WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 9 June

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Lately.

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Late Debate.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's great to have your company on the Late

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Debate James Macpherson with Caleb Bond and Freyer Leitch coming

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 3>up tonight. Why do people as they get older start

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 3>making noises every time they move?

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.319
<v Speaker 4>Don't look at me as if I'm the one to

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 4>answer it, Freyer.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 3>But that question was asked of Adoptor's Advice column in

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 3>his paper at the weekend. We'll tell you what they

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 3>said a little later. Plus when we look at what's

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 3>making news tomorrow, the government's green dreams in tatters as

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the price of green hydrogen set to explode metaphorically, of course,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 3>and calls for Aboriginal Australians facing court to have their

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 3>cases dealt with by a female judge to ensure cultural safety.

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 3>Will get to all of that a little later, but

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 3>let's start with former Prime Minister Scott Morrison.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Here's a question, does he deserve to be.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Named in the King's Birthday honors list as he was today?

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Living aside the question about whether or not politicians should

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 3>be recipients at all, there is the question of Morrison's

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 3>leadership during the COVID nineteen pandemic, which was given as

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 3>a prime reason for him being made a Companion of

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the Order of Australia. Today, I've got to be honest,

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't see why he would be honored for that.

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 3>I'll give him this, it was a very difficult time

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 3>in our history, unprecedented even I'll also give him this.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 3>I think he did a much better job than Bill

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Shorten or god forbid, Anthony Albaneze would have done had

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 3>they been in charge at the time. But I'm just

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 3>finding it hard to get my head around, Caleb and Freyer,

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>how you could be Prime Minister of this nation at

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 3>a time when human rights were trashed right across the

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 3>country and get.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Rewarded for it. It is strange. We should note, of course,

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of the things that were done during

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 2>COVID were done by the States.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 4>But I want to come back to now, will the FED.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Set up this national idea right? And the idea was

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>everyone would get in a room and they would all

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 2>come up with one idea and then they would all

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 2>walk out of the room as a united group and

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 2>do the same thing that very clearly didn't.

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Happen, which was a failure of leadership. And this is

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 3>convened by Morrison.

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 2>This is what I'm coming to. If you're the chairman

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>of the board and the chairman of the board fails

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 2>to get his members in line, then he's failed on

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 2>that count, and that Morrison certainly failed on that count.

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll give him credit for a number of things. Certainly

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 2>been one of the first people in the world to

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 2>take up the fight to China on the origins of COVID,

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 2>and he absolutely deserves applause for that and has never

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>received as much as he deserved. And of course we

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 2>were punished as a country for him doing the right thing.

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 2>But you know, why do you deserve to get an

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 2>ac for doing your job right? I mean the Order

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 2>of Australia should be about people who have gone above

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 2>and beyond their calling to do great things for the

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 2>country and the community. If you're the Prime Minister and

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 2>you've led the country through a time of crisis, I

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 2>mean that's what you were employed to do. You weren't

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 2>a volunteer. You didn't put yourself on the line in

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 2>a situation that you didn't need to be in. Who

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 2>haven't dedicated your life to doing things in your spare time.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 2>You were being compensated for doing that work. Am I

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 2>that upset about it? No, because every other prime minister's

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 2>had one as well as who is just another one

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 2>in the long line, except for Paul Keating who refused one.

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 2>But really, why do you deserve to get one for

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 2>doing your job? You don't need a pat on the

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 2>back to be told you did a good job as

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 2>prime minister. The record can show whether or not you

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 2>did a good job as prime minister, and I suppose

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>in the end the record will show that Morrison's government

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 2>was turfed.

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 5>But I think the point as well, though, is that

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 5>anyone who voluntarily takes up the role of Prime minister,

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 5>who puts themselves into the public eye, who dedicates their

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 5>life to public service, who puts their family at risk,

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 5>who works tirelessly for the nation, should be honored. Whether

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 5>you agree with the policies of certain prime ministers or not,

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 5>I would say that I still do think the majority

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 5>of our leaders hopefully do it out of public service

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 5>and not out of personal gain, and that in and

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 5>of itself should be honored.

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 6>Prime ministers work harder than a lot of logic.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Though, wouldn't you just give an Order of Australia to

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 3>every single Prime minister.

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 6>Well, they basically do too.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 4>Actually, I mean that's a dumb idea, right what everyone?

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean everyone deserves one because they've done some great

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 2>work for the country, don't they.

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Want every nurse doctor?

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>And surely the honor of the job is to have

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 2>been prime minister at all.

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 5>I agree the honor is to be prime minister. But

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 5>it is also true that our prime ministers do work

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 5>exceptionally hard, do put themselves in the public eye, do

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 5>compromise their family.

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 6>Think of someone like Peter Dutton.

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 5>He has had twenty four to seven police guard federal

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 5>Police Guard.

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 6>On him since the mid twenty ten.

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 5>His children have not known a life without being under

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 5>constant surveillance. He can't go to a restaurant or a

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 5>cafe or the grocery store, probably even now. And so

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 5>I do think that politicians and certainly the Prime minister,

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 5>put themselves in a unique position of leadership that we

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 5>should honor. And often it's easy to disparage them and go,

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 5>oh they did this wrong and that wrong, but ultimately

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 5>they were just seeing.

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Such So what about Scott Morrison, do you reckon he

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 3>deserves this specifically? I mean they named his leadership during

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 3>the COVID pandemic as a key reason that he should

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 3>be held up as a great Australian.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 4>You're going to go with.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 5>That, well, I think that a lot of the worst

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 5>measures were done by the state premiers.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 6>And interestingly, in an interview.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 5>Scott Morrison gave to The Australian upon the announcement of

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 5>his recognition, he actually said that he didn't support the

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 5>universal vaccine mandates, he didn't support the school closures. So

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 5>could he have been more vocal at the time, yes,

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 5>but I know for a fact that behind the scenes

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 5>and internally he was not happy with that decisions of

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 5>the states. But then also the other factor that was

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 5>considered was also his leadership in Orcus and our alliance

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 5>with the United States and the UK, so there were

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 5>other things that were considered as well. But really I

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 5>think we just honor every prime minister with this, and

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 5>so they were probably just picking out the most notable

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 5>elements of his prime ministership and using that as the expt.

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 3>I just will never get over the fact that at

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 3>the start of the pandemic, the government led by Scott

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Morrison had a pandemic plan in the bottom draw put

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 3>together by Tony Abbott as Health Minister, and that was

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 3>discarded and we turned the country into a satellite effectively

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 3>of communist China with lockdowns. And you're right, it was

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 3>labor premiers and they played a very political game and

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 3>they loved power, but it was power ceded to them

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 3>by Scott Morrison when he called them all in and

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 3>he believed that he could corral them and lead them

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 3>in the same direction. Failed abysmally at that. And I'm

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 3>not knocking Scott Morrison. It was a difficult time, but

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't see how you should be rewarded when Australians

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 3>underwent such torturous human rights abuses and he was the

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 3>prime minister.

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Job.

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I would warn against revisionism of Morrison's time as Prime

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 2>minister as well, because he did at many points support

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 2>publicly lockdowns, including in Western Australia where they remained lockdown

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>well after the rest of the country, and Morrison still

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>backed in Western Australia doing that, So he certainly supported

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 2>that element.

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 3>And he went very close to supporting vaccine mandates as well,

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 3>but you.

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Know, nearly didn't. So he now says that's that's the

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 2>state's fault. But you know. Look, if Daniel Andrews can

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 2>can get a gong for his leadership in public health,

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 2>that's what happened last year, then I suppose.

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 4>If you're going to use that as the media.

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Is the least of ours. While we're talking about federal politics,

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 2>we know not just the politicians, but the bureaucracy. One

0:07:51.920 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 2>of the things they excel in is spending your money,

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 2>and today's installment of money being in the rich man's world.

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 2>It's the fact that there is at least one and

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 2>a half million dollars of furniture for Parliament House currently

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 2>being kept in storage. We don't entirely know why it

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 2>is all sitting in storage, but according to the Department,

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 2>there is one hundred sorry one and a half million

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 2>dollars worth sitting in storage, including forty nine hundred and

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty in twenty one TV cabinets, forty thousand, one hundred

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 2>and fifty two dollars of fourteen cocktail and TV cabinets,

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 2>thirty five thousand, five hundred and eighty eight dollars of

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 2>executive desks eleven of them. The Department also admitted that

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 2>after spending twenty three thousand, four hundred and sixty three

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 2>dollars and sixty four cents on planning and design for

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 2>a six stand desk for parliamentarians and eleven eight hundred

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 2>and ninety five dollars and two cents on constructing It

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 2>had deemed it not feasible to retrofit existing desks or

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>sit stand capability, and it was an ongoing project. They

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 2>have spent more than nearly four million dollars on furniture

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 2>in the last decade alone, and now one and a

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 2>half million dollars of it is sitting in two warehouses

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>somewhere off site. Now, you know, I understand every now

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 2>and again you might update your furniture, but I am

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 2>a prolific user of Facebook, Marketplace and auction houses. So

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I will give a little tip to the bureaucrats at

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Parliament House. Just put it all on a truck, send

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 2>it down to Lawsons where I go every Thursday, and

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>just sell it at auction. What the hell are we

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 2>doing with one and a half million dollars of furniture

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 2>unused in warehouses?

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 3>I had to last at that, you know, thousands of

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 3>dollars on a what do they call it?

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 4>A sit stand desk?

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Some wag in the Australian Comments section wrote, why would

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 3>any of our politicians need a six stand desk Parliament?

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 3>And our politicians never stand for anything, But when a

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 3>public servant believes they deserve a twenty thousand dollar desk,

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.239
<v Speaker 3>that's when you know you've got a culture of entitlement

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 3>in Canberra. And we all believe Parliament House should look good.

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, it shouldn't be like, you know, furniture from

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Ikea that's delivered in a flat pack and put together.

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 2>It's our national teaching a thing or two actually.

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, but it's our national government place of meeting.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 4>It should look good.

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't begrudge them spending money on furniture, but to

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 3>have one half million dollars worth sitting in storage somewhere like,

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 3>sell it to Caleb, he'll buy it, he's got the money.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Is it any good or not? Still? No?

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 5>I loved the twenty thousand dollars desk that was custom

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 5>made for a senior bureau.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 6>Just for it to be put into storage.

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 5>But then after public outcry because this all came out

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 5>in senate estimates earlier this year, they apparently have now

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 5>taken it out of storage and it's now being used again,

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 5>so probably after this story, they're now going to do

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 5>a clearance of all their storage units. But not only

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 5>do you have the wasted value one point five million

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 5>dollars of furniture sitting there, you're also paying for it

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 5>to sit in storage. It's just a waste of money

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 5>no matter where you look. So yeah, flog it on

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Facebook market places.

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 3>You've got storage. I presume it's all insured. There was

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 3>also a sixty thousand dollars lounge.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Wow, that's in storage.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 6>I'll have that kind of lounges. Sixty thousand dollars.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 4>All the lounge you don't need because it's sitting in stall.

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's very impressive.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 5>Look our our good friend, the Swedish doom Goblin, as

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 5>she's been called here on Sky News, has been detained

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 5>by Israeli defense forces off the coast of Gaza. She

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 5>describes it as a kidnapping, which is rather insulting to

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 5>the fifty five hostages still being held in Gaza for

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 5>six hundred.

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 6>And eleven days.

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 5>But it really is just quite staggering the victim complex

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 5>that they have. Gazans are literally risky their lives to

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 5>protest against Haamas while they're sailing towards Hermas only condemning Israel,

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 5>making no mention of the hostages, no mention of October seven.

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 5>The double standards are honestly, really really shocking.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 6>So what do you guys, reckon?

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 5>Will Israel have to show her the October seven footage?

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 6>I've heard that as one of the options.

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 5>Another one is organized a tour for her of Israel

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 5>to see the apartheip for herself. Obviously, what she'll realize

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 5>is twenty percent of the country is actually Arab Muslim

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 5>and living perfectly happily in the supposed apartheid stay. But

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 5>it really is interesting. Here's a little clip of her

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 5>being detained by the Israelis.

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 7>My name is Giffa Timber and I am from Sweden.

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 7>If you see this video, we have been intercepted and

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 7>kidnapped in international waters by the Israeli occupational forces or

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 7>forces that support israel. I. Urge all my friends, family

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 7>and comrades to put pressure on the Swedish government to

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 7>release me and the others as soon as possible.

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 5>So these profound humanitarian activists and all the aid they

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 5>were carrying, well, it amounted to less than a truckload

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 5>over one thousand truckloads have entered Gaza in the last

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 5>two weeks, so so much for this wonderful, miraculous humanitarian convoy.

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 3>I had to laugh at Greta's video there, saying, if

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 3>you were watching this video, it is evidence that I've

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 3>been kidnapped by the IDF. She wishes, I mean, better

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 3>to be kidnapped by the IDF than by her mask,

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 3>which was the other option she was facing. And of

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 3>course I think she wanted to be intercepted by the

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>IDF because now she gets exactly what she was after.

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 4>We had protests outside.

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Anti Albanesi's office today calling for Greta to be released

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 3>by the IDF. We had Turkey calling Israel a terra

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 3>state for kidnapping Greta Tunberg. We had the Iranians accusing

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Israel of piracy, and we had the United Nations Reperteur

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 3>on Human Rights, Francesca Alberanzi saying that every port in

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 3>the Mediterranean should be sending boats.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 4>With aid and solidarity.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's not just about aid, it's also a political

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 3>movement that's by her own admission, and that's exactly what

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Greta wanted. She never wanted to get to Gaza because

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 3>that would.

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Have been awkward.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 3>What she wanted was to be intercepted by the IDF

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 3>to have her moment.

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 4>The only thing she.

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Didn't get was she didn't get aggressive nasty Israeli soldiers,

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 3>which would have topped it off instead. And we saw

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 3>some footage earlier where they're sitting in their life jackets

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 3>being handed bottles of water and sandwiches by the very

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 3>nice members of the IDF, who, as he said, Freyer,

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 3>will show her a video of the atrocities committed on

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 3>October seven. Penny Wong was on the boat because she

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.359
<v Speaker 3>could do with seeing that video and maybe Anthony Albanizi

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 3>could get on a boat to Gaza, be intercepted by

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 3>the IDF and see that video as well. But then

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 3>she returned safely to her home. As the IDF have said,

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 3>kidnapping not a bit she wishes.

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, let's be clear that the main contents of

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 2>that boat is fossil fuels and hot air. But this

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 2>is why they should have just let her sail on

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>to Gaza. And as you said, they have given her

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 2>exactly what she wanted, which is the photo opportunity to say, oh,

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I've been manhandled by the IDF and I've been taken

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 2>away and they won't let me go to Gaza. Just

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 2>let her go to Gaza. What did Israel have to

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 2>lose in doing so? She'd rock up there if she

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 2>meets some Hamas terrorists, that's her problem. I don't particularly care.

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 2>By intercepting her, they've now created the perception or the

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>image which she will now run with. And that's very

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 2>clear from her video that the IDF has interfered in

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>her opportunity to express her free speech and go about

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 2>her free will, and you can't possibly go there. That's

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 2>what she will now run with. So just let her

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 2>make land and do what she wants. It's not our problem.

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 5>No, But if she'd actually been able to land in Gaza,

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 5>her mass would have used her for the ultimate propaganda stunt,

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 5>just as they did when they were releasing the hostages.

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 5>It would all be orchestrated, all to make Israel look

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 5>terrible and her masks look wonderful.

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 2>What's the propaganda stunt with gret With Greta off it,

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 2>what we're going to do?

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 5>Paraded Greta around, showing her the scenes of the genocide.

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 6>That's exactly what they would have done.

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but to the peopleship. But who is that for?

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Is that for the people in Gaza outside you know.

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 5>For the Western world, for the people outside of Gaza.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but anyone who already agrees with Greater agrees with greater,

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>and everyone who hates Greta hates greater. So what is

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>using her as a propaganda to do to help?

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, what does any ha mass propaganda tool? Do People

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 5>want an excuse to hate Israel and it gives them

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 5>more of an excuse.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Anyone who thinks israled in the wrong thing by preventing

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 3>these people getting to a war zone clearly is biased

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 3>in the first place.

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's her business.

0:16:57.880 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 2>That's her business.

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Like if she wants to go to a wars, Israel

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 3>getting hit on both sides, right, So they're accused of.

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm not hitting Israel. I'm not gonna hit Israel. As

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 2>they letter get there, I'm to say, let her go.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 2>If you're an idiot, if you're dumb enough to get

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 2>on a boat and float yourself into a war zone,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 2>good luck to you. Yeah.

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 3>But I'm saying people say Israel have to keep you know,

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 3>civilians safe in a war zone. So if they were

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 3>allowed to if they if they were allowed to allow

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 3>these civilians into a war zone, well then they'd be

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 3>accused of not doing that.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, should just be more Darwinian about it. If you

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 2>get yourself in trouble, you get yourself in trouble. I

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 2>don't care.

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's come back to Australia, Sydney in particular. If you

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 3>walk around the CBD, there's lots of monuments that you

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 3>can check out. There's monuments of Captain Cook. Why would

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 3>there be a monument of Captain Cook. Well, he sailed

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 3>across oceans at a time when that.

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Was incredibly perilous.

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 3>There's statues of Matthew Flinders who are circumnavigated inside or

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 3>in shore.

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Australia.

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 3>Was the first person to do it, Robert Burns, the

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 3>famous Scottish poet. But of course the problem with all

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 3>these statues, as is regularly pointed.

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 4>Out, is that they are of white men.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, you can breathe easy, because that problem is about

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 3>to be addressed with a multimillion dollar five point five

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 3>meter high statue about to be erected at Sydney's Circular

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Key of an Aboriginal woman who is also part whale.

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Coming up out of the ocean.

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 3>The statue, as you can see on your screen there

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 3>will be called Black Women Rising and the artist Ellison

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Page says the statue will speak to female power in

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 3>a white man's world.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 4>She told media today this CBD.

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 3>Is peppered with monuments of white men in history, and

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 3>they are done in a way that is colonial.

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 4>It's all linear.

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 3>They're standing on sandstone plinths and doing something heroic, which

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 3>is kind of the point of why you have a

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 3>statue of someone because they did something heroic. She goes

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 3>on to say, this bronze bubbles at the base as

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 3>if she's forming out of water, as if she's this

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 3>superhero with her energy and essence living within the Aboriginal

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 3>women of Sydney today. She is everyone, every black woman,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 3>every mother, daughter, sister, auntie.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 4>She is country. I don't know if.

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 3>That inspired either of you. It didn't inspire me. It

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of confused me because I sort of thought, if

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 3>you're a bit annoyed that there's too many white men

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 3>being honored with statues in Sydney, then by all means

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 3>erect a monument to a black woman in Sydney. But

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe erect a monument to an actual black woman, not

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 3>a mythical black creature half woman, half whale, and maybe

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 3>honor a black woman or indeed an Indigenous man for

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 3>something of note that they did. The artist says that

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 3>white men are honored for heroic deeds, well honor an

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 3>indigenous person for heroic deeds. There's plenty of indigenous people

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 3>you could nominate who've done outstanding things.

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Why this mythical creature? I don't get it.

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean Nivel Bonna. I mean, I suppose not

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 2>a woman. So won't fit this particular idea, will it.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I have to say, though, I'm not sure who's funded

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 2>this because it's not clear whether it's funded by the

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 2>council or by Lyndlease, because it's going in front of

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 2>an apartment development. Right, If Lindles is paying for it,

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 2>and they're paying a significant sum of money for it,

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 2>then a free kick to them. You can do whatever

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the hell you want with your private money. If it

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 2>turns out that there is public money being tipped into this,

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 2>then it's a completely different story. But I have to say,

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 2>as meaningless as this thing actually is, it's much better

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 2>than most public art we see these days. I mean,

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 2>there is absolute garbage around. So a big bronze statue

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 2>of a half while half woman thing actually won't be

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 2>that bad to look at compared to most of the

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 2>we're subjected to now.

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 6>But this is the thing.

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 5>No one actually wants to go see modern art anymore.

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 5>Many modern art galleries are struggling to attract visitors, so

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 5>now they have to put it in the public sphere,

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 5>so you can't possibly avoid it. This is just a

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 5>way of getting people to look at terrible art. But

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 5>it's also something that is not particularly original to Sydney.

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 5>There are now bronze statues of random people in Florence,

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 5>like this one of a black woman holding looking.

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 6>At her phone.

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 5>There's a similar one in a Times Square of an

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 5>overweight black woman standing there. It's the glorification of the mundane,

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 5>and it's not beautiful. It's not inspiring. It doesn't draw

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 5>us higher into something transcendent. It doesn't inspire us to

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 5>the heroic like those colonial statues do. I have no

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 5>issue putting indigenous people into statues, but isn't it a

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 5>little insulting to these successful Aboriginal women. You should be

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 5>in the statue versus some fake mythological whale.

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, give us a specific example of someone that we

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 3>can all admire and say, you know what, that person

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 3>is a great role model, rather than a vague generality,

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:45.719
<v Speaker 3>which this monument is.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 2>And notwithstanding that, toppling a five meter tall bronze statue

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 2>of this magnitude would be an exceptionally difficult task. But

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder if someone decides to lop it over

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 2>many times whether they will say, oh, we won't put

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 2>it back up again, because it would be too expensive

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>to do so, as of course they have done with

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 2>monuments to Captain Cook, who, by the way, was not

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 2>involved in the first fleet or the colonization of this country.

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's go over to the United States. Of course, you

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 2>would have seen these riots going on in LA right now.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 2>All of this sparked by, of course, Donald Trump doing

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 2>what Donald Trump said Donald Trump would do, which is

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 2>to deport illegal migrants from the United States. And because

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 2>there has been a sweep through LA, they've rounded up

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of illegal migrants, many of them criminals, and

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 2>deported them overseas. Are now being held in El Salvadorian

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 2>prisons for at least a year, and then they'll work

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 2>out what to do with them again after that. But

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 2>the violence scenes that you have seen, and you can

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 2>see some of it on the screen here, people rioting,

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 2>setting self driving cars on fire. Of course, Donald Trump's

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 2>now sent out the National Guard. People are having rubber

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 2>bullets fired at them, And will come back to that

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 2>in the moment, because I'm sure you've seen the footage

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 2>tonight our journalist Lauren to Marzi being hit with a

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 2>rubber bullet. But I mean, this is exactly what we

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 2>were told would happen. And I don't mean we were

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 2>told that there would be civil unrisk, but we were

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.239
<v Speaker 2>told that Donald Trump would clean up the streets and

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 2>get rid of illegal migrants. And for some reason, the

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 2>idea of enforcing the law and that's all he's doing

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 2>enforcing the law now causes the left in the United

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 2>States to absolutely go off. It's nut. I mean, it's

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 2>not like we're talking about people who have been citizens

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 2>of the United States being ripped away from their families

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 2>and sent overseas that deserves riots in the street. We're

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 2>talking about illegal migrants, many of them criminals, and that

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 2>is how left us in the United States respond, Well.

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 5>This is exposing just how bad Biden's border crisis really was,

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 5>and I think Democrats trying to sweep it under the

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 5>rug and say, oh, no, it's not really that bad.

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 6>These are just some Laura abiding.

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 5>Peaceful people who just want to come to America and

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 5>make a better life. Well, inherent in being an illegal

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 5>migrant easier, not Laura abiding. But anyway, Gavin Newsom actually

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.239
<v Speaker 5>wrote to Trump asking him to rescind the deployment of

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 5>the National Guard, saying California has this under control. But

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 5>then just moments later the LA Police chief said officers

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 5>were overwhelmed. And then you have other Democrats like Tim

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 5>Waltz who accused Ice of being the new Gestapo. You're

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 5>the mayor of Boston who said, I so basically neo

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 5>Nazis it is. I mean, on the one hand, they

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 5>can't actually grapple with the fact that they have let

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 5>their cities get this bad. Now finally someone's coming in

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 5>to clean up the mess. But then they are also

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 5>actively putting in danger these law enforcement officials by creating

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 5>hysteria and comparing them to Nazis.

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 3>Well, you mentioned Tim wall So, I remember his wife

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 3>saying that during the Black Lives Matter protest, she opened

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 3>the windows of her home so she could smell the

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 3>fumes of the fires set by the rioters. I mean,

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats want this kind of thing, and Trump's had

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 3>to send in the National Guard because the mayor of

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Los Angeles, she has blatantly encouraged this. She said when

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump sent ice into California to remove illegal she said,

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 3>we will.

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 4>Not allow this to happen.

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 3>And then she made comments to the effect that her

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 3>office was liaising with community groups about the protests, which

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 3>was sort of a subtle message that you have permission

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 3>to do whatever you want to do. Nothing is going

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 3>to be done, so she's actively encouraging it. Gavin Newsom, Well,

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't know what to do, and we all know

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 3>that's the case because we're not surprised by it because

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 3>remember the fires, I mean, they had a natural disaster.

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 4>He'd know what to do about that. Now they've got rioting.

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't know what to do about that either.

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.959
<v Speaker 3>And there's only one way to deal with rioting, and

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 3>that is to come down hard and fast, because if

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 3>you don't, it spreads. And so Trump has got to

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 3>come in and deal with this. Now one little thing,

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 3>it's a minor thing, but it annoys me. How Donald

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Trump fives off tweets where he refers to Gavin Newsom,

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 3>a's Gavin new scum.

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 4>I just wish Trump.

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 3>He's got the law on his side, he's got a

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 3>mandate that he won at the election. I just don't

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 3>know why he has to resort to rubbish like that, which.

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 4>Just demeans him and the office.

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 3>And he seeds the high moral ground over and over

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 3>when he doesn't need to.

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean he does that all the He's always he's

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 2>always needs to do it. He doesn't need to, but

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 2>he's always gone for the jugular. So look, I think

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 2>of all the things going on at the moment, that's

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 2>probably on the mark.

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 3>But we saw the images on our TV, right, you

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 3>don't need to go for the jake you. Gavin Newsom

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 3>is condemned by the images he's allowing us to see

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 3>in his city.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.360
<v Speaker 4>But this is not by silly tweets.

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 2>From Trump, but I mean the fact that this is

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 2>just the response to law and order being enforced. I mean,

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 2>would these people prefer maybe they would would prefer to

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 2>live in an anarchist world. I mean they want the

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 2>world without borders and all that sort of stuff.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Any resistance to Trump is justified.

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 2>One thing though, and I'm sure you've seen the footage

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 2>tonight is the Lauren to Marzi from the Channel nine

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 2>being hit by a rubber bullet. Now, I don't know

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 2>how many times you've seen this footage. I've watched it

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 2>over a few times tonight. Keep your eye on the

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 2>left hand side of the screen. With one of the

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 2>coppers with his gun with the rubber bullet in it.

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 2>He seems to turn around and fired directly at Lauren

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 2>for no particular reason.

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Take a look.

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the only thing I can think of is

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.239
<v Speaker 2>that there was a car turning into that lane, so

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.959
<v Speaker 2>he's sending a warning. But then wouldn't you just shout

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 2>get the hell out of the way. You know, look

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 2>amongst lots of stuff that's going on there at the moment,

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 2>I get that this is reasonably minor. Lauren Tomazie was

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 2>all right. She made it across at six o'clock. She

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 2>said she was fine. But there was no call for that.

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's always going to be chaos in that kind

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 5>of a situation. What I don't like is anti Trump

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 5>people using that as evidence that Trump is going too

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 5>hard on the protesters, when I actually read somewhere that

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 5>the person who fired the shot was an LAPD officer

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 5>not even under Trump's control. So look, we'll see it's

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 5>always chaotic in these sorts of situations. But there is

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 5>a feud that is dividing the internet. Two of the

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 5>biggest names in women's sports, Riley Gaines and Simone Biles,

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 5>have erupted into an online feud. It all began when

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 5>Riley Gains, who is a former swimmer and women's rights activist,

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 5>posted a photo of a Minnesota team that won a championship,

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 5>but they won it with a trans player, and she said,

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 5>of course your comments are turned off. Your star player

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 5>is a boy. Not controversial for Riley Gaines to say.

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 5>But then out of nowhere came former Olympic gymnast Simone Biles,

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 5>who absolutely ripped into Riley Gains for this. She said,

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 5>pick on someone your own size. We should be uplifting

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 5>trans people, or making sport more inclusive, or perhaps finding

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 5>a transgender category in all sports, and then she called

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 5>Riley Gaines straight up a sore loser now rightfully. The

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 5>internet then exploded when Simone Biles said this because she

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 5>won her Olympic medals in the female category. If she

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 5>had been competing against men as she wants in her

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 5>inclusive utopia, she would never have won the gold medal

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 5>because of men's physical strength and advantage. And then the

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 5>funniest part was an old tweet of Simone Biles came

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 5>back to bite her back in twenty seventeen. She tweeted,

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 5>good thing guys don't compete against girls, or he'd take

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 5>all the gold medals. Riley Gains responded to this and said,

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 5>don't you hate it when your past self undermines your

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 5>current nonsensical argument. And that's the point everyone, deep down knows.

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 5>Any professional athlete would know that men have a substantial

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 5>physical advantage just by virtue of their biology. She knew

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 5>that somehow eight years ago she knew that, But now

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 6>She's fallen victim to the woke mind virus.

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Simone Biles got eleven Olympic medals competing in a

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 3>female sport against females, earned millions of dollars, and retired

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 3>and then started saying how males should be allowed to

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 3>compete in female sport, which seems a little easy. Not

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 3>only that, but she wants to take on Riley Gains,

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 3>we did face a male in her sports. Riley Gains

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 3>achieved fame or notoriety, depending on where you sit on

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 3>the issue when she complained had the temerity to be

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 3>upset that. Remember Leah Thomas, the biological male who was

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 3>dominating university swimming and beat Riley Gains. So Riley Gaines

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 3>knows what it is to be penalized in female sport

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 3>having to compete against a transgendered athlete.

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 4>For Simone Biles.

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 3>To win all their medals, take all her money and

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 3>then sit back righteously pontificating on we need to support

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 3>trans people in female sports is pretty rich.

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, mus Biles could simply put her money where her

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 2>mouth is and go back to competing and compete against men.

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 2>If she's that confident that this isn't an issue, then

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:49.719
<v Speaker 2>that's what you go and do. It's also interesting to

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 2>note that Gymnastics USAY, which is of course the governing

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 2>body for gymnastics in the United States, has now pulled

0:31:56.160 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 2>their transgender entrance policy from its web site, and previously

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 2>they updated it about five years ago and changed the

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 2>rules so that you didn't have to have gender assignment

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 2>surgery or anything in order to be able to compete

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 2>in gymnastics, so you can be a biological mail and

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 2>have taken very few steps to change anything about yourself

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 2>and compete as a woman. And amidst all of this,

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 2>they've now pulled that from their website. So it makes

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 2>you wonder what's going on behind the scenes in the

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 2>governing body and how they're now thinking about all of this.

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 2>If it turns out that Simone Bile's going off at

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 2>chops about this actually causes them to review this policy,

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 2>then maybe she's done a good thing.

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's exactly what's happened, because Riley Gaines

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 5>has said many athletes who are still competing professionally for

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 5>Gymnastics USA have contacted her privately behind the scenes, saying

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 5>they support her stance on the issue and that women's

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 5>sports should be protected for women. And this is the thing,

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 5>I don't know why people are still trying to make

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 5>this argument or fight this fight.

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 6>This is a ninety ten issue.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 5>I honestly, it's not even partisan, it's not political, it's

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 5>just basic common sense. So this would seem like a

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 5>real pr headache for Simone Biles to get into for

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 5>zero gain.

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's unbelievable.

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Why she would want to do this, who knows, but

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I guess it makes her look righteous in the eyes

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 3>of the work. Want to show you a headline that

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 3>I've got, to be honest, really confused me. In the

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Herald Sun today. It's regarding school policies on mobile phones

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 3>in Victoria. The headline reads, teachers and education experts call

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 3>for wearable devices to be banned in school phone policy.

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 3>In other words, Victorian government schools have banned mobile phones,

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 3>and for good reason. Obviously, they are a massive distraction

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 3>for young people, not to mention the bullying that goes

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 3>on with regards to social media. We don't need mobile

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 3>phones in schools. But writing their policy they forgot to

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 3>include things like Apple watches, evidently, and so now teachers

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 3>are saying we need to ban those as well. And

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 3>then you've got kids with their AirPods listening to I

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 3>guess they can get them to their laptops if they

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 3>don't have their mobile phones, calling for those to be

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 3>banned as well.

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 4>This seems to me to be so obvious.

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe they didn't write this into the policy originally,

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 3>but hopefully they will. As a parent of children, I

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 3>know very well how their devices are a massive distraction,

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 3>and they're honest enough to admit it to me themselves

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 3>that having a phone at school was not a good

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 3>thing to do.

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 4>So the Victorian government should quickly deal with this.

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, the evidence is very clear and the ban

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 5>just on mobile phones has already been quite effective. There

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 5>was a survey of students which found that eighty seven

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 5>percent of them said they were now less distracted, eighty

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 5>one percent said they were learning better. Teachers have reported

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 5>improved behavior. Obviously, you reduce the harm from online bullying,

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 5>the mental health impacts. So I mean, but this is

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 5>just classic bureaucrats. Well, we'll write this whole policy, but

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 5>forget the most obvious thing, like kids will always find

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 5>a way around a band.

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, before we get to a break, you'll remember a

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 2>little while ago, the CFMU went to administration because it

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 2>came out that they had links to biker gangs. So

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 2>you would think that with all of that going on,

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 2>they wouldn't be doing anything remotely near a biki gang

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, But no, it turns out that is

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 2>not the case because the CFMU, it turns out, has

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 2>been sponsoring the boxer son of a member of the

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Hell's Angels. Sir Danny Bolt is the father. He's the

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 2>member of the Hell's Angels, and you can you saw

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 2>there on the screen before Jesse Bolt so very clearly

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 2>showing off his c CFMU sorry sponsorship. Then, of course

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 2>we're not suggesting that mister Bolt has done anything wrong

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 2>or that he himself is a member of the Hell's Angels,

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 2>just that his father is a member of the Hell's Angels.

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 2>But you would think when you're in a bit of

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 2>trouble from the federal government you've gone into administration because

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 2>there is clear evidence that you've been a little too

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 2>those to biking gangs and that they've infiltrated your union,

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 2>that you would take steps to get as far away

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 2>from even the whiff of a biking gang as possible.

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 2>But apparently not. You know, when you've got the sons

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 2>of baking members walking around in boxing competitions, that's where

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 2>union money needs to be spent.

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 3>And there you go, Caleb Bond lamenting the lack of

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 3>wisdom and common sense from the CFM EU court.

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 4>We're going to go to a break.

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 3>When we come back, we'll look at what's making news tomorrow,

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 3>including calls for Aboriginal Australians who are going to court

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 3>to be given female judges so that they feel culturally safe.

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 4>That's coming up in a month.

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to the program. Let's take a look at

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 3>what's making news tomorrow. We'll start with the Australian Caleb.

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 3>The government's way looking at me like that.

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean, I'm just waiting. I'm waiting to

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 2>jump into that.

0:36:56.800 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 4>Look of anticipation is okay? Let's start with you that.

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Did you think the look was?

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 4>It was just a weird look that government's green dreams

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 4>are in trouble?

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Kalon.

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Can you blame me for giving a weird look when

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I have to look at this bloke sitting next to

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 2>me every night while we're talking about the green dream.

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:14.399
<v Speaker 2>High price hydrogen bombshell. The initial cost of producing green

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 2>hydrogen from Australia's two largest projects will be more than

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 2>four times the price of rival energy sources, posing a

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 2>fresh setback for Labour's bid to deliver a major new

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.919
<v Speaker 2>export industry by twenty thirty and meet net zero goal.

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Singapore based Intercontinental Energy, a co owner of two mega

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 2>developments in western Australia, where a combined one hundred and

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.760
<v Speaker 2>thirty six billion dollars has conceded. Initial costs for delivering

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 2>green energy from the facilities was estimated at between eight

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.879
<v Speaker 2>and eleven dollars a kilogram. I mean, look, I don't

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 2>know how many more holes can be shot in green energy.

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.319
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Twiggy's given up on all of his big projects.

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Ninety nine percent of the projects in the pipeline haven't

0:37:55.680 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 2>gone past the development or approval stage. And yet we've

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 2>still got the federal government carrying on about how good

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 2>it is, even though of course they had to bail

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 2>out down in South Australia because of course the steel

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 2>works down there weren't working, which were meant to be

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 2>fueled by hydrogen green hydrogen. On and on it goes.

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Can we just admit that it's not going to happen?

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, you got the Albanezi government has already spent eight

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars trying to kickstart this industry and they're hoping

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 5>to build it to a fifty billion dollar industry with

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 5>sixteen thousand jobs, but there is literally no investors, so

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 5>they're spending all this money on a pipe dream. Meanwhile,

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 5>they're criticizing nuclear, which is a tried and tested technology

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 5>that is green, that people will invest in, that is

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 5>working around the world.

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 6>Seriously stupid and that's my problem.

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 3>They're dismantling a very reliable, very cheap energy grid for

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:56.439
<v Speaker 3>speculative projects. Also on the front page, there's some good

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 3>news on energy. Dan Teen says the coalition will take

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 3>their time to work out whether or not they'll walk

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 3>away from net zero, so that is still being discussed

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 3>by the coalition and they probably won't go with Dutton's

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:14.479
<v Speaker 3>plan to have the Commonwealth buy or pay for nuclear power,

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 3>but certainly lift the ban on nuclear power. So there

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 3>is some common sense, thank god, on this topic.

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 2>We'll see where their land. I mean, if they want

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 2>to generate energy, they could burn all that furniture that

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 2>they're being installed they're not using a parliament house and

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 2>get the energy out of that. Or I'll give a

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 2>shout out to Spencer Housen, former radio host at the

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 2>ABC and four BC in Brisbane, sent me a message

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 2>a little earlier and said Parliament should put all of

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 2>that furniture up on Give It, which is a platform

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 2>where charities can get hold of furniture and money and

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 2>whatever that they need to distribute to people and give

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 2>it out to the needy. What a great idea that

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.720
<v Speaker 2>would be. Another story on the front of the ODS tomorrow,

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Indigenous Cultural Safety lawship. This one is insane exclusive from

0:39:56.120 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Ellie Dudley. Judges in the nation's largest criminal jurisdiction should

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 2>consider allowing cases involving Aboriginal Australians to be heard in

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 2>a closed court or before a female judicial officer in

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 2>order to enhance cultural safety, according to provisions inserted in

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 2>a new South Wales bench book. The Equality Before the

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Law bench Book, which was compiled by the state's judicial

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 2>watchdog and acts as an overview of legal procedure for judges,

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 2>instructs judicial officers to be wary of their own unconscious

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 2>racial and cultural biases when presiding over childs that involve

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:33.359
<v Speaker 2>Indigenous people. But the idea that you would have, I mean,

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and this is what we're talking about, different levels of

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 2>justice for different classes of which is no justice at

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:43.439
<v Speaker 2>all correct along racial lines. I mean, this is why

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:47.760
<v Speaker 2>people voted against the Voice. They didn't want any legal

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 2>recognition that people were different. Because we all agree, or

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 2>most of us agree anyway, that every man should be

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 2>equal and woman equal before the law. You go down

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 2>this road, we are not all equal before the law.

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 3>How do you ever have reconciliation and have one country

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 3>when you keep dividing everything up, even to the point

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 3>where certain people get different context for their criminal trial

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 3>based on race. It's insulting to judges to suggest they

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 3>can't create a fair environment in which someone's case is heard.

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 3>It's insulting to indigenous people to suggest they are so

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 3>traumatized by the events of two hundred years ago that

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 3>they can't possibly sit in a.

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Court of law the same as the rest of us.

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 3>And it's insulting to the rest of the country to

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 3>suggest that somehow a certain group gets special privileges i e.

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Closed court, a more sympathetic judge based on race.

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 5>It's also so funny that this is in the Equality

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 5>before the Law bench book, more like Inequality before the Law.

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 5>But anyway, moving on to the Herald Sun now, the

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 5>headline reads Vlad's crude war chest. Australia is helping bankroll

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 5>Moscow's war on Ukraine, the Kremlin reaping one point eighty

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 5>five billion dollars in tax on fuel shipped here despite

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:11.240
<v Speaker 5>a ban on importing oil from Vladimir Putin's regime. Russia's

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 5>windfall is more than the one point five billion Australia

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 5>has sent to Ukraine in aid, so on net by

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 5>about three hundred and fifty million dollars, Australia is actually

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 5>supporting Russia.

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 6>That news to me.

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that would seem to be a pretty poor result

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 3>for this country. For the Australian government to have that

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.800
<v Speaker 3>going on and not to make some changes to it.

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, it just makes a mockery of the

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 2>idea of sanctions. And this has of course been the

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 2>major problem in Europe is that they made themselves so

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 2>reliant on Russian gas and resources and then they don't

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 2>know how to wean themselves off of it. If you're

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 2>giving these powers to a dictatorial state like Russia, what

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 2>do you think is going to happen.

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 3>It's got the front page of the Towns called bulletin

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 3>awful conditions in Cleveland, leading two shorter sentences. Cleveland is

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 3>a youth detention center in towns or young crims get

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 3>out quicker because juvenile offenders being locked in their rooms

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 3>for days on end. And that is an example of

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 3>some of the unusual and harsh conditions. The paper says,

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 3>being considered by judges when reducing sentences in Queensland courts

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 3>awful conditions in judd in jail. I wasn't aware that

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:29.839
<v Speaker 3>jails were supposed to have pleasant conditions or nice conditions.

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 4>You guys think, but I.

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Don't think you should get a shorter sentence because prison

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 3>was more unpleasant than you thought it might be.

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm lid to believe you can get hold of sky

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 2>and use in some New South Wales prison. So if

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 2>you're watching from prison tonight, hollo, But I mean, this

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 2>is ridiculous if you are a child who's committed enough offenses,

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 2>because of course you don't want to be locking up

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 2>kids willy nearly in jail. But if you've got to

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the point where that is consideration youth detention for you,

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 2>you've gone pretty far down the line. And so now

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 2>we're saying, well, it might be a hard time for you,

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 2>so we'll lock you in your room. I mean, that's

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 2>what your parents should have been doing. And surely the

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 2>reality is, of course there'll be bail conditions whatever on

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 2>all of this sort of stuff that if you breach it,

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 2>the coppers can come around and then you will be

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 2>in the clink. But if you are the sort of

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 2>kid who has disobeyed your parents or your parents have

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 2>no control over you, are we seriously going to believe

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 2>that mister judge saying you must stay in your bedroom,

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 2>dear boy, is actually going to stop them from committing crime.

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 3>And typically they're locked in their room for days on

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 3>end or in their cell because there's either rioting happening

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 3>in the prison and so it's for their own safety,

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.800
<v Speaker 3>or it's because they have been able to be trusted

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:48.720
<v Speaker 3>in general population.

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 5>And most of youth crime is being driven by serious

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 5>repeat offenders. So maybe if when they went to prison

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 5>it was such an awful experience they never wanted to

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 5>go back, we could reduce the rates of recidivism.

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 4>All right, So I go on.

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.240
<v Speaker 2>We'll go to the Daily Telegraph tomorrow where it says

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 2>more fool you as senior Breaucrat warn sports codes should

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 2>not be fooled by Premier Chrisman's plans to hack More Sorry,

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Hack Sorry More Park golf course in half, saying there

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:19.720
<v Speaker 2>was nothing in the decision for new facilities. The warning

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 2>is contained in secret internal emails released via an order

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:26.800
<v Speaker 2>of Parliament, which suggests building new sporting facilities would require

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 2>mass tree clearing, which would never get enough support from

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the community for a government to actually go through with it.

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the whole idea was ridiculous in the first place,

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to cut a public golf course in

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 2>half and then turn half of it into parkland for

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 2>people to walk around. It's already parkland. I mean, just

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 2>leave it alone. It's a public golf course available for

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the benefit of the public, as opposed to private golf courses.

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:55.279
<v Speaker 2>I honestly don't know why they're persisting with it.

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 4>Could not agree more.

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:57.879
<v Speaker 3>We're going to go to a break when we come back.

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Why do people as they get older make noises every

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:03.719
<v Speaker 3>time they move? We'll talk about that and more in

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 3>just a moment. I've got no idea why. Caleb and

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Freyer asked me to introduce this particular topic, But there

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 3>was a letter to a doctor's advice column at news

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:19.360
<v Speaker 3>dot com dot Au over the weekend asking why do

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 3>people as they get older start groaning when they type

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 3>their shoelacers and make other movements.

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 4>The letter said, Dear doctor Zach, I don't know what's

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 4>happening to me.

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 3>But in the last twelve months, I've started to make

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:36.319
<v Speaker 3>what my partner is describing as old people noises. Why

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 3>is it every time I bend over to put my

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 3>shoes on, I groan? And why is it whenever I

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 3>get up from the couch, I make a noise? Why

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 3>is it when I get out of bed, I make

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:48.399
<v Speaker 3>a noise? It's really annoying. Well, I don't know any

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:51.840
<v Speaker 3>bad thing about this, of course, But apparently the doctor

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 3>replies that you're not falling apart.

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 4>It's audible adaptation.

0:46:56.360 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Where in your key postural muscles you die ram your

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:04.240
<v Speaker 3>pelvic floor, your abdominals, they get weaker as you get older,

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:07.280
<v Speaker 3>and so when your body is trying to stabilize caleb

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 3>as you bend down to tie your shoes. So I'm

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:12.840
<v Speaker 3>told it comes out as a noise or a groan,

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:15.759
<v Speaker 3>and then it becomes a habit, and then you become

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:18.279
<v Speaker 3>one of those old people who's making noises left, right

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 3>and center every time your move. There's a lot to

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 3>look forward to with aging. But of course I've got

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:24.800
<v Speaker 3>decades to find out what any of this really means.

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 2>And on that note, actually, no, no, we've still got

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 2>a few minutes of this show lift. Haven't we remember

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 2>when Chris Norman got done living next door to Alysee

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:38.399
<v Speaker 2>he got with Susie Quattro and they started stumbling in. Well,

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump has found his moment for that as well.

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 2>You mon't call it his Biden moment. Walking up the

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 2>stairs of Air Force one.

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And what there he goes.

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 2>He nearly fell, but he rights himself. He did a

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 2>slightly better job, it should be said, than Biden. Of course,

0:47:53.520 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you will remember this faous footage when well he every

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:02.359
<v Speaker 2>time he tried to hit. I am waiting and I'm

0:48:02.360 --> 0:48:05.560
<v Speaker 2>sure it will come eventually for the anti Trump people

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:08.320
<v Speaker 2>to tune this out and say, look, it's proof for

0:48:08.440 --> 0:48:11.399
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump can't make his way. He is just as

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:15.360
<v Speaker 2>bad as Joe Biden. Even Marco Rubio fell on the stairs.

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Maybe all this time we were a little harsh on

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden.

0:48:19.120 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Maybe more difficult having just done an old man's story,

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 3>who hasn't heard going up Biden one is like, that's

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 3>next leak?

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you reckon? He made a grown as.

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:36.440
<v Speaker 5>No steep stairs, but Biden definitely stumbled worse. Zebra was

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:39.439
<v Speaker 5>on the loose for a full week. It's shut down

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 5>highways everyone was looking for this zebra, but I'm pleased

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:46.880
<v Speaker 5>to say it has been found and returned home in

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 5>spectacular fashion. This is somebody's pet zebra in Tennessee being

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 5>airlifted by helicopter home. I mean, I didn't know you

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 5>were able to have pet zebra firstly, but look at

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:03.800
<v Speaker 5>that majestic vision.

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:06.799
<v Speaker 4>Wow, that's quite incredible.

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:09.799
<v Speaker 3>Why wouldn't you, as a zebra escape if you're going

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:11.279
<v Speaker 3>to get that sort of right at the end of.

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 2>It, I was going to say, like, this is no

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 2>encouragement for him to stop that behavior. I mean, he's

0:49:16.520 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 2>just like people jump out of plane for fun. He's like,

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:21.319
<v Speaker 2>holy I will be escaping now.

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 4>No board toy ride. That's it from us stick around.

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Coming up in just a moment, is the reader Penny

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:28.320
<v Speaker 3>show goodn'tight