show you, by the way,
Speaker 6: is how none of the inclusive teammates are smiling in
Speaker 6: the showers after the game. It's bad enough that they're
Speaker 6: allowing men to play women's sports, but now your government
Speaker 6: is using your money to make glossy advertisements warning you
Speaker 6: that if you don't celebrate men in women's sports, you
Speaker 6: are a bad person. They're quite literally manipulating women with
Speaker 6: weaponized empathy to participate in their own destruction. And this
Speaker 6: from a mob that last month appointed the nation's first
Speaker 6: ever Parliamentary Secretary for Men's Behavior Change in order to.
Speaker 3: Make Victoria a safer place for women and children.
Speaker 6: What a joke for a government that hates gas they
Speaker 6: sure love gas lighting. The Victorian government has seriously overstepped
Speaker 6: with this commercial. They should stay out of things they
Speaker 6: clearly don't understand and stop wasting public money vilifying women.
Speaker 1: Stuff. Thanks James, Well, let's bring in Independent Women's Forum
Speaker 1: fellow DODR Quanta Ahmed live from New York. Quanta, great
Speaker 1: to see you as always. You've got a terrific artic
Speaker 1: last week in the Spectator Australia where you talk about
Speaker 1: you are Muslim. I'll add, for the purpose of this
Speaker 1: discussion Muslim complicity in the ideology that led to the
Speaker 1: Hamas atrocities. You were there in southern Israel shortly after
Speaker 1: the atrocities of October seventh. The release of Noah Agamani
Speaker 1: brought sort of memories back to you. So tell us
Speaker 1: your basic thesis about how the Islamic world needs to
Speaker 1: respond to what has happened.
Speaker 28: Thanks Rue, and it's great to be back with you
Speaker 28: and everybody at Outsiders. The last time we spoke, I
Speaker 28: was in the Gaza envelope witnessing all of the atrocities
Speaker 28: Hamas perpetrated on innocent men, women, children, civilians, people of
Speaker 28: multiple nationalities forty one French citizens, thirty nine ties, almost
Speaker 28: forty Americans, five of whom are still in captivity. So yes,
Speaker 28: this entire time looking at the plight of one hundred
Speaker 28: and twenty hostages who still remain in Gaza.
Speaker 1: We're fearful.
Speaker 28: Many of them may have lost their lives, but many
Speaker 28: are still alive. The Palestinian civilian society is implicit in
Speaker 28: keeping these hostages captive. And that's not to impugne every Palestinian.
Speaker 28: There are many brave voices that we need to elevate.
Speaker 28: But even the eyewitness accounts that I took described Palestinian
Speaker 28: civilians participating on October seventh and clearly furnishing support for Hamas.
Speaker 28: And I think the Muslim world has to ask itself,
Speaker 28: and in fact the wider world, how we're legitimizing Harmas.
Speaker 28: We know that Harmas has been financed by Katar, by
Speaker 28: Iran we're discovering Harmas's tunnels eight hundred kilometers three hundred
Speaker 28: and fifty miles underground may have all also received Chinese
Speaker 28: engineering support. We know where the munitions are coming from.
Speaker 28: We have a major role in the Muslim world to
Speaker 28: supporting this kind of organization and not repudiating it. And
Speaker 28: now tonight we're on the threshold of the conflict getting
Speaker 28: even bigger.
Speaker 1: Tell us how Quanta.
Speaker 28: Well, there are reports coming in and certainly official news
Speaker 28: agencies including Al Qahira News outleting in Egypt and others
Speaker 28: are reporting that the Arab League has removed its designation
Speaker 28: of foreign terrorist organization from Hesbula.
Speaker 1: That seems confirmed.
Speaker 28: It's being reported also in Israel twenty four News other
Speaker 28: unconfirmed reports, but I'm receiving from American Iraqi sources in
Speaker 28: DC that the United States is asking Iraq to close
Speaker 28: its airspace to Iranian cargo ships headed likely with munitions
Speaker 28: and likely with armaments.
Speaker 1: For Lebanon.
Speaker 28: We know that Canada has asked its citizens to away
Speaker 28: from Lebanon back to Canada last weekend, and some reports
Speaker 28: on Twitter are saying the Saudis are doing the same
Speaker 28: and this is no coincidence. That we're two days after
Speaker 28: the American presidential debate, which revealed to us our commander
Speaker 28: in chief is not able to formulate coherent sentences. That's
Speaker 28: not coincidental, Rita.
Speaker 5: You talked about the support that her mass enjoys from
Speaker 5: the Palestinian population, and there has been polling showing that
Speaker 5: the clear majority support her mass support what happened on
Speaker 5: October seven, and that goes beyond Gaza. It's Muslims in
Speaker 5: the UK. There was some polling came out that only
Speaker 5: I think one in four believed that there were rapes
Speaker 5: and atrocities committed on October seven of those who were
Speaker 5: polled in the Muslim population. So tell me about that
Speaker 5: enduring issue of this fringe element, this radical element that exists,
Speaker 5: and how the rest of the Muslim community could bring
Speaker 5: that under control.
Speaker 28: Thanks, Rita, I mean that's so important. First of all,
Speaker 28: there's been an incredible effort to deny October seventh and
Speaker 28: erase it and to render it an unwitnessed event. That's
Speaker 28: been a global effort that's had huge dollars behind it,
Speaker 28: probably Iranian supporters that want to erase that and other
Speaker 28: very well moneyed actors that are doing this. But what
Speaker 28: I'm very worried about is we all lived through nine
Speaker 28: to eleven and we saw the world repudiate al Qaeda.
Speaker 28: We lived through Isis. The world, including the Muslim world,
Speaker 28: went to war against Isis. This time, the reaction is different,
Speaker 28: and I think Muslims have turned away from what Harmas
Speaker 28: is actually doing and actually intends to do. Of course,
Speaker 28: the Palestinian population is captive to Harmas, but it's more
Speaker 28: than being captive or signing up for their ideallogy. The
Speaker 28: entire structure of Gaza, with its subterranean labyrinths with tunnels
Speaker 28: and shafts in every homes. You remember from the rescue
Speaker 28: of Noah, the two Israeli commander teams led by the
Speaker 28: Commander Arnon, they were besieged by armed Hamas operatives that
Speaker 28: came out of civilian buildings. This kind of action is
Speaker 28: now being lionized and herald against the sovereign Israeli state.
Speaker 28: And my worry is that Muslim diasporas are embracing that position.
Speaker 28: My position is becoming a minority position, which is to
Speaker 28: reject jihadism, reject terrorism, and now in countries like Britain
Speaker 28: and France, and here in the United States. The Hamas ideology,
Speaker 28: and we're going to see whether Hesbela also receives that
Speaker 28: kind of legitimacy is becoming more mainstream and more popular.
Speaker 28: That will fragment very robust democracies.
Speaker 6: James helped me understand if the actions of Hama, as
Speaker 6: you argue, don't represent true Islam, why do so many
Speaker 6: Muslims all around the world support the actions of Hamas.
Speaker 28: That's a great question. Nothing I saw in the actions
Speaker 28: of Hamas is in any way consistent with being a Muslim.
Speaker 28: They believe in nihilism, desecration of the human body before death,
Speaker 28: after death, murder of innocence, absolutely no human values. I've
Speaker 28: spoken to soldiers Israeli soldiers that were subject to attempted
Speaker 28: ambush where they left Palestinian grandmothers as bait. That's how
Speaker 28: they treat their own population. But I think what's happened
Speaker 28: in the Muslim majority world is there is a cultivated
Speaker 28: sense of victimhood. Of course, we feel for innocent Palestinians,
Speaker 28: just as we do for people in Yemen. Half a
Speaker 28: million Yemenies killed in that conflict. People in Sudan millions
Speaker 28: now at risk and subject to genocide, by the RSF,
Speaker 28: so sorry by the jan juweed. So this sense of
Speaker 28: victimhood has been cultivated in the Muslim world, and I
Speaker 28: think more than what Muslims are saying, what I'm concerned
Speaker 28: about is the very significant reticence of Saudi Arabia, the
Speaker 28: leader of the Muslim world. How much it's been overshadowed
Speaker 28: by Qatar, a belligerent actor in public opinion, so that
Speaker 28: the leaders of the Muslim world are afraid to confront
Speaker 28: Muslim brotherhood ideology. They do not subscribe to political totalitarian
Speaker 28: Islamism as our religion, but we are lending it cover
Speaker 28: currency legitimacy, so that people like you ask that very
Speaker 28: challenging question which needs to be answered.
Speaker 1: Kandu Ahmed, thank you for answering it so beautifully. As always,
Speaker 1: great to have you here on Outsiders Live from New York.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, Doctor Quanta Ahmed. There coming up,
Speaker 1: Canbra Clown Show. In a tick Roll up, Roll up.
Speaker 1: It's the wackiest craziest show on Earth. Yes, it's the
Speaker 1: Canberra a Clown Show where this week the troop of
Speaker 1: Albozo's clowns yet again performed. There are the trit and
Speaker 1: Tired say no to Nuclear Act with resident comedian Murray.
Speaker 1: What trying out a brand new gag, this one being
Speaker 1: that somehow Peter Dutton is a communist, even though of course,
Speaker 1: back in his university day's elbow himself used to hang
Speaker 1: out with the real communists. But anyway, here we go.
Speaker 1: Murray's gag.
Speaker 32: Renewables are cheap, clean and provide a valuable source of
Speaker 32: income for regional Australians. But of course the biggest risk
Speaker 32: to this income source is the coalition's risky nuclear gamble,
Speaker 32: led by the new advocate of Soviet style policies, mister Dutton.
Speaker 32: That's right, proletariat Pete is not content with chasing away
Speaker 32: the thousands of jobs being created in our regions through.
Speaker 1: Cheap renewable energy.
Speaker 32: He's not content with chasing away the thousands of jobs
Speaker 32: being created in our regions through cheap renewable energy. He
Speaker 32: and his team led here by Bolshevik Burmo. When comrade cash.
Speaker 3: Walesel ragion, I withdraw, I withdraw, I withdraw.
Speaker 1: Ha ha bls Burma, what a beauty. Keep on working
Speaker 1: on the Murray, You'll get there eventually. Meanwhile, Bobo Bowen
Speaker 1: made a complete fool of himself attacking the Opposition over
Speaker 1: its so called big cost of nuclear, Yet his own
Speaker 1: Energy minister admitted almost exactly the same thing about Labour's
Speaker 1: big renewable costs.
Speaker 33: But the layer of the opposition was asked about the
Speaker 33: cost of his policy and I was watching thing.
Speaker 1: While here we go. Here we got to get the figures.
Speaker 3: The details are.
Speaker 1: The costs, and this is what the lawyer of the
Speaker 1: opposition said.
Speaker 3: It'll be a big bill, no question about that.
Speaker 33: That was the detail cost that we heard from the opposition.
Speaker 3: A big bill, no question about that.
Speaker 6: Now the question for the larter of opposition is how
Speaker 6: does a big bill lead to cheaper energy?
Speaker 3: He hasn't release is bigger?
Speaker 18: But does the government have an all up figure for
Speaker 18: its transition plan.
Speaker 5: We know the transition is going to be challenging and
Speaker 5: no one is stepping away from that fact.
Speaker 3: There will, of course be an expense.
Speaker 1: What a clown show. Better still, Katie the Clown, one
Speaker 1: of our favorites here at the Burly Griffin big top,
Speaker 1: attacking the Opposition for not releasing the costings and it's
Speaker 1: nuclear policy despite the government, yes she is in government,
Speaker 1: not having the faintest clue about its own costings.
Speaker 34: Well, it is interesting that I should get a question
Speaker 34: on costs from the opposition.
Speaker 1: I mean the nerve of these people.
Speaker 34: An Now, it's a big energy policy, supposedly a scam.
Speaker 30: I don't think we can it actually stands up to
Speaker 30: the test of policy.
Speaker 12: And does it have any costs attached?
Speaker 5: And no, do they know how they'll roll it out?
Speaker 12: No, anyone said to a really windy No.
Speaker 1: Not many pots and kettle spring to mind. But the
Speaker 1: Circus Act has a routine, off has its routine in
Speaker 1: off pat Now the joke only got funnier when Albozo
Speaker 1: brought in New South wales favorite Liberal party clown Matt
Speaker 1: Keen to be his climate guru. Matt Keen, the man
Speaker 1: who doesn't care which kind of government he blows up,
Speaker 1: Liberal or Labor. He'll bring them all crashing down to you.
Speaker 1: Watch too funny. But here's a reminder of Albozo, Jimbo
Speaker 1: and Bobo trying out their new lines.
Speaker 35: It might be the dumbest policy ever put forward by
Speaker 35: a major political party. It is the worst combination of
Speaker 35: economic and ideological stupidity.
Speaker 3: This is economic catastrophe.
Speaker 33: The Liberals and Nationals promised you a sensible energy plan. Instead,
Speaker 33: they're giving you a risky nuclear scam. Mister Dutton wants
Speaker 33: to be cut off from the rest of the world.
Speaker 33: Mister Dutton's isolated here.
Speaker 1: Bogo even rhymed there. So, just to be clear, according
Speaker 1: to Labour's clown show, nuclear energy is incredibly expensive and
Speaker 1: it's irrelevant to getting to meeting lower carbon emissions. And besides,
Speaker 1: nobody else in the world is doing it, or something
Speaker 1: like that. But peet behind the curtain and you find
Speaker 1: quite the opposite, even from the climate change cultists themselves,
Speaker 1: including Joe Biden when he could string a sentence or
Speaker 1: two together.
Speaker 8: Take nuclear power bigger source of clean energy employees over
Speaker 8: sixty thousand works, including many of you. The key to
Speaker 8: media of the goal of one hundred percent clean power
Speaker 8: grid by twenty thirty five depends a lot on it.
Speaker 8: That's why we're keeping existing plants open, restarting shuttered plants,
Speaker 8: and building in America's first new nuclear plants in decade.
Speaker 14: We're going to need a lot more energy and we're
Speaker 14: going to have to be doing much more nuclear over
Speaker 14: the coming decade.
Speaker 10: Well, Canada is a Tier one nuclear nation. We're a
Speaker 10: leader when it comes to nuclear technology. We have been
Speaker 10: for many, many years, and we've been.
Speaker 17: Able to do multi billion dollar projects, particularly over the
Speaker 17: last number of years, far ahead.
Speaker 10: Of schedule and on time and on budget.
Speaker 1: Which is really really important for decision makers around the world.
Speaker 10: So it's important.
Speaker 18: For me as the Minister of Energy in Ontario and
Speaker 18: Canada to talk about the.
Speaker 10: Success that we've been having and.
Speaker 26: Ensure decision makers from other countries that it makes sense.
Speaker 6: To move in nuclear Definitely, increasing nuclear capacities cornerstone of
Speaker 6: our carbon neutrality byify from.
Speaker 36: Nuclear energy is a low carbon power source, and South
Speaker 36: Korea has excellent nuclear technologies that are both safe and outstanding. Also,
Speaker 36: nuclear energy is important for South Korea's energy security as
Speaker 36: it can be used as baseload electricity comparing to renewable energy.
Speaker 36: To ensure our energy security, we need to use nuclear
Speaker 36: energy along with other power sources.
Speaker 8: The United States please the Laws Declaration to triple nuclear
Speaker 8: energy with more than twenty countries before cut.
Speaker 30: It would be a really important part of our energy
Speaker 30: mix going forward. And that's why just after Christmas, I
Speaker 30: said that the largest expansion of nuclear power in seventy years.
Speaker 1: What an absolute joke. All those people I just showed
Speaker 1: you are absolute climate change fanatics from all around the
Speaker 1: world who all believe that nuclear energy is critical, in
Speaker 1: fact imperative to tackling climate change. But not the Canberra
Speaker 1: clown show. Oh No. The hypocrisy of labor, the hypocrisy
Speaker 1: of the Greens, and worst of all, the hypocrisy of
Speaker 1: the Teals is unbelievable.
Speaker 34: Australia has some of the cheapest and best renewable resources
Speaker 34: in the world. You know, a solar panel in Australia costs,
Speaker 34: you know, creates two to three times more electricity than
Speaker 34: a panel you know in Japan or in Germany.
Speaker 1: And they pretend they clear care for the environment. As
Speaker 1: I say, come the next election, do yourself a favor
Speaker 1: and turf out a Teal. We also got the obscenity
Speaker 1: this week of the next Governor General, Sam Moston, who
Speaker 1: happens to be a climate obsessed, woke Republican in the
Speaker 1: Teals Mold, getting an obscene pay rise of two hundred
Speaker 1: and fourteen thousand dollars on top of her already obscene
Speaker 1: four hundred and ninety five thousand dollars salary plus all
Speaker 1: the perks. I thought there was a cost of living crisis.
Speaker 1: Well not in Yarralumla there ain't obviously. Tanya Plivacek, for one,
Speaker 1: was clearly unimpressed and embarrassed with Albozo throwing the paper
Speaker 1: money around like it was his minister.
Speaker 30: I'd also like to ask you about the Governor General
Speaker 30: and the pay rise that Sam Austin will be getting
Speaker 30: when she takes on the roll. A two hundred and
Speaker 30: fourteen thousand dollars pay rise, some forty.
Speaker 3: Plus percent increase.
Speaker 30: Does that sit well with you? Do you think it
Speaker 30: will sit well with voters?
Speaker 37: I think it reflects the fact that previous office holders
Speaker 37: have had pensions and so on. So look, I'm not
Speaker 37: going to comment on someone's pay I think that's a
Speaker 37: it's a matter for her.
Speaker 1: Sam Morston should of course give the full two hundred
Speaker 1: and fourteen thousand dollars to helping Australians living on the
Speaker 1: streets this winter thanks to the soaring cost of living
Speaker 1: and soaring energy prices. But worse, just to show what
Speaker 1: a total hypocrite Alban Easy is here he is back
Speaker 1: in two thousand and three complaining about a pay rise
Speaker 1: for a governor general. You can't make this stuff up.
Speaker 38: Bill which has been rush had to be rushed through
Speaker 38: the House by the circumstances in which in which the
Speaker 38: Convention operates. The Governor General will receive a fifty five
Speaker 38: thousand dollars pay rise, or more than one thousand dollars
Speaker 38: a week.
Speaker 1: There's a big.
Speaker 38: Contrast, mister speaker, with average Austraones and average astraones will
Speaker 38: be concerned.
Speaker 1: Indeed, and finally, the assaignash circus rolled into town this week.
Speaker 1: As I say, regardless of whether you view him as
Speaker 1: some free speech Internet hero or some weird obsessive who
Speaker 1: hit out under a desk in the ecuador In embassy
Speaker 1: for the best part of a decade, nobody deserves, after
Speaker 1: years with hardly any unhuman contact, to finally get out
Speaker 1: and be greeted by this man. Mister Sanjan, you comment seriously,
Speaker 1: after twenty minutes with Kevin right, I'd be begging to
Speaker 1: go back to Belmarsh prison. And then before you could
Speaker 1: say Guantanamo Bay up popped poor sad Old Albo, desperate
Speaker 1: to get in on the act, grab a bit of
Speaker 1: that lefty hero worshiping that Rudd was rolling himself in
Speaker 1: like a dog who just found a dead fish on
Speaker 1: the beach, so we got the phone call, so Albo
Speaker 1: could be close, but not get too close to the
Speaker 1: man whose mission is total freedom of the Internet at
Speaker 1: a time when both Liberal and Labor are giving the
Speaker 1: E Safety Commissioner more and more power to censor the Internet.
Speaker 1: That see Karen on the cover of the Spectator Australia.
Speaker 1: There what fine, all of which reminded us here on
Speaker 1: clown Show of Juliana Sorange's absolute finest moment when Megan
Speaker 1: Kelly asked Julian Assange, why doesn't Wiki leaks report dirt
Speaker 1: on Trump? Assonnge replied, because there isn't any still Now
Speaker 1: a songes back in business, maybe he can turn his
Speaker 1: mind to freeing up the Internet in Australia. And how
Speaker 1: about leaking all those Morrison Hunt TGA COVID secrets, or
Speaker 1: even better, spill the beans on all those alban Easy
Speaker 1: and Rudd government secrets. So ok, Kevin, my lips are sealed.
Speaker 1: Just ask the go.
Speaker 39: Gos Hyperbowl extreme exaggeration.
Speaker 1: Well maybe it's not exaggeration. Let's find out. Here's a
Speaker 1: South African MP, newly elected South African MP, calling for
Speaker 1: why let's go and kill some whites.
Speaker 16: Wife.
Speaker 1: We killed the children, we killed the women. We kill
Speaker 1: our cobs, we kill our cabs.
Speaker 6: James, I've been to South Africa many times. It's a
Speaker 6: wonderful country. But you see stuff like that. It is
Speaker 6: so sad and so far from what Mandela intended when
Speaker 6: he bought the country together.
Speaker 3: He would be rolling in.
Speaker 6: His grave to see how politicians speaking like that popular. Well,
Speaker 6: they've just cultivated grievance continually. The ANC has done that,
Speaker 6: other parties have done it, and now we're in a
Speaker 6: situation where no wonder whites want to flee to Australia
Speaker 6: to escape that sort of rhetoric rita.
Speaker 1: We've got Fatima Payman, the one who they won't kick
Speaker 1: out of the Labor Party, even though they're roll rule
Speaker 1: say they should hear she was on Insiders not long ago,
Speaker 1: a few minutes.
Speaker 40: You do not intend on leaving the party. We've had
Speaker 40: diverse views in the caucus from you know, various people,
Speaker 40: various perspectives.
Speaker 3: On the table.
Speaker 40: But I think that we need to be able to
Speaker 40: embrace that that diversity of.
Speaker 5: Views, diversity of views in the Labor Party. I'm sorry,
Speaker 5: I don't know what party you thought you were joining,
Speaker 5: but one thing you can say about the Labor Party,
Speaker 5: whether you like it or not, is they have party discipline.
Speaker 5: You do not cross the floor even if it's an
Speaker 5: issue that you feel very strongly about. With all, Penny
Speaker 5: Wong argue against same sex marriage when that was the
Speaker 5: official party position. So to have her now set this
Speaker 5: precedent for herself and she's doubled down. She said she's
Speaker 5: going to do this again if the issue comes up
Speaker 5: that she feels this strongly about. And there are a
Speaker 5: lot of Labor Party people from all factions who are
Speaker 5: very upset by this right.
Speaker 1: I'm surprised. Well, do we not have an exciting opportunity
Speaker 1: for you here on Outsiders. Yes, it is the opportunity
Speaker 1: for you to ask us Rita, James and I anything.
Speaker 1: You can ask us anything. You can ask us those
Speaker 1: questions you've always wanted to know. You know thing you
Speaker 1: always stopped me in the street and ask me about Rita.
Speaker 1: So now's your chance you can ask directly to Rita
Speaker 1: and James and me. You also have the chance to
Speaker 1: ask any of your favorite Sky News hosts anything as
Speaker 1: part of a video series on the Sky News Australia
Speaker 1: app Send your questions through to Ask Me Anything at
Speaker 1: skynews dot com dot au. Ask Me Anything is available
Speaker 1: exclusively for supporters of Sky News Australia with a five
Speaker 1: dollar monthly subscription to our app. That's all for this
Speaker 1: week's show. We'll be back next Sunday, bright and early
Speaker 1: here at nine o'clock. Thank you so much for watching Outsiders.
Speaker 1: So yeah,