Speaker 1: On scoring lives Ostrodia. This is the Wider Paney Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Riata Paney Show. Coming
Speaker 2: up tonight. How hard left activists plan to disrupt the
Speaker 2: election campaign Adam Crichton it's here, fresh from his harrowing
Speaker 2: experience on the ABC's Q and a program to discuss
Speaker 2: that and much more. A massive backflip from the Prime
Speaker 2: Minister as he abandons modeling, underpinning Labour's promise to cut
Speaker 2: power bills and slash your missions by twenty thirty people
Speaker 2: say in Pimer will tell us more about that and
Speaker 2: he must protest evolve into violence. Josh Hammer will have
Speaker 2: the latest from the US, and later in the hour
Speaker 2: we'll look at why Prince Harry has been accused of
Speaker 2: wooing and misogyny and Lefty is losing It features this
Speaker 2: gem from the view that somehow made it past the
Speaker 2: fact checkers.
Speaker 3: I'd never remember in my lifetime a sitting president and
Speaker 3: trashing a previous president.
Speaker 2: I've never heard that before. But first, good news for
Speaker 2: the Albanesi government. With the polls swinging back to Labor
Speaker 2: for the first time this year. Peter Dutton has some
Speaker 2: work to do. The preferred Prime Minister margin has significantly
Speaker 2: widened since last month, when forty five percent I should
Speaker 2: say I thought Anthony ALBUINESI would make a better Prime minister,
Speaker 2: while forty percent favored Peter Dutton. In the poll release today,
Speaker 2: the PM is now backed by forty nine percent compared
Speaker 2: to thirty eight percent preferring Peter Dutton. In the two
Speaker 2: party preferred metric, Labor is now ahead of the Coalition
Speaker 2: fifty one to forty nine percent, replicating the twenty twenty
Speaker 2: two election result. And as far as the primary vote goes,
Speaker 2: Labor is at thirty three, Greens at twelve, and the
Speaker 2: Coalition at thirty eight. That's only one point three percent
Speaker 2: above the last election. Joining me now as senior Fellow
Speaker 2: and Chief Economist at the Institute of Public Affairs, Adam Crichton, Adam,
Speaker 2: it looks like Peter Dutton's softly approach is not paying dividends.
Speaker 4: Yeah, certainly that's true.
Speaker 5: The Coalition would be pretty disappointed with these figures. And
Speaker 5: of course it wasn't just the news poll results that
Speaker 5: you were talking about. Then the Freshwater Pole and the
Speaker 5: Financial Review basically showed exactly the same thing, the same
Speaker 5: trend so that's two major polls on the same day.
Speaker 4: Not a great start. And also the betting markets are
Speaker 4: now showing.
Speaker 5: Labor as the favorite to win, whereas about four or
Speaker 5: five weeks ago the Coalition was the favorite. I always
Speaker 5: like to look at the betting markets instead, because these
Speaker 5: are people who are actually putting their money on the line.
Speaker 5: They've thought about it. You know, Poles can go either way,
Speaker 5: and of course they have a.
Speaker 4: Plus you know, plus minus three or four percent error.
Speaker 5: But yes, to your point, you know, since well, at
Speaker 5: least in my view, since the Coalition backed the eight
Speaker 5: point five billion dollars on many care, which Labor proposed,
Speaker 5: so same same, the polling of the Coalition has fallen.
Speaker 4: So I think they need to distinguish themselves more. There's
Speaker 4: not enough.
Speaker 2: Idea too late to do that now, because you're right,
Speaker 2: there's not a huge deal of ideological difference. We've got
Speaker 2: used to that. The party is not being that far apart.
Speaker 2: Certainly on economic policy you can pick some differences, but
Speaker 2: energy seems to be what's really a missed opportunity for
Speaker 2: the coalition. They could have fought this on energy policy alone.
Speaker 5: If they certainly could have looked the British Tories have.
Speaker 4: They've recently dumped it zero. I think that's very sensible.
Speaker 5: The opposition leader over there has come out and said
Speaker 5: it is just economically and even scientifically impossible to do.
Speaker 4: This is what Dutton should have done here.
Speaker 5: And then the election would have been a real intellectual
Speaker 5: contest something to talk about.
Speaker 4: I mean, right now, it's going to be excruciating, isn't it.
Speaker 4: I mean, basically we're talking about.
Speaker 5: A tiny tax cut on the one side or a
Speaker 5: temporary change in the fuel x scise rate on the
Speaker 5: other side.
Speaker 4: That's basically the only difference, more or less.
Speaker 5: And because the coalition supports in it zero, it does
Speaker 5: make it very hard for them to attack Labor on
Speaker 5: their energy policies because ultimately they both have the same,
Speaker 5: you know, the same apparent.
Speaker 2: Goal, and it flows into other parts of the economy
Speaker 2: as well, because of course energy policy impacts everything. So
Speaker 2: when you're talking about a cost of living election, we're
Speaker 2: talking about what is inflationary, what's causing people paying day
Speaker 2: to day? That comes into it. So it just really
Speaker 2: hamstrings them on a number of fronts. But is it
Speaker 2: too late now to come out boldly and say we
Speaker 2: are of course we've got nuclear that's going to be
Speaker 2: twenty thirty five onwards. But before then we are going
Speaker 2: to make sure that we've got plenty of coal and
Speaker 2: gas to have reliable, cheap energy.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Look, I mean this is probably one for the political strategist,
Speaker 5: but I don't think it's too late, And certainly, if
Speaker 5: their polling gets worse and worse, I think they really
Speaker 5: just should. I mean, if we're sitting here in a
Speaker 5: week's time and the poll's even worse, surely it's time
Speaker 5: to think about something like that. But you mentioned nuclear,
Speaker 5: and I haven't really talked about nuclear much. I think
Speaker 5: the opposition later mentioned it once in his budget reply speech.
Speaker 2: Labours seem to be talking about it more than they
Speaker 2: are as an attack, as opposed to them actually promoting
Speaker 2: it as a way of safeguarding our future and making
Speaker 2: sure we actually do have cheap, reliable energy, as well
Speaker 2: as slashing emissions if that's a priority. Now, you mentioned
Speaker 2: the betting markets, so let's have a look at how
Speaker 2: they're looking. Sports bet has Labor slightly in front a
Speaker 2: dollar eighty to two dollars ten majority, Government three dollars
Speaker 2: twenty five. No majority is the hot favorite there dollar thirty.
Speaker 2: And that's really the real fear, isn't it, Because we're
Speaker 2: talking about green labor coalition, green TiAl labor coalition, any
Speaker 2: sort of combination. There is not good same similar odds
Speaker 2: with TAB the Libs trailing Labor slightly. And again the
Speaker 2: money is in for a minority government. So that's I
Speaker 2: think what we're worried about.
Speaker 5: Yeah, look, and that's because Labor did so about it
Speaker 5: last time. I think they have seventy seven seats, you know,
Speaker 5: and the parliaments one hundred and fifty seats, so they
Speaker 5: have a tiny majority. They can't afford to go back
Speaker 5: with much. The Liberal Party, though, I think, has to
Speaker 5: win twenty two seats in net terms to form a
Speaker 5: majority government, so that is a big ask.
Speaker 4: Then again, there are lots of seats.
Speaker 5: That are held very marginally by the Labor Party, so
Speaker 5: you know, even a two three four percent swing is
Speaker 5: going to bring up a lot of seats. But of
Speaker 5: course the swing is not going to be uniform. I
Speaker 5: mean every seat is different, so we don't know how
Speaker 5: it's going to play out. But yes, sadly, it looks
Speaker 5: like it's going to be a minority government and the
Speaker 5: real fault of that is I think that nea side,
Speaker 5: you know, really offers much of an alternative, and so
Speaker 5: that they are so similar, of course they end up
Speaker 5: with the same number of seats more or less.
Speaker 2: Absolutely Now, Pro Palace sdin in activists are planning to
Speaker 2: resume weekly protests in Melbourne with support from members of
Speaker 2: the Greens. Hardline activists Mohammed Sharap, who's facing a kidnapping
Speaker 2: and assault trial, called Peter Dutton a racist TMU Trump,
Speaker 2: saying we don't need a more racist government than the
Speaker 2: one we have. He also said this is a very
Speaker 2: critical time for us to go and disrupt those election campaigns.
Speaker 2: Appearing on the same stage as Sharab was Green's federal
Speaker 2: candidate for the Victorian seat of Fraser Huang Trang, who
Speaker 2: said that Parliament is a racist, white supremacist colonial institution
Speaker 2: that still has not grappled with the fact that it
Speaker 2: is illegitimate until it recognizes sovereignty for First Nations people. Adam,
Speaker 2: but she wants to join this racist, white supremacist colonial institution.
Speaker 4: Well, that's a good point.
Speaker 2: This isn't that fantastic.
Speaker 5: That's a good point because of the paying conditions are
Speaker 5: so good in the Parliament, so.
Speaker 4: It's worth living with all the racism apparently.
Speaker 5: But look, the first thing that jumped out there for
Speaker 5: me was this is the Green's party.
Speaker 4: Where's to talk about the environment here?
Speaker 5: This is all about Palestine, So this is this is
Speaker 5: this is just a hard one.
Speaker 2: Oh, we know her mass are very very keen on
Speaker 2: green policies, that their emissions are next to nothing.
Speaker 5: You know, so observers should realize this is not the
Speaker 5: party of Bob Brown anymore. This is a hard left
Speaker 5: party which often is far more interested in these niche
Speaker 5: left wing issues about foreign policy than it is about
Speaker 5: the actual environment.
Speaker 4: You know, it's a take away.
Speaker 5: But the accusations of racism, of course completely ridiculous, And
Speaker 5: Charlie is this has been going on for decades.
Speaker 4: It's so boring. You know, they really need a new word.
Speaker 4: Really it is.
Speaker 2: They have misused and overused that word so much that
Speaker 2: it means nothing, which is actually not a great thing,
Speaker 2: because when there is genuine racism and you call it out,
Speaker 2: it doesn't mean anything because you can only cry wolf
Speaker 2: so many times.
Speaker 5: When calling Australia racist in particular, it's so ridiculous too.
Speaker 5: I think I mean it really is one of the
Speaker 5: least racist countries in the world.
Speaker 2: Oh absolutely, And anyone who's got any sort of who's
Speaker 2: cracked open a book over the last twenty years or
Speaker 2: has traveled anywhere would know that. Now, let's talk about
Speaker 2: the Friends of the ABC, another activist group. They've they're
Speaker 2: very perturbed. They're crying poor on behalf of the ABC
Speaker 2: ahead of the federal election, and an email to the
Speaker 2: Auntie Army President Cassandra Parkinson has warned that the stakes
Speaker 2: are high for the ABC in this election, and she
Speaker 2: also lamented that there was nothing in the budget for
Speaker 2: the ABC. Nothing in the They're getting over a billion
Speaker 2: dollars a year to completely disregard their charter. I don't
Speaker 2: know how much more they want at them.
Speaker 5: Yeah, look, I mean it's just ridiculous that that that
Speaker 5: message was even sent. As you say, they get a
Speaker 5: huge pot of money every single year for doing nothing.
Speaker 5: I mean, frankly, the public case for the ABC, if
Speaker 5: there ever was one, just really isn't there anymore. I Mean,
Speaker 5: we all have so much choice with our media consumption
Speaker 5: bea the Internet, obviously, we can you know, we can
Speaker 5: read newspapers from all around the world. We can consume
Speaker 5: all sorts of TV all around the world. There really
Speaker 5: is no case for this institution anymore.
Speaker 4: Sadly, you know, as grateful as I am that they
Speaker 4: sometimes have me on. Of course, I am the public
Speaker 4: policy case.
Speaker 2: Going to bring you a clip of you on the
Speaker 2: ABC shortly that that was you on Q and A
Speaker 2: last week. But let's first look at this example of
Speaker 2: another twisted priority of the Alban Eazy government and our universities.
Speaker 2: It must be said the government is now strongly encouraging
Speaker 2: students in poverty stricken puppy New Guinea to apply for
Speaker 2: scholarships to study get this climate change, gender studies and
Speaker 2: disability policy, when in previous years the focus has been
Speaker 2: on our agriculture or medicine or education. Out of had
Speaker 2: quaint that you know, you would expect them to talk
Speaker 2: about gender studies instead of perhaps study medicine.
Speaker 5: I mean, these topics are so stupid. This is one
Speaker 5: of the poorest countries in the world. It's one of
Speaker 5: our neighbors. You know, we do have an obligation to
Speaker 5: try to lift their living standards. These sorts of courses
Speaker 5: are just totally ridiculous. I mean, we should be educating
Speaker 5: them in areas that they can help their own country
Speaker 5: when they go back. And of course this is a
Speaker 5: reminder of the US AID schedule.
Speaker 2: That's what I thought of when I read.
Speaker 5: That these foreign policy agencies are just chopped full of
Speaker 5: hardcore left wing ideologues who are far more interested in
Speaker 5: spreading their ideology around the world than they aren't actually
Speaker 5: lifting living standards. So this is a prime case of that.
Speaker 5: And also this is what an Australian dohoge could chop
Speaker 5: if we.
Speaker 2: Absolutely and this is precisely the sort of thing that
Speaker 2: tax payers don't want their money wasted on, and these
Speaker 2: activists push their agenda without tax pay dollars and that's
Speaker 2: why it's being tackled in the US, but locally really
Speaker 2: not hearing much from resistance even from the Coalition about this.
Speaker 2: The Park Height in Melbourne, a hotel here in Melbourne,
Speaker 2: has caved to online activists and canceled plans to host
Speaker 2: a memorial for Cardinal George Pearl, citing a height and
Speaker 2: risk to the safety of its staff. And guess adam,
Speaker 2: the left santis it's the history of violent protests really
Speaker 2: do seem to give them this veto power. This is
Speaker 2: another example of the heckless Vita.
Speaker 4: No, that's exactly right.
Speaker 5: Look, I think it's pretty weak on the hotel's part
Speaker 5: to go back on this. I think that they should
Speaker 5: be tougher. There's far too much caving to these people.
Speaker 4: I agree. We always hear about the dangers of the
Speaker 4: far right. It's actually the far left that are far scarier.
Speaker 2: Actually, it was the last time a far left a
Speaker 2: figure didn't have a foot launch or didn't have an
Speaker 2: event because of right wing Yeah, it just wouldn't happen.
Speaker 2: And if there wasn't even a hint of it, you
Speaker 2: would have so many police there on the taxpayer's dime of.
Speaker 4: Course as well. Except you, Except.
Speaker 2: Now, Adam, before you go. You appeared on the ABCISQ
Speaker 2: and A program last week. You said plenty that's shockly apparently,
Speaker 2: But I don't know shocked because we keep being told
Speaker 2: that the audience is very much diverse. Half it didn't
Speaker 2: get left leaning, half conservative, one single platform. Okay, let's
Speaker 2: just have a look at twenty seconds of your contribution at.
Speaker 5: Zero, which we impose on ourselves. It is in effect
Speaker 5: a huge tariff on our manufacturing sector. It's a huge
Speaker 5: tariff on our energy prices, and it's not just.
Speaker 4: The power builder that effects.
Speaker 5: Of course, the cost of energy ripples through the cost
Speaker 5: of everything in the economy, and so the cause of
Speaker 5: the huge increase in cost of living is basically government
Speaker 5: those two things I just mentioned.
Speaker 4: He was very upset with my answer. She was not
Speaker 4: ready heard of that just common sense, that what I said.
Speaker 2: Well, of course it was. But you need to give
Speaker 2: trigger warnings before you start spitting facts like that. You
Speaker 2: can't just go there. You did challenge the net zero
Speaker 2: dogma on the ABC do you were you sick of life?
Speaker 2: For you wanting to be well? Actually harassed leaving the studio?
Speaker 2: Why did you do that?
Speaker 5: Well, actually, a few days later the clip went viral
Speaker 5: on x base.
Speaker 4: A lot of other accounts picked it up.
Speaker 5: I didn't push them, I didn't tweet it out, but
Speaker 5: suddenly it appeared. So I think there is a real
Speaker 5: thirst for people to criticize net zero, not just on
Speaker 5: the right, but in the center and even on the left.
Speaker 5: In fact, one guy who retweeted I think is a
Speaker 5: left wing economist that is like, it's great to hear
Speaker 5: the truth. Finally, well, of course, I mean, you can
Speaker 5: like net zero, but you still should appreciate that it
Speaker 5: is the source of our massive cost of living crisis
Speaker 5: in large part.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, this is what I don't understand if ideologically you
Speaker 2: believe this is the greatest moral dilemma of our time
Speaker 2: and it's worth the cost then to argue that, but
Speaker 2: pretending like renewables are the cheapest form of energy whilst
Speaker 2: we know the experience is absolutely the polar opposite. Absolutely
Speaker 2: is just treating everyday people like their idiots. And I
Speaker 2: think people are finally waking up and see if the
Speaker 2: coalition gives them a choice at the polls. Adam Kristen,
Speaker 2: thanks for your time today. Thanks Er joining me now
Speaker 2: is a steem geologist and author, Professor Ian Primer Professor.
Speaker 2: Let's start with this massive backflip from Anthony Albernezi is
Speaker 2: now abandoned. The modeling underpinning labours promised to cut power
Speaker 2: bills by three hundred and seventy eight dollars a year
Speaker 2: and reduce emissions by forty three percent by twenty thirty.
Speaker 6: You've by many international factors for not hitting your two
Speaker 6: hundred and seventy five dollars pledge. Hit that same reputex
Speaker 6: modeling full cast electricity prices from now until twenty thirty,
Speaker 6: we're reduced by one hundred dollars.
Speaker 4: Do you stand by that modeling?
Speaker 1: It's reputex as modeling.
Speaker 6: But no, excuse me, you talk that was what you
Speaker 6: your policies on.
Speaker 2: It's repitexas model co ownership of that modeling.
Speaker 7: It's reputexas modeling from that time.
Speaker 4: You don't support the modeling anymore. This is you walking
Speaker 4: away from that modeling.
Speaker 7: It's reputexas modeling based upon the circumstances at that time.
Speaker 2: But this is the very same modeling that he's sensationally
Speaker 2: champion at the last election.
Speaker 7: This is the most comprehensive modeling ever done for any
Speaker 7: policy by any opposition in Australia's history since federation.
Speaker 2: And what has gone wrong the modeling, the promises, it's
Speaker 2: all falling apart.
Speaker 8: Well, the models gave the wrong answer and the models
Speaker 8: don't work, and he's got a retreat from that position,
Speaker 8: and that makes his life pretty difficult.
Speaker 1: And to then try to argue it's international.
Speaker 8: Features that are driving the.
Speaker 1: Costs, well, that's just nonsense. We have abundant energy in
Speaker 1: this country. It was once cheap and reliable.
Speaker 8: It's been destroyed by putting in renewables and following the models,
Speaker 8: so he's working up the models don't work.
Speaker 1: Now, models often don't work.
Speaker 8: They're only a naive way of trying to understand how
Speaker 8: matters work. We know with climate models. There's more than
Speaker 8: one hundred climate models, and we've had forty years of
Speaker 8: climate modeling. We can see when we compare the models
Speaker 8: with what we've measured, the models don't work. So I'm
Speaker 8: not surprised it's a fairly weak way of getting out.
Speaker 1: Of it by blaming the modeling organization.
Speaker 8: I think he should shoulder the responsibility and say, well, folks,
Speaker 8: we trusted these models.
Speaker 1: We find they're not working, and we're going to move on.
Speaker 8: And if he was a real prime ministry would have said,
Speaker 8: we're going to move on and get rid of net zero.
Speaker 8: And by the way, we're going to move on and
Speaker 8: go back to cheap and reliable energy which you once had,
Speaker 8: and we will resurrect the coal mining and a coal
Speaker 8: burning industry to give you cheap electricity.
Speaker 2: Well that's never going to happen, particularly not when he's
Speaker 2: got the likes of Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris
Speaker 2: Bowen in his ear let's have a look at this
Speaker 2: video Bowen posted about the Coalition's policies, their nuclear policy,
Speaker 2: in particular, are.
Speaker 9: You waiting for that box to hit me? Well, if
Speaker 9: you don't like waiting, you will hate the Coalition's nuclear
Speaker 9: policy because they're going to make Australia wait until the
Speaker 9: twenty forties before we get any new electricity from nuclear,
Speaker 9: and that is not time that we have. Nuclear is
Speaker 9: expensive and slow to build, and that'll mean relying on
Speaker 9: coal firepower for longer, Terrible for emissions, terrible for reliability
Speaker 9: because coal fire power stations break down every single day.
Speaker 10: So if you don't want to wait, let's get on
Speaker 10: with the.
Speaker 9: Job of more cheaper, cleaner renewable energy now, not in
Speaker 9: the twenty forties.
Speaker 2: Okay, it's another clownish video. He makes the ridiculous claims
Speaker 2: that coal isn't reliable, but it does make a decent point.
Speaker 2: I think about the Coalition's nuclear policy in that it's
Speaker 2: years away. So what are they really giving us for
Speaker 2: their next term in government? What are we voting for?
Speaker 8: Well, mister Boone's painfully embarrassing the coalitions nuclear policy.
Speaker 1: I think it's a very good policy, But mister.
Speaker 8: Bowen is correct, This is going to take time before
Speaker 8: you can build those stations. In the interim, we have
Speaker 8: very old coal fired power stations that haven't had maintenance
Speaker 8: and haven't had investment because of the insecure market that
Speaker 8: the renewables have created. So the easiest thing to do
Speaker 8: is to get rid of the subsidies for the renewables.
Speaker 8: These subsidies are costing the taxpayer a huge.
Speaker 1: Amount of money.
Speaker 8: Get rid of those subsidies, build a few new coal
Speaker 8: fired power stations, resurrect a few coal fired power stations,
Speaker 8: and that will keep us going in the interim until
Speaker 8: we get nuclear and hopefully well have both coal and nuclear,
Speaker 8: because then we.
Speaker 1: Would have really reliable energy.
Speaker 8: So I don't think the Coalition is very much better
Speaker 8: than Labor on the energy policy.
Speaker 2: Well, they've given us a little bit more detail on
Speaker 2: their gas policy. They're going to force producers to keep
Speaker 2: more gas in Australia. If they don't comply by these requirements,
Speaker 2: they will be hit with financial penalties, and that extra
Speaker 2: gas for domestic consumption would be around ten to twenty
Speaker 2: percent of what we currently have extra. But ian do
Speaker 2: we know what that's going to do to prices? Is
Speaker 2: that really an answer just diverting the gas supply domestically
Speaker 2: rather than actually boosting production.
Speaker 1: Well, that's the key point.
Speaker 8: We have a structural short supply of gas and the
Speaker 8: only way you can get more gas into the system
Speaker 8: is to drill more.
Speaker 1: Well, you have to drill.
Speaker 8: Now, we have some many impediments to putting in a
Speaker 8: new gas well. We have so many impediments for building
Speaker 8: a gas field, building a gas compression plant that that
Speaker 8: takes years.
Speaker 1: It takes very high risk investment.
Speaker 8: Its investment a lot of people are not prepared to
Speaker 8: put into Australia. So we have had for a long
Speaker 8: while a policy of slowing down development, slowing down the
Speaker 8: production of energy for the industry, for the making of materials,
Speaker 8: factories use a lot of gas, and for domestic use.
Speaker 8: Now we have long term contracts that gas goes into
Speaker 8: Australia on a broad to fulfill those long term contracts.
Speaker 1: We have areas which we.
Speaker 8: Still can't operate in, such as Santos As Narrabri gas field.
Speaker 8: That's taken more than fifteen years of haggling and there
Speaker 8: still is no gas coming from that field. So the
Speaker 8: real problem is not the amount of gas, not the pipelines,
Speaker 8: but it's there is a structural supply problem and that
Speaker 8: is driven and by the approvals, and it's driven by governments.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, it is. It is government's red tape, green tape,
Speaker 2: black tape, as you've talked about, that has stifled this sector.
Speaker 2: It's incredible that we are sitting on hundreds of years
Speaker 2: of gas reserves and we've got shortages and we've got
Speaker 2: to go to these measures to try to get supply.
Speaker 2: Professor im Plymer, thanks so much for your time tonight.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 2: Still to come left. He is losing it. Plus anti
Speaker 2: Musk protests evolved into violence. Josh Hammer as the latest
Speaker 2: welcome back. It's time for left. He's losing it. Let's
Speaker 2: start with this bit of wisdom from the man who
Speaker 2: wants to be president. Yes, Tim Wall's the worst ever
Speaker 2: vice presidential candidate wants to go one better and be
Speaker 2: the worst ever presidential candidate. Listen here as he argues
Speaker 2: that Democrats should have gone harder, harder embracing DEI wokeness
Speaker 2: open borders.
Speaker 11: We let them define the issue on immigration, We let
Speaker 11: them define the issue on d and I DEI, and
Speaker 11: we let them define what woke is. We got ourselves
Speaker 11: in this mass because we weren't bold enough to stand
Speaker 11: up and say, you damn right, we're proud of these policies.
Speaker 4: We're going to put them in and we're going to
Speaker 4: execute them.
Speaker 2: Republicans everywhere should be praying that the Democrats listened to him,
Speaker 2: because they will never ever win the White House again
Speaker 2: if they double down on that idiocy. Now, talking about
Speaker 2: doubling down on idiocy and lunacy, time to check in
Speaker 2: with the ladies of the View, and here Joy Behar
Speaker 2: claims that no sitting president has ever criticized his predecessor
Speaker 2: before Donald Trump. She actually said this.
Speaker 10: They also to see to blame the Biden administration up.
Speaker 2: It's like, move on, that ship is sailed.
Speaker 3: I never remember in my lifetime a sitting president trashing
Speaker 3: a previous president.
Speaker 2: I've never heard that before your hero Joe Biden wanted
Speaker 2: to put his predecessor in prison. Joy. We don't have
Speaker 2: time for all the hours upon hours of footage of
Speaker 2: Joe Biden trashing Donald Trump. So he's just twenty seconds
Speaker 2: of him repeating a dangerous debunk lie about Donald Trump
Speaker 2: and then saying we should lock him up.
Speaker 8: When the President was asked what he thought had happened.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump said, I quote.
Speaker 8: There are very fine people on both sides.
Speaker 1: My god, that's me said.
Speaker 4: It sounds like I said this five years ago. You
Speaker 4: liked me up. We gotta like him up.
Speaker 11: Now.
Speaker 2: To a woman who would no doubt be a finalist
Speaker 2: in the Victim Olympics, here is a woman living in
Speaker 2: the West choosing to subjugate herself behind a nick a
Speaker 2: dehumanizing face covering, and then complaining about how hard it
Speaker 2: is to eat in public. I was struggling to eat
Speaker 2: in a veill at the beach end.
Speaker 9: This happened.
Speaker 2: Usually it's a struggle for me to eat outside anywhere,
Speaker 2: and sometimes like I can always just pull up my
Speaker 2: veill like this, eat through here. I actually found a
Speaker 2: better solution. This is my solution.
Speaker 4: Guys.
Speaker 2: We actually have a tenn There is a window, so
Speaker 2: I can just put it down when I'm eating to
Speaker 2: have my bagel, turn around and lift my bill and
Speaker 2: eat this way. Everything's covered right now. You can't see anything.
Speaker 1: You can't see anything not I can.
Speaker 2: Also turn around and eat. I just have to put
Speaker 2: this up.
Speaker 1: Can I have a bite?
Speaker 12: No?
Speaker 1: Can I be in there when you're eating?
Speaker 2: Why are you in here when I'm eating bie.
Speaker 13: Hey, isn't it so sad that you have to rely
Speaker 13: on attempt to eat?
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's sad. So make more female only accessible places.
Speaker 2: Oh dear, it's like chopping off your legs and complaining
Speaker 2: about not being able to walk.
Speaker 1: You know what.
Speaker 2: There are a number of Muslim majority countries, more than
Speaker 2: fifty in fact, where you can have all sorts of
Speaker 2: women only areas, And those countries are also full of
Speaker 2: millions of a pressed women, many of whom would love
Speaker 2: to be free of the veil, to be free in
Speaker 2: the West. Perhaps you can swap places with one of them. Now,
Speaker 2: let's hear from a couple of our celebrity friends. They
Speaker 2: are always so in touch with everyday folks, so insightful
Speaker 2: and not at all self involved narcissists. Here is Cynthia
Speaker 2: Aarrevo bleating about preferred pronouns hers art they them she
Speaker 2: identifies as a plural. It isn't easy.
Speaker 14: None of it is waking up and choosing to be yourself,
Speaker 14: proclaiming a space belongs to you when you don't feel welcomed,
Speaker 14: teaching people on a daily basis how to address you,
Speaker 14: and dealing with the frustration of reteaching people a word
Speaker 14: that has been in the human vocabulary since the dawn
Speaker 14: of time. They them words used to describe pedantically two
Speaker 14: or more people, poetically a person and who is simply more.
Speaker 2: Oh so, if you don't want to deliberately mangle the
Speaker 2: English language to Panda to the likes of her, then
Speaker 2: you'll being pedantic, don't you. You know she's more, She's
Speaker 2: so much more.
Speaker 15: You know what?
Speaker 2: This next girl argued, The they them message so much better.
Speaker 2: Oh love, it never stops being funny. But let's go
Speaker 2: back to our insufferable celebrities. And here is Bob Geldoff.
Speaker 2: It's been decades since he released anything that anyone wants
Speaker 2: to listen to, but here he is with another unhinged
Speaker 2: die tribe about Elon Musk, and here he says that
Speaker 2: he hopes to see teenagers mess with Elon's wealth.
Speaker 15: If I was fifteen or sixteen, I promise you what
Speaker 15: I definitely.
Speaker 1: Do, just for the lulls.
Speaker 15: I would organize a boycott of all things Musco. I
Speaker 15: would organize a boycott of Star Tesla, you know, Twitter X,
Speaker 15: And I do it because I had nothing to lose.
Speaker 15: But how amazing if you could mess with this guy's
Speaker 15: vast inappropriate world.
Speaker 2: Now we are seeing a lot of Elon Musk inspired
Speaker 2: derangement from lefties. Watch these damaged people scream shame at
Speaker 2: a dude in a Tesla for a sea. Say yes,
Speaker 2: there's an epidemic of crazy lefty losers who are attacking
Speaker 2: tesla's and tesla drivers and these attacks are becoming increasingly violent.
Speaker 2: Watch what happened to this sixty one year old woman.
Speaker 10: This is video from the victims tesla camera. It shows
Speaker 10: a green car pulling up to a Tesla and busy
Speaker 10: Route sixty six, then swerving in front to box the
Speaker 10: tesla in. The driver then walks over to the sixty
Speaker 10: one year old woman in the Tesla and reportedly starts
Speaker 10: hitting her while she's sitting behind the wheel. At one point,
Speaker 10: the woman says she bit the man's hand. Moments later,
Speaker 10: the passenger of the green car appears to walk over
Speaker 10: and pull the attacker away. They finally get back in
Speaker 10: their car and drive off. We spoke to the victim
Speaker 10: today who said she was terrified and can't understand why
Speaker 10: anyone would do this.
Speaker 2: I'm ashamed of our society and what they're doing.
Speaker 10: The victim, along with the other Tesla owner who received
Speaker 10: a threatening note in text, have both now signed up
Speaker 10: for a gun safety course at a gun range north
Speaker 10: of Flagstaff. They tell us they don't feel safe right now.
Speaker 2: Unbelievable attacking a sixty one year old woman. Hopefully that
Speaker 2: lifty loonies behind Baz and soon This next lefty has
Speaker 2: been arrested for allegedly driving into a pro Trump protester
Speaker 2: with his car.
Speaker 16: We just learned that a seventy year old man was
Speaker 16: arrested after Meridian police say he hit another man with
Speaker 16: his car. Today's demonstrations at the Tesla dealership in Meridian.
Speaker 16: Please say, seventy year old Christopher Talbot and Meridian made
Speaker 16: an obscene gesture towards a counter protester and then hit
Speaker 16: him with his car. Please say the victim had been
Speaker 16: driving a truck with pro Trump flags and had just
Speaker 16: parked and gotten out of his car when Talbot hit him.
Speaker 2: Jodding me now is Newsweek's senior editor at Large and
Speaker 2: Article three projects Senior Council Josh Hamma. Josh, someone is
Speaker 2: going to get killed soon if the Left don't stop
Speaker 2: this lawlessness, this unhinged violence.
Speaker 13: Well unfortunately, Rita. There's one thing that we know about
Speaker 13: the left, going back at least as far as Karl Marx. Frankly,
Speaker 13: you could probably go back at least even further to
Speaker 13: the French Revolution in the late eighteenth century. They love violence.
Speaker 13: Violence is actually part and parcel of what they believe.
Speaker 13: I mean, if you look at what the modern left
Speaker 13: stands for, they stand for barbarism against civilization. They stand
Speaker 13: for tearing things down, not for building things up. Of
Speaker 13: that old school Marxist class envy I think is really
Speaker 13: part of what is going on here. Elon Musk is
Speaker 13: literally the number one richest man in the world. You
Speaker 13: cannot pick a more picture perfect target of left wing
Speaker 13: classic Marxist iyre and angst and frustration than Elon Musk.
Speaker 13: There is a man who has built successful companies, not
Speaker 13: just Tesla, but space x. He's of course now leading Twitter,
Speaker 13: ak X into the free speech era and so forth
Speaker 13: as well. There So it's for all of those reasons,
Speaker 13: but more to the point, I mean, as an American
Speaker 13: who has to live with these people, I have to
Speaker 13: actually walk down the sidewalk, go to the supermarket, go
Speaker 13: go to the grocery store. I to like, look at
Speaker 13: these people in the face there. I mean, it is
Speaker 13: these fraying of the civic bonds of citizenship that ultimately,
Speaker 13: in the long term, have the pernicious potential to unravel
Speaker 13: the entire nation if it continues. I'm not saying that
Speaker 13: the nation is going to disintegrate tomorrow from this, but
Speaker 13: you have to prosecute this behavior.
Speaker 4: I mean, you.
Speaker 13: Literally cannot let them get away with this there. It
Speaker 13: kind of reminds me actually of the post October seven stuff,
Speaker 13: the prof and Mark protest. There was a Jewish man
Speaker 13: tragically killed by a pro Palestinian protester or protester aka
Speaker 13: kind of a writer out in southern California November. Very
Speaker 13: similar stuff here. Whatever the cause of the day is, reader,
Speaker 13: you can bank on the modern left being violent, But
Speaker 13: the answer to violence is robust and unapologetic enforcement of
Speaker 13: the rule of laws. Send these bums to jail if
Speaker 13: they're na sais, and send them pack and out of
Speaker 13: the country.
Speaker 2: Are these protests, Josh partly organized and perhaps funded by
Speaker 2: sous activist groups. We're hearing all sorts of reports about
Speaker 2: how it's almost like shift work for some of these
Speaker 2: people where they put the banners down at midday on
Speaker 2: the dots for example, and walk off, and others come
Speaker 2: precisely at the top of the hour.
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 2: It's all anecdotal, but do we know much about who's
Speaker 2: behind them, who's perhaps helping to fund it.
Speaker 13: We don't know for sure a lot left yet. But
Speaker 13: what we do know is that there are a lot
Speaker 13: of left wing protests over over the past few years,
Speaker 13: that there have been massive amounts of so called professional protesters.
Speaker 13: Professional protesting is now a very common thing on the left.
Speaker 13: We saw that as at Columbia University last April and
Speaker 13: May during the pro Hamas demonstrations there, where it was
Speaker 13: later revealed that a lot of these people were actually
Speaker 13: brought in by outside forces there. Frankly, a lot of
Speaker 13: the pro hamastaff actually ends up being orchestrated by just
Speaker 13: foreign actors, including people affiliated with the Iranian regime, people
Speaker 13: like that there. I personally do believe, yes, that a
Speaker 13: lot of this Testa stuff probably is due to Soro's
Speaker 13: Open Society Foundation, Arabella Advisors, Tides Foundation. It's always the
Speaker 13: same actors, It's always the exact same actors here. Whatever
Speaker 13: the cause of the day is, whether it's black lives matter,
Speaker 13: whether it's Hamas, whether it's anti Elon musk anarchy. They
Speaker 13: gravitate to the cause of the day, and it's toxic
Speaker 13: and evil no matter what stripe it is.
Speaker 2: Now to the always a charming Democrat, congress Woman Jasmine Crockets,
Speaker 2: and when she is not mocking disabled Americans in wheelchairs,
Speaker 2: she's engaging in some what I see is virulently racist dialogue.
Speaker 2: Listen here as she claims a black Republican colleague is
Speaker 2: whitewashed because he married a white woman.
Speaker 17: Some of our skin folk who definitely are not are
Speaker 17: kim folk, such as Byron Donald's. Literally, it's because you
Speaker 17: married a white woman, and so you think that they're whitewashing.
Speaker 17: I'm not really sure like what it.
Speaker 2: Is, you know.
Speaker 17: I feel like they give him as starking points and
Speaker 17: he's like, yes, Massa, I got it.
Speaker 2: Charming stuff. Skin folk are not kinfolk. Josha explain the
Speaker 2: rise and rise of Jasmine Crockett among the Democrats. The
Speaker 2: way she talks about some of the Republicans who she serves,
Speaker 2: with the manner in which she conducts herself, you would
Speaker 2: think it'd almost be disqualifying, but she's got significant power
Speaker 2: in her voice is amongst the loudest.
Speaker 13: Right now, read, I'll give you my quick take on
Speaker 13: Jasmine Crockett by way of a musical analogy. So I
Speaker 13: know that you and I are both big country music fans.
Speaker 13: I'm less certain how you feel about classic rock. But
Speaker 13: by way of example here, let's think about the Beatles.
Speaker 13: The Beatles are Paul McCartney, John Lennon, George Harrison and
Speaker 13: ringo star. So when the Squad comes into power in
Speaker 13: the US house back in twenty eighteen twenty nineteen, it's
Speaker 13: ilan Omar Rashida Tulay, Alexandro Cosio, quart Has and then
Speaker 13: Iana Presley in Massachusetts. But people forget about Aana Presley.
Speaker 13: I mean, she's kind of like a nothing burger these days.
Speaker 13: So my theory on Jasmine Crockett is that Jasmine Crockett
Speaker 13: is making a strong play to supplant Iana Presley as
Speaker 13: the ringo star of the Squad because Lennon, McCartney and
Speaker 13: Harrison are already taken. But she wants she wants in.
Speaker 13: She wants in on the band. She will be there
Speaker 13: in the background, she will do some drums there. She
Speaker 13: wants in on just the total chaos in the far
Speaker 13: left flank of the House Democratic Caucus there. You know,
Speaker 13: maybe the most offensive thing about Jasmine Crockett is that
Speaker 13: she deliberately talks. She puts on this shick, this this
Speaker 13: apt as if see as if she's kind of like
Speaker 13: just like fresh off the street. She has this accent
Speaker 13: she tries to talk. It's so domeining. I mean, you
Speaker 13: look at where this woman went to school. She went
Speaker 13: to extremely expensive, elitist private schools her whole life. This
Speaker 13: is not how she actually talks. It is literally all
Speaker 13: an act. I don't know why Democrats feel that they
Speaker 13: have to put on this act there. If I were
Speaker 13: a Democratic voter, I would be grossly offended by this.
Speaker 13: I would just be deeply offended there. I'm obviously not
Speaker 13: a Democratic voter there.
Speaker 2: I've played a footage of her before she put on
Speaker 2: this new accent and this new act, and it is
Speaker 2: an act. And yeah, she was beautifully spoken, that a
Speaker 2: product of a private school education. She went to an
Speaker 2: elite college, one of more expensive ones. I had to
Speaker 2: look at the fees there, They're astronomical, Josh. And suddenly
Speaker 2: she's yeah, she sounds like as she does now let's
Speaker 2: talk about Vice President JD. Vance. He recently addressed young
Speaker 2: Marines at Conico, and he had this message as his
Speaker 2: celebrates what he calls a renewed sense of patriotism.
Speaker 18: No more quotas, no more ridiculous mumbo jumbo, no more
Speaker 18: diversity trainings.
Speaker 16: We believe the.
Speaker 18: Real strength and the real diversity in the United States
Speaker 18: Marine Corps is that you all come from every walk
Speaker 18: of life, come from every quarter of America, and you
Speaker 18: have got the strength and the purpose to win the
Speaker 18: nation's wars. And that is what the Marine Corps is
Speaker 18: going to do, just like it's done for Dan Mehir
Speaker 18: two hundred and fifty years.
Speaker 2: Josh Dei is dead, certainly amongst the Marines, as possibly
Speaker 2: where it was at its most dangerous and destructive to
Speaker 2: have these elite ranks being corrupted by things other than meritocracy,
Speaker 2: to have diversity, equity inclusion considerations brought in instead of
Speaker 2: picking who are the elite soldiers he can serve.
Speaker 13: So this was all along one of my top arguments
Speaker 13: for a GDVAN it's actually being vice president of the
Speaker 13: United States in the first place. I argue this for
Speaker 13: months and months prior to Donaldron picking him, and one
Speaker 13: of the reason is that I think that he is
Speaker 13: such a good vice president and similarly actually won. The
Speaker 13: reasons why Pete Heggsat is such an inspiring Secretary of
Speaker 13: Defense is that these two men are very young. They
Speaker 13: are in their early two mid forties, and they are
Speaker 13: both veterans. They are both combat veterans of the of
Speaker 13: the Nations America's Post nine to eleven wars. If you
Speaker 13: want to actually look at what is one of the
Speaker 13: number one I would argue probably the number one biggest
Speaker 13: issue currently facing the United States military, which is plummeting recruitment.
Speaker 13: The Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines. They've all been missing
Speaker 13: the recruitment goals by double digit percentages for multiple years
Speaker 13: in a row. You need people like the Secretary of
Speaker 13: Defense and in this case, the Vice freaking President of
Speaker 13: the United States, guys who have actually fought in these
Speaker 13: combat in these wars there to go inspire the young soldier,
Speaker 13: sailors and marines to actually go there and put out
Speaker 13: videos that are disseminated across national television. There trying to
Speaker 13: inspire young Americans to actually go to your local crument
Speaker 13: office and serve the military gang there. That is exactly
Speaker 13: what this country needs right now. But thankfully read it.
Speaker 13: At this point, Dy and the military is out crippling
Speaker 13: Obama Biden Esque rules of engagement seem to be out
Speaker 13: the door there. America at this point is going to
Speaker 13: fight limited wars. But when we enter those wars, we
Speaker 13: are going to enter those wars to win. That is
Speaker 13: the way that it should be.
Speaker 1: In jd.
Speaker 13: Fans, I think embodies that to his core.
Speaker 2: Now to the activist judges who think they can overrule
Speaker 2: the Julie elected president, this is the real constitutional crisis
Speaker 2: if you ask me, Josh. And the New York Post
Speaker 2: reports that the daughter of DC District Court Judge Chief
Speaker 2: Judge James Bolsburg, he is the one who tried to
Speaker 2: stop the Trump administration from deporting gang bangers to El Salvador. Well,
Speaker 2: the daughter is employed by a nonprofit that received millions
Speaker 2: in government funding and opposes the Lake and Riley Act.
Speaker 2: His wife is also reportedly involved in a pro abortion
Speaker 2: ngo partly funded by USAID. Josh, how is the administration
Speaker 2: going to handle these activist judges going forward?
Speaker 13: So thankfully, Rita, Congress and the President have all sorts
Speaker 13: of remedies that they can attempt to get across the
Speaker 13: finish line when it comes to reigning in what Alexander Hamilton,
Speaker 13: famous who refer to as the least dangerous branch, which
Speaker 13: is the judiciary. So actually, just in today's Wall Street Journal,
Speaker 13: Chuck Grassley, the Senator from Iowa, has this wonderful op
Speaker 13: ed praising his new legislation seeking to put an end
Speaker 13: to so called nation wine injunctions, trying to bring back
Speaker 13: the common sensical notion that when a judge issues an injunction,
Speaker 13: it binds only two parties, the plaintiff and the defendant.
Speaker 13: What a concept, this notion that a judicial ruling could
Speaker 13: actually just bind the people before the court.
Speaker 16: There.
Speaker 13: So that's one very basic thing. Congress will also enacts
Speaker 13: so called jurisdiction stripping legislation. They could basically just take
Speaker 13: certain types of substantive jurisdiction, whether it's immigration law, abortion law, whatever,
Speaker 13: they want to just take it away from federal judges
Speaker 13: then move it to state courts. That is something that
Speaker 13: I've been arguing since my lassuel days. Should actually be
Speaker 13: much more frequent. Another thing that I actually do want
Speaker 13: to see some you know, some more momentum here is
Speaker 13: the idea of judicial impeachment. It's not actually going to
Speaker 13: go anywhere on the Senate. I'm sober about that. But
Speaker 13: I do think that you have to start making an
Speaker 13: example of at least one or two of these judges,
Speaker 13: whether it's Judge Boseburg and Washington d C. Judge McConnell,
Speaker 13: he's the USAID judge up up in the state of
Speaker 13: Rhode Island.
Speaker 4: There.
Speaker 13: These guys have to be to be made an example of,
Speaker 13: because you have to send a messages shot across the
Speaker 13: bow that we're not going to tolerate this behavior there,
Speaker 13: that we're not going to allow one judge to shut
Speaker 13: down the entire executive branch. That is not the system
Speaker 13: the Founder's devised. And thankfully, I think President Trump and
Speaker 13: his allies in Congress do acknowledge this. They understand this
Speaker 13: is only a question of time, frankly, until these lower
Speaker 13: court judges are put in their place.
Speaker 2: Josh Hannah, thank you so much for your time tonight.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 2: Rita Stilch cow Why Prince Harry is being accused of
Speaker 2: pulling and Misulgourny at Kinsey's go Field has the details.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, joining me now, celebrity and royal commentator Kinseiscofield Kinsey,
Speaker 2: It's going to be a rough week for Prince Harry
Speaker 2: after the chair of the charity Center Ballet, which he
Speaker 2: left only last week, claimed the Duke of Sussex was
Speaker 2: guilty of bullying and harassment within the organization.
Speaker 3: At some point on Tuesday, Prince Harry authorized the release
Speaker 3: of a damaging piece of news to the outside world
Speaker 3: without informing me, all my country directors, all my executive
Speaker 3: director and can you imagine what that attack has done
Speaker 3: for me on me and the five hundred and forty
Speaker 3: individuals in the Center party organizations and their family. That
Speaker 3: is an example of harassment and bullying at scale.
Speaker 2: Kinsey, what is the lightest here? What exactly is Harry
Speaker 2: being accused of?
Speaker 12: I mean, Prince Harry is being accused of doing exactly
Speaker 12: what he accused the British Royal family of doing, weaponizing
Speaker 12: the media against his enemy, which in this case is
Speaker 12: doctor Sophie. Doctor Sophie blasted this I thought was important
Speaker 12: to the decline in the Sussex is basically all over brand,
Speaker 12: saying in an interview with Financial Times the number one
Speaker 12: risk for the organization was the toxicity of its lead
Speaker 12: patron's brand, and accused Prince Harry of trying to eject
Speaker 12: her through bullying and unleashing the Sussex machine, adding that
Speaker 12: after a review of the charity's finances in July of
Speaker 12: twenty three that she discovered that after Prince Harry and
Speaker 12: Meghan left the Royal family, there was a huge decline
Speaker 12: in donations. She thinks Prince Harry's just grand standing here
Speaker 12: and Clay he wanted to destroy the charity to later
Speaker 12: return as its savior.
Speaker 2: Interesting, I think. Comments were also made about Meghan Markel
Speaker 2: and how she disrupted a charity polo event by suddenly
Speaker 2: turning up with Serena Williams and making all sorts of
Speaker 2: demand SKINSI yeah.
Speaker 12: Yes, I mean that's why you saw the hoedown on
Speaker 12: the I mean that in the dance term on the stage,
Speaker 12: the choreography was all messed up because they weren't expecting
Speaker 12: Meghan Markle there or Serena Williams. And she said it
Speaker 12: was disruptive to the event, that they had spent a
Speaker 12: significant time planning it. They were happy to have Meghan there,
Speaker 12: but to have her pop up at the last minute
Speaker 12: was inconvenient. And then when the chaos broke online about that,
Speaker 12: Prince Harry had the nerve to call Doctor Sophie and
Speaker 12: ask her to defend Meghan Markle in the press, and
Speaker 12: she said, I'm not an extension of the Sussex brand.
Speaker 12: I'm not going to do that.
Speaker 15: That's it.
Speaker 2: They wanted her to play their pr games, which is
Speaker 2: supposed to be running a charity. Now let's move along
Speaker 2: to Will Smith is making a comeback. He had, the,
Speaker 2: of course, fall from grace after that slapping incident with
Speaker 2: Chris Rock. That was three years ago. Now time flies.
Speaker 2: He's now released his first full length music album in
Speaker 2: two decades, called Based on a True Story? Kinsey, are
Speaker 2: we ready to forgive? Will Smith?
Speaker 12: Read? I am so sad. I am so sad about
Speaker 12: this album. I loved Will Smith's music prior to this.
Speaker 12: All the lyrics of Miami I could recite for you
Speaker 12: right now, but I'm going to quote the Daily Mail
Speaker 12: here that said Ken sad dad at karaoke, Will Smith
Speaker 12: safe his career. One commentator calling this his Elvis era.
Speaker 12: I am horrified by this album. They are saying that
Speaker 12: he's talking to Netflix about a roast. I think that
Speaker 12: it's more likely to revive his career than this fullop
Speaker 12: of an album. But you know, I feel bad. I
Speaker 12: actually feel bad for the guy because it's his Is
Speaker 12: this a medlife crisis? Is what I'm trying to ask you.
Speaker 2: I tell you the roast Idea is absolutely brilliant because
Speaker 2: the material the comics could work with there is abundant.
Speaker 2: The craziness the Jada Pinkett Smith has inflicted on that
Speaker 2: little family some of her podcast material where she talks
Speaker 2: about the affairs she's had and even talks to Will
Speaker 2: about the affairs. I mean that it's also very strange. So,
Speaker 2: oh my gosh, can you just imagine the fun the
Speaker 2: comics could have with that. Now, let's talk about Morgan
Speaker 2: Wollan is a country music superstar, not just country music.
Speaker 2: He charts in the regular charts, but he's come under
Speaker 2: five because of his abrupt departure from Saturday Night Live.
Speaker 2: He ended the musical before by praising the Lord and
Speaker 2: the volunteers. Country fans will get this, praise.
Speaker 19: The Lord and go off, and this is what caused
Speaker 19: a storm that he walked off during the credits, which
Speaker 19: drag on for a couple of minutes on Saturday Night Live.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much to Morgan Vahlane. I had a
Speaker 2: wonderful time.
Speaker 16: Thank you.
Speaker 2: He is off and the rest of the cast to
Speaker 2: stand around for two minutes sort of talking to each
Speaker 2: other and dancing. I don't know why that's a feature
Speaker 2: of the show. And then Morgan Wolland posted this to
Speaker 2: his Instagram's story. He said, take me to God's Country
Speaker 2: with a picture of a private plane. Kinsey, I don't
Speaker 2: understand what the fuss is about here. Why is he
Speaker 2: expected to stand around for two three minutes while the
Speaker 2: casts of a painfully on funny show just I don't know,
Speaker 2: clam around.
Speaker 12: Yeah, this isn't his demo and it isn't as cool
Speaker 12: of a show as it used to be. Rural conservatives
Speaker 12: are rocking out to Morgan, and this is a program
Speaker 12: that is metropolitan snob. In a two thousand and three interview,
Speaker 12: then head writer Tina Fey told a reporter of SNL,
Speaker 12: we have a liberal bias, obviously, and fellow lefties cheer
Speaker 12: that they have this playground in Saturday Night Live. Their
Speaker 12: ratings have been described lately as underwhelming. They need Morgan
Speaker 12: and his base more than Morgan needs them.
Speaker 2: Absolutely He is the superstar. He's the one who's flying
Speaker 2: in the charts and he's the one who comes with
Speaker 2: a massive audience while Saturday Not Lives figures are going
Speaker 2: down the other way. So why they would be acting
Speaker 2: up about this is beyond me. And they kind of
Speaker 2: canceled him a few years back, didn't they. So he
Speaker 2: went through some controversies. He's never far away from trouble.
Speaker 2: Of course, he had that chair incident where he threw
Speaker 2: a couple of chairs off a rooftop bar. But that's
Speaker 2: all behind him. Kinsey. We have forgiven and we have forgotten. Kinsey.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for your time. I always a
Speaker 2: pleasure to have Kinsey Schofield on the program. And that's
Speaker 2: it from me. I'll see you tomorrow night at eleven.
Speaker 2: Don't go anywhere. Newsnight is coming up next