WEBVTT - A budget built to fight an election

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>From Schwartzmedia In seven am. I'm Ashlyn McGee. This is

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the cost inside the living crisis. Last night Treasurer Jim

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Chalmers delivered a budget that may decide the fate of

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the Albanesi government. There's billions of dollars in new spending,

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>with another round of powerbell rebates for all of us,

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>no annual price hike on PBS medicines, and a boost

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to the rent assistance payment. But as so many Australians

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>struggle to put food on the table or keep a

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>roof over their head, has the government spent enough or

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>has it spent too much? And are they're more rate

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>hikes now on the cards today? Chief political correspondent for

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the Saturday Paper Karen Barlow and what support the government

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>delivered and whether there's devil in the detail. It's Wednesday,

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>May fifteen. Karen, First of all, welcome to the show,

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>our new chief political correspondent and we're talking on budget night.

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Hello, great to be.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Here, mister speaker. This is a budget for the here

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 3>and now, and it's a budget for the decades to come.

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 3>It's a response.

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So I want to begin with what Jim Charmers had

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to deliver in this budget, like what choices were the

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Albanesi government grappling with and how significant was it for

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the Treasurer to get it right?

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Hugely important. We're in an election year without a date.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Households are really crying out for cost of living relief

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.919
<v Speaker 2>and the Treasurer's main job is to not make it worse.

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 3>This uncertainty combines with cost of living pressures and higher

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 3>interest rates to slow our economy, with growth forecast to

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 3>be just one and three quarter percent this financial year

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 3>and two percent next.

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>We have Jim Chalmers presenting also relief and reform and

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of talk about promise and potential of a

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 2>more prosperous future. But this budget, Jim Chalmers third is

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 2>an economic and heavily political doctor speaker.

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 3>The number one priority of this government and this budget

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 3>is helping Australians with the cost of living responsible relief

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>that eases pressure on people and directly reduces inflation.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 2>For Jim Chalmers, this is what he's been working on

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 2>all year since the last budget. It has been taking

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 2>his every waking hour. He's been spending a lot of

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 2>time with the Finance Minister Katie Gallaher. But this is

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 2>also while you know there's people screaming out for more

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 2>cost of living relief, but at the same time urging

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 2>that the inflation problem is not made worse by extra spending.

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 3>So, mister speaker, the story of Australia is more than

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 3>a tale of the challenges that we have endured, and

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 3>in our future we need to strive for something more

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 3>than muddling through or making do so.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>The biggest issue for many Australians in this selection will

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>probably be that's sawing cost of living. So how big

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>did the government go on support for people?

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Look, it was a fair bit, but as I said before,

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 2>it's tempered by not making the whole situation worse. But

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 2>what we have here seven point eight billion dollars in

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 2>new spending. We have the amended Stage three tax cuts

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 2>that's worth twenty billion dollars a year over ten years.

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Remembering this is for all taxpayers and they kick in

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 2>shortly on July one, and there's a benefit about thirty

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 2>six dollars a week. But what's new is three point

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 2>five billion dollars in across the board energy bill relief

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 2>over three years.

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Just as every Australian taxpayer will get a tax cut

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 3>every Australian household will get energy price relief From July one.

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Australians will receive an energy rebate of three hundred dollars

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 3>and one million small businesses will get a little bit more.

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 2>There's some freezing of the maximum costs of medicines.

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 3>And we are freezing the maximum cost of people prescriptions

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.839
<v Speaker 3>for everyone this year and next year. No one will

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 3>pay more than thirty one dollars sixty.

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 2>There's also common Wealth rent assistance that's being increased to

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 2>further help young people and renters.

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 3>It's the first back to back increase to common Wealth

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 3>rent assistance in more than thirty years, and more much

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 3>needed help for young people and for renters of all

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 3>ages doing it tough.

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 2>The budget papers insist that the energy bill relief and

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 2>rent assistance will directly reduce headline inflation by point five

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of a percentage point in the next financial year. Every

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>percentage point counts, as we know, but look, if it's possible.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>There's also another centerpiece of the budget in the reform

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 2>of Aspiration. I guess the Future Made in Australia package.

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Doad, we more about that Future Made an Australia

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>plan because Essentially, it was a bit of a slogan

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>at the start and there wasn't much flesh on the bones.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>But have we now got a bit more detail around that,

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>like is it a sizeable poly see that's going to

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have some serious impact on the country.

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Our twenty two point seven billion dollar Future Made in

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Australia package will help make us an indispensable part of

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the global net zero economy.

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 2>It's seen as a bit of a slogan, but look,

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the Treasurer says, this is the big reform piece in

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the budget. It's been revealed as a ten year, twenty

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.799
<v Speaker 2>two point seven billion dollar package, but it's largely made

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>up of tax incentives to attract and deploy they say, investment,

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 2>and to get the nation of fossil fuels along the way.

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 3>We know that the global energy transformation presents a golden

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>opportunity for Australia. The world is changing and the pace

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 3>of that change is accelerating, and our approach to growth

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 3>and investment needs to change as well.

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>What we have here are production incentives. There's a seven

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar critical minerals production tax incentive and there's also

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 2>a six point seven seven billion dollar hydrogen production tax

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 2>incentive and that's going to provide a two dollar incentive

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 2>per kilo of renewable hydrogen.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 3>If we hang back, the chance for a new generation

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 3>of jobs and prosperity will pass us by, and our

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 3>people will be poorer and our economy will be more

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 3>vulnerable as a consequence.

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 2>And a real focus on batteries, renewable hydrogen, quantum computing,

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 2>low carbon liquid fuels. So a lot to see, but

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 2>there's also concern about like a risk to tax payers

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 2>money and we're talking about a lot here. Chalmers is

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 2>stressed that there will be protections built into the system

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>to stop any abuse of the billions.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So, Karen, it feels like a lot of the detail

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 1>in this budget has really already been spoon fed to

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>us over the past week or so. And one of

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>the headlines that the government's been really keen to talk

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>about is its surplus. So in this economy, how did

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we end up with a surplus? And why is it

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:02.679
<v Speaker 1>such an important thing for the government.

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's an incredible political imperative to this. It's the

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 2>mantle of better economic manager. It's a key indicator of

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 2>basic performance, I guess for a government. It's in most

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 2>opinion polls, and it's something that we know is a

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:16.559
<v Speaker 2>vote winner.

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Last year, our responsible economic management delivered the first surplus

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 3>in fifteen years. We now expect another surplus of nine

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 3>point three billion dollars this year. These would be the

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 3>first back to back surpluses in almost two decades.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 2>That's expected, and that comes after twenty two point one

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars the previous year. Chalmers is warning though, that

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>there are pressures on the government that are only going

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 2>to get worse, and while he and Katie Gallagher are

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 2>working to reign it in, there's a sea of red

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>about to pour in and the coming deficits are much

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 2>larger than previously forecast.

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>After the break the hidden details that hinted what's coming

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in the next election campaign, Karen, So, for a lot

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of yesterday, you're in the lock up pouring over the

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>budget of papers. Tell us about some of the more

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting things you uncovered in there.

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay. So, even if the three hundred energy bill

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 2>credit and the increase to comwealth rent assistance is not

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 2>enough of a big election sign, there's a promise of

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.719
<v Speaker 2>more to come. But a promise this column on a

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 2>table in the papers which the government does not want

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 2>to focus on. Is a place where we find what's

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 2>called the decisions taken but not yet announced and not

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 2>for publication. A pretty weighty little set of words there.

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 2>But it's about a figure that comes in at one

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>point one two billion dollars. So this is spending closer

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 2>to an election when voters are starting to firm. But

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 2>it is a very interesting number because we don't know

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 2>what it's for. We have to have a guess. It

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 2>is not for us to know just yet.

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>In the budget papers. Even though we know so much

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>detail before the budget is actually handed down now there

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>still can be some surprises. Did you find anything that

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was a.

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Surprise for me? I think the surprise can be found

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 2>in services for veterans. Three billion dollars has been found

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 2>there and part of that is bolstering staffing at the

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Veterans Affairs Department.

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 3>And we've achieved all of this despite much smaller revenue

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 3>upgrades in the budget and still providing an extra three

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars to ensure Australians, including our veterans, receive better

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 3>essential services.

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 2>This comes after the Veterans Royal Commission and after the

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 2>government has got through a claims backlog for veterans earlier

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 2>this year. That's quite a bit of money that's been

0:09:55.920 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 2>found related the Australian War Memorial had money more money

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 2>found for it, another eight million dollars. After nearly all,

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 2>just over half a billion dollars has been spent upgrading

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the Canberra based site. And I did find that the

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 2>National Mental Health Commission is being defunded and the money

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 2>is going back into the health budget and they're going

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 2>to delay the decisions on what to do with that

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 2>particular area. But that's part of it across the board

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 2>health spend and reprioritization, So that was particularly interesting. So

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 2>for people.

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Concerned about the cost of living, what do we know

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>about whether this kind of spending we're seeing in the

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>budget is going to make that better or whether this

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>spending could actually make the situation worse. It could lead

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to more interest rate rises well.

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 2>So the budget papers tell us that the spending on

0:10:55.120 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 2>cost of living relief is de inflationary and will amend

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the situation by point five of a percentage point.

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Annual inflation has more than half from its peak in

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty two, and it's now lower than anticipated in

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the media update. But we know that people are still

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 3>under the pump. That's why we designed our cost of

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 3>living policies to ease these pressures and take another three

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 3>quarters of a percentage point off inflation this year and

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 3>half a percentage point next year.

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 2>If you talk to the opposition, they've got other views

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 2>and they expect that this is going to be inflationary,

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 2>and they say that the government has been causing inflation

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 2>to rise over the entire term. I think the jury

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 2>is out at this stage. The RBA will be particularly

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 2>looking at the outcome of this particular budget and it

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 2>will be factoring it into its next decisions. But there

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 2>are some elements of spending that are what they call

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 2>off the books, and so therefore there is that question

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 2>mark about whether the new spending will add to the

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>possibility of making inflation worse.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>So finally, Karen, as you've said, this could be a

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>really consequential budget for who wins the next selection. So

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>coming out of tonight there's some pretty clear battle lines

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you can see that have been drawn with a coalition.

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 2>So Peter Dutton will officially have his say on Thursday

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 2>night with his traditional budget, replies Opposition leader. But as

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 2>you would expect he's not cheering charmers on Before seeing

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 2>the entire budget, he addressed the Liberal and National colleagues

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 2>saying this was a magic putting exercise by the Treasurer

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 2>and he's not delivering hope rather broken promises. And the

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 2>surplus has been denigrated by the Coalition as a windfall

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 2>surplus and what they are seeking is a structural surplus,

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 2>one by design. And you do point out here that

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 2>this is a coalition that did not deliver a surplus

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 2>when it was in office over nine years. There's a

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 2>blame game going on over inflation and that will continue.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Dutton with his economic team of Angus Taylor and Jane Hume,

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>saying this inflation is now home grown and it's the

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 2>government's decisions of the past two years that have really

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 2>driven it up. The government, of course nis this and

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 2>it's budget measures are in fact deinflationary and it has

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the budget papers to prove that. Dutton is hinting at

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 2>alternative policies. Budget Day and the day after is not

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 2>the day for that reveal, so we'll get to see

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 2>what the Coalition is yet to provide. But traditionally oppositions

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 2>don't give out too many things this far out from

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 2>the election, but essentially what we've got here with this

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 2>budget is game on and.

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 3>That's why I commend this bill, mister Speaker, and this

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 3>budget to the House.

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Karen, thanks so much of your time today, Thanks

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>very much.

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Ash.

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>In other news, former military lawyer David McBride has been

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to nearly six years in jail for stealing and

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>sharing classified documents with journalists. The files alleged Australian soldiers

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>had illegally killed civilians in Afghanistan earlier this month. McBride

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>spoke to us here at seven am and said he

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>had no regrets about his actions, and the sentencing judge

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>yesterday agreed he'd shown no remorse. Act Supreme Court Justice

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>David Mossip said McBride had decided he knew best and

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to follow the rules of the army. McBride

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>will have to serve two years and three months before

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>he is eligible for parole. And in another court, former

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Jetstar pilot Gregory Lean is on trial for the murder

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of campus Russell Hill and Carol Clay at an ice

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>later Victorian Campsite in twenty twenty. Prosecutors Allegedlyn dumped the

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>couple's bodies and burned the evidence, but Linde's defense teams

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>say the deaths were a tragic accident in a dispute

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>over hunting in the high Country. The trial continues in

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the Victorian Supreme Court. That's all from us for today.

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for your company. We'll see you again tomorrow