WEBVTT - Why Australia has more guns than ever

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Daniel James and you're listening to seven AM. In

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>December last year, in the wake of the Bondai terror attack,

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Alberinezi promised the biggest national gun buyback since Port Arthur.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>He wanted the states and territories to agree to new

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>gun laws by March and legislate them by July. But

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that first deadline has passed and the national response is fracturing.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Queensland and the Northern Territory are refusing the buy back,

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Tasmania is rejecting a cap on the number of firearms

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a person can own, and our national Register is not

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>expected to be running until twenty twenty eight. The Royal

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Commission into Anti Semitism has also waited, saying Australia should

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>waste no time implementing the buy back. So today, thirty

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>years after Port Arthur, we're returning to our January episode

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>when Nicole Johnson speaks with Eberde Bennett from the Australia

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Institute on why Australia has more guns than ever and

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>why reform is still so difficult. It's Sunday, May.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Three, Ebanie, thanks for speaking with me. Can you lay

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 2>out for me what the government's proposing.

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 3>Well after the Bondai massacre last year, national Cabinet met

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 3>and agreed to a number of gun law reforms, and

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 3>now the Government is implementing a bill that will hold

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 3>up its end of the bargain on there, and that

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 3>includes things like limiting the number of firearms that anyone

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 3>individual can hold, as well as limiting the open ended

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of firearms licensing that we've seen in the past. Obviously,

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>the National buyback Scheme, and things like accelerating the work

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 3>of standing up a national Firearms Registry.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 4>The government will establish a national gun buyback scheme to

0:01:55.720 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 4>purchase surplus newly banned and illegal firearms, the largest buyback

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 4>since the Howard government initiated one in nineteen ninety six.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 3>So in nineteen ninety six we saw the banning of

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 3>semi automatic and automatic weapons, and again we'll see many

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 3>more restrictions introduced of the type of firearm that we

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 3>used in the Bondai massacre here and the Commonwealth's part

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 3>of that in this legislation will be, for example, restricting

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 3>the importation of reloading rifles and shotguns into Australia.

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Australia's gun laws were last substantially reformed in the wake

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 4>of the Port Arthur tragedy. The terrible events at Bondai

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 4>show we need to get more guns off our streets now.

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 2>In the aftermath of the Bondaie attack, one of the

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 2>most shocking revelations was the fact that the older gunman,

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Sajid Akron that he had six legally registered guns even

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 2>though he was living in this city and his son

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 2>had been investigated by ASIO. Why was that able to

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 2>happen and how do these laws go about addressing that.

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's not exactly clear as yet how that happened,

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 3>but obviously it's evidence that our current gun laws as

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 3>they stand aren't working as intended. It appears like the

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 3>New South Wales authorities may not have had access to

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 3>that intelligence from ASIO, or the fact that one of

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 3>those perpetrators was known to ASIO in the way that

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 3>he was, And this legislation will introduce provisions that mean

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 3>that all of those licensing authorities at the state and

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 3>territory level will be able to access that kind of

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 3>intelligence from Commonwealth agencies like AZO and the Australian Criminal

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence Commission.

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 2>For example, if we could talk about the last time

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that we had major gun reform after Port Arthur. What

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>changes did John Howard make and how do we know

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>about how they actually made the country safer?

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the National Firearms Agreement was historic and landmark legislation

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 3>and it's obviously still hugely popular with the public.

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 4>The Prime Minister John Howard tonight detailed sweeping plans to

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 4>reform Australia's national gun laws.

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Which could mean the introduction of a.

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 5>One off tax to buy back illegal weapons.

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 3>John Howard, in the wake of the Port Arthur massacre,

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 3>gathered all the states and territories and the National Firearms

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Agreement did things like banning or restricting semi automatic and

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 3>automatic firearms, restricting the importation of those kinds of firearms.

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 6>We need to achieve a total prohibition on the ownership, possession, stale,

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 6>and importation of all automatic and semi automatic weapons.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 3>It included introducing mandatory licensing systems and background checks for

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 3>all license holders. It introduced things like rules for the

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 3>storage and use of firearms. Obviously, it implemented the National

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Gun Buyback Scheme, which saw around six hundred and fifty

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 3>thousand firearms surrendered to the authorities that at the time

0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 3>cost around three hundred.

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 5>Million dollars to the Commonwealth.

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 3>People could surrender their firearms, often to their local police station,

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 3>and then from the Australian Federal Police were in charge

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 3>of destroying those weapons. And obviously it included people who

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 3>owned guns that subsequently became illegal to own, or who

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 3>in the wake of Port Arthur just felt like I

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 3>don't really need these firearms anymore and I would like

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 3>to do my part by handing them in. And we

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 3>know that the National Firearms Agreement was incredibly successful because

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 3>in the years leading up to the Port Arthur massacre

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 3>we saw around thirteen mass shootings. In the eighteen years

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 3>preceding Port Arthur, in the wake of the National Firearms

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Agreement being introduced, that number of mass shootings involving casualties

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 3>of five or more people dropped to zero. It had

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 3>a number of other great benefits for the Australian community

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 3>and their safety. So it accelerated the decline of homicides

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 3>by firearm in Australia and it also accelerated the decline

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 3>in suicides by firearms in Australia. So it had a

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 3>dramatic improvement in public safety. And it's really clear that

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the fewer guns are in the Australian community.

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 5>The safer Australians.

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Are coming up. The unfinished business after port Arthur Ebony Well,

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 2>John Howard's reforms had a big impact, there is some

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>unfinished business from that time. Could you paint a picture

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 2>of our current patchwork of gun laws around the country.

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, as popular as the National Firearms Agreement was

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 3>at the time, it's really important to note that really

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 3>no state or territory or the Commonwealth indeed fully implemented

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 3>all of the details of that agreement. Each state and

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 3>territory still has a slightly different approach to gun laws,

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 3>and really we're only as safe as our worst state

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 3>or territory. So, for example, there was never implemented the

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 3>agreement to prevent children from having access to firearms. Across

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 3>the board, in most states, there's no limit on the

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 3>number of guns.

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 5>That any individual can hold.

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 3>For a long time, Western Australia was the only state

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 3>that had any kind of cap on the number of

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 3>guns that you could legally own, and it was only

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 3>December last year that New South Wales introduced its own caps.

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 3>For example, thirty years after the fact, there is still

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 3>no National Firearms Registry, something that all law enforcement would

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 3>lack access to. But for example, some states like here

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 3>in the Act, all of their records of gun ownership

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 3>for their Gun Register are analogue. They're on paper essentially,

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 3>so that makes the process of establishing the National Firearms

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Register obviously much more difficult. We've also seen a steady

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 3>chipping away in states and territories at Australia's gun law

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 3>reforms over many years. People might not remember, but just

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 3>prior to the Bondai massacre, for example, the Men's government

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 3>in New South Wales was considering really relaxing New South

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Wales gun laws in a deal with the Shooters and

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Fishers Party. They were looking to enshrine a right to hunt,

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 3>to open crown lands to hunting and shooting, and to

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 3>legalize the ownership of silences and suppressors. They've obviously dropped

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 3>all of that kind of legislation and now committed to

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 3>much more restrictive gun laws. But it just shows you

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 3>that over time state governments have become complacent about Australia's

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 3>gun laws and that there are always elements of the

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 3>gun lobby who've been trying to weaken them over decades.

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 2>And on this issue of how many guns were allowed

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 2>to have all the limits. Could you tell us in

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 2>some states how many guns we can actually own and

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 2>what's the maximum.

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so in Western Australia they had a cap of

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 3>five for most gun owners and that could increase up

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 3>to ten guns.

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 5>In New South Wales, I think the.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Cap of four, for example, applies across the board. But

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 3>currently Wa and New South Wales are the only states

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.599
<v Speaker 3>that have caps on the number of guns an individual

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 3>can own, so all the other states and territories really

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 3>have no limits. And we know from the data that

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 3>we looked into from various police forces across Australia that

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 3>there are a number of people who own huge numbers

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 3>of guns and it's not necessarily you know, farmers who

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>are using them to control pest animals on their properties.

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 3>For example. We know a large number of guns are

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 3>held in city and metropolitan areas and in New South Wales,

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 3>for example, there are close to one hundred people who

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 3>own over one hundred guns each, many of them in

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 3>the city. And obviously when it comes to the Bondai perpetrators,

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 3>they had six guns lived in the city and there's

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people in the Australian public saying, you know,

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 3>why do you need that many guns?

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Ebany, you mentioned the National Register, and there's been calls

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 2>for this since Port Arthur. Why do we need one?

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Obviously it's really important for law enforcement to know things

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 3>like who has a gun at a property or if

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 3>there are guns at a property, but it's also important

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 3>for the Australian public. When the Australia Institute tried to

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:46.359
<v Speaker 3>find out how many guns there were legally owned in Australia,

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 3>it was actually really difficult to find that information. It's

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:54.359
<v Speaker 3>not publicly available. Some states and territories really had difficulty

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 3>locating that information.

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 5>It wasn't easily accessible.

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 3>The Northern Territory just didn't respond at all to our

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 3>requests for that kind of information. So it's I think

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 3>really important for the public to know, not you know,

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>the personal home address of every gun own not obviously

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 3>that's only for law enforcement, but just knowing in general

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 3>how many guns there are in the community and roughly

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 3>where they are are they in your suburb? I think,

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, should be publicly accessible information for Australians.

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 2>So, Ebanie, on that point, what is it that you've

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>found out about the numbers and how did they end

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 2>up increasing after the buyback scheme in the nineties.

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so obviously the number of guns in the community

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 3>has dramatically increased. It's now hovering around four million legally

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 3>owned guns in Australia. And we've also found that a

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 3>huge number of guns legally owned guns are stolen every year.

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 3>When we looked at the number of guns that had

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 3>been stolen over time, it equated.

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 5>To roughly one every four hours.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 3>And law enforcement has said that the theft of legally

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 3>owned firearms is the biggest single source of illegal guns

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 3>in the community. And we know that police I think,

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 3>only recover around a third of those stolen weapons.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 2>So Ebonie John Howard was able to pretty easily change

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Australia's gun laws and was celebrated for it ever since.

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>But how's the debate changed to the point where getting

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 2>both sides of politics to agree on stricter gun control

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 2>seems almost impossible.

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 3>I was just really saddened to see John Howard come

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 3>out in the wake of the Bondai massacre and call

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 3>gun law reform a distraction. Obviously, gun law reform can't

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>stop hate, it can't stop anti semitism, but it can

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 3>stop the kind of hate that we saw in Bondi

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 3>from turning into the horror that we saw in Bondai.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 3>And I think John Howard's intervention here to label a

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 3>gun law reform just a distraction really shows that the

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Coalition is really willing to trash its political legacy on

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 3>gun law reform in the interests of politicizing this issue

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 3>and making life more difficult for the Labor government. Obviously,

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 3>there are big parts of the Nationals constituency, rural people,

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 3>farmers who do want access to guns, and increasingly in

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 3>recent years we've seen the Nationals really as the tail

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 3>that's wagging the coalition dog. Thankfully, Australia does not kind

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 3>of fetishize gun ownership in the way that we've seen

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 3>in the United States, for example, but it's really clear

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 3>the kind of retric employed by the NRA and the

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 3>gun lobby, and to see Australian political debate all the

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 3>time and more and more frequently. It's only a few

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 3>years since we saw Pauline Hanson's One Nation, for example,

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 3>caught on tape trying to solicit tens of millions of

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 3>dollars of donations from the NRA in exchange for weakening

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Australia's gun laws.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 5>But the Australian public really overwhelmingly.

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Supports stricter gun laws and it's widely considered, i think,

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 3>the biggest and most positive legacy of the Howard government,

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 3>so it's really sad to see them abandon that for

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>what looks like pure electoral politics.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Ebanie, thanks for speaking with us on seven AM.

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Daniel James. Thanks for listening seven am. We'll be

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>back tomorrow with a new episode where i interview Antoinette Latoufe.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking on the ABC and what audiences are losing

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in mainstream media.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 7>This is across institutions. It's not just the media.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 5>There's a real trust deficite.

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 7>There's very low historical levels of trust in government, historical

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 7>levels trust in business, but also in the media. I

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 7>think it's because it's been so plain to see, particularly

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 7>in the past two and a half years, the sorts

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 7>of lines and retrick that we're being fed by legacy

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 7>institutions and even our politicians where we're like, hey, are

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 7>you trying to gaslight us.

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 5>In real time?

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>That'll be in your feet tomorrow. See you then,